Reaction Paper

profileHong666
UWB_OB_2020_Lec2.pptx

Lecture 2 Personality

personality.

The relatively stable set of psychological characteristics that influences how one feels, behaves, thinks, & interacts with others/their environment

Determined by both, genetic predisposition & long-term learning history

Personality could change, BUT over long periods of time

Why is such a concept of interest to us in organizations/organizational studies anyways?

personality in OB.

The “person-situation debate” has helped us better understand the role of personality in OB through three approaches:

Dispositional

Situational

Interactionist

Behaviour in organizations is a function of one’s dispositions AND their environment/situation

Environment/organizational system influence behaviours/attitudes

(e.g. only the characteristics of one’s job/tasks will predict their level of job satisfaction or their performance)

Emphasizes personal dispositions & personality dimensions

One’s stable traits & characteristics influence their behaviours/attitudes (i.e. we have a predisposition to act in a certain way & that way ONLY)

fit.

Traits – alone – are not sufficient

there needs to be a suitable trigger/stimulus within the situation

the trigger/stimulus activates trait expression (e.g., in one’s behaviour)

The interactionist approach informs the concept of fit

Exhibits the manifestation of trait activation processes or person-situation interactions in an applied organizational context

Person-Job

Person-Org.

Person-Group

Degree of alignment in values, goals, personality, other characteristics, etc. with one’s immediate team

Degree of alignment in values, goals, personality, other characteristics, etc.

Degree of alignment between demands of the job & one’s KSAO’s

KSAO’s - knowledge, skills, abilities & other attributes

the situation.

The extent to which personality predicts/influences one’s behaviours & attitudes is contingent on the situation & its characteristics

Some situations bring out the best in people & vice versa

Weak

Strong

Structure, norms, rules, roles, contingencies, consequences, etc. are more defined

More boundaries  Less room for personality to be expressed & bear influence

Lack of structure, norms, rules, roles, contingencies, consequences, etc.

More room for personality to be expressed & bear influence

big 5 (Five-Factor Model of Personality).

Extraversion

Openness

Neuroticism

Worrying, nervous, emotional, high-strung, temperamental, insecure, self-pitying, impatient, self-conscious, vulnerable

Original, imaginative, creative, broad interests, complex, curious, daring, prefers variety, independent, analytical, liberal, untraditional

Sociable, fun loving, affectionate, friendly, spontaneous, talkative, active, passionate, warm, joiner

Agreeableness

Conscientiousness

Careful, reliable, hardworking, well organized, scrupulous, self disciplined, neat, punctual, practical, deliberate, ambitious, self-reliant, energetic, persevering, intelligent, businesslike, knowledgeable

Good natured, soft hearted, courteous, selfless, helpful, sympathetic, trusting, generous, lenient, forgiving, open minded, flexible, gullible, humble, straightforward, yielding

big 5 – job fit.

Extraversion

Openness

Neuroticism

Negatively shapes interactions with others at work.

Jobs featuring a great deal of creativity, learning, variety & need for intellectual curiosity.

Jobs needing interpersonal interaction & assertiveness, sociability, energy & ambition facilitate success.

Agreeableness

Conscientiousness

Important for the ALL jobs  who doesn’t want a hardworking & diligent employee?!

Jobs featuring a great deal of interaction, helping behaviours, cooperation, nurturing & teamwork.

big 5 – employee outcomes.

Extraversion

Openness

Neuroticism

Agreeableness

Conscientiousness

Retention

Unsafe work behaviour

Absenteeism

Job Satisfaction

Team Behaviours

Org. Citizenship Behaviours (OCB)

Career Success

Motivation

Counterproductive Work Behaviours (CWB)

personality & job performance.

Each of the Big 5 predict or relate to job performance differently depending on the job 

some personality traits are more influential or relevant for certain jobs (over others).

HOWEVER! Conscientiousness is the STRONGEST predictor of job performance across ALL occupations!

Bear 🐻 in mind…

personality by itself does not “paint the full picture”  it cannot fully predict job performance

As a practitioner, you should make sure you are collecting other information surrounding job applicants that could help you build a more complete picture

dark personality.

Personality traits that are socially deemed to be undesirable or aversive yet have adaptive value (help us get ahead)

Fall within a normal range of functioning – for the longest time it was thought that narcissism & psychopathy only exist at clinical levels

Their expression is facilitated by charm, assertiveness, impression management & leadership

Help us better understand personal motives/goals/interests

Narcissism

Psychopathy

Machiavellianism

Impulsivity, Lack of regard/concern

Value in manipulation, Cynicism, Expediency over principle

Inflated views of oneself,

Desire for control/ success, Need for admiration

Not receptive to criticism, Respond aggressively when undermined, Don’t compromise

Skilled at impression management, Exploitative, Aversive behaviours, Lack emotional depth, Charismatic

Unethical, Not skilled at maintaining good interpersonal relations, Overestimate their own emotional intelligence, Prefer a lack of structure

other characteristics/traits.

Locus of Control (Internal vs. External)

Degree of accountability for one’s own behaviour

Beliefs about whether my behaviours/outcomes are controlled by myself or by the situation/environment

Do I have control & power over my own outcomes (life)? Or do external factors overpower?

Internals tend to: be more in control, realize greater success, take initiative, be highly motivated, experience work more positively & report better health/well-being

Affectivity (Positive vs. Negative)

Degree to which one experiences more positive (vs. negative) moods

Moods impact behaviour

other characteristics/traits.

Self-Esteem

Degree to which one has positive feelings about oneself

Is my self-evaluation high or low?

What informs or predicts one’s self-esteem level?

What are some outcomes employees high (vs. low) in self-esteem could exhibit in the workplace?

Self-Efficacy

Degree to which one believes they can perform a task successfully

Specific to the task/job (i.e., not the same across all domains)

Why do employees high in self-efficacy report greater job performance?

other characteristics/traits.

Self-Monitoring

The degree to which one observes & regulates one’s behaviours & how they appear in social environments/situations

High self-monitors are very much so in tune with how they conduct themselves & how they are being perceived by others

Generally, high self-monitors enjoy career success & others perceive them as “go-to” individuals

Are there any negatives though?

Sources: McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1), 81. “Personality and Learning.” Organizational Behaviour, by Gary Johns and Alan Saks, Prentice Hall, 2017, pp. 2–43. “Understanding People at Work: Individual Differences and Perception ”Organizational Behavior, University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing, 2017, pp. 85–127. retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.24926/8668.1501