Personal Finance and Financial Literacy

profileHoneystorm
UNV-103Rubric-Reflection_PersonalFinanceBasics.pdf

Reflection: Personal Finance Basics - Rubric

Personal Finance and Financial Literacy 13 points

Criteria Description

Personal Finance and Financial Literacy

5. Target 13 points

The response is addressed with a well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is

supported by detailed information.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

The response to the prompt is clear and the supporting information digs deeper

into what the prompt is asking.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

The response to the prompt is acceptable but it could use more supporting

information.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

The response is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No response to the prompt is given.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Guidance 13 points

Criteria Description

Guidance

5. Target 13 points

The response is addressed with a well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is

supported by detailed information.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

The response is clear, but the supporting information is general or missing.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

The response is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting

information.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

The response is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No response to the prompt is given.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Growth Areas 13 points

Criteria Description

Growth Areas

5. Target 13 points

The response is addressed with a well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is

supported by detailed information.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

The response is clear, but the supporting information is general or missing.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

The response is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting

information.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

The response is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No response to the prompt is given.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Impact on Financial Security 13 points

Criteria Description

Impact on Financial Security

5. Target 13 points

The response is addressed with a well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is

supported by detailed information.

4. Acceptable 11.05 points

The response is clear, but the supporting information is general or missing.

3. Approaching 9.75 points

The response is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting

information.

2. Insufficient 8.45 points

The response is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No response to the prompt is given.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Paragraph Development and Transitions 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Paragraph Development and Transitions

5. Target 3.25 points

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress

and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.

Paragraph structure is seamless.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit

a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are

appropriate to purpose.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in

organization or in their relationship to each other.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity,

coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent

connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to

purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 6.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.88 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.23 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Paper Format 3.25 points

Criteria Description

Includes use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

5. Target 3.25 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable 2.76 points

Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching 2.44 points

Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor

errors may be present.

2. Insufficient 2.11 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of

control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

followed correctly.

Total 65 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.