philosophy paper 2

profileValerielee
UnderstandingMooresParadox.pdf

2/19/2018

1

Phil 2: Puzzles and Paradoxes

Prof. Sven Bernecker

University of California, Irvine

Understanding Moore‘s

Paradox

George Edward "G.E.“

Moore (1873 – 1958)

Moore was a British

philosopher who taught at the

University of Cambridge. He

worked in ethics,

epistemology, and

metaphysics.

2

Logical vs. Performative Contradiction

• A logical contradiction is the conjunction of a statement p and

its denial not-p. According to the law of non-contradiction

(more or less the same as the principle of bivalence), a

statement and its denial cannot both be true.

Examples:

– It is raining and it is not raining.

– I know that nothing can be known.

– All general claims have exceptions.

3

A performative contradiction occurs when the content of a statement

contradicts either the act of asserting it or the presuppositions of

asserting it. The contradiction is between the act of assertion and the

content asserted.

Examples:

• “I am not here.”

• “I cannot speak any English.”

• “Nothing exists.”

• “I am not thinking about anything.”

4

A performative contradiction is not a

logical contradiction because it does

not violate the law of non-contradiction.

The above utterances may be true.

LiYuxi

2/19/2018

2

• Some versions of the liar‘s paradox are performative

contradictions.

• A Cretan who intends to speak the truth while saying “All

Cretans are always liars“ commits a performative

contradiction. If this statement is true, then it is false (because

a Cretan has told the truth); conversely, if his statement is

false, then it is true (because a Cretan is lying).

• The liar‘s paradox is both a performative and a logical

contradiction.

5

Moore‘s Paradox

1. “It is raining but I don‘t believe it is“ (Moore 1942: 543)

2. “I went to the pictures last Tuesday but I don‘t believe that I did“

(Moore 1942: 543)

3. “I believe that he has gone out, but he has not“ (Moore 1944:

204)

Moore claims that it is “absurd“ or “odd“ to assert statements like

(1)-(3).

6

Moorean statements have either of two forms:

1

“Omissive“ because it self-reports a lack of true belief.

2

(I believe that p & not-p) ≡ (not-p & I believe that p)

(not-p & I believe that p) ≡ (p & I believe that not-p)

(“Commissive“ because it self-reports a mistake in belief.)

7

Omissive form: p & I do not believe that p

Commissive form I: I believe that p, but it is not the case that p

Commissive form II: p & I believe that not-p

• Moorean statements are not logical contradictions. If the Moorean

statement (1) were a logical contradiction, it would be a necessary

falsehood and hence the negation of (1) would have to be a

necessary truth. But

Negation-1. “Either it is not raining or I believe it is raining“

is not a necessary truth. This statement could be false. So Moorean

statements are different from liar-type statements.

8

2/19/2018

3

Even though Moorean statements are not logical contradictions asserting

them seems absurd or self-defeating in much the same way as asserting a

contradiction.

p & I do not believe that p

• It can be true at a particular time both that p, and that I do not believe

that p.

• I can assert or believe one of the two at a particular time.

• I cannot without absurdity assert or believe both of them at the same

time.

Moore‘s paradox is the problem of explaining why Moorean statements

cannot be sincerely asserted without absurdity.

9

Fake Moorean Statements

• The absurdity of (1) is not present in its future and past tense

counterparts:

- “It is raining but I did not believe so in the past“

- “It is raining but I will believe otherwise in the future“

10

• The absurdity of (1) is not present in the third (and second)

person counterpart:

- “It is raining but he believes that it is not raining“

• The absurdity of (1) is not present in its modal counterpart:

- “It is raining but I it is possible that I don‘t believe it“

11

• The first person plural counterparts of (1) does preserves the

absurdity:

- “It is raining but we believe that it is not raining“

• The absurdity of Moorean statements is also preserved if they

are only thought but not uttered.

12

2/19/2018

4

Genuine Moorean Statements

• “I have no beliefs now”

• “Although you think that all my opinions are mistaken, you are

always right”

• “God knows that we are not theists”

• “The atheism of my mother’s nieceless brother’s only nephew

angers God”

• “I don’t believe that this sentence expresses a truth”

• “It is raining but I don’t believe that I believe that it is raining”

13

• “I promise that I shall be there, but I haven’t the least intention

of being there.”

• “I congratulate you on your success, but I’m not glad that

you’re successful and I don’t believe you earned it.”

• “What time is it? But I don‘t want to know what time it is“

Moore‘s paradox is the problem of explaining why Moorean statements

cannot be sincerely asserted without absurdity.

14