health
Environmental Health Policies Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 5
Percentage of Course Grade: 19%.
|
CRITERIA |
NON-PERFORMANCE |
BASIC |
PROFICIENT |
DISTINGUISHED |
|
Describe the health impacts of an environmental hazard. 20% |
Does not describe the health impacts of an extreme environmental event. |
Describes the health impacts of an extreme environmental event, but the description is unclear or incomplete. |
Describes the health impacts of an extreme environmental event. |
Describes the health impacts of an extreme environmental event, and impartially considers conflicting evidence and/or other perspectives. |
|
Provide evidence to support the positive or negative effect of a public policy on the environmental quality of a community. 16% |
Does not provide evidence to support the positive or negative effect of a public policy on the environmental quality of a community. |
Provides insufficient evidence to support the positive or negative effect of a public policy on the quality of the environment in a community. |
Provides evidence to support the positive or negative effect of a public policy on the quality of the environment in a community. |
Provides evidence to support the positive or negative effect of a public policy on the quality of the environment in a community, and includes real-world anecdotes that reinforce the evidence. |
|
Advocate for a specific position related to increasing the effectiveness of an environmental policy on the health of a community. 16% |
Does not advocate for a specific position related to increasing the effectiveness of an environmental policy on the health of a community. |
Advocates somewhat for a position related to improving the impact of an environmental policy on the health of a community. |
Advocates for a specific position related to improving the impact of an environmental policy on the health of a community. |
Advocates for a specific position related to improving the impact of an environmental policy on the health of a community and impartially considers conflicting evidence and/or other perspectives. |
|
Provide a rationale for advocating for specific populations at risk from an extreme environmental event. 16% |
Does not provide a rationale for advocating for specific populations at risk from an extreme environmental event. |
Provides an unclear or incomplete rationale for advocating for specific populations at risk from an extreme environmental event. |
Provides a rationale for advocating for specific populations at risk from an extreme environmental event. |
Provides a rationale for advocating for specific populations at risk from an extreme environmental event and identifies areas of uncertainty, knowledge gaps, and/or additional information that would be needed for a more complete understanding. |
|
Anticipate the response of community members to environmental health policy changes. 16% |
Does not anticipate the response of community members to environmental health policy changes. |
Anticipates the response of community members to environmental health policy changes but assumptions fail to apply awareness of cultural values of community members. |
Anticipates the response of community members to environmental health policy changes. |
Anticipates the response of community members to environmental health policy changes and acknowledges own assumptions and biases. |
|
Record a five-minute presentation designed to educate and influence a governing body about improving the efficacy of an environmental health policy on a community. 16% |
Does not record a five-minute presentation designed to educate and influence a governing body about improving the efficacy of an environmental health policy on a community. |
Records an unclear or incomplete presentation designed to educate and influence a governing body about improving the efficacy of an environmental health policy on a community. |
Records five-minute presentation designed to educate and influence a governing body about improving the efficacy of an environmental health policy on a community. |
Records an engaging, informative five-minute presentation that clearly educates and provides strong motivation for a governing body to take action related to a community environmental health policy. |