Can someone answer 2 discussion questions, a power point and a Revision of Literature Review ?

Discussion 1

A co-worker sends you a business-related email about the new project assignment. The email has numerous grammar and spelling errors. His language is confusing and you are not certain what the message is stating. You bring up the issue and he responds disgruntled and angrily stating that it was only an email and you are overreacting. By utilizing the concepts from the readings for this unit, how would you appropriately respond to this situation as a professional?

PowerPoint Presentation

This involves analyzing a communication technique—presentations. On a daily basis, it is often expected that professionals be proficient with presentations. For this exercise, prepare a PowerPoint presentation that serves as your own professional code of communication. This exercise allows you to analyze communication techniques and reflect upon your own communication skills. Include at least the following within the presentation:

· Present your professional communication style.

· Present your communication strengths.

· Present your communication opportunities—how can you improve your communication skills?

· Present how you prefer to receive communication within a workplace.

· Present a professional workplace example of when a phone call might be better than an email.

· Present whether or not you believe that texting and instant messaging can be valuable in the workplace.

· Include at least three visuals (e.g., photographs, images, charts, or graphs).  The presentation must contain at least twelve slides.

Discussion 2 Consider the process you have gone through as you revised your paper so far—the introduction and literature review. What have you found to be most helpful for you? What would you share with others about your process? What techniques, tips, and methods have you used to help the process go more smoothly for you? You can also describe methods that were not as helpful to you and what you would like to do in the future that you think might be better. Revision of Literature Review and Introduction

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to revise the introduction and literature review of your academic argumentative research paper, which you created a draft of. Description: In this assignment, you will revise the introduction and literature review that you wrote previously. Revisions must be substantive and should be made in accordance with the instructions. The following parts of the assignment must be revised: Introduction (9-12 well-developed sentences/approximately 350 words): The following components must be included in the introduction (in the following order). Sentence 1: Introduce the general topic Sentence 2: Pro side (general) Sentence 3: Con side (general) Sentence 4: Narrow the scope (1) Sentence 5: Examples of the narrowed topic Sentence 6: Narrow the scope (2) Sentence 7: Specific controversy Sentence 8: Pro side (specific) Sentence 9: Con side (specific) Sentence 10: The thesis

Literature Review (800-900 words). Literature review preface: This paragraph acts as a guide to what the reader can expect in the literature review. Literature review body: This section includes three to four body paragraphs that discuss the history, terminology, and both sides of the controversy (pro and con). Literature review conclusion: The conclusion signals that the literature review is ending, but it also acts as a kind of preface for the body of the paper by restating the thesis statement and establishing your argument once again. Demonstrate the avoidance of plagiarism through proper use of APA citations and references for all paraphrased and quoted material. Implement techniques of editing and revising.