Understanding Sexuality

profileMswils0105
UnderstandingSexualityScoringGuide.pdf

5/6/19, 10)20 PMUnderstanding Sexuality Scoring Guide

Page 1 of 1https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PSYC-FP/PSYC-FP2800/181000/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html

Understanding Sexuality Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Apply psychological theories to a case study in human sexuality.

Does not describe psychological theories or apply them to a case study in human sexuality.

Describes psychological theories, but does not apply them to a case study in human sexuality.

Applies psychological theories to a case study in human sexuality.

Provides a detailed application of psychological theories to a case study in human sexuality, illustrating a clear link between the theories and the case.

Apply scholarly research findings to a case study in human sexuality.

Does not apply scholarly research findings to a case study in human sexuality.

Applies scholarly research findings to a case study in human sexuality at a cursory level.

Applies scholarly research findings to a case study in human sexuality.

Provides a detailed application of scholarly research findings to a case study in human sexuality, illustrating a clear link between the research findings and the case.

Explain how ethics inform professional behavior in the field of human sexuality.

Does not explain how ethics inform professional behavior in the field of human sexuality.

Explains, at a cursory level, how ethics inform professional behavior in the field of human sexuality.

Explains how ethics inform professional behavior in the field of human sexuality.

Applies ethical guidelines and standards to inform professional behavior in the field of human sexuality and illustrates the application with relevant examples.

Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.

Writing does not support a central idea and does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.

Writing supports an idea but is inconsistent and contains major errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Writing coherently supports a central idea with few errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Writing is coherent and uses evidence to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.

Use APA format and style.

Does not use APA format and style.

Uses APA format and style but inconsistently and with errors.

Uses APA format and style consistently and with few errors.

Uses correct APA format and style consistently and with no errors.