Revisions

If the URL on the image is not working, and you want to visit the Math and Writing Center Resources page, use Control

+ Click on the following link:

https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/ultra/organizations/_134435_1/cl/outline

Life Sentence Vs Death Penalty

Cecilia Williamson

Columbia Southern University

English 1302

Nickalus Rupert

April 7, 2023

Commented [MG1]: Hi, Cecilia! You need to add a page number to the upper right corner of each page. And do not capitalize vs. Title Page Your title page needs to include a page number in the top right-hand corner as well as the following elements centered in the middle of the page:

Title in Bold (in Title Case) (skip a line) Student Name University Name Course Name Instructor Name Date

Your essay also needs to be properly double spaced. Highlight your entire paper, and on the Home tab, click Paragraph. Under Spacing, select Double from the dropdown menu, and make sure that the spacing before and after each paragraph is set to 0. You will also need to go back through and delete any manual double spacing.

If you need more info about formatting, please see the CSU Citation Guide for formatting instructions. I suggest printing it out and keeping it handy: https://www.columbiasouthern.edu/citationguide7 Also, the following webinar on formatting formal assignments will walk you through the steps of properly formatting your essay: https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-128021211_1

Life in Prison Vs Death Penalty

The debate of life in prison verses versus the death penalty has been ongoing for centuries.

Those on the pro side of the argument often view life in prison as a better form of punishment

than the death penalty, believing the former to be a more humane and just way to punish

criminals. In contrast, those on the con side often view the death penalty as a more effective form

of punishment and retribution against serious crimes. Despite the differing opinions, there is a

consensus that the death penalty should only be used in extreme and heinous cases, such as

murder, drug possession, terrorism, and corruption. In addition, life in prison is seen as a

potential avenue for reformation and rehabilitation for those sentenced. When it comes to the

specific controversy surrounding the death penalty and life in prison, there are arguments on both

sides. On the pro side, there are those that view capital punishment as an effective deterrent and a

form of retribution for heinous crimes. On the con side, there are those that view the death

penalty as a violation of the right to life and an unreliable form of punishment. This paper will

analyze the moral and legal implications of the death penalty and life in prison, as well as the

fundamental right to life, in order to determine whether or not a death penalty is a suitable form

of punishment.

The Literature Review

This literature review seeks to explore the legal and moral implications of life

imprisonment and the death penalty and to analyze the arguments for and against the use of

capital punishment. It will begin by examining the nature and content of life imprisonment and

the arguments for and against the death penalty. It will then move on to examining the moral and

legal implications of both life imprisonment and the death penalty and the right to life. Lastly,

the literature review will provide an objective analysis of the arguments for and against the death

Commented [MG2]: Use “who” for people and “that” for objects.

Commented [MG3]: Avoid language like “this paper will…” This sort of language is great for an abstract or lit review, where you are describing what a paper will discuss, but not for your introduction or topic sentences. Jump straight to the heart of the matter. Tell you topic and your point in the sentence.

-Incorrect: This paper will examine the need for laptops in the classroom. -Correct: Laptops are needed in the classroom because they place information at students’ fingertips.

If you need help with your thesis statement, please watch the following tutorial: https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-128217798_1

penalty and its implications for the criminal justice system. This literature review provides an in­

depth exploration of the legal and moral implications of life imprisonment and the death penalty,

and serves as an important source for those looking to gain an understanding of the topic.

The Nature and Content of Life Imprisonment

Life imprisonment is a form of punishment where a convicted criminal is incarcerated for

life or a period of time that is deemed to be equivalent to life. According to Antonyan and

Antonyan (2020), life imprisonment is a complex issue, with both legal and moral implications,

which must be carefully considered when deciding whether or not to impose the sentence. The

authors argue that life imprisonment should only be imposed for the most serious crimes, such as

aggravated murder, and that there should be an attitude of reformation for those convicted.

Similarly, Purwanto (2020) states that the death penalty should only be imposed for "heinous

crimes" such as murder, drug possession, terrorism, and corruption (p. or para. #). These authors

both agree that the death penalty should be used sparingly, and that life imprisonment should be

the preferred punishment for serious crimes. In contrast, Norris and Mullinix (2019) argue that

life imprisonment should be used over the death penalty as a form of punishment, as the death

penalty is seen as a form of "cruel and unusual punishment" (p. or para. #) that violates the right

to life. This article provides evidence that the death penalty is not a form of "just punishment"

(p. or para. #) and that life imprisonment should be used as an alternative.

Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty

The death penalty has been a controversial issue for centuries, and there are both

arguments for and against the use of capital punishment. On one side of the argument, Purwanto

(2020) argues that the death penalty should be used sparingly and only for the most serious of

crimes, such as murder, drug possession, terrorism, and corruption. Similarly, Antonyan and

Commented [MG4]: “FANBOYS” You do not always need to put a comma in front of and (or the other FANBOYS: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so). These words are called conjunctions. Only use a comma + conjunction combination to do the following: -End a comma series Ex: red, blue, and yellow -Connect 2 independent clauses (a.k.a. clauses that could stand alone as sentences) Ex: She likes red, but he likes yellow. Both “she likes red” and “he likes yellow could function by themselves as sentences, so the comma + conjunction combo is appropriate here. Do not use a comma in front of conjunctions that do not fit one of these instances.

Commented [MG5]: The comma here splits up the complete thought,

so it is not needed since it is not a FABBOY.

Commented [MG6]: Be sure to add the page or paragraph number (If no page number is available) to the in-text citation when using a direct quote. In-text Citations Any time you directly quote or paraphrase from a source, you will need to include an in-text citation to reference your source. The in-text citation should include the author(s)’ surname(s) and the publication year. Citations following direct quotes should also include the page or paragraph number. Below are some examples of in-text citations for paraphrases and for direct quotations.

Summary or Paraphrase According to Smith and Brown (2007)… …..(Smith & Brown, 2007). Direct Quotation According to Smith and Brown (2007) “….” (p. 738). According to Smith and Brown (2007) “….” (para. 4). “…” (Smith & Brown, 2007, p. 738). “…” (Smith & Brown, 2007, para. 4). And when paraphrasing information from a source over multiple sentences or throughout a paragraph, cite the source in the first sentence using the borrowed information. You will only need to repeat the citation in the paragraph if you need to clarify the source again, such as if you are switching between multiple sources. Acknowledge the source again in the following paragraph if the borrowed information continues in a new paragraph. If you need more info about in-text citations, please watch the following tutorial: https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-128022053_1

Commented [MG7]: Add a page or paragraph number for each direct

quote in a sentence, even if they are from the same page or paragraph.

Antonyan (2020) state that life imprisonment should be the preferred punishment for serious

crimes, rather than the death penalty. They argue that life imprisonment can be used to achieve

justice and can also provide opportunities for reformation and rehabilitation. On the other hand,

Barry (2018) argues that the death penalty is not a form of "just punishment" and that life

imprisonment should be used as an alternative to the death penalty. Barry argues that capital

punishment is susceptible to arbitrary decisions, delays, and unreliability and is not a suitable

punishment for the crime. The authors also contend that the death penalty violates the right to

life guaranteed by the substantive due process clause of the United States Constitution. This

article provides a comprehensive overview of the legal and moral implications of the death

penalty and serves as an important source for those looking to gain an understanding of the

arguments against the death penalty.

Moral and Legal Implications

The moral and legal implications of the death penalty and life imprisonment are often

debated. On one hand, Purwanto (2020) argues that the death penalty should only be imposed for

the most serious of crimes, such as murder, drug possession, terrorism, and corruption. He argues

that capital punishment should be used sparingly, as it violates the right to life and can lead to

arbitrary decisions and delays. Similarly, Barry (2018) argues that the death penalty is not a form

of ''just punishment" and that life imprisonment should be used as an alternative. She argues that

the death penalty is not narrowly tailored to achieve its ostensible purposes of deterrence and

retribution and that it violates the right to life guaranteed by the substantive due process clause of

the United States Constitution. On the other hand, Antonyan and Antonyan (2020) argue that life

imprisonment can be used to achieve justice and can provide opportunities for reformation and

rehabilitation. They further state that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

Article 7 Verse (2)- (6), states that the death penalty must be performed appropriately without

resulting in imprisonment for years or mental suffering. This article provides an in-depth

exploration of the moral and legal implications of life imprisonment and the death penalty and

serves as an important source for those looking to gain an understanding of the topic.

The Death Penalty and the Fundamental Right to Life

The death penalty and the fundamental right to life are closely intertwined. According to

Barry (2018), the death penalty is not a form of "just punishment" and that life imprisonment

should be used as an alternative. She argues that the death penalty is not narrowly tailored to

achieve its ostensible purposes of deterrence and retribution and that it violates the right to life

guaranteed by the substantive due process clause of the United States Constitution. Similarly,

Purwanto (2020) states that the death penalty should only be imposed for "heinous crimes" such

as murder, drug possession, terrorism, and corruption, as it violates the right to life. In contrast,

Antonyan and Antonyan (2020) argue that life imprisonment can be used to achieve justice and

can provide opportunities for reformation and rehabilitation. This article comprehensively

analyzes the legal and moral implications of the death penalty and the right to life guaranteed by

the United States Constitution. It provides an objective analysis of the topic and serves as an

important source for anyone looking to gain an understanding of the death penalty and its

implications for the criminal justice system.

In conclusion, the debate over life in prison versus the death penalty is one that is highly

contested, with arguments on both sides. Those on the pro side argue that the death penalty is a

just form of punishment for serious crimes, while those on the con side argue that it is a violation

of the right to life and an unreliable form of punishment. Ultimately, it is clear that the death

penalty should only be used in extreme and heinous cases, such as murder, drug possession,

terrorism, and corruption, and that life in prison should be used as an alternative form of

punishment. Life imprisonment can be used to achieve justice and can provide opportunities for

reformation and rehabilitation. Furthermore, the death penalty should not be used as a form of

punishment, as it is susceptible to arbitrary decisions, delays, and unreliability. Therefore, life in

prison should be the preferred form of punishment for serious crimes.

Commented [MG8]: Use commas to set off non-essential phrases that come at the end of a sentence. Captain Mal has many responsibilities as the Serenity’s captain, such as keeping an eye out for Reavers and on occasion sporting a pretty bonnet. Inara had six packages arrive for her at the station, which is much higher than the amount she usually receives. Notice that both of these phrases could be removed with the sentence and the sentence would still be complete. This means that these are non-essential phrases.

Commented [MG9]: Excellent info and writing, Cecilia!!

References

Antonyan, Y. M., & Antonyan, E. A. (2020, March 24). Criminological Problems of Life

Imprisonment. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200321.0866

Barry, K. M. (2018). The Death Penalty & The Fundamental Right to Life.

https://doi.org/10 .2139/ssm.3287213

Kort-Butler, L. A., & Ray, C. M. (2018). Public support for the death penalty in a red state: The

distrustful, the angry, and the unsure. Punishment & Society, 21(4), 473-495.

https://doi.org/10.l 177/1462474518795896

Norris, R. J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2019). Framing innocence: an experimental test of the

effects of wrongful convictions on public opinion. Journal of Experimental Criminology.

https://doi.org/10.1007/sl 1292-019-09360-7

Commented [MG10]: Use the example I have provided to fix all of

your references. If you need more info about references, please watch the

following tutorial, which will show you how to format your references in

proper APA style:

https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-128022854_1

Commented [MG11]: Use sentence case and add the journal title,

volume, and issue number if they are available as shown below. Put the

journal title and volume in italics as shown in the example below.

Sentence Case

Articles, books, and webpages listed within your references should be in

sentence case, which means that you should capitalize only the first word

of the title, proper nouns, and the first word after a colon or hyphen.

Commented [MG12]: Hanging Indent

In each reference citation, all lines after the first line should be indented

½ inch. The following instructions will help you format that hanging

indent.

1. Highlight your reference.

2. Under Home, select the Paragraph window (by clicking the icon to

the right of the word paragraph).

3. Click the drop down menu below Special until you see Hanging.

4. After pressing Hanging, click OK.

Purwanto, A. (2020). Death Penalty and Human Rights in Indonesia. International Journal of

Criminology and Sociology, 2020, 9, 1356-1362.

https://papers.ssrn.com/so13/papers.cfm?abstract id=3987003