Unit5IndividualAssignmentRatioAnalysis.docx
Unit 5: Individual Assignment – Ratio Analysis
Introduction
In units 2 and 3 you worked on ratio calculations and received feedback on these assignments. In this unit, you will provide a brief written analysis of the ratios for Mastercard. Evaluation should be submitted in an MS Word document of at least 2 pages and no more than three pages and be concise, clear and professional.
Directions
Evaluation of Mastercard should include:
1. A discussion of the ratios calculated in relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories (profitability, liquidity, leverage, operating returns).
2. Discuss the importance of the ratio in financial analysis.
3. Other information pertinent to Mastercard which could affect their future performance and stock price.
Week 2 Review
Your work was good. You have placed your ratio calculations in the PayPal Financial MS Excel on the Ratios sheet for 2013 -2015. You have provided the formula used to calculate each ratio in the column to the right of your calculations. Your work was clear and complete.
Mitchell Miller , Jan 24 at 8:38am
Week 3 Review
Your work was good. You have placed your ratio calculations in the MS Excel table template for Mastercard for 2017 -2019. You have provided the formula used to calculate each ratio in the column to the right of your calculations. Your work was clear and complete.
Mitchell Miller , Feb 6 at 2:31pm
Research Project - Ratio Analysis
|
Research Project - Ratio Analysis
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Evaluation
|
|
25 to >22.5 pts
Excellent
Demonstrate critical thinking in the discussion of ratios in relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Evaluate the ratios of the selected company in an organized manner. Present other information pertinent to the corporation that could affect its future performance and stock price. Professional writing which is free of grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates a professional style.
|
22.5 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Demonstrate critical thinking in the discussion of ratios in relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Evaluate the ratios of the selected company in an organized manner. Some errors present in reasoning in analysis. Present other information pertinent to the corporation that could affect its future performance and stock price. Professional writing which has minor grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. The style of writing demonstrates a professional style.
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Below Expectations
Limited discussion of ratios with some relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Evaluate the ratios of the selected company in a somewhat organized manner. Does not present other information pertinent to the corporation that could affect its future performance and stock price. Make a recommendation regarding the future of this corporation. Recommendation is not supported by calculations. Professional writing which has grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors.
|
18 to >0 pts
Insufficient
Missing or incomplete discussion of ratios with little relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Evaluation of some ratios of the company, but not well organized manner. Does not present other information pertinent to the corporation that could affect its future performance and stock price. Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication.
|
|
|
Rymario1
