Nursing 5

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Accomplished

Needs Improvement

Not Acceptable

Introduction

5 to 5 Points

· Clearly states the purpose of the paper.

· Provides a comprehensive overview of topic or questions

· Engages the reader

· Organized and has easy follow

2 to 4 Points

· Overview is provided, but key points/ideas are missing

· Purpose statement is not clear

· Does not engage the reader

· Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible

0 to 1 Points

· Does not provide an overview of the paper or is absent

· No purpose statements

Body

Definition and Description of Health Inequalities

7 to 7 Points

· Defines Health Inequalities

· Describes the key components of Health Inequalities

· Provides examples of Health Inequalities

3 to 6 Points

· Defines Health Inequalities

· Describes the key components of Health Inequalities

· Does not provide examples of Health Inequalities or limited discussion

· Definition and/or description missing information or confusing

0 to 2 Points

· Missing half or more of the content

· Not enough depth to demonstrate understanding of Health Inequalities

Advocacy for Patients, Families and Community

7 to 7 Points

· Discusses how writer would advocate for patients, families and communities

· Provides examples of advocacy

3 to 6 Points

· Discusses how writer would advocate for patients, families, and communities

· Does not provide examples of advocacy

· Discussion is missing information or confusing

0 to 2 Points

· Missing half or more of the content

· Not enough depth to demonstrate understanding of advocacy for patients, families, and community

Results of Test

6 to 6 Points

· A brief discussion for each of the 6 Project Implicit tests is clear

3 to 5 Points

· 5 or less tests are discussed

· Lacks critical thinking and depth.

0 to 2 Points

· Project Implicit test are not discussed

Cultural Competency vs. Humility

7 to 7 Points

· Discusses if the writer is culturally competent or has cultural humility

· Discussion is clear and in depth

· Discusses the writer’s next steps in cultural growth

3 to 6 Points

· Discussion related to cultural competency or humility is confusing

· Discussion is missing writer’s next steps in cultural growth

0 to 2 Points

· Does not discuss cultural competency

· Does not discuss cultural humility

· Does not discuss writer’s next steps in cultural growth

Conclusion

5 to 5 Points

· Summarizes paper and reflects on what the reader has learned from the paper

· Demonstrates persuasive thought and is well organized

2 to 4 Points

· Merely summarizes the introduction or contains new ideas not present in the paper contents

· Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible

0 to 1 Points

· Simply restates the introduction or is absent

· Disorganized to the point of distraction

Stylistics

4 to 4 Points

· APA Citations are appropriate.

· Formatted correctly

· Reference page is complete and correctly formatted

· At least 4 references provided: Two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. *References not older than five years

· More than 600 words excluding title and reference pages

2 to 3 Points

· APA Citations are appropriate and formatted correctly

· Reference page is formatted correctly

· References are not professional or is not formatted correctly

· Missing 1 professional reference

· At least 600 words or more excluding title and reference pages

0 to 1 Points

· No citations are used or citations are made but not formatted correctly

· Reference page is missing.

· Less than 600 words excluding title and reference pages