medical term discussion

profileAayuska
Unit2DiscussionBoardgradingrubric.pdf

Unit 2 Discussion Board

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Terms with common root and word deconstruction

25 pts Meets or Exceeds Expectations Provides a root and three medical terms using that root. Deconstructs each medical term, giving the definition of each word part (prefix, root, suffix), as appropriate. Response is clear and organized. Work is original and is not a copy of examples provided or a copy of work from another source.

13 pts Developing Performance Some parts of the three new medical terms or deconstruction are missing or incorrect.

0 pts Unacceptable Performance Does not provide response or response is off target. OR Work is NOT original and is a copy of examples provided or a copy of work from another source.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Definitions

25 pts Meets or Exceeds Expected Performance Provides detailed and accurate definition of each new medical term. Work is original and is not a copy of examples provided or a copy of work from another source.

13 pts Developing Performance Definitions of three medical terms are not clear and accurate or some are missing.

0 pts Unacceptable Performance Does not provide response or response is off target. OR Work is NOT original and is a copy of examples provided or a copy of work from another source.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sentences

25 pts Meets or Exceeds Expected Performance Provides sentences using of each of the three medical terms that make the meaning of the term clear from the context of the sentence. Uses proper English grammar, complete sentences, and correct spelling and punctuation. Work is original and is not a copy of examples provided or a copy of work from another source.

13 pts Developing Performance Makes comments to the question or task that are generally on target. Some items may be incorrect or missing. For example, the meanings of all of the terms are not clear from the context in the sentence. OR The sentences do not use proper English grammar, are not complete sentences or do not use correct spelling and punctuation.

0 pts Unacceptable Performance Does not provide response or response is off target. For example, sentences are provided, but terms are used incorrectly. OR Work is NOT original and is a copy of examples provided or a copy of work from another source.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Replies

25 pts Meets or Exceeds Expected Performance Replies with substantive and well informed comments or feedback to at least 2 colleagues. Addresses the person by name, restates their three terms, and explains how understanding these terms will be helpful to you in the future.

13 pts Developing Performance Replies with substantive and generally well informed comments or feedback to one colleague. OR Replies to 2 colleagues with comments that are missing one of the required parts: Addresses the person by name, restates their three terms, and explains how understanding these terms will be helpful to you in the future.

0 pts Unacceptable Performance Does not reply to colleagues OR Provides minimal replies to colleagues that do not include 2 of the required parts: Addresses the person by name, restates their three terms, and explains how understanding these terms will be helpful to you in the future.

25 pts

Total Points: 100