Research Methods, Final Project?
1
6
Sun Coast’s Hypothesis Testing
Data Analysis: Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is the examination of the relationship between two or more variables. It tests whether two variables affects one another or not (Keysers&Wagenmakers, 2020) It also tests the strength of relationship that exists between the variables. One variable is assumed to be dependent while the other is assumed to be independent (Creswell, 2018). The dependent variable relies on the independent variable. On the other hand, independent variable does not rely on dependent variable and would happen either way with or without dependent variable (Creswell, 2018). Here we will explore two parametric statistical procedures used to test hypothesis. They are the t test and ANOVA. The two tests are similar yet different. The t test is used to compare two means and ANOVA is used to compare more than two means (Creswell, 2018).
Independent Samples tTest: Hypothesis Testing
Ho4: There are no statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of the revised training program versus the prior training program.
Ha4: There are statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of the revised program versus the prior training program.
|
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group A Prior Training Scores |
Group B Revised Training Scores |
|
|
|
Mean |
69.79032258 |
84.77419 |
|
|
|
Variance |
122.004495 |
26.96457 |
|
|
|
Observations |
62 |
62 |
|
|
|
Hypothesized Mean Difference |
0 |
|
|
|
|
df |
87 |
|
|
|
|
t Stat |
-9.666557191 |
|
|
|
|
P(T<=t) one-tail |
9.69914E-16 |
|
|
|
|
t Critical one-tail |
1.66255735 |
|
|
|
|
P(T<=t) two-tail |
1.93983E-15 |
|
|
|
|
t Critical two-tail |
1.987608241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation:
The mean value is lower for Group A (Prior training) than Group B (Revised training). We used the alpha of 0.05; the results of the independent samples t test show a p-value (two-tailed) of 1.94E-15, which is lower than the alpha of 0.05. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. There are statistically significant differences in mean values of the DV between the prior training program and revised training program. Respectfully, Sun Coast should replace the prior training program with the revised training program.
Dependent Samples (Paired Samples) tTest: Hypothesis Testing
Ho5: There is no statistically significant difference in employee blood lead levels between pre-exposure and post-exposure.
Ha5: There is a statistically significant difference in employee blood lead levels between pre-exposure and post-exposure.
|
|
t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Exposure μg/dL |
Post-Exposure μg/dL |
|
|
|
Mean |
32.85714286 |
33.28571 |
|
|
|
Variance |
150.4583333 |
155.5 |
|
|
|
Observations |
49 |
49 |
|
|
|
Pearson Correlation |
0.992236043 |
|
|
|
|
Hypothesized Mean Difference |
0 |
|
|
|
|
df |
48 |
|
|
|
|
t Stat |
-1.92980256 |
|
|
|
|
P(T<=t) one-tail |
0.029776356 |
|
|
|
|
t Critical one-tail |
1.677224197 |
|
|
|
|
P(T<=t) two-tail |
0.059552711 |
|
|
|
|
t Critical two-tail |
2.010634722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation:
We were provided with an alpha of 0.05 and the results show a p-value of 0.06 which is greater than the given alpha of 0.05. We must reject the alternative hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis which states that there are no statistically significant differences in the lead levels in the blood pre exposure and post exposure of employees working where lead remediation is being conducted.
ANOVA: Hypothesis Testing
Ho6: There are no statistically significant differences with return on investment and each line of service.
Ha6: There are statistically significant differences with return on investment and each line of service.
|
Anova: Single Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Groups |
Count |
Sum |
Average |
Variance |
|
|
|
A = Air |
20 |
178 |
8.9 |
9.357895 |
|
|
|
B = Soil |
20 |
182 |
9.1 |
3.042105 |
|
|
|
C = Water |
20 |
140 |
7 |
6.631579 |
|
|
|
D = Training |
20 |
108 |
5.4 |
1.410526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANOVA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of Variation |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
P-value |
F crit |
|
Between Groups |
182.8 |
3 |
60.93333333 |
11.9231 |
1.75888E-06 |
2.72494395 |
|
Within Groups |
388.4 |
76 |
5.110526316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
571.2 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation:
The ANOVA p-value is 1.76E-06 which is less than our alpha of 0.05. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. There are statistically significant differences between return on investment and the four lines of service offered at Sun Coast.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018).Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Keysers, C., Gazzola, V., &Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020).Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature neuroscience, 23(7), 788-799.