Unit I ScholarlyActivity DiversitySelf-Assessment
Running head: DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENT 1
Diversity Self-Assessment
Name : Nicole Samuels
Waldorf University
Commented [DJ1]: remove
Running head: DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENT 2
My Diversity Wheel
Name: Click here to enter text.
Source: Cañas & Sondak (2014)
Age(26
years)
Ethnicity (African)
Gender
(male)
Race(
Black
American)
physical ability (flexible)
Height
(1.75m)
M il
it a ry
e x p
e ri
e n c e (
n o
Religious
belief(
Christian)
E d u c a tio
n (
G ra
d u a te
)
Disability
(No
disability)
Work
experience(5
years)
sexual orientation
(Heterosexual )
Primary Dimensions Secondary Dimensions
Commented [DJ2]: remove the words “Running head”, it only goes on the first page
Commented [DJ3]: your name goes here
Commented [DJ4]: should be able to see all of the information in the wheel, if not change font size.
Commented [DJ5]: all blocks should be filled in
Running head: DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENT 3
Identity Self-Assessment
1. Discuss your identity or self-concept. Evaluate how each of the primary
dimensions you listed in “My Diversity Wheel” contributes to your overall self-concept. As
you completed the “My Diversity Wheel” exercise, what did you learn about your self-
concept?
I am a young man who recently attained the age of 26 years. I was born in the United
States in New York State to a White American mother and an African mother with her roots
from Ghana. I am a very social person who likes interacting with various people and this
behavior is very common with all African-American individuals. Even after meeting with new
people in social places such as in wedding ceremonies, church functions as well as graduation
functions, I freely interact with them and make a lot of friends. In addition to that, physically, I
am a well-built man with a lot of physical flexibility which makes me a good rugby player. In
sexual orientation wise, I am a heterosexual man who is always attracted to the opposite sex.
2. How does your self-concept influence your experiences in team and organization
settings? Specifically, how does your self-concept shape the way you relate with others?
How does your identity influence the way others relate with you? Give specific examples,
incorporating your primary and/or secondary dimensions of diversity into your discussion.
Been a social person, I am a good team player who likes working with other people in
various groups. Organizations are mostly working as groups where employees are grouped in
teams and assigned specific duties and responsibilities. My three years of working experience
makes me a good leader who can easily and positively influence the people in an organization.
Been a single man who has not yet gotten married, I find a lot of time to interact with people and
Commented [DJ6]: header
Commented [DJ7]: questions do not go in a paper just answer them and use the level head, such as you did.
Commented [DJ8]: Remove, where is the level heading?
Running head: DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENT 4
also undertake my duties in the organization. In the team, I might be assigned extra work than
other teammates who have family responsibilities and commitments. Been a social person, many
people are free to interact with me.
Good Christian background helps me shape my personal and professional behaviors. I am
a strong believer in fairness, honesty, and commitment. These qualities make me stand out
among other workers in the organization and also make me effectively relate to them. They help
me fight against a lot of unethical issues such as corruption, discrimination, and harassment in
workplace settings.
3. Describe a group within your organization or your community (either face-to-face
or virtual) which you are closely affiliated with. Using the Diversity Wheel, discuss the
primary or secondary dimensions that this group has in common. For which dimensions
are people within the group different or diverse? What draws you to affiliate with this
group?
The ‘Care for the Homeless Group’ is a community-based organization that its main aim is to
make assist the homeless within the community. It provides the poor and street families with
food, shelter, and clothes. The group is made up of both males and females graduates from
various institutions. Another factor that is common with the group is that its members are all
Christians who are less than 30 years and most of them are African-American individuals. All
members also come from New York City. These qualities suit me and therefore make me a
complete member of the group. However, the group has some dimensions that are diverse as it is
made up of the people who are of different work backgrounds, class, gender and marital status.
Commented [DJ9]: Header
Commented [DJ10]: above
Commented [DJ11]: indent
Commented [DJ12]: remove
Commented [DJ13]: above
Running head: DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENT 5
The group is one of the best groups that I have ever been a member of. The members’ oneness
and unity make it achieve most of its goals and objectives (Caña & Sondak, 2014).
4. Why is evaluating your self-concept important for understanding diversity and
inclusion?
My self-concept evaluation is very crucial for understanding diversity and inclusion.
Diversity and inclusion are part and parcel of every human being. People usually interact and
come across other people from different places and with varying concepts, qualities, and
characteristics. In that view, self-concept evaluation is ideal as it helps me understand that people
are different and their differences and diversity should be respected and valued (Harrison, 2011).
It also helps me make sure that I learn to interact and make new friends from different parts of
the world.
Commented [DJ14]: header
Commented [DJ15]: spacing
Commented [DJ16]: level heading
Commented [DJ17]: source date should be within 5 years, see the Announcement.
Commented [DJ18]: Where is the conclusion, every paper must have one, see the Announcement?
Running head: DIVERSITY SELF-ASSESSMENT 6
References
Cañas, K. A., & Sondak, H. (2014). Opportunities and challenges of workplace diversity:
Theory, cases, and exercises. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harrison, C. (2011). Re-thinking Assesment Philosophy and Practice Peer- and Self-assessment.
Commented [DJ19]: header
Commented [DJ20]: lowercase
Commented [DJ21]: spelling
Commented [DJ22]: lowercase
Commented [DJ23]: above
Commented [DJ24]: above
Commented [DJ25]: above
Commented [DJ26]: Retrieved from where?