Environmental Science
|
Criteria |
Excellent (A) |
Good (B) |
Acceptable (C) |
Poor (D) |
Failing (F) |
Not Submitted |
Criterion Score |
|
Information in Diagram |
50 points Problem is correctly defined, and All key contributors have been highlighted. |
42.5 points Problem is mostly correctly defined, and most key contributors have been highlighted. |
37.5 points Problem is mostly correctly defined, and some key contributors have been highlighted. |
32.5 points There are key contributors that have been left out and erroneous information regarding the problem. May have misunderstood application of fishbone diagram. |
27.5 points There are no key contributors identified and no problem defined or defined incorrectly. |
0 points Not Submitted |
Score of Information in Diagram, / 50 |
|
Format |
50 points The diagram is properly formatted |
42.5 points The diagram meets most of the requirements for formatting |
37.5 points The diagram lacks proper formatting overall |
32.5 points There are numerous formatting errors that do not accurately depict the problem and solutions. |
27.5 points There was no attempt to format this work into specified fishbone diagram. |
0 points Not Submitted |
Score of Format, / 50 |
Total
Score of Unit 1 - Sustainability Activity Rubric,
/ 100