Paraphrasing of paper
College of Banking and Financial Studies
Assignment Brief – BTEC
Higher National Diploma in Business (Level 5)
Assignment
|
Submission Format: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. The submission is in the form of an individual written report and individual presentation. This should be written in a concise, formal business style using single spacing and font size 12. 2. You are required to make use of headings, paragraphs and subsections as appropriate, and all work must be supported with research and referenced using the Harvard referencing system. 3. Please provide a bibliography using Harvard referencing system if you referred any sources for theoretical parts or questions. 4. The report and presentation must be submitted to Turnitin. Report in word document format and presentation in PPT slides. 5. The total word count (excluding bibliography) of the report should be around 5,000 words, but you will not be penalised for exceeding the word limit. 6. A Power point presentation with speaker notes to be submitted along with the report. Keep the number of slides in your presentation to a maximum of 15. 7. The file must be saved in the format: student ID-RP-Formative-A1, for formative submission and student ID-RP-Summative-A1, for summative assignment. 8. PPT to be saved in the format: student ID-RP-PPT-Summative 9. In case of extenuating situations, the relevant college policies apply
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unit Learning Outcomes: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
LO1: Examine appropriate research methodologies and approaches as part of the research process LO2: Conduct and analyze research relevant for a business research project.
LO3: Communicate the outcomes of a research project to identified stakeholders.
LO4: Reflect on the application of research methodologies and concepts. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assignment Brief and Guidance:
Scenario:
· the role of line managers and leaders in employee development and well-being; · talent management being used as a lever for culture change; · the importance of contextualising approaches to talent management; · the need for new and innovative ways of working to achieve a strategic approach to talent management; · barriers for the development of a strategic approach caused by economic and day-to-day operational pressures.
Staff retention, training and morale is key in any industry where talented motivated employees can help differentiate one organisation from another and influence business success. An increasing number of businesses are rethinking ways to get the most from their staff. Rising costs, recruitment difficulties and changing employee attitudes mean that, for many employers, the traditional approaches to recruiting, training and retaining staff are being revisited to harness and develop talent and ultimately drive competitive advantage.
Assume that you are a Senior Researcher working in public limited company in Oman. Your job involves collecting data and information and undertaking policy research. Using the above scenario, you are requested to conduct a research project addressing the importance of contextualising approaches to talent management in workplace. The range of topics discussed could cover the following:
· Talent management as a strategic priority · The role of talent management frameworks and future implications within organisations · Effective talent management strategies for successful organisations · The impact of talent management on the role HR · Talent management for entrepreneurs and small businesses · Best practices in global talent management within multinationals.
Your research and the report should:
a) Critically evaluate research methodologies and processes in application to a business research project to justify chosen research methods and analysis. b) Communicate critical analysis of the outcomes and make valid, justified recommendations. c) Demonstrate critical reflection and insight that results in recommended actions for improvements and future research considerations.
NOTE: Apart from submitting the report, you need also to submit the presentation slides with speaker notes, the preliminary research proposal, the ethics form, along with the supervisor logbook.
(Source: Pearson BTEC Higher National qualifications in Business Pearson-set Theme Release 1st September 2020 to 31st August 2021)
Recommended Resources
Research:
1. COSTLEY, C., ELLIOT, G. and GIBBS, P. (2010) Doing Work Based Research: Approaches to Enquiry for Insider-researchers. London: SAGE. 2. Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2013). The Business case for equality and diversity: A survey of the academic literature. BIS occasional paper No 4. Retrieved from https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/other/the-business-case-for-equality-and-diversity 3. FLICK, U. (2011) Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing a Research Project. London: SAGE. 4. SAUNDERS, M., LEWIS, P. and THORNHILL, A. (2012) Research methods for Business Students. 6th Ed. Harlow: Pearson.
Talent Management:
1. BhanupriyaGidwani and Tariq Aziz (2012), “Talent Transition Strategies for Departing Employees”, International Journal of Management Research, 2(1), pp.23-27. 2. Chris Smith Selby, Maria Daskalaki, Tony Elger and Donna Brown (2008), “Labour turnover and management retention strategies in new manufacturing plants”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), pp. 395-416 3. DeisiPatriota (2000), “The employee recognition and reward programme can generate significant revenues and profit”, Employee Retention- Recognition Council, 35(5), pp. 103-105 4. Dmitry Kucherov and Elena Zavyalova (2012), “Human Resource Development Practices and Talent Management in the Companies with the Employer Brand”, European Journal of Training and Development, 36(2), pp.84-89 5. E. P. Sheehan(2001)’, “Affective responses to Employee Turnover”, Journal of Social Psychology, 135: p 63-69 6. Gakovic, Anika and Keith Yardley (2007), Global Talent Management at HSBC”. Organization Development Journal, 25(2), pp.201-205 7. Guer, Solari and Luca (2012), “Talent Management Practices in Italy – Implications for Human Resource Development”, International Journal of Human Resource Development, 15(1), pp.25-41
Journals
· International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research. · Qualitative Research Journal.
Grading Criteria
Students - PLEASE READ THIS PAGE CAREFULLY TO ENSURE YOU COVER WHAT IS REQUIRED TO SATISFY THE GRADE
|
1
Learner Assessment Submission and Declaration
When submitting evidence for assessment, each learner must sign a declaration confirming that the work is their own.
Please list the evidence submitted for each task. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found or describe the nature of the evidence (e.g. video, illustration).
|
Task ref. |
Evidence submitted |
Page numbers or Description |
|
LO1 |
|
|
|
LO2 |
|
|
|
LO3 |
|
|
|
LO4 |
|
|
|
Additional comments to the Assessor:
|
|
Learner declaration
I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.
Learner signature: Date:
|
|
ASSESSMENT RECORD SHEET – FORMATIVE FEEDBACK |
|||
|
Programme |
BTEC HND BUSINESS LEVEL 5 |
Learner name |
|
|
Assignment title |
Approaches and Application of Talent Management |
Assessor name |
Dr. Binu James / Dr. Vidya Suresh/ Dr. Omer Ali |
|
Unit no. & title |
Unit 11: Research Project (R/508/0522) |
Targeted learning aims/assessment criteria |
LO1, LO2, LO3 and LO4 |
|
First Submission |
|||
|
Deadline |
Refer Turnitin
|
Date submitted |
|
|
Targeted criteria |
Criteria achieved |
Assessment comments |
|
|
P1 |
|
|
|
|
P2 |
|
|
|
|
P3 |
|
|
|
|
P4 |
|
|
|
|
P5 |
|
|
|
|
P6 |
|
|
|
|
P7 |
|
|
|
|
M1 |
|
|
|
|
M2 |
|
|
|
|
M3 |
|
|
|
|
M4 |
|
|
|
|
D1 |
|
|
|
|
D2 |
|
|
|
|
D3 |
|
|
|
|
General comments |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Assessor declaration |
I certify that the evidence submitted for this assignment is the learner’s own. The learner has clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice. |
||
|
Assessor signature |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Date of feedback to learner |
|
|
|
Resubmission authorisation by Lead Internal Verifier* |
|
Date |
|
|
* All resubmissions must be authorised by the Lead Internal Verifier. Only one resubmission is possible per assignment, providing: · The learner has met initial deadlines set in the assignment, or has met an agreed deadline extension. · The tutor considers that the learner will be able to provide improved evidence without further guidance. · Evidence submitted for assessment has been authenticated and accompanied by a signed and dated declaration of authenticity by the learner. **Any resubmission evidence must be submitted within 15 working days of receipt of results of assessment.
|
|
ASSESSMENT RECORD SHEET - RESUBMISSION – SUMMATIVE FEEDBACK |
|||
|
Deadline |
|
Date submitted |
|
|
Targeted criteria |
Criteria achieved |
Assessment comments |
|
|
P1 |
|
|
|
|
P2 |
|
|
|
|
P3 |
|
|
|
|
P4 |
|
|
|
|
P5 |
|
|
|
|
P6 |
|
|
|
|
P7 |
|
|
|
|
M1 |
|
|
|
|
M2 |
|
|
|
|
M3 |
|
|
|
|
M4 |
|
|
|
|
D1 |
|
|
|
|
D2 |
|
|
|
|
D3 |
|
|
|
|
General comments |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Learner Declaration |
I certify that the evidence submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice. |
||
|
Learner signature |
|
Date |
|
|
Assessor declaration |
I certify that the evidence submitted for this assignment is the learner’s own. The learner has clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice. |
||
|
Assessor signature |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Date of feedback to learner |
|
Supervisor Logbook
Name: Student ID:
Project Title:
Date:
Update on weekly research/tasks achieved
Any risks and/or issues identified?
Problems encountered
Tasks planned for next contact
Project plan status to date
(on, ahead, behind)
Supervisor comments to address
Supervisor Name: Signature: