Ethics comparison chart

profilesus3848
Unit3_Assignment_HarshalPatel.docx

3

The Ethical Theories Comparison Chart

Harshal Patel

Purdue Global

February 23rd, 2021

Utilitarianism

Ethical Egoism

Ethics of Care

Kantianism

Prima Facie Duties

Divine Command Theory

Virtue Theory

How is “good” Determined

Basically a form of consequentialism in that it tests on the idea that it is the consequences or results of actions, policies and laws.

Based on the ideology that, it is morally upright to promote one’s own good.

The general obligation to a stranger is limited.

Moral worth is recognized if one is motivated by morality.

Based on the first impression or appearance.

Based on the idea that right morality action is as God commands.

Bases individual’s ethical behaviours on common sense rather than on the rules set.

Most Noted Philosopher(s)

Jeremy Bentham

(Britannica.com, 2021)

Ayn Rand and Max Stirner

Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings.

Immanuel Kant

David Ross

St Augustine and William of Ockham.

Aristotle and Plato. (Bai, 2020)

Major Strengths

Focuses on consequences of action hence is pragmatic.

Higher chances of self-improvement.

Humanizes ethics making it real instead of just cold rules.

Morality is straightforward and applies to everyone.

It provides for doing well when not even asked to.

System is clear and so straightforward.

Major Weaknesses

Aims at predicting consequences of action which impossible.

Caring for others is rejected even for their own sake.

It threatens to devolve into tribalism.

Considers what actions are good but not the right thing in situations.

Some actions bringing happiness may not be right.

Views to slavery and homosexual behaviour are somehow negative.

References Bai, F. H. (2020). Does virtue lead to status?Testing the moral virtue theory of status attainment. Journal of personality and socialsocial psychology,. Britannica.com. (2021, February 12). Retrieved from www.britannica.com: https://www.britannica.com/