bel hav u7
tretaylor
Unit7_FinalProject.pdf
Unit 7: Final Project
Due Jun 21 by 11:59pm Points 400 Submitting a file upload
Unit 7 - Final Project - Grading Rubric
Start Assignment
Final Project: Submit by Saturday 11:59 p.m.
3-Day Content Area Literacy Thematic Unit Plan (400 points) See Appendix B for full instructions and required documents Be sure to check the rubric before uploading your document to verify that you have addressed all parts of the assignment. You are required to include a minimum of 3 daily lesson plans. You are allowed to include more if you choose. Defense of Thematic unit plan
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 1/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
Instructional goals & Standards
The teacher can relate his/her disciplinary knowledge to other subject areas InTASC 4,7; ILA 2.1 CAEP 1.1 Research
20 pts
InTASC #4 - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners. threshold: 3.0 pts
--
20 pts Advanced - 4
Instructional goals (3-5) clearly and concisely state what the student will know or be able to do, are specific, detailed, and measurable. Goals are aligned with given standards and are challenging but attainable. (20 pts)
17 pts Proficient - 3
Instructional goals (3-5) state what the student will know or be able to do, are specific, detailed, and measurable. Goals are clearly aligned with given standards. (17 pts)
14 pts Basic - 2
Instructional goals are simply restatements of the unit standards. Goals are not specific or measurable. Words like “know” and “understand” are used as what the student will be able to do. (14 pts)
11 pts Minimal - 1
Instructional goals do not state what the student will be able to do at the end of the unit but rather state what the teacher will do; goals are related to activities but are not specific or measurable. (11 pts)
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 2/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
InTASC #7B-1 - Planning for Instruction (updated)
The teacher draws upon knowledge of content areas, cross-disciplinary skills, learners, the community, and pedagogy to plan instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals. (The teacher is able to plan instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and curriculum goals.) threshold: 3.0 pts
--
2.1 - ILA Standard 2: Curriculum and Instruction
Candidates use instructional approaches, materials, and an integrated, comprehensive, balanced
--
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 3/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
curriculum to support student learning in reading and writing. Candidates use foundational knowledge to design or implement an integrated, comprehensive, and balanced curriculum. threshold: 3.0 pts
CAEP A1.1 - Research
Use of research and understanding of qualitative, quantitative and/or mixed methods research methodologies threshold: 3.0 pts --
depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
4 pts Advanced: The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills
2 pts Basic The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
1 pts Minimal The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 4/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
Instructional goals & Standards
The teacher can relate his/her disciplinary knowledge to other subject areas
20 pts
Use of Text Set
The teacher knows how to enhance learning through the use of a wide variety of materials as well as human and technological resources InTASC 4.13 ILA 2.2 CAEP 1.1 Technology
30 pts
InTASC #4B - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches
--
20 pts Advanced - 4
ELA and Content standard are applicable to the lesson and unit. (20 pts)
17 pts Proficient - 3
ELA and Content standard are applicable to the lesson and unit. (17 pts)
14 pts Basic - 2
Instructional goals are generally aligned with given standards (ELA and/or Content standards) that are applicable to the unit. (14 pts)
11 pts Minimal - 1
The relationship between instructional goals and standards is minimal. (11 pts)
30 pts Advanced - 4 A variety of all required text formats and human and technological resources is used for specific lessons within the unit with a focus on grade level instruction AND includes adaptations for above and below grade level instruction. (30 pts)
26 pts Proficient - 3 A variety of all required text formats and human and technological resources is used for specific lessons within the unit with a focus on grade level instruction. (26 pts)
21 pts Basic - 2 Required number of texts are not used, OR instruction is not on grade level OR technological resources not used. (21 pts)
16 pts Minimal - 1 Required number of texts are not used, OR instruction is not on grade level OR technological resources not used (two of three). (16 pts)
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 5/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners. threshold: 3.0 pts
2.2 - ILA Standard 2: Curriculum and Instruction
Candidates use instructional approaches, materials, and an integrated, comprehensive, balanced curriculum to support student learning in reading and writing. Candidates use appropriate and varied instructional approaches, including those that develop word recognition, language comprehension, strategic
--
thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 6/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
knowledge, and reading-writing connections. threshold: 3.0 pts
CAEP A1.1 - Technology
Supporting appropriate applications of technology for their field of specialization threshold: 3.0 pts
--
Integration of created materials
Candidates use appropriate and varied instructional approaches. InTASC 4,7 ILA 2.2
20 pts
4 pts Advanced: The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills
2 pts Basic The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
1 pts Minimal The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
20 pts Advanced - 4 Created activities and handouts are practical, original, creative, and related to all chosen texts and the rigor of the grade- level instructional
17 pts Proficient - 3 Selected activities and handouts are practical, specific, and related to the chosen texts and rigor of the grade- level instructional standards. (17 pts)
14 pts Basic - 2 Selected activities and handouts are specifically listed, but some are not practical or related to the unit or the texts or do not align with the rigor of the grade- level instructional
11 pts Minimal - 1 The relationship between the texts and the activities and handouts is unclear and/or do not align with the instructional standards. (11 pts)
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 7/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
InTASC #4D - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners. threshold: 3.0 pts
--
InTASC #7B-2 - Planning for Instruction (updated)
The teacher draws upon knowledge of content areas, cross-disciplinary skills, learners, the community, and pedagogy to plan instruction that supports
--
standards. (20 pts)
standards. (14 pts)
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 8/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
every student in meeting rigorous learning goals. (The teacher is able to plan instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and curriculum goals.) threshold: 3.0 pts
2. 2B - ILA Standard 2: Curriculum and Instruction
Candidates use instructional approaches, materials, and an integrated, comprehensive, balanced curriculum to support student learning in reading and writing. Candidates use appropriate and varied instructional approaches, including those that develop word recognition, language comprehension, strategic
--
demonstrates academic and professional skills.
of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
reflective thinking.
with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 9/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
knowledge, and reading-writing connections. threshold: 3.0 pts
Integration of created materials
Candidates use appropriate and varied instructional approaches. InTASC 4 ILA 2.2
20 pts
InTASC #4E - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners. threshold: 3.0 pts
--
20 pts Advanced - 4 Activities and handouts are well designed and give thorough directions and explanations for use and incorporate a variety of instructional approaches. (20 pts)
17 pts Proficient - 3 Activities and handouts are well-designed and give directions and explanations for use and incorporate a variety of instructional approaches. (17 pts)
14 pts Basic - 2 Activities and handouts do not give clear direction or do not seem to support the purpose. (14 pts)
11 pts Minimal - 1 Activities and handouts are unclear and seem to lack purpose. (11 pts)
4 pts Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
3 pts Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and
2 pts Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
1 pts Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 10/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
Integration of Literacy Strategies
Candidates develop word recognition, language comprehension, strategic knowledge, and reading-writing connections. ILA 2.2
40 pts
Introductory Phase - BEFORE LEARNING/ READING (Motivation, Prior Knowledge, Content Focus)
The teacher knows how to take contextual considerations (instructional materials, individual student interests, needs, and aptitudes, and community resources) into account in planning instruction that creates an effective bridge
40 pts
professional skills.
40 pts Advanced - 4 Literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration] is clearly evident throughout the unit. (40 pts)
34 pts Proficient - 3 Literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration] is evident throughout most of the unit. (34 pts)
28 pts Basic - 2 The unit exhibits limited literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration]. (28 pts)
22 pts Minimal - 1 Very little integration of literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration] throughout unit. (22 pts)
40 pts Advanced - 4 Extensive and ongoing documentation of gaining attention or motivating students, presenting learner outcomes or relating new information to prior experience or knowledge related to content area focus. (40 pts)
34 pts Proficient - 3 Clear, adequate, and ongoing documentation of gaining attention or motivating students, presenting learner outcomes or relating new information to prior experience or knowledge related to content area focus. (34 pts)
28 pts Basic - 2 Limited and intermittent documentation of gaining attention or motivating students, presenting learner outcomes or relating new information to prior experience or knowledge related to content area focus. (28 pts)
22 pts Minimal - 1 Insufficient documentation of gaining attention or motivating students, presenting learner outcomes or relating new information to prior experience or knowledge related to content area focus. (22 pts)
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 11/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
between curriculum goals and students' experiences.
Developmental Phase - DURING LEARNING / READING (Teacher Input, Skills Development and Integration)
The teacher creates short- range and long- term plans that are linked to student needs and performance, and adapts the plans to ensure and capitalize on student progress and motivation.
40 pts
Developmental Phase DURING & AFTER LEARNING/ READING (Student Response, Feedback,
40 pts
40 pts Advanced - 4
Creative, extensive and ongoing documentation of plans for teacher presentation of content area focus and/or skills development that incorporates literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and technology integration]. (40 pts)
34 pts Proficient - 3
Clear, concise, adequate and ongoing documentation of plans for teacher presentation of content area focus and/or skills development that incorporates literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and technology integration]. (34 pts)
28 pts Basic - 2
Limited and intermittent documentation of plans for teacher presentation of content area focus and/or skills development that incorporates literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and technology integration]. (28 pts)
22 pts Minimal - 1
Insufficient documentation of plans for teacher presentation of content area focus and/or skills development that incorporates literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and technology integration]. (22 pts)
40 pts Advanced - 4
Creative, extensive and ongoing documentation of plans for checking for understanding, providing independent and guided practices,
34 pts Proficient - 3
Clear, concise, adequate and ongoing documentation of plans for checking for understanding, providing independent and guided practices,
28 pts Basic - 2
Limited and intermittent documentation of plans for checking for understanding, providing independent and guided practices or providing
22 pts Minimal - 1
Insufficient documentation of plans for checking for understanding, providing independent and guided practices or providing feedback related
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 12/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
Integration)
The teacher knows when and how to adjust plans based on student responses and other contingencies.
Concluding Phase - AFTER LEARNING / READING (reinforce, clarify, and elaborate)
) The teacher accesses student's thinking and experiences as a basis for instructional activities by, for example, encouraging discussion, listening and responding to group interaction, and eliciting samples of student thinking orally and in writing.
40 pts
and providing feedback related to the content focus and literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration]. (40 pts)
and providing feedback related to content focus and literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration] (34 pts)
feedback related to content focus and literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration] (28 pts)
to content focus and literacy instruction [vocabulary development, reading comprehension, writing to texts, and/or technology integration]. (22 pts)
40 pts Advanced - 4 Creative, extensive and ongoing documentation of provisions for reinforcing lesson focus, clarifying and elaborating ideas and addressing closure throughout the unit related to content focus. (40 pts)
34 pts Proficient - 3 Clear, concise, adequate and ongoing documentation of provisions for clarifying and elaborating ideas and addressing closure related to content focus throughout the unit. (34 pts)
28 pts Basic - 2 Adequate and intermittent documentation of provisions for adequate clarifying and elaborating activities to bring closure throughout the unit. (28 pts)
22 pts Minimal - 1 Insufficient documentation of provisions for adequate closure throughout the unit. (22 pts)
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 13/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
Accommodations
The teacher identifies and designs instruction appropriate to students' stages of development, learning styles, strengths, and needs.
30 pts
Teacher Reflection Defense of Project
Project Candidates display positive dispositions related to their own reading and writing and the teaching of reading and writing and pursue the development of individual professional knowledge and behaviors.
30 pts
APA-Compliant formatting
15 pts
30 pts Advanced - 4
Unit plan provides extensive specific accommodations related to students’ content area and literacy needs. (30 pts)
26 pts Proficient - 3
Unit plan provides adequate, specific accommodations related to students’ content area and literacy needs. (26 pts)
21 pts Basic - 2
Unit plan provides a limited number of specific accommodations related to students’ content area and literacy needs. (21 pts)
0 pts Minimal - 1
Unit plan does not adequately address specific accommodations related to students’ content area and literacy needs. (0 pts)
30 pts Advanced - 4
In-depth response is clearly related to the element addressed by the prompt; multiple examples of specific evidence from the unit is cited to support response; and the explanation of how evidence cited is related to the response is clear, concise and insightful. (30 pts)
26 pts Proficient - 3
Adequate response is clearly related to the element addressed by the prompt; examples of specific evidence from the unit is cited to support response; and explanation of how evidence cited is related to the response is clear and concise. (26 pts)
21 pts Basic - 2
Response is loosely related to the element addressed by the prompt; limited specific evidence from the unit is cited to support response; and/or explanation of how evidence cited is related to the response is limited. (21 pts)
16 pts Minimal - 1
Response is not adequately nor clearly related to the element addressed by the prompt; limited specific evidence from the unit is cited to support response, and/or explanation of how evidence cited is related to the response is minimal. (16 pts)
15 pts Advanced - 4
Consistently follows APA format including title page and citations. There is
13 pts Proficient - 3
Consistently follows APA format including title page and citations. There is
10 pts Basic - 2
Limited (3-5) errors in APA format including title page, citations, or
8 pts Minimal - 1
More than 5 APA errors in format including title page, citations, or
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 14/15
Criteria Ratings Pts
Mechanics
15 pts
Total Points: 400
a properly formatted and accurate references page (NO errors) (15 pts)
a properly formatted and accurate references page (1-2 MINOR errors). (13 pts)
references page. (10 pts)
references page. (8 pts)
15 pts Advanced - 4 The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS. (15 pts)
13 pts Proficient - 3 The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (1-2 MINOR errors). (13 pts)
10 pts Basic - 2 The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (3-5 errors). (10 pts)
8 pts Minimal - 1 The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (More than 5 errors). (8 pts)
6/9/25, 11:47 PM Unit 7: Final Project
https://belhaven.instructure.com/courses/46283/assignments/875161 15/15
