CRITICAL R

profileGoodwills
TUTORIAL-assignment3301122.docx

TUTORIAL – assignment 3

· quick overview around Assignment 3,

· For assignment 3. it has 3 sections.

· First, you need to describe a poor practice at, and it's consequences. Basically, this can be based on the assignment one. And because all the 3 assignments they are mix

· In the first section of assignment, when you write about poor practice at the end of that section, you can't talk about your Pico, which is going to be only one or 2 sentences. So, you provide your research question that what you're going to do in terms of like. If there is any specific intervention in order to improve that poor practice? Or are you focusing on any specific experiences of some of the partners. So basically, PICO would be qualitative or quantitative.

· The second section, which is the main section of assignment 3 is the critical argument of evidence-based practice for improving, or even resolving the poor practice so the second section, which is critical argument of evidence-based practice includes 3 key categories. So you basically need to talk that to discuss how poor practice can be improved, and how you will consider patient's values in improving the poor practice. Now what do you think about professional expertise around improving the full practice, and also what evidence-based research suggests at the end.

Third section of assignment 3 you're going to talk about the recommendations. So basically, recommendations can be different like. There can be a diverse range of recommendations that you can provide. It can be recommendations for consumers. I always try to use the word consumers rather than patients, and recommendations can be for providers or healthcare professionals or practitioners. Recommendations can be for policymakers

when you focus on a poor practice and then you try to provide some evidence-based research to improve that poor practice. Then this will help a lot in order to update your knowledge in order to update your education, and at the same time improve your practice. And hopefully, this can result in changes in policy, making and practices as well imagine the same thing for the personal life as well

· When we say quantitative, it is mainly around intervention.

· So you will focus on, for example, intervention could be some sort of training, some sort of I don't know, for example, implementation of a specific technology in the workplace, or something like that. So you provide intervention in order to see what is happening in terms of the I don't know consumers outcome, or staff training or education, or those kinds of things, so interventions could be quite different, and it could target different audiences or different partners,

· But then, with some time for qualitative studies, you will focus on the experiences of the partners which could be consumers which could be healthcare providers. And then you will see that what they are suggesting around improving a poor practice.

· So basically, sometimes even you can, consider a mix of the study to include both interventions, and also in-depth understanding of an issue based on experiences of the involve partners. So it becomes what you really want to do, and how you want to approach that through practice you can feel free to include a different kinds of research designs, and as different studies in order to improve that poor practice. So basically, you can consider multiple solutions.

· And then, in the recommendations, or in the second section, that you talk about improving the poor practice, you can connect those dots to see how, for example, different approaches together can improve the poor practice. Actually, this could be very interesting, because sometimes there could be different approaches and different tools. In order to improve in a poor practice and different researchers may look at the issue from different perspectives. So it's. It's really good that you consider those approaches and different solutions in order to look at the issue in a more comprehensive and holistic way.

Another point which is really important. I want you to talk about

Partners and the stakeholders which are related to the poor practice. I want you to put yourself in the shoes of the involved partners. For example, when you talk about the poor practice which could actually impact staff or consumers or patience. You feel that you are as specific as the stakeholder or partner, and see how that practice impacting you, and then try to write. Based on that it will give you a better, a perception how the issue can be resolved

· key points into consideration. For example, patient's values could be around like a

key variables to consider in terms of patient's values. It can be, any examples around patients values that we need to consider in improving poor practice, or cultural beliefs. the patient-centered care and how to include them in the decision-making process.

· Talking about the culture is that the depends on which community we're talking about their cultural beliefs, influence how they interact with the professionals, how they accept, and who they accept the help from and how also they engage with health care, professional doctors, nurses and all of these aspects.

What about professional experiences expertise

· like you might have had so many different consumers, and you might have been working across different settings in health, social community care settings. And then, after all those years of experiences, you may have a really good reflection out and understanding about some specific diseases, and that what may works also considering health promotion approaches as well, very important, and as health care professional

if you are finding papers from different countries, and if you see that this specific issue has been approached differently in other countries that it could be, it could be.

· It can be done differently in Australia it will be always really good to provide those as recommendations of change. and it doesn't matter if those countries they are. If they are having exactly the same system, it could be, the system could be different. But still we can learn from each other.