week 2 508 discussion part 1
O R I G I N A L P A P E R
Supporting More Able Students on the Autism Spectrum: College and Beyond
Ernst VanBergeijk Æ Ami Klin Æ Fred Volkmar
Published online: 3 January 2008
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008
Abstract In the 1990’s a surge of children were diag-
nosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and are
now approaching college age. Through early diagnosis
and intervention many of these children are now able to
consider post secondary education. However, these stu-
dents will need specific interventions and supports in
order to be successful. This article reviews the nosology
of ASDs, the legal basis for providing accommodations to
students on the autism spectrum, and the incidence and
prevalence of ASDs. The authors provide specific rec-
ommendations regarding the academic, independent
living, social, vocational and counseling needs of college
students who are on the autism spectrum. With a carefully
planned transition, appropriate accommodations, and
support, ASD students can be successful academically and
socially in college.
Keywords Autism spectrum disorder � Asperger syndrome � College � Young adults
Introduction
In the last 20 years, changes in the diagnostic specification
of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) coupled with
heightened public awareness has led to increased identifi-
cation of children and adults with one of these disorders.
ASDs are currently estimated to occur in 0.2% of the
general population of children (Gillberg 2005). The Center
for Disease Control estimates that 1 out of every 166
children in the United States has an ASD (Bertrand et al.
2001). This translates to over 500,000 Americans having an
ASD (Fombonne 2003). If one were to examine the seg-
ment of the population potentially preparing to enter
college, Fombonne (2005) estimated that in 2002 there
were between 284,000 and 486,000 individuals with the
broader diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder
under the age of 20 years old alone.
The overwhelming majority of individuals with a per-
vasive developmental disorder have milder forms of ASD.
For example, the number of children suffering from
Asperger Syndrome is double the number of children suf-
fering from classic autism (VanBergeijk and Shtayermman
2005). The main thrust of the academic literature has
focused upon the more severe forms of ASDs. Compara-
tively little attention has been paid to children and young
adults who possess milder forms of the disorder.
Although children and youth with an ASD demonstrate
significant and limiting interpersonal deficits, they may
possess cognitive abilities similar to neurotypical or gifted
individuals (Barnhill et al. 2000). Consequently, while
many individuals with an ASD are intellectually capable of
university level education, they will require a range of
academic and supportive accommodations in order for
them to succeed both educationally and in terms of tran-
sitioning to greater independence (Glennon 2001). Despite
the fact that there is a bourgeoning number of college-
bound youth with an ASD, there is relatively little infor-
mation available about the unique needs of this group. This
article seeks to fill this gap by discussing the supportive
E. VanBergeijk (&) Vocational Independence Program, New York Institute
of Technology, 300 Carleton Avenue, Independence Hall,
Central Islip, NY 11722, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
A. Klin � F. Volkmar Yale University, Yale Child Study Center, New Haven,
CT, USA
123
J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370
DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0524-8
requirements of these young adults with respect to higher
education and social development.
Terminology and Overview of Diagnostic Concepts
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a term that is used as
an organizing rubric for a series of lifelong neuropsychi-
atric disorders including autism, Asperger Syndrome,
Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Speci-
fied (PDD-NOS). Autism Spectrum Disorders are
characterized by impairments in reciprocal social interac-
tion, communication and the presence of stereotyped
behavior, interests or activities. ASD is often used inter-
changeably with the term Pervasive Developmental
Disorder although the latter is the preferred term for
this constellation of disorders because of its implication
that the disruption in development occurs across multiple
areas of functioning and implies a multidisciplinary
approach to assessment and intervention.
Autism is the most widely recognized pervasive devel-
opmental disorder (APA 1994, p. 66). The hallmark of this
disorder is a profound impairment in the social interaction
skills of the individual as well as his or her communication
skills. One of the distinguishing features of autism as it
presents in infancy is the delay or total lack of language
development. In terms of IQ testing individuals with autism
will have stronger nonverbal or performance skills as
compared to their verbal skills. This holds true for both
typical autism and what has been described as High
Functioning Autism (HFA). Autism is frequently co-
morbid with mental retardation. In addition to these
features, an individual with autism even as an adult typi-
cally has a severely restrictive repertoire of activities and
interests.
Asperger Syndrome (AS) is characterized by severe and
sustained impairment in social interaction, and the devel-
opment of restricted, patterns of behavior, interests and
activities. These two features of the disorder will create a
clinically significant impairment in the social, occupational
and other areas of functioning. AS has a later onset than
autism (Klin et al. 2000) and there is no clinically signif-
icant delay in either receptive or expressive language
development. Students with AS may have excellent
vocabularies, although, their communication is quite
impaired. Their difficulties often lie in the semantics and
pragmatics of speech. They do not understand the give and
take of a conversation. Individuals with AS may dominate
a conversation on an esoteric topic that is of little interest to
the other person. Their style of speech can be described as
pedantic or very formal in its style. Also, in contrast to
autism, there are no clinically significant delays in adaptive
functioning, and cognitive abilities. Their IQ profile is the
reverse of students with autism or HFA, i.e., typically
students with AS have a deficit in their nonverbal skills.
Their IQ scores on the performance portions of standard-
ized IQ tests are markedly poor as compared to their scores
on the verbal portions of these tests (Volkmar and Klin
2001). The seemingly strong verbal skill of the student with
AS belies the true nature of their disability. AS is often
referred to, albeit incorrectly, as high-functioning autism.
This is likely done to highlight the verbal and cognitive
strengths of the individual. The term, high functioning
autism, is a colloquial one used by clinicians to describe
individuals on the autism spectrum who score above a 70
on standardized IQ tests and would be considered in the
normal range of intelligence. A debate remains as to
whether high functioning autism is a separate and distinct
clinical entity from Asperger Syndrome (Volkmar and Klin
2001).
A diagnosis of PDD-NOS is reserved for clinical situ-
ations where the individual’s presenting symptomatology is
either atypical or sub-threshold. The clinical presentation
of PDD-NOS does not meet the criteria for autistic disorder
nor does the presentation meet the criteria for Schizo-
phrenia, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, or Avoidant
Personality Disorder. The impairment in reciprocal social
interaction, verbal and nonverbal communication, and
stereotyped interests, activities and interests are present but
are of late onset. The student may have had normal speech
development for a period of time and was not diagnosed
with autism until after the age of three
The clinical presentation of Non-Verbal Learning Dis-
ability (NLD) (Rourke 1989) is similar in many ways to
AS. Individuals with NLD have deficits in social percep-
tion, judgment, and interaction skills. In addition, there
are bilateral deficits in tactile perception, psychomotor
coordination and visual spatial organizational abilities.
Adaptation to novel situations, particularly complex social
situations, is impaired. An individual with NLD will rely
upon rote application of social skills to these situations,
which are often incorrect and inappropriate. There are also
notable deficits in the individual’s ability to incorporate
feedback from social interactions, nonverbal problem
solving, concept formation, hypothesis formulation, and
hypothesis testing (Klin et al. 2000, p. 236).
Co-morbidity
The issue of co-morbidity with Asperger’s disorder (and,
for that matter, higher functioning autism) has assumed
increasing importance in recent years; it is intimately
related to issues of syndrome validity and approaches to
sub-typing the autism spectrum. Although there are meth-
odological challenges associated with defining and
1360 J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370
123
identifying co-morbid conditions the most common con-
ditions are anxiety and depression in adolescents and
young adults (Klin and Volkmar 1996). In many cases,
anxiety appears to stem from the individual’s difficulties in
dealing with the fast-paced world of social information
processing and depression may, to some degree, be viewed
as a result of recurrent failure experiences (Klin et al.
2005). Seligman (1975) described a resultant state of
anxiety and depression after repeated failed attempts to
solve a problem as ‘‘learned helplessness.’’ The co-morbid
anxiety and depression exhibited by the ASD population
may be a manifestation of learned helplessness. However,
there is some suggestion for the limited available family-
genetic work of increased rates of anxiety and depression
in immediate relatives—particularly female relatives (Klin
et al. 2005). Research suggests that rates of co-morbid
anxiety and/or depression in individuals with AS are
as high as 65% (Ellis et al. 1994; Fujikawa et al. 1987;
Ghaziuddin 2002; Ghaziuddin et al. 2002; Ghaziuddin
et al. 1998; Green et al. 2000; Howlin and Goode 1998).
Case studies have suggested potential links to other
disorders including Tourette’s syndrome (e.g., Gillberg and
Rastam 1992; Kerbeshian and Burd 1986; Littlejohns et al.
1990; Marriage et al. 1993), obsessive–compulsive disor-
der (Thomsen 1994) and psychotic conditions (both
psychotic depression and bipolar disorder) (Gillberg 1985).
A small, mostly British literature suggests some increased
risk for criminality and/or troubles with the law (e.g.,
Baron-Cohen 1988; Everall and LeCouteur 1990; Mawson
et al. 1985; Scragg and Shah 1994; Tantam 1988c; Wing
1981) although often legal troubles seem to stem from poor
social judgment and limited empathy rather than malevo-
lent intent (Ghaziuddin et al. 1991; Klin et al. 2004).
Individuals with AS often have difficulty secondary to their
tendency to rigidity and, somewhat paradoxically, a firm
and invariant adherence to ‘the rules’.
ASD and Young Adults
The surge of children diagnosed with an ASD beginning in
the early 1990s is now adolescent age on the brink of
transitioning to adulthood. Existing research suggests that
these children will continue to exhibit interpersonal defi-
cits throughout their adulthood. Many will experience
improvements in their social and communication skills
(Nordin and Gillberg 1998) particularly if they received
intervention services earlier in their lives (McGovern and
Sigman 2005). In some individuals, the severity of their
autistic symptoms may be reduced with intervention to
point where they are more behaviorally similar to indi-
viduals diagnosed with PDD-NOS (NRC report 2001).
The presence or absence of communicative speech by
5–6 years of age and the child’s school age IQ score appear
to predict functioning at adolescence and beyond (Gillberg
and Steffenberg 1987).
The limited research available addressing the psycho-
social profiles of these young people suggests that they
continue to struggle with the developmental tasks of their
age (Billstedt et al. 2005). Howlin et al. (2004) examined
the adult outcomes of individuals diagnosed with autism as
children. They found that while some of these individuals
were able to live independently, the majority was unable to
transition fully to an adult life that embraced work, per-
sonal relationships and independent living. Most of these
individuals remained dependent upon their families and
were socially isolated. Sperry and Mesibov (2005) reported
similar findings. Based on their sample of adults with
autism, they identified a number of interpersonal chal-
lenges affecting the quality of life of these individuals.
These challenges included forming and maintaining func-
tional work and personal relationships, demonstrating age
and interpersonally appropriate behaviors with members of
the opposite sex, and developing meaningful personal
understanding of ASD.
Overall, the literature suggests that approximately 70%–
80% (Billstedt et al. 2005; Fombonne 2003) of individuals
diagnosed with an ASD at childhood will continue to
demonstrate marked social impairment in adolescence and
adulthood. Fombonne’s (2005) review of epidemiological
studies of autistic samples found a median proportion of
subjects without intellectual impairment to be 29.6%
(range 0%–60%). The proportion of subjects who pos-
sessed mild to moderate intellectual impairment comprised
29.3% of the samples. The level of cognitive impairment in
AS and PDD samples is assumed to be less pronounced
than in autistic samples. Findings reported by Howlin et al.
(2004) and Mawhood et al. (2000) indicate that perfor-
mance IQ typically declines and the verbal IQ increases as
the individual ages. The majority of these individuals will
experience difficulty in undertaking adult social roles
although they may be cognitively capable of meaningful
employment.
Individuals with ASD and Higher Education
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
was authorized in 1990 providing a federal mandate to
educate children with disabilities. This legislation was first
enacted in 1975 as P.L. 94-142 and was subsequently re-
authorized as IDEA. Prior to 1975, there was no legal
requirement on the part of the state to provide educational
services to children with a developmental disability. A
school district could refuse to educate a child citing either a
lack of appropriate educational services or a lack of
J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370 1361
123
funding. At the time P.L. 94-142 was passed there were
8 million handicapped children in the US. An estimated
1.75 million were not provided any educational services.
An additional 2.5 million children were inadequately
served (Allen-Meares 2004). The law established the
legal doctrine known as Free and Appropriate Public
Education (FAPE). FAPE guaranteed the right of all
children to be educated. The Zero Reject Principle of
IDEA forbids the exclusion of any student with a dis-
ability from FAPE (Turnbull et al. 2002). As a result of
IDEA, children with autism spectrum disorders are enti-
tled to supportive services to enable them to maintain
their placement in public schools. It is because a greater
number of children with ASDs have been able to receive
a high school education and our greater awareness of the
importance of early intervention that a greater number of
these young people are prepared and interested in
attending university.
Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act and
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Congress passed the Vocational Rehabilitation Act in 1973.
This law pre-dates both IDEA and the Americans with
Disabilities Act. It established the precedence that any
program receiving federal funding may not discriminate
against individuals with disabilities. The law emphasized
equal treatment in federally funded programs whereas
IDEA emphasized adequate access to a free and appro-
priate education (FAPE) (Walker 2006). In 1990 Congress
re-authorized and re-named the Vocational Rehabilitation
Act as the Americans with Disabilities Act. Walker (2006)
cogently argues that IDEA and ADA are complimentary
laws that should be used in tandem to secure students’
educational placements especially since the Supreme
Court’s decision in the Shaffer v. Weast, which reversed the
burden of proof. Historically, the burden of proof was
placed upon the school districts to demonstrate that the
student’s placement met his or her educational needs, i.e.,
the placement was free and appropriate. Now it is incum-
bent upon the party bringing forth the legal action,
(typically the parents), to demonstrate that the current
educational placement is not meeting the student’s needs.
The implication is that this Supreme Court decision will
make it more difficult for parents to obtain services for
their children.
IDEA provides funding for special education services to
local educational agencies. This funding covers a student
until he or she receives a high school degree. For the
students who are unable to earn a high school degree IDEA
provides funding for the provision of independent living
and vocational skills training until he or she reaches the
age of 22. The Americans with Disabilities Act shapes how
universities provide services to students with ASDs. The
ADA prohibits any public institution from discriminating
against individuals with disabilities. The rationale for
provision of academic supports appears to be self-evident
given that a university’s chief mission is the education of
its students and the failure to do so would severely limit a
major life activity of disabled students. However, accord-
ing to Glennon (2001), ‘‘the overall goals of any university
experience include developing skills for adulthood, form-
ing life-long relationships, identifying a vocational
pathway, and/or participating in extracurricular activities’’
(p. 185). The nature of autism spectrum disorders is a
social disability and the failure by universities to provide
social supports would substantially impair the student’s
ability to reach these goals. Furthermore, the failure to
provide supports in the social realms for students with
ASDs would exclude these students from being successful
in academic achievement, which is a major life activity
and the primary focus of universities. To be in compliance
with the ADA universities must learn to address the social
and organizational difficulties of this population. Over
recent years there has been an increase in the number of
self-help resources made available by parents of children
with ASD and adults with ASD addressing the university
application process and tips for academic and social suc-
cess. There have been a growing number of reports within
the pedagogical literature to develop awareness of this
anticipated demand on university education. For example,
Taylor (2005) outlines a series of recommendations for
teaching, evaluating, and supporting students with ASD
within higher education. Glennon (2001) identifies
important issues to be addressed by campus support ser-
vices for university students with Asperger Syndrome.
Prince-Hughes (2003) describes ASD-related challenges
for students as it related to college life. However, in the
helping disciplines there continues to be a dearth of
information addressing the needs of this college bound
population.
The 2001 report of the National Research Council,
Educating Young Children with Autism, emphasized that
times of transition were critical times in the lives of
young children with ASDs. This would include transition
from high school to young adulthood as another critical
juncture for individuals on the autism spectrum. Among
a neurotypical sample of students, Pancer and Hunsber-
ger (2000) found an indirect relationship between
students’ stress level prior to enrolling in a university
and their adjustment 6 months later. Students with ASDs
have tremendous difficulties with transitions. Without
preparation students with ASDs would predictably fare
far worse than neurotypcial students in their transition to
university. Preparing young people with an ASD for the
1362 J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370
123
transition to post secondary education is the next logical
step.
The Transition to University: Issues of Fit
One of the first most important aspects of the transition to
higher education is the fit of the student to the institution.
When undertaking this decision process, the student should
draw upon the Individualized Education Plan (IEP)
developed with school personnel during the high school
years. A well-developed IEP may serve as a blue print for
the individualization of services at the university level. The
IEP should identify the student’s areas of relative strength
and weaknesses. This ‘‘Individualized College Plan’’
should outline academic modifications, independent living
skills, socialization skills and goals, vocational goals, and
mental health supports.
IDEA requires school districts to develop a transition
plan for students as a part of the IEP. The transition plan
must be in place by the time the student reaches the age of
14. The transition plan typically identifies whether or not
the student will graduate from high school or continue in a
special education placement emphasizing vocational and
independent living skills. For the higher functioning stu-
dents on the autism spectrum the transition plan should
include exposure to the college curriculum while the
student is still in high school. Matriculating in 1–2 college
courses at a local community college exposes the student
to the academic and social demands of the college envi-
ronment. Careful attention should be paid to the selection
of these courses to maximize the student’s chances of
success. The courses should be of the student’s choosing
that are in his or her areas of strength. Creative school
districts in the New York area have designed IEPs for
these students that include a ‘‘Grade 13.’’ During this year
the students take courses at the local community college
in the morning. In the afternoon the students return to
their high schools for academic and social support. In
addition to exposing the higher functioning students to the
college curriculum and environment, this intervention
decreases the stress the students face by reducing the
number of college courses they have to take each
semester.
As with neurotypical students, the size of the school will
impact the adjustment process of the student with ASD.
Small colleges offer familiarity and personalized learning
environment. The smaller setting for some students repre-
sents less of a transition from high school where the classes
range in size from 15 to 30 students. The likelihood that
small college will offer smaller class sizes is greater than
large state institutions. Smaller colleges may be appropri-
ate for students with ASDs who are easily over stimulated
by large groups of people and become increasingly anxious
in unpredictable social situations. Smaller schools, how-
ever, may not be familiar with the unique educational
needs of students on the autism spectrum. They may
approach the student as though he or she has a specific
learning disability and provide academically based inter-
ventions only.
Large universities offer students on the autism spectrum
the possibility of finding their niche both socially and
vocationally. The student that may have been described as
‘‘odd’’ in high school because of narrow and particular
interests has the possibility of finding a community of peers
with similar interests. Larger universities also offer a cur-
riculum that is typically more diverse than what is offered
at smaller colleges. This gives the student with an ASD the
opportunity to excel in an academic area and plays to his or
her strengths.
Harris et al. (2005) describe 3 basic models of educa-
tional interventions for young children on the autism
spectrum. These are home-based, center based, and school
based programs. Although there are significant develop-
mental differences between young children and college
aged young adults, their tri-modal approach is useful when
considering how to implement college-level educational
and social supports. Home-based services in college set-
tings would place services in the student’s current
residence, typically a dormitory. Given the less structured
and more socially complex nature of communal living,
such home-based services may play a critical role in the
student’s success at college. Center-based programs in a
university setting would assist students in learning requi-
site classroom social skills in a systematically monitored
environment that specializes in providing services to ASD
students. Some universities currently have centers that
target remediation of academic skills which is analogous in
structure. This model may be seen as too insular in its
approach in that only students with ASDs would attend the
center and the skills are learned within the confines of the
program. A school-based program at a university level
would contrast with the center-based program in its
approach to how and where the services to the students
would be offered. In a school based program the services
are provided to the student in his or her classroom settings
and general education environment. Peer training and
support models have been shown to be effective in among
college-aged students on campuses (Krohn and Goetz
2005; Tevyaw et al. 2007). The major advantage of this
approach is that it allows the student to enjoy the full
extent of the college life experience. When selecting a
potential university, the student and his or her family
should evaluate this ‘‘goodness of fit’’ (Schalock et al.
1989) between the students with an ASD and his or her
environment as well as identify the models of intervention
J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370 1363
123
the university uses to assist students on the autism
spectrum.
Counseling Supports
Whether the student with an ASD and their parents select a
small college or larger university should rest upon their
assessment of how supportive the college community is of
people with different abilities. A university’s commitment
to diversity should include their commitment to serving
people with varying degrees of disabilities. One way to
assess this commitment is to examine their office of student
disabilities’ statistics regarding not only the number of
students they serve with disabilities, but also the types of
disabilities served as well as the overall portion of students
with disabilities vis-à-vis the total student body. Deter-
mining the types of disabilities served is an important
distinction. Most colleges and universities are familiar with
the leaning needs of students with specific learning dis-
abilities and attention deficit disorder. These students need
specific supports and modifications in the academic realm.
However, students on the autism spectrum require modi-
fications and supports in social, organizational, and
communicative realms in addition to traditional academic
supports.
While neurotypical students may benefit from a variety
of counseling modalities, students on the autism spectrum
require directive, explicit guidance and counseling.
Because students on the autism spectrum will have diffi-
culty making inferences, drawing conclusions and making
connections social situations, in particular, must be broken
down and analyzed. Each step the student is expected to
take should be clearly stated and rehearsed prior to the
student attempting the behavior. Role-plays with explicit
feedback are critical. Because many students on the autism
spectrum have difficulty generalizing skills across situa-
tions practicing new behaviors should ideally be practiced
in vivo.
Modifications in the Classroom
Currently colleges and universities are required to make
academic modifications for students with disabilities
although there is variability in the extent to which this is
implemented. Although approximately 3% of the college
student population self-identifies as having some sort of
disability (Thomas 2002), research suggests that faculty
have limited understanding of the ADA and a student’s
rights to modifications in a university setting (Dona and
Edminster 2001). Therefore it is critical that students with
ASD register with the university’s office of student
disabilities. It is only with the confirmed registration of the
individual’s disability that the student is eligible for man-
dated accommodations within the classroom and for
evaluation. For example, many students with ASD have
fine motor problems. As a result, note taking can be a
barrier to learning. Appropriate accommodations would
include allowing the use of laptop computers, scribes, and
tape recorders. Providing the student with an ASD a copy
of lecture notes and/or slides prior to the class is also an
appropriate accommodation.
Organizational help is critical to the success of a student
on the autism spectrum. Just as in elementary and high
school, these college students may continue to need
explicit instructions on organizing their classroom and
study materials (e.g., developing separate color coded
binders for each subject area, sub-dividing binders into
areas for notes, assignments, syllabi etc.). This organiza-
tional help requires more than simple verbal instruction.
For the student with AS it may require written instructions
paired with a picture of what is meant. Neurotypical stu-
dents will have a general idea of abstract terms such as
‘‘organized’’ or ‘‘neat.’’ A student with AS will not have an
innate understanding of these terms. Without a concrete
pairing of the words to the pictures, the student with AS
may not truly understand what is being expected of him or
her.
Large assignments may need to be broken down into
manageable units and turned in separately. Because stu-
dents with ASD will have difficulty with time management
they will need explicit instructions as to when he or she
should begin researching a term paper, writing a rough
draft, and writing the final draft of a paper. If the student
with ASD can maintain a visual representation of an
organizer/calendar in their mind, then teaching a student
how to use a personal digital assistant (PDA) can be a
useful tool. Audible alarms can be set to remind a student
of when to go to class, when to start studying for a test, and
when to start researching a term paper etc. If the student is
unable to maintain a visual representation, then he or she
must be taught to use a hard copy of a calendar/organizer.
There are also a number of other computer resources
available to help students on the autism spectrum. A
sample of some helpful computer programs and links to
relevant websites are available at the Yale Child Study
Center website (http://www.info.med.yale.edu/chldstdy/
autism/pdd).
Evaluation and Testing
Accommodations in testing are frequently required to
enable students with a variety of disabilities succeed in
college. In accordance with the ADA, students with a
1364 J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370
123
confirmed, registered disability are entitled to standard
accommodations set by the law in each of his/her classes.
For individuals with ASD, accommodations will likely
include being given extra time to complete tests. The
provision of extra time for testing is a vital accommodation
for many students on the autism spectrum. Neurotypical
students are anxious when an instructor gives a test. For
students on the spectrum this normal level of anxiety sur-
rounding a test is exacerbated by their experience of testing
as a change in the normal routine. This elevated level of
anxiety interferes with the student’s ability to concentrate
necessitating additional time. Furthermore, many students
with ASDs have graphomotor difficulties. They need extra
time to be able to write out their responses or even fill in
the bubbles on Scantron sheets for multiple-choice tests.
A second accommodation in testing pertains to the
physical setting in which the testing occurs. Because many
of the students on the autism spectrum have difficulties
with distractibility a reasonable accommodation would be
to conduct the testing in a separate location free of dis-
tractions or provide the student with an on-line testing
option. Many students on the autism spectrum have sensory
integration dysfunction (Ayers 1972). Sensory integration
dysfunction refers to an individual’s inability to correctly
process sensory input. The student on the autism spectrum
may be either hyposensitive or hypersensitive to sensory
stimulation. In a classroom setting this may manifest as an
inability to filter out certain kinds of noises. For example,
in the quiet of a testing situation a student on the autism
spectrum may not have the ability to concentrate because
of the hum of the fluorescent lights. It is imperative that the
student’s sensory issues are identified and appropriate
accommodations be made in the testing situation. The
testing accommodation may not necessarily mean that the
student must be tested in a separate location. The student
may simply be allowed to wear stereo headphones to block
out the distracting sounds. By allowing the student to wear
stereo headphones rather than earplugs, less attention will
be drawn to the student and their accommodation. Having
a student wear ear protectors would unnecessarily draw
attention to the student.
Social Functioning
Since autism spectrum disorders are developmental dis-
abilities that impact a variety of domains in a student’s life,
college personnel must expand the areas where they typi-
cally intervene. University personnel are familiar with
providing academic supports for students with specific
learning disabilities or attention deficit disorder. However,
they are often unprepared to address non-academic con-
cerns. These concerns include life skills, socializing, doing
laundry, budgeting, checking, and getting along with
roommates. Issues of sexuality are particularly difficult for
this population. Many of these students are very naı̈ve and
could be taken advantage of sexually. Others do not know
how to negotiate a simple dating situation let alone a far
more complex social situation (i.e., negotiating a sexual
relationship). There is also a risk that students on the aut-
ism spectrum will be told by their peers to say something or
do something that is inappropriate to member of the
opposite sex as a joke. Students on the autism spectrum
must be explicitly taught what is appropriate to say to a
person he or she may find attractive (Volkmar 2004).
Furthermore, these students will need sexual education that
is developmentally appropriate and concrete in its orien-
tation. This includes how to protect themselves from
disease and unwanted pregnancy. Volkmar (2004) provides
a complete overview to adolescence and sexuality for
children on the autism spectrum including teaching about
privacy and modesty, establishing boundaries, encouraging
healthy sexual relationships, and birth control.
Although there is empirical support for the usefulness of
social skills groups for young children with (Kransy et al.
2003; Paul 2003) they are not commonly used with col-
lege-aged students on the spectrum. The developmental
nature of ASDs and this population’s difficulty in gener-
alizing skills to new settings suggests using social skills
groups with students on the spectrum as they enter college.
They have a need for explicit teaching/role play. Practice
should be done in vivo across environments to promote
generalization. How to start a conversation with a new
person should be practiced in the cafeteria, in a dorm room,
in the student lounge, on the quad etc. Professionals
working with students on the autism spectrum cannot
expect generalization across environments. These skills are
often situation specific for this population.
Mental Health Support
Students with autism spectrum disorders often have limited
insight to their own emotional states and have even more
limited insight into the emotional states of others. Psycho-
education is a more promising approach. This approach
teaches the student what it means to have an autism
spectrum disorder and what measures they can employ to
compensate for their limitations. Directive counseling is
needed. The student must be told how to handle a variety of
social situations (e.g., how to get along with a roommate).
Klin and Volkmar (1996) recommend explicit instruction
with homework, role-playing, and coaching. The skills
should be taught in ‘‘…a rote fashion using a parts-to- whole teaching approach, where the verbal steps are in the
correct sequence for the behavior to be effective’’ (p. 6).
J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370 1365
123
Further, Klin and Volkmar (1996) highlight the need for
the individual with an ASD to be taught how to identify
novel situations and ‘‘resort to a pre-planned, well
rehearsed list of steps to be taken’’ (p. 7). Above all, sup-
port personnel must not assume that general explanations
will suffice and that the student with an ASD will be able to
generalize to similar situations.
Mental health professionals working in university
environments should be aware of a possible increase in
some co-morbid conditions (e.g., depression/anxiety). The
first semester in college will be a critical transitional period
for students on the autism spectrum. During the first
semester the student’s skills will be taxed. The novelty of
the new environment will elevate the student’s anxiety.
This will be further exacerbated by the negotiations of a
complex social environment in the dorms. The lack of
familiar routine and structure will compound the student’s
anxiety. The variable schedule of classes and the lack of a
consistent daily structure can even further increase the
student’s sense of anxiety and unpredictability University
officials who know that they have students on the spectrum
need to proactively reach out to these students and create
more structure and predictability for these students Without
such proactive supports these students are at increased risk
for depression and perhaps increased risk of suicide.
Resident advisors should be alerted to the presence of a
student on the spectrum and the warning signs that the
student is in crisis. Trained peer life coaches may help
students on the spectrum deal with the seemingly unpre-
dictable university environment and provide structure for
the student. They, along with the resident advisors may be
the first to detect signs of depression or increased anxiety
before it becomes an acute crisis.
Case Vignette
Mike was very fortunate and had a number of factors that
optimized his potential for living independently and suc-
cessfully completing college. Although he was born over
30 years ago, he was diagnosed with autism at the age of
2 years old. His parents were university professors. Both
his parents and extended family were extremely supportive.
Mike received applied behavioral analysis (ABA) when the
technique was in the early stages of development. This
intervention began shortly after his initial diagnosis. His
family belonged to a house of worship that took the family
under its wing. The congregation included Mike in its
social activities and sought to integrate him into the
community.
When Mike began school his I.Q. scores were in the
normal intelligence range. However, there was a severe
discrepancy between his verbal and performance abilities.
Mike was exceptionally talented in non-verbal math skills.
Throughout his public school experience he actually
received minimal educational supports. One consistent
source of support was a private therapist. The therapist
employed an eclectic approach to treatment. However, the
focus of their work was on social skills development and
problem solving. One personal factor that significantly
affected Mike’s success was a strong desire on his part to
‘‘fit in.’’
Mike had a talent, which his parents encouraged, that
aided him in fulfilling his desire to fit in. During high
school he was a competitive runner and joined the track
team. He received recognition and acceptance from the
other students for his athletic abilities.
Mike also continued to excel in mathematics during high
school. In his senior year Mike took the Scholastic Apti-
tude Tests (SATs). He did exceptionally well on the
mathematical portion of the exam. His verbal scores were
fair at best. He applied to number of different colleges and
was accepted to all of them. Mike wanted to go to a large
highly competitive technical school that had a world-
renowned reputation for its academic rigor in math, science
and engineering. His parents wanted him to go to an
extremely small college where class sizes were small and
he could get individualized attention. They compromised.
Mike attended a mid sized college in a small college
town in the North East, which was close to his parents’
home.
A critical factor to Mike’s success was his engagement
in social activities. He joined the college track team. The
college provided him with a roommate from the track team.
The roommate acted as a life skills coach for Mike. This
person helped him navigate the social complexities of dorm
life and taught him independent living skills. They ate
meals together. The roommate even invited him on social
outings like camping trips with friends. This ‘‘interven-
tion’’ happened through serendipity—not through design.
The roommate took a genuine interest in helping Mike
decode the social world. A key function the roommate
provided Mike with was a list of rules of how to behave
and under what circumstances. Mike did well in situations
where the rules were well defined.
Another area of interest of Mike’s was developed into
mechanism to engage him socially. He loved music. Mike
joined the college radio station. He was assigned to a shift
in the wee hours of the morning. His vast knowledge of
music was extraordinary. He would provide listeners with
incredibly detailed background information about a
recording. Normally, in a social setting this type of per-
severation would turn off a listener in a conversation.
Mike’s knowledge earned him a reputation and a cult fol-
lowing of devoted listeners who regularly called into his
radio show. His active participation in the college radio and
1366 J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370
123
other clubs contributed to his sense of well-being and
social success.
Academically Mike did well in his math and sciences
classes. He did less well in fast paced classes that required
creativity and quick thinking. His parents provided him
with tutors for these subjects. The tutors assisted him with
the executive functioning aspects of researching, organiz-
ing and writing papers. His classroom accommodations
were minimal. He was able to take tests in a distraction free
environment and was given extra time on tests. Mike also
received extra time on his written assignments. Another
strategy Mike employed was regarding his scheduling of
classes. He scheduled the lightest possible full-time load
during the academic year. Summer semesters were
reserved for classes that he had the most difficulty with.
He typically took only 1–2 classes during this time in
his subject that gave him the greatest challenge: English.
A final factor that contributed to his success was the
continuation of his relationship with his therapist from
home.
After graduation from college Mike had difficulty find-
ing employment. Consequently he returned to graduate
school and earned a masters degree in computer science.
He is currently employed for large organization where he is
involved in data management. Mike lives independently
and owns his own apartment. Through work he has met a
few women that have developed into girlfriends. He cur-
rently is not in a relationship.
Vocational Issues
The role of colleges and universities is to prepare students
to become productive members of the labor force. This
function is done is an indirect manner. Students learn good
study habits, which are supposed to translate into good
work habits in the future. The university helps the student
to identify his or her own strengths through the grades they
earn in their courses. The students are trained to think
about a problem in a particular manner based upon the
academic discipline they are pursuing. The process for a
neurotypical student is sub rosa. Upon graduation the
student is expected to pursue a career based upon a nebu-
lous set of skills. The process of job training is secondary to
teaching the student how to think about life. For the
majority of neurotypical students, this seemingly haphaz-
ard approach to their education and job training appears to
work. Most college students are gainfully employed after
graduation. According to the US. Department of Labor
Statistics, 89% of college graduates ages 25–34 are a part
of the civilian labor force. The remaining 11% enter
graduate school, stay home to raise a family or enter the
military (Dohm and Wyatt 2002).
For the student on the autism spectrum preparing the
student for work must be a conscious and planned effort.
Direct connections should be made between what he or she
is learning in college and the world of work. Explicit
preparation is crucial. Completing the job search and
application process is a skill that needs to be practiced with
students on the autism spectrum. Course instruction and
assignments should include how to write resumes. Because
their disability is a social disability, students on the spec-
trum are most severely disadvantaged during a job
interview. Teaching students on the spectrum how to
conduct themselves during a job interview through role-
playing is vital. The job interview should be broken down
into discrete tasks for the student to accomplish. Because
much of a job interview is unscripted, student on the autism
spectrum may have to practice a variety of scenarios in
reference to how to introduce themselves, making small
talk, whether or not to shake someone’s hand, and where to
sit. Employment interviewing training programs have been
shown to improve interview performance with neurotypical
college students (Knudstrup et al. 2003)
The issue of whether and/or when the student should
disclose their disability to a prospective employer can be
complicated. Past research has shown that knowledge of a
disability is a deterrent to granting an interview by
employers (Peason et al. 2003). However, properly timed
and considered disclosure can allow for an employer to
make reasonable accommodations to the employee’s work
site and assignments (Munir et al. 2005). The topic of
disclosure should be discussed with the student prior to any
job interviews.
Once the student on the spectrum has been hired, the
student must be explicitly taught what the requirements of
the job are. This includes the dress code, when to arrive and
leave work, how long to take a lunch break, where they are
expected to place their personal belongings and how to do
their job in detail. Students on the autism spectrum should
not be placed in jobs that are highly unpredictable and
require the ability to discern complex social interactions.
Students on the autism spectrum should seek jobs that
focus upon areas of strength. A student’s interest or per-
severation may be turned into a marketable job skill. Many
individuals on the spectrum are quite adept at programming
and repairing computers. Others are highly skilled at
organizing and filing things, once they are shown what the
system is. The key to successfully placing a student on the
autism spectrum in a job is to ensure that there is a
goodness of fit between his or her strengths and the job
requirements. Highly predictable, structured, routinized
jobs serve this population well.
Part of the transitioning students with ASDs to the labor
force, involves preparing them to leave the university
environment. Again this is another transition period that
J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370 1367
123
generates considerable anxiety for this population. The
students may finally become habituated to the university
environment and have established a routine. They have
developed mastery of basic tasks such as going to class,
completing assignments, eating in the dormitory cafeteria,
but have not mastered the independent living skills nec-
essary to live outside the confines of the university
environment. The student may fail to fulfill the course
distribution requirements necessary for graduation and
thereby delay graduating. Others may actually begin to fail
course work as a means to postpone this stressful transition.
Finally, a student with an ASD may develop an acute
psychiatric crisis in response to the stress of the pending
transition to post college life.
Conclusion
Students with ASDs are a burgeoning population. Many
have post secondary school aspirations. With specifically
tailored interventions students with ASDs can fulfill those
aspirations and can reach their potential to become inde-
pendent contributing members of society. The transition
from high school to the college environment is a critical
juncture for students on the autism spectrum that must be
well planned. It is imperative that the student and his or her
parents examine the goodness of fit between the student
and the prospective college. The goodness of fit should be
examined in terms of the size of the university, the size of
the typical classes and the receptiveness of the institution to
students with a variety of disabilities. While many uni-
versities are quite adept at making accommodations for
students with specific learning disabilities and ADHD, they
face new challenges when accommodating students on the
autism spectrum. Universities will have to learn how to
effectively intervene in the areas of communication, social,
and independent living skills, and executive functioning.
Their repertoire of supportive services will have to be
expanded to include social skills groups, psycho-
educational groups, directive counseling, vocational train-
ing, and life coaching in order to help accommodate
students on the spectrum. These interventions will need to
be empirically evaluated and if effective, disseminated to
professionals in the field. Finally, social policies must be
written to support young adults with autism spectrum dis-
orders that focus upon helping the student transition to
independent living. This includes the provision of funding
for university based supportive services, job skills, transi-
tional programs and supportive housing.
Acknowledgment This publication was made possible through a National Institute of Health LRP grant (Number L30 HD053966–01)
References
Allen-Meares, P. (2004). Social work services in schools (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 35.104, 42 U.S.C.
12101.
Ayers, J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Barnhill, G., Hagiwara, T., Myles, B. S., & Simpson, R. (2000).
Asperger syndrome: A study of the cognitive profiles of 37
children and adolescents. Focus on Autism and Other Develop- mental Disabilities, 15(3), 146–153.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). The assessment of violence in a young man
with Asperger’s Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29, 351–360.
Bertrand, J., Mars, A., Boyle, C., Bove, F., Yeargin-Allsop, M., &
Decoufle, P. (2001). Prevalence of autism in United States
population: The Brick Township, New Jersey, investigation.
Pediatrics, 108(5), 1155–1161. Billstedt, E., Gillberg, C., & Gillberg, I. C. (2005). Autism after
adolescence: Population-based 13- to 22-year follow-up study of
120 individuals with autism diagnosed in childhood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(3), 351–360.
Dona J., & Edminster, J. H. (2001). An examination of community
college faculty members’ knowledge of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 at the fifteen community colleges in
Mississippi. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 14(2), 91–103.
Dohm, A., & Wyatt, I. (2002). College at work: Outlook and earning
for college graduates, 2000–2010. Occupational Outlook Quar- terly, 4(1), 2–15.
Ellis, H. D., Ellis, D. M., Fraser, W., & Deb, S. (1994). A preliminary
study of right hemisphere cognitive deficits and impaired social
judgments among young people with Asperger syndrome.
European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3(4), 255–266. Everall, I. P., & Le Couture, A. (1990). Fire-setting in an adolescent
with Asperger’s Syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 284–287.
Fombonne, E. (2005). Epidemiological studies of pervasive develop-
mental disorders. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D.
Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed.).
Fombonne, E. (2003). Epidemiological surveys of autism and other
pervasive developmental disorders: An update. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(4), 365–382.
Fujikawa, H., Kobayashi, R., Koga, Y., & Murata, T. (1987). A case
of Asperger syndrome in a nineteen- year-old who showed
psychotic breakdown with depressive state and attempted suicide
after entering university. Japanese Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(4), 217–255.
Ghaziuddin, M. (2002). Asperger syndrome: Associated psychiatric
and medical conditions. Focus on Autism and Other Develop- mental Disabilities, 17(3), 138–144.
Ghaziuddin, M., Ghaziuddin, N., & Greden, J. (2002). Depression in
persons with autism: Implications for research and clinical care.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(4), 299–306.
Ghaziuddin, M., Tsai, L. Y., & Ghaziuddin, N. (1991). Brief report:
Violence in Asperger Syndrome, a critique. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 21(3), 349–354.
Ghaziuddin, M., Weidmer-Mikhail, E., & Ghaziuddin, N. (1998).
Co-morbidity of Asperger syndrome: A preliminary report.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42(4), 643–649.
1368 J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370
123
Gillberg, C. (2005). The epidemiology of autism. In M. Coleman
(Ed.), The neurology of autism (pp. 119–135). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gillberg, C. (1985). Asperger syndrome and recurrent psychosis: A
case study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 15(4), 389–397.
Gillberg C., & Steffenberg, S. (1987). Outcome and prognostic
factors in infantile autism and similar conditions: A population
based study of 46 cases through puberty. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 17, 272–288.
Gillberg, C., & Rastam, M. (1992). Do some cases of anorexia
nervosa reflect underlying autistic like conditions? Behavioural Neurology, 5(1), 27–32.
Glennon, T. J. (2001). The stress of the university experience for
students with Asperger Syndrome. Work, 17, 183–190. Green, J., Gilchrist, A., Burton, D., & Cox, A. (2000). Social and
psychiatric functioning in adolescents with Asperger syndrome
compared with conduct disorder. Journal of Autism and Devel- opmental Disorders, 30, 279–293.
Harris, S. L., Handleman, J. S., & Jennett, H. K. (2005). Models of
educational intervention for students with autism: Home, center,
and school-based programming. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A.
Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive, developmental disorders (3rd ed., pp. 1043–1054). Hoboken: Wiley.
Howlin, P., Goode, S., Hutton, J., & Rutter, M. (2004). Adult outcome
for children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 212–229.
Howlin P., & Goode, S. (1998). Outcome in adult life for people with
autism and Asperger syndrome. In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (pp. 209–241). Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerbeshian, J., & Burd, L. (1986). Asperger syndrome and Tourette
syndrome: The case of the pinball wizard. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 731–736.
Klin, A., Chawarska, K., Paul, R., Rubin, E., Morgan, T., Wiesner, L.,
& Volkmar, F. R. (2004). Autism in a 15-month-old child.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(11), 1–7. Klin, A., McPartland, J., & Volkmar, F. R. (2005). Asperger
Syndrome. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen
(Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive, developmental disorders (3rd ed., pp. 88–125). Hoboken: Wiley.
Klin, A., Pauls, D., Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. R. (2005). Three
diagnostic approaches to Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 35(2), 221–234.
Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. R. (1996). Asperger syndrome: Treatment and Intervention: Some Guidelines for Parents. Learning Disabilities Association of America.
Klin, A., Volkmar, F. R., & Sparrow, S. S. (2000). Asperger syndrome. New York: Guilford.
Knudstrup, M., Segrest, S. L., & Hurley, A. E. (2003). The use of
mental imagery in the simulated employment interview situation.
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(6), 573–591. Krohn, F. B., & Goetz, K. M. (2005). The Goetz plan: A practical
smoking cessation program for college students. College Student Journal, 39(2), 260–267.
Krasny, L., Williams, B. J., Provencal, S., & Ozonoff, S. (2003).
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12, 107–122.
Littlejohns, C. S., Clarke, D. J., & Corbett, J. A. (1990). Tourette like
disorder in Asperger’s syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 430–433.
Marriage, K., Miles, T., Stokes, D., & Davey, M. (1993). Clinical and
research implications ofvthe co-occurrence of Asperger’s and
Tourette syndrome. Australian and New Zealander Journal of Psychiatry, 27(4), 666–672.
Mawhood, L., Howlin, P., & Rutter, M. (2000). Autism and
developmental receptive language disorder–A comparative fol-
low-up in early adult life. I: Cognitive and language outcomes.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(5), 547–559. Mawson, D., Grounds, A., Tantam, D., (1985). Violence and Asperger
Syndrome: A case study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 566–569.
McGovern, C. W., & Sigman, M. (2005). Continuity and change from
early childhood to adolescence in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(4), 401–408.
Munir, F., Jones, D., Leka, S., & Griffiths, A. (2005). Work
limitations and employer adjustments for employees with
chronic illness. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 28(2), 111–117.
National Research Council (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nordin, V., & Gillberg, C. (1998). The long-term course of autistic
disorders: Update on follow-up studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 97, 99–108.
Pancer, S. M., & Hunsberger, B. (2000). Cognitive complexity of
expectations and adjustment to university in the first year.
Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(1), 38–57. Paul, R. (2003). Promoting social communication in high functioning
individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Child and Adoles- cent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12, 87–106.
Pearson V., Ip F., Hui H., Yip N., Ho K. K., & Lo, E. (2003). To tell
or not to tell; disability disclosure and job application outcomes.
Journal of Rehabilitation, 69(4), 35–38. Prince-Hughes, D. (2003). Understanding college students with
autism. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved October 17, 2005.
Rourke, B. P. (1989). Non-verbal learning disabilities: The syndrome
and the model. New York: Guilford.
Scragg, P., & Shah, A. (1994). Prevalence of Asperger’s syndrome in a
secure hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165(5), 679–682. Seligman, M. E. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development,
and death. New York: W.H. Freedman.
Schalock, R., Keith, K. D., Hoffman, K., & Karan, O. C. (1989).
Quality of life: Its measurement and use. Mental Retardation, 27(1), 25–31.
Sperry, L. A., & Mesibov, G. B. (2005). Perceptions of social
challenges of adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 9(4), 362–376.
Tantam, D. (1988). Lifelong eccentricity and social isolation: I.
Psychiatric, social, and forensic aspect. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 777–782.
Taylor, M. J. (2005). Teaching students with autistic spectrum
disorders in HE. Education + Training, 47(7), 484–495. Tevyaw, T. O., Borsari, B., Colby, S. M., & Monti, P. M. (2007). Peer
enhancement of a brief motivational intervention with mandated
college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(1), 114–119.
Thomas, S. B. (2002). Students, colleges and disability law. Dayton: Educational Law Association.
Thomsen, P. H. (1994). Obsessive compulsive disorder in children
and adolescents: A 6–22 year follow-up study: Clinical descrip-
tions of the course and the continuity of obsessive-compulsive
symptomatology. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3(2), 82–96.
Turnbull, H. R., Wilcox, B. L., & Stowe, M. J. (2002). A brief
overview of special education law with a focus on autism.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 479–493.
VanBergeijk, E. O., & Shtayermman, O. (2005). Asperger Syndrome:
An enigma for social work. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2(1), 23–37.
J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370 1369
123
Volkmar, F. R., & Klin, A. (2001). Asperger syndrome and higher
functioning autism: Same or different? International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23(1), 83–110.
Volkmar F. (2004). Adolescence and sexuality. In F. R. Volkmar, &
L. A. Wiesner (Eds.), Healthcare for children on the autism spectrum (pp. 245–260). New York: Harbor House.
Walker, C. J. (2006). Adequate access or equal treatment: Looking
beyond the IDEA to Section 504 in a Post-Schaffer public
school. Stanford Law Review, 58, 1563–1622. Wing, L. (1981). Clarification on Asperger’s syndrome (Letters to the
Editor). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16(4), 513–515.
1370 J Autism Dev Disord (2008) 38:1359–1370
123