Management
Unit V Lecture Transcript
Slide 1
Unit V, Employee Rights, Employee Management, and Labor Relations.
Slide 2
In order to gain a deeper understanding of the concepts presented in
this course, the unit lessons will be structured in question and answer
format. Each slide will provide at least one question based on concepts
presented in this unit and an accompanying audio response from a subject
matter expert. Review each slide to further enhance your practical
knowledge about the field of human resource management.
Slide 3
Meet Marilyn Pike. Marilyn has over 20 years of experience in HR
leadership positions in both the public and private sector, large and small
businesses, and union and non-union environments. She currently holds
both the SPHR and SHRM-SCP.
Question: Can you talk to us about employee rights? Management
rights?
Answer: As Americans, we have all learned that we certain inalienable
Constitutional rights; however, it’s important to recognize that while we
have those rights in our private lives, in the workplace, we give up many of
those rights in exchange for a paycheck. That’s why it’s important to pay
attention to the ethics and/or mission of the organization which provides you
with that paycheck. An employer cannot force you to do anything against
your will; however, the consequence of you choosing not to do what your
employer wants you to do can mean loss of your job. That is the reality of
the world. Key idea, let’s get something out of the way: First Amendment
Right of Free Speech. In the workplace, individual freedom of speech is
limited. The reality is the employer has a responsibility to ensure that
everyone is treated with mutual respect. An employee cannot say whatever
they want, whenever they want. Respectful communication is everything.
That said, within organizations, individuals should still be free to
express concerns or discontent with organizational policies or to even blow
the whistle without fear of harm. Many employees fear that if they speak up,
their employer will retaliate against them by limiting their promotion
opportunities or just make their life miserable at work. There are laws
against this. In fact, a charge of retaliation can be more costly to an
employer than the penalty associated with the original complaint. Manager
rights are based on the necessity for the organization to protect itself and its
employees from persons that might do them intentional or unintentional
harm. The manager has to weigh the individual’s rights against the potential
harm that could be done to the organization by allowing the individual to
express those rights. Management has the right to:
create and enforce an employee code of conduct;
create workplace data and device policies to protect data and to
maintain control of its networks;
monitor the workplace to protect the organization and its
employees;
identify the relationship with workers as one of employment-at-
will, which basically allows either party to break the relationship
at any time, even without stating a reason;
set up an orientation program and require that new employees
attend such orientation; and
test for drugs in the workplace.
In each case, these rights are offered based on the need for managers
to be able to protect the organization and the employees from unnecessary
danger or harm.
Slide 4
Question: You mentioned employment at will. Can you explain this
concept further?
Answer: Employment at will allows the company or the employee to
break their work relationship at any point in time, with or without any
particular reason, as long as in doing so, no law is violated, which essentially
means that the employee is not being terminated due to any protected class
status.
The reality is that if an employer is using at-will employment to
terminate an employee, if that employee happens to be part of a protected
status group, the employer would be wise to document some reason for the
termination, showing that the reason was not protected class status. At-will
employment also runs both ways. An employee can leave an employer at
any time for any reason. While the professional thing to do is to give a
minimum of two weeks’ notice, the employer cannot require an employee to
give notice. I’ve heard many employees feel at-will employment is unfair,
but I suggest they consider that rarely is a manager going to decide to
terminate a good employee “just because.” The effect on other employees
would be devastating should a manager just walk up to someone and say,
“You’re gone.” When a manager terminates an employee, there is usually a
very good reason. At-will employment just does not require the manager to
share that reason with the employee.
Slide 5
Question: What is coaching verses counseling?
Answer: The major objective of coaching, counseling and discipline is
to change behavior. I’ve found, often, managers are reluctant to talk with
employees about issues. I think it is important to change the paradigm and
realize that by reaching out to the employee as soon as the issue is
identified, the manager is doing both themselves and the employee a huge
favor.
Coaching, generally, should be the first step in dealing with problem
employees, but if they are unwilling or unable to change, or a rule has been
broken, discipline is necessary. The second objective is to let employees
know action will be taken when standing plans or performance requirements
are not met and to maintain authority when challenged. It is all about
accountability. Management counseling, that involves giving employees
feedback so they realize a problem (often personal) is affecting their job
performance and referring employees with problems that cannot be
managed within the work structure to an employee assistance program. Of
course, coaching, counseling, and discipline may differ globally. The most
important thing in any successful interaction between the coach and the
recipient of coaching is probably an understanding of the individual, not the
culture that the individual comes from. This is because no matter what
culture a person belongs to, individual personalities may or may not adhere
to cultural norms and values. Therefore, two of the most significant issues
that the coach needs to attempt to determine are the individual’s personality
type and their motivators.
Slide 6
Question: What is job satisfaction, and why is it important?
Answer: Job satisfaction is an attitude, not a behavior. We can
experience behaviors directly, while we can measure attitudes only
indirectly, making job satisfaction difficult to measure. The seven
determinants of job satisfaction include individual personality, the work
itself, compensation, growth and upward mobility, coworkers, management,
and communication. Although compensation (pay and benefits) is important
to job satisfaction, research, historically, has not strongly supported the idea
that pay is the only, or even the primary determinant of job satisfaction in
many cases. Job satisfaction is, to a large extent, based on personality and
perception, so it can be changed. If you work at being more positive by
focusing on the good parts of your job and spend less time thinking about
problems, and especially complaining to others about your job, then you
may increase your job satisfaction.
Slide 7
Question: Let’s talk about unions. What drives employees’ desire to
unionize?
Answer: We talked about job satisfaction. Job dissatisfaction has a lot
to do with employees wanting to join unions. Treating employees well and
fairly is a very effective union avoidance tactic. Employees organize for a
variety of reasons, including better pay and benefits (especially good
healthcare coverage and retirement plans), they organize to fight unfair
management practices that lead to poor labor relations, and they fight for
job security. I’ve worked with three different unions and been involved in
two union organization attempts. One organization attempt failed and the
other succeeded.
In the attempt which succeeded, we realized after the fact that the
main reason the employees wanted to organize is they felt they were not
being heard. Conflict is part of every relationship and every social system.
You are in conflict when you get aggravated at someone or when someone
does something that bothers you. When there is conflict and employees do
not feel heard, they turn to unionization in order to attempt to gain some
type of power on their side in the process.
Labor and management are required by law to bargain with each other
in good faith, and companies need to maintain effective employee relations,
but when in conflict, we cannot always resolve our dispute alone. In these
cases, we can use something called alternative dispute resolution.
Alternative dispute resolution includes a series of tools, most commonly
either mediation or arbitration, which parties in conflict can use to resolve
their disagreements without going through the process of litigation.
The NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) has taken a stance that
heavily favors the employee in virtually all situations where there may be
questions about whether or not an action is protected concerted activity.
Business, as a result of these interpretations, has found it more difficult to
maintain good order and discipline within their organizations. However, there
is at least some help from some recent court decisions that have reversed
some of the more extreme NLRB decisions, noting that sometimes, you have
to use common sense in such situations.
Companies have become much more knowledgeable concerning
avoiding unionization drives. However, it doesn’t mean that their activities
are necessarily ethical. Staying within the letter of the law (NO TIPS) may
not provide the company with the kind of skilled workforce that it needs. We
have to pay attention to whether or not actions on the part of management
will increase the satisfaction and engagement levels of the employees or
cause them to decrease.
Slide 8
This concludes the Unit V question and answer session with subject
matter expert, Marilyn Pike. Reflect on this question and answer session as
you review your readings for this unit.