Why post-secondary education should be free

profileMichelle_Michy
Untitleddocument.edited5.docx

Pluto interlinks the issue of Justice with a design for the integration of knowledge of the individual and society while Aristotle regards Justice as being important for in some sense Justice is the most complete among the virtues.

In his opinion, Plato views political Justice as easy to achieve especially within a city and then from which it is reflected a specific individual thereby creating a stability in the method of governance which is possible to achieve using education and reason.

Pluto classification of society is in layers using layers of professions to classify society. In contrast, Aristotle classifies society mainly using only three layers lower middle and high this Aristotle classification based on the wealth with little regard on the ills affecting the society. Plato's main idea and +drive is to implement transformative politics that aim at ensuring that he transforms the local politics. On the other hand, Aristotle aim is to study the existing political systems. Plato believes that the political systems can be transformed and made better while Aristotle believes this the existing political systems is impossible to change. Plato opinion about politics and Justice is that it has to be ideal; however, this is disputed by Aristotle who views Justice and politics as real and impossible to become ideal.