PLAGIARISM FREE "A" PLUS WORK

1

Adolescent Diversion Project (Michigan State University)

2

Adolescent Diversion project is a combination of staff from the Ingham County

(Michigan) Juvenile Court, community members, and Michigan State University. These various

bodies came together in 1976 to develop a bit cheaper alternative to the official dispensation of

teenagers in retort to an increase in adolescent delinquency and a requisite for cheaper options to

the prescribed dispensation of teenagers in the state. The Adolescent Diversion Initiative is based

on strength and is headed by a university project that diverts teenagers aged 13-15 of all races

and genders from prescribed dispensation in the adolescent fairness scheme and aids the public

(Mackin, et al 2019).

Objectives of the Program

Adolescent Diversion project is an initiative based on strengths, led by the university

effort that averts detained youths from recognized juvenile justice system dispensation and

instead places them in a program that provides them with community-based help. Our mission is

to inhibit imminent felonies by firming adolescence' relationships to their families and other

prosocial persons, enhancing kids' access to community services, and preventing adolescents

from being exposed to potentially stigmatizing social settings (Mackin, et al 2019). The ADP is

based on a variety of combined theoretical ideas (such as the juvenile justice system).

Theoretical Framework

Adolescent Diversion project is based on three perspectives: bonding and social control,

the theory of social learning, and societal regulatory or social control theories. Among the views

is the formation of bonds and the exercise of social control. The idea of societal control claims

that, for one to prevent delinquent behavior, it is necessary to create social relationships with

other people. According to the social learning theory of delinquency, delinquency is learned via

the actions of family members, peers, and other adults. When a juvenile's behavior is categorized

3

as delinquent, according to the idea of social interactions, other social contacts occur that either

inadvertently or intentionally label the juvenile as delinquent, thereby perpetuating the cycle

(Farrell, et al 2018). The University of New Hampshire's psychology department oversees the

Teenage Diversion Project, a federally funded program.

Graduate psychology students engage in a course taking two semesters to get the

required skills in diversionary work and to perform eight hours per week of civic structure

counseling in the community as part of their degree requirements. Students and volunteers are

exposed to extensive monitoring for the following eighteen weeks while working with children

who have been referred by the Admission Split of the adolescent justice system throughout their

eight-week training in specialized behavioral strategies and advocacy (Farrell, et al 2018).

Personnel in Positions of Power

The Michigan State University Department of Psychology oversees the administration of

the Adolescent Diversion project. Undergraduate psychology students learn about diversionary

labor and spend eight hours a week in a systematic community mentoring program over the two-

semester course. Student volunteers who work with children in the admission Section of the

Ingham County Juvenile Court are given eight weeks of training in behavioral therapy and

support techniques, trailed by intense surveillance of 18 weeks (Gearing, et al 2017).

Program-related activities

Juvenile court processes may be replaced with a program focused on the capabilities of

those involved. The caseworkers (student volunteers) interact with the youngsters in their

families, schools, and localities for six to eight hours a week throughout the 18-week therapy.

Caseworkers visit with adolescents one-on-one to evaluate their needs to tailor programs to fit

their specific needs. Teenagers' skills in a range of areas, including family relationships,

4

academic obstacles, and employment opportunities, are all addressed by caseworkers (Gearing,

et al 2017). As an example, juveniles are taught about local resources by youth caseworkers so

that they may utilize them when the course is completed.

Throughout this phase, designated as the lively segment, case personnel devotes much

stretch with youngsters on a weekly basis, helping them with behavioral management and

voluntary work as required as they go through the first 12 weeks. It is during this phase that case

workforces devote a short while every week giving the same sorts of help to adolescents, but

their position evolves from counselor to consultant, preparing them to employ the skills and

tactics they have acquired after the course is completed.

Cost of Adolescent Diversion project

For an 18-week intervention period, the Teenager Diversion Project (ADP), which

includes overhead and administrative expenses, costs about $1,020.83 per adolescent. On the

other hand, a local juvenile court spent an average of $13,466 on each child they served. Every

year, Adolescent Diversion project serves 144 teenagers and serves 375 juveniles in the county's

juvenile court system. As opposed to conventional juvenile court, serving 144 children in

Adolescent Diversion project saved about $1,799,104 per year in terms of expenditures (Aos, et

al 2018).

At-risk youth are diverted from the juvenile court system and connected with community-

based support via this university-led project. The program's efficacy has been established.

Members of the course had lesser degrees of formal crime than those in the control group,

statistically speaking. There was an evident statistically noteworthy alteration in self-reported

felony between the two groups.

5

The FDA has awarded this program a satisfactory grade founded on indications from at

least one high-quality randomized controlled study. Based on either 1(a single study performed

in many areas, or 2) two or three studies conducted in separate locations, this program's rating is

determined. You may learn more about the technique that we use to identify multisite sites.

Faculty and students at the University were required to broaden their duties to include

real engagement and presence in the community, participation in a "peer-to-peer" connection

rather than an "expert-client" one, and, most crucially, patience. These are distinct from the role

behaviors expected of a regular faculty member. The community partners were also required to

adopt new role behaviors, such as making decisions based on scientifically sound best practice

rather than based on personal experience, sharing resources with an academic institution that had

previously been deemed "untrustworthy," and allowing students to participate in professional

roles (Aos, et al 2018). They, too, had to develop a sense of patience for the "slow pace of

scientific discovery." The cooperation was only effective because of these key factors. Because

such unique relationships will not be formed and maintained in a brief period, it is critical to be

systematic and persistent in your pursuit of these alliances. There were several lessons to be

learned at the level of the program model.

When it comes to juvenile offenders, the findings of the study clearly highlighted the

concepts that should guide optimal practices in intervention. A considerable reduction in

recidivism and improvement in academic achievement may be achieved by the implementation

of intensive, time-restricted, one-on-one, and model-specific treatments. To make things even

more complicated, initiative-taking training and monitoring of intervention actions are required

to get reliable outcomes. In conclusion, initiative-taking intervention strategies in addressing

crucial life domains of kids (e.g., family, school, peers, and work) are vital to achieving positive

6

prosocial outcomes. There are several concepts that have evolved at the level of innovation

sustainability. A critical component is the inclusion of technologies that will provide

scientifically valid information on outcomes and costs (Wang, et al 2019). In today's financially

constrained environment, having clear and unambiguous information is a significant advantage

in the battle for continuous financing.

It is equally critical that the Adolescent Diversion project include considerations for long-

term viability and distribution from the beginning. If this had not been included in the original

plan, it would have been far more difficult to continue operations once the government funds had

expired. Finally, it is vital to include key stakeholders in developing the innovation strategy from

the beginning. It was easier to achieve long-term success since the Adolescent Diversion project

included important community stakeholders (judiciary, employees, community members, county

commissioners) (Wang, et al 2019). Finally, I support this juvenile justice program since it has a

beneficial influence on the youngsters, as seen by their continued attendance at school and

absence from problems and assisting the community in saving money and remaining safer.

References

7

Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (2018). The comparative costs and benefits of

programs to reduce crime: A review of research findings with implications for

Washington State. Costs and benefits of preventing crime, 149-175.

https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429501265-6/comparative-

costs-benefits-programs-reduce-crime-steve-aos-polly-phipps-robert-barnoski-roxanne-

lieb

Farrell, J., Betsinger, A., & Hammond, P. (2018). Best practices in youth diversion. The Institute

for Innovation & Implementation. Retrieved https://theinstitute. umaryland.

edu/media/ssw/institute/md-center-documents/Youth-Diversion-Literature-Review. pdf.

https://theinstitute.umaryland.edu/media/ssw/institute/md-center-documents/Youth-

Diversion-Literature-Review.pdf

Gearing, R. E., Schwalbe, C. S., MacKenzie, M. J., Ibrahim, R. W., Bushnaq, S., & Brewer, K.

B. (2017). C-FIT adolescent diversion program: A behavioral intervention pilot test for

delinquent offenders. International Social Work, 60(5), 1111-1125.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0020872817695397?casa_token=Ai3jRQi

ZkHcAAAAA%3A81PEQ-H9_Gf_yQ-F1fIc7-

SwEUdOF5o6wGXrEMvNxAchCm9zAuyPln-vsTZ_nNIHDDE3L3GeGJUFLhU

Mackin, J. R., Eby, K. K., Scofield, M. G. E., & Davidson II, W. S. (2019). Integrating the ivory

tower and the community: The adolescent diversion project. In Teaching about

Adolescence an Ecological Approach (pp. 167-186). Routledge.

https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315861500-12/integrating-

ivory-tower-community-juliette-mackin-kimberly-eby-melody-embree-scofield-william-

davidson-ii

8

Wang, Y., Liang, J., Yang, J., Ma, X., Li, X., Wu, J., ... & Feng, Y. (2019). Analysis of the

environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and

management: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection

motivation theory. Journal of environmental management, 237, 15-23.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030147971930221X