Summary Paper and Data-Driven Implementation Rubric
Implementation Rubric
Data-Driven Instruction and Assessment
The rubric is intended to be used to assess the present state of data-driven instruction and assessment in a school. The rubric specifically targets interim assessments and the key drivers leading to increased student achievement.
Rating codes: 4 = Exemplary Implementation 3 = Proficient Implementation 2 = Beginning Implementation 1 = No Implementation
|
Data-Driven Culture |
Rating |
|
1. Highly active leadership team: Facilitate teacher-leader data analysis meetings after each interim assessment and maintain focus on the process throughout the year. |
__/4 |
|
2. Introductory professional development: Teachers and leaders are introduced to data-driven instruction effectively—they understand how interim assessments define rigor and experience the process of analyzing results and adapting instruction. |
__/4 |
|
3. Implementation calendar: Begin school year with a detailed calendar that includes time for assessment creation and adaptation, implementation, analysis, planning meetings, and re-teaching (flexible enough to accommodate district changes and mandates). |
__/4 |
|
4. Ongoing professional development: Professional development calendar is aligned with data-driven instructional plan: includes modeling assessment analysis and action planning and is flexible enough to adapt to student learning needs. |
__/4 |
|
5. Build by borrowing: Identify and implement best practices from high-achieving teachers and schools: visit schools and classrooms; share and disseminate resources and strategies. |
__/4 |
|
Assessments |
Literacy Rating |
Math Rating |
|
1. Common interim assessments: Assessments conducted four to six times per year. |
__/4 |
__/4 |
|
2. Transparent starting point: Teachers see the assessments at the beginning of each cycle and use them to define the road map for teaching. |
__/4 |
__/4 |
|
3. Aligned to state tests and college readiness. |
__/4 |
__/4 |
|
4. Aligned to instructional sequence of clearly defined grade-level and content expectations. |
__/4 |
__/4 |
|
5. Re-assessed previously taught standards. |
__/4 |
__/4 |
|
Analysis |
Rating |
|
1. Immediate turnaround of assessment results (ideally within forty-eight hours). |
__/4 |
|
2. Data reports provide user-friendly, succinct item-level analysis, standards-level analysis, and bottom-line results. |
__/4 |
|
3. Teacher-owned analysis facilitated by effective leadership preparation. |
__/4 |
|
4. Test-in-hand analysis between teacher and instructional leader. |
__/4 |
|
5. Deep analysis moves beyond what students got wrong to answer why they got it wrong. |
__/4 |
|
Action |
Rating |
|
1. Planning: Teachers plan new lessons collaboratively to develop new strategies based on data analysis. |
__/4 |
|
2. Implementation: Explicit teacher action plans are implemented in whole-class instruction, small groups, tutorials, and before- or after-school support sessions. |
__/4 |
|
3. Ongoing assessment: Teachers use in-the-moment checks for understanding and in-class assessment to ensure student progress between interim assessments. |
__/4 |
|
4. Accountability: Instructional leaders review lesson and unit plans and give observation feedback driven by the action plan and student learning needs. |
__/4 |
|
5. Engaged students: Students know the end goal, how they did, and what actions they are taking to improve. |
__/4 |
TOTAL: _____/100
PAGE
2