part of group project. Software management.

profileDalamri
Untitled.pdf

1

C SC

3 8

3 S

o ft

w a

re P

ro je

c t

M a

n a

g e

m e

n t

2

S O

F T

W A

R E

P R

O JE

C T

M A

N A

G E

M E

N T

C S

C -

38 3

• R

is k

M an

ag em

en t

3

R E

S O

U R

C E

E S

T IM

AT IO

N

C O

C O

M O

II

4

5

P R

O JE

C T

E S

T IM

AT IO

N

S of

tw ar

e P

ro je

ct P

la n

P ro

je ct

S co

pe R

es ou

rc es

E st

im at

es R

is ks

S ch

ed ul

e C

on tr

ol s

tr at

eg y

6

D E

F IN

IN G

P R

O JE

C T

R IS

K S

W ha

t c an

g o

w ro

ng ?

W ha

t i s

th e

lik el

ih oo

d? W

ha t w

ill th

e da

m ag

e be

? W

ha t c

an w

e do

a bo

ut it

?

• R

is k

in vo

lv es

2 th

in gs

: 1.

U nc

er ta

in ty

in th

e ris

k oc

cu rr

in g

2. Lo

ss if

th e

ris k

do es

oc

cu r

7– 7

M A

N A

G IN

G R

IS K

• R

is k

R e

sp o

n se

D e

ve lo

p m

e n

t •

M iti

g a

tin g

R is

k •

R e

d u

c in

g t

h e

li ke

lih o

o d

a n

a d

ve rs

e e

ve n

t w

ill o

c c

u r.

• R

e d

u c

in g

im p

a c

t o

f a

d ve

rs e

e ve

n t.

• A

vo id

in g

R is

k •

C h

a n

g in

g t

h e

p ro

je c

t p

la n

t o

e lim

in a

te th

e r

is k

o r

c o

n d

iti o

n .

• Tr

a n

sf e

rr in

g R

is k

• P

a yi

n g

a p

re m

iu m

t o

p a

ss t

h e

r is

k to

a n

o th

e r

p a

rt y.

• R

e q

u iri

n g

B u

ild -O

w n

-O p

e ra

te -T

ra n

sf e

r (B

O O

T) p

ro vi

si o

n s.

• R

e ta

in in

g R

is k

• M

a ki

n g

a c

o n

sc io

u s

d e

c is

io n

t o

a c

c e

p t

th e

r is

k.

PR O

A C

T IV

E V

S. R

E A

C T

IV E

8

9

R E

A C

T IV

E R

IS K

M A

N A

G E

M E

N T

• P

ro je

ct te

am r

ea ct

s to

r is

ks w

he n

th ey

o cc

ur •

M iti

ga tio

n —

pl an

fo r

ad di

tio na

l r es

ou rc

es in

an

tic ip

at io

n of

fi re

fi gh

tin g

• Fi

x on

fa ilu

re —

re so

ur ce

a re

fo un

d an

d ap

pl ie

d w

he n

th e

ris k

st rik

es •

C ri

si s

m an

ag em

en t —

fa ilu

re d

oe s

no t

re sp

on d

to a

pp lie

d re

so ur

ce s

an d

pr oj

ec t i

s in

je

op ar

dy

10

P R

O A

C T

IV E

R IS

K

M A

N A

G E

M E

N T

• F

or m

al r

is k

an al

ys is

is p

er fo

rm ed

• O

rg an

iz at

io n

co rr

ec ts

th e

ro ot

c au

se s

of r

is k

• A

pp ly

q ua

lit y

m an

ag em

en t c

on ce

pt s

an d

st at

is tic

al

S Q

A •

E xa

m in

e ris

k so

ur ce

s th

at li

e be

yo nd

th e

bo un

ds o

f th

e so

ftw ar

e •

D ev

el op

th e

sk ill

s to

m an

ag e

ch an

ge

11

T H

R E

E T

Y P

E S

O F

R IS

K S

1. P

ro je

ct R

is ks

• T

hi ng

s th

at w

ill n

eg at

iv el

y im

pa ct

y ou

r pr

oj ec

t p la

n •

In cl

ud es

s ta

ffi ng

, b ud

ge t,

pe rs

on ne

l, et

c. 2.

Te ch

ni ca

l R is

ks •

A ll

pr ob

le m

s w

ith d

es ig

n, im

pl em

en ta

tio n,

e tc

. •

A ls

o in

cl ud

es s

pe ci

fic at

io n

am bi

gu ity

, “ bl

ee di

ng -

ed ge

” te

ch no

lo gy

, e tc

.

12

T H

R E

E T

Y P

E S

O F

R IS

K S

II

3. B

us in

es s

R is

ks •

M ar

ke t R

is k

- M

ak e

a pr

od uc

t n o

on e

w an

ts •

S tr

at eg

ic R

is k –

pr od

uc t d

oe sn

't fit

b us

in es

s st

ra te

gy •

S al

es R

is k –

M ak

in g

a pr

od uc

t s al

es c

an ’ t s

el l

• M

an ag

em en

t R is

k –

m an

ag em

en t l

os es

in te

re st

• B

ud ge

t R is

k –

pr oj

ec t l

os es

fu nd

in g

13

P R

O D

U C

T R

IS K

IS S

U E

S

• P

ro du

ct a

ttr ib

ut es

th at

e ffe

ct r

is k:

• E

st im

at ed

s iz

e of

th e

pr od

uc t:

• in

L O

C o

r F

P ?

• in

n um

be r

of p

ro gr

am s,

fi le

s, tr

an sa

ct io

ns ?

• in

s iz

e of

d at

ab as

e cr

ea te

d or

u se

d by

th e

pr od

uc t?

• P

er ce

nt ag

e de

vi at

io n

in s

iz e

of p

ro du

ct fr

om a

ve ra

ge

fo r

pr ev

io us

p ro

du ct

s?

14

P R

O D

U C

T R

IS K

IS S

U E

S II

• M

or e

P ro

du ct

a ttr

ib ut

es th

at e

ffe ct

r is

k: •

N um

be r

of u

se rs

o f t

he p

ro du

ct ?

• N

um be

r of

p ro

je ct

ed c

ha ng

es to

th e

re qu

ire m

en ts

fo r

th e

pr od

uc t?

be fo

re d

el iv

er y?

af te

r de

liv er

y? •

A m

ou nt

o f r

eu se

d so

ftw ar

e?

15

S E

I’ S

S E

V E

N P

R IN

C IP

LE S

O F

R IS

K

M A

N A

G E

M E

N T

1. M

ai nt

ai n

a gl

ob al

p er

sp ec

tiv e —

vi ew

s of

tw ar

e ris

ks w

ith in

th

e co

nt ex

t o f s

ys te

m a

nd th

e bu

si ne

ss p

ro bl

em

2. Ta

ke a

fo rw

ar d-

lo ok

in g

vi ew

? —

th in

k ab

ou t t

he r

is ks

th at

m

ay a

ris e

in th

e fu

tu re

; es

ta bl

is h

co nt

in ge

nc y

pl an

s

3. E

nc ou

ra ge

o pe

n co

m m

un ic

at io

n —

if so

m eo

ne s

ta te

s a

po te

nt ia

l r is

k, d

on ’ t d

is co

un t i

t.

4. In

te gr

at e —

th e

co ns

id er

at io

n of

r is

k m

us t b

e in

te gr

at ed

in to

th

e so

ftw ar

e pr

oc es

s

16

S E

V E

N P

R IN

C IP

LE S

II

5. E

m ph

as iz

e a

co nt

in uo

us p

ro ce

ss —

th e

te am

m us

t b e

vi gi

la nt

th ro

ug ho

ut th

e so

ftw ar

e pr

oc es

s, m

od ify

in g

id en

tif ie

d ris

ks a

s m

or e

in fo

rm at

io n

is k

no w

n an

d ad

di ng

n ew

o ne

s as

be

tte r

in si

gh t i

s ac

hi ev

ed .

6. D

ev el

op a

s ha

re d

pr od

uc t v

is io

n —

if al

l s ta

ke ho

ld er

s sh

ar e

th e

sa m

e vi

si on

o f t

he s

of tw

ar e,

it li

ke ly

th at

b et

te r

ris k

id en

tif ic

at io

n an

d as

se ss

m en

t w ill

o cc

ur .

7. E

nc ou

ra ge

te am

w or

k —

th e

ta le

nt s,

s ki

lls a

nd k

no w

le dg

e of

al

l s ta

ke ho

ld er

s ho

ul d

be p

oo le

d

17

R IS

K

R IS

K M

A N

A G

E M

E N

T PA

R A

D IG

M

co nt

ro l

id en

tif y

an al

yz e

pl an

tr ac

k

18

Q U

E S

T IO

N S

F O

R A

S S

E S

S IN

G P

R O

JE C

T R

IS K

-I

1. H

a ve

t o

p s

o ft

w a

re a

n d

c u

st o

m e

r m

a n

a g

e rs

fo

rm a

lly c

o m

m itt

e d

t o

s u

p p

o rt

t h

e p

ro je

c t?

2. A

re e

n d

-u se

rs e

n th

u si

a st

ic a

lly c

o m

m itt

e d

t o

t h

e

p ro

je c

t a

n d

t h

e s

ys te

m /p

ro d

u c

t to

b e

b u

ilt ?

3. A

re r

e q

u ire

m e

n ts

f u

lly u

n d

e rs

to o

d b

y th

e s

o ft

w a

re

e n

g in

e e

rin g

t e

a m

a n

d t

h e

ir c

u st

o m

e rs

?

4. H

a ve

c u

st o

m e

rs b

e e

n in

vo lv

e d

f u

lly in

t h

e d

e fin

iti o

n

o f

re q

u ire

m e

n ts

?

19

Q U

E S

T IO

N S

F O

R A

S S

E S

S IN

G P

R O

JE C

T R

IS K

-I I

5. D

o e

n d

-u se

rs h

a ve

re a

lis tic

e xp

e c

ta tio

n s?

6. Is

p ro

je c

t sc

o p

e s

ta b

le ?

7. D

o e

s th

e s

o ft

w a

re e

n g

in e

e rin

g t

e a

m h

a ve

t h

e r

ig h

t m

ix o

f sk

ill s?

8. A

re p

ro je

c t

re q

u ire

m e

n ts

s ta

b le

?

20

Q U

E S

T IO

N S

F O

R A

S S

E S

S IN

G P

R O

JE C

T R

IS K

-I II

9. D

o e

s th

e p

ro je

c t

te a

m h

a ve

e xp

e rie

n c

e w

ith t

h e

te

c h

n o

lo g

y to

b e

im p

le m

e n

te d

?

10 .I

s th

e n

u m

b e

r o

f p

e o

p le

o n

t h

e p

ro je

c t

te a

m

a d

e q

u a

te t

o d

o t

h e

jo b

?

11 .D

o a

ll c

u st

o m

e r/

u se

r c

o n

st itu

e n

c ie

s a

g re

e o

n t

h e

im

p o

rt a

n c

e o

f th

e p

ro je

c t

a n

d o

n t

h e

r e

q u

ire m

e n

ts

fo r

th e

s ys

te m

/p ro

d u

c t

to b

e b

u ilt

?

21

B U

IL D

IN G

A R

IS K

T A

B LE

• D

ef in

e th

e ris

k ca

te go

ry •

E st

im at

e th

e pr

ob ab

ili ty

of o

cc ur

re nc

e •

E st

im at

e th

e im

pa ct

o n

th e

pr oj

ec t o

n a

sc al

e of

1

to 5

, w he

re •

1 =

lo w

im pa

ct o

n pr

oj ec

t s uc

ce ss

• 5

= ca

ta st

ro ph

ic im

pa ct

o n

pr oj

ec t s

uc ce

ss •

• S

or t t

he ta

bl e

by p

ro ba

bi lit

y an

d im

pa ct

22

R IS

K S

C AT

E G

O R

IE S

F O

R T

H E

R IS

K T

A B

LE

• P

er fo

rm an

ce ri

sk —

th e

de gr

ee o

f u nc

er ta

in ty

th at

th e

pr od

uc t

w ill

m ee

t i ts

r eq

ui re

m en

ts a

nd b

e fit

fo r

its in

te nd

ed u

se .

• C

os t r

is k —

th e

de gr

ee o

f u nc

er ta

in ty

th at

th e

pr oj

ec t b

ud ge

t w

ill b

e m

ai nt

ai ne

d.

• S

up po

rt ris

k —

th e

de gr

ee o

f u nc

er ta

in ty

th at

th e

re su

lta nt

so

ftw ar

e w

ill b

e ea

sy to

c or

re ct

, a da

pt , a

nd e

nh an

ce .

• S

ch ed

ul e

ris k —

th e

de gr

ee o

f u nc

er ta

in ty

th at

th e

pr oj

ec t

sc he

du le

w ill

b e

m ai

nt ai

ne d

an d

th at

th e

pr od

uc t w

ill b

e de

liv er

ed o

n tim

e.

23

B U

IL D

IN G

A R

IS K

T A

B LE

R is

k P

ro b

Im pa

ct R

M M

M

R is

k M

iti ga

tio n

M on

ito ri

ng &

M

an ag

em en

t C

ut of

f Li

ne

C at

eg or

y

C an

u se

8 0/

20 r

ul e

to h

el p

dr aw

th e

cu to

ff li

ne –

80 %

o f r

is k

in 2

0% o

f i te

m s

24

C A

LC U

LA T

IN G

R IS

K E

X P

O S

U R

E (

IM PA

C T

)

• T

he o

ve ra

ll ri

sk e

xp os

ur e,

R E

, i s

de te

rm in

ed u

si ng

th e

fo llo

w in

g re

la tio

ns hi

p: R

E =

P x

C •

W he

re :

• P

is th

e pr

ob ab

ili ty

o f o

cc ur

re nc

e fo

r a

ris k

• C

is th

e co

st to

th e

pr oj

ec t s

ho ul

d th

e ris

k oc

cu r

• H

el ps

m ak

e ris

ks q

ua nt

ifi ab

le s

o m

an ag

em en

t c an

un

de rs

ta nd

th em

• i.e

. p ut

th em

in fi

na nc

ia l t

er m

s

25

• M

iti ga

tio n—

ho w

c an

w e

av oi

d th

e ris

k?

• M

on ito

ri ng

— ho

w d

o w

e tr

ac k

th e

ris k

?

• M

an ag

em en

t— w

ha t c

on tin

ge nc

y pl

an s

do

w e

ha ve

if th

e ris

k be

co m

es a

r ea

lit y?

R IS

K M

IT IG

AT IO

N , M

O N

IT O

R IN

G , A

N D

M

A N

A G

E M

E N

T

26

• M

iti ga

tio n—

• H

ow c

an w

e av

oi d

th e

ris k?

• D

ev el

op a

s tr

at eg

y fo

r ei

th er

a vo

id in

g th

e ris

k or

m

in im

iz in

g its

im pa

ct •

F or

te ch

ni ca

l r is

ks , r

ec al

l e ar

ly fe

as ib

ili ty

an

al ys

is to

h el

p as

se ss

s ev

er ity

o f t

he te

ch ni

ca l

ris k

• A

ls o

al w

ay s

ha ve

p ar

al le

l p at

hs fo

r ea

ch

id en

tif ie

d hi

gh te

ch ni

ca l r

is k

ar ea

R IS

K M

IT IG

AT IO

N , M

O N

IT O

R IN

G , A

N D

M

A N

A G

E M

E N

T II

27

• M

on ito

ri ng

— •

W ha

t f ac

to rs

c an

w e

tr ac

k th

at w

ill e

na bl

e us

to d

et er

m in

e if

th e

ris k

is b

ec om

in g

m or

e or

le ss

li ke

ly ?

• A

ss es

s if

th e

ris ks

a ct

ua lly

m ay

b e

oc cu

rr in

g •

E ns

ur e

an y

ris k

av oi

da nc

e pl

an s

ar e

be in

g fo

llo w

ed •

C ol

le ct

in fo

/m et

ric s

fo r

fu tu

re r

is k

an al

ys is

R IS

K M

IT IG

AT IO

N , M

O N

IT O

R IN

G , A

N D

M

A N

A G

E M

E N

T III

28

• M

an ag

em en

t— •

W ha

t c on

tin ge

nc y

pl an

s do

w e

ha ve

if th

e ris

k be

co m

es a

r ea

lit y?

• P

la ce

th is

in th

e P

ro je

ct P

la n

or a

s ep

ar at

e R

is k

m an

ag em

en t P

la n

• B

e su

re to

d oc

um en

t t he

r is

ks a

nd c

on sc

io us

ly

m an

ag e

th em

R IS

K M

IT IG

AT IO

N , M

O N

IT O

R IN

G , A

N D

M

A N

A G

E M

E N

T IV

7– 29

C O

N T

IN G

E N

C Y

F U

N D

IN G

A N

D T

IM E

B

U FF

E R

S

• C

o n

tin g

e n

c y

Fu n

d s

• Fu

n d

s to

c o

ve r p

ro je

c t

ris ks —

id e

n tif

ie d

a n

d u

n kn

o w

n .

• Si

ze o

f fu

n d

s re

fle c

ts o

ve ra

ll ris

k o

f a

p ro

je c

t •

B u

d g

e t

re se

rv e

s •

A re

li n

ke d

t o

t h

e id

e n

tif ie

d ri

sk s

o f

sp e

c ifi

c w

o rk

p a

c ka

g e

s. •

M a

n a

g e

m e

n t

re se

rv e

s •

A re

la rg

e f

u n

d s

to b

e u

se d

t o

c o

ve r m

a jo

r u n

fo re

se e

n r

is ks

( e

.g .,

c h

a n

g e

in p

ro je

c t

sc o

p e

) o

f th

e t

o ta

l p ro

je c

t.

• Ti

m e

B u

ff e

rs •

A m

o u

n ts

o f

tim e

u se

d t

o c

o m

p e

n sa

te f

o r

u n

p la

n n

e d

d e

la ys

in

t h

e p

ro je

c t

sc h

e d

u le

. •

Se ve

re r

is k,

m e

rg e

, n o

n c

rit ic

a l,

a n

d s

c a

rc e

r e

so u

rc e

a c

tiv iti

e s