Pro-Con Position draft paper.dox

profileKali23
Untitleddocument23.pdf

Week 6 Assignment: Pro-Con Position Paper Draft – Instructor Review

Submit Assignment

● Due​ Sunday by 11:59pm ● ​Points​ 45 ● ​Submitting​ a file upload

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

● Lesson: Week 6; review Week 5 (organizational patterns) ● Link (Word doc): ​Pro-Con Position Paper Template ● Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (including ​at least two peer-reviewed​ sources)

Apply the following writing resources to your posts:

● Link (multimedia presentation): ​APA Basics ● (Links to an external site.) ● (Review this tutorial for formatting an APA paper and title page.) ● Link (multimedia presentation): ​Citing References in Text ● (Links to an external site.) ● ● Link (website): ​APA Citation and Writing ● (Links to an external site.) ●

Instructions

For this assignment, you will submit a draft of your paper to your instructor for review. The essay draft should follow one of the two organizational patterns from the Week 5 lesson. Use the Pro-Con Essay Template (in Required Resources) to complete your draft.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

● Length: 4-5 pages (not including title page or references page)

● 1-inch margins ● Double spaced ● 12-point Times New Roman font ● Title page ● References page (minimum of 5 scholarly resources, including ​at least two

peer-reviewed​ sources)

Grading

This activity will be graded using the Pro-Con Position Draft Grading Rubric. Instructors will be providing ​broad​ feedback based on the designated rubric areas. You are expected to use this feedback, additional writing and APA resources, and revision and proofreading strategies to fully improve the essay for final submission.

Course Outcomes (CO): 7

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Pro-Con Position Draft Grading Rubric - 45 pts

Criteri a

Ratings Pts

This criterio n is linked to a Learnin g Outco me

Length

5.0 pts

Meets length requirement

0.0 pts

Does not meet length requirement

5.0 pts

This criterio n is linked to a Learnin g Outco me

Paragr aph Develo pment

10.0 pts

The central idea is develope d and expande d with depth of critical thought. The writing supports claims with several detailed and persuasi ve examples .

8.5 pts

The central idea is developed.T he writing supports claims with examples, but additional analysis or examples could strengthen the argument.

7.5 pts

The central idea needs more developme nt with points tying back to the thesis. The writing supports claims with examples, but the examples are not well-develo ped or examined. Additional examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasive .

6.0 pts

The central idea is not develope d, and the analysis lacks critical thought. The central idea is not well-sup ported by claims and/or examples .

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterio n is linked to a Learnin g Outco me

Source Integra tion

10.0 pts

Paper properly referenc es and integrate s 5 scholarly sources.

8.5 pts

Paper properly referenc es and integrate s 4 scholarly sources.

7.5 pts

Paper properly referenc es and integrate s 3 scholarly sources.

6.0 pts

Paper properly referenc es and integrate s 2 scholarly sources.

0.0 pts

Paper properly reference s and integrate s 0-1 scholarly sources.

10.0 pts

This criterio n is linked to a Learnin g Outco me

Organi zation

10.0 pts

Paper is clear and cohesive. Introducti on and conclusio n support the overall flow of the paper.

8.5 pts

Paper is basicall y clear and well-org anized with a minimu m of non-rela ted material present.

7.5 pts

Paper has some issues with clarity, flow, and cohesion. Paper lacks organizati on.

6.0 pts

Paper lacks organizati on and has difficulty staying on track. Central themes are difficult to identify.

0.0 pts

No effor t

10.0 pts

This criterio n is linked to a Learnin g Outco me

Writing : Mecha nics & Usage

5.0 pts

The writing is free of major errors in gramma r, spelling, and punctuat ion that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.

4.25 pts

The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuati on, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.

3.75 pts

The writing contains some major errors in grammar , spelling, and punctuat ion that need to be addresse d for a clearer reading of the paper.

3.0 pts

The writing contains several major errors in grammar , spelling, and punctuat ion that impede a clear reading of the paper.

0.0 pts

No effor t

5.0 pts

This criterio n is linked to a Learnin g Outco me

APA Paper Format

5.0 pts

Paper is formatt ed to include all 7 of the followi ng: title page, referen ces page, Times New Roman font, 12-poin t font, double spacin g, running header, and page number s.

4.25 pts

Paper is formatt ed to include 6 of the followi ng: title page, referen ces page, Times New Roman font, 12-poin t font, double spacin g, runnin g header, and page number s.

3.75 pts

Paper is formatt ed to include 5 of the followi ng: title page, referen ces page, Times New Roman font, 12-poin t font, double spacin g, runnin g header, and page number s.

3.0 pts

Paper is formatt ed to include 4 of the followi ng: title page, referen ces page, Times New Roman font, 12-poin t font, double spacin g, runnin g header, and page number s.

0.0 pts

Paper is formatt ed to include less than 4 of the followin g: title page, referenc es page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing , running header, and page number s.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 45.0

Previous​Next