group project, part 1 and 2

profilelzy19951031
UAPart1and2rubric.pdf

Exceeds Expectations

(A to A+)

Meets Expectations

(B to B+)

Approaching Expectations

(C to C+)

Minimal Understanding

(D to D+)

No Attempt

(F)

Inclusion of Assignment Criteria (25 marks)

All requirements of the assignment are met. Student group provides in-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Student adds more information which adds to the reader’s understanding of the business leader

All requirements of the assignment are included. Student group provides in-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.

All essential requirements of the assignment are met; a few small details are missing. Student group has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively.

Some of the assignment requirements are included. Student group has cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections.

Few assignment requirements are met however essential aspects are missing.

Integration of Knowledge (25 marks)

The paper demonstrates that the student group fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The student group provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

The paper demonstrates that the student group, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.

The paper demonstrates that the student group, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

The paper demonstrates that the student group has limited understanding of core concepts from the course and therefore is unable to apply them.

The paper demonstrates that the student group has limed understanding of core course concepts or is lacking any reference concepts learned in the course.

Quality of Writing (10 marks)

Assignment is of extraordinary caliber with excellent organization which contributes to making it very informative

Assignment is well written, with good organization which contributes to an overall good readability

Assignment has some issues with poor style or organization but still has overall a good readability

Assignment has major issues with style or organization which makes its overall readability poor

Assignment has no style or organization leading to major issues with readability

Grammar, Usage and Mechanics (5 marks)

No spelling, punctuation or Al grammatical errors

Virtually no spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors

Few spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors but none interfere with the meaning of the assignment

A number of spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors that at times interfere with the

So many spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors that the assignment is unreadable

meaning of the assignment

Team Contracts, Sources and Citations (5 marks)

All three contracts submitted on time.

At least 5 current sources. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. All web sites utilized are authoritative. All information obtained from other sources is cited correctly using APA or MLA with in-text and bibliography.

All three contracts submitted on time. More than 4 current sources. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. All web sites utilized are authoritative. All information obtained from other sources is cited correctly using APA or MLA with in-text and bibliography.

All three contracts submitted on time.

Fewer than 4 current sources. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. All web sites utilized are authoritative. All information obtained from other sources is cited correctly using APA or MLA with in-text and bibliography.

Contracts missing. Fewer than 3 current sources. Sources include little variety. Some web sites utilized are authoritative. All information obtained from other sources is cited correctly using APA or MLA with in-text and bibliography.

Contracts missing. Few sources are used and the ones used none of reliable due to currency, relevance, or author. Missing citations, AUTOMATIC FAIL!

Total Marks: ________/70 marks _______ % Weighted ________/10%

Comments:

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________