Strategic Staffing Third Edition
Chapter 13
Staffing System
Evaluation and
Technology
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
• Describe the effects staffing activities have on applicants,
new hires, and organizations.
• Explain the different types of staffing metrics and how each
is best used.
• Describe a balanced staffing scorecard.
• Explain how digital staffing dashboards can help managers
monitor and improve the staffing process.
• Describe how staffing technology can improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the staffing function.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Strategic Staffing Outcomes
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Direct and Indirect Costs
Direct costs: charges incurred as an immediate result of
some staffing activity (e.g., higher training costs, lower
productivity)
Indirect costs: not directly attributable to staffing activities
(e.g., lost business opportunities, lower morale)
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Staffing System Evaluation
• Staffing evaluation: the analysis of a staffing system to
determine its performance and effectiveness.
• Evaluating a staffing system allows us to objectively identify
which staffing activities are related to business strategy execution
and company performance, assess how well different staffing
initiatives are working, and improve the staffing system based on
what is learned.
• Competitive advantage can be created through staffing by
identifying the staffing activities that drive business success and
strategy execution, evaluating them, and improving them.
• Measurement occurs at a single point in time, and isn’t as useful
as is tracking and making comparisons over time.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Key performance indicators: measurable factors critical to the
firm’s success and long- and short-term goals that can help
understand, track, and improve organizational performance and
the bottom line.
• KPIs are the outcomes against which the effectiveness of the staffing
system is evaluated.
To design effective KPIs, it is essential to understand what is
important to the business and what key business measures exist.
The KPIs that promote and lead to organizational success are
those best able to enhance strategy execution and organizational
performance, such as financial outcome measures (e.g., revenue
growth) and strategy execution and performance drivers (e.g.,
customer satisfaction, innovation, and globalization).
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Leading and Lagging Indicators (1 of 2)
Lagging indicator: information that is available only after
staffing decisions have been made.
Leading indicator: information that precedes or predicts
staffing outcomes.
Some indicators can be both leading and lagging indicators.
• For example, while the availability of talent is generally thought of
as a leading indicator of the quality of hire (the larger the talent
pool, the more likely you are to hire more qualified people), it can
also be a lagging indicator of a company’s employer image.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Leading and Lagging Indicators (2 of 2)
Table 13-1 Leading and Lagging Staffing Indicators
Staffing Indicator Outcome(s)
Leading Indicators Blank
Employer image Application rates, applicant quality, new hire quality, staffing ROI
Applicant quality Time to fill, new hire quality, turnover, the satisfaction of hiring
managers, leadership skills in an organization, staffing ROI
Applicant quantity Ability to hire, quality of hire, time to fill, hiring manager
satisfaction
Lagging Indicators Blank
Employer image Poor hiring decisions, poor staffing process, poor recruiting
Turnover Poor hiring decisions, poor sourcing, poor recruiting
Job success Poor planning, sourcing, recruiting, and selection
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Long- and Short-term Metrics
Short-term metrics help to evaluate the success of a staffing system in terms
of recruiting and new hire outcomes and include:
• Percentages of hires for each job or job family coming from each recruiting source
(e.g., college hiring, employee referrals, job fairs, newspaper advertisements,
Internet advertisements, etc.)
• Number of high-quality new hires coming from each recruiting source and recruiter
• Number of diverse hires coming from each recruiting source and recruiter
• Average time-to-start (by position, source, and recruiter)
• Average time-to-contribution (by position, source, and recruiter)
Long-term metrics help to evaluate the success of a staffing system in terms
of outcomes that take place some time after hire and include:
• Job success by recruiting source and by recruiter
• Employee tenure by recruiting source and by recruiter
• Promotion rates by recruiting source and by recruiter
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Staffing Efficiency Metrics (1 of 3)
Staffing efficiency: the amount of resources used in the
staffing process.
• Hiring costs include sourcing, recruiting, screening, and hiring costs
including referral bonuses, travel expenses, advertisements, candidate
assessments, meals, transportation, and testing including drug tests
and background checks.
• Replacement costs include hiring costs as well as the productivity
loss while the position is unfilled. Reducing time-to-fill and improving
socialization and onboarding can reduce replacement costs.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Staffing Efficiency Metrics (2 of 3)
Staffing effectiveness: how well the staffing process meets
stakeholder needs and contributes to strategy execution and
organizational performance.
• Help answer questions such as, “Is the number and caliber of finalists
being sent to hiring managers meeting their needs?” “Is the hiring
experience and speed acceptable to candidates?”
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Staffing Efficiency Metrics (3 of 3)
• Job success
• Quality of hire
• Retention rates
• Voluntary turnover rate of top performers
• Voluntary turnover rate of bottom performers
• Value of top performers
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Return on Investment
• When using metrics and evaluating staffing activities, it can
be easy to focus on staffing efficiency and lose sight of
staffing effectiveness.
• A balance must be struck between staffing efficiency and
staffing effectiveness.
• ROI can be calculated for a firm’s investment in individual
staffing activities, such as the ROI of different recruiting
sources or assessment methods, or for the staffing system
as a whole.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Six Sigma (1 of 5)
• Six Sigma: a data-driven quality initiative and
methodology that uses statistical analysis to measure and
improve business processes and their outcomes to near
perfection
• Six Sigma can be used to improve a variety of staffing
outcomes, such as:
‒ Lowering turnover among high performers
‒ Improving applicant quality
‒ Improving new hire fit with corporate culture
‒ Reducing time-to-fill
‒ Increasing the return on the company’s staffing investment
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Six Sigma (2 of 5)
• Six Sigma methodology begins with a process map that defines
and graphically maps out the process to be improved.
• The process map represents the entire process, and is helpful in
identifying important metrics for analysis.
• After identifying the source of any defects, an improvement
program is created to remove the cause of the defects.
• To improve the quality of a staffing process, each step of the
process must maximize the probability that the selected
candidate meets the hiring manager’s expectations by
maximizing the chances that unqualified candidates are
screened out at each step, and enhancing candidates’ interest
in the job and in the organization as an employer.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Six Sigma (3 of 5)
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Six Sigma (4 of 5)
For existing internal processes, use DMAIC (Define,
Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control)
• Define the problem: reduce unwanted turnover among high
performers.
• Measure: identify key measurements underlying turnover.
• Analyze: understand key factors and trends that create
turnover.
• Improve: identify and execute a plan to address those factors.
• Control: implement controls to lower turnover on an ongoing
basis.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Six Sigma (5 of 5)
To create new processes, use DMADV (Define, Measure,
Analyze, Design, and Verify)
• Define project goals and customer deliverables, such as
improved new-hire quality
• Measure: determine hiring manager needs
• Analyze the process of sourcing, recruiting, screening, and
making job offers
• Design the staffing process to screen out undesirable
candidates and maximize new-hire quality
• Verify the performance of the process and its ability to meet
hiring manager needs
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Balanced Staffing Scorecard (1 of 3)
Balanced scorecard: a tool for managing employees’ performance
and for aligning all employees with key business objectives by
assigning financial and non-financial goals and monitoring and
assessing performance
Balanced scorecards help organizations to:
• Compare performance within the organization
• Track trend performance within the organization
• Benchmark the organization against other organizations
• Identify best performers in the company and its best practices
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Balanced Staffing Scorecard (2 of 3)
• Balanced staffing scorecard: contains objectives, targets, and
initiatives for each activity that adds value to the staffing process.
• The company’s goals and strategies should guide scorecard
development, with most measures focusing on value creation and
staffing effectiveness and a smaller number addressing staffing
efficiency and cost control.
• The choice of scorecard criteria can be based on company strategy and
goals, anticipated challenges such as a tightening labor market or
changing workforce demographics, current problems such as difficulty
staffing key leadership positions, and practical reasons such as ease of
communication to hiring managers.
• When choosing what to include on a staffing scorecard, be sure to
consider the company’s talent philosophy, and HR strategy. Set clear
and consistent goals, and carefully balance cost, time, quality, and
customer satisfaction.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Balanced Staffing Scorecard (3 of 3)
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Staffing Evaluation Process
Identify a problem area and assess how to measure and improve it.
The metrics you use shouldn’t be too complex or numerous to understand or
explain to others.
It is often a good idea to implement a staffing evaluation program incrementally,
rather than taking on the entire staffing system at once.
• Evaluate one component of the system at a time by calculating its impact on relevant KPIs
such as a division’s productivity, tenure, performance, labor costs, and promotions. For
example, a firm pursuing a cost-leadership strategy based on an operational excellence
competitive advantage might be very concerned about labor costs.
Evaluating the impact of employee turnover and new hire quality on labor costs
helps build the case that these factors are important.
• Involve other units like finance and operations to acquire needed information and data.
This process helps build your case that staffing activities influence important
organizational outcomes and can secure the buy-in needed to make staffing
improvements and increase the scope of the evaluation program.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Résumé Screening Software
• Screens résumés for certain words or phrases so that
recruiters do not have to look at every résumé.
• Saves recruiters a lot of time, and makes Internet recruiting
much more manageable for companies that receive
thousands of responses to a job posting.
• Relying too heavily on software can lead to overlooking
highly qualified candidates who do not match specific
criteria.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Applicant Tracking Systems
• Applicant tracking system: software that allows you to
maintain a database of both applicant and job information to
facilitate finding matches between openings and applicants.
• Allow human resources and line managers to oversee the
entire recruitment and staffing process, from mining
résumés to identifying qualified candidates to conducting
background checks and facilitating onboarding by tracking
completed tasks and activities and automatically sending
new hires relevant information.
• Reduce costs, speed up hiring process, and improve the
company’s ability to find people who fit its success profile.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Applicant Tracking System (ATS)
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Human Resources Information
Systems (HRIS)
• Human resources information system: a system of
software and supporting computer hardware specifically
designed to store and process all HR information and keep
track of all employees and information about them
• Combine separate HR systems into a centralized database
that performs the majority of HR transactions.
• HRIS include reporting capabilities, and some systems are
able to track applicants before they become employees.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Company Web Site
• In addition to providing information about current job
openings, the careers site can also contain information
about the corporate culture and mission.
• Online applications are possible, and prescreening tests
can be administered.
• Thoughtfully developed careers sites can also result in more
effective interviews because applicants’ basic questions will
already have been answered by Web site content and poor
fits are more likely to have self-selected out after learning
more about the organization and job opportunity online.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Digital Staffing Dashboards
Digital staffing dashboards: interactive computer displays
of indicators of how the staffing function is meeting its goals
Well-crafted staffing dashboards help companies monitor and
manage their workforce and chart progress toward meeting
strategic and tactical staffing objectives.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Seven Tips for Creating Digital
Staffing Dashboard (1 of 2)
1. Identify drivers of staffing and business success.
2. Set specific goals. Each metric should have a target level or range that reflects a business
priority (e.g., hiring and retaining more top performers, promoting from within) or financial
return (e.g., reducing turnover saves money).
3. Prioritize. Dashboards are ineffective if they contain too much information. Identify which
metrics are key, and put them on the main dashboard page.
4. Identify how best to present the data. Bar charts, tables, pie charts, graphs, and even
speedometer-style displays are all possible. Test formats and warning colors with the people
who will be using it to identify what works best.
5. Assess user comprehension. Ensure that users are not misinterpreting the data and that
the communicated information is being quickly and clearly understood.
6. Consider including dynamic capabilities on the dashboard to allow for scenario planning
and growth projections.
7. Create data entry accountability. If data is not entered accurately or on time, the
dashboard will not be accurate. Assess and reward managers for maintaining the database.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Seven Tips for Creating Digital
Staffing Dashboard (2 of 2)
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Technology Enables Evaluation
• By creating a database of applicant and employee information,
and automating many of the steps of the staffing process,
technology greatly facilitates the staffing evaluation process.
• When properly created and kept current and accurate, databases
enable the relatively fast generation of reports and analyses of
every step of the staffing process.
• Digital staffing dashboards can pull information directly from the
database to reflect real-time staffing information.
• Technology can also facilitate the administration of employee
surveys that can help evaluate the effectiveness of the staffing
system.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Discussion Questions (1 of 2)
1. What might prevent organizations from evaluating their
staffing systems, and what can be done to remove these
barriers?
2. In your opinion, what three metrics might a university use
to evaluate the effectiveness of its efforts to fill instructor
positions?
3. If your manager was reluctant to invest in an applicant
tracking system, how would you persuade him or her to
make the investment?
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Discussion Questions (2 of 2)
4. As an applicant, how would you feel knowing that
technology was used to make an initial decision to screen
you out of the hiring process?
5. What information do you want to see when you visit the
careers section of a potential employer’s web site?
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Develop Your Skills Exercise
In this chapter’s “Develop Your Skills” feature, we gave you
some tips for creating a digital staffing dashboard. Using this
information, create a dashboard for Osram Sylvania (featured
in this chapter’s opening vignette) reflecting the following
metrics. Use color coding to indicate whether or not a metric
is within the parameters the company desires.
Metrics:
• Top five staffing vendors
• Job applicant quantity
• New hires’ time-to-contribution rates by recruiting source
• Diversity by recruiting source
• Osram Sylvania’s staffing efficiency ratio
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Opening Vignette Exercise
This chapter’s opening vignette illustrated how Osram
Sylvania used technology to improve its staffing system.
Reread the vignette, and answer the following questions:
• In what ways did technology improve the company’s staffing
function?
• Do you think it is appropriate for Osram Sylvania to rank-order
applicants based on their answers to the online prescreening
questions? Why or why not?
• If you were a hiring manager at Osram Sylvania, what metrics
would you most want to have available about your hires?
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Chern’s Case Assignment
a) Create a digital staffing dashboard with the five most
important indicators of the overall staffing process.
b) Recommend various staffing technologies to enhance the
performance and efficiency of the staffing system.
c) Thoroughly explain your recommendations and persuade
the company to consider adopting them.
d) Write an executive summary of the entire set of
recommendations and place it at the front of the report.
Copyright © 2015, 2012, 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written
permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.