Heat and gravity.

profilePRAJWAL NEUPANE
Turcotte_D.L._Schubert_G._Geodynamics.pdf

Geodynamics

First published in 1982, Don Turcotte and Jerry Schubert’s Geodynamics be-

came a classic textbook for several generations of students of geophysics and

geology. In this second edition, the authors bring this classic text completely

up-to-date. Important additions include a chapter on chemical geodynamics,

an updated coverage of comparative planetology based on recent planetary

missions, and a variety of other new topics.

Geodynamics provides the fundamentals necessary for an understanding of

the workings of the solid Earth. The Earth is a heat engine, with the source

of the heat the decay of radioactive elements and the cooling of the Earth

from its initial accretion. The work output includes earthquakes, volcanic

eruptions, and mountain building. Geodynamics comprehensively explains

these concepts in the context of the role of mantle convection and plate

tectonics. Observations such as the Earth’s gravity field, surface heat flow,

distribution of earthquakes, surface stresses and strains, and distribution of

elements are discussed. The rheological behavior of the solid Earth, from an

elastic solid to fracture to plastic deformation to fluid flow, is considered.

Important inputs come from a comparison of the similarities and differences

between the Earth, Venus, Mars, Mercury, and the Moon. An extensive set

of student exercises is included.

This new edition of Geodynamics will once again prove to be a classic

textbook for intermediate to advanced undergraduates and graduate stu-

dents in geology, geophysics, and Earth science.

Donald L. Turcotte is Maxwell Upson Professor of Engineering, Depart-

ment of Geological Sciences, Cornell University. In addition to this book, he

is author or co-author of 3 books and 276 research papers, including Fractals

and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics (Cambridge University Press, 1992

and 1997) and Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets (with Gerald

Schubert and Peter Olson; Cambridge University Press, 2001). Professor

Turcotte is a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union, Honorary Fellow

of the European Union of Geosciences, and Fellow of the Geological So-

ciety of America. He is the recipient of several medals, including the Day

Medal of the Geological Society of America, the Wegener Medal of the Euro-

pean Union of Geosciences, the Whitten Medal of the American Geophysical

Union, the Regents (New York State) Medal of Excellence, and Caltech’s

Distinguished Alumnus Award. Professor Turcotte is a member of the Na-

tional Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Gerald Schubert is a Professor in the Department of Earth and Space

Sciences and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the Uni-

iv

versity of California, Los Angeles. He is co-author with Donald Turcotte

and Peter Olson of Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets (Cambridge

University Press, 2001), and author of over 400 research papers. He has par-

ticipated in a number of NASA’s planetary missions and has been on the

editorial boards of many journals, including Icarus, Journal of Geophysical

Research, Geophysical Research Letters, and Annual Reviews of Earth and

Planetary Sciences. Professor Schubert is a Fellow of the American Geo-

physical Union and a recipient of the Union’s James B. MacElwane medal.

He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Contents

Preface page x

Preface to the Second Edition xiii

1 Plate Tectonics 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 The Lithosphere 9

1.3 Accreting Plate Boundaries 10

1.4 Subduction 15

1.5 Transform Faults 23

1.6 Hotspots and Mantle Plumes 25

1.7 Continents 30

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 36

1.9 Triple Junctions 59

1.10 The Wilson Cycle 65

1.11 Continental Collisions 70

1.12 Volcanism and Heat Flow 76

1.13 Seismicity and the State of Stress in the Lithosphere 85

1.14 The Driving Mechanism 90

1.15 Comparative Planetology 91

1.16 The Moon 92

1.17 Mercury 97

1.18 Mars 99

1.19 Phobos and Deimos 105

1.20 Venus 105

1.21 The Galilean Satellites 107

2 Stress and Strain in Solids 127

2.1 Introduction 127

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces 128

vi Contents

2.3 Stress in Two Dimensions 140

2.4 Stress in Three Dimensions 146

2.5 Pressures in the Deep Interiors of Planets 148

2.6 Stress Measurement 151

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain 154

2.8 Strain Measurements 167

3 Elasticity and Flexure 185

3.1 Introduction 185

3.2 Linear Elasticity 187

3.3 Uniaxial Stress 189

3.4 Uniaxial Strain 191

3.5 Plane Stress 193

3.6 Plane Strain 196

3.7 Pure Shear and Simple Shear 197

3.8 Isotropic Stress 198

3.9 Two-Dimensional Bending or Flexure of Plates 199

3.10 Bending of Plates under Applied Moments and Vertical

Loads 205

3.11 Buckling of a Plate under a Horizontal Load 210

3.12 Deformation of Strata Overlying an Igneous Intrusion 212

3.13 Application to the Earth’s Lithosphere 216

3.14 Periodic Loading 217

3.15 Stability of the Earth’s Lithosphere Under an End Load 220

3.16 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere under the Loads of

Island Chains 222

3.17 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere at an Ocean Trench 227

3.18 Flexure and the Structure of Sedimentary Basins 230

4 Heat Transfer 237

4.1 Introduction 237

4.2 Fourier’s Law of Heat Conduction 238

4.3 Measuring the Earth’s Surface Heat Flux 240

4.4 The Earth’s Surface Heat Flow 242

4.5 Heat Generation by the Decay of Radioactive Elements 244

4.6 One-Dimensional Steady Heat Conduction 249

4.7 A Conduction Temperature Profile for the Mantle 253

4.8 Continental Geotherms 254

4.9 Radial Heat Conduction in a Sphere or Spherical Shell 260

4.10 Temperatures in the Moon 263

4.11 Steady Two- and Three-Dimensional Heat Conduction 264

Contents vii

4.12 Subsurface Temperature 266

4.13 One-Dimensional, Time-Dependent Heat Conduction 269

4.14 Periodic Heating of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 271

4.15 Instantaneous Heating or Cooling of a Semi-Infinite

Half-Space 276

4.16 Cooling of the Oceanic Lithosphere 285

4.17 Plate Cooling Model of the Lithosphere 290

4.18 The Stefan Problem 294

4.19 Solidification of a Dike or Sill 300

4.20 The Heat Conduction Equation in a Moving Medium 304

4.21 One-Dimensional, Unsteady Heat Conduction in an

Infinite Region 307

4.22 Thermal Stresses 310

4.23 Ocean Floor Topography 317

4.24 Changes in Sea Level 323

4.25 Thermal and Subsidence History of Sedimentary Basins 325

4.26 Heating or Cooling a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 333

4.27 Frictional Heating on Faults 335

4.28 Mantle Geotherms and Adiabats 337

4.29 Thermal Structure of the Subducted Lithosphere 345

4.30 Culling Model for the Erosion and Deposition of Sediments 348

5 Gravity 354

5.1 Introduction 354

5.2 Gravitational Acceleration 355

5.3 Centrifugal Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity 365

5.4 The Gravitational Potential and the Geoid 366

5.5 Moments of Inertia 373

5.6 Surface Gravity Anomalies 378

5.7 Bouguer Gravity Formula 383

5.8 Reductions of Gravity Data 385

5.9 Compensation 387

5.10 The Gravity Field of a Periodic Mass Distribution on a

Surface 389

5.11 Compensation Due to Lithospheric Flexure 391

5.12 Isostatic Geoid Anomalies 394

5.13 Compensation Models and Observed Geoid Anomalies 397

5.14 Forces Required to Maintain Topography and the Geoid 405

6 Fluid Mechanics 411

6.1 Introduction 411

viii Contents

6.2 One-Dimensional Channel Flows 412

6.3 Asthenospheric Counterflow 418

6.4 Pipe Flow 421

6.5 Artesian Aquifer Flows 425

6.6 Flow Through Volcanic Pipes 426

6.7 Conservation of Fluid in Two Dimensions 427

6.8 Elemental Force Balance in Two Dimensions 428

6.9 The Stream Function 432

6.10 Postglacial Rebound 434

6.11 Angle of Subduction 442

6.12 Diapirism 447

6.13 Folding 456

6.14 Stokes Flow 467

6.15 Plume Heads and Tails 476

6.16 Pipe Flow with Heat Addition 481

6.17 Aquifer Model for Hot Springs 485

6.18 Thermal Convection 488

6.19 Linear Stability Analysis for the Onset of Thermal

Convection 492

6.20 A Transient Boundary-Layer Theory 500

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory 505

6.22 The Forces that Drive Plate Tectonics 516

6.23 Heating by Viscous Dissipation 521

6.24 Mantle Recycling and Mixing 525

7 Rock rheology 538

7.1 Introduction 538

7.2 Elasticity 540

7.3 Diffusion Creep 553

7.4 Dislocation Creep 568

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 574

7.6 Mantle Rheology 588

7.7 Rheological Effects on Mantle Convection 597

7.8 Mantle Convection and the Cooling of the Earth 599

7.9 Crustal Rheology 605

7.10 Viscoelasticity 609

7.11 Elastic–Perfectly Plastic Behavior 615

8 Faulting 627

8.1 Introduction 627

8.2 Classification of Faults 628

Contents ix

8.3 Friction on Faults 632

8.4 Anderson Theory of Faulting 637

8.5 Strength Envelope 642

8.6 Thrust Sheets and Gravity Sliding 643

8.7 Earthquakes 647

8.8 San Andreas Fault 659

8.9 North Anatolian Fault 664

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting 667

8.11 Stress Diffusion 679

8.12 Thermally Activated Creep on Faults 682

9 Flows in Porous Media 692

9.1 Introduction 692

9.2 Darcy’s Law 693

9.3 Permeability Models 695

9.4 Flow in Confined Aquifers 697

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 700

9.6 Geometrical Form of Volcanoes 717

9.7 Equations of Conservation of Mass, Momentum, and

Energy for Flow in Porous Media 722

9.8 One-Dimensional Advection of Heat in a Porous Medium 725

9.9 Thermal Convection in a Porous Layer 729

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media 735

9.11 Porous Flow Model for Magma Migration 746

9.12 Two-Phase Convection 752

10 Chemical Geodynamics 761

10.1 Introduction 761

10.2 Radioactivity and Geochronology 763

10.3 Geochemical Reservoirs 771

10.4 A Two-Reservoir Model with Instantaneous Crustal

Differentiation 776

10.5 Noble Gas Systems 786

10.6 Isotope Systematics of OIB 788

Appendix A Symbols and Units 795

Appendix B Physical Constants and Properties 806

Appendix C Answers to Selected Problems 815

Index 828

Preface

This textbook deals with the fundamental physical processes necessary for

an understanding of plate tectonics and a variety of geological phenomena.

We believe that the appropriate title for this material is geodynamics. The

contents of this textbook evolved from a series of courses given at Cornell

University and UCLA to students with a wide range of backgrounds in

geology, geophysics, physics, mathematics, chemistry, and engineering. The

level of the students ranged from advanced undergraduate to graduate.

In all cases we present the material with a minimum of mathematical

complexity. We have not introduced mathematical concepts unless they are

essential to the understanding of physical principles. For example, our treat-

ment of elasticity and fluid mechanics avoids the introduction or use of

tensors. We do not believe that tensor notation is necessary for the under-

standing of these subjects or for most applications to geological problems.

However, solving partial differential equations is an essential part of this

textbook. Many geological problems involving heat conduction and solid and

fluid mechanics require solutions of such classic partial differential equations

as Laplace’s equation, Poisson’s equation, the biharmonic equation, and the

diffusion equation. All these equations are derived from first principles in the

geological contexts in which they are used. We provide elementary explana-

tions for such important physical properties of matter as solid-state viscosity,

thermal coefficient of expansion, specific heat, and permeability. Basic con-

cepts involved in the studies of heat transfer, Newtonian and non-Newtonian

fluid behavior, the bending of thin elastic plates, the mechanical behavior of

faults, and the interpretation of gravity anomalies are emphasized. Thus it

is expected that the student will develop a thorough understanding of such

fundamental physical laws as Hooke’s law of elasticity, Fourier’s law of heat

conduction, and Darcy’s law for fluid flow in porous media.

The problems are an integral part of this textbook. It is only through

Preface xi

solving a substantial number of exercises that an adequate understanding

of the underlying physical principles can be developed. Answers to selected

problems are provided.

The first chapter reviews plate tectonics; its main purpose is to provide

physics, chemistry, and engineering students with the geological background

necessary to understand the applications considered throughout the rest of

the textbook. We hope that the geology student can also benefit from this

summary of numerous geological, seismological, and paleomagnetic observa-

tions. Since plate tectonics is a continuously evolving subject, this material

may be subject to revision. Chapter 1 also briefly summarizes the geologi-

cal and geophysical characteristics of the other planets and satellites of the

solar system. Chapter 2 introduces the concepts of stress and strain and dis-

cusses the measurements of these quantities in the Earth’s crust. Chapter 3

presents the basic principles of linear elasticity. The bending of thin elastic

plates is emphasized and is applied to problems involving the bending of the

Earth’s lithosphere. Chapter 4 deals mainly with heat conduction and the

application of this theory to temperatures in the continental crust and the

continental and oceanic lithospheres. Heat transfer by convection is briefly

discussed and applied to a determination of temperature in the Earth’s man-

tle. Surface heat flow measurements are reviewed and interpreted in terms

of the theory. The sources of the Earth’s surface heat flow are discussed.

Problems involving the solidification of magmas and extrusive lava flows are

also treated. The basic principles involved in the interpretation of gravity

measurements are given in Chapter 5. Fluid mechanics is studied in Chapter

6; problems involving mantle convection and postglacial rebound are empha-

sized. Chapter 7 deals with the rheology of rock or the manner in which it

deforms or flows under applied forces. Fundamental processes are discussed

from a microscopic point of view. The mechanical behavior of faults is dis-

cussed in Chapter 8 with particular attention being paid to observations of

displacements along the San Andreas fault. Finally, Chapter 9 discusses the

principles of fluid flow in porous media, a subject that finds application to

hydrothermal circulations in the oceanic crust and in continental geothermal

areas.

The contents of this textbook are intended to provide the material for a

coherent one-year course. In order to accomplish this goal, some important

aspects of geodynamics have had to be omitted. In particular, the fundamen-

tals of seismology are not included. Thus the wave equation and its solutions

are not discussed. Many seismic studies have provided important data rele-

vant to geodynamic processes. Examples include (1) the radial distribution

of density in the Earth as inferred from the radial profiles of seismic veloci-

xii Preface

ties, (2) important information on the locations of plate boundaries and the

locations of descending plates at ocean trenches provided by accurate deter-

minations of the epicenters of earthquakes, and (3) details of the structure

of the continental crust obtained by seismic reflection profiling using arti-

ficially generated waves. An adequate treatment of seismology would have

required a very considerable expansion of this textbook. Fortunately, there

are a number of excellent textbooks on this subject.

A comprehensive study of the spatial and temporal variations of the

Earth’s magnetic field is also considered to be outside the scope of this

textbook. A short discussion of the Earth’s magnetic field relevant to pale-

omagnetic observations is given in Chapter 1. However, mechanisms for the

generation of the Earth’s magnetic field are not considered.

In writing this textbook, several difficult decisions had to be made. One

was the choice of units; we use SI units throughout. This system of units

is defined in Appendix 1. We feel there is a strong trend toward the use of

SI units in both geology and geophysics. We recognize, however, that many

cgs units are widely used. Examples include µcal cm−2 s−1 for heat flow,

kilobar for stress, and milligal for gravity anomalies. For this reason we have

often included the equivalent cgs unit in parentheses after the SI unit, for

example, MPa (kbar). Another decision involved the referencing of original

work. We do not believe that it is appropriate to include a large number of

references in a basic textbook. We have credited those individuals making

major contributions to the development of the theory of plate tectonics and

continental drift in our brief discussion of the history of this subject in

Chapter 1. We also provide references to data. At the end of each chapter a

list of recommended reading is given. In many instances these are textbooks

and reference books, but in some cases review papers are included. In each

case the objective is to provide background material for the chapter or to

extend its content.

Many of our colleagues have read all or parts of various drafts of this

textbook. We acknowledge the contributions made by Jack Bird, Peter Bird,

Muawia Barazangi, Allan Cox, Walter Elsasser, Robert Kay, Suzanne Kay,

Mark Langseth, Bruce Marsh, Jay Melosh, John Rundle, Sean Solomon,

David Stevenson, Ken Torrance, and David Yuen. We particularly wish to

acknowledge the many contributions to our work made by Ron Oxburgh

and the excellent manuscript preparation by Tanya Harter.

Preface to the Second Edition

As we prepared our revisions for this second edition of Geodynamics we were

struck by the relatively few changes and additions that were required. The

reason is clear: this textbook deals with fundamental physical processes that

do not change. However, a number of new ideas and concepts have evolved

and have been included where appropriate.

In revising the first chapter on plate tectonics we placed added emphasis

on the concept of mantle plumes. In particular we discussed the association

of plume heads with continental flood basalts. We extensively revised the

sections on comparative planetology. We have learned new things about the

Moon, and the giant impact hypothesis for its origin has won wide accep-

tance. For Venus, the Magellan mission has revolutionized our information

about the planet. The high-resolution radar images, topography, and grav-

ity data have provided new insights that emphasize the tremendous differ-

ences in structure and evolution between Venus and the Earth. Similarly,

the Galileo mission has greatly enhanced our understanding of the Galilean

satellites of Jupiter.

In Chapter 2 we introduce the crustal stretching model for the isostatic

subsidence of sedimentary basins. This model provides a simple explanation

for the formation of sedimentary basins. Space-based geodetic observations

have revolutionized our understanding of surface strain fields associated with

tectonics. We introduce the reader to satellite data obtained from the global

positioning system (GPS) and synthetic aperture radar interferometry (IN-

SAR). In Chapter 4 we introduce the plate cooling model for the thermal

structure of the oceanic lithosphere as a complement to the half-space cool-

ing model. We also present in this chapter the Culling model for the diffu-

sive erosion and deposition of sediments. In Chapter 5 we show how geoid

anomalies are directly related to the forces required to maintain topography.

In Chapter 6 we combine a pipe-flow model with a Stokes-flow model in

xiv Preface to the Second Edition

order to determine the structure and strength of plume heads and plume

tails. The relationship between hotspot swells and the associated plume flux

is also introduced. In addition to the steady-state boundary-layer model for

the structure of mantle convection cells, we introduce a transient boundary-

layer model for the stability of the lithosphere.

Finally, we conclude the book with a new Chapter 10 on chemical geo-

dynamics. The concept of chemical geodynamics has evolved since the first

edition was written. The object is to utilize geochemical data, particularly

the isotope systematics of basalts, to infer mantle dynamics. Questions ad-

dressed include the homogeneity of the mantle, the fate of subducted litho-

sphere, and whether whole mantle convection or layered mantle convection

is occurring.

The use of SI units is now firmly entrenched in geology and geophysics,

and we use these units throughout the book. Since Geodynamics is meant to

be a textbook, large numbers of references are inappropriate. However, we

have included key references and references to sources of data in addition to

recommended collateral reading.

In addition to the colleagues who we acknowledge in the preface to the

first edition, we would like to add Claude Allègre, Louise Kellogg, David

Kohlstedt, Bruce Malamud, Mark Parmentier, and David Sandwell. We also

acknowledge the excellent manuscript preparation by Stacey Shirk and Ju-

dith Hohl, and figure preparation by Richard Sadakane.

1

Plate Tectonics

1.1 Introduction

Plate tectonics is a model in which the outer shell of the Earth is divided into

a number of thin, rigid plates that are in relative motion with respect to one

another. The relative velocities of the plates are of the order of a few tens of

millimeters per year. A large fraction of all earthquakes, volcanic eruptions,

and mountain building occurs at plate boundaries. The distribution of the

major surface plates is illustrated in Figure 1–1.

The plates are made up of relatively cool rocks and have an average

thickness of about 100 km. The plates are being continually created and

consumed. At ocean ridges adjacent plates diverge from each other in a pro-

cess known as seafloor spreading. As the adjacent plates diverge, hot mantle

rock ascends to fill the gap. The hot, solid mantle rock behaves like a fluid

because of solid-state creep processes. As the hot mantle rock cools, it be-

comes rigid and accretes to the plates, creating new plate area. For this

reason ocean ridges are also known as accreting plate boundaries. The ac-

cretionary process is symmetric to a first approximation so that the rates

of plate formation on the two sides of a ridge are approximately equal. The

rate of plate formation on one side of an ocean ridge defines a half-spreading

velocity u. The two plates spread with a relative velocity of 2u. The global

system of ocean ridges is denoted by the heavy dark lines in Figure 1–1.

Because the surface area of the Earth is essentially constant, there must

be a complementary process of plate consumption. This occurs at ocean

trenches. The surface plates bend and descend into the interior of the Earth

in a process known as subduction. At an ocean trench the two adjacent plates

converge, and one descends beneath the other. For this reason ocean trenches

are also known as convergent plate boundaries. The worldwide distribution

2 Plate Tectonics

F igu

re 1.1

D istribu

tio n

o f th

e m

a jo

r p la

tes. T

h e

ocea n

rid ge

a xis

(a ccretio

n a l p la

te m

a rgin

s), su

bd u ctio

n zo

n es

(co n vergen

t p la

te m

a rgin

s), a n d

tra n sfo

rm fa

u lts

th a t m

a ke

u p

th e

p la

te bo

u n d a ries

a re

sh o w n .

1.1 Introduction 3

Figure 1.2 Accretion of a lithospheric plate at an ocean ridge and its sub- duction at an ocean trench. The asthenosphere, which lies beneath the lithosphere, is shown along with the line of volcanic centers associated with subduction.

of trenches is shown in Figure 1–1 by the lines with triangular symbols,

which point in the direction of subduction.

A cross-sectional view of the creation and consumption of a typical plate

is illustrated in Figure 1–2. That part of the Earth’s interior that comprises

the plates is referred to as the lithosphere. The rocks that make up the

lithosphere are relatively cool and rigid; as a result the interiors of the plates

do not deform significantly as they move about the surface of the Earth. As

the plates move away from ocean ridges, they cool and thicken. The solid

rocks beneath the lithosphere are sufficiently hot to be able to deform freely;

these rocks comprise the asthenosphere, which lies below the lithosphere. The

lithosphere slides over the asthenosphere with relatively little resistance.

As the rocks of the lithosphere become cooler, their density increases

because of thermal contraction. As a result the lithosphere becomes gravi-

tationally unstable with respect to the hot asthenosphere beneath. At the

ocean trench the lithosphere bends and sinks into the interior of the Earth

because of this negative buoyancy. The downward gravitational body force

on the descending lithosphere plays an important role in driving plate tec-

tonics. The lithosphere acts as an elastic plate that transmits large elas-

tic stresses without significant deformation. Thus the gravitational body

force can be transmitted directly to the surface plate and this force pulls

the plate toward the trench. This body force is known as trench pull. Ma-

jor faults separate descending lithospheres from adjacent overlying litho-

spheres. These faults are the sites of most great earthquakes. Examples are

the Chilean earthquake in 1960 and the Alaskan earthquake in 1964. These

4 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.3 Izalco volcano in El Salvador, an example of a subduction zone volcano (NOAA—NGDC Howell Williams).

are the largest earthquakes that have occurred since modern seismographs

have been available. The locations of the descending lithospheres can be

accurately determined from the earthquakes occurring in the cold, brittle

rocks of the lithospheres. These planar zones of earthquakes associated with

subduction are known as Wadati–Benioff zones.

Lines of active volcanoes lie parallel to almost all ocean trenches. These

volcanoes occur about 125 km above the descending lithosphere. At least

a fraction of the magmas that form these volcanoes are produced near the

upper boundary of the descending lithosphere and rise some 125 km to the

surface. If these volcanoes stand on the seafloor, they form an island arc,

as typified by the Aleutian Islands in the North Pacific. If the trench lies

adjacent to a continent, the volcanoes grow from the land surface. This is

the case in the western United States, where a volcanic line extends from

Mt. Baker in the north to Mt. Shasta in the south. Mt. St. Helens, the

site of a violent eruption in 1980, forms a part of this volcanic line. These

volcanoes are the sites of a large fraction of the most explosive and violent

volcanic eruptions. The eruption of Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991,

the most violent eruption of the 20th century, is another example. A typical

subduction zone volcano is illustrated in Figure 1–3.

The Earth’s surface is divided into continents and oceans. The oceans have

an average depth of about 4 km, and the continents rise above sea level. The

reason for this difference in elevation is the difference in the thickness of the

crust. Crustal rocks have a different composition from that of the mantle

rocks beneath and are less dense. The crustal rocks are therefore gravita-

1.1 Introduction 5

tionally stable with respect to the heavier mantle rocks. There is usually a

well-defined boundary, the Moho or Mohorovičić discontinuity, between the

crust and mantle. A typical thickness for oceanic crust is 6 km; continental

crust is about 35 km thick. Although oceanic crust is gravitationally stable,

it is sufficiently thin so that it does not significantly impede the subduction

of the gravitationally unstable oceanic lithosphere. The oceanic lithosphere

is continually cycled as it is accreted at ocean ridges and subducted at ocean

trenches. Because of this cycling the average age of the ocean floor is about

108 years (100 Ma).

On the other hand, the continental crust is sufficiently thick and gravita-

tionally stable so that it is not subducted at an ocean trench. In some cases

the denser lower continental crust, along with the underlying gravitationally

unstable continental mantle lithosphere, can be recycled into the Earth’s in-

terior in a process known as delamination. However, the light rocks of the

upper continental crust remain in the continents. For this reason the rocks

of the continental crust, with an average age of about 109 years (1 Ga), are

much older than the rocks of the oceanic crust. As the lithospheric plates

move across the surface of the Earth, they carry the continents with them.

The relative motion of continents is referred to as continental drift.

Much of the historical development leading to plate tectonics concerned

the validity of the hypothesis of continental drift: that the relative positions

of continents change during geologic time. The similarity in shape between

the west coast of Africa and the east coast of South America was noted as

early as 1620 by Francis Bacon. This “fit” has led many authors to spec-

ulate on how these two continents might have been attached. A detailed

exposition of the hypothesis of continental drift was put forward by Frank

B. Taylor (1910). The hypothesis was further developed by Alfred Wegener

beginning in 1912 and summarized in his book The Origin of Continents

and Oceans (Wegener, 1946). As a meteorologist, Wegener was particularly

interested in the observation that glaciation had occurred in equatorial re-

gions at the same time that tropical conditions prevailed at high latitudes.

This observation in itself could be explained by polar wander, a shift of the

rotational axis without other surface deformation. However, Wegener also

set forth many of the qualitative arguments that the continents had formerly

been attached. In addition to the observed fit of continental margins, these

arguments included the correspondence of geological provinces, continuity of

structural features such as relict mountain ranges, and the correspondence

of fossil types. Wegener argued that a single supercontinent, Pangaea, had

formerly existed. He suggested that tidal forces or forces associated with the

6 Plate Tectonics

rotation of the Earth were responsible for the breakup of this continent and

the subsequent continental drift.

Further and more detailed qualitative arguments favoring continental drift

were presented by Alexander du Toit, particularly in his book Our Wan-

dering Continents (du Toit, 1937). Du Toit argued that instead of a single

supercontinent, there had formerly been a northern continent, Laurasia, and

a southern continent, Gondwanaland, separated by the Tethys Ocean.

During the 1950s extensive exploration of the seafloor led to an improved

understanding of the worldwide range of mountains on the seafloor known

as mid-ocean ridges. Harry Hess (1962) hypothesized that the seafloor was

created at the axis of a ridge and moved away from the ridge to form an ocean

in a process now referred to as seafloor spreading. This process explains the

similarity in shape between continental margins. As a continent breaks apart,

a new ocean ridge forms. The ocean floor created is formed symmetrically

at this ocean ridge, creating a new ocean. This is how the Atlantic Ocean

was formed; the mid-Atlantic ridge where the ocean formed now bisects the

ocean.

It should be realized, however, that the concept of continental drift won

general acceptance by Earth scientists only in the period between 1967 and

1970. Although convincing qualitative, primarily geological, arguments had

been put forward to support continental drift, almost all Earth scientists

and, in particular, almost all geophysicists had opposed the hypothesis.

Their opposition was mainly based on arguments concerning the rigidity

of the mantle and the lack of an adequate driving mechanism.

The propagation of seismic shear waves showed beyond any doubt that

the mantle was a solid. An essential question was how horizontal displace-

ments of thousands of kilometers could be accommodated by solid rock. The

fluidlike behavior of the Earth’s mantle had been established in a general

way by gravity studies carried out in the latter part of the nineteenth cen-

tury. Measurements showed that mountain ranges had low-density roots.

The lower density of the roots provides a negative relative mass that nearly

equals the positive mass of the mountains. This behavior could be explained

by the principle of hydrostatic equilibrium if the mantle behaved as a fluid.

Mountain ranges appear to behave similarly to blocks of wood floating on

water.

The fluid behavior of the mantle was established quantitatively by N. A.

Haskell (1935). Studies of the elevation of beach terraces in Scandinavia

showed that the Earth’s surface was still rebounding from the load of the

ice during the last ice age. By treating the mantle as a viscous fluid with

a viscosity of 1020 Pa s, Haskell was able to explain the present uplift of

1.1 Introduction 7

Scandinavia. Although this is a very large viscosity (water has a viscosity of

10−3 Pa s), it leads to a fluid behavior for the mantle during long intervals

of geologic time.

In the 1950s theoretical studies had established several mechanisms for

the very slow creep of crystalline materials. This creep results in a fluid

behavior. Robert B. Gordon (1965) showed that solid-state creep quantita-

tively explained the viscosity determined from observations of postglacial

rebound. At temperatures that are a substantial fraction of the melt tem-

perature, thermally activated creep processes allow mantle rock to flow at

low stress levels on time scales greater than 104 years. The rigid lithosphere

includes rock that is sufficiently cold to preclude creep on these long time

scales.

The creep of mantle rock was not a surprise to scientists who had studied

the widely recognized flow of ice in glaciers. Ice is also a crystalline solid, and

gravitational body forces in glaciers cause ice to flow because its temperature

is near its melt temperature. Similarly, mantle rocks in the Earth’s interior

are near their melt temperatures and flow in response to gravitational body

forces.

Forces must act on the lithosphere in order to make the plates move. We-

gener suggested that either tidal forces or forces associated with the rotation

of the Earth caused the motion responsible for continental drift. However, in

the 1920s Sir Harold Jeffreys, as summarized in his book The Earth (Jeffreys,

1924), showed that these forces were insufficient. Some other mechanism had

to be found to drive the motion of the plates. Any reasonable mechanism

must also have sufficient energy available to provide the energy being dis-

sipated in earthquakes, volcanoes, and mountain building. Arthur Holmes

(1931) hypothesized that thermal convection was capable of driving mantle

convection and continental drift. If a fluid is heated from below, or from

within, and is cooled from above in the presence of a gravitational field, it

becomes gravitationally unstable, and thermal convection can occur. The

hot mantle rocks at depth are gravitationally unstable with respect to the

colder, more dense rocks in the lithosphere. The result is thermal convec-

tion in which the colder rocks descend into the mantle and the hotter rocks

ascend toward the surface. The ascent of mantle material at ocean ridges

and the descent of the lithosphere into the mantle at ocean trenches are

parts of this process. The Earth’s mantle is being heated by the decay of

the radioactive isotopes uranium 235 (235U), uranium 238 (238U), thorium

232 (232Th), and potassium 40 (40K). The volumetric heating from these

isotopes and the secular cooling of the Earth drive mantle convection. The

heat generated by the radioactive isotopes decreases with time as they de-

8 Plate Tectonics

cay. Two billion years ago the heat generated was about twice the present

value. Because the amount of heat generated is less today, the vigor of the

mantle convection required today to extract the heat is also less. The vigor

of mantle convection depends on the mantle viscosity. Less vigorous mantle

convection implies a lower viscosity. But the mantle viscosity is a strong

function of mantle temperature; a lower mantle viscosity implies a cooler

mantle. Thus as mantle convection becomes less vigorous, the mantle cools;

this is secular cooling. As a result, about 80% of the heat lost from the in-

terior of the Earth is from the decay of the radioactive isotopes and about

20% is due to the cooling of the Earth (secular cooling).

During the 1960s independent observations supporting continental drift

came from paleomagnetic studies. When magmas solidify and cool, their

iron component is magnetized by the Earth’s magnetic field. This remanent

magnetization provides a fossil record of the orientation of the magnetic

field at that time. Studies of the orientation of this field can be used to

determine the movement of the rock relative to the Earth’s magnetic poles

since the rock’s formation. Rocks in a single surface plate that have not

been deformed locally show the same position for the Earth’s magnetic poles.

Keith Runcorn (1956) showed that rocks in North America and Europe gave

different positions for the magnetic poles. He concluded that the differences

were the result of continental drift between the two continents.

Paleomagnetic studies also showed that the Earth’s magnetic field has

been subject to episodic reversals. Observations of the magnetic field over

the oceans indicated a regular striped pattern of magnetic anomalies (regions

of magnetic field above and below the average field value) lying parallel to

the ocean ridges. Frederick Vine and Drummond Matthews (1963) correlated

the locations of the edges of the striped pattern of magnetic anomalies with

the times of magnetic field reversals and were able to obtain quantitative

values for the rate of seafloor spreading. These observations have provided

the basis for accurately determining the relative velocities at which adjacent

plates move with respect to each other.

By the late 1960s the framework for a comprehensive understanding of

the geological phenomena and processes of continental drift had been built.

The basic hypothesis of plate tectonics was given by Jason Morgan (1968).

The concept of a mosaic of rigid plates in relative motion with respect to

one another was a natural consequence of thermal convection in the mantle.

A substantial fraction of all earthquakes, volcanoes, and mountain building

can be attributed to the interactions among the lithospheric plates at their

boundaries (Isacks et al., 1968). Continental drift is an inherent part of plate

1.2 The Lithosphere 9

tectonics. The continents are carried with the plates as they move about the

surface of the Earth.

Problem 1.1 If the area of the oceanic crust is 3.2 × 108 km2 and new

seafloor is now being created at the rate of 2.8 km2 yr−1, what is the mean

age of the oceanic crust? Assume that the rate of seafloor creation has been

constant in the past.

1.2 The Lithosphere

An essential feature of plate tectonics is that only the outer shell of the

Earth, the lithosphere, remains rigid during intervals of geologic time. Be-

cause of their low temperature, rocks in the lithosphere do not significantly

deform on time scales of up to 109 years. The rocks beneath the lithosphere

are sufficiently hot so that solid-state creep can occur. This creep leads to

a fluidlike behavior on geologic time scales. In response to forces, the rock

beneath the lithosphere flows like a fluid.

The lower boundary of the lithosphere is defined to be an isotherm (surface

of constant temperature). A typical value is approximately 1600 K. Rocks

lying above this isotherm are sufficiently cool to behave rigidly, whereas

rocks below this isotherm are sufficiently hot to readily deform. Beneath the

ocean basins the lithosphere has a thickness of about 100 km; beneath the

continents the thickness is about twice this value. Because the thickness of

the lithosphere is only 2 to 4% of the radius of the Earth, the lithosphere

is a thin shell. This shell is broken up into a number of plates that are in

relative motion with respect to one another. The rigidity of the lithosphere

ensures, however, that the interiors of the plates do not deform significantly.

The rigidity of the lithosphere allows the plates to transmit elastic stresses

during geologic intervals. The plates act as stress guides. Stresses that are

applied at the boundaries of a plate can be transmitted throughout the

interior of the plate. The ability of the plates to transmit stress over large

distances has important implications with regard to the driving mechanism

of plate tectonics.

The rigidity of the lithosphere also allows it to bend when subjected to

a load. An example is the load applied by a volcanic island. The load of

the Hawaiian Islands causes the lithosphere to bend downward around the

load, resulting in a region of deeper water around the islands. The elastic

bending of the lithosphere under vertical loads can also explain the structure

of ocean trenches and some sedimentary basins.

However, the entire lithosphere is not effective in transmitting elastic

10 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.4 An accreting plate margin at an ocean ridge.

stresses. Only about the upper half of it is sufficiently rigid so that elas-

tic stresses are not relaxed on time scales of 109 years. This fraction of the

lithosphere is referred to as the elastic lithosphere. Solid-state creep pro-

cesses relax stresses in the lower, hotter part of the lithosphere. However,

this part of the lithosphere remains a coherent part of the plates. A detailed

discussion of the difference between the thermal and elastic lithospheres is

given in Section 7–10.

1.3 Accreting Plate Boundaries

Lithospheric plates are created at ocean ridges. The two plates on either side

of an ocean ridge move away from each other with near constant velocities of

a few tens of millimeters per year. As the two plates diverge, hot mantle rock

flows upward to fill the gap. The upwelling mantle rock cools by conductive

heat loss to the surface. The cooling rock accretes to the base of the spreading

plates, becoming part of them; the structure of an accreting plate boundary

is illustrated in Figure 1–4.

As the plates move away from the ocean ridge, they continue to cool and

the lithosphere thickens. The elevation of the ocean ridge as a function of

distance from the ridge crest can be explained in terms of the temperature

distribution in the lithosphere. As the lithosphere cools, it becomes more

dense; as a result it sinks downward into the underlying mantle rock. The

topographic elevation of the ridge is due to the greater buoyancy of the

1.3 Accreting Plate Boundaries 11

thinner, hotter lithosphere near the axis of accretion at the ridge crest. The

elevation of the ocean ridge also provides a body force that causes the plates

to move away from the ridge crest. A component of the gravitational body

force on the elevated lithosphere drives the lithosphere away from the accre-

tional boundary; it is one of the important forces driving the plates. This

force on the lithosphere is known as ridge push and is a form of gravitational

sliding.

The volume occupied by the ocean ridge displaces seawater. Rates of

seafloor spreading vary in time. When rates of seafloor spreading are high,

ridge volume is high, and seawater is displaced. The result is an increase

in the global sea level. Variations in the rates of seafloor spreading are the

primary cause for changes in sea level on geological time scales. In the Creta-

ceous (≈80 Ma) the rate of seafloor spreading was about 30% greater than

at present and sea level was about 200 m higher than today. One result

was that a substantial fraction of the continental interiors was covered by

shallow seas.

Ocean ridges are the sites of a large fraction of the Earth’s volcanism.

Because almost all the ridge system is under water, only a small part of this

volcanism can be readily observed. The details of the volcanic processes at

ocean ridges have been revealed by exploration using submersible vehicles.

Ridge volcanism can also be seen in Iceland, where the oceanic crust is

sufficiently thick so that the ridge crest rises above sea level. The volcanism

at ocean ridges is caused by pressure-release melting. As the two adjacent

plates move apart, hot mantle rock ascends to fill the gap. The temperature

of the ascending rock is nearly constant, but its pressure decreases. The

pressure p of rock in the mantle is given by the simple hydrostatic equation

p = ρgy, (1.1)

where ρ is the density of the mantle rock, g is the acceleration of gravity, and

y is the depth. The solidus temperature (the temperature at which the rock

first melts) decreases with decreasing pressure. When the temperature of

the ascending mantle rock equals the solidus temperature, melting occurs, as

illustrated in Figure 1–5. The ascending mantle rock contains a low-melting-

point, basaltic component. This component melts to form the oceanic crust.

Problem 1.2 At what depth will ascending mantle rock with a tempera-

ture of 1600 K melt if the equation for the solidus temperature T is

T (K) = 1500 + 0.12p (MPa).

12 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.5 The process of pressure-release melting is illustrated. Melting occurs because the nearly isothermal ascending mantle rock encounters pressures low enough so that the associated solidus temperatures are below the rock temperatures.

Figure 1.6 Typical structure of the oceanic crust, overlying ocean basin, and underlying depleted mantle rock.

Assume ρ = 3300 kg m−3, g = 10 m s−2, and the mantle rock ascends at

constant temperature.

The magma (melted rock) produced by partial melting beneath an ocean

ridge is lighter than the residual mantle rock, and buoyancy forces drive

1.3 Accreting Plate Boundaries 13

Table 1.1 Typical Compositions of Important Rock Types

Clastic Continental Granite Diorite Sediments Crust Basalt Harzburgite “Pyrolite” Chondrite

SiO2 70.8 57.6 70.4 61.7 50.3 45.3 46.1 33.3 Al2O3 14.6 16.9 14.3 15.8 16.5 1.8 4.3 2.4 Fe2O3 1.6 3.2 —— —— —— —— —— —— FeO 1.8 4.5 5.3 6.4 8.5 8.1 8.2 35.5 MgO 0.9 4.2 2.3 3.6 8.3 43.6 37.6 23.5 CaO 2.0 6.8 2.0 5.4 12.3 1.2 3.1 2.3 Na2O 3.5 3.4 1.8 3.3 2.6 —— 0.4 1.1 K2O 4.2 3.4 3.0 2.5 0.2 —— 0.03 —— TiO2 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.2 —— 0.2 ——

it upward to the surface in the vicinity of the ridge crest. Magma cham-

bers form, heat is lost to the seafloor, and this magma solidifies to form the

oceanic crust. In some localities slices of oceanic crust and underlying man-

tle have been brought to the surface. These are known as ophiolites; they

occur in such locations as Cyprus, Newfoundland, Oman, and New Guinea.

Field studies of ophiolites have provided a detailed understanding of the

oceanic crust and underlying mantle. Typical oceanic crust is illustrated in

Figure 1–6. The crust is divided into layers 1, 2, and 3, which were origi-

nally associated with different seismic velocities but subsequently identified

compositionally. Layer 1 is composed of sediments that are deposited on the

volcanic rocks of layers 2 and 3. The thickness of sediments increases with

distance from the ridge crest; a typical thickness is 1 km. Layers 2 and 3 are

composed of basaltic rocks of nearly uniform composition. A typical com-

position of an ocean basalt is given in Table 1–1. The basalt is composed

primarily of two rock-forming minerals, plagioclase feldspar and pyroxene.

The plagioclase feldspar is 50 to 85% anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8) component

and 15 to 50% albite (NaAlSi3O8) component. The principal pyroxene is

rich in the diopside (CaMgSi2O6) component. Layer 2 of the oceanic crust is

composed of extrusive volcanic flows that have interacted with the seawater

to form pillow lavas and intrusive flows primarily in the form of sheeted

dikes. A typical thickness for layer 2 is 1.5 km. Layer 3 is made up of gab-

bros and related cumulate rocks that crystallized directly from the magma

chamber. Gabbros are coarse-grained basalts; the larger grain size is due to

slower cooling rates at greater depths. The thickness of layer 3 is typically

4.5 km.

Studies of ophiolites show that oceanic crust is underlain primarily by a

14 Plate Tectonics

peridotite called harzburgite. A typical composition of a harzburgite is given

in Table 1–1. This peridotite is primarily composed of olivine and orthopy-

roxene. The olivine consists of about 90% forsterite component (Mg2SiO4)

and about 10% fayalite component (Fe2SiO4). The orthopyroxene is less

abundant and consists primarily of the enstatite component (MgSiO3). Rel-

ative to basalt, harzburgite contains lower concentrations of calcium and

aluminum and much higher concentrations of magnesium. The basalt of the

oceanic crust with a density of 2900 kg m−3 is gravitationally stable with

respect to the underlying peridotite with a density of 3300 kg m−3. The

harzburgite has a greater melting temperature (≃500 K higher) than basalt

and is therefore more refractory.

Field studies of ophiolites indicate that the harzburgite did not crystallize

from a melt. Instead, it is the crystalline residue left after partial melting

produced the basalt. The process by which partial melting produces the

basaltic oceanic crust, leaving a refractory residuum of peridotite, is an

example of igneous fractionation.

Molten basalts are less dense than the solid, refractory harzburgite and

ascend to the base of the oceanic crust because of their buoyancy. At the

base of the crust they form a magma chamber. Since the forces driving plate

tectonics act on the oceanic lithosphere, they produce a fluid-driven fracture

at the ridge crest. The molten basalt flows through this fracture, draining the

magma chamber and resulting in surface flows. These surface flows interact

with the seawater to generate pillow basalts. When the magma chamber is

drained, the residual molten basalt in the fracture solidifies to form a dike.

The solidified rock in the dike prevents further migration of molten basalt,

the magma chamber refills, and the process repeats. A typical thickness of

a dike in the vertical sheeted dike complex is 1 m.

Other direct evidence for the composition of the mantle comes from xeno-

liths that are carried to the surface in various volcanic flows. Xenoliths are

solid rocks that are entrained in erupting magmas. Xenoliths of mantle peri-

dotites are found in some basaltic flows in Hawaii and elsewhere. Mantle

xenoliths are also carried to the Earth’s surface in kimberlitic eruptions.

These are violent eruptions that form the kimberlite pipes where diamonds

are found.

It is concluded that the composition of the upper mantle is such that

basalts can be fractionated leaving harzburgite as a residuum. One model

composition for the parent undepleted mantle rock is called pyrolite and its

chemical composition is given in Table 1–1. In order to produce the basaltic

oceanic crust, about 20% partial melting of pyrolite must occur. Incompat-

ible elements such as the heat-producing elements uranium, thorium, and

1.4 Subduction 15

potassium do not fit into the crystal structures of the principal minerals

of the residual harzburgite; they are therefore partitioned into the basaltic

magma during partial melting.

Support for a pyrolite composition of the mantle also comes from studies of

meteorites. A pyrolite composition of the mantle follows if it is hypothesized

that the Earth was formed by the accretion of parental material similar to

Type 1 carbonaceous chondritic meteorites. An average composition for a

Type 1 carbonaceous chondrite is given in Table 1–1. In order to generate a

pyrolite composition for the mantle, it is necessary to remove an appropriate

amount of iron to form the core as well as some volatile elements such as

potassium.

A 20% fractionation of pyrolite to form the basaltic ocean crust and a

residual harzburgite mantle explains the major element chemistry of these

components. The basalts generated over a large fraction of the ocean ridge

system have near-uniform compositions in both major and trace elements.

This is evidence that the parental mantle rock from which the basalt is frac-

tionated also has a near-uniform composition. However, both the basalts of

normal ocean crust and their parental mantle rock are systematically de-

pleted in incompatible elements compared with the model chondritic abun-

dances. The missing incompatible elements are found to reside in the conti-

nental crust.

Seismic studies have been used to determine the thickness of the oceanic

crust on a worldwide basis. The thickness of the basaltic oceanic crust has

a nearly constant value of about 6 km throughout much of the area of the

oceans. Exceptions are regions of abnormally shallow bathymetry such as

the North Atlantic near Iceland, where the oceanic crust may be as thick

as 25 km. The near-constant thickness of the basaltic oceanic crust places

an important constraint on mechanisms of partial melting beneath the ridge

crest. If the basalt of the oceanic crust represents a 20% partial melt, the

thickness of depleted mantle beneath the oceanic crust is about 24 km.

However, this depletion is gradational so the degree of depletion decreases

with depth.

1.4 Subduction

As the oceanic lithosphere moves away from an ocean ridge, it cools, thick-

ens, and becomes more dense because of thermal contraction. Even though

the basaltic rocks of the oceanic crust are lighter than the underlying mantle

rocks, the colder subcrustal rocks in the lithosphere become sufficiently dense

to make old oceanic lithosphere heavy enough to be gravitationally unstable

16 Plate Tectonics

with respect to the hot mantle rocks immediately underlying the lithosphere.

As a result of this gravitational instability the oceanic lithosphere founders

and begins to sink into the interior of the Earth at ocean trenches. As the

lithosphere descends into the mantle, it encounters increasingly dense rocks.

However, the rocks of the lithosphere also become increasingly dense as a

result of the increase of pressure with depth (mantle rocks are compressible),

and they continue to be heavier than the adjacent mantle rocks as they de-

scend into the mantle so long as they remain colder than the surrounding

mantle rocks at any depth. Phase changes in the descending lithosphere and

adjacent mantle and compositional variations with depth in the ambient

mantle may complicate this simple picture of thermally induced gravita-

tional instability. Generally speaking, however, the descending lithosphere

continues to subduct as long as it remains denser than the immediately ad-

jacent mantle rocks at any depth. The subduction of the oceanic lithosphere

at an ocean trench is illustrated schematically in Figure 1–7.

The negative buoyancy of the dense rocks of the descending lithosphere

results in a downward body force. Because the lithosphere behaves elasti-

cally, it can transmit stresses and acts as a stress guide. The body force

acting on the descending plate is transmitted to the surface plate, which is

pulled toward the ocean trench. This is one of the important forces driving

plate tectonics and continental drift. It is known as slab pull.

Prior to subduction the lithosphere begins to bend downward. The con-

vex curvature of the seafloor defines the seaward side of the ocean trench.

The oceanic lithosphere bends continuously and maintains its structural in-

tegrity as it passes through the subduction zone. Studies of elastic bending

at subduction zones are in good agreement with the morphology of some

subduction zones seaward of the trench axis (see Section 3–17). However,

there are clearly significant deviations from a simple elastic rheology. Some

trenches exhibit a sharp “hinge” near the trench axis and this has been

attributed to an elastic–perfectly plastic rheology (see Section 7–11).

As a result of the bending of the lithosphere, the near-surface rocks are

placed in tension, and block faulting often results. This block faulting allows

some of the overlying sediments to be entrained in the upper part of the

basaltic crust. Some of these sediments are then subducted along with the

basaltic rocks of the oceanic crust, but the remainder of the sediments are

scraped off at the base of the trench. These sediments form an accretionary

prism (Figure 1–7) that defines the landward side of many ocean trenches.

Mass balances show that only a fraction of the sediments that make up layer

1 of the oceanic crust are incorporated into accretionary prisms. Since these

sediments are derived by the erosion of the continents, the subduction of

1.4 Subduction 17

Figure 1.7 Subduction of oceanic lithosphere at an ocean trench. Sediments forming layer 1 of the oceanic crust are scraped off at the ocean trench to form the accretionary prism of sediments. The volcanic line associated with subduction and the marginal basin sometimes associated with subduction are also illustrated.

sediments is a mechanism for subducting continental crust and returning it

to the mantle.

The arclike structure of many ocean trenches (see Figure 1–1) can be

qualitatively understood by the ping-pong ball analogy. If a ping-pong ball

is indented, the indented portion will have the same curvature as the original

ball, that is, it will lie on the surface of an imaginary sphere with the same

radius as the ball, as illustrated in Figure 1–8. The lithosphere as it bends

downward might also be expected to behave as a flexible but inextensible

thin spherical shell. In this case the angle of dip α of the lithosphere at the

trench can be related to the radius of curvature of the island arc. A cross

section of the subduction zone is shown in Figure 1–8b. The triangles OAB,

BAC, and BAD are similar right triangles so that the angle subtended by the

indented section of the sphere at the center of the Earth is equal to the angle

of dip. The radius of curvature of the indented section, defined as the great

circle distance BQ, is thus aα/2, where a is the radius of the Earth. The

radius of curvature of the arc of the Aleutian trench is about 2200 km. Taking

a = 6371 km, we find that α = 39.6◦. The angle of dip of the descending

lithosphere along much of the Aleutian trench is near 45◦. Although the

18 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.8 The ping-pong ball analogy for the arc structure of an ocean trench. (a) Top view showing subduction along a trench extending from S to T. The trench is part of a small circle centered at Q. (b) Cross section of indented section. BQR is the original sphere, that is, the surface of the Earth. BPR is the indented sphere, that is, the subducted lithosphere. The angle of subduction α is CBD. O is the center of the Earth.

ping-pong ball analogy provides a framework for understanding the arclike

structure of some trenches, it should be emphasized that other trenches

do not have an arclike form and have radii of curvature that are in poor

agreement with this relationship. Interactions of the descending lithosphere

with an adjacent continent may cause the descending lithosphere to deform

so that the ping-pong ball analogy would not be valid.

Ocean trenches are the sites of many of the largest earthquakes. These

earthquakes occur on the fault zone separating the descending lithosphere

1.4 Subduction 19

from the overlying lithosphere. Great earthquakes, such as the 1960 Chilean

earthquake and the 1964 Alaskan earthquake, accommodate about 20 m of

downdip motion of the oceanic lithosphere and have lengths of about 350

km along the trench. A large fraction of the relative displacement between

the descending lithosphere and the overlying mantle wedge appears to be

accommodated by great earthquakes of this type. A typical velocity of sub-

duction is 0.1 m yr−1 so that a great earthquake with a displacement of 20

m would be expected to occur at intervals of about 200 years.

Earthquakes within the cold subducted lithosphere extend to depths of

about 660 km. The locations of these earthquakes delineate the structure

of the descending plate and are known as the Wadati-Benioff zone. The

shapes of the upper boundaries of several descending lithospheres are given

in Figure 1–9. The positions of the trenches and the volcanic lines are also

shown. Many subducted lithospheres have an angle of dip near 45◦. In the

New Hebrides the dip is significantly larger, and in Peru and North Chile

the angle of dip is small.

The lithosphere appears to bend continuously as it enters an ocean trench

and then appears to straighten out and descend at a near-constant dip angle.

A feature of some subduction zones is paired belts of deep seismicity. The

earthquakes in the upper seismic zone, near the upper boundary of the

descending lithosphere, are associated with compression. The earthquakes

within the descending lithosphere are associated with tension. These double

seismic zones are attributed to the “unbending,” i.e., straightening out, of

the descending lithosphere. The double seismic zones are further evidence

of the rigidity of the subducted lithosphere. They are also indicative of the

forces on the subducted lithosphere that are straightening it out so that it

descends at a typical angle of 45◦.

Since the gravitational body force on the subducted lithosphere is down-

ward, it would be expected that the subduction dip angle would be 90◦. In

fact, as shown in Figure 1–9, the typical dip angle for a subduction zone

is near 45◦. One explanation is that the oceanic lithosphere is “foundering”

and the trench is migrating oceanward. In this case the dip angle is deter-

mined by the flow kinematics. While this explanation is satisfactory in some

cases, it has not been established that all slab dips can be explained by the

kinematics of mantle flows. An alternative explanation is that the subducted

slab is supported by the induced flow above the slab. The descending litho-

sphere induces a corner flow in the mantle wedge above it, and the pressure

forces associated with this corner flow result in a dip angle near 45◦ (see

Section 6–11).

One of the key questions in plate tectonics is the fate of the descending

20 Plate Tectonics

plates. Earthquakes terminate at a depth of about 660 km, but termination

of seismicity does not imply cessation of subduction. This is the depth of

a major seismic discontinuity associated with the solid–solid phase change

from spinel to perovskite and magnesiowüstite; this phase change could act

to deter penetration of the descending lithosphere. In some cases seismic

activity spreads out at this depth, and in some cases it does not. Shallow

subduction earthquakes generally indicate extensional stresses where as the

deeper earthquakes indicate compressional stresses. This is also an indica-

tion of a resistance to subduction. Seismic velocities in the cold descending

lithosphere are significantly higher than in the surrounding hot mantle. Sys-

tematic studies of the distribution of seismic velocities in the mantle are

known as mantle tomography. These studies have provided examples of the

descending plate penetrating the 660-km depth.

The fate of the descending plate has important implications regarding

mantle convection. Since plates descend into the lower mantle, beneath a

depth of 660 km, some form of whole mantle convection is required. The

entire upper and at least a significant fraction of the lower mantle must

take part in the plate tectonic cycle. Although there may be a resistance to

convection at a depth of 660 km, it is clear that the plate tectonic cycle is

not restricted to the upper mantle above 660 km.

Volcanism is also associated with subduction. A line of regularly spaced

volcanoes closely parallels the trend of the ocean trench in almost all cases.

These volcanics may result in an island arc or they may occur on the con-

tinental crust (Figure 1–10). The volcanoes lie 125 to 175 km above the

descending plate, as illustrated in Figure 1–9.

It is far from obvious why volcanism is associated with subduction. The

descending lithosphere is cold compared with the surrounding mantle, and

thus it should act as a heat sink rather than as a heat source. Because the

flow is downward, magma cannot be produced by pressure-release melting.

One source of heat is frictional dissipation on the fault zone between the

descending lithosphere and the overlying mantle. However, there are several

problems with generating island-arc magmas by frictional heating. When

rocks are cold, frictional stresses can be high, and significant heating can

occur. However, when the rocks become hot, the stresses are small, and it

appears to be impossible to produce significant melting simply by frictional

heating.

It has been suggested that interactions between the descending slab and

the induced flow in the overlying mantle wedge can result in sufficient heating

of the descending oceanic crust to produce melting. However, thermal models

of the subduction zone show that there is great difficulty in producing enough

1.4 Subduction 21

F ig

u re

1. 9

T h e

sh a pe

s o f th

e u p pe

r bo

u n d a ri

es o f d es

ce n d in

g li th

o sp

h er

es a t se

ve ra

l oc

ea n ic

tr en

ch es

ba se

d o n

th e

d is

tr ib

u ti o n s

o f ea

rt h qu

a ke

s. T

h e

n a m

es o f th

e tr en

ch es

a re

a bb

re vi

a te

d fo

r cl

a ri

ty (N

H =

N ew

H eb

ri d es

, C

A =

C en

tr a l A

m er

ic a , A

L T

= A

le u ti a n , A

L K

= A

la sk

a , M

= M

a ri

a n a , IB

= Iz

u – B o n in

, K

E R

= K

er m

a d ec

, N

Z =

N ew

Z ea

la n d , T

= T o n ga

, K

K =

K u ri

le – K

a m

ch a tk

a , N

C =

N o rt

h C

h il e,

P =

P er

u ).

T h e

lo ca

ti o n s

o f th

e vo

lc a n ic

li n es

a re

sh o w n

by th

e so

li d

tr ia

n gl

es . T

h e

lo ca

ti o n s

o f th

e tr en

ch es

a re

sh o w n

ei th

er a s

a ve

rt ic

a l li n e

o r

a s

a h o ri

zo n ta

l

li n e

if th

e tr en

ch – vo

lc a n ic

li n e

se pa

ra ti o n

is va

ri a bl

e (I

sa ck

s a n d

B a ra

za n gi

, 1 9 7 7 ).

22 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.10 Eruption of ash and steam from Mount St. Helens, Washington, on April 3, 1980. Mount St. Helens is part of a volcanic chain, the Cascades, produced by subduction of the Juan de Fuca plate beneath the western margin of the North American plate (Washington Department of Natural Resources).

heat to generate the observed volcanism. The subducted cold lithospheric

slab is a very large heat sink and strongly depresses the isotherms above the

slab. It has also been argued that water released from the heating of hydrated

minerals in the subducted oceanic crust can contribute to melting by de-

pressing the solidus of the crustal rocks and adjacent mantle wedge rocks.

However, the bulk of the volcanic rocks at island arcs have near-basaltic com-

positions and erupt at temperatures very similar to eruption temperatures

at accretional margins. Studies of the petrology of island-arc magmas indi-

cate that they are primarily the result of the partial melting of rocks in the

mantle wedge above the descending lithosphere. Nevertheless, geochemical

evidence indicates that partial melting of subducted sediments and oceanic

crust does play an important role in island-arc volcanism. Isotopic studies

have shown conclusively that subducted sediments participate in the melt-

ing process. Also, the locations of the surface volcanic lines have a direct

geometrical relationship to the geometry of subduction. In some cases two

adjacent slab segments subduct at different angles, and an offset occurs in

the volcanic line; for the shallower dipping slab, the volcanic line is farther

from the trench keeping the depth to the slab beneath the volcanic line

nearly constant.

Processes associated with the subducted oceanic crust clearly trigger sub-

duction zone volcanism. However, the bulk of the volcanism is directly asso-

ciated with the melting of the mantle wedge in a way similar to the melting

1.5 Transform Faults 23

beneath an accretional plate margin. A possible explanation is that “flu-

ids” from the descending oceanic crust induce melting and create sufficient

buoyancy in the partially melted mantle wedge rock to generate an ascend-

ing flow and enhance melting through pressure release. This process may be

three-dimensional with ascending diapirs associated with individual volcanic

centers.

In some trench systems a secondary accretionary plate margin lies be-

hind the volcanic line, as illustrated in Figure 1–7. This back-arc spreading

is very similar to the seafloor spreading that is occurring at ocean ridges.

The composition and structure of the ocean crust that is being created are

nearly identical. Back-arc spreading creates marginal basins such as the Sea

of Japan. A number of explanations have been given for back-arc spreading.

One hypothesis is that the descending lithosphere induces a secondary con-

vection cell, as illustrated in Figure 1–11a. An alternative hypothesis is that

the ocean trench migrates away from an adjacent continent because of the

“foundering” of the descending lithosphere. Back-arc spreading is required

to fill the gap, as illustrated in Figure 1–11b. If the adjacent continent is

being driven up against the trench, as in South America, marginal basins

do not develop. If the adjacent continent is stationary, as in the western Pa-

cific, the foundering of the lithosphere leads to a series of marginal basins as

the trench migrates seaward. There is observational evidence that back-arc

spreading centers are initiated at volcanic lines. Heating of the lithosphere

at the volcanic line apparently weakens it sufficiently so that it fails under

tensional stresses.

Problem 1.3 If we assume that the current rate of subduction, 0.09 m2

s−1, has been applicable in the past, what thickness of sediments would have

to have been subducted in the last 3 Gyr if the mass of subducted sediments

is equal to one-half the present mass of the continents? Assume the density

of the continents ρc is 2700 kg m−3, the density of the sediments ρs is 2400

kg m−3, the continental area Ac is 1.9× 108 km2, and the mean continental

thickness hc is 35 km.

1.5 Transform Faults

In some cases the rigid plates slide past each other along transform faults.

The ocean ridge system is not a continuous accretional margin; rather, it is

a series of ridge segments offset by transform faults. The ridge segments lie

nearly perpendicular to the spreading direction, whereas the transform faults

lie parallel to the spreading direction. This structure is illustrated in Figure

24 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.11 Models for the formation of marginal basins. (a) Secondary mantle convection induced by the descending lithosphere. (b) Ascending convection generated by the foundering of the descending lithosphere and the seaward migration of the trench.

Figure 1.12 (a) Segments of an ocean ridge offset by a transform fault. (b) Cross section along a transform fault.

1–12a. The orthogonal ridge–transform system has been reproduced in the

laboratory using wax that solidifies at the surface. Even with this analogy,

the basic physics generating the orthogonal pattern is not understood. The

relative velocity across a transform fault is twice the spreading velocity.

1.6 Hotspots and Mantle Plumes 25

This relative velocity results in seismicity (earthquakes) on the transform

fault between the adjacent ridge sections. There is also differential vertical

motion on transform faults. As the seafloor spreads away from a ridge crest,

it also subsides. Since the adjacent points on each side of a transform fault

usually lie at different distances from the ridge crest where the crust was

formed, the rates of subsidence on the two sides differ. A cross section along

a transform fault is given in Figure 1–12b. The extensions of the transform

faults into the adjacent plates are known as fracture zones. These fracture

zones are often deep valleys in the seafloor. An ocean ridge segment that

is not perpendicular to the spreading direction appears to be unstable and

transforms to the orthogonal pattern.

A transform fault that connects two ridge segments is known as a ridge–

ridge transform. Transform faults can also connect two segments of an ocean

trench. In some cases one end of a transform fault terminates in a triple junc-

tion of three surface plates. An example is the San Andreas fault in Califor-

nia; the San Andreas accommodates lateral sliding between the Pacific and

North American plates.

1.6 Hotspots and Mantle Plumes

Hotspots are anomalous areas of surface volcanism that cannot be directly

associated with plate tectonic processes. Many hotspots lie well within the

interiors of plates; an example is the volcanism of the Hawaiian Islands

(Figure 1–13). Other hotspots lie at or near an ocean ridge, an example

is the volcanism that forms Iceland. Much more voluminous than normal

ocean ridge volcanism; this volcanism resulted in a thick oceanic crust and

the elevation of Iceland above sea level.

In many cases hotspots lie at the end of well-defined lines of volcanic

edifices or volcanic ridges. These are known as hotspot tracks. The hotspot

track associated with the Hawaiian hotspot is the Hawaiian–Emperor island–

seamount chain that extends across the Pacific plate to the Aleutian Islands.

There is little agreement on the total number of hotspots. The positions

of thirty hotspots are given in Table 1–2, and twenty of the most prominent

hotspots are shown in Figure 1–14. Also shown in this figure are some of

the hotspot tracks. Some compilations of hotspots list as many as 120 (see

Figure 1–15). The definition of a hotspot tends to be quite subjective, partic-

ularly with regard to volcanism on or adjacent to plate boundaries. Hotspots

occur both in the oceans and on the continents. They do not appear to be

uniformly distributed over the Earth’s surface. There are numerous hotspots

26 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.13 Satellite photograph of the island of Hawaii. The island is dom- inated by the active volcano Mauna Loa near its center (NASA STS61A- 50-0057).

in Africa and relatively few in South America, North America, Europe, and

Asia.

Jason Morgan (1971) attributed hotspot volcanism to a global array of

deep mantle plumes. Mantle plumes are quasi-cylindrical concentrated up-

wellings of hot mantle rock and they represent a basic form of mantle con-

vection. Pressure-release melting in the hot ascending plume rock produces

the basaltic volcanism associated with most hotspots. The hypothesis of

fixed mantle plumes impinging on the base of the moving lithospheric plates

explains the origin of hotspot tracks (see Figure 1–16).

The prototype example of a hotspot track is the Hawaiian–Emperor chain

of volcanic islands and sea-mounts illustrated in Figure 1–17. The associated

hot-spot volcanism has resulted in a nearly continuous volcanic ridge that

extends some 4000 km from near the Aleutian Islands to the very active

1.6 Hotspots and Mantle Plumes 27

Table 1.2 Hotspot Locations

Overlying Latitude Longitude Hotspot Plate (Degrees) (Degrees)

Hawaii Pacific 20 −157 Samoa Pacific −13 −173 St. Helena Africa −14 −6 Bermuda N. America 33 −67 Cape Verde Africa 14 −20 Pitcairn Pacific −26 −132 MacDonald Pacific −30 −140 Marquesas Pacific −10 −138 Tahiti Pacific −17 −151 Easter Pac-Naz −27 −110 Reunion Indian −20 55 Yellowstone N. America 43 −111 Galapagos Nazca 0 −92 Juan Fernandez Nazca −34 −83 Ethiopia Africa 8 37 Ascencion S. Am–Afr −8 −14 Afar Africa 10 43 Azores Eurasia 39 −28 Iceland N. Am–Eur 65 −20 Madeira Africa 32 −18 Canary Africa 28 −17 Hoggar Ind–Ant −49 69 Bouvet Afr–Ant −54 2 Pr. Edward Afr–Ant −45 50 Eifel Eurasia 48 8 San Felix Nazca −24 −82 Tibesti Africa 18 22 Trinadade S. America −20 −30 Tristan S. Am–Afr −36 −13

Source: After Crough and Jurdy (1980).

Kilauea volcano on the island of Hawaii. There is a remarkably uniform age

progression, with the age of each volcanic shield increasing systematically

with distance from Kilauea. Directly measured ages and ages inferred from

seafloor magnetic anomalies are given in Figure 1–17. These ages are given

as a function of distance from Kilauea in Figure 1–18 and they correlate

very well with a propagation rate of 90 mm yr−1across thePacific plate.

A striking feature of this track is the bend that separates the near-linear

trend of the Emperor chain from the near-linear trend of the Hawaiian chain.

The bend in the track occurred at about 43 Ma when there was an abrupt

shift in the motion of the Pacific plate. This shift was part of a global

28 Plate Tectonics

reorientation of plate motions over a span of a few million years. This shift

has been attributed to the continental collision between India and Asia,

which impeded the northward motion of the Indian plate.

Many hotspots are associated with linear tracks as indicated in Figure 1–

14. When the relative motions of the plates are removed the hotspots appear

to be nearly fixed with respect to each other. However, they are certainly

not precisely fixed. Systematic studies have shown that the relative motion

among hotspots amounts to a few mm yr−1. These results are consistent

with plumes that ascend through a mantle in which horizontal velocities are

about an order of magnitude smaller than the plate velocities.

Many hotspots are also associated with topographic swells. Hotspot swells

are regional topographic highs with widths of about 1000 km and anomalous

elevations of up to 3 km. The hotspot swell associated with the Hawaiian

hotspot is illustrated in Figure 1–19. The swell is roughly parabolic in form

and extends upstream from the active hotspot. The excess elevation asso-

ciated with the swell decays rather slowly down the track of the hotspot.

Hotspot swells are attributed to the interaction between the ascending hot

mantle rock in the plume and the lithospheric plate upon which the plume

impinges.

The volcanic rocks produced at most hotspots are primarily basalt. In

terms of overall composition, the rocks are generally similar to the basaltic

rocks produced at ocean ridges. It appears that these volcanic rocks are also

produced by about 20% partial melting of mantle rocks with a pyrolite com-

position. However, the concentrations of incompatible elements and isotopic

ratios differ from those of normal mid-ocean ridge basalts. Whereas the mid-

ocean ridge basalts are nearly uniformly depleted in incompatible elements,

the concentrations of these elements in hotspot basalts have considerable

variation. Some volcanoes produce basalts that are depleted, some produce

basalts that have near chondritic ratios, and some volcanoes produce basalts

that are enriched in the incompatible elements. These differences will be dis-

cussed in some detail in Chapter 10.

The earthquakes of the Wadati–Benioff zone define the geometry of the

subducted oceanic lithosphere. No seismicity is associated with mantle plumes,

and little direct observational evidence exists of their structure and origin.

Thus we must depend on analytical, numerical, and laboratory studies for

information. These studies indicate that plumes originate in a lower hot

thermal boundary layer either at the base of the mantle (the D′′-layer of

seismology) or at an interface in the lower mantle between an upper con-

vecting mantle layer and an isolated lower mantle layer. Plumes result from

the gravitational instability of the hot lower thermal boundary layer just as

1.6 Hotspots and Mantle Plumes 29

Figure 1.14 Hotspot and hotspot track locations: 1, Hawaii (Hawaiian– Emperor Seamount Chain); 2, Easter (Tuomoto–Line Island Chain); 3, MacDonald Seamount (Austral–Gilbert–Marshall Island Chain); 4, Bellany Island; 5, Cobb Seamount (Juan de Fuca Ridge); 6, Yellowstone (Snake River Plain–Columbia Plateau); 7, Galapagos Islands; 8, Bermuda; 9, Ice- land; 10, Azores; 11, Canary Islands; 12, Cape Verde Islands; 13, St. He- lena; 14, Tristan de Cunha (Rio Grande Ridge (w), Walvis Ridge (e)); 15, Bouvet Island; 16, Prince Edward Island; 17, Reunion Island (Mauri- tius Plateau, Chagos–Lacadive Ridge); 18, Afar; 19, Eifel; 20, Kerguelen Plateau (Ninety-East Ridge).

the subducted lithosphere results from the gravitational instability of the

cold, surface thermal boundary layer, the lithosphere.

Numerical and laboratory studies of the initiation of plumes show a lead-

ing diapir or plume head followed by a thin cylindrical conduit or plume tail

that connects the diapir to the source region. An example from a laboratory

experiment is given in Figure 1–20. Confirmation of this basic model comes

from the association of massive flood basalts with plume heads. There is

convincing observational evidence that flood basalt eruptions mark the ini-

tiation of hotspot tracks. As specific examples, the hotspot tracks of the

currently active Reunion, Iceland, Tristan da Cunha, and Prince Edward

hotspots originate, respectively, in the Deccan, Tertiary North Atlantic,

Parana, and Karoo flood basalt provinces.

The association of the Reunion hotspot with the Deccan flood basalt

province is illustrated in Figure 1–21. Pressure-release melting in the plume

head as it approached and impinged on the lithosphere can explain the

30 Plate Tectonics

eruption of the Deccan traps in India with a volume of basaltic magma in

excess of 1.5 × 106 km3 in a time interval of less than 1 Myr. Since then,

Reunion hotspot volcanism has been nearly continuous for 60 Myr with an

average eruption rate of 0.02 km3 yr−1. As the Indian plate moved northward

the hotspot track formed the Chagos–Laccadive Ridge. The hotspot track is

then offset by seafloor spreading on the central Indian Ridge and forms the

Mascarene Ridge on the Indian plate that connects to the currently active

volcanism of the Reunion Islands.

1.7 Continents

As described in the previous sections, the development of plate tectonics

primarily involves the ocean basins, yet the vast majority of geological data

comes from the continents. There is essentially no evidence for plate tectonics

in the continents, and this is certainly one reason why few geologists were

willing to accept the arguments in favor of continental drift and mantle

convection for so long. The near surface rocks of the continental crust are

much older than the rocks of the oceanic crust. They also have a more silicic

composition. The continents include not only the area above sea level but

also the continental shelves. It is difficult to provide an absolute definition

of the division between oceanic and continental crust. In most cases it is

appropriate to define the transition as occurring at an ocean depth of 3 km.

The area of the continents, including the margins, is about 1.9 × 108 km2,

or 37% of the surface of the Earth.

The rocks that make up the continental crust are, in bulk, more silicic

and therefore less dense than the basaltic rocks of the oceanic crust. Also,

the continental crust with a mean thickness of about 40 km is considerably

thicker than the oceanic crust. These two effects make the continental litho-

sphere gravitationally stable and prevent it from being subducted. Although

continental crust cannot be destroyed by subduction, it can be recycled in-

directly by delamination. The mantle portion of the continental lithosphere

is sufficiently cold and dense to be gravitationally unstable. Thus it is pos-

sible for the lower part of the continental lithosphere, including the lower

continental crust, to delaminate and sink into the lower mantle. This is par-

tial subduction or delamination. It has been suggested that delamination is

occurring in continental collision zones such as the Himalayas and the Alps

and behind subduction zones such as in the Altiplano in Peru. There are

a number of continental areas in which the mantle lithosphere is absent.

One example is the western United States. Crustal doubling such as in Ti-

bet has also been attributed to the absence of mantle lithosphere beneath

1.7 Continents 31

F ig

u re

1. 15

D is

tr ib

u ti o n

o f su

rf a ce

h o ts

po ts

, ce

n te

rs o f in

tr a p la

te vo

lc a n is

m , a n d

a n o m

a lo

u s

p la

te m

a rg

in vo

lc a n is

m .

32 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.16 Formation of an island–seamount chain by the movement of a lithospheric plate over a melting anomaly in the upper mantle.

Figure 1.17 Age progression of the Hawaiian–Emperor seamount and island chain (Molnar and Stock, 1987). Dated seamounts and islands are shown in normal print and dates inferred from magnetic anomalies are shown in bold print.

Asia. Delamination is an efficient mechanism for the removal of continental

lithosphere. Continental crust can also be recycled into the mantle by the

subduction of sediments. Although there is evidence of the recycling of the

continental crust, it is much less efficient than the recycling of oceanic crust

by the plate tectonic cycle. The result is that the continental crust is nearly

a factor of 10 older than oceanic crust. Continental crust older than 1 billion

years is common, and some is older than 3 billion years.

Determining the relative age of continental rocks has been an important

1.7 Continents 33

Figure 1.18 Ages of islands and seamounts in the Hawaiian–Emperor chain as a function of distance from the currently active Kilauea volcano. The straight line gives a constant rate of propagation across the Pacific plate of 90 mm yr−1.

Figure 1.19 Bathymetric profile across the Hawaiian ridge at Oahu (Watts, 1976).

aspect of the historical development of geology. The early classification of the

age of rocks was based on the fossils found in sedimentary rocks. By studying

the evolution of the species involved, and their relative positions in the

stratigraphic column, an uncalibrated, relative time scale was developed. The

divisions of the time scale were associated with sedimentary unconformities.

These are recognized as discontinuities in the sedimentation process, where

adjacent strata often contain dissimilar fossils. These unconformities occur

worldwide.

It is now recognized that major unconformities correspond with times of

low sea level. During these periods erosion occurred over a large fraction of

the continents, causing gaps in the sedimentary record. During periods of

high sea level much of the area of the continents was covered with shallow

34 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.20 Photograph of a low-density, low-viscosity glucose fluid plume ascending in a high-density, high-viscosity glucose fluid (Olson and Singer, 1985).

seas, and sediments were deposited. The causes of the periods of high and

low sea levels are not fully understood. Clearly, ice ages can cause periods

of low sea level. Also, on a longer time scale, variations in the volume of the

ocean ridge system can change the sea level.

Quantitative measurements of the concentrations of radioactive isotopes

and their daughter products in rocks have provided an absolute geological

time scale. The science of dating rocks by radioisotopic techniques is known

as geochronology. Geochronological methods will be discussed in Section 10–

2.

The radiometrically calibrated geological time scale is given in Table 1–3.

Note that the Precambrian period, during which fossils were not available

for classification purposes, represents 88% of the Earth’s history.

Erosion and sedimentation play an important role in shaping the surface

of the continents. Mountain ranges that are built by plate tectonic processes

are eroded to near sea level in a few million years. Any areas of the con-

tinents that are depressed below sea level are filled with these sediments

to form sedimentary basins. The base of a sedimentary basin is referred to

as the basement. Because the ages of basement rocks are not well known

on a worldwide basis, it is difficult to specify a mean age for continental

1.7 Continents 35

Figure 1.21 The relationship between the Reunion hotspot track and the Deccan flood basalts (White and McKenzie, 1989).

rocks. Regions of the continents where Precambrian metamorphic and ig-

neous rocks are exposed are known as continental shields. Detailed studies

of Precambrian terrains indicate that the plate tectonic processes that are

occurring today have been going on for at least 3 billion years.

It is relatively easy to estimate the composition of the upper continental

crust, but it is difficult to estimate the composition of the crust as a whole.

Direct evidence for the composition of the lower continental crust comes

from surface exposures of high-grade metamorphic rocks and lower crustal

36 Plate Tectonics

xenoliths transported to the surface in diatremes and magma flows. Indirect

evidence of the composition

of the lower crust comes from comparisons between seismic velocities and

laboratory studies of relevant minerals. An estimate of the bulk composi-

tion of the continental crust is given in Table 1–1. It is compared with the

mean composition of clastic sediments (representative of the upper conti-

nental crust) and with a typical basalt composition. Estimates of the mean

composition of the continental crust are clearly more basic (less silicic) than

the composition of the upper continental crust, but they do not approach a

basaltic composition.

An important question is: How is continental crust formed? One hypoth-

esis is that it is formed from partial melts of the mantle. But as we have dis-

cussed, mantle melts have near-basaltic compositions. Thus, if this were the

case, the mean composition of the continental crust would also be basaltic.

However, as seen in Table 1–1, the mean continental crust is considerably

more silicic than the composition of basalts. A preferred hypothesis for the

generation of the continental crust consists of three steps: 1) Basaltic volcan-

ism from the mantle associated with island-arc volcanics, continental rifts,

and hotspots is responsible for the formation of the continental crust. 2) In-

tracrustal melting and high-temperature metamorphism are responsible for

the differentiation of the continental crust so that the upper crust is more

silicic and the lower crust is more basic. Basaltic magmas from the mantle

that intrude into a basaltic continental crust in the presence of water can

produce the granitic rocks associated with the bulk continental crust. 3)

Delamination of substantial quantities of continental lithosphere including

the mantle and lower crust returns a fraction of the more basic lower crust

to the mantle. The residuum, composed primarily of the upper crust, thus

becomes more silicic and forms the present continental crust.

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates

Although qualitative geological arguments had long favored the continental

drift theory, it remained for paleomagnetic studies to provide quantitative

confirmation. Paleomagnetism is the study of the Earth’s past magnetic field

from the records preserved in magnetized rocks. The silicate minerals mak-

ing up the bulk of a rock are either paramagnetic (olivine, pyroxene, garnet,

amphiboles) or diamagnetic (quartz, feldspar) and are incapable of acquir-

ing a permanent magnetization. However, rocks containing small amounts

of ferromagnetic, or more accurately ferrimagnetic, minerals, that is, iron

oxides such as magnetite Fe3O4 and hematite Fe2O3 and iron sulfides such

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 37

Table 1.3 Geologic Time Scale

Age (Ma) Period Era Eon

0 Holocene0.01

Upper 0.13

Middle Pleistocene 0.8

Lower 1.8

Upper 3.6 Pliocene

Lower 5.3

Upper 11.2

Middle Miocene 16.4

Lower 23.8

Upper Cenozoic 28.5 Oligocene

Lower 33.7

Upper 37.0

Middle Eocene 49.0

Lower 54.8

Upper 61.0 Paleocene

Lower 65.0

Upper 98.9 Cretaceous

Lower 142.0

Upper 159.4

Middle Jurassic Mesozoic 180.1

Lower

Ph an

er oz

oi c

205.7 Upper

227.4 Middle Triassic

241.7 Lower

248.2 Upper

256.0 Permian Lower

290.0 Upper

323.0 Carboniferous Lower

354.0 Upper

370.0 Middle Devonian

391.0 Lower Paleozoic

417.0 Silurian

443.0 Upper

470.0 Ordovician Lower

495.0 Upper

505.0 Middle Cambrian

518.0 Lower

545.0 Proterozoic

2500 Precambrian Archean 4550

N eo

ge ne

Pa le

og en

e

Te rt

ia ry

Q ua

te rn

ar y

38 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.22 Declination and inclination of the magnetic field.

as pyrrhotite Fe1−yS, can acquire a weak permanent magnetism when they

are formed. The fossil magnetism in a rock is referred to as natural remanent

magnetism (NRM).

A rock can acquire NRM in several ways. When a mineral is heated above

its Curie temperature, all magnetism is lost. For magnetite the Curie tem-

perature is 851 K. When a rock containing ferromagnetic minerals is cooled

to a temperature below the Curie temperature, known as the blocking tem-

perature, in the presence of a magnetic field, it can acquire a remanent

magnetism. This is known as thermoremanent magnetism (TRM). In some

cases magnetic minerals are formed by chemical processes at low tempera-

tures. As a grain of a ferromagnetic mineral grows, it reaches a size where

it becomes magnetically stable. If this occurs in an applied magnetic field,

a chemical remanent magnetism (CRM) may be acquired. A sedimentary

rock may also acquire a remanent magnetism during its formation. As small

particles of ferromagnetic minerals fall through water in the presence of a

magnetic field, their magnetic moments become partially aligned with the

ambient magnetic field; the result is that the sedimentary rock that is formed

with these particles present has a depositional remanent magnetism (DRM).

Rocks may also acquire magnetism after they are formed. This type of

magnetism may usually be removed by subjecting the rock to alternating

magnetic fields or by heating the rock to a substantial fraction of the Curie

temperature. After it has been confirmed that the magnetism in a rock is

in fact the remanent magnetism acquired at the time of its formation, the

orientation or direction of the remanent field is determined. This is normally

expressed in terms of the declination D or magnetic azimuth, which is the

angle between geographic north and the magnetic field direction measured

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 39

Figure 1.23 The Earth’s dipole magnetic field.

positive clockwise (0 to 360◦), and the inclination I, which is the angle

between the horizontal and the field direction measured positive downward

(−90 to +90◦) (Figure 1–22).

In addition to declination and inclination, the complete specification of a

remanent magnetic field requires the determination of its magnitude B. The

SI unit of B is the tesla or weber m−2. Figure 1–22 clearly shows that the

horizontal BH and vertical BV components of the magnetic field are related

to the magnitude of the field and the inclination by

BH = B cos I (1.2)

BV = B sin I. (1.3)

The horizontal field can be further resolved into a northward component

BHN and an eastward component BHE given by

BHN = B cos I cosD (1.4)

BHE = B cos I sinD. (1.5)

The present-day magnetic field of the Earth can be reasonably approx-

imated as a dipole magnetic field, the form of which is sketched in Figure

1–23. The horizontal and vertical components of the Earth’s dipole magnetic

field, Bθ and Br, at its surface, assuming that the Earth is a sphere of radius

a, are given by

Bθ = µ0m

4πa3 sin θm (1.6)

40 Plate Tectonics

Br = µ0m

2πa3 cos θm, (1.7)

where µ0 is the permeability of free space (µ0 = 4π× 10−7 tesla m A−1), m

is the dipole moment (A m2), and θm is the magnetic colatitude (magnetic

latitude φm = π/2 − θm) (see Figure 1–23). The magnetic poles are the

positions where the dipole field lines are vertical. At the north magnetic pole

(θm = 0, φm = π/2), Bθ = 0, Br = µ0m/2πa 3, the inclination is π/2 rad

or 90◦, and the field is directed into the Earth. At the south magnetic pole

(θm = π, φm = −π/2), Bθ = 0, Br =−µ0m/2πa 3, the inclination is −π/2

rad or −90◦, and the field is directed out from the Earth. The magnetic field

lines of the Earth’s present dipole magnetic field leave at the south magnetic

pole and enter at the north magnetic pole (Figure 1–23). At the magnetic

equator (θm = π/2, φm = 0), Br = 0, Bθ = µ0m/4πa 3, the field lines are

horizontal, and the inclination is zero. The angle of inclination of the dipole

magnetic field is given by

tan I = Br Bθ , (1.8)

and its magnitude B can be written

B = (B2 r +B2

θ ) 1/2. (1.9)

By substituting for Br and Bθ from Equations (1–6) and (1–7), we can

rewrite these expressions for I and B as

tan I = 2cot θm = 2 tan φm (1.10)

B = µ0m

4πa3 (sin2 θm + 4cos2 θm)1/2

= µ0m

4πa3 (1 + 3 cos2 θm)1/2

= µ0m

4πa3 (1 + 3 sin2 φm)1/2. (1.11)

The Earth’s magnetic field is only approximately a dipole. The present

locations (latitude and longitude) of the magnetic poles are 73◦N, 100◦W

and 68◦S, 143◦E. The magnetic poles of the dipole field that is the best fit

to the Earth’s field are at 79◦N, 70◦W and 79◦S, 110◦E. Thus the axis of the

dipole field makes an angle of about 11◦ with the Earth’s rotational axis.

The moment of the dipole field is m = 7.94 × 1022 A m2, and the surface

magnetic field at the magnetic equator is Bθ = 3.07 × 10−5 teslas. Maps of

the magnitude, declination, and inclination of the present magnetic field of

the Earth are presented in Figure 1–24.

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 41

Problem 1.4 Assume that the Earth’s magnetic field is a dipole. What is

the maximum intensity of the field at the core–mantle boundary?

Problem 1.5 Assume that the Earth’s magnetic field is a dipole. At what

distance above the Earth’s surface is the magnitude of the field one-half of

its value at the surface?

If a dipole field is a reasonable approximation of the Earth’s magnetic

field throughout geologic time, a paleomagnetic measurement of declination

and inclination can be used to locate the magnetic pole position at the time

the rock acquired its magnetization. Suppose that the paleomagnetic mea-

surement is carried out at a north latitude φ and an east longitude ψ, as

in Figure 1–25. From the definition of declination it is clear that the paleo-

magnetic north pole lies an angular distance θm along a great circle making

an angle D with the meridian through the measurement point. Geographic

north, paleomagnetic north, and the measurement point define a spherical

triangle with sides π/2 − φ, θm, and π/2 − φp, where φp is the latitude of

the paleomagnetic pole. The triangle contains the included angle D. Using

a result from spherical trigonometry, we can write

cos

(

π

2 − φp

)

= cos

(

π

2 − φ

)

cos θm

+ sin

(

π

2 − φ

)

sin θm cosD.

(1.12)

This can be simplified by noting that cos(π/2−φp) = sinφp, cos(π/2−φ) =

sinφ, and sin(π/2 − φ) = cosφ. The result is

sinφp = sinφ cos θm + cosφ sin θm cosD. (1.13)

The magnetic colatitude θm can be determined from Equations (1–8) and

(1–10). The angle between the meridians passing through the measurement

point and the paleomagnetic north pole is ψp − ψ, where ψp is the east lon-

gitude of the paleomagnetic pole. A second spherical trigonometric formula

allows us to write

sin(ψp − ψ)

sin θm =

sinD

sin(π/2 − φp) =

sinD

cosφp (1.14)

or

sin(ψp − ψ) = sin θm sinD

cosφp , (1.15)

42 Plate Tectonics

F igu

re 1.24

P resen

t-d a y

m a gn

etic fi eld

o f th

e E a rth

. (a

) M

a gn

itu d e, µ T

. C

o n tin

u ed

o n

p p . 2 6 – 7 .

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 43

F ig

u re

1. 24

(c o n t. )

(b )

D ec

li n a ti o n , d eg

.

44 Plate Tectonics

F igu

re 1.24

(co n t.)

(c) In

clin a tio

n , d eg.

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 45

if cos θm > sinφ sinφp. If cos θm < sinφ sinφp, Equation (1–15) must be

replaced by

sin(π + ψ − ψp) = sin θm sinD

cosφp . (1.16)

Paleomagnetic measurements are useful only if the orientation of the sam-

ple has remained fixed with respect to the rest of the geological province,

since the sample was magnetized. Usually the absence of subsequent de-

formation can be established with some certainty and the reliability of the

measurement established.

Problem 1.6 The measured declination and inclination of the paleomag-

netic field in Upper Triassic rocks at 41.5◦N and 72.7◦W are D = 18◦ and

I = 12◦. Determine the paleomagnetic pole position.

Problem 1.7 The measured declination and inclination of the paleo-

magnetic field in Oligocene rocks at 51◦N and 14.7◦E are D = 200◦ and

I = −63◦. Determine the paleomagnetic pole position.

Problem 1.8 The measured declination and inclination of the paleomag-

netic field in Lower Cretaceous rocks at 45.5◦N and 73◦W are D = 154◦ and

I = −58◦. Determine the paleomagnetic pole position.

Paleomagnetic measurements can indicate the position of the magnetic

pole as a function of time for rocks of different ages. However, before dis-

cussing these results, we should note that one of the early conclusions of

paleomagnetic measurements was that the Earth’s magnetic field has been

subject to periodic reversals in which the north magnetic pole became the

south magnetic pole and vice versa. This was apparent from the reversed

orientations of the remanent magnetic field in a series of rocks of different

ages from the same locality. A summary of dated rocks with normal and

reversed polarities for the last 5 Ma is given in Figure 1–26. Measurements

indicate that for the past 720,000 years the magnetic field has been in its

present (normal) orientation; this magnetic time period is referred to as the

Brunhes epoch. Between 0.72 and 2.45 Ma, there was a period known as

the Matuyama epoch during which the orientation of the field was predom-

inantly reversed. Periods of normal polarity for the last 170 Ma are given in

Table 1–4.

The mechanism for magnetic field reversals is not known. In fact, the

way in which the Earth’s magnetic field is generated is only qualitatively

understood. It is well established from seismology that the outer core of the

Earth is primarily composed of liquid iron. Presumably, electric currents in

46 Plate Tectonics

the highly electrically conducting liquid iron generate the Earth’s magnetic

field. However, the currents that create the magnetic field are themselves

driven by motions of the conducting liquid in the presence of the magnetic

field. The field generation mechanism requires the presence of the field itself.

The process by which fluid motions maintain the magnetic field against its

tendency to decay because of ohmic dissipation is known as regenerative

dynamo action.

An energy source is required to overcome the resistive losses. Possible

energy sources are the decay of radioactive elements in the core, the cooling

of the core, the latent heat release upon solidification of the inner core,

and the gravitational energy release that accompanies solidification of the

inner core. The last energy source exists because the outer core contains an

alloying element lighter than iron. The light element does not enter the inner

core when solidification occurs at the inner core–outer core boundary. As a

result, growth of the inner core concentrates the light element in the outer

core, causing outer-core liquid to become increasingly lighter with time. This

releases gravitational potential energy in the same way that separation of

the entire core did early in the Earth’s evolution.

One or more of these energy sources drives the thermal or chemical con-

vective motions of the highly conducting liquid iron that result in a self-

excited dynamo; however, detailed theories of the process are not available.

Self-excited mechanical dynamos built in the laboratory exhibit random re-

versals of the resulting field. Presumably, the dynamo in the Earth’s core is

subject to random fluctuations that aperiodically lead to field reversals.

It is believed that the rotation of the Earth has an important influence on

the generation of the field. We have already noted that the Earth’s present

dipole axis is nearly aligned with its axis of rotation. It is implicitly assumed

in the use of paleomagnetic measurements that the magnetic poles and the

geographic poles coincide. A measurement of a paleomagnetic pole can then

be used to deduce the motion of the plate on which the measurement was

made.

Many paleomagnetic measurements have been made. Data are divided into

geological periods and into continental areas that appear to have remained

a single unit over the periods considered. Average pole positions are given in

Table 1–5. If no relative motion occurred among the continental blocks, all

measurements during a particular period should give the same pole position.

Clearly, as can be seen from Table 1–5, this is not the case. If a sequence

of pole positions for a particular continental area is plotted, it should form

a continuous path terminating close to the present position of the magnetic

pole; this is known as the polar wandering path for the magnetic pole. A polar

Figure 1.25 Geometry for determining the latitude and longitude of a pa- leomagnetic field.

wandering path of a plate can be used to determine the absolute position of

that plate relative to the geographic poles. The relation between the polar

wandering paths of two adjacent plates can be used to determine relative

velocities between the plates. The polar wandering paths for North America

and Europe are shown in Figure 1–27. The systematic divergence of the

paths over the past several hundred million years was one of the first pieces

of quantitative evidence that continental drift was occurring. Unfortunately

the considerable scatter in paleomagnetic measurements makes it difficult

to obtain reliable data. Much of this scatter can be attributed to deviations

of the magnetic poles from the geographic poles.

The magnitude of the magnetic field at the Earth’s surface varies both in

space and in time. The spatial variations are known as magnetic anomalies.

In the continents, regions of high magnetic field, that is, positive magnetic

anomalies, are usually associated with concentrations of magnetic minerals

in the Earth’s crust. Regional surveys of the magnetic field are an important

method of exploration for economic deposits of minerals.

Similar magnetic surveys over the oceans have shown a pattern of striped

magnetic anomalies, that is, elongated continuous zones of positive mag-

netic anomalies some tens of kilometers wide separated from one another

by zones of negative magnetic anomalies. The zones of striped magnetic

48 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.26 Measurements of the polarity of the Earth’s magnetic field for the last 5 million years. Each short line indicates a dated polarity determi- nation from a volcanic rock. The shaded periods are intervals of predomi- nantly normal polarity.

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 49

Table 1.4 Ages in Ma of Periods of Normal Polarity of the Earth’s

Magnetic Field for the Last 170 Ma

Normal Polarity Normal Polarity Normal Polarity Anomaly Interval Anomaly Interval Anomaly Interval

1.1 0.00 0.72 6.7 22.90 23.05 M1 118.70 121.81 1.2 0.91 0.97 6.8 23.25 23.38 M2 122.25 123.03 2.1 1.65 1.88 6.9 23.62 23.78 M4 125.36 126.46 2.2 2.06 2.09 7.1 25.01 25.11 M6 127.05 127.21 2.3 2.45 2.91 7.2 25.17 25.45 M7 127.34 127.52 2.4 2.98 3.07 7.3 25.84 26.01 M8 127.97 128.33 2.5 3.17 3.40 8.1 26.29 26.37 M9 128.60 128.91 3.1 3.87 3.99 8.2 26.44 27.13 M10.1 129.43 129.82 3.2 4.12 4.26 9.1 27.52 28.07 M10.2 130.19 130.57 3.3 4.41 4.48 9.2 28.12 28.51 M10.3 130.63 131.00 3.4 4.79 5.08 10.1 29.00 29.29 M10.4 131.02 131.36 3.5 5.69 5.96 10.2 29.35 29.58 M11.1 131.65 132.53 3.6 6.04 6.33 11.1 30.42 30.77 M11.2 133.03 133.08 3.7 6.66 6.79 11.2 30.82 31.21 M11.3 133.50 134.31 4.1 7.01 7.10 12 31.60 32.01 M12.1 134.42 134.75 4.2 7.17 7.56 13.1 34.26 34.44 M12.2 135.56 135.66 4.3 7.62 7.66 13.2 34.50 34.82 M12.3 135.88 136.24 4.4 8.02 8.29 15.1 36.12 36.32 M13 136.37 136.64 4.5 8.48 8.54 15.2 36.35 36.54 M14 137.10 137.39 4.6 8.78 8.83 15.3 36.93 37.16 M15 138.30 139.01 5.1 8.91 9.09 16.1 37.31 37.58 M16 139.58 141.20 5.2 9.14 9.48 16.2 37.63 38.01 M17 141.85 142.27 5.3 9.49 9.80 17.1 38.28 39.13 M18 143.76 144.33 5.4 9.83 10.13 17.2 39.20 39.39 M19.1 144.75 144.88 5.5 10.15 10.43 17.3 39.45 39.77 M19.2 144.96 145.98 5.6 10.57 10.63 18.1 39.94 40.36 M20.1 146.44 146.75 5.7 11.11 11.18 18.2 40.43 40.83 M20.2 146.81 147.47 5.8 11.71 11.90 18.3 40.90 41.31 M21 148.33 149.42 5.9 12.05 12.34 19 42.14 42.57 M22.1 149.89 151.46 5.10 12.68 12.71 20 43.13 44.57 M22.2 151.51 151.56 5.11 12.79 12.84 21 47.01 48.51 M22.3 151.61 151.69 5.12 13.04 13.21 22 50.03 50.66 M22.4 152.53 152.66 5.13 13.40 13.64 23.1 51.85 52.08 M23.1 152.84 153.21 5.14 13.87 14.24 23.2 52.13 52.83 M23.2 153.49 153.52 5.15 14.35 14.79 23.3 53.15 53.20 M24.1 154.15 154.48 5.16 14.98 15.07 24.1 53.39 53.69 M24.2 154.85 154.88 5.17 15.23 15.35 24.2 54.05 54.65 M24.3 155.08 155.21 5.18 16.27 16.55 25 57.19 57.80 M24.4 155.48 155.84 5.19 16.59 16.75 26 58.78 59.33 M25.1 156.00 156.29 5.20 16.82 16.99 27 61.65 62.17 M25.2 156.55 156.70 5.21 17.55 17.87 28 62.94 63.78 M25.3 156.78 156.88 5.22 18.07 18.09 29 64.16 64.85 M25.4 156.96 157.10 5.23 18.50 19.00 30 65.43 67.14 M26.1 157.20 157.30 6.1 19.26 20.23 31 67.23 68.13 M26.2 157.38 157.46 6.2 20.52 20.74 32.1 70.14 70.42 M26.3 157.53 157.61 6.3 20.97 21.37 32.2 70.69 72.35 M26.4 157.66 157.85 6.4 21.60 21.75 32.3 72.77 72.82 M27 158.01 158.21 6.5 21.93 22.03 33 73.12 79.09 M28 158.37 158.66 6.6 22.23 22.60 34 84.00 118.00 M29 158.87 159.80

J-QZ 160.33 169.00

Source: Harland et al. (1990).

anomalies generally lie parallel to ocean ridges and are symmetric with re-

spect to the ridge crest. A typical pattern adjacent to the mid-Atlantic ridge

is shown in Figure 1–28. A typical magnetic anomaly profile perpendicular

to the East Pacific Rise is given in Figure 1–29. The magnitude of any in-

dividual anomaly is a few hundred nanoteslas, or about 1% of the Earth’s

dipole field at the surface. The magnetic anomalies are attributed to ther-

mal remanent magnetism in the basaltic oceanic crust. As the volcanic rocks

of the oceanic crust cool through the magnetic blocking temperature near

the ocean ridge, a thermal remanent magnetism is acquired in the direc-

tion of the Earth’s magnetic field. This magnetization of the oceanic crust

produces the magnetic anomalies as a consequence of the episodic reversals

50 Plate Tectonics

T ab

le 1.5

P o sitio

n o f th

e N

o rth

M a gn

etic P o le

in D

iff eren

t G

eo logica

l P eriod

s a s

D eterm

in ed

by

P a leo

m a gn

etic S tu

d ies

N o rth

R u

ssian Sib

erian So

u th

A m

erica Eu

ro p e

P latfo

rm P

latfo rm

A frica

A m

erica A

u stralia

In d

ia

U 87N

,140E 80N

,157E 78N

,191E 66N

, 234E 87N

,152E 77N

,275E 82N

,62E Tertiary

L 85N

,197E 75N

,151E 68N

,192E 57N

,152E 85N

,186E 70N

,306E

C retaceous

64N ,187E

86N ,0E

66N ,166E

77N ,176E

61N ,260E

78N ,236E

53N ,329E

22N ,295E

Jurassic 76N

,142E 36N

,50E 65N

,138E 84N

,256E 65N

,262E 48N

,331E Triassic

62N ,100E

45N ,143E

51N ,154E

47N ,151E

80N ,71E

20N ,308E

Perm ian

46N ,117E

45N ,160E

44N ,162E

27N ,269E

7S,304E

U 38N

,161E 43N

,168E 34N

,144E 46N

,220E 60N

,180E 46N

,315E 26S,312E

C arboniferous

L 37N

,126E 22N

,168E 26N

,206E 73N

,34E 43N

,151E D

evonian 36N

,162E 28N

,151E 72N

,174E

Silurian 29N

,123E O

N ,136E

28N ,149E

24N ,139E

54N ,91E

O rdovician

28N ,192E

10N ,176E

25S,131E 24S,165E

11S,143E 2N

,188E C

am brian

7N ,140E

22N ,167E

8N ,189E

36S,127E 28N

,212E

S o u rce:

A fter

M . W

. M

cE lh

in n y

(1 9 7 3 ).

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 51

Figure 1.27 Polar wandering paths for North America and Europe. Num- bers give time before present in millions of years.

in the Earth’s magnetic field. Ocean floor created in the last 720,000 years

has been magnetized in the direction of the Earth’s present magnetic field,

leading to a positive magnetic anomaly (see Figure 1–26). However, ocean

floor created between 2.45 and 0.72 Ma was primarily magnetized in the

direction of the reversed field. This magnetization is opposite to the present

Earth’s field and therefore subtracts from it, leading to a zone of low field or

a negative magnetic anomaly, as illustrated in Figure 1–29b. The conclusion

is that the stripes of seafloor with positive magnetic anomalies were created

during periods of normal polarity of the Earth’s magnetic field and stripes of

the seafloor with negative magnetic anomalies were created during periods

of reversed polarity of the Earth’s magnetic field.

Since the dates of the field reversals are known independently from geochrono-

logical studies, the widths of the magnetic stripes can be used to determine

the velocity of seafloor spreading. For the example given in Figure 1–29a,

the distance from the ridge crest to the edge of each anomaly is plotted

against the time of known field reversal in Figure 1–29c. The result is nearly

a straight line, the slope of which is the velocity of seafloor spreading, 45

mm yr−1 in this case. Velocities of seafloor spreading (half-spreading rates)

range upward to about 100 mm yr−1.

52 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.28 Striped pattern of magnetic anomalies parallel to the Mid- Atlantic ridge (Heirtzler et al., 1966).

Problem 1.9 Determine the velocity of seafloor spreading on the East

Pacific Rise from the magnetic anomaly profile given in Figure 1–30a.

Problem 1.10 Determine the velocity of seafloor spreading on the

South East Indian Rise from the magnetic anomaly profile given in Figure

1–30b.

Shipboard magnetometers have been used to obtain maps of magnetic

anomalies over a large fraction of the world’s oceans. Striped patterns of

magnetic anomalies have not been obtained near the paleomagnetic equator.

At the magnetic equator the magnetic field is horizontal, and the magneti-

zation of the ferromagnetic minerals in the oceanic crust does not produce

a significant surface magnetic anomaly. The maps of magnetic anomalies

have been used to determine the age of a large fraction of the ocean floor

(Figure 1–31). This distribution of ages has been confirmed by the Deep Sea

Drilling Project (DSDP). The deep-sea capability of the drilling ship Glomar

Challenger made it possible to drill a large number of cored holes through

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 53

Figure 1.29 (a) Magnetic anomaly profile perpendicular to the East Pa- cific Rise (52◦S, 118◦W). (b) Induced magnetization in the oceanic crust due to episodic reversals of the Earth’s magnetic field. (c) Correlation of the positions x of the magnetic anomalies with t of field reversals to give the velocity u of seafloor spreading.

the sedimentary cover and into the underlying basaltic oceanic crust. If we

hypothesize that the age of the oldest sediments in the sedimentary sequence

adjacent to the volcanic crust, as determined from studies of fossils, corre-

sponds to the age of the volcanic rocks, then we can determine the age of the

seafloor. This has been done for a number of DSDP holes, and the results

have been compared with the age of the seafloor inferred from studies of

the magnetic anomalies in Figure 1–32. The excellent agreement is striking

confirmation of the magnetic method for determining the age of the seafloor.

Because the surface area of the Earth remains essentially constant, the

velocities of seafloor spreading at ocean ridges can be related to velocities

of subduction at ocean trenches. As a result the relative velocities among

the rigid plates can be determined. The ten major plates are illustrated in

Figure 1–1. The relative motion between two adjacent plates can be obtained

using Euler’s theorem. This theorem states that any line on the surface of a

sphere can be translated to any other position and orientation on the sphere

by a single rotation about a suitably chosen axis passing through the center

of the sphere. In terms of the Earth this means that a rigid surface plate

can be shifted to a new position by a rotation about a uniquely defined

axis. The point where this axis intersects the surface of the Earth is known

54 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.30 Typical profiles of the magnetic anomaly pattern (a) perpen- dicular to the East Pacific Rise at 61◦S and 151◦W and (b) perpendicular to the South East Indian Rise at 54◦S and 142◦E.

as a pole of rotation. This is illustrated in Figure 1–33, where plate B is

rotating counterclockwise with respect to plate A. Ridge segments lie on

lines of longitude emanating from the pole of rotation P. Transform faults

lie on small circles with their centers at the pole of rotation.

The relative motion between two adjacent plates is completely specified

when the latitude and longitude of the pole of rotation together with the

angular velocity of rotation ω are given. The location of the pole of rotation

can be determined from the orientations of ridge crests, magnetic lineaments,

and transform faults. The angular velocity of rotation can be obtained from

the seafloor-spreading velocities determined from widths of the magnetic

lineaments and the requirement that surface area must be preserved.

The latitudes and longitudes of the poles of rotation for relative motions

among ten plates are given in Table 1–6. The angular velocities of rotation

are also given. The relative velocity u between plates at any plate boundary

is

u = ωa sin ∆, (1.17)

where a is the radius of the Earth and ∆ is the angle subtended at the center

of the Earth by the pole of rotation P and point A on the plate boundary

(see Figure 1–34). Note that ω is in radians per unit time. The angle ∆ can

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 55

F ig

u re

1. 31

M a p

o f se

a fl oo

r a ge

s (M

u ll er

et a l. , 1 9 9 7 ).

56 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.32 Correlation of the ages of the oldest sediments in DSDP holes with the predicted ages of the oceanic crust based on seafloor magnetic anomalies.

Figure 1.33 Plate B is moving counterclockwise relative to plate A. The motion is defined by the angular velocity ω about the pole of rotation P. Double lines are ridge segments, and arrows denote directions of motion on transform faults.

be related to the colatitude θ and east longitude ψ of the pole of rotation and

the colatitude θ′ and east longitude ψ′ of the point on the plate boundary

by the same spherical trigonometry formula used in Equation (1–12). By

referring to Figure 1–35 we can write

cos ∆ = cos θ cos θ′ + sin θ sin θ′ cos(ψ − ψ′).

(1.18)

1.8 Paleomagnetism and the Motion of the Plates 57

Table 1.6 Pole Positions and Rates of Rotation for Relative Motion

Between Adjacent Surface Plates∗

Plates Lat. (N) Long. (E) ω (deg/Myr)

EU–NA 62.4 135.8 0.21 AF–NA 78.8 38.3 0.24 AF–EU 21.0 −20.6 0.12 NA–SA 16.3 −58.1 0.15 AF–SA 62.5 −39.4 0.31 AN–SA 86.4 −40.7 0.26 NA–CA −74.3 −26.1 0.10 CA–SA 50.0 −65.3 0.18 NA–PA 48.7 −78.2 0.75 CO–PA 36.8 −108.6 2.00 CO–NA 27.9 −120.7 1.36 CO–NZ 4.8 −124.3 0.91 NZ–PA 55.6 −90.1 1.36 NZ–AN 40.5 −95.9 0.52 NZ–SA 56.0 −94.0 0.72 AN–PA 64.3 −84.0 0.87 PA–AU −60.1 −178.3 1.07 EU–PA 61.1 −85.8 0.86 CO–CA 24.1 −119.4 1.31 NZ–CA 56.2 −104.6 0.55 AU–AN 13.2 38.2 0.65 AF–AN 5.6 −39.2 0.13 AU–AF 12.4 49.8 0.63 AU–IN −5.6 77.1 0.30 IN–AF 23.6 28.5 0.41 AR–AF 24.1 24.0 0.40 IN–EU 24.4 17.7 0.51 AR–EU 24.6 13.7 0.50 AU–EU 15.1 40.5 0.69 IN–AR 3.0 91.5 0.03

∗ Global plate motion model NUVEL-1A. The first plate moves counterclockwise relative to the second plate. Abbreviations: PA, Pacific; NA, North America; SA,

South America; AF, Africa; CO, Cocos; NZ, Nazca; EU, Eurasia; AN, Antarctica; AR, Arabia; IN, India; AU, Australia; CA, Caribbean. See Figure

1–1 for plate geometries. Source: DeMets et al. (1994).

The surface distance s between points A and P is

s = a∆, (1.19)

with ∆ in radians. This relation along with Equation (1–18) can be used

to determine the distance between two points on the surface of the Earth

58 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.34 Geometry for the determination of the relative plate velocity at point A on the boundary between two plates in terms of the rate of rotation ω about pole P.

Figure 1.35 Geometry for determining the angle between point A on a plate boundary and a pole of rotation.

given the latitudes and longitudes of the points. Using Equations (1–17) and

(1–18), one can find the relative velocity between two plates, at any point

on the boundary between the plates, once the latitude and longitude of the

point on the boundary have been specified.

As a specific example let us determine the relative velocity across the San

Andreas fault at San Francisco (37.8◦N, 122◦W). We assume that the entire

relative velocity between the rigid Pacific and North American plates is

accommodated on this fault. From Table 1–6 we find θ = 90◦ − 48.7◦ = 41.3◦

and ψ = −78.2◦. Since θ′ = 52.2◦ and ψ′ = 238◦, we find from Equation

1.9 Triple Junctions 59

(1–18) that ∆ = 33.6◦; with ω = 0.75◦ Myr−1, we find from Equation (1–17)

that the relative velocity across the fault is 46 mm yr−1.

Problem 1.11 Determine the declination and inclination of the Earth’s

magnetic field at Boston (φ = 42.5◦, ψ = −71◦). Use the dipole approxima-

tion to the field, but do not assume that the geographic and magnetic poles

coincide.

Problem 1.12 Determine the declination and inclination of the Earth’s

magnetic field at Chicago (φ = 41.8◦, ψ = −87.5◦). Use the dipole approx-

imation to the field, but do not assume that the geographic and magnetic

poles coincide.

Problem 1.13 What are the surface distances between the Earth’s mag-

netic poles and geographic poles?

Problem 1.14 What is the surface distance between the Earth’s mag-

netic poles and the best-fit dipole poles?

Problem 1.15 Plot the distance between the paleomagnetic poles ob-

tained from North American and European rocks as a function of time, and

discuss the results.

Problem 1.16 Plot the distance between the paleomagnetic poles ob-

tained from the Russian and Siberian Platform rocks as a function of time,

and discuss the results.

Problem 1.17 What is the spreading rate between the North American

and Eurasian plates in Iceland (65◦N, 20◦W)?

Problem 1.18 What is the relative plate velocity between the Nazca

and South American plates at Lima, Peru (12◦S, 77◦W)?

Problem 1.19 What is the relative plate velocity between the Indian

and Eurasian plates in the Himalayas (30◦N, 81◦E)?

1.9 Triple Junctions

A plate boundary can end only by intersecting another plate boundary;

this intersection is a triple junction. Since there are three types of plate

boundaries – ridges, trenches, and transform faults – there are in princi-

ple ten types of triple junctions. However, some of these triple junction

cannot exist. An example is a triple junction of three transform faults. The

required condition for the existence of a triple junction is that the three

vector velocities defining relative motions between plate pairs at a triple

60 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.36 (a) Schematic of a ridge–ridge–ridge (RRR) triple junction of plates A, B, and C. (b) Vector velocities for relative motion between the plates.

junction must form a closed triangle. For many types of triple junctions this

condition requires a particular orientation of the plate boundaries.

As a specific example let us consider the ridge– ridge–ridge (RRR) triple

junction illustrated in Figure 1–36a. The ridge between plates A and B lies in

the north-south direction (an azimuth with respect to the triple junction of

0◦). Since the relative velocity across a ridge is perpendicular to the ridge,

the vector velocity of plate B relative to plate A, uBA, has an azimuth,

measured clockwise from north, of 90◦; we assume that the magnitude is

uBA = 100 mm yr−1. The ridge between plates B and C has an azimuth of

110◦ relative to the triple junction. The vector velocity of plate C relative

to plate B, uCB, therefore has an azimuth of 200◦; we assume that the

magnitude uCB = 80 mm yr−1. The problem is to find the azimuth of the

ridge between plates A and C, α, and the azimuth and magnitude of the

relative velocity uAC.

The velocity condition for all triple junctions requires that

uBA + uCB + uAC = 0. (1.20)

This is illustrated in Figure 1–36b. In order to determine the magnitude of

the velocity uAC we use the law of cosines:

uAC = (1002 + 802 − 2 · 100 · 80 · cos 70◦)1/2

1.9 Triple Junctions 61

= 104.5 mm yr−1. (1.21)

The angle α is then determined using the law of sines:

sin(α− 180◦) = 80

104.5 sin 70◦ = 0.7518 = −sinα,

α = 228.7◦. (1.22)

The azimuth of the ridge is 228.7◦, and the azimuth of uAC is 318.7◦. An

example of an RRR triple junction is the intersection of the Nazca, Cocos,

and Pacific plates (see Figure 1–1).

Problem 1.20 Consider an RRR triple junction of plates A, B, and

C. The ridge between plates A and B lies in a north–south direction (an

azimuth of 0◦ with respect to the triple junction) and has a relative velocity

of 60 mm yr−1. The ridge between plates B and C has an azimuth of 120◦

with respect to the triple junction, and the ridge between plates A and C

has an azimuth of 270◦ with respect to the triple junction. Determine the

azimuths and magnitudes of the relative velocities between plates B and C

and C and A.

We next consider a trench–trench–trench (TTT) triple junction. In gen-

eral this type of triple junction cannot exist. A geometry that is acceptable

is illustrated in Figure 1–37a. Both plates A and B are being subducted

beneath plate C along a single north–south trench. Plate A is also being

subducted beneath plate B along a trench that has an azimuth of 135◦ with

respect to the triple junction. Since oblique subduction can occur, the rel-

ative velocities between plates where subduction is occurring need not be

perpendicular to the trench. We assume that the velocity of plate A relative

to plate B has a magnitude uAB = 50 mm yr−1 and an azimuth of 225◦. We

also assume that the relative velocity of plate B with respect to plate C has

a magnitude uBC = 50 mm yr−1 and an azimuth of 270◦. Applying the law

of cosines to the velocity triangle of Figure 1–37b, we find

uAC = (502 + 502 − 2 · 50 · 50 · cos 135◦)1/2

= 92.4 mm yr−1. (1.23)

The angle α in Figure 1–37b is determined from the law of sines:

sinα = 50

92.4 sin 135◦ = 0.383, α = 22.5◦, (1.24)

so that the azimuth of uAC is 247.5◦. The velocity at which subduction is

occurring is uAC cosα = 85.4 mm yr−1, and the velocity of migration of the

triple junction along the north–south trench is uAC sinα = 35.4 mm yr−1.

62 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.37 (a) Illustration of a trench–trench–trench (TTT) triple junc- tion of plates A, B, and C. (b) Vector velocities for relative motion between the plates.

Figure 1.38 Another TTT triple junction.

An example of a TTT triple junction is the intersection of the Eurasian,

Pacific, and Philippine plates (see Figure 1–1).

Problem 1.21 Show that a triple junction of three transform faults

cannot exist.

Problem 1.22 Consider the TTT triple junction illustrated in Figure 1–

38. This triple junction is acceptable because the relative velocity between

plates C and A, uCA, is parallel to the trench in which plate B is being

subducted beneath plate C. The trench between plates C and B has an

azimuth of 180◦ so that uCA has an azimuth of 0◦; assume that uCA = 50

mm yr−1. Also assume that the azimuth and magnitude of uBA are 315◦

and 60 mm yr−1. Determine the azimuth and magnitude of uBC.

1.9 Triple Junctions 63

Figure 1.39 (a) A trench–ridge–fault (TRF) triple junction of plates A, B, and C. (b) Vector velocities for the relative motions between the plates.

As our final example we consider a ridge–trench–fault (RTF) triple junc-

tion. This is another type of triple junction that cannot generally exist.

An acceptable geometry is illustrated in Figure 1–39a; the trench and the

transform fault are aligned in the north–south direction. Plate C is being

subducted beneath plate B; plate A is sliding past plate B on a transform

fault. The velocity of plate B relative to plate A has a magnitude uBA = 50

mm yr−1 and an azimuth of 180◦ (the orientation of the fault requires an

azimuth of either 0◦ or 180◦). The ridge has an azimuth of 225◦ with respect

to the triple junction. This constrains the relative velocity between plates

A and C to have an azimuth of 315◦; we assume that uAC = 40 mm yr−1.

Applying the law of cosines to the velocity triangle in Figure 1–39b we get

uCB = (502 + 402 − 2 · 40 · 50 cos 45◦)1/2

= 35.7 mm yr−1, (1.25)

and from the law of sines we find

sinα = 40

35.7 sin 45◦ = 0.79, α = 52.4◦. (1.26)

The rate at which the ridge is migrating northward along the trench–transform

boundary is uCB cosα+uAC cos 45◦ = 50.1 mm yr−1. An example of an RTF

triple junction is the intersection of the Pacific, North American, and Cocos

plates (see Figure 1–1).

It should be emphasized that the relative plate motions given in Table

1–6 are only instantaneously valid. As plates evolve, their poles of rotation

migrate, and their angular velocities change. Plate boundaries and triple

64 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.40 A TTR triple junction.

junctions must also evolve. One result is that a plate boundary may cease to

be active or new plate boundaries and triple junctions may form. Another

consequence is that plate boundaries may become broad zones of diffuse

deformation. The western United States is an example of such a zone; the

deformation associated with the interaction of the Pacific, Juan de Fuca,

and North American plates extends from the Colorado Front in Wyoming,

Colorado, and New Mexico, to the Pacific Coast (see Section 1–13).

Problem 1.23 Consider the TTR triple junction illustrated in Figure

1–40. A ridge with an azimuth of 135◦ relative to the triple junction is

migrating along a north–south trench. If the azimuth and magnitude of uBA

are 270◦ and 50 mm yr−1 and uCB = 40 mm yr−1, determine the azimuth

and magnitude of uCA. Also determine the direction and rate of migration

of the ridge relative to plate A.

Problem 1.24 Consider the TTF triple junction illustrated in Figure 1–

41a. A right-lateral transform fault has an azimuth of 45◦ with respect to the

triple junction that is migrating along a north–south trench. If the azimuth

and magnitude of uBA are 270◦ and 50 mm yr−1 and uCB = 50 mm yr−1,

determine the azimuth and magnitude of uCA. Also determine the direction

and rate of migration of the fault along the trench.

Problem 1.25 Consider the TTF triple junction illustrated in Figure 1–

41b. A left-lateral transform fault has an azimuth of 0◦, and two trenches

have azimuths of 180◦ and 225◦. If the azimuth and magnitude of uCB are

90◦ and 10 mm yr−1 and uAB = 50 mm yr−1, determine the azimuth and

magnitude of uAC.

1.10 The Wilson Cycle 65

Figure 1.41 Two TTF triple junctions.

1.10 The Wilson Cycle

J. Tuzo Wilson (1966) proposed that continental drift is cyclic. In particular

he proposed that oceans open and close cyclically; this concept is now known

as the Wilson cycle and was based on the opening and closing of the Atlantic

Ocean. The Wilson cycle, in its simplest form, is illustrated in Figure 1–42.

The first step in the Wilson cycle, illustrated in Figure 1–42a, is the

breakup of a continent. This occurs on continental rift zones. The first stage

of the splitting process is the formation of a rift valley. When a continent

starts to fracture under tensional stresses, a rift valley is formed. The cen-

tral block of the rift valley, known as a graben, subsides, as shown in Figure

1–42a, and the edges of the adjacent blocks are uplifted. The faults that

occur on the sides of the down-dropped central graben are known as normal

faults. Displacements on the normal faults accommodate horizontal exten-

sion. Examples of rift valleys that may be in the first stage of continental

splitting include the East African rift system and the Rio Grande (river

valley) rift. There is ample evidence in the geological record, however, that

some rift valleys never evolve into an ocean. The splitting process may be

aborted. Once the formation of the rift valley relieves the tensional stresses,

no further horizontal extension may occur.

The Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden are rift valleys that have progressed to

the formation of accreting plate margins. Together with the East African rift

they define a three-armed pattern that can be seen in the satellite photograph

in Figure 1–43. If all the rifts of a three-armed system develop into accreting

plate margins, an RRR triple junction is formed. In many cases, however,

66 Plate Tectonics

only two arms develop into accreting margins, and the third becomes a relict

rift zone in the continent. This third arm is referred to as a failed arm. An

example of a failed arm is the Benue rift on the western margin of Africa

shown in Figure 1–53. The other two arms of this system became part of the

early mid-Atlantic ridge at which the Atlantic Ocean formed. The failed arm

of the system eventually became filled with sediments; the sediment-filled

fossil rift is known as an aulacogen.

The second stage of continent splitting is the formation of a seafloor-

spreading center, or ocean ridge. This is illustrated in Figure 1–42b. The

normal faults associated with the margins of the rift valley now form the

margins of a new ocean. Upwelling hot mantle rock partially melts to form

new ocean crust and the first stages of an ocean ridge. An example of an

ocean at this early stage of development is the Red Sea (Figure 1–43). As

seafloor spreading continues at the spreading center, an ocean is formed.

Because the creation of new seafloor at an ocean ridge is very nearly a

symmetric process, the ocean ridge bisects the newly created ocean. This is

illustrated in Figure 1–42c. An example is the Atlantic Ocean. The margins

of the opening ocean are known as passive continental margins in contrast

to the active continental margins where subduction is occurring.

As the seafloor at the continental margin grows older, the lithosphere

becomes thicker and more dense. Eventually the lithosphere becomes suf-

ficiently unstable so that it founders and an ocean trench develops and

subduction begins. This is illustrated in Figure 1–42d. Trenches apparently

form immediately adjacent to one of the continents. This is the site of the

oldest, coldest, and most unstable oceanic lithosphere. Also, the continental

margin is inherently a zone of weakness. As the ocean basin adjacent to a

continent grows older, it continues to subside relative to the continent. This

differential subsidence is accommodated on the normal faults associated with

the continental margin. These normal faults are zones of weakness, and they

may play a key role in the formation of new ocean trenches, when a passive

continental margin is converted to an active continental margin.

If the rate of subduction is greater than the rate of seafloor spreading,

the size of the ocean will decrease. Eventually the ocean ridge itself will be

subducted (see Figure 1–42e). Ridge subduction is occurring along the west

coast of North America. The remanents of the Juan de Fuca ridge form the

boundary between the Juan de Fuca plate and the Pacific plate (Figure 1–1).

The northern part of this ridge was subducted beneath the Aleutian trench.

Other parts of the ridge were subducted off the west coast of California. In

these cases, the subduction led to the transformation of the convergent plate

boundaries between the North American plate and the Juan de Fuca plate

1.10 The Wilson Cycle 67

F ig

u re

1. 42

T h e

W il so

n cy

cl e.

68 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.43 Satellite photograph of the Red Sea (NASA STS040-078-088).

(also known as the Farallon plate) to the present transform fault boundaries

between the North American and Pacific plates.

After ridge subduction, the remainder of the oceanic plate will be sub-

ducted and the continents will collide (Figure 1–42f). The implications of a

continental collision are discussed in the next section.

Evidence of the past motions of the continents comes from many sources.

The distribution of magnetic lineations on the seafloor can be used to re-

construct the positions of the continents for about the last 150 Ma. Because

there is very little seafloor older than this, reconstructions prior to about

150 Ma are primarily based on paleomagnetic measurements in continental

rocks. Many other sources of information contribute to paleoreconstructions.

Dated orogenic events provide information on the locations of ocean trenches

and continental collision zones. The spatial distributions of fossils, glacia-

tions, and morphological features provide additional latitude control.

Continental reconstructions for the last 170 Ma are given in Figure 1–44.

1.10 The Wilson Cycle 69

Figure 1.44 Continental reconstructions. (a) 170 Ma. Continued on pp. 42–3. (Smith et al., 1974)

Reassembly of the continents clearly resembles the construction of a jigsaw

puzzle. Not only does South America fit against Africa, but Australia can be

fit together with Southeast Asia and Antarctica as well as Greenland with

North America and Europe. Continental reconstructions can be extended

even farther back in time, but the uncertainties become large.

At 170 Ma the supercontinent Pangaea was being rifted to form the north-

ern continent Laurasia (composed of North America, Europe, and Asia) and

the southern continent Gondwanaland composed of South America, Africa,

India, Australia, and parts of Antarctica and Southeast Asia. Between these

continents the Tethys Ocean was being formed. Between 170 and 100 Ma

the central Atlantic Ocean began to form as North America rotated away

from Africa. Simultaneously the Tethys Ocean was closing. Between 100 and

50 Ma the Atlantic Ocean continued to form and the Indian Ocean formed

70 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.44 (cont.) (b) 100 Ma. (Smith et al., 1974)

as Australia and Antarctica rotated away from Africa. The Tethys Ocean

continued to close. In the last 50 Ma the Atlantic has continued to open,

India has collided with Eurasia, and Australia has moved northward relative

to Antarctica. Today the Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, and Caspian Sea

are the only relics of the Tethys Ocean.

1.11 Continental Collisions

The collision of two continents when an ocean closes is a major cause of

mountain building. At present a continental collision is occurring along a

large fraction of the southern boundary of the Eurasian plate. The style of

this collision varies considerably from west to east. The mountain building

associated with a continental collision is referred to as an orogeny. The re-

gion where mountain building is occurring is referred to as an orogenic zone.

1.11 Continental Collisions 71

F ig

u re

1. 44

(c o n t. )

(c )

72 Plate Tectonics

The collision between the Eurasian and African plates has resulted in the

formation of the Alps; this is a relatively subdued continental collision and

the Alpine orogenic zone is relatively narrow. One model for this collision

is illustrated in the cross section given in Figure 1–45. A flake of the upper

continental crust of the Eurasian plate has overridden the continental crust

of the African plate. The forces associated with the southward dipping sub-

duction of the Eurasian plate has driven the upper Eurasian crust several

hundred kilometers over the African crust. The lower Eurasian crust has

been delaminated and is being subducted into the mantle with the Eurasian

lithosphere. The underlying African crust is exposed through the overly-

ing upper Eurasian crust at several points in the Alps. The splitting of the

Eurasian crust at a depth of about 15 km requires an intracrustal decolle-

ment. This type of splitting is often observed in the geological record and is

attributed to a soft crustal rheology at intermediate crustal depths.

The continental collision between the Eurasian and the Indian plates has

resulted in a much broader orogenic zone that extends throughout much of

China. This orogenic zone is illustrated in Figure 1–46. The collision has

resulted in the formation of the Himalayas, the highest and most extensive

mountain range in the world. A satellite photograph of the Himalayas look-

ing to the northwest is given in Figure 1–47. Imbedded within the Himalayas

is the Indus suture, the actual boundary between the Indian plate and the

Eurasian plate. The Tibetan plateau is a broad region of elevated topogra-

phy with extensive faulting but very little recent volcanism. Faulting extends

throughout much of China. A substantial fraction of the largest historical

earthquakes has occurred on these faults and in many cases the death toll

has been very high. Reports claimed that there were 655,000 deaths during

the Tangshan earthquake of July 28, 1976. The largest reported death toll in

an earthquake was the 800,000 deaths attributed to the Shensi earthquake

on January 23, 1556.

It is necessary to explain why this orogenic zone is so broad and why the

orogeny is principally on the Eurasian plate with relatively little deformation

on the Indian plate. One explanation for the asymmetric deformation is that

the Eurasian lithosphere in Tibet and China was thin and weak prior to the

collision. This area may have resembled the present western United States

which has a weak and easily deformable lithosphere. A simplified model for

this continental collision is given in Figure 1–48. The Indian continental

crust and lithosphere have been thrust beneath the Eurasian crust across

the entire width of the Tibetan plateau.

Continental collisions can produce large amounts of horizontal strain. It

is estimated that the original continental crust in the Himalayas has been

1.11 Continental Collisions 73

Figure 1.45 Cross section of the Alpine orogenic zone (after Schmid et al., 1997).

shortened by 300 km or more. Strain in the crust is accommodated by both

brittle and ductile mechanisms. The brittle upper crust can be compressed

and thickened by displacements on a series of thrust faults that form a thrust

belt such as that illustrated in Figure 1–49; each of the upthrust blocks

forms a mountain range. Sedimentary basins often form over the downthrust

blocks. In the Wyoming thrust belt these sedimentary basins are the sites of

major oil fields. Crustal thickening and shortening resulting from thrusting

during the collision of India and Asia are illustrated in Figure 1–48. In

some cases the entire brittle part of the continental crust is thrust over

the adjacent continental crust as a thrust sheet. Evidence indicates that a

thrust sheet in the southern Appalachian Mountains extends over hundreds

of kilometers. This structure is associated with the continental collision that

occurred when the proto-Atlantic ocean closed at about 250 Ma.

The crust can also be compressed by ductile deformation, one result of

which is folding. The convex upward or top of a fold is known as an anticline,

and the concave upward or bottom of a fold is known as a syncline. On a large

scale these are known as anticlinoria and synclinoria. Folding is illustrated

in Figure 1–50. When a region of large-scale folding is eroded, the easily

eroded strata form valleys, and the resistant stata form ridges. This type

of valley and ridge topography is found in Pennsylvania and West Virginia

(Figure 1–51). The ridges are primarily sandstone, and the valleys are the

74 Plate Tectonics

F igu

re 1.46

Illu stra

tio n

o f th

e o rogen

ic zo

n e

resu ltin

g fro

m th

e co

n tin

en ta

l co

llisio n

betw een

th e

E u ra

sia n

a n d

In d ia

n p la

tes. T

h e

m a jo

r fa

u lts

a n d

zo n es

o f vo

lca n ism

a re

sh o w n . T

h e

In d u s

su tu

re is

th e

p ro

ba ble

bo u n d a ry

betw een

th e

p la

tes (a

fter T a p po

n ier

a n d

M o ln

a r,

1 9 7 7 ).

1.11 Continental Collisions 75

Figure 1.47 Satellite photograph of the Himalayas and the Tibetan plateau (NASA STS 41G-120-0022).

result of the erosion of shales. The large-scale folding in this area was also

the result of the continental collision that occurred at about 250 Ma. An

extreme amount of deformation occurs in the formation of nappes. A nappe

may be either a thrust sheet or a recumbent fold, that is, a fold whose limbs

are almost parallel and roughly horizontal (Figure 1–45).

The effects of continental collisions appear to vary widely. The collision

between India and Asia is responsible not only for the Himalaya Mountains

but also for tectonics and seismicity throughout China. In contrast, the

Alpine orogeny in Europe is narrowly confined. There is also observational

evidence that the continental collision that resulted in the formation of the

Appalachian Mountains was relatively mild. This difference in collisional

orogenies may be attributed to the characteristics of the orogenic zone prior

to collision. China may have resembled the western United States; that is, its

lithosphere may have been very thin prior to collision, and it may therefore

have been easily deformed during the collision.

76 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.48 A schematic cross section of the Himalaya and the southern Tibetan plateau showing underthrusting of the Indian continental crust and lithosphere beneath the Eurasian crust. MBT, Main Boundary Thrust; MCT, Main Central Thrust; STD, South Tibetan Detachment (after Zhao and Nelson, 1993).

Figure 1.49 Horizontal compression resulting in continental collision and a series of thrust faults. Each uplifted block creates a mountain range and each downdropped block a sedimentary basin.

1.12 Volcanism and Heat Flow

As we have previously discussed, volcanism is associated with both accre-

tionary plate margins and subduction zones. The worldwide distribution of

active volcanoes is shown in Figure 1–52. Clearly, most volcanoes are associ-

ated with plate margins. Continuous volcanism occurs along the worldwide

ocean ridge system, where it forms the 6-km-thick basaltic oceanic crust.

Only a small fraction of this volcanism is included in the distribution of

active volcanoes given in Figure 1–52; the remainder occurs on the seafloor,

where it cannot be readily observed. The linear chains of active volcanoes

associated with ocean trenches are clearly illustrated in Figure 1–52. How-

ever, significant gaps in the chains do occur even when active subduction is

going on. Examples are in Peru and central Chile.

1.12 Volcanism and Heat Flow 77

Figure 1.50 Large-scale folding resulting from horizontal compression. The easily eroded strata form valleys, and the resistive strata form ridges.

While a large fraction of the Earth’s volcanism can be directly attributed

to plate boundaries, there are many exceptions. The most obvious example

is the volcanism of the Hawaiian Islands. This intraplate volcanism occurs

near the center of the Pacific plate. As discussed in Section 1–6 centers

of intraplate volcanism are referred to as hotspots. The locations of thirty

hotspots are given in Table 1–2 and the distribution of twenty hotspots

is shown on the map in Figure 1–14. These are both intraplate hotspots

and hotspots located on or near oceanic ridges. One example of a hotspot

on an oceanic ridge is Iceland, where very high rates of volcanism have

produced anomalously thick oceanic crust. Other examples are the Azores

and Galapagos Islands, where anomalous volcanism has produced groups of

islands near an ocean ridge.

In many ways hotspot volcanics are notable for their differences rather

than their similarities. We will now discuss in somewhat more detail the

hotspot volcanics of Africa and western North America. The distribution

of volcanic rocks in Africa that are younger than 26 million years is shown

in Figure 1–53. Active volcanism is occurring throughout much of Africa.

The East African rift system is a nearly linear feature extending southwest

several thousand kilometers from its junction with the Red Sea and the

Gulf of Aden. The rift is characterized by tensional tectonics and horizontal

extension. As discussed previously, the rift may represent the first stage of

continental rupture.

The East African rift is also characterized by near-circular regions of el-

evated topography referred to as swells. The relationship of these features

to the rifting process is uncertain. They may be associated with convec-

tive plumes in the mantle. An alternative hypothesis for continental rifts is

that they are the direct result of tensional stresses in the lithosphere. The

78 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.51 Space shuttle radar image of the Appalachian foldbelt in Penn- sylvania. The more resistant strata such as sandstones form the narrow ridges (NASA PIA01306).

tensional stresses cause the continental lithosphere to rupture, leading to

volcanism and uplift.

Other areas of extensive volcanism in Africa are the Tibesti area in north-

east Chad and Hoggar to the west. In addition to volcanism these areas are

associated with crustal swells; however, they do not appear to be associated

with any linear features. The Haruj volcanics north of Tibesti are not as-

sociated with any apparent crustal elevation. Adjacent to the continental

margin in the Gulf of Guinea is the Cameroon line of recent volcanics. This

is a series of active volcanic centers that pass from oceanic onto continental

crust. Although this is a linear chain of volcanic centers, the linear progres-

sion in time is not well defined. Farther to the north on the continental

margin of Africa lie the Canary Islands. In this group of volcanic islands,

volcanism has been centered for a long period.

It is evident that very diverse types of intraplate volcanism occur in Africa.

1.12 Volcanism and Heat Flow 79

Figure 1.52 Distribution of active volcanoes in the Quaternary.

It is not clear whether all this volcanism can be attributed to a single mech-

anism. If mantle plumes are responsible for this volcanism, how many are

required? Why does the volcanism in Africa have such a variety of forms?

The western United States is another area of extensive volcanism. The

distribution of recent surface volcanic rocks (with ages of less than 7 million

years) is given in Figure 1–54. Because the San Andreas fault in California

is recognized as a major plate boundary between the Pacific and North

American plates, the volcanism of this area may be classified as being plate-

margin-related; however, the volcanism extends more than 1500 km from

the plate margin.

Yellowstone National Park in the northwest corner of Wyoming is the

center of extensive recent volcanism that occurs at the end of a track of

volcanism that extends along the Snake River plain. For this reason the

Yellowstone area is classified as a hotspot (see Figure 1–14), and it is thus

a possible site of a mantle plume. The ages of surface volcanic rocks on the

Snake River plain are given as a function of the distance from Yellowstone

in Figure 1–55. The ages of the oldest volcanic rocks tend to increase with

distance from Yellowstone; however, young volcanic rocks occur along much

of the length of the Snake River plain. It is difficult to associate these young

volcanics, which extend over a distance of some 500 km, with a single melting

80 Plate Tectonics

anomaly beneath Yellowstone. Also, it is clear from Figure 1–54 that very

young volcanics extend throughout the western United States. Some of these

volcanics form the volcanic line associated with subduction of the Juan

de Fuca plate beneath Washington, Oregon, and northern California. But

much volcanism remains unexplained. Small amounts of volcanism appear

to be associated with the tensional tectonics of the Rio Grande rift in New

Mexico and the Basin and Range province in Nevada and Arizona. Further

discussion of this is given in the next section.

Variations in surface heat flow can also be correlated with the distribution

of plates. On a worldwide basis the average surface heat flow is about 87

mW m−2. For rocks with an average thermal conductivity this corresponds

to an increase in temperature with depth of 25 K km−1. The heat being lost

to the surface of the Earth can be attributed to the heat produced by the

decay of the radioactive isotopes and to the cooling of the Earth.

Plate margins and other areas where volcanism occurs are generally char-

acterized by surface heat flows much higher than the average value just

given. The high heat flows may be the result of a thin lithosphere or, in

some cases, the migration of magma through a relatively thick lithosphere.

The cooling of the oceanic lithosphere as it spreads from an oceanic ridge

leads to a systematic decrease with age in the heat flux to the seafloor.

1.12 Volcanism and Heat Flow 81

Figure 1.53 Distribution of volcanic rocks in Africa. Dark areas are surface volcanic rocks with ages less than 26 Ma. Also shown are some of the tectonic provinces and areas of crustal doming.

82 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.54 Distribution of recent volcanic rocks in the western United States. Dark areas are rocks younger than 1.5 Ma; shaded areas are rocks with ages between 1.5 and 7 Ma.

1.12 Volcanism and Heat Flow 83

Figure 1.55 Ages of volcanic rocks in the Snake River plain as a function of the distance from Yellowstone Caldera.

Figure 1.56 Old Faithful Geyser in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming (J. R. Stacy 692, U.S. Geological Survey).

84 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.57 Global distribution of earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 5.1 for the period 1964–1995 (Engdahl et al., 1998).

The occurrence of hot springs is also strongly correlated with volcanism.

In continental areas with no volcanism, the temperatures of springs seldom

exceed 293 K. Most boiling hot springs and geysers (Figure 1–56) are di-

rectly associated with the cooling of a magma body at a relatively shallow

depth. The circulation of heated ground water near a cooling intrusion ac-

celerates the solidification of the intrusion and plays an important role in

the emplacement of ore deposits. Minerals dissolve in the hot water; when

the water boils or is cooled, the minerals precipitate to form ore deposits.

Hydrothermal circulation of seawater in the oceanic crust also is believed to

play a significant role in removing the heat at ocean ridges and in concen-

trating minerals on the seafloor and in the oceanic crust. Exploration with

the deep submersible Alvin has provided actual observations of hot water

from the crust venting directly to the ocean. Submarine thermal springs

have been discovered on the Galápagos rift and the East Pacific rise crest.

Spectacular submarine hot springs with exit water temperatures near 700

K have also been discovered at the latter location.

1.13 Seismicity and the State of Stress in the Lithosphere 85

Figure 1.58 View along the San Andreas fault in Choia Valley. Note the streams have been offset by the right-lateral displacement on the fault (R. E. Wallace 304, U.S. Geological Survey).

1.13 Seismicity and the State of Stress in the Lithosphere

Just as in the case of volcanoes, the occurrences of earthquakes strongly

correlate with plate boundaries. The worldwide distribution of seismicity is

illustrated in Figure 1–57. Earthquakes occur on all types of plate bound-

aries; however, subduction zones and areas of continental collision are noted

for their very large earthquakes. Large earthquakes also occur in plate inte-

riors but with a much lower frequency.

Earthquakes are associated with displacements on preexisting faults. A

typical displacement in a very large earthquake is 10 m. If the relative ve-

locity across a plate boundary is 50 mm yr−1, it would take 200 years to

accumulate this displacement. Large earthquakes at subduction zones and

major transform faults such as the San Andreas reoccur in about this pe-

riod. Since regular displacements do not have to be accommodated in plate

interiors, the period between major intraplate earthquakes is much longer.

The near-surface expressions of major faults are broad zones of fractured

rock with a width of a kilometer or more (Figure 1–58). Smaller faults may

have zones of fault gouge with widths of a few centimeters or less. Small

86 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.59 Cross sections of (a) a normal fault and (b) a thrust fault and top views of (c) right-lateral and (d) left-lateral strike-slip faults.

faults grade down to rock fractures across which there is no offset displace-

ment. The total offset across major faults may be hundreds of kilometers.

A fault zone is a zone of weakness. When the regional stress level becomes

sufficiently large, the fault ruptures and an earthquake occurs. There is ex-

tensive geological evidence that faults become reactivated. Large stresses

can reactivate faults that have been inactive for tens or hundreds of millions

of years.

The direction of the displacement on a fault can be used to determine the

state of stress responsible for the displacement. Since voids cannot be created

in the Earth’s deep interior, displacements on faults are parallel to the fault

surface. If a region is in a state of tensional stress, normal faulting will occur,

as illustrated in Figure 1–59a. If a region is in a state of compressional stress,

thrust faulting will occur, as illustrated in Figure 1–59b.

If a region is in a state of shear, strike–slip faulting will occur, as illus-

trated in Figures 1–59c and 1–59d. If, to an observer standing on one side of

the fault, the motion on the other side of the fault is to the left, the fault is a

left-lateral or sinistral strike–slip fault. If the motion on the other side of the

fault is to the right, it is a right-lateral or dextral strike–slip fault. The dis-

placement during many earthquakes combines the horizontal displacement

associated with strike–slip faulting and the vertical displacement associated

with either normal or thrust faulting.

As discussed previously, the lithosphere can transmit stress over large dis-

tances. There are several sources for the stress in the lithosphere. One source

is the body forces that drive the motion of the surface plates. These include

the negative buoyancy on the descending plate at a subduction zone and the

1.13 Seismicity and the State of Stress in the Lithosphere 87

gravitational sliding of a plate off an ocean ridge. Changes of temperature

lead to thermal stresses. When the temperature increases or decreases, rock

expands or contracts. The expansion or contraction can cause very large

stresses. Erosion and sedimentation also cause a buildup of stress through

the addition or removal of surface loads. Glaciation and deglaciation act sim-

ilarly. Because the Earth is not a perfect sphere but rather a spheroid with

polar flattening and an equatorial bulge, plates must deform as they change

latitude. This deformation leads to membrane stresses in the lithosphere.

Plate interactions such as continental collisions are an important source of

stress. Large displacements of the cool, near-surface rocks often occur in

these zones. If these deformations occur on faults, high stress levels and ma-

jor earthquakes can be expected. The state of stress in the lithosphere is the

result of all these factors and other contributions.

As a specific example of seismicity and stress we again turn to the west-

ern United States. The distribution of seismicity in this region is given in

Figure 1–60. Also included in the figure are the relative velocities between

plates and the directions of lithospheric stress inferred from displacements

on faults. The Juan de Fuca plate is being formed on the Juan de Fuca

ridge with a half-spreading rate of 29 mm yr−1. The seismicity on a trans-

form fault offsetting two segments of the ridge is clearly illustrated. Because

the lithosphere is thin at the ridge and the rocks are hot and weak, rela-

tively little seismicity is associated with the spreading center at the ridge

crest. The Juan de Fuca plate is being subducted at a rate of about 15

mm yr−1 at a trench along the Oregon and Washington coasts. The seis-

micity in Oregon and Washington associated with this subduction is also

relatively weak. This may be due to aseismic slip on the fault zone between

the descending oceanic plate and the overlying continental lithosphere. In

this case the relative displacement is accommodated without the buildup of

the large stresses required for extensive seismicity. An alternative explana-

tion is that the accumulated displacement was relieved in a great earthquake

several hundred years ago and insufficient displacement has accumulated to

cause high stresses. The historic record of earthquakes in the western United

States is relatively short, and since the subduction velocity is quite small,

the recurrence period would be expected to be of the order of 500 years.

Although the extensive seismicity usually associated with active subduction

is absent in the Pacific Northwest, a well-defined line of active volcanoes lies

parallel to the trench. The volcanoes extend from Mount Baker in Wash-

ington to Mount Shasta in northern California. These volcanoes have had

violent eruptions throughout the recent geological past. An eruption about

6000 years ago removed the upper 2 km of Mount Mazama, creating Crater

88 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.60 Distribution of seismicity in the geological provinces of the western United States (stars). Solid arrows give relative plate velocities; open arrows give stress directions inferred from seismic focal mechanism studies.

Lake in Oregon. The spectacular eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington

(Figure 1–10), on May 18, 1980, blew out its entire north flank, a volume of

about 6 km3.

The velocity between the Pacific and North American plates is 47 mm yr−1

in California. A large fraction of this is accommodated by displacements on

the San Andreas fault. In the north the fault terminates in a fault–fault–

trench (FFT) triple junction with the Juan de Fuca plate. In the south the

fault terminates in a series of small spreading centers (ocean ridges) extend-

ing down the Gulf of California. Along much of the fault, displacements are

almost entirely right-lateral strike–slip. However, north of Los Angeles the

fault bends, introducing a thrusting component. Motion on thrust faults in

1.13 Seismicity and the State of Stress in the Lithosphere 89

this region is responsible for the formation of a series of mountain ranges

known as the Transverse Ranges.

A great earthquake occurred on the northern section of the San Andreas

fault in 1906; the average displacement was 4 m. A great earthquake oc-

curred on the southern section of the San Andreas fault in 1857; the average

displacement was 7 m. A detailed discussion of the San Andreas fault is

given in Section 8–8.

It is clear that the displacements on accreting plate margins, subduction

zones, and transform faults cannot explain the entire distribution of seismic-

ity in the western United States. Major earthquakes occur throughout the

region. Rapid mountain building is associated with the Rocky Mountains

and the Sierra Nevada. The Basin and Range province is a region of exten-

sive normal faulting. The presence of many graben structures is evidence

of crustal extension due to tensional stresses. The asthenosphere rises to

the base of the continental crust in this region, and the lithosphere is thin

and weak. Considerable volcanism occurs throughout the province. The Rio

Grande rift, which marks the eastern boundary of this area of volcanism,

seismicity, and mountain building, is also an extensional feature. The stress

directions shown in Figure 1–60 indicate the entire western United States

appears to be extending because of tensional stresses. Although there is no

comprehensive understanding of this area, it is likely that the seismicity, vol-

canism, and mountain building are the result of complex interactions of the

Pacific, North American, and Juan de Fuca plates that are deforming the

entire region. It is likely that there is a geometrical incompatibility between

the strike–slip motion on the San Andreas fault and the time-dependent

relative displacement between the Pacific and North American plates. As a

result the western part of the North American plate is being deformed.

China is another region of extensive tectonics. It is the site of extensive

seismicity and mountain building. Deformation associated with the continen-

tal collision between India and Asia extends several thousands of kilometers

north of the suture zone.

Seismicity can also occur in plate interiors. An example is New Madrid,

Missouri, where three very large earthquakes struck in 1811 and 1812. A

significant number of small earthquakes occur in this region at the present

time. It should not be surprising that earthquakes occur in plate interiors,

since the elastic lithosphere can transmit large stresses. These intraplate

earthquakes are likely to occur where the elastic properties of the plate

change and stress concentrates.

90 Plate Tectonics

1.14 The Driving Mechanism

Plate tectonics provides a general framework for understanding the world-

wide distribution of seismicity, volcanism, and mountain building. These

phenomena are largely associated with plate interactions at plate margins.

However, an explanation must also be given for the relative motions of the

plates. The basic mechanism responsible for plate tectonics must provide

the energy for the earthquakes, volcanism, and mountain building. The only

source of energy of sufficient magnitude is heat from the interior of the

Earth. This heat is the result of the radioactive decay of the uranium iso-

topes 238U and 235U, the thorium isotope 232Th, and the potassium isotope 40K as well as the cooling of the Earth. An accurate estimate of the heat

lost from the interior of the Earth can be obtained from measurements of

the surface heat flow. The energy associated with seismicity, volcanism, and

mountain building is about 1% of the heat flow to the surface.

Heat can be converted to directed motion by thermal convection. Consider

a horizontal fluid layer in a gravitational field that is heated from within and

cooled from above. The cool fluid near the upper boundary is heavier than

the hotter fluid in the layer. Buoyancy forces cause the cool fluid to sink,

and it is replaced by hot rising fluid. Laboratory experiments show that

under appropriate conditions two-dimensional convection cells develop, as

illustrated in Figure 1–61. A thin thermal boundary layer of cool fluid forms

adjacent to the upper boundary of the layer. Thermal boundary layers from

two adjacent cells merge and separate from the upper boundary to form a

cool descending plume. The negative buoyancy of the cool descending plume

drives the flow. The thin thermal boundary layer is directly analogous to the

lithosphere. The separation of the thermal boundary layers to form the cool

descending plume is analogous to subduction. The buoyancy body force on

the cool descending plume is analogous to the body force on the descending

lithosphere.

Ascending mantle plumes can also be associated with thermal convection.

There is expected to be a hot thermal boundary layer at the base of the

convecting mantle. Buoyancy forces on the low-density mantle rock would

be expected to form hot ascending plumes either at the base of the mantle

(the D′′-layer of seismology) or at an interface in the lower mantle between

an upper convecting layer and an isolated lower layer.

The fluidlike behavior of the Earth’s crystalline mantle can be explained

by solid-state creep processes. At low stress levels and temperatures ap-

proaching the rock solidus, the dominant creep process is the diffusion of

ions and vacancies through the crystal lattice. This diffusion relieves an

1.15 Comparative Planetology 91

Figure 1.61 Boundary layer model for two-dimensional thermal convection in a fluid layer heated from within and cooled from above.

applied stress and results in strain. The strain rate is proportional to the

stress, resulting in a Newtonian fluid behavior. At higher stress levels creep

is the result of the movement of dislocations through the crystal lattice. In

this case, the strain rate is proportional to the third power of the stress,

resulting in a non-Newtonian fluid behavior. Both diffusion creep and dislo-

cation creep are thermally activated; that is, the strain rates are inversely

proportional to the exponential of the inverse absolute temperature.

The strain rate in the mantle is so small that it cannot be reproduced

in the laboratory. However, extrapolations of laboratory measurements give

fluid properties consistent with thermal convection in the mantle. Indepen-

dent information on the fluid behavior of the mantle comes from studies

of glacial loading and unloading. When an ice sheet forms, its weight forces

mantle rock to flow from beneath it, and the Earth’s surface subsides. When

the ice sheet melts, the mantle rock returns, and the Earth’s surface re-

bounds. It takes about 10,000 years for the rebound to take place. Data on

the rate of rebound come from dated, elevated beaches. These data have

been used to obtain a viscosity for the mantle of about 1021 Pa s. Although

this viscosity is large, it allows a fluid behavior of the mantle on geological

time scales.

1.15 Comparative Planetology

Space missions have provided extensive information on the other planets and

the planetary satellites of the solar system. It appears that plate tectonics is

92 Plate Tectonics

unique to the Earth. The Moon and Mercury have continuous lithospheres

whose surfaces have been shaped largely by impacts and volcanic processes.

Although impact cratering and volcanism have also been prevalent on Mars,

its surface has also been modified by its atmosphere and the flow of a surface

fluid, presumably water. Cloud-covered Venus has yielded its secrets to the

eyes of Earth-based and spacecraft radar systems. Cratering and volcanism

have extensively modified its surface, but there is no direct evidence of plate

tectonic features such as extensive ridge or trench systems. The Galilean

satellites of Jupiter have been shown to have very diverse features including

very active volcanism on Io. The surface of Ganymede shows impact craters

and tectonic structures resulting from dynamical processes in an underlying

predominantly ice lithosphere. Callisto is a heavily cratered object about the

same size as Ganymede, but there is no sign that its surface has been altered

by internal activity. Europa is mainly a rocky object, somewhat smaller than

the Moon, with a relatively thin outer shell of water that is ice at the surface

but may be liquid at depth.

The surface of Io has been recently formed by a style of volcanism ap-

parently unique to that body. Io is the only body in the solar system, other

than the Earth, on which we have observed active volcanism; this satellite

is the most volcanically active body in the solar system. Lithospheric plate

evolution has destroyed much of the evidence of the early evolution of the

Earth by continuously creating new surface rocks and returning old surface

rocks to the mantle. The pervasive volcanism of Io has had the same effect

by blanketing the surface with recently formed lavas. However, bodies such

as Mercury, the Moon, Callisto, and the satellites of Mars preserve the early

records of their evolutions in their cratered surfaces and thereby provide

information on the early history of the solar system. Some of the physical

properties of the terrestrial-like bodies of the solar system are summarized

in Appendix 2, Section C.

1.16 The Moon

Early telescopic observations showed that the near side of the Moon is com-

posed of two types of surfaces: topographically low, dark areas-referred to as

maria (or seas) and topographically elevated, light areas known as highlands

(Figure 1–62). The highlands are more heavily cratered and are therefore

presumed to be older because the flux of meteorities is known to have de-

creased with time. Because of its synchronous rotation with respect to the

Earth, the far side of the Moon was first observed from spacecraft in lunar

1.16 The Moon 93

Figure 1.62 Full hemispheric image of the Moon taken by the Galileo space- craft on December 7, 1992, on its way to explore the Jupiter system in 1995–97. The distinct bright ray crater at the bottom of the image is the Tycho impact basin. The dark areas are basaltic-rock-filled impact basins: Oceanus Procellarum (on the left), Mare Imbrium (center left), Mare Seren- itatis and Mare Tranquillitatis (center), and Mare Crisium (near the right edge) (NASA Image PIA00405).

orbit. Highland terrain dominates the far side of the Moon; there are no

extensive maria on the farside lunar surface.

The first manned landing on the Moon took place on July 20, 1969. This

Apollo 11 mission as well as the subsequent Apollo 12, 15, and 17 missions

landed on the lunar maria. Chemical studies of the rocks returned on these

missions showed that the maria are composed of basaltic rocks similar in

major element chemistry to the basalts of the oceanic crust. Radioactive

dating of these rocks gives ages of 3.16 to 3.9 Ga.

The Apollo 14 and 16 missions returned samples from the lunar high-

lands. These rocks have a much more complex chemical history than the

mare rocks. They have been extensively shocked and melted by meteorite

bombardment. Detailed chemical studies have shown, however, that these

rocks are highly fractionated igneous rocks. Radioactive dating of the high-

land rocks indicates that they crystallized about 4.5 Ga ago, close to the

estimated age of the solar system.

The evolution of the Moon can be divided into three phases: (1) highlands

94 Plate Tectonics

formation, (2) mare formation, and (3) surface quiescence. The highlands of

the Moon formed early in its evolution, one hypothesis being that they crys-

tallized from a global magma ocean. It is difficult to date the crystallization

of the highlands exactly, but it certainly terminated by 4.0 Ga and probably

before 4.4 Ga. The terminal bombardment between 3.8 and 4.0 Ga resulted

in the excavation of many large, deep basins. These basins, particularly on

the nearside, were subsequently filled by mare basaltic volcanism. The lunar

maria constitute some 17% of the surface area.

One of the major discoveries of the Apollo missions was that the Moon

is made up of a variety of igneous rock types that differ widely in both

their chemistry and mineral composition. The major differences between

the lunar maria and highlands indicate large-scale chemical differentiation

of the Moon. Early recognition of the fact that the highlands are composed

mostly of plagioclase, a relatively light mineral, led to the suggestion that

this mineral represents crystal flotation at the top of a deep magma ocean.

The basic argument for a “magma ocean” is the need for a mechanism

to float a plagioclase-rich crust, while denser minerals such as olivine and

pyroxene sink. As the Moon formed, its outer portions consisted of a layer

of molten silicate magma in which plagioclase floated and accumulated into

the first stable lunar crust.

The solidification of the magma ocean must have occurred in about 100

Myr after the formation of the solar system because of the age of the re-

turned lunar samples. Seismic studies carried out on the Apollo missions

showed that the lunar crust has a thickness between 60 and 100 km. Seis-

mic velocities and the mean density of the Moon indicate that the lunar

mantle is composed primarily of peridotite similar to the Earth’s mantle.

It is hypothesized that the lunar crust represents about a 20% partial melt

fraction of a primitive lunar mantle with a composition similar to pyrolite.

It is expected that there is a layer of depleted mantle rock beneath the lunar

crust with a thickness of about 300–500 km.

Subsequent to the solidification of the magma ocean, the morphology

of the lunar surface was strongly affected by collisions with the remaining

planetesimals and large meteorites. These collisions created large basins; the

largest of the colliding bodies created the Imbrium basin, an event that has

been dated at 3.86 Ga. A period of volcanism lasting 1 Gyr then filled the

floors of these preexisting impact basins with the dark basaltic rocks that

form the lunar maria. This volcanism terminated at about 3 Ga. Since then

the lunar surface has remained virtually unaltered.

All of the smooth dark regions visible on the Moon’s nearside consist

of basaltic rocks that partly or completely fill the multiring mare basins.

1.16 The Moon 95

Nearly all of the basalts occur on the nearside. A significant time interval

elapsed between the formation of a large mare basin by impact and its

subsequent filling with basaltic magma flows to form a dark lunar maria.

Current information dates the Imbrium basin at 3.86 Ga, but the lavas that

fill it date at about 3.3 Ga. The primary landforms resulting from lunar

basaltic volcanism are vast, smooth plains, indicating low lava viscosities

and high eruption rates. Major basaltic eruptions lasted a minimum of 800

million years, i.e., from 3.9 to 3.1 Ga. On the basis of low crater densities

on some formations, minor eruptions could have continued until as recently

as 2 Ga.

Although lunar rocks are similar to igneous rocks on the Earth, there are

significant differences between the two bodies. Unlike the Earth, the Moon

does not have a large iron core. The Moon may have a small iron core,

but its radius is constrained by the measured values of lunar mass, radius,

and moment of inertia to have a value less than about 350 km. Since the

mean density of the Moon is only 3340 kg m−3, the missing iron cannot

be distributed through the lunar mantle. It is therefore concluded that the

Moon is deficient in metallic iron relative to the Earth. The Moon also has

fewer volatile elements than the Earth; there is no evidence of a significant

presence of water during the evolution of the Moon.

Magnetic field measurements were made by small satellites left in lunar

orbit by the Apollo 15 and 16 missions. Although localized regions of mag-

netized rock were detected by the subsatellites, no global lunar magnetic

field could be measured. A lunar magnetic dipole moment can be no larger

than 1016 A m2. This is nearly seven orders of magnitude smaller than the

Earth’s dipole moment. The absence of a present-day global lunar magnetic

field is presumably due to the absence of an active dynamo in the Moon.

This may indicate that the Moon has no core; on the other hand, a small

lunar core could have cooled, or solidified, sufficiently so that convective

motions in it are no longer possible. It has been suggested that the localized

areas of remanent lunar magnetism were magnetized in the ambient field of

an ancient lunar dynamo.

The Moon is the only body other than the Earth for which we have in situ

determinations of the surface heat flux. Two lunar heat flow measurements

have been made, one on the Apollo 15 mission and the other on Apollo 17.

The measured heat flow values are 20 mW m−2 and 16 mW m−2. Although

these two determinations may not be representative of the average lunar

heat flow, the values are consistent with the Earth’s surface heat loss if the

differences in the sizes of the planets are accounted for.

The lunar gravity field is known quite well from the radio tracking of

96 Plate Tectonics

the many spacecraft that have been placed in lunar orbit. A map of the

Moon’s gravity field is shown in a later chapter (Figure 5–13). The lunar

maria are sites of positive gravity anomalies, or excess concentrations of

mass known as mascons. These surface loads appear to be supported by the

lunar lithosphere, an observation that implies that the Moon’s lithosphere

is thicker and therefore stronger than the Earth’s. The Earth’s lithosphere

is not thick enough to support large excess loads – mountains, for example

– with the consequence that such loads tend to depress the lithosphere and

subside. Since the maria were formed by 3 Ga, the Moon’s lithosphere must

have thickened sufficiently by then to support the mascons.

The Moon’s motion about the Earth is prograde; that is, it rotates in

the same sense as the rotation of the planets about the sun. In its present

prograde orbit the tidal interactions between the Earth and the Moon cause

the separation between the bodies to increase; in the past the Moon was

closer to the Earth. Extrapolation of the present rate of tidal dissipation

back in time would bring the Moon to within a few Earth radii of the

Earth between 1.5 and 3 Ga. Since there is little evidence to support a close

approach of the two bodies during this period, it is presumed that the rate

of tidal dissipation in the past has been lower than at present. Nevertheless,

it is highly likely that the Moon has been considerably closer to the Earth

than it is today.

Theories for the origin of the Moon have been debated for more than a

century. The classic theories claim (1) that the Moon formed as a separate

planet and was captured by the Earth, (2) that the Moon was originally

part of the Earth and that the Earth broke into two parts, and (3) that

the Earth and moon formed as a binary planet. None of these theories has

been able to satisfy all the major constraints on lunar origin, which include

the large prograde angular momentum of the Earth–Moon system relative

to the other planets and the Moon’s depletion in volatile elements and iron

compared with the cosmic (chondritic) abundances. Another theory pro-

poses that the Moon formed by accreting from a disc of ejecta orbiting the

Earth after the impact of a Mars-size body with the Earth. The giant im-

pact origin of the Moon has gained widespread support because it does not

violate any of the major observational constraints on lunar origin. One of

the major consequences of the giant impact hypothesis of lunar origin is a

hot, partially molten (or perhaps completely molten) Moon upon accretion

from the circumterrestrial ejecta disk.

1.17 Mercury 97

Figure 1.63 Hemispheric image of Mercury acquired by the Mariner 10 spacecraft on March 24, 1974 (NASA Image PIA00437).

1.17 Mercury

Although it is the smallest of the terrestrial planets, Mercury is the densest

(Appendix 2, Section C). If the planet has the cosmic abundance of heavy

elements, then its large density requires that Mercury is 60% to 70% Fe by

mass. With the iron concentrated in a central core, Mercury could best be

described as a ball of iron surrounded by a thin silicate shell.

In photographs obtained by the Mariner 10 spacecraft during 1974 and

1975 (Figure 1–63), portions of Mercury’s surface strongly resemble the

heavily cratered lunar highlands. In addition, there are large areas of rel-

atively smooth terrain and a number of ringed basins believed to be im-

pact structures. The largest of these is the 1300-km-diameter Caloris basin,

which is similar to the Imbrium and Orientale basins on the Moon. The

Caloris basin is covered with a relatively smooth plains type of material,

perhaps similar to the lunar maria, having many fewer craters than the

heavily cratered terrain. Areas of relatively smooth terrain known as in-

tercrater plains are also found interspaced between the basins and craters.

Lobate scarps, probably curved fault scarps, which are several kilometers

high and extend for hundreds of kilometers across Mercury’s surface, have

98 Plate Tectonics

Figure 1.64 Photomosaic of Mariner 10 images of the Michelangelo Quad- rangle H-12 on Mercury. In addition to the numerous impact craters, ejecta deposits are seen as bright lines or rays radiating outward from some young craters. Several large lobate scarps are visible in the lower left side of the image (NASA Image PIA02237).

no lunar counterpart (Figure 1–64). These scarps are suggestive of thrust

faults resulting from crustal shortening and compression.

Several hypotheses have been advanced to explain the compressional sur-

face features on Mercury. The first hypothesis concerns tidal despining. Early

in its evolution Mercury may have had a rapid rotation. If the planet was

hot it would have had a near hydrostatic shape with considerable polar flat-

tening and an equatorial bulge. As the planet cooled, a global lithosphere

developed with considerable rigidity and ellipticity. However, tidal interac-

tions with the sun gradually slowed the rotation of the planet. The rigidity

of the lithosphere preserved a fossil ellipticity associated with the early rapid

rotation but as a result large lithospheric stresses developed. The resultant

compressional stresses in the equatorial region are one explanation for the

observed compressional features. An alterative explanation is that they were

caused by the formation and/or solidification of the large iron core on Mer-

cury. Mercury’s high mean density of 5440 kg m−3, almost equal to the

Earth’s, is attributed to a large iron core with a 500 to 600 km thick cover

of silicate rocks. One explanation for the high mean density is that a massive

collision blasted off a large fraction of an early mantle of larger size.

Magnetic field measurements by Mariner 10 showed that Mercury has an

intrinsic global magnetic field. Because of the limited amount of data, there

are large uncertainties in the inferred value of Mercury’s magnetic dipole

moment. Most estimates lie in the range of 2 to 5 × 1019 A m2, or about

1.18 Mars 99

5 × 10−4 of the Earth’s magnetic field strength. Although a magnetized

crust cannot be ruled out as a source of this field, it seems more likely that

it originates by dynamo action in a liquid part of Mercury’s core.

Because of the similarities in the surfaces of Mercury and the Moon, their

evolutions must have been similar in several respects. Separation of the

iron and silicates in Mercury and crustal differentiation must have occurred

very early in its history because the planet’s surface preserves an ancient

record of heavy bombardment similar to the lunar highlands. The filling of

the Caloris basin must have occurred subsequent to the termination of this

severe cratering phase because the basin material is relatively free of craters.

The lobate scarps must also have formed at the end of or subsequent to the

early phase of severe bombardment because they sometimes pass through

and deform old craters (Figure 1–64). The scarps may be a consequence of

the cooling and contraction of the core, and if so, they are the only surface

features that distinguish Mercury with its large core from the Moon with

only a very small core or none at all.

1.18 Mars

The first detailed photographs of the Martian surface were returned from the

flybys of Mariner 4 (1965) and Mariners 6 and 7 (1969). These photographs

showed a heavily cratered surface much like that of the Moon. However,

the Mariner 9 (1971) photographs revealed that the earlier spacecraft had

photographed only a single type of terrain on a planet of great geologi-

cal diversity. There are volcanoes that dwarf the largest volcanic structures

on Earth, a huge canyon complex comparable to the East African rift sys-

tem, meandering channels with multiple braided features and stream-lined

islands, sand dunes, and polar caps. The richness and variety of Martian

geologic forms was not fully realized prior to the pictures returned by the

Viking 1 and 2 orbiters and landers (1976) and the Mars orbiter camera

aboard the Mars Global Surveyor (1999). The surface of Mars is character-

ized by a wide variety of volcanic and tectonic landforms. However, there is

no evidence of the global system of ridges and trenches that are character-

istic of active plate tectonics. Thus, it is concluded that Mars does not have

active plate tectonics.

The most striking global feature of the Martian surface is its hemispheric

asymmetry. Much of the southern hemisphere of Mars is covered by densely

cratered highlands, whereas most of the northern hemisphere is made up of

lightly cratered plains. The heavily cratered terrain in the southern hemi-

100 Plate Tectonics

sphere is probably the remnant of the postaccretionary surface of the planet,

and the younger northern plains are probably volcanic in origin.

The southern highlands cover more than 60% of the surface of Mars. Most

of the highland terrain consists of ancient densely cratered rock (largely

impact breccias) formed early in the planet’s history when impact rates were

high. Extensive lava flows have covered large areas within the highlands. The

large, roughly circular basins of Argyre and Hellas (Figure 1–65) are located

in the southern hemisphere and are generally believed to be impact basins

similar to the mare basins on the Moon. The Hellas basin has a rim diameter

of ∼2300 km and is one of the largest impact structures in the solar system.

It is the dominant surface feature of the Martian southern highlands. The

Argyre basin has a diameter in excess of 1500 km. Volcanic plains cover

much of the northern lowlands of Mars. These volcanic plains are similar to

the volcanic plains that dominate other planetary surfaces, e.g., Venus, and

they are much less cratered than the southern highlands.

The approximately hemispherical dichotomy is generally held to be an

ancient, first-order feature of the Martian crust. The dichotomy has been

ascribed variously to a very long-wavelength mantle convective planform,

to subcrustal erosion due to mantle convection, to post-accretional core for-

mation, to one large impact, and to several impact events. Sleep (1994)

has proposed that the lowland crust was formed in an episode of seafloor

spreading on Mars. He hypothesized a hemispheric subduction event that

destroyed the original primitive crust in the northern hemisphere, and pro-

posed a well-defined sequence of seafloor-spreading events that created the

northern volcanic plains.

One of the major volcanotectonic features on Mars is the Tharsis region,

which is a large elevated region composed of relatively young volcanics. The

horizontal scale is some 3000 km with the elevation rising about 10 km above

the mean surface elevation. The region exhibits a complex history of episodic

tectonism, closely associated with volcanism on local and regional scales. The

entire Tharsis uplift appears to be the result of extensive volcanism.

Three immense volcanic shields (Arsia, Pavonis, and Ascraeus Montes)

form the Tharsis Montes, a linear chain of volcanoes extending northeast-

ward across the Tharsis rise (Figures 1–65 and 1–66). These three shields

have gentle slopes of a few degrees (the upper slopes are commonly steeper

than the lower slopes), wide calderas, and flank vents. The shields appear

to be the result of basaltic flows and are similar to the intraplate shield vol-

canoes of the Hawaiian Islands. The Martian shield volcanoes rise 10 to 18

km above the Tharsis rise and attain elevations of 18 to 26 km. Along the

Tharsis axial trend, volcanoes stretch from Arsia Mons to near Tempe Pat-

1.18 Mars 101

Figure 1.65 Composite images of the two hemispheres of Mars. Upper left is the “eastern” hemisphere. The hemispheric dichotomy between the young, smooth, low-lying northern plains and the heavily cratered, old, south- ern highlands is clearly illustrated. The dark circular Hellas basin in the south is accepted to be an impact structure. Lower right is the “western” hemisphere. The three giant shield volcanoes that form the linear Tharsis Montes chain lie near the equator. Olympus Mons, the tallest mountain in the solar system, lies to the northwest of this chain. To the east the Valles Marineris canyon system is seen (NASA Image PIA02040).

era, some 4000 km. Lava flows that were erupted from the Tharsis Montes

and surrounding vents cover nearly 7 × 106 km2.

Olympus Mons (Figures 1–65 and 1–66) is a shield volcano nearly 600 km

102 Plate Tectonics

in diameter and over 26 km high, the tallest mountain in the solar system.

Flows on the flanks of the volcano and adjacent volcanic plains that were

erupted from fissures east of the volcano are among the youngest flows on

Mars. The extreme height of the Martian volcanoes can be attributed to the

low surface gravity and the lack of relative motion between the lithosphere

and the magma source. The presence of shield volcanoes on Mars and their

absence on the Moon can be attributed to differences in the viscosities of the

erupted lavas. A significant gravity anomaly is associated with the Tharsis

uplift. This gravity anomaly can be explained if the volcanic construct is

partially supported by the elastic lithosphere on Mars. Because Mars is

smaller than the Earth, it would be expected to cool more efficiently – it has

a larger surface area to volume ratio – and has a thicker lithosphere, other

factors being the same. This additional thickness and the smaller radius give

the elastic lithosphere on Mars a much greater rigidity.

Another major tectonic feature on Mars is an enormous canyon system,

Valles Marineris, extending eastward from Tharsis for about 4500 km (Figure

1–67; see also Figure 1–68). Individual canyons are up to 200 km wide and

several kilometers deep. In the central section (Figure 1–68), the system

is about 600 km wide and over 7 km deep. The Valles Marineris system

might be a complex set of fractures in the Martian crust caused by the

large topographic bulge containing the Tharsis volcanic region. The system

is roughly radial to this bulge, as are other prominent fractures.

Numerous channels are widely distributed over the Martian surface. They

display a variety of morphologic forms, including braiding and stream-lined

islands, strongly suggestive of formation by flowing water (Figure 1–69). If

water did flow on the surface of Mars some time in the past, the water may

have originated by the melting of subsurface ice. This is supported by the

association of the apparent sources of many channels with so-called chaotic

terrain: areas of large, irregular blocks probably formed by collapse follow-

ing the removal of a subsurface material such as ground ice. Chaotic terrain

is visible in the photomosaic in Figure 1–67 at the eastern end of the Val-

lis Marineris system; a broad collapsed area extends outward from Capri

Chasma. Many of the north-trending channels in this area appear to origi-

nate in this chaotic terrain. Martian channels give the impression of having

been formed by episodic flooding of large areas, as might be expected from

the sudden release of large amounts of subsurface water. Possible terrestrial

analogs to these channels are the scablands of the Columbia plateau in the

United States and the Sandur plains in Iceland, both of which formed by

the sudden release of large quantities of glacial meltwater. The existence of

a Martian ground ice is also indicated by the unusual forms of some crater

1.18 Mars 103

Figure 1.66 Image mosaic of the shield volcanoes in the Tharsis region of Mars obtained on a single Martian afternoon by the Mars orbiter camera on board the Mars Global Surveyor. Olympus Mons is the large shield in the upper left corner. Arsia Mons, Pavonis Mons, and Ascraeus Mons lie on a line trending SW–NE near the center of the image. The great canyon system, Valles Marineris, can be seen in the lower right corner (NASA Image PIA02049).

Figure 1.67 Mars Global Surveyor image of the Valles Marineris canyon system on Mars (NASA Image PIA00422).

ejecta. Figure 1–70 shows a lobate ejecta flow surrounding an impact crater

on Mars. The unique appearance of the ejecta pattern suggests the incor-

poration of large amounts of water into the ejecta, as would occur if the

impact penetrated a ground-ice-rich subsurface. In addition to the small

amount of water currently present in the thin CO2 atmosphere of Mars,

104 Plate Tectonics

the planet presently contains water in the form of ice in its permanent or

residual polar caps, which underlie the seasonal CO2 ice caps.

Although processes associated with liquid flow may have been active only

in the past, the present surface of Mars is being actively modified by at-

mospheric erosion and deposition. It is hardly surprising, in view of the

perennial dust storms that blanket the planet, that windblown sand effec-

tively alters the present surface of Mars. Figure 1–71 is a photograph of a

large dune field on Mars. Winds are an effective means of transporting mate-

rial over the Martian surface; there are layered deposits in the polar regions

that are believed to be accumulations of material carried by the atmosphere

from other regions of the planet.

The mean density of 3950 kg m−3 and the relatively small moment of

inertia of Mars are evidence that Mars has a metallic core. The size of the

core depends on assumptions about its composition, whether the core is

Fe–FeS, for example; model values of core radius vary between 0.4 and 0.6

of the Martian radius. Even though Mars has a metallic core, it does not

have a global intrinsic magnetic field. Early magnetic field measurements

from the Mars 2, 3, and 5 spacecraft were interpreted to imply that Mars

had a small magnetic field with a dipole moment 3× 10−4 times the Earth’s

magnetic dipole moment. Data from the Mars Global Surveyor have settled

the question of the existence of a global Martian magnetic field – there is

none, but the crust of Mars has strong concentrations of remanent mag-

netism implying that Mars had a global magnetic field in the past. Crustal

magnetization on Mars is mainly confined to the ancient highlands of the

southern hemisphere and it is largely organized into east-west-trending lin-

ear features of alternating polarity extending over distances as large as 2000

km. The magnetization features are reminiscent of the magnetic stripes on

the Earth’s seafloor, and suggest the possibility of a plate tectonic regime

with seafloor spreading early in the history of Mars. The absence of crustal

magnetism near large impact basins such as Hellas and Argyre implies that

the early Martian dynamo ceased to operate before about 4 Ga. The major

evidence for an initially hot and differentiated Mars is the acceptance of

Mars as a parent body of the SNC meteorites. This is a class of meteorites

found on Earth that apparently escaped from the Martian gravity field af-

ter one or more large impacts. The radiometric ages for SNC meteorites are

about 4.6 Ga, the U/Pb isotopic composition of SNC meteorites require core

formation at about 4.6 Ga, and the old age (≥4 Ga) of the southern high-

lands suggests early crustal differentiation. Other evidence for a hot early

Mars includes water-carved features on the Martian surface suggesting early

outgassing and an early atmosphere.

1.19 Phobos and Deimos 105

1.19 Phobos and Deimos

The two satellites of Mars, Phobos and Deimos, are very small, irregularly

shaped objects. Little was known of these bodies until the Mariner 9, Viking,

and the Mars Global Surveyor missions provided detailed photographs of

them (Figure 1–72). Roughly speaking, they are triaxial ellipsoids about 10

to 20 km across. Their surfaces are heavily cratered, but not identical in

appearance. In particular, Phobos has a system of long linear depressions

or grooves each of which is about 100 to 200 m wide and 10 to 20 m deep

(Figure 1–72). There are no grooves on Deimos. The grooves on Phobos

are probably related to fractures caused by a large impact, perhaps the one

responsible for the Stickney crater (Figure 1–72). There are no craters on

Deimos as large as Stickney; this may explain the absence of grooves on

Deimos. The low mean density of Phobos, 2000 kg m−3, and its reflectance

spectrum suggest that it is made of a dark gray material similar to Types I

or II carbonaceous chondrite meteorites.

1.20 Venus

In terms of size and density Venus is the planet that is most similar to

the Earth. An obvious working hypothesis would be that the tectonics of

Venus would be similar to the tectonics of the Earth and there would be plate

tectonics. We now know that this is not the case and that mantle convection

on Venus has a different surface expression than mantle convection on the

Earth.

The cloud cover on Venus has prevented optical observations. However,

Pioneer Venus radar, Earth-based radar observations, Venera 15–16 orbital

imaging radar, and the Magellan radar images have provided clear views of

the surface of Venus. These views, along with topography and gravity data,

indicate that Earth and Venus are in fact quite different. On Earth the global

oceanic rift system and the arcuate ocean trenches are the primary surface

manifestations of plate tectonics. The almost total absence of these features

on Venus has led to the conclusion that active plate tectonics is not occurring

on that planet at this time. Clearly, any comprehensive understanding of

tectonism and volcanism on Venus requires an understanding of how heat is

transported in the absence of plate tectonics.

There are other ways in which Venus is strikingly different. It rotates in a

retrograde sense with a period of 243 days; a Venusian day is 117 Earth days.

Venus has a massive, mostly CO2 atmosphere with a surface temperature of

about 750 K and a surface pressure of nearly 10 MPa. Sulfuric acid clouds

106 Plate Tectonics

blanket the planet and prevent us from directly viewing the surface. Because

of its earthlike size and mass, Venus most likely has a metallic core similar to

Earth’s. However, magnetic field measurements by the Pioneer Venus orbiter

during 1979 and 1980 revealed that Venus does not have an intrinsic global

magnetic field; these observations determined that if Venus had an intrinsic

magnetic field, its dipole moment would have to be much less than 1019 A

m2.

Studies of the surface of Venus during the Magellan mission have provided

a wealth of data on its tectonic and volcanic processes. The radar images

of the surface are complemented by global topography and gravity data.

The planet is remarkably smooth; 64% of the surface comprises a plains

province with elevation differences of 2 km or less; highland areas stand as

much as 10 km above the plains but they constitute only about 5% of the

surface; lowlands are 2 to 3 km below the plains and occupy the remaining

31% of the surface. Figure 1–73 shows the distribution of these topographic

provinces. Although local elevation extremes on Venus and Earth are roughly

comparable, global topographic variations are much smaller on Venus; the

planet’s surface is at a nearly uniform level.

There are tectonic features on Venus that resemble major tectonic features

on the Earth. Beta Regio has many of the features of a continental rift on

Earth. It has a domal structure with a diameter of about 2000 km and a

swell amplitude of about 2 km. It has a well-defined central rift valley with

a depth of 1–2 km and there is some evidence of a three-armed planform

(aulacogen). It is dominated by two shieldlike features, Theia Mons and

Rhea Mons, which rise about 4 km above the mean level. The U.S.S.R.

Venera 9 and 10 spacecraft, which landed just east of Beta Regio, measured

a basaltic composition and a density of 2800 kg m−3 for the surface rocks.

These observations substantiate the identification of Theia Mons and Rhea

Mons as shield volcanoes. Atla, Eistla, and Bell Regiones have rift zone

characteristics similar to Beta Regio.

Most of the highlands on Venus are concentrated into two main continental-

sized areas: Ishtar Terra, the size of Australia, in the northern hemisphere,

and Aphrodite Terra, about the size of Africa, near the equator (Figures

1–73 and 1–74). Aphrodite Terra, with a length of some 1500 km, is remi-

niscent of major continental collision zones on Earth, such as the mountain

belt that extends from the Alps to the Himalayas. Ishtar Terra is a region of

elevated topography with a horizontal scale of 2000–3000 km. A major fea-

ture is Lakshmi Planum which is an elevated plateau similar to Tibet with

a mean elevation of about 4 km. This plateau is surrounded by linear moun-

1.21 The Galilean Satellites 107

tain belts. Akna, Danu, Freyja, and Maxwell Montes, reaching elevations of

10 km, are similar in scale and elevation to the Himalayas.

The gravitational anomalies associated with topographic planetary fea-

tures further constrain their origin. Gravity anomalies obtained from track-

ing Pioneer Venus provided further major surprises. Unlike on the Earth,

gravity anomalies correlate with high topography on Venus. Large posi-

tive gravity anomalies are directly associated with Beta Regio and eastern

Aphrodite Terra.

One of the most important observational constraints on the geodynamics

of Venus comes from studies of impact cratering on the surface (Figure 1–

75). Some 840 impact craters have been identified from Magellan images

with diameters ranging from 2 to 280 km. The distribution of craters on

Venus cannot be distinguished from a random distribution. Unlike the Moon

and Mars, older and younger terrains cannot be identified. The surface of

Venus appears to be of a near-uniform age. Correlations of this impact flux

with craters on the Moon, the Earth, and Mars indicate a mean surface

age of 0.5 ± 0.3 Ga. Another important observation is that 52% of the

craters are slightly fractured and only 4.5% are embayed by lava flows. These

observations led Schaber et al. (1992) to hypothesize that a global volcanic

resurfacing event had occurred at about 500 Ma and that relatively little

surface volcanism has occurred since. Further statistical tests have shown

that a large fraction of the surface of Venus (≈80–90%) was covered by fresh

volcanic flows during a period of 10–50 Myr. It is well established that the

geologic evolution of Venus is far more catastrophic than the Earth’s.

Other major features unique to Venus are the coronae. These are quasi-

circular features, 100–2600 km in diameter, with raised interiors and elevated

rims, often with annular troughs. It has been suggested that the perimeters

of several large coronae on Venus, specifically Artemis (Figure 1–76), Latona,

and Eithinoha, resemble terrestrial subduction zones in both planform and

topography. Artemis chasma has a radius of curvature similar to that of

the South Sandwich subduction zone on the Earth. Large coronae may be

incipient circular subduction zones. The foundering lithosphere is replaced

by ascending hot mantle in a manner similar to back-arc spreading on the

Earth.

1.21 The Galilean Satellites

The innermost satellites of Jupiter, in order of distance from the planet,

are Amalthea, Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. The latter four were

discovered by Galileo in 1610 and are collectively referred to as the Galilean

108 Plate Tectonics

satellites. Amalthea was discovered by Barnard in 1892. They all have nearly

circular prograde orbits lying almost exactly in Jupiter’s equatorial plane.

Our knowledge of the Galilean satellites increased considerably as a con-

sequence of the flybys of Voyagers 1 and 2 on March 5, 1979 and July 9,

1979, respectively, and the Galileo mission (1995–2000) has yielded a further

enormous jump in our knowledge of these bodies. We now know as much

about the surfaces and interiors of the Galilean satellites as we do about

some of the terrestrial planets in our inner solar system. These satellites are

very different from one another and from the terrestrial planets; many of

the physical processes occurring in their interiors and on their surfaces are

unique to these bodies.

From Appendix 2, Section D, it can be seen that Io is only slightly larger

and more massive than the Moon. Its similarity to the Moon extends no

further, however; the Voyager and Galileo missions showed Io to be the

most volcanically active body in the solar system. During the flybys of both

the Voyager and Galileo spacecraft numerous active volcanic plumes were

observed, some extending to heights of hundreds of kilometers above the

surface. Io (Figures 1–77 and 1–78) displays a great diversity of color and

albedo; spectral reflectance data suggest that its surface is dominated by

sulfur-rich materials that account for the variety of colors – orange, red,

white, black, and brown. Io’s volcanism is predominantly silicate-based as

on the terrestrial planets though sulfur-based volcanism also occurs. The

circular features on Io (Figure 1–77) are caldera-like depressions (Figure

1–78); some have diameters as large as 200 km. There are no recognizable

impact craters on the satellite, although the flux of impacting objects in the

early Jovian system is believed to be as large as it was around the terrestrial

planets. Io’s surface is geologically very young, the silicate and sulfur lavas

having only recently resurfaced the planet. Relatively few of Io’s calderas

are associated with structures of significant positive relief. Thus they are

quite unlike the calderas of the Hawaiian volcanoes or the Tharsis volcanoes

on Mars. There are isolated mountains with considerable relief on Io (∼10

km), but their exact height as well as their mode of origin is uncertain.

The source of heat for Io’s volcanism is tidal dissipation. The gravitational

interaction of Io with Europa and Ganymede forces Io into an orbit with

higher eccentricity than it would have if it were circling Jupiter by itself.

The resulting tidal flexing of Io in Jupiter’s gravity field dissipates very

large quantities of heat; Io’s surface heat flow exceeds the global heat loss

from the Earth by a factor of 3 or more. Tidal dissipation is insignificant

as a heat source for the terrestrial planets that are heated mainly by the

decay of radioactive elements. However, the special circumstances of Io’s

1.21 The Galilean Satellites 109

orbit around a massive planet makes tidal heating an unusually effective

heat source for Io.

Io’s density and moment of inertia constrain its internal structure. The

satellite has a large metallic core whose exact size is uncertain because we

do not know the composition of the core. The core radius could be as large

as about half of Io’s radius and is surrounded by a silicate mantle. Io’s

extensive volcanism suggests that the satellite has a crust and a partially

molten asthenosphere. Much of the tidal dissipative heating probably occurs

in this asthenosphere. Io is known to be in hydrostatic equilibrium under

the action of the Jovian tidal forces and its rotation. It is not known if Io

has its own magnetic field.

Europa is only slightly smaller and less massive than the Moon (Appendix

2, Section D), but it also looks quite different from our satellite. Figure 1–

79 is a Voyager 2 picture of Europa that shows the surface to consist of

two major terrain types: a uniformly bright terrain crossed by numerous

dark linear markings and a somewhat darker mottled terrain. Relatively few

impact craters exist on Europa indicating that the surface is geologically

young. The linear markings are ridges and fractures; they have little or no

vertical relief. They extend over distances as large as thousands of kilome-

ters and vary in width from several kilometers to about 100 km. Europa’s

density and moment of inertia indicate that, although it is composed mainly

of silicates, it must contain a large fraction (about 20% by mass) of water.

The water is believed to be in a surface layer about 100 km thick surround-

ing a silicate mantle and metallic core. The water layer may be completely

frozen or it may consist of ice above liquid. Infrared spectra of Europa and

its high albedo indicate that the surface is covered with water ice or frost.

High-resolution Galileo pictures show features such as ice rafts that have

rotated and separated from each other over an underlying soft ice layer or

an internal liquid ocean. The relative absence of craters on Europa may have

resulted from the freezing of a competent ice layer only after the termination

of the early phase of severe bombardment or it may be due to geologically

recent resurfacing of the satellite; the global fracture pattern may be a conse-

quence of tidal stresses and nonsynchronous rotation of Europa’s outer shell

of ice. The surfaces of Europa and, as we shall see, Ganymede and Callisto

are shaped by processes occurring in a predominantly ice shell. Although

large ice-covered regions of the Earth give us some clues about what surface

features to expect, the icy Galilean satellites provide a unique example of

surfaces shaped by global-scale ice tectonic processes at extremely low tem-

peratures (the surface temperatures of the Galilean satellites are about 150

K). The geologist studying Io must be mainly a volcanologist; the geologist

110 Plate Tectonics

investigating Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, on the other hand, must be

mainly a glaciologist! If there is an internal ocean on Europa, the satellite

must then be considered a possible site for extra-terrestrial life. Some tidal

heating of Europa is necessary to prevent the freezing of an internal liquid

water ocean.

Ganymede and Callisto, the icy Galilean satellites, are about the size of

Mercury (Appendix 2, Sections C and D). Their low mean densities, less

than 2000 kg m−3, indicate that they are composed of silicates with very

substantial amounts of water. The fraction of water contained in these bodies

depends on the density of the silicates; as much as 50% of the satellites

could be water. Multiple flybys of Ganymede and Callisto by the Galileo

spacecraft have provided us with knowledge of the satellites’ densities and

moments of inertia from which we can infer the internal structures of the

bodies. Ganymede is fully differentiated into a metallic core, silicate mantle,

and thick (many hundreds of kilometers) outer ice shell. In contrast, Callisto

is only partially differentiated. Most of the satellite consists of a primordial

ice–rock mixture; only in the outer few hundred kilometers can the ice and

rock have separated.

The Galileo spacecraft found that Ganymede has its own magnetic field

while Callisto does not. Ganymede is the only moon in our solar system

known to have an intrinsic global magnetic field at present. Ganymede’s

magnetic field is so large that the field must be generated by dynamo action

in a liquid metallic core just as a dynamo in the Earth’s outer core produces

our magnetic field. Observations of Ganymede by the Galileo spacecraft

provide strong support for the complete differentiation of the satellite and

for the existence of a liquid metallic core in its interior.

A major unsolved question is why Ganymede is fully differentiated while

Callisto is only slightly differentiated; both bodies are about the same size

and are made up of about the same proportions of ice and rock. One possible

explanation is that Ganymede was tidally heated in the past whereas Callisto

was not. The appearances of Ganymede and Callisto are consistent with a

differentiated interior for Ganymede and a relatively primordial interior for

Callisto.

Unlike Europa and Io, Ganymede has numerous impact craters. Two ma-

jor terrain types have been identified: relatively dark heavily cratered terrain

and lighter grooved terrain. The former has a crater density comparable with

that of the lunar highlands and other ancient cratered surfaces of the inner

planets. Although the grooved terrain contains fewer craters, it nonetheless

has a crater density comparable with the oldest lunar maria and Martian

plains units. Bright-rayed impact craters are abundant on both types of ter-

References 111

rain. Almost all the grooved terrain is a mosaic of sets of grooves; groove

systems are 10 to 100 km wide and 10 to 1000 km long. Individual grooves

are a few hundred meters deep. The craters on Ganymede display a vari-

ety of morphologic forms. Craters several hundred kilometers in diameter

are found only as subdued scars on the oldest parts of Ganymede’s surface.

These presumably degraded impact craters appear today as circular bright

patches without rims or central depressions; they have been described as

crater palimpsests. Creep in a predominantly ice surface is probably respon-

sible for the severe degradation of the large craters. Craters in the younger

grooved terrain are generally better preserved that those in the older heavily

cratered areas. There is no major relief on Ganymede; that is, there are no

large mountains or basins. Galileo observations of Ganymede confirm that

tectonism has been a major factor in shaping the satellite’s surface. Tectonic

activity on Ganymede is in accord with its differentiated interior.

References

Crough, S. T., and D. M. Jurdy (1980), Subducted lithosphere, hotspots,

and the geoid, Earth Planet. Sci. Let. 48, 15–22.

DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, and S. Stein (1994), Effect of recent

revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current

plate motions, Geophys. Res. Let. 21, 2191–2194.

du Toit, A. (1937), Our Wandering Continents (Oliver and Boyd, Edin-

burgh).

Engdahl, E. R., R. van der Hilst, and R. Buland (1998), Global teleseismic

earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for

depth determination, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 88, 722–743.

Gordon, R. B. (1965), Diffusion creep in the Earth’s mantle, J. Geophys.

Res. 70, 2413–2418.

Harland, W. B., R. L. Armstrong, A. V. Cox, L. E. Craig, A. G. Smith, and

D. G. Smith (1990). A Geologic Time Scale 1989 (Cambridge University

Press, Cambridge).

Haskell, N. A. (1935), The motion of a viscous fluid under a surface load,

Physics 6, 265–269.

Heirtzler, J. R., X. LePichon, and J. G. Baron (1966), Magnetic anomalies

over the Reykjanes Ridge, Deep Sea Res. 13, 427–443.

Hess, H. (1962), History of ocean basins, in Petrologic Studies: A Volume in

Honour of A. E. Buddington, A. E. J. Engle, ed., pp. 599–620 (Geolog-

ical Society of America, Boulder).

112 References

Holmes, A. (1931), Radioactivity and Earth movement XVIII, Trans. Geol.

Soc. Glasgow 18, 559–606.

Isacks, B. L., and M. Barazangi (1977), Geometry of Benioff zones: Lateral

segmentation and downwards bending of the subducted lithosphere,

in Island Arcs, Deep Sea Trenches, and Back-Arc Basins, pp. 99–114

(American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.).

Isacks, B. L., J. Oliver, and L. R. Sykes (1968), Seismology and the new

global tectonics, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 5855–5899.

Jeffreys, H. (1924), The Earth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

McElhinny, M. W. (1973), Paleomagnetism and Plate Tectonis (Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge).

Molnar, P., and J. Stock (1987), Relative motions of hotspots in the Pacific,

Atlantic and Indian Oceans since the late Cretaceous, Nature 327, 587–

591.

Morgan, W. J. (1968), Rises, trenches, great faults, and crustal blocks, J.

Geophys. Res. 73, 1959–1982.

Morgan, W. J. (1971), Convection plumes in the lower mantle, Nature 230,

42–43.

Muller, R. D., W. R. Roest, J. Y. Royer, L. M. Gahagan, and others (1997),

Digital isochrons of the world’s ocean floor, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 3211–

3214.

Olson, P., and H. Singer (1985), Creeping plumes, J. Fluid Mech. 158, 511–

531.

Runcorn, K. (1956), Paleomagnetic comparisons between Europe and North

America, Proc. Geol. Assoc. Canada 8, 77–85.

Schaber, G. G., R. G. Strom, H. J. Moore, L. A. Soderblom, R. L. Kirk, D.

J. Chadwick, D. D. Dawson, L. R. Gaddis, J. M. Boyce, and J. Russell

(1992), Geology and distribution of impact craters on Venus: What are

they telling us? J. Geophys. Res. 97, 13,257–13,301.

Schmid, S. M., O. A. Pfiffner, G. Schönborn, N. Froitzheim, and E. Kissling

(1997), Integrated cross section and tectonic evolution of the Alps along

the eastern traverse, in Deep Structure of the Swiss Alps: Results of NRP

20, O. A. Pfiffner, P. Lehner, P. Heitzmann, S. Mueller, and A. Steck,

eds., pp. 289–304 (Birkhäuser, Cambridge, Mass.).

Sleep, N. H. (1994), Martian plate tectonics, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 5639–

5655.

Smith, A. G., J. C. Briden, and G. E. Drewry (1974), Phanerozoic world

maps, in Organisms and Continents through Time, N. F. Hughes, ed.,

pp. 1–42 (The Paleontological Association, London).

Collateral Reading 113

Tapponier, P., and P. Molnar (1977), Active faulting and tectonics in China,

J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2905–2930.

Taylor, F. B. (1910), Bearing of the Tertiary mountain belt on the origin of

the Earth’s plan, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 21, 179–226.

Vine, F., and D. Matthews (1963), Magnetic anomalies over ocean ridges,

Nature 199, 947.

Watts, A. B. (1976), Gravity and bathymetry in the central Pacific Ocean,

J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1533–1553.

Wegener, A. (1946), The Origin of Continents and Oceans, 4th Ed. (Dover,

New York).

White, R., and D. McKenzie (1989), Magmatism at rift zones: The genera-

tion of volcanic continental margins and flood basalts, J. Geophys. Res.

94, 7685–7729.

Wilson, J. T. (1966), Did the Atlantic close and then reopen? Nature 211,

676–681.

Zhao, W., and K. D. Nelson (1993), Deep seismic reflection evidence for

continental underthrusting beneath southern Tibet, Nature 366, 557–

559.

Collateral Reading

Continents Adrift, Readings from Scientific American (W. H. Freeman and

Company, San Francisco, 1972), 172 pages.

A collection of 15 papers on plate tectonics originally published in Scientific

American. The papers are divided into three major sections dealing

with the Earth’s interior, seafloor spreading and continental drift, and

consequences and examples of continental drift. Each section is preceded

by a brief introduction by J. T. Wilson.

Decker, R., and B. Decker, Volcanoes (W. H. Freeman and Company, San

Francisco, 1981), 244 pages.

An introductory discussion of volcanoes, how they work, and how they are

produced by plate tectonic processes.

Jacobs, J. A., Reversals of the Earth’s Magnetic Field, 2nd Ed. (Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge, 1994), 346 pages.

A detailed discussion of observations and theory associated with the reversals

of the Earth’s magnetic fields.

LePichon, X., J. Francheteau, and J. Bonnin, Plate Tectonics (Elsevier, Am-

sterdam, 1973), 300 pages.

One of the first textbooks on plate tectonics. There are major chapters on

114 Collateral Reading

the rheology of the mantle, kinematics of plate movements, and physical

processes at accreting and consuming plate boundaries.

Lowrie, W., Fundamentals of Geophysics (Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, 1997), 354 pages.

This is a comprehensive treatment of basic geophysics at a moderately ad-

vanced level. Topics include gravity, seismology, geomagnetism, and geo-

dynamics.

McDonald, G. A., Volcanoes (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972),

510 pages.

A largely descriptive and in-depth discussion of the physical aspects of vol-

canology. Major chapters include volcanic rocks and magmas, lava flows,

volcanic eruptions and edifices, craters, calderas, fumaroles, hot springs,

and geysers.

McElhinny, M. W., Paleomagnetism and Plate Tectonics (Cambridge, Lon-

don, 1973), 358 pages.

Seven chapters deal with geomagnetism, rock magnetism, experimental

methods in paleomagnetism, reversals of the Earth’s field, seafloor

spreading and plate tectonics, apparent polar wandering, and paleo-

magnetic poles.

Merrill, R. T., M. W. McElhinny, and P. L. McFadden, The Magnetic Field

of the Earth (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996), 531 pages.

A comprehensive discussion of all aspects of the Earth’s magnetic field.

Topics include the present geomagnetic field, paleomagnetism, reversals,

and dynamo theory.

Press, F., and R. Siever, Earth (W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco,

1974), 945 pages.

An introductory textbook on Earth science. The book is divided into three

major sections dealing with the geological history of the Earth and its

surface and interior.

Ringwood, A. E., Composition and Petrology of the Earth’s Mantle

(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975), 618 pages.

An advanced textbook that combines observational data from natural petrol-

ogy with experimental results on phase equilibria of natural rock sys-

tems at high temperature and pressure to discuss the composition and

petrology of the upper mantle–crust system. There are also chapters

discussing the lower mantle and the origin and evolution of the Earth.

Williams, H., and A. R. McBirney, Volcanology (Freeman, Cooper and Com-

pany, San Francisco, 1979), 397 pages.

An advanced textbook with chapters on the physical nature of magmas, gen-

eration, rise, and storage of magma, eruptive mechanisms, lava flows,

Collateral Reading 115

pyroclastic flows, fissure eruptions, oceanic volcanism, and hydrother-

mal phenomena.

Wyllie, P. J., The Dynamic Earth: Textbook in Geosciences (John Wiley,

New York, 1971), 416 pages.

An advanced textbook designed mainly for graduate students in geology and

geochemistry. Chapters deal with the structure, composition, mineral-

ogy, and petrology of the crust and mantle, mantle phase transitions,

magma generation, plate tectonics, and the Earth’s interior.

116 Collateral Reading

Figure 1.68 Mars Global Surveyor image showing the layered structure in the walls of a mesa in southern Melas Chasma in Valles Marineris. This image covers an area 3 km wide and 8.2 km long. Erosion by landslides has exposed tens of layers several meters in thickness and has created the dark fan-shaped deposits seen near the center of the image. The floor of the canyon is dark and is covered by many parallel ridges and grooves (lower third of the image) (NASA Image PIA02398).

Collateral Reading 117

Figure 1.69 Mars Global Surveyor image showing a branching valley “net- work” in an ancient cratered terrain. This image covers an area of 11.5 by 27.4 km. The eroded valleys are bright and taken as evidence that Mars had liquid water running across its surface about 4 billion years ago (NASA Image PIA01499).

118 Collateral Reading

Figure 1.70 This Mars Global Surveyor image shows two small impact craters with dark ejecta deposits that were blown out of the craters during the impacts. The large crater has a diameter of about 89 m and the smaller crater about 36 m. The ejecta is darker than the surrounding substrate because the impacts broke through the upper, brighter surface material and penetrated to a layer of darker material beneath (NASA Image PIA01683).

Collateral Reading 119

Figure 1.71 Mars Global Surveyor image of a sand dune field. The number of impact craters in the image indicate that the dunes are quite ancient (NASA Image PIA02359).

120 Collateral Reading

Figure 1.72 This image of Phobos, the inner and larger of the two moons of Mars, was taken by the Mars Global Surveyor on August 19, 1998. It shows a close-up of the largest crater on Phobos, Stickney, 10 km in diameter, nearly half the size of the entire body. Crossing at and near the rim of Stickney are shallow, elongated depressions which may be fractures that resulted from the impact that created Stickney (NASA Image PIA01333).

Collateral Reading 121

Figure 1.73 Composite radar images of the two hemispheres of Venus. The left hemispheric view is centered at 0◦E longitude. The light region near the north pole is Maxwell Montes, the highest region on Venus. The circular structure near the center is Heng-o Corona. The light stippled region south of this is Alpha Regio. The right hemispheric view is centered at 180◦E longitude. The bright equatorial region just south of the equator on the left is Aphrodite Terra. The large circular feature just south of this is Artemis Corona (NASA Image PIA00157).

122 Collateral Reading

Figure 1.74 Magellan image of Maxwell Montes, the highest mountain on Venus, rising almost 11 km above the mean planetary radius. The promi- nent circular structure is Cleopatra, an impact basin with a diameter of about 100 km and a depth of 2.5 km (NASA Image PIA00149).

Figure 1.75 Magellan radar image of three large impact craters in the Lavinia region of Venus. The craters range in diameter from 37 km to 50 km. The bright areas are rough (radar-bright) ejecta (NASA Image PIA00086).

Collateral Reading 123

Figure 1.76 Composite Magellan radar image of Artemis corona. The near circular trough of the Artemis chasma has a diameter of 2100 km. The concentric features outside the chasma are attributed to normal faulting associated with lithospheric flexure similar to that occurring seaward of subduction zones on the Earth. The geometry of Artemis corona is generally similar to the Aleutian island arc and has been associated with an aborted subduction zone (NASA Image PIA00101).

124 Collateral Reading

Figure 1.77 High-resolution image of Jupiter’s moon Io acquired by the Galileo spacecraft on July 3, 1999. The surface is covered by volcanic cen- ters, many of them active (NASA Image PIA02308).

Collateral Reading 125

Figure 1.78 An active volcanic eruption on Jupiter’s moon Io was captured in this image taken on February 22, 2000, by the Galileo spacecraft. This picture is about 250 km across. The eruption is occurring at Tvashtar Catena, a chain of giant volcanic calderas (NASA Image PIA02550).

126 Collateral Reading

Figure 1.79 Near hemispheric image of Jupiter’s satellite Europa taken by the Voyager 2 spacecraft on July 9, 1979. The linear crack-like features are clearly illustrated as well as the darker mottled regions (NASA Image PIA01523).

2

Stress and Strain in Solids

2.1 Introduction

Plate tectonics is a consequence of the gravitational body forces acting on

the solid mantle and crust. Gravi- tational forces result in an increase of

pressure with depth in the Earth; rocks must support the weight of the

overburden that increases with depth. A static equilibrium with pressure

increasing with depth is not possible, however, because there are horizontal

variations in the gravitational body forces in the Earth’s interior. These

are caused by horizontal variations in density associated with horizontal

differences in temperature. The horizontal thermal contrasts are in turn the

inevitable consequence of the heat release by radioactivity in the rocks of the

mantle and crust. The horizontal variations of the gravitational body force

produce the differential stresses that drive the relative motions associated

with plate tectonics.

One of the main purposes of this chapter is to introduce the fundamen-

tal concepts needed for a quantitative understanding of stresses in the solid

Earth. Stresses are forces per unit area that are transmitted through a mate-

rial by interatomic force fields. Stresses that are transmitted perpendicular

to a surface are normal stresses; those that are transmitted parallel to a

surface are shear stresses. The mean value of the normal stresses is the pres-

sure. We will describe the techniques presently used to measure the state of

stress in the Earth’s crust and discuss the results of those measurements.

Stress in an elastic solid results in strain or deformation of the solid. The

simplest example of strain is the decrease in volume accompanying an in-

crease in pressure due to the compressibility of a solid. Normal strain is

defined as the ratio of the change in length of a solid to its original length.

The shear strain is defined as one-half of the decrease in a right angle in

a solid when it is deformed. The surface of the Earth is continually being

128 Stress and Strain in Solids

strained by tectonic processes. These changes in strain can be measured di-

rectly by geodetic techniques. This chapter also discusses the basic concepts

required for a quantitative understanding of strain and changes in strain in

the solid Earth.

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces

The forces on an element of a solid are of two types: body forces and surface

forces. Body forces act throughout the volume of the solid. The magnitude

of the body force on an element is thus directly proportional to its volume

or mass. An example is the downward force of gravity, that is, the weight of

an element, which is the product of its mass and the acceleration of gravity

g. Since density ρ is mass per unit volume, the gravitational body force

on an element is also the product of ρg and the element’s volume. Thus

the downward gravitational body force is g per unit mass and ρg per unit

volume.

The densities of some common rocks are listed in Appendix 2, Section

E. The densities of rocks depend on the pressure; the values given are zero-

pressure densities. Under the high pressures encountered deep in the mantle,

rocks are as much as 50% denser than the zero-pressure values. The varia-

tion of density with depth in the Earth is discussed in Chapter 4. Typical

mantle rocks have zero-pressure densities of 3250 kg m−3. Basalt and gab-

bro, which are the principal constituents of the oceanic crust, have densities

near 2950 kg m−3. Continental igneous rocks such as granite and diorite

are significantly lighter with densities of 2650 to 2800 kg m−3. Sedimentary

rocks are generally the lightest and have the largest variations in density, in

large part because of variations in porosity and water content in the rocks.

Surface forces act on the surface area bounding an element of volume.

They arise from interatomic forces exerted by material on one side of the

surface onto material on the opposite side. The magnitude of the surface

force is directly proportional to the area of the surface on which it acts.

It also depends on the orientation of the surface. As an example, consider

the force that must act at the base of the column of rock at a depth y

beneath the surface to support the weight of the column, as illustrated in

Figure 2–1. The weight of the column of cross-sectional area δA, is ρgyδA.

This weight must be balanced by an upward surface force σyyδA distributed

on the horizontal surface of area δA at depth y. We are assuming that no

vertical forces are acting on the lateral surfaces of the column and that

the density ρ is constant; σyy is thus the surface force per unit area acting

perpendicular to a horizontal surface, that is, stress. Since the forces on the

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces 129

Figure 2.1 Body and surface forces acting on a vertical column of rock.

Figure 2.2 A continental block “floating” on the fluid mantle.

column of rock must be equal if the column is in equilibrium, we find

σyy = ρgy. (2.1)

The normal force per unit area on horizontal planes increases linearly with

depth. The normal stress due to the weight of the overlying rock or over-

burden is known as the lithostatic stress or pressure.

To find a typical value for stress in the lithosphere, let us determine

the lithostatic stress on a horizontal plane at the base of the continental

crust. Assume that the crust is 35 km thick and that its mean density is

2750 kg m−3; from Equation (2–1) we find that

σyy = 2750 kg m−3 × 10 m s−2 × 3.5 × 104 m

= 9.625 × 108 Pa = 962.5 MPa.

The SI unit for pressure or stress is the pascal (Pa). Pressures and stresses

in the Earth are normally given in megapascals (Mpa); 1 megapascal =

106 pascals.

130 Stress and Strain in Solids

Think of continents as blocks of wood floating on a sea of mantle rock,

as illustrated in Figure 2–2. The mean density of the continent, say ρc =

2750 kg m−3, is less than the mean upper mantle density, say ρm = 3300 kg m−3,

so that the continent “floats.” Archimedes’ principle applies to continents;

they are buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of mantle rock displaced.

At the base of the continent σyy = ρcgh, where ρc is the density of the

continent and h is its thickness. At this depth in the mantle, σyy is ρmgb,

where ρm is the mantle density and b is the depth in the mantle to which the

continent “sinks.” Another statement of Archimedes’ principle, also known

as hydrostatic equilibrium, is that these stresses are equal. Therefore we find

ρch = ρmb. (2.2)

The height of the continent above the surrounding mantle is

h− b = h− ρc ρm

h = h

(

1 − ρc ρm

)

. (2.3)

Using the values given earlier for the densities and the thickness of the con-

tinental crust h = 35 km, we find from Equation (2–3) that h− b = 5.8 km.

This analysis is only approximately valid for determining the depth of the

oceans relative to the continents, since we have neglected the contribution

of the seawater and the oceanic crust. The application of hydrostatic equi-

librium to the continental crust is known as isostasy; it is discussed in more

detail in Chapter 5.

Problem 2.1 An average thickness of the oceanic crust is 6 km. Its density

is 2900 kg m−3. This is overlain by 5 km of water (ρw = 1000 kg m−3) in a

typical ocean basin. Determine the normal force per unit area on a horizontal

plane at the base of the oceanic crust due to the weight of the crust and the

overlying water.

Problem 2.2 A mountain range has an elevation of 5 km. Assuming that

ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρc = 2800 kg m−3, and that the reference or nor-

mal continental crust has a thickness of 35 km, determine the thickness of

the continental crust beneath the mountain range. Assume that hydrostatic

equilibrium is applicable.

Problem 2.3 There is observational evidence from the continents that

the sea level in the Cretaceous was 200 m higher than today. After a few

thousand years, however, the seawater is in isostatic equilibrium with the

ocean basins. What was the corresponding increase in the depth of the ocean

basins? Take ρw = 1000 kg m−3 and the density of the displaced mantle to

be ρm = 3300 kg m−3.

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces 131

Figure 2.3 Isostasy of the continental crust relative to an ocean basin.

A more realistic model for the depth of the ocean basins is illustrated

in Figure 2–3. The continental crust has a thickness hcc and a density ρcc;

its upper surface is at sea level. The oceanic crust is covered with water of

depth hw and density ρw. The oceanic crust has a thickness hoc and density

ρoc. The mantle density is ρm. Application of the principle of isostasy to the

base of the continental crust gives

ρcchcc = ρwhw + ρochoc + ρm(hcc − hw − hoc).

(2.4)

The depth of the ocean basin relative to the continent is given by

hw = (ρm − ρcc)

(ρm − ρw) hcc −

(ρm − ρoc)

(ρm − ρw) hoc. (2.5)

Taking hcc = 35 km, hoc = 6 km, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρw = 1000 kg m−3,

ρcc = 2800 kg m−3, and ρoc = 2900 kg m−3, we find hw = 6.6 km.

Subsidence of the surface of the continental crust often results in the for-

mation of a sedimentary basin. Assume that the surface of the continental

crust is initially at sea level and, as it subsides, sediments are deposited

so that the surface of the sediments remains at sea level. One cause of the

subsidence is the thinning of the continental crust. As the crust is thinned,

isostasy requires that the surface subside. A simple model for this subsi-

dence applicable to some sedimentary basins is the crustal stretching model

(McKenzie, 1978). This two-dimensional model is illustrated in Figure 2–4.

A section of continental crust with an initial width w0 is stretched to a final

width wb. The stretching factor α is defined by

α = wb w0 . (2.6)

In order to conserve the volume of the stretched continental crust we assume

a constant crustal density ρcc and require that

wbhcb = w0hcc, (2.7)

132 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.4 Illustration of the crustal stretching model for the formation of a sedimentary basin. A section of continental crust of initial width w0, illustrated in (a), is stretched by a stretching factor α=4 to a final width wb to form the sedimentary basin illustrated in (b).

Figure 2.5 Thickness of a sedimentary basin hsb as a function of the crustal stretching factor α.

where hcc is the initial thickness of the continental crust and hcb is the final

thickness of the stretched crust. The combination of Equations (2–6) and

(2–7) gives

hcb = hcc α . (2.8)

The surface of this stretched continental crust subsides and is assumed to

be covered with sediments of density ρs(ρs<ρcc) to sea level. The sediments

have a thickness hsb and the lower boundary of the sediments is referred

to as basement. Application of the principle of isostasy to the base of the

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces 133

reference continental crust gives

ρcchcc = ρshsb + ρcchcb + ρm(hcc − hsb − hcb).

(2.9)

The combination of Equations (2–8) and (2–9) gives the thickness of the

sedimentary basin in terms of the stretching factor as

hsb = hcc

(

ρm − ρcc ρm − ρs

)(

1 − 1

α

)

. (2.10)

The thickness of the sedimentary basin is given as a function of the stretching

factor in Figure 2–5 for hcc = 35 km, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρcc = 2800 kg m−3,

and ρs = 2500 kg m−3. The maximum thickness of the sedimentary basin

for an infinite stretching factor is hsb = 22 km.

Problem 2.4 A sedimentary basin has a thickness of 4 km. Assuming

that the crustal stretching model is applicable and that hcc = 35 km, ρm =

3300 kg m−3, ρcc = 2750 kg m−3, and ρs = 2550 kg m−3, determine the

stretching factor.

Problem 2.5 A sedimentary basin has a thickness of 7 km. Assuming

that the crustal stretching model is applicable and that hcc = 35 km, ρm =

3300 kg m−3, ρcc = 2700 kg m−3, and ρs = 2450 kg m3, determine the

stretching factor.

Problem 2.6 A simple model for a continental mountain belt is the crustal

compression model illustrated in Figure 2–6. A section of the continental

crust of width w0 is compressed to a width wmb. The compression factor β

is defined by

β = w0

wmb . (2.11)

Show that the height of the mountain belt h is given by

h = hcc (ρm − ρcc)

ρm (β − 1). (2.12)

Assuming β = 2, hcc = 35 km, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, and ρcc = 2800 kg m−3,

determine the height of the mountain belt h and the thickness of the crustal

root b.

Just as there are normal surface forces per unit area on horizontal planes

in the Earth, there are also normal surface forces per unit area on vertical

planes, as sketched in Figure 2–7. The horizontal normal stress components

σxx and σzz can include large-scale tectonic forces, in which case σxx 6=

134 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.6 Illustration of the crustal compression model for a mountain belt. A section of continental crust of width w0, shown in (a), is compressed by compression factor β= 2 to form a mountain belt as shown in (b).

Figure 2.7 Horizontal surface forces acting on vertical planes.

Figure 2.8 Force balance on a section of continental block.

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces 135

Figure 2.9 The area under the stress versus depth profile is proportional to the total horizontal force on a vertical plane.

σzz 6= σyy. On the other hand, there are many instances in which rock was

heated to sufficiently high temperatures or was sufficiently weak initially

so that the three stresses σxx, σzz, and σyy are equal to the weight of the

overburden; that is,

pL ≡ σxx = σzz = σyy = ρgy. (2.13)

When the three normal stresses are equal, they are defined to be the pressure.

The balance between pressure and the weight of the overburden is known as a

lithostatic state of stress. It is completely equivalent to the hydrostatic state

of stress in a motionless body of fluid wherein pressure forces are exerted

equally in all directions and pressure increases proportionately with depth.

We will now show that the continental block illustrated in Figure 2–2

cannot simply be in a lithostatic state of stress. The force balance on the

continental block is illustrated in Figure 2–8. A horizontal force is acting on

the edge of the block Fm. We assume that this force is due to the lithostatic

pressure in the mantle rock of density ρm. The vertical distribution of this

pressure is given in Figure 2–9. The horizontal force Fm is obtained by

integrating the lithostatic pressure:

Fm =

∫ b

0 pL dy = ρmg

∫ b

0 y dy =

1

2 ρmgb

2. (2.14)

This force is per unit width of the block so that it has dimensions of force

per unit length. The total force per unit width is proportional to the area

under the stress distribution given in Figure 2–9.

We next determine the horizontal force per unit width acting at a typical

cross section in the continental block Fc. We assume that the horizontal nor-

mal stress acting in the continent σxx is made up of two parts, the lithostatic

contribution ρcgy and a constant tectonic contribution ∆σxx,

σxx = ρcgy + ∆σxx. (2.15)

136 Stress and Strain in Solids

The tectonic contribution is also known as the deviatoric stress. The hori-

zontal force Fc is obtained by integrating the horizontal normal stress

Fc =

∫ h

0 σxx dy =

∫ h

0 (ρcgy + ∆σxx) dy

= 1 2ρcgh

2 + ∆σxxh. (2.16)

In order to maintain a static balance, the two forces Fc and Fm must be

equal. Using Equations (2–2), (2–14), and (2–16), we obtain

∆σxx = 1

2

ρmgb 2

h − 1

2 ρcgh = −1

2 ρcgh

(

1 − ρc ρm

)

.

(2.17)

A horizontal tensile stress is required to maintain the integrity of the con-

tinental block. The horizontal tensile stress is a force per unit area acting on

vertical planes and tending to pull on such planes. A compressive stress is

a normal force per unit area tending to push on a plane. We consider com-

pressive stresses positive and tensile stresses negative, a convention generally

adopted in the geological literature. This is opposite to the sign convention

used in most elasticity textbooks in which positive stress is tensional. Taking

h = 35 km, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, and ρc = 2750 kg m−3, we find from Equa-

tion (2–17) that ∆σxx = −80.2 MPa. Typical values for deviatoric stresses

in the continents are of the order of 10 to 100 MPa.

Problem 2.7 Consider a continental block to have a thickness of 70 km

corresponding to a major mountain range. If the continent has a density

of 2800 kg m−3 and the mantle a density of 3300 kg m−3, determine the

tensional stress in the continental block.

Problem 2.8 Determine the deviatoric stress in the continent for the

oceanic–continental structure in Figure 2–3 by proceeding as follows. Show

that the pressure as a function of depth in the continental crust pc is

pc = ρccgy, (2.18)

and that the pressures in the water, in the oceanic crust, and in the mantle

beneath the oceanic crust are

p0 = ρwgy 0 ≤ y ≤ hw

= ρwghw + ρocg(y − hw) hw ≤ y ≤ hw + hoc

= ρwghw + ρocghoc + ρmg(y − hw − hoc)

hw + hoc ≤ y ≤ hcc. (2.19)

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces 137

Figure 2.10 Normal and tangential surface forces on an area element in the fault plane of a strike–slip fault.

Find the net difference in the hydrostatic pressure force between the conti-

nental and the oceanic crusts F by integrating the pressures over a depth

equal to the thickness of the continental crust. The result is

F = g[hwhcc(ρm − ρw) + hochcc(ρm − ρoc)

−hwhoc(ρm − ρoc) − 1 2h

2 w(ρm − ρw)

− 1 2h

2 oc(ρm − ρoc) − 1

2h 2 cc(ρm − ρcc)]. (2.20)

Calculate F for hw = 5 km, ρw = 1000 kg m−3, hoc = 7 km, ρoc = 2900 kg

m−3, ρcc = 2800 kg m−3, and ρm = 3300 kg m−3. Find hcc from Equation (2–

5). If the elastic stresses required to balance this force are distributed over

a depth equal to hcc, determine the stress. If the stresses are exerted in the

continental crust, are they tensional or compressional? If they act in the

oceanic lithosphere, are they tensional or compressional?

Surface forces can act parallel as well as perpendi-cular to a surface. An

example is provided by the forces acting on the area element δA lying in

the plane of a strike–slip fault, as illustrated in Figure 2–10. The normal

compressive force σxxδA acting on the fault face is the consequence of the

weight of the overburden and the tectonic forces tending to press the two

sides of the fault together. The tangential or shear force on the element

σxzδA opposes the tectonic forces driving the left-lateral motion on the fault.

This shear force is the result of the frictional resistance to motion on the

fault. The quantity σxz is the tangential surface force per unit area or the

shear stress. The first subscript refers to the direction normal to the surface

element and the second subscript to the direction of the shear force.

Another example of the resistive force due to a shear stress is the em-

138 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.11 Normal and tangential forces acting on a rock mass displaced horizontally to the right in a low-angle overthrust fault.

placement of a thrust sheet. In zones of continental collision a thin sheet

of crystalline rock is often overthrust upon adjacent continental rocks on a

low-angle thrust fault. This process is illustrated in Figure 2–11, where the

thrust sheet has been emplaced from the left as a consequence of horizontal

tectonic forces. Neglecting the influence of gravity, which is considered in

Section 8–4, we can write the total horizontal tectonic force FT due to a

horizontal tectonic stress ∆σxx as

FT = ∆σxxh, (2.21)

where h is the thickness of the thrust sheet and FT is a force per unit width

of the sheet. This tectonic driving force is resisted by the shear stress σyx acting on the base of the thrust sheet. The total resisting shear force per

unit width FR is

FR = σyxL, (2.22)

where L is the length of the thrust sheet.

In many cases it is appropriate to relate the shear stress resisting the

sliding of one surface over another to the normal force pressing the surfaces

together. Empirically we often observe that these stresses are proportional

to one another so that

σyx = fσyy, (2.23)

where σyy is the vertical normal stress acting on the base of the thrust sheet

and f , the constant of proportionality, is known as the coefficient of friction.

Assuming that σyy has the lithostatic value

σyy = ρcgh, (2.24)

and equating the driving tectonic force FT to the resisting shear force, we

2.2 Body Forces and Surface Forces 139

Figure 2.12 Gravitational sliding of a rock mass.

find that

∆σxx = fρcgL. (2.25)

This is the tectonic stress required to emplace a thrust sheet of length L.

Taking a typical value for the tectonic stress to be ∆σxx = 100 MPa and

assuming a thrust sheet length L = 100 km and ρc = 2750 kg m−3, we find

that the required coefficient of friction is f = 0.036. The existence of long

thrust sheets implies low values for the coefficient of friction.

Problem 2.9 Assume that the friction law given in Equation (2–23) is

applicable to the strike–slip fault illustrated in Figure 2–10 with f = 0.3.

Also assume that the normal stress σxx is lithostatic with ρc = 2750 kg m−3.

If the fault is 10 km deep, what is the force (per unit length of fault) resisting

motion on the fault? What is the mean tectonic shear stress over this depth

σ̄zx required to overcome this frictional resistance?

Problem 2.10 Consider a block of rock with a height of 1 m and horizontal

dimensions of 2 m. The density of the rock is 2750 kg m−3. If the coefficient

of friction is 0.8, what force is required to push the rock on a horizontal

surface?

Problem 2.11 Consider a rock mass resting on an inclined bedding plane

as shown in Figure 2–12. By balancing the forces acting on the block parallel

to the inclined plane, show that the tangential force per unit area σx′y ′ on

the plane supporting the block is ρgh sin θ (ρ is the density and h is the

thickness of the block). Show that the sliding condition is

θ = tan−1f. (2.26)

Problem 2.12 The pressure ph of fluids (water) in the pores of rocks

reduces the effective normal stress pressing the surfaces together along a

fault. Modify Equation (2–25) to incorporate this effect.

140 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.13 Surface forces acting on a small rectangular element in a two- dimensional state of stress.

2.3 Stress in Two Dimensions

In the previous section we were concerned primarily with stresses on the

surface of a material. However, stress components can be defined at any

point in a material. In order to illustrate this point, it is appropriate to

consider a small rectangular element with dimensions δx, δy, and δz defined

in accordance with a cartesian x, y, z coordinate system, as illustrated in

Figure 2–13. In this section we will consider a two-dimensional state of

stress; the state is two-dimensional in the sense that there are no surface

forces in the z direction and none of the surface forces shown vary in the

z direction. The normal stresses are σxx and σyy, and the shear stresses

are σxy and σyx. The notation adopted in labeling the stress components

allows immediate identification of the associated surface forces. The second

subscript on σ gives the direction of the force, and the first subscript gives

the direction of the normal to the surface on which the force acts.

The tangential or shear stresses σxy and σyx have associated surface forces

that tend to rotate the element in Figure 2–13 about the z axis. The moment

exerted by the surface force σxyδyδz is the product of the force and the

moment arm δx; that is, it is σxyδxδyδz. This couple is counteracted by the

moment σyxδxδyδz exerted by the surface force σyxδxδz with a moment arm

δy. Because the element cannot rotate if it is in equilibrium,

σxy = σyx. (2.27)

2.3 Stress in Two Dimensions 141

Figure 2.14 Transformation of stresses from the x, y coordinate system to the x ′, y ′ coordinate system. (a) Illustration of the coordinate systems. (b) Triangular element (with sides in the x, y, and y ′ directions) on which a static force balance is carried out.

Thus the shear stresses are symmetric in that their value is independent of

the order of the subscripts. Three independent components of stress σxx, σyy,

and σxy must be specified in order to prescribe the two-dimensional state of

stress.

The state of stress is dependent on the orientation of the coordinate sys-

tem. We will now determine the three components of stress in a coordinate

system x′, y′ inclined at an angle θ with respect to the x, y coordinate sys-

tem as illustrated in Figure 2–14a. To determine the normal stress, we carry

out a static force balance on the triangular element OAB illustrated in Fig-

ure 2–14b. The sides of the triangle lie in the x, y, and y′ directions. We first

write a force balance in the y direction. The force in the y direction on face

AO is

σyyAO,

and the force in the y direction on face OB is

σxyOB.

142 Stress and Strain in Solids

The force in the y direction on face AB is

−σx′x′AB sin θ − σx′y′AB cos θ.

The sum of these forces must be zero for the triangular element OAB to be

in equilibrium. This gives

(σx′x′ sin θ + σx′y′ cos θ)AB = σyyAO + σxyOB.

(2.28)

However, the sides of triangle OAB are in the ratios

AO

AB = sin θ

OB

AB = cos θ, (2.29)

so that

σx′x′ sin θ + σx′y′ cos θ = σyy sin θ + σxy cos θ.

(2.30)

We next write a force balance in the x direction. The force in the x

direction on face AO is

σyxAO,

and the force in the x direction on face OB is

σxxOB.

The force in the x direction on face AB is

−σx′x′AB cos θ + σx′y′AB sin θ.

Upon equating the sum of these forces to zero, we get

(σx′x′ cos θ − σx′y′ sin θ)AB = σyxAO + σxxOB.

(2.31)

With the values of AO/AB and OB/AB as given in Equation (2–29), we

find

σx′x′ cos θ − σx′y′ sin θ = σyx sin θ + σxx cos θ.

(2.32)

We multiply Equation (2–30) by sin θ, multiply Equation (2–32) by cos θ,

and add the results to obtain

σx′x′(cos 2 θ + sin2 θ) = σxx cos2 θ + σyy sin2 θ

+σxy sin θ cos θ

+σyx sin θ cos θ. (2.33)

2.3 Stress in Two Dimensions 143

This can be further simplified by using

cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1 (2.34)

σxy = σyx (2.35)

2 sin θ cos θ = sin 2θ. (2.36)

The result is

σx′x′ = σxx cos2 θ + σyy sin2 θ + σxy sin 2θ. (2.37)

By multiplying Equation (2–30) by cos θ and subtracting the product of

Equation (2–32) with sin θ, we find

σx′y′(sin 2 θ + cos2 θ) = σyy sin θ cos θ + σxy cos2 θ

−σxx sin θ cos θ − σyx sin2 θ.

(2.38)

By using the trigonometric relations already quoted, the symmetry of the

shear stresses σxy and σyx and

cos 2θ = cos2 θ − sin2 θ, (2.39)

we can rewrite Equation (2–38) in the simpler form:

σx′y′ = 1 2 (σyy − σxx) sin 2θ + σxy cos 2θ. (2.40)

Equations (2–37) and (2–40) provide formulas for obtaining the nor-

mal and shear stresses on arbitrarily oriented elements of area in terms of

σxx, σyy, and σxy (or σyx). Thus these three stress components completely

specify the state of two-dimensional stress in a solid. When θ = 0, the equa-

tions show that σx′x′ is σxx and σx′y′ is σxy, as required.

Problem 2.13 Show that

σy ′y ′ = σxx sin2 θ + σyy cos2 θ − σxy sin 2θ. (2.41)

Problem 2.14 The state of stress at a point on a fault plane is σyy =

150 MPa, σxx = 200 MPa, and σxy = 0 (y is depth and the x axis points

westward). What are the normal stress and the tangential stress on the fault

plane if the fault strikes N–S and dips 35◦ to the west?

For any arbitrary two-dimensional state of stress σxx, σyy, σxy, it is pos-

sible to find a surface oriented in such a manner that no shear forces are

144 Stress and Strain in Solids

exerted on the surface. We need simply set σx′y′ in Equation (2–40) to zero

and solve for θ. Stress σx′y′ is zero if

tan 2θ = 2σxy

σxx − σyy . (2.42)

The direction θ defined by Equation (2–42) is known as a principal axis of

stress. If θ is a principal axis direction, then so is θ + π/2 because tan 2θ =

tan[2(θ + π/2)]; this can be seen as follows:

tan

[

2

(

θ + π

2

)]

= tan(2θ + π) = tan 2θ + tan π

1 − tan 2θ tanπ

= tan 2θ. (2.43)

The last step is true because tan π = 0. The coordinate axes defined by the

orthogonal principal axis directions are called the principal axes. There are

no shear stresses on area elements oriented perpendicular to the principal

axes.

The normal stresses in the principal axis coordinate system are known

as principal stresses. To solve for the principal stresses σ1 and σ2, substi-

tute Equation (2–42) into the expression for σx′x′ , Equation (2–37). Before

making the substitution, rewrite Equation (2–37) using the identities

sin2 θ = 1 − cos 2θ

2 (2.44)

cos2 θ = 1 + cos 2θ

2 . (2.45)

Equation (2–37) becomes

σx′x′ = σxx + σyy

2 +

1

2 cos 2θ(σxx − σyy) + σxy sin 2θ

(2.46)

or

σx′x′ = σxx + σyy

2 +

1

2 cos 2θ(σxx − σyy + 2σxy tan 2θ).

(2.47)

The determination of the principal stresses from Equation (2–47) requires

an expression for cos 2θ as well as for tan 2θ. The value of cos 2θ can be

obtained from the expression for tan 2θ using

tan2 2θ = sin2 2θ

cos2 2θ =

1 − cos2 2θ

cos2 2θ , (2.48)

2.3 Stress in Two Dimensions 145

which can be rewritten as

cos 2θ = 1

(1 + tan2 2θ)1/2 . (2.49)

By substituting Equation (2–42) into Equation (2–49), one finds

cos 2θ = σxx − σyy

±(4σ2 xy + (σxx − σyy)2)

1/2 . (2.50)

Upon substituting the expressions above for tan 2θ and cos 2θ into Equa-

tion (2–47), we get

σ1,2 = σxx + σyy

2 ± {

(σxx − σyy) 2

4 + σ2

xy

}1/2

.

(2.51)

Instead of specifying σxx, σyy, and σxy, we can describe the state of stress

at a point in a solid by giving the orientation of the principal axes and the

values of the principal stresses.

In deriving these formulas for the orientation of the principal axes and the

magnitudes of the principal stresses, we have tacitly assumed σxx−σyy 6= 0.

If σxx = σyy, then σx′y′ = σxy cos 2θ, and the principal axes have angles of

±45◦, assuming σxy 6= 0. If σxy = 0, the principal stresses are σxx and σyy.

If σxx = σyy and σxy 6= 0, the principal stresses are

(σxx + σyy)

2 ± σxy = σxx ± σxy. (2.52)

It is often convenient to have formulas for the normal and shear stresses for

an arbitrarily oriented coordinate system in terms of the principal stresses

and the angle of the coordinate system with respect to the principal axes.

To derive such formulas, consider the x, y axes in Figure 2–14 to be principal

axes so that σ1 = σxx, σ2 = σyy, and σxy = 0. The stresses σx′x′ , σx′y′ , and

σy′y′ are then given as

σx′x′ = σ1 cos2 θ + σ2 sin2 θ

= σ1 + σ2

2 +

(σ1 − σ2)

2 cos 2θ (2.53)

σx′y′ = −1 2(σ1 − σ2) sin 2θ (2.54)

σy′y′ = σ1 sin2 θ + σ2 cos2 θ

= σ1 + σ2

2 − (σ1 − σ2)

2 cos 2θ. (2.55)

At this point, there is no particular reason to retain the primes on the

146 Stress and Strain in Solids

coordinate axes. We can simplify future applications of Equations (2–53)

to (2–55) by identifying the x′, y′ coordinate axes as “new” x, y coordinate

axes. Therefore, if θ is considered to be the angle between the direction of

σ1 and the x direction (direction of σxx), we can write

σxx = σ1 + σ2

2 +

(σ1 − σ2)

2 cos 2θ (2.56)

σxy = −1 2(σ1 − σ2) sin 2θ (2.57)

σyy = σ1 + σ2

2 − (σ1 − σ2)

2 cos 2θ. (2.58)

Problem 2.15 Show that the sum of the normal stres- ses on any two

orthogonal planes is a constant. Evaluate the constant.

Problem 2.16 Show that the maximum and minimum normal stresses

act on planes that are at right angles to each other.

By differentiating Equation (2–40) with respect to θ and equating the

resulting expression to zero, we can find the angle at which the shear stress

σx′y′ is a maximum; the angle is given by

tan 2θ = (σyy − σxx)

2σxy . (2.59)

A comparison of Equations (2–42) and (2–59) shows that tan 2θ for the

principal axis orientation and tan 2θ for the maximum shear stress orien-

tation are negative reciprocals. Thus the angles 2θ differ by 90◦ and the

axes that maximize the shear stress lie at 45◦ to the principal axes. The

maximum value of the shear stress can thus be found by letting θ = π/4 in

Equation (2–57). One gets

(σxy)max = 1 2(σ1 − σ2). (2.60)

The maximum shear stress is half the difference of the principal stresses. It

is also obvious from Equation (2–57) that (σxy)max is exerted on a surface

whose normal is at 45◦ to the principal axes.

2.4 Stress in Three Dimensions

In three dimensions we require additional stress components to specify the

surface forces per unit area on surfaces of arbitrary orientation. Figure 2–15

shows the surface forces per unit area, that is, the stresses, on the faces

of a small rectangular parallelepiped. There are nine components of stress

required to describe the surface forces per unit area on the faces of the

2.4 Stress in Three Dimensions 147

Figure 2.15 Stress components on the faces of a small rectangular paral- lelepiped.

element. σxx, σyy, and σzz are the normal stresses, and σxy, σyx, σxz, σzx, σyz,

and σzy are shear stresses. If the parallelepiped is not to rotate about any

of its axes, then σxy = σyx, σxz = σzx, and σyz = σzy. Only six of the stress

components are independent.

The transformation of coordinates to principal axes can also be carried

out in three dimensions. Three orthogonal axes can always be chosen such

that all shear stress components are zero. The normal stresses on planes

perpendicular to these axes are the principal stresses, usually denoted as

σ1, σ2, and σ3. By convention these are chosen such that σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3.

Therefore, σ1 is the maximum principal stress, σ3 is the minimum principal

stress, and σ2 is the intermediate principal stress. The state of stress at a

point in a solid is completely specified by giving σxx, σyy, σzz, σxy, σyz, and

σxz or the orientation of the principal axes and the values of the principal

stresses.

Clearly two or even three of the principal stresses may be equal. When all

three are equal, the state of stress is isotropic and the principal stresses can

be identified as the pressure p = σ1 = σ2 = σ3. In any coordinate system the

normal stresses are equal to the pressure, and there are no shear stresses.

Any set of orthogonal axes qualifies as a principal axis coordinate system.

148 Stress and Strain in Solids

This is referred to as a hydrostatic state of stress. The lithostatic state of

stress is a hydrostatic state in which the stress increases proportionately

with depth at a rate controlled by the density of the rock. When the three

principal stresses are not equal, the pressure is defined to be their mean:

p= 1 3 (σ1 + σ2 + σ3). (2.61)

The pressure is invariant to the choice of coordinate system, that is, to the

orientation of the coordinate axes, so that it is equal to the mean of the

normal stresses in any coordinate system:

p= 1 3(σxx + σyy + σzz). (2.62)

Recall that we have taken normal stress to be positive for compression so

that it has the same sign as the pressure.

In studying stress in the Earth, it is often convenient to subtract the mean

stress, that is, the pressure, from the normal stress components. Accordingly,

we define deviatoric normal stresses by

σ′xx = σxx − p σ′yy = σyy − p σ′zz = σzz − p

σ′xy = σxy σ′xz = σxz σ′yz = σyz,

(2.63)

where primes refer to the deviatoric stresses. By definition, the average of

the normal deviatoric stresses is zero. Similarly deviatoric principal stresses

can be defined as

σ′1 = σ1 − p σ′2 = σ2 − p σ′3 = σ3 − p,

(2.64)

and their average is zero.

We can determine the orientation of the plane on which the shear stress

is a maximum, just as we did in the case of two-dimensional stress. The

direction of the normal to this plane bisects the angle between the directions

of the maximum and minimum principal stresses. The largest possible value

of the shear stress is (σ1 − σ3)/2.

2.5 Pressures in the Deep Interiors of Planets

Because rocks can readily deform on geologic time scales at the high temper-

atures encountered deep in planetary interiors, it is a good approximation

for many purposes to consider the planets to be in a hydrostatic state of

stress completely described by the dependence of pressure p on radius r.

2.5 Pressures in the Deep Interiors of Planets 149

Figure 2.16 Spherically symmetric model of a planet for the purpose of calculating p(r).

Pressure must increase with depth because the weight of the material above

any radius r increases as r decreases. The situation is completely analogous

to the lithostatic state of stress al- ready discussed. By differentiating Equa-

tion (2–13) with respect to y, we find that the rate of increase of pressure, or

lithostatic stress, with depth is ρg. In spherical coordinates, with spherical

symmetry, the rate of decrease of pressure with radius is given by

dp

dr = −ρg. (2.65)

In calculating the lithostatic stress near the surface of a planet, it is ade-

quate to consider g to be constant. However, deep in a planet g is a function

of radius, as shown in Figure 2–16. In addition, ρ is also generally a function

of r. The gravitational acceleration g(r) for a spherically symmetric body is

given by

g(r) = GM(r)

r2 , (2.66)

where G is the universal gravitational constant and M(r) is the mass inside

radius r.

M(r) =

∫ r

0 4πr′ 2ρ(r′) dr′. (2.67)

A further discussion of planetary gravity is given in Chapter 5. Given a

model of the density inside a planet, that is, given the form of ρ(r), one can

integrate Equation (2–67) to obtain M(r); g(r) follows from Equation (2–

66). Equation (2–65) can then be integrated to solve for p(r). In general,

however, ρ(r) is a function of p(r); so an equation of state is required.

150 Stress and Strain in Solids

For a small planet, such as the Moon, the procedure is particularly straight-

forward, since ρ can be considered a constant; M(r) is then 4 3πρr

3, and the

acceleration of gravity is

g(r) = 4 3πρGr. (2.68)

The equation for p is

dp

dr = −4

3πρ 2Gr, (2.69)

which upon integration gives

p = −2 3πρ

2Gr2 + c. (2.70)

The constant of integration c can be evaluated by equating the pressure to

zero at the surface of the body r = a. One obtains

p = 2 3πρ

2G(a2 − r2). (2.71)

Pressure is a quadratic function of radius in a small constant-density planet.

Problem 2.17 Determine the pressure at the center of the Moon. Assume

ρ = 3300 kg m−3 and a = 1738 km. What is the variation of g with radius

in the Moon?

Problem 2.18 Consider a simple two-layer model of a planet consisting

of a core of density ρc and radius b surrounded by a mantle of density ρm and thickness a − b. Show that the gravitational acceleration as a function

of radius is given by

g(r) = 4 3πρcGr 0 ≤ r ≤ b

= 4 3πG[rρm + b3(ρc − ρm)/r2] b ≤ r ≤ a.

(2.72)

and that the pressure as a function of radius is given by

p(r) = 4

3 πρmGb

3(ρc − ρm)

(

1

r − 1

a

)

+ 2

3 πGρ2

m(a2 − r2) b ≤ r ≤ a

= 2

3 πGρ2

c(b 2 − r2) +

2

3 πGρ2

m(a2 − b2)

+ 4

3 πρmGb

3(ρc − ρm)

(

1

b − 1

a

)

0 ≤ r ≤ b. (2.73)

Apply this model to the Earth. Assume ρm = 4000 kg m−3, b = 3486 km, a =

2.6 Stress Measurement 151

Figure 2.17 Schematic of overcoring technique for stress measurements. (a) A hole is drilled, and four strain gauges are installed: one on the side wall to measure σyy and three on the base to measure σxx, σxz, and σzz . It is assumed that the drilling of the hole has not affected the ambient state of stress. (b) The second annular hole is drilled. It is assumed that this annular hole completely relieves the initial stresses.

6371 km. Calculate ρc given that the total mass of the Earth is 5.97×1024 kg.

What are the pressures at the center of the Earth and at the core–mantle

boundary? What is the acceleration of gravity at r = b?

2.6 Stress Measurement

The direct measurement of stress is an important source of information on

the state of stress in the lithosphere. At shallow depths, the state of stress

is strongly affected by the presence of faults and joints, and stress measure-

ments near the surface yield little useful information on tectonic stresses in

the lithosphere. At sufficiently large depths, the lithostatic pressure closes

these zones of weakness, allowing stresses to be transmitted across them.

Stress measurements made at depth are thus directly interpretable in terms

of large-scale tectonic stresses. Stress measurements at depth are carried out

in mines and in deep boreholes. The two principal methods of making in situ

stress measurements are overcoring and hydrofracturing.

The first step in overcoring is to drill a hole in rock that is free of faults and

joints. Strain (deformation) gauges can be installed in three perpendicular

directions on the base of the hole and on the side, as illustrated in Figure 2–

17a (strain or deformation in response to stress is discussed quantitatively

in the following section). Alternatively two holes are drilled at right angles,

and strain gauges are installed on the bases of the two holes. We assume that

152 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.18 Pressure log during hydrofracturing.

the stress in the direction of the strain gauge is not affected by the drilling

of the hole. The hole is then overcored; that is, an annular hole with radius

larger than the original hole is drilled, as shown in Figure 2–17b. We assume

that the overcoring completely relieves the stresses in the isolated block of

rock to which the strain gauges have been attached. The displacements on

the strain gauges can then be used to determine the original state of stress.

An important limitation of this method is that the length of the hole used is

limited to about 1 m. To make overcoring measurements at greater depths,

it is necessary to drill the holes in mines.

The second method of direct stress measurement is hydrofracturing. In

this method a section of a borehole that is free of fractures or other porosities

is isolated using inflatable packers. The isolated section is then pressurized

by pumping fluid into it, and the pressure of the fluid is monitored. The

pressure is increased until a fracture occurs. The fluid pressure at which

the fracture occurs is referred to as the breakdown pressure pb. A typical

pressure–time history during hydrofracturing is illustrated in Figure 2–18.

If the pump is shut off immediately and the hydraulic circuit kept closed, an

instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) is recorded, as illustrated in Figure 2–

18. This is the pressure that is just sufficient to hold the fracture open. If

the fluid pressure is dropped and then increased, the maximum pressure is

the ISIP when the fracture is once again opened.

Several assumptions are implicit in the interpretation of the pressure

record obtained during hydrofracturing. The first is that the resultant frac-

ture is in a vertical plane. The second is that the rock fractures in pure

tension so that the stress perpendicular to the fracture is the minimum

horizontal principal stress. With these assumptions the magnitude of the

2.6 Stress Measurement 153

Figure 2.19 Measured values of the minimum horizontal stress σmin as a function of depth y in the Cajon Pass borehole in California (Zoback and Healy, 1992). Also included in this figure are the vertical component of stress σyy shown by the solid line (assumed equal to the lithostatic pressure) and 0.6 σyy shown by the dashed line.

minimum horizontal principal stress is equal to the ISIP. Using theories for

the fracture of rock, the maximum horizontal principal stress can be deduced

from pb and ISIP, but with considerably less accuracy.

Measurements of the minimum horizontal stress σmin as a function of

depth in the Cajon Pass borehole in California are given in Figure 2–19.

This borehole is adjacent to the San Andreas fault in southern California

and was drilled to a depth of 3.5 km. A series of ISIP measurements were

carried out using both hydrofractures and preexisting fractures, and it is

assumed that these gave σmin.

In general, measurements of the vertical component of stress indicate that

it is nearly equal to the weight of the overburden, that is, the lithostatic

pressure. Using Equation (2–1) with ρg = 26.5 MPa km−1 the vertical com-

ponent of stress σyy is also given as a function of depth in Figure 2–19. The

measured stresses correlate reasonably well with 0.6 σyy.

Another technique used to determine the orientation of crustal stresses is

the observation of wellbore breakouts. Wellbore breakouts are the result of

localized failure around a borehole in response to horizontal compression.

154 Stress and Strain in Solids

Table 2.1 Stress Measurements at 200 m Depth vs. Distance from the San

Andreas Fault

Distance Maximum Minimum from Principal Principal Fault (km) Stress (MPa) Stress (MPa)

2 9 8 4 14 8

22 18 8 34 22 11

Compression produces spallation zones along the wellbore at the azimuth of

minimum principal stress where the circumferential compressive stress is a

maximum. The spallation zones can be used to infer the directions of the

horizontal principal stresses (Gough and Bell, 1981).

Observations of wellbore breakouts can be obtained from borehole tele-

viewer data. The borehole tele- viewer is an ultrasonic well-logging tool

which can image the orientation and distribution of fractures as well as the

orientation of stress-induced wellbore breakouts.

Problem 2.19 An overcoring stress measurement in a mine at a depth

of 1.5 km gives normal stresses of 62 MPa in the N–S direction, 48 MPa

in the E–W direction, and 51 MPa in the NE–SW direction. Determine the

magnitudes and directions of the principal stresses.

Problem 2.20 The measured horizontal principal stresses at a depth of

200 m are given in Table 2–1 as a function of distance from the San Andreas

fault. What are the values of maximum shear stress at each distance?

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain

Stresses cause solids to deform; that is, the stresses produce changes in the

distances separating neighboring small elements of the solid. In the discus-

sion that follows we describe the ways in which this deformation can occur.

Implicit in our discussion is the assumption that the deformations are small.

Figure 2–20 shows a small element of the solid in the shape of a rectangular

parallelepiped. Prior to deformation it has sides δx, δy, and δz. The element

may be deformed by changing the dimensions of its sides while maintaining

its shape in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped. After deformation, the

sides of the element are δx−εxxδx, δy−εyyδy, and δz−εzzδz. The quantities

εxx, εyy, and εzz are normal components of strain; εxx is the change in length

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain 155

Figure 2.20 A deformation that changes the dimensions of a rectangular parallelepiped but not its shape.

of the side parallel to the x axis divided by the original length of the side,

and εyy and εzz are similar fractional changes in the lengths of the sides

originally parallel to the y and z axes, respectively. The normal components

of strain εxx, εyy, and εzz are assumed, by convention, to be positive if

the deformation shortens the length of a side. This is consistent with the

convention that treats compressive stresses as positive.

If the deformation of the element in Figure 2–20 is so small that squares

and higher order products of the strain components can be neglected in

computing the change in volume of the element, the fractional change in

volume (volume change divided by original volume) is εxx + εyy + εzz. This

quantity is known as the dilatation ∆; it is positive if the volume of the

element is decreased by compression.

Problem 2.21 Uplift and subsidence of large areas are also accompanied

by horizontal or lateral strain because of the curvature of the Earth’s surface.

Show that the lateral strain ε accompanying an uplift ∆y is given by

ε = ∆y

R , (2.74)

where R is the radius of the Earth.

Problem 2.22 The porosity φ of a rock is defined as its void volume

per unit total volume. If all the pore spaces could be closed, for example,

by subjecting the rock to a sufficiently large pressure, what would be the

dilatation? For loose sand φ is about 40%, and for oil sands it is usually in

the range of 10 to 20%. Table 2–2 gives the porosities of several rocks.

The strain components of a small element of solid can be related to the

displacement of the element. In order to simplify the derivation of this re-

lationship, we consider the two-dimensional example in Figure 2–21. Prior

to deformation, the rectangular element occupies the position pqrs. After

156 Stress and Strain in Solids

Table 2.2 Rock Porosities

Rock Porosity (%)

Hasmark dolomite 3.5 Marianna limestone 13.0 Berea sandstone 18.2 Muddy shale 4.7 Repetto siltstone 5.6

Figure 2.21 Distortion of the rectangular element pqrs into the rectangular element p′q′r′s′.

deformation, the element is in the position p′q′r′s′. It is assumed to retain a

rectangular shape. The coordinates of the corner p before strain are x and

y; after strain the corner is displaced to the location denoted by p′ with

coordinates x′, y′. The displacement of the corner p as a result of the strain

or deformation is

wx(x, y) = x− x′ (2.75)

in the x direction and

wy(x, y) = y − y′ (2.76)

in the y direction. Displacements in the negative x and y directions are con-

sidered positive to agree with the sign convention in which positive strains

imply a contraction. Corner q at x + δx, y is displaced to position q′ with

coordinates x′ + δx′, y′ as a result of the deformation. Its displacement in

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain 157

the x direction is

wx(x+ δx, y) = x+ δx− (x′ + δx′). (2.77)

Similarly, the displacement of corner s in the y direction wy(x, y + δy) is

given by the difference in the y coordinates of s′ and s

wy(x, y + δy) = y + δy − (y′ + δy′). (2.78)

In writing Equations (2–77) and (2–78), we have assumed that the strains

(δx− δx′)/δx and (δy − δy′)/δy are small.

Since δx and δy are infinitesimal, we can expand wx(x+δx, y) and wy(x, y+

δy) as

wx(x+ δx, y) = wx(x, y) + ∂wx ∂x

δx (2.79)

wy(x, y + δy) = wy(x, y) + ∂wy ∂y

δy. (2.80)

Substitution of Equation (2–79) into Equation (2–77) and subtraction of

Equation (2–75) yield

δx = δx′ + ∂wx ∂x

δx. (2.81)

Similarly, substitution of Equation (2–80) into Equation (2–78) and subtrac-

tion of Equation (2–76) yield

δy = δy′ + ∂wy ∂y

δy. (2.82)

From the definitions of the strain components and Equations (2–81) and

(2–82) we find

εxx ≡ δx− δx′

δx = ∂wx ∂x

(2.83)

εyy ≡ δy − δy′

δy = ∂wy ∂y

. (2.84)

In three-dimensional strain, the third strain component εzz is clearly given

by

εzz = δz − δz′

δz = ∂wz ∂z

. (2.85)

The components of strain in the x, y, and z directions are proportional to

the derivatives of the associated displacements in the respective directions.

The dilatation ∆ is given by

∆ = ∂wx ∂x

+ ∂wy ∂y

+ ∂wz ∂z

. (2.86)

158 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.22 Distortion of a rectangle into a parallelogram by a strain field involving shear.

We have so far considered strains or deformations that do not alter the

right angles between line elements that are mutually perpendicular in the

unstrained state. Shear strains, however, can distort the shapes of small

elements. For example, Figure 2–22 shows a rectangular element in two

dimensions that has been distorted into a parallelogram. As illustrated in

this figure, the shear strain εxy is defined to be one-half of the decrease in

the angle SPQ

εxy ≡ −1 2(φ1 + φ2), (2.87)

where φ1 and φ2 are the angles through which the sides of the original

rectangular element are rotated. The sign convention adopted here makes

εxy negative if the original right angle is altered to an acute angle. As in the

case of stress, the shear strain is symmetric so that εyx = εxy. Figure 2–22

shows that the angles φ1 and φ2 are related to the displacements by

tanφ1 = −wy(x+ δx, y)

δx = φ1 (2.88)

tanφ2 = −wx(x, y + δy)

δy = φ2. (2.89)

In Equations (2–88) and (2–89), we assume that the rotations are infinites-

imal so that the tangents of the angles are very nearly equal to the angles

themselves.

We can express wy(x + δx, y) and wx(x, y + δy) in terms of the spatial

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain 159

derivatives of the displacements according to

wy(x+ δx, y) = ∂wy ∂x

δx (2.90)

wx(x, y + δy) = ∂wx ∂y

δy, (2.91)

Where, for simplicity, we assume wx(x, y) = 0 and wy(x, y) = 0. Substitution

of Equations (2–90) and (2–91) into Equations (2–88) and (2–89) and further

substitution of the resulting expressions for φ1 and φ2 into Equation (2–87)

yield

εxy = 1

2

(

∂wy ∂x

+ ∂wx ∂y

)

(2.92)

as the relation between shear strain and the spatial derivatives of displace-

ments. In the engineering literature, γxy = 2εxy is often used. Care should

be exercised in dealing with these quantities.

Shear strain can also lead to a solid-body rotation of the element if φ1 6= φ2. The solid-body rotation ωz is defined by the relation

ωz = −1

2 (φ1 − φ2). (2.93)

Substitution of Equations (2–88) and (2–89) into Equation (2–93) gives

ωz = 1

2

(

∂wy ∂x

− ∂wx ∂y

)

. (2.94)

The rotation of any element can be resolved in terms of the shear strain

and the solid-body rotation. From Equations (2–87) and (2–93), the angle

φ1 through which a line element parallel to the x axis is rotated is

φ1 = −(εxy + ωz), (2.95)

and the angle φ2 through which a line element in the y direction is rotated

is

φ2 = ωz − εxy. (2.96)

Thus, in the absence of solid-body rotation, εxy is the clockwise angle through

which a line element in the x direction is rotated. It is also the counterclock-

wise angle through which a line element in the y direction is rotated.

If the amount of solid-body rotation is zero, the distortion is known as

pure shear. In this case, illustrated in Figure 2–23a,

φ1 = φ2 (2.97)

∂wy ∂x

= ∂wx ∂y

(2.98)

160 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.23 Sketch of (a) pure shear strain that involves no solid-body rotation of elements and (b) simple shear strain that includes such rotation.

and the shear strain is

εxy = ∂wx ∂y

= ∂wy ∂x

. (2.99)

The case of simple shear, shown in Figure 2–23b, combines solid-body rota-

tion and shear in such a manner that

φ1 = ∂wy ∂x

= 0. (2.100)

From Equation (2–94), the amount of solid-body rotation is

ωz = −1

2

∂wx ∂y

, (2.101)

and the shear strain is

εxy = 1

2

∂wx ∂y

. (2.102)

Simple shear is often associated with strike–slip faulting.

The equations given for two-dimensional strains and solid-body rotation

about one axis can be readily generalized to three dimensions. A pure shear

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain 161

strain in the xz plane has an associated shear strain component given by

εxz = εzx = 1

2

(

∂wz ∂x

+ ∂wx ∂z

)

(2.103)

and a pure shear strain in the yz plane corresponds to

εyz = εzy = 1

2

(

∂wz ∂y

+ ∂wy ∂z

)

. (2.104)

A solid-body rotation about the x axis ωx is related to displacement deriva-

tives by

ωx = 1

2

(

∂wz ∂y

− ∂wy ∂z

)

. (2.105)

Similarly, a solid-body rotation about the y axis is

ωy = 1

2

(

∂wx ∂z

− ∂wz ∂x

)

. (2.106)

The strain components εxx, εyy, εzz, εxy, εxz, and εyz are sufficient to de-

scribe the general infinitesimal deformation of solid elements subjected to

stresses. The solid-body rotations ωx, ωy, and ωz do not alter distances be-

tween neighboring elements of a solid and, therefore, do not involve stresses.

Accordingly, the strain components and their associated stresses are of pri-

mary concern to us in subsequent chapters.

Just as it was important to know the stresses on area elements whose

normals make arbitrary angles with respect to x, y axes, so it is essential to

know the fractional changes in length and the rotation angles of arbitrarily

inclined line elements. For simplicity we consider the two-dimensional case.

We wish to determine the strains in the x′, y′ coordinate system, which is

inclined at an angle θ with respect to the x, y coordinate system, as shown in

Figure 2–24a. As a result of the strain field εxx, εyy , εxy and the solid-body

rotation ωz, the line elements PR and PQ experience changes in length and

rotations. Line element PR is parallel to the x′ axis, and PQ is parallel to

the y′ axis. The extension in length of PR divided by the original length

δx′ is the strain component −εx′x′ ; the counterclockwise angle of rotation of

PR is the angle φ′1 = −εx′y′ − ωz′ . This is illustrated in Figure 2–24b. The

extension in length of PQ divided by the original length δy′ is the strain

component −εy ′y ′; the clockwise rotation of PQ is the angle φ′2 = ωz ′−εx′y ′ .

This is shown in Figure 2–24c.

We first determine the strain component −εx′x′ . The displacement of R

to R ′ in Figure 2–24b is the net result of the combined elongations and

rotations of δx and δy. The x component of the displacement of R ′ relative

to R arises from the elongation of δx in the x direction, −εxxδx, and the

162 Stress and Strain in Solids

rotation of δy through the clockwise angle φ2. The latter contribution to the

displacement is φ2δy, which, according to Equation (2–96), is (ωz − εxy)δy.

Thus the total x component of the displacement of R ′ with respect to R is

−εxxδx+ (ωz − εxy)δy.

The y component of the displacement of R ′ with respect to R is the sum

of the elongation of δy,−εyyδy, and the contribution from the rotation of

δx, which, with Equation (2–95), is φ1δx = −(εxy +ωz)δx. Thus the total y

component of displacement of R ′ with respect to R is

−εyyδy − (εxy + ωz)δx.

For small strains, the change in length of PR is the sum of the x component

of RR ′ projected on the line PR,

[−εxxδx+ (ωz − εxy)δy] cos θ,

and the y component of RR ′ projected on the line PR,

[−εyyδy − (εxy + ωz)δx] sin θ.

The strain component εx′x′ is thus

−εx′x′ = [−εxxδx+ (ωz − εxy)δy] cos θ

δx′

+ [−εyyδy − (εxy + ωz)δx] sin θ

δx′ . (2.107)

Since

δx

δx′ = cos θ

δy

δx′ = sin θ (2.108)

Equation (2–107) can be rewritten as

εx′x′ = εxx cos2 θ + εyy sin2 θ + 2εxy sin θ cos θ.

(2.109)

Using Equation (2–36), we can further rewrite Equation (2–109) as

εx′x′ = εxx cos2 θ + εyy sin2 θ + εxy sin 2θ. (2.110)

This has the same form as the transformation of the normal stress given in

Equation (2–37).

We next determine the strain component −εy ′y ′ . As can be seen in Fig-

ure 2–24c, the component of the displacement of Q′ with respect to Q in

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain 163

Figure 2.24 (a) The transformation of coordinates x, y through an angle θ to x ′, y ′. (b) The transformation of the strain components onto the x ′

axis. (c) The transformation of the strain components onto the y ′ axis.

the negative x direction is the sum of the elongation of δx, −εxxδx, and the

contribution from the rotation of δy, −φ2δy = −(ωz − εxy)δy, that is,

−εxxδx− (ωz − εxy)δy.

The y component of the displacement of Q ′ with respect to Q is the sum of

the elongation of δy,−εyyδy, and the contribution due to the rotation of δx,

−φ1δx = (εxy + ωz)δx, that is,

−εyyδy + (ωz + εxy)δx.

After projection of these displacements onto the line PQ, the strain compo-

nent εy ′y′ can be written as

−εy ′ y ′ = −[εxxδx+ (ωz − εxy)δy] sin θ

δy′

164 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.25 Geometrical determination of (a) φ′1 and (b) φ′2.

+ [−εyyδy + (ωz + εxy)δx] cos θ

δy′ . (2.111)

Since

δx

δy′ = sin θ

δy

δy ′ = cos θ, (2.112)

Equation (2–111) can be put in the form

εy ′y ′ = εxx sin2 θ + εyy cos2 θ − 2εxy sin θ cos θ.

(2.113)

By substituting Equation (2–36) into Equation (2–113), we get

εy ′y ′ = εxx sin2 θ + εyy cos2 θ − εxy sin 2θ. (2.114)

Problem 2.23 Derive Equation (2–114) from Equation (2–110) by using

the substitution θ′ = θ + π/2. Why can this be done?

We now turn to the determination of the shear strain, εx′y ′ , and the solid-

body rotation ωz ′ in the new coordinate system. We first determine the angle

φ′1 = −εx′y ′ −ωz′ from the geometrical relationships shown in Figure 2–25a.

For sufficiently small strain, φ′1 is given by

φ′1 = −εx′y′ − ωz′ = R′V

δx′ . (2.115)

From Figure 2–25a we can see that

R′V = R′U − V U = R′U − TS, (2.116)

2.7 Basic Ideas about Strain 165

and

R′U = [−εyyδy − (εxy + ωz)δx] cos θ (2.117)

TS = [−εxxδx+ (ωz − εxy)δy] sin θ. (2.118)

By combining Equations (2–108) and (2–115) with (2–118), we obtain

εx′y ′ + ωz ′ = (εyy − εxx) sin θ cos θ

+ εxy(cos 2 θ − sin2 θ) + ωz. (2.119)

The angle φ′2 can be found from the geometrical relationships shown in

Figure 2–25b; it is given by

φ′2 = ωz ′ − εx′y ′ = U ′S′

δy′ . (2.120)

From Figure 2–25b it is seen that

U ′S′ = U ′T ′ + T ′S′, (2.121)

and

U ′T ′ = −[−εxxδx− (ωz − εxy)δy] cos θ (2.122)

T ′S′ = [−εyyδy + (ωz + εxy)δx] sin θ. (2.123)

By combining Equations (2–112) and (2–120) with (2–123), we obtain

ωz′ − εx′y′ = (εxx − εyy) sin θ cos θ

− εxy(cos 2 θ − sin2 θ) + ωz. (2.124)

By adding and subtracting Equations (2–119) and (2–124), we can find

separate equations for ωz ′ and εx′y ′ :

ωz ′ = ωz (2.125)

εx′y′ = (εyy − εxx) sin θ cos θ + εxy(cos 2 θ − sin2 θ).

(2.126)

The solid-body rotation is invariant to the coordinate transformation, as

expected, because it represents a rotation of an element without deforma-

tion. By introducing Equations (2–36) and (2–39) into Equation (2–126), we

obtain

εx′y ′ = 1 2(εyy − εxx) sin 2θ + εxy cos 2θ. (2.127)

This has the same form as the transformation of the shear stress given in

Equation (2–40).

Just as there are principal axes of stress in a solid, there are principal axes

166 Stress and Strain in Solids

of strain. In the principal strain axis coordinate system, shear strain com-

ponents are zero. Setting εx′y ′ = 0 in Equation (2–127) gives the direction

of one of the principal axes of strain as

tan 2θ = 2εxy

εxx − εyy . (2.128)

We have already shown, in connection with principal stress axes, that if θ is a

principal axis direction, so is θ+π/2. The fractional changes in length along

the directions of the principal strain axes are the principal strains. With θ

given by Equation (2–128), Equation (2–110) determines the principal strain

ε1 = εx′x′ . The principal strain ε2 is identified with εy ′y ′ . By a procedure

analogous to the one used in deriving Equation (2–51) we find

ε1,2 = 1 2 (εxx + εyy) ±

{

ε2xy + 1 4(εxx − εyy)

2 }1/2

.

(2.129)

It is convenient to have formulas for the normal and shear strains at an

angle θ with respect to the ε1 principal strain axis. Taking εxy = 0, εxx = ε1,

and εyy = ε2 in Equations (2–109) and (2–127), we obtain

εxx = ε1 cos2 θ + ε2 sin2 θ (2.130)

εxy = −1 2(ε1 − ε2) sin 2θ. (2.131)

Problem 2.24 Show that the principal strains are the minimum and the

maximum fractional changes in length.

Problem 2.25 Show that the maximum shear strain is given by 1 2(ε1−ε2).

What is the direction in which the shear strain is maximum?

Principal axes of strain can also be found for arbitrary three-dimensional

strain fields. With respect to these axes all shear strain components are zero.

The normal strains along these axes are the principal strains ε1, ε2, and ε3.

One can introduce the concept of deviatoric strain in analogy to deviatoric

stress by referring the strain components to a state of isotropic strain equal

to the average normal strain e. In three dimensions

e ≡ 1 3 (εxx + εyy + εzz) = 1

3∆. (2.132)

The average normal strain and the dilatation are invariant to the choice of

coordinate axes. The deviatoric strain components, denoted by primes, are

ε′xx = εxx − e ε′yy = εyy − e ε′zz = εzz − e

ε′xy = εxy ε′xz = εxz ε′yz = εyz . (2.133)

2.8 Strain Measurements 167

Figure 2.26 A fence offset by 3 m on the ranch of E. R. Strain, Marin County, California, as a result of slip along the San Andreas fault during the great 1906 earthquake (G. K. Gilbert 3028, U.S. Geological Survey.)

2.8 Strain Measurements

Strain or deformation at the Earth’s surface is often a consequence of large-

scale tectonic forces. Thus the measurement of surface strain can provide

important information on fundamental geodynamic processes. For example,

in order to understand the mechanical behavior of faults, it is essential to

determine the distribution of the coseismic surface strain as a function of

distance from the fault, a problem we discuss further in Chapter 8. Because

surface strains are generally very small, sophisticated distance-measuring

techniques are usually required to determine them. However, there are in-

stances in which surface displacements are so large that they can be easily

measured. An example is the surface offset on a fault when a great earth-

quake occurs; offsets of 10 m and more have been recorded. Tree lines, roads,

railroad tracks, pipelines, fences, and the like can be used to make such

measurements. Figure 2–26 shows a fence offset by 3 m during the 1906

earthquake on the San Andreas fault in California. Measured surface offsets

resulting from this earthquake are summarized in Figure 2–27. Although

there is considerable scatter in the data, an offset of about 4 m was ob-

served along much of the fault break. The scatter of the data illustrates one

168 Stress and Strain in Solids

of the principal problems in measuring surface strain. The Earth’s crust is

not a continuum material with uniform properties. Changes in rock type,

the presence of thick soil layers, and offsets on branching or secondary faults

all contribute to the variations in the measured offsets.

The strain field associated with the 1906 earthquake can be estimated

from the data in Figure 2–27. Since the San Andreas fault is a strike–slip

fault, we assume that the strain field is a simple shear and that it extends

40 km from the fault. The distance that the cyclic strain field extends from

the fault is considered in detail in Chapter 8. The value of 40 km is subject

to considerable uncertainty. The mean displacement of 4 m across the fault

during the earthquake is made up of 2 m displacements on opposite sides of

the fault. The shear strain εxz can thus be estimated from Equation (2–102)

as

εxz = 1

2

∂wx ∂z

≈ 1

2

2m

40,000 m = 2.5 × 10−5. (2.134)

If great earthquakes recur about every 100 years along the San Andreas

fault, the rate of shear strain accumulation on the fault ε̇xz is

ε̇xz = 2.5 × 10−5

100 yr = 0.25 × 10−6 yr−1. (2.135)

As we have already noted, surface strains of the magnitude calculated in

Equation (2–134) are difficult to measure; they require extremely accurate

determinations of distances. This has been the main concern of geodesy for

several centuries. The traditional end product of geodetic surveys is the to-

pographic map, constructed from the elevations of a network of benchmarks.

Benchmarks are spaced over much of the United States at intervals of a

few kilometers and ground surveys are used to establish accurate bench-

mark elevations in a geodetic network. Geodetic networks are systematically

resurveyed to determine the changes in elevation between benchmarks. Ver-

tical displacements of benchmarks on the order of 10 to 100 cm are often

found. In many instances, these displacements can be associated with sub-

sidence due to the removal of ground water. However, in other cases they

must be attributed to tectonic causes. Extensive geodetic measurements

have been made along the San Andreas fault, and these are used to illus-

trate the concepts discussed in this section. Because the San Andreas fault is

a strike–slip fault, the displacements associated with slip along the fault are

predominantly horizontal. Thus we restrict our attention to the horizontal

components of strain εxx, εxz , and εzz. Horizontal strains are obtained by

measuring the positions of fixed monuments.

Historically, the standard method for determining the positions of monu-

2.8 Strain Measurements 169

F ig

u re

2. 27

O bs

er ve

d su

rf a ce

o ff se

ts o n

th e

S a n

A n d re

a s

fa u lt

re su

lt in

g fr o m

th e

1 9 0 6

ea rt

h qu

a ke

(T h a tc

h er

, 1 9 7 5 ).

170 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.28 Illustration of triangulation. The x, z position of monument C can be determined from the line length AB and the angles θ1 and θ2. The positions of the other monuments can be similarly determined.

ments is triangulation, as illustrated in Figure 2–28. Assume that the abso-

lute positions of the reference points A and B have been determined. The

location of monument C can be found from the line length AB and the

two angles θ1 and θ2 as follows. Applying the law of sines to triangle ABC

produces

(AB)

sin(π − θ1 − θ2) =

(AC)

sin θ2 . (2.136)

If we assume that point A defines the origin of the x, z coordinate system

and that AB lies on the z axis, the coordinates of C(xc, zc) are given by

xc = (AC) sin θ1 zc = (AC) cos θ1. (2.137)

By solving Equation (2–136) for (AC) and substituting into Equation (2–

137), we obtain

xc = (AB) sin θ1 sin θ2 sin(π − θ1 − θ2)

(2.138)

zc = (AB) cos θ1 sin θ2 sin(π − θ1 − θ2)

. (2.139)

The locations of the other monuments in the triangulation network can be

similarly determined. The use of redundant triangles, as shown in Figure 2–

28, improves the accuracy of the results.

Problem 2.26 The coordinates xA, zA and xB , zB of monuments A and B

shown in Figure 2–29 are assumed known. Determine the coordinates xC , zC of monument C in terms of the coordinates of monuments A and B and the

angles θ1 and θ2.

The angles required for triangulation are obtained using a theodolite. The

2.8 Strain Measurements 171

Figure 2.29 Sketch for Problem 2–26.

Figure 2.30 (a) The three monuments at Mount Diablo, Mocho, and Mount Toro are part of a primary triangulation network that spans the San An- dreas fault south of San Francisco. (b) Observed changes in the angle θ between the monuments since 1882 (Savage and Burford, 1973).

accuracy to which an angle can be determined is 0.3 to 1.0 second of arc,

implying errors in distance determination of about 3 in 106. A typical max-

imum length over which a measurement is made is 50 km. The accuracy

of triangulation observations is equivalent to about 10 years of shear strain

accumulation on the San Andreas fault; see Equation (2–135). Therefore,

considerable redundancy in a network is required to obtain meaningful re-

sults.

An example of triangulation observations is given in Figure 2–30. Mount

Diablo, Mocho, and Mount Toro are three monuments in a primary trian-

gulation network that spans the San Andreas fault south of San Francisco

(Figure 2–30a). The changes in the angle θ between these monuments in

a series of surveys since 1882 are given in Figure 2–30b. Mount Toro lies

30 km southwest of the San Andreas fault, and Mocho lies 60 km north-

172 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.31 A triangulation net across the San Andreas fault (a) and the measured angle θ since 1855 (b).

east of the fault. If it is assumed that these monuments lie outside the zone

of strain accumulation and release associated with great earthquakes, the

relative motion across the San Andreas fault can be obtained from these

observations. A reasonable fit to the data is dθ/dt = −0.192 sec of arc yr−1.

The length of the line between Mocho and Mount Toro is 125 km, and

it crosses the San Andreas fault at an angle of 45◦. The calculated relative

velocity across the fault is thus

u = 125 × 106 × 0.192

3600 × 57.3 × sin 45◦ = 41 mm yr−1. (2.140)

This value is in quite good agreement with the predicted relative velocity of

46 mm yr−1 from plate tectonics (see Section 1–8).

Problem 2.27 Figure 2–31 shows three monuments on Mount Diablo,

Sonoma Mountain, and Farallon lighthouse and the change in the included

angle θ relative to the 1855 measurement. Assuming that these three mon-

uments lie outside the zone of strain accumulation and release on the San

Andreas fault, determine the relative velocity across the fault.

Problem 2.28 Triangulation measurements at monument 0 give the time

rate of change of θ1, θ̇1 and the time rate of change of θ2, θ̇2 (Figure 2–32).

Show that

ε̇xy = 1

2

(θ̇2 sec θ2 csc θ2 − θ̇1 sec θ1 csc θ1)

(tan θ2 − tan θ1) (2.141)

2.8 Strain Measurements 173

Figure 2.32 Sketch for Problem 2–28.

and

ε̇yy − ε̇xx = (θ̇2 csc2 θ2 − θ̇1 csc2 θ1)

(ctn θ1 − ctn θ2) , (2.142)

where ε̇xx = dεxx/dt, and so on.

As we have shown, the accuracy of triangulation measurements is gener-

ally insufficient to obtain useful data on strain accumulation. Fortunately

electro-optical distance-measuring instruments greatly improve the accuracy

of strain measurements. However, they also greatly increase the expense. To

make a distance measurement, a geodolite is placed on one monument and

a reflector on the second monument. The geodolite emits a modulated laser

beam that is reflected back to the instrument from the reflector. A com-

parison of the modulated phases of the emitted and returned beams deter-

mines the length of the optical path between the monuments as an unknown

number of whole modulation lengths plus a precisely determined fractional

modulation length. The unknown number of whole modulation lengths is

determined by carrying out measurements at successively lower modulation

frequencies.

Distances between measured monuments are typically 10 km, and the in-

herent accuracy of the geodimeter is about 1 mm. Therefore an accuracy of

1 part in 107 can in principle be achieved. This is about an order of magni-

tude better than triangulation measurement accuracy. In practice, however,

the accuracy of distance determinations is limited by variations in refractiv-

ity along the atmospheric path. In order to obtain accuracies approaching

1 part in 107, it is necessary to determine the temperature and humidity

along the path. This is usually done by flying a suitably equipped airplane

or helicopter along the path while the distance measurement is being car-

174 Stress and Strain in Solids

Figure 2.33 Illustration of how strain measurements between three monu- ments A, B, and C can be used to determine the strain field εxx, εzz, and εxz.

ried out. The atmospheric pressure at the two terminal monuments is also

required.

By carrying out measurements at three different wavelengths or frequen-

cies, devices with multiwavelength capabilities have eliminated the need for

meteorological observations along the optical path. This approach reduces

costs and improves accuracy to a few parts in 108.

If it is assumed that the three monuments A,B, and C in Figure 2–33 are

in a uniform strain field, measurements of the rates of change in the three line

lengths ε̇xx = −∆AB/AB, ε̇x′x′ = −∆AC/AC, and ε̇x′′x′′ = −∆BC/BC

and the angles θ1 and θ2 give the entire rate of strain field ε̇xx, ε̇zz , and ε̇xz.

From Equation (2–109) we have

ε̇x′x′ = ε̇xx cos2 θ1 + ε̇zz sin2 θ1 + 2ε̇xz sin θ1 cos θ1

(2.143)

ε̇x′′x′′ = ε̇xx cos2 θ2 + ε̇zz sin2 θ2 + 2ε̇xz sin θ2 cos θ2.

(2.144)

These equations can be solved for ε̇zz and ε̇xz; we find

ε̇zz = ε̇xx(ctn θ1 − ctn θ2) − ε̇x′x′ sec θ1 csc θ1

tan θ2 − tan θ1

+ ε̇x′′x′′ sec θ2 csc θ2 tan θ2 − tan θ1

(2.145)

ε̇xz = ε̇xx(ctn

2θ1 − ctn 2θ2) − ε̇x′x′ csc 2 θ1

2(ctn θ2 − ctn θ1)

+ ε̇x′′x′′ csc

2 θ2 2(ctn θ2 − ctn θ1)

. (2.146)

2.8 Strain Measurements 175

The results can be transformed into any other coordinate system using Equa-

tions (2–109), (2–114), and (2–127).

As an example of the direct measurement of strain accumulation, consider

the data given in Figure 2–34. We assume that the three lines measured are

in a uniform strain field. We further assume that line 7 (length 28 km) defines

the x coordinate so that ε̇xx = 8/(28×106) yr−1 = 0.29×10−6 yr−1 and that

line 10 (length 31 km) defines the z coordinate so that ε̇zz = −5/(31× 106)

yr−1 = −0.16 × 10−6 yr−1. The angle between lines 9 and 10 is 30◦. The

rate of strain on line 9 (length 25 km) is ε̇x′x′ = −1.5/(25 × 106) yr−1 =

−0.6×10−6 yr−1. The rate of shear strain ε̇xz can be determined by inverting

Equation (2–109):

ε̇xz = 1 2 (ε̇x′x′ sec θ csc θ − ε̇xxctn θ − ε̇zz tan θ).

(2.147)

With θ = 120◦ and the previously determined values of ε̇x′x′ , ε̇xx, and ε̇zz we obtain

ε̇xz = 1 2 (−0.6 × 1.15 × 2 − 0.29 × 1.73

+0.16 × 0.58)× 10−6 yr−1

= −0.90 × 10−6 yr−1. (2.148)

From Equation (2–128) the direction of one of the principal strain rate

axes relative to the x axis is θ = −38◦. Assuming that line 9 trends N–S,

the directions of the principal strain rate axes are 22◦ W of N and 22◦ N

of E. These can be compared with the principal axis directions expected for

a simple shear strain model of strain accumulation in this region; since the

San Andreas trends 45◦ W of N in this area, the expected directions are

north and east.

The values of the principal strain rates from Equation (2–129) are ε̇1.2 =

0.993 × 10−6 yr−1, −0.863 × 10−6 yr−1. Assuming ε̇xz = ε̇1 = −ε̇2 = 0.93 × 10−6 yr−1 (the average of the above two values) and that simple shear is

occurring uniformly for a distance d from the fault, d can be determined from

the shear strain rate and the relative velocity u = 46 mm yr−1 according to

d = u

4ε̇xz =

46 × 10−3

4 × 0.93 × 10−6 = 12.4 km. (2.149)

With the uniform strain assumption, the strain accumulation would be lim-

ited to a region closer to the fault than the geodetic net considered.

Problem 2.29 Given in Figure 2–35 are the line lengths between the mon-

ument at Diablo and the monuments at Hills, Skyline, and Sunol obtained

176 Stress and Strain in Solids

F igu

re 2.34

L in

e len

gth ch

a n ges

betw een

th e

m o n u m

en t a t M

t. H

a m

ilto n

a n d

th e

m o n u m

en ts

a t A

lliso n

(lin e

7 ),

L o m

a P rieta

(lin e

1 0 ),

a n d

M o rga

n (lin

e 9 )

o bta

in ed

betw een

1 9 6 1

a n d

1 9 7 1

u sin

g a

geod im

eter (S

a va

ge a n d

B u rfo

rd , 1 9 7 3 ).

2.8 Strain Measurements 177

Figure 2.35 Geodetic net and measurements for use in Problem 2–29. The line length is L.

between 1970 and 1978 using a geodimeter. Assuming a uniform strain field,

determine ε̇xx, ε̇yy, and ε̇xy. Take the Sunol–Diablo line to define the y co-

ordinate. Discuss the results in terms of strain accumulation on the San

Andreas fault, which can be assumed to trend at 45◦ with respect to the

Sunol–Diablo line (Savage and Prescott, 1978).

Advances in space geodesy have revolutionized geodetic investigations of

tectonic motions. Studies carried out in the 1980s utilized satellite laser

ranging (SLR) and very long baseline interferometry (VLBI). SLR measures

distances from a ground station to various satellites using an electro-optical

instrument similar to the geodolite previously described. Signals are reflected

from the satellite and the position of the station is determined relative to the

Earth’s center of mass. VLBI uses

interstellar emissions from quasars to obtain interferometric patterns that

determine an absolute position of a station. This technique can also be used

for studies of the motion of Earth relative to the stars. Because the signals

pass through the denser part of the atmosphere at an oblique angle, attenu-

ation problems associated with water vapor are greatly reduced. The success

of these techniques demonstrated that space-based geodetic systems could

178 Stress and Strain in Solids

provide absolute positions on the surface of the Earth with a subcentimeter

accuracy. However, both techniques have serious limi-tations due to their

use of large stationary or mobile antennas that are bulky and expensive.

These difficulties were overcome when the global positioning system (GPS)

became fully operational in the early 1990s. GPS consists of some 24 satel-

lites that interact with ground-based receivers to provide accurate surface

positions. GPS was introduced by the Department of Defense as a global

navigation system with an accuracy of meters (Hofmann-Wallenhof et al.,

1997). However, surface instruments were developed that use the carrier sig-

nals from the active GPS satellites in an interferometric mode to determine

differential positions between surface benchmarks with a subcentimeter ac-

curacy (Larson, 1996). The great advantage of GPS is the low cost and

availability of the instruments so that large numbers of surface observations

can be made.

One of the first accomplishments of space geodesy was the confirmation

that the plate tectonic velocities given in Section 1–8 are also valid on a year-

to-year basis. As a specific example, we show in Figure 2–36 the relative

displacements between the Yaragadee station (Perth, Australia) and the

Maui station (Hawaiian Islands). These SLR observations give a relative

velocity uYM = −90± 5 mm yr−1.

We next compare this value with the value predicted by the plate mo-

tions given in Table 1–6. We first obtain the motion of the Maui station

(θ′ = 90◦ − 20.7◦ = 69.3◦, ψ′ = 203.7◦) relative to the fixed Australian

plate. From Table 1–6 we find θ = 90◦ + 60.1◦ = 150.1◦, ψ = −178.3◦,

and ω = 1.07 deg Myr−1 (0.0187 rad Myr−1). Using Equation (1–18) we

find that the angle ∆PM = 82.76◦. Substitution into Equation (1–17) gives

uMP = 118 mm yr−1. This is the velocity of the Maui station relative to

the fixed Australian plate; this velocity is perpendicular to the great circle

path passing through the pole of rotation and the Maui station and is in the

counterclockwise direction.

The measured relative velocity between the Yaragadee and Maui stations,

uYM = −90± 5 mm yr−1, is in the direction of the great circle between the

two stations (the negative sign indicates a convergence). The angle β between

the two great circle paths YM and MP must be determined and the plate

motion velocity must be resolved onto the YM great circle direction. From

Figure 1–35 we see that we can determine the angle β using Equation (1–18)

with the result

cos β = cos ∆PY − cos ∆PM cos ∆YM

sin ∆PM sin ∆YM , (2.150)

2.8 Strain Measurements 179

1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989

−0.5

−0.25

0.0

0.25

0.5

Year

Figure 2.36 The geodetic time series for the change in distance along a great circle path between the Yaragadee station (Perth, Australia) and the Maui station (Hawaiian Islands). The distance changes are in meters. The data were obtained using satellite laser ranging (SLR) (Smith et al., 1990). The straight line correlation gives a velocity uym =−90±5 mm yr−1.

Figure 2.37 Observed velocity vectors for geodetic stations in southern Cal- ifornia obtained from a combined GPS and VLBI data set (Feigl et al., 1993). The velocities are given relative to a fixed Pacific plate. Error el- lipses and major faults are also illustrated.

180 Stress and Strain in Solids

where ∆PY is the angle subtended at the center of the Earth by the pole of

rotation P and the Yaragadee station Y (θ′′ = 90◦+29◦ = 119◦, ψ′′ = 115.3◦)

and ∆YM is the angle subtended by the Maui station M and the Yaragadee

station Y . From Equation (1–18) we find ∆PY = 53.6◦ and ∆YM = 98.5◦.

Substitution of these values into Equation (2–150) gives β = 51.4◦. The

relative velocity between the Yaragadee and Maui stations uYM is related

to the velocity of the Maui station relative to the Australian plate uMP by

uYM = uMP cos(90◦ − β) = uMP sinβ. (2.151)

Taking β = 51.4◦ and uMP = −118 mm yr−1, Equation (2–151) gives uYM =

−92 mm yr−1. This is in excellent agreement with the observed value uYM =

−90 ± 5 mm yr−1.

Problem 2.30 Based on SLR observations, the relative velocity between

the Greenbelt, USA (39◦N, 283.2◦E), and Weitzell, Germany (49.1◦N, 12.9◦E),

stations is 18±4 mm yr−1. Determine the expected relative velocities based

on the plate motion data given in Table 1–6.

Problem 2.31 Based on SLR observations, the relative velocity between

the Simosato, Japan (33.5◦N, 136◦E), and the Maui stations is −62±6 mm yr−1.

Determine the expected relative velocities based on the plate motion data

given in Table 1–6.

Problem 2.32 Based on SLR observations, the relative velocity between

the Easter Island (27.1◦S, 250.6◦E) and the Arequipa, Peru (16.5◦S, 288.5◦E),

stations is −62±7 mm yr−1. Determine the expected relative velocities based

on the plate motion data given in Table 1–6.

The low cost and mobility of GPS systems allow detailed determinations

of tectonic strain in active plate boundary regions. An example for central

and southern California is shown in Figure 2–37 which gives the observed

velocity vectors of geodetic stations obtained from a combined GPS and

VLBI data set (Feigl et al., 1993). The velocities are given relative to a fixed

Pacific plate. The velocity vectors of the OVRO (Owens Valley) and MOJA

(Mojave) stations are representative of the relative southwest motion of the

North American plate with respect to the Pacific plate. The virtual station-

arity of the VNDN (Vandenberg AFB) and the BLUF (San Clemente Island)

stations indicate their attachment to a rigid Pacific plate. The intermediate

motion of the JPL (Pasadena) station represents the complex displacement

field within the Los Angeles basin.

Problem 2.33 The displacement of the OVRO (Owens Valley) station

2.8 Strain Measurements 181

Figure 2.38 Interferometric pattern of the coseismic deformation associated with the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake on June 28, 1992 (Price and Sandwell, 1998). The dark lines represent surface ruptures asso- ciated with the earthquake and the white lines represent other known faults in the region. Each interferometric fringe corresponds to a displacement of 28 mm.

is 20.1 mm yr−1 to the east and −28.0 mm yr−1 to the north. Assuming

the San Andreas fault to be pure strike slip, and that this displacement is

associated only with motion on this fault, determine the mean slip velocity

on the fault and its orientation.

Problem 2.34 The displacement of the MOJA (Mojave) station is

23.9 mm yr−1 to the east and −26.6 mm yr−1 to the north. Assuming

the San Andreas fault to be pure strike slip and that this displacement is

182 Collateral Reading

associated only with motion on this fault, determine the mean slip velocity

on the fault and its orientation.

Synthetic aperture radar interferometry (INSAR) from satellites has opened

a new era in geodetic observations. A synthetic aperture radar (SAR) im-

age is obtained using radar backscatter returns from the Earth’s surface. If

the Earth’s surface deforms between two SAR image acquisitions, a radar

interferogram can be obtained to quantify the deformation. The point-wise

product of the first image with the second image produces a fringe pattern

associated with the phase differences between the two images. Each fringe

represents a phase change of 2π radians.

An example of INSAR interferometry is given in Figure 2–38 (Price and

Sandwell, 1998). This is the pattern of images associated with the magnitude

7.3 Landers, California, earthquake which occurred on June 28, 1992, and

ruptured nearly 100 km of previously unmapped faults in the Mojave Desert,

California. The maximum measured surface displacement was 5.1 m. The

images were acquired by the ERS-1 satellite on April 24 and August 7, 1992.

The satellite was at an altitude of 785 km and the radar images were collected

along ray paths pointed west at an average angle of 23◦ from the vertical.

Each fringe corresponds to 28 mm (half the 56-mm wavelength of the ERS-1

SAR). The distribution of coseismic deformation shown in Figure 2–38 will

be considered in detail in Chapter 8.

Collateral Reading

Feigl, K. L., et al. (1993), Space geodetic measurement of crustal deformation

in central and southern California, 1984–1992, J. Geophys. Res. 98,

21,677–21,712.

Gough, D. J., and J. S. Bell (1981), Stress orientations from borehole

well fractures with examples from Colorado, east Texas, and northern

Canada, Can. J. Earth Sci. 19, 1,358–1,370.

Hofmann-Wallenhof, B., H. Lichtenegger, and J. Collins (1997), Global Po-

sitioning System, 4th Ed. (Springer, Vienna), 389p.

Larson, K. M. (1996), Geodesy, Prog. Astron. Aeronaut. 164, 539–557.

McKenzie, D. (1978), Some remarks on the development of sedimentary

basins, Earth Planet. Sci. Let. 40, 25–32.

Price, E. J., and D. T. Sandwell (1998), Small-scale deformations associated

with the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake mapped by synthetic

aperture radar interferometry phase gradients, J. Geophys. Res. 103,

27,001–27,016.

Collateral Reading 183

Savage, J. C., and R. O. Burford (1973), Geodetic determination of relative

plate motion in central California, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 832–845.

Savage, J. C., and W. H. Prescott (1978), Geodolite measurements near the

Briones Hills, California, earthquake swarm of January 8, 1977, Seis.

Soc. Am. Bull. 68, 175–180.

Smith, D. E., et al. (1990), Tectonic motion and deformation from satellite

laser ranging to LAGEOS, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 22,013–22,041.

Thatcher, W. (1975), Strain accumulation and release mechanism of the

1906 San Francisco earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4,862–4,872.

Zoback, M. D., and J. H. Healy (1992), In situ stress measurements to 3.5 km

depth in the Cajon Pass scientific research borehole: Implications for

the mechanics of crustal faulting, J. Geophys. Res. 97, 5,039–5,057.

Collateral Reading

Bomford, G., Geodesy (Oxford University Press, London, 1962), 561 pages.

An in-depth discussion of geodetic measurement techniques, methods of

analysis, and implications of gravity observations for the figure of the

Earth, crustal structure, and the state of stress in the crust.

Heiskanen, W. A., and H. Moritz, Physical Geodesy (W. H. Freeman and

Company, San Francisco, 1967), 364 pages.

A graduate level textbook in geodesy. The contents includes chapters on

potential theory, the gravity field of the Earth, gravimetric methods,

astrogeodetic methods, and statistical and mathematical approaches in

determinations of the Earth’s figure.

Jaeger, J. C., and N. G. W. Cook, Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics (Chap-

man and Hall, London, 1976), 585 pages.

An advanced textbook presenting the mathematical and experimental foun-

dations of the mechanical behavior of rock. There are chapters on stress

and strain, friction, elasticity, rock strength, laboratory testing, duc-

tile behavior, fluid flow in rocks, fracture, state of stress underground,

measurements of underground stresses, mining and engineering appli-

cations, and geological and geophysical applications.

Jeffreys, H., The Earth, Its Origin, History and Physical Constitution (Cam-

bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1962), 438 pages.

A classic textbook on the physics of the solid Earth, which includes discus-

sions of stress, strain, elasticity, mechanical behavior of rocks, seismol-

ogy, gravity, and stress differences in the Earth.

Timoshenko, S., and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity (McGraw-Hill, New

York, 1970), 567 pages.

184 Collateral Reading

Fundamentals of the mathematical theory of elasticity with engineering ap-

plications. There are major chapters on plane stress and plane strain,

bending of beams, two-dimensional stress problems in rectangular, po-

lar, and curvilinear coordinates, solutions by the method of complex

variables, three-dimensional stress-strain problems, torsion, bending of

bars, thermal stresses, wave propagation, and finite-difference solutions.

About half the chapters include student exercises.

3

Elasticity and Flexure

3.1 Introduction

In the previous chapter we introduced the concepts of stress and strain. For

many solids it is appropriate to relate stress to strain through the laws of

elasticity. Elastic materials deform when a force is applied and return to their

original shape when the force is removed. Almost all solid materials, includ-

ing essentially all rocks at relatively low temperatures and pressures, behave

elastically when the applied forces are not too large. In addition, the elastic

strain of many rocks is linearly proportional to the applied stress. The equa-

tions of linear elasticity are greatly simplified if the material is isotropic, that

is, if its elastic properties are independent of direction. Although some meta-

morphic rocks with strong foliations are not strictly isotropic, the isotropic

approximation is usually satisfactory for the earth’s crust and mantle.

At high stress levels, or at temperatures that are a significant fraction of

the rock solidus, deviations from elastic behavior occur. At low temperatures

and confining pressures, rocks are brittle solids, and large deviatoric stresses

cause fracture. As rocks are buried more deeply in the earth, they are sub-

jected to increasingly large confining pressures due to the increasing weight

of the overburden. When the confining pressure on the rock approaches its

brittle failure strength, it deforms plastically. Plastic deformation is a contin-

uous, irreversible deformation without fracture. If the applied force causing

plastic deformation is removed, some fraction of the deformation remains.

We consider plastic deformation in Section 7–11. As discussed in Chapter

1, hot mantle rocks behave as a fluid on geological time scales; that is, they

continuously deform under an applied force.

Given that rocks behave quite differently in response to applied forces,

depending on conditions of temperature and pressure, it is important to

determine what fraction of the rocks of the crust and upper mantle behave

186 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.1 (a) Structure formed immediately after rapidly pouring a very viscous fluid into a container. (b) Final shape of the fluid after a long time has elapsed.

elastically on geological time scales. One of the fundamental postulates of

plate tectonics is that the surface plates constituting the lithosphere do not

deform significantly on geological time scales. Several observations directly

confirm this postulate. We know that the transform faults connecting offset

segments of the oceanic ridge system are responsible for the major linear

fracture zones in the ocean. That these fracture zones remain linear and

at constant separation is direct evidence that the oceanic lithosphere does

not deform on a time scale of 108 years. Similar evidence comes from the

linearity of the magnetic lineaments of the seafloor (see Section 1–8).

There is yet other direct evidence of the elastic behavior of the lithosphere

on geological time scales. Although erosion destroys mountain ranges on a

time scale of 106 to 107 years, many geological structures in the continental

crust have ages greater than 109 years. The very existence of these struc-

tures is evidence of the elastic behavior of the lithosphere. If the rocks of

the crust behaved as a fluid on geological time scales, the gravitational body

force would have erased these structures. As an example, pour a very vis-

cous substance such as molasses onto the bottom of a flat pan. If the fluid is

sufficiently viscous and is poured quickly enough, a structure resembling a

mountain forms (see Figure 3–1a). However, over time, the fluid will even-

tually cover the bottom of the pan to a uniform depth (see Figure 3–1b).

The gravitational body force causes the fluid to flow so as to minimize the

gravitational potential energy.

A number of geological phenomena allow the long-term elastic behavior of

3.2 Linear Elasticity 187

the lithosphere to be studied quantitatively. In several instances the litho-

sphere bends under surface loads. Direct evidence of this bending comes

from the Hawaiian Islands and many other island chains, individual islands,

and seamounts. There is also observational evidence of the elastic bending

of the oceanic lithosphere at ocean trenches and of the continental litho-

sphere at sedimentary basins – the Michigan basin, for example. We will

make quantitative comparisons of the theoretically predicted elastic defor-

mations of these structures with the observational data in later sections of

this chapter.

One important reason for studying the elastic behavior of the lithosphere

is to determine the state of stress in the lithosphere. This stress distribu-

tion is responsible for the occurrence of earthquakes. Earthquakes are di-

rect evidence of high stress levels in the lithosphere. An earthquake relieves

accumulated strain in the lithosphere. The presence of mountains is also

evidence of high stress levels. Elastic stresses must balance the gravitational

body forces on mountains. Because of their elastic behavior, surface plates

can transmit stresses over large horizontal distances.

3.2 Linear Elasticity

A linear, isotropic, elastic solid is one in which stresses are linearly propor-

tional to strains and mechanical properties have no preferred orientations.

The principal axes of stress and strain coincide in such a medium, and the

connection between stress and strain can be conveniently written in this

coordinate system as

σ1 = (λ+ 2G)ε1 + λε2 + λε3 (3.1)

σ2 = λε1 + (λ+ 2G)ε2 + λε3 (3.2)

σ3 = λε1 + λε2 + (λ+ 2G)ε3, (3.3)

where the material properties λ and G are known as Lamé parameters; G

is also known as the modulus of rigidity. The material properties are such

that a principal strain component ε produces a stress (λ+2G)ε in the same

direction and stresses λε in mutually perpendicular directions.

Equations (3–1) to (3–3) can be written in the inverse form as

ε1 = 1

E σ1 −

ν

E σ2 −

ν

E σ3 (3.4)

ε2 = − ν

E σ1 +

1

E σ2 −

ν

E σ3 (3.5)

188 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.2 Deformation under uniaxial stress.

ε3 = − ν

E σ1 −

ν

E σ2 +

1

E σ3, (3.6)

and E and ν are material properties known as Young’s modulus and Pois-

son’s ratio, respectively. A principal stress component σ produces a strain

σ/E in the same direction and strains (−νσ/E) in mutually orthogonal

directions.

The elastic behavior of a material can be characterized by specifying either

λ and G or E and ν; the sets of parameters are not independent. Analytic

formulas expressing λ and G in terms of E and ν, and vice versa, are ob-

tained in the following sections. Values of E, G, and ν for various rocks are

given in Section E of Appendix 2. Young’s modulus of rocks varies from

about 10 to 100 GPa, and Poisson’s ratio varies between 0.1 and 0.4. The

elastic properties of the earth’s mantle and core can be obtained from seis-

mic velocities and the density distribution. The elastic properties E, G, and

ν inferred from a typical seismically derived earth model are given in Section

F of Appendix 2. The absence of shear waves in the outer core (G = 0) is

taken as conclusive evidence that the outer core is a liquid. In the outer core

ν has the value 0.5, which we will see is appropriate to an incompressible

fluid.

The behavior of linear solids is more readily illustrated if we consider

idealized situations where several of the stress and strain components vanish.

These can then be applied to important geological problems.

3.3 Uniaxial Stress 189

3.3 Uniaxial Stress

In a state of uniaxial stress only one of the principal stresses, σ1 say, is

nonzero. Under this circumstance Equations (3–2) and (3–3), with σ2 =

σ3 = 0, give

ε2 = ε3 = −λ

2(λ+G) ε1. (3.7)

Not only does the stress σ1 produce a strain ε1, but it changes the linear

dimensions of elements aligned perpendicular to the axis of stress. If σ1 is a

compression, then ε1 is a decrease in length, and both ε2 and ε3 are increases

in length. The element in Figure 3–2 has been shortened in the y direction,

but its cross section in the xz plane has expanded.

Using Equations (3–4) to (3–6), we can also write

ε2 = ε3 = − ν

E σ1 = −νε1. (3.8)

By comparing Equations (3–7) and (3–8), we see that

ν = λ

2(λ+G) . (3.9)

From Equations (3–1) and (3–7) we find

σ1 = G(3λ + 2G)

(λ+G) ε1, (3.10)

which, with the help of Equation (3–8), identifies Young’s modulus as

E = G(3λ+ 2G)

(λ+G) . (3.11)

Equations (3–9) and (3–11) can be inverted to yield the following formulas

for G and λ in terms of E and ν

G = E

2(1 + ν) (3.12)

λ = Eν

(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν) . (3.13)

The relation between stress and strain in uniaxial compression or tension

from Equation (3–8),

σ1 = Eε1, (3.14)

is also known as Hooke’s law. A linear elastic solid is said to exhibit Hookean

behavior. Uniaxial compression testing in the laboratory is one of the sim-

plest methods of determining the elastic properties of rocks. Figure 3–3

190 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.3 Stress–strain curves for quartzite in uniaxial compression (Bi- eniawski, 1967).

shows the data from such a test on a cylindrical sample of quartzite. The

rock deforms approximately elastically until the applied stress exceeds the

compressive strength of the rock, at which point failure occurs. Compressive

strengths of rocks are hundreds to thousands of megapascals. As we discussed

in the previous chapter, a typical tectonic stress is 10 MPa. With E = 70

GPa, this yields a typical tectonic strain in uniaxial stress of 1.4 × 10−4.

The dilatation ∆ or fractional volume change in uniaxial compression is,

according to Equation (3–8),

∆ = ε1 + ε2 + ε3 = ε1(1 − 2ν). (3.15)

The decrease in volume due to contraction in the direction of compressive

stress is offset by an increase in volume due to expansion in the orthogonal

directions. Equation (3–15) allows us to determine Poisson’s ratio for an

incompressible material, which cannot undergo a net change in volume. In

order for ∆ to equal zero in uniaxial compression, ν must equal 1/2. Under

uniaxial compression, an incompressible material contracts in the direction

of applied stress but expands exactly half as much in each of the perpendic-

ular directions.

There are some circumstances in which the formulas of uniaxial compres-

sion can be applied to calculate the strains in rocks. Consider, for example,

3.4 Uniaxial Strain 191

a rectangular column of height h that is free to expand or contract in the

horizontal; that is, it is laterally unconstrained. By this we mean that the

horizontal stresses are zero (σ2 = σ3 = 0). Then the vertical stress σ1 at a

distance y from the top of the column of rock is given by the weight of the

column,

σ1 = ρgy. (3.16)

The vertical strain as a function of the distance y from the top is

ε1 = ρgy

E . (3.17)

The slab contracts in the vertical by an amount

δh =

∫ h

0 ε1 dy =

ρg

E

∫ h

0 y dy =

ρgh2

2E . (3.18)

3.4 Uniaxial Strain

The state of uniaxial strain corresponds to only one nonzero component of

principal strain, ε1 say. With ε2 = ε3 = 0, Equations (3–1) to (3–3) give

σ1 = (λ+ 2G)ε1 (3.19)

σ2 = σ3 = λε1 = λ

(λ+ 2G) σ1. (3.20)

Equations (3–4) to (3–6) simplify to

σ2 = σ3 = ν

(1 − ν) σ1 (3.21)

σ1 = (1 − ν)Eε1

(1 + ν)(1 − 2ν) . (3.22)

By comparing Equations (3–19) to (3–22), one can also derive the relations

already given between λ,G and ν,E.

The equations of uniaxial strain can be used to determine the change in

stress due to sedimentation or erosion. We first consider sedimentation and

assume that an initial surface is covered by h km of sediments of density ρ,

as shown in Figure 3–4. We also assume that the base of the new sedimen-

tary basin is laterally confined so that the equations of uniaxial strain are

applicable. The two horizontal components of strain are zero, ε2 = ε3 = 0.

The vertical principal stress on the initial surface σ1 is given by the weight

of the overburden

σ1 = ρgh. (3.23)

192 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.4 Stresses on a surface covered by sediments of thickness h.

From Equation (3–21) the horizontal normal stresses are given by

σ2 = σ3 = ν

(1 − ν) ρgh. (3.24)

The horizontal stresses are also compressive, but they are smaller than the

vertical stress.

It is of interest to determine the deviatoric stresses after sedimentation.

The pressure at depth h as defined by Equation (2–61) is

p = 1

3 (σ1 + σ2 + σ3) =

(1 + ν)

3(1 − ν) ρgh. (3.25)

The deviatoric stresses are then determined from Equations (2–63) with the

result

σ′1 = σ1 − p = 2(1 − 2ν)

3(1 − ν) ρgh (3.26)

σ′2 = σ2 − p = σ′3 = σ3 − p = −(1 − 2ν)

3(1 − ν) ρgh.

(3.27)

The horizontal deviatoric stress is tensional. For ν = 0.25 the horizontal

deviatoric stress is 2/9 of the lithostatic stress. With ρ = 3000 kg m−3 and

h = 2 km the horizontal deviatoric stress is −13.3 MPa. This stress is of the

same order as measured surface stresses.

We next consider erosion. If the initial state of stress before erosion is

that given above, erosion will result in the state of stress that existed before

sedimentation occurred. The processes of sedimentation and erosion are re-

versible. However, in many cases the initial state of stress prior to erosion is

lithostatic. Therefore at a depth h the principal stresses are

σ1 = σ2 = σ3 = ρgh. (3.28)

3.5 Plane Stress 193

After the erosion of h km of overburden the vertical stress at the surface is

σ̄1 = 0 (an overbar denotes a stress after erosion). The change in vertical

stress ∆σ1 = σ̄1 − σ1 is −ρgh. If only ε1 is nonzero, Equation (3–21) gives

∆σ2 = ∆σ3 =

(

ν

1 − ν

)

∆σ1. (3.29)

The horizontal surface stresses after erosion σ̄2 and σ̄3 are consequently given

by

σ̄2 = σ̄3 = σ2 + ∆σ2 = ρgh − ν

(1 − ν) ρgh

=

(

1 − 2ν

1 − ν

)

ρgh. (3.30)

If h = 5 km, ν = 0.25, and ρ = 3000 kg m−3, we find from Equation (3–30)

that σ̄2 = σ̄3 = 100 MPa. Erosion can result in large surface compressive

stresses due simply to the elastic behavior of the rock. This mechanism is

one explanation for the widespread occurrence of near-surface compressive

stresses in the continents.

Problem 3.1 Determine the surface stress after the erosion of 10 km of

granite. Assume that the initial state of stress is lithostatic and that ρ = 2700

kg m−3 and ν = 0.25.

Problem 3.2 An unstressed surface is covered with sediments with a den-

sity of 2500 kg m−3 to a depth of 5 km. If the surface is laterally constrained

and has a Poisson’s ratio of 0.25, what are the three components of stress

at the original surface?

Problem 3.3 A horizontal stress σ1 may be accompanied by stress in

other directions. If it is assumed that there is no displacement in the other

horizontal direction and zero stress in the vertical, find the stress σ2 in the

other horizontal direction and the strain ε3 in the vertical direction.

Problem 3.4 Assume that the earth is unconstrained in one lateral direc-

tion (σ2 = σ3) and is constrained in the other (ε1 = 0). Determine ε2 and

σ1 when y kilometers of rock of density ρ are eroded away. Assume that the

initial state of stress was lithostatic.

3.5 Plane Stress

The state of plane stress exists when there is only one zero component of

principal stress; that is, σ3 = 0, σ1 6= 0, σ2 6= 0. The situation is sketched

194 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.5 Plane stress.

in Figure 3–5, which shows a thin plate loaded on its edges. The strain

components according to Equations (3–4) to (3–6) are

ε1 = 1

E (σ1 − νσ2) (3.31)

ε2 = 1

E (σ2 − νσ1) (3.32)

ε3 = −ν E

(σ1 + σ2). (3.33)

The geometry of Figure 3–5 suggests that the plane stress formulas may be

applicable to horizontal tectonic stresses in the lithosphere. Let us assume

that in addition to the lithostatic stresses there are equal horizontal com-

ponents of principal stress ∆σ1 = ∆σ2. According to Equations (3–31) to

(3–33), the horizontal tectonic stresses produce the strains

ε1 = ε2 = (1 − ν)

E ∆σ1 (3.34)

ε3 = −2ν

E ∆σ1. (3.35)

If the horizontal tectonic stresses are compressive, vertical columns of

lithosphere of initial thickness hL, horizontal area A, and density ρ will

undergo a decrease in area and an increase in thickness. The mass in a

column will remain constant, however. Therefore we can write

δ(ρAhL) = 0. (3.36)

3.5 Plane Stress 195

The weight per unit area at the base of the column ρghL will increase, as

can be seen from

δ(ρghL) = δ

(

ρghLA · 1

A

)

= 1

A δ(ρghLA) + ρghLA δ

(

1

A

)

= ρghLA

(

− 1

A2

)

δA = ρghL

(

−δA A

)

.

(3.37)

The term δ(ρghLA)/A is zero from Equation (3–36); δ(ρghL) is positive

because −δA/A is a positive quantity given by

−δA A

= ε1 + ε2 = 2(1 − ν)

E ∆σ1. (3.38)

The increase in the weight per unit area at the base of the lithospheric

column gives the increase in the vertical principal stress ∆σ3. By combining

Equations (3–37) and (3–38), we get

∆σ3 = 2(1 − ν)ρghL

E ∆σ1 (3.39)

or ∆σ3

∆σ1 =

2(1 − ν)ρghL E

. (3.40)

Taking ν = 0.25, E = 100 GPa, ρ = 3000 kg m−3, g = 10 m s−2, and hL =

100 km as typical values for the lithosphere, we find that ∆σ3/∆σ1 = 0.045.

Because the change in the vertical principal stress is small compared with

the applied horizontal principal stresses, we conclude that the plane stress

assumption is valid for the earth’s lithosphere.

Problem 3.5 Triaxial compression tests are a common laboratory tech-

nique for determining elastic properties and strengths of rocks at various

pressures p and temperatures. Figure 3–6 is a schematic of the experimen-

tal method. A cylindrical rock specimen is loaded axially by a compres-

sive stress σ1. The sample is also uniformly compressed laterally by stresses

σ2 = σ3 < σ1.

Show that

ε2 = ε3

and

σ1 − σ2 = 2G(ε1 − ε2).

196 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.6 Sketch of a triaxial compression test on a cylindrical rock sam- ple.

Figure 3.7 An example of plane strain.

Thus if the measured stress difference σ1−σ2 is plotted against the measured

strain difference ε1 − ε2, the slope of the line determines 2G.

3.6 Plane Strain

In the case of plane strain, ε3 = 0, for example, and ε1 and ε2 are nonzero.

Figure 3–7 illustrates a plane strain situation. A long bar is rigidly confined

between supports so that it cannot expand or contract parallel to its length.

3.7 Pure Shear and Simple Shear 197

Figure 3.8 Principal stresses and shear stresses in the case of pure shear.

In addition, the stresses σ1 and σ2 are applied uniformly along the length

of the bar.

Equations (3–1) to (3–3) reduce to

σ1 = (λ+ 2G)ε1 + λε2 (3.41)

σ2 = λε1 + (λ+ 2G)ε2 (3.42)

σ3 = λ(ε1 + ε2). (3.43)

From Equation (3–6) it is obvious that

σ3 = ν(σ1 + σ2). (3.44)

This can be used together with Equations (3–4) and (3–5) to find

ε1 = (1 + ν)

E {σ1(1 − ν) − νσ2} (3.45)

ε2 = (1 + ν)

E {σ2(1 − ν) − νσ1}. (3.46)

3.7 Pure Shear and Simple Shear

The state of stress associated with pure shear is illustrated in Figure 3–8.

Pure shear is a special case of plane stress. One example of pure shear is

σ3 = 0 and σ1 = −σ2. From Equations (2–56) to (2–58) with θ = −45◦

(compare Figures 2–14 and 3–8), we find that σxx = σyy = 0 and σxy = σ1.

In this coordinate system only the shear stress is nonzero. From Equations

198 Elasticity and Flexure

(3–31) and (3–32) we find that

ε1 = (1 + ν)

E σ1 =

(1 + ν)

E σxy = −ε2, (3.47)

and from Equations (2–130) and (2–131) with θ = −45◦ we get εxx = εyy = 0

and εxy = ε1. Equation (3–47) then gives

σxy = E

1 + ν εxy. (3.48)

By introducing the modulus of rigidity from Equation (3–12), we can write

the shear stress as

σxy = 2Gεxy , (3.49)

which explains why the modulus of rigidity is also known as the shear mod-

ulus. (Note: In terms of γxy ≡ 2εxy, σxy = Gγxy.) These results are valid

for both pure shear and simple shear because the two states differ by a

solid-body rotation that does not affect the state of stress.

Simple shear is generally associated with displacements on a strike–slip

fault such as the San Andreas in California. In Equation (2–134) we con-

cluded that the shear strain associated with the 1906 San Francisco earth-

quake was 2.5× 10−5. With G = 30 GPa, Equation (3–49) gives the related

shear stress as 1.5 MPa. This is a very small stress drop to be associated

with a great earthquake. However, for the stress drop to have been larger,

the width of the zone of strain accumulation would have had to have been

even smaller. If the stress had been 15 MPa, the width of the zone of strain

accumulation would have had to have been 4 km on each side of the fault.

We will return to this problem in Chapter 8.

Problem 3.6 Show that Equation (3–49) can also be derived by assuming

plane strain.

3.8 Isotropic Stress

If all the principal stresses are equal σ1 = σ2 = σ3 ≡ p, then the state

of stress is isotropic, and the principal stresses are equal to the pressure.

The principal strains in a solid subjected to isotropic stresses are also equal

ε1 = ε2 = ε3 = 1 3∆; each component of strain is equal to one-third of the

dilatation. By adding Equations (3–1) to (3–3), we find

p =

(

3λ+ 2G

3

)

∆ ≡ K∆ ≡ 1

β ∆. (3.50)

3.9 Two-Dimensional Bending or Flexure of Plates 199

The quantity K is the bulk modulus, and its reciprocal is β, the compressibil-

ity. The ratio of p to the bulk modulus gives the fractional volume change

that occurs under isotropic compression.

Because the mass of a solid element with volume V and density ρ must be

conserved, any change in volume δV of the element must be accompanied by

a change in its density δρ. The fractional change in density can be related to

the fractional change in volume, the dilatation, by rearranging the equation

of mass conservation

δ(ρV ) = 0, (3.51)

which gives

ρδV + V δρ = 0 (3.52)

or −δV V

= ∆ = δρ

ρ . (3.53)

Equation (3–53) of course assumes ∆ to be small. The combination of Equa-

tions (3–50) and (3–53) gives

δρ = ρβp. (3.54)

This relationship can be used to determine the increase in density with depth

in the earth.

Using Equations (3–11) to (3–13), we can rewrite the formula for K given

in Equation (3–50) as

K = 1

β =

E

3(1 − 2ν) . (3.55)

Thus as ν tends toward 1/2, that is, as a material becomes more and more

incompressible, its bulk modulus tends to infinity.

3.9 Two-Dimensional Bending or Flexure of Plates

We have already discussed how plate tectonics implies that the near-surface

rocks are rigid and therefore behave elastically on geological time scales.

The thin elastic surface plates constitute the lithosphere, which floats on

the relatively fluid mantle beneath. The plates are subject to a variety of

loads – volcanoes, seamounts, for example – that force the lithosphere to

bend under their weights. By relating the observed flexure or bending of

the lithosphere to known surface loads, we can deduce the elastic properties

and thicknesses of the plates. In what follows, we first develop the theory of

200 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.9 A thin plate of length L and thickness h pinned at its ends and bending under and applied load Va.

Figure 3.10 Forces and torques on a small section of a deflecting plate.

plate bending in response to applied forces and torques. The theory can also

be used to understand fold trains in mountain belts by modeling the folds

as deformations of elastic plates subject to horizontal compressive forces.

Other geologic applications also can be made. For example, we will apply

the theory to model the upwarping of strata overlying igneous intrusions

(Section 3–12).

A simple example of plate bending is shown in Figure 3–9. A plate of

thickness h and width L is pinned at its ends and bends under the load of a

line force Va (N m−1) applied at its center. The plate is infinitely long in the

z direction. A vertical, static force balance and the symmetry of the situation

require that equal vertical line forces Va/2 be applied at the supports. The

plate is assumed to be thin compared with its width, h≪ L, and the vertical

deflection of the plate w is taken to be small, w ≪ L. The latter assumption

is necessary to justify the use of linear elastic theory. The two-dimensional

bending of plates is also referred to as cylindrical bending because the plate

takes the form of a segment of a cylinder.

The deflection of a plate can be determined by requiring it to be in equilib-

3.9 Two-Dimensional Bending or Flexure of Plates 201

rium under the action of all the forces and torques exerted on it. The forces

and torques on a small section of the plate between horizontal locations x

and x+ dx are shown in Figure 3–10. A downward force per unit area q(x)

is exerted on the plate by whatever distributed load the plate is required

to support. Thus, the downward load, per unit length in the z direction,

between x and x + dx is q(x) dx. A net shear force V , per unit length in

the z direction, acts on the cross section of the plate normal to the plane

of the figure; it is the resultant of all the shear stresses integrated over that

cross-sectional area of the plate. A horizontal force P , per unit length in the

z direction, is applied to the plate; it is assumed that P is independent of

x. The net bending moment M , per unit length in the z direction, acting on

a cross section of the plate is the integrated effect of the moments exerted

by the normal stresses σxx, also known as the fiber stresses, on the cross

section. We relate M to the fiber stresses in the plate later in the discussion.

All quantities in Figure 3–10 are considered positive when they have the

sense shown in the figure. At location x along the plate the shear force is V ,

the bending moment is M , and the deflection is w; at x+dx, the shear force

is V + dV , the bending moment is M + dM , and the deflection is w+ dw. It

is to be emphasized that V , M , and P are per unit length in the z direction.

A force balance in the vertical direction on the element between x and

x+ dx yields

q(x) dx+ dV = 0 (3.56)

or dV

dx = −q. (3.57)

The moments M and M+dM combine to give a net counterclockwise torque

dM on the element. The forces V and V +dV are separated by a distance dx

(an infinitesimal moment arm) and exert a net torque V dx on the element

in a clockwise sense. (The change in V in going from x to x + dx can be

ignored in calculating the moment due to the shear forces.) The horizontal

forces P exert a net counterclockwise torque −P dw on the element through

their associated moment arm −dw. (Note that dw is negative in going from

x to x+ dx.) A balance of all the torques gives

dM − P dw = V dx (3.58)

or dM

dx = V + P

dw

dx . (3.59)

We can eliminate the shear force on a vertical cross section of the plate V

202 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.11 The normal stresses on a cross section of a thin curved elastic plate.

from Equation (3–59) by differentiating the equation with respect to x and

substituting from Equation (3–57). One obtains

d 2M

dx2 = −q + P

d 2w

dx2 . (3.60)

Equation (3–60) can be converted into a differential equation for the deflec-

tion w if the bending moment M can be related to the deflection; we will

see that M is inversely proportional to the local radius of curvature of the

plate R and that R−1 is −d 2w/dx2.

To relate M to the curvature of the plate, we proceed as follows. If the

plate is deflected downward, as in Figure 3–11, the upper half of the plate

is contracted, and the longitudinal stress σxx is positive; the lower part of

the plate is extended, and σxx is negative. The fiber stress σxx is zero on the

midplane y = 0, which is a neutral unstrained surface. The net effect of these

stresses is to exert a counterclockwise bending moment on the cross section

of the plate. The curvature of the plate has, of course, been exaggerated in

Figure 3–11 so that x is essentially horizontal. The force on an element of

the plate’s cross section of thickness dy is σxx dy. This force exerts a torque

about the midpoint of the plate given by σxxy dy. If we integrate this torque

over the cross section of the plate, we obtain the bending moment

M =

∫ h/2

−h/2 σxxy dy, (3.61)

where h is the thickness of the plate.

The bending stress σxx is accompanied by longitudinal strain εxx that is

positive (contraction) in the upper half of the plate and negative (extension)

in the lower half. There is no strain in the direction perpendicular to the

xy plane because the plate is infinite in this direction and the bending is

two-dimensional or cylindrical; that is, εzz = 0. There is also zero stress

3.9 Two-Dimensional Bending or Flexure of Plates 203

normal to the surface of the plate; that is, σyy = 0. Because the plate is

thin, we can take σyy = 0 throughout. Thus plate bending is an example

of plane stress, and we can use Equations (3–31) and (3–32) to relate the

stresses and strains; that is,

εxx = 1

E (σxx − νσzz) (3.62)

εzz = 1

E (σzz − νσxx). (3.63)

In writing these equations, we have identified the principal strains ε1, ε2 with εxx, εzz and the principal stresses σ1, σ2 with σxx, σzz. With εzz = 0,

Equations (3–62) and (3–63) give

σxx = E

(1 − ν2) εxx. (3.64)

Equation (3–61) for the bending moment can be rewritten, using Equation

(3–64), as

M = E

(1 − ν2)

∫ h/2

−h/2 εxxy dy. (3.65)

The longitudinal strain εxx depends on the distance from the midplane

of the plate y and the local radius of curvature of the plate R. Figure 3–12

shows a bent section of the plate originally of length l (l is infinitesimal).

The length of the section measured along the midplane remains l. The small

angle φ is l/R in radians. The geometry of Figure 3–12 shows that the change

in length of the section ∆l at a distance y from the midplane is

∆l = −yφ = −y l R , (3.66)

where the minus sign is included because there is contraction when y is

positive. Thus the strain is

εxx = −∆l

l = y

R . (3.67)

Implicit in this relation is the assumption that plane sections of the plate

remain plane.

The local radius of curvature R is determined by the change in slope of the

plate midplane with horizontal distance. The geometry is shown in Figure

3–13. If w is small, −dw/dx, the slope of the midplane, is also the angular

deflection of the plate from the horizontal α. The small angle φ in Figure

3–13 is simply the change in α, that is, dα, in the small distance l or dx.

204 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.12 Longitudinal extension and contraction at a distance y from the midplane of the plate.

Thus

φ = dα = dα

dx dx =

d

dx

(

−dw dx

)

dx = −d 2w

dx2 dx,

(3.68)

and we find

1

R = φ

l ≈ φ

dx = −d

2w

dx2 . (3.69)

Finally, the strain is given by

εxx = −yd 2w

dx2 , (3.70)

and the bending moment can be written

M = −E

(1 − ν2)

d 2w

dx2

∫ h/2

−h/2 y2 dy

= −E

(1 − ν2)

d 2w

dx2

(

y3

3

)h/2

−h/2

= −Eh3

12(1 − ν2)

d 2w

dx2 . (3.71)

The coefficient of −d 2w/dx2 on the right side of Equation (3–71) is called

the flexural rigidity D of the plate

D ≡ Eh3

12(1 − ν2) . (3.72)

3.10 Bending of Plates under Applied Moments and Vertical Loads 205

Figure 3.13 Sketch illustrating the geometrical relations in plate bending.

According to Equations (3–69), (3–71), and (3–72), the bending moment is

the flexural rigidity of the plate divided by its curvature

M = −Dd 2w

dx2 = D

R . (3.73)

Upon substituting the second derivative of Equation (3–73) into Equation

(3–60), we obtain the general equation for the deflection of the plate

D d4w

dx4 = q(x) − P

d 2w

dx2 . (3.74)

We next solve Equation (3–74) for plate deflection in a number of simple

cases and apply the results to the deformation of crustal strata and to the

bending of the lithosphere.

3.10 Bending of Plates under Applied Moments and Vertical

Loads

Consider a plate embedded at one end and subject to an applied torque Ma

at the other, as shown in Figure 3–14. Assume for simplicity that the plate

is weightless. With q = 0, Equation (3–57) shows that the shear stress on

a section of the plate V must be a constant. In fact, V = 0, since there is

no applied force acting on the plate. This can easily be seen by considering

206 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.14 An embedded plate subject to an applied torque.

Figure 3.15 Force and torque balance on a section of the plate in Figure 3–14.

a force balance on a section of the plate, as shown in Figure 3–15. Since

P = 0 and since we have established V = 0, Equation (3–59) requires that

M = constant. The constant must be Ma, the applied torque, as shown by

a moment balance on an arbitrary section of the plate (Figure 3–15).

To determine the deflection of the plate, we could integrate Equation (3–

74) with q = P = 0. However, since we already know M ≡Ma, it is simpler

to integrate Equation (3–73), the twice integrated form of the fourth-order

differential equation. The boundary conditions are w = 0 at x = 0 and

dw/dx = 0 at x = 0. These boundary conditions at the left end of the plate

clarify what is meant by an embedded plate; the embedded end of the plate

cannot be displaced, and its slope must be zero. The integral of Equation

(3–73) subject to these boundary conditions is

w = −Max

2

2D . (3.75)

The bent plate has the shape of a parabola. w is negative according to the

convention we established if M is positive; that is, the plate is deflected

upward.

Problem 3.7 What is the displacement of a plate pinned at both ends

(w = 0 at x = 0, L) with equal and opposite bending moments applied at

the ends? The problem is illustrated in Figure 3–16.

As a second example we consider the bending of a plate embedded at

its left end and subjected to a concentrated force Va at its right end, as

illustrated in Figure 3–17. In this situation, q = 0, except at the point

x = L, and Equation (3–57) gives V = constant. The constant must be

3.10 Bending of Plates under Applied Moments and Vertical Loads 207

Figure 3.16 Bending of a plate pinned at both ends.

Figure 3.17 An embedded plate subjected to a concentrated load.

Va, as shown by the vertical force balance on the plate sketched in Figure

3–18. With P also equal to zero, Equation (3–59) for the bending moment

simplifies to

dM

dx = Va. (3.76)

This equation can be integrated to yield

M = Vax+ constant, (3.77)

and the constant can be evaluated by noting that there is no applied torque

at the end x = L; that is, M = 0 at x = L. Thus we obtain

M = Va(x− L). (3.78)

The bending moment changes linearly from −VaL at the embedded end to

zero at the free end. A simple torque balance on the section of the plate

shown in Figure 3–18 leads to Equation (3–78), since M must balance the

torque of the applied force Va acting with moment arm L− x.

The displacement can be determined by integrating Equation (3–74),

which simplifies to

d4w

dx4 = 0, (3.79)

when q = P = 0. The integral of Equation (3–79) is

d3w

dx3 = constant. (3.80)

208 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.18 Forces and torques on a section of a plate loaded at its right end by a force Va.

Figure 3.19 A uniformly loaded plate embedded at one end.

The constant can be evaluated by differentiating Equation (3–73) with re-

spect to x and substituting for dM/dx from Equation (3–76). The result

is

d3w

dx3 = −Va

D . (3.81)

A second-order differential equation for w can be obtained by integrating

Equation (3–81) and evaluating the constant of integration with the bound-

ary condition d 2w/dx2 = 0 at x = L. Alternatively, the same equation can

be arrived at by substituting for M from Equation (3–78) into Equation

(3–73)

d 2w

dx2 = −Va

D (x− L). (3.82)

This equation may be integrated twice more subject to the standard bound-

ary conditions w = dw/dx = 0 at x = 0. One finds

w = Vax

2

2D

(

L− x

3

)

. (3.83)

Problem 3.8 Determine the displacement of a plate of length L pinned

at its ends with a concentrated load Va applied at its center. This problem

is illustrated in Figure 3–9.

As a third and final example, we consider the bending of a plate embedded

3.10 Bending of Plates under Applied Moments and Vertical Loads 209

at one end and subjected to a uniform loading q(x) = constant, as illustrated

in Figure 3–19. Equation (3–74), with P = 0, becomes

d4w

dx4 =

q

D . (3.84)

We need four boundary conditions to integrate Equation (3–84). Two of

them are the standard conditions w = dw/dx = 0 at the left end x = 0.

A third boundary condition is the same as the one used in the previous

example, namely, d 2w/dx2 = 0 at x = L, because there is no external

torque applied at the right end of the plate – see Equation (3–73). The fourth

boundary condition follows from Equation (3–59) with P = 0. Because there

is no applied concentrated load at x = L, V must vanish there, as must

dM/dx and from Equation (3–73), d3w/dx3. After some algebra, one finds

the solution

w = qx2

D

(

x2

24 − Lx

6 + L2

4

)

. (3.85)

The shear force at x = 0 is −D(d3w/dx3)x=0. From Equation (3–85)

this is qL, a result that also follows from a consideration of the overall

vertical equilibrium of the plate because qL is the total loading. The shear

stress on the section x = 0 is qL/h. The bending moment on the section

x = 0 is −D(d 2w/dx2)x=0 or −qL2/2. The maximum bending or fiber stress,

σmax xx = σxx at y = −h/2, is given, from Equations (3–85), (3–64), and (3–

70), by

σmax xx =

E

(1 − ν2)

h

2

d 2w

dx2 =

6

h2 D d 2w

dx2 = −6M

h2 .

(3.86)

At x = 0, σmax xx is 3qL2/h2. The ratio of the shear stress to the maximum

bending stress at x = 0 is h/3L, a rather small quantity for a thin plate. It

is implicit in the analysis of the bending of thin plates that shear stresses in

the plates are small compared with the bending stresses.

Problem 3.9 Calculate V and M by carrying out force and torque bal-

ances on the section of the uniformly loaded plate shown in Figure 3–20.

Problem 3.10 A granite plate with ρ = 2700 kg m−3 is embedded at one

end. If L = 10 m and h = 1/4 m, what is the maximum bending stress and

the shear stress at the base?

Problem 3.11 Determine the displacement of a plate that is embedded

at the end x = 0 and has a uniform loading q from x = L/2 to x = L.

210 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.20 Section of a uniformly loaded plate.

Figure 3.21 Plate buckling under a horizontal force.

Problem 3.12 Determine the deflection of a plate of length L that is

embedded at x = 0 and has equal loads Va applied at x = L/2 and at

x = L.

Problem 3.13 Find the deflection of a uniformly loaded beam pinned at

the ends, x = 0, L. Where is the maximum bending moment? What is the

maximum bending stress?

Problem 3.14 A granite plate freely supported at its ends spans a gorge

20 m wide. How thick does the plate have to be if granite fails in tension at

20 MPa? Assume ρ = 2700 kg m−3.

Problem 3.15 Determine the deflection of a freely supported plate, that

is, a plate pinned at its ends, of length L and flexural rigidity D subject to

a sinusoidal load qa = q0 sinπx/L, as shown in Figure 3–21.

3.11 Buckling of a Plate under a Horizontal Load

When an elastic plate is subjected to a horizontal force P , as shown in Fig-

ure 3–22a, the plate can buckle, as illustrated in Figure 3–22b, if the applied

force is sufficiently large. Fold trains in mountain belts are believed to result

from the warping of strata under horizontal compression. We will therefore

3.11 Buckling of a Plate under a Horizontal Load 211

Figure 3.22 A freely supported plate loaded sinusoidally.

consider the simplest example of plate buckling under horizontal compres-

sion to determine the minimum force required for buckling to occur and

the form, that is, the wavelength, of the resulting deflection. In a subsequent

section we will carry out a similar calculation to determine if the lithosphere

can be expected to buckle under horizontal tectonic compression.

We consider a plate pinned at both ends and subjected to a horizontal

force P , as shown in Figure 3–22. The deflection of the plate is governed by

Equation (3–74) with q = 0:

D d4w

dx4 + P

d 2w

dx2 = 0. (3.87)

This can be integrated twice to give

D d 2w

dx2 + Pw = c1x+ c2. (3.88)

However, we require that w is zero at x = 0, L and that d 2w/dx2 = 0 at

x = 0, L, since there are no applied torques at the ends. These boundary

conditions require that c1 = c2 = 0, and Equation (3–88) reduces to

D d 2w

dx2 + Pw = 0. (3.89)

Equation (3–89) has the general solution

w = c1 sin

(

P

D

)1/2

x+ c2 cos

(

P

D

)1/2

x, (3.90)

where c1 and c2 are constants of integration. Because w is equal to zero at

x = 0, c2 must be zero, and

w = c1 sin

(

P

D

)1/2

x. (3.91)

212 Elasticity and Flexure

But w must also vanish at x = L, which implies that if c1 6= 0, then

sin

(

P

D

)1/2

L = 0. (3.92)

Thus (P/D)1/2L must be an integer multiple of π,

(

P

D

)1/2

L = nπ n = 1, 2, 3, . . . (3.93)

Solving this equation for P , we get

P = n2π2

L2 D. (3.94)

Equation (3–94) defines a series of values of P for which nonzero solutions

for w exist. The smallest such value is for n = 1 when P is given by

P = Pc = π2

L2 D. (3.95)

This is the minimum buckling load for the plate. If P is smaller than this

critical value, known as an eigenvalue, the plate will not deflect under the

applied load; that is, c1 = 0 or w = 0. When P has the value given by

Equation (3–95), the plate buckles or deflects under the horizontal load. At

the onset of deflection the plate assumes the shape of a half sine curve

w = c1 sin

(

P

D

)1/2

x

= c1 sin πx

L . (3.96)

The amplitude of the deflection cannot be determined by the linear analysis

carried out here. Nonlinear effects fix the magnitude of the deformation.

The application of plate flexure theory to fold trains in mountain belts

requires somewhat more complex models than considered here. Although a

number of effects must be incorporated to approximate reality more closely,

one of the most important is the influence of the medium surrounding a

folded stratum. The rocks above and below a folded layer exert forces on

the layer that influence the form (wavelength) of the folds and the critical

horizontal force necessary to initiate buckling.

3.12 Deformation of Strata Overlying an Igneous Intrusion

A laccolith is a sill-like igneous intrusion in the form of a round lens-shaped

body much wider than it is thick. Laccoliths are formed by magma that

3.12 Deformation of Strata Overlying an Igneous Intrusion 213

is intruded along bedding planes of flat, layered rocks at pressures so high

that the magma raises the overburden and deforms it into a domelike shape.

If the flow of magma is along a crack, a two-dimensional laccolith can be

formed. Our analysis is restricted to this case. A photograph of a laccolithic

mountain is given in Figure 3–23 along with a sketch of our model.

The overburden or elastic plate of thickness h is bent upward by the

pressure p of the magma that will form the laccolith upon solidification.

The loading of the plate q(x) is the part of the upward pressure force p in

excess of the lithostatic pressure ρgh:

q = −p+ ρgh. (3.97)

This problem is very similar to the one illustrated in Figure 3–19. In both

cases the loading is uniform so that Equation (3–84) is applicable. We take

x = 0 at the center of the laccolith. The required boundary conditions are

w = dw/dx = 0 at x = ±L/2. The solution of Equation (3–84) that satisfies

these boundary conditions is obtained after some algebra in the form

w = −(p − ρgh)

24D

(

x4 − L2x2

2 + L4

16

)

. (3.98)

Note that because of the symmetry of the problem the coefficients of x and

x3 must be zero. The maximum deflection at the center of the laccolith,

x = 0, is

w0 = −(p− ρgh)L4

384D . (3.99)

In terms of its maximum value, the deflection is given by

w = w0

(

1 − 8 x2

L2 + 16

x4

L4

)

. (3.100)

Problem 3.16 Show that the cross-sectional area of a two-dimensional

laccolith is given by (p− ρgh)L5/720D.

Problem 3.17 Determine the bending moment in the overburden above

the idealized two-dimensional laccolith as a function of x. Where is M a

maximum? What is the value of Mmax?

Problem 3.18 Calculate the fiber stress in the stratum overlying the two-

dimensional laccolith as a function of y (distance from the centerline of the

layer) and x. If dikes tend to form where tension is greatest in the base of

the stratum forming the roof of a laccolith, where would you expect dikes

to occur for the two-dimensional laccolith?

214 Elasticity and Flexure

(a )F igu

re 3.23

(a )

A la

cco lith

in R ed

a n d

W h ite

M o u n ta

in , C

o lo

ra d o . T

h e

o verlyin

g sed

im en

ta ry

rocks h a ve

been

erod ed

(U n iversity

o f C

o lo

ra d o , B o u ld

er). (b)

A tw

o -d

im en

sio n a l m

od el

fo r

a la

cco lith

.

3.12 Deformation of Strata Overlying an Igneous Intrusion 215

F ig

u re

3. 24

M od

el s

fo r

ca lc

u la

ti n g

th e

h yd

ro st

a ti c

re st

o ri

n g

fo rc

e o n

li th

o sp

h er

ic p la

te s

d efl

ec te

d by

a n

a p p li ed

lo a d

q a . (a

) O

ce a n ic

ca se

. (b

) C

o n ti n en

ta l ca

se .

216 Elasticity and Flexure

3.13 Application to the Earth’s Lithosphere

When applying Equation (3–74) to determine the downward deflection of

the earth’s lithosphere due to an applied load, we must be careful to include

in q(x) the hydrostatic restoring force caused by the effective replacement

of mantle rocks in a vertical column by material of smaller density. In the

case of the oceanic lithosphere, water fills in “the space vacated” by mantle

rocks moved out of the way by the deflected lithosphere. In the case of the

continental lithosphere, the rocks of the thick continental crust serve as the

fill. Figure 3–24a illustrates the oceanic case. The upper part of the figure

shows a lithospheric plate of thickness h and density ρm floating on a “fluid”

mantle also of density ρm. Water of density ρw and thickness hw overlies the

oceanic lithosphere. Suppose that an applied load deflects the lithosphere

downward a distance w and that water fills in the space above the plate, as

shown in the bottom part of Figure 3–24a. The weight per unit area of a

vertical column extending from the base of the deflected lithosphere to the

surface is

ρwg(hw + w) + ρmgh.

The pressure at a depth hw + h+w in the surrounding mantle where there

is no plate deflection is

ρwghw + ρmg(h +w).

Thus there is an upward hydrostatic force per unit area equal to

ρwghw + ρmg(h+ w) − {ρwg(hw + w) + ρmgh} = (ρm − ρw)gw (3.101)

tending to restore the deflected lithosphere to its original configuration. The

hydrostatic restoring force per unit area is equivalent to the force that re-

sults from replacing mantle rock of thickness w and density ρm by water

of thickness w and density ρw. The net force per unit area acting on the

lithospheric plate is therefore

q = qa − (ρm − ρw)gw, (3.102)

where qa is the applied load at the upper surface of the lithosphere. Equation

(3–74) for the deflection of the elastic oceanic lithosphere becomes

D d4w

dx4 + P

d 2w

dx2 + (ρm − ρw)gw = qa(x). (3.103)

Figure 3–24b illustrates the continental case. The upper part of the figure

shows the continental crust of thickness hc and density ρc separated by the

3.14 Periodic Loading 217

Moho from the rest of the lithosphere of thickness h and density ρm. The

entire continental lithosphere lies on top of a fluid mantle of density ρm. The

lower part of Figure 3–24b shows the plate deflected downward a distance

w by an applied load such as excess topography. The Moho, being a part of

the lithosphere, is also deflected downward a distance w. The space vacated

by the deflected lithosphere is filled in by crustal rocks. The crust beneath

the load is effectively thickened by the amount w by which the Moho is

depressed. The weight per unit area of a vertical column extending from the

base of the deflected plate to the surface is

ρcg(hc + w) + ρmgh.

The pressure at a depth hc + h+w in the surrounding mantle far from the

deflected plate is

ρcghc + ρmg(h + w).

The difference between these two quantities is the upward hydrostatic restor-

ing force per unit area

ρcghc + ρmg(h+ w) − {ρcg(hc + w) + ρmgh} = (ρm − ρc)gw. (3.104)

The restoring force is equivalent to the force that results from replacing

mantle rock by crustal rock in a layer of thickness w. The net force per unit

area acting on the elastic continental lithosphere is therefore

q = qa − (ρm − ρc)gw. (3.105)

Equation (3–74) for the deflection of the plate becomes

D d4w

dx4 + P

d 2w

dx2 + (ρm − ρc)gw = qa(x). (3.106)

We are now in a position to determine the elastic deflection of the lithosphere

and the accompanying internal stresses (shear and bending) for different

loading situations.

3.14 Periodic Loading

How does the positive load of a mountain or the negative load of a valley

deflect the lithosphere? To answer this question, we determine the response

of the lithosphere to a periodic load. We assume that the elevation of the

topography is given by

h = h0 sin 2π x

λ , (3.107)

218 Elasticity and Flexure

where h is the topographic height and λ is its wavelength. Positive h cor-

responds to ridges and negative h to valleys. Since the amplitude of the

topography is small compared with the thickness of the elastic lithosphere,

the influence of the topography on this thickness can be neglected. The

load on the lithosphere corresponding to the topography given by Equation

(3–107) is

qa(x) = ρcgh0 sin 2π x

λ (3.108)

where ρc is the density of the crustal rocks associated with the height vari-

ation. The equation for the deflection of the lithosphere is obtained by sub-

stituting this expression for qa(x) into Equation (3–106) and setting P = 0

to obtain

D d4w

dx4 + (ρm − ρc)gw = ρcgh0 sin 2π

x

λ . (3.109)

Because the loading is periodic in x, the response or deflection of the

lithosphere will also vary sinusoidally in x with the same wavelength as the

topography. Thus we assume a solution of the form

w = w0 sin 2π x

λ . (3.110)

By substituting Equation (3–110) into Equation (3–109), we determine the

amplitude of the deflection of the lithosphere to be

w0 = h0

ρm ρc

− 1 + D

ρcg

(

λ

)4 . (3.111)

The quantity (D/ρcg) 1/4 has the dimensions of a length. It is proportional

to the natural wavelength for the flexure of the lithosphere.

If the wavelength of the topography is sufficiently short, that is, if

λ≪ 2π

(

D

ρcg

)1/4

, (3.112)

then the denominator of Equation (3–111) is much larger than unity, and

w0 ≪ h0. (3.113)

Short-wavelength topography causes virtually no deformation of the litho-

sphere. The lithosphere is infinitely rigid for loads of this scale. This case is

illustrated in Figure 3–25a. If the wavelength of the topography is sufficiently

long, that is, if

λ≫ 2π

(

D

ρcg

)1/4

, (3.114)

3.14 Periodic Loading 219

Figure 3.25 Deflection of the lithosphere under a periodic load. (a) Short-wavelength loading with no deflection of the lithosphere. (b) Long- wavelength loading with isostatic deflection of the lithosphere.

Figure 3.26 Buckling of an infinitely long plate under an applied horizontal load with a hydrostatic restoring force.

then Equation (3–111) gives

w = w0∞ = ρch0

(ρm − ρc) . (3.115)

This is the isostatic result obtained in Equation (2–3). For topography of

sufficiently long wavelength, the lithosphere has no rigidity and the topog-

raphy is fully compensated; that is, it is in hydrostatic equilibrium.

The degree of compensation C of the topographic load is the ratio of the

deflection of the lithosphere to its maximum or hydrostatic deflection

C = w0

w0∞ . (3.116)

Upon substituting Equations (3–111) and (3–115) into the equation for C,

we obtain

C = (ρm − ρc)

ρm − ρc + D

g

(

λ

)4 . (3.117)

220 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.27 Dependence of the degree of compensation on the nondimen- sional wavelength of periodic topography.

This dependence is illustrated in Figure 3–26. For a lithosphere with elastic

thickness 25 km, E = 70 GPa, ν = 0.25, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, and ρc =

2800 kg m−3 we find that topography is 50% compensated (C = 0.5) if

its wavelength is λ = 420 km. Topography with a shorter wavelength is

substantially supported by the rigidity of the lithosphere; topography with

a longer wavelength is only weakly supported.

3.15 Stability of the Earth’s Lithosphere under an End Load

We have already seen how a plate pinned at its ends can buckle if an applied

horizontal load exceeds the critical value given by Equation (3–95). Let us

investigate the stability of the lithosphere when it is subjected to a horizontal

force P . We will see that when P exceeds a critical value, an infinitely long

plate (L → ∞) will become unstable and deflect into the sinusoidal shape

shown in Figure 3–27.

The equation for the deflection of the plate is obtained by setting qa = 0

in Equation (3–103):

D d4w

dx4 + P

d 2w

dx2 + (ρm − ρw)gw = 0. (3.118)

This equation can be satisfied by a sinusoidal deflection of the plate as given

in Equation (3–110) if

D

(

λ

)4

− P

(

λ

)2

+ (ρm − ρw)g = 0, (3.119)

a result of directly substituting Equation (3–110) into Equation (3–118).

Equation (3–119) is a quadratic equation for the square of the wavelength

3.15 Stability of the Earth’s Lithosphere Under an End Load 221

of the sinusoid λ. Its solution is (

λ

)2

= P ± [P 2 − 4(ρm − ρw)gD]1/2

2D . (3.120)

Because the wavelength of the deformed lithosphere must be real, there can

only be a solution if P exceeds the critical value

Pc = {4Dg(ρm − ρw)}1/2. (3.121)

Pc is the minimum value for P for which the initially horizontal lithosphere

will become unstable and acquire the sinusoidal shape. If P < Pc, the hori-

zontal lithosphere is stable and will not buckle under the end load.

The eigenvalue Pc can also be written

Pc =

(

Eh3(ρm − ρw)g

3(1 − ν2)

)1/2

= σch, (3.122)

where σc is the critical stress associated with the force Pc. Solving Equation

(3–122) for the critical stress we find

σc =

(

Eh(ρm − ρw)g

3(1 − ν2)

)1/2

. (3.123)

The wavelength of the instability that occurs when P = Pc is given by

Equation (3–120):

λc = 2π

(

2D

Pc

)1/2

= 2π

(

D

g(ρm − ρw)

)1/4

= 2π

(

Eh3

12(1 − ν2)(ρm − ρw)g

)1/4

. (3.124)

We wish to determine whether buckling of the lithosphere can lead to

the formation of a series of synclines and anticlines. We consider an elastic

lithosphere with a thickness of 50 km. Taking E = 100 GPa, ν = 0.25,

ρm = 3300 kg m−3, and ρw = 1000 kg m−3, we find from Equation (3–123)

that σc = 6.4 GPa. A 50-km-thick elastic lithosphere can support a hori-

zontal compressive stress of 6.4 GPa without buckling. Because of the very

large stress required, we conclude that such buckling does not occur. The

lithosphere fails, presumably by the development of a fault, before buckling

can take place. In general, horizontal forces have a small influence on the

bending behavior of the lithosphere. For this reason we neglect them in the

lithosphere bending studies to follow.

Horizontal forces are generally inadequate to buckle the lithosphere be-

cause of its large elastic thickness. However, the same conclusion may not

222 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.28 A bathymetric profile across the Hawaiian archipelago.

apply to much thinner elastic layers, such as elastic sedimentary strata em-

bedded between strata that behave as fluids and highly thinned lithosphere

in regions of high heat flow. To evaluate the influence of horizontal forces

on the bending of such thin layers, we take h = 1 km and the other param-

eters as before and find from Equation (3–123) that σc = 900 MPa. From

Equation (3–124) we obtain λc = 28 km. We conclude that the buckling of

thin elastic layers may contribute to the formation of folded structures in

the earth’s crust.

3.16 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere under the Loads of

Island Chains

Volcanic islands provide loads that cause the lithosphere to bend. The

Hawaiian ridge is a line of volcanic islands and seamounts that extends

thousands of kilometers across the Pacific. These volcanic rocks provide a

linear load that has a width of about 150 km and an average amplitude of

about 100 MPa. The bathymetric profile across the Hawaiian archipelago

shown in Figure 3–28 reveals a depression, the Hawaiian Deep, immediately

adjacent to the ridge and an outer peripheral bulge or upwarp.

To model the deflection of the lithosphere under linear loading, let us

consider the behavior of a plate under a line load V0 applied at x = 0, as

shown in Figure 3–29. Since the applied load is zero except at x = 0, we

take qa(x) = 0 and P = 0 in Equation (3–103) and solve

D d4w

dx4 + (ρm − ρw)gw = 0. (3.125)

The general solution of Equation (3–125) is

w = ex/α (

c1 cos x

α + c2 sin

x

α

)

+ e−x/α (

c3 cos x

α + c4 sin

x

α

)

, (3.126)

3.16 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere under the Loads of Island Chains 223

Figure 3.29 Deflection of the elastic lithosphere under a line load.

where the constants c1, c2, c3, and c4 are determined by the boundary con-

ditions and

α =

[

4D

(ρm − ρw)g

]1/4

. (3.127)

The parameter α is known as the flexural parameter.

Because there is symmetry about x = 0, we need only determine w for

x ≥ 0. We require that w → 0 as x → ∞ and that dw/dx = 0 at x = 0.

Clearly, c1 and c2 must be zero and c3 = c4. Equation (3–126) becomes

w = c3e −x/α

(

cos x

α + sin

x

α

)

x ≥ 0. (3.128)

The constant c3 is proportional to the magnitude of the applied line load

V0. From Equation (3–81) we have

1

2 V0 = D

d3w

dx3 (x = 0) =

4Dc3 α3

. (3.129)

(Half the plate supports half the load applied at x = 0. Note also that a

downward force on the left end of the plate is negative according to the sign

convention illustrated in Figure 3–10.) Substituting for c3 from Equation

(3–129) into Equation (3–128), we obtain

w = V0α

3

8D e−x/α

(

cos x

α + sin

x

α

)

x ≥ 0.

(3.130)

The maximum amplitude of the deflection at x = 0 is given by

w0 = V0α

3

8D . (3.131)

In terms of w0, the deflection of the plate is

w = w0e −x/α

(

cos x

α + sin

x

α

)

. (3.132)

This profile is given in Figure 3–30.

The deflection of the lithosphere under a line load is characterized by a

224 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.30 Half of the theoretical deflection profile for a floating elastic plate supporting a line load.

well-defined arch or forebulge. The half-width of the depression, x0, is given

by

x0 = α tan−1(−1) = 3π

4 α. (3.133)

The distance from the line load to the maximum amplitude of the forebulge,

xb, is obtained by determining where the slope of the profile is zero. Upon

differentiating Equation (3–132) and setting the result to zero

dw

dx = −2w0

α e−x/α sin

x

α = 0, (3.134)

we find

xb = α sin−1 0 = πα. (3.135)

The height of the forebulge wb is obtained by substituting this value of xb into Equation (3–132):

wb = −w0e −π = −0.0432w0. (3.136)

The amplitude of the forebulge is quite small compared with the depression

of the lithosphere under the line load.

This analysis for the line load is only approximately valid for the Hawaiian

Islands, since the island load is distributed over a width of about 150 km.

However, the distance from the center of the load to the crest of the arch can

be used to estimate the thickness of the elastic lithosphere if we assume that

it is equal to xb. A representative value of xb for the Hawaiian archipelago

is 250 km; with xb = 250 km, Equation (3–135) gives a flexural parameter

α = 80 km. For ρm−ρw = 2300 kg m−3 and g = 10 m s−2 Equation (3–127)

gives D = 2.4 × 1023 N m. Taking E = 70 GPa and ν = 0.25, we find from

Equation (3–72) that the thickness of the elastic lithosphere is h = 34 km.

3.16 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere under the Loads of Island Chains 225

Figure 3.31 Deflection of a broken elastic lithosphere under a line load.

Problem 3.19 (a) Consider a lithospheric plate under a line load. Show

that the absolute value of the bending moment is a maximum at

xm = α cos−1 0 = π

2 α (3.137)

and that its value is

Mm = −2Dw0

α2 e−π/2 = −0.416

Dw0

α2 . (3.138)

(b) Refraction studes show that the Moho is depressed about 10 km beneath

the center of the Hawaiian Islands. Assuming that this is the value of w0

and that h = 34 km, E = 70 GPa, ν = 0.25, ρm − ρw = 2300 kg m−3, and

g = 10 m s−2, determine the maximum bending stress in the lithosphere.

Since volcanism along the Hawaiian ridge has weakened the lithosphere, it

may not be able to sustain large bending moments beneath the load. In this

case we should consider a model in which the lithosphere is fractured along

the line of the ridge. Let us accordingly determine the deflection of a semi-

infinite elastic plate floating on a fluid half-space and subjected to a line

load V0/2 at its end, as sketched in Figure 3–31. The deflection is given by

Equation (3–126), with the constants of integration yet to be determined.

Since the plate extends from x = 0 to x = ∞ and we require w → 0 as

x → ∞, c1 and c2 must again be zero. We have assumed that no external

torque is applied to the end x = 0. From Equation (3–73) we can conclude

that d 2w/dx2 = 0 at x = 0. This boundary condition requires that c4 = 0.

Finally, by equating the shear on the end x = 0 to the applied line load, we

find

1

2 V0 = D

d3w

dx3 (x = 0) =

2Dc3 α3

. (3.139)

With the value of c3 from Equation (3–139) and c1 = c2 = c4 = 0, Equation

(3–126) gives

w = V0α

3

4D e−x/α cos

x

α . (3.140)

226 Elasticity and Flexure

Figure 3.32 The deflection of the elastic lithosphere under an end load.

The maximum amplitude of the deflection at x = 0 is

w0 = V0α

3

4D . (3.141)

For the same load, the deflection amplitude of a broken lithosphere is twice

as great as it is for a lithosphere without a break. By substituting Equation

(3–141) into Equation (3–140), we can write

w = w0e −x/α cos

x

α . (3.142)

This profile is given in Figure 3–32.

The half-width of the depression and the position and amplitude of the

forebulge are given by

x0 = π

2 α (3.143)

xb = 3π

4 α (3.144)

wb = w0e −3π/4 cos

4 = −0.0670w0. (3.145)

The amplitude of the forebulge for the broken lithosphere model, although

still small compared with the deflection of the lithosphere under the load, is

considerably larger than the forebulge amplitude of an unbroken lithosphere

supporting the same load.

We again evaluate the model results for the deflection of the lithosphere

caused by the Hawaiian Islands. With xb = 250 km, we find from Equation

(3–144) that α = 106 km. This result, together with ρm − ρw = 2300 kg

m−3, g = 10 m s−2, E = 70 GPa, and ν = 0.25, gives D = 7.26 × 1023 Nm

and h = 49 km. The thickness of a broken lithosphere turns out to be about

50% greater than the thickness of an unbroken lithosphere.

3.17 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere at an Ocean Trench 227

Figure 3.33 Bending of the lithosphere at an ocean trench due to an applied vertical load and bending moment.

Problem 3.20 (a) Consider a lithospheric plate under an end load. Show

that the absolute value of the bending moment is a maximum at

xm = α tan−1 1 = π

4 α, (3.146)

and that its value is

Mm = −2Dw0

α2 e−π/4 sin

π

4 = −0.644

Dw0

α2 .

(3.147)

(b) Refraction studies show that the Moho is depressed about 10 km beneath

the center of the Hawaiian Islands. Assuming that this is the value of w0

and that h = 49 km, E = 70 GPa, ν = 0.25, ρm − ρw = 2300 kg m−3, and

g = 10 m s−2, determine the maximum bending stress in the lithosphere.

3.17 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere at an Ocean Trench

Another example of the flexure of the oceanic elastic lithosphere is to be

found at ocean trenches. Prior to subduction, considerable bending of the

elastic lithosphere occurs. The bent lithosphere defines the oceanward side

of the trench. To model this behavior, we will consider an elastic plate acted

upon by an end load V0 and a bending moment M0, as illustrated in Figure

3–33.

The deflection of the plate is governed by Equation (3–125), and once

again the general solution is given by Equation (3–126). We require w → 0

as x→ ∞ so that c1 = c2 = 0 and

w = e−x/α (

c3 cos x

α + c4 sin

x

α

)

. (3.148)

At x = 0, the bending moment is −M0; from Equation (3–73) we obtain

c4 = −M0α

2

2D . (3.149)

228 Elasticity and Flexure

Also, at x = 0, the shear force is −V0; from Equations (3–59) and (3–73) we

find

c3 =(V0α+M0) α2

2D . (3.150)

The equation for w can now be written as

w = α2e−x/α

2D

{

−M0 sin x

α + (V0α+M0) cos

x

α

}

.

(3.151)

Equation (3–151) reduces to Equation (3–140) in the case M0 = 0. Note

that the line load here is V0; it was V0/2 in Equation (3–140).

The elastic deflection of the oceanic lithosphere in terms of the vertical

force and bending moment at the ocean trench axis is given by Equation

(3–151). The vertical force and bending moment are the result of the grav-

itational body force acting on the descending plate. Unfortunately, V0 and

M0 cannot be determined directly. Quantities that can be measured directly

are the height of the forebulge wb and the half-width of the forebulge xb –

x0, as illustrated in Figure 3–33. We therefore express the trench profile in

terms of these parameters. We can determine x0 by setting w = 0:

tan x0

α = 1 +

αV0

M0 . (3.152)

Similarly, we can determine xb by setting dw/dx = 0:

tan xb α

= −1 − 2M0

αV0 . (3.153)

The height of the forebulge is obtained by substituting this value of xb into

Equation (3–151):

wb = α2

2D e−xb/α

[

−M0 sin xb α

+ (M0 + V0α) cos xb α

]

.

(3–154)

From Equations (3–152) and (3–154) we find

tan

(

xb − x0

α

)

= sin (xb α − x0

α

)

cos (xb α − x0

α

)

= sin xb

α cos x0 α − cos xb

α sin x0 α

cos xb α cos x0

α + sin xb α sin x0

α

= tan xb

α − tan x0 α

1 + tan xb α tan x0

α

= 1 (3.155)

3.17 Bending of the Elastic Lithosphere at an Ocean Trench 229

and

xb − x0 = π

4 α. (3.156)

This half-width is a direct measure of the flexural parameter and, therefore,

of the flexural rigidity and thickness of the elastic lithosphere.

By using Equation (3–152), we can rewrite Equation (3–151) for the de-

flection of the lithosphere as

w = α2M0

2D e−x/α

(

−sin x

α + tan

x0

α cos

x

α

)

= α2M0

2D e−[(x−x0)/α]−x0/α

× {

sin x0 α cos xα− cos x0

α sin x α

cos x0 α

}

= −α 2M0

2D e−[(x−x0)/α]e−x0/α

sin (x−x0

α

)

cos (x0 α

) .

(3.157)

The height of the forebulge is thus given by

wb = −α 2M0

2D e−[(xb−x0)/α]e−x0/α

sin (

xb−x0 α

)

cos (x0 α

) .

(3.158)

Upon dividing Equation (3–157) by Equation (3–158) and eliminating α

using Equation (3–156), we obtain

w

wb =

exp [

− π 4

(

x− x0 xb − x0

)]

exp (

−π4 )

sin [

π 4

(

x− x0 xb − x0

)]

sin π 4

= √

2eπ/4exp

[

−π 4

(

x−x0

xb−x0

)]

sin

[

π

4

(

x−x0

xb−x0

)]

.

(3.159)

The plot of w/wb vs. (x − x0)/(xb/x0) shown in Figure 3–34a defines a

universal flexure profile. The profile is valid for any two-dimensional elastic

flexure of the lithosphere under end loading.

We can solve for the bending moment in terms of (x − x0)/(xb − x0) by

substituting Equation (3–159) into Equation (3–73)

M =

√ 2π2eπ/4

8

Dwb (xb − x0)2

cos

[

π(x− x0)

4(xb − x0)

]

230 Elasticity and Flexure

× exp

[

− π(x− x0)

4(xb − x0)

]

. (3.160)

The dependence of M(xb−x0) 2/Dwb on (x− x0)/(xb−x0) is shown in Fig-

ure 3–34b. The bending moment is a maximum at (x− x0)/(xb − x0) = −1.

The shear force can be determined from Equations (3–59) and (3–160) to

be

V = − √

2π3eπ/4

32

Dwb (xb − x0)3

[

cos

{

π(x− x0)

4(xb − x0)

}

+ sin

{

π(x− x0)

4(xb − x0)

}]

exp

[

− π(x− x0)

4(xb − x0)

]

.

(3.161)

The dimensionless shear force V (xb−x0) 3/Dwb is plotted vs. (x−x0)/(xb−

x0) in Figure 3–34c. The shear force is zero at (x− x0)/(xb − x0) = −1.

The universal flexure profile is compared with an observed bathymetric

profile across the Mariana trench in Figure 3–35. In making the comparison,

we take xb = 55 km and wb = 500 m (x0 = 0). From Equation (3–156) we

find that α = 70 km. With ρm − ρw = 2300 kg m−3 and g = 10 m s−2,

Equation (3–127) gives D = 1.4 × 1023 N m. From Equation (3–72) with

E = 70 GPa and ν = 0.25 we find that the thickness of the elastic lithosphere

is 28 km. This value is in quite good agreement with the thickness of the

oceanic elastic lithosphere obtained by considering island loads. The largest

bending stress is 900 MPa, and it occurs 20 km seaward of the trench axis.

This is a very large deviatoric stress, and it is doubtful that the near-surface

rocks have sufficient strength in tension. However, the yield stress of the

mantle is likely to approach this value at depth where the lithostatic pressure

is high.

Although the trench bathymetric profile given in Figure 3–35 appears

to exhibit elastic flexure, other trench profiles exhibit an excessively large

curvature near the point of the predicted maximum bending moment. This

is discussed in Chapter 7, where we associate this excess curvature with the

plastic failure of the lithosphere.

3.18 Flexure and the Structure of Sedimentary Basins

Lithospheric flexure is also associated with the structure of many sedimen-

tary basins. A sedimentary basin is a region where the earth’s surface has

been depressed and the resulting depression has been filled by sediments.

Typical sedimentary basins have depths up to 5 km, although some are as

3.18 Flexure and the Structure of Sedimentary Basins 231

F ig

u re

3. 34

U n iv

er sa

l so

lu ti o n

fo r

th e

d efl

ec ti o n

o f a n

el a st

ic li th

o sp

h er

e u n d er

a ve

rt ic

a l en

d lo a d

a n d

be n d in

g

m o m

en t.

(a )

D ep

en d en

ce o f th

e n o n d im

en si

o n a l d is

p la

ce m

en t

w /w

b o n

th e

n o n d im

en si

o n a l po

si ti o n

(x −

x 0 )/

(x b −

x 0 ).

T h e

p ro

fi le

is a ls o

sh o w n

a t a n

a m

p li fi ca

ti o n

o f 1 0

to 1

to m

o re

cl ea

rl y

sh o w

th e

st ru

ct u re

o f th

e

fo re

bu lg

e. (b

) T

h e

d im

en si

o n le

ss be

n d in

g m

o m

en t ve

rs u s

(x −

x 0 )/

(x b −

x 0 ).

(c )

T h e

d im

en si

o n le

ss ve

rt ic

a l sh

ea r

fo rc

e a s

a fu

n ct

io n

(x −

x 0 )/

(x b −

x 0 ).

232 Elasticity and Flexure

F igu

re 3.35

C o m

pa riso

n o f a

ba th

ym etric

p ro

fi le

a cro

ss th

e M

a ria

n a

tren ch

(so lid

lin e)

w ith

th e

u n iversa

l

lith o sp

h eric

d efl

ectio n

p ro

fi le

given by

E qu

a tio

n (3

– 1 5 9 )

(d a sh

ed lin

e); x b =

5 5

km a n d

w b =

0 .5

km .

3.18 Flexure and the Structure of Sedimentary Basins 233

deep as 15 km. Because sedimentary basins contain reservoirs of petroleum,

their structures have been studied in detail using seismic reflection profiling

and well logs.

Some sedimentary basins are bounded by near-vertical faults along which

the subsidence has occurred. Others, however, have a smooth basement, and

the subsidence is associated with the flexure of the elastic lithosphere. The

horizontal dimensions of these sedimentary basins, about 400 to 1000 km,

reflect the magnitude of the flexural parameter based on sediments of density

ρs replacing mantle rock of density ρm, α = [4D/(ρm − ρs)g] 1/4.

Some sedimentary basins have a nearly twodimensional structure. They

are caused by the loading of a linear mountain belt and are known as foreland

basins. Examples are the series of sedimentary basins lying east of the Andes

in South America and the Appalachian basin in the eastern United States

lying west of the Appalachian Mountains. Depth contours of the basement

beneath the Appalachian basin are given in Figure 3–36a. A basement profile

is shown in Figure 3–36b. The depth w is the depth below sea level, and the

coordinate −x is measured from the point where basement rocks are exposed

at the surface.

It is appropriate to model the structure of the Appalachian basin as a two-

dimensional lithospheric plate under a linear end load. Thus the universal

flexure profile given in Equation (3–159) is directly applicable. In order to

fit the basement profile given in Figure 3–36b we take xb = 122 km and

wb = 290 m (x0 = 0). Since the forebulge has been destroyed by erosion this

choice of parameters is not unique. They can be varied somewhat, and a

reasonable fit can still be obtained. However, these values are near the center

of the acceptable range. From Equation (3–156) we find that they correspond

to α = 155 km. As we have already noted, the flexural rigidity must be based

on the density difference between the mantle and the sediments ρm − ρs.

With ρm − ρs = 700 kg m−3 and g = 10 m s−2 we find D = 1024 N

m. From Equation (3–72) with E = 70 GPa and ν = 0.25 we find that

the thickness of the elastic continental lithosphere is h = 54 km. This is

somewhat larger than the values we obtained for the thickness of the elastic

oceanic lithosphere. Flexure studies of other sedimentary basins give similar

values of elastic thickness.

Problem 3.21 An ocean basin has a depth of 5.5 km. If it is filled to sea

level with sediments of density 2600 kg m−3, what is the maximum depth

of the resulting sedimentary basin? Assume ρm = 3300 kg m−3.

Problem 3.22 The Amazon River basin in Brazil has a width of 400 km.

Assuming that the basin is caused by a line load at its center and that the

234 Collateral Reading

Figure 3.36 (a) Contours of basement (in km) in the Appalachian basin of the eastern United States. Data are from well logs and seismic reflection studies. (b) The data points are the depths of basement below sea level as a function of the distance from the point where basement rocks are exposed at the surface along the profile given by the heavy line in (a). The solid line is the universal flexure profile from Equation (3–159) with xb = 122 km and wb = 290 m (x0 =0).

elastic lithosphere is not broken, determine the corresponding thickness of

the elastic lithosphere. Assume E = 70 GPa, ν = 0.25, and ρm − ρs = 700

kg m−3.

Collateral Reading

Bieniawski, Z. T. (1967), Mechanism of brittle fracture of rock: Part II.

Experimental studies, Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci., 4, 407–423.

Collateral Reading 235

Collateral Reading

Eringen, A. C., Mechanics of Continua (John Wiley, New York, 1967), 502

pages.

A comprehensive treatment of the mechanics of continua at a relatively

sophisticated level. The basic concepts of strain, stress, flow, thermo-

dynamics, and constitutive equations are introduced. Applications are

made to elasticity, fluid dynamics, thermoplasticity, and viscoelasticity.

Fung, Y. C., Foundations of Solid Mechanics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood

Cliffs, NJ, 1965), 525 pages.

A graduate-level textbook on the mechanics of solids. The text is mainly

concerned with the classical theory of elasticity, thermodynamics of

solids, thermoelasticity, viscoelasticity, plasticity, and finite deforma-

tion theory. The book begins with an introductory chapter on elastic

and viscoelastic behavior. Cartesian tensors are then introduced and

used in the discussions of stress, strain, and the conservation laws. Sub-

sequent chapters deal with linear elasticity, solutions of elastic prob-

lems by potentials, two-dimensional problems, energy theorems, Saint-

Venant’s principle, Hamilton’s principle, wave propagation, elasticity

and thermodynamics, thermoelasticity, viscoelasticity, and finite strain

theory. Problems for the student are included.

Jaeger, J. C., Elasticity, Fracture, and Flow, 3rd edition (Methuen, London,

1969), 268 pages.

A monograph on the mathematical foundations of elasticity, plasticity, vis-

cosity, and rheology. Chapter 1 develops the analysis of stress and strain

with emphasis on Mohr’s representations. Chapter 2 discusses stress–

strain relations for elasticity, viscosity, and plasticity, and criteria for

fracture and yield. Chapter 3 derives the equations of motion and equi-

librium. Chapters 4 and 5 deal with stresses in the earth’s crust, rock

mechanics, and applications to structural geology.

Jaeger, J. C., and N. G. W. Cook, Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics (Chap-

man and Hall, London, 1976), 585 pages.

See collateral reading list for Chapter 2.

Kraus, H., Thin Elastic Shells (John Wiley, New York, 1967).

An extensive mathematical treatment of the deformation of thin elastic

shells. It includes three chapters on the theory of thin elastic shells,

four chapters on static analysis, two chapters on dynamic analysis, and

two chapters on numerical methods.

Muskhelishvili, N. I., Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of

Elasticity, 4th edition (P. Noordhoff, Groningen, 1963), 718 pages.

236 Collateral Reading

This treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity is divided into seven

major parts. Part 1 deals with the fundamental equations of the me-

chanics of an elastic body. It includes separate chapters on analyses

of stress and strain, relation between stress and strain, the equilibrium

equations of an elastic body, and the fundamental boundary value prob-

lems of static elasticity. Part 2 treats planar problems whose solutions

are obtained with the aid of the stress function and its complex rep-

resentation. The technique of conformal mapping is introduced. Part 3

develops the Fourier series approach to the solution of planar problems,

while Parts 4 and 5 make use of Cauchy integrals. Part 6 presents solu-

tions for special planar geometries and Part 7 deals with the extension,

torsion and bending of bars.

Novozhilov, V. V., Thin Shell Theory (P. Noordhoff, Groningen, 1964), 377

pages.

A mathematical analysis of stresses and strains in thin shells using linear

elasticity theory. There are four chapters on the general theory of thin

elastic shells, the membrane theory of shells, cylindrical shells, and shells

of revolution.

Timoshenko, S., and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, (McGraw-Hill, New

York, 1970), 567 pages.

See collateral reading list for Chapter 2.

Timoshenko, S., and D. H. Young, Elements of Strength of Materials, 5th

edition (Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1968), 377 pages.

An undergraduate engineering textbook with an extensive treatment of the

bending of beams and elastic stability. Problems with solutions are in-

cluded.

4

Heat Transfer

4.1 Introduction

In the previous chapter we studied the elastic behavior of the outer shell of

the Earth. Our studies of the bending of the lithosphere have shown that a

near-surface region with a thickness of 25 to 50 km behaves elastically on

geological time scales. Seismic studies have shown that the entire mantle of

the Earth to a depth of 2885 km is a solid because it transmits shear waves.

In order to understand the presence of a thin elastic shell, it is necessary to

allow for variations in the rheology of the solid rock as a function of depth.

Although the behavior of the near-surface rocks is predominantly elastic, the

deeper rocks must exhibit a fluid or creep behavior on geological time scales

in order to relax the stresses. The fluid behavior of mantle rock also results

in mantle convection and the associated movement of the surface plates.

We know from both laboratory and theoretical studies that the rheology

of solids is primarily a function of temperature. Therefore, to understand the

mechanical behavior of the Earth, we must understand its thermal structure.

The rheology of mantle rocks is directly related to the temperature as a

function of depth. This, in turn, is dependent on the rate at which heat

can be lost from the interior to the surface. There are three mechanisms for

the transfer of heat: conduction, convection, and radiation. Conductive heat

transfer occurs through a medium via the net effect of molecular collisions.

It is a diffusive process wherein molecules transmit their kinetic energy to

other molecules by colliding with them. Heat is conducted through a medium

in which there is a spatial variation in the temperature. Convective heat

transport is associated with the motion of a medium. If a hot fluid flows

into a cold region, it will heat the region; similarly, if a cold fluid flows into

a hot region, it will cool it. Electromagnetic radiation can also transport

heat. An example is the radiant energy from the Sun. In the Earth, radiative

238 Heat Transfer

heat transport is only important on a small scale and its influence can be

absorbed into the definition of the thermal conductivity.

As the discussion of this chapter shows, both conduction and convection

are important heat transport mechanisms in the Earth. The temperature dis-

tribution in the continental crust and lithosphere is governed mainly by the

conductive heat loss to the surface of heat that is generated internally by the

decay of radioactive isotopes in the rocks and heat that flows upward from

the subcontinental mantle. The loss of the Earth’s internal heat through the

oceanic crust and lithosphere is controlled largely by conduction, although

convective heat transport by water circulating through the basaltic crustal

rocks is also important, especially near ridges. Intrusive igneous bodies cool

by both conduction and the convective effects of circulating groundwater.

The heating of buried sediments and the adjustment of subsurface temper-

atures to effects of surface erosion and glaciation occur via the process of

conduction. Convection plays the dominant role in the transport of heat from

the Earth’s deep mantle and in controlling the temperature of its interior.

This chapter discusses mainly heat conduction and its application to ge-

ological situations. Because convective heat transfer involves fluid motions,

we will postpone a detailed discussion of this subject to Chapter 6, where

we will develop the fundamentals of fluid mechanics. However, the conse-

quences of convective heat transport are incorporated into our discussion of

the Earth’s temperature toward the end of this chapter.

4.2 Fourier’s Law of Heat Conduction

The basic relation for conductive heat transport is Fourier’s law, which

states that the heat flux q, or the flow of heat per unit area and per unit

time, at a point in a medium is directly proportional to the temperature

gradient at the point. In one dimension, Fourier’s law takes the form

q = −kdT dy

(4.1)

where k is the coefficient of thermal conductivity and y is the coordinate

in the direction of the temperature variation. The minus sign appears in

Equation (4–1) since heat flows in the direction of decreasing temperature.

With dT/dy > 0, T increases in the positive y direction, so that heat must

flow in the negative y direction.

Figure 4–1 is a simple example of how Fourier’s law can be used to give the

heat flux through a slab of material of thickness l across which a temperature

4.2 Fourier’s Law of Heat Conduction 239

Figure 4.1 Heat transfer through a slab.

Figure 4.2 Heat flux and the local slope of the temperature profile when T(y) has nonzero curvature.

difference ∆T is maintained. In this case, the temperature gradient is

dT

dy = −∆T

l , (4.2)

and the heat flux, from Fourier’s law, is

q = k∆T

l . (4.3)

Fourier’s law applies even when the temperature distribution is not linear,

as sketched in Figure 4–2. In this case, the local slope of the temperature

profile must be used in Fourier’s law, and for constant k the heat flux is a

function of y, q = q(y). We will see that curvature in a temperature profile

implies either the occurrence of sources or sinks of heat or time dependence.

240 Heat Transfer

4.3 Measuring the Earth’s Surface Heat Flux

The average heat flux at the Earth’s surface provides important information

on the amount of heat being produced in the Earth and the temperature

distribution in its interior. In the 1800s it was recognized that the tem-

perature in caves and mines increases with depth. Typical values for this

increase are dT/dy = 20 to 30 K km−1. Since the thermal conductivities

of near-surface rocks are usually in the range 2 to 3 W m−1 K−1, the heat

flow to the surface of the Earth implied by these temperature gradients is,

according to Equation (4–1), 40 to 90 mW m−2. It is standard practice to

take the upward surface heat flow to be a positive quantity, even though

from Equation (4–1), with y measured positive downward, it has a negative

value.

Although temperature measurements in caves and mines give approximate

values for the near-surface thermal gradient, accurate measurements of the

thermal gradient in continental areas require deep drill holes. Deep mea-

surements are necessary because climatic variations in the Earth’s surface

temperature, particularly those due to ice ages, influence the temperatures

in the near-surface rocks. These effects are considered quantitatively in Sec-

tion 4–14. In order to reach the steady-state thermal structure, holes must

be drilled deeper than about 300 m.

The thermal gradient is measured by lowering a thermistor (an accu-

rate electronic thermometer) down the drill hole. Care must be exercised

to prevent the circulation of drilling fluid during drilling from affecting the

measured gradient. This can be done in either of two ways. Measurements

can be made at the bottom of the drill hole during drilling. The drilling

fluid does not have time to change the temperature at the bottom of the

hole. Alternatively, the temperature log of the hole (the measurement of

the temperature as a function of depth) can be carried out some time after

drilling has ceased. It usually takes 1 to 2 years for a drill hole to equilibrate

to the ambient geothermal gradient. Drill holes are invariably filled with

groundwater. It is the temperature of this water that is measured by the

thermistor. As long as the water is not flowing, its temperature equilibrates

with that of the surrounding rock. However, many drill holes cross aquifers

(underground channels of porous rock in which water flows), with the result

that water will flow up or down the drill hole if it is not lined and will affect

the temperature distribution.

From Fourier’s law it is clear that the determination of the heat flux re-

quires a measurement of both the temperature gradient and the thermal

conductivity of the rock. The thermal conductivity of rocks can be deter-

4.3 Measuring the Earth’s Surface Heat Flux 241

Figure 4.3 Laboratory device for measuring the thermal conductivity of a rock sample.

mined in the laboratory by subjecting samples cut from drill holes to known

heat fluxes and measuring the temperature drops across them. Figure 4–3

is a schematic of one way in which this can be done.

The rock sample of thermal conductivity kr is placed between material –

brass, for example – of thermal conductivity kb. Thermocouples measure the

temperatures of the hot and cold ends of the metal, TH and Tc, respectively,

and the temperatures at the surfaces of the metal adjoining the rock section,

T1 and T2. The contact between the rock and metal (air perhaps) involves an

unknown thermal resistance to the flow of heat. Since the same heat must be

conducted through the rock and metal in steady state, Fourier’s law (4–1)

can be used to determine kr in terms of the measurable quantities TH , Tc,

T1, T2, d, l and the conductivity kb. Thermal conductivities of a variety of

rocks are given in Section E of Appendix 2.

Problem 4.1 For the situation sketched in Figure 4–3 and discussed

above, show that the thermal conductivity of the rock sample can be deter-

mined from the equation

T1 − T2

TH − T1 = kb kr

d

l +

2δkb lkc

(4.4)

The thermal resistance of the contacts are accounted for by associating a

thermal conductivity kc and a thickness δ with each contact. By making

242 Heat Transfer

measurements on rock samples of different thicknesses and plotting (T1 − T2)/(TH − T1) vs. d, one can determine kr from the slope of the resulting

straight line without knowing either δ or kc.

We just discussed the determination of the surface heat flow in the con-

tinents. The heat flow can also be measured on the ocean floor. A large

fraction of the seafloor is covered by a layer of soft sediments. A needlelike

probe carrying a series of thermistors is dropped from a ship and penetrates

the sediments. Typically the probe has a length of 3 m. The near-surface

heat flow in the oceanic crust is almost a constant because climatic vari-

ations do not change the temperature of the seawater in the deep oceans.

This water is buffered at a temperature between 1 and 2◦C, the temperature

at which the density of the seawater is a maximum. The variation is due to

changes in salinity. In many cases, however, the near-surface heat flow in the

sediments is influenced by the hydrothermal convection of seawater through

the sediments and basaltic crustal rocks.

The thermal conductivity of the sediments can be determined using a

heater in the heat-flow probe. The record of the increase in probe tempera-

ture with time after the heater is turned on can be interpreted to give the

thermal conductivity of the sediments, as discussed later in this chapter.

Problem 4.2 Temperatures at the interfaces between sedimentary layers

of different rock types as determined from a well log are given in Table 4–1.

The measured thermal conductivity of each layer is also given. Determine

the heat flow through each layer and the mean value of the heat flow.

4.4 The Earth’s Surface Heat Flow

Tens of thousands of heat flow measurements have been made both in the

continents and the oceans. Because the oceanic crust participates in the

plate tectonic cycle and the continental crust does not, we can consider

these regions separately.

The mean heat flow for all continents is 65 ± 1.6 mW m−2. Regions of

high heat flow in the continents are generally restricted to active volcanic

areas. Examples are the lines of volcanoes associated with ocean trenches

– the Andes, for example – and regions of tensional tectonics such as the

western United States. The areas of high heat flow associated with volcanic

lines are generally quite small and do not contribute significantly to the

mean heat flow. Similarly, areas of tensional tectonics are quite small on a

global basis. Broad regions of continental tectonics, such as the collision zone

4.4 The Earth’s Surface Heat Flow 243

Table 4.1 Temperatures Between Layers of Rock Types

Depth (m) Temp. (◦C) Rock Type k (Wm--1 K--1)

380 18.362 Sandstone 3.2

402 18.871 Shale 1.7

412 19.330 Sandstone 5.3

465 20.446 Salt 6.1

475 20.580 Sandstone 3.4

510 21.331 Shale 1.9

515 21.510

extending from the Alps through the Himalayas, have near-normal surface

heat flows. Therefore, regions of active tectonics and mountain building make

a relatively small contribution to the mean continental heat flow.

In stable continental areas, the surface heat flow has a strong correlation

with the surface concentrations of the radioactive, heat-producing isotopes.

This correlation, which is discussed in detail in Section 4–8, is illustrated in

Figure 4–11. Approximately one-half of the surface heat flow in the conti-

nents can be attributed to the heat production from the radioactive isotopes

of uranium, thorium, and potassium in the continental crust. Surface heat

flow systematically decreases with the age of the surface rocks in stable con-

tinental areas. Similarly, the concentration of the radioactive isotopes in the

surface rocks also decreases with the age of the rocks. This decrease is at-

tributed to the progressive effects of erosion that remove the near-surface

rocks with the largest concentrations of the heat-producing isotopes. The

conclusion is that the decrease in surface heat flow with age in stable con-

tinental areas can be primarily attributed to the decrease in the crustal

concentrations of the heat-producing isotopes.

The mean measured heat flow for all the oceans is 101 ± 2.2 mW m−2.

The concentration of the heat-producing isotopes in the oceanic crust is

about one order of magnitude less than it is in the continental crust. Also,

the oceanic crust is about a factor of 5 thinner than the continental crust.

Therefore, the contribution of heat production by the radioactive isotopes

in the oceanic crust to the surface heat flow is negligible (∼2%).

The most striking feature of heat flow measurements in the oceans is the

244 Heat Transfer

systematic dependence of the surface heat flow on the age of the seafloor.

This can be understood as a consequence of the gradual cooling of the

oceanic lithosphere as it moves away from the mid-ocean ridge. This pro-

cess is analyzed in detail in Section 4–16, where it is shown that conductive

cooling of the initially hot oceanic mantle can explain quantitatively the

observed heat flow–age relation. The dependence of the oceanic heat flow

measurements on age is given in Figure 4–25.

The total heat flow from the interior of the Earth Q can be obtained by

multiplying the area of the continents by the mean continental heat flow and

adding the product of the oceanic area and the mean oceanic heat flow. The

continents, including the continental margins, have an area Ac = 2×108 km2.

Multiplying this by the mean observed continental heat flow, 65 mW m−2,

we get the total heat flow from the continents to be Qc = 1.30 × 1013 W.

Similarly, taking the oceans, including the marginal basins, to have an area

Ao = 3.1 × 108 km2 and a mean observed heat flow of 101 mW m−2, we

find that the total heat flow from the oceans is Qo = 3.13× 1013 W. Adding

the heat flow through the continents and the oceans, we find that the total

surface heat flow is Q = 4.43×1013 W. Dividing by the Earth’s surface area

A = 5.1 × 108 km2, we get 87 mW m−2 for the corresponding mean surface

heat flow.

4.5 Heat Generation by the Decay of Radioactive Elements

A substantial part of the heat lost through the Earth’s surface undoubtedly

originates in the interior of the Earth by the decay of the radioactive elements

uranium, thorium, and potassium. Some part of the surface heat loss must

come from the overall cooling of the Earth through geologic time. An upper

limit to the concentration of radioactive elements in the Earth can be derived

by attributing all the surface heat loss to the radioactive heat generation.

The mean heat generation per unit mass H is then given by

H = Q

M . (4.5)

If we take M = 5.97×1024 kg, the mass of the Earth, and Q = 4.43×1013 W,

we find H = 7.42 × 10−12 W kg−1. However, on the basis of geochemical

studies, we can argue that the core cannot contain a significant fraction of

the heat-producing elements. In this case, the mass in Equation (4–5) should

be the mass of the mantle, M = 4.0×1024 kg and H = 11.1×10−12 W kg−1.

A further reduction must be made in the value of H appropriate to the

mantle because a substantial fraction of the heat lost from the continents

4.5 Heat Generation by the Decay of Radioactive Elements 245

originates in the highly concentrated radioactive isotopes of the continental

crust. Although the mean continental heat flux of 65 mW m−2 is known with

some certainty, we are uncertain as to the fraction that can be attributed to

the heat-producing elements. Based on estimates of the mean concentrations

of these elements in the continental crust, we attribute 37 mW m−2 to the

heat-producing elements. The remaining 28 mW m−2 is attributed to basal

heating of the continental lithosphere by mantle convection. This heat is then

conducted through the mantle portion of the continental lithosphere to the

base of the continental crust. Radiogenic heat production in the continental

crust corresponds to a total heat flow of 7.4 × 1012 W, or 17% of the total

surface heat flow. Reduction of the mantle heat production by this amount

gives H = 9.22 × 10−12 W kg−1.

A further correction to the radiogenic heat production in the mantle must

be made because of the secular cooling of the Earth. Only a fraction of the

present-day surface heat flow can be attributed to the decay of radioactive

isotopes presently in the mantle. Because the radioactive isotopes decay

into stable isotopes, heat production due to radioactive decay is decreasing

with time. For example, we will show that the heat production 3 billion

years ago was about twice as great as it is today. Since less heat is being

generated in the Earth through time, less heat is also being convected to

the surface. Thus, the vigor of the mantle convection system is decreasing

with the age of the Earth. Because the strength of convection is dependent

on viscosity and the viscosity of the mantle is a sensitive function of its

temperature, a decrease in the heat flux with time leads to a decrease in the

mean mantle temperature. This cooling of the Earth in turn contributes to

the surface heat flow. We will consider this problem in some detail in Section

7–8 and conclude that about 80% of the present-day surface heat flow can be

attributed to the decay of radioactive isotopes presently in the Earth and

about 20% comes from the cooling of the Earth. We can thus reduce the

present-day mantle heat production accordingly so that our preferred value

is H = 7.38 × 10−12 W kg−1.

Radioactive heating of the mantle and crust is attributed to the decay

of the uranium isotopes 235U and 238U, the thorium isotope 232Th, and the

potassium isotope 40K. The rates of heat production and the half-lives τ1/2 of these isotopes are given in Table 4–2. At the present time natural uranium

is composed of 99.28% by weight 238U and 0.71% 235U. Natural thorium is

100% 232Th. Natural potassium is composed of 0.0119% 40K. The present

rates of heat production of natural uranium and potassium are also given in

Table 4–2.

The ratios of potassium to uranium and thorium to uranium are nearly

246 Heat Transfer

Table 4.2 Rates of Heat Release H and Half-Lives τ1/2 of the Important

Radioactive Isotopes in the Earth’s Interior

H τ1/2 Concentration C

Isotope (W kg--1) (yr) (kg kg--1)

238U 9.46 × 10−5 4.47 × 109 30.8 × 10−9

235U 5.69 × 10−4 7.04 × 108 0.22 × 10−9

U 9.81 × 10−5 31.0 × 10−9

232Th 2.64 × 10−5 1.40 × 1010 124 × 10−9

40K 2.92 × 10−5 1.25 × 109 36.9 × 10−9

K 3.48 × 10−9 31.0 × 10−5

Note: Heat release is based on the present mean mantle concentrations of the heat-producing elements.

constant in a wide range of terrestrial rocks. Based on these observed ra-

tios we take CK 0 /C

U 0 = 104 and CTh

0 /CU 0 = 4, where CK

0 , CTh 0 , and CU

0

are the present mass concentrations of potassium, thorium, and uranium,

respectively. The total present-day production H0 is related to the heat gen-

eration rates of the individual radioactive elements by

H0 = CU 0

(

HU + CTh

0

CU 0

HTh + CK

0

CU 0

HK )

. (4.6)

Taking H0 = 7.38× 10−12 W kg−1 and the other parameters as given above

and in Table 4–2, we find that CU 0 = 3.1×10−8 kg kg−1 or 31 ppb (parts per

billion by weight). These preferred values for the mean mantle concentrations

of heat-producing elements are also given in Table 4–2.

The mean heat production rate of the mantle in the past can be related

to the present heat production rate using the half-lives of the radioactive

isotopes. The concentration C of a radioactive isotope at time t measured

backward from the present is related to the present concentration C0 and

the half-life of the isotope τ1/2 by

C = C0 exp

(

t ln 2

τ1/2

)

. (4.7)

Thus, the past mean mantle heat production rate is given by

H = 0.9928CU 0 H

U238 exp

t ln 2

τU238

1/2

+ 0.0071CU 0 H

U235 exp

t ln 2

τU235

1/2

4.5 Heat Generation by the Decay of Radioactive Elements 247

Figure 4.4 Mean mantle heat production rates due to the decay of the radioactive isotopes of U, Th, and K as functions of time measured back from the present.

+CTh 0 HTh exp

(

t ln 2

τTh 1/2

)

+ 1.19 × 10−4CK 0 H

K40 exp

t ln 2

τK40

1/2

 .

(4.8)

The rate of mean mantle heat production based on Equation (4–8) and

parameter values in Table 4–2 is plotted as a function of time before the

present in Figure 4–4. The past contributions of the individual radioactive

elements are also shown. We see that the rate of heat production 3× 109 yr

ago was about twice the present value. Today heat is produced primarily by 238U and 232Th, but in the distant past 235U and 40K were the dominant

isotopes because of their shorter half-lives.

The concentrations of the heat-producing elements in surface rocks vary

considerably. Some typical values are given in Table 4–3. The mantle values

from Table 4–2 are included for reference. Partial melting at ocean ridges

depletes mantle rock of incompatible elements such as uranium, thorium,

and potassium. These incompatible elements are concentrated in the basaltic

partial melt fraction. As a result, the oceanic crust is enriched in these

elements by about a factor of 4 relative to the fertile mantle. Peridotites

that have been depleted in the incompatible elements are sometimes found

on the surface of the Earth. A typical example of the small concentrations

of the heat-producing elements in a “depleted” peridotite is given in Table

4–3. Processes that lead to the formation of the continental crust, such

as the volcanism associated with ocean trenches, further differentiate the

248 Heat Transfer

Table 4.3 Typical Concentrations of the Heat-Producing Elements in

Several Rock Types and the Average Concentrations in Chondritic

Meteorites

Concentration Rock Type U (ppm) Th (ppm) K (%)

Reference undepleted (fertile) mantle 0.031 0.124 0.031 “Depleted” peridotites 0.001 0.004 0.003 Tholeiitic basalt 0.07 0.19 0.088 Granite 4.7 20 4.2 Shale 3.7 12 2.7 Average continental crust 1.42 5.6 1.43 Chondritic meteorites 0.008 0.029 0.056

incompatible elements. The concentrations of the heat-producing elements

in a typical continental rock such as a granite are quite variable, but in

general they are an order of magnitude greater than in tholeiitic basalts.

Representative values of concentrations in granite are given in Table 4–3.

It is generally accepted that the chondritic class of meteorites is rep-

resentative of primitive mantle material. The average concentrations of the

heatproducing elements in chondritic meteorites are listed in Table 4–3. The

concentrations of uranium and thorium are about a factor of 4 less than our

mean mantle values, and the concentration of potassium is about a factor of

2 larger. The factor of 8 difference in the ratio CK 0 /C

U 0 is believed to repre-

sent a fundamental difference in elemental abundances between the Earth’s

mantle and chondritic meteorites.

Problem 4.3 Determine the present mean mantle concentrations of the

heat-producing elements if the present value for the mean mantle heat pro-

duction is 7.38 × 10−12 W kg−1 and CK 0 /C

U 0 = 6 × 104 and CTh

0 /CU 0 = 4.

Problem 4.4 Determine the rates of heat production for the rocks listed

in Table 4–3.

Problem 4.5 The measured concentrations of the heat-producing ele-

ments in a rock are CU = 3.2 ppb, CTh = 11.7 ppb, and CK = 2.6%.

Determine the rate of heat generation per unit mass in the rock.

4.6 One-Dimensional Steady Heat Conduction 249

Figure 4.5 Heat flow into q(y) and out of q(y+ δ y) a thin slab of thickness δy producing heat internally at the rate of H per unit mass.

4.6 One-Dimensional Steady Heat Conduction with Volumetric

Heat Production

Heat conduction theory enables us to determine the distribution of temper-

ature in a region given information about the temperatures or heat fluxes

on the boundaries of the region and the sources of heat production in the

region. In general, we can also use the theory to determine time variations

in the temperature distribution. We first develop the theory for the simple

situation in which heat is transferred in one direction only and there are no

time variations (steady state) in the temperature or heat flow. The basic

equation of conductive heat transfer theory is a mathematical statement of

conservation of energy; the equation can be derived as follows.

Consider a slab of infinitesimal thickness δy, as sketched in Figure 4–5.

The heat flux out of the slab q(y + δy) crosses the face of the slab located

at y + δy, and the heat flux into the slab q(y) crosses the face located at y.

The net heat flow out of the slab, per unit time and per unit area of the

slab’s face, is

q(y + δy) − q(y).

Since δy is infinitesimal, we can expand q(y + δy) in a Taylor series as

q(y + δy) = q(y) + δy dq

dy + · · · . (4.9)

250 Heat Transfer

Thus we find

q(y + δy) − q(y) = δy dq

dy = δy

d

dy

[

−k (

dT

dy

)]

= δy

[

−k (

d2T

dy2

)]

, (4.10)

where we have used Equation (4–1) (Fourier’s law) for q, and we have as-

sumed a constant thermal conductivity. The right side of Equation (4–10)

is the net heat flow out of a slab of thickness δy, per unit time and per unit

area. It is nonzero only when there is curvature in the temperature profile.

If there is a nonzero net heat flow per unit area out of the thin slab, as

given by Equation (4–10), this heat flow must be supplied, in steady state,

by heat generated internally in the slab. If H is the heat production rate

per unit mass, the amount of heat generated in the slab per unit time and

per unit area of the slab face is

ρHδy, (4.11)

where ρ is the density of the slab. By equating (4–10) and (4–11), one obtains

0 = k d2T

dy2 + ρH. (4.12)

This equation can be integrated to determine temperature as a function of

position y once the region of interest and appropriate boundary conditions

have been specified.

Assume that the medium is a half-space with the surface at y = 0 (see

Figure 4–6). The coordinate y increases with distance into the half-space;

thus y is a depth coordinate. One possible set of boundary conditions for

Equation (4–12) is the specification of both temperature and heat flux at the

surface. Thus we require the temperature T to be T0 at y = 0 and the heat

flux at the surface q to be −q0. The reason for the difference in sign between

q and q0 is that q is positive in the direction of positive y, that is, downward,

while q0 is assumed to be positive upward (we anticipate application to the

Earth for which the surface heat flux is indeed upward).

One integration of Equation (4–12) gives

ρHy = −kdT dy

+ c1 = q + c1, (4.13)

where c1 is a constant of integration. Since q = −q0 on y = 0, we find

c1 = q0 (4.14)

4.6 One-Dimensional Steady Heat Conduction 251

Figure 4.6 Geometry and boundary conditions for integration of Equation (4–12).

and

ρHy = −kdT dy

+ q0. (4.15)

Integration of Equation (4–15) results in

ρH y2

2 = −kT + q0y + c2, (4.16)

where c2 is another constant of integration. Since T = T0 on y = 0, we find

c2 = kT0.

and

T = T0 + q0 k y − ρH

2k y2. (4.17)

Problem 4.6 Consider a geological situation in which the subsurface is

layered, with bedding planes making an angle θ with the horizontal surface,

as shown in Figure 4–7a. Suppose that the thermal conductivity for heat

conduction parallel to BC is k1 and the conductivity for heat transport par-

allel to AB is k3. Though the bedding planes are inclined to the horizontal,

isotherms are nevertheless horizontal. Show that the upward surface heat

flow is given by

q0 = {k1 + (k3 − k1) cos2 θ}∂T ∂y

. (4.18)

HINT: Introduce coordinates ζ and η as shown in Figure 4–7b. Note that

y = η cos θ + ζ sin θ (4.19)

252 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.7 Geometry for Problem 4–6.

Figure 4.8 Temperature as a function of depth within the Earth assuming heat transport is by conduction (conduction geotherm). Also included are the solidus and liquidus of basalt and the solidus of peridotite (olivine).

and

∂T

∂η = cos θ

∂T

∂y

∂T

∂ζ = sin θ

∂T

∂y . (4.20)

Write a steady-state heat balance for the triangle ABC in Figure 4–7a. Use

Fourier’s law of heat conduction to evaluate qζ and qη. Note q0 = −qy. Assume no heat sources.

4.7 A Conduction Temperature Profile for the Mantle 253

4.7 A Conduction Temperature Profile for the Mantle

We can use Equation (4–17) to determine the temperature as a function of

depth in the Earth, that is, the geotherm, assuming heat is transported by

conduction. The depth profile of the temperature is given in Figure 4–8, as-

suming T0 = 0◦C, q0 = 70 mW m−2, ρ = 3300 kg m−3, H = 7.38× 10−12 W

kg−1, and k = 4 W m−1 K−1. Also included in Figure 4–8 are the liquidus

and solidus of basalt and the solidus of peridotite. Basalt is the low-melting-

temperature fraction of the mantle. When the temperature of the mantle

exceeds the basalt solidus, this fraction starts to melt, resulting in volcan-

ism. This is the cause of the extensive basaltic volcanism that forms the

oceanic crust. When the temperature reaches the basalt liquidus, this frac-

tion is entirely melted, leaving a high-melting-temperature residuum that is

primarily composed of the mineral olivine. When the mantle temperature

reaches the olivine solidus, the remainder of the mantle rock melts. The abil-

ity of seismic shear waves to propagate through the mantle indicates that

substantial melting does not occur. The conclusion is that this conduction

analysis does not predict the temperature in the Earth’s mantle.

In an attempt to assess the failure of the conductive mantle geotherm to

model the Earth, one may ask whether the near-surface concentration of

radioactive elements in crustal rocks can modify the analysis. (The partial

melting processes that lead to the formation of the crust concentrate the

radioactive elements.) The only way in which this could have an effect is

through a reduction in the amount of the surface heat flow q0 attributed

to mantle heat sources. Thus we must assess the contribution of crustal

radioactivity to surface heat flow. It is appropriate to do this for the oceanic

crust because the suboceanic mantle geotherm dominates the temperature

distribution of the mantle.

To determine the contribution qc to the surface heat flow of a layer of

crust of thickness hc and heat production per unit mass Hc, we proceed

as indicated in Figure 4–9. Equation (4–13) applies to this case also, with

ρ = ρc and H = Hc (subscript c refers to the crust),

ρcHcy = −kdT dy

+ c1 = q + c1. (4.21)

To evaluate c1, we note that q = −qc on y = 0 and

c1 = qc.

The heat flux in the slab satisfies

q + qc = ρcHcy. (4.22)

254 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.9 Heat flow through the top of a slab containing internal heat sources. No heat flows through the bottom of the slab.

But q = 0 at y = hc because we have assumed that no heat enters the bottom

of the slab (the appropriate boundary condition if we want to determine the

heat flowing out the top of the slab due only to radioactive isotopes contained

in it). Thus we find

qc = ρcHchc. (4.23)

The oceanic crust is primarily composed of basalts. Thus we take ρc =

2900 kg m−3, hc = 6 km, and Hc = 2.6 × 10−11 W kg−1. (The radiogenic

heat production rate per unit mass of basalts was calculated in Problem

4–4.) From Equation (4–23) the resultant contribution to the surface heat

flow is qc = 0.45 mW m−2; this is a small fraction of the mean oceanic heat

flow, which is about 100 mW m−2. The conclusion is that heat production

in the oceanic crust does not make a significant contribution to the oceanic

surface heat flow. Therefore, an alternative explanation must be found for

the failure of the simple conduction profile to model the suboceanic mantle

geotherm. In later sections we show that heat flow due to mantle convection

invalidates the conduction results.

4.8 Continental Geotherms

Whereas conductive temperature profiles fail to describe the mantle geotherm,

they successfully model the geotherm in the continental crust and litho-

sphere, where the dominant thermal processes are radiogenic heat produc-

tion and conductive heat transport to the surface. Because of the great age

4.8 Continental Geotherms 255

of the continental lithosphere, time-dependent effects can, in general, be

neglected.

The surface rocks in continental areas have considerably larger concen-

trations of radioactive elements than the rocks that make up the oceanic

crust. Although the surface rocks have a wide range of heat production, a

typical value for a granite is Hc = 9.6 × 10−10 W kg−1 (H for granite was

calculated in Problem 4–4). Taking hc = 35 km and ρc = 2700 kg m−3, one

finds that the heat flow from Equation (4–23) is qc = 91 mW m−2. Since this

value is considerably larger than the mean surface heat flow in continental

areas (65 mW m−2), we conclude that the concentration of the radioactive

elements decreases with depth in the continental crust.

For reasons that we will shortly discuss in some detail it is appropriate to

assume that the heat production due to the radioactive elements decreases

exponentially with depth,

H = H0e −y/hr . (4.24)

Thus H0 is the surface (y = 0) radiogenic heat production rate per unit

mass, and hr is a length scale for the decrease in H with depth. At the depth

y = hr, H is 1/e of its surface value. Substitution of Equation (4–24) into

the equation of energy conservation (4–12) yields the differential equation

governing the temperature distribution in the model of the continental crust:

0 = k d2T

dy2 + ρH0e

−y/hr . (4.25)

Beneath the near-surface layer of heat-producing elements we assume that

the upward heat flow at great depth is qm; that is, q → −qm as y → ∞.

This model for heat production in the continental crust is sketched in Figure

4–10.

An integration of Equation (4–25) yields

c1 = k dT

dy − ρH0hre

−y/hr = −q − ρH0hre −y/hr .

(4.26)

The constant of integration c1 can be determined from the boundary con-

dition on the heat flux at great depth, that is, from the mantle heat flux to

the base of the lithosphere

c1 = qm. (4.27)

Thus the heat flux at any depth is

q = −qm − ρH0hre −y/hr . (4.28)

256 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.10 Model of the continental crust with exponential radiogenic heat source distribution.

The surface heat flow q0 = −q(y = 0) is obtained by setting y = 0 with the

result

q0 = qm + ρhrH0. (4.29)

With an exponential depth dependence of radioactivity, the surface heat

flow is a linear function of the surface radioactive heat production rate.

In order to test the validity of the linear heat flow–heat production re-

lation (4–29), determinations of the radiogenic heat production in surface

rocks have been carried out for areas where surface heat flow measurements

have been made. Several regional correlations are given in Figure 4–11. In

each case a linear correlation appears to fit the data quite well. The cor-

responding length scale hr is the slope of the best-fit straight line and the

mantle (reduced) heat flow qm is the vertical intercept of the line. For the

Sierra Nevada data we have qm = 17 mW m−2 and hr = 10 km; for the

eastern United States data we have qm = 33 mW m−2 and hr = 7.5 km;

for the Norway and Sweden data, qm = 22 mW m−2 and hr = 7.2 km; and

for the eastern Canadian shield data, qm = 30.5 mW m−2 and hr = 7.1 km.

In all cases the length scale hr is near 10 km. The values of the mantle or

reduced heat flow qm are reasonably consistent with the mean basal heating

of the continental lithosphere qm = 28 mW m−2 given in Section 4–5.

Thus a model of the continental crust with exponentially decreasing ra-

4.8 Continental Geotherms 257

Figure 4.11 Dependence of surface heat flow q0 on the radiogenic heat production per unit volume in surface rock ρ H0 in selected geological provinces: Sierra Nevada (solid squares and very long dashed line), east- ern U.S. (solid circles and intermediate dashed line), Norway and Sweden (open circles and solid line), eastern Canadian shield (open squares and short dashed line). In each case the data are fit with the linear relationship Equation (4–29).

dioactivity can explain the linear surface heat flow–surface radioactivity

relation. The exercises to follow show that the exponential radioactivity

distribution is not unique in its ability to model the linear q0 versus ρH0

relation; other dependences of H on depth that confine radioactivity near

the surface are consistent with observations. However, the exponential dis-

tribution is the only one that preserves the linear q0 versus ρH0 relation

under differential erosion, a strong argument to support its relevance to the

continental crust. The exponential depth dependence is also consistent with

magmatic and hydrothermal differentiation processes, although a detailed

understanding of these processes in the continental crust is not available.

Problem 4.7 Table 4–4 gives a series of surface heat flow and heat produc-

tion measurements in the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California. Determine

the reduced heat flow qm and the scale depth hr.

Problem 4.8 Consider one-dimensional steady-state heat conduction in

a half-space with heat production that decreases exponentially with depth.

258 Heat Transfer

Table 4.4 Surface Heat Flow and Heat Production Data for the Sierra

Nevada Mountains

q0 ρ H0 q0 ρ H0

(mW m--2) (µWm--3) (mW m--2) (µW m--3)

18 0.3 31 1.5 25 0.8 34 2.0 25 0.9 42 2.6 29 1.3 54 3.7

The surface heat flow–heat production relation is q0 = qm + ρH0hr. What

is the heat flow–heat production relation at depth y = h∗? Let q∗ and H∗

be the upward heat flux and heat production at y = h∗.

Problem 4.9 Assume that the radioactive elements in the Earth are

uniformly distributed through a near-surface layer. The surface heat flow

is 70 mW m−2, and there is no heat flow into the base of the layer. If

k = 4 W m−1 K−1, T0 = 0◦C, and the temperature at the base of the layer

is 1200◦C, determine the thickness of the layer and the volumetric heat

production.

Problem 4.10 Consider one-dimensional steady-

state heat conduction in a half-space. The heat sources are restricted to

a surface layer of thickness b; their concentration decreases linearly with

depth so that H = H0 at the surface y = 0 and H = 0 at the depth y = b.

For y > b, H = 0 and there is a constant upward heat flux qm. What is

the q0 (upward surface heat flow)–H0 relation? Determine the temperature

profile as a function of y.

Problem 4.11 The exponential depth dependence of heat production is

preferred because it is self-

preserving upon erosion. However, many alternative models can be pre-

scribed. Consider a two-layer model with H = H1 and k = k1 for 0 ≤ y ≤ h1,

and H = H2 and k = k2 for h1 ≤ y ≤ h2. For y > h2, H = 0 and the up-

ward heat flux is qm. Determine the surface heat flow and temperature at

y = h2 for ρ1 = 2600 kg m−3, ρ2 = 3000 kg m−3, k1 = k2 = 2.4 W m−1

K−1, h1 = 8 km, h2 = 40 km, ρ1H1 = 2 µW m−3, ρ2H2 = 0.36 µW m−3,

T0 = 0 ◦C, and qm = 28 mW m−2.

A further integration of Equation (4–28) using Equation (4–1) and the

4.8 Continental Geotherms 259

Figure 4.12 A typical geotherm in the continental crust.

boundary condition T = T0 at y = 0 gives

T = T0 + qmy

k + ρH0h

2 r

k (1 − e−y/hr). (4.30)

or, alternatively, using Equation (4–29), we obtain

T = T0 + qmy

k +

(q0 − qm)hr k

(1 − e−y/hr). (4.31)

Figure 4–12 is a plot of a typical geotherm in the continental crust computed

from Equation (4–31) with T0 =10 ◦C, q0 = 56.5 mW m−2, qm = 30 mW

m−2, hr = 10 km, and k = 3.35 W m−1 K−1.

Problem 4.12 An alternative model for the continental crust is to assume

that in addition to the exponentially decreasing near-surface radioactivity

there is also a constant concentration of radioactivity H0 to the depth hc.

Show that the crustal geotherm for this model is given by

T = T0 + ρH0h

2 r

k (1 − e−y/hr) − ρHcy

2

2k

+ (qm + ρHchc)

k y for 0 ≤ y ≤ hc, (4.32)

T = T0 + ρHch

2 c

2k + ρH0h

2 r

k + qmy

k for y ≥ hc.

(4.33)

260 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.13 Heat flow into and out of a thin spherical shell with internal heat generation.

4.9 Radial Heat Conduction in a Sphere or Spherical Shell

We next consider the steady radial conduction of heat in a sphere or spher-

ical shell with volumetric heat production. The temperature distributions

in thick planetary lithospheres, such as the lithospheres of the Moon and

Mars, are properly described by solutions of the heat conduction equation in

spherical geometry. The effects of spherical geometry are not so important

for the Earth’s lithosphere, which is quite thin compared with the Earth’s

radius. However, on a small body like the Moon, the lithosphere may be a

substantial fraction of the planet’s radius. To describe heat conduction in

spherical geometry, we must derive an energy balance equation.

Consider a spherical shell of thickness δr and inner radius r, as sketched

in Figure 4–13. Assume that the conductive transport of heat occurs in a

spherically symmetric manner. The total heat flow out of the shell through

its outer surface is

4π(r + δr)2qr(r + δr),

and the total heat flow into the shell at its inner surface is

4πr2qr(r).

The subscript r on the heat flux q indicates that the flow of heat is radial.

Since δr is infinitesimal, we can expand qr(r + δr) in a Taylor series as

qr(r + δr) = qr(r) + δr dqr dr

+ · · · . (4.34)

Thus neglecting powers of δr, the net heat flow out of the spherical shell is

4.9 Radial Heat Conduction in a Sphere or Spherical Shell 261

given by

4π[(r + δr)2qr(r + δr) − r2qr(r)]

= 4πr2 (

2

r qr +

dqr dr

)

δr. (4.35)

If the net heat flow from the shell is nonzero, then, by conservation of

energy, this flow of heat must be supplied by heat generated internally in

the shell (in steady state). With the rate of heat production per unit mass

H, the total rate at which heat is produced in the spherical shell is

4πr2ρHδr,

4πr2δr being the approximate expression for the volume of the shell. By

equating the rate of heat production to the net heat flow out of the spherical

shell, Equation (4–35), we get

dqr dr

+ 2qr r

= ρH. (4.36)

The heat balance Equation (4–36) can be converted into an equation for

the temperature by relating the radial heat flux qr to the radial temperature

gradient dT/dr. Fourier’s law still applies in spherical geometry,

qr = −kdT dr . (4.37)

Upon substituting Equation (4–37) into Equation (4–36), we find

0 = k

(

d2T

dr2 +

2

r

dT

dr

)

+ ρH (4.38)

or

0 = k 1

r2 d

dr

(

r2 dT

dr

)

+ ρH. (4.39)

By twice integrating Equation (4–39), one obtains a general expression for

the temperature in a sphere or spherical shell with internal heat production

and in steady state:

T = −ρH 6k

r2 + c1 r

+ c2. (4.40)

The constants of integration c1 and c2 depend on the boundary conditions

of a particular problem. As an example, we determine the temperature dis-

tribution in a sphere of radius a that has a uniform internal rate of heat

production. The boundary condition is that the outer surface of the sphere

has a temperature T0. In order to have a finite temperature at the center

262 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.14 Steady-state temperature distribution in a sphere containing internal heat sources.

of the sphere, we must set c1 = 0. To satisfy the temperature boundary

condition at the surface of the sphere, we require

c2 = T0 + ρHa2

6k . (4.41)

The temperature in the sphere is therefore given by

T = T0 + ρH

6k (a2 − r2). (4.42)

From Equation (4–37), the surface heat flux q0 at r = a is given by

q0 = 1

3 ρHa. (4.43)

Equation (4–43) is a statement of conservation of energy that applies no

matter what the mode of internal heat transfer in the sphere is. The tem-

perature distribution in the sphere is shown in Figure 4–14.

Problem 4.13 Derive the equation q0 = ρHa/3 for a sphere with uniform

volumetric heating and density by making a simple overall steady-state heat

balance.

Problem 4.14 What would the central temperature of the Earth be if

it were modeled by a sphere with uniform volumetric heating? Take q0 =

70 mW m−2, k = 4 W m−1 K−1, and T0 = 300 K.

Problem 4.15 Derive an expression for the temperature at the center of

a planet of radius a with uniform density ρ and internal heat generation H.

4.10 Temperatures in the Moon 263

Heat transfer in the planet is by conduction only in the lithosphere, which

extends from r = b to r = a. For 0 ≤ r ≤ b heat transfer is by convection,

which maintains the temperature gradient dT/dr constant at the adiabatic

value −Γ. The surface temperature is T0. To solve for T (r), you need to

assume that T and the heat flux are continuous at r = b.

Problem 4.16 It is assumed that a constant density planetary body of

radius a has a core of radius b. There is uniform heat production in the core

but no heat production outside the core. Determine the temperature at the

center of the body in terms of a, b, k, T0 (the surface temperature), and q0 (the surface heat flow).

4.10 Temperatures in the Moon

The Moon is a relatively small planetary body so it is a good approximation

to assume that its density is constant. If we also assume that the Moon is in a

steady-state thermal balance and that the mean heat production is the same

as the value we derived for the Earth’s mantle, that is, H = 7.38× 10−12 W

kg−1, we can determine the surface heat flow on the Moon using Equation (4–

43). With ρ = 3300 kg m−3 and a = 1738 km we find that q0 = 14.1 mW

m−2. The mean of two lunar heat flow measurements on Apollos 15 and 17

is qs = 18 mW m−2. This approximate agreement suggests that the mean

lunar abundances of the radioactive isotopes are near those of the Earth.

The difference may be partially attributable to the cooling of the Moon.

Assuming that the conduction solution is applicable and that the Moon

has a uniform distribution of radioactivity, the maximum temperature at the

center of the Moon can be obtained from Equation (4–42) with the result

Tmax = 3904 K, assuming k = 3.3 W m−1 K−1 and that the surface temper-

ature is T0 = 250 K. This conduction solution indicates that a substantial

fraction of the interior of the Moon is totally melted. However, the limited

seismic results from the Apollo missions suggest that a sizable liquid core

in the Moon is unlikely. Thus, either the conductive solution is not valid or

the radioactive isotopes are not distributed uniformly throughout the Moon.

There should be some upward concentration of radioactive isotopes in the

relatively thick lunar highland crust (60 km) by analogy with the upward

concentration of radioactive isotopes in the Earth’s continental crust.

Problem 4.17 Determine the steady-state conduction temperature profile

for a spherical model of the Moon in which all the radioactivity is confined

to an outer shell whose radii are b and a (a is the lunar radius). In the outer

shell H is uniform.

264 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.15 Heat flow into and out of a rectangular element.

4.11 Steady Two- and Three-Dimensional Heat Conduction

Obviously, not all heat conduction problems of geologic interest can be solved

by assuming that heat is transported in one direction only. In this section,

we generalize the heat conduction equation to account for heat transfer

in two dimensions. The further generalization to three dimensions will be

obvious and stated without proof. The first step is to write an appropriate

energy conservation equation. If heat can be conducted in both the x and y

directions, we must consider the heat balance on a small rectangular element

with dimensions δx and δy, as illustrated in Figure 4–15.

The heat flux in the x direction is qx, and in the y direction it is qy.

The rate at which heat flows into the element in the y direction is qy(y)δxl,

where l is an arbitrary length in the third direction (in two-dimensional heat

conduction we assume that nothing varies in the third dimension). Similarly,

heat flows into the element in the x direction at the rate qx(x)δyl. The heat

flow rates out of the element are qy(y + δy)δxl and qx(x + δx)δyl. The net

heat flow rate out of the element is

{qx(x+ δx) − qx(x)}δyl + {qy(y + δy) − qy(y)}δxl

= ∂qx ∂x

δxδyl + ∂qy ∂y

δxδyl =

(

∂qx ∂x

+ ∂qy ∂y

)

δxδyl.

(4.44)

Taylor series expansions have been used for qx(x + δx) and qy(y + δy) to

simplify the expression in Equation (4–44). Partial derivative symbols ap-

4.11 Steady Two- and Three-Dimensional Heat Conduction 265

pear in Equation (4–44) because qx can depend on both x and y; similarly

qy can be a function of both x and y.

In steady state, a nonzero value of the right side of Equation (4–44) re-

quires that heat be produced internally in the rectangular element. The rate

of heat generation in the element is ρH(δxδyl); equating this to the right

side of Equation (4–44) yields

∂qx ∂x

+ ∂qy ∂y

= ρH. (4.45)

Clearly, if we had heat conduction in three dimensions, Equation (4–45)

would be replaced by

∂qx ∂x

+ ∂qy ∂y

+ ∂qz ∂z

= ρH. (4.46)

Fourier’s law of heat conduction relates the heat flow in any direction to

the temperature gradient in that direction. If we assume that the thermal

conductivity of the rock is isotropic, that is, the rock conducts heat equally

readily in any direction, Fourier’s law can be written

qx = − k∂T ∂x

(4.47)

qy = − k∂T ∂y

. (4.48)

Upon substitution of Equations (4–47) and (4–48) into Equation (4–45), we

obtain

−k (

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2

)

= ρH. (4.49)

Generalizing this to three-dimensional heat conduction gives

−k (

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2 + ∂2T

∂z2

)

= ρH. (4.50)

If there are no internal heat sources, the temperature satisfies

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2 = 0. (4.51)

Equation (4–51) is known as Laplace’s equation. In three dimensions, Laplace’s

equation is

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2 + ∂2T

∂z2 = 0. (4.52)

Laplace’s equation is encountered in many other fields, including fluid flow,

diffusion, and magnetostatics.

266 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.16 Temperature in a half-space whose surface temperature varies periodically with distance.

Problem 4.18 If the medium conducting heat is anisotropic, separate

thermal conductivities must be used for heat transfer in the x and y direc-

tions, kx and ky, respectively. What equation replaces Equation (4–49) for

determining the temperature distribution in such a medium?

4.12 Subsurface Temperature Due to Periodic Surface

Temperature and Topography

As an example of a two-dimensional heat conduction problem, we solve for

the temperatures beneath the surface in a region where there are lateral

variations in surface temperature. Such surface temperature variations can

arise as a result of topographic undulations and the altitude dependence

of temperature in the Earth’s atmosphere. Horizontal surface temperature

variations also occur at the boundaries between land and bodies of water,

such as lakes or seas. A knowledge of how surface temperature variations

affect subsurface temperature is important for the correct interpretation of

borehole temperature measurements in terms of surface heat flow.

Consider again a semi-infinite half-space in the region y ≥ 0. The surface

is defined by the plane y = 0. For simplicity, we assume that the surface

temperature Ts is a periodic function of x (horizontal distance) given by

Ts = T0 + ∆T cos 2πx

λ , (4.53)

where λ is the wavelength of the spatial temperature variation. The situa-

tion is sketched in Figure 4–16. We also assume that there are no radiogenic

heat sources in the half-space, since our interest here is in the nature of the

subsurface temperature variations caused by the periodic surface tempera-

ture. To determine the temperature distribution, we must solve Equation

(4–51) with the boundary condition given by Equation (4–53).

We assume that the method of separation of variables is appropriate; that

4.12 Subsurface Temperature 267

Figure 4.17 An undulating surface topography results in surface tempera- ture variations that extend downward.

is,

T (x, y) = T0 +X(x)Y (y). (4.54)

In order to satisfy the surface boundary condition, we must have

X(x) = cos 2πx

λ ; (4.55)

that is, the horizontal variations in temperature are the same at all depths.

When Equations (4–54) and (4–55) are substituted into Equation (4–51),

we obtain

0 = −4π2

λ2 Y +

d2Y

dy2 , (4.56)

which is an ordinary differential equation for Y . The general solution of this

equation is

Y (y) = c1e −2πy/λ + c2e

2πy/λ, (4.57)

where c1 and c2 are the constants of integration. Since the temperature

must be finite as y → ∞, we must require that c2 = 0. To satisfy the

boundary condition given in Equation (4–53), it is necessary that c1 = ∆T .

The solution for the temperature distribution in the half-space is

T (x, y) = T0 + ∆T cos 2πx

λ e−2πy/λ. (4.58)

The temperature disturbance introduced by the surface temperature vari-

ation decays exponentially with depth in a distance proportional to the

horizontal wavelength of the surface temperature variation.

The energy equation is linear in the temperature. Therefore, solutions to

the equation can be added, and the result is still a solution of the energy

equation. This is known as the principle of superposition. If the temperature

in the continental crust is given by Equation (4–30) but the surface temper-

ature has a periodic variation given by Equation (4–53), the temperature

268 Heat Transfer

distribution in the crust is obtained by adding Equations (4–30) and (4–58):

T = T0 + qmy

k + ρH0h

2 r

k (1 − e−y/hr)

+ ∆T cos 2πx

λ e−2πy/λ. (4.59)

This result satisfies the applicable energy equation (4–49) and the required

surface boundary condition (4–53).

The analysis in this section can also be used to determine the effect of

small amplitude, periodic topography on the near-surface temperature dis-

tribution. This problem is illustrated in Figure 4–17. The topography is

given by the relation

h = h0 cos 2πx

λ (4.60)

We assume that the atmosphere has a vertical temperature gradient β so

that the surface temperature Ts is given by

Ts = T0 + βy y = h. (4.61)

A typical value for β is 6.5 K km−1.

To apply these results, we must project the surface temperature values

that are known on y = h onto y = 0. This is because the temperature

given by Equation (4–59) is written in terms of ∆T , the amplitude of the

periodic temperature variation on y = 0; see Equation (4–53). Because the

topography is shallow, this can be accomplished with just the first term of

a Taylor series expansion:

T (y = 0) = T (y = h) − (

∂T

∂y

)

y=0 h. (4.62)

The temperature on y = h is given by Equation (4–61), and the temperature

gradient (∂T/∂y)y=0 is given to sufficient accuracy by the value of the gradi-

ent in the absence of topography because h is small. From Equation (4–29)

we can write (

∂T

∂y

)

y=0 = q0 k

= qm + ρhrH0

k . (4.63)

The result of substituting Equations (4–61) and (4–63) into Equation (4–62)

is

T (y = 0) = T0 + βh− (qm + ρhrH0)

k h

= T0 +

{

β − (

qm + ρhrH0

k

)}

h0 cos 2πx

λ .

4.13 One-Dimensional, Time-Dependent Heat Conduction 269

(4.64)

Comparison of Equation (4–53) and (4–64) shows that

∆T =

(

β − qm k

− ρH0hr k

)

h0. (4.65)

Finally, substitution of Equation (4–65) into Equation (4–59) gives

T = T0 + qmy

k + ρH0h

2 r

k (1 − e−y/hr )

+

(

β − qm k

− ρH0hr k

)

h0 cos 2πx

λ e−2πy/λ,

(4.66)

for the temperature distribution in the continental crust with periodic to-

pography.

Problem 4.19 If a spatially periodic surface temperature variation has a

wavelength of 1 km, at what depth is the horizontal variation 1% of that at

the surface?

Problem 4.20 A mountain range can be represented as a periodic topog-

raphy with a wavelength of 100 km and an amplitude of 1.2 km. Heat flow

in a valley is measured to be 46 mW m−2. If the atmospheric gradient is

6.5 K km−1 and k = 2.5 Wm−1 K−1, determine what the heat flow would

have been without topography; that is, make a topographic correction.

4.13 One-Dimensional, Time-Dependent Heat Conduction

Many of the important geological problems involving heat conduction are

time dependent. Examples that we consider later are the cooling of intrusive

igneous bodies, the cooling of the oceanic lithosphere, erosion or sedimenta-

tion effects on temperature, and others. Volumetric heat production usually

plays a minor role in these phenomena, and we accordingly assume H = 0.

In addition, it is adequate to consider heat conduction in one direction only.

If there are not heat sources in the medium, a net heat flow out of the

slab illustrated in Figure 4–5 must reduce its temperature. The specific heat

c of the medium is the energy required to raise the temperature of a unit

mass of material by one degree. Thus, an element of the slab of thickness δy

and unit cross-sectional area requires an energy flow per unit time given by

ρc ∂T

∂t δy

270 Heat Transfer

to maintain a temperature change at the rate ∂T/∂t(ρδy is the slab mass

per unit cross-sectional area and ρcδy is the slab’s heat capacity per unit

cross-sectional area). Thus we can equate the right side of Equation (4–10)

with −δy ρc∂T/∂t, since a net heat flow out of the slab leads to a decrease

in slab temperature

ρc ∂T

∂t = k

∂2T

∂y2 . (4.67)

Equation (4–67) is the basic equation governing the time and spatial vari-

ations of the temperature when heat is transferred in one dimension by

conduction. Partial derivatives are required because T is a function of both

time and space. We can rewrite Equation (4–67) in the form

∂T

∂t = κ

∂2T

∂y2 , (4.68)

where κ, the thermal diffusivity, is

κ = k

ρc . (4.69)

Note that κ has units of length2/time such as square meters per second.

If temperature changes occur with a characteristic time interval τ , they

will propagate a distance on the order of √ κτ . Similarly, a time l2/κ is

required for temperature changes to propagate a distance l. Such simple

considerations can be used to obtain useful estimates of thermal effects. We

now proceed to solve Equation (4–68) for a number of situations of geological

and geophysical interest.

Problem 4.21 Derive the time-dependent heat conduction equation for

a situation in which heat transport occurs radially toward or away from a

line of infinite length. The heat flux q and the temperature T depend only

on the perpendicular distance from the line r and time t (see Figure 4–18a).

HINT: Write an energy balance for a cylindrical shell of length l, inner

radius r, and outer radius r+δr. The heat flows occur over the entire lateral

surfaces of the cylindrical shell, as sketched in Figure 4–18b. Fourier’s law

of heat conduction in the form q = −k (∂T/∂r) applies. The answer is

∂T

∂t = κ

r

∂r

(

r ∂T

∂r

)

. (4.70)

Problem 4.22 Derive the time-dependent heat conduction equation ap-

propriate to the situation in which heat transport is always radially toward

or away from a point. Equation (4–35) gives the net heat flow out of a thin

4.14 Periodic Heating of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 271

Figure 4.18 Geometry for the derivation of the time-dependent heat con- duction equation in cylindrical coordinates.

spherical shell. This must be equated to the time rate of change of temper-

ature of the shell times the heat capacity of the shell. Fourier’s law in the

form of Equation (4–37) applies. The answer is

∂T

∂t = κ

r

∂2

∂r2 (rT ). (4.71)

Problem 4.23 Using the relation τ = l2/κ and taking κ = 1 mm2 s−1,

determine the characteristic times for the conductive cooling of the Earth,

Moon, Mars, Venus, and Mercury. What are the implications of these esti-

mates?

Problem 4.24 If the mean surface heat flow on the Earth (q̄0 = 87 mW

m−2) were attributed entirely to the cooling of the Earth, what would be

the mean rate of cooling? (Take c̄ = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1.)

Problem 4.25 If the mean surface heat flow on the Moon (q̄0 = 18 mW m−2)

were attributed entirely to the cooling of the Moon, what would be the mean

rate of cooling (Take c̄ = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1q0).

4.14 Periodic Heating of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space: Diurnal and

Seasonal Changes in Subsurface Temperature

The surface temperature of the Earth regularly changes with time because

of day–night variations and the changes of season. On a longer time scale,

it changes because of the quasi-periodic nature of glaciations, for example.

In this section we use the one-dimensional, time-dependent heat conduction

equation to determine how these time-periodic surface temperature changes

affect temperatures below the surface.

272 Heat Transfer

Again consider a semi-infinite half-space in the region y ≥ 0 whose surface

is defined by the plane y = 0. We assume that the surface temperature is a

periodic function of time

Ts = T0 + ∆T cosωt. (4.72)

The circular frequency ω is related to the frequency f by

ω = 2πf. (4.73)

In addition, the period of the temperature fluctuations τ is

τ = 1

f =

ω . (4.74)

If this represents the daily variation of the surface temperature, then τ = 1

day, f = 1.157×10−5 s−1, and ω = 7.272×10−5 rad s−1. We also assume that

T → T0 as y → ∞; that is, very far beneath the surface, the temperature is

the average surface temperature.

To solve Equation (4–68) with this surface boundary condition, we use

the method of separation of variables:

T (y, t) = T0 + Y (y)T ′(t). (4.75)

Because the surface temperature is time-periodic, we can assume that the

subsurface temperature also varies periodically with time at the same fre-

quency. However, it is not correct to assume that T ′(t) is simply cosωt,

as that would imply that the subsurface temperatures are in exact time

phase with the surface temperature. In other words, if T ′(t) were cosωt, the

maximum and minimum temperatures would be reached at the same times,

independent of depth. In fact, we will see that the temperature changes at

different depths are not in phase; the maximum temperature at any depth

lags behind the maximum temperature at the surface, for example, because

of the finite amount of time required for the temperature maximum to dif-

fuse downward. The difference in phase between temperature variations at

the surface and those at depth can be accounted for by using both cosωt

and sinωt dependences for T ′(t). We generalize Equation (4–75) to

T (y, t) = T0 + Y1(y) cosωt+ Y2(y) sinωt. (4.76)

By substituting Equation (4–76) into Equation (4–68), we find

−ωY1 = κ d2Y2

dy2 ωY2 = κ

d2Y1

dy2 . (4.77)

These are two coupled ordinary differential equations for the unknowns Y1

4.14 Periodic Heating of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 273

and Y2. We can solve the first of these equations for Y1 and substitute into

the second equation to obtain

d4Y2

dy4 + ω2

κ2 Y2 = 0. (4.78)

Alternatively, we could have solved the second of Equations (4–77) for Y2

and substituted into the first equation. Had we done so, we would have found

that Y1 satisfies the same fourth-order ordinary differential equation as does

Y2.

A standard technique for solving ordinary differential equations with con-

stant coefficients, of which Equation (4–78) is an example, is to assume a

solution of the form

Y2 = ceαy. (4.79)

If Equation (4–79) is to satisfy Equation (4–78), then

α4 + ω2

κ2 = 0 (4.80)

or

α = ± (

1 ± i√ 2

) √

ω

κ , (4.81)

where i is the square root of −1. Because four values of α satisfy Equation (4–

80), the general solution for Y2 (or Y1) must be written

Y2 = c1 exp

(

(1 + i)√ 2

ω

κ y

)

+ c2 exp

(

(1 − i)√ 2

ω

κ y

)

+ c3 exp

(−(1 + i)√ 2

ω

κ y

)

+ c4 exp

(−(1 − i)√ 2

ω

κ y

)

. (4.82)

Because the temperature fluctuations must decay with depth, the constants

c1 and c2 are zero, and Y2 takes the form

Y2 = exp

(

− y

ω

)[

c3 exp

(

− iy

ω

)

+ c4 exp

(

iy

ω

)]

. (4.83)

274 Heat Transfer

It is convenient to rewrite the solution for Y2 as

Y2 = exp

(

− y

ω

)(

b1 cos

ω

2κ y + b2 sin

ω

2κ y

)

,

(4.84)

where b1 and b2 are constants that can be related to c3 and c4, although it is

unnecessary to do so. The transition from Equation (4–83) to Equation (4–

84) is possible because the trigonometric functions sin x and cos x can

be written in terms of the exponentials eix and e−ix, and vice versa. The

unknown function Y1 has a similar form

Y1 = exp

(

− y

ω

)(

b3 cos

ω

2κ y + b4 sin

ω

2κ y

)

.

(4.85)

The remaining constants of integration can be determined as follows. If

Y1 and Y2 are to satisfy Equations (4–77), then

b2 = b3 and b1 = −b4. (4.86)

Also, the surface temperature must be of the form (4–72), which requires

b1 = 0 and b3 = ∆T. (4.87)

Thus, the temperature variation in the half-space due to a time-periodic

surface temperature is

T = T0 + ∆T exp

(

− y

ω

)

× (

cosωt cos y

ω

2κ + sinωt sin y

ω

)

,

(4.88)

T = T0 + ∆T exp

(

−y √

ω

)

cos

(

ωt− y

ω

)

.

(4.89)

Equation (4–89) shows that the amplitude of the time-dependent tem-

perature fluctuation decreases exponentially with depth. This fluctuation

decreases to 1/e of its surface value in a skin depth dω given by

dω =

(

ω

)1/2

. (4.90)

For the daily variation of temperature, the frequency is ω = 7.27 × 10−5

rad s−1. With κ = 1 mm2 s−1, the skin depth for diurnal temperature

4.14 Periodic Heating of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 275

changes from Equation (4–90) is 0.17 m. Except for a factor of π−1/2, the

skin depth for the penetration of the surface temperature variation is just

what one would have estimated on the basis of dimensional arguments, that

is, √ κτ(τ = period). Because skin depth is inversely proportional to the

square root of frequency, it is clear that the more rapid the fluctuation in

temperature, the less it penetrates beneath the surface.

The argument of the trigonometric factor in Equation (4–89) shows that

the phase difference φ between temperature fluctuations at the surface and

those at depth y is

φ = y

ω

2κ . (4.91)

If the depth y is the skin depth, the fluctuations are out of phase by 1 radian

(57.3◦). Figure 4–19 illustrates how the amplitudes of the temperature vari-

ations decay with depth and how the phases of the fluctuations shift with

depth.

Problem 4.26 Assume that the yearly temperature variation is periodic.

What is the skin depth? At what depth is the temperature 180◦ out of phase

with the surface variation? Assume κ = 1 mm2 s−1.

Problem 4.27 Assume that the temperature effects of glaciations can be

represented by a periodic surface temperature with a period of 104 yr. If

it is desired to drill a hole to a depth that the temperature effect of the

glaciations is 5% of the surface value, how deep must the hole be drilled?

Assume κ = 1 mm2 s−1.

Problem 4.28 Estimate the depth to which frost penetrates in the ground

at a latitude where the annual surface temperatures vary between −5 and

25◦C. Assume that the water content of the ground is sufficiently small so

that the latent heat can be ignored on freezing and thawing. Assume κ for

the soil is 0.8 mm2 s−1.

Problem 4.29 Estimate the effects of variations in bottom water tem-

perature on measurements of oceanic heat flow by using the model of a

semi-infinite half-space subjected to periodic surface temperature fluctua-

tions. Such water temperature variations at a specific location on the ocean

floor can be due to, for example, the transport of water with variable tem-

perature past the site by deep ocean currents. Find the amplitude of water

temperature variations that cause surface heat flux variations of 40 mWm−2

above and below the mean on a time scale of 1 day. Assume that the ther-

mal conductivity of sediments is 0.8 W m−1 K−1 and the sediment thermal

diffusivity is 0.2 mm2 s−1.

276 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.19 Phase shift and amplitude decay with depth of a time-periodic surface temperature variation.

Problem 4.30 Consider a semi-infinite half-space (y≥ 0) whose surface

temperature is given by Equation (4–72). At what values of ωt is the surface

heat flow zero?

4.15 Instantaneous Heating or Cooling of a Semi-Infinite

Half-Space

A number of important geological problems can be modeled by the instan-

taneous heating or cooling of a semi-infinite half-space. In the middle of the

nineteenth century Lord Kelvin used this solution to estimate the age of

the Earth. He assumed that the surface heat flow resulted from the cool-

ing of an initially hot Earth and concluded that the age of the Earth was

about 65 million years. We now know that this estimate was in error for two

reasons – the presence of radioactive isotopes in the mantle and solid-state

thermal convection in the mantle.

4.15 Instantaneous Heating or Cooling of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 277

Figure 4.20 Heating of a semi-infinite half-space by a sudden increase in surface temperature.

In many cases magma flows through preexisting joints or cracks. When

the flow commences, the wall rock is subjected to a sudden increase in tem-

perature. Heat flows from the hot magma into the cold country rock, thus

increasing its temperature. The temperature of the wall rock as a function of

time can be obtained by solving the one-dimensional, time-dependent heat

conduction equation for a semi-infinite half-space, initially at a uniform tem-

perature, whose surface is suddenly brought to a different temperature at

time t = 0 and maintained at this new temperature for later times.

This solution can also be used to determine the thermal structure of the

oceanic lithosphere. At the crest of an ocean ridge, hot mantle rock is sub-

jected to a cold surface temperature. As the seafloor spreads away from the

ridge crest, the near-surface rocks lose heat to the cold seawater. The cooling

near-surface rocks form the rigid oceanic lithosphere.

We now obtain the solution to Equation (4–68) in a semi-infinite half-

space defined by y > 0 whose surface is given an instantaneous change in

temperature. Initially at t = 0, the half-space has a temperature T1; for

t > 0, the surface y = 0 is maintained at a constant temperature T0. As a

result, heat is transferred into the half-space if T0 > T1, and the temperature

increases. If T1 > T0, the half-space cools, and its temperature decreases.

The situation is sketched in Figure 4–20 for the case T0 > T1.

The temperature distribution in the rock is the solution of Equation (4–

68) subject to the conditions

T = T1 at t = 0, y > 0

T = T0 at y = 0 t > 0

T → T1 as y → ∞ t > 0. (4.92)

The problem posed by Equations (4–68) and (4–92) is a familiar one in the

theory of partial differential equations. It can be solved in a rather straight-

forward way using an approach known as similarity. First, it is convenient

278 Heat Transfer

to introduce the dimensionless temperature ratio θ

θ = T − T1

T0 − T1 (4.93)

as a new unknown. The equation for θ is identical with the one for T ,

∂θ

∂t = κ

∂2θ

∂y2 , (4.94)

but the conditions on θ are simpler

θ(y, 0) = 0

θ(0, t) = 1

θ(∞, t) = 0. (4.95)

The similarity approach to determining θ is based on the idea that the only

length scale in the problem, that is, the only quantity that has the dimen-

sions of length other than y itself, is √ κt, the characteristic thermal diffusion

distance (recall that the diffusivity κ has dimensions of length2/time). It is

reasonable to suppose that, in this circumstance, θ is not a function of t and

y separately, but rather it is a function of the dimensionless ratio

η = y

2 √ κt . (4.96)

The factor of 2 is introduced to simplify the subsequent results. It is not only

reasonable that θ should depend only on η, but a theorem in dimensional

analysis shows that this must be the case.

The dimensionless parameter η is known as the similarity variable. The

solutions at different times are “similar” to each other in the sense that the

spatial dependence at one time can be obtained from the spatial dependence

at a different time by stretching the coordinate y by the square root of the

ratio of the times. We will see from the solution to this problem that the

characteristic thermal diffusion length is the distance over which the effects

of a sudden, localized change in temperature can be felt after a time t has

elapsed from the onset of the change.

The equations (4–94) and (4–95) must be rewritten in terms of η. This

requires that we determine the partial derivatives of θ with respect to t and

y in terms of derivatives with respect to η. This can be accomplished using

the chain rule for differentiation as follows:

∂θ

∂t = dθ

∂η

∂t = dθ

(

−1

4

y√ κt

1

t

)

= dθ

(

−1

2

η

t

)

(4.97)

4.15 Instantaneous Heating or Cooling of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 279

∂θ

∂y = dθ

∂η

∂y = dθ

1

2 √ κt

(4.98)

∂2θ

∂y2 =

1

2 √ κt

d2θ

dη2

∂η

∂y =

1

4

1

κt

d2θ

dη2 . (4.99)

Equation (4–94) becomes

−η dθ dη

= 1

2

d2θ

dη2 . (4.100)

The boundary conditions are easy to deal with; y = 0 maps into η = 0

and both y = ∞ and t = 0 map into η = ∞. Thus the conditions (4–95)

reduce to

θ(∞) = 0

θ(0) = 1. (4.101)

The fact that the introduction of the similarity variable reduces the par-

tial differential equation (4–94) to an ordinary differential equation (4–100)

with respect to η and reduces the separate conditions in t and y to consis-

tent conditions involving η alone, is a posteriori proof of the validity of the

approach.

Equation (4–100) can be integrated by letting

φ = dθ

dη . (4.102)

Rewriting Equation (4–100), we obtain

−ηφ = 1

2

dη (4.103)

or

−η dη = 1

2

φ . (4.104)

Integration of Equation (4–104) is straightforward:

−η2 = lnφ− ln c1, (4.105)

where − ln c1 is the constant of integration. It follows that

φ = c1e −η2 =

dη . (4.106)

Upon integrating Equation (4–106), we get

θ = c1

∫ η

0 e−η

′2 dη′ + 1, (4.107)

280 Heat Transfer

where η′ is a dummy variable of integration and the condition θ(0) = 1 was

used to evaluate the second constant of integration. Since θ(∞) = 0, we

must have

0 = c1

∫ ∞

0 e−η

′2 dη′ + 1. (4.108)

The integral in Equation (4–108) is well known:

∫ ∞

0 e−η

′2 dη′ =

√ π

2 . (4.109)

Thus the constant c1 is −2/ √ π and

θ = 1 − 2√ π

∫ η

0 e−η

′2 dη′. (4.110)

The function defined by the integral in Equation (4–110) occurs so often

in solutions of physical problems that it is given a special name, the error

function erf(η)

erf(η) ≡ 2√ π

∫ η

0 e−η

′2 dη′. (4.111)

Thus we can rewrite θ as

θ = 1 − erf(η) = erfc η (4.112)

where erfc(η) is the complementary error function. Values of the error func-

tion and the complementary error function are listed in Table 4–5. The

functions are also shown in Figure 4–21.

The solution for the temperature as a function of time t and distance y is

Equation (4–112). It can be written in terms of the original variables as

T − T1

T0 − T1 = erfc

y

2 √ κt . (4.113)

At y = 0, the complementary error function is 1 and T = T0. As y → ∞ or

t = 0, erfc is 0 and T = T1. The general solution for θ or (T −T1)/(T0 −T1)

is shown as erfc η in Figure 4–21.

The near-surface region in which there is a significant temperature change

is referred to as a thermal boundary layer. The thickness of the thermal

boundary layer requires an arbitrary definition, since the temperature T

approaches the initial rock temperature T1 asymptotically. We define the

thickness of the boundary layer yT as the distance to where θ = 0.1. This

distance changes with time as the half-space heats up or cools off. The con-

dition θ = 0.1 defines a unique value of the similarity variable ηT , however.

4.15 Instantaneous Heating or Cooling of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 281

Table 4.5 The Error Function and the Complementary Error Function

η erf η erfc η

0 0 1.0 0.02 0.022565 0.977435 0.04 0.045111 0.954889 0.06 0.067622 0.932378 0.08 0.090078 0.909922 0.10 0.112463 0.887537 0.15 0.167996 0.832004 0.20 0.222703 0.777297 0.25 0.276326 0.723674 0.30 0.328627 0.671373 0.35 0.379382 0.620618 0.40 0.428392 0.571608 0.45 0.475482 0.524518 0.50 0.520500 0.479500 0.55 0.563323 0.436677 0.60 0.603856 0.396144 0.65 0.642029 0.357971 0.70 0.677801 0.322199 0.75 0.711156 0.288844 0.80 0.742101 0.257899 0.85 0.770668 0.229332 0.90 0.796908 0.203092 0.95 0.820891 0.179109 1.0 0.842701 0.157299 1.1 0.880205 0.119795 1.2 0.910314 0.089686 1.3 0.934008 0.065992 1.4 0.952285 0.047715 1.5 0.966105 0.033895 1.6 0.976348 0.023652 1.7 0.983790 0.016210 1.8 0.989091 0.010909 1.9 0.992790 0.007210 2.0 0.995322 0.004678 2.2 0.998137 0.001863 2.4 0.999311 0.000689 2.6 0.999764 0.000236 2.8 0.999925 0.000075 3.0 0.999978 0.000022

From Equation (4–112) and Table (4–5) we obtain

ηT = erfc−10.1 = 1.16 (4.114)

282 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.21 The error function and the complementary error function.

and from Equation (4–96) we get

yT = 2ηT √ κt = 2.32

√ κt. (4.115)

The thickness of the thermal boundary layer is 2.32 times the characteristic

thermal diffusion distance √ κt.

Problem 4.31 Derive an expression for the thickness of the thermal

boundary layer if we define it to be the distance to where θ = 0.01.

Problem 4.32 If the surface temperature is increased 10 K, how long is

it before the temperature increases 2 K at a depth of 1 m (κ = 1 mm2 s−1)?

The heat flux at the surface y = 0 is given by differentiating Equation (4–

113) according to Fourier’s law and evaluating the result at y = 0 such

that

q = −k (

∂T

∂y

)

y=0

= −k(T0 − T1) ∂

∂y

(

erfc y

2 √ κt

)

y=0

= k(T0 − T1) ∂

∂y

(

erf y

2 √ κt

)

y=0

= k(T0 − T1)

2 √ κt

d

dη (erf η)η=0

= k(T0 − T1)

2 √ κt

(

2√ π e−η

2 )

η=0 = k(T0 − T1)√

πκt .

(4.116)

4.15 Instantaneous Heating or Cooling of a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 283

The surface heat flux q is infinite at t = 0 because of the sudden application

of the temperature T0 at t = 0. However, q decreases with time, and the

total heat into the semi-infinite half-space up to any time, Q, is finite; it is

given by the integral of Equation (4–116) from t = 0 to t

Q =

∫ t

0 q dt′ =

2k(T0 − T1)√ κπ

√ t. (4.117)

Except for the factor π−1/2 the heat flux into the rock is k times the tem-

perature difference (T0 − T1) divided by the thermal diffusion length √ κt.

In the mid-1800s William Thompson, later Lord Kelvin, used the theory

for the conductive cooling of a semi-infinite half-space to estimate the age

of the Earth. He hypothesized that the Earth was formed at a uniform high

temperature T1 and that its surface was subsequently maintained at the low

temperature T0. He assumed that a thin near-surface boundary layer devel-

oped as the Earth cooled. Since the boundary layer would be thin compared

with the radius of the Earth, he reasoned that the one-dimensional model

developed above could be applied. From Equation (4–116) he concluded that

the age of the Earth t0 was given by

t0 = (T1 − T0)

2

πκ(∂T/∂y)20 , (4.118)

where (∂T/∂y)0 is the present near-surface thermal gradient. With (∂T/∂y)0 =

25 K km−1, T1−T0 = 2000 K, and κ = 1 mm2 s−1, the age of the Earth from

Equation (4–118) is t0 = 65 million years. It was not until radioactivity was

discovered about 1900 that this estimate was seriously questioned.

Problem 4.33 One way of determining the effects of erosion on subsurface

temperatures is to consider the instantaneous removal of a thickness l of

ground. Prior to the removal T = T0 + βy, where y is the depth, β is

the geothermal gradient, and T0 is the surface temperature. After removal,

the new surface is maintained at temperature T0. Show that the subsurface

temperature after the removal of the surface layer is given by

T = T0 + βy + βl erf

(

y

2 √ κt

)

.

How is the surface heat flow affected by the removal of surface material?

Problem 4.34 Determine the effect of a glacial epoch on the surface

geothermal gradient as follows. At the start of the glacial epoch t = −τ , the subsurface temperature is T0 +βy. The surface is y = 0, and y increases

downward. During the period of glaciation the surface temperature drops to

284 Heat Transfer

T0 − ∆T0. At the end of the glacial period, t = 0, the surface temperature

again rises to T0. Find the subsurface temperature T (y, t) and the surface

heat flow for t > −τ . If the last glaciation began at 13,000 year BP and

ended 8000 year BP and ∆T0 = 20 K (κ = 1 mm2 s−1, k = 3.3 W m−1

K−1), determine the effect on the present surface heat flow.

HINT: Use the idea of superposition to combine the elementary solutions

to the heat conduction equation in such a way as to develop the solution of

this problem without having to solve a differential equation again.

Problem 4.35 One technique for measuring the thermal conductivity of

sediments involves the insertion of a very thin cylinder, or needle, heated by

an internal heater wire at a known and constant rate, into the sediments. A

small thermistor inside the needle measures the rise of temperature T with

time t. After the heater has been on for a short time, measurements of T

show a linear growth with ln t,

T = c1 ln t+ c2.

The sediment conductivity can be deduced from the slope of a T versus ln

t plot, c1, with the aid of a theoretical formula you can derive as follows.

Consider the temperature field due to an infinite line source that emits

Q units of heat per unit time and per unit length for times t > 0 in an

infinite medium initially at temperature T0. Determine T (r, t) by solving

Equation (4–70) subject to the appropriate initial and boundary conditions.

HINT: A similarity solution with the similarity variable η = r2/4κt works.

In fact, the solution is

T − T0 = Q

4πk

∫ ∞

η

e−η ′

η′ dη′. (4.119)

The integral ∫∞ η (1/η′)e−η

dη′ is known as the exponential integral E1(η).

Thus T −T0 = (Q/4πk)E1(η). The function E1(η) can be evaluated numer-

ically and tabulated, just as the error function. (Values of E1(η) are given

in Table 8–4.) Furthermore, it can be shown that for η sufficiently small (t

large enough)

E1(η) = −γ − ln η + · · · , (4.120)

where γ is Euler’s constant 0.5772156649. . . . Thus, after a sufficiently long

time,

T − T0 = Q

4πk (−γ − ln η + · · ·)

= −Qγ 4πk

− Q

4πk ln

r2

4κt + · · ·

4.16 Cooling of the Oceanic Lithosphere 285

= −Qγ 4πk

− Q

4πk ln r2

4κ +

Q

4πk ln t+ · · · .

(4.121)

The measured slope c1 is thus Q/4πk, and, with Q known, k can be deter-

mined.

Problem 4.36 Displacements along faults can bring rock masses with

different temperatures into sudden contact. Thrust sheets result in the em-

placement of buried crustal rocks above rocks that were previously at the

surface. The transform faults that offset ocean ridge segments juxtapose

oceanic lithospheres of different ages. Consider therefore how temperature

varies with time and position when two semi-infinite half-spaces initially

at temperatures T−(y < 0) and T+(y > 0) are placed adjacent to each other

along y = 0 at time t = 0. Show that T is given by

T = (T+ + T−)

2 +

(T+ − T−)

2 erf

(

y

2 √ κt

)

. (4.122)

Consider also how temperature varies with time and depth for a situation

in which the initial temperature distribution in a half-space (y > 0) is T =

T1 for 0<y<b and T = T2 for y >b. Assume that the surface y = 0 is

maintained at T =T0 for t> 0 and that T → T2 as y →∞ for t > 0. Show

that T (y, t) is given by

T = (T1 − T0)erf

(

y

2 √ κt

)

+ (T2 − T1)

2

× {

erf (y − b)

2 √ κt

+ erf (y + b)

2 √ κt

}

+ T0. (4.123)

4.16 Cooling of the Oceanic Lithosphere

As we have already noted, the solution developed in Section 4–15 is also

relevant to the cooling of the oceanic lithosphere adjacent to a mid-ocean

ridge. In Chapter 1 we discussed how the mid-ocean ridge system is asso-

ciated with ascending mantle convection. The surface plates on either side

of the ridge move horizontally with a velocity u, as illustrated in Figure 4–

22. The plates are created from the hot mantle rock that is flowing upward

beneath the ridge. This rock is cooled by the seawater and forms the rigid

plates that move away from the ridge. Since the oceanic lithosphere is the

surface plate that moves rigidly over the deeper mantle, it can be identi-

fied with the part of the upper mantle whose temperature is less than some

value below which mantle rocks do not readily deform over geologic time.

286 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.22 Schematic of the cooling oceanic lithosphere.

Figure 4.23 The solid lines are isotherms, T − T0 (K), in the oceanic lithosphere from Equation (4–125). The data points are the thicknesses of the oceanic lithosphere in the Pacific determined from studies of Rayleigh wave dispersion data (Leeds et al., 1974).

High-temperature deformation of rocks in the laboratory indicates that this

temperature is about 1600 K. Thus we can think of the lithosphere as the

region between the surface and a particular isotherm, as shown in the figure.

The depth to this isotherm increases with the age of the lithosphere; that

is, the lithosphere thickens as it moves farther from the ridge, since it has

more time to cool. We refer to the age of the lithosphere as the amount of

time t required to reach the distance x from the ridge (because of symmetry

we consider x positive); t = x/u.

The temperature of the rock at the ridge crest x = 0 and beneath the plate

is T1. The seawater cools the surface to the temperature T0. Thus, a column

of mantle is initially at temperature T1, and its surface is suddenly brought

to the temperature T0. As the column moves away from the ridge, its sur-

face temperature is maintained at T0, and it gradually cools. This problem is

identical to the sudden cooling of a half-space, treated in Section 4–15, if we

neglect horizontal heat conduction compared with vertical heat conduction.

4.16 Cooling of the Oceanic Lithosphere 287

Figure 4.23 Vertical columns of mantle and lithosphere moving horizontally away from the ridge and cooling vertically to the surface (t2 > t1 > 0).

This is a good approximation as long as the lithosphere is thin. With hori-

zontal heat conduction neglected, heat conduction is vertical in columns of

mantle and lithosphere, as it is in the half-space problem. Although a thin

column may not resemble a semi-infinite half-space, the essential feature

both have in common that makes the cooling problem identical for both

is the vertical heat conduction. Figure 4–23 illustrates columns of mantle

moving laterally away from the ridge and cooling to the surface.

To adapt the half-space sudden cooling solution to the oceanic lithosphere

cooling situation, let t = x/u, and rewrite Equation (4–113) as

T1 − T

T1 − T0 = erfc

(

y

2 √

κx/u

)

. (4.124)

This can be further rearranged as

T1 − T

T1 − T0 = 1 − T − T0

T1 − T0 = 1 − erf

(

y

2 √

κx/u

)

and T − T0

T1 − T0 = erf

(

y

2 √

κx/u

)

. (4.125)

According to Equation (4–125) the surface temperature is T0, since erf

(0) = 0 and T → T1 as the depth y → ∞, since erf(∞) = 1. Figure 4–24

shows the isotherms beneath the ocean surface as a function of the age of

the seafloor for T1 − T0 = 1300 K, and κ = 1 mm2 s−1. The isotherms

in Figure 4–24 have the shape of parabolas. The thickness of the oceanic

lithosphere yL can be obtained directly from Equation (4–115) by replacing

t with x/u:

yL = 2.32(κt)1/2 = 2.32

(

κx

u

)1/2

. (4.126)

With κ = 1 mm2 s−1 the thickness of the lithosphere at an age of 80 Myr is

288 Heat Transfer

116 km. It should be emphasized that the thickness given in Equation (4–

126) is arbitrary in that it corresponds to (T − T0)/(T1 − T0) = 0.9. Also

included in Figure 4–24 are thicknesses of the oceanic lithosphere in the

Pacific obtained from studies of Rayleigh wave dispersion.

The surface heat flux q0 as a function of age and distance from the ridge

crest is given by Equation (4–116)

q0 = k(T1 − T0)√

πκt = k(T1 − T0)

(

u

πκx

)1/2

. (4.127)

This is the surface heat flow predicted by the half-space cooling model.

Many measurements of the surface heat flow in the oceans have been

carried out and there is considerable scatter in the results. A major cause of

this scatter is hydrothermal circulations through the oceanic crust. The heat

loss due to these circulations causes observed heat flows to be systematically

low. Lister et al. (1990) considered only measurements in thick sedimentary

cover that blocked hydrothermal circulations. Their values of surface heat

flow are given in Figure 4–25 as a function of the age of the seafloor. The

results, for the half-space cooling model from Equation (4–127) are compared

with the observations taking k = 3.3 W m−1 K−1 and the other parameter

values as above. Quite good agreement is found at younger ages but the data

appear to lie above the theoretical prediction for older ages. This discrepancy

will be discussed in detail in later sections.

The cumulative area of the ocean floor A as a function of age, that is,

the area of the seafloor with ages less than a specified value, is given in

Figure 4–26. The mean age of the seafloor is 60.4 Myr. Also included in

Figure 4–26 is the cumulative area versus age for a model seafloor that has

been produced at a rate dA/dt = 0.0815 m2 s−1 and subducted at an age

τ of 120.8 Myr (dashed line). This is the average rate of seafloor accretion

over this time. It should be noted that the present rate of seafloor accretion

is about 0.090 m2 s−1; very close to the long-term average value.

For a constant rate of seafloor production and for subduction at an age

τ , the mean oceanic heat flow q̄0 is

q̄0 = 1

τ

∫ τ

0 q0 dt =

1

τ

∫ τ

0

k(T1 − T0)√ πκt

dt = 2k(T1 − T0)√

πκτ .

(4.128)

Taking τ = 120.8 Myr and the other parameters as above, we find that

the mean oceanic heat flow is q̄0 = 78.5 mW m−2. This is in reasonable

agreement with the mean value of oceanic heat flow measurements (101 mW

m−2) given in Section 4–4. This agreement is somewhat fortuitous since

4.16 Cooling of the Oceanic Lithosphere 289

Figure 4.25 Heat flow as a function of the age of the ocean floor. The data points are from sediment covered regions of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (Lister et al., 1990). Comparisons are made with the half-space cooling model (HSCM) from Equation (4–127) and the plate model from Equation (4–133) with yL0 =95 km (PM 95) and with yL0 =125 km (PM 125).

the data are not evenly distributed with respect to the age of the seafloor;

oceanic heat flow data are also biased toward areas of the seafloor that are

well covered by sediments. Nevertheless, we can conclude that a substantial

fraction of the heat lost from the interior of the Earth is directly attributable

to the cooling of the oceanic lithosphere. An oceanic geotherm corresponding

to the mean age of 60.4 Myr as obtained from Equation (4–125) is given in

Figure 4–27.

So far we have discussed only the oceanic lithosphere. We can also ap-

ply the one-dimensional cooling model to the continental lithosphere and

compare the surface heat flow predicted by the model with heat flow mea-

surements. The heat flow values that are relevant to this purpose are the

reduced heat flows defined in Section 4–8. Recall that the reduced heat

flux is the mantle contribution to the surface heat flow; it is deduced from

the correlation of the surface heat flow with the surface concentration of

heat-producing radioactive isotopes (see Equation (4–29) and Figure 4–11).

Reduced heat flux values for several geological provinces are plotted against

290 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.26 Cumulative area of seafloor A as a function of age t (the area of seafloor with ages younger than a given age) (solid lines). The dashed line is a cumulative area function for a model seafloor produced at a constant rate of 0.0815 m2 s−1, and subducted at an age of 120.8 Myr.

the ages of the provinces in Figure 4–28. If the mantle heat flow in conti-

nental areas were due to the conductive cooling of the lithosphere, qm would

be given by Equation (4–127) with t the age of the continental crust. The

prediction of this equation for k = 3.3 W m−1 K−1, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, and

T1−T0 = 1300 K is also shown in Figure 4–28. Clearly, the values of mantle

heat flow deduced from observations lie considerably above the conductive

cooling prediction for the older provinces. The measured values correlate

better with a constant mantle heat flow of 25 mW m−2 for ages between

500 Myr and 2.5 Gyr. This correlation is strong evidence that there is an

additional heat input to the base of the continental lithosphere caused by

mantle convection; this heat input is very close to the mean mantle heat

flow qm = 28 mW m−2 given in Section 4–5.

4.17 Plate Cooling Model of the Lithosphere

As discussed earlier, observations show that the half-space cooling model

does not predict the time evolution of the continental lithosphere. The con-

tinental lithosphere does not continue to thicken with age but instead ap-

4.17 Plate Cooling Model of the Lithosphere 291

Figure 4.27 Mean oceanic geotherm determined from Equation (4–125) with t =60.4 Myr.

proaches an equilibrium, time-independent thermal structure. This result

requires heating of the base of the continental lithosphere by mantle convec-

tion. The surface heat flow data from the ocean basins given in Figure 4–25

show that there is also basal heating of the oceanic lithosphere. To account

for this basal heating, we introduce the plate cooling model.

Consider the instantaneous heating or cooling of a finite thickness plate.

Since our application is to the lithosphere, we take the plate thickness to be

yL0, the thickness of the lithosphere at large times. The infinitely long plate

fills the region 0 ≤ y ≤ yL0. The temperature in the plate is a solution of

the one-dimensional unsteady heat conduction equation (4–68).

Initially at t = 0 the plate is at the temperature T1; for t > 0, the surface

of the plate y = 0 is maintained at the temperature T0. The base of the

plate y = yL0 is maintained at the temperature T1. These conditions can be

written as

T = T1 at t = 0, 0 ≤ y ≤ yL0

T = T0 at y = 0, t > 0

292 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.28 Dependence of the mantle heat flow on age for several conti- nental geological provinces. The solid line is the predicted heat flow for a conductively cooling continental lithosphere from Equation (4–127), and the dashed line is a constant mantle heat flow of 25 mW m−2. Data are from Sclater et al. (1980).

T = T1 at y = yL0, t > 0. (4.129)

The solution of Equation (4–68) that satisfies the initial and boundary

conditions given in Equation (4–129) can be obtained in the form of an

infinite series. A detailed derivation of the solution has been given by Carslaw

and Jaeger (1959, p. 100). The result can be written as

T = T0 + (T1 − T0)

[

y

yL0 +

2

π

∞ ∑

n=1

1

n exp

(

−κn 2π2t

y2 L0

)

sin

(

nπy

yL0

)

]

. (4.130)

At large times, t ≫ y2 L0/κ, an equilibrium linear temperature profile is es-

tablished:

T = T0 + (T1 − T0) y

yL0 . (4.131)

At small times, t≪ y2 L0/κ, the half-space cooling solution given in Section 4–

16 is recovered. The deviations from the half-space cooling solution are well

approximated if only the first two terms of the expansion given in Equation

(4–130) are retained, with the result

T = T0 + (T1 − T0)

[

y

yL0 +

2

π exp

(

−κπ 2t

y2 L0

)

sin

4.17 Plate Cooling Model of the Lithosphere 293

(

πy

yL0

)

+ 1

π exp

(

−4κπ2t

y2 L0

)

sin

(

2πy

yL0

)]

.

(4.132)

We can obtain the surface heat flow q0 as a function of age t from Equa-

tions (4–1) and (4–130) as

q0 = k(T1 − T0)

yL0

[

1 + 2 ∞ ∑

n=1

exp

(

−κn 2π2t

y2 L0

)

]

.

(4.133)

For large times, t≫ y2 L0/κ, the equilibrium value of the surface heat flow is

q0e = k(T1 − T0)

yL0 . (4.134)

We can approximate the deviations of the surface heat flow from the half-

space cooling result given in Equation (4–127) by retaining the first two

terms of the expansion in Equation (4–133) with the result

q0 = k(T1 − T0)

yL0

[

1 + 2 exp

(

−κπ 2t

y2 L0

)

+ 2exp

(

−4κπ2t

y2 L0

)]

. (4.135)

For large times t → ∞ the heat flow from Equation (4–135) approaches the

equilibrium heat flow in Equation (4–134).

We next compare the predictions of the plate model with the heat flow

compilation as a function of seafloor age given in Figure 4–25. Comparisons

are made for two values of plate thickness, yL0 = 95 and 125 km, and for

other parameter values as before. For yL0 = 95 km, the equilibrium t → ∞ heat flow from Equation (4–134) is q0e = 45 mW m−2, and for yL0 = 125 km,

we have q0e = 34 mW m−2. At ages of less than about 50 Ma, the half-space

cooling model and the plate models give the same results. At these ages,

the thickness of the thermal boundary layer is less than the thickness of the

plate, so the presence of a finite plate thickness has no effect. At older ages,

the specified plate thickness restricts the growth of the thermal boundary

layer and the heat flows predicted by the plate models are somewhat greater

than those predicted by the half-space cooling model. Further discussion

of the agreement between theories and observations will be postponed to

Section 4–23.

294 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.29 Growth of a solid layer at the surface of a cooling lava flow.

4.18 The Stefan Problem

A number of important geological problems involve the solidification of mag-

mas. We assume that the magma has a well-defined melt temperature at

which the phase change from liquid to solid occurs. Associated with this

phase change is a latent heat of fusion L. This is the amount of heat that is

liberated upon the solidification of 1 kg of magma. Heat conduction prob-

lems involving phase changes differ from problems we have already solved in

two major ways. First, we have to determine as part of the solution where

the phase change boundary, that is, the interface between solid and liquid,

is located. The position of this boundary obviously changes as solidification

proceeds. Second, we have to account for the latent heat of fusion, which

is liberated at the solid–liquid interface as solidification takes place; this

additional heat must be conducted away from the phase change boundary.

The first problem we consider is that of a horizontal layer of magma that

is solidifying from its upper surface downward as a result of being cooled

from above. We assume that the upper surface is maintained at a constant

temperature T0. An example of this would be the solidification of a lava

flow. Because of heat loss to the surface the solid layer grows thicker with

time. A lava flow also solidifies at its base. However, if we assume that the

magma is extruded at its melt temperature, then as long as there is still

a liquid region, the solidification from the top and bottom can be treated

independently. This also means that the overall flow thickness is unimportant

in describing the solidification process as long as a molten region is present.

In this section, we will consider the solidification from above; in the next

section, we will treat the solidification from below. The solidification of a

lava flow from above is essentially identical with the freezing of a lake. This

is the problem for which Stefan (1891) first obtained the solution developed

below.

4.18 The Stefan Problem 295

The problem we solve is illustrated in Figure 4–29. The flow has solidified

to the depth y = ym(t). We assume that molten material of uniform tem-

perature Tm lies everywhere below the growing surface layer. The fact that

the molten region does not extend infinitely far below the surface is of no

consequence to the solution. We must solve the heat conduction equation

(4–68) in the space 0 ≤ y ≤ ym(t) subject to the conditions T = T0 at y = 0,

T = Tm at y = ym(t), and ym = 0 at t = 0. The position of the solidification

boundary is an a priori unknown function of time. As in the case of the

sudden heating, or cooling, of a semi-infinite half-space, there is no length

scale in this problem. For this reason, we once again introduce the dimen-

sionless coordinate η = y/2 √ κt as in Equation (4–96); it is also convenient

to introduce the dimensionless temperature θ = (T − T0)/(Tm − T0) as in

Equation (4–93).

The dimensionless coordinate η is obtained by scaling the depth with the

thermal diffusion length √ κt because there is no other length scale in the

problem. Similarly, the depth of the solidification interface ym must also scale

with the thermal diffusion length in such a way that ym/ √ κt is a constant.

In other words, the depth of the solidification boundary increases with time

proportionately with the square root of time. We have used dimensional

arguments to determine the functional form of the dependence of ym on t,

a nontrivial result. Because η = y/2 √ κt and ym is proportional to

√ κt, the

solidification boundary corresponds to a constant value ηm = ym/2 √ κt of

the similarity coordinate η. We denote this constant value by ηm = λ1. Thus

we have

ym = 2λ1

√ κt. (4.136)

With our definitions of θ and η, the heat conduction equation for θ(η)

is clearly identical to Equation (4–100), whose solution we already know to

be proportional to erf(η). This form of solution automatically satisfies the

condition θ = 0(T = T0) on η = 0(y = 0). To satisfy the remaining condition

that θ = 1(T = Tm) at η = ηm(y = ym) = λ1, we need simply choose the

constant of proportionality appropriately. The solution is

θ = erf(η)

erf(λ1) . (4.137)

Equation (4–137) determines the temperature in the solidified layer 0 ≤ y ≤ ym. In the molten region y > ym, T = Tm and θ = 1.

The constant λ1 is determined by requiring that the latent heat liberated

at the solidification boundary be conducted vertically upward, away from

the interface. The situation at the solidification boundary is illustrated in

296 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.30 Latent heat released at the solidification boundary must be conducted upward through the solidified layer.

Figure 4–30. In time δt, the interface moves downward a distance (dym/dt)δt.

In so doing, a mass per unit area ρ(dym/dt)δt is solidified, thus releasing an

amount of latent heat ρL(dym/dt)δt per unit area. Conservation of energy

requires that this heat release be conducted away from the boundary at

precisely the rate at which it is liberated. The heat cannot be conducted

downward because the magma is at a constant temperature; moreover, heat

flows toward cooler temperatures that lie upward. Fourier’s law gives the

rate of upward heat conduction per unit time and per unit area at y = ym as k(∂T/∂y)y=ym . Multiplying this by δt and equating it to ρL(dym/dt)δt

gives the equation for finding λ1.

ρL dym dt

= k

(

∂T

∂y

)

y=ym

. (4.138)

From Equation (4–136) the speed of the solidification boundary is

dym dt

= λ1

√ κ√ t . (4.139)

From Equation (4–137) the temperature gradient at y = ym is (

∂T

∂y

)

y=ym

=

(

)

η=ηm=λ1

(

∂η

∂y

)

(Tm − T0)

= (Tm − T0)

2 √ κT

2√ π e−λ

2 1

1

erfλ1 . (4.140)

Substituting Equations (4–139) and (4–140) into Equation (4–138), we get

L √ π

c(Tm − T0) =

e−λ 2 1

λ1 erfλ1 , (4.141)

4.18 The Stefan Problem 297

Figure 4.31 The right side of the transcendental equation for determining the growth of a solid layer at the surface of a cooling lava flow.

a transcendental equation for determining λ1. Given a numerical value for

the left side of Equation (4–141), λ1 can be found by iteratively calculating

the right side of the equation until agreement is found. Alternatively, the

right side of Equation (4–141) can be plotted as a function of λ1, as in

Figure 4–31, and the solution, for a particular value of the left side of the

equation, can be found graphically.

This theory can be compared directly with observations. The thickness

of the crusts on three lava lakes on the Hawaiian volcano Kilauea have

been measured as functions of time. Eruptions produced lava lakes in the

pit craters Kilauea Iki in 1959, Alae in 1963, and Makaopuhi in 1965. A

photograph of the initial formation of the crust on the lava lake in the Alae

pit crater is given in Figure 4–32. The thicknesses of the solidifying crusts

on the three lava lakes are given as functions of time after the eruptions in

Figure 4–33. For L = 400 kJ kg−1, c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, and Tm−T0 = 1050 K,

Equation (4–141) gives λ1 = 0.876. With this value of λ1 and κ = 0.7 mm2

s−1, we can determine the thickness of a solidifying crust as a function of

298 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.32 Photograph of the lava lake formed in the pit crater Alae during the 1963 eruption. A solid crust is just beginning to form on the magma (D. L. Peck 19, U.S. Geological Survey).

time from Equation (4–136). The result plotted in Figure 4–33 shows quite

good agreement between the observations and theory.

Problem 4.37 A body of water at 0◦C is subjected to a constant surface

temperature of −10◦C for 10 days. How thick is the surface layer of ice? Use

L = 320 kJ kg−1, k = 2 J m−1 s−1 K−1, c = 4 kJ kg−1 K−1, ρ = 1000 kg

m−3.

Problem 4.38 Scientists believe that early in its evolution, the Moon was

covered by a magma ocean with a depth of 50 km. Assuming that the magma

was at its melt temperature of 1500 K and that the surface of the Moon was

maintained at 500 K, how long did it take for the magma ocean to solidify

if it was cooled from the surface? Take L = 320 kJ kg−1, κ = 1 mm2 s−1,

and c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1.

Problem 4.39 One of the estimates for the age of the Earth given by

Lord Kelvin in the 1860s assumed that Earth was initially molten at a

constant temperature Tm and that it subsequently cooled by conduction

with a constant surface temperature T0. The age of the Earth could then be

determined from the present surface thermal gradient (dT/dy)0. Reproduce

Kelvin’s result assuming Tm−T0 = 1700 K, c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, L = 400 kJ

kg−1, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, and (dT/dy)0 = 25 K km−1. In addition, determine

the thickness of the solidified lithosphere. Note: Since the solidified layer is

4.18 The Stefan Problem 299

Figure 4.33 The thicknesses of the solidifying crusts on the lava lakes in the three pit craters Kilauea lki (1959), Alae (1963), and Makaopuhi (1965) on the volcano Kilauea, Hawaii (Wright et al. 1976). The theoretical curve is from Equations (4–136) and (4–141).

thin compared with the Earth’s radius, the curvature of the surface may be

neglected.

Problem 4.40 Consider the solidification near the upper surface of a lava

flow. Compute the surface heat flux q0 as a function of time. Integrate q0 over time, and compare the result with the latent heat release up to that

time, ρLym.

Problem 4.41 Generalize the solution for the solidification of the top of a

lava lake to the situation where the lava is initially at a uniform temperature

Tv greater than the solidification temperature Tm. Assume that the lava

extends to great depth y → ∞ and that T → Tv as y → ∞ for all t. Also

assume that T = T0 at y = 0 for all t. Assume that the molten lava and the

solidified layer near the surface have the same thermal properties.

HINT: You have to modify the energy balance condition at the solid–liquid

interface to account for heat conduction in the liquid.

300 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.34 (a) Photograph of a large sill on Finger Mountain, Victoria, Victoria Land, Antarctica (W. B. Hamilton 384, U.S. Geological Survey). (b) Photograph of a small dike offset along a joint (J. P. Lockwood 1, U.S. Geological Survey).

Problem 4.42 The oceanic crust is believed to form from the solidification

of a large magma chamber beneath the ridge crest. Use the Stefan solution

to determine the width of the magma chamber at its base. Let L = 400 kJ

kg−1, c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, Tm − T0 = 1300 K, u = 50 mm yr−1, κ = 1 mm2

s−1, and the thickness of the oceanic crust is 6 km.

Problem 4.43 The mantle rocks of the asthenosphere from which the

lithosphere forms are expected to contain a small amount of magma. If the

mass fraction of magma is 0.05, determine the depth of the lithosphere–

asthenosphere boundary for oceanic lithosphere with an age of 60 Ma. As-

sume L = 400 kJ kg−1, c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, Tm = 1600 K, T0 = 275 K, and

κ = 1 mm2 s−1.

4.19 Solidification of a Dike or Sill

A large fraction of the magma coming from the interior of the Earth does not

reach the surface but instead solidifies as intrusive igneous bodies. Two of the

simplest types of intrusive bodies are sills and dikes. A sill is a horizontal

layer of solidified rock, and a dike is its vertical counterpart. These one-

dimensional structures are illustrated in Figure 4–34. We will now consider

the problem of the solidification of a dike or sill. The solidifying magma loses

heat by conduction to the adjacent country rock.

Our model for dike or sill solidification is illustrated in Figure 4–35. The

plane y = 0 defines the original magma–rock boundary. The dike or sill

occupies the region −2b < y < 0. Initially at t = 0 the molten rock in the

dike is at its melt temperature Tm, and the wall rock is at the temperature

4.19 Solidification of a Dike or Sill 301

Figure 4.35 Initial temperature distribution at t = 0 (T= T0 for y> 0, T= Tm for −2b< y< 0) and subsequent temperature distribution at t = t1 when the solidification boundary is at y = ym(t).

T0. At time t = 0, the dike begins solidifying at the interface y = 0. Figure 4–

35 shows the temperature distribution initially at t = 0 and at a later time

t1. The liquid part of the dike −2b < y < ym(t) is still at temperature Tm,

but the solidified part ym < y < 0 has cooled below Tm. The surrounding

rock near the dike has been warmed above T0 by the release of the latent

heat of fusion, but T → T0 far from the dike y → ∞.

We assume that the physical properties of the country rock and solid-

ified magma are the same. Therefore the temperature satisfies the one-

dimensional, time-dependent heat conduction equation (4–68) in the region

y > ym(t). The boundary conditions are that T = Tm at y = ym(t) and

T → T0 as y → ∞; the initial condition is that T = T0 for y > 0 and

ym = 0. Once again Equation (4–138) provides a balance between the heat

conducted away from the solidification interface and the heat released by

the solidification. We use the same method of solution as in the previ-

ous section and introduce the dimensionless variables η = y/(2 √ κt) and

θ = (T − T0)/(Tm − T0).

In this problem the position of the solidification boundary ym is negative

so that ηm = ym/(2 √ κt) is also negative. We denote this constant value by

ηm = −λ2. Thus we have

ym = −2λ2

√ κt. (4.142)

302 Heat Transfer

The dimensionless temperature in the region η > −λ2 satisfies Equation (4–

100). We have previously shown that a solution of this equation is propor-

tional to erfc η. Such a solution also satisfies the condition θ → 0(T → T0)

as η → ∞(y → ∞). In order to satisfy the condition that θ= 1 (T =Tm) at

η= ηm =−λ2(y= ym), we need simply to choose the constant of proportion-

ality appropriately. The solution is clearly

θ = erfc η

erfc(−λ2) . (4.143)

From the definition of erfc in Equation (4–112) and the property erf (−x) =

−erf x we obtain

erfc(−λ2) = 1 − erf(−λ2) = 1 + erf λ2. (4.144)

Substitution of Equation (4–144) into Equation (4–143) gives

θ = erfc η

1 + erf λ2 . (4.145)

The temperature of the boundary between the country rock and the solidified

magma η = 0(y = 0) is

θ(0) = 1

1 + erf λ2 . (4.146)

The temperature of this boundary is therefore constant while solidification

is occurring.

In order to determine the constant λ2, we must once again use the heat

balance at the solidification boundary given in Equation (4–138). The speed

of this boundary is obtained by differentiating Equation (4–142)

dym dt

= −λ2

(

κ

t

)1/2

. (4.147)

The temperature gradient at y = ym is obtained by differentiating Equa-

tion (4–145). (

∂T

∂y

)

y=ym

=

(

)

η=−λ2

(

∂η

∂y

)

(Tm − T0)

= −(Tm − T0)

(πκt)1/2 e−λ

2 2

(1 + erf λ2) . (4.148)

Substitution of Equations (4–147) and (4–148) into Equation (4–138) gives

L √ π

c(Tm − T0) =

e−λ 2 2

λ2(1 + erf λ2) . (4.149)

4.19 Solidification of a Dike or Sill 303

Figure 4.36 The right side of the transcendental Equation (4–149) for de- termining the motion of the solidification boundary.

In terms of evaluating λ2, this equation plays the same role that Equation (4–

141) played in the Stefan problem. The right side of the equation is plotted as

a function of λ2 in Figure 4–36. Given a value for the left side of the equation,

λ2 may be determined graphically from the figure or more accurately by

iterative numerical calculations.

The time ts required to solidify a dike of width 2b can be obtained directly

from Equation (4–142). Solidification occurs symmetrically from the two

sides of the dike so that

ts = b2

4κλ2 2

. (4.150)

At t = ts all the magma has solidified.

Let us again consider a numerical example. Taking L = 320 kJ kg−1,

Tm − T0 = 1000 K, and c = 1.2 kJ kg−1 K−1, we find from Equation (4–

149) (Figure 4–36) that λ2 = 0.73. With this value of λ2, b = 1 m, and

κ = 0.5 mm2 s−1, we find from Equation (4–150) that the time required

to solidify this intrusion is 10.9 days. The temperature at the boundary

304 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.37 Temperature profiles at different times during dike solidifica- tion.

between the country rock and the solidified magma from Equation (4–139)

is T0+590 K. The temperature profiles at several times are given in Figure 4–

37.

Problem 4.44 Use the results of the sudden half-space heating problem,

Equation (4–117), to estimate the time required for dike solidification by

setting Q = ρLb. How does this time compare with the 10.9 days computed

in the example?

Problem 4.45 Consider the following model for the cooling and solidifica-

tion of an intrusive igneous body. Suppose that the region y < 0 is initially

solid with constant temperature T− and that the region y > 0 is initially

liquid with constant temperature T+. The igneous body cools and solidifies;

a solid–liquid interface at temperature Tm propagates into the region y > 0.

The melting temperature Tm is less than T+, but it is greater than T−. De-

termine ym, the position of the solidification boundary as a function of time

t. Find T in the regions y < 0, 0 < y < ym, and y >ym.

4.20 The Heat Conduction Equation in a Moving Medium:

Thermal Effects of Erosion and Sedimentation

A number of important problems in geology involve moving boundaries.

Examples include the solidification problems that we have just discussed;

4.20 The Heat Conduction Equation in a Moving Medium 305

Figure 4.38 Fixed (x, y) and moving (ξ, ζ) coordinate systems for the derivation of the heat conduction equation for a moving medium.

other examples involve erosion and sedimentation. One useful approach to

the solution of moving boundary problems is to consider the boundary fixed

and the material moving into the boundary. For this and other reasons it

is worthwhile to develop the form of the equation of heat conduction for a

moving medium. Let x, y be a fixed coordinate system, and assume that

the medium moves in the positive x direction with velocity U . Let ξ, ζ be

a coordinate system moving with the medium. The situation is sketched in

Figure 4–38. The coordinates x, y and ξ, ζ are thus related by

x = ξ + Ut y = ζ ∂2T

∂ζ2 . (4.151)

The heat conduction equation for an observer moving with the medium

is Equation (4–68) (generalized to two dimensions): (

∂T

∂t

)

ξ = κ

(

∂2T

∂ξ2 + ∂2T

∂ζ2

)

. (4.152)

To find the appropriate form of the heat conduction equation with respect to

the fixed coordinate system, we need to relate partial derivatives with respect

to ξ, ζ, t to partial derivatives with respect to x, y, t. From Equation (4–151)

we have (

∂T

∂t

)

ξ =

(

∂T

∂t

)

x + ∂T

∂x

dx

dt =

(

∂T

∂t

)

x + U

∂T

∂x ,

(4.153) (

∂T

∂ξ

)

t =

(

∂T

∂x

)

t

(

∂T

∂ζ

)

t =

(

∂T

∂y

)

t . (4.154)

Thus Equation (4–152) can be rewritten as

∂T

∂t + U

∂T

∂x = κ

(

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2

)

, (4.155)

where derivatives are understood to be taken with x or t held constant as

appropriate. The term U(∂T/∂x) is the advective derivative. An observer

306 Heat Transfer

moving with the medium and measuring temperature on a recorder cannot

distinguish between temperature variations resulting from motion through a

spatially varying temperature field U(∂T/∂x) and actual temporal variations

in temperature ∂T/∂t.

As an additional example of the use of Equation (4–155), consider the

oceanic lithosphere cooling problem. With respect to an observer moving

with a column of lithosphere, the relevant heat conduction equation is (4–

152), a point of view we have already taken. Alternatively, one could take a

larger view of the situation and consider a fixed observer viewing the whole

spreading process and measuring x from the ridge. That observer sees a

steady heat transfer problem described by Equation (4–155) with ∂T/∂t = 0

(and vertical heat conduction only):

U ∂T

∂x = κ

∂2T

∂y2 . (4.156)

These alternative ways of approaching the problem are, of course, equivalent

because the age of the seafloor is x/U .

Problem 4.46 Assume that a half-space with a deep temperature T∞ is being eroded at a constant velocity U . If the erosional surface is at a

temperature T0, determine the temperature as a function of the distance

from the surface.

Problem 4.47 Assume that a half-space y > 0 with a deep temperature

T∞ is being eroded such that ym = α √ t, where ym is the depth of the

instantaneous surface measured from the location of the surface at t = 0. If

the erosional surface is at a temperature T0, determine T (y, t) and the heat

flow at the surface.

HINT: Solve the problem in the y, t system and assume an artificial (un-

known) temperature at y = 0.

Problem 4.48 Suppose that upon entering the Earth’s atmosphere, the

surface of a meteorite has been heated to the melting point and the molten

material is carried away by the flow. It is of interest to calculate the rate at

which melting removes material from the meteorite. For this purpose, con-

sider the following problem. The surface of a semi-infinite half-space moves

downward into the half-space with constant velocity V , as indicated in Fig-

ure 4–39. The surface is always at the melting temperature Tm, and melted

material above the instantaneous surface is removed from the problem. As-

sume that the surface of the half-space is melted by a constant heat flux qm into the half-space from above the surface. Assume also that far from the

melting surface the temperature is T0; that is, T → T0 as ζ → ∞. Find the

4.21 One-Dimensional, Unsteady Heat Conduction in an Infinite Region 307

Figure 4.39 Model for the ablating meteorite problem.

temperature distribution in the half-space as a function of time T (ζ, t), and

determine V in terms of qm and the thermodynamic properties of the rock.

Account for the latent heat L required to melt the material.

4.21 One-Dimensional, Unsteady Heat Conduction in an Infinite

Region

The problem solved in Section 4–19 provides the temperature distribution

up until the time the dike or sill is completely solidified. To determine the

subsequent thermal history, we must solve the problem of one-dimensional

unsteady heat conduction in an infinite region with a specified initial tem-

perature distribution.

If the temperature distribution at t = 0 is T̄ (y), the temperature distri-

bution at subsequent times is

T = 1

2 √ πκt

∫ ∞

−∞ T̄ (y′)e−(y−y′)2/4κtdy′. (4.157)

This result is known as Laplace’s solution. For the dike or sill cooling prob-

lem, the temperature at the time of total solidification would be the initial

temperature distribution T̄ (y), and Equation (4–157) could then be used to

determine the subsequent temperature distribution. To do this would require

a numerical integration.

Instead, an approximate solution is possible if the temperature far from

the dike is considered. The heat content of the dike per unit area of the

dike–country rock interface is

Q = ρ[c(Tm − T0) + L]2b (4.158)

For | y | ≫ b, one can consider the dike to be a planar heat source located

at y = 0 containing Q units of heat per unit area at t = 0. At later times

this heat diffuses away from the origin, and we are interested in determining

308 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.40 Planar heat source containing Q units of heat at t =0.

how the temperature evolves as a function of distance from the origin and

time. The situation is sketched in Figure 4–40.

The temperature T (y, t) must satisfy the one-

dimensional, time-dependent heat conduction equation (4–68) subject to

the conditions T → T0 as |y| → ∞. An essential condition on the tempera-

ture distribution is that the heat content of all space must be the original

heat content of the dike,

ρc

∫ ∞

−∞ (T − T0) dy = 2ρc

∫ ∞

0 (T − T0) dy = Q,

(4.159)

for all t. In other words, the heat pulse supplied by the dike can spread out

as it diffuses away from the origin, but no heat can be lost from the medium.

A nondimensional form of the solution must be possible. The only quantity

with dimensions of length is the thermal diffusion length √ κt so that, once

again, the solution depends on the similarity variable η = y/2 √ κt. Because

this problem has no imposed temperature drop, T must be made dimension-

less with the specified initial heat content of the dike Q. A quantity with

units of temperature obtained from Q is

Q

2ρc √ κt ,

and the appropriate dimensionless temperature for this problem is

θ ≡ T − T0

Q/(2ρc √ κt)

. (4.160)

θ as defined in this equation depends only on η. The integral constraint on

4.21 One-Dimensional, Unsteady Heat Conduction in an Infinite Region 309

temperature (4–159) can be written in terms of θ as

2ρc

∫ ∞

0

Q

2ρc √ κt θ2

√ κt dη = Q

or ∫ ∞

0 θdη =

1

2 . (4.161)

The heat conduction equation must be rewritten in terms of θ. From

Equation (4–160) we have

∂T

∂t =

Q

2ρc √ κt

(−η 2t

)

+ Qθ

2ρc √ κ

(

−1

2

)

t−3/2

= −Qt−3/2

4ρc √ κ

(

η dθ

dη + θ

)

. (4.162)

Also, from Equation (4–160) one obtains

κ ∂2T

∂y2 =

κQ

2ρc √ κt

d2θ

dη2

1

4κt . (4.163)

Upon equating (4–162) and (4–163), we find

−2

(

η dθ

dη + θ

)

= d2θ

dη2 (4.164)

or

−2 d

dη (ηθ) =

d2θ

dη2 , (4.165)

which can be integrated to give

−2ηθ = dθ

dη + c1. (4.166)

The constant c1 must be zero because the temperature distribution must be

symmetric about the plane y = 0. This requires dθ/dη = 0 at η = 0. Thus

we have

−2ηdη = dθ

θ , (4.167)

which integrates to

θ = c2e −η2 . (4.168)

From the integral constraint (4–161) we can find c2 to be

∫ ∞

0 c2e

−η2dη = 1

2 = c2

√ π

2

310 Heat Transfer

or

c2 = 1√ π . (4.169)

Finally, the temperature distribution is

T − T0 = Q

2ρc √ πκt

e−y 2/4κt. (4.170)

At distances that are large compared with the width of the initial tempera-

ture distribution, the time dependence of the temperature is independent of

the initial temperature distribution and is proportional to the heat content

of the region.

The temperature at any distance y as given by Equation (4–170) increases

with time to a maximum value and then decreases. The time tmax when this

maximum occurs can be obtained by setting the time derivative of Equation

(4–170) equal to zero. The result is

tmax = y2

2κ . (4.171)

Except for a factor of 2, tmax is the thermal diffusion time corresponding

to the distance y. Substitution of Equation (4–171) into Equation (4–170)

gives the maximum temperature Tmax as a function of y,

Tmax = T0 + Q

ρcy

(

1

2πe

)1/2

. (4.172)

The maximum temperature is proportional to 1/y.

Applying these results to the example given at the end of Section 4–19,

we find Q = 8.8 × 109 J m−2 with the parameter values given for that

example and ρ = 2900 kg m−3. For the temperature distribution given in

Equation (4–170) to be valid, the time must be long compared with the

solidification time of 10.9 days. The temperature profiles from Equation (4–

170) at several times are given in Figure 4–41. The maximum temperature

as a function of distance from the center of the dike, from Equation (4–172),

is given in Figure 4–42. Calculations of this type can be used to determine

the distance from an intrusion that low-temperature metamorphic reactions

in the country rock can be expected.

4.22 Thermal Stresses

According to the laws of thermodynamics the equilibrium state of any ma-

terial is determined by any two state variables. Examples of state variables

4.22 Thermal Stresses 311

Figure 4.41 Temperatures as a function of distance from the center of a 2-m-wide intrusion at several times from Equation (4–170).

Figure 4.42 Maximum temperature as a function of distance from the cen- ter of a 2-m-wide intrusion from Equation (4–172).

include the temperature T , pressure p, and density ρ. In thermodynamics

it is often convenient to use the specific volume v (volume per unit mass)

rather than the density; the two variables are related by

v = 1

ρ . (4.173)

312 Heat Transfer

As a state variable, the specific volume can be related to the pressure and

temperature using the chain rule for partial differentiation

dv =

(

∂v

∂T

)

p dT +

(

∂v

∂p

)

T dp. (4.174)

The subscript indicates the variable that is held constant during the differ-

entiation; that is, (∂v/∂T )p is the partial derivative of volume with respect

to temperature at constant pressure.

The two partial derivatives appearing in Equation (4–174) are related

to well-known thermodynamic quantities. The isothermal compressibility β

of a material is its fractional change in volume with pressure at constant

temperature,

β = −1

v

(

∂v

∂p

)

T , (4.175)

and its volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion αv is its fractional change

in volume with temperature at constant pressure,

αv = 1

v

(

∂v

∂T

)

p . (4.176)

The coefficients β and αv are material properties that can be obtained from

laboratory experiments. We previously saw in Equation (3–55) how β is

related to the elastic properties of a material. Substitution of Equations (4–

175) and (4–176) into Equation (4–174) yields

dv = −vβ dp+ vαv dT. (4.177)

If a material is unconstrained, so that the pressure does not change (dp = 0)

when the temperature and volume change, Equation (4–177) implies

dv = vαv dT (4.178)

or

dρ = −ραv dT. (4.179)

If a material is confined, so that its volume cannot change (dv = 0), the

changes in temperature and pressure are related by

dp = αv β dT. (4.180)

Typical values of αv and β for rock are 3 × 10−5 K−1 and 10−11 Pa−1,

respectively. With these material properties and a temperature increase of

100 K, the increase in the confining pressure from Equation (4–180) is ∆p =

4.22 Thermal Stresses 313

300 MPa. The implication is that changes in temperature can lead to very

large changes in pressure or stress.

When temperature changes occur, the laws of linear elasticity must be

modified to include the thermally associated changes in volume. We have

seen that a temperature change ∆T produces a volume change ∆v = vαv∆T

in an unconstrained body. This change in volume is accompanied by the

strains

ε1 = ε2 = ε3 = −1

3 αv∆T (4.181)

if the body is isotropic. The minus sign on the right side of Equation (4–

181) arises because of the sign convention that treats contraction strains as

positive. The linear coefficient of thermal expansion αl relates the thermally

induced strains to the temperature change,

ε1 = ε2 = ε3 = −αl∆T or αl = 1

3 αv , (4.182)

so that the linear coefficient of thermal expansion is the change in the strain

in the material per degree change in temperature.

The total strain in a body is the sum of the stress-associated strains and

the temperature-associated strains. The stress-associated strains have been

written in Equations (3–4) to (3–6). If to these we add the thermal strains

of Equation (4–182), we obtain the total strain

ε1 = 1

E (σ1 − νσ2 − νσ3) − αl∆T (4.183)

ε2 = 1

E (−νσ1 + σ2 − νσ3) − αl∆T (4.184)

ε3 = 1

E (−νσ1 − νσ2 + σ3) − αl∆T. (4.185)

For a state of uniaxial stress we take σ1 = σ and σ2 = σ3 = 0. From

Equations (4–183) to (4–185) we obtain

ε1 = σ

E − αl∆T (4.186)

ε2 = ε3 = −ν E σ − αl∆T. (4.187)

For plane stress, σ3 = 0, and the equations of thermal elasticity reduce to

ε1 = 1

E (σ1 − νσ2) − αl∆T (4.188)

ε2 = 1

E (σ2 − νσ1) − αl∆T (4.189)

314 Heat Transfer

ε3 = − ν

E (σ1 + σ2) − αl∆T. (4.190)

For a state of isotropic stress σ1 = σ2 = σ3 = p, ε1 = ε2 = ε3 = ∆/3, and by

adding Equations (4–183) to (4–185) we find

∆ = 3

E (1 − 2ν)p− 3αl∆T. (4.191)

We previously identified the isothermal compressibility in Equation (3–55)

as

β = 3

E (1 − 2ν). (4.192)

This together with αl = αv/3 and ∆ = −dv/v shows that Equation (4–191)

is equivalent to Equation (4–177).

In Section 4–14, Equation (4–89), we obtained the temperature distribu-

tion in a semi-infinite half-space due to time periodic variation of the surface

temperature. Assuming that this half-space is a uniform elastic medium, we

can determine the resultant thermal stresses. Take the half-space to be con-

fined in the horizontal directions so that ε1 = ε2 = 0 and to be unconstrained

in the vertical direction so that σ3 = 0. From Equations (4–188) and (4–189)

we find

σ1 = σ2 = Eαl∆T

1 − ν . (4.193)

The temperature ∆T is measured relative to the temperature at which the

stress is zero. For the periodic heating of a semi-infinite half-space we as-

sume that at T = T0, the average temperature, the stress is zero. Therefore

substitution of Equation (4–89) into Equation (4–193) gives

σ1 = σ2 = Eαl∆T

(1 − ν) exp

(

−y √

ω

)

cos

(

ωt− y

ω

)

,

(4.194)

where ∆T is the actual amplitude of the periodic surface temperature vari-

ation about the average temperature. The maximum thermal stress is ob-

tained by setting y = t = 0 in Equation (4–194),

σmax = Eαl∆T

1 − ν . (4.195)

Let us take as typical values for rock E = 60 GPa, ν = 0.25, and αl =

10−5 K−1. If ∆T = 100 K, we find that σmax = 80 MPa.

In Section 3–4 we determined the elastic stresses resulting from sedimen-

tation and erosion. It was shown that the addition or removal of overburden

caused significant deviatoric stresses. However, when overburden is added or

4.22 Thermal Stresses 315

removed, the temperature at a given depth changes, and as a result thermal

stresses are generated. Because the equations of thermal elasticity are linear,

the thermal stresses can be added to those previously obtained.

We first consider near-surface rocks that have been buried to a depth h.

If sufficient time has elapsed to reestablish the normal geothermal gradient

β, the temperature increase of the surface rocks is βh. Again assuming no

horizontal strain, the thermal stress from Equation (4–193) is

σ1 = σ2 = Eαlβh

(1 − ν) . (4.196)

The elastic stress due to the addition of the overburden was given in Equa-

tion (3–24). Addition of the thermal stress to the elastic stress gives

σ1 = σ2 = h

(1 − ν) (ρgν + Eαlβ). (4.197)

To determine the deviatoric stresses after sedimentation, we determine the

pressure at depth h, noting that σ3 = ρgh; the result is

p = 1

3 (σ1 + σ2 + σ3) =

(1 + ν)

3(1 − ν) ρgh+

2

3

Ehαlβ

(1 − ν) .

(4.198)

The deviatoric stresses are obtained by subtracting this expression for p

from Equation (4–197) and from σ3 = ρgh:

σ′1 = σ′2 = −(1 − 2ν)

3(1 − ν) ρgh+

Ehαlβ

3(1 − ν) (4.199)

σ′3 = 2

3

(1 − 2ν)

(1 − ν) ρgh− 2

3

Ehαlβ

(1 − ν) . (4.200)

The differential horizontal stresses due to the elastic effect are extensional;

because of the thermal effect they are compressional. Figure 4–43 gives

σ′1/ρgh as a function of β for E = 60 GPa, ν = 0.25, αl = 10−5 K−1,

g = 10 m s−2, and ρ = 2700 kg m−3. The thermal effect is seen to be

more important than the elastic effect for thermal gradients greater than

23 K km−1. Because this is a typical thermal gradient in continental areas,

the thermal and overburden stresses are likely to be comparable under most

conditions of sedimentation.

Consider next what the surface stress is after h km of overburden have

been eroded. As in Section 3–4 we assume that the initial stresses are litho-

static so that Equation (3–30) gives the nonthermal part of the surface

stress. We also assume that a new thermal equilibrium has been established

subsequent to the removal of surface material. After the erosion of h km

316 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.43 Differential stress resulting from the addition of h km of over- burden to an initially unstressed surface.

the change in temperature of the surface rocks is −βh. Again assuming no

horizontal strain, we find the surface thermal stress from Equation (4–193)

to be

σ1 = σ2 = −Eαlβh

(1 − ν) . (4.201)

Adding the surface thermal stress to the surface elastic stress due to the

removal of overburden, Equation (3–30), we obtain

σ1 = σ2 = h

(1 − ν) [(1 − 2ν)ρg − Eαlβ]. (4.202)

As a consequence of erosion, the elastic effect causes surface compression,

and the thermal effect causes surface extension. If σ′1/ρgh given in Figure 4–

43 is multiplied by −3, one obtains σ1/ρgh due to erosion. Thus it is clear

that surface thermal stress and surface stresses resulting directly from re-

moval of surface material are comparable for typical values of the geothermal

gradient.

Problem 4.49 Determine the surface stress after 10 km of erosion. Take

E = 60 GPa, ν = 0.25, αl = 10−5 K−1, ρ = 2700 kg m−3, and β = 20 K

km−1.

Problem 4.50 If αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1 and the temperature of the Earth

increased by 100 K, what would the change in radius be?

There is an important distinction between renewable and nonrenewable

stresses. Thermal and erosional stresses are permanently relieved by irre-

versible creep and are examples of nonrenewable stresses. Examples of re-

newable stresses include bending stresses in the lithosphere, the lithosphere

stresses that drive plate tectonics, and the crustal stresses that support

mountain ranges. These stresses are not relieved by a small amount of creep.

4.23 Ocean Floor Topography 317

Figure 4.44 The principle of isostasy requires the ocean to deepen with age to offset the thermal contraction in the lithosphere.

4.23 Ocean Floor Topography

We previously solved for the thermal structure of the lithosphere adjacent

to ocean ridges in Equation (4–125). We also demonstrated in the previ-

ous section that the cooling of the oceanic lithosphere causes the density of

lithospheric rock to increase. The relationship between density and temper-

ature is given in Equation (4–179). In addition, we introduced the principle

of isostasy in Section 2–2.

The principle of isostasy states that any vertical column of material has

the same mass per unit area between the surface and some depth of com-

pensation. This is equivalent to the assumption that the lithostatic pressure

at some depth is the same over a large horizontal area. However, as shown

in Figure 4–23, columns of mantle material at different ages do not contain

the same mass per unit area. The older column contains more dense, cold

lithosphere than the younger one; the extra weight of the older lithosphere

causes it to subside. Mantle material below the lithosphere flows away to

accommodate the subsidence, and the ocean fills in the hole created at the

surface. Figure 4–44 shows the oceanic lithosphere with the overlying ocean

increasing in depth with distance from the ridge. The two columns of ages

t1 and t2 now have the same mass per unit area because the older column

contains more water to offset the added weight of dense lithospheric rock.

The ability of the mantle rock beneath the lithosphere to behave as a fluid

on geological time scales is the key to the isostatic adjustment of the oceanic

lithosphere. By calculating the masses per unit area in vertical columns

extending from the surface to the base of the lithosphere and requiring that

these be the same for columns of all ages, we can derive a formula for the

318 Heat Transfer

depth of the ocean floor w as a function of age t or distance from the ridge

x.

The mass per unit area in a column of any age is ∫ yL

0 ρ dy + wρw,

where yL is the thickness of the lithosphere and ρw is the density of water.

At the ridge crest, ρ = ρm the deep mantle density, and the mass of a column

of vertical height w + yL is ρm(w + yL). Isostasy requires that

ρm(w + yL) =

∫ yL

0 ρ dy + wρw (4.203)

or

w(ρw − ρm) +

∫ yL

0 (ρ− ρm) dy = 0. (4.204)

The first term in Equation (4–204) represents a negative mass because the

water with density ρw is less dense than the mantle rock that it has replaced

because of the subsidence of the seafloor a distance w. The second term

in the equation represents a positive mass because thermal contraction in

the cooling lithosphere causes the density ρ to be higher than the reference

hot mantle rock density ρm. Introducing the volume coefficient of thermal

expansion from Equation (4–179), we can write

ρ− ρm = ρmαv(T1 − T ). (4.205)

Upon substitution of the temperature profile from Equation (4–125) into

Equation (4–205) and that result into Equation (4–204), we obtain

w(ρm− ρw) = ρmαv(T1 −T0)

× ∫ ∞

0 erfc

[

y

2

(

u0

κx

)1/2 ]

dy. (4.206)

Because ρ → ρm and T → T1 at the base of the lithosphere, the limit on

the integral has been changed from y = yL to y = ∞. We can rewrite

Equation (4–206) by using the similarity variable η = (y/2)× (u0/κx) 1/2 so

that

w = 2ρmαv(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρw)

(

κx

u0

)1/2 ∫ ∞

0 erfc(η) dη.

(4.207)

The definite integral has the value ∫ ∞

0 erfc(η) dη =

1√ π , (4.208)

4.23 Ocean Floor Topography 319

Figure 4.45 Seafloor depth as a function of age in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans. Data are from DSDP and ODP drill sites on normal ocean crust and depths have been corrected for sediment cover (Johnson and Carlson, 1992). Comparisons are made with the half-space cooling model (HSCM) from Equation (4–209) and the plate model from Equation (4–211) with yL0 =95 km (PM 95) and yL0 =125 km (PM 125).

so that

w = 2ρmαv(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρw)

(

κx

πu0

)1/2

. (4.209)

Equation (4–209) predicts that the depth of the ocean increases with

the square root of the distance from the ridge or the square root of the

age of the ocean floor. This theoretical result is compared with seafloor

depths in Figure 4–45. The results shown are from Deep Sea Drilling Project

(DSDP) and Ocean Drilling Project (ODP) drill sites (Johnson and Carlson,

1992). Corrections have been made for sediment cover and results are given

for the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans. Predicted seafloor depths are

included for the half-space cooling model, Equation (4–209), assuming ρm =

3300 kg m−3, ρw = 1000 kg m−3, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, T1 − T0 = 1300 K, and

αv = 3× 10−5K−1. In addition, the ridge depth is 2.5 km. For seafloor ages

greater than about 80 Myr, the predicted values are systematically deeper

than the observed values. This divergence is taken as evidence of the basal

heating of old oceanic lithosphere.

A model that approximates basal heating of the lithosphere is the plate

cooling model introduced in Section 4–17. The temperature distribution in

the oceanic lithosphere according to the plate cooling model was given in

Equation (4–130). Substitution of this temperature distribution into Equa-

320 Heat Transfer

tion (4–205) and further substitution of the resulting density distribution

into Equation (4–204) give

w = ρmαv(T1 − T0) yL0

2(ρm − ρw)

[

1 − 4

π

∫ 1

0

∞ ∑

n=1

1

n exp

(

− κn2π2t

y2 L0

)

sin(nπy′) dy′ ]

. (4.210)

Evaluation of the integral in Equation (4–210) leads to

w = ρmαv(T1 − T0) yL0

(ρm − ρw)

[

1

2 − 4

π2

∞ ∑

m=0

1

(1 + 2m)2 exp

(

−κ(1 + 2m)2π2t

y2 L0

)

]

. (4.211)

Only the terms with n = 1, 3, 5, . . . in Equation (4–210) contribute to the

result in Equation (4–211) since the terms with n = 2, 4, 6, . . . integrate to

zero. For large times, t≫ y2 L0/κ, the equilibrium depth we is given by

we = ρmαv(T1 − T0)yL0

2(ρm − ρw) . (4.212)

This is the equilibrium depth of the old ocean basins beneath the ridge crests.

This relation provides a constraint on the thickness of the plate in the plate

cooling model. In comparing the predictions of this model with observations,

we consider plate thicknesses yL0 = 95 and 125 km. With ρm = 3300 kg m−3,

ρw = 1000 kg m−3, T1 − T0 = 1300 K, and αv = 3× 10−5 K−1, we find from

Equation (4–212) that we = 2.7 km for yL0 = 95 km and we = 3.5 km

for yL0 = 125 km. With the depth of ocean ridges equal to 2.5 km, the

corresponding equilibrium depths of ocean basins are 5.2 km and 6 km,

respectively.

We can approximate the deviations of bathymetry from the half-space

cooling result given in Equation (4–209) by retaining the first term of the

expansion given in Equation (4–211), with the result

w = ρmαv(T1 − T0)yL0

ρm − ρw

[

1

2 − 4

π2 exp

(

−κπ 2t

y2 L0

)]

.

(4.213)

The n = 2 term in the temperature distribution, Equation (4–130), does not

contribute to the bathymetry. Seafloor subsidence predicted by the plate

cooling model is compared with observations and the half-space cooling

4.23 Ocean Floor Topography 321

model in Figure 4–45 for plate thicknesses of yL0 = 95 km (PM 95) and

yL0 = 125 km (PM 125). The results for a plate thickness yL0 = 125 km

are in excellent agreement with the data. While a thickness of yL0 = 95 km

is in good agreement with the heat flow data (as shown in Figure 4–25), a

thickness of yL0 = 125 km is in good agreement with the subsidence data

(Figure 4–45). Because there is generally less scatter in seafloor bathymetry

than in heat flow, we prefer the value yL0 = 125 km although we recognize

there is considerable uncertainty in the choice.

The plate model is clearly an idealization of the oceanic lithosphere. There

is no well-defined “lower plate boundary” in the mantle. The flattening of

the cooling curves can be attributed to the basal heating of the oceanic

lithosphere. For yL0 = 125 km, the required basal heating from Equation (4–

135) is qm = 34 mW m−2, which is quite close to our preferred value for

the basal heating of the continental lithosphere, qm = 28 mW m−2. The

difference between the basal heating flux qm = 34 mW m−2 and the mean

oceanic heat flux qo = 101 mW m−2 we will refer to as the plate tectonic or

subduction flux qs = 67 mW m−2.

From this value of the basal heat flux for the continental lithosphere and

with the area of the continents including continental margins Ac = 2.0 × 108 km2, we find that the total basal heating of the continental lithosphere

is Qmc = 0.56×1013 W. From the value of the basal heat flux for the oceanic

lithosphere and with the area of the oceans including marginal basins Ao =

3.1×108 km2, we find that the total basal heating of the oceanic lithosphere

is Qmo = 1.05 × 1013 W. Thus, the basal heating of the entire lithosphere

is Qm = 1.61 × 1013 W, which represents 36% of the total global heat flux

Qg = 4.43 × 1013 W. From the estimate of the fraction of the oceanic heat

flow directly associated with subduction (qs = 67 mW m−2) we find that the

total heat flux associated with subduction is Qs = 2.08× 1013 W. The total

global heat flux can be divided into three contributions: (1) radiogenic heat

production in the continental crust Qr = 0.74 × 1013 W (16.7%), (2) basal

heating of the lithosphere Qm = 1.61× 1013 W (36.3%), and (3) subduction

of the oceanic lithosphere Qs = 2.08 × 1013 W (47%).

These results show that basal heating of the lithosphere is quantitatively

large. There are two competing hypotheses for this basal heating. The first is

heat transfer from mantle plumes impinging on the base of the lithosphere,

and the second is small-scale or secondary convection in the lower litho-

sphere and underlying asthenosphere. It is generally accepted that mantle

plumes are a source of basal heating so that the only question is the magni-

tude of this heating. We will address this question in Chapter 6. Small-scale

or secondary convection is associated with an instability in the lower litho-

322 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.46 Diagram for Problem 4–52.

sphere arising from the strong temperature dependence of the lithospheric

viscosity. It is a form of delamination or foundering of the lithosphere and

contrasts with the instability of the entire lithosphere that is manifest as

lithospheric subduction at an ocean trench. The amount of heat transported

by secondary convection near the base of the lithosphere is highly uncertain.

Problem 4.51 Assume that the temperature in the subducting lithosphere

is given by Equation (4–131). Show that the plate tectonic heat flux associ-

ated with subduction Qs is given by

Qs = 1

2 ρmcyL0Fs,

where ρm is mantle density, c is the specific heat, and Fs is rate of seafloor

subduction. Determine Qs taking ρm = 3300 kg m−1, c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1,

yL0 = 125 km, and Fs = 0.090 m2 s−1.

Problem 4.52 The ocean ridges are made up of a series of parallel seg-

ments connected by transform faults, as shown in Figure 1–12. Because of the

difference of age there is a vertical offset on the fracture zones. Assuming the

theory just derived is applicable, what is the vertical offset (a) at the ridge

crest and (b) 100 km from the ridge crest in Figure 4–46 (ρm = 3300 kg m−3,

κ = 1 mm2 s−1, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, T1 − T0 = 1300 K, u = 50 mm yr−1).

Problem 4.53 Because of its cooling, the seafloor subsides relative to a

continent at a passive continental margin. Determine the velocity of sub-

sidence if ρm = 3300 kg m−3, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, T1 − T0 = 1300 K, αv =

3 × 10−5 K−1, and the age is 20 Ma.

Problem 4.54 The influence of a small amount of partial melt on the

lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary has been considered in Problem 4–43.

Determine the contribution of this small degree of partial melt to the sub-

sidence of the seafloor as a function of age. The density of the magma is

ρl, its mass fraction is x, and the latent heat of fusion is L. If x = 0.05,

L = 400 kJ kg−1, c = 1kJ kg−1 K−1, T1 − T0 = 1350 K, κ = 1mm2 s−1,

ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρl = 2800 kg m−3, and αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, determine

4.24 Changes in Sea Level 323

Figure 4.47 Height of the sea surface in the past relative to present sea level from studies of sedimentation (Vail et al., 1978).

the ratio of the subsidence due to solidification to the subsidence due to

thermal contraction.

4.24 Changes in Sea Level

Changes in sea level are well documented from studies of sedimentation. On

short time scales (∼104 to 105 years) sea level changes can be explained by

variations in the volume of the polar ice sheets. However, on longer time

scales (∼107 to 108 years) the magnitudes of sea level changes are too large

to be understood in this way. If the polar ice sheets were completely melted,

the water added to the oceans would increase sea level by about 80 m. Yet

compared with its present level, the sea has been hundreds of meters higher

during the last 550 Ma, as shown by the record in Figure 4–47 (the value

at t = 0 of 80 m above present sea level accounts for the water in the polar

ice sheets). Sea level in the Cretaceous (80 Ma) was 300 m higher than it is

today, and water flooded about 40% of the present area of the continents.

These large, long-term changes in sea level are attributed to changes in the

average depth w̄ of the seafloor below the level of the ridge crests. If this

average depth decreases as a consequence of a decrease in the average age

τ of subduction, the volume of water contained in the deep ocean basins

decreases and the height of the sea above the ridge crests h, that is, sea

level, increases. This is supported by magnetic anomaly studies that show

324 Heat Transfer

that the Cretaceous was a time when there were more ridges and the ridges

were spreading more rapidly than at present. Since 75 Ma, an extensive

ridge system has been subducted beneath western North America. Thus, on

average, the present seafloor is older and deeper than the seafloor at 80 Ma.

The present deep ocean basins hold more water than the basins during the

Cretaceous, and the sea surface today lies well below its level in that period.

Changes in the configuration of the seafloor cannot change the total vol-

ume of water in the oceans. If we neglect the changes that occur in the area

of the oceans as sea level changes, a change δw̄ in the mean depth of the

ocean basins below the ridge crests produces an opposite change δh in the

height of the sea above the ridge crests

δh = −δw̄. (4.214)

The mean depth of the ocean floor is

w̄ = 1

τ

∫ τ

0 w dt. (4.215)

By substituting for w from Equation (4–209), we get

w̄ = 2ρmαv(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρw)

(

κ

π

)1/2(1

τ

∫ τ

0 t1/2 dt

)

= 4

3

ρmαv(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρw)

(

κτ

π

)1/2

. (4.216)

The mean depth of the ocean basins is directly proportional to the square

root of the mean age of subduction. Sea level changes are therefore related

to changes in the average age at which subduction occurs by

δh = −4

3

ρmαv(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρw)

(

κ

π

)1/2

δ(τ1/2). (4.217)

Equation (4–217) enables us to estimate the mean age of subduction during

the Cretaceous. We take ρm = 3300 kg m−3, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, κ =

1 mm2 s−1, T1 − T0 = 1300 K, ρw = 1000 kg m−3, the present mean age of

subduction equal to 120.8 Myr, and δh = 220 m (80 m of the 300-m sea level

rise is attributed to water presently locked up in polar ice). The average age

at which seafloor subducted in the Cretaceous is found to be 100 Myr.

Sea level changes due to changes in the mean subduction age of the seafloor

can be used to infer past variations in the mean oceanic heat flow q̄0. By

combining Equations (4–128) and (4–217), we find

δ

(

1

q̄0

)

= −3π

8

(ρm − ρw)

kρmαv(T1 − T0)2 δh. (4.218)

4.25 Thermal and Subsidence History of Sedimentary Basins 325

We will see that the changes that have occurred in mean oceanic heat flow

δq̄0 are small compared with the present value q̄0ρ. The left side of Equation

(4–218) can therefore be approximated by −δq̄0/q̄2 0ρ, and we can write the

percentage variation in mean oceanic heat flow as

δq̄0

q̄0ρ =

8

(ρm − ρw)q̄0ρ kρmαv(T1 − T0)2

δh. (4.219)

Higher sea levels in the past imply larger values of the mean oceanic heat

flux. This is expected from the association of higher sea levels with a younger

seafloor. With the previous parameter values, k = 3.3 W m−1K−1, and

q̄0ρ = 87 mW m−2, we find that a 26 m increase in sea level is associated

with a 1% increase in the mean oceanic heat flux.

The fractional changes in average oceanic heat flow inferred from the sea

level data of Figure 4–47 with Equation (4–219) and the above parameter

values are shown in Figure 4–48. The figure also shows the increase in average

oceanic heat flow that would be expected in the past if the heat lost through

the oceans was proportional to the increased rate of heat production from

the radioactive isotopes in the mantle – see Equation (4–8). The inferred

fractional changes that have occurred in the average oceanic heat flux during

the past 550 Ma are about 10%. These variations in oceanic heat flow are not

attributable to larger radiogenic heat production rates in the past. Instead

they are statistical variations associated with changes in the geometry and

the mean spreading rate of the oceanic ridge system.

Problem 4.55 What would be the decrease in sea level due to a 10%

reduction in the area of the continents? Assume the depth of deep ocean

basins to be 5 km.

4.25 Thermal and Subsidence History of Sedimentary Basins

Subsidence of the Earth’s surface often results in the formation of sedimen-

tary basins. We can explain the subsidence history of many sedimentary

basins by essentially the same model that we used to understand the cool-

ing, thickening, and subsidence of the oceanic lithosphere. The model is

illustrated in Figure 4–49. Consider a region of the Earth that is hot, either

because of seafloor spreading or extensive volcanism. Initially (t = 0) there

is no sediment, and the basement has a temperature T1 and a density ρm.

Surface cooling causes subsidence as the basement rocks cool and contract.

We assume that sediments fill the basin caused by the subsidence; that is,

326 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.48 Fractional variations in the mean oceanic heat flow in the past 550 Ma inferred from the sea level data in Figure 4–47 and Equation (4– 219). The dashed line is the expected increase in the mean oceanic heat flow due to the larger rate of radiogenic heat production in the past.

Figure 4.49 Sedimentary basin model.

the region 0 < y < ySB. This assumption requires an adequate supply of

sediment to prevent the formation of a deep ocean basin.

As long as the thickness of the sediment ySB is much smaller than the

lithosphere thickness yL, we can carry over the results of the cooling oceanic

lithosphere calculation. Therefore the depth of the sedimentary basin is given

by Equation (4–209) with ρs, the density of the sediments, replacing ρw, and

t, the age of the basin, replacing x/u0, the age of the oceanic lithosphere;

the result is

ySB = 2ρmαm(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρs)

(

κmt

π

)1/2

, (4.220)

where the subscripts m on α and κ emphasize that these properties refer

4.25 Thermal and Subsidence History of Sedimentary Basins 327

Figure 4.50 Depths to sedimentary layers deposited at times ts as functions of time.

to the mantle rocks and not the sediment (αm is αv for the mantle rocks).

The depth of the sedimentary basin is proportional to the square root of

time. The subsidence of the basin is caused primarily by the cooling of the

basement or lithospheric rocks. The cooling of the sedimentary rocks is a

negligible effect when ySB/yL ≪ 1.

It is of interest to determine the subsidence history of a sedimentary layer

that was deposited at a time ts after the initiation of subsidence. At the

time ts the basement lies at a depth given by setting t = ts in Equation

(4–220). Assuming no compaction of the sediments, the layers deposited at

time ts will always be this distance above the basement. However, the depth

of the basement at time t is given directly by Equation (4–220). Therefore

the depth to the sediments deposited at time t = ts at a later time t, denoted

by ys, is given by the difference between the depth to basement at t and ts;

that is,

ys = 2ρmαm(T1 − T0)

(ρm−ρs)

(

κm π

)1/2

(t1/2− t1/2s ). (4.221)

The depth to sedimentary layers deposited at various times is given in Fig-

ure 4–50. These curves were calculated assuming that ρm = 3300 kg m−3,

κm =1 mm2s−1, T1−T0 = 1300 K, αm = 3×10−5 K−1, and ρs = 2500 kg m−3.

Because the sedimentary layer is thin, the temperature–depth profile is

essentially linear in the sediments. The sedimentary layer must transport

the heat from the cooling basement rocks. Denoting this heat flux by q0, we

have, from Equation (4–127),

q0 = km(T1 − T0)√

πκmt . (4.222)

328 Heat Transfer

From Fourier’s law of heat conduction, we know that in the sediments

q0 = ks

(

dT

dy

)

s , (4.223)

where (dT/dy)s is the constant geothermal gradient in the sediments. By

combining these last two equations, we get (

dT

dy

)

s = km ks

(T1 − T0)√ πκmt

. (4.224)

Thus the temperature distribution in the sediments is

Ts = T0 + km ks

(T1 − T0)√ πκmt

y. (4.225)

The temperature of a sedimentary layer deposited at time ts at a subsequent

time t is given by substituting Equation (4–221) into Equation (4–225)

TSL = T0 + 2

π

km ks

ρmαm(T1 − T0) 2

(ρm − ρs)

(

1 − √

ts t

)

.

(4.226)

The thermal history of a sedimentary layer can be used to determine whether

organic material in the sediments has been converted to petroleum.

The Los Angeles basin is a relatively small sedimentary basin with a

width of about 50 km and a length of about 75 km. The basin is a pull-

apart structure associated with the San Andreas fault system. It is probably

similar to the small spreading centers that offset transform faults in the

Gulf of California. During the initiation of the basin subsidence, volcanism

was occurring. Volcanic rocks from drill holes in the basin have ages of 10

to 15 Ma. This volcanism was probably similar to the volcanism presently

occurring in the Imperial Valley of southern California.

Since volcanism ceased at about 10 Ma, subsidence has continued. It is

reasonable to assume that the volcanism thinned the lithosphere and that

the subsequent subsidence is associated with the conductive cooling and

thickening of the lithosphere. The structure of the basin is clearly com-

plex, with considerable faulting. Although these faults add complexity to

the basin, they are also likely to allow free vertical subsidence of the various

fault-bounded blocks.

Let us apply our analysis of the thermal subsidence of sedimentary basins

to the southwest block, which extends roughly from Santa Monica to Long

Beach and is the site of several major oil fields. A cross section of this part of

the basin is given in Figure 4–51. The depths of various sedimentary units in

4.25 Thermal and Subsidence History of Sedimentary Basins 329

Figure 4.51 Cross section of the southwest block of the Los Angeles basin. (From California Oil and Gas Fields, Vol. 2, California Division of Oil and Gas, Report TR12, Sacramento, 1974). The sedimentary layers are Pleistocene–Holocene (PH), Upper Pliocene (UPI), Lower Pliocene (LPI), Upper Miocene (UMi), Middle Miocene (MMi), and Cretaceous or older basement (Cr). Also shown is the theoretical section from Equation (4– 221).

Figure 4.52 The crosses are the depths to the boundaries between strati- graphic units in the Wilmington oil field at the ages of the boundaries. The solid line is the subsidence predicted by Equation (4–221).

the Wilmington oil field are given as a function of their ages in Figure 4–52.

The predicted depths of these sedimentary units are given by Equation (4–

221). Taking ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρs = 2500 kg m−3, αm = 3 × 10−5 K−1,

T1 − T0 = 1200 K, and κm = 1 mm2 s−1, we obtain the solid curve given

in Figure 4–52. The predicted theoretical section is also given in Figure 4–

52. Reasonably good agreement is obtained, although considerable tectonic

structure is clearly associated with the formation of the basin and subsequent

motion on the San Andreas fault now located to the east.

330 Heat Transfer

The present thermal gradient in the basin is predicted by Equation (4–

224). With km = 3.3 W m−1 K−1, ks = 2 W m−1 K−1, and the other

parameter values as before, we find (dT/dy)s = 59 K km−1. The measured

surface thermal gradients in the Wilmington oil field are in the range 48 to

56 K km−1. Again reasonably good agreement is obtained.

Problem 4.56 Assume that the continental lithosphere satisfies the half-

space cooling model. If a continental region has an age of 1.5 × 109 years,

how much subsidence would have been expected to occur in the last 300 Ma?

Take ρm = 3300 kg m−3, κ = 1mm2 s−1, Tm − T0 = 1300 K, and αv =

3× 10−5 K−1. Assume that the subsiding lithosphere is being covered to sea

level with sediments of density ρs = 2500 kg m−3.

Problem 4.57 If petroleum formation requires temperatures between 380

and 430 K, how deep would you drill in a sedimentary basin 20 Ma old?

Assume T0 =285 K, T1 = 1600 K, κm = 1 mm2 s−1, ks = 2 W m−1K−1, and

km = 3.3 W m−1 K−1.

In Section 2–2 we introduced the crustal stretching model to explain the

subsidence of a sedimentary basin. In this model the subsidence is caused by

the thinning of the continental crust. The model was illustrated in Figure 2–

4; a section of continental crust with an initial width w0 stretched by a

stretching factor α to a final width wb = αw0 from Equation (2–6). In order

to conserve the volume of the crust the initial thickness of the crust hcc is

reduced to hcb = hcc/α as given by Equation (2–8). The resulting depth of

the sedimentary basin hsb is given by Equation (2–10).

We now extend the crustal stretching model by assuming that the conti-

nental lithosphere within the sedimentary basin is also mechanically stretched

and thinned by the same stretching factor α as the crust. We assume that

the shape of the temperature profile in the lithosphere remains unchanged

but that its thickness is reduced by the factor 1/α.

We assume that before stretching, the temperature distribution in the

lithosphere is given by Equation (4–124). By introducing the thickness of the

unstretched lithosphere yL0 from Equation (4–126), we can rewrite Equation

(4–124) as

T1 − T

T1 − T0 = erfc(1.16y/yL0). (4.227)

In order to conserve the volume of the lithosphere we require

yLb = yL0

α , (4.228)

where yLb is the thickness of the stretched lithosphere. The temperature

4.25 Thermal and Subsidence History of Sedimentary Basins 331

distribution in the stretched and thinned lithosphere is given by

T1 − T

T1 − T0 = erfc(1.16yα/yL0). (4.229)

Whereas the thinning of the crust produces subsidence, the thinning of the

lithosphere inhibits subsidence. The thinned continental lithosphere is hotter

and less dense than the original lithosphere leading to a thermal uplift.

Application of the principle of isostasy to the base of the continental

lithosphere gives

(ρcc − ρm)hcc − ρmαν(T1 − T0)

∫ ∞

0 erfc

(

1.16y

yL0

)

dy

= (ρs − ρm)hsb + (ρcc − ρm) hcc α

− ρmαν(T1 − T0)

× ∫ ∞

0 erfc

(

1.16αy

yL0

)

dy. (4.230)

Evaluation of the integrals using Equation (4–208) gives the thickness of the

sedimentary basin hsb in terms of the stretching factor α as

hsb =

[

(ρm − ρcc)

(ρm − ρs) hcc −

1

1.16 √ π

ρmαν(T1 − T0)yL0

(ρm − ρs)

]

× (

1 − 1

α

)

. (4.231)

The dependence of the basin thickness on α is the same as that given

in Equation (2–10) for crustal thinning alone. Taking the same parame-

ter values used in Section 2–2 (hcc = 35 km, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρcc =

2800 kg m−3, and ρs = 2500 kg m−3) along with αν = 3 × 10−5 K−1,

T1 − T0 = 1300 K, and yL0 = 150 km, we find that hsb = 10.1 km in the

limit α → ∞. The subsidence associated with crustal thinning alone would

be 22 km, so the lithospheric thinning reduces the subsidence considerably.

In the analysis just given, we implicitly assumed that crust and lithosphere

are stretched in a time interval that is short compared with the thermal time

constant κ/y2 L of the thinned lithosphere. After the initial thinning of the

crust and lithosphere, the lithosphere will thicken because of the loss of

heat to the surface. This cooling and thickening of the lithosphere will lead

to further thermal subsidence. With the assumption that the temperature

profile in the thickening lithosphere as a function of time is given by Equation

(4–124), the thickness of the sedimentary basin as a function of time is given

332 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.53 Depth of the sedimentary basin hsb as a function of age t for several values of the stretching factor α.

by

hsb = hcc

(

ρm − ρcc ρm − ρs

)(

1 − 1

α

)

− yL0ρmαν(T1 − T0)

1.16 √ π(ρm − ρs)

× [

1 − (

1

α2 +

2.322κt

y2 L0

)1/2 ]

. (4.232)

The thickness of the sedimentary basin as a function of time is given in

Figure 4–53 for several values of the stretching factor and for the same

parameters as before with κ = 1 mm2 s−1. When the thickness of the thinned

lithosphere increases to its initial value yL0, the total subsidence will be that

given by Equation (2–10).

Problem 4.58 Assume that the continental crust and lithosphere have

been stretched by a factor α = 2. Taking hcc = 35 km, yL0 = 125 km,

ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρcc= 2750 kg m−3, ρs = 2550 kg m−3, αv = 3× 10−5 K−1,

and T1 −T0 = 1300 K, determine the depth of the sedimentary basin. What

is the depth of the sedimentary basin when the thermal lithosphere has

thickened to its original thickness?

4.26 Heating or Cooling a Semi-Infinite Half-Space 333

Problem 4.59 Assume that the continental crust and lithosphere have

been stretched by a factor α = 4. Taking hcc = 35 km, yL0 = 150 km,

ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρcc= 2700 kg m−3, ρs = 2450 kg m−3, αv = 3× 10−5 K−1,

and T1 −T0 = 1250 K, determine the depth of the sedimentary basin. What

is the depth of the sedimentary basin when the thermal lithosphere has

thickened to its original thickness?

Problem 4.60 The compression model for a continental mountain belt

considered in Problem 2–6 can be extended to include the compression of

the lithosphere. Assuming that the temperature in the lithosphere after com-

pression is given by

T1 − T

T1 − T0 = erfc

(

1.16y

βyL0

)

(4.233)

show that the height of the mountain belt is given by

h =

[

(ρm − ρcc)

ρm hcc −

αv(T1 − T0)yL0

1.16 √ π

]

(β − 1).

(4.234)

Assuming β = 2, hcc = 35 km, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρcc = 2800 kg m−3,

αv = 3 × 10−5, T1 − T0 = 1300 K, and yL0 = 150 km, determine the height

of the mountain belt and the thickness of the crustal root.

4.26 Heating or Cooling a Semi-Infinite Half-Space by a

Constant Surface Heat Flux

So far we have been primarily concerned with heat conduction problems

in which temperature boundary conditions are specified. In some geological

applications it is appropriate to specify boundary conditions on the heat flux.

If we take the partial derivative of the unsteady heat conduction equation

(4–68) with respect to y and substitute Fourier’s law (4–1), we obtain

∂q

∂t = κ

∂2q

∂y2 . (4.235)

The heat flux satisfies the same diffusion equation as does temperature.

We now consider the heating of a semi-infinite half-space by the constant

addition of heat at its surface, q = q0 at y = 0. Initially at t = 0 the

temperature in the half-space is constant T = T0, and there is no heat flow

q(0) = 0. This problem is solved by Equation (4–235) with the boundary

conditions

q = 0 at t = 0, y > 0

334 Heat Transfer

q = q0 at y = 0, t > 0

q → 0 as y→∞, t > 0. (4.236)

This problem is identical with the sudden heating or cooling of a semi-infinite

half-space. Equation (4–235) together with conditions (4–236) is equivalent

to Equation (4–94) and conditions (4–95) if we identify θ as q/q0. The solu-

tion from Equation (4–112) is

q = q0 erfc η, (4.237)

with η defined by Equation (4–96). In order to find the temperature, we

substitute Fourier’s law (4–1) into Equation (4–237) with the result

∂T

∂y = −q0

k erfc η = −q0

k erfc

(

y

2 √ κt

)

. (4.238)

We can integrate Equation (4–238) using the boundary condition T → T0

as y → ∞. We find

T = T0 − q0 k

∫ y

∞ erfc

(

y′

2 √ κt

)

dy′

= T0 + q0 k

∫ ∞

y erfc

(

y′

2 √ κt

)

dy′

= T0 + 2q0

√ κt

k

∫ ∞

η erfc η′ dη′. (4.239)

After an integration by parts we can express the temperature as

T = T0 + 2q0 k

√ κt

{

e−η 2

√ π

− η erfc η

}

= T0 + 2q0 k

{

κt

π e−y

2/4κt − y

2 erfc

y

2 √ κt

}

.

(4.240)

The surface temperature Ts is obtained by setting y = 0 in Equation (4–240)

Ts = T0 + 2q0 k

(

κt

π

)1/2

. (4.241)

This formula gives the increase in the surface temperature due to the uniform

addition of heat to a half-space.

Problem 4.61 The heat loss from the Earth’s surface qs due to radiation

is given by

qs = σT 4, (4.242)

4.27 Frictional Heating on Faults 335

Figure 4.54 Geometry of the descending plate. (a) Side view. (b) Vertical view.

where σ = 0.567 × 10−7 W m−2 K−4 is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, and

T is the absolute temperature. Assuming that T = 300 K, k = 2 W m−1

K−1, and κ = 0.8 mm2 s−1, use this heat loss to determine the cooling of the

Earth’s surface during 12 hr of night. (Assume q is constant, a reasonable

approximation, and use the half-space cooling model in this section.)

4.27 Frictional Heating on Faults: Island Arc Volcanism and

Melting on the Surface of the Descending Slab

As noted in Section 1–4, ocean trenches where subduction is occurring usu-

ally have parallel chains of active volcanoes overlying the descending litho-

sphere. Since the subduction process returns cold lithospheric rocks into the

interior of the Earth, a subduction zone would be expected to have low tem-

peratures and low surface heat flows. It is quite surprising, therefore, that

extensive volcanism is associated with subduction zones.

One explanation for the high temperatures required for volcanism is fric-

tional heating on the fault zone between the descending lithosphere and the

overlying mantle. That this fault zone is the site of many large earthquakes

is indicative of a large stress on the fault. When slip occurs in the presence

of a large stress, significant frictional heating occurs. If the mean stress on

the fault is τ and the mean velocity of the descending plate is u, the mean

rate of heat production on the fault, per unit area of the fault, is

q = uτ. (4.243)

336 Heat Transfer

To assess the influence of fault heating on the descending lithosphere, let

us consider the simplified geometry illustrated in Figure 4–54. The surface

plate approaches the trench with a velocity u at an angle φ to the normal

to the trench and descends into the mantle at an angle θ to the horizontal.

The linear chain of active volcanoes lies at a distance dv above the slip zone.

An x, y coordinate system is set up in the descending plate as shown.

The solution for constant heat addition to a uniform half-space can be

used for this problem if several assumptions are made:

a. A substantial fraction of the heat produced on the fault zone is lost to the

underlying descending lithosphere. This is a good approximation because

the cold descending plate is the dominant heat sink.

b. The initial thermal structure of the lithosphere can be neglected. Because

thermal conduction problems are linear in temperature, their solutions

can be superimposed. The heat addition problem can be treated inde-

pendently of the ambient conduction problem as long as the required

boundary conditions are not violated.

c. Time t in the transient conduction problem is replaced by

t = x

u cosφ . (4–244)

Substitution of Equations (4–243) and (4–244) into Equation (4–241) gives

the temperature on the slip zone Tsz as

Tsz = T0 + 2τ

k

(

uκx

π cosφ

)1/2

. (4.245)

For surface volcanism to occur, the temperature on the slip zone beneath

the volcanoes (with dv = x sin θ) must equal the melt temperature of the

rock Tm. From Equation (4–245) we find

Tm = T0 + 2τ

k

(

κdvu

π cosφ sin θ

)1/2

. (4.246)

As a typical example of a trench system we take Tm − T0 = 1200 K, u =

100 mm yr−1, k = 4 W m−1 K−1, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, dv = 125 km, θ = 45◦, and

φ = 0◦. From Equation (4–246) we find that the mean stress level required

to produce the necessary heating is τ = 180 MPa. Although this is a high

stress, it may be a reasonable value when relatively cool rocks are carried

to depths where the lithostatic pressure is high. Stress levels on faults are

considered in some detail in Chapter 8.

Problem 4.62 Assume a constant sliding velocity uf on a fault during an

earthquake that results in a frictional heat production uf τ (τ is the stress

4.28 Mantle Geotherms and Adiabats 337

on the fault). If uf = 10 m s−1, the total displacement d = 4 m, τ = 10 MPa,

k = 4 W m−1 K−1, and κ= 1 mm2 s−1, what is the temperature increase on

the fault during the earthquake as predicted by Equation (4–245)?

Problem 4.63 The amount of heat generated by friction on a fault during

an earthquake is given by Q = bτ , where b is the slip on the fault and τ

is the mean stress on the fault. If b = 3 m and τ = 10 MPa, what is the

maximum temperature increase 1 m from the fault due to friction on the

fault (ρ = 2700 kg m−3, c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1)?

4.28 Mantle Geotherms and Adiabats

The thermal structure of the upper mantle is dominated by the large tem-

perature gradients in the lithosphere. The thermal structure of the oceanic

lithosphere was determined in Sections 4–16 and 4–17; the temperature–

depth relation is given in Equation (4–125) or Equation (4–130). A repre-

sentative geotherm for the oceanic lithosphere was plotted in Figure 4–27

for t = 60.4 Myr, T1−T0 = 1300 K, and κ = 1 mm2 s−1. The thermal struc-

ture of stable continental crust was determined in Section 4–8 and given in

Figure 4–12.

Beneath the thermal boundary layer that defines the lithosphere, heat

transport is primarily by convection. Details of this convection and the creep

mechanisms responsible for the fluidlike behavior of hot, solid mantle rock

are discussed in later chapters. For our purposes it is sufficient to know

that in the interior of a vigorously convecting fluid the mean temperature

increases with depth approximately along an adiabat. The adiabatic tem-

perature gradient in the mantle is the rate of increase of temperature with

depth as a result of compression of the rock by the weight of the overlying

material. If an element of material is compressed and reduced in volume by

increasing pressure, it will also be heated as a result of the work done by

the pressure forces during the compression. If there is no transfer of heat

into or out of the element during this process, the compression is said to be

adiabatic, and the associated temperature rise is the adiabatic increase in

temperature.

The change in density with pressure under adiabatic conditions is given

by the adiabatic compressibility

βa = 1

ρ

(

∂ρ

∂p

)

s . (4.247)

The subscript s means that the entropy s is constant. A reversible adiabatic

process is a constant entropy or isentropic process. For a solid the adiabatic

338 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.55 Seismic velocities Vp and Vs and the density ρ are given as a function of depth.

compressibility is somewhat smaller than the isothermal compressibility de-

fined in Equation (4–175) because the temperature increases with pressure

in an adiabatic process so there is some thermal expansion. If we assume that

the adiabatic compressibility is a constant, we can integrate Equation (4–

247) with the boundary condition ρ = ρ0 at p = 0 to give

ρ = ρ0e βap . (4.248)

The increase in pressure with depth is given by

dp

dy = ρg. (4.249)

For the Earth’s mantle we can reasonably assume that the gravitational

acceleration g is a constant. By combining Equations (4–248) and (4–249)

and integrating with g constant and the boundary condition p = 0 at y = 0,

we obtain

p = −1

βa ln(1 − ρ0gβay) (4.250)

ρ = ρ0

1 − ρ0gyβa . (4.251)

These expressions for pressure and density as functions of depth are not

completely satisfactory approximations to the actual pressure and density in

the mantle. The dependence of the mantle density on depth is given in Fig-

ure 4–55. The values were deduced from the seismic velocities, which are also

4.28 Mantle Geotherms and Adiabats 339

shown in Figure 4–55 and are tabulated in Section F of Appendix 2. The den-

sity discontinuity near a depth of 410 km is attributed to a solid–solid phase

change of the mineral olivine, the dominant mineral in the mantle. Labora-

tory studies have shown that olivine transforms to a denser spinel structure

at a pressure of 13.5 GPa and a temperature of about 1700 K. The density

increase due to this phase change is ∆ρ = 200 − 300 kg m−3. Laboratory

studies have also indicated that the density discontinuity near a depth of

660 km is caused by a transformation of the spinel structure to perovskite

and magnesiowüstite. At a pressure of 23.1 GPa this transformation takes

place at a temperature of about 1875 K. The density increase due to this

transformation is ∆ρ ≈ 400 kg m−3. These density discontinuities cannot be

modeled using Equation (4–247). In addition, the adiabatic compressibility

decreases with increasing pressure in the mantle from a near-surface value of

8.7×10−12 Pa−1 to a value of 1.6×10−12 Pa−1 at the core–mantle boundary.

For these reasons Equation (4–251) is a relatively poor approximation for

the Earth’s mantle.

We now return to our discussion of the mantle geotherm. As already

noted, the temperature gradient beneath the near-surface thermal boundary

layer (the lithosphere) is very near the adiabatic gradient due to mantle

convection. The adiabatic temperature gradient can be calculated from the

thermodynamic relation between entropy per unit mass s, temperature, and

pressure

ds = cp T dT − αv

ρ dp, (4.252)

where cp is the specific heat at constant pressure and ds, dT , and dp are

infinitesimal changes in entropy, temperature, and pressure. The entropy

change in an adiabatic process is zero if the process is also reversible. Thus

the rate of increase of temperature with pressure in an adiabatic, reversible

process is obtained by putting ds = 0 in Equation (4–252), from which it

follows that (

dT

dp

)

s =

(

αvT

ρcp

)

. (4.253)

We assume that Equation (4–253) is valid in the vigorously convecting com-

pressible mantle in which heat conduction and other irreversible processes

can be neglected.

If a material is strictly incompressible, pressure forces cannot change the

volume of an element of the material. Accordingly, there can be no adiabatic

compressional heating of an incompressible material; its adiabatic tempera-

ture gradient is zero. Rocks, however, are sufficiently compressible so that

340 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.56 Representative oceanic and continental shallow upper mantle geotherms.

the large increases in pressure with depth in the mantle produce significant

adiabatic increases of temperature with depth.

The adiabatic temperature gradient in the Earth (dT/dy)s can be found

by multiplying (dT/dp)s from Equation (4–253) by dp/dy from Equation

(4–249): (

dT

dy

)

s = αvgT

cp . (4.254)

For the near-surface values αv = 3× 10−5 K−1, T = 1600 K, cp = 1 kJ kg−1

K−1, and g = 10 m s−2, Equation (4–235) yields (dT/dy)s = 0.5 K km−1.

At greater depths the volume coefficient of thermal expansion is consider-

ably smaller. To extend the temperature profile in the oceanic lithosphere

given in Figure 4–27 to greater depths in the upper mantle, we assume

that (dT/dy)s = 0.3 K km−1. Figure 4–56 shows the oceanic upper mantle

geotherm to a depth of 400 km.

The upper mantle geotherm beneath the continents is not as well under-

4.28 Mantle Geotherms and Adiabats 341

Figure 4.57 Mantle geotherms are given for whole-mantle convection “(Curve a) and layered mantle convection” (Curve b). The range of val- ues for the mantle solidus and the minimum temperatures in a subducted slab are also given.

stood as the one beneath the oceans. One way to model the temperature

distribution in the continental lithosphere would be to apply the same one-

dimensional half-space cooling solution that we applied earlier to the oceanic

lithosphere. However, as shown in Figure 4–28, the predicted mantle heat

flows are considerably lower than the observed values. Also, if old continen-

tal lithosphere continued to cool, it would also continue to subside according

to Equation (4–209) (see Problem 4–56). The result would be continental

cratons overlain by a continuously thickening sedimentary cover. This con-

dition has not been observed, so there must be a heat input into the base of

the old continental lithosphere that retards further cooling and allows old

continental lithosphere to tend toward a steady-state temperature profile.

The input of heat to the base of the lithosphere is attributed either to mantle

plumes impinging on the base of the lithosphere or to secondary convection

in the lower lithosphere or to both, as discussed in Section 4–23.

342 Heat Transfer

The influence of near-surface radioactivity on continental surface heat flow

has been considered in Section 4–8. From Equation (4–29) and the data

given in Figure 4–11 we found that the heat flow beneath the near-surface

layer of heat-producing elements is about 37 mW m−2. We assume that

heat production beneath the near-surface radioactive layer can be neglected

and that the thermal structure of the continental lithosphere has reached a

steady state. Therefore, it is appropriate to assume the heat flow through

the continental lithosphere beneath the near-surface heat-producing layer,

qm, is constant. The resulting geotherm in the continental lithosphere is

given in Figure 4–56 for qm = 37 mW m−2 and k = 3.35 W m−1 K−1. The

thickness of the continental lithosphere is about 200 km.

Our discussion so far has centered on the thermal state of the shallow up-

per mantle; the geotherms in Figure 4–56 extend only to a depth of 400 km.

If the entire mantle were homogeneous and strongly convecting, the adi-

abatic temperature gradient given by Equation (4–254) would be a good

approximation of the slope of the temperature profile throughout the man-

tle. We have noted, however, that the distribution of density with depth has

significant discontinuities near depths of 410 and 660 km (see Figure 4–55).

The density discontinuity at 410 km is associated with the transformation

of olivine to a spinel structure. The phase change from olivine to spinel is

exothermic with a heat of reaction L = 90 kJ kg−1. For adiabatic flow

downward through the phase change, the temperature of the mantle rock

increases by

∆T = L

cp . (4.255)

The heat released by the phase change increases the temperature of the

rock. For cp = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, the increase in temperature is 90 K at a

depth of 410 km. This increase in temperature with depth for adiabatic flow

is shown in Figure 4–57, where the whole mantle geotherm is given. We will

show that the 410-km phase change enhances mantle convection; that the

associated density boundary does not block mantle convection is indicated

by the descent of the subducted lithosphere through this depth.

The density discontinuity at a depth of 660 km is attributed to the trans-

formation of the spinel structure to perovskite and magnesiowüstite. This

transformation is endothermic with a heat of reaction L = −70 kJ kg−1.

The heat absorbed by this reaction cools the rock. From Equation (4–255)

with cp = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, the decrease in temperature is 70 K at a depth of

660 km. We will show that the 660-km transformation is expected to retard

flow through this boundary.

4.28 Mantle Geotherms and Adiabats 343

Deep-focus earthquakes provide conclusive evidence that there is active

mantle convection to depths of 660 km. Since the lower mantle is expected

to contain significant concentrations of radioactive isotopes, we expect that

mantle convection will occur in the lower mantle in order to transport the

resulting heat.

Three alternative models for mantle convection have been proposed:

a Whole mantle convection. If significant amounts of subducted lithosphere

can enter the lower mantle beneath 660 km, then there must be a comple-

mentary mantle upwelling. In this case the geotherm for the entire mantle

is likely to be adiabatic. The expected geotherm is illustrated in Figure

4–57 as curve a. The primary arguments against whole mantle convection

come from chemical geodynamic studies, which we will discuss in Chapter

10.

b Layered mantle convection. Two separate convection systems are operat-

ing in the upper and lower mantle. This would be the case if the density

discontinuity at a depth of 660 km completely blocks convection. An up-

per convective system associated with plate tectonics would be restricted

to the upper 660 km of the mantle; a lower, separate system would op-

erate between a depth of 660 km and the core–mantle boundary. In this

case a thermal boundary layer would be expected to develop at a depth

of 660 km similar to the lithosphere. However, it is very difficult to es-

timate the change in temperature associated with this boundary layer.

An expected geotherm for layered mantle convection is given as curve b

in Figure 4–57. Although deep-focus earthquakes do not occur at depths

greater than 660 km, studies using mantle tomography indicate that at

least some subducted slabs penetrate through this boundary. This is taken

as convincing evidence that there is significant material transport between

the upper and lower mantle.

c Hybrid models. Hybrid models have been proposed that involve a strong

time dependence and/or a barrier to convection within the lower mantle.

If the 660-km seismic discontinuity acts as a partial barrier to mantle

convection, then mantle “avalanches” may be triggered that would lead

to a strongly time-dependent mantle convection. Dense subducted litho-

sphere could “pile up” on the 660-km deep seismic discontinuity until a

finite-amplitude instability resulted in a mantle “overturn” or avalanche.

Episodic mantle overturns have been proposed as an explanation for ap-

parent episodicities in the geological record. It has also been proposed

that there is a compositional barrier to whole mantle convection within

the lower mantle. Studies using seismic tomography have been used to

344 Heat Transfer

argue in favor of such a barrier having considerable topography and time

dependence.

A constraint on the temperature at the base of the mantle is the seismic

evidence that the outer core is liquid. This evidence consists mainly of the

inability of shear waves to propagate through the outer core. Measured veloc-

ities of seismic compressional waves in the outer core indicate that, although

the outer core is primarily composed of iron, it must also contain significant

concentrations of one or more other constituents, the most likely of which is

sulfur. The melting temperature for the iron–sulfur eutectic mixture at the

core–mantle boundary is estimated to be 3200 K. This is an approximate

minimum value for the temperature at the core–mantle boundary. The adi-

abatic lower mantle geotherm in Figure 4–57 is in approximate agreement

with this constraint.

Just as an upper mantle thermal boundary layer, the lithosphere, inter-

venes between the surface and the interior adiabatic state of the mantle,

a lower mantle thermal boundary layer is expected to exist just above the

core–mantle boundary. Seismic studies have confirmed the existence of this

boundary layer, which is referred to as the D′′-layer. The D′′-layer has a

complex structure with a thickness of 150 to 300 km. Laboratory studies

indicate that the solidus temperature of a perovskite–magnesiowüstite as-

semblage at the core–mantle boundary would be about 4300 K. In addition

to showing the two geotherms associated with whole mantle convection a

and layered mantle convection b, Figure 4–57 gives the range of values for

the mantle solidus as well as the temperature increases associated with the

D′′-layer. Although the required heat flux through the D′′-layer can be esti-

mated,the stability of the layer which would give its thickness is difficult to

determine. There may also be compositional stratification in this layer.

Problem 4.64 How much heat is conducted along the adiabat of Figure

4–57 at depths of 1000 and 2000 km? At the core–mantle interface? Use

k = 4 W m−1 K−1, αv = 1.5 × 10−5 K−1, g = 10 m s−2, cp = 1 kJ kg−1

K−1.

Problem 4.65 If the rate at which heat flows out of the core (J s−1) is

10% of the rate at which heat is lost at the Earth’s surface, how large is

the mean temperature drop across the lower mantle thermal boundary layer

in terms of the mean temperature drop across the upper mantle thermal

boundary layer? Assume that the heat transport across a boundary layer

can be calculated from Fourier’s law of heat conduction in the simple form

4.29 Thermal Structure of the Subducted Lithosphere 345

Figure 4.58 Isotherms (◦C) in a typical descending lithosphere. The 410- km phase change is elevated in the subducted lithosphere. The position of the slip zone is also shown.

of Equation (4–3). Also assume that the upper and lower mantle boundary

layers have the same thicknesses.

4.29 Thermal Structure of the Subducted Lithosphere

The subduction of the cold oceanic lithosphere into the deep mantle is a

primary mechanism for the transport of heat from the interior of the Earth

to its surface. Hot mantle rock comes to the surface at accretional plate

boundaries (ocean ridges) and is cooled by heat loss to the seafloor. The re-

sult is a cold thermal “boundary layer,” the oceanic lithosphere. The thermal

structure of this boundary layer was determined in Sections 4–16 and 4–17.

The cold subducted lithosphere is gradually heated and eventually becomes

part of the convecting mantle. Upward convective heat transfer through the

mantle involves the sinking of cold thermal anomalies (descending litho-

sphere at ocean trenches) and the rising of hot thermal anomalies (mantle

plumes). The density differences associated with the lateral temperature

variations provide the driving force for the mantle convective circulation.

In this section we discuss the temperature distribution in the subducted

oceanic lithosphere.

Isotherms in a lithosphere descending at an angle of 45◦ into the mantle

346 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.59 The Clapeyron or equilibrium curve separating two phases of the same material.

are shown in Figure 4–58. Since the subducted lithosphere was formed on the

seafloor, its initial thermal structure upon subduction is given by Equation

(4–125). The dependence of temperature upon depth prior to subduction is

the oceanic geotherm given in Figure 4–56. As the subducted lithosphere

descends into the mantle, frictional heating occurs at its upper boundary.

The effects of frictional heating were studied in Section 4–26. As discussed

there, the temperature distribution due to frictional heating – Equation (4–

240) – can be superimposed on the initial temperature distribution to give

the isotherms in the slab. The result is shown in Figure 4–58.

The low temperatures in the descending lithosphere cause it to have a

higher density than the surrounding mantle. The higher density results in

a body force driving the descending lithosphere downward. This body force

is important in driving the plates. An additional downward body force on

the descending slab is provided by the distortion of the olivine–spinel phase

boundary in the slab, as shown in Figure 4–58.

The olivine–spinel phase boundary is elevated in the descending litho-

sphere as compared with its position in the surrounding mantle because the

pressure at which the phase change occurs depends on temperature. Fig-

ure 4–59 is a sketch of the Clapeyron curve, which gives the pressures and

temperatures at which two phases of the same material, such as olivine and

spinel, are in equilibrium. Actually, the olivine–spinel transition is not uni-

variant; it occurs over a range of temperatures and pressures. It is sufficient

for our purposes here, however, to treat the phase change as occurring at a

single temperature corresponding to a single pressure. The two phases can

coexist at any point T , p lying on the Clapeyron curve.

The slope of the Clapeyron curve γ is defined by

γ ≡ (

dp

dT

)

pc . (4.256)

4.29 Thermal Structure of the Subducted Lithosphere 347

If we divide this equation by Equation (4–249), we obtain the change dy in

the vertical location of the phase transition corresponding to a change in

temperature dT

(

dy

dT

)

pc =

γ

ρg . (4.257)

For the olivine to spinel phase change, the slope of the Clapeyron curve

is positive. Since dT is negative for the lower temperatures in the interior

of the descending lithosphere, dy is negative, and the olivine–spinel phase

change occurs at a shallower depth (lower pressure) in the slab.

With γ = 2 MPa K−1, ρ = 3600 kg m−3, and g = 10 m s−2, we find from

Equation (4–257) that (dy/dT )pc = 0.055 km K−1. If we take the maximum

temperature difference across the slab to be ∆T = 800 K, we find that the

elevation of the olivine–spinel phase boundary in the descending lithosphere

is about 44 km. This elevation is illustrated in Figure 4–58. Since spinel is

about 280 kg m−3 denser than olivine, the additional mass of the elevated

spinel in the descending lithosphere provides a significant body force for

driving the plates in addition to the downward body force provided by the

thermal contraction of the lithosphere.

This approach can also be applied to the transition of spinel to perovskite

and magnesiowüstite. In this case the slope of the Clapeyron curve is nega-

tive and the transition occurs at a deeper depth (higher pressure) in the slab.

With γ = −2.5 MPa K−1, ρ = 3700 kg m−3 and g = 10 m s−2, we find from

Equation (4–257) that (dy/dT )pc = −0.07 km K−1. If we take the maximum

temperature across the slab to be ∆T = 750 K, we find that the depression

of this phase transition is 52 km. Since perovskite–magnesiowüstite is about

400 kg m−3 denser than spinel, the buoyancy of the depressed spinel pro-

vides a significant body force that inhibits convection through the 660-km

boundary.

Problem 4.66 Estimate the downward body force on the slab per unit

length of trench due to the elevation of the olivine–spinel phase boundary

in Figure 4–58. Assume ρ(spinel)− ρ(olivine) = 300 kg m−3. Estimate the

downward body force on the slab per unit length of trench due to thermal

contraction by integrating over the temperature distribution in Figure 4–58.

Assume αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, and consider the densification of the slab only

to depths of 660 km.

348 Heat Transfer

4.30 Culling Model for the Erosion and Deposition of Sediments

The erosion and deposition of sediments are responsible for the formation

and evolution of many landforms. A classic example is an alluvial fan caused

by the deposition of sediments on a horizontal surface. Cross sections of

alluvial fans often resemble the form of the complementary error function

given in Figure 4–21. This similarity suggests that sediment deposition may

be modeled using the heat equation.

The use of the heat equation to model sediment erosion and deposition

was first proposed by W. E. H. Culling (1960) and this approach is known

as the Culling model. The basic hypothesis is that the down slope flux of

sediments S is linearly proportional to the slope so that

S = −K∂h

∂x , (4.258)

where h is the elevation of topography above a base level, x is the horizontal

distance, and K is a constant that is called a transport coefficient. The

sediment flux S is the volume of sediment transported per unit time per

unit width. In terms of the analogy with the heat equation (4–68), the flux

equation (4–258) is directly analogous to Fourier’s law given in Equation

(4–1).

Consider an element of topography of width δx. The flux of sediment out

of this element at x + δx is S(x + δx) and the flux of sediment into this

element at x is S(x). Using Equation (4–258) and the same expansion given

in Equations (4–9) and (4–10) we have

S(x+ δx) − S(x) = δx ∂S

∂x = −δxK ∂2h

∂x2 , (4.259)

where we have assumed K to be a constant. If there is a net flow of sediment

into the element, there must be a change in elevation h given by

δx ∂h

∂t .

Since a net flux of sediment out of the element leads to a decrease in eleva-

tion, we have

∂h

∂t = K

∂2h

∂x2 , (4.260)

which is identical to the one-dimensional, time-

dependent heat conduction equation (4–68).

Let us apply the Culling model to the progradation of a river delta into

a quiet basin with a horizontal flow. Sediments are supplied to the delta by

the river forming it. Sediments are deposited near the landward edge of the

4.30 Culling Model for the Erosion and Deposition of Sediments 349

Figure 4.60 Illustration of the one-dimensional model for a prograding river delta. It is assumed that the delta progrades seaward at a constant velocity U0; its position at successive times t1 to t4 is illustrated. The height of the prograding delta above the basin floor is h.

delta and are transported down the front of the delta by creep and shallow

landslides. Our simple one-dimensional model is illustrated in Figure 4–60.

The delta front is assumed to prograde forward at a constant velocity U0

and its position at successive times t1, t2, t3, and t4 is shown.

We utilize the approach given in Section 4–19 to solve this problem. Let

ξ = x− U0t (4.261)

be a coordinate that is moving with the front of the delta. The shape of the

delta is independent of time in this coordinate system and substitution of

Equation (4–261) into Equation (4–260) gives

−U0 dh

dξ = K

d2h

dξ2 , (4.262)

with the boundary conditions h = h0 at ξ = 0 and h → 0 as ξ → ∞ where

h0 is the height of the landward edge of the delta front. The solution of

Equation (4–262) is

h = A exp

(

−U0ξ

K

)

+B, (4.263)

where A and B are constants. When the boundary conditions are satisfied

we obtain

h = h0 exp

(

−U0ξ

K

)

. (4.264)

Substitution of Equation (4–261) into Equation (4–264) gives

h = h0 exp

[

−U0

K (x− U0t)

]

. (4.265)

The height of the delta front above the floor decreases exponentially with

350 Heat Transfer

Figure 4.61 Dependence of the nondimensional height h/h0 on the nondi- mensional distance from shore U0(x−U0t)/K from Equation (4–265).

Figure 4.62 Cross-sectional profiles of the Mississippi River delta (south- west passage) at various times showing its progradation (Fisk et al., 1954).

distance from the shore. A plot of height versus distance from the shore is

given in Figure 4–61.

Comparisons with progradation data are obtained using the delta front

slope. This slope at ξ = 0 is given by (

∂h

∂x

)

ξ=0 = −U0h

K . (4.266)

Using this relation, we can obtain the transport coefficient from the progra-

dation velocity U0 and the morphology of the delta. As a specific example,

consider the southwest pass segment of the Mississippi River delta. Longitu-

dinal profiles of this delta front are shown in Figure 4–62. Taking h = 107 m,

4.30 Culling Model for the Erosion and Deposition of Sediments 351

U0 = 76 m yr−1, and (∂h/∂x)ξ=0 = −0.0096, we find from Equation (4–266)

that K = 8.5 × 105 m2 yr−1.

Problem 4.67 Consider a simplified one-dimensional model for the for-

mation of an alluvial fan. Assume that there is a uniform flux of sediment

S0 over a vertical cliff, forming a one-dimensional, time-dependent alluvial

fan. Assume that the Culling theory is applicable and use the methods of

Section 4–25 to show that

h = 2S0

K

{(

Kt

π

)1/2

exp

(

− x2

4Kt

)

− x

2 erfc

(

x

2(Kt1/2)

)}

. (4.267)

Also show that the height of the alluvial fan at the cliff (x = 0) is given by

h0 = 2S0

(

t

πK

)1/2

(4.268)

and that the slope of the alluvial fan at the cliff is given by (

∂h

∂x

)

x=0 = −S0

K (4.269)

and

h0 = −2

(

∂h

∂x

)

x=0

(

Kt

π

)1/2

. (4.270)

For the alluvial fan beneath the San Gabriel Mountains in Pasadena, Cal-

ifornia, it is appropriate to take h0 = 400 m, (∂h/∂x)x=0 = −0.075, and

t = 106 years. What is the corresponding transport coefficient K?

Problem 4.68 The Culling model can also be applied to the erosion and

deposition of a fault scarp. Assume that a vertical fault scarp of height h0

forms at t = 0 and x = 0 and subsequently erodes symmetrically. At t = 0,

h = h0 for x < 0 and h = 0 for x > 0. For t > 0, h = h0/2 at x = 0,

the region x < 0 erodes and deposition occurs in x > 0. Assume that both

erosion and deposition are governed by Eq. (4–260) withK prescribed. Show

that the height of the topography h is given by

h = h0

2 erfc

(

x

2 √ Kt

)

. (4.271)

Also show that slope at x = 0 is given by (

∂h

∂x

)

x=0 =

−h0

2(πKt)1/2 . (4.272)

352 Collateral Reading

An earthquake is known to have occurred 400 years ago; with h0 = 3 m and

(∂h/∂x)x=0 = −0.5, what is the value of the transport coefficient K?

The morphology of sedimentary landforms such as prograding river deltas,

alluvial fans, eroding fault scarps, and eroding shorelines are often in good

agreement with solutions of the heat equation. However, derived values of

the transport coefficient K have considerable variability. This is not surpris-

ing because submarine sediment transport is very different from subaerial

sediment transport. Also, both are very dependent on climate, weather, and

rock type.

Collateral Reading

Carslaw, H. S., and J. C. Jaeger (1959), Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd

edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 510 p.

Culling, W. E. H. (1960), Analytical theory of erosion, J. Geol. 68, 336–344.

Fisk, H. N., E. McFarlan, C.R. Kolb, and L. J. Wilbert (1954), Sedimentary

framework of the modern Mississippi Delta, J. Sedimen. Petrol. 24,

76–99.

Johnson, H. P., and R. L. Carlson (1992), Variation of sea floor depth with

age: A test of models based on drilling results, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19,

1971–1974.

Leeds, A. R., L. Knopoff, and E. G. Kausel (1974), Variations of upper

mantle structure under the Pacific Ocean, Science 186, 141–143.

Lister, C. R. B., J. G. Sclater, E. E. Davis, H. Villinger, and S. Nagihara

(1990), Heat flow maintained in ocean basins of great age: Investigations

in the north-equatorial west Pacific, Geophys. J. Int. 102, 603–630.

Pollack, H. N., S. J. Hurter, and J. R. Johnson (1993), Heat flow from the

Earth’s interior: Analysis of the global data set, Rev. Geophys. 31, 267–

280.

Sclater, J. G., C. Jaupart, and D. Galson (1980), The heat flow through

oceanic and continental crust and the heat loss of the Earth, Rev. Geo-

phys. Space Phys. 18, 269–311.

Stefan, J. (1891), Uber die Theorie der Eisbildung, insbesondere uber die

Eisbildung im Polarmeere, Ann. Physik Chem. 42, 269–286.

Vail, P. R., R. M. Mitchum, and S. Thompson (1978), Seismic stratigraphy

and global changes of sea level, in Seismic Stratigraphy: Applications to

Hydrocarbon Exploration, C. F. Payton, ed., American Association of

Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 26, pp. 83–97.

Collateral Reading 353

Wright, T. L., D. L. Peck, and H. R. Shaw (1976), Kilauea lava lakes: Natural

laboratories of study of cooling, crystallization and differentiation of

basaltic magma, in The Geophysics of the Pacific Ocean Basin and

its Margin, G. H. Sutton, M. H. Manghnani, and R. Moberly, eds.,

American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C., pp. 375–390.

Collateral Reading

Burchfield, J. D., Lord Kelvin and the Age of the Earth (Science History

Publications, New York, 1975), 260 pages.

A historical account of scientific attempts to determine the age of the Earth.

The book focuses on Kelvin’s influence and the debate between physi-

cists and geologists between the mid-1800s and the early 1900s.

Carslaw, H. S., and J. C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd edition

(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959), 510 pages.

A classic textbook on the mathematical theory of heat conduction in solids.

It describes fundamental mathematical techniques for solving time-

dependent heat conduction problems in a variety of geometries. The

book contains an extensive compilation of solutions to boundary value

problems often encountered in geological and geophysical applications.

5

Gravity

5.1 Introduction

The force exerted on an element of mass at the surface of the Earth has two

principal components. One is due to the gravitational attraction of the mass

in the Earth, and the other is due to the rotation of the Earth. Gravity refers

to the combined effects of both gravitation and rotation. If the Earth were

a nonrotating spherically symmetric body, the gravitational acceleration on

its surface would be constant. However, because of the Earth’s rotation,

topography, and internal lateral density variations, the acceleration of gravity

g varies with location on the surface. The Earth’s rotation leads mainly to a

latitude dependence of the surface acceleration of gravity. Because rotation

distorts the surface by producing an equatorial bulge and a polar flattening,

gravity at the equator is about 5 parts in 1000 less than gravity at the poles.

The Earth takes the shape of an oblate spheroid. The gravitational field of

this spheroid is the reference gravitational field of the Earth. Topography

and density inhomogeneities in the Earth lead to local variations in the

surface gravity, which are referred to as gravity anomalies.

The mass of the rock associated with topography leads to surface gravity

anomalies. However, as we discussed in Chapter 2, large topographic features

have low-density crustal roots. Just as the excess mass of the topography

produces a positive gravity anomaly, the low-density root produces a nega-

tive gravity anomaly. In the mid-1800s it was observed that the gravitational

attraction of the Himalayan Mountains was considerably less than would be

expected because of the positive mass of the topography. This was the first

evidence that the crust–mantle boundary is depressed under large mountain

belts.

A dramatic example of the importance of crustal thickening is the ab-

sence of positive gravity anomalies over the continents. The positive mass

5.2 Gravitational Acceleration 355

anomaly associated with the elevation of the continents above the ocean

floor is reduced or compensated by the negative mass anomaly associated

with the thicker continental crust. We will show that compensation due to

the hydrostatic equilibrium of thick crust leads in the first approximation

to a zero value for the surface gravity anomaly. There are mechanisms for

compensation other than the simple thickening of the crust. An example

is the subsidence of the ocean floor due to the thickening of the thermal

lithosphere, as discussed in Section 4–23.

Gravity anomalies that are correlated with topography can be used to

study the flexure of the elastic lithosphere under loading. Short wavelength

loads do not depress the lithosphere, but long wavelength loads result in

flexure and a depression of the Moho. Gravity anomalies can also have im-

portant economic implications. Ore minerals are usually more dense than the

country rock in which they are found. Therefore, economic mineral deposits

are usually associated with positive gravity anomalies. Major petroleum oc-

currences are often found beneath salt domes. Since salt is less dense than

other sedimentary rocks, salt domes are usually associated with negative

gravity anomalies.

As we will see in the next chapter, mantle convection is driven by vari-

ations of density in the Earth’s mantle. These variations produce grav-

ity anomalies at the Earth’s surface. Thus, measurements of gravity at

the Earth’s surface can provide important constraints on the flow patterns

within the Earth’s interior. However, it must be emphasized that the surface

gravity does not provide a unique measure of the density distribution within

the Earth’s interior. Many different internal density distributions can give

the same surface distributions of gravity anomalies. In other words, inver-

sions of gravity data are non-unique.

5.2 Gravitational Acceleration External to the Rotationally

Distorted Earth

The gravitational force exerted on a mass m′ located at point P outside the

Earth by a small element of mass dm in the Earth is given by Newton’s law

of gravitation. As shown in Figure 5–1, the gravitational attraction dfm in

the direction from P to dm is given by

dfm = Gm′dm

b2 , (5.1)

where G is the universal gravitational constant G = 6.673 × 10−11 m3 kg−1

s−2 and b is the distance between dm and the point P . The infinitesimal

356 Gravity

Figure 5.1 Force on a mass m′ due to the gravitational attraction of an infinitesimal element of mass dm in the Earth.

gravitational acceleration at P due to the attraction of dm is the force per

unit mass exerted on m′ in the direction of P :

dgm = dfm m′ . (5.2)

By combining Equations (5–1) and (5–2) we obtain

dgm = Gdm

b2 . (5.3)

If the distribution of mass in the Earth were known exactly, the gravitational

attraction of the Earth on a unit mass outside the Earth could be obtained

by summing or integrating dgm over the entire distribution. Suppose, for

example, that the entire mass of the Earth M were concentrated at its

center. The gravitational acceleration at a distance r from the center would

then be directed radially inward and, according to Equation (5–3), it would

be given by

gm = GM

r2 . (5.4)

Following the generally accepted sign convention, we take gm to be positive,

even though it is directed in the −r direction.

We next determine the gravitational acceleration outside a spherical body

with a density distribution that is a function of radius only, ρ = ρ(r′). The

geometry is illustrated in Figure 5–2. It is clear from symmetry considera-

tions that the gravitational acceleration gm at a point P outside the mass

5.2 Gravitational Acceleration 357

Figure 5.2 Geometry for the calculation of the gravitational acceleration at a point outside a spherically symmetric mass distribution.

distribution is directed radially inward and depends only on the distance r

of point P from the center of the sphere. For convenience, we let the line

from P to O be the polar axis of a spherical coordinate system r, θ, ψ. The

gravitational acceleration at P due to an element of mass dm located in the

sphere at r′, θ′, ψ′ is directed along the line from P to dm and is given by

Equation (5–3). The component of this gravitational acceleration along the

line from P to O is

G cosαdm

b2 .

The net radially inward gravitational acceleration at P is found by integrat-

ing this expression over the entire mass distribution:

gm = G

cosα dm

b2 . (5.5)

The element of mass dm is the product of the volume element dV with the

density ρ(r′) at the location of dV

dm = ρ(r′) dV. (5.6)

358 Gravity

The element of volume can be expressed in spherical coordinates as

dV = r′2 sin θ′ dθ′ dψ′ dr′. (5.7)

The integral over the spherical mass distribution in Equation (5–5) can thus

be written

gm = G

∫ a

0

∫ π

0

∫ 2π

0

ρ(r′)r′2 sin θ′ cosα dψ′ dθ′ dr′

b2 ,

(5.8)

where a is the radius of the model Earth. The integral over ψ′ is 2π, since

the quantities in the integrand of Equation (5–8) are independent of ψ′. To

carry out the integration over r′ and θ′, we need an expression for cosα.

From the law of cosines we can write

cosα = b2 + r2 − r′2

2rb . (5.9)

Because the expression for cos α involves b rather than θ′, it is more conve-

nient to rewrite Equation (5–8) so that the integration can be carried out

over b rather than over θ′. The law of cosines can be used again to find an

expression for cos θ′:

cos θ′ = r′2 + r2 − b2

2rr′ . (5.10)

By differentiating Equation (5–10) with r and r′ held constant, we find

sin θ′dθ′ = b db

rr′ . (5.11)

Upon substitution of Equations (5–9) and (5–11) into Equation (5–8), we

can write the integral expression for gm as

gm = πG

r2

∫ a

0 r′ρ(r′)

∫ r+r′

r−r′

{

r2 − r′2

b2 + 1

}

db dr′.

(5.12)

The integration over b gives 4 r′ so that Equation (5–12) becomes

gm = 4πG

r2

∫ a

0 dr′r′2ρ(r′). (5.13)

Since the total mass of the model is given by

M = 4π

∫ a

0 dr′r′2ρ(r′), (5.14)

5.2 Gravitational Acceleration 359

the gravitational acceleration is

gm = GM

r2 . (5.15)

The gravitational acceleration of a spherically symmetric mass distribu-

tion, at a point outside the mass, is identical to the acceleration obtained

by concentrating all the mass at the center of the distribution. Even though

there are lateral density variations in the Earth and the Earth’s shape is dis-

torted by rotation, the direction of the gravitational acceleration at a point

external to the Earth is very nearly radially inward toward the Earth’s cen-

ter of mass, and Equation (5–15) provides an excellent first approximation

for gm.

Problem 5.1 For a point on the surface of the Moon determine the ratio

of the acceleration of gravity due to the mass of the Earth to the acceleration

of gravity due to the mass of the Moon.

The rotational distortion of the Earth’s mass adds a small latitude-dependent

term to the gravitational acceleration. This term depends on the excess mass

in the rotational equatorial bulge of the Earth. The observed latitude depen-

dence of gm can thus be used to determine this excess mass. In addition, this

effect must be removed from observed variations in surface gravity before the

residual gravity anomalies can properly be attributed to density anomalies

in the Earth’s interior. The model we use to calculate the contribution of

rotational distortion to gravitational acceleration is sketched in Figure 5–3.

The Earth is assumed to be flattened at the poles and bulged at the equator

because of its rotation with angular velocity ω. The mass distribution is as-

sumed to be symmetrical about the rotation axis. Because of the departure

from spherical symmetry due to rotation, the gravitational acceleration at a

point P outside the Earth has both radial and tangential components. The

radial component is the sum of GM/r2 and the term g′r due to rotational

distortion of the mass distribution; the tangential component g′t is entirely

due to the rotationally induced departure from spherical symmetry. Follow-

ing our previous sign convention both GM/r2 and g′r are positive if directed

inward. Since rotation modifies the otherwise spherically symmetric model

Earth only slightly, g′r and g′t are small compared with GM/r2.

The total gravitational acceleration is {(

GM

r2 + g′r

)2

+ g′2t

}1/2

=

{(

GM

r2

)2

+ 2

(

GM

r2

)

g′r + g′2r + g′2t

}1/2

. (5.16)

360 Gravity

Figure 5.3 Geometry for calculating the contribution of rotational distor- tion to the gravitational acceleration.

It is appropriate to neglect the quadratic terms because the magnitudes of g′r and g′t are much less than GM/r2. Therefore the gravitational acceleration

is given by

{(

GM

r2

)2

+ 2

(

GM

r2

)

g′r

}1/2

=

(

GM

r2

){

1 + 2g′r

GM/r2

}1/2

=

(

GM

r2

){

1 + g′r

GM/r2

}

= GM

r2 + g′r. (5.17)

Equation (5–17) shows that the tangential component of the gravitational

acceleration is negligible; the net gravitational acceleration at a point P

external to a rotationally distorted model Earth is essentially radially inward

to the center of the mass distribution.

The radial gravitational acceleration for the rotationally distorted Earth

model can be obtained by integrating Equation (5–5) over the entire mass

distribution. We can rewrite this equation for gm by substituting expression

(5–9) for cos α with the result

gm = G

2r2

∫ {

r

b + r3

b3

(

1 − r′2

r2

)}

dm. (5.18)

5.2 Gravitational Acceleration 361

The three distances appearing in the integral of Equation (5–18) r, r′, and

b are the sides of the triangle connecting O, P , and dm in Figure 5–3. It is

helpful for carrying out the integration to eliminate b from the integrand in

terms of r, r′, and the angle β, which is opposite the side of length b in this

triangle. From the law of cosines we can write

b2 = r2 + r′2 − 2rr′ cos β, (5.19)

which can be rearranged as

r

b =

{

1 + r′2

r2 − 2r′

r cos β

}−1/2

. (5.20)

Upon substituting Equation (5–20) into Equation (5–18), we get

gm = G

2r2

∫ {

1 + r′2

r2 − 2r′

r cos β

}−1/2

× {

1 +

(

1 − r′2

r2

)(

1 + r′2

r2 − 2r′

r cos β

)−1}

dm.

(5.21)

An analytic evaluation of the integral in Equation (5–21) is not possible.

The integration is complicated because both r′ and β vary with the position

of dm. However, the integration can be made tractable by approximating

the integrand with a power series in r′/r and retaining terms only up to

(r′/r)2. For P outside the mass distribution, r′/r < 1. We will show that

the expansion in powers of (r′/r) is equivalent to an expansion of the grav-

itational field in powers of a/r. This approximation yields an expression for

gm that is sufficiently accurate for our purposes. Using the formulas

(1 + ε)−1/2 ≈ 1 − ε

2 +

3ε2

8 + · · · (5.22)

(1 + ε)−1 ≈ 1 − ε+ ε2 + · · · , (5.23)

which are approximately valid for ε < 1, we find

gm = G

r2

∫ {

1 + 2r′

r cos β +

3r′2

r2

(

1 − 3

2 sin2 β

)}

dm.

(5.24)

The integrations in Equation (5–24) can be carried out in terms of well-

known physical properties of a mass distribution. The first term is just the

integral of dm over the entire mass. The result is simply M . The integral

of r′ cos β over the mass distribution is a first moment of the distribution.

362 Gravity

It is by definition zero if the origin of the coordinate system is the center of

mass of the distribution. Thus Equation (5–24) becomes

gm = GM

r2 +

3G

r4

r′2 (

1 − 3

2 sin2 β

)

dm. (5.25)

The first term on the right of Equation (5–25) is the gravitational acceler-

ation of a spherically symmetric mass distribution. The second term is the

modification due to rotationally induced oblateness of the body. If higher

order terms in Equations (5–24) and (5–23) had been retained, the expan-

sion given in Equation (5–25) would have been extended to include terms

proportional to r−5 and higher powers of r−1.

We will now express the integral appearing in Equation (5–25) in terms

of the moments of inertia of an axisymmetric body. We take C to be the

moment of inertia of the body about the rotational or z axis defined by θ = 0.

This moment of inertia is the integral over the entire mass distribution of

dm times the square of the perpendicular distance from dm to the rotational

axis. The square of this distance is x′2 + y′2 so that we can write C as

C ≡ ∫

(x′2 + y′2) dm =

r′2 sin2 θ′ dm (5.26)

because

x′ = r′ sin θ′ cosψ′ (5.27)

y′ = r′ sin θ′ sinψ′. (5.28)

The moment of inertia about the x axis, which is defined by θ = π/2, ψ = 0,

is

A ≡ ∫

(y′2 + z ′2) dm

=

r′2(sin2 θ′ sin2 ψ′ + cos2 θ′) dm (5.29)

because

z′ = r′ cos θ′. (5.30)

Similarly, the moment of inertia about the y axis, which is defined by θ =

π/2, ψ = π/2, is

B ≡ ∫

(x′2 + z ′2) dm

=

r′2(sin2 θ′ cos2 ψ′ + cos2 θ′) dm. (5.31)

5.2 Gravitational Acceleration 363

For a body that is axisymmetric about the rotation or z axis, A = B. The

addition of Equations (5–26), (5–29), and (5–31) together with the assump-

tion of axisymmetry gives

A+B + C = 2

r′2 dm = 2A+ C. (5.32)

This equation expresses the integral of r′2dm appearing in Equation (5–25)

in terms of the moments of inertia of the body.

We will next derive an expression for the integral of r′2 sin2 βdm. Because

of the axial symmetry of the body there is no loss of generality in letting

the line OP in Figure 5–3 lie in the xz plane. With the help of Equation

(5–32) we rewrite the required integral as

r′2 sin2 β dm =

r′2(1 − cos2 β) dm

= A+ 1

2 C −

r′2 cos2 β dm.

(5.33)

The quantity r′ cos β is the projection of r′ along OP . But this is also

r′ cos β = x′ cosφ+ z′ sinφ, (5.34)

where φ is the latitude or the angle between OP and the xy plane. Note that

y′ has no projection onto OP , since OP is in the xz plane. We use Equation

(5–34) to rewrite the integral of r′2 cos2 β in the form ∫

r′2 cos2 β dm = cos2 φ

x′2 dm

+ sin2 φ

z ′2 dm

+2cosφ sinφ

x′z′ dm. (5.35)

For an axisymmetric body, ∫

x′2 dm =

y′2 dm. (5.36)

This result and Equation (5–26) give

x′2 dm = 1

2

(x′2 + y′2) dm = 1

2 C. (5.37)

364 Gravity

The integral of z ′2dm can be evaluated by using Equations (5–26) and (5–32) ∫

z ′2 dm =

(x′2 + y′2 + z ′2) dm − ∫

(x′2 + y′2) dm

=

r′2 dm− ∫

(x′2 + y′2) dm

= A− 1

2 C. (5.38)

With mass symmetry about the equatorial plane we have ∫

x′z′ dm =

r′2 cos θ′ sin θ′ cosψ′ dm = 0. (5.39)

Substitution of Equations (5–37) to (5–39) into Equation (5–35) yields ∫

r′2 cos2 β dm = 1

2 C cos2 φ+

(

A− 1

2 C

)

sin2 φ.

(5.40)

When Equations (5–33) and (5–40) are combined, we find, using sin2 φ +

cos2 φ = 1, that ∫

r′2 sin2 β dm = A cos2 φ+ C sin2 φ. (5.41)

The gravitational acceleration is finally obtained by substituting Equations

(5–32) and (5–41) into Equation (5–25):

gm = GM

r2 − 3G(C −A)

2r4 (3 sin2 φ− 1). (5.42)

Equation (5–42) is a simplified form of MacCullagh’s formula for an ax-

isymmetric body. The moment of inertia about the rotational axis C is larger

than the moment of inertia about an equatorial axis A because of the ro-

tational flattening of the body. It is customary to write the difference in

moments of inertia as a fraction J2 of Ma2, that is

C −A = J2Ma2, (5.43)

where a is the Earth’s equatorial radius. In terms of J2, gm is

gm = GM

r2 − 3GMa2J2

2r4 (3 sin2 φ− 1). (5.44)

The Earth’s gravitational field can be accurately determined from the track-

ing of artificial satellites. The currently accepted values are:

a = 6378.137 km

GM = 3.98600440 × 1014 m3s−2

5.3 Centrifugal Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity 365

Figure 5.4 Centrifugal acceleration at a point on the Earth’s surface.

J2 = 1.0826265 × 10−3. (5.45)

Although a satellite is acted upon only by the Earth’s gravitational accel-

eration, an object on the Earth’s surface is also subjected to a centrifugal

acceleration due to the Earth’s rotation.

5.3 Centrifugal Acceleration and the Acceleration of Gravity

The force on a unit mass at the surface of the Earth due to the rotation of

the Earth with angular velocity ω is the centrifugal acceleration gω. It points

radially outward along a line perpendicular to the rotation axis and passing

through P , as shown in Figure 5–4, and is given by

gω = ω2s, (5.46)

where s is the perpendicular distance from P to the rotation axis. If r is the

radial distance from P to the center of the Earth and φ is the latitude of

point P , then

s = r cosφ (5.47)

and

gω = ω2r cosφ. (5.48)

The currently accepted value for the Earth’s angular velocity is

ω = 7.292115 × 10−5 rad s−1.

366 Gravity

Problem 5.2 Determine the ratio of the centrifugal acceleration to the

gravitational acceleration at the Earth’s equator.

The gravitational and centrifugal accelerations of a mass at the Earth’s

surface combine to yield the acceleration of gravity g. Because gω ≪ gm, it

is appropriate to add the radial component of the centrifugal acceleration

to gm to obtain g; see Equations (5–16) and (5–17). As shown in Figure 5–

4, the radial component of centrifugal acceleration points radially outward.

In agreement with our sign convention that inward radial accelerations are

positive, the radial component of the centrifugal acceleration is

g′r = −gω cosφ = −ω2r cos2 φ. (5.49)

Therefore, the acceleration of gravity g is the sum of gm in Equation (5–44)

and g′r:

g = GM

r2 − 3GMa2J2

2r4 (3 sin2 φ− 1) − ω2r cos2 φ.

(5.50)

Equation (5–50) gives the radially inward acceleration of gravity for a point

located on the surface of the model Earth at latitude φ and distance r from

the center of mass.

5.4 The Gravitational Potential and the Geoid

By virtue of its position in a gravitational field, a mass m′ has gravitational

potential energy. The energy can be regarded as the negative of the work

done on m′ by the gravitational force of attraction in bringing m′ from infin-

ity to its position in the field. The gravitational potential V is the potential

energy of m′ divided by its mass. Because the gravitational field is conser-

vative, the potential energy per unit mass V depends only on the position

in the field and not on the path through which a mass is brought to the

location. To calculate V for the rotationally distorted model Earth, we can

imagine bringing a unit mass from infinity to a distance r from the center

of the model along a radial path. The negative of the work done on the unit

mass by the gravitational field of the model is the integral of the product

of the force per unit mass gm in Equation (5–44) with the increment of dis-

tance dr (the acceleration of gravity and the increment dr are oppositely

directed):

V =

∫ r

{

GM

r′2 − 3GMa2J2

2r′4 (3 sin2 φ− 1)

}

dr′

5.4 The Gravitational Potential and the Geoid 367

(5.51)

or

V = −GM r

+ GMa2J2

2r3 (3 sin2 φ− 1). (5.52)

In evaluating V , we assume that the potential energy at an infinite distance

from the Earth is zero. The gravitational potential adjacent to the Earth is

negative; Earth acts as a potential well. The first term in Equation (5–52)

is the gravitational potential of a point mass. It is also the gravitational

potential outside any spherically symmetric mass distribution. The second

term is the effect on the potential of the Earth model’s rotationally induced

oblateness. A gravitational equipotential surface is a surface on which V is a

constant. Gravitational equipotentials are spheres for spherically symmetric

mass distributions.

Problem 5.3 (a) What is the gravitational potential energy of a 1-kg mass

at the Earth’s equator? (b) If this mass fell toward the Earth from a large

distance where it had zero relative velocity, what would be the velocity at

the Earth’s surface? (c) If the available potential energy was converted into

heat that uniformly heated the mass, what would be the temperature of the

mass if its initial temperature T0 = 100 K, c = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, Tm = 1500

K, and L = 400 kJ kg−1?

A comparison of Equations (5–44) and (5–52) shows that V is the integral

of the radial component of the gravitational acceleration gm with respect to

r. To obtain a gravity potential U which accounts for both gravitation and

the rotation of the model Earth, we can take the integral with respect to r

of the radial component of the acceleration of gravity g in Equation (5–50)

with the result that

U = − GM

r + GMa2J2

2r3 (3 sin2 φ− 1)

− 1

2 ω2r2 cos2 φ. (5.53)

A gravity equipotential is a surface on which U is a constant. Within a few

meters the sea surface defines an equipotential surface. Therefore, elevations

above or below sea level are distances above or below a reference equipoten-

tial surface.

The reference equipotential surface that defines sea level is called the geoid.

We will now obtain an expression for the geoid surface that is consistent with

our second-order expansion of the gravity potential given in Equation (5–

53). The value of the surface gravity potential at the equator is found by

368 Gravity

substituting r = a and φ = 0 in Equation (5–53) with the result

U0 = −GM a

(

1 + 1

2 J2

)

− 1

2 a2ω2. (5.54)

The value of the surface gravity potential at the poles must also be U0

because we define the surface of the model Earth to be an equipotential

surface. We substitute r = c (the Earth’s polar radius) and φ = ±π/2 into

Equation (5–53) and obtain

U0 = −GM c

[

1 − J2

(

a

c

)2]

. (5.55)

The flattening (ellipticity) of this geoid is defined by

f ≡ a− c

a . (5.56)

The flattening is very slight; that is, f ≪ 1. In order to relate the flattening

f to J2, we set Equations (5–54) and (5–55) equal and obtain

1 + 1

2 J2 +

1

2

a3ω2

GM = a

c

[

1 − J2

(

a

c

)2]

. (5.57)

Substituting c = a(1 − f) and the neglecting quadratic and higher order

terms in f and J2, because f ≪ 1 and J2 ≪ 1, we find that

f = 3

2 J2 +

1

2

a3ω2

GM . (5.58)

Taking a3ω2/GM = 3.46139 × 10−3 and J2 = 1.0826265 × 10−3 from Equa-

tion (5–45), we find from Equation (5–58) that f = 3.3546×10−3 . Retention

of higher order terms in the theory gives the more accurate value

f = 3.35281068 × 10−3 = 1

298.257222 . (5.59)

It should be emphasized that Equation (5–58) is valid only if the surface of

the planetary body is an equipotential.

The shape of the model geoid is nearly that of a spherical surface; that is,

if r0 is the distance to the geoid,

r0 ≈ a(1 − ε), (5.60)

where ε≪ 1. By setting U = U0 and r = r0 in Equation (5–53), substituting

Equation (5–54) for U0 and Equation (5–60) for r0, and neglecting quadratic

and higher order terms in f , J2, a 3ω2/GM , and ε, we obtain

ε =

(

3

2 J2 +

1

2

a3ω2

GM

)

sin2 φ. (5.61)

5.4 The Gravitational Potential and the Geoid 369

Figure 5.5 Geoid height (EGM96) above reference ellipsoid WGS84 (Lemoine et al., 1998).

The substitution of Equation (5–61) into Equation (5–60) gives the approx-

imate model equation for the geoid as

r0 = a

{

1 − (

3

2 J2 +

1

2

a3ω2

GM

)

sin2 φ

}

(5.62)

or

r0 = a(1 − f sin2 φ). (5.63)

The nondimensional quantity a3ω2/GM is a measure of the relative im-

portance of the centrifugal acceleration due to the rotation of the Earth

compared with the gravitational attraction of the mass in the Earth. The

rotational contribution is about 0.33% of the mass contribution.

In the preceding analysis we considered only terms linear in J2 and a3ω2/GM .

In order to provide a reference geoid against which geoid anomalies are mea-

sured, it is necessary to include higher order terms. By convention, the ref-

erence geoid is a spheroid (ellipsoid of revolution) defined in terms of the

equatorial and polar radii by

r20 cos2 φ

a2 + r20 sin2 φ

c2 = 1. (5.64)

370 Gravity

The eccentricity e of the spheroid is given by

e ≡ (

a2 − c2

a2

)1/2

= (2f − f2)1/2. (5.65)

It is the usual practice to express the reference geoid in terms of the equa-

torial radius and the flattening with the result

r20 cos2 φ

a2 +

r20 sin2 φ

a2(1 − f)2 = 1 (5.66)

or

r0 = a

[

1 + (2f − f2)

(1 − f)2 sin2 φ

]−1/2

. (5.67)

If Equation (5–67) is expanded in powers of f and if terms of quadratic

and higher order in f are neglected, the result agrees with Equation (5–63).

Equation (5–67) with a = 6378.137 km and f = 1/298.257222 defines the

reference geoid.

The difference in elevation between the measured geoid and the reference

geoid ∆N is referred to as a geoid anomaly. A map of geoid anomalies is

given in Figure 5–5. The maximum geoid anomalies are around 100 m; this

is about 0.5% of the 21-km difference between the equatorial and polar radii.

Clearly, the measured geoid is very close to having the spheroidal shape of

the reference geoid.

The major geoid anomalies shown in Figure 5–5 can be attributed to den-

sity inhomogeneities in the Earth. A comparison with the distribution of

surface plates given in Figure 1–1 shows that some of the major anomalies

can be directly associated with plate tectonic phenomena. Examples are the

geoid highs over New Guinea and Chile–Peru; these are clearly associated

with subduction. The excess mass of the dense subducted lithosphere causes

an elevation of the geoid. The negative geoid anomaly over China may be

associated with the continental collision between the Indian and Eurasian

plates and the geoid low over the Hudson Bay in Canada may be associated

with postglacial rebound (see Section 6–10). The largest geoid anomaly is

the negative geoid anomaly off the southern tip of India, which has an am-

plitude of 100 m. No satisfactory explanation has been given for this geoid

anomaly, which has no surface expression. A similar unexplained negative

geoid anomaly lies off the west coast of North America.

The definition of geoid anomalies relative to the reference geoid is some-

what arbitrary. The reference geoid itself includes an averaging over den-

sity anomalies within the Earth. An alternative approach is to define geoid

anomalies relative to a hydrostatic geoid. The Earth is assumed to have a

5.4 The Gravitational Potential and the Geoid 371

Figure 5.6 Relationship of measured and reference geoids and geoid anomaly ∆ N.

layered structure in terms of density, but each layer is in hydrostatic equilib-

rium relative to the rotation of the Earth. The anomaly map is significantly

different for the two approaches, but the major features remain unaffected.

One of the primary concerns in geodesy is to define topography and

bathymetry. Both are measured relative to “sea level.” Sea level is closely

approximated by an equipotential surface corresponding to a constant value

of U . As we have discussed, geoid anomalies relative to a reference spheroidal

surface can be as large as 100 m. Thus, if we define sea level by a global

spheroid we would be in error by this amount. Topography (and bathymetry)

in any local area must be measured relative to a surface that approximates

the local sea level (equipotential surface).

Problem 5.4 Assume a large geoid anomaly with a horizontal scale of

several thousand kilometers has a mantle origin and its location does not

change. Because of continental drift the passive margin of a continent passes

through the anomaly. Is there a significant change in sea level associated with

the passage of the margin through the geoid anomaly? Explain your answer.

The anomaly in the potential of the gravity field measured on the reference

geoid ∆U can be related directly to the geoid anomaly ∆N . The potential

anomaly is defined by

∆U = Um0 − U0, (5.68)

where Um0 is the measured potential at the location of the reference geoid

and U0 is the reference value of the potential defined by Equation (5–54).

The potential on the measured geoid is U0, as shown in Figure 5–6. It can

be seen from the figure that U0, Um0, and ∆N are related by

U0 = Um0 +

(

∂U

∂r

)

r= r0

∆N, (5.69)

because ∆N/a ≪ 1. Recall from the derivation of Equation (5–53) that we

obtained the potential by integrating the acceleration of gravity. Therefore,

372 Gravity

the radial derivative of the potential in Equation (5–69) is the acceleration

of gravity on the reference geoid. To the required accuracy we can write (

∂U

∂r

)

r= r0

= g0, (5.70)

where g0 is the reference acceleration of gravity on the reference geoid. Just

as the measured potential on the reference geoid differs from U0, the mea-

sured acceleration of gravity on the reference geoid differs from g0. However,

for our purposes we can use g0 in Equation (5–69) for (∂U/∂r)r= r0 because

this term is multiplied by a small quantity ∆N . Substitution of Equations

(5–69) and (5–70) into Equation (5–68) gives

∆U = −g0∆N. (5.71)

A local mass excess produces an outward warp of gravity equipotentials and

therefore a positive ∆N and a negative ∆U . Note that the measured geoid

essentially defines sea level. Deviations of sea level from the equipotential

surface are due to lunar and solar tides, winds, and ocean currents. These

effects are generally a few meters.

The reference acceleration of gravity on the reference geoid is found by

substituting the expression for r0 given by Equation (5–62) into Equation

(5–50) and simplifying the result by neglecting quadratic and higher order

terms in J2 and a3ω2/GM . One finds

g0 = GM

a2

(

1+ 3

2 J2 cos2 φ

)

+aω2(sin2 φ− cos2 φ).

(5.72)

To provide a standard reference acceleration of gravity against which gravity

anomalies are measured, we must retain higher order terms in the equation

for g0. Gravity anomalies are the differences between measured values of g on

the reference geoid and g0. By international agreement in 1980 the reference

gravity field was defined to be

g0 = 9.7803267715(1 + 0.0052790414 sin2 φ

+ 0.0000232718 sin4 φ

+ 0.0000001262 sin6 φ

+ 0.0000000007 sin8 φ), (5.73)

with g0 in m s−2. This is known as the 1980 Geodetic Reference System

(GRS) (80) Formula. The standard reference gravity field given by Equation

(5–73) is of higher order in φ than is the consistent quadratic approximation

5.5 Moments of Inertia 373

used to specify both g0 in Equation (5–72) and r0 in Equation (5–67). The

suitable SI unit for gravity anomalies is mm s−2.

Problem 5.5 Determine the values of the acceleration of gravity at the

equator and the poles using GRS 80 and the quadratic approximation given

in Equation (5–72).

Problem 5.6 By neglecting quadratic and higher order terms, show that

the gravity field on the reference geoid can be expressed in terms of the

gravity field at the equator ge according to

g0 = ge

[

1 +

(

2 ω2a3

GM − 3

2 J2

)

sin2 φ

]

. (5.74)

Problem 5.7 What is the value of the acceleration of gravity at a distance

b above the geoid at the equator (b≪ a)?

5.5 Moments of Inertia

MacCullagh’s formula given in Equation (5–42) relates the gravitational

acceleration of an oblate planetary body to its principal moments of inertia.

Thus, we can use the formula, together with measurements of a planet’s

gravitational field by flyby or orbiting spacecraft, for example, to constrain

the moments of inertia of a planet. Since the moments of inertia reflect

a planet’s overall shape and internal density distribution, we can use the

values of the moments to learn about a planet’s internal structure. For this

purpose it is helpful to have expressions for the moments of inertia of some

simple bodies such as spheres and spheroids.

The principal moments of inertia of a spherically symmetric body are all

equal, A = B = C, because the mass distribution is the same about any axis

passing through the center of the body. For simplicity, we will determine the

moment of inertia about the polar axis defined by θ = 0. For a spherical

body of radius a, substitution of Equations (5–6) and (5–7) into Equation

(5–26) gives

C =

∫ 2π

0

∫ π

0

∫ a

0 ρ(r′)r′4 sin3 θ′ dr′ dθ′ dψ′. (5.75)

Integration over the angles ψ′ and θ′ results in ∫ 2π

0 dψ′ = 2π

and ∫ π

0 sin3 θ′ dθ′ =

[

1

3 cos3 θ′ − cos θ′

0 =

4

3 ,

374 Gravity

Table 5.1 Values of the Dimensionless Polar Moment of Inertia, J2, and

the Polar Flattening for the Earth, Moon, Mars, and Venus

Earth Moon Mars Venus

C/Ma2 0.3307007 0.3935 0.366 0.33

J2 ≡

1

Ma2

(

C −

A + B

2

)

1.0826265 × 10−3 2.037 × 10−4 1.96045 × 10−3 4.458 × 10−6

f ≡

2

(a + b)

(

a + b

2 − c

)

3.35281068 × 10−3 1.247 × 10−3 6.4763 × 10−3 ——

so that Equation (5–75) becomes

C = 8π

3

∫ a

0 ρ(r′)r′4 dr′. (5.76)

For a spherical body with a constant density ρ0, the integration of Equation

(5–76) gives

C = 8π

15 ρ0a

5. (5.77)

Because the mass of the sphere is

M = 4

3 πa3ρ0, (5.78)

the moment of inertia is also given by

C = 2

5 Ma2. (5.79)

The dimensionless polar moments of inertia of the Earth and Moon are listed

in Table 5–1. The value C/Ma2 = 0.3307 for the Earth is considerably

less than the value 0.4 that Equation (5–79) gives for a constant-density

spherical planet. This difference is clearly associated with the Earth’s high-

density core. The value C/Ma2 = 0.3935 for the Moon is close to the value

for a constant-density planet, but does not rule out a small (radius less than

about 300 km) metallic core.

Problem 5.8 Consider a spherical body of radius a with a core of radius

rc and constant density ρc surrounded by a mantle of constant density ρm.

Show that the moment of inertia C and mass M are given by

C = 8π

15 [ρcr

5 c + ρm(a5 − r5c )] (5.80)

M = 4π

3 [ρcr

3 c + ρm(a3 − r3c )]. (5.81)

Determine mean values for the densities of the Earth’s mantle and core given

5.5 Moments of Inertia 375

C = 8.04 × 1037 kg m2, M = 5.97 × 1024 kg, a = 6378 km, and rc = 3486

km.

We will next determine the principal moments of inertia of a constant-

density spheroid defined by

r0 = ac

(a2 cos2 θ + c2 sin2 θ)1/2 . (5.82)

This is a rearrangement of Equation (5–64) with the colatitude θ being used

in place of the latitude φ. By substituting Equations (5–6) and (5–7) into

Equations (5–26) and (5–29), we can write the polar and equatorial moments

of inertia as

C = ρ

∫ 2π

0

∫ r0

0

∫ π

0 r′4 sin3 θ′ dθ′ dr′ dψ′ (5.83)

A = ρ

∫ 2π

0

∫ r0

0

∫ π

0 r′4 sin θ′

× (sin2 θ′ sin2 ψ′ + cos2 θ′) dθ′ dr′ dψ′, (5.84)

where the upper limit on the integral over r′ is given by Equation (5–82)

and B = A for this axisymmetric body. The integrations over ψ′ and r′ are

straightforward and yield

C = 2

5 πρa5c5

∫ π

0

sin3 θ′ dθ′

(a2 cos2 θ′ + c2 sin2 θ′)5/2 (5.85)

A = 1

2 C +

2

5 πρa5c5

∫ π

0

cos2 θ′ sin θ′ dθ′

(a2 cos2 θ′ + c2 sin2 θ′)5/2 .

(5.86)

The integrals over θ′ can be simplified by introducing the variable x =

cos θ′(dx = − sin θ′ dθ′, sin θ′ = (1 − x2)1/2) with the result

C = 2

5 πρa5c5

∫ 1

−1

(1 − x2) dx

[c2 + (a2 − c2)x2]5/2 (5.87)

A = 1

2 C +

2

5 πρa5c5

∫ 1

−1

x2 dx

[c2 + (a2 − c2)x2]5/2 .

(5.88)

From a comprehensive tabulation of integrals we find

∫ 1

−1

dx

{c2 + (a2 − c2)x2}5/2 =

2

3

(2a2 + c2)

c4a3 (5.89)

376 Gravity

∫ 1

−1

x2 dx

{c2 + (a2 − c2)x2}5/2 =

2

3

1

c2a3 . (5.90)

By substituting Equations (5–89) and (5–90) into Equations (5–87) and (5–

88), we obtain

C = 8

15 πρa4c (5.91)

A = 4

15 πρa2c(a2 + c2). (5.92)

These expressions for the moments of inertia can be used to determine J2

for the spheroid. The substitution of Equations (5–91) and (5–92) into the

definition of J2 given in Equation (5–43), together with the equation for the

mass of a constant-density spheroid

M = 4π

3 ρa2c, (5.93)

yields

J2 = 1

5

(

1 − c2

a2

)

. (5.94)

Consistent with our previous assumption that J2 ≪ 1 and (1 − c/a) ≪ 1

this reduces to

J2 = 2

5

(

1 − c

a

)

= 2f

5 . (5.95)

Equation (5–95) relates J2 to the flattening of a constant-density planetary

body. The deviation of the near-surface layer from a spherical shape pro-

duces the difference in polar and equatorial moments of inertia in such a

body. For a planet that does not have a constant density, the deviation from

spherical symmetry of the density distribution at depth also contributes to

the difference in moments of inertia.

If the planetary surface is also an equipotential surface, Equation (5–58)

is valid. Substitution of Equation (5–95) into that relation gives

f = 5

4

a3ω2

GM (5.96)

or

J2 = 1

2

a3ω2

GM . (5.97)

These are the values of the flattening and J2 expected for a constant-density,

rotating planetary body whose surface is a gravity equipotential.

Observed values of J2 and f are given in Table 5–1. For the Earth J2/f =

5.5 Moments of Inertia 377

0.3229 compared with the value 0.4 given by Equation (5–95) for a constant-

density body. The difference can be attributed to the variation of density

with depth in the Earth and the deviations of the density distribution at

depth from spherical symmetry.

For the Moon, where a constant-density theory would be expected to

be valid, J2/f = 0.16. However, both J2 and f are quite small. The ob-

served difference in mean equatorial and polar radii is (a + b)/2 − c = 2

km, which is small compared with variations in lunar topography. Therefore

the observed flattening may be influenced by variations in crustal thick-

ness. Because the Moon is tidally coupled to theEarth so that the same side of

the Moon always faces the Earth, the rotation of the Moon is too small to

explain the observed value of J2. However, the present flattening may be

a relic of a time when the Moon was rotating more rapidly. At that time

the lunar lithosphere may have thickened enough so that the strength of the

elastic lithosphere was sufficient to preserve the rotational flattening.

For Mars, a3ω2/GM = 4.59×10−3 and J2 = 1.960×10−3. From Equation

(5–58) the predicted value for the dynamic flattening is 5.235 × 10−3. This

compares with the observed flattening of 6.4763×10−3 . Again the difference

may be attributed to the preservation of a fossil flattening associated with

a higher rotational velocity in the past. The ratio of J2 to the observed

flattening is 0.3027; this again is considerably less than the value of 0.4 for

a constant-density planet from Equation (5–95).

Problem 5.9 Assuming that the difference in moments of inertia C−A is associated with a nearsurface density ρm and the mass M is associated

with a mean planetary density ρ̄, show that

J2 = 2

5

ρm ρ̄ f. (5.98)

Determine the value of ρm for the Earth by using the measured values of

J2, ρ̄, and f . Discuss the value obtained.

Problem 5.10 Assume that the constant-density theory for the moments

of inertia of a planetary body is applicable to the Moon. Determine the

rotational period of the Moon that gives the measured value of J2.

Problem 5.11 Take the observed values of the flattening and J2 for Mars

and determine the corresponding period of rotation. How does this compare

with the present period of rotation?

378 Gravity

Figure 5.7 The gravitational attraction due to a sphere of anomalous den- sity ∆ρ and radius R buried at a depth b beneath the surface.

5.6 Surface Gravity Anomalies

Mass anomalies on and in the Earth’s crust are a primary source of surface

gravity anomalies. Let us first consider the surface gravity anomalies caused

by buried bodies of anomalous density. Examples include localized mineral

deposits that usually have excess mass associated with them and igneous in-

trusions that often have an associated mass deficiency. The gravity anomaly

due to a body of arbitrary shape and density distribution can be obtained

by integrating Equation (5–3) over the body. However, it is generally im-

possible to carry out the necessary integrals except for the simplest shapes,

and numerical methods are usually required.

As a specific example of a buried body we consider a buried sphere of

radius R with a uniform density anomaly ∆ρ, as shown in Figure 5–7. It

should be emphasized that the effective density in determining the surface

gravity anomaly caused by a buried body is the density difference between

the body and the surrounding rock. From Equation (5–15), the gravitational

acceleration due to the spherical mass anomaly at a distance r from its center

(r > R) is

gm = 4πGR3∆ρ

3r2 . (5.99)

This acceleration is directed toward the center of the sphere if ∆ρ is positive

(see Figure 5–7). Because the gravitational acceleration due to the buried

body is small compared with Earth’s gravitational acceleration, the surface

gravity anomaly ∆g is just the vertical component of the surface gravi-

tational acceleration of the body; see Equations (5–16) and (5–17). From

Figure (5–7) we can write

∆g ≡ gm cos θ, (5.100)

5.6 Surface Gravity Anomalies 379

Figure 5.8 The surface gravity anomaly resulting from a spherical body of radius R whose center is at a depth b, as in Equation (5–102).

where θ is indicated in the figure. Gravity anomalies are measured positive

downward. For a point on the surface,

cos θ = b

r =

b

(x2 + b2)1/2 , (5.101)

where x is the horizontal distance between the surface point at which ∆g

is measured and the center of the sphere and b is the depth to the sphere’s

center. Substituting Equations (5–99) and (5–101) into Equation (5–100),

we obtain

∆g = 4πGR3∆ρb

3r3 =

4πGR3∆ρ

3

b

(x2 + b2)3/2 .

(5.102)

The resulting gravity anomaly is plotted in Figure 5–8.

A specific example of a surface gravity anomaly caused by a density

anomaly at depth is the gravity anomaly over a salt dome off the Gulf

coast of the United States. A contour map of the surface gravity anomaly

is given in Figure 5–9a. Measurements of the gravity on the cross section

AA are given in Figure 5–9b. The measurements are compared with the

theoretical gravity anomaly computed from Equation (5–102) taking b = 6

km and 4πGR3∆ρ/3b2 = 0.1 mm s−2. Assuming that salt has a density of

2200 kg m−3 and that the mean density of the sediments is 2400 kg m−3,

we find that R = 4.0 km. This would appear to be a reasonable radius for

an equivalent spherical salt dome.

380 Gravity

Figure 5.9 (a) Contour map (0.01 mm s−2 contours) of the surface gravity anomaly over a salt dome 125 miles southeast of Galveston, Texas, near the outer edge of the continental shelf (Nettleton, 1957). (b) Measurements of gravity on section AA from (a) compared with a theoretical fit based on Equation (5–102).

Problem 5.12 A gravity profile across the Pyramid No. 1 ore body near

Pine Point, Northwest Territories, Canada, is shown in Figure 5–10. A

reasonable fit with Equation (5–102) is obtained taking b = 200 m and

4πGR3∆ρ/3b2 = 0.006 mm s−2. Assume that the gravity anomaly is caused

by lead–zinc ore with a density of 3650 kg m−3 and that the country rock has

a density of 2650 kg m−3. Estimate the tonnage of lead–zinc ore, assuming

5.6 Surface Gravity Anomalies 381

Figure 5.10 (a) Contour map (10−2 mm s−2 contours) of the surface gravity anomaly over the Pyramid No. 1 ore body (Seigel et al., 1968). (b) Gravity measurements on section BB from (a) compared with a theoretical fit based on Equation (5–102).

a spherical body. The tonnage established by drilling in this ore body was

9.2 million tons.

Problem 5.13 Show that the gravity anomaly of an infinitely long hor-

izontal cylinder of radius R with anomalous density ∆ρ buried at depth b

beneath the surface is

∆g = 2πGR2∆ρb

(x2 + b2) , (5.103)

382 Gravity

Figure 5.11 A buried sheet AB of excess mass σ per unit area.

where x is the horizontal distance from the surface measurement point to the

point on the surface directly over the cylinder axis. What is the maximum

gravity anomaly caused by a long horizontal underground tunnel of circular

cross section with a 10-m radius driven through rock of density 2800 kg m−3

if the axis of the tunnel lies 50 m below the surface?

Problem 5.14 Calculate the gravity anomaly for a buried infinitely long

horizontal line of excess mass γ per unit length by taking the limit of ex-

pression (5–103) as R→ 0 and ∆ρ→∞ such that πR2∆ρ→ γ. The result

is

∆g = 2Gγb

x2 + b2 , (5.104)

where x is the horizontal distance from the surface observation point to the

point directly above the line source. By integrating Equation (5–104), show

that the gravity anomaly of a buried infinite slab of mass excess ∆ρ and

thickness h is

∆g = 2πGh∆ρ. (5.105)

Note that the anomaly of the infinite slab depends only on its density excess

and thickness but not on its depth of burial.

Problem 5.15 Integrate Equation (5–104) to find the gravity anomaly,

at x = 0, of the buried mass sheet shown in Figure 5–11. The sheet extends

infinitely far in the z direction and has an excess density σ per unit area.

The surface gravity anomaly at x = 0 is given by

∆g = 2Gσθ, (5.106)

where θ is the angle defined in Figure 5–11.

5.7 Bouguer Gravity Formula 383

Figure 5.12 Coordinate system used to determine the gravitational attrac- tion of a circular disk at a point along its axis.

5.7 Bouguer Gravity Formula

In the previous section we were concerned with surface gravity anomalies

caused by buried bodies of anomalous density. Another important source

of surface gravity anomalies is the gravitational effect of the mass associ-

ated with topography. In general this effect can be determined by direct

integration of Equation (5–3); however, such a procedure usually requires

numerical calculations and is extremely tedious. Because almost all topogra-

phy has a relatively shallow slope, we can derive an approximate expression

for the gravitational effect of topography as well as other shallow density

anomalies.

To determine the gravitational attraction of the topography immediately

beneath an observer, we will consider an observer who is located a distance

b above the upper surface of a cylindrical disk of radius R and thickness

h, as illustrated in Figure 5–12. The observer is on the axis of the disk

whose density ρ depends on the vertical coordinate y but not on the radial

coordinate r, ρ = ρ(y). By symmetry, the net gravitational attraction at the

position of the observer due to a mass ring of vertical thickness dy and radial

thickness dr is vertically downward along the axis of the cylinder. According

to Equation (5–3) it is given by

dgy = (2πr dr dy)(ρ)G

[r2 + (y + b)2]

{

y + b

[r2 + (y + b)2]1/2

}

.

(5.107)

384 Gravity

The various factors in Equation (5–107) are 2πr dr dy, the volume of the

ring; r2 + (y + b)2, the square of the distance between the observer and an

element of the ring; and the quantity in braces, the cosine of the angle θ (see

Figure 5–12) required to obtain the vertical component of the attraction of

an element of the ring. Thus, the vertical component of the gravitational

attraction of the entire disk on the axis of the disk at a distance b above its

upper surface is given by

gy = 2πG

∫ h

0

∫ R

0

(b+ y)rρ(y) dr dy

[r2 + (b+ y)2]3/2 . (5.108)

We can readily integrate Equation (5–108) with respect to r to obtain

gy = 2πG

∫ h

0 ρ(y)

(

1 − b+ y

[R2 + (b+ y)2]1/2

)

dy.

(5.109)

An approximate result applicable to the situation of slowly varying topog-

raphy and other shallow density anomalies is obtained by taking the limit

R→ ∞ in Equation (5–109), such that

gy = 2πG

∫ h

0 ρ(y) dy. (5.110)

This is the Bouguer gravity formula. It relates the surface gravity anomaly

at a point to the mass excess or deficiency beneath that point ( ∫ h 0 ρ dy is the

mass per unit surface area of the circular disk.) The result is independent of

the distance b at which the observer is above the anomalous mass. Equation

(5–110) is a good approximation as long as the horizontal scale over which

the density changes is large compared with both h and b.

The Bouguer gravity formula is particularly useful in obtaining the gravity

anomaly due to topography. If topography has a height h and a density ρc,

the resulting gravity anomaly from Equation (5–110) is

∆g = 2πρcGH. (5.111)

This result is identical to the formula we derived for the gravity anomaly

of a buried infinite slab; see Equation (5–105). With ρc = 2670 kg m−3 the

gravity anomaly for each kilometer of elevation is ∆g = 1.12 mm s−2.

In deriving the Bouguer gravity formula we have assumed a planar geom-

etry. Using this formula as a topographic correction is a good approximation

only if the wavelength of the topography is small compared with the radius

of the Earth.

5.8 Reductions of Gravity Data 385

Problem 5.16 A seamount with a density of 2900 kg m−3 rests on the

seafloor at a depth of 5 km. What is the expected surface gravity anomaly

if the seamount just reaches the sea surface? (Assume the width to height

ratio of the seamount is large and that it does not deflect the seafloor on

which it rests.)

Problem 5.17 Integrate Equation (5–109) to show that the gravity anomaly

due to a vertical cylinder of constant anomalous density ∆ρ on the axis of

the cylinder a distance b above its upper surface is

∆g = 2πG∆ρ{h+ (b2 +R2)1/2

− [(b+ h)2 +R2]1/2}. (5.112)

Problem 5.18 A volcanic plug of diameter 10 km has a gravity anomaly

of 0.3 mm s−2. Estimate the depth of the plug assuming that it can be

modeled by a vertical cylinder whose top is at the surface. Assume that the

plug has density of 3000 kg m−3 and the rock it intrudes has a density of

2800 kg m−3.

Problem 5.19 The lunar gravity field has been determined by the tracking

of orbiting spacecraft. Figure 5–13 is a contour map of the gravity anomalies

on the near side of the Moon at an altitude of 100 km above the surface.

The most noticeable features are the positive anomalies coincident with the

circular mare basins. These are the lunar mascons. Determine the surface

density of the anomalous mass associated with Mare Serenitatis centered at

about 30◦N, 17◦E.

5.8 Reductions of Gravity Data

Scientists measure gravity using a variety of gravimeters. Almost all these

measuring devices are based on the simple principle that a spring is deflected

as the gravitational acceleration acting on a mass attached to the spring

varies. Gravimeters can easily measure variations in the gravity field of 1

part in 107 or 0.001 mm s−2. When a surface gravity measurement is made,

a series of corrections are applied in order to obtain the surface gravity

anomaly. First the reference gravity field g0 given by Equation (5–73) is

subtracted out. This subtraction includes a latitude correction.

If the gravity measurement is carried out at an elevation h, a correction

is also applied to account for the variation of gravity with elevation; this is

known as the elevation correction. Using Equation (5–15), for example, we

386 Gravity

F igu

re 5.13

L u n a r

gra vity

a n o m

a lies

a t a n

a ltitu

d e

o f 1 0 0

km (S

jogren , 1 9 7 7 ).

T h e

va lu

es a re

in 1 0 −

2 m

m s −

2 a n d

th e

co n to

u r

in terva

l is

0 .2

m m

s − 2.

5.9 Compensation 387

can relate the value of the gravitational acceleration at an elevation h above

the reference geoid to the value g0 on the reference geoid by

g = g0 r20

(r0 + h)2 ≈ g0

(

1 − 2h

r0

)

, (5.113)

where r0 is the radial position of the reference geoid given by Equation

(5–67). Therefore the elevation correction ∆gh is

∆gh = 2hg0 r0

. (5.114)

The ∆gh is added to the measured gravity if the measurement is made

at a point above the reference geoid. With g0 = 9.78 m s−2 and r0 =

6378 km the elevation correction at an elevation of 1 km is 3.07 mm s−2.

Often this correction is referred to as the free-air correction. When a gravity

measurement has been corrected for latitude and elevation, the result is a

free-air gravity anomaly ∆gfa.

At short wavelengths free-air gravity anomalies correlate strongly with

local topography. To remove the gravitational attraction of the local topog-

raphy, the Bouguer gravity formula is used. The Bouguer gravity anomaly

∆gB is given by

∆gB = ∆gfa − 2πGρch. (5.115)

This simple correction is effective in removing topographic influences if the

correct crustal density is chosen and if the topography is not too steep. A

typical value for the crustal density is ρc = 2670 kg m−3. If steep topography

is present near the measurement site, additional terrain corrections must be

applied.

Problem 5.20 The surface gravity at a measuring site is 9.803243 m s−2.

The site has a latitude 43◦32′16′′N and an elevation of 542.3 m. Obtain the

free-air and Bouguer gravity anomalies.

5.9 Compensation

Although the Bouguer gravity formula is effective in removing the gravita-

tional influence of local (short wavelength) topography, it is not effective

in removing the influence of regional (long wavelength) topography. The

reason for this has already been discussed in Section 3–14. A mountain or

valley with a small horizontal scale, say 10 km, can be supported by the

elastic lithosphere without deflection. Therefore the presence of the moun-

tain or valley does not influence the density distribution at depth. However,

388 Gravity

Figure 5.14 Free-air (b) and Bouguer (c) gravity anomalies associated with the topography given in (a).

the load due to a mountain range with a large horizontal scale, say 1000

km, deflects the lithosphere downward. Since the Moho is generally embed-

ded in the lithosphere, it is also deflected downward. Because crustal rocks

are lighter than mantle rocks, this results in a low-density “root” for the

mountain ranges with a large horizontal scale. The mass associated with the

topography of the mountains is compensated at depth by the low-density

root.

Because the Bouguer gravity correction for topography does not account

for this negative root, Bouguer gravity anomalies over mountain ranges are

strongly negative. We have shown in Equation (3–115) that the negative

mass of the mountain root cancels the positive mass of the mountain in

the long-wavelength limit. The Bouguer gravity formula, Equation (5–110),

relates the surface gravity anomaly to the net mass excess or deficiency

beneath an observer. Because the condition of isostasy (hydrostatic equilib-

rium) gives no net mass difference, we expect that long-wavelength free-air

gravity anomalies over mountain ranges are near zero. This is in fact the

case.

An example of the free-air and Bouguer gravity anomalies associated with

a mountain range is given in Figure 5–14. The free-air gravity anomaly is

proportional to the short-wavelength topography, but it does not show any

structure associated with the long-wavelength topography. The Bouguer

correction removes the influence of the short-wavelength topography and

smooths the profile. However, the Bouguer gravity anomaly is strongly neg-

ative, reflecting the negative density root of the long-wavelength topography.

5.10 The Gravity Field of a Periodic Mass Distribution on a Surface 389

We turn next to a quantitative consideration of the influence of litho-

spheric flexure on compensation and surface gravity anomalies. Before doing

so, however, let us determine the surface gravity anomaly caused by a peri-

odic density variation at depth. This will allow us to determine the surface

gravity effect of a displacement of the Moho.

5.10 The Gravity Field of a Periodic Mass Distribution on a

Surface

The Bouguer gravity formula derived in Section 5–7 gives the vertical com-

ponent of the gravitational acceleration due to a layer of anomalous mass for

an observer located immediately above the layer. This approximate formula

is valid only if the observer’s height above the mass layer is small relative

to the layer thickness and the scale of any horizontal density variations in

the layer. In this section we are interested in determining the gravitational

acceleration due to a mass layer with horizontal density variations when

the observer is at a height above the mass layer that is comparable to the

scale of the lateral density variations in the layer. For this purpose we will

consider the situation sketched in Figure 5–15. The mass is assumed to be

concentrated in a layer of negligible thickness at y = 0. The mass per unit

area of the layer σ is

σ = lim h→ 0

∫ h

0 ρ(y) dy. (5.116)

The layer extends to infinity in the positive and negative z directions, and

the surface density of mass is taken to vary periodically in the x direction,

σ = σ0 sin 2πx

λ , (5.117)

where σ0 is the amplitude of the surface density variation and λ is its wave-

length. Just above the surface layer, at y = 0−, the vertical component of

the gravitational acceleration of the layer is given by the Bouguer formula,

Equation (5–110),

gy = 2πGσ0 sin 2πx

λ at y = 0 − . (5.118)

We are interested in determining how gy depends on y.

The gravitational potential V associated with a mass distribution satisfies

Laplace’s equation outside the mass distribution. For the two-dimensional

mass distribution considered here we can write

∂2V

∂x2 + ∂2V

∂y2 = 0. (5.119)

390 Gravity

Figure 5.15 Gravitational acceleration due to a surface mass layer with horizontally varying density distribution.

The vertical component of the gravitational acceleration is related to the

potential by

gy = −∂V ∂y

. (5.120)

Thus, if we take the derivative of Equation (5–119) with respect to y and

substitute Equation (5–120), we obtain

∂2gy ∂x2

+ ∂2gy ∂y2

= 0. (5.121)

The vertical component of the gravitational acceleration also satisfies Laplace’s

equation. We can find gy by solving the differential Equation (5–121) subject

to the boundary condition imposed by Equation (5–118) and the require-

ment that gy goes to zero for observers infinitely far from the mass sheet,

gy(y → −∞) = 0. (5.122)

We have already solved Laplace’s equation for a half-space with periodic

boundary conditions in Section 4–12. By direct analogy with Equation (4–

58) we can write the solution to the problem of this section as

gy = 2πGσ0 sin 2πx

λ e2πy/λ. (5.123)

The gravity anomaly decays exponentially with distance (−y) from the mass

layer. The length scale for the decay is λ/2π. Equation (5–123) provides a

formula for the upward, or downward, continuation of gravity anomalies

measured at a particular level above an anomalous mass distribution. Be-

cause any function of x can be Fourier-analyzed into periodic contributions

5.11 Compensation Due to Lithospheric Flexure 391

of different wavelengths, any observed gy(x) can be continued to an arbitrary

level by applying Equation (5–123) to the individual Fourier components of

gy(x) and then reconstructing the new gy(x) by superposition of the modified

components.

5.11 Compensation Due to Lithospheric Flexure

In Section 3–14 we considered the flexure of the lithosphere under periodic

loading associated with the additional weight of topography. To simplify the

analysis, we assumed periodic topography of the form

h = h0 sin 2πx

λ . (5.124)

From Equations (3–110) and (3–111) we can write the deflection of the

lithosphere w due to the loading of the topography as

w = h0

[

ρm ρc

− 1 + D

ρcg

(

λ

)4] sin 2πx

λ , (5.125)

where ρc is the density of the crust, ρm is the density of the mantle, and D

is the flexural rigidity of the lithosphere.

There are two contributions to the surface free-air gravity anomaly. The

first is the contribution of the topography. From the Bouguer gravity for-

mula, Equation (5–111), this is given by

∆gt = 2πρcGh0 sin 2πx

λ . (5.126)

The second is the contribution of the deflection of the Moho. The vertical

deflection of the Moho is equal to the vertical deflection of the lithosphere

because the Moho is assumed to be a compositional change embedded in

the lithosphere. The anomalous surface mass density associated with the

deflection of the Moho is

σ = (ρc − ρm)w

= −(ρm − ρc)h0

[

ρm ρc

− 1 + D

ρcg

(

λ

)4] sin 2πx

λ . (5.127)

However, the Moho is buried at a mean depth bm. Accordingly, the vertical

component of the surface gravitational field due to the deflection of the

392 Gravity

Moho is obtained from Equation (5–123),

∆gm = −2πG(ρm − ρc)h0e −2πbm/λ

[

ρm ρc

− 1 + D

ρcg

(

λ

)4] sin 2πx

λ .

(5.128)

The surface free-air gravity anomaly is found by adding Equations (5–126)

and (5–128) with the result

∆gfa = ∆gt + ∆gm

= 2πρcG

1 − e−2πbm/λ

{

1 + D

(ρm − ρc)g

(

λ

)4}

×h0 sin 2πx

λ .

(5.129)

From Equation (5–115) the surface Bouguer gravity anomaly is

∆gB = −2πρcGe

−2πbm/λ

[

1 + D

(ρm − ρc)g

(

λ

)4]h0 sin 2πx

λ .

(5.130)

For short-wavelength topography,

λ≪ 2π

[

D

(ρm − ρc)g

]1/4

, (5.131)

the free-air gravity anomaly is

∆gfa = 2πGρch0 sin 2πx

λ , (5.132)

and the Bouguer gravity anomaly is

∆gB = 0. (5.133)

The mass of the local topography is uncompensated, and the Bouguer grav-

ity anomaly is zero.

For long-wavelength topography,

λ≫ 2π

[

D

(ρm − ρc)g

]1/4

(5.134)

5.11 Compensation Due to Lithospheric Flexure 393

Figure 5.16 Correlation of Bouguer gravity anomalies with topography for the United States (Dorman and Lewis, 1972) compared with Equation (5– 130).

and

λ≫ bm, (5.135)

the free-air gravity anomaly is

∆gfa, = 0, (5.136)

and the Bouguer gravity anomaly is

∆gB = −2πρcGh0 sin 2πx

λ . (5.137)

As shown in Equation (3–115), the surface topography is totally compen-

sated.

The condition of isostasy, or total compensation, requires that the total

mass in vertical columns be equal. This is the condition of hydrostatic equi-

librium. In terms of the density distribution in the lithosphere this condition

can be written as ∫ h

0 ∆ρ(y)dy = 0. (5.138)

Because this is the integral that appears in the Bouguer formula, Equation

(5–110), the free-air gravity anomaly associated with compensated topogra-

phy is identically zero.

The correlation of Bouguer gravity anomalies with topography is shown as

a function of wavelength for the United States in Figure 5–16. It is seen that

topography with a wavelength less than about 100 km is not compensated.

394 Gravity

Also included in Figure 5–16 is the predicted correlation of the Bouguer

gravity anomaly with topography given by Equation (5–130). In making

this comparison, we have taken ρm = 3400 kg m−3, ρc = 2700 kg m−3,

bm= 30 km, and α= [4D/(ρm − ρc)g] 1/4 =5, 10, 20, and 50 km. Although

there is considerable scatter in the data, reasonable agreement is obtained

taking α≈ 20 km or D ≈ 1021 N m. With E = 60 GPa and ν = 0.25, this

value of D implies, from Equation (3–72), that the thickness of the elastic

lithosphere is about 6 km. A large fraction of the significant topography

in the United States is in the West, where much of the area has high heat

flow and active volcanism; therefore it is not too surprising that the derived

thickness of the elastic lithosphere is small.

The ratio of the Bouguer gravity anomaly ∆gB to topography h as given

in Figure 5–16 is often referred to as the admittance. This is a term used

when the correlation between two quantities is obtained as a function of

wavelength. It must be emphasized that any correlation between gravity

and topography in ancient terrains must be considered critically. Erosion

eliminates topography on a wide range of time scales. If a lithospheric plate

is loaded by topography and that topography is subsequently eroded, then,

according to the theory given here, the associated gravity anomaly is elimi-

nated. However, if the thickness of the lithosphere changes between the time

when topography is created and when it is removed, isostatic displacements

of the Moho can be preserved even though the associated topography is re-

moved. The result is a buried load that causes a gravity anomaly. Several

regions in the United States have significant gravity anomalies in areas of

very flat topography. For example, the buried load believed to be responsible

for the origin of the Michigan basin as discussed in Section 3–18 produces a

strong surface gravity anomaly but no significant surface topography.

5.12 Isostatic Geoid Anomalies

In the previous section we showed that mass anomalies in the crust and

upper mantle that extend over distances greater than a few hundred kilo-

meters are completely compensated. We would like to learn how the mass

deficiencies that balance the topographic mass excesses in isostatically com-

pensated regions are distributed with depth. Although gravity anomalies

can tell us that a region is isostatically compensated, they are not the best

sources of information on the dependence of density on depth. This is be-

cause the net mass density σ defined in Equation (5–116) is identically zero

in regions of isostatic compensation. The free-air gravity anomaly is ap-

proximately proportional to σ, according to the Bouguer formula (5–110),

5.12 Isostatic Geoid Anomalies 395

and thus ∆gfa ≈ 0 for isostatically compensated topography. The nearly

zero value of ∆gfa in an isostatically compensated region tells us only that ∫ h 0 ∆ρdy = 0; an infinite number of density distributions ρ(y) satisfy this

integral constraint.

In this section we show that geoid anomalies, or perturbations in the

Earth’s gravity equipotential surface, are nonzero in isostatically compen-

sated regions and that they measure the dipole moment of the density dis-

tribution ∫ h

0 ∆ρ(y)y dy.

Thus they provide additional information on the distribution of density with

depth and on the mechanisms of compensation in the lithosphere.

To calculate the geoid or gravity equipotential of topography and other

shallow density anomalies, we proceed as in Section 5–7, where we derived

the Bouguer gravity formula for such features. Recall that the starting point

of that derivation was the determination of the gravitational acceleration of

a cylindrical disk at a point on the axis of the disk a distance b above the

top surface of the disk (see Figure 5–12). Let us begin by developing an

expression for the gravitational potential of the disk at the same point of

observation. We can find the gravitational potential of the cylindrical disk

in Figure 5–12 by integrating the formula for the potential dU of a mass

ring of radius r, cross section dr dy, and density ρ(y) over the volume of the

disk. From the discussion in Section (5–4) it is clear that dU is given by

dU = −G2πr∆ρ(y) dr dy

[r2 + (y + b)2]1/2 (5.139)

because all the mass in the ring is at the same distance from the point on

the axis at y = −b. Thus, the expression (5–139) for the potential anomaly

∆U on the axis of the disk a distance b above its upper surface is given by

∆U = −2πG

∫ h

0

∫ R

0

r∆ρ(y) dr dy

[r2 + (b+ y)2]1/2 . (5.140)

Integration with respect to r yields

∆U = − 2πG

∫ h

0 ∆ρ(y){[R2 + (b+ y)2]1/2

− (b+ y)} dy. (5.141)

We again assume that the density anomalies are slowly varying horizontally

and take the limit R → ∞. To do this, we expand the R-dependent term

396 Gravity

of the integrand of Equation (5–141) in powers of 1/R using the binomial

theorem

[R2 + (b+ y)2]1/2 = R

(

1 + (b+ y)2

R2

)1/2

≈ R

(

1 + 1

2

(

b+ y

R

)2

+ · · · )

.

(5.142)

Equation (5–141) becomes

∆U = − 2πG

{

R

∫ h

0 ∆ρ(y) dy

− ∫ h

0 (y + b)∆ρ(y) dy + · · ·

}

. (5.143)

However, the condition of isostasy requires, from Equation (5–138), that

the first integral in Equation (5–143) be zero. Therefore Equation (5–143)

reduces to

∆U = 2πG

∫ h

0 y∆ρ(y) dy. (5.144)

The gravitational potential anomaly due to a shallow, long wavelength iso-

static density distribution is proportional to the dipole moment of the den-

sity distribution beneath the point of measurement.

The anomaly in the geopotential has been related to the geoid anomaly

in Equation (5–71). Substitution of Equation (5–144) into Equation (5–71)

gives

∆N = −2πG

g

∫ h

0 y∆ρ(y) dy. (5.145)

Geoid height anomalies associated with long-wavelength isostatic density

anomalies are directly proportional to the dipole moment of the density dis-

tribution. The dipole moment of ∆ρ(y) is nonzero, and the first moment of

the density, that is, the net mass, is zero for isostatic density distributions.

Thus observed geoid height anomalies are a direct measure of the lowest

order nonzero moment of the density–depth profile. Geoid anomalies are di-

rectly measurable over oceanic areas because the surface of the ocean closely

conforms to the geoid. Accurate geoid height contour maps over oceanic areas

have been compiled by measuring sea surface heights with satellite altime-

ters and correcting for the small disturbing effects of currents, tides, etc.

An example is given in Figure 5–17. A comparison with the satellite-derived

5.13 Compensation Models and Observed Geoid Anomalies 397

worldwide geoid anomaly map given in Figure 5–5 shows that measurements

of sea surface topography give much more short-wavelength detail.

Problem 5.21 Show that the result in Equation (5–145) is independent

of the origin of the coordinate y. HINT: Use the isostatic condition given in

Equation (5–138).

5.13 Compensation Models and Observed Geoid Anomalies

The density compensation required by isostasy can be accomplished in sev-

eral ways. We discuss three simplified models for compensation; clearly, com-

pensation in the lithosphere may be a complex combination of these models.

We previously discussed in Section 2–2 compensation by the depression of

the Moho as a consequence of topographic loading. This is known as Airy

compensation and is illustrated in Figure 5–18a. The density of the crust ρc and the mantle ρm are assumed to be constant. The thickness of continental

crust with zero elevation, with respect to sea level, is H; crust with an ele-

vation h has a crustal root of thickness b. From the principle of hydrostatic

equilibrium we find

b = ρch

ρm − ρc . (5.146)

If the height of the topography is negative and it is covered with water, then

b =

(

ρc − ρw ρm − ρc

)

h. (5.147)

Taking continental crust with zero elevation as the reference, the geoid

anomaly associated with compensated positive topography from Equation

(5–145) is

∆N = −2πG

g

{

∫ H+b

H y(ρc − ρm) dy +

∫ 0

−h yρc dy

}

= πG

g ρc

{

2Hh+ ρm

(ρm − ρc) h2 }

, (5.148)

where Equation (5–146) has been used to substitute for the thickness of the

root b. In writing Equation (5–148), we measured y positive downward from

sea level. Because a crust of thickness H with zero elevation lying above a

mantle of density ρm is the reference state, the anomalous density of positive

topography is ρc, and the anomalous density of a crustal root is ρc − ρm.

398 Gravity

F igu

re 5.17

G eo

id a n o m

a lies

in m

eters ba

sed o n

sa tellite

a ltim

eter d a ta

. A

n o m

a lies

a re

rela tive

to a

sp h ero

id w ith

a =

6 3 7 8 .1

3 7

km a n d

f= 1 /2

9 8 .2

5 7 . T

h e

co n to

u rs

a re

a t 2 -m

in terva

ls (M

a rsh

et a l.,

1 9 8 6 ).

5.13 Compensation Models and Observed Geoid Anomalies 399

Figure 5.18 Airy (a) and Pratt (b) models of isostatic compensation.

For topography below sea level (h negative) the geoid anomaly is given by

∆N = −2πG

g

{

∫ −h

0 dyy(ρw − ρc)

+

∫ H

H+b dyy(ρm − ρc)

}

= πG

g (ρc − ρw)

{

2Hh+

(

ρm − ρw ρm − ρc

)

h2 }

.

(5.149)

The Airy geoid anomaly based on Equations (5–148) and (5–149) with ρm =

3300 kg m−3, ρc = 2800 kg m−3, and H = 30 km is given in Figure 5–19 as

a function of elevation. A geoid anomaly of about 5 m is expected for each

kilometer of elevated topography and a negative anomaly of less than 2 m

is anticipated for each kilometer of topography below sea level.

The observed geoid anomaly across the Atlantic continental margin of

North America at 40.5◦N is shown in Figure 5–20a. This geoid anomaly was

obtained using a radar altimeter from a satellite to determine the position

of the sea surface. Let us assume that Airy isostasy is applicable across

this passive continental margin and determine the predicted geoid anomaly

from Equation (5–149). In making the comparison shown in Figure 5–20a,

we assumed ρc = 2800 kg m−3, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, and H = 30 km. The

assumed density distribution corresponding to the observed bathymetry is

given in Figure 5–20b. Quite good agreement between observation and theory

is obtained, even though the wavelength of the geoid anomaly is relatively

small. This is evidence that passive continental margins are close to isostatic

equilibrium.

Problem 5.22 It is sometimes a better approximation to divide the con-

400 Gravity

Figure 5.19 Geoid anomaly as a function of topographic elevation above and below sea level. For Pratt compensation ρ0 = 3100 kg m−3 and W=100 km. For Airy compensation ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρc = 2800 kg m−3, and H=30 km.

Figure 5.20 (a) Observed geoid anomaly across the Atlantic continental margin of North America at 40.5◦N compared with the predicted anomaly from Equation (5–149). (b) The distribution of density used in the calcu- lation.

5.13 Compensation Models and Observed Geoid Anomalies 401

tinental crust into upper and lower crusts. If the lower crust has a constant

thickness bL and a density ρcL and the upper crust has a variable thickness

with a density ρcU , determine the geoid anomaly associated with isostatically

compensated positive topography.

Problem 5.23 Consider the formation of a sedimentary basin on the

seafloor. Suppose isostatic compensation is achieved by the displacement

of mantle material of density ρm. Show that sediment thickness s is related

to water depth d by

s = (ρm − ρw)

(ρm − ρs) (D − d), (5.150)

where D is the initial depth of the sediment-free ocean. What is the maxi-

mum possible thickness of the sediment if ρs = 2500 kg m−3, ρm = 3300 kg

m−3, and D = 5 km?

An alternative model for isostatic compensation uses horizontal variations

in density over a prescribed depth W . This is known as Pratt compensation

and is illustrated in Figure 5–18b. The variable density ρp is related to the

elevation above sea level by

ρp = ρ0

(

W

W + h

)

, (5.151)

where ρ0 is the reference density corresponding to zero elevation and W is

referred to as the depth of compensation. For topography below sea level (h

negative) the variable density is given by

ρp = ρ0W + ρwh

W + h . (5.152)

Again taking continental crust with zero elevation as the reference, the geoid

anomaly associated with compensated positive topography is

∆N = −2πG

g

{

∫ 0

−h ρpy dy +

∫ W

0 (ρp − ρ0)y dy

}

= πG

g ρ0Wh, (5.153)

where we have used Equation (5–151) to eliminate ρp. Similarly, the geoid

anomaly of compensated negative topography is

∆N = −2πG

g

{

∫ −h

0 (ρw − ρ0)y dy

402 Gravity

Figure 5.21 Dependence of the observed geoid anomalies on bathymet- ric anomalies across the Hawaiian swell (Crough, 1978) and across the Bermuda swell (Haxby and Turcotte, 1978) compared with the predicted dependence for crustal thickening (Airy compensation) and Pratt compen- sation with various depths of compensation.

+

∫ W

−h (ρp − ρ0)y dy

}

= πG

g (ρ0 − ρw)Wh. (5.154)

The geoid anomaly is linearly dependent on the topography. With ρ0 = 3100

kg m−3 and W = 100 km, the geoid–topography ratio (GTR) = 6.6 m km−1

for positive topography from Equation (5–153). Similarly, with ρw = 1000

kg m−3 and these same values of ρ0 and W , the GTR = 4.5 m km−1 for

negative topography from Equation (5–154). The geoid anomaly of the Pratt

model is shown in Figure 5–19 as a function of topographic elevation.

Hotspot swells are areas of anomalously shallow topography associated

with hotspot volcanics (see Section 1–6). Two examples are the Hawaiian

swell in the Pacific Ocean and the Bermuda swell in the Atlantic Ocean.

The dependence of the observed geoid anomaly across each of these swells

as a function of anomalous bathymetry is given in Figure 5–21.

One hypothesis for the origin of this anomalously shallow topography is

the thickening of the oceanic crust. Assuming a reference thickness of the

oceanic crust to beH = 6 km with ρc = 2900 kg m−3 and ρm = 3300 kg m−3,

5.13 Compensation Models and Observed Geoid Anomalies 403

the predicted geoid anomaly from Equation (5–149) is given in Figure 5–21.

Clearly the observed geoid anomalies are much larger than those predicted

by crustal thickening.

In Figure 5–21 we also compare the observed geoid anomalies across the

Hawaiian and Bermudas wells with the predicted geoid anomalies due to

Pratt compensation. The Pratt geoid anomaly is obtained from Equation

(5–154) with ρ0 = 3300 kg m−3 and W = 75, 100, and 125 km. Within the

scatter of the data, good agreement is obtained for Pratt compensation with

a depth of compensation of about 100 km. If we accept the Pratt model to be

applicable, the conclusion is that the mantle rocks beneath the Hawaiian and

Bermuda swells have anomalously low densities to depths of approximately

100 km.

A third type of isostatic compensation is thermal isostasy. This has been

considered in Section 4–23 and is relevant to the oceanic lithosphere. The

oceanic lithosphere is created from hot mantle rock (temperature T1) at

an ocean ridge. The lithosphere cools and thickens by heat transfer to the

surface. As the oceanic lithosphere cools its density increases; as a result it

subsides. We refer to this type of subsidence as thermal isostasy.

With the oceanic ridge crest taken as the reference density distribution,

the geoid anomaly associated with the subsiding thermally compensated

oceanic lithosphere can be written, using Equation (5–145), as

∆N = −2πG

g

{

∫ 0

−w y(ρw − ρm) dy

+

∫ ∞

0 y(ρ− ρm) dy

}

. (5.155)

The first term in Equation (5–155) can be integrated directly, and the sec-

ond term can be rewritten by using Equation (4–205) relating density to

temperature. The result is

∆N = −2πG

g

{

(ρm − ρw)w2

2

+αρm

∫ ∞

0 y(T1 − T ) dy

}

. (5.156)

By using Equation (4–209) for the ocean floor depth w and Equation (4–

125) for the temperature distribution in the lithosphere, we can obtain the

following simple formula for the geoid anomaly over a spreading ridge:

∆N = −2πGρmα(T1 − T0)κ

g

404 Gravity

Figure 5.22 The observed geoid anomaly across the mid-Atlantic ridge at 44.5◦N (referenced to the ridge crest) compared with the predicted anomaly from Equation (5–157).

× {

1 + 2ρmα(T1 − T0)

π(ρm − ρw)

}

t. (5.157)

This geoid anomaly is a linear function of the age of the seafloor. Taking

ρm = 3300 kg m−3, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, T1 − T0 = 1200 K, and α = 3 × 10−5

K−1, we find that the geoid anomaly decreases at the constant rate of 0.16

m Myr−1. The geoid anomaly calculated from Equation (5–157) is compared

with a measured geoid anomaly across the mid-Atlantic ridge in Figure 5–22.

Clearly, good agreement is obtained.

Problem 5.24 The mean geoid height over the continents is very nearly

equal to the mean geoid height over the ocean basins. The positive geoid

anomaly associated with the thicker continental crust is nearly cancelled by

the negative geoid anomaly associated with the thicker continental litho-

sphere. Assume that the two contributions are equal and determine the

thickness of the continental lithosphere. Also assume that the temperature

profiles in both the oceanic and continental crusts are given by Equation (4–

124). Take ρm = 3300 kg m−3, ρc = 2800 kg m−3, H = 35 km, yLO = 100

km, α = 3×10−5 K −1, and the depth of the ocean basins is 5.5 km. Neglect

the contribution of the ocean crust.

Problem 5.25 Determine the geoid offset across the fracture zone consid-

ered in Problem 4–52 (illustrated in Figure 4–46) assuming the applicability

of the half-space cooling model. Use the parameter values given in Problem

4–52.

In Section 4–17 we introduced the plate cooling model as an alternative

to the half-space cooling model. The geoid anomaly associated with the sub-

siding, thermally compensated oceanic lithosphere as predicted by the plate

model is obtained by substituting Equation (4–130) for the temperature dis-

tribution into Equation (5–156). After carrying out the necessary integrals

5.14 Forces Required to Maintain Topography and the Geoid 405

we obtain

∆N = −2πG

g

{

(ρ1 − ρw)w2

2 + αρ1(T1 − T0)y

2 L0

× [

1

6 +

2

π2

∞ ∑

n=1

(−1)n

n2 exp

(

−κn 2π2t

y2 L0

)]}

,

(5.158)

with w given by Equation (4–211). For large times, t ≫ y2 L0/κ, the equilib-

rium value of the geoid ∆Ne is given by

∆Ne = −2πGαρ1(T1 − T0)y 2 L0

g

[

1

6 + αρ1(T1 − T0)

8(ρ1 − ρw)

]

.

(5.159)

This is the predicted difference in the geoid between ocean ridges and ocean

basins. For the parameter values used above and yL0 = 95 km, we find

∆Ne = −8.63 m; with yL0 = 125 km, we find ∆Ne = −14.9 m.

Again, we approximate the deviation of the geoid from the equilibrium

value by retaining the first terms of the expansions given in Equations (4–

211) and (5–159) with the result

∆N = −2πGρ1α(T1 − T0)y 2 L0

g

{[

1

6 + αρ1(T1 − T0)

8(ρ1 − ρw)

]

− 2

π2

[

1 + ρ1α(T1 − T0)

(ρ1 − ρw)

]

exp

(

− κπ2t

y2 L0

)

+ 8ρ1α(T1 − T0)

π4(ρ1 − ρw) exp

(

− 2κπ2t

y2 L0

)

+ 1

2π2 exp

(

− 4κπ2t

y2 L0

)}

. (5.160)

5.14 Forces Required to Maintain Topography and the Geoid

In Section 2–2 we determined the horizontal force in the lithosphere required

to maintain differences in topography by integrating the lithostatic pressure

over the thickness of the lithosphere. This problem was illustrated in Figure

2–8. The resulting horizontal stress component was given in Equation (2–17).

We will now show that this force difference is proportional to the difference

in geoid height between the two points considered.

We consider a section of continental crust and lithosphere as illustrated

in Figure 5–23 with a vertical distribution of density ρ(y) to a depth of

406 Gravity

Figure 5.23 Force balance on a section of continental crust and lithosphere.

compensation h; reference lithosphere has a constant density ρm. Isostasy

requires that ∫ h

0 ρ(y) dy = bρm. (5.161)

The horizontal force within the continental crust F1 is obtained by inte-

grating the lithostatic pressure over the depth of compensation with the

result

F1 =

∫ h

0 g

[

∫ y

0 ρ(y′)dy′

]

dy. (5.162)

The horizontal force F2 in the reference lithosphere is

F2 =

∫ b

0 gρmy dy =

1

2 gρmb

2. (5.163)

The net horizontal force on the lithosphere FR is

FR = F1 − F2

= g

∫ h

0

[

∫ y

0 ρ(y′) dy′

]

dy − 1

2 gρmb

2. (5.164)

The integral in Equation (5–164) can be evaluated using the method of

integration by parts, which, in general, gives ∫ b

a f(y)

dg(y)

dy dy = f(b)g(b) − f(a)g(a)

− ∫ b

a g(y)

df(y)

dy dy. (5.165)

If we let

f(y) =

∫ y

0 ρ(y′) dy′, g(y) − y,

then using Equation (5–165) to evaluate the integral in Equation (5–164)

gives

∫ h

0

[

∫ h

0 ρ(y′) dy′

]

dy = h

∫ h

0 ρ(y) dy

5.14 Forces Required to Maintain Topography and the Geoid 407

− ∫ h

0 yρ(y) dy.

(5.166)

The isostasy condition, Equation (5–161), can be used to further simplify

Equation (5–166) with the result

∫ h

0

[

∫ h

0 ρ(y′) dy′

]

dy = hbρm − ∫ h

0 yρ(y) dy.

(5.167)

Upon substituting this result into Equation (5–164) we find

FR = g

[

ρm

(

hb− 1

2 b2 )

− ∫ h

0 yρ(y) dy

]

. (5.168)

We next evaluate the difference in the gravitational potential between

sections 1 and 2 using Equation (5–144) and obtain

∆U = U1 − U2 = 2πG

[

∫ h−b

0 yρ(y) dy

+

∫ h

h−b y[ρ(y) − ρm] dy

]

= 2πG

[

∫ h

0 yρ(y) dy − ρm

(

hb− 1

2 b2 )

]

.

(5.169)

A comparison of Equations (5–168) and (5–169) using Equation (5–71) gives

FR = − g

2πG ∆U =

g2

2πG ∆N. (5.170)

Thus, the horizontal body force on the lithosphere is proportional to the sur-

face geoid anomaly. Although this result was derived for a specific configu-

ration, the result is generally valid under the same conditions that Equation

(5–144) is valid.

For example, determine the ridge push force on the oceanic lithosphere

assuming the validity of the plate cooling model. The difference in geoid

between an ocean ridge and the adjacent ocean basin was given in Equation

(5–159). Substitution of this into Equation (5–170) gives the ridge push force

per unit ridge length:

FRP = gαρm(T1 − T0)y 2 L0

[

1

6 + αρm(T1 − T0)

8(ρm − ρw)

]

.

408 Collateral Reading

(5.171)

For the parameter values we have used previously and yL0 = 125 km we

find that FRP = 3.41 × 1012 N m−1. If this force is distributed uniformly

over a 100-km depth, the resulting compressional stress in the lithosphere is

σxx = 34.1 MPa.

Collateral Reading

Crough, S. T. (1978), Thermal origin of midplate hot-spot swells, Geophys.

J. Royal Astron. Soc. 55, 451–469.

Dorman, L. M., and B. T. R. Lewis (1972), Experimental isostasy. 3. In-

version of the isostatic Green’s function and lateral density changes, J.

Geophys. Res. 77, 3068–3077.

Haxby, W. F., and D. L. Turcotte (1978), On isostatic geoid anomalies, J.

Geophys. Res. 83, 5473–5478.

Lemoine, F. G., S. C. Kenyon, J. K. Factor, R. G. Trimmer, N. K. Palvis, D.

S. Chinn, C. M. Cox, S. M. Klosko, S. B. Luthcke, M. H. Torrence, Y.

M. Wang, R. G. Williamson, E. C. Palvis, R. H. Rapp, and T. R. Olson

(1998), The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National

Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96,

NASA/TP-1998–206861.

Marsh, J. G., A. C. Brenner, B. D. Beckley, and T. V. Martin (1986), Global

mean sea surface based on Seasat altimetry data, J. Geophys. Res. 91,

3501–3506.

Nettleton, L. L. (1957), Gravity survey over a Gulf Coast continental shelf

mound, Geophysics 22, 630–642.

Seigel, H. O., H. L. Hill, and J. G. Baird (1968), Discovery case history

of the Pyramid ore bodies Pine Point, Northwest Territories, Canada,

Geophysics 33, 645–656.

Sjogren, W. L. (1977), Lunar gravity determinations and their implications,

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 285, 219–226.

Collateral Reading

Bomford, G., Geodesy, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, London, 1980), 561

pages.

See collateral reading list for Chapter 2.

Dobrin, M. B., Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, 3rd ed. (McGraw-

Hill Book Company, New York, 1976), 630 pages.

Collateral Reading 409

A textbook on the fundamental principles and techniques of geophysical

prospecting. Principal emphasis is on gravity, magnetic, and seismic

techniques. One chapter deals with electrical prospecting methods. The

book is intended for advanced undergraduate and graduate students in

geology, mining engineering, petroleum engineering, and mineral explo-

ration.

Garland, G. D., Introduction to Geophysics (W. B. Saunders Company,

Philadelphia, 1979), 494 pages.

A textbook on the physics of the solid Earth suitable for graduate and

advanced undergraduate students. It extensively discusses seismology,

gravity, magnetism, heat transfer, the Earth’s thermal state, and geo-

dynamics. There are appendixes with basic data, problems at the end of

each chapter, and bibliographical citations to original research papers.

Grant, F. S., and G. F. West, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics

(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1965), 584 pages.

A basic textbook in applied geophysics presenting the mathematical and

physical foundations for interpreting observational data in the areas

of seismology, gravimetric and magnetometric surveying, and electrical

and electromagnetic exploration. Six chapters on seismology introduce

seismic methods, elastic waves in layered media, analysis of seismic

records, seismic interpretation, and reflection and refraction of spheri-

cal waves. Six chapters on gravity and magnetic methods cover potential

field theory, reduction and interpretation of gravity data, quantitative

interpretations of gravity and magnetic anomalies, and rock magnetism.

The final six chapters deal with electrical conduction and electromag-

netic induction methods.

Heiskanen, W. A., and F. A. Vening Meinesz, The Earth and Its Gravity

Field (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1958), 470 pages.

One of the first textbooks to discuss the Earth’s gravity field and the infor-

mation it provides about the structure and mechanical properties of the

interior. Chapters cover the internal constitution of the Earth, gravity

field, gravity potential, equilibrium figure, gravity measurements, re-

duction of gravity measurements, isostasy, gravity anomalies, physical

geodesy, deviations from isostasy, and convection currents in the Earth.

Kaula, W. M., An Introduction to Planetary Physics (John Wiley & Sons,

New York, 1968), 490 pages.

A basic textbook on planetary physics for graduate students. While several

chapters deal with aspects of the Earth’s interior, the emphasis is on all

the terrestrial planets. In addition to the standard topics such as gravity,

seismology, and magnetism, chapters also discuss the dynamics of the

410 Collateral Reading

Earth–Moon system, the dynamics of the solar system, the geology of

the Moon and Mars, remote sensing of the planets, meteorites, and

planetary origins. Each chapter contains problems for the student.

Pick, M., J. Picha, and V. Vyskocil, Theory of the Earth’s Gravity Field

(Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1973), 538 pages.

A fundamental textbook on gravimetry for graduate students in solid Earth

geophysics and geodesy. The coverage of the subject is extensive and

includes potential theory, relative measurements of the acceleration of

gravity, gravity anomalies and their interpretations, gravimetry and the

Earth’s internal structure, the geoid, the Earth’s figure, tides, and astro-

nomical aspects. A lengthy appendix describes the mathematical tech-

niques employed in the book.

Stacey, F. D., Physics of the Earth, 3rd ed. (Brookfield Press, Brisbane,

1992), 513 pages.

A fundamental textbook on geophysics for graduate and advanced under-

graduate students. Topics include the Earth as a part of the solar sys-

tem, radioactivity and the age of the Earth, the Earth’s rotation, grav-

ity, tides, seismology, the Earth’s internal heat, geomagnetism, paleo-

magnetism, and tectonics. There are tables of useful data, appendixes

on special topics, and problems for the student.

Torge, W., Geodesy, 2nd ed. (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991), 253 pages.

A basic textbook on the theoretical aspects of geodesy. Subjects include

the gravity field of the Earth, geodetic reference systems, methods of

measurement, methods of evaluation, and geodetic networks.

6

Fluid Mechanics

6.1 Introduction

Any material that flows in response to an applied stress is a fluid. Although

solids acquire a finite deformation or strain upon being stressed, fluids de-

form continuously under the action of applied forces. In solids, stresses are

related to strains; in fluids, stresses are related to rates of strain. Strains in

solids are a consequence of spatial variations or gradients in the displace-

ments of elements from their equilibrium positions. Strain rates in fluids

are a result of gradients in the velocities or rates of displacement of fluid

elements. Velocity gradients are equivalent to strain rates, so stresses in flu-

ids are related to velocity gradients. The equation connecting stresses with

velocity gradients in a fluid is known as the rheological law for the fluid.

The simplest fluid, and as a consequence the one most often studied, is the

Newtonian or linear fluid, in which the rate of strain or velocity gradient is

directly proportional to the applied stress; the constant of proportionality is

known as the viscosity. We deal only with Newtonian viscous fluids through-

out this chapter. Non-Newtonian fluid behavior is discussed in Chapter 7.

Fluid mechanics is the science of fluid motion. It uses the basic principles

of mass, momentum, and energy conservation together with the rheological

or constitutive law for the fluid to describe how the fluid moves under an

applied force.

Many problems involving fluid mechanics arise in geodynamics. Obvi-

ous examples involve flows of groundwater and magma. Groundwater flows

through underground channels known as aquifers. If the aquifers are suffi-

ciently deep and pass through rock sufficiently hot, hot springs may result. In

areas of active volcanism the groundwater may be heated above the boiling

point and geysers result. In some cases steam or very hot water is trapped

at depth; such deposits may serve as reservoirs for geothermal power plants.

412 Fluid Mechanics

The circulation of seawater through the oceanic crust is similar in many

respects to the flow of groundwater on land. Seawater can become so hot

in passing through crustal rocks near an oceanic ridge that submarine hot

springs develop.

Geochemical studies show that magmas flowing from surface volcanoes

have in some cases originated at depths of 100 km or more. Studies of ex-

tinct volcanoes show that the magma flows through volcanic conduits at

shallow depths. These conduits have the form of nearly circular pipes or

two-dimensional channels. Mechanisms for the flow of magma at depths

exceeding 5 km are a subject of considerable controversy. Alternative hy-

potheses involve propagating fractures, large bodies of ascending magma,

and continuous conduits.

In terms of geodynamics, however, one of our principal interests is mantle

convection. The fluid behavior of the mantle is responsible for plate tectonics

and continental drift; it plays a dominant role in determining the thermal

structure of the Earth. An understanding of thermal convection is essential

to the understanding of fundamental geodynamic processes. When a fluid is

heated from within or from below and cooled from above, thermal convection

can occur. The hot fluid at depth is gravitationally unstable with respect to

the cool fluid near the upper surface. Buoyancy forces drive the convective

flow.

On many scales crustal rocks appear to have been folded. Folding can be

attributed to the fluid behavior of these rocks. A fluid instability can also

explain the formation of salt domes due to the diapiric upwelling of a buried

layer of salt. The salt is gravitationally unstable because of its low density.

6.2 One-Dimensional Channel Flows

The movement of the plates over the surface of the Earth represents a flow

of mantle rock from accreting plate boundaries to subduction zones. A com-

plementary flow of mantle rock from subduction zones to accreting plate

boundaries must occur at depth. One model for this counterflow assumes

that it is confined to the asthenosphere immediately below the lithosphere.

Interpretations of postglacial rebound data suggest the presence of a thin

(about 100 km thick), low-viscosity region beneath the oceanic lithosphere.

In addition, seismic studies show that there is a region beneath the litho-

sphere in which the seismic velocities are low and the seismic waves, partic-

ularly shear waves, are attenuated. This layer, the seismic low-velocity zone,

has a thickness of about 200 km. Although the presence of a seismic low-

velocity zone is not direct evidence of the existence of a low-viscosity region,

6.2 One-Dimensional Channel Flows 413

Figure 6.1 (a) The force balance on a layer of fluid in a channel with an applied pressure gradient. (b) A typical velocity profile.

the physical circumstances responsible for the reduction in seismic wave

speeds and the attenuation of the waves (high temperature, small amounts

of partial melting) also favor the formation of a low-viscosity region. Any

flow in an asthenosphere would be approximately horizontal because of the

large horizontal distances involved (the dimensions of lithospheric plates are

thousands of kilometers) compared with the small vertical dimension of the

region. Thus we consider the one-dimensional flow of a Newtonian viscous

fluid in a channel between parallel plates as a model for asthenospheric flow.

Figure 6–1 is a sketch of a one-dimensional channel flow. The fluid moves

with velocity u in the x direction in a channel of thickness h. The horizontal

velocity varies only with the vertical coordinate; that is, u = u(y), where

y is the distance from the upper boundary (y = 0). The flow may occur

as a result of either an applied horizontal pressure gradient (p0 − p1)/l (l

is the horizontal length of a section of the channel, p1 is the pressure at

the entrance to the section, and p0 is the pressure at the section exit) or

the prescribed motion of one of the walls (where we assume that the upper

boundary y = 0 has the given speed u = u0 and the lower boundary y = h

is motionless).

The flow may also be driven by a combination of a pressure gradient and

a prescribed wall velocity. As a result of the shear, or gradient in the velocity

profile, a shear stress τ (force per unit area) is exerted on horizontal planes

in the fluid and at the channel walls. For a Newtonian fluid with constant

viscosity µ the shear stress at any location in the channel is given by

τ = µ du

dy . (6.1)

The shear stress defined in Equation (6–1) is the tangential stress on a

surface whose outer normal points in the y direction. The viscosity of a

414 Fluid Mechanics

Table 6.1 Transport Properties of Some Common Fluids at 15◦C and

Atmospheric Pressure

Kinematic Thermal Viscosity µ Viscosity ν Diffusivity κ Prandtl (Pa s) (m2 s−1) (m2 s−1) Number Pr

Air 1.78 × 10−5 1.45 × 10−5 2.02 × 10−5 0.72 Water 1.14 × 10−3 1.14 × 10−6 1.40 × 10−7 8.1 Mercury 1.58 × 10−3 1.16 × 10−7 4.2 × 10−6 0.028 Ethyl alcohol 1.34 × 10−3 1.70 × 10−6 9.9 × 10−8 17.2 Carbon tetrachloride 1.04 × 10−3 6.5 × 10−7 8.4 × 10−8 7.7 Olive oil 0.099 1.08 × 10−4 9.2 × 10−8 1,170 Glycerine 2.33 1.85 × 10−3 9.8 × 10−8 18,880

Newtonian fluid is the constant of proportionality between shear stress and

strain rate or velocity gradient. The more viscous the fluid, the larger the

stress required to produce a given shear.

The viscosities of some common fluids are listed in Table 6–1. The SI unit

of viscosity is the Pascal second (Pa s). The ratio µ/ρ (ρ is the density of

the fluid) occurs frequently in fluid mechanics. It is known as the kinematic

viscosity ν of a fluid

ν = µ

ρ . (6.2)

The quantity µ is the dynamic viscosity. The SI unit of kinematic viscosity

is square meter per second (m2 s−1). The kinematic viscosity is a diffusivity,

similar to the thermal diffusivity κ. While κ describes how heat diffuses by

molecular collisions, ν describes how momentum diffuses. The ratio of ν to

κ is a dimensionless quantity known as the Prandtl number, Pr

Pr ≡ ν

κ . (6.3)

A fluid with a small Prandtl number diffuses heat more rapidly than it does

momentum; the reverse is true for a fluid with a large value of Pr. Table

6–1 also lists the kinematic viscosities, thermal diffusivities, and Prandtl

numbers of a variety of fluids.

The flow in the channel in Figure 6–1 is determined by the equation of

motion. This is a mathematical statement of the force balance on a layer

of fluid of thickness δy and horizontal length l (see Figure 6–1). The net

pressure force on the element in the x direction is

(p1 − p0) δy.

6.2 One-Dimensional Channel Flows 415

This is the force per unit depth of the channel in the direction normal to

the plane in Figure 6–1. Since the shear stress as well as the velocity is a

function only of y, the shear force on the upper boundary of the layer in the

x direction is

−τ(y)l,

and the shear force on the lower boundary of the layer in the x direction is

τ(y + δy)l =

(

τ(y) + dτ

dy δy

)

l. (6.4)

The net force on the layer must be zero. This gives

(p1 − p0) δy+

{

τ(y) + dτ

dy δy

}

l− τ(y)l = 0, (6.5)

which in the limit δy → 0 becomes

dy = −(p1 − p0)

l . (6.6)

The right side of Equation (6–6) is the horizontal pressure gradient in the

channel dp

dx = −(p1 − p0)

l (6.7)

in terms of which the equation of motion can be written

dy = dp

dx . (6.8)

With p1>p0, a pressure difference tending to move the fluid in the positive

x direction, the pressure gradient dp/dx is negative. The pressure drop in a

channel is often expressed in terms of a hydraulic head H given by

H ≡ (p1 − p0)

ρg . (6.9)

The hydraulic head is the height of fluid required to hydrostatically provide

the applied pressure difference p1 − p0.

An equation for the velocity can be obtained by substituting the expres-

sion for τ from Equation (6–1) into Equation (6–8). We obtain

µ d2u

dy2 = dp

dx . (6.10)

Integration of this equation gives

u = 1

dp

dx y2 + c1y + c2. (6.11)

416 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.2 One-dimensional channel flows of a constant viscosity fluid.

To evaluate the constants, we must satisfy the boundary conditions that

u= 0 at y=h and u=u0 at y= 0. These boundary conditions are known as

no-slip boundary conditions. A viscous fluid in contact with a solid bound-

ary must have the same velocity as the boundary. When these boundary

conditions are satisfied, Equation (6–11) becomes

u = 1

dp

dx (y2 − hy) − u0y

h + u0. (6.12)

If the applied pressure gradient is zero, p1 = p0 or dp/dx = 0, the solution

reduces to the linear velocity profile

u = u0

(

1 − y

h

)

. (6.13)

This simple flow, sketched in Figure 6–2a, is known as Couette flow. If the

velocity of the upper plate is zero, u0 = 0, the velocity profile is

u = 1

dp

dx (y2 − hy). (6.14)

When we rewrite this in terms of distance measured from the centerline of

the channel y′, where

y′ = y − h

2 , (6.15)

6.2 One-Dimensional Channel Flows 417

Figure 6.3 Unidirectional flow of a constant thickness layer of viscous fluid down an inclined plane.

we find

u = 1

dp

dx

(

y′2 − h2

4

)

. (6.16)

The velocity profile is a parabola that is symmetric about the centerline of

the channel, as shown in Figure 6–2b.

Problem 6.1 Show that the mean velocity in the channel is given by

ū = − h2

12µ

dp

dx + u0

2 . (6.17)

Problem 6.2 Derive a general expression for the shear stress τ at any

location y in the channel. What are the simplified forms of τ for Couette

flow and for the case u0 = 0?

Problem 6.3 Find the point in the channel at which the velocity is a

maximum.

Problem 6.4 Consider the steady, unidirectional flow of a viscous fluid

down the upper face of an inclined plane. Assume that the flow occurs in a

layer of constant thickness h, as shown in Figure 6–3. Show that the velocity

profile is given by

u = ρg sinα

2µ (h2 − y 2), (6.18)

where y is the coordinate measured perpendicular to the inclined plane

(y = h is the surface of the plane), α is the inclination of the plane to

the horizontal, and g is the acceleration of gravity. First show that

dy = −ρg sinα, (6.19)

418 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.4 Velocity profile associated with the asthenospheric counterflow model.

and then apply the no-slip condition at y = h and the free-surface condition,

τ = 0, at y = 0. What is the mean velocity in the layer? What is the thickness

of a layer whose rate of flow down the incline (per unit width in the direction

perpendicular to the plane in Figure 6–3) is Q?

6.3 Asthenospheric Counterflow

One model for the flow in the mantle associated with the movement of the

surface plates is a counterflow immediately beneath the lithosphere, as shown

in Figure 6–4. The lithosphere is assumed to be a rigid plate of thickness

hL moving with velocity u0. Beneath the lithosphere is an asthenosphere

of thickness h and uniform viscosity µ. At the base of the asthenosphere

we assume that the mantle is stationary; that is, u = 0. The boundary

conditions u = 0 at y = h and u = u0 at y = 0 were satisfied in writing

Equation (6–12) so that this equation gives the flow in the asthenosphere.

Conservation of mass requires that the flow of material in the +x direction

in the lithosphere must be balanced by a counterflow in the asthenosphere.

For this model the net horizontal flow as illustrated in Figure 6–4 is zero.

Quantitatively this can be written

u0hL +

∫ h

0 u dy = 0, (6.20)

where the first term is the flux of material in the lithosphere and the second

term is the flux of material in the asthenosphere (per unit distance per-

pendicular to the plane of the figure). By substituting Equation (6–12) into

6.3 Asthenospheric Counterflow 419

Figure 6.5 The asthenospheric counterflow model requires the seafloor to rise with distance from a ridge in order to supply the pressure required to drive the return flow toward the ridge in the asthenosphere.

Equation (6–20) and integrating, we obtain

u0hL − h3

12µ

dp

dx + u0h

2 = 0, (6.21)

where dp/dx is the horizontal pressure gradient in the asthenosphere. We can

solve Equation (6–21) for the pressure gradient that satisfies the counterflow

condition dp

dx =

12µu0

h2

(

hL h

+ 1

2

)

. (6.22)

Substitution of this result into Equation (6–12) gives the velocity profile in

the asthenosphere,

u = u0

{

1 − y

h + 6

(

hL h

+ 1

2

)

(

y2

h2 − y

h

)

}

. (6.23)

This velocity profile is illustrated in Figure 6–4; it is independent of the

viscosity.

The shear stress on the base of the lithosphere τLA due to the counterflow

in the asthenosphere can be evaluated directly using Equations (6–1) and

(6–23). The result is

τLA = −2µu0

h

(

2 + 3 hL h

)

. (6.24)

The minus sign in Equation (6–24) indicates that the asthenosphere exerts

a drag force on the base of the lithosphere tending to oppose its motion. For

µ = 4 × 1019 Pa s (a possible value for the viscosity of the asthenosphere),

hL = 100 km, h = 200 km, and u0 = 50 mm yr−1, we get 2.2 MPa for the

magnitude of the shear stress on the base of the lithosphere from Equation

(6–24).

The asthenospheric counterflow considered in this section requires that

420 Fluid Mechanics

the pressure in the asthenosphere increase with x; that is, p must increase

in the direction of seafloor spreading. This increase in pressure with dis-

tance from a ridge could only be provided by a hydrostatic head associated

with topography; that is, the ocean floor would have to rise with distance

from the ridge. The situation is sketched in Figure 6–5. The pressure in the

asthenosphere a distance b beneath the ridge is given by the hydrostatic

formula as

p = ρwgw + ρg(wr − w + b), (6.25)

where ρw is the density of seawater, w is the depth of the ocean a distance

x from the ridge, ρ is the mantle density, and wr is the depth of the ocean

at the ridge. By differentiating Equation (6–25) with respect to x, we can

relate the slope of the seafloor to the horizontal pressure gradient in the

asthenosphere:

dp

dx = −(ρ− ρw)g

dw

dx . (6.26)

A positive dp/dx requires a negative dw/dx or an ocean depth that decreases

with x. By combining Equations (6–22) and (6–26), we can solve for the slope

of the seafloor required by the asthenospheric counterflow model. We find

dw

dx = − 12µu0

(ρ− ρw)gh2

(

hL h

+ 1

2

)

. (6.27)

For ρw = 1000 kg m−3, ρ = 3300 kg m−3, g = 10 m s−2, and the other

parameter values given above, the slope of the seafloor is dw/dx = −7.2 × 10−4. Across the width of the Pacific Ocean, x = 10,000 km, this would give

a decrease in depth of 7.2 km. However, no systematic decrease in ocean

depth as one moves to the northwest in the Pacific has been observed.

The pressure gradient required to drive the asthenospheric counterflow

would also result in a gravity anomaly. We can determine the value of the

anomaly ∆g using the Bouguer gravity formula, Equation (5–111), which

combined with Equation (6–27) gives

d(∆g)

dx =

24πGµu0

gh2

(

hL h

+ 1

2

)

. (6.28)

For the preceding example we find that d∆g/dx = 10−10 s−2. Across the

width of the Pacific this gives a gravity anomaly of 7.2 mm s−2, which also

has not been observed. We conclude, therefore, that the shallow counterflow

model for mantle convection is not correct and that significant convective

flows occur beneath the asthenosphere.

6.4 Pipe Flow 421

Figure 6.6 Poiseuille flow through a circular pipe.

Problem 6.5 For an asthenosphere with a viscosity µ = 4 × 1019 Pa s

and a thickness h = 200 km, what is the shear stress on the base of the

lithosphere if there is no counterflow (∂p/∂x = 0)? Assume u0 = 50 mm yr−1

and that the base of the asthenosphere has zero velocity.

Problem 6.6 Assume that the base stress obtained in Problem 6–5 is

acting on 6000 km of lithosphere with a thickness of 100 km. What tensional

stress in the lithosphere (hL = 100 km) must be applied at a trench to

overcome this basal drag?

6.4 Pipe Flow

With subsequent applications to flows in aquifers and volcanic conduits in

mind, we next consider viscous flow through a circular pipe. The pipe has

a radius R and a length l, as illustrated in Figure 6–6. The flow is driven

by the pressure difference (p1 − p0) applied between the sections a distance

l apart. We assume that the velocity of the fluid along the pipe u depends

only on distance from the center of the pipe r. The form of the velocity

profile u(r) can be found by writing a force balance on a cylindrical control

volume of radius r and length l, as shown in Figure 6–6. The net pressure

force on the ends of the cylindrical control volume is (p1 − p0)πr 2; this is

a force along the cylinder axis in the direction of flow. Since there can be

no net force on the control volume if the flow is steady, this pressure force

must be balanced by the shear force acting on the cylindrical surface of the

control volume. The shear stress on the cylindrical surface τ(r) exerts a net

frictional force −2πrlτ(r) on the control volume (τ is a negative quantity).

The force balance equation is thus

πr2(p1 − p0) = −2πrlτ (6.29)

or

422 Fluid Mechanics

τ = r

2

dp

dx , (6.30)

where dp/dx is the pressure gradient along the pipe (Equation (6–7)).

In the cylindrical geometry in Figure 6–6, the shear stress τ is directly

proportional to the radial gradient of the velocity u

τ = µ du

dr . (6.31)

As in Equation (6–1), the viscosity µ is the constant of proportionality. By

substituting Equation (6–31) into Equation (6–30), we obtain an expression

for the slope of the velocity profile,

du

dr =

r

dp

dx , (6.32)

which can be integrated to give

u = − 1

dp

dx (R2 − r2). (6.33)

We used the condition u = 0 at r = R in obtaining Equation (6–33). The

velocity profile in the pipe is a parabaloid of revolution; it is known as

Poiseuille flow.

The maximum velocity in the pipe umax occurs at r = 0. From Equation

(6–33) it is given by

umax = −R 2

dp

dx . (6.34)

Because dp/dx is negative when p1 > p0, umax is a positive quantity. The

volumetric flow rate Q through the pipe is the total volume of fluid passing

a cross section per unit time. The flow through an annulus of thickness dr

and radius r occurs at the rate 2πrdru(r); Q is the integral of this over a

cross section

Q =

∫ R

0 2πru dr. (6.35)

Upon substituting Equation (6–33) into Equation (6–35) and carrying out

the integration, we get

Q = −πR 4

dp

dx . (6.36)

If we divide Q by the cross-sectional area of the pipe πR2, we obtain the

6.4 Pipe Flow 423

mean velocity ū in the pipe

ū = −R 2

dp

dx . (6.37)

By comparing Equations (6–34) and (6–37), we see that

ū = 1

2 umax. (6.38)

The mean and maximum velocities in the pipe are directly proportional to

the pressure gradient and inversely proportional to the viscosity. This result

is valid as long as the flow is laminar.

It is often convenient in fluid mechanics to work in terms of dimensionless

variables. The relation between the mean velocity in the pipe and the pres-

sure gradient [Equation (6–37)] can be put into standard dimensionless form

by introducing two quantities: a dimensionless pressure gradient or friction

factor f and the Reynolds number Re. The friction factor is defined as

f ≡ −4R

ρū2

dp

dx , (6.39)

and the Reynolds number is given by

Re ≡ ρūD

µ , (6.40)

where D = 2R is the pipe diameter. Using Equations (6–39) and (6–40), we

can rewrite Equation (6–37) as

f = 64

Re . (6.41)

The inverse dependence of the friction factor on the Reynolds number in

laminar flow is shown in Figure 6–7.

At sufficiently high Reynolds numbers, observed pressure drops become

considerably higher than those given by laminar theory. The flow in the

pipe becomes unsteady with random eddies. This is known as turbulent flow.

The qualitative difference between laminar and turbulent flow is illustrated

in Figure 6–8. The principal advantage of the formulation of the problem

in nondimensional form is that the transition to turbulent flow occurs at

Re ≈ 2200 independent of the pipe radius, flow velocity, or type of fluid

considered (viscosity and density). The mean velocity corresponding to the

transition Reynolds number of 2200 is 22 mm s−1 for water with a viscosity

of 10−3 Pa s flowing in a 0.1-m-diameter pipe. This illustrates that most

flows of ordinary liquids and gases are in the turbulent regime.

No theoretical equivalent to the Newtonian relationship between shear

424 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.7 Dependence of the friction factor f on the Reynolds number Re for laminar flow, from Equation (6–41), and for turbulent flow, from Equation (6–42).

Figure 6.8 Illustration of the difference between (a) laminar and (b) turbu- lent flow. Laminar flow is steady, and the fluid flows parallel to the walls: lateral transport of momentum takes place on a molecular scale. Turbulent flow is unsteady and has many time-dependent eddies and swirls. These eddies are much more effective in the lateral transport of momentum than are molecular processes. Therefore, the friction factor (pressure drop) in turbulent flow is larger at a prescribed Reynolds number (flow velocity).

stress and rate of strain as given in Equation (6–1) or Equation (6–31)

exists for turbulent flow. It is found empirically that

f = 0.3164 Re−1/4 (6.42)

in the turbulent flow regime. This result is also shown in Figure 6–7 along

with the transition from laminar to turbulent flow.

Problem 6.7 Determine the Reynolds number for the asthenospheric flow

considered in Problem 6–5. Base the Reynolds number on the thickness of

the flowing layer and the mean velocity (u0 = 50 mm yr−1 and ρ = 3200 kg

m−3). This problem illustrates that the viscosity of mantle rock is so high

that the Reynolds number is generally small.

6.5 Artesian Aquifer Flows 425

Figure 6.9 A semicircular aquifer with a circular cross section (a toroid). A hydrostatic head b is available to drive the flow.

6.5 Artesian Aquifer Flows

Naturally occurring springs are usually due to the flow of groundwater from

a high elevation to a low elevation. The flow takes place through an aquifer

or permeable formation. Figure 6–9 shows an idealized model of an aquifer

in the shape of a semicircle of radius R ′, a form suggested by the geometry

of porous layers in folded sedimentary rock. The entrance of the aquifer lies

a distance b above the exit, and its cross section is assumed to be circular

with radius R. The hydrostatic pressure head available to drive flow through

the aquifer is ρgb, where ρ is the density of water. Since the overall length

of the aquifer is πR ′(R ′ ≫ b), the driving pressure gradient is

dp

ds =

−ρgb πR′ , (6.43)

where s is distance along the aquifer. The volumetric flow rate produced by

this pressure gradient can be calculated from Equation (6–36) if the flow

through the aquifer is laminar. The result of substituting Equation (6–43)

into Equation (6–36), identifying dp/ds as dp/dx, is

Q = ρgbR 4

8µR′ . (6.44)

If the flow is turbulent, we can determineQ by using the empirical relation

(6–42) between f and Re. The first step is to recast Equation (6–42) into

dimensional form using the definitions of f and Re. We find

−4R

ρū2

dp

dx = 0.3164

(

µ

ρū2R

)1/4

. (6.45)

426 Fluid Mechanics

The result of rearranging Equation (6–45) so as to determine ū is

ū=

(

4 × 21/4

0.3164

)4/7 (

−1

ρ

dp

dx

)4/7

R5/7 (

ρ

µ

)1/7

.

(6.46)

Because Q is πR2ū, we obtain the volumetric flow rate through the aquifer

for turbulent flow by multiplying Equation (6–46) by πR2 and substituting

for (−1/ρ) (dp/dx) from Equation (6–43). One finds

Q = 7.686

(

gb

R′

)4/7 (ρ

µ

)1/7

R19/7. (6.47)

Problem 6.8 A spring has a flow of 100 liters per minute. The entrance

to the spring lies 2 km away from the outlet and 50 m above it. If the

aquifer supplying the spring is modeled according to Figure 6–9, find its

cross-sectional radius. What is the average velocity? Is the flow laminar or

turbulent?

6.6 Flow Through Volcanic Pipes

Another example of naturally occurring pipe flow is the flow of magma

through volcanic conduits of nearly circular cross section. The upward flow

of magma is driven by the natural buoyancy of the lighter magma relative

to the denser surrounding rock. At a depth h the lithostatic pressure in the

rock is ρsgh, where ρs is the rock density. At the same depth the hydrostatic

pressure in a stationary column of magma is ρlgh, where ρl is the magma

density. Assuming that the lithostatic and hydrostatic pressures are equal

in the pipe, the pressure gradient available to drive the magma up to the

surface is −(ρs − ρl)g. The assumption of equal lithostatic and hydrostatic

pressures in the pipe is equivalent to assuming that the walls of the pipe

are free to deform as the magma is driven upward. The volumetric flow Q

driven by this pressure gradient through a volcanic pipe of radiusR is, from

Equation (6–36),

Q = π

8

(ρs − ρl)gR 4

µ , (6.48)

if the flow is laminar. From Equation (6–46) and Q=πR2ū, the volumetric

flow for turbulent conditions is

Q = 14.8 R19/7[(ρs − ρl)g]

4/7

ρ 3/7 l µ1/7

. (6.49)

6.7 Conservation of Fluid in Two Dimensions 427

Figure 6.10 Flow across the surfaces of an infinitesimal rectangular ele- ment.

Problem 6.9 Determine the rate at which magma flows up a two-

dimensional channel of width d under the buoyant pressure gradient −(ρs− ρl)g. Assume laminar flow.

6.7 Conservation of Fluid in Two Dimensions

We now extend our studies of viscous fluid flow to two dimensions. We

consider a general flow in the xy plane with the corresponding velocity com-

ponents u and v. The spatial variations of these two velocity components are

constrained by the need to conserve fluid. We consider a rectangular control

volume with dimensions δx and δy, as illustrated in Figure 6–10. The flow

rate per unit area in the x direction at x is u. The flow rate per unit area

at x+ δx is

u(x+ δx) = u+ ∂u

∂x δx. (6.50)

The net flow rate out of the region between x and x + δx per unit area

normal to the x direction is

u+ ∂u

∂x δx− u =

∂u

∂x δx. (6.51)

Similarly, flow in the y direction (vertically downward) yields a net volume

flow per unit area normal to the y direction out of the region between y and

y + δy given by

v + ∂v

∂y δy − v =

∂v

∂y δy. (6.52)

To find the net rate at which fluid flows out of the rectangular region

428 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.11 Pressure forces acting on an infinitesimal rectangular fluid el- ement.

shown in Figure 6–10, we must combine the flows in the two directions. The

net outward flow rate in the x direction is (∂u/∂x) δx times the area of the

face across which the flow occurs, which is δy multiplied by a unit dimension

in the direction normal to the diagram. The net outward flow rate in the x

direction is thus (∂u/∂x) δx δy. Similarly the net outward flow rate in the y

direction is (∂v/∂y) δy δx. The total net outward flow rate per unit area of

the rectangle is

∂u

∂x + ∂v

∂y .

If the flow is steady (time-independent), and there are no density variations

to consider, then there can be no net flow into or out of the rectangle. The

conservation of fluid or continuity equation is

∂u

∂x + ∂v

∂y = 0. (6.53)

This is the form of the continuity equation appropriate to an incompressible

fluid.

6.8 Elemental Force Balance in Two Dimensions

The forces acting on the control volume in Figure 6–10 must be in balance.

Included in the force balance are the pressure forces, viscous forces, and

gravity force. We neglect the inertial force associated with the acceleration

of a fluid element. This is appropriate for the slow motion of very viscous or

high Prandtl number fluids. The Earth’s mantle behaves as a highly viscous

fluid on geologic time scales. The viscosity of the mantle is about 1021 Pa s;

its density and thermal diffusivity are about 4000 kg m−3 and 1 mm2 s−1.

6.8 Elemental Force Balance in Two Dimensions 429

Thus the Prandtl number of the Earth’s mantle is about 1023. The balance

of pressure, viscous, and gravity forces and the neglect of inertial forces

are equivalent to the application of Newton’s second law of motion to a

fluid element with the neglect of its acceleration. It is also equivalent to a

statement of momentum conservation.

The pressure forces acting on an infinitesimal rectangular element of fluid

are illustrated in Figure 6–11. Because pressure is force per unit area, p δy

(times a unit length in the direction normal to the plane of the figure) is

the force acting to the left on the face of the rectangle located at x, for

example. Pressure forces act perpendicular to surfaces and are directed into

the volume enclosed by the surface. The net pressure force on the element

in the x direction per unit area of the fluid element is

p(x) δy − p(x+ δx) δy

δx δy = − [p(x+ δx) − p(x)]

δx ,

(6.54)

which by virtue of a simple Taylor series expansion is

−∂p ∂x .

Thus, only if there is a pressure gradient in the x direction will there be any

net pressure force on the fluid element in this direction. If there is no such

pressure variation, the pressure forces on opposite sides of the element will

simply cancel each other and there will be no net effect. Similarly, the net

pressure force on the element in the y direction per unit area of the element

is

−∂p ∂y .

The gravitational body force on a fluid element is its mass times the ac-

celeration of gravity. The mass of the fluid element in Figure 6–11 is ρ δx δy

(times a unit length in the third dimension) and, accordingly, ρg is the force

of gravity per unit area of the element (and per unit length in the third

dimension). We assume that gravity acts in the positive y direction. Thus

the net gravitational force per unit area of the element is in the y direction

and is ρg.

Only the viscous forces acting on the element in Figure 6–11 remain to

be discussed. These are shown in Figure 6–12. Viscous forces on the element

act both parallel and perpendicular to the surfaces. The quantities τxy and

τyx are viscous shear stresses, that is, viscous forces per unit area that act

parallel to the surfaces of the element, and τxx and τyy are viscous normal

430 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.12 Viscous forces acting on an infinitesimal two-dimensional rect- angular fluid element.

stresses, that is, viscous forces per unit area that act perpendicular to the

element’s surfaces. The stresses are considered positive in the directions

shown in the figure. The sign convention adopted here for the viscous stresses

τ is standard in the fluid mechanics literature; it is opposite to the sign

convention adopted in Chapters 2 and 3 for the stresses σ.

Clearly, if there is to be no net torque about the center of the fluid element,

then

τxy = τyx. (6.55)

The net viscous force in the x direction per unit cross-sectional area of the

element is

τxx(x+ δx) δy− τxx(x) δy

δx δy + τyx(y+ δy) δx− τyx(y) δx

δx δy ,

which, with a Taylor series expansion, simplifies to

∂τxx ∂x

+ ∂τyx ∂y

.

Similarly, the net viscous force in the y direction per unit cross-sectional

area of the element is ∂τyy ∂y

+ ∂τxy ∂x

.

For an ideal Newtonian viscous fluid, the viscous stresses are linearly

6.8 Elemental Force Balance in Two Dimensions 431

proportional to the velocity gradients. The generalization of Equation (6–1)

to two dimensions yields

τxx = 2µ ∂u

∂x (6.56)

τyy = 2µ ∂v

∂y (6.57)

τyx = τxy = µ

(

∂u

∂y + ∂v

∂x

)

, (6.58)

where µ is again the dynamic viscosity. If v = 0 and u = u(y), then τxx and

τyy are zero and

τyx = τxy = µ du

dy , (6.59)

which is identical to Equation (6–1). The total normal stress is the sum of

the pressure and the viscous stress; that is,

σxx = p− τxx = p− 2µ ∂u

∂x (6.60)

σyy = p− τyy = p− 2µ ∂v

∂y . (6.61)

The minus signs in front of τxx and τyy in these equations are the result of

the opposite sign conventions adopted for σ and τ . The viscous stress is the

only contribution to the shear stress.

When we use Equations (6–56) to (6–58) to rewrite the expressions already

derived for the viscous forces on a small rectangular fluid element, we find

that the viscous forces in the x and y directions per unit cross-sectional area

of the element are, for constant viscosity,

2µ ∂2u

∂x2 + µ

(

∂2u

∂y2 +

∂2v

∂x ∂y

)

and

2µ ∂2v

∂y2 + µ

(

∂2v

∂x2 +

∂2u

∂y ∂x

)

,

respectively. Both these expressions can be further simplified by using the

continuity equation. By differentiating Equation (6–53), we obtain

∂2v

∂x ∂y = −∂

2u

∂x2 (6.62)

∂2u

∂y ∂x = −∂

2v

∂y2 . (6.63)

432 Fluid Mechanics

Using Equations (6–62) and (6–63) for the mixed partial derivatives, we

arrive at

µ

(

∂2u

∂x2 + ∂2u

∂y2

)

and

µ

(

∂2v

∂x2 + ∂2v

∂y2

)

as the expressions for the net viscous forces per unit cross-sectional area in

the x and y directions, respectively.

We determine the force balance equations for an incompressible fluid with

very large viscosity undergoing steady flow in two dimensions by adding the

pressure, gravity, and viscous forces together and equating their sum to zero.

For the x direction we obtain

0 = −∂p ∂x

+ µ

(

∂2u

∂x2 + ∂2u

∂y2

)

, (6.64)

and for the y direction the equation is

0 = −∂p ∂y

+ ρg + µ

(

∂2v

∂x2 + ∂2v

∂y2

)

. (6.65)

Gravity acts only in the y direction, of course. To eliminate the hydrostatic

pressure variation in Equation (6–65), we introduce

P = p− ρgy. (6.66)

The pressure P is the pressure generated by fluid flow. Substitution of Equa-

tion (6–66) into Equations (6–64) and (6–65) yields

0 = −∂P ∂x

+ µ

(

∂2u

∂x2 + ∂2u

∂y2

)

(6.67)

0 = −∂P ∂y

+ µ

(

∂2v

∂x2 + ∂2v

∂y2

)

. (6.68)

6.9 The Stream Function

We can satisfy the incompressible continuity equation in two dimensions if

we introduce a stream function ψ defined such that

u = −∂ψ ∂y

(6.69)

6.9 The Stream Function 433

v = ∂ψ

∂x . (6.70)

Substituting Equations (6–69) and (6–70) into Equation (6–53) yields

− ∂2ψ

∂x∂y +

∂2ψ

∂y ∂x = 0 (6.71)

because the order of differentiation is interchangeable. Substituting Equa-

tions (6–69) and (6–70) into Equations (6–67) and (6–68) gives

0 = ∂P

∂x + µ

(

∂3ψ

∂x2 ∂y + ∂3ψ

∂y3

)

(6.72)

0 = −∂P ∂y

+ µ

(

∂3ψ

∂x3 +

∂3ψ

∂y2 ∂x

)

. (6.73)

We can eliminate the pressure from these equations and obtain a single

differential equation for ψ if we take the partial derivative of Equation (6–

72) with respect to y and the partial derivative of Equation (6–73) with

respect to x and add. The result is

0 = ∂4ψ

∂x4 + 2

∂4ψ

∂x2 ∂y2 + ∂4y

∂y4 . (6.74)

This is the biharmonic equation. In terms of the Laplacian operator ∇2,

∇2 = ∂2

∂x2 +

∂2

∂y2 , (6.75)

we can write the biharmonic equation for the stream function in the form

∇4ψ = 0. (6.76)

For two-dimensional flows of a very viscous fluid the stream function satisfies

the biharmonic equation.

The stream function can be given a physical interpretation in terms of the

volumetric flow rate between any two points in an incompressible, steady,

two-

dimensional flow. Consider two pointsA andB separated by an infinitesimal

distance δs, as shown in Figure 6–13. The flow across AB can be calculated

from the flows across AP and PB because conservation of mass requires

zero net flow into or out of the infinitesimal triangle PAB. The volumetric

flow rate across AP into the triangle per unit distance normal to the figure

is u δy; similarly the flow rate across PB out of the triangle is v δx. The

434 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.13 Volumetric flow rate between points A and B.

net flow rate out of PAB is thus −u δy + v δx; this must be equal to the

volumetric flow rate (per unit distance in the third dimension) into PAB

across AB. In terms of the stream function, −u δy + v δx can be written

−u δy + v δx = ∂ψ

∂y δy +

∂ψ

∂x δx = dψ. (6.77)

Thus, the small difference dψ is the volumetric flow rate between any two

points separated by the infinitesimal distance δs. If the points are separated

by an arbitrary distance, the integral of dψ between the points

∫ B

A dψ = ψB − ψA (6.78)

gives the volumetric flow rate between the points; that is, the difference

between the values of the stream function at any two points is the volumetric

rate of flow across any line drawn between the points. The absolute value

of the stream function is arbitrary; only the differences in ψ between points

has physical significance.

Problem 6.10 Determine the stream function for the general one-dimensional

channel flow discussed in Section 6–2. Find ψ for the asthenospheric coun-

terflow model in Section 6–3. Discuss the physical meaning of ψ in all these

cases.

6.10 Postglacial Rebound

Important information on the fluid behavior of the Earth’s mantle comes

from studies of the dynamic response of the mantle to loading and unloading

at the surface. Mountains depress the underlying crust–mantle boundary as

6.10 Postglacial Rebound 435

Figure 6.14 Subsidence due to glaciation and the subsequent postglacial rebound.

discussed in Section 2–2. However, mountain building is so slow that dy-

namic effects can be neglected; that is, the mantle beneath a mountain is in

essential hydrostatic equilibrium throughout the life cycle of the mountain.

The growth and melting of ice sheets, on the other hand, occur sufficiently

fast so that dynamic effects are important in the adjustment of the mantle

to the changing surface load. The thick ice sheet that covers Greenland has

depressed the surface several kilometers so that it is below sea level in places.

The load of the ice sheet has forced mantle rock to flow laterally, allowing

the Earth’s surface beneath the ice to subside. During the last great ice

age Scandinavia was covered with a thick ice sheet that caused considerable

subsidence of the surface. When the ice sheet melted about 10,000 years

ago the surface rebounded. The rate of rebound has been determined by

dating elevated beaches. We will now show how these data can be used to

determine the solid-state viscosity of the mantle. The process of subsidence

and rebound under the loading and unloading of an ice sheet is illustrated

in Figure 6–14.

To determine the response of the Earth’s mantle to the removal of an ice

436 Fluid Mechanics

load, we consider the flow in a semi-infinite, viscous fluid half-space (y > 0)

subjected to an initial periodic surface displacement. We assume the initial

displacement of the surface is given by

wm = wmo cos 2πx/λ, (6.79)

where λ is the wavelength and wm ≪ λ. The displacement of the surface w

leads to a horizontal pressure gradient due to the hydrostatic load similar to

that given in Equation (6–26). When the surface is displaced upward (neg-

ative w), the pressure is positive. This corresponds to a positive load, and

fluid is driven away from this region as the displacement decreases. When

the surface is displaced downward (positive w), the pressure is negative. This

corresponds to the case when a load has been removed and fluid is driven

into this region as the displacement decreases.

The return of the surface to an undeformed (w = 0) state is governed by

the viscous flow in the half-space. The flow can be determined by solving

the biharmonic equation for the stream function. Since the initial surface

displacement is of the form cos 2πx/λ, it is reasonable to anticipate that ψ

must also vary periodically with x in a similar fashion. However, since ψ

and w are not simply related, it is a priori uncertain whether ψ varies as

cos 2πx/λ, sin 2πx/λ, or some combination thereof. It turns out that ψ is

directly proportional to sin 2πx/λ; we assume this at the outset to simplify

the discussion. However, it would only require some additional algebra to

carry through the solution assuming that ψ is an arbitrary combination

of sin 2πx/λ and cos 2πx/λ. Thus we apply the method of separation of

variables and take

ψ = sin 2πx

λ Y (y), (6.80)

where Y (y) is to be determined. By substituting this form of ψ into the

biharmonic equation (6–74), we obtain

d4Y

dy4 − 2

(

λ

)2 d2Y

dy2 +

(

λ

)4

Y = 0. (6.81)

Solutions of the constant coefficient differential equation for Y are of the

form

Y ∝ exp(my). (6.82)

If we substitute this function forY in Equation (6–81), we find that m is a

solution of

m4 − 2

(

λ

)2

m2 +

(

λ

)4

=

[

m2 − (

λ

)2 ]2

= 0

6.10 Postglacial Rebound 437

(6–83)

or

m = ±2π

λ . (6.84)

These two values of m provide two possible solutions for Y

exp

(

2πy

λ

)

and exp

(−2πy

λ

)

.

Because the differential equation forY is of fourth order, these two solutions

are incomplete. Two additional solutions are required. It can be verified by

direct substitution that

y exp

(

2πy

λ

)

and y exp

(−2πy

λ

)

also satisfy Equation (6–81). The general solution for Y is the sum of these

four solutions; it can be written

ψ = sin 2πx

λ (Ae−2πy/λ

+Bye−2πy/λ + Ce2πy/λ +Dye2πy/λ), (6.85)

where the four arbitrary constants A, B, C, and D are determined by the

appropriate boundary conditions.

We first require the solution to be finite as y → ∞ so that C = D = 0.

The formula for the stream function simplifies to

ψ= sin 2πx

λ e−2πy/λ(A+ By). (6.86)

The velocity components u and v can be obtained by differentiating ψ ac-

cording to Equations (6–69) and (6–70). We find

u = sin 2πx

λ e−2πy/λ

{

λ (A+By) −B

}

(6.87)

and

v = 2π

λ cos

2πx

λ e−2πy/λ(A+By). (6.88)

Because the part of the mantle that behaves as a fluid is overlain with

a rigid lithosphere, we force the horizontal component of the velocity to be

zero at y = w; that is, we apply the no-slip condition at the upper boundary

of the fluid half-space. However, because the vertical displacement of this

438 Fluid Mechanics

boundary is small, w ≪ λ, it is appropriate to apply this condition at y = 0.

By setting u = 0 at y = 0 in Equation (6–87), we find that

B = 2πA

λ (6.89)

and

ψ = A sin 2πx

λ e−2πy/λ

(

1 + 2πy

λ

)

(6.90)

u = A

(

λ

)2

ye−2πy/λ sin 2πx

λ (6.91)

v = A 2π

λ cos

2πx

λ e−2πy/λ

(

1 + 2πy

λ

)

. (6.92)

To evaluate the final constant A, we must equate the hydrostatic pres-

sure head associated with the topography w to the normal stress at the

upper boundary of the fluid half-space. The former quantity is −ρgw, and

the latter, from Equation (6–61), is p − 2µ(∂v/∂y). Because the surface

displacement is small, it is appropriate to equate these stresses

−ρgw = p− 2µ ∂v

∂y at y = 0. (6.93)

To apply condition (6–93), we must first calculate the pressure and the

displacement at y = 0.

The pressure can be found by inserting expression (6–91) for u into the

horizontal force balance (6–64). One obtains

∂p

∂x = −2µA

(

λ

)3

sin 2πx

λ , (6.94)

at y = 0. This can be integrated with respect to x to give

p = 2µA

(

λ

)2

cos 2πx

λ , (6.95)

at y = 0. We also need (∂v/∂y) at y = 0 for Equation (6–93). This is

easily found by differentiating Equation (6–92) with respect to y and then

evaluating the result at y = 0. We get (

∂v

∂y

)

y= 0

= 0. (6.96)

Condition (6–93) thus simplifies to

wy= 0 = −2µA

ρg

(

λ

)2

cos 2πx

λ . (6.97)

6.10 Postglacial Rebound 439

The surface displacement w is related to the velocity field by the fact that

the time derivative of w is just the vertical component of the surface velocity (

∂w

∂t

)

y=w = vy=w. (6.98)

Again, because the vertical displacement of the surface is small (w ≪ λ),

we can write (

∂w

∂t

)

y= 0 = vy= 0. (6.99)

From Equation (6–92) we have

vy= 0 = A 2π

λ cos

2πx

λ (6.100)

so that (

∂w

∂t

)

y=0 = A

λ cos

2πx

λ (6.101)

By combining Equations (6–97) and (6–101), we find that w at y = 0 satisfies

∂w

∂t = −wλρg

4πµ = −w λg

4πν . (6.102)

This can be integrated, with the initial condition w = wm at t = 0, to give

w=wm exp

(−λρgt 4πµ

)

=wm exp

(−λgt 4πν

)

. (6.103)

The surface displacement decreases exponentially with time as fluid flows

from regions of elevated topography to regions of depressed topography.

Equation (6–103) can be rewritten as

w = wme −t/τr , (6.104)

where τr, the characteristic time for the exponential relaxation of the initial

displacement, is given by

τr = 4πµ

ρgλ =

4πν

gλ . (6.105)

The viscosity of the mantle can be estimated from Equation (6–105) once

the relaxation time for postglacial rebound has been determined.

440 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.15 Elevated beach terraces on Östergransholm, Eastern Gotland, Sweden. The contempory uplift rate is about 2 mm yr−1. (Photographer and copyright holder, Arne Philip, Visby, Sweden; courtesy IGCP Project Ecostratigraphy.)

Problem 6.11 Show that the constant of integrationA in the above post-

glacial rebound solution is given by

A = − (

λ

)2 ρgwm 0

2µ e−t/τr . (6.106)

Quantitative information on the rate of postglacial rebound can be ob-

tained from elevated beach terraces. Wave action over a period of time erodes

a beach to sea level. If sea level drops or if the land surface is elevated, a

fossil beach terrace is created, as shown in Figure 6–15. The age of a fossil

beach can be obtained by radioactive dating using carbon 14 in shells and

driftwood. The elevations of a series of dated beach terraces at the mouth

of the Angerman River in Sweden are given in Figure 6–16. The elevations

of these beach terraces are attributed to the postglacial rebound of Scandi-

navia since the melting of the ice sheet. The elevations have been corrected

for changes in sea level. The uplift of the beach terraces is compared with

the exponential time dependence given in Equation (6–104). We assume that

uplift began 10,000 years ago so that t is measured forward from that time

to the present. We also assume that wm0 = 300 m with 30 m of uplift to

6.10 Postglacial Rebound 441

Figure 6.16 Uplift of the mouth of the Angerman River, Sweden, as a func- tion of time before the present compared with the exponential relaxation model, Equation (6–104), for wm0 =300 m less 30 m of uplift yet to occur, τr =4400 years, and an initiation of the uplift 10,000 years ago.

occur in the future; that is, we take w = 30 m at t = 104 years, the present.

The solid line in Figure 6–16 is obtained with τr = 4400 years. Except for

the earliest times, there is quite good agreement with the data.

This value of the relaxation time can be used to obtain a viscosity for

the mantle using Equation (6–105). For the glaciation of Fennoscandia, a

reasonable value for the wavelength is λ = 3000 km. Taking ρ = 3300 kg m−3

and g = 10 m s−2 along with τr = 4400 years, we find that µ = 1.1×1021 Pa s.

We have considered only the response to a spatially periodic surface dis-

placement. Because the problem is linear, solutions can be superimposed in

order to consider other distributions of surface displacement. However, more

complete studies of postglacial rebound include the flexural rigidity of the

elastic lithosphere and a depth-dependent mantle viscosity. If the ice sheets

continue to melt during the period of rebound, the sea level will increase, and

this must be taken into account. Available rebound data including changes

in sea level are included on a worldwide basis. These studies require numeri-

cal solutions, and the results of one such effort are summarized in Table 6–2.

We see that the mean mantle viscosity is in good agreement with the value

we obtained using the approximate analytic solution.

Problem 6.12 The ice sheet over Hudson Bay, Canada, had an

estimated thickness of 2 km. At the present time there is a negative free-air

gravity anomaly in this region of 0.3 mm s−2.

442 Fluid Mechanics

Table 6.2 Distribution of Viscosity in the Mantle from Postglacial Rebound

Studies

Region Depth (km) Dynamic Viscosity (Pa s)

Lithosphere 0–100 Elastic Asthenosphere 100–175 4× 1019

175–2848 1021

Table 6.3 Approximate Dip Angles of Subduction at Several Island Arcs

Arc Dip Angle

Central Chile 5◦

Northern Chile 30◦

Southern Chile 30◦

Honshu 30◦

Izu–Bonin 60◦

Java 70◦

New Hebrides 70◦

Ryukyu 45◦

West Indies 50◦

a. Assuming that the ice (density of 1000 kg m−3) was in isostatic equilib-

rium and displaced mantle rock with a density of 3300 kg m−3, determine

the depression of the land surface wm 0.

b. Assuming that the negative free-air gravity anomaly is due to incomplete

rebound, determine w at the present time.

c. Applying the periodic analysis given above, determine the mantle vis-

cosity. Assume that the ice sheet melted 10,000 years ago and that the

appropriate wavelength for the Hudson Bay ice sheet was 5000 km.

d. Discuss the difference between the viscosity obtained in (c) and that

obtained for Scandinavia.

6.11 Angle of Subduction

As discussed in Section 3–17, the oceanic lithosphere bends in a continuous

manner as it is subducted at an ocean trench. The gravitational body force

on the descending lithosphere is directed vertically downward. We might ex-

pect that under this body force the lithosphere would bend through 90◦ and

descend vertically downward into the mantle. However, observations indicate

that the oceanic lithosphere straightens out after subduction and descends

6.11 Angle of Subduction 443

Figure 6.17 Forces acting on a descending lithosphere.

Figure 6.18 Viscous corner flow model for calculating induced flow pres- sures on a descending lithosphere.

at a finite angle of dip θ. (This was discussed in Section 1–4 and illustrated

in Figure 1–9). The approximate dip angles associated with subduction at

several ocean trenches are given in Table 6–3.

One explanation for why the lithosphere descends at an angle other than

90◦ is that pressure forces due to the induced flows in the mantle balance

the gravitational body forces. This problem is illustrated in Figure 6–17.

The pressure forces are due to the mantle flow induced by the motion of the

descending lithosphere; they are flow pressures relative to the hydrostatic

pressure. The dip of a subducting lithosphere is thus a consequence of the

balance between the gravitational torque and the lifting pressure torque.

The pressure forces acting on a descending lithosphere can be calculated

using the two-dimensional viscous corner flow model in Figure 6–18. The

trench is located at x = 0. It is assumed that the surface y = 0, x < 0

444 Fluid Mechanics

moves with constant speed U toward the trench; the surface y = 0, x > 0 is

stationary. The descending lithosphere is the line extending from the origin

downward at the dip angle to the positive x axis; the velocity parallel to

this line is U . Distance measured along this line is r. The line divides the

viscous mantle into two corners: the arc corner and the oceanic corner. The

motion of this line viscously drives a flow in the arc corner. The velocities

of the dipping line and the surface induce a flow in the oceanic corner. We

will solve for the motions in both corners and determine the flow pressures

on the dipping line.

The stream functions for the corner flows in Figure 6–18 are solutions of

the biharmonic Equation (6–74). For the corner flow geometry, we can write

ψ in the form

ψ = (Ax+By) + (Cx+Dy) arctan y

x , (6.107)

where A,B,C, and D are constants whose values are determined by bound-

ary conditions. The problem in Figure 6–18 has two stream functions with

distinct values of these constants because the arc and oceanic corners have

different angles and different conditions on their bounding lines. It can be

verified by direct substitution that Equation (6–107) is a solution of the

biharmonic Equation (6–74). To do this, it is helpful to recall that

∂y arctan

(

y

x

)

= 1

(1 + y2/x2)

1

x =

x

x2 + y2

(6.108)

and

∂x arctan

(

y

x

)

= 1

(1 + y2/x2)

(−y x2

)

= −y

x2 + y2 . (6.109)

The velocity components corresponding to the stream function of Equa-

tion (6–107) follow from Equations (6–69) and (6–70):

u = −B −D arctan y

x + (Cx+Dy)

( −x x2 + y2

)

(6.110)

v = A+ C arctan y

x + (Cx+Dy)

( −y x2 + y2

)

.

(6.111)

The pressure can be found by substituting Equation (6–110) into Equa-

6.11 Angle of Subduction 445

tion (6–67) and integrating the resulting expression for ∂P/∂x. Alterna-

tively, Equations (6–68) and (6–111) can be used, in which case we integrate

an expression for ∂P/∂y, obtaining

P = −2µ(Cx+Dy)

(x2 + y2) . (6.112)

The pressure given by Equation (6–112) is the pressure relative to the hy-

drostatic pressure, that is, pressure associated with flow.

General expressions for the constants of integration are somewhat com-

plicated; so we evaluate them for a particular value of the dip angle. As

an example we choose a dip of π/4, representative of the Ryukyu arc. The

boundary conditions for the arc corner are u = v = 0 on y = 0, x > 0, or

arctan y

x = 0, (6.113)

and u = v = U √

2/2 on y = x, or

arctan y

x = π

4 . (6.114)

Application of these conditions leads to the following expressions for the

constants C and D in the arc corner:

C = −πU

√ 2

2(2 − π2/4) (6.115)

D = −U

√ 2(2 − π/2)

(2 − π2/4) . (6.116)

Thus the pressure in the arc corner is

Parc corner = µU

√ 2{πx+ (4 − π)y}

(2 − π2/4)(x2 + y2) . (6.117)

If we evaluate this expression on x = y and note that

x = y = r √

2

2 (6.118)

on the dipping line, we find that the flow pressure on the top of the descend-

ing slab is

P = 4µU

(2 − π2/4)r =

−8.558µU

r . (6.119)

The negative value of the flow pressure on the top of the descending slab

gives the effect of a suction force tending to lift the slab against the force of

gravity. The pressure force varies as 1/r along the upper surface of the slab

446 Fluid Mechanics

and therefore has a singularity in this idealized model as r → 0. However,

the lifting torque on the slab is the integral of the product rP over the upper

surface of the slab. The lifting torque per unit distance along the top of the

slab is a constant; the torque on the slab is thus proportional to its length.

The boundary conditions for the oceanic corner are u = U, v = 0 on y = 0,

x < 0, or

arctan y

x = π, (6.120)

and u = v = U √

2/2 on y = x, or

arctan y

x = π

4 . (6.121)

By substituting Equations (6–110) and (6–111) into Equations (6–120) and

(6–121), we find

C = U

(9π2/4 − 2)

{

2 − √

2

(1 + 3π/2)

(

2 +

9π2

4

)

}

(6.122)

D = U

(9π2/4 − 2)

{√ 2

(

2 + 3π

2

)

− 2

(

1 + 3π

2

)}

.

(6.123)

The flow pressure in the oceanic corner is found by substituting these val-

ues of C and D into Equation (6–112). When the resulting expression is

evaluated on the dipping line, we obtain

P = µU

r

(

3π √

2 − 4

9π2/4 − 2

)

= 0.462µU

r (6.124)

for the flow pressure on the bottom of the descending slab. The positive

value of P means that the induced pressure on the bottom of the slab also

exerts a lifting torque on the slab. The torque per unit distance along the

slab is a constant. The net lifting torque on the slab is the sum of the torques

exerted by pressures on the top and bottom of the slab. A comparison of

Equations (6–119) and (6–124) shows that the torque exerted by the suction

pressure in the arc corner far outweighs the lifting effect of pressure on the

bottom of the slab.

Problem 6.13 Calculate the velocities in the arc and oceanic corners

formed by a slab descending into the mantle with speed U and dip angle

π/4.

6.12 Diapirism 447

Problem 6.14 Derive expressions for the lifting torques on the top

and bottom of a slab descending into the mantle with speed U at a dip angle

of 60◦.

6.12 Diapirism

In the previous two sections we applied the equations of slow viscous flow to

the mantle. We now turn to several problems involving the flow of crustal

rocks. We first consider diapirism, or the buoyant upwelling of relatively

light rock. As the lighter rock rises into the heavier overlying rock, a diapir

of the lighter rock is formed. One example of diapirism is the formation of a

salt dome, which occurs because salt is less dense than other typical sedimen-

tary rocks. The process of salt dome formation is illustrated in Figure 6–19.

Initially a layer of salt is deposited at the surface by evaporation of sea-

water (Figure 6–19a). Subsequent sedimentation buries this layer under

other heavier sedimentary rocks such as shales and sandstones (Figure 6–

19b). At shallow depths the strength of the salt layer is sufficient to prevent

gravitational instability from inducing flow. As the depth of the salt layer

increases with the further deposition of sediments, the temperature of the

salt increases because of the geothermal gradient. Thermally activated creep

processes then allow the salt to flow upward to be replaced by the heavier

overlying sedimentary rocks. Eventually the upward flow of the salt creates

a series of salt domes. Figure 6–20 is a photograph of salt domes in the

Zagros Mountains of Iran.

Salt domes are important in the search for gas and oil. The deformation of

the rocks above salt domes results in the formation of impermeable traps for

the upward migrating oil and gas. Many oil and gas fields are found above

salt domes.

There are other examples of diapirism in crustal rocks. In mountain belts

high heat flow and volcanism heat lower crustal rocks to sufficiently high

temperatures so that they can freely flow by solid-state creep processes. If

the heated rocks at depth are lighter than the overlying rocks, the deeper

rocks will flow upward to form diapirs in a manner similar to the formation

of salt domes. When the mountain belt is subsequently eroded, the diapirism

is evident in the surface metamorphic rocks.

We apply the same type of analysis as was used in our study of postglacial

rebound to investigate diapirism. The geometry of the problem is shown in

Figure 6–21. A fluid layer with a thickness b and a density ρ1 overlies a

second fluid layer also of thickness b but with a density ρ2. Both fluid layers

have the same viscosity µ. The upper boundary of the top layer and the lower

448 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.19 Diapiric formation of salt domes due to the gravitational in- stability of a light salt layer buried beneath heavier sedimentary rocks.

boundary of the bottom layer are rigid surfaces. Because we are interested

in the case of instability, we take ρ1 > ρ2. The gravitational instability of

heavy fluid overlying light fluid is known as the Rayleigh–Taylor instability.

The undisturbed interface between the superposed fluid layers is taken

to be at y = 0. Thus, y = −b and y = b are the upper and lower rigid

boundaries, respectively. As a consequence of the gravitational instability,

the interface between the fluids distorts and motions occur in the fluid layers.

The displacement of the disturbed fluid interface is denoted by w. We assume

that w is given by Equation (6–79). The stream function ψ1 for the flow in

the upper fluid layer has the form of Equation (6–85), which we rewrite here

using hyperbolic functions instead of the exponentials

ψ1 = sin 2πx

λ

(

A1 cosh 2πy

λ +B1 sinh

2πy

λ

6.12 Diapirism 449

Figure 6.20 Satellite photograph of salt domes (dark circular areas) in the Zagros Mountains of Iran (NASA STS 047–151–035).

Figure 6.21 The Rayleigh–Taylor instability of a dense fluid overlying a lighter fluid.

+C1y cosh 2πy

λ +D1y sinh

2πy

λ

)

. (6.125)

Similarly, the stream function ψ2 for the lower layer is

ψ2 = sin 2πx

λ

(

A2 cosh 2πy

λ +B2 sinh

2πy

λ

+C2y cosh 2πy

λ +D2y sinh

2πy

λ

)

. (6.126)

The velocity components in the layers are found by differentiating these

equations for ψ1 and ψ2 according to Equations (6–69) and (6–70):

u1 = −2π

λ sin

2πx

λ

{(

A1 + C1y + λD1

)

sinh 2πy

λ

450 Fluid Mechanics

+

(

B1 +D1y + λC1

)

cosh 2πy

λ

}

(6.127)

v1 = 2π

λ cos

2πx

λ

{

(A1 + C1y) cosh 2πy

λ

+(B1 +D1y) sinh 2πy

λ

}

(6.128)

u2 = −2π

λ sin

2πx

λ

{(

A2 + C2y + λD2

)

sinh 2πy

λ

+

(

B2 +D2y + λC2

)

cosh 2πy

λ

}

(6.129)

v2 = 2π

λ cos

2πx

λ

{

(A2 + C2y) cosh 2πy

λ

+(B2 +D2y) sinh 2πy

λ

}

. (6.130)

Among the boundary conditions we have for evaluating the constants of

integration are the no-slip conditions on y = ±b,

u1 = v1 = 0 on y = −b (6.131)

u2 = v2 = 0 on y = b, (6.132)

and continuity of u and v across the interface. For small displacements of

the interface, w ≪ λ, it is appropriate to require continuity of u and v at

the undisturbed location of the interface, y = 0. Thus we require

u1 = u2 and v1 = v2 on y = 0.

(6.133)

By applying these boundary conditions to Equations (6–127) to (6–130), we

obtain

B1 + λC1

2π = B2 +

λC2

2π (6.134)

A1 = A2 (6.135) (

A1 − bC1 + λD1

)

tanh 2πb

λ = B1 − bD1 +

λC1

2π (6.136)

(B1 − bD1) tanh 2πb

λ = A1 − bC1 (6.137)

6.12 Diapirism 451 (

A2 + bC2 + λD2

)

tanh 2πb

λ =−B2 − bD2 −

λC2

2π (6.138)

(B2 + bD2) tanh 2πb

λ = −A2 − bC2. (6.139)

Shear stress must also be continuous across the interface between the fluid

layers. For w ≪ λ and for equal viscosities across the interface this condition

can be written

∂u1

∂y + ∂v1 ∂x

= ∂u2

∂y + ∂v2 ∂x

on y = 0,

(6.140)

where Equation (6–58) has been used for the shear stress. Since v is contin-

uous at y = 0, so is ∂v/∂x, and Equation (6–140) simplifies to

∂u1

∂y = ∂u2

∂y on y = 0. (6.141)

Equation (6–141) requires that

(

A1 + λD1

)

+ λD1

2π +D1 =

(

A2 + λD2

)

+ λD2

2π (6.142)

or, with A1 = A 2,

D1 = D2. (6.143)

By subtracting Equations (6–137) and (6–139) and combining the result

with the difference between Equations (6–136) and (6–138), we obtain

0 = (C1 + C2)

{

1 + 2πb

λ

(

tanh 2πb

λ − coth

2πb

λ

)}

.

(6.144)

Equation (6–144) can be satisfied for arbitrary 2πb/λ only if

C1 = −C2. (6.145)

If we add Equations (6–137) and (6–139) and make use of Equation (6–145),

we also deduce that

452 Fluid Mechanics

B1 = −B2. (6.146)

By using Equations (6–145) and (6–146) to simplify Equation (6–134), we

get

B1 = −λC1

2π . (6.147)

All the constants of integration can now be determined in terms of A1

by solving Equations (6–136), (6–137), and (6–147). After some algebraic

manipulation we find that the stream function in the upper layer is

ψ1 = A1 sin 2πx

λ cosh

2πy

λ

+A1 sin 2πx

λ

{

y

b

(

λ

2πb

)

tanh 2πb

λ sinh

2πy

λ

+

(

y

b cosh

2πy

λ − λ

2πb sinh

2πy

λ

)

× (

λ

2πb +

1

sinh(2πb/λ) cosh(2πb/λ)

)}

× {

1

sinh(2πb/λ) cosh(2πb/λ)

− (

λ

2πb

)2

tanh 2πb

λ

}−1

. (6.148)

The expression for ψ2 is obtained by replacing y with −y in Equation (6–

148).

The solution for the stream function can be used to obtain an equation

for the motion of the interface. The time rate of change of the interface

displacement ∂w/∂t must be equal to the vertical component of the fluid

velocity at the interface. If this condition were not satisfied, a void would

be created between the fluid layers. Because the interface displacement is

small, this condition can be written

∂w

∂t = vy=0. (6.149)

The vertical velocity v can be evaluated by differentiating Equation (6–148)

with respect to x. If this is done, and the result evaluated at y = 0, we can

rewrite Equation (6–149) as

∂w

∂t =

2πA1

λ cos

2πx

λ . (6.150)

6.12 Diapirism 453

Figure 6.22 The buoyancy force associated with the displacement of the interface.

To eliminate the constant A1 from the equation of motion of the interface,

we need to incorporate an essential aspect of the physics of the problem into

the analysis. This is the buoyancy force brought into play by the displace-

ment of the interface. Figure 6–22 compares two columns of fluid, one with

the interface in the undisturbed location and the other with the interface

displaced downward. Because of the interface displacement, fluid of density

ρ1 replaces fluid of density ρ2 between y = 0 and y = w. The additional

weight of this fluid (ρ1 − ρ2)gw is felt as a normal stress or pressure on the

disturbed interface. It must be balanced by the net normal stress on the

interface due to flow pressure and normal viscous stress. It is sufficient to

determine these stresses on y = 0 because of the small interface displace-

ment. According to Equation (6–57) the normal viscous stress on y = 0 is

2µ(∂v/∂y)y=0. By differentiating Equation (6–148) with respect to x and y

and evaluating the result on y = 0, we see that this quantity is zero. Thus

the buoyancy force per unit area due to the displacement of the interface

is balanced solely by the net flow pressure exerted on the interface. This

condition can be written

(ρ1 − ρ2)gw = (P2 − P1)y=0. (6.151)

Equation (6–151) provides a second relationship between w and the flow

field that allows us to relate w to A1 and thereby convert Equation (6–150)

into an equation for w.

The flow pressure on y = 0 in the upper layer can be found by substituting

Equation (6–148) into Equation (6–72) with the result

(P1)y= 0 = 2µA1

b

(

λ

)

(

λ

2πb +

1

sinh 2πb λ cosh 2πb

λ

)

× (

1

sinh 2πb λ cosh 2πb

λ

− (

λ

2πb

)2

454 Fluid Mechanics

× tanh 2πb

λ

)−1

× cos 2πx

λ . (6.152)

By carrying through the same procedure using ψ2, we find

(P2)y=0 = −(P1)y= 0. (6.153)

Equation (6–151) becomes

(ρ1 − ρ2)gw = −2(P1)y= 0. (6.154)

Equation (6–154) shows that with a heavy fluid above a light one (ρ1 >

ρ2), a downward displacement of the interface (w > 0) causes a negative

pressure in the upper fluid layer. This tends to produce a further downward

displacement of the interface leading to instability of the configuration. Upon

substituting Equation (6–152) into Equation (6–154), we get

(ρ1 − ρ2)gw = −4µA1

b

(

λ

)

cos 2πx

λ

× (

λ

2πb +

1

sinh(2πb/λ) cosh(2πb/λ)

)

× (

1

sinh(2πb/λ) cosh(2πb/λ)

− (

λ

2πb

)2

tanh 2πb

λ

)−1

. (6.155)

By solving this equation for A1 and substituting the resulting expression

into Equation (6–150), we finally arrive at

∂w

∂t =

(ρ1 − ρ2)gb

×

(

(

λ 2πb

)

2

tanh 2πb λ − 1

sinh 2πb λ

cosh 2πb λ

)

(

λ 2πb + 1

sinh 2πb λ

cosh 2πb λ

) w.

(6.156)

The solution of this equation is

w = w0e t/τa , (6.157)

with

τa = 4µ

(ρ1 − ρ2)gb

6.12 Diapirism 455

Figure 6.23 Dimensionless growth time of a disturbance as a function of dimensionless wave number for the Rayleigh–Taylor instability.

×

(

λ 2πb + 1

sinh 2πb λ

cosh 2πb λ

)

(

(

λ 2πb

)2

tanh 2πb λ − 1

sinh 2πb λ

cosh 2πb λ

) .

(6.158)

The quantity τa is the growth time (for ρ1 > ρ2) of a disturbance. Its value

depends on the wavelength λ of the interface distortion. Figure 6–23 is a

plot of the dimensionless growth time (ρ1 − ρ2)gbτa/4µ as a function of the

dimensionless disturbance wave number 2πb/λ. If heavy fluid lies on top

(ρ1 > ρ2), the interface is always unstable; that is, τa > 0. If light fluid lies

on top (ρ1 < ρ2), τa is negative for all λ and the interface is stable. It can

be shown from Equation (6–158) that for large wavelengths,

τa → 24µ

(ρ1 − ρ2)gb

(

λ

2πb

)2

. (6.159)

456 Fluid Mechanics

For very small wavelengths,

τa → 4µ

(ρ1 − ρ2)gb

(

2πb

λ

)

. (6.160)

These asymptotic behaviors of τa can be seen in Figure 6–23.

When the heavy fluid lies on top and the configuration is unstable, the

disturbance with the shortest time constant grows and dominates the insta-

bility. The wavelength that gives the smallest value for τa is

λ = 2.568b. (6.161)

The rate of growth of this dominant disturbance is obtained by substituting

Equation (6–161) into Equation (6–158) with the result

τa = 13.04µ

(ρ1 − ρ2)gb . (6.162)

The instability takes longer to grow, the more viscous the fluids and the

smaller the density difference. Although we have considered only the stabil-

ity problem for small displacements, we expect that the wavelength of the

most rapidly growing small disturbance closely corresponds to the spacing

between fully developed diapirs. A map view showing the distribution of salt

domes in the north of Germany is given in Figure 6–24. The depth to the

salt layer is about 5 km, and the spacing of the salt domes is about 10 to

15 km, in good agreement with Equation (6–161).

Problem 6.15 A layer of salt at a depth of 3 km with a density of 2150

kg m−3 lies beneath sediments with a density of 2600 kg m−3. The salt layer

is known to have doubled the amplitude of its instability in 100,000 years.

Estimate the equivalent viscosity of the system.

Problem 6.16 Suppose that the 660-km density discontinuity in the man-

tle corresponds to a compositional change with lighter rocks lying above

more dense ones. Estimate the minimum decay time for a disturbance to this

boundary. Assume ρ = 4000 kg m−3, ∆ρ = 100 kg m−3, and µ = 1021 Pa s.

Problem 6.17 Discuss how you would modify the analysis of the previous

section to account for a viscosity difference between the two fluid layers.

6.13 Folding

Folding of crustal rock occurs on all scales. On the largest scale, folding

results in a series of parallel mountain ranges. This was illustrated in Fig-

ure 1–41. On this large scale a fold that is concave upward is referred to as

6.13 Folding 457

Figure 6.24 Distribution of salt domes in northern Germany.

a synclinorium. Rocks folded in this manner are usually sedimentary rocks,

and younger rocks are ordinarily found in the flexure formed of older rocks.

Also on this large scale a fold whose flanks diverge downward is referred to

as an anticlinorium. Erosion of large-scale folds often results in a valley and

ridge topography such as that found in Pennsylvania and West Virginia (see

Figure 1–42). In this case the valleys are the result of the erosion of shales,

whereas the ridges are composed of more resistant sandstones.

Folds are found in both sedimentary and metamorphic rocks on scales

ranging down to a few centimeters. Folding occurs under a wide variety of

conditions, but it is often associated with compressional tectonics. Two im-

portant questions concerning folding are why does the rock deform and why

does it deform in such a manner as to produce folds. It is perhaps surprising

that at relatively low temperatures sedimentary rocks flow to produce folds

rather than fracture. Although the rheology of folded sedimentary rocks is

458 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.25 (a) Compression of a uniform medium. This type of compres- sion can often be identified in rocks by the flattening of spherical inclusions. (b) Folding of a layered medium composed of strong (competent) and weak (incompetent) members under compression.

not fully understood, pressure solution creep is thought to play an impor-

tant role. Sedimentary rocks are often saturated with water. The solubility

of minerals such as quartz in the water is a function of pressure as well as

temperature. When differential stresses are applied to the rock, the minerals

dissolve in regions of high stress and are deposited in regions of low stress.

The result is a deformation of the rock. Pressure solution creep of sedimen-

tary rocks can result in a linear relationship between stress and rate of strain

and, therefore, a Newtonian fluid behavior. A viscosity can be determined.

A more detailed discussion of pressure solution creep is given in the next

chapter.

Folded sedimentary or metamorphic rocks usually have a preexisting lay-

ered structure. There usually is considerable variation in the material proper-

ties of adjacent layers when folding occurs. If a uniform medium is subjected

to compression, it will be uniformly squeezed, as illustrated in Figure 6–25a.

However, if the medium is composed of a series of weak and strong layers,

folding will occur, as shown in Figure 6–25b. The strong layers are referred to

6.13 Folding 459

Figure 6.26 An elastic plate of thickness h is embedded between two viscous fluids with viscosity µ. An end load P̄ is applied to the elastic plate until it buckles (folds).

as being competent; an example is a limestone. The weak layers are referred

to as being incompetent ; an example is a sandstone. It should be noted that

strength and resistance to erosion are not necessarily related.

One approach to the quantitative study of folding is to consider an elas-

tic (competent) layer of thickness h embedded between two semi-infinite

Newtonian viscous fluids (incompetent). An end load P̄ on the elastic layer

may cause it to buckle; however, its deformation will be restricted by the

confining fluids. This problem is illustrated in Figure 6–26.

We have already considered the deformation of a thin elastic plate under

end loading in Section 3–11. The applicable differential equation is Equation

(3–74). The vertical component of the normal stress due to flow in the fluids

above and below the plates can be used to determine the force per unit area

q(x) on the plate. The fluids occupy semi-infinite half-spaces. We assume

that the deformation of the plate is given by

w = wm cos(2πx/λ)et/τa . (6.163)

Because the plate forms the boundaries of the fluid half-spaces, these bound-

aries have sinusoidally varying shapes. This situation is identical with the

one we encountered in our study of postglacial rebound in Section 6–10. We

can use the results of that section to advantage here.

By symmetry, the solutions above and below the plate are identical. We

consider the solution below the plate and measure y positive downward

from the base of the plate, as illustrated in Figure 6–26. The appropriate

solution of the biharmonic equation is Equation (6–85). The condition that

the velocities be finite as y → ∞ again requires C = D = 0. The rigidity

of the elastic plate requires that u = 0 on the plate, and because we again

assume w ≪ λ, this boundary condition can be applied at y = 0. Therefore

Equation (6–90) is applicable in the fluid below the plate. From Equation

(6–95), the pressure Pb on the base of the plate (evaluated at y = 0) is given

460 Fluid Mechanics

by

Pb = 2A µ

(

λ

)2

cos 2πx

λ . (6.164)

This can be rewritten in terms of w by using Equation (6–101)

Pb = 2µ

(

λ

)

∂w

∂t . (6.165)

The pressure PT acting downward on the top of the plate is related to the

pressure Pb acting upward on the base of the plate by

PT (x) = −Pb(x). (6.166)

This is a consequence of the symmetry of the flows above and below the plate;

we found an identical result – Equation (6–153) – in the previous section.

There is no normal viscous stress on the plate because ∂v/∂y vanishes on

y = 0 according to Equation (6–96). Thus the net normal stress on the plate

is

q = PT − Pb = −2Pb. (6.167)

By substituting Equation (6–165) into this equation, we obtain

q(x, t) = −4µ

(

λ

)

∂w(x, t)

∂t . (6.168)

With the force per unit area acting on the elastic plate now determined,

we can write the equation for the deflection of the plate – Equation (3–74)

– as

D ∂4w

∂x4 + P̄

∂2w

∂x2 = −4µ

(

λ

)

∂w

∂t , (6.169)

where D, you recall, is the flexural rigidity of the plate; see Equation (3–72).

Upon substituting Equation (6–163) into (6–169), we find

τa = −4µ

2π λ

[

D (

2π λ

)2 − P̄

] . (6.170)

The wavelength corresponding to the smallest value of τa is obtained by

setting the derivative of τa with respect to λ equal to zero; the result is

λ = 2π

(

3D

)1/2

. (6.171)

This is the wavelength of the most rapidly growing disturbance. Upon sub-

stituting Equation (3–72) for D into (6–171) and writing

P̄ = σh, (6.172)

6.13 Folding 461

Figure 6.27 Dependence of the thickness of the dominant member in a fold on the wavelength of the fold compared with Equation (6–173). Data points are from Currie et al. (1962).

where σ is the stress in the elastic layer associated with the end load, we get

λ = πh

{

E

σ(1 − ν2)

}1/2

. (6.173)

It is expected that when folds develop in an elastic layer of rock surrounded

by rock exhibiting fluid behavior, the initial wavelength of the folds has the

dependence on the thickness of the elastic layer and the applied stress given

by Equation (6–173).

The observed dependence of fold wavelength on the thickness of the domi-

nant member of a fold is given in Figure 6–27 for a wide variety of folds. Ex-

cellent agreement with Equation (6–173) is obtained for σ(1−ν2)/E = 10−2.

For E = 50 GPa and ν = 0.25 for sedimentary rocks, this gives σ = 530 MPa.

Although this is a high stress, it is likely to be about the same as the com-

pressional strength of many sedimentary rocks when they are buried to a

depth of 2 to 5 km.

As the amplitude of a fold increases, its wavelength decreases somewhat,

and the bending stress in the elastic member exceeds the yield strength of

the rock. The elastic member then either fractures or plastically yields at the

points of maximum bending moment that are at x = ±1 2nλ, n = 0, 1, 2, . . . .

If plastic bending occurs, an angular or chevron fold would be expected, as

462 Fluid Mechanics

illustrated in Figure 6–28a. Folds with nearly straight limbs of this type are

often observed. A further analysis of this type of plastic bending is given in

the next chapter.

Although many observed folds exhibit a plastic deformation in the domi-

nant or competent member of the fold, there are many other cases in which

a rounded structure is observed. For a rounded fold such as that illustrated

in Figure 6–28b the dominant member has probably also been deformed in

a fluidlike manner. An alternative approach to the theory of folding is to as-

sume that the competent layer is a Newtonian fluid with a viscosity µ1. It is

embedded between two semi-infinite fluids with a viscosity µ0, and µ1 ≫ µ0.

This mechanism, first proposed by Maurice Biot, is often referred to as the

Biot theory of folding.

To analyze the viscous folding problem, it is necessary to develop the

theory for the bending of a free or isolated plate of viscosity µ. We follow

the derivation for the bending of a free elastic plate given in Section 3–9.

Recall that the key aspect of that derivation was the determination of the

bending moment M given by Equation (3–61):

M =

∫ h/2

−h/2 σxxy dy. (6.174)

The longitudinal stress σxx in a viscous plate is given by Equation (6–60).

For a free plate, σyy must vanish on its surfaces, and if the plate is thin,

we can take σyy = 0 throughout the plate, as in the elastic plate derivation.

From Equation (6–61) with σyy = 0 we obtain

p = 2µ ∂v

∂y . (6.175)

The incompressible continuity Equation (6–53) gives ∂v/∂y = −∂u/∂x, and

we can rewrite Equation (6–175) as

p = −2µ ∂u

∂x . (6.176)

By substituting Equation (6–176) into Equation (6–60) in order to eliminate

the pressure, we obtain

σxx = −4µ ∂u

∂x . (6.177)

This is the relationship between the bending stress σxx and the rate of

longitudinal strain ∂u/∂x for a thin viscous plate. It is analogous to Equation

(3–64), which relates the fiber stress σxx to the strain εxx in a thin elastic

plate.

6.13 Folding 463

Figure 6.28 (a) Angular or chevron folds near Copiapo in Atacama Province, northern Chile. The folded resistant layers of silty limestone al- ternate with less resistant but more competent layers of sandstone (K. Sagerstrom 563, U.S. Geological Survey.) (b) Rounded fold in amphibolite near Salmon River, Idaho (W. B. Hamilton 377, U.S. Geological Survery.)

464 Fluid Mechanics

Equation (6–174) for the bending moment in the viscous plate becomes

M = −4µ

∫ h/2

−h/2

∂u

∂x y dy. (6.178)

By direct analogy with Equation (3–70) the rate of strain ∂u/∂x is given by

∂u

∂x = y

∂3w

∂x2∂t . (6.179)

The sign of this equation is opposite to that of Equation (3–70), since the rate

of strain ∂u/∂x and the strain rate ε̇xx have opposite signs. If we substitute

Equation (6–179) into (6–178) and carry out the integration, we get

M = −µh 3

3

∂3w

∂x2∂t . (6.180)

Upon substituting the second derivative with respect to x of (6–180) into

(3–60), we obtain the general equation for the bending of a thin viscous

plate,

µh3

3

∂5w

∂x4∂t = q − P̄

∂2w

∂x2 . (6.181)

Solutions of this equation give the vertical displacement w of a viscous plate

as a function of time.

As a specific example, consider a free viscous plate of length L embed-

ded at one end with a concentrated load Va applied at its other end, as in

Figure 3–17. Since P̄ = q = 0, Equation (6–181) reduces to

µh3

3

∂5w

∂x4∂t = 0. (6.182)

Integrating twice with respect to x yields

µh3

3

∂3w

∂x2∂t = −M = f1(t)x+ f2(t), (6.183)

where f1(t) and f2(t) are constants of integration that can depend on time.

Because the overall torque balance given in Equation (3–78),

M = Va(x− L), (6.184)

must also be applicable to the viscous plate, we can identify f1 and f2 as

f1 = −Va f2 = VaL. (6.185)

Equation (6–183) thus takes the form

µh3

3

∂3w

∂x2∂t = −Vax+ VaL. (6.186)

6.13 Folding 465

We integrate this equation twice more with respect to x and satisfy the

boundary conditions for an embedded plate, w = ∂w/∂x = 0 at x = 0, to

get

µh3

3

∂w

∂t = Vax

2

2

(

L− x

3

)

. (6.187)

A final integration with respect to time and application of the initial condi-

tion w = 0 at t = 0 gives

w = 3

2

Vax 2

µh3

(

L− x

3

)

t. (6.188)

A comparison of Equations (6–188) and (3–83) shows that the deflection of

the viscous plate has the same spatial dependence as the deflection of the

elastic plate. This is a general correspondence between the behavior of vis-

cous and elastic plates. However, although the deflection of the elastic plate

is time-independent, the deflection of the viscous plate increases linearly

with time.

We return now to the viscous folding problem by considering the buck-

ling of a viscous plate contained between two semi-infinite viscous fluids. If

the approximation σyy = 0 that we made in our derivation of the bending

moment of a free viscous plate is to be applicable to this situation, the plate

viscosity µ1 must be much larger than the viscosity µ0 of the surrounding

half-spaces. In this case, Equation (6–181) governs the time-dependent dis-

placement of the plate, which we can take to be of the form (6–163). The

responses of the semi-infinite fluids to the deformation of the viscous plate

are identical with their responses to the bending of an elastic plate. There-

fore the force per unit area on the viscous plate is given by Equation (6–168).

Upon substituting Equation (6–168) into (6–181), we obtain

µ1h 3

3

∂5w

∂x4∂t = −8πµ0

λ

∂w

∂t − P̄

∂2w

∂x2 . (6.189)

With w given by Equation (6–163) we must have

τa = 1

[

π µ0 +

4π2

3λ2 µ1h

3

]

. (6.190)

The wavelength corresponding to the smallest value of τa is obtained by

setting the derivative of τa with respect to λ equal to zero; the result is

λ = 2πh

(

1

6

µ1

µ0

)1/3

. (6.191)

This is the wavelength of the most rapidly growing mode. A comparison of

466 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.29 Sketch for Problem 6–20.

Figure 6.30 Sketch for Problem 6–21.

this result with the observed dependence of the wavelength of the competent

layer on its thickness given in Figure 6–27 shows good agreement for µ1/µ0 =

750.

Problem 6.18 In the examples of folding just considered we assumed that

the competent rock adhered to the incompetent rock. If the layers are free

to slip, show that the wavelength of the most rapidly growing disturbance

in an elastic layer of rock contained between two semi-infinite viscous fluids

is given by

λ = πh[E/σ(1 − ν2)]1/2. (6.192)

The free slip condition is equivalent to a zero shear stress condition at the

boundaries of the elastic layer.

Problem 6.19 In the folding examples, we assumed that the competent

rock adhered to the incompetent rock. If the layers are free to slip, show that

the wavelength of the most rapidly growing disturbance in a fluid layer of

viscosity µ1 contained between two semi-infinite fluids of viscosity µ0, µ1 ≫ µ0, is given by

λ = 2πh(µ1/6µ0) 1/3. (6.193)

The free slip condition is equivalent to a zero shear stress condition at the

boundaries between the layers.

Problem 6.20 A marble plate 0.1 m thick and 2 m long is simply sup-

ported at its ends, as shown in Figure 6–29. In 150 years the center has

sagged 2 mm. Assuming that the plate behaves as a Newtonian fluid, deter-

mine the viscosity of the marble (ρ = 2300 kg m−3).

6.14 Stokes Flow 467

Problem 6.21 A marble plate 0.2 m thick and 5 m long is embedded at

one end. In 200 years the free end has sagged 5 mm, as shown in Figure 6–30.

Assuming the plate behaves as a Newtonian fluid, determine the viscosity

of the marble (ρ = 2300 kg m−3).

6.14 Stokes Flow

A solid body will rise or fall through a fluid if its density is different from

the density of the fluid. If the body is less dense, the buoyancy force will

cause it to rise; if the body is more dense, it will fall. If the fluid is very

viscous, the Reynolds number Re based on the size of the body, the velocity

at which the body moves through the fluid, and the viscosity of the fluid will

be small. In the limit Re ≪ 1 inertia forces can be neglected, and Equations

(6–53), (6–67), and (6–68) are applicable.

If the body has a spherical shape, a relatively simple solution can be ob-

tained in the limit of a very viscous fluid. The resulting flow is known as

Stokes flow. This problem has a number of geological applications. One is to

obtain an estimate for the velocity of magmas as they rise through the litho-

sphere. Many basaltic lava flows contain xenoliths, chunks of solid rock that

were entrained in the magma as it rose through the lithosphere. The solid

xenoliths are carried with the magma when it is erupted on the Earth’s sur-

face. Because the viscosity of the magma and the density difference between

the xenolith and magma can be estimated, the size of the largest observed

xenolith can be used to estimate the magma ascent velocity.

Stokes solution can also be used to estimate the size of a mantle hetero-

geneity that can be entrained in mantle flows. One model for the ascent

of magma in the mantle is that magma “bubbles” rise under the buoyancy

force. Stokes solution can be used to estimate the rate of magma ascent as

a function of the size of the magma bubble.

Let us derive an expression for the velocity of ascent or descent U of a

spherical body in a constant-viscosity fluid with a different density. We first

calculate the net force or drag exerted by the fluid on the sphere and then

equate this force to the buoyancy force responsible for the sphere’s motion.

For the purpose of calculating the drag on the sphere due to its steady

motion through the “fluid” we can consider the sphere to be fixed and have

the fluid move past the sphere. We will not discuss the transient period

during which the sphere accelerates to its final steady or terminal velocity.

The sphere of radius a is centered at the origin of a spherical coordinate

system (r, θ, φ), as illustrated in Figure 6–31. The fluid approaches the sphere

at z = ∞ with velocity −U in the z direction. The viscosity of the fluid is

468 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.31 Steady flow of a viscous fluid past a sphere.

µ. The flow is clearly axisymmetric about the z axis. Thus, neither the

velocity nor the pressure p of the fluid depends on the azimuthal angle φ.

In addition there is no azimuthal component of fluid motion; that is, the

only nonzero components of fluid velocity are the radial velocity ur and the

meridional velocity uθ, as shown in Figure 6–31. The continuity equation

and the equations of motion for the slow, steady, axisymmetric flow of a

viscous incompressible fluid are, in spherical polar coordinates with uφ = 0,

0 = 1

r2 ∂

∂r (r2ur) +

1

r sin θ

∂θ (sin θuθ) (6.194)

0 = −∂p ∂r

+ µ

{

1

r2 ∂

∂r

(

r2 ∂ur ∂r

)

+ 1

r2 sin θ

∂θ

(

sin θ ∂ur ∂θ

)

− 2ur r2

− 2

r2 sin θ

∂θ (uθ sin θ)

}

(6.195)

0 = −1

r

∂p

∂θ + µ

{

1

r2 ∂

∂r

(

r2 ∂uθ ∂r

)

+ 1

r2 sin θ

∂θ

(

sin θ ∂uθ ∂θ

)

6.14 Stokes Flow 469

+ 2

r2 ∂ur ∂θ

− uθ r2 sin2 θ

}

. (6.196)

These are the axisymmetric equivalents of Equations (6–53), (6–67), and

(6–68). We must obtain a solution subject to the condition that the fluid

velocity approaches the uniform velocity −U in the z direction as r → ∞.

The radial and meridional components of the uniform velocity are −U cos θ

and U sin θ, respectively. Therefore we can write

ur→−U cos θ and uθ→U sin θ as r→∞. (6.197)

We must also satisfy the no-slip velocity boundary condition on r = a

ur = uθ = 0 on r = a. (6.198)

The nature of the boundary conditions suggests that we try a solution of

the form

ur = f(r) cos θ and uθ = g(r) sin θ.

(6.199)

If we substitute Equations (6–199) into (6–194) to (6–196), we obtain

g = −1

2r

d

dr (r2f) (6.200)

0 = −∂p ∂r

+ µ cos θ

r2

{

d

dr

(

r2 df

dr

)

− 4(f + g)

}

(6.201)

0 = −∂p ∂θ

+ µ sin θ

r

{

d

dr

(

r2 dg

dr

)

− 2(f + g)

}

.

(6.202)

We can eliminate the pressure by differentiating Equation (6–201) with re-

spect to θ and subtracting the derivative of Equation (6–202) with respect

to r to obtain

0 = 1

r2 d

dr

(

r2 df

dr

)

− 4(f + g)

r2

+ d

dr

{

1

r

d

dr

(

r2 dg

dr

)

− 2(f + g)

r

}

. (6.203)

The solutions of Equations (6–200) and (6–203) for the functions f and g

can be found as simple powers of r. Thus we let

f = crn, (6.204)

470 Fluid Mechanics

where c is a constant. Equation (6–200) gives

g = −c(n+ 2)

2 rn. (6.205)

By substituting Equations (6–204) and (6–205) into (6–203), we find that n

must satisfy

n(n+ 3)(n − 2)(n + 1) = 0 (6.206)

or

n = 0,−3, 2,−1. (6.207)

The functions f and g are thus linear combinations of r0, r−3, r2, and r−1

f = c1 + c2 r3

+ c3 r

+ c4r 2 (6.208)

g = −c1 + c2 2r3

− c3 2r

− 2c4r 2, (6.209)

where c1, c2, c3, and c4 are constants. The velocity components ur and uθ are given by

ur =

(

c1 + c2 r3

+ c3 r

+ c4r 2 )

cos θ (6.210)

uθ =

(

− c1 + c2 2r3

− c3 2r

− 2c4r 2 )

sin θ. (6.211)

Since ur and uθ must satisfy conditions (6–197) as r → ∞, it is clear that

c1 = −U and c4 = 0. (6.212)

The no-slip condition on r = a, Equation (6–198), requires

c2 = −a3U

2 c3 =

3aU

2 . (6.213)

The final expressions for ur and uθ are

ur = U

(

−1 − a3

2r3 +

3a

2r

)

cos θ (6.214)

uθ = U

(

1 − a3

4r3 − 3a

4r

)

sin θ. (6.215)

The pressure associated with this flow can be found by substituting Equa-

tions (6–214) and (6–215) into (6–196) and integrating with respect to θ

p = 3µaU

2r2 cos θ. (6.216)

6.14 Stokes Flow 471

Both pressure forces and viscous forces act on the surface of the sphere. By

symmetry, the net force on the sphere must be in the negative z direction.

This net force is the dragD on the sphere. We first calculate the contribution

of the pressure forces to the drag. The pressure force on the sphere acts in

the negative radial direction. The component of this force in the negative z

direction is, per unit area of the surface,

p cos θ = 3µU

2a cos2 θ. (6.217)

The pressure drag Dp is obtained by integrating the product of this force per

unit area with the surface area element 2πa2 sin θ dθ over the entire surface

of the sphere

Dp = 3πµaU

∫ π

0 sin θ cos2 θ dθ = 2πµaU.

(6.218)

We next compute the net viscous drag Dv on the sphere. The viscous

stresses acting on an area element of the sphere’s surface are the radial

viscous stress τrr

(τrr)r=a = 2µ

(

∂ur ∂r

)

r=a (6.219)

and the tangential stress τrθ

(τrθ)r= a = µ

{

r ∂

∂r

(

uθ r

)

+ 1

r

∂ur ∂θ

}

r= a .

(6.220)

By substituting Equations (6–214) and (6–215) into these expressions, we

find that the viscous stresses on the surface of the sphere are

(τrr)r= a = 0 (6.221)

(τrθ)r= a = 3µU sin θ

2a . (6.222)

The nonzero tangential stress τrθ is a force per unit area in the θ direction.

The component of this force per unit area in the negative z direction is

τrθ sin θ = 3µU sin2 θ

2a . (6.223)

The viscous drag Dv is found by integrating the product of this quantity

with the surface area element 2πa2 sin θ dθ over the entire surface of the

sphere

Dv = 3πµaU

∫ π

0 sin3 θdθ = 4πµaU. (6.224)

472 Fluid Mechanics

The total drag on the sphere is the sum of the pressure drag and the viscous

drag

D = Dp +Dv = 6πµaU. (6.225)

This is the well-known Stokes formula for the drag on a sphere moving

with a small constant velocity through a viscous incompressible fluid. Stokes

resistance law is often written in dimensionless form by normalizing the drag

with the product of the pressure 1 2ρfU

2 (ρf is the density of the fluid) and

the cross-sectional area of the sphere πa2. The dimensionless drag coefficient

cD is thus

cD ≡ D 1 2ρfU

2πa2 =

12

(ρfUa)/µ =

24

Re , (6.226)

where the Reynolds number is given by

Re = ρfU(2a)

µ . (6.227)

The Stokes drag formula can be used to determine the velocity of a sphere

rising buoyantly through a fluid by equating the drag to the gravitational

driving force. If the density of the sphere ρs is less than the density of the

fluid ρf , the net upward buoyancy force according to Archimedes principle

is

F = (ρf − ρs)g

(

4

3 πa3

)

. (6.228)

We set this equal to the drag on the sphere 6πµaU and solve for the upward

velocity U to obtain

U = 2(ρf − ρs)ga

2

9µ . (6.229)

It should be emphasized that this result is valid only if the Reynolds number

is less than 1.

For larger values of the Reynolds number the flow of a fluid about a

sphere becomes quite complex. Vortices are generated, and the flow becomes

unsteady. The measured dependence of the drag coefficient for a sphere on

Reynolds number is given in Figure 6–32. This dependence applies to any

type of fluid as long as it is incompressible. Figure 6–32 also shows the

result for Stokes flow from Equation (6–226). We see that Stokes flow is

a valid approximation for Re < 1. The sharp drop in the drag coefficient

at Re = 3 × 105 is associated with the transition to turbulent flow. The

dependence of cD on Re for a sphere given in Figure 6–32 is similar to the

dependence of f on Re for pipe flow given in Figure 6–7. In terms of the

6.14 Stokes Flow 473

Figure 6.32 Dependence of the drag coefficient CD for a sphere on Reynolds number. The solid line is the measured dependence, and the dashed line is the result from Stokes formula, Equation (6–226).

drag coefficient, the upward velocity of a sphere from Equations (6–226),

(6–227), and (6–229) is given by

U =

[

8

3

ag(ρf − ρs)

cDρf

]1/2

. (6.230)

The drag coefficient can be obtained from the value of the Reynolds number

and Figure 6–32.

We can now obtain an estimate for the velocity of magma ascent through

the lithosphere. Refractory peridotite xenoliths with a maximum dimension

of about 0.3 m have been found in the basaltic lavas erupted in 1801 at

Hualalai Volcano, Hawaii. These solid xenoliths were entrained in the lava as

it flowed through the lithosphere. An upper limit on the size of the xenoliths

that can be entrained is obtained by setting the relative velocity U equal

to the flow velocity of the magma. A reasonable estimate for the viscosity

of the basaltic magma is 10 Pa s. Also assuming ρs − ρm = 600 kg m−3

and a = 0.15 m, we find from Equation (6–229) that U = 3 m s−1 (10.8 km

per hr). The corresponding value of the Reynolds number from Equation (6–

227) with ρf = 2700 kg m−3 is 243. Therefore the Stokes formula is only

approximately valid. Using Equation (6–230) and the empirical correlation

given in Figure 6–32, we find U = 0.87 m s−1 and Re = 70. This is still

474 Fluid Mechanics

quite a high velocity. It indicates that magma can penetrate a 100-km-thick

lithosphere in about 32 hr.

It is also of interest to determine whether a body with a different density

will be entrained in mantle convection. Taking a typical mantle velocity to

be 10 mm yr−1,∆ρ = 100 kg m−3, µ = 1021 Pa s, and g = 10 m s−2, we find

from Equation (6–229) that spherical bodies with radii less than 38 km will

be entrained in mantle flows. The conclusion is that sizable inhomogeneous

bodies can be carried with the mantle rocks during mantle convection.

One model for magma migration is that sizable magma bodies move

through the mantle because of the differential buoyancy of the liquid. The

velocity of a spherical bubble of low-viscosity fluid moving through a high-

viscosity fluid because of buoyancy is given by

U = a2g(ρf − ρb)

3µf , (6.231)

where ρb is the density of the fluid in the bubble, ρf is the density of the

surrounding fluid, and µf is the viscosity of the ambient fluid. See Problem 6–

23 for an explanation of the difference between Equations (6–231) and (6–

229). Taking a = 0.5 km, ρf − ρb = 600 kg m−3, and µ = 1021 Pa s, we

find that U = 0.016 mm yr−1. Even for a relatively large magma body

the migration velocity is about 13 orders of magnitude smaller than that

deduced from the entrainment of xenoliths.

Another order of magnitude calculation also shows that this calculated

velocity is unreasonably small. At a velocity of 0.016 mm yr−1 it would

take the magma body about 10 Gyr to migrate 100 km. This is clearly an

unreasonable length of time. It is also necessary that a magma body reach

the Earth’s surface without solidification if surface volcanism is to occur. An

order of magnitude estimate of the time it takes to solidify a magma body

of a minimum dimension a is the thermal time constant a2/κ. If we take a

time of 32 hr derived above from xenolith entrainment and κ = 1 mm2 s−1,

we estimate the minimum dimension of a magma body that penetrates the

lithosphere to be 10 cm.

If magma does not penetrate the lithosphere by diapirism, an alterna-

tive mechanism must be found. One possibility that has been proposed is

hydrofracturing. Liquid under pressure can fracture rock. It has been sug-

gested that the pressure caused by the differential buoyancy of magma can

result in the propagation of a fracture through the lithosphere along which

the magma migrates.

Problem 6.22 The Stokes drag D on a sphere can only depend on the

6.14 Stokes Flow 475

Figure 6.33 Illustration of the plume model.

velocity of the sphere U , its radius a, and the viscosity µ and density ρ of

the fluid. Show by dimensional analysis that

D

ρU2a2 = f

(

ρUa

µ

)

, (6.232)

where f is an arbitrary function. Because the equations of slow viscous flow

are linear, D can only be directly proportional to U . Use this fact together

with Equation (6–232) to conclude that

D ∝ µUa. (6.233)

Problem 6.23 Consider a spherical bubble of a low-viscosity fluid with

density ρb rising or falling through a much more viscous fluid with density

ρf and viscosity µf because of a buoyancy force. For this problem the appro-

priate boundary conditions at the surface of the sphere, r = a, are ur = 0

and τrθ = 0.

Using Equations (6–210), (6–211), and (6–220) show that

ur = U

(

− 1 + a

r

)

cos θ (6.234)

uθ = U

(

1 − 1

2

a

r

)

sin θ. (6.235)

476 Fluid Mechanics

By integrating Equation (6–196), show that on r = a,

p = µfU

a cos θ. (6.236)

The drag force is obtained by carrying out the integral

D = 2πa2 ∫ π

0

(

p− 2µf ∂ur ∂r

)

r=a cos θ sin θdθ.

(6.237)

Show that

D = 4πµfaU, (6.238)

and demonstrate that the terminal velocity of the bubble in the fluid is

U = a2g(ρf − ρb)

3µf . (6.239)

6.15 Plume Heads and Tails

A simple steady-state model for the ascent of a plume head through the

mantle is given in Figure 6–33. The plume head is modeled as a spherical

diapir whose velocity is given by the Stokes flow solution. The mantle rock

in the plume head is hotter, less dense, and less viscous than the surrounding

mantle rock. We utilize the solution to Problem 6–23 and write the terminal

velocity U of the ascending spherical diapir from Equation (6–239) as

U = a2g(ρm − ρp)

3µm , (6.240)

where a is the radius of the diapir, ρp is the density of the hot plume rock,

ρm is the density of the surrounding rock, and µm is the viscosity of the

surrounding mantle rock. We take Tp to be the mean temperature of the

plume rock and T1 to be the temperature of the surrounding mantle rock.

From Equation (4–172) we write

ρp − ρm = −ρmαν(Tp − T1). (6.241)

Substitution of Equation (6–241) into (6–240) gives

U = a2gρmαv(Tp − T1)

3µm , (6.242)

as the ascent velocity of the plume head.

6.15 Plume Heads and Tails 477

The plume tail is modeled as a cylindrical pipe and the buoyancy driven

volume flux Qp of plume rock is given by Equation (6–48)

Qp = π

8

(ρm − ρp)gR 4

µp , (6.243)

where R is the radius of the plume tail and µp is the viscosity of the plume

rock. A measure of the strength of a plume is the buoyancy flux B, which

is defined by

B = Qp(ρm − ρp). (6.244)

A combination of Equations (6–241), (6–243), and (6–244) gives

B = π

8

gR 4ρ2 m(Tp − T1)

2α2 v

µp . (6.245)

The total heat flux in a plume QH is related to the volume flux by

QH = ρmcp(Tp − T1)Qp, (6.246)

where cp is the specific heat at constant pressure. A combination of Equa-

tions (6–241), (6–244), and (6–246) gives

QH = cpB

αv . (6.247)

This relation can be used to convert a plume buoyancy flux to a heat flux.

In our steady-state model the plume head neither gains nor loses fluid;

this requires that the mean flow velocity in the plume tail equals the ascent

velocity of the plume head U . Thus we have

Qp = πR2U. (6.248)

Once the plume flux B has been specified along with the other parameters,

the radius of the plume tail R can be determined from Equation (6–245),

the heat flux in the plume from Equation (6–246), the ascent velocity of the

plume head U from Equation (6–248), and the radius of the plume head

from Equation (6–242).

As we pointed out in Section 1–6, hotspots that are attributed to mantle

plumes are associated with topographic swells. The Hawaiian swell was il-

lustrated in Figure 1–20. The buoyancy flux associated with a mantle plume

can be determined from the rate of hotspot swell formation. We hypothesize

that the excess mass associated with the swell is compensated by the mass

deficit of the hot (light) plume rock impinging on the base of the lithosphere.

Thus the buoyancy fluxB associated with the plume is given by

B = (ρm − ρw)Asup, (6.249)

478 Fluid Mechanics

where ρm is the mantle density, ρw is the water density (assuming the swell

is covered by water), As is the cross-sectional area of the swell in a vertical

cross section perpendicular to the plume track, and up is the plate speed

relative to a “fixed” hotspot reference frame.

As a specific example consider the Hawaiian hotspot. From Figure 1–19

we have up = 90 mm yr−1, from Figure 1–20 we have As = 1.13 km2,

and taking ρm − ρw = 2300 kg m−3 we find B = 7.4 × 103 kg s−1. Taking

cp = 1.25 kJ kg−1 K−1 and αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, the plume heat flux from

Equation (6–247) QH = 3 × 1011 W; this represents slightly less than 1%

of the total surface heat flux. The radius of the Hawaiian plume R can be

obtained from Equation (6–245). Taking B = 7.4×103 kg s−1, µp = 1019 Pa

s, Tp − T1 = 200 K, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, and g = 9.8 m

s−2, we find that the plume radius R = 84 km. This is relatively small and

explains why plumes are very difficult to observe seismically.

From Equations (6–241) and (6–244) and the parameter values given

above, the volume flux in the Hawaiian plume Qp = 12 km3 yr−1. It is

of interest to compare this volume flux with the volume flux of basalt Qv required to create the Hawaiian Islands and seamount chain. It is estimated

that Qv = 0.1 km3 yr−1, thus it was necessary to melt only about 1% of

the plume flux to generate the hotspot volcanics at Hawaii. From Equa-

tion (6–248) we find that the mean ascent velocity in the plume U = 0.54 m

yr−1.

The buoyancy fluxes for forty-three mantle plumes are given in Table 6–4.

The total buoyancy flux for these plumes B = 58.5 × 103 kg s−1. Taking

cp = 1.25 kJ kg−1 K−1 and αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, the total plume heat flux

from Equation (6–247) QH = 0.244 × 1013 W. This represents 5.5% of the

total global heat flow Q = 4.43 × 1013 W. In Section 4–23 we estimated

that the basal heating of the oceanic and continental lithosphere Qm =

1.58× 1013 W. Thus our derived plume heat flux is only 15% of the total

heat flux associated with the basal heating of the lithosphere. This missing

heat flux can be attributed either to plumes that impinge on the base of the

lithosphere but are too small to have a surface expression or to secondary

mantle convection involving the lower part of the lithosphere.

The relationship between the Réunion hotspot and the flood basalt province

of the Deccan Traps was illustrated in Figure 1–22. This basalt province is

associated with the plume head that initiated the plume tail responsible

for the plume track that now terminates in the Réunion hotspot. We now

estimate the quantitative aspects of the Réunion mantle plume and plume

head.

From Table 6–4, the present buoyancy flux of the Réunion plume B =

6.15 Plume Heads and Tails 479

Table 6.4 Values of the Buoyancy Flux Associated with Forty-Three

Hotspot Swells

B, Buoyancy Flux Hotspot (103 kg s--1)

Afar, Ethiopia 1.2 Ascenscion 0.9 Australia, East 0.9 Azores 1.1 Baja, California 0.3 Bermuda 1.3 Bouvet 0.4 Bowie Seamount 0.6 Canary Islands 1.0 Cape Verde 1.0 Caroline Islands 1.6 Crozet 0.5 Darfur 0.4 Discovery Seamount 0.4 East African 0.6 Easter Island 3.3 Ethiopia 1.0 Fernando 0.7 Galapagos Islands 1.0 Great Meteor Seamount 0.4 Hawaii 7.4 Hoggar Mountains, Algeria 0.6 Iceland 1.4 Juan de Fuca/Cobb Seamount 0.3 Juan Fernandez 1.6 Kerguelen 0.4 Louisville 2.0 MacDonald Seamount 3.6 Marquesas Islands 4.0 Martin 0.6 Meteor 0.4 Pitcairn Islands 2.5 Réunion 1.4 Samoa 1.6 San Felix 2.0 St. Helena 0.4 Tahiti 4.6 Tasman, Central 0.9 Tasman, East 0.9 Tibesti, Chad 0.3 Tristan de Cunha 1.1 Vema Seamount 0.4 Yellowstone 1.5

Total 58.5

480 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.34 Heat balance on a small cylindrical shell in a circular pipe.

1.4× 103 kg s−1. With the same parameter values used before we find from

Equation (6–243) that the radius of the plume conduit R = 55 km; from

Equations (6–241) and (6–244) we find that the volume flux Qp = 2.2 km3

yr−1; and from Equation (6–248) we find that the mean ascent velocity in

the plume U = 0.23 m yr−1. We make the assumption that the strength of

the Réunion plume has remained constant for the last 60 Myr that it has

been active. Taking µm = 1021 Pa s, we find from Equation (6–242) that

the radius of the plume head a = 336 km. The corresponding volume of the

plume head VPH = 1.2×108 km3. The volume of basalts in the Deccan Traps

VB ≈ 1.5× 106 km3. Thus it was necessary to melt about one percent of the

plume head to form the flood basalts of the Deccan Traps. This is the same

melt fraction that we previously obtained for the volcanics of the Hawaiian

hotspot. Assuming that the volume flux of the Réunion plume Qp = 2.2 km3

yr−1 and has remained constant over the 60 Myr lifetime of the plume, the

total volume flux through the plume tail has been 1.3 × 108 km3. This is

essentially equal to the volume of the plume head. For the ascent velocity

of the plume head U equal to 0.23 m yr−1, it would take about 12 Myr for

the plume head to ascend from the core–mantle boundary to the Earth’s

surface.

Problem 6.24 Determine the radius of the plume conduit, the volume

flux, the heat flux, the mean ascent velocity, and the plume head volume for

the Azores plume. Assume that Tp − T1 = 200 K, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, µp =

1019 Pa s, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, µm = 1021 Pa s, and cp = 1.25 kJ kg−1 K−1.

Problem 6.25 Determine the radius of the plume conduit, the volume

flux, the heat flux, the mean ascent velocity, and the plume head volume for

the Tahiti plume. Assume that Tp − T1 = 200 K, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, µp =

1019 Pa s, ρm = 3300 kg m−3, µm = 1021 Pa s, and cp = 1.25 kJ kg−1 K−1.

6.16 Pipe Flow with Heat Addition 481

6.16 Pipe Flow with Heat Addition

We now turn to problems involving both fluid flow and heat transfer. As our

first example we will treat the flow in a pipe with heat addition or heat loss,

a situation relevant to the heating of water in an aquifer. We consider the

heat balance on a thin cylindrical shell of fluid in the pipe. The thickness of

the shell is δr, and its length is δx, as illustrated in Figure 6–34. The heat

conducted out of the cylindrical surface at r + δr per unit time is

2π(r + δr) δxqr(r + δr),

where qr(r + δr) is the radial heat flux at r + δr. The heat conducted into

the shell across its inner cylindrical surface is

2πrδxqr(r)

per unit time. Because δr is small, we can expand qr(r + δr) as

qr(r + δr) = qr(r) + ∂qr ∂r

δr + · · · .

By neglecting higher powers of δr, we can write the net rate at which heat

is conducted into the cylindrical shell through its inner and outer surfaces

as

2πδx[rqr(r) − (r + δr)qr(r + δr)]

= −2πδx

(

r ∂qr ∂r

+ qr

)

δr. (6.250)

In cylindrical coordinates, the radial heat flux qr is related to the radial

temperature gradient ∂T/∂r by Fourier’s law of heat conduction (see Prob-

lem 4–21),

qr = −k∂T ∂r , (6.251)

where k is the thermal conductivity of the fluid. Expression (6–250) for the

net effect of radial heat conduction can thus be rewritten in terms of the

temperature as

2πδx δrk

(

r ∂2T

∂r2 + ∂T

∂r

)

.

The amount of heat convected out of the shell at x + δx by the velocity

u(r) per unit time is given by

2πr δruρcT (x+ δx),

482 Fluid Mechanics

and the amount of heat convected into the shell at x per unit time is given

by

2πr δruρcT (x).

By using the first two terms of a Taylor series expansion for T (x+ δx), we

find that the net rate at which fluid carries heat out of the shell is

2πr δruρc[T (x+ δx) − T (x)] = 2πr δruρc ∂T

∂x δx.

(6.252)

If the flow is steady so that the temperature of the fluid does not change

with time and if axial heat conduction is unimportant compared with advec-

tion of heat by the flow, the net effects of radial heat conduction and axial

heat advection must balance. Therefore we can equate the right side of Equa-

tion (6–252) with the modified form of the right side of Equation (6–250) to

obtain

ρuc ∂T

∂x = k

(

∂2T

∂r2 +

1

r

∂T

∂r

)

. (6.253)

By equating axial heat advection to radial heat conduction, we also tacitly

assumed that viscous dissipation or frictional heating in the fluid is negligible.

We can determine the temperature distribution in the pipe using Equa-

tion (6–253) for the laminar flow considered in Section 6–4. The velocity as

a function of radius can be expressed in terms of the mean velocity ū by

combining Equations (6–33) and (6–37) to give

u = 2ū

[

1 − (

r

R

)2 ]

. (6.254)

We consider the case in which the wall temperature of the pipe Tw is chang-

ing linearly along its length; that is,

Tw = C1x+ C2, (6.255)

where C1 and C2 are constants. Accordingly, we assume that the tempera-

ture of the fluid is given by

T = C1x+ C2 + θ(r) = Tw + θ(r). (6.256)

(In this situation, the net contribution of axial heat conduction to the heat

balance of a small cylindrical shell vanishes identically.) Thus θ is the differ-

ence between the fluid temperature and the wall temperature. Substitution

6.16 Pipe Flow with Heat Addition 483

of Equations (6–254) and (6–256) into (6–253) yields

2ρcū

[

1 − (

r

R

)2 ]

C1 = k

(

d2θ

dr2 +

1

r

dr

)

.

(6.257)

The boundary conditions are

T = Tw at r = R (6.258)

and

qr = 0 at r = 0. (6.259)

The latter condition is required because there is no line source or sink of

heat along the axis of the pipe. Condition (6–258) is satisfied if

θr=R = 0, (6.260)

and Condition (6–259), with the aid of Fourier’s law (6–251), becomes (

dr

)

r=0 = 0. (6.261)

The solution of Equation (6–257) that satisfies these boundary conditions is

θ = −ρcūC1R 2

8k

{

3 − 4 r2

R2 + r4

R4

}

. (6.262)

The heat flux to the wall qw can be found by substituting Equation (6–

262) into Fourier’s law (6–251) and evaluating the result at r = R. One

finds

qw = −1 2ρcūRC1. (6.263)

The heat flux is thus a constant, independent of x. If C1 is positive, the

wall temperature increases in the direction of flow, and heat flows through

the wall of the pipe into the fluid. If C1 is negative, the wall temperature

decreases in the direction of flow, and heat flows out of the fluid into the

wall of the pipe. The heat flux to the wall can be expressed in a convenient

way by introducing a heat transfer coefficient h between the wall heat flux

and the excess fluid temperature according to

qw = h(T̄ − Tw) = hθ̄, (6.264)

where the overbar represents an average over the cross section of the pipe.

The average is weighted by the flow per unit area, that is, the velocity

484 Fluid Mechanics

through an annular area at radius r. Thus the flow-weighted average excess

fluid temperature is

θ̄ = 2π ∫ R 0 θur dr

πR2ū =

−11ρcūC1R 2

48k . (6.265)

By combining Equations (6–263) to (6–265), we find that the heat transfer

coefficient for laminar flow in a circular pipe is

h = 48k

11D , (6.266)

where D = 2R is the pipe diameter. Equation (6–266) is valid only for

Reynolds numbers less than about 2200. At higher values of the Reynolds

number the flow is turbulent.

The fluid mechanics literature commonly introduces a dimensionless mea-

sure of the heat transfer coefficient known as the Nusselt number Nu. For

pipe flow with heat addition,

Nu ≡ hD

k =

48

11 = 4.36. (6.267)

The Nusselt number measures the efficiency of the heat transfer process. If

the temperature difference T̄ −Tw were established across a stationary layer

of fluid of thickness D and thermal conductivity k, the conductive heat flux

qc would be

qc = k(T̄ − Tw)

D = qwk

Dh . (6.268)

Thus the Nusselt number can be written

Nu = qw qc . (6.269)

Therefore, heat transfer with fluid flow through the pipe is 4.36 times more

efficient than conductive heat transport through an equivalent stationary

fluid layer across which the same temperature difference is applied.

Problem 6.26 Consider unidirectional flow driven by a constant horizon-

tal pressure gradient through a channel with stationary plane parallel walls,

as discussed in Section 6–2. Determine the temperature distribution in the

channel, the wall heat flux, the heat transfer coefficient, and the Nusselt

number by assuming, as in the pipe flow problem above, that the tempera-

ture of both walls and the fluid varies linearly with distance x along the chan-

nel. You will need the form of the temperature equation in two dimensions

that balances horizontal heat advection against vertical heat conduction, as

given in Equation (4–156).

6.17 Aquifer Model for Hot Springs 485

6.17 Aquifer Model for Hot Springs

We can use the results of the previous section to study the heating of water

flowing through an aquifer surrounded by hot rocks. We again consider the

semicircular aquifer with circular cross section illustrated in Figure 6–9. If

we balance the heat convected along the aquifer against the heat lost or

gained by conduction to the walls, we can write

πR2ρcū dT̄

ds = 2πRh(Tw − T̄ ), (6.270)

where s is the distance measured along the aquifer from the entrance, ū is

the mean velocity in the aquifer, T̄ is the flow-averaged temperature of the

aquifer fluid, and Tw is the temperature of the aquifer wall rock. We assume

laminar flow so that the heat transfer coefficient h is given by Equation (6–

266). The coordinate s can be related to the angle φ (see Figure 6–9) by

s = R ′φ. (6.271)

We assume that the wall temperature of the aquifer can be related to the

local geothermal gradient β by

Tw = R ′β sinφ+ T0, (6.272)

where T0 is the surface temperature and β is constant. Equation (6–272)

assumes that the flow in the aquifer does not affect the temperature of the

adjacent rock. Substitution of Equations (6–266), (6–271), and (6–272) into

(6–270) yields

R2ρcū

R′

dT̄

dφ =

48

11 k(R ′β sinφ+ T0 − T̄ ). (6.273)

This equation can be simplified through the introduction of the Péclet

number Pe defined by

Pe = ρcūR

k . (6.274)

The Péclet number is a dimensionless measure of the mean velocity of the

flow through the aquifer. It is related to the dimensionless parameters Re

and Pr already introduced. Since the thermal diffusivity κ is k/ρc, Pe can

be written as

Pe = ūR

κ . (6.275)

Using the definition of the Reynolds number Re in Equation (6–40) and the

486 Fluid Mechanics

Prandtl number Pr in Equation (6–3) we can further rewrite Equation (6–

275) as

Pe = 1

2

ū2R

ν

ν

κ =

1

2 Re Pr. (6.276)

The simplification of Equation (6–273) is also facilitated by the introduction

of a dimensionless temperature θ defined by

θ = T̄ − T0

βR ′ . (6.277)

With Equations (6–274) and (6–277) we can put (6–273) into the form

11

48

R

R′ Pe dθ

dφ + θ = sinφ. (6.278)

This is a linear first-order differential equation that can be integrated

using an integrating factor. With the boundary condition that the water

entering the aquifer is at the surface temperature, T̄ = T0 or θ = 0 at φ = 0,

the solution can be written

θ =

[

48R ′

11RPe sinφ− cosφ+ exp

(

−48

11

R ′

RPe φ

)]

× (

48

11

R ′

RPe

)

[

1 +

(

48R ′

11RPe

)2 ]−1

. (6.279)

The nondimensional temperature θe at the exit of the aquifer, φ = π, is

given by

θe =

[

exp (

−48 11

R′π RPe

)

+ 1 ]

48 11

R′

RPe

1 + (

48R′

11RPe

)2 . (6.280)

The nondimensional exit temperature is plotted as a function of RPe/R′

in Figure 6–35. It is seen that the exit temperature of the hot spring is a

maximum for RPe/R′ = 5. Thus, for given values of all parameters other

than ū, there is a particular flow rate through the aquifer that maximizes

the exit temperature of the water. The maximum exit temperature is about

one-half the maximum wall temperature at the base of the aquifer because

θe = 1/2 corresponds to T̄ e = T0+ 1 2βR

′, and Tw at φ = π/2 is T0+βR ′(T0 ≪

βR′).

To better understand why there is a maximum exit temperature, we will

show the mean temperature of the water in the aquifer as a function of

position in Figure 6–36 for three flow rates. The dimensionless wall or rock

6.17 Aquifer Model for Hot Springs 487

Figure 6.35 Dependence of the nondimensional temperature at the exit of the hot spring on the nondimensional flow rate through the aquifer.

temperature,

θw = Tw − T0

βR′ , (6.281)

is also given in the figure. For a low flow rate, RPe/R′ = 1, for example, the

water temperature follows the wall temperature because of the large heat

transfer, and the exit temperature is low. For very slow flow, RPe/R′ → 0,

the water temperature equals the wall temperature θ = θw = sinφ, the exit

temperature equals the entrance temperature, and there is no hot spring.

For a high flow rate, RPe/R′ = 15, for example, there is very little heat

transfer, and the water does not heat up. In the limit RPe/R′ → ∞ the water

temperature everywhere in the aquifer equals the entrance temperature, and

there is no hot spring. The case of maximum exit temperature, RPe/R′ = 5

and θe = 0.52 is also shown in Figure 6–36.

Although the analysis given here has been greatly simplified, the results

are applicable to the more general problem in which the temperature dis-

tribution in the rock through which the aquifer passes must also be deter-

mined. This requires a solution of Laplace’s equation. Also, the transition

to turbulence must be considered. The more complete solutions require nu-

merical methods. However, the results show that the maximum temperature

to expect from a hot spring is about one-half the temperature obtained by

extrapolating the regional geothermal gradient to the base of the aquifer,

similar to the result obtained here.

Problem 6.27 Verify by direct substitution that Equation (6–279)

is the solution of (6–278).

Problem 6.28 The results of this section were based on the assumption of

488 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.36 Dimensionless mean water temperature in the aquifer as a function of position for three nondimensional flow rates. The dashed line is the dimensionless aquifer wall temperature.

a laminar heat transfer coefficient for the aquifer flow. Because this requires

Re< 2200, what limitation is placed on the Péclet number?

6.18 Thermal Convection

As discussed in Section 1–14, plate tectonics is a consequence of thermal

convection in the mantle driven largely by radiogenic heat sources and the

cooling of the Earth. When a fluid is heated, its density generally decreases

because of thermal expansion. A fluid layer that is heated from below or from

within and cooled from above has dense cool fluid near the upper boundary

and hot light fluid at depth. This situation is gravitationally unstable, and

the cool fluid tends to sink and the hot fluid rises. This is thermal convection.

The phenomenon is illustrated in Figure 1–61.

Appropriate forms of the continuity, force balance, and temperature equa-

tions for two-dimensional flow are required for a quantitative study of ther-

mal convection. Density variations caused by thermal expansion lead to the

buoyancy forces that drive thermal convection. Thus it is essential to account

for density variations in the gravitational body force term of the conserva-

tion of momentum or force balance equation. In all other respects, however,

the density variations are sufficiently small so that they can be neglected.

This is known as the Boussinesq approximation. It allows us to use the in-

compressible conservation of fluid equation (6–53). The force balance equa-

6.18 Thermal Convection 489

tions (6–64) and (6–65) are also applicable. However, to account for the

buoyancy forces, we must allow for small density variations in the vertical

force balance, Equation (6–65), by letting

ρ = ρ0 + ρ′, (6.282)

where ρ0 is a reference density and ρ′ ≪ ρ0. Equation (6–65) can then be

written

0 = −∂p ∂y

+ ρ0g + ρ′g + µ

(

∂2v

∂x2 + ∂2v

∂y2

)

. (6.283)

We can eliminate the hydrostatic pressure corresponding to the reference

density by introducing

P = p− ρ0gy (6.284)

as in Equation (6–66). The horizontal and vertical equations of motion,

Equations (6–64) and (6–283), become

0 = −∂P ∂x

+ µ

(

∂2u

∂x2 + ∂2u

∂y2

)

(6.285)

0 = −∂P ∂y

+ ρ′g + µ

(

∂2v

∂x2 + ∂2v

∂y2

)

. (6.286)

Density variations caused by temperature changes are given by Equa-

tion (4–179)

ρ′ = −ρ0αv(T − T0), (6.287)

where αv is the volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion and T0 is the ref-

erence temperature corresponding to the reference density ρ0. Substitution

of Equation (6–287) into Equation (6–286) gives

0 = −∂P ∂y

+ µ

(

∂2v

∂x2 + ∂2v

∂y2

)

− gρ0αv(T − T0).

(6.288)

The last term in this equation is the buoyancy force per unit volume. The

gravitational buoyancy term depends on temperature. Thus the velocity field

cannot be determined without simultaneously solving for the temperature

field. Therefore we require the heat equation that governs the variation of

temperature.

490 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.37 Heat transport across the surfaces of an infinitesimal rectan- gular element by convection.

The energy balance must account for heat transport by both conduc-

tion and convection. Consider the small two-dimensional element shown in

Figure 6–37. Since the thermal energy content of the fluid is ρcT per unit

volume, an amount of heat ρcTu δy is transported across the right side of the

element by the velocity component u in the x direction. This is an energy flow

per unit time and per unit depth or distance in the dimension perpendicular

to the figure. If ρcTu is the energy flux at x, then ρcTu+ ∂/∂x(ρcTu) δx is

the energy flow rate per unit area at x + δx. The net energy advected out

of the elemental volume per unit time and per unit depth due to flow in the

x direction is thus

[{

ρcTu+ ∂

∂x (ρcTu) δx

}

− ρcTu

]

δy

= ∂

∂x (ρcTu) δx δy. (6.289)

The same analysis applied in the y direction gives

[(

ρcTv + ∂

∂y {ρcTv} δy

)

− ρcTv

]

δx

= ∂

∂y (ρcTv) δx δy (6.290)

for the net rate at which heat is advected out of the element by flow in the

y direction per unit depth. Thus, the net rate of heat advection out of the

element by flow in both directions is

6.18 Thermal Convection 491

[

∂x (ρcTu) +

∂y (ρcTv)

]

δx δy

per unit depth. We have already derived the expression for the net rate at

which heat is conducted out of the element, per unit depth, in Equation (4–

49); it is

−k (

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2

)

δx δy.

Conservation of energy states that the combined transport of energy out

of the elemental volume by conduction and convection must be balanced by

the change in the energy content of the element. The thermal energy of the

fluid is ρcT per unit volume. Thus, this quantity changes at the rate

∂t (ρcT ) δx δy

per unit depth of fluid. By combining the effects of conduction, convection,

and thermal inertia, we obtain

∂t (ρcT ) − k

(

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2

)

+ ∂

∂x (ρcuT ) +

∂y (ρcvT ) = 0. (6.291)

By treating ρ and c as constants and noting that

∂x (uT ) +

∂y (vT ) = u

∂T

∂x + v

∂T

∂y + T

(

∂u

∂x + ∂v

∂y

)

= u ∂T

∂x + v

∂T

∂y (6.292)

(the last step following as a consequence of the continuity equation) and

κ = k/ρc, we finally arrive at the heat equation for two-dimensional flows

∂T

∂t + u

∂T

∂x + v

∂T

∂y = κ

(

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2

)

. (6.293)

In deriving Equation (6–293), we have neglected some factors that contribute

to a general energy balance but are negligible in our present application.

These include frictional heating in the fluid associated with the resistance

to flow and compressional heating associated with the work done by pressure

forces in moving the fluid. We have already derived and used simplified forms

of this equation in Section 4–20.

492 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.38 Two-dimensional cellular convection in a fluid layer heated from below.

6.19 Linear Stability Analysis for the Onset of Thermal

Convection in a Layer of Fluid Heated from Below

The layer of fluid illustrated in Figure 6–38 is heated from below; that is,

its upper surface y = −b/2 is maintained at the relatively cold reference

temperature T0 and its lower boundary y = b/2 is kept at the relatively hot

temperature T1(T1 > T0). We assume that there are no heat sources in the

fluid. Buoyancy forces tend to drive convection in the fluid layer. Fluid near

the heated lower boundary becomes hotter and lighter than the overlying

fluid and tends to rise. Similarly, fluid near the colder, upper boundary is

denser than the fluid below and tends to sink. However, the motion does

not take place for small temperature differences across the layer because the

fluid’s viscous resistance to flow must be overcome. We use the equations of

the preceding section to determine the conditions required for convection to

occur, such as the minimum temperature difference.

In the absence of convection, that is, for T1 − T0 sufficiently small, the

fluid is stationary (u = v = 0), and we can assume that a steady (∂/∂t = 0)

conductive state with ∂/∂x = 0 exists. The energy equation (6–293) then

simplifies to

d2Tc dy2

= 0, (6.294)

where the subscript c indicates that this is the conduction solution. The

solution of Equation (6–294) that satisfies the boundary conditions T = T0

at y = −b/2 and T = T1 at y = +b/2 is the linear temperature profile

Tc = T1 + T0

2 +

(T1 − T0)

b y. (6.295)

If one imagines gradually increasing the temperature difference across the

layer (T1 − T0), the stationary conductive state will persist until T1 − T0

6.19 Linear Stability Analysis for the Onset of Thermal Convection 493

reaches a critical value at which even the slightest further increase in tem-

perature difference will cause the layer to become unstable and convection

to occur. Thus, at the onset of convection the fluid temperature is nearly

the conduction temperature profile and the temperature difference T ′,

T ′ ≡ T −Tc = T − (T1 +T0)

2 − (T1 −T0)

b y,

(6.296)

is arbitrarily small. The convective velocities u′, v′ are similarly infinitesimal

when motion first takes place.

The form of the energy equation that pertains to the onset of convec-

tion can be written in terms of T ′ by solving Equation (6–296) for T and

substituting into Equation (6–293). One gets

∂T ′

∂t + u′

∂T ′

∂x + v′

∂T ′

∂y + v′(T1 − T0)

b

= κ

(

∂2T ′

∂x2 + ∂2T ′

∂y2

)

. (6.297)

Because T ′, u′, v′ are small quantities, the nonlinear terms u′∂T ′/∂x and

v′∂T ′/∂y on the left side of Equation (6–297) are much smaller than the

remaining linear terms in the equation. Thus they can be neglected and

Equation (6–297) can be written as

∂T ′

∂t + v′

b (T1 − T0) = κ

(

∂2T ′

∂x2 + ∂2T ′

∂y2

)

. (6.298)

The neglect of the nonlinear terms, the terms involving products of the small

quantities u′, v′, and T ′, is a standard mathematical approach to problems

of stability. Our analysis for the conditions in the fluid layer at the onset of

convection is known as a linearized stability analysis. It is a valid approach

for the study of the onset of convection when the motions and the thermal

disturbance are infinitesimal.

To summarize, the equations for the small perturbations of temperature

T ′, velocity u′, v′, and pressure P ′ when the fluid layer becomes unstable

are

∂u′

∂x + ∂v′

∂y = 0 (6.299)

0=−∂P ′

∂x + µ

(

∂2u′

∂x2 + ∂2u′

∂y2

)

(6.300)

494 Fluid Mechanics

0=−∂P ′

∂y − ρ0αvgT

′ + µ

(

∂2v′

∂x2 + ∂2v′

∂y2

)

(6.301)

∂T ′

∂t + v′

b (T1 − T0) = κ

(

∂2T ′

∂x2 + ∂2T ′

∂y2

)

. (6.302)

From the second term on the right side of the vertical force balance equa-

tion (6–301), it is seen that we have taken the buoyancy force at any point in

the layer to depend only on the departure of the fluid temperature from the

basic conduction temperature at the point. The conduction temperature

profile of the stationary state is the reference temperature profile against

which buoyancy forces are determined.

Equations (6–299) to (6–302) are solved subject to the following boundary

conditions. We assume that the surfaces y = ±b/2 are isothermal and that

no flow occurs across them; that is,

T ′ = v′ = 0 on y = ± b 2

(6.303)

If the boundaries of the layer are solid surfaces, then

u′ = 0 on y = ± b 2 . (6.304)

This is the no-slip condition requiring that there be no relative motion be-

tween a viscous fluid and a bounding solid surface at the solid–fluid inter-

face. If the surfaces y = ±b/2 are free surfaces, that is, if there is nothing

at y = ±b/2 to exert a shear stress on the fluid, u′ need not vanish on the

boundaries. Instead, the shear stress τ ′yx must be zero on y = ±b/2. From

Equation (6–58) this requires

∂u′

∂y + ∂v′

∂x = 0 on y = ± b

2 . (6.305)

Conditions (6–305) can be simplified even further because v′ = 0 on y =

±b/2 for any x and consequently ∂v′/∂x ≡ 0 on y = ±b/2. The free surface

boundary conditions are therefore

∂u′

∂y = 0 on y = ± b

2 . (6.306)

A simple analytic solution can be obtained for the linearized stability prob-

lem if the free surface conditions (6–306) are adopted.

We once again introduce the stream function defined in Equations (6–

69) and (6–70). Thus the conservation Equation (6–299) is automatically

satisfied, and Equations (6–300) to (6–302) can be written

6.19 Linear Stability Analysis for the Onset of Thermal Convection 495

0 = −∂P ′

∂x − µ

(

∂3ψ′

∂x2 ∂y + ∂3ψ′

∂y3

)

(6.307)

0 = −∂P ′

∂y − ρ0gαvT

′ + µ

(

∂3ψ′

∂x3 +

∂3ψ′

∂y2 ∂x

)

(6.308)

∂T ′

∂t +

1

b (T1 − T0)

∂ψ′

∂x = κ

(

∂2T ′

∂x2 + ∂2T ′

∂y2

)

.

(6.309)

Eliminating the pressure from (6–307) and (6–308) yields

0 = µ

(

∂4ψ′

∂x4 + 2

∂4ψ′

∂x2 ∂y2 + ∂4ψ′

∂y4

)

− ρ0gαv ∂T ′

∂x .

(6.310)

The problem has now been reduced to the solution of two simultaneous

partial differential equations (6–309) and (6–310) for the two variables ψ′

and T ′.

Because these equations are linear equations with constant coefficients,

we can solve them by the method of separation of variables. The boundary

conditions (6–303) and (6–306) are automatically satisfied by solutions of

the form

ψ′ = ψ′ 0 cos

(πy)

b sin

(

2πx

λ

)

eα ′t (6.311)

T ′ = T ′ 0 cos

(πy)

b cos

(

2πx

λ

)

eα ′t. (6.312)

The velocity and temperature perturbations described by these equations are

horizontally periodic disturbances with wavelength λ and maximum ampli-

tudes ψ′ 0 and T ′

0. The value of α′ determines whether or not the disturbances

will grow in time. For α′ positive, the disturbances will amplify, and the

heated layer is convectively unstable. For α′ negative, the disturbances will

decay in time, and the layer is stable against convection. We can determine

α′ by substituting Equations (6–311) and (6–312) into Equations (6–309)

and (6–310). We find (

α′ + κπ2

b2 + κ4π2

λ2

)

T ′ 0 =− (T1 − T0)2π

λb ψ′

0

496 Fluid Mechanics

(6.313)

µ

(

4π2

λ2 + π2

b2

)2

ψ′ 0 =− 2π

λ ρ0gαvT

′ 0. (6.314)

The disturbance amplitudes ψ′ 0 and T ′

0 can be eliminated from these equa-

tions by division, yielding an equation that can be solved for α′. The growth

rate α′ is found to be

α′ = κ

b2

{(

ρ0gαvb 3(T1 − T0)

µκ

)(

4π2b2

λ2

(4π2b2

λ2 + π2)2

)

− (

π2 + 4π2b2

λ2

)}

. (6.315)

The dimensionless growth rate α′b2/κ is seen to depend on only two quan-

tities, 2πb/λ, a dimensionless wave number, and a dimensionless combination

of parameters known as the Rayleigh number Ra

Ra = ρ0gαv(T1 − T0)b

3

µκ . (6.316)

In terms of the Rayleigh number we can write Equation (6–315) as

α′b2

κ =

Ra4π2b2

λ2 − (π2 + 4π2b2

λ2 )3

(π2 + 4π2b2

λ2 )2 . (6.317)

The growth rate is positive and there is instability if

Ra > (π2 + 4π2b2

λ2 )3

4π2b2

λ2

. (6.318)

The growth rate is negative and there is stability if Ra is less than the right

side of Equation (6–318). Convection just sets in when α′ = 0, which occurs

when

Ra ≡ Racr = (π2 + 4π2b2

λ2 )3

4π2b2

λ2

(6.319)

The critical value of the Rayleigh number Racr marks the onset of convection.

If Ra < Racr, disturbances will decay with time; if Ra > Racr, perturbations

will grow exponentially with time.

According to Equation (6–319), the critical Rayleigh number is a function

of the wavelength of the disturbance. Figure 6–39 shows how Racr depends

on 2πb/λ. If the Rayleigh number and disturbance wavelength are such that

6.19 Linear Stability Analysis for the Onset of Thermal Convection 497

Figure 6.39 Critical Rayleigh number Racr for the onset of convection in a layer heated from below with stress-free boundaries as a function of di- mensionless wave number 2πb/λ.

the point lies above the curve, the perturbation of wavelength λ is unsta-

ble; if the point lies below the curve, convection cannot occur with distur-

bances of wavelength λ. For example, if Ra = 2000, all disturbances with

0.8 . 2πb/λ . 5.4 are convectively unstable. However, convection cannot

occur for 2πb/λ . 0.8 and 2πb/λ & 5.4. Figure 6–39 shows that there is a

minimum value of Racr. If Ra lies below the minimum value, all disturbances

decay, the layer is stable, and convection cannot occur.

The value of 2πb/λ at which Racr is a minimum can be obtained by setting

the derivative of the right side of Equation (6–319) with respect to 2πb/λ

equal to zero. One obtains

∂Racr

∂ (

2πb λ

) =

4π2b2

λ2 3

(

π2 + 4π2b2

λ2

)2

2

(

2πb

λ

)

498 Fluid Mechanics

− (

π2 + 4π2b2

λ2

)3

2

(

2πb

λ

)

× (

4π2b2

λ2

)−2

= 0 (6.320)

or

2πb

λ =

π√ 2 . (6.321)

The value of the wavelength corresponding to the smallest value of the crit-

ical Rayleigh number is

λ = 2 √

2 b. (6.322)

Substitution of this value for the wavelength back into Equation (6–319)

gives the minimum critical Rayleigh number

min(Racr) = 27π4

4 = 657.5. (6.323)

The requirement that Ra exceed Racr for convection to occur can be re-

stated in a number of more physical ways. One can think of the temperature

difference across the layer as having to exceed a certain minimum value or

the viscosity of the fluid as having to lie below a critical value before con-

vection sets in. If Ra is increased from 0, for example, by increasing T1 −T0,

other quantities remaining fixed, convection sets in when Ra reaches 657.5

(for heating from below with stress-free boundaries), and the aspect ratio

of each convection cell is √

2, as shown in Figure 6–38. The minimum value

of Racr and the disturbance wavelength for which Racr takes the minimum

value must be determined numerically for no-slip velocity boundary condi-

tions. For that case, min Racr = 1707.8 and λ = 2.016b.

The linear stability analysis for the onset of convection can also be carried

out for a fluid layer heated uniformly from within and cooled from above.

The lower boundary is assumed to be insulating; that is, no heat flows across

the boundary. Once again the fluid near the upper boundary is cooler and

more dense than the fluid beneath. Therefore buoyancy forces can drive fluid

motion provided they are strong enough to overcome the viscous resistance.

This type of instability is directly applicable to the Earth’s mantle because

the interior of the Earth is heated by the decay of the radioactive elements

and the near-surface rocks are cooled by heat conduction to the surface.

These near-surface rocks are cooler and more dense than the hot mantle

rocks at depth. The appropriate Rayleigh number for a fluid layer heated

6.19 Linear Stability Analysis for the Onset of Thermal Convection 499

from within is

RaH = αvρ

2 0gHb

5

kµκ , (6.324)

where H is the rate of internal heat generation per unit mass. For no-slip

velocity boundary conditions, the minimum critical Rayleigh number is 2772,

and the associated value of 2πb/λ is 2.63; for free-slip conditions, min Racr =

867.8, and the associated value of 2πb/λ is 1.79.

We can estimate the value of this Rayleigh number for the mantle of the

Earth. Based on the postglacial rebound studies, we take µ = 1021 Pa s.

For the rock properties we take k = 4 W m−1 K−1, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, and

αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1. We assume g = 10 m s−2 and an average density

ρ0 = 4000 kg m−3. Based on our discussion of the distribution of heat sources

in the mantle (see Chapter 4) we take H = 9×10−12 W kg−1. If convection is

restricted to the upper mantle, it is reasonable to take b = 700 km. We find

that RaH = 2 × 106. If we apply the same values to the entire mantle and

take b = 2880 km, we find that RaH = 2× 109. In either case the calculated

value for the Rayleigh number is much greater than the minimum critical

value. It was essentially this calculation that led Arthur Holmes to propose

in 1931 that thermal convection in the mantle was responsible for driving

continental drift.

Problem 6.29 Estimate the values of the Rayleigh numbers for the man-

tles of Mercury, Venus, Mars, and the Moon. Assume heat is generated

internally at the same rate it is produced in the Earth. Use the same values

for µ, k, κ, and αv as used above for the Earth’s mantle. Obtain appropriate

values of ρ0, g, and b from the discussion in Chapter 1.

Problem 6.30 Calculate the exact minimum and maximum values of

the wavelength for disturbances that are convectively unstable at Ra = 2000.

Consider a fluid layer heated from below with free-slip boundary conditions.

Problem 6.31 Formulate the linear stability problem for the onset of

convection in a layer of fluid heated from within. Assume that the boundaries

are stress-free. Take the upper boundary to be isothermal and the lower

boundary to be insulating. Carry the formulation to the point where the

solution to the problem depends only on the integration of a single ordinary

differential equation for the stream function subject to appropriate boundary

conditions.

500 Fluid Mechanics

6.20 A Transient Boundary-Layer Theory for Finite-Amplitude

Thermal Convection

The linear stability theory given in the previous section determines whether

thermal convection occurs. However, it is not useful in determining the struc-

ture of the convection when the Rayleigh number exceeds the critical value.

Because it is linear, the stability analysis cannot predict the magnitude of

finite-

amplitude convective flows. To do this, it is necessary to solve the full non-

linear equations, which, in general, can only be done numerically. In the

following, however, we present approximate solutions that are valid when

the Rayleigh number is large and convection is vigorous.

For large values of the Rayleigh number, a convecting fluid layer of thick-

ness b heated from below is largely isothermal. By symmetry, the isothermal

core temperature Tc of the bulk of the fluid is given by

Tc = T0 + 1 2(T1 − T0), (6.325)

where the upper boundary is maintained at the temperature T0 and the

lower boundary at the temperature T1. The thermal gradient between the

cold upper boundary at temperature T0 and the core at temperature Tc occurs across a thin thermal boundary layer adjacent to the upper boundary.

The thermal gradient between the core at temperature Tc and the hot lower

boundary at temperature T1 occurs across a thin thermal boundary layer

adjacent to the lower boundary.

We first consider a boundary-layer stability approach to the thickening

thermal boundary layers. We assume that initially the isothermal core fluid

is in contact with the boundaries of the fluid layer. Subsequently the fluid

adjacent to the hot lower boundary is heated forming a hot thermal bound-

ary layer and the fluid adjacent to the cold upper boundary layer is cooled

forming a cold thermal boundary layer. The boundary layers thicken until

they become gravitationally unstable and separate from the boundaries. The

hot lower boundary layer ascends into the isothermal core heating it, and

the cold upper boundary layer descends into the isothermal core cooling it.

The end of the boundary-layer growth is determined by a stability analysis

of the boundary layers similar to the stability analysis of a fluid layer carried

out in the previous section. The process is then assumed to repeat.

The transient growth of the two thermal boundary layers can be described

by the one-dimensional heat conduction analysis of Section 4–15. Initially, at

t = 0, the core fluid with temperature Tc is assumed to be in contact with

the boundaries. Subsequently, conductive heat losses to the surface result

6.20 A Transient Boundary-Layer Theory 501

in the development of thin thermal boundary layers. Because of symme-

try we consider only the growth of the cold thermal boundary layer adja-

cent to the upper boundary. The results can be directly applied to the hot

thermal boundary layer adjacent to the lower boundary. The temperature

distribution in the cold thermal boundary layer as a function of time from

Equation (4–113) is

Tc − T

Tc − T0 = erfc

(

y

2 √ κt

)

. (6.326)

A similar expression can be written for the thickening hot boundary layer

on the lower boundary. The thickness of the thermal boundary layer from

Equation (4–115) is

yT = 2.32(κt)1/2. (6.327)

The thickness increases with the square root of time since the boundary

layer was established. The basic assumption in this approach is that a lin-

ear stability analysis can be applied to the boundary layers. We assume

that the boundary layers thicken until the stability condition is satisfied,

at which time they break away from the boundary surfaces to be replaced

by isothermal core fluid and the process repeats. The breakaway condition

is assumed to be given by the stability analysis for a fluid layer developed

in Section 6–19. The applicable Rayleigh number, given by an expression

similar to Equation (6–316), is based on the boundary-layer thickness, i.e.,

b in Equation (6–316) is replaced by yT from Equation (6–327). Also the

relevant temperature difference is

Tc − T0 = 1 2(T1 − T0), (6.328)

from Equation (6–325). The critical value of the Rayleigh number RayT ,cr

gives a critical value for the boundary layer thickness yT,cr

RayT ,cr = ρ0αvg(T1 − T0)y

3 T,cr

2µκ . (6.329)

The critical value of this Rayleigh number for free-surface boundary condi-

tions is RayT ,cr = 657.5.

From Equations (6–327) and (6–329), the time at which boundary layer

breakaway occurs tc is given by

tc = 1

5.38κ

[

2µκRayT ,cr

ρ0αvg(T1 − T0)

]2/3

. (6.330)

502 Fluid Mechanics

The mean heat flow q across the fluid layer during the time tc from Equa-

tion (4–117) is

q̄ = 2k(Tc − T0)

(πκtc)1/2 = k(T1 − T0)

(πκtc)1/2 (6.331)

The combination of Equations (6–330) and (6–331) gives

q̄ = 1.31k(T1 − T0)

[

ρ0αvg(T1 − T0)

2µκRayT ,cr

]1/3

. (6.332)

The Nusselt number Nu is defined in Equation (6–267) as the ratio of the

convective heat flow across the layer q̄ to the heat flow qc that conduction

would transport,

Nu ≡ q̄

qc , (6.333)

and

qc = k(T1 − T0)

b . (6.334)

Upon substituting Equations (6–332) and (6–334) into Equation (6–333),

we obtain

Nu = 1.04

(

Ra

RayT ,cr

)1/3

. (6.335)

where Ra is the Rayleigh number based on the full layer thickness b and the

overall temperature difference (T1 −T0) as defined in Equation (6–316). We

find that the Nusselt number is proportional to the Rayleigh number to the

one-third power. With RayT ,cr = 657.5 we find

Nu = 0.120Ra1/3. (6.336)

Although this is an approximate solution, the dependence of the Nusselt

number on the Rayleigh number is generally valid for vigorous thermal

convection in a fluid layer heated from below with free-surface boundary

conditions.

It is of interest to apply this boundary-layer stability analysis directly to

the problem of thermal convection in the upper mantle. The depth of deep

earthquakes associated with the descending lithosphere at ocean trenches

(about 660 km) provides a minimum thickness for the convecting part of the

mantle. We assume that mantle convection is restricted to the upper 700 km

of the mantle and evaluate the Rayleigh number in Equation (6–316), with

b = 700 km, ρ0 = 3700 kg m−3, g= 10 m s−2, αv = 3× 10−5 K−1, T1 −T0 =1500

6.20 A Transient Boundary-Layer Theory 503

K, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, and µ = 1021 Pa s; we obtain Ra = 5.7× 105. The mean

surface heat flux q̄ is given by

q̄ = k(T1 − T0)

b Nu =

0.120k(T1 − T0)Ra1/3

b .

(6.337)

With the same parameter values and k = 4 W m−1 K−1, we find q̄ = 85 mW

m−2. This is remarkably close to the the Earth’s mean surface heat flow of

87 mW m−2 given in Section 4–4. However, such excellent agreement must

be considered fortuitous.

Equation (6–330) for the time at which boundary-layer breakaway occurs

can be rewritten using RayT ,cr =657.5 as

tc = 22.3b2

κRa2/3 . (6.338)

Substituting the values given above for upper mantle convection we find

tc = 50.5 Myr. This is about one-half the mean age of subduction given in

Figure 4–26.

The boundary-layer stability approach can also be applied to a fluid layer

that is heated from within and cooled from above. In this case there is only a

single thermal boundary layer on the upper boundary of the fluid layer. The

mean heat flow out of the upper boundary q̄ is related to the heat generation

per unit mass in the layerH by

q̄ = ρ0Hb. (6.339)

Applying Equations (6–630) and (6–331) to the upper boundary layer only,

we have

q̄ = 2.62k(T1 − T0)

[

ρ0αvg(T1 − T0)

µκRayT ,cr

]1/3

, (6.340)

where T1 is now the temperature of both the lower boundary and the isother-

mal core. By combining Equations (6–339) and (6–340), we can solve for the

temperature of the isothermal core with the result

T1 − T0 =

(

ρ0Hb

2.62k

)3/4 (µκRayT ,cr

ρ0αvg

)1/4

, (6.341)

where T1 − T0 is also the temperature rise across the fluid layer.

The efficiency with which convection cools the fluid layer can be assessed

by comparing the temperature rise across the internally heated layer given

504 Fluid Mechanics

by Equation (6–341) with that which would be obtained if all the internally

generated heat were removed only by conduction (T1c −T0). The dimension-

less temperature ratio,

θ = T1 − T0

T1c − T0 , (6.342)

is thus a measure of convective efficiency for the internally heated fluid

layer. The smaller θ is, the more efficient convection is in removing the heat

produced in the fluid. Without convection, the temperature rise across the

layer would be (see Section 4–6)

T1c − T0 = ρ0Hb

2

2k . (6.343)

By substituting Equations (6–341) and (6–343) into (6–342) we find that

θ = 0.97

(

RayT ,cr

RaH

)1/4

(6.344)

where RaH is the Rayleigh number defined for a fluid layer heated from

within in Equation (6–324). The nondimensional temperature difference

between the isothermal core and the upper boundary decreases as con-

vection becomes more vigorous with increasing Rayleigh number. Taking

RayT ,cr = 657.5 we find

θ = 4.91Ra −1/4 H . (6.345)

Again, the dependence of the dimensionless temperature on Rayleigh num-

ber is generally valid for a vigorously convecting fluid layer heated from

within and cooled from above with free surface boundary conditions, al-

though the constant of proportionality is model dependent. The dimensional

temperature of the isothermal core is given by

T1 − T0 = phb2

2k θ = 2.45

pHb2

k Ra

−1/4 H . (6.346)

The boundary layer stability analysis for thermal convection in a uni-

formly heated fluid layer cooled from above can be applied to thermal con-

vection that occurs throughout the whole mantle. For this case we take b =

2880 km. Based on the discussion in Chapter 4 we assume H = 9×10−12 W

kg−1. We also take αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, ρ0 = 4700 kg m−3, g = 10 m

s−2, k = 4 W m−1 K−1, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, and µ = 1021 Pa s and obtain

RaH = 3 × 109 from Equation (6–324). From Equation (6–346) and these

parameter values we have T1 − T0 = 918 K. This is about a factor of 2 too

low.

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory 505

Figure 6.40 Boundary-layer structure of two-dimensional thermal convec- tion cells in a fluid layer heated from below.

The boundary-layer stability results just discussed give episodic bursts of

convection. This is clearly quite different than the steady-state subduction

that occurs on the Earth. However, as discussed in Section 1–20, episodic

subduction has been proposed to explain the global resurfacing that occurred

on Venus about 500 Ma ago.

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory for

Finite-Amplitude Thermal Convection

We will now develop a thermal boundary-layer analysis of vigorous steady

convection in a fluid layer heated from below. We will limit our consid-

erations to very large Prandtl numbers so that the inertia terms in the

momentum equations can be neglected. The boundary layer structure and

coordinate system are illustrated in Figure 6–40. The flow is divided into

cellular two-dimensional rolls of width λ/2; alternate rolls rotate in oppo-

site directions. The entire flow field is highly viscous. On the cold upper

boundary a thin thermal boundary layer forms. When the two cold bound-

ary layers from adjacent cells meet, they separate from the boundary and

form a cold descending thermal plume. Similarly, a hot thermal boundary

layer forms on the lower boundary of the cell. When two hot boundary layers

meet from adjacent cells, they form a hot ascending plume. The buoyancy

forces in the ascending and descending plumes drive the flow. The core of

each cell is a nearly isothermal viscous rotational flow. As pointed out in

506 Fluid Mechanics

our discussion of the boundary-layer stability analysis, symmetry requires

that the temperature Tc in the nearly isothermal core must be the mean

of the two boundary temperatures and Equation (6–325) applies. We now

carry out a quantitative calculation for the velocities in the fluid layer and

the amount of heat transported by the motions.

Although an exact solution for the steady-state boundary-layer model

requires numerical methods, we can obtain an analytic solution by making

a number of approximations. The results will then be compared with more

rigorous solutions. We first obtain the structure of the cold thermal boundary

layer adjacent to the upper boundary of the fluid layer. For this calculation

we let y = 0 be the upper boundary and measure y positive downward. We

also let x be the horizontal coordinate and let x = 0 be at the center of the

ascending plume (Figure 6–40). To obtain an analytic solution, we assume

that the horizontal fluid velocity at the upper boundary is a constant u0. The

horizontal fluid velocity is actually zero at x = 0 and λ/2 and increases to a

maximum near x = λ/4. The constant velocity u0 is an average of the actual

horizontal velocity on the upper boundary. We have already solved for the

thermal structure of this boundary layer in Section 4–16. From Equation (4–

124) the temperature distribution in the cold thermal boundary layer is

Tc − T

Tc − T0 = erfc

[

y

2

( u0

κx

)1/2 ]

. (6.347)

As discussed previously in Section 4–16, a direct association can be made

between the cold thermal boundary layer of a thermal convection cell and

the thickening oceanic lithosphere. By integrating the surface heat flux (4–

127) across the width of the cell, that is, from x = 0 to x = λ/2, we obtain

the total rate rate of heat flow Q out of the top of the cell per unit distance

along the axis of the roll,

Q = 2k(Tc − T0)

(

u0λ

2πκ

)1/2

. (6.348)

At the boundary between two cells the cold thermal boundary layers from

two adjacent cells turn through 90◦ to form a cold, symmetrical descending

thermal plume. This process is directly analogous to the subduction of the

oceanic lithosphere at an ocean trench (although lithospheric subduction is

not a symmetrical process). Because very little heat conduction can occur

during this transition from a thermal boundary layer to a thermal plume,

the distribution of temperature in the newly formed plume is the same as

in the boundary layer. As in the case of the horizontal velocity in the cold

boundary layer, we assume that the vertical (descending) velocity in the

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory 507

cold plume is a constant v0. However, the velocity v0 may differ from the

velocity u0. Since the convected heat in the plume just after its formation

must equal the convected heat just before its formation, the thickness of the

plume relative to the boundary layer must be in the ratio u0/v0. Therefore

the temperature distribution in the plume just as it is formed is given by

Tc − T

Tc − To = erfc

[

v0 2u0

(

λ

2 − x

)(

2u0

κλ

)1/2 ]

, (6.349)

with a similar expression for the other half of the symmetrical plume formed

from the adjacent cell.

As the plume descends along the boundary between two adjacent cells, its

temperature distribution can be obtained by using the temperature given in

Equation (6–349) as the initial temperature distribution in Laplace’s solu-

tion of the heat conduction equation – see Equation (4–157). Laplace’s solu-

tion for a time-dependent problem can be applied to the descending plume

by identifying t as y/v0. This is analagous to our use of a time-dependent

solution of the heat conduction equation for the structure of the cold surface

thermal boundary layer (see Section 4–16). In that problem we identified t

as x/u0.

The temperature distribution in the descending plume can be used to

calculate the total downward gravitational body force on the plume due

to its negative buoyancy relative to the isothermal core. The downward

buoyancy force per unit volume on an element of the plume is

ρ0gαv(Tc − T ).

Thus

fb = −ρ0gαv

∫ −∞

λ/2 (Tc − T ) dx (6.350)

is the downward buoyancy body force per unit depth and per unit distance

along the roll axis on one-half of the cold plume. It is appropriate to replace

the integral across the finite width of the plume with the infinite integral,

since T → Tc at the edge of the plume; see, for example, Equation (4–206)

for a similar change of limits. The total downward buoyancy body force Fb on the descending plume is obtained by integrating fb along the vertical

extent of the plume from y = 0 to y = b; that is,

Fb =

∫ b

0 fb dy, (6.351)

508 Fluid Mechanics

where Fb is a force per unit length of the plume along the roll axis.

The integral in Equation (6–350) is proportional to the heat content of a

slice of the plume of thickness dy. Since no heat is added to the descending

plume along its length, this heat content is a constant. This also follows from

the fact that the integral of the temperature distribution given by Laplace’s

solution is a constant independent of t (see Section 4–21). Therefore, the

buoyancy body force on the plume per unit depth fb is independent of y

and

Fb = fbb. (6.352)

Because fb is a constant, we can evaluate it anywhere along the plume, that

is, at any depth, by carrying out the integration in Equation (6–350). This is

most conveniently done just after the plume forms, where Equation (6–349)

provides an expression for the temperature in the plume. Substitution of

Equation (6–349) into (6–350) with x′ = λ/2 − x yields

fb = ρ0gαv(Tc − T0)

∫ ∞

0 erfc

{

v0x ′

2u0

(

2u0

κλ

)1/2 }

dx′

= 2ρ0gαv(Tc − T0) u0

v0

(

κλ

2u0

)1/2 ∫ ∞

0 erfcz dz

= 2ρ0gαv(Tc − T0) u0

v0

(

κλ

2πu0

)1/2

. (6.353)

Thus the total downward gravitational body force Fb on one-half of the

symmetrical plume is

Fb = fbb = 2ρ0gαvb(Tc − T0) u0

v0

(

κλ

2πu0

)1/2

.

(6.354)

So far we have considered only the cold thermal boundary layer and plume.

However, the problem is entirely symmetrical, and the structures of the hot

thermal boundary layer and plume are identical with their cold counter-

parts when Tc − T0 is replaced by Tc − T1. The total upward body force on

the ascending hot plume is equal to the downward body force on the cold

descending plume and is given by Equation (6–354).

Determination of the viscous flow in the isothermal core requires a solu-

tion of the biharmonic equation. However, an analytic solution cannot be

obtained for the boundary conditions of this problem. Therefore we approx-

imate the core flow with the linear velocity profiles shown in Figure 6–41;

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory 509

Figure 6.41 Linear velocity profiles used to model the core flow in a con- vection cell. The areas under the triangles are equal to conserve fluid.

that is, we take

u = u0

(

1 − 2 y

b

)

(6.355)

v = − v0

(

1 − 4 x

λ

)

. (6.356)

To conserve fluid, we require

v0λ

2 = u0b. (6.357)

This balance is also illustrated in Figure 6–41. It must be emphasized that

the assumed velocity profiles do not satisfy the required boundary conditions

on the velocity components. For example, the condition u = 0 at x = 0, λ/2

is not satisfied. However, the assumed profiles are reasonable approximations

to the actual flow near the center of the cell.

The shear stress on the vertical boundaries of the core flow is given by

Equation (6–58) as

τcv = µ ∂v

∂x = µ

4v0 λ , (6.358)

and the shear stress on the horizontal boundaries is given by

τch = µ ∂u

∂(−y) = µ 2u0

b . (6.359)

The derivative with respect to −y occurs in Equation (6–359), since the

derivative must be in the direction of the outward normal to the surface.

For the horizontal area at the top of the cell this is the negative y direction.

The rate at which work is done on each vertical boundary by the shear stress

is bτcvv0 per unit distance parallel to the roll axis. The rate of doing work

510 Fluid Mechanics

is the product of force and velocity; see also Equation (4–243). The rate at

which work is done on each horizontal boundary is (λ/2)τchu0. The rate at

which the buoyancy force does work on each of the plumes is Fbv0. The rate

at which work is done on the plumes by the gravitational body forces must

equal the rate at which work is done on the boundaries by the viscous forces;

this gives

2Fbv0 = 2bτcvv0 + λτchu0. (6.360)

Substitution of Equations (6–354), (6–358), and (6–359) into Equation (6–

360) yields

ρ0gαvu0(Tc − T0)

(

κλ

2πu0

)1/2

= 2v2

λ + u2

0µλ

2b2 .

(6.361)

After eliminating the core temperature using Equation (6–346) and the ver-

tical velocity using Equation (6–357), we solve for the horizontal velocity

and obtain

u0 = κ

b

(

λ 2b

)7/3

(1 + λ4

16b4 )2/3

(

Ra

2 √ π

)2/3

, (6.362)

where the Rayleigh number Ra appropriate to a fluid layer heated from

below has been defined in Equation (6–316).

Having determined the mean velocity along the upper boundary of the

cell, we can now find the total rate of heat flow through the cell Q from

Equation (6–348)

Q = k(T1 − T0)

21/3π2/3

(

λ 2b

)5/3

(1 + λ4

16b4 )1/3 Ra1/3. (6.363)

The Nusselt number Nu is defined as the ratio of the heat flow rate with

convection Q to the heat flow rate by conduction Qc in the absence of

convection [see also Equation (6–333)]

Nu = Q

Qc , (6.364)

where

Qc = k(T1 − T0)

b

λ

2 . (6.365)

Upon substituting Equations (6–363) and (6–365) into Equation (6–364),

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory 511

we obtain

Nu = 1

21/3π2/3

(

λ 2b

)2/3

(1 + λ4

16b4 )1/3 Ra1/3. (6.366)

The aspect ratio of the cells, that is, the ratio of the horizontal width to

the vertical thickness, λ/2b, remains unspecified. According to linear sta-

bility theory, the aspect ratio of the most rapidly growing disturbance is

λ/(2b) = √

2; see Equation (6–322). However, for finite-amplitude convection

we determine the aspect ratio for which the Nusselt number is a maximum.

This is the aspect ratio of the cells that is most effective in transporting heat

across the fluid layer at a fixed value of the Rayleigh number. We therefore

require

∂Nu

∂(λ/2b) = 0 (6.367)

and find that λ

2b = 1. (6.368)

For this value of the aspect ratio the horizontal velocity is

u0 = 0.271 κ

b Ra2/3 (6.369)

and the Nusselt number is

Nu = 0.294Ra1/3. (6.370)

It is of interest to compare this result with that obtained using the tran-

sient boundary-layer theory given in Equation (6–336). Both approximate

solutions give the same power law dependence of the Nusselt number on the

Rayleigh number but the numerical constants differ by about a factor of

two, 0.120 versus 0.294. Numerical calculations show that the value of this

constant should be 0.225.

It is appropriate to apply the steady-state, boundary-layer analysis of

thermal convection in a fluid layer heated from below to the problem of

thermal convection in the upper mantle. As before we take b = 700 km,

ρ0 = 3700 kg m−3, g = 10 m s−2, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, T1 − T0 = 1500 K,

κ = 1 mm2 s−1, and µ = 1021 Pa s and from Equation (6–316) again find

that Ra = 5.7 × 105. The mean surface heat flux q̄ is given by

q̄ = 2Q

λ =

2Qc λ

Nu = k(T1 − T0)

b Nu

= k(T1 − T0)

b (0.294)Ra1/3. (6.371)

512 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.42 The boundary-layer structure of two-dimensional thermal con- vection cells in a fluid layer heated from within and cooled from above.

[Compare with Equation (6–337)]. With the above parameter values and

k = 4 W m−1 K−1, q̄ is 200 mW m−2. This is about 2.3 times larger than

the observed mean heat flow of 87 mW m−2. From Equation (6–369) the

mean horizontal velocity u0 is 84 mm yr−1. This is about twice the mean

surface velocity associated with plate tectonics.

The steady-state boundary-layer theory can also be applied to a fluid layer

that is heated from within and cooled from above. The flow is again divided

into counterrotating, two-dimensional cells with dimensions b and λ/2. A

cold thermal boundary layer forms on the upper boundary of each cell.

When the two cold boundary layers from adjacent cells meet, they separate

from the boundary to form a cold descending thermal plume. However, for

the fluid layer heated from within there is no heat flux across the lower

boundary. Therefore no hot thermal boundary layer develops on the lower

boundary, and there are no hot ascending plumes between cells. This flow

is illustrated in Figure 6–42. In the boundary-layer approximation, we can

assume that all fluid that is not in the cold thermal boundary layers and

plumes has the same temperature T1. The temperature T1 is not known

a priori and must be determined as part of the solution to the convection

problem.

The temperature distribution in the upper cold thermal boundary layer

is given by Equation (6–347), and the total rate at which heat flows out of

the top of each cellQ is given by Equation (6–348). In the layer there is a

uniform heat production H per unit mass. Thus, the total heat production

in a cell is ρ0Hbλ/2. Because we assume a steady state,Q must equal the

rate of heat generation in the cell

ρ0Hbλ

2 = 2k(T1 − T0)

(

u0λ

2πκ

)1/2

. (6.372)

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory 513

The calculation of the total buoyancy force on the descending cold plume

is also the same as in the previous problem; Fb is given by Equation (6–

354). This problem, however, has only the single plume. The rate of doing

work on the boundaries is the same as in the previous problem. However,

the energy input comes only from the single plume. By equating the rate of

energy input to a cell to the rate of doing work on the boundaries, we find

ρ0gαv(T1 − T0)u0

(

κλ

2πu0

)1/2

= 4v2

λ + u2

0µλ

b2 .

(6.373)

Substitution of Equation (6–357) to eliminate v0 and Equation (6–372) to

eliminate T1 − T0 yields

u0 = κ

2b

(

λ 2b

)2

(1 + λ4

16b4 )1/2 Ra

1/2 H , (6.374)

where the Rayleigh number for a fluid layer heated from within has been

defined in Equation (6–324).

We can solve for the temperature of the core T1 by substituting Equation

(6–374) into Equation (6–372):

T1 − T0 =

(

π

2

)1/2 ρ0Hb 2

k

(

1 + λ4

16b4

)1/4

(

λ 2b

)1/2 Ra

−1/4 H ,

(6.375)

where T1−T0 is also the temperature rise across the fluid layer. To assess the

efficiency with which convection cools the fluid layer we again introduce the

dimensionless temperature ratio θ defined in Equation (6–342). This is the

ratio of the temperature difference across the layer with convection to the

temperature difference without convection, the latter was given in Equation

(6–343). By substituting Equation (6–375) into Equation (6–342), we find

θ = (2π)1/2

(

1 + λ4

16b4

)1/4

( λ2b) 1/2

Ra −1/4 H . (6.376)

The dimensionless temperature ratio θ is a function of the cell aspect ratio

λ/2b. The cell aspect ratio that minimizes θ is found by setting

∂θ

∂(λ/2b) = 0. (6.377)

514 Fluid Mechanics

This gives

λ

2b = 1, (6.378)

the same value that was obtained for the layer heated from below. With an

aspect ratio of unity, the horizontal velocity and dimensionless temperature

ratio are

u0 = 0.354 κ

b Ra

1/2 H (6.379)

and

θ = 2.98Ra −1/4 H . (6.380)

The nondimensional temperature difference between the isothermal core and

the upper boundary decreases as convection becomes more vigorous with

increasing Rayleigh number. We compare this result with that obtained us-

ing the transient boundary-layer analysis given in Equation (3–344). Again

both approximate solutions give the same power law dependence of the non-

dimensional temperature difference on the Rayleigh number but the numer-

ical constants again differ by about a factor of two, 4.91 versus 2.98.

It is again of interest to apply the steady-state boundary-layer analysis

of thermal convection in a uniformly heated fluid layer cooled from above

to the problem of thermal convection in the whole mantle. We again take

b = 2880 km, H = 9 × 10−12 W kg−1, ρ0 = 4700 kg m−3, g = 10 m s−2,

k = 4 W m−1 K−1, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, and µ = 1021 Pa s and from Equation

(6–324) find that RaH = 3 × 109. Equations (6–341), (6–342), and (6–380)

give T1−T0 = 550 K. This is about a factor of 4 low. From Equation (6–379)

we find that u0 = 210 mm yr−1, which is about a factor of 4 too high.

The parameterizations of Nusselt number and nondimensional temper-

ature obtained above have been for free-slip surface boundary conditions.

Most laboratory experiments are carried out with no-slip surface bound-

ary conditions because walls are required to confine the fluid. For a fluid

layer heated from below with no-slip wall boundary conditions it is found

experimentally that

Nu = 0.131Ra0.3, (6.381)

and for a fluid layer heated from within and cooled from above,

θ = 5.95

Ra0.23 H

. (6.382)

These results are similar to those obtained above.

6.21 A Steady-State Boundary-Layer Theory 515

Problem 6.32 An excellent approximation to the Nusselt number–Rayleigh

number relation for a fluid layer heated from below as in Equation (6–381)

can be derived from the θ–Ra relation in Equation (6–382) for an internally

heated fluid layer as follows. Write Nu as

Nu = q̄

k (T1 − T0)/b . (6.383)

Identify q̄, the heat flux through the upper boundary with ρ0Hb, the total

rate of heat generation in the internally heated layer. Take T1 − T0 equal

to twice the temperature rise across the internally heated convecting layer.

Rewrite Equation (6–383) as

Nu = ρ0Hb

2

2k (Tc − T0) . (6.384)

Eliminate H from Equation (6–384) by using Equations (6–341), (6–342),

and (6–382). Introduce the Rayleigh number for heated-from-below convec-

tion based on the temperature difference Tc − T0. You should obtain

Nu = 0.12Ra0.3, (6.385)

an almost identical result with Equation (6–381).

Problem 6.33 Consider convection in a fluid layer heated from below. The

mean surface heat flux q̄ is transferred through the cold thermal boundary

layer by conduction. Therefore we can write

q̄ = k (Tc − T0)

δ , (6.386)

where δ is a characteristic thermal boundary layer thickness. Show that

δ

b = 1.7Ra−1/3. (6.387)

Calculate δ for an upper mantle convection cell given the parameter values

used in the discussion in this section.

Problem 6.34 In what ways are surface plates and descending slabs dif-

ferent from the thermal boundary layers and descending plumes of two-

dimensional convection cells in layers of ordinary viscous fluids heated from

below or from within?

Problem 6.35 Suppose that convection extends through the entire

mantle and that 10% of the mean surface heat flow originates in the core.

If the surface thermal boundary layer and the boundary layer at the core–

mantle interface have equal thicknesses, how does the temperature rise across

516 Fluid Mechanics

the lower mantle boundary layer compare with the temperature increase

across the surface thermal boundary layer?

Problem 6.36 Apply the two-dimensional boundary-layer model for heated-

from-below convection to the entire mantle. Calculate the mean surface heat

flux, the mean horizontal velocity, and the mean surface thermal boundary-

layer thickness. Assume T1 − T0 = 3000 K, b= 2880 km, k= 4 W m−1 K−1,

κ= 1 mm2 s−1, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, g= 10 m s−2, and ρ0 = 4000 kg m−3.

6.22 The Forces that Drive Plate Tectonics

In Section 6–21 we saw that thermal convection in a fluid layer heated from

within has many similarities to mantle convection. The thermal boundary

layer adjacent to the cooled upper surface can be directly associated with

the oceanic lithosphere. The separation of the boundary layer to form a

cold descending plume is associated with the subduction of the lithosphere

at an ocean trench. Just as the gravitational body force on the cold plume

drives the convective flow, the gravitational body force on the descending

lithosphere at a trench is most likely important in driving plate tectonics.

The gravitational body force Fb1 on the descending lithosphere due to

its temperature deficit relative to the adjacent mantle can be evaluated

with Equation (6–354). Because of the rigidity of the lithosphere, u0 = v0.

This also follows from Equation (6–357) for an aspect ratio λ/2b = 1. The

equation for Fb1 is thus

Fb1 = 2ρ0gαvb(Tc − T0)

(

κλ

2πu0

)1/2

. (6.388)

In using this expression, we have neglected the heating of the descending

lithosphere by friction, as discussed in Section 4–27. A principal uncertainty

in evaluating the gravitational body force is the depth of the convection

cell b; this is equivalent to the length of the descending lithosphere beneath

trenches. Based on the distribution of earthquakes that extend to a depth of

about 700 km, we take b = 700 km. Also taking ρ0 = 3300 kg m−3, g = 10 m

s−2, αv = 3 × 10−5 K−1, Tc − T0 = 1200 K, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, u0 = 50 mm

yr−1, and λ = 4000 km, we obtain Fb1 = 3.3 × 1013 N m−1. This is a force

per unit length parallel to the trench.

Another force on the descending lithosphere is due to the elevation of the

olivine–spinel phase change (see Section 4–29). The position of the phase

change boundary in the descending lithosphere is sketched in Figure 6–43.

The phase change occurs at a depth in the surrounding mantle where the

temperature is Tos. Because the descending lithosphere is colder than the

6.22 The Forces that Drive Plate Tectonics 517

Figure 6.43 Elevation of the olivine–spinel phase change in the descending lithosphere contributes to the downward body force.

mantle, the phase change occurs at lower pressure or shallower depth in the

slab. Because the temperature of the descending lithosphere Ts at the depth

where the mantle phase change occurs depends on position Ts = Ts(x ′), the

phase change boundary elevation hos also depends on position hos(x ′). The

downward gravitational body force on the descending lithosphere due to the

phase boundary elevation Fb2 is thus

Fb2 = g∆ρos

∫ x′=x′s

x′=0 hos(x

′) dx′, (6.389)

where ∆ρos is the positive density difference between the phases. The eleva-

tion of the phase boundary is given by

hos = γ(Tos − Ts)

ρ0g , (6.390)

where γ is slope of the Clapeyron curve (dp/dT ). Substitution of Equation

(6–390) into (6–389) yields

Fb2 = γ∆ρos ρ0

∫ x′=x′s

x′=0 (Tos − Ts) dx

′. (6.391)

The integral in Equation (6–391) is the integrated temperature deficit in

the descending lithosphere at the depth in the mantle where the olivine–

spinel phase change occurs. This can be evaluated using the boundary-layer

model discussed previously. In calculating fb in Equation (6–353), we found

that the integrated temperature deficit per unit depth of the descending

plume is a constant. Its value, from Equation (6–353), with u0 = v0, is

518 Fluid Mechanics

fb/ρ0gαv or

2(Tc − T0)

(

κλ

2πu0

)1/2

.

Using this for the value of the integral in Equation (6–391), we find

Fb2 = 2(Tc − T0)γ∆ρos

ρ0

(

κλ

2πu0

)1/2

. (6.392)

With ∆ρos = 270 kg m−3, γ = 4 MPa K−1, and the other parameter values

given above, we obtain Fb2 = 1.6 × 1013 N m−1. The body force due to

elevation of the olivine–spinel phase change is about half the body force due

to thermal contraction. The total body force on the descending lithosphere

is Fb = 4.9×1013 N m−1. This force is often referred to as trench pull. If the

force is transmitted to the surface plate as a tensional stress in an elastic

lithosphere with a thickness of 50 km, the required tensional stress is 1 GPa,

clearly a very high stress.

A force is also exerted on the surface plates at ocean ridges. The elevation

of the ridges establishes a pressure head that drives the flow horizontally

away from the center of the ascending plume. This ridge push can also be

thought of as gravitational sliding. A component of the gravitational field

causes the surface plate to slide downward along the slope between the ridge

crest and the deep ocean basin.

The force exerted on a surface plate due to the elevation of an ocean

ridge can be evaluated from the force balance in Figure 6–44. We consider

the horizontal forces on a section of the ocean, lithosphere, and underlying

mantle, as shown in the figure. All pressure forces are referenced to the

ridge crest (y = 0). The water layer above the ridge crest has a constant

depth and exerts no net horizontal force. The integrated horizontal force on

the base of the lithosphere F1 can be determined from the equilibrium of

section RCD of the mantle. The net horizontal pressure force on RD,F5,

must equal F1. The force F5 is easily obtained by integrating the lithostatic

pressure beneath the ridge crest:

F5 = F1 =

∫ w+yL

0 ρmgy dy, (6.393)

where ρm is the mantle density. This can be rewritten as

F1 = g

∫ w

0 ρmy dy + g

∫ yL

0 ρm(w + ȳ) dȳ, (6.394)

where

ȳ = y − w. (6.395)

6.22 The Forces that Drive Plate Tectonics 519

Figure 6.44 Horizontal forces acting on a section of the ocean, lithosphere, and mantle at an ocean ridge.

The integrated pressure force on the upper surface of the lithosphere F2 is

equal to F4, the net pressure force on AB, because the section of water RAB

must be in equilibrium. Thus we can integrate the hydrostatic pressure in

the water to obtain

F2 = F4 =

∫ w

0 ρwgy dy, (6.396)

where ρw is the water density. The horizontal force F3 acting on the section

of lithosphere BC is the integral of the pressure in the lithosphere PL

F3 =

∫ yL

0 PL dȳ, (6.397)

where

PL = ρwgw +

∫ ȳ

0 ρLg dȳ

′ (6.398)

and ρL is the density in the lithosphere. Substituting Equation (6–398) into

Equation (6–397) gives

F3 =

∫ yL

0

{

ρwgw +

∫ ȳ

0 ρLg dȳ

}

dȳ. (6.399)

The net horizontal force on the lithosphere adjacent to an ocean ridge FR is obtained by combining Equations (6–394), (6–396), and (6–399)

FR = F1 − F2 − F3 = g

∫ w

0 (ρm − ρw)y dy

+ g

∫ yL

0

{

(ρm − ρw)w + ρmȳ − ∫ ȳ

0 ρL dȳ

}

dȳ.

(6.400)

520 Fluid Mechanics

We substitute the isostatic relation from Equation (4–204) and the identity

ρmȳ =

∫ ȳ

0 ρm dȳ

′ (6.401)

to give

FR = g(ρm − ρw) w2

2 + g

∫ yL

0

{

∫ ∞

0 (ρL − ρm) dȳ′

− ∫ ȳ

0 (ρL − ρm) dȳ′

}

dȳ′

= g(ρm − ρw) w2

2

+g

∫ ∞

0

{

∫ ∞

ȳ (ρL − ρm) dȳ′

}

dȳ′. (6.402)

As in Equation (4–206) the limit yL has been replaced by ∞ because the

integrals are convergent. Substitution of Equations (4–205) and (4–124) and

z = 1

2 ȳ

(

u0

κx

)1/2

(6.403)

yields

FR = g(ρm − ρw) w2

2 + gρmαv(T1 − T0)

×4κx

u0

∫ ∞

0

( ∫ ∞

z erfcz′ dz′

)

dz, (6.404)

where T1 is the mantle temperature. The repeated integral of the comple-

mentary error function has the value 1/4. By substituting for w from Equa-

tion (4–209), we finally arrive at

FR = gρmαv(T1 − T0)

[

1 + 2

π

ρmαv(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρw)

]

κx

u0

= gρmαv(T1 − T0)

[

1 + 2

π

ρmαv(T1 − T0)

(ρm − ρw)

]

κt,

(6.405)

where t is the age of the seafloor.

The horizontal forces required to maintain topography were derived in

Section 5–14 and the resulting ridge push force for the plate cooling model

was given in Equation (5–171). The geoid anomaly ∆N associated with

6.23 Heating by Viscous Dissipation 521

Figure 6.45 Frictional heating in Couette flow.

the half-space cooling model was given in Equation (5–157). Substitution of

Equation (5–157) into Equation (6–405) gives

FR = g2∆N

2πG . (6.406)

This result was previously given in Equation (5–170).

From Equation (6–405) the force due to the elevation of the ocean ridge

is proportional to the age of the lithosphere. Taking g = 10 m s−2, ρm =

3300 kg m−3, ρw = 1000 kg m−3, κ = 1 mm2 s−1, T1 − T0 = 1200 K, and

αv = 3×10−5 K−1, we find that the total ridge push on 100 Myr old oceanic

lithosphere is 3.9 × 1012 Nm−1. This is a force per unit length parallel to

the ridge. This ridge push force is in quite good agreement with the value

obtained in Section 5–14 for the plate cooling model with yL0 = 125 km.

The force in the equilibrated ocean basin was found to be 3.41×1012 N m−1.

Ridge push is thus an order of magnitude smaller than trench pull. How-

ever, trench pull may be mostly offset by large resistive forces encountered

by the descending lithosphere as it penetrates the mantle. The net force at

the trench is probably comparable to ridge push.

6.23 Heating by Viscous Dissipation

Throughout the discussion in this chapter we have neglected the effects of

viscous dissipation or frictional heating. In this section we will calculate the

temperature rise and the heat flux produced by viscous dissipation in a

simple Couette flow (see Section 6–2) between plane parallel walls, as shown

in Figure 6–45.

The velocity profile

u = u0

(

1 − y

h

)

(6.407)

522 Fluid Mechanics

is produced by the constant shear stress,

τ = µ du

d(−y) = µu0

h = τ0, (6.408)

applied at the upper surface (y = 0) of the channel. The derivative with

respect to −y occurs in Equation (6–408) because the outer normal to a

horizontal area at the upper boundary of the fluid points in the negative y

direction.

The rate at which shear forces do work on the entire fluid layer, per unit

horizontal area, is given by the product of the shear stress τ0 and the velocity

of the upper boundary u0, that is,

µu2 0

h .

If we average this over the entire fluid layer, we get

µu2 0

h2 ,

the rate of shear heating per unit volume. This heating rate per unit volume

is constant because the shear stress is constant and the velocity profile is

linear. For example, we could have calculated the rate at which shear forces

do work on the fluid in the lower half of the channel, µu2 0/2h, upon averaging

this over the appropriate volume of fluid, unit horizontal area ×h/2, we

still get µu2 0/h

2 for the volumetric heating rate due to viscous dissipation.

This volumetric heating rate can be identified with the internal volumetric

heat production rate ρH in Equation (4–12) to obtain the equation for the

temperature distribution in the channel

k d2T

dy2 = −µu

2 0

h2 . (6.409)

A straightforward integration of this equation with the boundary condi-

tions T = T0 at y = 0 and T = T1 at y = h gives

T = T0 + y

h

{

T1 − T0 + µu2

0

2k

}

− µu2 0

2k

y2

h2 . (6.410)

This can be written in the convenient dimensionless form

θ = T − T0

T1 − T0 = y

h

{

1 + µu2

0/2k

T1 − T0

}

− y2

h2

(

µu2 0/2k

T1 − T0

)

.

(6.411)

6.23 Heating by Viscous Dissipation 523

The temperature distribution in the channel is governed by the single di-

mensionless parameter

µu2 0/2k

(T1 − T0) .

This can be written as 1/2 times the product of the Prandtl number Pr and

a dimensionless parameter known as the Eckert number,

E ≡ u2 0

cp(T1 − T0) , (6.412)

where cp is the specific heat at constant pressure. Thus we can write

1

2 PrE =

µu2 0/2k

(T1 − T0) (6.413)

and

θ = y

h

(

1 + PrE

2

)

− y2

h2

(

PrE

2

)

. (6.414)

The dimensionless temperature θ is plotted in Figure 6–46 for several val-

ues of Pr E. The conduction profile in the absence of frictional heating is the

straight line for PrE = 0. The temperatures in excess of this linear profile

are a consequence of viscous dissipation. The slopes of the temperature pro-

files indicate that so much heat is generated by friction when PrE = 4 that

heat flows out of the channel at both boundaries. Normally, with T1>T0,

heat flows into the channel at the lower boundary. The excess temperature

due to frictional heating θe is obtained by subtracting the linear profile from

Equation (6–414)

θe =

(

PrE

2

)(

y

h

)(

1 − y

h

)

. (6.415)

The maximum excess temperature is found by differentiating θe with respect

to y/h and setting the result to zero. The maximum θe occurs at y/h = 1/2

and

θmax e =

PrE

8 . (6.416)

The upward heat flux at the upper boundary q0 is found by using Fourier’s

law – Equation (4–1) – and Equation (6–410)

q0 = k

(

dT

dy

)

y=0

= k

h

{

T1 − T0 + µu2

0

2k

}

. (6.417)

524 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.46 Dimensionless temperature distribution in a frictionally heated Couette flow.

The excess upward heat flux qe at y = 0 is clearly

qe = µu2

0

2h . (6.418)

If all the frictionally generated heat flowed out of the upper boundary, qe would equal µu2

0/h; half the shear heating in the channel flows out through

the lower boundary. The ratio of the excess heat flowing through the upper

boundary qe to the heat flux without viscous dissipation qc = k(T1 − T0)/h

is qe qc

= 1

2 PrE. (6.419)

We can use the results of this section to quantify the effects of frictional

heating in an asthenospheric shear flow, for example. With µ = 4× 1019 Pa

s, u0 = 50 mm yr−1, k = 4 W m−1 K−1, and T1 − T0 = 300 K, we find

PrE/2 = 0.04. Thus the maximum additional temperature rise due to shear

heating would be 1% of the temperature rise across the asthenosphere or

about 3 K in this example; see Equation (6–416). The excess heat flux to

the surface would be 4% of the heat conducted across the asthenosphere in

the absence of dissipation. These results show that frictional heating effects

in mantle shear flows are generally small. However, they can be important,

especially if the viscosity is larger than assumed in our numerical example.

We discuss frictional heating again in Chapter 8 in connection with thermally

activated creep on a fault zone.

Problem 6.37 Show that half of the frictionally generated heat flows out

6.24 Mantle Recycling and Mixing 525

of the lower boundary of the channel in the Couette flow example in this

section.

Problem 6.38 Consider frictional heating in a Couette flow with an

isothermal upper boundary and an insulated lower boundary. Determine the

temperature profile in the channel and the excess upward heat flow at the

upper boundary due to the shear heating. What is the temperature of the

lower boundary as a consequence of the frictional heating? Compare the

temperature rise across this channel with the maximum temperature rise in

a channel with equal wall temperatures.

6.24 Mantle Recycling and Mixing

The plate tectonic cycle is an inherent component of mantle convection. The

surface plates are the lithosphere and the lithosphere is the upper thermal

boundary layer of mantle convection cells. The oceanic lithosphere is created

at mid-ocean ridges and is recycled back into the mantle at subduction zones.

Mid-ocean ridges migrate over the surface of the Earth in response to

the kinematic constraints of plate tectonics. Mantle rock ascends passively

beneath an ocean ridge in response to seafloor spreading and becomes par-

tially molten due to the decrease in pressure on ascent. The magma per-

colates through the residual solid and then solidifies to form the oceanic

crust, with an average thickness of ∼6 km. The result is a two-layer struc-

ture for the rigid oceanic lithosphere. The upper part of the lithosphere is

the solidified magma of the oceanic crust and the lower part is the comple-

mentary residual solid in the upper mantle. The residual solid also has a

vertical stratification. The uppermost mantle rock is highly depleted in the

low-melting-temperature basaltic component, and it grades into undepleted

mantle over a depth range of ∼50 km.

Isotopic and trace element studies of mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB)

show that they are remarkably uniform and systematically depleted in in-

compatible trace elements with respect to bulk Earth values. This indicates

that, on average, the mantle source of MORB is a well-stirred depleted chem-

ical reservoir on the scale at which it is sampled by mid-ocean ridge pro-

cesses. However, heterogeneities do persist in this reservoir, as indicated by

variations in MORB. Large-scale heterogeneities are evident in variations be-

tween average Atlantic Ocean MORB and average Indian Ocean MORB. In

addition, small-scale heteroge-

neities are evident in deviations from average MORB. These heterogeneities

526 Fluid Mechanics

are most evident when the mantle is sampled locally, as it is at young Pacific

Ocean seamounts.

The depleted mantle source of MORB is complementary to the enriched

continental crust. Incompatible elements are partitioned into the continents

by the volcanic processes responsible for the formation of the continents; this

occurs primarily at island arcs. When the oceanic lithosphere is subducted,

the oceanic crust is partially melted; the resulting enriched magmas ascend

to the surface and form island-arc volcanoes leaving a more strongly depleted

oceanic lithosphere. The complementary nature of the continental crust and

the MORB source reservoir requires that this depleted oceanic lithosphere,

from which the continental crust has been extracted, be mixed into the

MORB source region.

Atomic diffusion plays a role in the homogenization of the mantle only

on scales of a meter or less because the solid-state diffusion coefficient is so

small. Values of the relevant diffusion coefficients are estimated to be in the

range D = 10−18 − 10−20 m2 s−1. Over the age of the Earth, 4.5 × 109 yr,

the corresponding range of diffusion lengths is 0.3–0.03 m. We conclude

that the subducted lithosphere is mixed back into the mantle by convection,

but that diffusive mixing is significant only on small scales. This process

of convective homogenization is known as kinematic mixing and has been

extensively studied in polymer science. The mantle is composed of a matrix

of discrete, elongated layers of subducted oceanic lithosphere. Each layer

has its own isotopic, chemical, and age identity. The older the layer the

more it will have been elongated by mantle flows; on average, the older

layers will be thinner. The mantle thus has the appearance of a marble

cake. The marble cake comprises the enriched oceanic crust, which has been

partially depleted by subduction zone volcanism, and the complementary,

highly depleted upper mantle.

Approximately the upper 60 km of the lithosphere is processed by the

plate tectonic cycle. We first ask the question: What fraction of the mantle

has been processed by the plate tectonic cycle since the Earth was formed?

We consider the two limiting cases of layered mantle convection (above a

depth of 660 km) and whole mantle convection.

To simplify the analysis we assume that the rate Ṁ at which mass is

processed into a layered structure at ocean ridges is constant, and that

the subducted rock is uniformly distributed throughout the mantle (upper

mantle). We define Mp to be the primordial unprocessed mass in the mantle

reservoir. The rate of loss of this primordial mass by processing at ocean

6.24 Mantle Recycling and Mixing 527

ridges is given by

dMp

dt = −Mp

Mm Ṁ, (6.420)

where Mm is the mass of the mantle participating in the plate tectonic

convective cycle – the whole mantle for whole mantle convection and the

upper mantle for layered mantle convection. The ratio Mp(t)/Mm is the

fraction of the mantle reservoir that has not been processed at an ocean

ridge. Upon integration with the initial condition Mp = Mm at t = 0 we

obtain

Mp = Mme −t/τp , (6.421)

where

τp = Mm

Ṁ (6.422)

is the characteristic time for processing the mantle in the plate tectonic

cycle. The processing rate Ṁ is given by

Ṁ = ρmhp dS

dt , (6.423)

where ρm is the mantle density, hp is the thickness of the layered oceanic

lithosphere structure, and dS/dt is the rate at which new surface plate area

is created (or subducted). Taking dS/dt = 0.0815 m2 s−1 (see Figure 4–26),

hp = 60 km, and ρm = 3300 kg m−3, we obtain Ṁ = 1.61 × 107 kg s−1.

For layered mantle convection (Mm = 1.05 × 1024 kg) the characteristic

time for processing the mantle from Equation (6–422) is τp = 2 Gyr; for

whole mantle convection τp = 8 Gyr. The fraction of primordial unprocessed

mantle Mp/Mm obtained from Equation (6–421) is given as a function of

time t in Figure 6–47 for both layered and whole mantle convection. For

layered mantle convection 10.5% of the upper mantle is unprocessed at the

present time while for whole mantle convection 57% is unprocessed.

This analysis was carried out assuming a constant rate of recycling. As

shown in Section 4–5 the rate of radioactive heat generation in the Earth

H was higher in the past. To extract this heat from the Earth’s interior,

the rate of plate tectonics was probably also higher in the past. The time

dependence of the radioactive heat generation as given in Figure 4–4 can be

approximated by the relation

H = H0e λ(te−t), (6.424)

where H0 is the present rate of heat production, te is the present value of the

time t, and λ is the average decay constant for the mixture of radioactive

528 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.47 Fraction of the mantle reservoir that has not been processed by the plate tectonic cycle Mp/Mm during a period of time t. (a) Whole mantle convection. (b) Layered mantle convection. The dashed lines are for a constant processing rate and the solid lines are a rate that decreases exponentially with time.

Figure 6.48 Illustration of the kinematic stretching of a passive layer of material in a uniform shear flow. (a) Initially at t = 0 the layer is vertical and has a thickness δ0 and a length h. (b) At a subsequent time t the layer has been stretched in the horizontal flow to reduced thickness δ and an increased length L.

isotopes in the mantle. From the results given in Figure 4–4 we take λ =

2.77 × 10−10 yr−1. Assuming that the rate Ṁ at which mass is processed

into a layered structure at ocean ridges is proportional to the rate of heat

generation given in Equation (6–424) we write

Ṁ = Ṁ0e λ(te−t), (6.425)

where Ṁ0 is the present rate of processing. Substitution of Equation (6–425)

into Equation (6–420) gives

dMp

dt = −Mp

Mm Ṁ 0e

λ(te−t). (6.426)

6.24 Mantle Recycling and Mixing 529

Integration of Equation (6–426) with the initial condition Mp = Mm at t = 0

gives

Mp = Mm exp

[

−1

τp0λ (eλte − eλ(te−t))

]

, (6.427)

where

τp0 = Mm

Ṁ0

(6.428)

is again the characteristic time for processing the mantle in the plate tectonic

cycle. For layered mantle convection we again have τp0 = 2 Gyr and for whole

mantle convection we have τp0 = 8 Gyr. With λ = 2.77 × 10−10 yr−1, the

fraction of primordial unprocessed mantle Mp/Mm obtained from Equation

(6–427) is given as a function of time t in Figure 6–47 for both layered and

whole mantle convection. For layered mantle convection 1% of the upper

mantle is unprocessed at the present time while for whole mantle convection

33% is unprocessed. The time-dependent processing is more efficient, as

expected. However, in all cases substantial fractions of the mantle reservoir

have been processed by the plate tectonic cycle.

The layered oceanic lithosphere is subducted back into the mantle at

oceanic trenches. The cold subducted lithosphere is heated by conduction

from the surrounding mantle on a time scale of ≈50 Myr. The heated and

softened subducted lithosphere is then entrained in the mantle convective

flows and is subjected to the fluid deformation. With the assumption that the

subducted layered lithosphere behaves passively, it is subject to kinematic

mixing.

We next quantify the rate of kinematic mixing in the mantle. We consider

the problem of layer stretching. As stated before, we hypothesize that the

subducted oceanic crust becomes entrained in the convecting mantle and

is deformed by the strains associated with thermal convection. Kinematic

mixing can occur by both shear strains and normal strains. We first consider

the thinning of a passive layer in a uniform shear flow. Initially we take the

one-dimensional channel flow (Couette flow, see Figure 6–2a) of width h

as illustrated in Figure 6–48. The passive layer has an initial width δ0 and

is assumed to be vertical with a length L. The linear velocity profile from

Equation (6–13) is

u = ε̇(h− y), (6.429)

where the strain rate ε̇ = u0/h. At a subsequent time t the top of the layer

530 Fluid Mechanics

Figure 6.49 Illustration of the kinematic stretching of a passive layer of material in a uniform stagnation point flow. The converging vertical flow is given by Equation (6–435) and the diverging horizontal flow is given by Equation (6–434). (a) Initially at t =0 the passive horizontal layer has a thickness δ0. (b) At a subsequent time t the layer has been stretched and its thickness has been reduced to δ.

has moved a distance u0t while the bottom boundary remains in place. The

total length of the strip is now

L = h[1 + (ε̇t)2]1/2. (6.430)

However, to conserve the mass of material in the strip we require

hδ0 = Lδ. (6.431)

Substitution of Equation (6–430) into (6–431) gives

δ

δ0 =

1

[1 + (ε̇t)2]1/2 . (6.432)

And for large strains, ε̇t ≫ 1, this becomes

δ

δ0 = (ε̇t)−1. (6.433)

Using Equation (6–433) we can determine how long it takes to thin the

subducted oceanic crust (δ0 = 6 km) to a thickness δ = 10 mm. For whole

mantle convection we take ε̇ = 50 mm yr−1/2886 km = 5.5 × 10−16 s−1

and find that t = 3.5 × 104 Gyr. For layered mantle convection we take

ε̇ = 50 mm yr−1/660 km = 2.4× 10−15 s−1 and find that t = 7.9× 103 Gyr.

Clearly this type of mixing is very inefficient.

In the relatively complex flows associated with mantle convection, normal

strains may also be important for mixing. An idealized flow that illustrates

normal strain is the two-dimensional stagnation point flow illustrated in

6.24 Mantle Recycling and Mixing 531

Figure 6–49. In this flow

u = ε̇x (6.434)

v = −ε̇y, (6.435)

where u is the x-component of velocity and v is the y-component of velocity.

The strain rate ε̇ is independent of time. In the upper half-space (y > 0)

there is a uniform downward flow and in the lower half-space (y < 0) there

is a uniform upward flow. These vertical flows converge on y = 0. There is

a complementary divergent horizontal flow. In the right half-space (x > 0)

there is a uniform divergent flow to the right. In the left half-space there is

a uniform divergent flow to the left. This steady stagnation flow satisfies the

governing continuity Equation (6–53) and force balance equations (6–67)

and (6–68).

Problem 6.39 Obtain the stream function corresponding to the two-

dimensional stagnation point flow given in Equations (6–434) and (6–435).

Show that this stream function satisfies the biharmonic Equation (6–74).

We again consider the thinning of a passive layer by the stagnation point

flow. This passive layer initially occupies the region −δ0/2 ≤ y ≤ δ0/2. The

deformation of this layer is uniform in x direction and the change of the

layer thickness δ with time is given by

1

2

dt = v(δ) = −ε̇δ. (6.436)

Integration with the initial condition δ = δ0 at t = 0 gives

δ = δ0e −2ε̇t. (6.437)

The stagnation point flow stretches and thins the passive layer. With normal

strains the passive layer thins exponentially with time. Normal strains are

much more effective in layer thinning than shear strains.

Based on Equation (6–437), we can determine how long it takes for normal

strains to thin the subducted oceanic crust (δ0 = 6 km) to a thickness of

10 mm. We again take ε̇ = 5.5× 10−16 s−1 for whole mantle convection and

find t = 380 Myr. For layered mantle convection we take ε̇ = 2.4×10−15 s−1

and find t = 88 Myr. Thus, normal strains can thin the oceanic lithosphere

to thicknesses that can be homogenized by diffusion in reasonable lengths

of geological time (≈108 yr).

The first question that arises in discussing the geological implications of

the mixing hypothesis is whether there is direct observational evidence of

an imperfectly mixed mantle. Allègre and Turcotte (1986) argued that the

532 Collateral Reading

“marble cake structure” associated with imperfect mixing can be seen in

high-temperature peridotites (also called orogenic lherzolite massifs), which

represent samples of the Earth’s mantle. Typical locations include Beni

Bousera in Morocco, Rhonda in Spain, and Lherz in France. These rocks

consist primarily of depleted lherzolite. Embedded in this matrix are bands

of pyroxenite comprising a few percent of the massif. Trace element studies

of these bands indicate that they were originally basaltic in composition.

These characteristics led to the postulate that the bands are former sam-

ples of oceanic crust that have been subducted and deformed by convective

shear before emplacement into their current locations. The bands range in

thickness from a few meters to a few centimeters and some have been exten-

sively folded. Essentially, no stripes are found with thicknesses of 1 cm or

less, probably because stripes of this width have been destroyed by diffusive

processes. According to this hypothesis, they have undergone 5 to 6 orders

of magnitude of thinning from an initial thickness of 6 km. Figure 6–50

illustrates some examples.

Further evidence for the marble cake structure of the mantle comes from

eclogitic xenoliths associated with basaltic volcanism and kimberlites. In

some kimberlites, diamonds are found in the eclogite nodules. These “eclogitic”

diamonds have been found to have carbon isotope ratios characteristic of

sediments. A number of authors have suggested that subducted carbonates

are one source of diamonds. Graphitized diamonds have been found in the

pyroxenite bands of the Beni Bousera high-temperature peridotite in Mo-

rocco. These observations are completely consistent with the hypothesis that

sediments are entrained in the subducted oceanic crust. During convective

mixing in the deep interior some carbonate sediments are transformed to

diamonds as the oceanic crust in which they are embedded is stretched and

thinned.

Collateral Reading

Allègre, C. J., and D. L. Turcotte (1986), Implications of a two-component

marble-cake mantle, Nature 323, 123–127.

Currie, J. B., H. W. Patnode, and R. P. Trump (1962), Development of folds

in sedimentary strata, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 73, 655–674.

Collateral Reading

Acheson, D. J., Elementary Fluid Dynamics (Oxford University Press, Ox-

ford, 1990), 397 pages.

Collateral Reading 533

F ig

u re

6. 50

O cc

u rr

en ce

s o f p yr

o xe

n it e

la ye

rs in

th e

B en

i B o u se

ra h ig

h -t em

pe ra

tu re

pe ri

d o ti te

, M

o ro

cc o . G

re y,

p yr

o xe

n it e;

w h it e,

lh er

zo li te

w it h

fo li a ti o n . (a

) O

cc u rr

en ce

s in

a n

o u tc

ro p

w it h

n o

fo ld

in g;

(b )–

(d ),

oc cu

rr en

ce s

w it h

fo ld

in g

a n d

bo u d in

a ge

.

534 Collateral Reading

This is an intermediate level textbook that covers a broad range of topics in

fluid dynamics. Topics of particular interest include the Navier–Stokes

equations, very viscous flows, and fluid instabilities.

Batchelor, G. K., An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University

Press, London, 1967), 615 pages.

A modern classic on the fundamentals of fluid mechanics written for the

student with a good foundation in applied mathematics and a fa-

miliarity with vector analysis and tensor notation. The topics cov-

ered include the physical properties of fluids, kinematics of flow fields,

equations governing the motions of fluids, flows of a uniform incom-

pressible viscous fluid, flows at large Reynolds numbers (boundary-

layer theory), and the theory of irrotational flows. Discussions of low

Reynolds number flows are particularly useful for geological applica-

tions. Many sections contain challenging exercises for the student.

Cathles, L. M., The Viscosity of the Earth’s Mantle (Princeton University

Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1975), 386 pages.

A research monograph describing how the viscosity of the mantle has been

inferred from the geological data on uplift and subsidence of the Earth’s

surface in response to the melting of the last great ice sheets that cov-

ered Canada, Fennoscandia, and Siberia and the addition of this water

to the oceans. The book presents the basic theory necessary for model-

ing the Earth’s isostatic adjustment to these Pleistocene load redistri-

butions as that of a self-gravitating, viscoelastic sphere. The geological

data are reviewed and applied to the models to infer a mantle with a

nearly uniform viscosity of 1021 Pa s.

Chandrasekhar, S., Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability (Oxford

University Press, London, 1961), 652 pages.

A classic treatise on the stability of fluids subjected to adverse distributions

of temperature and density, angular velocity, angular momentum, shear,

gravity, and capillarity. The onset of thermal convection in fluid layers

heated from below is treated with particular completeness and rigor.

The required level of mathematical expertise is high. The student should

be familiar with vector analysis, tensor notation, and partial differential

equations.

Faber, T. E., Fluid Dynamics for Physicists (Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, 1995), 440 pages.

This is a comprehensive treatment of the fundamentals of fluid dynamics

at a moderately advanced level. It covers a wide variety of topics with

many applications.

Collateral Reading 535

Furbish, D. J., Fluid Physics in Geology (Oxford University Press, New York,

1997), 476 pages.

This is a relatively advanced level textbook that treats a wide variety of

problems in fluid mechanics with geological applications. Both fluid

flows and flows in porous media receive attention.

Johnson, A. M., Physical Process in Geology (Freeman, Cooper, San Fran-

cisco, 1970), 577 pages.

A basic textbook on mechanics and its applications to geological problems.

Emphasis is placed on the development of flexure theory from the funda-

mental principles governing the behavior of elastic materials. Theories

of plate and beam bending are applied to the geological problem of

folding. Stresses and failure criteria are discussed in the context of un-

derstanding patterns of faults, joints, and dikes. A final chapter deals

with the rheology and flow of ice, lava, and debris. There are exercises

for the student and the mathematical level is not demanding given the

nature of the subject.

Johnson, A. M., Styles of Folding: Mechanics and Mechanisms of Folding of

Natural Elastic Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1977), 406 pages.

A specialized book detailing the research of the author and his colleagues

on folding. Many of the chapters are individual research papers previ-

ously published in various journals. Chapter 1 reviews the literature on

folding. Chapter 2 discusses the folding of bedded sandstones in Arches

National Monument, Utah, and attempts to understand these folds us-

ing Biot’s theory for buckling viscous layers. The next several chapters

discuss more sophisticated attempts to model the observed character-

istics of folds including their kink-like and chevron-like appearances.

Lamb, H., Hydrodynamics, 6th edition (Cambridge University Press, Cam-

bridge, 1932), 738 pages.

A classic treatise on the fundamentals of hydrodynamics, the dynamics of in-

viscid fluids. The major subjects include the equations of motion, irrota-

tional flows motions of a liquid in two and three dimensions, motions of

solids through a liquid, vortex motions, tidal waves, surface waves, waves

of expansion, effects of viscosity, and rotating liquid masses. The level

of mathematical sophistication is high.

Langlois, W. E., Slow Viscous Flow (Macmillan Company, New York, 1964),

229 pages.

A book on low Reynolds number fluid dynamics for the applied mathemati-

cian. Familiarity with differential equations and multiple integrals is

assumed. The first chapter introduces cartesian tensors that are used

536 Collateral Reading

extensively throughout the text. Chapter 2 discusses the basic equa-

tions and boundary conditions of viscous flow theory. Remaining chap-

ters treat exact solutions of the equations, pipe flow, flow past a sphere,

plane flow, rotary flow, and lubrication theory.

Ramberg, H., Gravity, Deformation and the Earth’s Crust (Academic Press,

London, 1967), 214 pages.

A textbook on laboratory and theoretical modeling of geologic structures

resulting from tectonic deformation of the crust. The role of gravity

in tectonics is emphasized. Among the problems discussed are dome

structures, buckling of horizontal layers, buckling of the crust, spreading

and folding, buoyant rise of magma, subsiding bodies, and isostatic

adjustment. An easily readable, relatively nonmathematical discussion

of the dynamics of gravity tectonics.

Schlichting, H., Boundary Layer Theory, 6th edition (McGraw-Hill, New

York, 1968), 747 pages.

A classic textbook on boundary-layer phenomena written principally for en-

gineers. The first part of the book discusses the fundamentals of viscous

fluid flow and introduces the concept of a boundary layer. Exact solu-

tions of the Navier–Stokes equations of motion are presented for flows in

pipes and channels and other geometries. A chapter is devoted to very

slow motions and introduces the hydrodynamic theory of lubrication

and Hele–Shaw flow, both topics having applications in geophysics. A

number of chapters discuss boundary-layer theory in great detail, in-

cluding thermal boundary layers in forced and natural flows. Other sec-

tions deal with turbulence and turbulent boundary layers. A reasonable

degree of mathematical sophistication is required.

Tritton, D. J., Physical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edition (Clarendon Press, Ox-

ford, 1988), 519 pages.

This is an outstanding introductory textbook in fluid mechanics. The au-

thor is a geophysicist, therefore many of the topics covered are directly

relevant to geodynamics. Pipe and channel flows, flows past circular

cylinders, and free convective flows are treated. The basic equations are

introduced with concepts of similarity. Viscous flows, stratified flows,

flows in rotating fluids, turbulence, double diffusive convection, and dy-

namical chaos are considered in depth.

White, F. M., Viscous Fluid Flow (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974), 725

pages.

A textbook for senior undergraduate or first-year graduate students in engi-

neering dealing with the analysis of viscous flows. A knowledge of basic

fluid mechanics, vector notation, and differential equations is assumed.

Collateral Reading 537

The first two chapters cover the properties of fluids and the basic equa-

tions governing their behavior. Chapters 3 and 4 discuss methods of

analysis of laminar flows. Chapter 5 treats the stability of laminar flows

and their transition to turbulence. Chapter 6 deals with incompress-

ible turbulent flows, while the final chapter covers compressible laminar

and turbulent boundary layers. Problems are given at the end of each

chapter.

7

Rock Rheology

7.1 Introduction

At atmospheric pressure and room temperature most rocks are brittle; that

is, they behave nearly elastically until they fail by fracture. Cracks or frac-

tures in rock along which there has been little or no relative displacement are

known as joints. They occur on all scales in both sedimentary and igneous

rocks. Joints are commonly found in sets defining parallel or intersecting

patterns of failure related to local stress orientations. The breakdown of

surface rocks by erosion and weathering is often controlled by systems of

joints along which the rocks are particularly weak and susceptible to disin-

tegration and removal. These processes in turn enhance the visibility of the

jointing. Igneous rocks often develop joints as a result of the thermal stresses

associated with cooling and contraction. Columnar jointing in basaltic lava

flows (Figure 7–1) and parallel jointing in granitic rocks (Figure 7–2) are

examples.

Faults are fractures along which there has been relative displacement.

Faults also occur on all scales; examples of faults have already been given

in Figures 1–58 and 4–34b and another example is given in Figure 7–3. The

mechanical aspects of faulting are discussed in the next chapter.

Although fracture is important in shallow crustal rock at low tempera-

tures and pressures, there are many circumstances in which rock behaves

as a ductile material. In determining the transition from brittle to ductile

behavior, pressure, temperature, and strain rate are important. If the con-

fining pressure of rock is near the brittle strength of the rock, a transition

from brittle to ductile behavior will occur. To model this behavior of crustal

and mantle rocks, it is often appropriate to use an idealized elastic–perfectly

plastic rheology. An elastic–perfectly plastic material exhibits a linear elastic

7.1 Introduction 539

behavior until a yield stress is reached. The material can then be deformed

plastically an unlimited amount at this stress.

At temperatures that are a significant fraction of the melt temperature

the atoms and dislocations in a crystalline solid become sufficiently mobile

to result in creep when the solid is subjected to deviatoric stresses. At very

low stresses diffusion processes dominate, and the crystalline solid behaves

as a Newtonian fluid with a viscosity that depends exponentially on pressure

and the inverse absolute temperature. At higher stresses the motion of dis-

locations becomes the dominant creep process resulting in a non-Newtonian

or nonlinear fluid behavior that also has an exponential pressure and inverse

absolute temperature dependence. Mantle convection and continental drift

are attributed to these thermally activated creep processes.

The exponential dependence of the rheology on the inverse absolute tem-

perature is particularly important in understanding the role of mantle con-

vection in transporting heat. The temperature dependence of the rheology

acts as a thermostat to regulate the mantle temperature. Any tendency of

the mean mantle temperature to increase is offset by an associated reduction

in mantle viscosity, an increase in convective vigor, and a more efficient out-

ward transport of heat. Similarly, a decrease in mantle temperature tends

to increase mantle viscosity, reduce convective flow velocities, and decrease

the rate of heat transfer. As a result of the sensitive feedback between mean

mantle temperature and rheology, relatively small changes in temperature

can produce large changes in heat flux, and the temperature is consequently

buffered at a nearly constant value.

Creep processes are also important in the lower lithosphere, where they

can relax elastic stresses. Such behavior can be modeled with a rheological

law that combines linear elasticity and linear (Newtonian) or nonlinear vis-

cosity. A material that behaves both elastically and viscously is known as

a viscoelastic medium. Viscoelastic relaxation can be used to determine the

thickness of the elastic upper part of the lithosphere.

Folding is evidence that crustal rocks also exhibit ductile behavior under

stress. Examples of folding have been given in Figure 6–28. Pressure solution

creep is a mechanism that can account for the ductility of crustal rocks at

relatively low temperatures and pressures. The process involves the dissolu-

tion of minerals in regions of high pressure and their precipitation in regions

of low pressure. As a result creep of the rock occurs.

540 Rock rheology

Figure 7.1 Columnar jointing in a basalt due to thermal contraction in the Devil’s Postpile National Monument, California (University of Colorado, Boulder).

7.2 Elasticity

At low stress levels and relatively high strain rates, rock behaves elastically.

The linear relations between components of stress and strain associated with

elastic deformation have been given in Equations (3–1) to (3–3) or (3–4) to

(3–6). The elastic behavior of a crystalline solid arises from the interatomic

forces maintaining each atom in its lattice position. These forces resist any

attempt to move the atoms farther apart or closer together. If the crystalline

lattice is compressed, the interatomic forces resist the compression; if the

crystalline lattice is placed under tension, the interatomic forces resist the

expansion. This situation is illustrated in Figure 7–4, which shows the energy

7.2 Elasticity 541

Figure 7.2 Ordovician diabase sill with cooling joints, Rodeo, San Juan Province, Argentina (photograph courtesy of Richard Allmendinger).

of a crystal lattice U as a function of the separation of the atoms b. When the

atoms are infinitely far apart, the energy of the lattice is zero. Long-range

attractive forces – for example, the electrostatic Coulomb forces between

ions of opposite sign – act to reduce the separation between atoms; they

cause the energy of the lattice to decrease with decreasing lattice spacing.

The repulsive forces that come into play at short range prevent the atoms

from approaching too closely; they cause the lattice energy to increase with

decreasing lattice spacing. The total energy of the lattice is the sum of these

two contributions. It exhibits a minimum value U0 when the lattice spacing

has its equilibrium value b0. There are no forces on the atoms of the lattice

when they occupy their equilibrium positions. The energy −U0 is known as

the binding or cohesive energy of the lattice. It is the energy required to

break up the lattice and disperse its atoms to infinity.

The compressibility β of a solid provides a direct measure of these inter-

atomic forces because it gives the pressure required to change the volume,

or lattice spacing, of the solid. In the case of ionic solids such as sodium

chloride (NaCl) we can derive a simple formula connecting lattice spacing,

lattice energy, and compressibility because of the relatively simple lattice

542 Rock rheology

Figure 7.3 Offsets of trees in an orchard caused by the m=7.5 Guatemala City earthquake February 4, 1976. This earthquake resulted in the deaths of 23,000 people (U.S. Geological Survey).

Figure 7.4 Lattice energy U as a function of lattice spacing b.

structures of such solids and the known character of the attractive energy

resulting from ionic bonding. Figure 7–5 shows the configuration of the NaCl

lattice. Every ion is surrounded by six nearest neighbors of opposite sign;

this is the coordination number for the NaCl lattice. The nearest neighbor

distance between Na+ and Cl− ions is b. The atomic volume, that is, the

7.2 Elasticity 543

Figure 7.5 Lattice structure of NaCl.

volume per atom, is b3. Since there are two atoms per molecule in NaCl, the

molecular volume V , or volume per molecule, is

V = 2b3. (7.1)

It is standard practice to characterize a lattice by its molecular or molar

properties.

To derive the formula connecting β, b0, and U0 for an ionic solid, we recall

the definition of compressibility provided in Equation (3–50). Compressibil-

ity is the ratio of the fractional change in volume dV/V caused by a change

in pressure dp to the pressure change, that is,

β = 1

V

dV

dp . (7.2)

The reciprocal of the compressibility is the bulk modulus K

K ≡ 1

β = V

dp

dV . (7.3)

Recall that we consider a decrease in volume to be a positive quantity. Thus

with dp > 0, dV is positive and β is also a positive quantity. The work done

by the pressure forces in compressing an elastic solid an amount dV is pdV ;

this work is stored as elastic strain energy dU in the crystal lattice, that is,

pdV = dU (7.4)

or

p = dU

dV . (7.5)

Upon substituting this expression for the pressure into Equation (7–3), we

obtain

544 Rock rheology

1

β = V

d2U

dV 2 , (7.6)

where U is the lattice energy per molecule just as V is the molecular volume.

By taking the derivative of Equation (7–1) with respect to the spacing b, we

obtain

dV = 6b2db (7.7)

and

1

β =

1

18b

d2U

db2 . (7.8)

The compressibility β0 is the value of β at p = 0 when the equilibrium lattice

spacing is b0. Thus we have

1

β0 =

1

18b0

(

d2U

db2

)

b=b0

. (7.9)

The equilibrium bulk modulus is directly proportional to the second deriva-

tive of the lattice energy per molecule with respect to the lattice spacing.

We need a model of the lattice potential energy in order to calculate

d2U/db2. For an ionic lattice such as NaCl we can write

U = −z2e2A

4πε0b +Be−b/s, (7.10)

where the first term is the attractive Coulomb energy of the lattice, the

second term is an approximate representation of the short-range repulsive

potential, z is the number of electron charges e on each ion, ε0 is the permit-

tivity of free space, and A,B, and s are constants. The charge on an electron

e is 1.602 × 10−19 coulomb and ε0 = 8.85 × 10−12 farad m−1. The constant

A, known as the Madelung constant, depends only on lattice structure and

can be calculated for any ionic lattice. For NaCl, A is 1.7476 and z = 1. The

calculation ofA is straightforward. The Coulomb energy of an Na+ ion and

a Cl− ion separated by a distance b is −e2/4πε0b. The Coulomb energy of

any ion pair is given by a similar formula employing the appropriate sep-

aration distance and using a plus sign for ions of the same sign. Since the

regular geometrical structure of the lattice allows any separation distance

to be calculated in terms of b, the Coulomb energy of any ion pair can be

written as a positive or negative multiple of −e2/4πε0b. Thus, the total en-

ergy obtained by summing the Coulomb potential energies between any one

ion and all other ions in the lattice can be written in the form −e2A/4πε0b.

7.2 Elasticity 545

The second derivative of Equation (7–10) with respect to lattice spacing

b gives

(

d2U

db2

)

b=b0

= −2z2e2A

4πε0

1

b30 + B

s2 e−b0/s. (7.11)

The constants B and s can be eliminated from this expression by noting

that dU/db is zero at the equilibrium spacing b = b0

(

dU

db

)

b=b0

= 0 = z2e2A

4πε0

1

b20 − B

s e−b0/s (7.12)

and U = U0, the lattice potential energy per molecule, at b = b0

U0 = −z2e2A

4πε0b0 +Be−b0/s. (7.13)

Equation (7–13) yields

Be−b0/s = U0 + z2e2A

4πε0b0 , (7.14)

which, together with Equation (7–12), gives

s = 4πε0b

2 0

z2e2A

(

U0 + z2e2A

4πε0b0

)

. (7.15)

By combining Equations (7–9), (7–11), (7–14), and (7–15), we obtain

β0 = −18b40

(

4πε0 z2e2A

)

(

U0 + z2e2A 4πε0b0

)

(

2U0 + z2e2A 4πε0b0

) , (7.16)

which, upon rearrangement, gives

−U0 = 9V0 + β0

(

z2e2A 4πε0b0

)

2β0 + 9V0

(

4πε0b0 z2e2A

) , (7.17)

where, from Equation (7–1), V0 is the equilibrium molecular volume 2b30.

Equation (7–17) provides a means of calculating the binding energy per

molecule in an ionic solid from basic information on lattice structure and

measurements of density and compressibility. Because the binding energy is

the energy required to disperse the lattice, we can compare the prediction

of this equation with independent thermodynamic determinations of −U0.

For NaCl we have already noted that A = 1.7476 and z = 1. In addition,

546 Rock rheology

Table 7.1 Elastic and Structural Data for Computing the Lattice Binding

Energies of Several Oxides

Crystal V (10–30 m3) A β (10–12 Pa–1)

BeO 13.77 1.886 4.636 MgO 18.67 1.748 6.254 CaO 27.83 1.748 9.532 ZnO 23.74 1.905 7.199

β0 = 4.26 × 10−11 Pa−1. Since the density of NaCl is 2163 kg m−3 and its

molecular weight is 58.448, its molar volume is 2.702 × 10−5 m3. (A mole

of a substance has a mass equal to its molecular weight times 10−3 kg.)

Because a mole of NaCl contains Avogadro’s number (N0 = 6.023 × 1023)

of molecules, its molecular volume is V0 = 4.486 × 10−29 m3. With V0 given

by 2b30 we find b0 = 2.82 × 10−10 m. When these values of β0, V0, b0, z, and

A are substituted into Equation (7–17), we obtain −U0 = 1.262 × 10−18 J

molecule−1 = 7.6 × 105 J mole−1 = 760 kJ mole−1. Thermodynamic data

give 773 kJ mole−1 for the binding energy of NaCl.

There is good agreement between the calculated and measured values of

binding energy for ionic crystals because the forces between the ions in the

lattice are short-range repulsive forces and Coulomb forces. However, other

forces not accounted for in this theory are important in the lattices of oxides

and silicates. These forces include van der Waals forces, covalent bonds, and

dipole and higher order multipole forces. The forces associated with covalent

bonding are generally the most important of the nonionic forces. Theoretical

estimates of lattice binding energy must include the energy in these bonds.

Problem 7.1 Compute the binding energy of CsCl. Use β0 = 5.95×10−11

Pa−1, ρ0 = 3988 kg m−3, and A = 1.7627. The molecular weight of CsCl is

168.36, and thermodynamic data give −U0 = 660 kJ mole−1.

Problem 7.2 Calculate the binding energies of the oxides BeO, MgO,

CaO, and ZnO using the data in Table 7–1. Account only for the Coulomb

and repulsive energies.

Problem 7.3 A theoretical estimate of the strength of a crystalline solid is

its binding energy per unit volume. Evaluate the strength of forsterite if its

binding energy is 103 kJ mole−1 and its mean atomic volume is 6.26× 10−6

m3 mole−1. The presence of grain boundaries and dislocations weakens a

crystalline solid considerably below its theoretical strength.

7.2 Elasticity 547

The atoms of a crystalline solid do not, of course, occupy fixed lattice po-

sitions. The lattice sites are the mean locations of the atoms, which oscillate

about their equilibrium positions. The energy in these oscillatory motions

is the internal thermal energy of the solid. The temperature of a crystalline

solid is a measure of its internal energy and the vigor of the oscillations of its

atoms. The oscillations of the atoms in a crystalline solid are a consequence

of the interatomic forces tending to bind the atoms to their lattice sites.

In their equilibrium positions the atoms experience no net force. However,

the displacement of an atom from its lattice site results in a force on the

atom tending to restore it to its equilibrium position. To a first approxima-

tion, that is, for small excursions of an atom from its equilibrium location,

the restoring force is linearly proportional to the displacement of the atom

and results in simple harmonic motion of the atom about its equilibrium

position. As for the thermal energy of a lattice, consider the atoms as be-

ing interconnected by elastic springs with linear restoring forces. The lattice

thermal energy resides in the kinetic energy of the oscillating atoms and the

elastic strain energy or potential energy of the springs.

The equation of simple harmonic motion of an atom about its equilibrium

position is, in one dimension,

m d2x

dt2 + k̄x = 0, (7.18)

where m is the mass of the atom, x is its displacement from the equilibrium

position (x = 0), and k̄ is the “spring constant,” a measure of the strength

of the interatomic restoring forces. The force on the atom is −k̄x; it always

points in the direction of the equilibrium position x = 0. A solution for the

position and velocity (v= dx/dt) of the atom is

x = x0 sin

(

2πt

τ

)

(7.19)

v = v0 cos

(

2πt

τ

)

, (7.20)

where the period τ of the oscillation is given by

τ = 2π

(

m

)1/2

, (7.21)

and the maximum velocity v0 and maximum displacement x0 are related

according to

v0 = 2π

τ x0 =

(

m

)1/2

x0. (7.22)

548 Rock rheology

The period of the oscillation τ is known as the Einstein period; its reciprocal

is the Einstein frequency.

The instantaneous kinetic energy of the atom is 1 2mv

2. The kinetic energy

varies between 0, when the atom is at the farthest point of its excursion,

and 1 2mv

2 0 when the atom is passing through its equilibrium position. The

mean kinetic energy of the atom during a single oscillation period is

1

2 mv2 =

m

∫ τ

0 v2 dt =

mv2 0

∫ τ

0 cos2

(

2πt

τ

)

dt

= mv2

0

4 = k̄x2

0

4 . (7.23)

The mean kinetic energy is one-half the maximum kinetic energy. To obtain

the potential energy of the atom, we need only integrate the product of the

force acting on the atom −k̄x with the infinitesimal displacement dx from the

equilibrium position to any location x. The instantaneous potential energy

of the atom is

− ∫ x

0 (−k̄x) dx =

1

2 k̄x2, (7.24)

where the minus sign in front of the integral accounts for the fact that

the force and the displacement are in opposite directions. The potential

energy varies between 0, when the atom is passing through its equilibrium

position, and 1 2 k̄x

2 0, when the atom is farthest away from the origin. The

mean potential energy of the atom during an oscillatory cycle is

1

2 k̄ x2 =

∫ τ

0 x2 dt

= k̄x2

0

∫ τ

0 sin2

(

2πt

τ

)

dt = k̄x2

0

4 . (7.25)

The mean potential energy is one-half the maximum potential energy. A

comparison of Equations (7–23) and (7–25) shows that the mean kinetic

and potential energies of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator are equal.

The total instantaneous energy of the atom is

1

2 mv2 +

1

2 k̄x2 =

1

2 mv2

0 cos2 (

2πt

τ

)

+ 1

2 k̄x2

0 sin2 (

2πt

τ

)

= 1

2 k̄x2

0

[

cos2 (

2πt

τ

)

+ sin2 (

2πt

τ

)]

= 1

2 k̄x2

0 = 1

2 mv2

0. (7.26)

7.2 Elasticity 549

Equation (7–26) is a statement of conservation of energy. At any point in its

oscillation, the energy of the atom is divided between kinetic and potential

energies, but the sum of these energies is always a constant.

In an actual lattice, an individual atom can oscillate in any of three basic

orthogonal directions. Kinetic and potential energies can be associated with

vibrations in each of the three directions. There are thus six contributions to

the total energy of an atom; the atom is said to have six degrees of freedom.

Not all the atoms in the lattice oscillate with the same amplitude. There is

a spectrum of vibrational amplitudes or energies, as we will discuss in more

detail in the next section. However, according to the principle of equipartition

of energy, when an average is taken over all the atoms of a lattice, the

energies associated with the six degrees of freedom are all equal and each

is given by 1 2kT , where k is Boltzmann’s constant (k = 1.3806 × 10−23

J K−1) and T is the absolute temperature. A proof of the validity of the

equipartition principle requires the solution of the Schrödinger equation for

the quantum mechanical behavior of atoms.

The internal energy of the solid per unit mass e is therefore given by

e = 6( 1

2kT )

m =

3kT

m =

3(kN0)T

(mN0) =

3RT

Ma , (7.27)

where R = N0k is the universal gas constant (R = 8.314510 J mole−1 K−1)

and Ma = mN0 is the mean mass of Avogadro’s number of atoms in the

crystal, that is, the mean atomic weight. The specific heat of the solid c is

defined to be the change in internal energy with temperature

c = de

dT . (7.28)

From Equations (7–27) and (7–28) the specific heat c of a crystalline solid

is

c = 3 R

Ma . (7.29)

This is the law of Dulong and Petit; it is a good approximation for all

crystalline solids at moderate temperatures.

As an example, consider forsterite, Mg2SiO4, whose molecular weight is

140.73. The mass of a mole of forsterite is 140.73× 10−3 kg. Because a mole

of forsterite contains 7N0 atoms, the mean weight of N0 atoms is 20.1×10−3

kg. Thus Ma equals 20.1×10−3 kg mole−1, and c, according to Equation (7–

29), is 1.24×103 J kg−1 K−1. The measured value of c at standard conditions

of temperature and pressure is 840 J kg−1 K−1.

Problem 7.4 According to the law of Dulong and Petit the specific heats

550 Rock rheology

Figure 7.6 The asymmetry of the lattice potential energy about its min- imum results in the expansion and contraction of solids with changes in temperature.

of solids should differ only because of differences in Ma. Calculate Ma and

c for MgSiO3 and MgO. The measured values of c at standard conditions of

temperature and pressure are 815 J kg−1 K−1 for MgSiO3 and 924 J kg−1

K−1 for MgO.

Problem 7.5 Obtain an order of magnitude estimate for the spring con-

stant k̄ associated with the interatomic forces in a silicate crystal such as

forsterite by assuming k̄ ∼Eb, where E is Young’s modulus and b is the

average interatomic spacing. Young’s modulus for forsterite is 1.5× 1011 Pa.

Obtain a value for b by assuming b3 is the mean atomic volume. The density

of forsterite is 3200 kg m−3. Estimate the maximum amplitude of vibration

of an atom in a forsterite crystal at a temperature of 300 K. How does it

compare with the mean interatomic spacing? What is the Einstein frequency

at this temperature? The spring constant may also be estimated from the

compressibility of forsterite using k̄ ∼ 3b/β, where the factor of 3 arises

from the relation between fractional volume changes and fractional changes

in length. How does this estimate of k̄ compare with the previous one? The

compressibility of forsterite is 0.8 × 10−11 Pa−1.

If the atoms of a crystalline solid were perfect harmonic oscillators, the

amplitudes of their vibrations would increase with increasing temperature,

but the mean distances between the atoms would remain constant; that is,

there would be no change in volume with temperature. The thermal expan-

sion of a crystalline solid is thus a direct consequence of the anharmonicity

in the vibrations of its atoms. The anharmonicity of the thermal motions is,

7.2 Elasticity 551

in turn, a result of the asymmetry of the lattice potential energy about its

minimum value. A qualitative understanding of the phenomenon of thermal

expansion can be obtained from Figure 7–6 which shows the potential energy

of a lattice U as a function of the spacing b of its atoms, as in Figure 7–4.

The minimum in the potential energy curve gives the equilibrium lattice

spacing b0 at zero temperature. At any nonzero value of temperature, the

thermal energy 3kT is partitioned equally between the kinetic and poten-

tial energies of the atoms. Thus the potential energy of the lattice exceeds

the zero temperature lattice potential energy U0 by 3kT/2. Accordingly, the

lattice spacing can lie between bA and bB , as shown in Figure 7–6, where bA and bB are the values of the lattice spacing at the intersections of the lattice

potential energy curve with the energy U0 + 3 2kT . The mean lattice spacing

b1 is

b1 = 1 2(bA + bB). (7.30)

Clearly, because the potential energy curve is skewed about its minimum, b1 exceeds b0; that is, the lattice expands with increasing temperature. If the

lattice potential energy curve were symmetric about its minimum, b1 would

equal b0 and there would be no change in mean lattice spacing, or volume

of the crystalline solid, with temperature.

One can derive a simple expression for the mean lattice spacing in terms

of the skewness of the lattice potential energy function. Sufficiently near the

minimum in the U versus b curve, the lattice energy can be written as a

power series

U = U0 + aδ2 − fδ3, (7.31)

where

δ = b− b0. (7.32)

A positive value of f ensures that the energy rises more steeply to the left

of the minimum than it does to the right of this point. The intersections

of the potential energy function with the energy U0 + 3 2kT are obtained by

substituting this value of the energy in Equation (7–31) with the result

3 2kT = aδ2 − fδ3. (7.33)

The solutions of Equation (7–33), correct to first order in f (the asymmetry

552 Rock rheology

in the potential function is assumed to be small), are

δA =

(

3kT

2a

)1/2

+ f

(

3kT

4a2

)

(7.34)

δB = − (

3kT

2a

)1/2

+ f

(

3kT

4a2

)

. (7.35)

The mean lattice spacing is thus

b1 = 1

2 (bA + bB) =

1

2 (bA − b0 + bB − b0) + b0

= 1

2 (δA + δB) + b0 =

3fkT

4a2 + b0. (7.36)

The lattice expands with increasing temperature if f is a nonzero positive

quantity, as is the case for the potential in Figure 7–6. The linear coefficient

of thermal expansion,

αl = 1

b0

(

∂b1 ∂T

)

, (7.37)

is one-third of the volumetric thermal expansivity αv – see Equation (4–175)

– so that

αv = 3

b0

∂b1 ∂T

. (7.38)

By substituting Equation (7–36) into Equation (7–38), we obtain

αv = 9kf

4a2b0 . (7.39)

The thermal expansion coefficient of a crystalline solid is directly propor-

tional to the skewness of the lattice potential energy function about its

minimum; to this order of approximation it is also independent of tempera-

ture.

The coefficients a and f in the expansion of U about its equilibrium value

U0 can be determined for an ionic solid from the exact expression for the

lattice potential energy – Equation (7–10). A Taylor series expansion of the

right side of Equation (7–10) in powers of (b − b0) yields, with the help of

Equation (7–13),

U = U0 + (b− b0) 2

{

− z2e2A

4πε0b30 + Be−b0/s

2s2

}

+ (b− b0) 3

{

z2e2A

4πε0b40 − Be−b0/s

6s3

}

. (7.40)

7.3 Diffusion Creep 553

A comparison of Equations (7–31), (7–32), and (7–40) enables us to identify

a and f as

a = − z2e2A

4πε0b30 + Be−b0/s

2s2 (7.41)

f = − z2e2A

4πε0b40 + Be−b0/s

6s3 . (7.42)

By substituting for Be−b0/s and s from Equations (7–14) and (7–15), and

by using (7–16) for β0 and (7–17) for U0, we find

a = 9b0 β0

(7.43)

f = z2e2A

24πε0b 4 0β

2 0

[

{

2β0 + 9V0

(

4πε0b0 z2e2A

)}2

− 6β2 0

]

.

(7.44)

Upon substituting these expressions for a and f into Equation (7–39), we

can write the equation for the thermal expansivity of an ionic crystalline

solid as

αv = z2e2kA

216πε0b0V 2 0

[

{

2β0 + 9V0

(

4πε0b0 z2e2A

)}2

− 6β2 0

]

.

(7.45)

For NaCl we have seen that z = 1, A = 1.7476, b0 = 2.82 × 10−10 m,

V0 = 4.486 × 10−29 m3, and β0 = 4.26 × 10−11 Pa−1. When these values

are used in Equation (7–45), we obtain αv = 2.26 × 10−5 K−1. This is an

estimate of the zero temperature value of thermal expansivity. The measured

value of the coefficient of thermal expansion of NaCl at 300 K is about 5

times larger; at 100 K the measured value of αv is only 3 times larger.

Problem 7.6 Calculate the thermal expansivity of CsCl from the data

contained in Problem 7–1.

The elastic behavior of a crystalline solid is limited to relatively low tem-

peratures T and pressures p. At higher values of T and p other microscopic

physical processes occur that allow the solid to creep. We now proceed to

discuss these other deformation mechanisms.

7.3 Diffusion Creep

At very low stress levels, creep deformation in rocks occurs predominantly

by diffusion. Diffusion creep results from the diffusion of atoms through

554 Rock rheology

the interiors of crystal grains when the grains are subjected to stress. As

a result of the diffusion, the grains deform leading to rock strain. We will

derive an expression for the dependence of strain rate on stress using a

simple model for a crystalline solid. Our result will show that diffusion creep

leads to a Newtonian fluid behavior. A viscosity for the solid also will be

derived. Diffusion can also occur along grain boundaries. In some cases this

process dominates over diffusion through the interiors of grains. When grain

boundary diffusion controls crystal deformation, the process is known as

Coble creep.

In the previous section we described how the mean kinetic energy associ-

ated with the thermal motions of atoms in a crystal lattice is 3 2kT per atom,

corresponding to 1 2kT for vibrations in each of the three orthogonal direc-

tions. Individual atoms have kinetic energies that are distributed about this

mean; some atoms have higher kinetic energies than the mean, and some

have lower energies. The number of atoms per unit volume dnφ with kinetic

energies between φ and φ+ dφ is given by

dnφ = 2πnφ1/2

(πkT )3/2 exp

(−φ kT

)

dφ, (7.46)

where n is the total number of atoms per unit volume. This is the Maxwell–

Boltzmann distribution of energy; it has a wide application to all forms of

matter.

Problem 7.7 Verify that the total number of atoms per unit volume in

the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution is n by integrating Equation (7–46)

over all energies between 0 and ∞.

Problem 7.8 The average kinetic energy φ̄ of an atom in a crystalline

solid is given by

φ̄ = 1

n

∫ ∞

0 φdnφ. (7.47)

Verify that the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution gives φ̄ = 3 2kT by carrying

out the integration.

Each atom in the crystalline solid is bound to its lattice site by the in-

teratomic forces discussed in the previous section. An atom is effectively in

a potential well; if its kinetic energy exceeds the potential energy barrier

φ0 confining it to its lattice position, it is able to escape the site and move

elsewhere in the lattice. In the context of the one-dimensional simple har-

monic oscillator model, an atom whose vibrational amplitude x0 matches

the lattice spacing b must certainly be considered to have escaped from its

7.3 Diffusion Creep 555

site in the lattice. The barrier potential energy φ0 can thus be equated with

the maximum potential energy 1 2 k̄b

2 of such an atom

φ0 = 1 2 k̄b

2. (7.48)

The spring constant of the interatomic forces is a measure of the barrier

potential energy. The Einstein period of an atom with sufficient energy to

escape its lattice site can be related to φ0 by solving Equation (7–48) for k̄

and substituting into (7–21). The result is

τ = 2πb

(

m

2φ0

)1/2

. (7.49)

The number of atoms per unit volume in a crystal that have kinetic ener-

gies greater than φ0, nφ0, can be found by integrating Equation (7–46) from

φ = φ0 to φ = ∞

nφ0 =

∫ ∞

φ0

dnφ = 2πn

(πkT )3/2

∫ ∞

φ0

φ1/2 exp

(−φ kT

)

dφ.

(7.50)

By introducing s = (φ/kT )1/2, we can rewrite this equation as

nφ0 = 4n

π1/2

∫ ∞

( φ0 kT

)1/2 s2e−s

2 ds, (7.51)

which can be integrated by parts to give

nφ0 = 2n

π1/2

{

(−se−s2)∞ (

φ0 kT

)1/2 +

∫ ∞

( φ0 kT

)1/2 dse−s

2

}

= n

{

2

(

φ0

πkT

)1/2

e−φ0/kT + erfc

(

φ0

kT

)1/2 }

.

(7.52)

The ratio nφ0/n is the fraction of the atoms in a crystalline solid that have

sufficient energy to jump the potential barrier between lattice sites. Because

most lattice sites are occupied, the potential barrier φ0 must greatly exceed

the average kinetic energy of the atoms 3 2kT . Thus, φ0/kT ≫ 1, and we can

simplify the expression for nφ0/n by using the asymptotic formula for the

complementary error function,

erfc

(

φ0

kT

)1/2

≈ (

kT

πφ0

)1/2

e−φ0/kT , (7.53)

which is valid when the argument of erfc is large compared with unity. It is

clear from Equation (7–53) that the second term in (7–52) is much smaller

556 Rock rheology

than the first and can be neglected when φ0/kT ≫ 1. The simplified formula

for nφ0 is therefore

nφ0 = 2n

(

φ0

πkT

)1/2

e−φ0/kT . (7.54)

The fraction of high energy atoms is a very sensitive function of temperature

through its exponential dependence on the inverse absolute temperature.

At any finite temperature, some atoms have enough energy to escape from

their lattice sites; therefore, some lattice positions will be empty. These open

lattice sites are known as vacancies. A vacancy is one form of a point defect

in a crystal. Other types of point defects are interstitial atoms that do not

fit into the regular lattice structure and impurity atoms. Vacancies play an

essential role in diffusion processes. Let us make the reasonable assumption

that the number of vacancies per unit volume nv in a crystal lattice is equal

to the number of atoms that have sufficient energy to overcome the potential

barrier. From Equation (7–54) we can therefore write

nv = nφ0 = 2n

(

φ0

πkT

)1/2

e−φ0/kT . (7.55)

If the lattice site adjacent to an atom is unoccupied, the atom can jump

into the site when its energy exceeds the potential energy barrier φ0. The site

originally occupied by the atom becomes a vacancy. In effect, the vacancy

has jumped into the adjacent lattice site. We are interested in the rate at

which vacancies migrate or diffuse through a lattice because we shall see that

the flow of vacancies from one region of a crystal to another can deform the

crystal and lead to creep. The frequency Γv,+x with which a given vacancy

jumps into the adjacent lattice site in the +x direction is the product of the

probability that the atom in that site has the requisite barrier energy, nφ0/n,

and the frequency with which the atom moves toward the vacancy, 1/6τ (in

an Einstein period τ the atom can move in any one of six directions):

Γv,+x = nφ0

6τn . (7.56)

By substituting Equation (7–55) for nφ0 and (7–49) for τ into (7–56), we

obtain

Γv,+x = φ0

6πb

(

2

πmkT

)1/2

e−φ0/kT . (7.57)

The presence of a vacancy actually reduces the potential energy barrier

against an adjacent atom jumping into the vacant site. However, this effect

has not been taken into account in this approximate analysis.

Let us assume that a small gradient of vacancy density exists in the crystal

7.3 Diffusion Creep 557

Figure 7.7 Diffusion of a minor species in a crystalline solid. Initially (a) all atoms of minor species A are to the left of the dashed line. Vacancies are denoted by unfilled spaces. After a time that is of the order of an Einstein period multiplied by nv/n, a significant fraction of the atoms will have randomly jumped into adjacent vacancies. This is illustrated in (b) with arrows denoting the directions in which atoms have jumped in order to create the vacancies. The further migration of atoms into vacant lattice sites is illustrated in (c) and (d ). Species A will eventually become randomly mixed.

in the x direction. The number of vacancies per unit volume is nv(x). The

number of vacancies on the plane of atoms at x per unit area is nv(x)b. The

number of vacancies on the adjacent plane of atoms at x + b per unit area

is nv(x+ b)b. The net rate of flow of vacancies from the plane of atoms at x

to the plane of atoms at x+ b is, per unit area,

Jv,x = Γv,+xnv(x)b− Γv,−xnv(x+ b)b. (7.58)

The derivation of Γv,+x leading to Equation (7–57) could just as easily have

been applied to the jump frequency of a vacancy into an adjacent lattice site

in the −x direction, Γv,−x. Thus Γv,+x = Γv,−x and Equation (7–58) can be

written

Jv,x = −b2Γv,+x {

nv(x+ b) − nv(x)

b

}

. (7.59)

If the spacing b between the planes of atoms is small compared with the

scale of variation of nv, it is a good approximation to write

nv(x+ b) − nv(x)

b = dnv dx

. (7.60)

558 Rock rheology

The expression for the vacancy flux can therefore be written

Jv,x = −b2Γv,+x dnv dx

. (7.61)

The flux of vacancies by diffusion is directly proportional to the gradient

of the vacancy number density. The minus sign in Equation (7–61) means

that vacancies diffuse from regions of high vacancy concentration toward

regions of low vacancy density (the vacancy density gradient points in the

direction of increasing vacancy concentration). The magnitude of the con-

stant of proportionality in Equation (7–61) is the diffusion coefficient Dv for

vacancies

Dv = b2Γv,+x. (7.62)

In terms of the diffusion coefficient, the vacancy flux can be written

Jv,x = −Dv dnv dx

, (7.63)

a form known as Fick’s first law of diffusion. By substituting Equation (7–

57) into (7–62), we find that the vacancy diffusion coefficient is given by

Dv = φ0b

(

2

πmkT

)1/2

e−φ0/kT . (7.64)

So far we have discussed only the diffusion of vacancies in a crystal lattice.

If a lattice predominantly made up of atoms of species B contains a small

nonuniform concentration of atoms of species A, the existence of vacancies

will allow the atoms of species A to migrate or diffuse through the lattice, a

process illustrated in Figure 7–7. Initially all atoms of minor species A are

to the left of the dashed line (Figure 7–7a). Vacancies are denoted by blank

spaces. After a time that is of the order of the product of the Einstein period

and the ratio nv/n, a significant fraction of the vacancies will have been

filled by atoms that have randomly jumped from adjacent lattice sites. This

is illustrated qualitatively in Figures 7–7b–d. Arrows denote the directions

in which atoms have jumped. As a result of the random migration of atoms,

species A becomes more evenly distributed in the region. In Figure 7–7d

there are as many atoms of species A to the right of the dashed line as

there are to the left. Therefore, an initially ordered distribution of minor

species A (all atoms of species A to the left of the dashed line) has become

disordered (atoms of species A randomly distributed throughout the region).

The entropy of the system has increased, and the process cannot be reversed.

Diffusion is an irreversible phenomenon.

7.3 Diffusion Creep 559

To quantitatively describe the diffusion of a nonuniformly distributed mi-

nor species A, we need to determine the frequency ΓA,+x with which a given

atom of species A jumps into a vacant lattice site in the +x direction. The

frequency is the product of three factors: the probability that the atom has

the requisite energy, nA,φ0/nA (nA is the number density of atoms of species

A and nA,φ0 is the number of atoms of species A per unit volume with energy

in excess of φ0), the probability that the adjacent lattice site is empty nv/n,

and the frequency with which the atom moves toward the adjacent lattice

site in the +x direction, 1/6τ ,

ΓA,+x =

(

nA,φ0

nA

)(

nv n

)(

1

)

. (7.65)

The fraction of atoms of any species with energy in excess of the barrier

energy φ0 depends only on temperature (see Equation (7–55)). Accordingly,

we can equate the number density ratios

nA,φ0

nA = nφ0

n (7.66)

and write ΓA,+x as

ΓA,+x = nv n

(

nφ0

6τn

)

. (7.67)

Upon comparing Equations (7–56) and (7–67), we see that the frequency

factors ΓA,+x and Γv,+x are related by

ΓA,+x = nv n

Γv,+x. (7.68)

The frequency with which a minor species atom jumps in the +x direction

is smaller, by the factor nv/n, than the frequency with which a vacancy

jumps. The reason for this is that a minor species atom jumps in the +x

direction only when there is a vacancy in the adjacent position, while a va-

cancy makes the jump with an atom in the adjacent position. The likelihood

that a vacancy is in the adjacent site is much smaller than the chance that

an atom occupies the position.

We now assume that a concentration gradient of minor species A exists in

a crystal in the x direction. The number of atoms of species A on the plane

of atoms at x per unit area is nA(x)b. The number of atoms of species A on

the adjacent plane of atoms at x + b per unit area is nA(x + b)b. The net

rate of flow of atoms of species A from the plane of atoms at x to the plane

of atoms at x+ b is, per unit area,

JA,x = ΓA,+xnA(x)b− ΓA,−xnA(x+ b)b

= −bΓA,+x{nA(x+ b) − nA(x)}, (7.69)

560 Rock rheology

where we have used the fact that ΓA,+x = ΓA,−x just as Γv,+x = Γv,−x. By

using Equation (7–68), we can rewrite the equation for the flux of minor

species atoms as

JA,x = −b 2nv n

Γv,+x

{

nA(x+ b) − nA(x)

b

}

. (7.70)

If the spacing b between planes of atoms is small compared with the scale

of variation of nA, it is a good approximation to write

nA(x+ b) − nA(x)

b = dnA

dx . (7.71)

Upon substituting Equation (7–71) into (7–70), we obtain

JA,x = −b 2nv n

Γv,+x dnA

dx . (7.72)

Minor species atoms diffuse down their concentration gradient in accor-

dance with Fick’s first law. The diffusion coefficient for the atoms D is given

by

D = b2nv n

Γv,+x = nv n Dv. (7.73)

In terms of D, the flux of minor species atoms is

JA,x = −DdnA

dx . (7.74)

By combining Equations (7–55), (7–64), and (7–73), we put the diffusion

coefficient for atoms in the form

D = φ0b

3π2kT

(

2φ0

m

)1/2

e−2φ0/kT . (7.75)

An alternative expression for D employs the gas constant R, the mean

atomic weight Ma, and the barrier energy per mole E0 = N0φ0,

D = E0b

3π2RT

(

2E0

Ma

)1/2

e−2E0/RT . (7.76)

In general, the diffusion coefficient is a function of both temperature T

and pressure p, a dependence often expressed in the form

D = D0 exp

(

− Ea + pVa RT

)

, (7.77)

where Ea is the activation energy per mole, Va is the activation volume per

mole, and D0 is the frequency factor. The term pVa takes account of the

effect of pressure in reducing the number of vacancies and increasing the

7.3 Diffusion Creep 561

T ab

le 7.

2 P ro

pe rt

ie s

o f S ev

er a l E le

m en

ts In

cl u d in

g D

iff u si

o n

C oe

ffi ci

en t P a ra

m et

er s

D 0

a n d

E a

fo r

th e

G iv

en

R a d io

a ct

iv e

Is o to

pe

A lu

m in

u m

C o p p er

M a g n es

iu m

S il ic

o n

A to

m ic

m a ss

2 6 .9

8 6 3 .5

5 2 4 .3

0 2 8 .0

9 D

en si

ty , k g

m −

3 2 7 0 0

8 9 6 0

1 7 4 0

2 3 3 0

M el

t te

m p er

a tu

re , K

9 3 3

1 3 5 6

9 2 2

1 6 8 3

S p ec

ifi c

h ea

t, J

k g −

1 K

− 1

9 0 0

3 8 5

1 0 1 7

7 0 3

Is o th

er m

a l co

m p re

ss ib

il it y,

P a −

1 1 .3

8 ×

1 0 −

1 1

0 .7

3 ×

1 0 −

1 1

3 .0 ×

1 0 −

1 1

1 .0 ×

1 0 −

1 1

V o lu

m e

co effi

ci en

t o f th

er m

a l ex

p a n si

o n , K

− 1

7 .5 ×

1 0 −

5 5 ×

1 0 −

5 7 .5 ×

1 0 −

5 0 .9 ×

1 0 −

5

D iff

u si

n g

ra d io

a ct

iv e

is o to

p e

A 1 2 7

C u

6 7

M g 2 8

S i3

1

F re

q u en

cy fa

ct o r, D

0 , m

2 s−

1 1 .7 ×

1 0 −

4 7 .8 ×

1 0 −

5 1 .5 ×

1 0 −

4 1 .8 ×

1 0 −

1

A ct

iv a ti o n

en er

g y, E

a , k J

m o le

− 1

1 4 2

2 1 1

1 3 6

4 6 0

562 Rock rheology

potential energy barrier between lattice sites. Note that Equation (7–77)

neglects the temperature dependence of the frequency factor. We can also

account for both the temperature and pressure dependences of the diffusion

coefficient by the equation

D = D0e −aTm/T , (7.78)

where Tm is the melt temperature of the crystalline solid. The ratio T/Tm is

referred to as the homologous temperature. The pressure dependence of the

diffusion coefficient is accounted for through the pressure dependence of the

melt temperature.

The parameters in Equation (7–77), Ea, Va, and D0, or the ones in (7–

78), a, Tm, and D0, are usually empirically determined. Diffusion coefficients

for many crystalline solids can be obtained by using radioactive isotopes as

tracers. The diffusion of the radioactive isotope through the crystal can be

monitored and the diffusion coefficient thereby determined. Diffusion coeffi-

cient parameters for several elements are given in Table 7–2.

Problem 7.9 Consider the one-dimensional diffusion of radioactive tracer

atoms initially absent from a crystalline solid but deposited uniformly at

time t = 0 on the surface x = 0 of the semi-infinite solid. The number of

radioactive atoms deposited at t = 0 is C per unit surface area. Show that

the concentration of radioactive atoms n (number per unit volume) in the

solid must satisfy the diffusion equation

∂n

∂t = D

∂2n

∂x2 . (7.79)

Equation (7–79) can be obtained by first deriving the equation of conserva-

tion of tracer atoms

∂n

∂t = −∂J

∂x , (7.80)

where we assume that tracer atoms diffuse in the x direction only. The actual

decay of the tracer atoms has been ignored in formulating the mass balance.

Solve Equation (7–79) subject to the initial and boundary conditions

n (x, t = 0) = 0 (7.81)

∫ ∞

0 n (x, t) dx = C. (7.82)

7.3 Diffusion Creep 563

Table 7.3 Model Data for Determining the Diffusion Coefficient from a

Radioactive Tracer Experiment

Counts per Second Section Thickness (10–6 m)

5020 104 3980 110 2505 101 1395 98 570 96

Figure 7.8 Diffusion of atoms in a cubic crystal of dimension h due to the application of a horizontal compressive stress and a vertical tensional stress. The shape of the crystal after the diffusion of a surface layer of atoms is illustrated by the dashed lines. The six faces of the cube are denoted by A, B, C, D, E, and F.

Show that n (x, t) is given by

n (x, t) = C

(πDt)1/2 exp

(−x2

4Dt

)

. (7.83)

We solved a similar heat diffusion problem in Section 4–21. Determine the

diffusion coefficient for the laboratory data summarized in Table 7–3. The

data were obtained by depositing a thin layer of tracer atoms on an AI

surface, annealing for 30 hours, and then sectioning.

We now consider how the diffusion of atoms in a crystal in the presence of

differential stress can result in creep. Diffusion creep is illustrated in Figure

7–8. A crystal is initially a cube of dimension h. The crystal is subjected

564 Rock rheology

to a compressional stress σ in the x direction and an equal tensional stress

−σ in the y direction. These stresses cause atoms to diffuse from the crystal

faces A and C to the crystal faces B and D. Alternatively we can consider

the equivalent process of vacancy diffusion in the opposite direction. When

a layer of atoms has been removed from faces A and C and added to faces

B and D, the strain in the x direction is εxx = 2b/h, and the strain in the

y direction is εyy = −2b/h. It should also be noted that atoms diffuse away

from faces A and C toward faces E and F (on which no stresses are applied,

σzz = 0) and diffuse away from faces E and F toward faces B and D. There

will be no net loss or gain of atoms on faces E and F so that εzz = 0.

Because of the application of a compressional stress on face A (and face C)

the number density of vacancies is decreased from nv to nvA. Similarly, the

application of a tensional stress on face B (and face D) increases the number

density of vacancies from nv to nvB . The number density of vacancies on

faces E and F remains nv because no stress is applied. The difference in

vacancy densities on the faces of the cube results in a flux of vacancies from

faces B and D to faces A and C and a corresponding flux of atoms from

faces A and C to faces B and D.

The fluxes of vacancies (per unit area and time) from faces A and C to

faces B and D are, from Equation (7–63),

Jv,AB = Jv,AD = Jv,CB = Jv,CD = Dv

√ 2

h (nvB −nvA).

(7.84)

In writing Equations (7–84), we have used nvD = nvB and nvC = nvA and

the fact that h/ √

2 is the mean distance between adjacent faces of the cube.

Similarly, the fluxes of vacancies from faces A and C to faces E and F and

from faces E and F to faces B and D are

Jv,AE = Jv,AF = Jv,CE = Jv,CF = Dv

√ 2

h (nv − nvA)

(7.85)

Jv,EB = Jv,ED = Jv,FB = Jv,FD = Dv

√ 2

h (nvB − nv).

(7.86)

The area over which each flux occurs is h2/ √

2, and the strain associated

with the transfer of each vacancy is −b3/h3. The rates of strain in the x and

7.3 Diffusion Creep 565

y directions are therefore given by

ε̇yy = − b3

h3

h2

√ 2 (Jv,AB + Jv,AD + Jv,CB + Jv,CD

+ Jv,EB + Jv,ED + Jv,FB + Jv,FD) (7.87)

ε̇xx = b3

h3

h2

√ 2 (Jv,AB + Jv,AD + Jv,CB + Jv,CD

+ Jv,AE + Jv,AF + Jv,CE + Jv,CF ). (7.88)

The fluxes can be eliminated from these strain rate expressions by substi-

tution of Equations (7–84) to (7–86). If in addition we use the fact that

n = 1/b3, we obtain

ε̇yy = −4Dv

nh2 (2nvB − nvA − nv) (7.89)

ε̇xx = −4Dv

nh2 (nv + nvB − 2nvA). (7.90)

We must now specify how the vacancy densities nvA and nvB that drive

diffusion depend on the applied stresses. The isotropic vacancy density in

the absence of an applied stress nv is given by Equation (7–55). By direct

analogy with the way pressure affects the diffusion constant (see Equation

(7–77)) the stresses at the crystal boundaries modify the vacancy density

according to

nvA = 2n

(

E0

πRT

)1/2

exp

{

− (E0 + σVa)

RT

}

(7.91)

nvB = 2n

(

E0

πRT

)1/2

exp

{

− (E0 − σVa)

RT

}

. (7.92)

If the applied stress is sufficiently small, then σVa/RT≪ 1, and we can write

nvA nv

= e−σVa/RT ≈ 1 − σVa RT

(7.93)

nvB nv

= eσVa/RT ≈ 1 + σVa RT

. (7.94)

By substituting Equations (7–73), (7–93), and (7–94) into Equations (7–89)

and (7–90), we obtain

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = 12VaD

RTh2 σ. (7.95)

566 Rock rheology

Diffusion creep, also referred to as Herring–Nabarro creep, results in a

linear relationship between strain rate and stress. A Newtonian fluid exhibits

a linear relationship between stress and velocity gradient; from Equation (6–

56) we have

τxx = 2µ ∂u

∂x . (7.96)

In our creep analysis we have σ = σxx = τxx and using Equation (2–83) we

write

∂u

∂x =

∂x

(

∂wx ∂t

)

= ∂

∂t

(

∂wx ∂x

)

= ∂εxx ∂t

= ε̇xx.

(7.97)

Substitution of Equation (7–97) into Equation (7–96) gives

σ = 2µε̇xx. (7.98)

From Equations (7–95) and (7–96) the viscosity of the crystalline solid is

given by

µ = RTh2

24VaD . (7.99)

By substituting for the diffusion coefficient from Equation (7–77), we can

rewrite the formula for the viscosity associated with diffusion creep as

µ = RTh2

24VaD0 exp

(

Ea + pVa RT

)

, (7.100)

or using Equation (7–78)

µ = RTh2

24VaD0 exp

(

aTm T

)

. (7.101)

The Newtonian viscosity of diffusion creep is strongly temperature and pres-

sure dependent. The temperature dependence of the preexponential factor

in Equations (7–100) and (7–101) is virtually insignificant when compared

with the highly sensitive dependence of the exponential of the inverse ab-

solute temperature. Because of the dominance of the exponential factor, µ

decreases markedly with an increase in temperature. The diffusion creep

viscosity increases with pressure, as can be seen directly in Equation (7–

100). Because Tm increases with pressure, the dependence of µ on p is also

inherent in Equation (7–101).

So far in our discussion of diffusion creep we have assumed that the atoms

diffuse through the interiors of mineral grains. However, diffusion occurs

along grain boundaries as well. If the diffusion coefficient for grain boundary

7.3 Diffusion Creep 567

diffusion of vacancies Dvb is much larger than the coefficient for diffusion of

vacancies through the interiors of grains, grain boundary diffusion may be

the dominant manner in which creep occurs. For the diffusion of vacancies

along grain boundaries the fluxes of vacancies from faces A and C to faces

B and D (see Figure 7–8) are, from Equation (7–63),

Jv,AB = Jv,AD = Jv,CB = Jv,CD = Dvb

h (nvB − nvA),

(7.102)

where h is the mean distance of diffusion along the boundary. The specifica-

tion of constant values of nvB , nvA, etc., on the grain boundaries is only an

approximation because diffusion occurs along these same boundaries. The

fluxes of vacancies from faces A and C to faces E and F and from faces E

and F to faces B and D are, according to Equation (7–63),

Jv,AE = Jv,AF = Jv,CE = Jv,CF = Dvb

h (nv − nvA)

(7.103)

Jv,EB = Jv,ED = Jv,FB = Jv,FD = Dvb

h (nvB − nv).

(7.104)

The area over which each flux occurs is hδ, where δ is the width of the

grain boundary. As before, the strain associated with the transfer of each

vacancy is −b3/h3. Therefore, we can write the net strain rates as we did

previously in Equations (7–87) and (7–88) in the form

ε̇yy = − b3

h3 hδ(Jv,AB + Jv,AD + Jv,CB + Jv,CD

+ Jv,EB + Jv,ED + Jv,FB + Jv,FD) (7.105)

ε̇xx = b3

h3 hδ(Jv,AB + Jv,AD + Jv,CB + Jv,CD

+ Jv,AE + Jv,AF + Jv,CE + Jv,CF ). (7.106)

Upon substitution of Equations (7–102) to (7–104) into (7–105) and (7–

106), we obtain expressions for the strain rates that are analogous to those

of Equations (7–89) and (7–90)

ε̇yy = −4δDvb

h3n (2nvB − nvA − nv) (7.107)

ε̇xx = 4δDvb

h3n (nv + nvB − 2nvA). (7.108)

568 Rock rheology

We can further simplify these equations, as we did previously, by substituting

the formulas for nvA/nv and nvB/nv from Equations (7–93) and (7–94). In

addition, we can introduce a diffusion coefficient for grain boundary diffusion

of atoms Db, by analogy with Equation (7–73), as

Db = nv n Dvb. (7.109)

The strain rates can then be written

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = 12VaδDb

RTh3 σ. (7.110)

Grain boundary creep, or Coble creep, also yields a linear relationship be-

tween rate of strain and stress. The associated viscosity, from Equation

(7–98), is

µ = RTh3

24VaδDb . (7.111)

The grain boundary diffusion coefficient is also of the form given in Equation

(7–77), that is,

Db = Db0 exp

(

− Ea + pVa RT

)

, (7.112)

so that the viscosity of grain boundary creep can be written

µ = RTh3

24VaδDb0 exp

(

Ea + pVa RT

)

. (7.113)

The dependence of viscosity on temperature and pressure when diffusion

takes place along grain boundaries is the same as when diffusion occurs

through the interiors of grains. The magnitude of the ratio δDb/hD deter-

mines whether grain boundary or intragranular diffusion dominates.

7.4 Dislocation Creep

In the previous section we saw how the migration of vacancies in crystalline

solids leads to creep deformation. In this section we explain how the mi-

gration of dislocations also results in subsolidus creep. Dislocations are im-

perfections in the crystalline lattice structure. Although dislocations can be

found in many complex forms, they can all be obtained by the superposition

of two basic types. These are the edge and screw dislocations.

An edge dislocation in a cubic lattice is illustrated in Figure 7–9. A plane

of atoms is present in part of the crystal. The end of the plane, indicated

by the solid circle in Figure 7–9, defines the line of atoms perpendicular to

the figure that is the edge dislocation. The dislocation deforms the crystal

7.4 Dislocation Creep 569

Figure 7.9 Side view of an edge dislocation in a cubic lattice. The edge dislocation is the line of atoms at the end of the additional plane of atoms in the upper part of the crystal. The edge dislocation, denoted by the solid circle, is perpendicular to the plane of the figure. Two Burgers circuits are also shown. The one in the lower part of the figure does not include the dislocation and is closed. The Burgers circuit in the upper part of the figure includes the edge dislocation. The ten steps in the two circuits are numbered, and the upper circuit does not close. The vector defining the lack of closure b* is the Burgers vector for this dislocation.

lattice and produces stresses in it as a result. The adjacent planes of atoms

are in compression above the dislocation and in tension below it.

Dislocations are defined in terms of the Burgers vector, which is a measure

of the relative atomic motion (slip) that occurs when a dislocation line passes

through a lattice. The surface that traces the motion of a dislocation line is

the glide surface, and such surfaces are usually planar. Specification of the

Burgers vector and the line direction fully defines a dislocation. The Burgers

vector is determined by a Burgers circuit. A Burgers circuit that does not

include a dislocation is illustrated in the lower part of Figure 7–9. The ten

steps on the circuit are numbered, and the circuit closes. A Burgers circuit

that includes the edge dislocation is shown in the upper part of Figure 7–9.

Again the ten steps on the circuit are numbered, but the circuit does not

close. The vector defining the lack of closure is the Burgers vector b∗. For

570 Rock rheology

Figure 7.10 A screw dislocation in a cubic lattice constitutes a deformation that is out of the plane of atoms illustrated. The two atoms denoted by solid circles are essentially part of a second plane. The Burgers circuit indicated by the numbered steps naturally moves into this second plane. Therefore in order to close the circuit the Burgers vector b* must be perpendicular to the plane of atoms shown.

the simple cubic lattice with a single edge dislocation |b∗| = b. The Burgers

vector of an edge dislocation lies in the plane of the Burgers circuit.

The screw dislocation is an out-of-the-plane deformation of the crystal,

as indicated in Figure 7–10. The appropriate Burgers circuit is also shown.

After the circuit that includes the screw dislocation is completed, a displace-

ment perpendicular to the plane of the circuit is required to close the circuit.

Thus the Burgers vector is perpendicular to the plane of the Burgers circuit.

If the Burgers circuit were continued, it would form a second circuit lying

mainly in the layer of atoms behind the one illustrated before ending on a

third layer. The further continuation of the Burgers circuit would consti-

tute a spiral motion from one layer to another. Because this spiral motion

resembles the threads on a screw, this out-of-the-plane crystal deformation

is called a screw dislocation if the dislocation line is parallel to the Burgers

vector. If the dislocation line is perpendicular to the Burgers vector, it is an

edge dislocation. Most dislocations have both edge and screw components.

The two principal ways in which dislocations can contribute to creep are

through dislocation climb and dislocation slip. We first consider dislocation

climb, as illustrated in Figure 7–11 for a pair of edge dislocations. The pro-

7.4 Dislocation Creep 571

cess of dislocation climb for an edge dislocation refers to either a lengthening

or a shortening of the extra plane of atoms defining the dislocation. The dis-

location line moves by the addition of atoms. This is not a mass-conserving

motion because it requires the diffusion of atoms from elsewhere in the lat-

tice. For a crystal under horizontal compression and vertical tension, the

edge dislocation defined by the additional vertical plane of atoms tends to

shorten and the edge dislocation defined by the extra horizontal plane of

atoms tends to lengthen. As a result, compressional strain occurs in the

horizontal direction, and extensional strain occurs in the vertical direction.

Figure 7–11 shows how the diffusion of the atoms b, c, and d from the extra

vertical plane to the extra horizontal plane results in the deformation. The

dislocation defined by the extra vertical plane of atoms climbs as a result

of the process. The diffusion of atoms between dislocations is caused by the

migration of vacancies as discussed in the previous section. Thus the analy-

sis developed for diffusion creep can also be applied to the lengthening and

shortening of crystals by dislocation climb.

Dislocation slip is illustrated in Figure 7–12 for an edge dislocation. The

process involves the transfer of an edge dislocation to an adjacent plane

of atoms as the result of a shear stress applied to the crystal. This motion

conserves mass so that diffusion of atoms through the lattice is not required.

Shear strain occurs as the dislocation sweeps across the lattice. Dislocation

slip is a thermally activated process driven by a shear stress acting on the

dislocation. Because diffusion through the lattice structure is not required,

dislocation slip is a more rapid process than dislocation climb.

There are many alternative quantitative formulations for dislocation creep.

All types of dislocation creep are thermally activated processes, at relatively

low stress levels, so the rheology is exponentially dependent on the inverse

absolute temperature and the pressure. Again the Maxwell–Boltzmann dis-

tribution gives the number of atoms that have sufficient energy to overcome

the interatomic bonds restricting the motion of a dislocation. Different for-

mulations yield different power-law relations between strain rate and stress;

however, all are non-Newtonian. As an example of one approach we assume

that dislocations act as sources and sinks of vacancies just as grain bound-

aries do in diffusion creep. Equation (7–95) can then be used to relate the

strain rate ε̇xx or ε̇yy to the stress σ if the grain size h is replaced by the

mean spacing between dislocations hd

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = 12VaD

RTh2 d

σ. (7.114)

The mean spacing between dislocations is related to the volume density of

572 Rock rheology

dislocations nd by

hd = n −1/3 d . (7.115)

The dislocation density, or alternatively hd, depends on stress and many

other factors. Under a wide range of conditions,

hd = b∗G

σ , (7.116)

where b∗ is the magnitude of the Burgers vector for the dislocations and

G is the shear modulus. Upon substituting Equation (7–116) into Equation

(7–114), we obtain

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = 12VaD

RTb∗2G2 σ3 (7.117)

as the relation between strain rate and stress for dislocation creep. Although

dislocation creep gives a non-Newtonian fluid behavior, an effective viscosity

µeff can still be defined (using Equation (7–98)) as the ratio of stress to twice

the strain rate

µeff = σ

2ε̇xx = RTb∗2G2

24VaD

1

σ2 . (7.118)

By substituting Equation (7–77) for the diffusion coefficient into (7–118),

we can rewrite µeff as

µeff = RTb∗2G2

24VaD0

1

σ2 exp

(

Ea + pVa RT

)

. (7.119)

The effective viscosity of dislocation creep is inversely proportional to the

square of the stress; it is also proportional to the exponential of the inverse

absolute temperature and the pressure. The stress dependence of µeff for

dislocation creep facilitates deformation in regions of high stress.

7.4 Dislocation Creep 573

Figure 7.11 The process of dislocation climb. Because of the diffusion of the atoms b, c, and d from the extra vertical plane of atoms to the additional horizontal plane of atoms, the crystal is shortened in the x direction and lengthened in the y direction. This is the result of the tensional stress in the y direction and the compressional stress in the x direction that drives the diffusion of atoms between the two dislocations.

574 Rock rheology

Figure 7.12 The process of dislocation slip for an edge dislocation involves the transfer of the dislocation to adjacent planes of atoms as the result of an applied shear stress.

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids with Temperature-

and Stress-Dependent Rheologies

We have seen in the previous sections that the viscosities of both diffusion

creep and dislocation creep are directly proportional to the exponential of

the inverse absolute temperature. Thus, the viscosity of the mantle has this

strong temperature dependence no matter which of these mechanisms con-

trols the subsolidus deformation of the mantle. In addition, if dislocation

creep is the dominant mechanism, and we conclude this is likely to be the

case in the next section, the effective viscosity of the mantle will be stress de-

pendent as well. It is important then to consider how the strong temperature

dependence and possible stress dependence of mantle viscosity influence con-

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 575

vection and shear flow in the mantle. To do this, let us first consider the ef-

fects of temperature-

and stress-dependent rheologies on some of the simple flows we discussed

in Chapter 6. We will begin with an example of the channel flow of a fluid

with stress-dependent viscosity. We will then devote the rest of the section

to the more important effects of strongly temperature-dependent viscosity.

The rheological law given in Equation (7–117) is a particular example of

non-Newtonian deformation known as power-law creep in which strain rate

is proportional to a power n of the stress. The manner in which such a non-

Newtonian rheology influences fluid motion can be readily illustrated by the

simple example of the flow of a power-law fluid in a channel. We consider a

channel of thickness h with stationary walls at y = ±h/2. The flow is driven

by a pressure difference p1 − p0 over the channel length L. The shear stress

τ in the fluid satisfies Equation (6–6)

dy =

−(p1 − p0)

L . (7.120)

For a power-law fluid, the shear stress and velocity gradient, or strain rate,

are related by

du

dy = C1τ

n, (7.121)

with n = 1, 3, 5, 7, . . . and C1 a positive constant. Because the shear du/dy

can be positive or negative in a flow, n cannot be an even integer. Upon

solving Equation (7–121) for τ and substituting into Equation (7–120), we

get

1

C 1/n 1

d

dy

{

(

du

dy

)1/n }

= −(p1 − p0)

L . (7.122)

A single integration with the symmetry condition du/dy = 0 at y = 0 yields

du

dy = −C1

{

p1 − p0

L

}n

yn. (7.123)

A second integration with the boundary condition u = 0 at y = ±h/2 gives

u = C1

(n+ 1)

{

p1 − p0

L

}n {

(

h

2

)n+1

− yn+1

}

.

(7.124)

576 Rock rheology

The mean velocity in the channel is

ū = 2

h

∫ h/2

0 u dy =

C1

(n+ 2)

{

p1 − p0

L

}n(h

2

)n+1

(7.125)

and the ratio of the velocity to the mean velocity is

u

ū =

(

n+ 2

n+ 1

)

{

1 − (

2y

h

)n+1 }

. (7.126)

Velocity profiles for n = 1 (Newtonian), 3, and 5 are given in Figure 7–13.

We see that for increasing values of n, the gradients of the velocity become

large near the walls where the shear stress is a maximum. A nearly rigid

core flow develops where the shear stress is low. The effective viscosity of

the power-law fluid is proportional to τ1−n. For large n, the viscosity is high

where τ is small and low where τ is large. Because τ is small in the center of

the channel, the fluid is highly viscous there. Near the walls where τ is high,

µeff is low, and the velocity gradients are large. The plug-flow appearance

of the velocity profiles for large n is a consequence of the stress dependence

of the effective viscosity.

Problem 7.10 Show that the effective viscosity µeff for the channel flow

of a power-law fluid is given by

µeff ≡ τ

du/dy =

(

p1 − p0

L

)

h2

4(n + 2)ū

(

2y

h

)1−n

(7.127)

or

µeff

µeff,wall =

(

2y

h

)1−n

, (7.128)

where µeff,wall is the value of µeff at y = ±h/2. Plot µeff/µeff,wall as a function

of y/h for n = 1, 3, and 5.

Because of its relevance to shear flow in the asthenosphere, we next con-

sider the influence of a viscosity with an exponential dependence on the

inverse absolute temperature on the Couette flow in Section 6–2. Recall

that Couette flow takes place in an infinitely long channel whose upper

boundary (y = 0) moves with velocity u1 relative to its stationary lower

boundary (y = h). There is no applied pressure gradient along the channel.

We assume that the upper wall is maintained at temperature T0 while the

lower wall is kept at temperature T1(T1 > T0). If account is taken of heating

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 577

Figure 7.13 Velocity profiles in a channel for power-law fluid rheologies with n =1 (Newtonian), 3, and 5.

by viscous dissipation in the shear flow, the temperature dependence of the

viscosity couples the temperature T (y) and velocity profiles in the channel.

Both quantities T (y) and u(y) must be determined simultaneously because

one depends on the other. The velocity depends on T through the depen-

dence of µ on T and T depends on u because frictional heating depends on

the shear in the velocity profile. For simplicity, we will first treat a situation

in which shear heating is negligible. This allows us to write the solution for

the temperature in the channel as the simple linear profile

T = T0 + (T1 − T0) y

h (7.129)

independent of u(y).

We assume that the viscosity has the form given in Equation (7–100) and

that the channel is thin enough so that the effect of pressure on velocity is

unimportant. We also consider the temperature dependence of the preexpo-

nential factor as negligible compared with the temperature dependence of

the exponential factor and write

µ = CeEa/RT , (7.130)

578 Rock rheology

where C is a constant. The shear stress τ , which is a constant in the absence

of a horizontal pressure gradient, is given by

τ = µ du

dy = CeEa/RT du

dy . (7.131)

Upon substituting for T from Equation (7–129), we obtain an equation for

du/dy by rearranging Equation (7–131)

du

dy = τ

C exp

{

−Ea/R T0 + (T1 − T0)

y h

}

. (7.132)

The solution for the velocity profile is found as the integral of Equation

(7–132).

The integration can be carried out analytically if we assume that the

temperature difference T1 − T0 is small compared with T0. The argument of

the exponential factor in Equation (7–132) can then be approximated as

−(Ea/RT0) {

1 + (T1−T0) T0

y h

} ≈ − Ea RT0

{

1 + (T1 − T0)

T0

y

h

}

,

(7.133)

so that Equation (7–132) becomes

du

dy = τ

C exp

{−Ea RT0

}

exp

{

Ea(T1 − T0)

RT 2 0

y

h

}

.

(7.134)

Upon integrating this equation with the boundary condition u = 0 on y = h,

we find

u = τhRT 2

0

CEa(T1 − T0) exp

{−2EaT0 + EaT1

RT 2 0

}

× [

exp

{

Ea(T1 − T0)

RT 2 0

(

y

h − 1

)}

− 1

]

. (7.135)

By further requiring that u = u1 at y = 0, we can rewrite the velocity profile

in the somewhat simpler form

u

u1 =

exp {

−Ea(T1−T0) RT 2

0

(

1 − y h

)

}

− 1

exp {

−Ea(T1−T0) RT 2

0

}

− 1 . (7.136)

The shear stress and the velocity of the upper boundary are related by

u1 = τhRT 2

0

CEa(T1 − T0) exp

(−Ea RT0

)

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 579

Figure 7.14 Velocity profiles for Couette flow in a channel with a linear temperature profile. The fluid’s viscosity is proportional to the exponential of the inverse absolute temperature. The dimensionless temperature differ- ence across the channel (T1 −T0)/T0 is 0.5. Ea/RT0 is the dimensionless activation energy parameter. The top wall (y= 0) is cold (T= T0), and the bottom wall (y= h) is hot (T= T1).

× [

1 − exp

{

Ea(T1 − T0)

RT 2 0

}

]

. (7.137)

Velocity profiles u/u1 versus y/h are shown in Figure 7–14 for (T1 − T0)/T0 = 0.5 and Ea/RT0 = 0, 10, 20, and 30. We will see that the larger

values of Ea/RT0 are representative of the upper mantle; T0 can be thought

of as the temperature at the base of the rigid lithosphere while T1 is the tem-

perature at the base of the asthenosphere. The reasonable values T0 = 800◦C

and T1 = 1300◦C give (T1 − T0)/T0 = 500/1073 ≈ 0.5. When the fluid vis-

cosity is independent of temperature (Ea/RT0 = 0), the velocity profile is

linear. As the viscosity becomes increasingly temperature dependent (larger

values of Ea/RT0), the shear in the velocity profile is confined to progres-

sively narrower regions near the lower boundary where the fluid is hottest

and the viscosity is the smallest. For the large values of Ea/RT0 typical of

the mantle, most of the fluid in the channel moves at the velocity of the

upper boundary while the reduction in velocity occurs in a relatively hot

low viscosity layer adjacent to the lower boundary. The upper part of the

channel behaves as a nearly rigid extension of the overlying lithosphere, that

580 Rock rheology

is, it is really part of the lithosphere, while the lower part of the channel is

a high shear, low viscosity asthenosphere.

The viscosity variation in the channel can be determined from Equation

(7–129) and (7–130). The constant C can be eliminated by referencing the

viscosity to its value at the upper boundary µ0. From Equation (7–130) µ0

is given by

µ0 = CeEa/RT0 (7.138)

and C is

C = µ0e −Ea/RT0 . (7.139)

The viscosity can thus be written

µ = µ0 exp

{

Ea RT0

(

T0

T − 1

)}

= µ0 exp

{

Ea RT0

([

1 +

(

T1 − T0

T0

)

y

h

]−1

− 1

)

}

.

(7.140)

The viscosity profiles µ/µ0 versus y/h are shown in Figure 7–15 for (T1 − T0)/T0 = 0.5 and Ea/RT0 = 0, 10, 20, and 30. The large reduction in

viscosity in the hot lower portion of the channel that occurs for the higher

values of Ea/RT0 is apparent.

Problem 7.11 Determine the shear stress in the channel. AssumeEa/RT0 =

20, (T1 − T0)/T0 = 0.5, u1 = 50 mm yr−1, h = 100 km, and µ0 = 1024 Pa s.

Problem 7.12 Consider an ice sheet of thickness h lying on bedrock with

slope α, as shown in Figure 7–16. The ice will creep slowly downhill under

the force of its own weight. Determine the velocity profile u(y) in the ice. The

viscosity of ice has the temperature dependence given in Equation (7–130).

Assume that the temperature profile in the ice is linear with the surface

temperature T0 (at y = 0) and the bedrock–ice interface temperature T1

(at y = h). Assume that there is no melting at the base of the ice sheet so

that the no-slip condition applies; that is, u = 0 at y = h, and utilize the

approximation given in Equation (7–133).

Frictional heating can have dramatic consequences on the shear flow of

a fluid with a strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. A simple channel

flow model suffices to demonstrate the effects. We again consider a situation

in which flow is driven by a shear stress τ applied at the upper moving

boundary (y = 0) of a channel whose lower surface (y = h) is fixed. With

no pressure gradient along the channel, τ is a constant, independent of y, as

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 581

Figure 7.15 Viscosity profiles for Couette flow with temperature-dependent viscosity.

before. In the present example we insulate the lower boundary of the channel

so that all the excess heat in the fluid is generated internally solely by viscous

dissipation. The heat generated by friction in the flow escapes through the

upper boundary of the channel whose temperature is maintained at T0.

Equation (6–409) governing the temperature in a frictionally heated shear

flow is valid even when viscosity is temperature dependent. The temperature

in the channel is thus the solution of

k d2T

dy2 + τ2

µ = 0, (7.141)

together with the boundary conditions

T = T0 on y = 0 (7.142)

dT

dy = 0 on y = h. (7.143)

With µ given by Equation (7–130), we can rewrite the temperature equation

582 Rock rheology

Figure 7.16 An ice sheet of thickness h on bedrock sloping at angle α. The ice will creep downhill under its own weight.

as

d2T

dy2 + τ2

kC e−Ea/RT = 0. (7.144)

Equations (7–142) to (7–144) define a nonlinear boundary value problem

for temperature because of the dependence of the frictional heating term

on exp(−Ea/RT ). We can solve for T (y) analytically if we only consider

situations wherein frictional heating produces small temperature increases.

Thus we set

T = T0 + T ′, (7.145)

where T ′ ≪ T0. The inverse of the temperature, which appears in the expo-

nent of the shear heating term, is approximately given by

T−1 = (T0 + T ′)−1 = T−1 0

(

1 + T ′

T0

)−1

≈ T−1 0

(

1 − T ′

T0

)

. (7.146)

Upon substituting Equations (7–145) and (7–146) into (7–144), we get

d2T ′

dy2 +

2

kC e−(Ea/RT0)e(EaT ′/RT 2

0 ) = 0. (7.147)

While the temperature rise due to frictional heating is small (T ′/T0 ≪ 1),

the associated decrease in viscosity, exp(−EaT ′/RT 2 0 ), may be quite large

because (Ea/RT0)(T ′/T0) can be large. Consider T ′/T0 = 0.5 and Ea/RT0

= 30, for example. The boundary conditions on the temperature rise T ′ are

T ′ = 0 on y = 0 (7.148)

dT ′

dy = 0 on y = h. (7.149)

The solution for T ′ can be facilitated by introducing the dimensionless

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 583

variables

θ = EaT

RT 2 0

ȳ = y

h . (7.150)

The equation for the dimensionless temperature rise θ and its associated

boundary conditions are

d2θ

dȳ2 + τ2h2Ea kCRT 2

0

e−(Ea/RT0)eθ = 0, (7.151)

θ = 0 on ȳ = 0 (7.152)

dȳ = 0 on ȳ = 1. (7.153)

The dimensionless coefficient of eθ in Equation (7–151) is known as the

Brinkman number Br

Br = τ2h2Eae

−(Ea/RT0)

kCRT 2 0

. (7.154)

In terms of the Brinkman number, the differential equation for the dimen-

sionless temperature increase is simply written as

d2θ

dȳ2 + Breθ = 0. (7.155)

The entire temperature distribution in the frictionally heated shear flow is

uniquely determined by the single dimensionless parameter Br.

The Brinkman number has a simple physical interpretation. The heat

generated per unit horizontal area of the channel at the temperature T0 is

τ2h

CeEa/RT0 .

The conductive heat flux produced by a temperature rise RT 2 0 /Ea across

the channel is

k(RT 2 0 /Ea)

h ,

where the temperature increase RT 2 0 /Ea is just what is required to reduce

the viscosity by the factor e. The Brinkman number, also sometimes known

as the Gruntfest number, is the ratio of these two heat flows. Qualitatively, Br

measures the ability of the fluid to conduct away the frictionally generated

heat.

To solve for θ, we make the substitution

φ = eθ. (7.156)

584 Rock rheology

By differentiating this expression, we find

dȳ = eθ

dȳ = φ

dȳ (7.157)

or dθ

dȳ =

1

φ

dȳ . (7.158)

Thus we can rewrite Equation (7–155) as

d

dȳ

(

1

φ

dȳ

)

= −Brφ. (7.159)

A rearrangement of this equation yields (

1

φ

dȳ

)

d

dȳ

(

1

φ

dȳ

)

= −Br dφ

dȳ , (7.160)

which can be integrated to give (

1

φ

dȳ

)2

= −2Brφ+ c1, (7.161)

where c1 is a constant of integration. Because dθ/dȳ is zero on ȳ = 1 from

Equation (7–153), so is dφ/dȳ, and the constant c1 must be

c1 = 2Brφ(1), (7.162)

where φ(1) is φ at ȳ = 1. The equation for φ is thus

1

φ

dȳ = {2Br(φ(1) − φ)}1/2. (7.163)

The argument of the square root is always positive; that is, φ(1) ≥ φ. This is

because θ(1) ≥ θ, a result that follows from the boundary conditions on θ and

Equation (7–155). The curvature of θ versus ȳ is always negative according

to Equation (7–155). Thus θ increases from 0 on ȳ = 0 to a maximum value

θ(1) on ȳ = 1 where dθ/dȳ = 0.

Equation (7–163) can be integrated by writing it in the form

dȳ = dφ

φ{2Br[φ(1) − φ]}1/2 . (7.164)

Integration of this equation yields

ȳ = 1

[2Brφ(1)]1/2

× ln

[

c2

{{2Br[φ(1) − φ]}1/2 − [2Brφ(1)]1/2

{2Br[φ(1) − φ]}1/2 + [2Brφ(1)]1/2

}]

(7.165)

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 585

with c2 a constant. From boundary condition (7–152) and Equation (7–156),

we must have φ = 1 on ȳ = 0. Thus the argument of the log in Equation

(7–165) must be 1 when φ = 1. This determines the constant c2 and leads

to the expression

ȳ = [2Brφ(1)]−1/2

× ln

[{{2Br[φ(1) − φ]}1/2 − [2Brφ(1)]1/2

{2Br[φ(1) − φ]}1/2 + [2Brφ(1)]1/2

}

× {{2Br[φ(1) − 1]}1/2 + [2Brφ(1)]1/2

{2Br[φ(1) − 1]}1/2 − [2Brφ(1)]1/2

}]

.

(7.166)

An equation for φ(1), the exponential of the maximum temperature rise in

the channel, can be found by setting ȳ = 1 in this equation. The result is

[2Brφ(1)]1/2

= ln

[{2Br[φ(1) − 1]}1/2 + [2Brφ(1)]1/2

[2Brφ(1)]1/2 − {2Br[φ(1) − 1]}1/2

]

(7.167)

This can be rearranged in the form

φ(1) = 1

1 − {

e √

2Brφ(1)−1

e √

2Brφ(1)+1

}2 (7.168)

or

[φ(1)]1/2 = cosh

(

Brφ(1)

2

)1/2

. (7.169)

Equation (7–169) is a transcendental equation for φ(1) as a function of

the Brinkman number. The maximum temperature increase in the channel

θ(1) is simply ln φ(1). The most straightforward way to calculate φ(1) is to

rewrite Equation (7–169) as

Br = 2 (

Brφ(1) 2

)

{

cosh (

Brφ(1) 2

)1/2 }2 . (7.170)

Br can be calculated directly from Equation (7–170) for any given value of

[Brφ(1)/2]1/2. Thus, one assumes a value of the latter parameter, calculates

Br, and then determines φ(1). The maximum temperature θ(1) calculated in

this way is shown in Figure 7–17 as a function of Br. For Br = 0, there is no

motion in the channel and θ(1) = 0. As Br increases from zero, by increasing

the shear stress applied to the upper wall of the channel, for example, θ(1)

586 Rock rheology

Figure 7.17 Maximum temperature θ(1) in a frictionally heated Couette flow with temperature-dependent viscosity and an adiabatic lower bound- ary as a function of the Brinkman number Br. There are two solutions, one on the subcritical branch and the other on the supercritical branch, for every value of Br between 0 and Brc = 0.88.

increases. In fact, by using Taylor series expansions of cosh and ln, one finds

from Equation (7–169) that θ(1) increases as

θ(1) ≈ 1 2Br (7.171)

for Br ≪ 1. As Br or the applied shear stress increases, the fluid adjacent

to the upper wall of the channel moves faster, resulting in a larger shear

and an increase in frictional heating. However, as the upper wall of the

channel is pulled increasingly fast, a point is reached where an increase in

the applied shear stress is no longer required. In fact, larger velocities and

higher temperatures can be achieved by reducing the applied stress or Br.

Thus, there are two distinct types of shear flow in the channel. For the class

of flows referred to as subcritical, θ(1) increases with increasing Br. For

supercritical flows, θ(1) increases with decreasing Br. The turning point in

Figure 7–17, where Br equals its maximum value Brc, separates the states on

the lower subcritical branch of the θ(1) versus Br curve from the solutions

along the upper supercritical branch.

Figure 7–17 shows that there are multiple solutions to the channel shear

flow with frictional heating and temperature-dependent viscosity. For any

7.5 Shear Flows of Fluids 587

value of Br between 0 and Brc = 0.88 two possible flows exist, one on the

subcritical branch and one on the supercritical branch. For the same value

of applied shear stress there are two flows, one having considerably higher

temperatures and velocities than the other. However, for a given velocity

of the upper wall, or a prescribed temperature at the lower wall, there is

a unique flow. Figure 7–17 also indicates that there are no steady channel

flows for too large an applied stress, that is, Br > Brc. Actually, a more exact

analysis shows that there is a second turning point at high temperature and

a third branch along which θ(1) again increases with Br. There is therefore

a channel flow for any value of Br, but the temperatures along the third or

hot branch are so large as to be physically unrealizable, that is, the material

in the channel would melt long before reaching the high temperatures of the

hot branch. Thus, application of too large a stress to the upper wall, that

is, a stress giving Br>Brc, leads to an instability phenomenon known as

thermal runaway. Shear heating produces such large temperatures when Br

exceeds Brc that melting occurs. There have been suggestions that thermal

runaway might occur under certain situations in the mantle, for example,

in the asthenosphere or in the slip zone at the top of a descending slab.

However, such possibilities must be regarded as speculative at the present

time.

The existence of subcritical and supercritical solutions to shear flow with

viscous dissipation and temperature-dependent viscosity can be understood

as follows. On the subcritical branch there is relatively little frictional heat-

ing and only small increases in temperature. Therefore, when the applied

shear stress is increased, a subcritical flow responds as the flow of a constant

viscosity fluid would – the shear du/dy and the amount of viscous dissipa-

tion both increase. Because of the increased heating, the temperature of the

fluid rises and its viscosity drops. This reduces the increase in shear stress

somewhat (τ = µdu/dy), but the decrease in viscosity is sufficiently small

so that the increase in the shear du/dy dominates. On the supercritical

branch large temperature increases occur due to frictional heating. Viscous

dissipation and temperature decrease with an increase in shear stress be-

cause the viscosity variation with temperature is the controlling factor and

µ must increase for τ to increase. This is only possible with a reduction in

temperature.

Problem 7.13 Compute the stress that gives a Brinkman number equal to

the value at the turning point of Figure 7–17. Assume Ea/RT0 = 20, h = 100

km, µ0 = 1024 Pa s, T0 = 1073 K, and k = 4 Wm−1 K−1. What is the

temperature of the lower boundary for this value of the stress?

588 Rock rheology

Figure 7.18 The strain rate and stress associated with postglacial rebound ε̇r and σr , superimposed on the strain rate and stress associated with man- tle convection ε̇m and σm for (a) a linear rheology and (b) a cubic rheology.

Problem 7.14 Calculate the heat flux through the upper boundary for

the channel flow with a moving isothermal upper wall and a stationary

insulated lower wall. Construct a plot of the heat flux as a function of the

Brinkman number. The heat flux through the upper wall is due entirely to

heat generated frictionally in the channel. This heat ultimately derives from

the work done in moving the upper boundary. Use this principle to derive a

formula for the velocity of the upper wall. Construct a plot of the velocity of

the upper boundary as a function of Br. Derive expressions for the heat flux

through the upper boundary, the velocity of the upper boundary, and the

temperature of the lower boundary at the turning point. Calculate numerical

values for these quantities for the parameters given in the previous problem.

7.6 Mantle Rheology

In Sections 7–3 and 7–4 we discussed two fundamental mechanisms for the

subsolidus deformation of rocks – diffusion creep and dislocation creep. We

do not know which of these mechanisms governs flow in the mantle; although,

as the following discussion illustrates, we can make some informed guesses.

If diffusion creep pertains, the mantle behaves as a Newtonian fluid. If dis-

location creep applies, the mantle is a power-law fluid with n approximately

equal to 3. While it is important to understand the rheology of the mantle,

it is not crucial that we be able to distinguish between a rheological law with

n = 1 and one with n = 3 to obtain a qualitatively correct picture of flow

in the mantle. To be sure, if the mantle viscosity were the stress-dependent

7.6 Mantle Rheology 589

effective viscosity of dislocation creep, mantle motions would be quantita-

tively different from those of a Newtonian fluid. However, the temperature

and pressure dependences of the viscosity, which are identical for diffusion

creep and dislocation creep, are much more important in controlling mantle

motions than is any possible stress dependence of mantle viscosity.

One source of information on the rheology of the mantle is the study of

postglacial rebound data. As discussed in Section 6–10, these data have been

interpreted in terms of a Newtonian fluid mantle with a viscosity of about

1021 Pa s. Although the mathematical analysis would be more complex, the

rebound data could alternatively be interpreted in terms of a non-Newtonian

fluid mantle with a power-law rheology. The inferred viscosity of the mantle

would then be the stress-dependent effective viscosity in Equation (7–119).

To properly interpret postglacial rebound data, it must be realized that

the mantle flow associated with the rebound phenomenon is superimposed

on the circulation associated with mantle convection. This superposition of

strain rates and stresses is illustrated in Figure 7–18 for both linear and

cubic rheologies. The mantle convection strain rate and stress are denoted

by ε̇m and σm, and the rebound strain rate and stress are ε̇r and σr. The

total strain rate and stress ε̇ and σ are

ε̇ = ε̇r + ε̇m (7.172)

σ = σr + σm. (7.173)

For the linear rheology

σ = µε̇, (7.174)

so that

σr + σm = µ(ε̇r + ε̇m). (7.175)

But the strain rate and stress of mantle convection are separately related by

σm = µε̇m. (7.176)

By subtracting Equation (7–176) from (7–175), we find that

σr = µε̇r (7.177)

or

µ = σr ε̇r . (7.178)

590 Rock rheology

In the case of a Newtonian mantle, the viscosity inferred from the ratio of

rebound stress to rebound strain rate is the actual mantle viscosity.

For the power-law rheology with n = 3, total strain rate and total stress

are related by

ε̇ = Cσ3 (7.179)

or

ε̇m + ε̇r = C(σm + σr) 3

= Cσ3 m

(

1 + σr σm

)3

. (7.180)

If σr is small compared with σm, we can approximate the right side of

Equation (7–180) as

ε̇m + ε̇r ≈ Cσ3 m

(

1 + 3 σr σm

)

= Cσ3 m + 3Cσ2

mσr.

(7.181)

The strain rate and stress of mantle convection also satisfy the rheological

law

ε̇m = Cσ3 m. (7.182)

Upon subtracting Equation (7–182) from (7–181), we obtain

ε̇r = (3Cσ2 m)σr. (7.183)

The effective viscosity for mantle convection is

µeff,m = σm ε̇m

= 1

Cσ2 m

. (7.184)

The effective viscosity corresponding to the rebound strain rate and stress

is

µeff,r = σr ε̇r

= 1

3Cσ2 m

= 1

3 µeff,m. (7.185)

In the non-Newtonian case, the strain rate and stress of postglacial rebound

define an effective viscosity that is one-third of the effective viscosity asso-

ciated with mantle convection.

7.6 Mantle Rheology 591

Figure 7.19 Observed dependence of strain rate on stress for olivine at a temperature of 1400◦C. (Ashby and Verrall, 1978).

A typical strain rate for mantle convection is obtained by dividing a ve-

locity of 50 mm yr−1 by a depth of 700 km; one gets ε̇m = 2.3 × 10−15

s−1. The product of this strain rate with the Newtonian viscosity of 10 21

Pa s inferred from postglacial rebound data gives a mantle convection stress

of 2.3 MPa. If the mantle is non-Newtonian and 1021 Pa s is the value of

µeff,r, the effective viscosity of mantle convection is 3 times larger, and the

mantle convection stress is 6.9 MPa. Considering the many uncertainties

involved in deducing the viscosity and stress level in the mantle, a factor of

3 uncertainty associated with the rheological law is not too serious. Studies

of postglacial rebound give important information on the rheology of the

mantle, but it is doubtful that they can discriminate between a linear and

a third-power rheology.

Another important source of information on mantle rheology is laboratory

studies of creep. Since olivine is the primary mineral in the mantle, stud-

ies of the high-temperature creep of olivine are particularly relevant. The

measured dependence of strain rate ε̇xx or −ε̇yy on stress in dry olivine at a

temperature of 1400◦C is given in Figure 7–19. The relation

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = C1σ 3e−Ea/RT (7.186)

with C1 = 4.2 × 105 MPa−3 s−1 and Ea = 523 kJ mol−1 is also shown.

The data are well represented by this cubic power-law rheology. (The ex-

perimental data in Figure 7–19 were fit by an equation that neglects the

weak temperature dependence of the preexponential constant. In addition,

592 Rock rheology

Table 7.4 Rheological Parameter Values of Geologic Materials

Material C1(MPa–n S–1) n Ea(kJ mol–1)

Ice 8.8×105 3 60.7 Halite 9.5×10−1 5.5 98.3 Dry quartzite 6.7×10−12 6.5 268 Wet quartzite 4.4×10−2 2.6 230 Limestone 4.0×103 2.1 210 Maryland diabase 5.2×102 3 356

Table 7.5 Parameter Values for Diffusion Creep and Dislocation Creep in

a Dry Upper Mantle (Karato and Wu, 1993)∗

Quantity Diffusion Creep Dislocation Creep

Preexponential factor A, s−1 8.7 × 1015 3.5 × 1022

Stress exponent n 1 3.5 Grain size exponent m 2.5 0 Activation energy Ea, kJ mol−1 300 540 Activation volume Va, m3 mol−1 6 × 10−6 2 × 10−5

∗ Other relevant parameter values are G=80 GPa, b=0.5 nm, and R= 8.3144 JK−1 mol−1.

the data do not account for the effect of pressure on creep.) The agree-

ment of the data with the theoretical relation for dislocation creep is taken

as evidence that dislocation creep is the dominant deformation mechanism

over the range of strain rates considered in the laboratory. It should be em-

phasized, however, that the smallest strain rate studied in the laboratory,

approximately 10−8 s−1, is some 7 orders of magnitude larger than man-

tle strain rates. Nevertheless, the theoretical basis for Equation (7–186) is

reasonably sound so that its extrapolation to mantle strain rates should be

justified.

Other geologic materials have been found to creep nonlinearly when de-

formed at high temperature in the laboratory. Table 7–4 lists the values of

the rheological parameters in the relation

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = C1σ ne−Ea/RT (7.187)

for ice, halite, and several crustal rocks including quartzite under wet and

dry conditions, limestone, and Maryland diabase.

Problem 7.15 Calculate the stresses required to deform olivine and the

crustal rocks listed in Table 7–4 at the constant rate ε̇xx = 10−15 s−1 for

7.6 Mantle Rheology 593

a series of temperatures between 700 and 1300◦C, and construct a plot of

σ vs. T . Compute the effective viscosities of these materials and plot µeff

vs T . Assume that Equation (7–184), with parameter values determined by

laboratory creep tests, is applicable at the very low strain rate of 10−15 s−1.

Experiments and theory indicate that a general form of the relationship

between strain ε̇ and deviatoric stress σ valid for both diffusion and dislo-

cation creep is given by

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = A

(

σ

G

)n( b

h

)m

exp

(

− Ea + pVa RT

)

,

(7.188)

where A is the preexponential factor, G is the shear modulus, h is the grain

size, and b is the lattice spacing. Presently preferred values for diffusion creep

are n = 1 and m= 2.5 and for dislocation creep n=3.5 and m= 0. This

relation is in quite good agreement with our derived theoretical relations,

Equation (7–95) for diffusion creep and Equation (7–117) for dislocation

creep, with the diffusion coefficient given by Equation (7–77).

The parameter values for diffusion creep and dislocation creep in a dry

upper mantle are given in Table 7–5. An important question is whether dif-

fusion creep or dislocation creep is the applicable deformation mechanism

in the upper mantle. The transition between diffusion creep and dislocation

creep occurs when, for a given stress, the strain rates given by the two mech-

anisms are equal. In general, for a given stress, the deformation mechanism

with the larger strain rate prevails. We can delineate the regimes of applica-

bility of rival deformation mechanism, by using a deformation map, which

gives stress as a function of temperature for several values of strain rate.

A deformation map for a dry upper mantle with p = 0, based on Equation

(7–188) and the parameter values in Table 7–5, is given in Figure 7–20. The

diffusion creep values are based on a grain size h = 3 mm; this is a typi-

cal value for mantle rocks found in diatremes and in ophiolites. Dislocation

creep is the applicable deformation mechanism for high stress levels and high

temperatures, while diffusion creep is dominant for low stress levels and low

temperatures. Uncertainties in flow law parameters lead to uncertainties of

about an order of magnitude in deformation maps. Typical values of ε̇ and T

for mantle convection are ε̇ = 10−15 s−1 and T = 1600 K; these values locate

the solid circle in Figure 7–20 and correspond to σ = 0.5 MPa. This point

clearly falls in the dislocation creep field of the upper mantle deformation

map.

The generalized strain rate–deviatoric stress relation, Equation (7–188),

594 Rock rheology

Figure 7.20 Deformation map for a dry upper mantle. The deviatoric stress σ is given as a function of temperature T for several strain rates ε̇. The dashed line separates the dislocation creep regime from the diffusion creep regime. The solid circle represents a typical condition for mantle convection.

can be used to generate a generalized viscosity relation valid for both diffu-

sion and dislocation creep:

µ = C

(

σ

G

)1−n

exp

{

Ea + pVa RT

}

, (7.189)

where

C = 1

2

(

G

A

)(

h

b

)m

(7.190)

and the coefficient C depends upon both the rigidity G and the grain size

h. For diffusion creep with n=1, grain size h= 3 mm, and parameter values

from Table 7–5 we have

µ = C1 exp

{

Ea + pVa RT

}

, (7.191)

with C1 = 4.05×1011 Pa s. For dislocation creep with n = 3.5 and parameter

values from Table 7–5 we have

µ = C2

(

G

σ

)2.5

exp

{

Ea + pVa RT

}

, (7.192)

7.6 Mantle Rheology 595

Figure 7.21 Dependence of the viscosity of a dry upper mantle on temper- ature is given for several stress levels. The solid line is for diffusion creep; the viscosity is not dependent on stress level. The dashed lines are for dislo- cation creep illustrating the dependence on the stress level. The solid circle represents a typical condition for mantle convection.

with C2 = 1.14 × 10−12 Pa s.

The viscosities from Equations (7–191) and (7–192) are given in Figure

7–21 as a function of temperature for shallow upper mantle conditions (p =

0). The result for diffusion creep (solid line) is independent of stress and

results for dislocation creep (dashed lines) are given for σ = 105 and 106

Pa. For σ = 106 Pa deformation is due to dislocation creep for the entire

range of temperatures considered. For σ = 105 Pa deformation is due to

dislocation creep for T > 1415 K and to diffusion creep for T < 1415 K.

For σ = 104 Pa deformation is due to diffusion creep for the entire range of

temperatures considered. Typical upper mantle viscosity and temperature

values are µ = 3× 1020 Pa s and T = 1600 K; this condition (filled circle in

Figure 7–21) lies in the dislocation creep field with σ = 105 Pa.

We have seen in Section 7–3 that the temperature and pressure depen-

dences of the diffusion coefficient and therefore the strain rate could be

596 Rock rheology

written in the form

e−aTm/T

instead of

e−[(Ea+pVa)/RT ].

By equating the exponents of these expressions, we obtain

aTm = Ea + pVa

R . (7.193)

Because p = ρgy, we can rewrite this as

aRTm = Ea + ρgVay. (7.194)

Upon differentiating with respect to depth, treating Ea and Va as constants,

we get

Va = aR

ρg

dTm dy

. (7.195)

We can substitute Equation (7–195) into (7–193) and solve for a to obtain

a = Ea

R (

Tm − y dTm dy

) . (7.196)

If we approximate the melting temperature by the linear profile

Tm = Tm0 + y dTm dy

, (7.197)

where Tm0 is the melting temperature at the surface, the parameter a is

approximately

a ≈ Ea RTm0

. (7.198)

For olivine, Ea is 523 kJ mol−1 and Tm0 is 2140 K; the parameter a is thus

29.4. A reasonable value for the increase of the olivine melt temperature

with depth in the upper mantle is 2 K km−1. With ρ = 3500 kg m−3 we

find that Va in the upper mantle is 1.2 × 10−5 m3 mol−1 from Equation

(7–195). This is in good agreement with the empirically determined value of

1.34 × 10−5 m3 mol−1 for olivine.

Problem 7.16 Calculate mantle viscosity as a function of depth assuming

µ ∝ exp{(Ea + pVa)/RT}. Use Ea = 523 kJ mol−1 and Va = 1.34 × 10−5

m3 mol−1. Normalize the viscosity to the value 1021 Pa s at a depth of 150

km. Assume that a single rheological law applies over the entire depth of

the mantle and that all rheological parameters and the mantle stress are

7.7 Rheological Effects on Mantle Convection 597

constant with depth. Assume also that there are no viscosity changes across

phase transitions. Use the models for T and p as functions of depth in the

mantle developed in Section 4–28. Are your calculated values of µ consistent

with the conclusion from postglacial rebound studies that viscosity does not

increase substantially across the mantle? If not, which of the assumptions

would you change in order to obtain a viscosity that is more nearly constant

with depth?

7.7 Rheological Effects on Mantle Convection

In Chapter 6 we studied thermal convection in a Newtonian fluid with con-

stant fluid properties. We developed a boundary-layer theory for convection

at high Rayleigh number and showed that the boundary layer that grew

adjacent to the upper cold boundary of the fluid was similar in structure to

the oceanic lithosphere. Also, velocities obtained from the boundary-layer

analysis were in reasonably good agreement with the velocities of the surface

plates.

In this chapter we have shown that the mantle is likely to be a non-

Newtonian fluid with an effective viscosity dependent on the exponential

of the inverse absolute temperature and the pressure. It is important to

consider how this rheology affects mantle convection. The studies of the

preceding sections have indicated that the power-law rheology with n ≈ 3

is likely to have a relatively minor influence, while the strong temperature

dependence is certain to have important effects. For example, the temper-

ature dependence of the rheology allows the lithosphere to develop rigidity

as a consequence of the cold temperatures in the surface thermal boundary

layer. However, the rigidity of the lithosphere has been incorporated into

our analysis of its thermal evolution in Section 4–16, and this same thermal

development has been applied to the fluid boundary layer in Section 6–19.

Thus, this effect of temperature-dependent rheology does not directly mod-

ify the age dependences of such measurable quantities as oceanic heat flow,

ocean floor topography, and the oceanic geoid.

One way in which the rigidity of the lithosphere has an important influence

on mantle convection is by inhibiting subduction. A cold fluid boundary layer

will separate from the upper boundary and sink more readily than an elastic

plate. Thus the aspect ratios of mantle convection cells are generally larger

than those of cells in a constant viscosity fluid. In Chapter 6 we found that

the aspect ratios of convection cells in constant viscosity fluids were near

unity. Table 7–6 lists approximate values of the aspect ratios of convection

cells associated with the major tectonic plates for convection restricted to

598 Rock rheology

Table 7.6 Approximate Aspect Ratios of Mantle Convection Cells

Upper Mantle Whole Mantle Plate Convection Convection

Pacific 14 3.3 North American 11 2.6 South American 11 2.6 Indian 8 2.1 Nazca 6 1.6

Figure 7.22 The closest approach of the geotherm to the solidus in the upper mantle leads to a weak viscosity minimum.

the upper mantle and for whole mantle convection. Because the gravitational

instability of the lithosphere is inhibited by its rigidity, the aspect ratios of

mantle convection cells are larger than unity.

If there are thermal boundary layers elsewhere in the mantle, for example,

at the mantle–core interface, the temperature dependence of µ would pro-

duce strong viscosity variations across such layers. Because a core–mantle

boundary layer would be hotter than the overlying mantle, the viscosity in

such a boundary layer would be significantly reduced. Plumes represent an-

other situation in which localized temperature contrasts could cause large

associated variations in mantle viscosity. The lowered viscosity in a hot

narrow mantle plume would facilitate the upwelling of plume material in

the surrounding more viscous mantle. Mantle plumes could originate by a

Rayleigh–Taylor or gravitational instability of hot, light, and relatively in-

viscid material in a mantle–core boundary layer.

It is possible that the mantle is divided into upper and lower convection

systems. Such a division could be caused by a change in mantle composition.

7.8 Mantle Convection and the Cooling of the Earth 599

A compositional boundary would act as a barrier to thermal convection so

that separate upper and lower mantle convection systems would be expected.

A thermal boundary layer would develop between the systems, and the lower

mantle would be expected to have a significantly higher temperature than

the upper mantle. Associated with the higher temperature would be a lower

viscosity. However, the postglacial rebound data, which suggest that the

mantle has a nearly uniform viscosity, argue against separate upper and

lower mantle convection systems.

The nearly uniform viscosity of the mantle can be understood in terms

of its strong temperature and pressure dependences. The increase of tem-

perature with depth in the mantle tends to decrease mantle viscosity with

depth. However, the increase of pressure with depth tends to increase man-

tle viscosity with depth. These competing effects cancel each other, thereby

producing a mantle with nearly constant viscosity.

The viscosity of the mantle can also be understood by considering the rela-

tion between the mantle geotherm and its solidus, as indicated by Equation

(7–101). Figure 7–22 is a sketch of the geotherm, the solidus, and the vis-

cosity profile. The rapid increase in temperature across the surface thermal

boundary layer brings the geotherm closer to the solidus as depth increases.

The large associated decrease of viscosity with depth corresponds to the de-

crease in viscosity between the highly viscous, essentially rigid lithosphere

and the underlying mantle. With a further increase in depth, T rises along an

adiabat that increases slightly less steeply with depth than does the solidus.

The ratio Tm/T therefore has a weak minimum in the upper mantle, and

according to Equation (7–101) so does the viscosity. The region of the weak

viscosity minimum may be associated with the asthenosphere, a zone that

may decouple the lithosphere from the underlying mantle by a large shear

in the mantle velocity. The velocity shear would be a direct consequence of

the reduction of viscosity in a region of constant shear stress.

7.8 Mantle Convection and the Cooling of the Earth

The amount of heat escaping through the Earth’s surface at the present

time is due to the heat now being generated by the decay of radioactive

isotopes in the Earth and to the cooling of the Earth. The decrease in the

temperature of the Earth’s interior with time is a consequence of the decay

of its radiogenic heat sources. For example, 3 billion years ago the rate of

heat production was about twice as great as it is today (see Section 4–

5). As the heat generation decreases, the temperature of the convecting

mantle also decreases. The strong temperature dependence of the mantle’s

600 Rock rheology

rheology causes its viscosity to increase, and it convects less vigorously to

transport the reduced amount of internally generated heat. In this section

we develop a simple model of mantle cooling by the convection of a fluid with

strongly temperature-dependent viscosity that allows us to estimate the rate

of decrease of mantle temperature with time and the relative contributions

of cooling and heat production to the present surface heat flow.

An upper limit to the rate at which the Earth’s temperature is decreasing

with time can be obtained by attributing the entire surface heat flow to

the cooling of the Earth. The heat lost through the Earth’s surface is the

product of its surface area 4πa2 where a is the Earth’s radius, with its mean

surface heat flux q̄. The thermal energy of the Earth is the product of its

mass 4 3πa

3ρ̄, where ρ̄ is the Earth’s mean density, with its mean specific heat

c̄ and its mean temperature T̄ . Upon equating the rate of heat flow through

the surface to the rate of decrease of the Earth’s thermal energy, we obtain

4πa2q̄ = −4

3 πa3ρ̄ c̄

dT̄

dt (7.199)

or

dT̄

dt = − 3q̄

aρ̄ c̄ . (7.200)

With q̄ = 87 mW m−2, ρ̄ = 5520 kg m−3, c̄ = 920 J kg−1 K−1, and a = 6371

km, we find from Equation (7–200) that dT̄ /dt = −254 K Gyr−1. The actual

rate of cooling of the Earth must be smaller than this because a significant

fraction of the surface heat loss comes from radioactive heat generation.

In order to determine the actual rate of mantle cooling, it is necessary to

relate the temperature of the convecting mantle T1 to its volumetric rate

of heat production ρH. The temperature of an internally heated convecting

layer has been discussed in Section 6–21. We apply the considerations of that

section to the mantle and combine Equations (6–324), (6–342), (6–343), and

(6–380) to obtain

2k(T1 − T0)

ρHb2 = 2.98

(

kκµ

αρ2gHb5

)1/4

, (7.201)

where T0 is the surface temperature and b is the depth of the mantle. This is

the equation connecting mantle temperature and heat production. However,

it is not as simple as it appears at first glance because the mantle viscosity

µ is a strong function of T1. From Equation (7–130) we can write

µ = µr exp

(

Ea RT1

)

, (7.202)

7.8 Mantle Convection and the Cooling of the Earth 601

where µr is a constant of proportionality. By substituting Equation (7–202)

into (7–201), we get

2k(T1 − T0)

ρHb2 = 2.98

(

kκµr αρ2gHb5

)1/4

exp

(

Ea 4RT1

)

.

(7.203)

The radioactive heat sources in the mantle decay exponentially with time

according to

H = H0e −λ(t−t0), (7.204)

where H0 is the present rate of heat production, t0 is the present value of the

time t, and λ is the average decay constant for the mixture of radioactive

isotopes in the mantle, see Equation (4–8). As H decreases, T1 must also

decrease to maintain the balance of heat production and convective heat

transport expressed by Equation (7–203). Upon substituting Equation (7–

204) into (7–203), we obtain

2k(T1 − T0)

ρH0b2 = 2.98

(

kκµr αρ2gH0b5

)1/4

× exp

(

Ea 4RT1

)

exp

(

− 3λ(t− t0)

4

)

.

(7.205)

This equation gives the dependence of the mantle temperature on time. It

can be simplified considerably by noting that the present mantle tempera-

ture T10 must satisfy the equation at t = t0

2k(T10 −T0)

ρH0b2 =2.98

(

kκµr αρ2gH0b5

)1/4

exp

(

Ea 4RT10

)

.

(7.206)

The division of Equation (7–205) by Equation (7–206) yields

T1 − T0

T10 − T0 = exp

{

Ea 4R

(

1

T1 − 1

T10

)}

× exp

{

− 3λ

4 (t− t0)

}

. (7.207)

We can find the mantle cooling rate by differentiating Equation (7–207)

with respect to time:

dT1

dt

(

1

T10 − T0

)

= exp

{

Ea 4R

(

1

T1 − 1

T10

)}

602 Rock rheology

× (

− Ea 4RT 2

1

)

dT1

dt exp

{

− 3λ

4 (t− t0)

}

+ exp

{

Ea 4R

(

1

T1 − 1

T10

)}(

− 3λ

4

)

× exp

{

− 3λ

4 (t− t0)

}

. (7.208)

We can rewrite this equation by using Equation (7–207) to substitute for

the exponential factors:

dT1

dt

(

1

T10 − T0

)

=

(

T1 − T0

T10 − T0

)( −Ea 4RT 2

1

)

dT1

dt

− 3λ

4

(

T1 − T0

T10 − T0

)

. (7.209)

A further rearrangement yields

dT1

dt

{

1 + Ea

4RT 2 1

(T1 − T0)

}

= −3λ

4 (T1 − T0).

(7.210)

The second term in the brackets on the left side of Equation (7–210) is much

larger than unity because the term is approximately Ea/4RT1(T0 ≪ T1), a

quantity we have estimated to be about 10. The approximate mantle cooling

rate is therefore

dT1

dt = −3λ

(

RT 2 1

Ea

)

. (7.211)

The present cooling rate is

dT1

dt (t = t0) = −3λ

(

RT 2 10

Ea

)

. (7.212)

The rate at which the mantle is cooling is independent of its thickness, its

present rate of heat generation, and the reference viscosity.

A numerical estimate of the mantle cooling rate based on Equation (7–212)

depends on only three reasonably well-known mantle parameters: −λ, T10,

and Ea/RT10. From the discussion of Section 7–6 we take Ea/RT10 = 30.

The considerations in Section 4–28 give a mean mantle temperature T10 =

2250 K, and from Section 4–5 we obtain λ = 2.77× 10−10 yr−1. The cooling

rate is found to be 62 K Gyr−1. From Equation (7–200), this cooling rate

contributes 21 mW m−2 to the mean surface heat flow of 87 mW m−2.

Thus the cooling of the Earth is responsible for about 25% of the Earth’s

heat loss, while 75% is attributable to radiogenic heating. There is little

room for uncertainty in this conclusion. The mantle cools at a relatively

7.8 Mantle Convection and the Cooling of the Earth 603

slow rate because its temperature is buffered by the strong temperature

dependence of its viscosity. As the rate of heat production in the mantle

decreases, less vigorous convection is required to transport the heat to the

Earth’s surface. As a result the required Rayleigh number is less. However,

the Rayleigh number is inversely proportional to the mantle viscosity, and

this viscosity is an exponential function of the inverse absolute temperature.

Therefore only a relatively small decrease in temperature suffices to produce

the required increase in viscosity, decrease in Rayleigh number, and decrease

in convective heat flux.

Problem 7.17 The way in which subsolidus convection with temperature-

dependent viscosity regulates the Earth’s thermal history can be quantita-

tively assessed using the following simple model. Assume that the Earth can

be characterized by the mean temperature T̄ and that Equation (7–200)

gives the rate of cooling. Let the model Earth begin its thermal evolution at

time t = 0 with a high temperature T̄ (0) and cool thereafter. Disregard the

heating due to the decay of radioactive isotopes and assume that the Earth

cools by vigorous subsolidus convection. Show that the mean surface heat

flow q̄ can be related to the mean temperature by

q̄ = 0.74k

(

ρgαv µκ

)1/3

(T̄ − T0) 4/3. (7.213)

Use Equations (6–316) and (6–337) and assume that the total temperature

drop driving convection is twice the difference between the mean tempera-

ture T̄ and the surface temperature T0.

Following Equation (7–100), assume that the viscosity is given by

µ = CT̄ exp

(

Ea RT̄

)

(7.214)

and write the cooling formula as

dT̄

dt =− 2.2κ

a

(

ρgαv Cκ

)1/3

T̄ exp

(

− Ea 3RT̄

)

. (7.215)

Equation (7–215) was obtained assuming (T̄ − T0) 4/3 ≈T̄ 4/3, a valid simpli-

fication since T0 ≪ T̄ . Integrate the cooling formula and show that

Ei

(

Ea 3RT̄

)

− Ei

(

Ea 3RT̄ (0)

)

= 2.2κ

a

(

ρgαv Cκ

)1/3

, t

(7.216)

where Ei is the exponential integral. Calculate and plot T̄ /T̄ (0) versus t

604 Rock rheology

Table 7.7 Values of the Exponential Integral Ei(x )=— f∞–x(e –t/t ) dt.

- x Ei(x ) xe–xEi(x )

0 −∞ 0.01 −4.01793 0.02 −3.31471 0.03 −2.89912 0.04 −2.60126 0.05 −2.36788 0.10 −1.62281 0.20 −0.82176 0.30 −0.30267 0.40 0.10477 0.50 0.45422 0.60 0.76988 0.70 1.06491 0.80 1.34740 0.90 1.62281 1.0 1.89512 1.2 2.44209 1.4 3.00721 1.6 3.60532 1.8 4.24987 2.0 4.95423 2.5 7.07377 3.0 9.93383 3.5 13.92533 4.0 19.63087 4.5 27.93370 5.0 40.18524 6 85.98976 7 1.22241 8 1.18185 9 1.15276

10 1.13147

for representative values of the parameters in Equation (7–216). Discuss the

role of the temperature dependence of the viscosity in the cooling history.

Note: The exponential integral Ei is distinct from the exponential inte-

gralE1 defined in Problem 4–35 and listed in Table 8–4. Ei(x) is −f∞−x(e−t/t) dt, where f indicates that the path of integration excludes the origin and does

not cross the negative real axis. In addition, x should be positive. Values

of Ei(x) are given in Table 7–7.

7.9 Crustal Rheology 605

Figure 7.23 Compaction and deformation of sand grains by pressure so- lution. (a) Initially undeformed grains with nearly point contacts. (b) De- formed grains with widened contacts due to minerals entering solution. The thick lines represent grain growth on free surfaces caused by mineral precipitation.

7.9 Crustal Rheology

Near-surface rocks exhibit not only brittle behavior resulting in joints and

faults, but also fluidlike deformation, as evidenced by the occurrence of folds

at all spatial scales. Folding can be attributed to either plastic deformation or

fluid behavior; there is observational evidence of both. Plastic deformation

is discussed in Section 7–11. In this section we are concerned with how

relatively cool crustal rocks can behave as a fluid.

The textures of many folded rocks indicate that the deformation that led

to the folding was the result of diffusive mass transfer. However, studies of

metamorphic reactions in the rocks show that the temperature at the time

of folding was only a small fraction of the solidus temperature. Therefore

the deformation could not have been the result of the thermally activated

diffusion of atoms discussed in the previous section. Instead, it is inferred

that the rate of diffusive mass transport was enhanced by the presence of

an intergranular fluid film through a process known as pressure solution in

which material is forced into solution in regions of high pressure or stress

and is precipitated in regions of low pressure or stress. Pressure solution

creep is similar to Coble creep in that they both involve mass transport

along intergranular boundaries.

An example of deformation due to pressure solution is the compaction

606 Rock rheology

of sediments. Consider the collection of quartz sand grains shown in Figure

7–23a. The pore spaces between the sand grains are assumed to be filled

with water. As long as the sand grains are more dense than water, the excess

mass of the grains must be supported on the contacts between the grains and

the pressure on the contacts exceeds the pressure in the water. The actual

pressure at the contacts depends on their area and the elastic response of

the grains. Because the pressure on the contacts is higher, quartz tends to

dissolve on the contacts and be deposited on the free surfaces of the grains

where the pressure is lower. In effect, silica diffuses through the intergranular

film of water from the contacts where it dissolves to the free surfaces where it

precipitates. This process of solution and precipitation leads to the structure

in Figure 7–23b, which is well documented in sandstones.

Pressure solution is believed to play an important role in the continuum

deformation of a wide variety of crustal rocks. Its occurrence has been ver-

ified in many folded crustal rocks. As long as water is present along grain

boundaries, it can act as a solvent for the minerals constituting the grains.

The dissolved minerals then diffuse along the grain boundaries from regions

of high stress where the solubility is high to regions of low stress where the

solubility is low. The diffusion of the dissolved minerals results in creep.

Pressure solution creep can be dealt with quantitatively in a manner anal-

ogous to the way in which grain boundary diffusion creep was treated in

Section 7–3. We again consider a cubic crystal with an initial dimension h

subjected to a compressive stress σ in the x direction and a tensional stress

−σ in the y direction, as shown in Figure 7–8. We assume that the crystal is

completely surrounded by a water film in which the minerals of the crystal

can dissolve. In the absence of an applied deviatoric stress there is an equi-

librium concentration of minerals or solute Cs0 in the water film; Cs0 (kg of

solute per kg of solution) depends on both pressure and temperature. Be-

cause the mass fraction of solute is a small quantity, the equilibrium number

density of solute ns0 can be calculated from

ns0 = ρeCs0 Ms

, (7.217)

where ρe is the density of the solvent (water) and Ms is the molecular mass

of the solute. In the presence of an applied deviatoric stress σ, the solute

concentration Cs is

Cs = Cs0 + C ′ s, (7.218)

7.9 Crustal Rheology 607

where the stress dependence of C ′ s is given by the empirical relation

C ′ s =

σ

σs(T ) . (7.219)

The function σs(T ) has the approximate value of 300 MPa for the solubility

of silica in water at 500◦C. Equation (7–219) shows that solubility increases

under compression, that is, minerals dissolve, and decreases under tension,

that is, minerals precipitate. The number density of solute ns under the

action of an applied stress is

ns = ns0 + n′s = ρe Ms

(Cs0 + C ′ s)

= ns0 + ρeσ

Msσs . (7.220)

The solute number densities at the faces of the crystal in Figure 7–8 are

therefore

nA = nC = ns0 + ρeσ

Msσs (7.221)

nB = nD = ns0 − ρeσ

Msσs (7.222)

nE = nF = ns0. (7.223)

The fluxes of solute molecules through the fluid film surrounding the crys-

tal from faces A and C to faces B and D are, by analogy with Equation

(7–102),

JAB = JAD = JCB = JCD

= Ds

h (nA − nB)

= Ds

h

{(

ns0 + ρeσ

Msσs

)

− (

ns0 − ρeσ

Msσs

)}

= Ds

h

2ρeσ

Msσs , (7.224)

where Ds is the diffusion coefficient for the solute in the solvent. Similarly,

the fluxes of solute molecules from faces A and C to faces E and F , and from

faces E and F to faces B and D, are, by analogy with Equations (7–103)

and (7–104),

JAE = JAF = JCE = JCF = Ds

h (nA − nE)

= Ds

h

{

ns0 + ρeσ

Msσs − ns0

}

608 Rock rheology

= Ds

h

ρeσ

Msσs (7.225)

JEB = JED = JFB = JFD = Ds

h (nE − nB)

= Ds

h

{

ns0 − (

ns0 − ρeσ

Msσs

)}

= Ds

h

ρeσ

Msσs . (7.226)

The area over which each flux occurs is hδ, where δ is the width of the

grain boundary. The strain associated with the transfer of each atom is

b3/h3 = 1/nsh 3, where ns is the number density of the solute. Therefore,

by analogy with Equations (7–105) and (7–106), we can write the net strain

rates as

ε̇yy = −hδ nsh3

(JAB + JAD + JCB + JCD + JEB

+ JED + JFB + JFD) (7.227)

ε̇xx = hδ

nsh3 (JAB + JAD + JCB + JCD + JAE

+ JAF + JCE + JCF ). (7.228)

By substituting Equations (7–224) to (7–226) into (7–227) and (7–228), we

obtain

ε̇xx = −ε̇yy = 12δρeDs

h3ρsσs σ, (7.229)

where ρs is the solute density Msns.

Strain rate is linearly proportional to applied stress in pressure solution

creep. Thus the deformation is equivalent to that of a Newtonian fluid with

a viscosity

µps = h3ρsσs

24δρeDs . (7.230)

For the pressure solution creep of quartz at 500◦C we take h = 2× 10−3 m,

Ds = 2.4× 10−8 m2 s−1, δ = 10−9 m, ρs = 2700 kg m−3, ρe = 1000 kg m−3,

and σs = 300 MPa. The calculated value of the viscosity is µps = 1.1× 1016

Pa s, a very low viscosity for crustal rocks at a temperature of 500◦C. It

should be emphasized that there are many uncertainties in the application

of Equation (7–230). The value of the diffusion coefficient we used was de-

termined in bulk experiments and its relevance to grain boundary films is

in question. The value we used for the width of the grain boundary is only

an estimate. Nevertheless, pressure solution creep is clearly an important

7.10 Viscoelasticity 609

deformation mechanism for crustal rocks and it can explain viscous folding

of rocks at quite low temperatures.

7.10 Viscoelasticity

Seismic shear waves propagate through the Earth’s mantle with relatively

little attenuation. Therefore we conclude that the mantle is an elastic solid.

However, we have shown conclusively that the crystalline solid behaves as a

viscous fluid on geological time scales as short as the 104 yr characteristic of

postglacial rebound. The mantle behaves as an elastic solid on time scales

of the order of 1 to 104 seconds but behaves as a viscous fluid on time scales

of 1011 to 1017 seconds.

A material that behaves elastically on short time scales and viscously on

long time scales is known as a viscoelastic material. The Maxwell model of

a viscoelastic material consists of a material in which the rate of strain ε̇ is

the superposition of a linear elastic strain rate ε̇e produced by the rate of

change of stress σ̇ and a linear viscous strain rate ε̇f produced by the stress

σ. Consider such a medium subjected to the uniaxial stress σ. The elastic

strain of the material as given by Equation (3–14) is

εe = σ

E , (7.231)

where, it will be recalled, E is Young’s modulus. The rate of strain of a

Newtonian viscous fluid subjected to a deviatoric normal stress σ is given

by Equation (6–60) as

dεf dt

= −∂u ∂x

= σ

2µ . (7.232)

The minus sign connecting ε̇f and ∂u/∂x arises from our sign convention

that treats compressive strains as positive. The total strain ε is the sum of

the elastic and fluid strains

ε = εe + εf . (7.233)

The total rate of strain is therefore the sum of ε̇f from Equation (7–232)

and the time derivative ε̇e of (7–231)

dt =

1

2µ σ +

1

E

dt . (7.234)

This is the fundamental rheological law relating strain rate, stress, and rate

of change of stress for a Maxwell viscoelastic material.

Let us consider what will happen if we suddenly apply a strain ε0 to this

610 Rock rheology

viscoelastic medium at t = 0 and maintain the strain constant for t > 0.

During the very rapid application of strain the time derivative terms in

Equation (7–234) dominate and the material behaves elastically. Therefore,

the initial stress σ0 at t = 0 is

σ0 = Eε0. (7.235)

Subsequently, there is no change in the strain, dε/dt = 0, and Equation

(7–234) reduces to

0 = 1

2µ σ +

1

E

dt (7.236)

or

σ = − E

2µ dt. (7.237)

This equation can be integrated with the initial condition σ = σ0 at t = 0

to give

σ = σ0 exp

(

− Et

)

. (7.238)

The stress relaxes to 1/e of its original value in a time

τve = 2µ

E . (7.239)

This is known as the viscoelastic relaxation time. The relaxation time for the

asthenosphere can be estimated by taking µ = 4×1019 Pa s and E = 70 GPa

with the result τve = 36 years. As expected, this time is intermediate be-

tween the periods of seismic waves and the times associated with postglacial

rebound.

An example of an instantaneous application of strain is the coseismic

displacement on a fault. This displacement occurs in a few seconds, and a

change in the regional state of stress occurs. If the temperature of the rock

is sufficiently high, this stress is relaxed by solid-state creep processes.

Problem 7.18 Determine the response of a Maxwell viscoelastic material

to the sudden application of a stress σ0 at time t = 0 assuming that the stress

is maintained constant for t > 0. What is the initial value of the strain ε0?

Describe what will happen if the stress is removed at time t = t1 > 0.

Problem 7.19 Another model of viscoelastic behavior is the Kelvin model,

in which the stress σ in the medium for a given strain ε and strain rate ε̇

7.10 Viscoelasticity 611

is the superposition of linear elastic and linear viscous stresses, σe and σf .

Show that the rheological law for the Kelvin viscoelastic material is

σ = εE + 2µ dε

dt . (7.240)

Show also that the response of the Kelvin viscoelastic material to the sudden

application of a stress σ0 at time t = 0 is

ε = σ0

E (1 − e−t/τve). (7.241)

Assume that σ = σ0 for t > 0. While stresses decay exponentially with time

in a Maxwell material subjected to constant strain, strain relaxes in the

same way in a Kelvin material subjected to constant stress.

Problem 7.20 Generalize the rheological law, Equation (7–234), for a

Maxwell viscoelastic material to a three-dimensional state of stress and

strain by appropriately combining the linear elastic equations (3–4) to (3–6)

with the linear viscous equations (6–60) and (6–61) and the obvious exten-

sion of the viscous equations to the third dimension. Use the idea that strain

components add and stress components are identical to show that

ε̇1 = σ̇1

E − ν

E (σ̇2 + σ̇3) +

1

2µ (σ1 − p) (7.242)

ε̇2 = σ̇2

E − ν

E (σ̇1 + σ̇3) +

1

2µ (σ2 − p) (7.243)

ε̇3 = σ̇3

E − ν

E (σ̇1 + σ̇2) +

1

2µ (σ3 − p) (7.244)

where

p = 1 3(σ1 + σ2 + σ3). (7.245)

Determine the stresses and strains in a Maxwell viscoelastic medium in a

state of uniaxial strain ε2 6= 0, ε1 = ε3 ≡ 0. Assume that a stress σ2 = σ0

is suddenly applied at t = 0 and that σ2 = σ0 for t > 0. Assume also that

there is no preferred horizontal direction, that is, take σ1 = σ3. Prove that

σ1 = σ3 = σ0

{

1 + (2ν − 1)

(1 − ν) exp

( −Et 6µ(1 − ν)

)}

(7.246)

ε2 = σ0

E (1 − 2ν)

{

3 + 2(2ν − 1)

(1 − ν) exp

( −Et 6µ(1 − ν)

)}

.

(7.247)

Discuss the behavior of the Maxwell material in the limits t→ 0 and t→ ∞.

612 Rock rheology

A simple viscoelastic model can be used to determine if the elastic stresses

in the lithosphere are relaxed by subsolidus creep. We assume that relax-

ation of lithospheric stresses occurs by dislocation creep, and, accordingly,

we modify the rheological law for the Maxwell solid by using the stress-

dependent effective viscosity µeff for dislocation creep. From the rate of

strain-stress relation for dislocation creep, Equation (7–186), we can write

the effective viscosity as

µeff = 1

2C1σ2 eEa/RT . (7.248)

Upon substituting Equation (7–248) into (7–234), we obtain the viscoelastic

relation dε

dt = C1σ

3e−Ea/RT + 1

E

dt . (7.249)

We again consider the case in which a constant strain is applied instan-

taneously at t = 0 with the resultant initial stress σ0. Since the strain is

constant, Equation (7–249) reduces to

0 = C1σ 3e−Ea/RT +

1

E

dt (7.250)

or dσ

σ3 = −EC1e

−Ea/RT dt, (7.251)

which can readily be integrated to yield

σ =

{

1

σ2 0

+ 2EC1te −Ea/RT

}−1/2

. (7.252)

The time τr for the stress σ0 to relax to one-half of its original value is

τr = 3

2EC1σ2 0

eEa/RT . (7.253)

If we base µeff on the initial stress σ0,

µeff,0 ≡ 1

2C1σ2 0

eEa/RT , (7.254)

then the stress relaxation time can be written

τr = 3µeff,0

E , (7.255)

which is closely analogous to Equation (7–239) for the viscoelastic relaxation

time of a Maxwell material.

According to Equation (7–253), the stress relaxation time is a strong func-

tion of temperature, the rheological parameters, and the initial stress. Figure

7.10 Viscoelasticity 613

Figure 7.24 The temperature at which an initial stress relaxes to one-half of its original value as a function of time for several values of the initial stress. The solid curves are for a dry olivine rheology, and the dashed ones are for a wet olivine.

7–24 illustrates these dependences for two sets of rheological parameters: dry

olivine for which C1 = 4.2 × 10 5 MPa−3 s−1, Ea = 523 kJ mol−1, and wet

olivine for which C1 = 5.5×104 MPa−3 s−1, Ea = 398 kJ mol−1. In addition

we assumed E = 7× 104 MPa. For relevant geological times (say 107 years)

and stress levels (say 100 MPa), significant stress relaxation does not oc-

cur at temperatures less than about 675◦C for dry olivine or 475◦C for wet

olivine. Thus, if the dry olivine rheology controls creep, the base of the elas-

tic lithosphere is defined by the 675◦C isotherm; if the wet olivine rheology

pertains, the appropriate isotherm is 475◦C. The thickness or base of the

elastic oceanic lithosphere yEL can therefore be determined as a function of

its age t by using Equation (4–125) for the thermal structure. By choosing

T0 = 0◦C, and T1 = 1300◦C, we obtain

yEL = 2(κt)1/2 erf−1 (

675 1300

)

= 1.0(κt)1/2 (7.256)

for dry olivine and

yEL = 2(κt)1/2 erf−1 (

475 1300

)

= 0.68(κt)1/2 (7.257)

for wet olivine. At depths in the thermal lithosphere greater than yEL, elastic

stresses are relieved by solid-state creep processes on geologically significant

614 Rock rheology

Figure 7.25 Thicknesses of the oceanic lithosphere from flexure studies at ocean trenches, islands, and ridges as a function of age of the oceanic litho- sphere at the time of loading (Calmant et al., 1990). The squares are data for the Atlantic Ocean, diamonds for the Indian Ocean, and triangles for the Pacific Ocean. The solid line curve defines the base of the elastic litho- sphere for the dry olivine rheology, and the dashed curve gives the base for the wet olivine rheology.

time scales. However, the rock still has sufficient rigidity so that the strain

is small compared to unity and the lower thermal lithosphere is able to

maintain its integrity.

The predicted thicknesses of the oceanic elastic lithosphere for the two

rheologies are compared with observations in Figure 7–25. The data were

obtained from studies of lithospheric flexure at ocean trenches and under

the loads of islands, and from correlations of ocean ridge topography with

gravity. Although there is considerable scatter, the observed thickness of

the oceanic elastic lithosphere does appear to increase with its age. The

predicted elastic lithosphere thicknesses are larger than the observed thick-

nesses, especially for the very old lithosphere. The model thickness for a wet

olivine rheology fits the data much better than does that for a dry olivine

rheology. Elastic stresses in the lithosphere are apparently relaxed at even

lower temperatures than predicted by our particular wet olivine rheological

formula.

7.11 Elastic–Perfectly Plastic Behavior 615

Figure 7.26 Deformation of a solid exhibiting an elastic–plastic transfor- mation.

7.11 Elastic–Perfectly Plastic Behavior

At low confining pressures rock behaves as a brittle material; that is, it

fractures when a large stress is applied. However, when the confining pres-

sure approaches a rock’s brittle strength, a transition from brittle or elastic

behavior to plastic behavior occurs, as shown in Figure 7–26. The elastic–

plastic transformation takes place when the stress exceeds a critical value

known as the yield stress σ0. In the plastic regime the material yields and

deforms irreversibly; upon loading, the stress–strain history follows path

AB in Figure 7–27; upon unloading, path BC is followed. The unloading

history follows a path essentially parallel to the initial elastic stress–strain

line and results in an unrecoverable amount of strain associated with the

plastic yielding. In general, the deformation of a material exhibiting an

elastic–plastic transition depends on its entire loading history. Temperature

also has a strong influence on elastic–plastic deformation. In particular, the

yield stress usually decreases with increasing temperature. Most studies of

elastic–plastic behavior generally assume that the stress–strain curves are

independent of the rate of application of the load. Thus, the stress–strain

relation is taken to be time independent.

An idealized representation of the behavior just described is the elastic–

perfectly plastic rheology, in which the material behaves elastically at stresses

less than the yield stress σ0 and deforms without limit at the yield stress,

as shown in Figure 7–28. On loading, the material follows the stress–strain

path ABC. Along AB the linear elastic relation σ = Eε applies. On BC σ =

σ0, and ε can be arbitrarily large. Upon unloading, the material behaves

616 Rock rheology

Figure 7.27 Stress–strain history for loading and unloading of an elastic– plastic material.

Figure 7.28 The stress–strain relation for an elastic–perfectly plastic ma- terial.

elastically in a manner unaffected by the plastic flow; that is, it follows path

CD, which is parallel to AB. When the applied stress is reduced to zero,

the elastic strain ε = σ0/E is recovered, but the plastic strain AD remains.

The elastic–perfectly plastic rheology is compared in Figure 7–29 with

laboratory studies of the deformation of dunite at a confining pressure of

500 MPa and a temperature of 800◦C. Dunite is a representative mantle rock,

and its rheological behavior is in good agreement with the elastic–perfectly

7.11 Elastic–Perfectly Plastic Behavior 617

Figure 7.29 The elastic–perfectly plastic rheology is compared with the ex- perimentally observed stress–strain behavior of dunite at a confining pres- sure of 500 MPa and a temperature of 800◦C.

plastic model. A typical confining pressure required for the brittle–plastic

transformation in rock is 500 MPa. This corresponds to a depth of 17 km

in rock of average density 3000 kg m−3. At depths greater than this, plastic

yielding is expected at large deviatoric stress levels.

In the case of uniaxial loading the yield condition for plastic deformation is

σ = σ0. In the case of three-dimensional stress, however, the yield condition

is more complicated. There are two criteria that are in general use. The

Tresca or maximum shear stress criterion states that a solid yields when the

maximum shear stress reaches a critical value σ∗. We noted in Section 2–4

that the maximum shear stress in a three-dimensional state of stress is one-

half the difference between the minimum and maximum principal stresses, 1 2 (σ1 − σ3). Thus the Tresca yield condition is

σ∗ = 1 2 (σ1 − σ3). (7.258)

Because this must reduce to the yield condition for uniaxial stress when

σ2 = σ3 = 0, for example, we can write

σ∗ = 1 2σ1 = 1

2σ0. (7.259)

The final form of the Tresca condition is therefore

σ0 = σ1 − σ3. (7.260)

The von Mises criterion asserts that plastic yielding occurs when

σ∗2 = (σ1 −σ2) 2 + (σ1 −σ3)

2 + (σ2 −σ3) 2. (7.261)

The right side of Equation (7–261) is a stress invariant; that is, its value is

618 Rock rheology

unchanged by the replacement of σ1, σ2, and σ3 with the values σxx, σyy, and

σzz appropriate to any coordinate system. This criterion must also reduce

to the condition σ0 = σ1 when σ2 = σ3 = 0 so that

σ∗2 = 2σ2 1 = 2σ2

0 . (7.262)

Thus the von Mises criterion is

2σ2 0 = (σ1 −σ2)

2 + (σ1 −σ3) 2 + (σ2 −σ3)

2. (7.263)

Problem 7.21 Determine the shear stress at which an elastic–perfectly

plastic material yields in pure shear using (a) the Tresca criterion and (b)

the von Mises criterion.

Problem 7.22 Consider an elastic–perfectly plastic material loaded in

plain strain (see Section 3–6) with ε3 = 0 and σ2 = 0. Use the von Mises

criterion to determine the value of σ1 at which yielding occurs, and determine

the associated value of ε1.

Problem 7.23 Consider the state of stress σxx = σyy = σzz = σ and

σxy = σyx = τ, σxz = σzx = σyz = σzy = 0. Determine the yield conditions

on the basis of the Tresca and von Mises criteria. How does hydrostatic

loading affect plastic yielding?

We now apply the elastic–perfectly plastic rheology to the bending of a

plate. The purely elastic bending of a plate has been discussed in Chapter

3. The stress distribution in an elastic plate is given by Equations (3–64)

and (3–70)

σxx = − Ey

1 − ν2

d2w

dx2 . (7.264)

The stress increases linearly with distance y from the center of the plate.

The plate bends elastically until the stresses at the surface of the plate,

y = ±h/2, become sufficiently large for plastic yielding to occur. We denote

the value of σxx at which yielding first takes place by σxx,0. The value of

σxx,0 can be determined in terms of the yield stress σ0 from the Tresca or

von Mises criteria. The principal stresses in the plate are σxx, σyy, and σzz.

We recall that σyy = 0 and εzz = 0 in the two-dimensional bending of a

plate. These conditions give σzz = vσxx. Thus the three principal stresses in

the plate, arranged in the order σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ σ3, are

7.11 Elastic–Perfectly Plastic Behavior 619

σ1 = σxx σ2 = σzz = νσxx σ3 = σyy = 0.

(7.265)

By substituting Equation (7–265) into the Tresca criterion (7–260), we get

σxx,0 = σ0. (7.266)

For the von Mises criterion we find

σxx,0 = σ0

(1 − ν + ν2)1/2 . (7.267)

For ν = 0.25, the von Mises criterion gives a value of σxx,0 that is only 8%

larger than the value obtained from the Tresca criterion.

The plate curvature corresponding to the onset of plasticity is given by

Equation (7–264)

d2w

dx2 = −2σxx,0(1 − ν2)

Eh . (7.268)

The corresponding value of the bending moment which follows from Equa-

tion (3–71) is

M0 = σxx,0h

2

6 . (7.269)

If the bending moment in the plate exceeds M0, the elastic solution is no

longer valid because plastic deformation occurs.

Let us consider the state of stress in the plate when M > M0. We assume

as we did for purely elastic bending that transverse sections of the plate

remain plane. Therefore the strain is still a linear function of the distance y

from the center of the plate, and Equation (3–70), which is a purely geomet-

rical result, remains valid. The interior part of the plate where strains are

small remains elastic, but the outer parts deform plastically. In the elastic

part of the plate, |y| < y0, the fiber stress is proportional to the longitudinal

strain and the strain is proportional to y, so that stress is also proportional

to y. In the plastic part of the plate, |y| > y0, the stress has the constant

value σxx,0. The stress distribution σxx is thus

σxx = σxx,0 y0 ≤ y ≤ h

2

620 Rock rheology

= σxx,0

(

y

y0

)

− y0 ≤ y ≤ y0 (7.270)

= −σxx,0 − h

2 ≤ y ≤ −y0

The bending moment for the partially plastic plate is obtained by substitut-

ing Equation (7–270) into Equation (3–61) and integrating with the result

M = 2

{

∫ y0

0 σxx,0

(

y

y0

)

y dy +

∫ h/2

y0 σxx,0y dy

}

= σxx,0h

2

4

(

1 − 4y2 0

3h2

)

. (7.271)

When y0 = 0, the plate is entirely plastic. The maximum or critical bending

moment Mc corresponding to this case is

Mc = σxx,0h

2

4 . (7.272)

This is the maximum bending moment that the plate can transmit. The

bending moment at the onset of plasticity M0 corresponding to y0 = h/2 is

related to the maximum bending moment by

M0 = 2 3Mc. (7.273)

The bending moment in the plate can be increased 50% beyond the elastic

limit before the maximum bending moment is reached. Stress distributions

for various bending moments are given in Figure 7–30.

The curvature of the plate is related to the half-width of the elastic core

y0 and the yield stress σxx,0 by Equation (7–264), which gives

d2w

dx2 = −σxx,0(1 − ν2)

Ey0 . (7.274)

Upon eliminating y0 from Equations (7–271) and (7–274), we get

d2w

dx2 = − σxx,0(1 − ν2)

E (

3 4h

2 − 3M σxx,0

)1/2 , (7.275)

a result that relates the curvature of the plate to the bending moment. This

is the elastic–perfectly plastic equivalent of Equation (3–71). At the onset

of plasticity (

d2w

dx2

)

0 = −2σxx,0(1 − ν2)

Eh = −σxx,0h

2

6D , (7.276)

7.11 Elastic–Perfectly Plastic Behavior 621

Figure 7.30 Stress profiles across a bending plate for various values of the moment. (a) Elastic bending. (b) Onset of plasticity, σxx = σxx,0 at y= h/2. (c) Partially plastic bending, y0 =0.354h. (d) Totally plastic bend- ing, y0 =0.

where the flexural rigidity D has been defined in Equation (3–72). Using

this result, we can put Equation (7–275) in the convenient form

d2w

dx2

/(

d2w

dx2

)

0 =

(

3 − 2M

M0

)−1/2

. (7.277)

This dependence of the plate curvature on bending moment is given in Figure

7–31. The curvature approaches infinity as the bending moment approaches

the critical value Mc = 1.5M0. This rapid increase in curvature is referred

to as a plastic hinge.

Figure 3–35 shows that some ocean trench profiles are in good agreement

with the elastic theory for the bending of plates. However, some are not, as

illustrated by the profile across the Tonga trench given in Figure 7–32. This

622 Rock rheology

Figure 7.31 Dependence of the nondimensional plate curvature on the ratio of the bending moment to the bending moment at the onset of plasticity.

profile is compared with the predicted elastic profile given by Equation (3–

159) taking xb = 60 km and wb =0.2 km. The observed profile has a much

larger curvature in the trench than the one predicted by elastic theory. If

we attribute this additional curvature to plastic hinging, the analysis given

above predicts that the excess curvature will develop where the bending

moment is a maximum. This occurs at x = 2x0 − xb according to Equation

(3–160). Therefore we predict that a plastic hinge would develop at x = −60

km. This prediction agrees with the observations.

Problem 7.24 Consider a long circular cylinder of elastic–perfectly plastic

material that is subjected to a torque T at its outer surface r = a. The state

of stress in the cylinder can be characterized by an azimuthal shear stress τ .

Determine the torque for which an elastic core of radius c remains. Assume

that the yield stress in shear is σ0. In the elastic region the shear stress is

proportional to the distance from the axis of the cylinder r. What is the

torque for the onset of plastic yielding? What is the maximum torque that

can be sustained by the cylinder?

Collateral Reading 623

Figure 7.32 Observed profile across the Tonga trench compared with an elastic plate profile assuming xb =60 km and wb = 0.2 km.

Collateral Reading

Ashby, M. F., and R. A. Verrall (1978), Micromechanisms of flow and frac-

ture and their relevance to the rheology of the upper mantle, Phil.

Trans. Roy. Soc. London 288A, 59–95.

Calmant, S., J. Francheteau, and A. Cazenave (1990), Elastic layer thicken-

ing with age of the oceanic lithosphere: A tool for prediction of the age

of volcanoes or oceanic crust, Geophys. J. Int. 100, 59–67.

Griggs, D. T., F. J. Turner, and H. C. Heard (1960), Deformation of rocks

at 500◦C to 800◦C, Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir 79, 39–104.

Karato, S. I., and P. Wu (1993), Rheology of the upper mantle: A synthesis,

Science 260, 771–778.

Collateral Reading

Hill, R., The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Oxford University Press,

London, 1950), 355 pages.

A fundamental textbook for engineers and applied mathematicians on the

theory of plasticity. The student should be familiar with elasticity the-

ory, cartesian tensors, and hyperbolic differential equations. The book

presents the foundations of plasticity theory, solutions of elastic–plastic

problems including bending and torsion of beams and bars, plane strain

and slip-line theory, steady two-dimensional problems including sheet-

drawing and sheet-extrusion, nonsteady two-dimensional problems such

as indentation and hardness tests, problems with axial symmetry, and

plastic anisotropy.

Hull, D., and D. J. Bacon, Introduction to Dislocations, 3rd edition (Perga-

mon Press, Oxford, 1984), 255 pages.

An account of the geometry, properties, and behavior of dislocations in crys-

tals for advanced undergraduate students in metallurgy, engineering,

624 Collateral Reading

and physics. The first part of the book describes the geometry, move-

ment, and elastic properties of dislocations together with a discussion

of the methods of observing and studying them. This is followed by

a description of the more detailed features of dislocations in specific

structures: face-centered cubic, hexagonal close-packed, body-centered

cubic, ionic, layer and super-lattice structures. Other topics include jogs

and the intersection of dislocations, origin and multiplication of dislo-

cations, dislocation arrays and crystal boundaries, strength of annealed

crystals, and strengthening by dislocations.

Nadai, A., Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids, Volume 2 (McGraw-Hill,

New York, 1963), 705 pages.

This classic work on the deformation of solids emphasizes problems in which

temperature and the time rate of permanent deformation play an im-

portant role. Part 1, on the principles of mechanical work, contains

three chapters dealing with the theory of thermoelasticity, mechanical

work associated with small finite strain, and extremum principles of

work. The next six chapters, which comprise part 2, discuss elasticity

and viscosity, plane strain and plane stress, axially symmetric stress

distributions, and the bending of plates and viscoelastic beams. Part

3 contains five chapters on subsidence and postglacial uplift, thermal

stresses and strains, residual stress, and flow of a generally viscous sub-

stance through a cylindrical tube. The next two parts discuss the theory

of perfectly loose and of generally plastic substances and the creep of

metals at elevated temperatures. The final part is a selection of prob-

lems in geomechanics.

Nicolas, A., and J. P. Poirier, Crystalline Plasticity and Solid State Flow in

Metamorphic Rocks (John Wiley and Sons, London, 1976), 444 pages.

A textbook on the mechanics of deformation of minerals and rocks. Ma-

jor chapter headings include structural analysis in metamorphic rocks,

elements of solid mechanics and physical metallurgy, flow and anneal-

ing processes in crystals, plastic deformation of rock-forming miner-

als, development of textures and preferred orientations by plastic flow

and recrystallization, strain analysis of field structures, interpretation

of structures, textures, and preferred orientations in peridotites, large-

scale flow in peridotites, and upper mantle geodynamics.

Poirier, J. P., Introduction to the Physics of the Earth’s Interior (Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge, 1991), 264 pages.

This is an advanced level treatise on the physics of the Earth’s interior with

an emphasis on mineral physics. Subjects covered include the thermo-

Collateral Reading 625

dynamics of solids, elastic moduli, lattice vibrations, equations of state,

melting, and transport properties.

Poirier, J. P., Creep of Crystals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

1985), 260 pages.

This is an excellent and broad treatment of solid-state creep processes. Dif-

fusion and dislocation mechanisms are considered along with the role

of water, dynamic recrystallization, superplasticity, and transformation

plasticity.

Prager, W., and P. G. Hodge, Jr., Theory of Perfectly Plastic Solids (John

Wiley and Sons, New York, 1951), 264 pages.

An introduction to the mathematical theory of the behavior of perfectly

plastic solids written for senior undergraduate or graduate students in

engineering and applied mathematics. Following an introduction to the

basic concepts of plasticity, the book treats trusses and beams, including

the flexure of elastic–plastic beams, torsion of cylindrical and prismatic

bars, problems involving plane strain, and extremum principles. Prob-

lems are given at the end of each chapter.

Ranalli, G., Rheology of the Earth, 2nd edition (Chapman and Hall, London,

1995), 413 pages.

A reference work that provides a comprehensive coverage of the deformation

and flow of Earth materials from both the continuum mechanics and

the microphysical viewpoints. The fundamental principles of elasticity,

viscous flow, and plasticity are covered. The atomic bases for defor-

mation are introduced including vacancies, diffusion, dislocations, and

recrystallization. The concept of deformation maps is introduced.

Weertman, J., and J. R. Weertman, Elementary Dislocation Theory

(Macmillan Company, New York, 1964), 213 pages.

A book on dislocation theory for advanced undergraduate students. Basic

calculus and vector analysis are required. A large number of problems

are given. The main subjects are description of a dislocation, the stress

field around a dislocation, forces on a dislocation, dislocation reactions

in crystals, dislocation multiplication, twinning, Peierls force, image

forces, and interactions with point defects.

Wert, C. A., and R. M. Thomson, Physics of Solids, 2nd edition (McGraw-

Hill, New York, 1970), 522 pages.

A book for advanced undergraduate engineering students on basic solid-state

physics. The treatment is quantitative, but the mathematical analysis

is on an intermediate level. The first part of the book discusses the

crystal structure of solids and the properties that depend on struc-

ture. Topics include the geometry of perfect crystals, imperfections in

626 Collateral Reading

crystals, heat capacity, vacancies and interstitials, point defects, diffu-

sion, phase diagrams, and dislocations. The second part deals with the

electronic structure of solids and covers metals, ionic crystals, covalent

crystals, molecular crystals, and the physical properties of semiconduc-

tors. The remaining chapters are applications of electronic structure to

the electrical and magnetic properties of metals, semiconductors, and

ionic crystals. The subjects covered are transport properties and specific

heat of metals, semiconductor devices, electromagnetic and dielectric

behavior of solids, diamagnetism, paramagnetism, and ferromagnetism.

Problems are given at the end of each chapter.

8

Faulting

8.1 Introduction

At low temperatures and pressures rock is a brittle material that will fail

by fracture if the stresses become sufficiently large. Fractures are widely

observed in surface rocks of all types. When a lateral displacement takes

place on a fracture, the break is referred to as a fault. Surface faults occur

on all scales. On the smallest scale the offset on a clean fracture may be

only millimeters. On the largest scale the surface expression of a major fault

is a broad zone of broken up rock known as a fault gouge; the width may

be a kilometer or more, and the lateral displacement may be hundreds of

kilometers.

Earthquakes are associated with displacements on many faults. Faults

lock, and a displacement occurs when the stress across the fault builds up

to a sufficient level to cause rupture of the fault. This is known as stick–

slip behavior. When a fault sticks, elastic energy accumulates in the rocks

around the fault because of displacements at a distance. When the stress on

the fault reaches a critical value, the fault slips and an earthquake occurs.

The elastic energy stored in the adjacent rock is partially dissipated as heat

by friction on the fault and is partially radiated away as seismic energy. This

is known as elastic rebound. Fault displacements associated with the largest

earthquakes are of the order of 30 m.

The relative motions of the rigid plates are often accommodated on major

faults. At ocean trenches, the oceanic lithosphere is being subducted beneath

an adjacent oceanic or continental lithosphere along a dipping fault plane.

The convergence of the two lithospheres results in thrust faulting and the

occurrence of most of the world’s great earthquakes. These earthquakes oc-

cur regularly in order to accommodate the continuous subduction process.

628 Faulting

Because the surface expression of these faults is at the base of an ocean

trench, they are difficult to study in detail.

At accretional plate margins, extensive normal faulting occurs on the

flanks of the ocean ridges. The lithosphere at ocean ridges is thin and weak,

so the resulting earthquakes are small. Segments of the ocean ridge system

are connected by transform faults. Strike–slip faulting occurs on these faults.

The San Andreas fault is a major strike–slip fault that is a plate boundary

in the continental lithosphere. This fault has good surface exposure and has

been extensively studied; it is discussed in detail in Section 8–8. Extensive

faulting of all types occurs in zones of continental collision. The great earth-

quakes that take place throughout China are associated with the broad zone

of deformation resulting from the collision between the Indian and Eurasian

plates. Further to the west the extension of this zone of continental collision

causes extensive seismicity in Turkey, as discussed in Section 8–9.

8.2 Classification of Faults

We previously discussed the classification of faults in Section 1–13. Here we

provide quantitative definitions of the different types of faults in terms of

the relative magnitudes of the principal stresses. Because voids cannot open

up deep in the Earth, displacements on faults occur parallel to the fault

surface. For simplicity we assume that the fault surface is planar; in fact,

faulting often occurs on curved surfaces or on a series of surfaces that are

offset from one another.

We will first consider thrust faulting, which occurs when the oceanic litho-

sphere is thrust under the adjacent continental (or oceanic) lithosphere at an

ocean trench. Thrust faulting also plays an important role in the compression

of the lithosphere during continental collisions. Idealized thrust faults are il-

lustrated in Figure 8–1. Compressional stresses cause displacement along a

fault plane dipping at an angle β to the horizontal. As a result of the fault-

ing, horizontal compressional strain occurs. Thrust faults can form in either

of the two conjugate geometries shown in Figure 8–1a and b. The elevated

block is known as the hanging wall, and the depressed block is called the

foot wall. The upward movement of the hanging wall is also referred to as

reverse faulting.

We assume that the stresses in the x, y, and z directions are the principal

stresses. The vertical component of stress σyy is the overburden or lithostatic

pressure

8.2 Classification of Faults 629

Figure 8.1 Thrust faulting. Two conjugate thrust faults with dip angles β are shown in (a) and (b). The principal stresses illustrated in (c) are all compressional with magnitudes σxx>σzz >σyy.

σyy = ρgy. (8.1)

The vertical deviatoric stress ∆σyy is zero. To produce the thrust faults in

Figure 8–1, a compressional deviatoric stress applied in the x direction ∆σxx is required,

∆σxx > 0. (8.2)

The horizontal compressional stress,

σxx = ρgy + ∆σxx, (8.3)

therefore exceeds the vertical lithostatic stress

σxx > σyy. (8.4)

For the fault geometry shown in Figure 8–1 it is appropriate to assume

that there is no strain in the z direction. In this situation of plane strain we

can use Equation (3–44) to relate the deviatoric stress component ∆σzz to

∆σxx

∆σzz = ν∆σxx. (8.5)

The deviatoric stress in the z direction is also compressional, but its mag-

nitude is a factor of ν less than the deviatoric applied stress. Therefore the

horizontal compressional stress,

σzz = ρgy + ∆σzz = ρgy + ν∆σxx, (8.6)

630 Faulting

Figure 8.2 Normal faulting. Two conjugate normal faults with angle of dip β are shown in (a) and (b). The principal stresses illustrated in (c) have magnitudes related by σyy > σzz > σxx.

exceeds the vertical stress σyy, but it is smaller than the horizontal stress

σxx. Thrust faults satisfy the condition

σxx > σzz > σyy. (8.7)

The vertical stress is the least compressive stress.

Just as thrust faulting accommodates horizontal compressional strain,

normal faulting accommodates horizontal extensional strain. Normal fault-

ing occurs on the flanks of ocean ridges where new lithosphere is being

created. Normal faulting also occurs in continental rift valleys where the

lithosphere is being stretched. Applied tensional stresses can produce nor-

mal faults in either of the two conjugate geometries shown in Figure 8–2.

The displacements on the fault planes dipping at an angle β to the hori-

zontal lead to horizontal extensional strain. Normal faulting is associated

with a state of stess in which the vertical component of stress is the litho-

static pressure σyy = ρgy and the applied deviatoric horizontal stress ∆σxx is tensional

∆σxx< 0. (8.8)

The horizontal stress,

σxx = ρgy + ∆σxx, (8.9)

is therefore smaller than the vertical stress,

σyy > σxx. (8.10)

The plane strain assumption is again appropriate to the situation in Figure

8–2, and Equation (8–5) is applicable. Consequently, the deviatoric stress

8.2 Classification of Faults 631

Figure 8.3 Strike-slip faulting. Two conjugate strike-slip faults inclined at an angle ψ to the direction of the principal stress σxx are shown in (a) and (b). The principal stresses illustrated in (c) are related by σzz > σyy > σxx.

in the z direction ∆σzz is also tensional, but its magnitude is a factor of ν

smaller than the deviatoric applied stress. The total stress,

σzz = ρgy + ν∆σxx, (8.11)

is smaller than σyy but larger than σxx. Normal faults satisfy the condition

σyy > σzz > σxx, (8.12)

where the vertical stress is the maximum compressive stress. Both thrust

faults and normal faults are also known as dip–slip faults because the dis-

placement along the fault takes place on a dipping plane.

A strike–slip fault is a fault along which the displacement is strictly hor-

izontal. Thus there is no strain in the y direction. The situation is one of

plane strain with the nonzero strain components confined to the horizontal

plane. Vertical views of two conjugate strike–slip faults are shown in Figure

8–3. The fault planes make an angle ψ with respect to the direction of the

principal stress σxx. The fault illustrated in Figure 8–3a is right lateral and

the one in Figure 8–3b is left lateral.

The state of stress in strike–slip faulting consists of a vertical lithostatic

stress σyy = ρgy and horizontal deviatoric principal stresses that are com-

pressional in one direction and tensional in the other. The case shown in

Figure 8–3 has

∆σxx < 0 ∆σzz > 0. (8.13)

One can also have

∆σxx > 0 ∆σzz < 0. (8.14)

632 Faulting

One horizontal stress will thus be larger than σyy while the other will be

smaller. For the situation given by Equation (8–13) we have

σzz > σyy > σxx, (8.15)

while Equation (8–14) gives

σxx > σyy > σzz. (8.16)

For strike–slip faulting, the vertical stress is always the intermediate stress.

A special case of strike–slip faulting occurs when

|∆σxx| = |∆σzz| = τ0. (8.17)

This is the situation of pure shear discussed in Section 3–7. The stress τ0 is

the shear stress applied across the fault. In pure shear the angle ψ is 45◦.

The displacement on an actual fault is almost always a combination of

strike–slip and dip–slip motion. However, one type of motion usually domi-

nates.

8.3 Friction on Faults

Displacements on faults accommodate a substantial fraction of the strain

occurring in the upper crust. These displacements sometimes occur in a

continuous manner at tectonic velocities of tens of millimeters per year.

This type of displacement is referred to as fault creep. However, it is much

more common for the displacements on faults to occur during earthquakes.

Between earthquakes the fault remains locked. This is known as stick–slip

behavior.

A simple model for the stick–slip behavior of a fault is illustrated in Figure

8–4. We assume that the behavior of the fault is uniform with depth and

neglect the forces at the bases of the adjacent plates. Figure 8–4a shows the

situation after a major earthquake when the fault locks. The stress across

the fault is τfd, the frictional stress that is operative on the fault at the end

of faulting. A uniform relative velocity u0 is applied at a distance b from the

fault, and the shear strain increases with time according to ε(t) = u0t/(4b)

– see Equation (2–102) – for example, as shown in Figure 8–4b. The shear

stress on the fault as a function of time t since the last displacement on the

fault is therefore

τ = τfd + Gu0t

2b , (8.18)

where G is the shear modulus (see Equation (3–49)). The locked fault can

transmit any shear stress less than the static frictional stress τfs. When

8.3 Friction on Faults 633

Figure 8.4 Stick–slip behavior and elastic rebound on a fault.

this stress is reached, slip occurs. Therefore, the time t = t∗ when the next

displacement occurs on the fault is

t∗ = 2b

Gu0 (τfs − τfd). (8.19)

The slip on the fault generates an earthquake. The displacement on the

fault during the earthquake occurs in a few seconds so that the edges of the

plates can be assumed to be stationary during this time. The accumulated

shear strain ε = u0t ∗/4b is recovered by the plates in a process known as

elastic rebound. The resulting displacement on the fault ∆w is 2ε(2b) – see

Equation (2–94) – or

∆w = 2ε(2b) = 4b

(

u0t ∗

4b

)

= 2b

G (τfs − τfd).

(8.20)

The quantity τfs− τfd is the stress drop on the fault during the earthquake.

After the earthquake, the fault locks and the cycle repeats, as shown in

Figure 8–4c.

The displacement on a fault during an earthquake can be measured from

the surface rupture. A typical value for a large earthquake is 5 m. It is

difficult to determine the stress drop during an earthquake. Estimates of

634 Faulting

Figure 8.5 A block of mass m on an inclined surface. The angle θ is in- creased until the block slips. The component of the gravitational force mg normal to the surface is mg cos θ, the component parallel to the surface is mg sin θ.

stress drops during large earthquakes range from τfs− τfd = 1 to 100 MPa.

Taking G for crustal rocks equal to 30 GPa, we find from Equation (8–20)

that the distance b lies in the range 75 m to 7.5 km.

The static frictional stress is the stress on the fault when earthquake

rupture initiates on the fault. During rupture, slip is occurring on the fault

and the shear stress on the fault is the dynamic frictional stress. Stick–slip

behavior occurs as long as the static frictional stress τfs is greater than the

dynamic frictional stress τfd, τfs>τfd.

Extensive laboratory studies have been carried out to determine when slip

will initiate on a contact surface. A simple example is a block of mass m

sitting on an inclined surface as illustrated in Figure 8–5 (see also Problem

2–10). The angle θ is increased until the block begins to slip. The normal

stress that the block exerts on the surface is

σn = mg cos θ

A (8.21)

where A is the contact area of the block. The frictional shear stress on the

surface required to keep the block from slipping is

τf = mg sin θ

A . (8.22)

Slip will occur when τf = τfs, the static frictional stress. Under a wide

variety of conditions it is found experimentally that

τfs = fsσn, (8.23)

where fs is the coefficient of static friction. This relation is known as Amon-

ton’s law. The greater the normal stress, the harder it is to initiate sliding.

8.3 Friction on Faults 635

Figure 8.6 A shear stress with magnitude |τ |= fsσn must be applied across a fault to initiate sliding when there is a normal compressive stress σn acting on the fault.

The coefficient of friction depends weakly on the types of material in con-

tact but is independent of the normal stress. The concept of friction was

discussed briefly in Section 2–2.

Problem 8.1 Assuming Amonton’s law to be applicable with fs = 0.8,

determine the angle θ at which the block illustrated in Figure 8–5 will begin

to slip.

Amonton’s law is generally valid when two rough surfaces are in contact

or when a granulated material such as a fault gouge is present between the

surfaces. The law can be applied to a nearly planar fracture or fault, as

sketched in Figure 8–6. A shear stress τfs given by Equation (8–23) must be

applied parallel to the fault to cause sliding when the two sides of the fault

are pressed together by the normal stress σn.

Laboratory data on the maximum shear stress to initiate sliding are given

in Figure 8–7 for a wide variety of rocks including granites, gabbros, lime-

stones, and sandstones at normal stresses up to 100 MPa. Although there is

considerable scatter, good agreement is obtained for max fs = 0.85.

The presence of water throughout much of the Earth’s crust affects the

frictional behavior of a fault. The pressure of water on a fault is referred to

as the pore pressure pw. The effective normal stress acting on a wet fault

is the actual normal stress less the pore pressure. Therefore on a wet fault

Amonton’s law can be written

|τ | = fs(σn − pw). (8.24)

If the water is freely connected with the surface and there are no flow losses,

the water pressure is the hydrostatic pressure pw = ρwgy. Because the den-

sity of water ρw is considerably less than the density of rocks, the hydrostatic

pressure is generally 35 to 50% of the overburden or lithostatic pressure. In

some cases, however, water is trapped, and the pore pressure can nearly

636 Faulting

Figure 8.7 Maximum shear stress to initiate sliding as a function of nor- mal stress for a variety of rock types. The linear fit defines a maximum coefficient of static friction max fs equal to 0.85. Data from Byerlee (1977).

equal or even exceed the overburden pressure. In these cases the shear stress

resisting motion on a fault is low.

It is clear from Equation (8–24) that the injection of fluid can reduce the

frictional resistance to an earthquake on a fault. There are many instances in

which fluids pumped at high pressures into waste disposal wells have induced

small earthquakes. When pumping ended, the earthquakes ceased. It has

been suggested that large earthquakes could be prevented by the injection

of fluids on major faults. The fluid pressure would reduce the maximum

shear stress required for an earthquake. Displacement on the fault would

be accommodated through a large number of small earthquakes rather than

a few large earthquakes. The consequences of inducing a large earthquake

have so far prevented a large-scale test of this suggestion.

8.4 Anderson Theory of Faulting 637

8.4 Anderson Theory of Faulting

We now combine the results of the previous two sections and determine the

angle of dip β of normal and thrust faults in terms of the coefficient of static

friction fs. As in Section 8–2 we assume that the horizontal stresses σxx and

σzz and the vertical stress σyy are principal stresses and that the fault is a

plane dipping at an angle β (see Figures 8–1 and 8–2). We again assume

that the vertical stress σyy is the lithostatic pressure and that σxx is the sum

of the lithostatic pressure and a tectonic deviatoric stress ∆σxx,

σyy = ρgy (8.25)

σxx = ρgy + ∆σxx. (8.26)

For thrust faulting ∆σxx is positive, and for normal faulting it is negative.

To apply Amonton’s law, it is necessary to relate σxx and σyy to σn and

τ . The geometry is illustrated in Figure 8–8. By comparing this figure with

Figure 2–11, we see that σn and τ can be found from Equations (2–53) and

(2–54) by equating σ1 and σ2 in those equations with σxx and σyy; the result

is

σn = 1 2(σxx + σyy) + 1

2(σxx − σyy) cos 2θ (8.27)

τ = −1 2(σxx − σyy) sin 2θ, (8.28)

where θ is the angle of the fault with respect to the vertical, θ = π/2 − β. Upon substituting Equations (8–25) and (8–26) into (8–27) and (8–28),

we find that the normal and tangential stresses on the fault are

σn = ρgy + ∆σxx

2 (1 + cos 2θ) (8.29)

τ = −∆σxx 2

sin 2θ. (8.30)

If we include the effect of pore pressure on the fault, these stresses are related

by Amonton’s law in the form of Equation (8–24). Substitution of Equations

(8–29) and (8–30) into Equation (8–24) yields

±∆σxx 2

sin 2θ= fs

{

ρgy − pw + ∆σxx

2 (1 + cos 2θ)

}

,

(8–31)

where the upper sign applies to thrust faults (∆σxx > 0) and the lower sign

to normal faults (∆σxx < 0). Rearrangement of Equation (8–31) gives an

expression for the tectonic stress ∆σxx in terms of the angle of the fault

638 Faulting

Figure 8.8 Principal stresses and normal and tangential stresses on a dip– slip fault.

with the vertical

∆σxx = 2fs(ρgy − pw)

± sin 2θ − fs(1 + cos 2θ) . (8.32)

Continental crustal rocks contain many preexisting joints and faults. We

hypothesize that under a tectonic stress these preexisting zones of weakness

will be reactivated to form a dip–slip fault at an angle requiring the mini-

mum value of the tectonic stress. In other words, thrust faulting and normal

faulting will occur at angles that minimize |∆σxx|. The angle θ that gives

the minimum value of |∆σxx| in Equation (8–32) is determined by setting

d∆σxx/dθ = 0 with the result

tan 2θ = ∓ 1

fs . (8.33)

This can be rewritten in terms of β as

tan 2β = ± 1

fs . (8.34)

The upper signs in these equations apply to thrust faults and the lower signs

to normal faults. Figure 8–9 shows how the dip angles of normal and thrust

faults depend on the coefficient of friction. Thrust faults dip less steeply

than normal faults.

The tectonic stresses corresponding to these angles of dip are obtained by

substituting Equation (8–33) into Equation (8–32)

∆σxx = ±2fs(ρgy − pw)

(1 + f2 s )

1/2 ∓ fs . (8.35)

Again, the upper signs are used for thrust faults and the lower signs for

normal faults. Figure 8–10 shows how the tectonic stress computed from

Equation (8–35) varies with the coefficient of friction on normal and thrust

faults for the case pw = ρwgy, ρ = 2700 kg m−3, ρw = 1000 kg m−3, g = 10

m s−2, and y = 5 km. Thrust faulting requires somewhat larger stresses, in

8.4 Anderson Theory of Faulting 639

Figure 8.9 Dependence of the angle of dip β on the coefficient of friction fs for normal and thrust faults.

Figure 8.10 Dependence of the deviatoric stress on the coefficient of static friction for thrust and normal faults with pw = ρwgy, ρ=2,700kgm−3,ρw = 1,000kg m−3, g=10m s−2, and y= 5km.

absolute magnitude, than does normal faulting. Based on laboratory mea-

surements, a typical value for the coefficient of friction would be fs = 0.85

(see Figure 8–7). From Equation (8–34) the corresponding angle of dip for a

thrust fault is β = 24.8◦. At a depth of 5 km the deviatoric stress from Fig-

ure 8–10 is ∆σxx = 305 MPa. The angle of dip of a normal fault is β = 65.2◦,

640 Faulting

Figure 8.11 Deep structure of the Wind River thrust fault, Wyoming, is obtained by deep crustal seismic reflection profiling (Brewer et al., 1980).

and the tectonic stress is ∆σxx = −65 MPa. The derivation of the angle of

dip of dip–slip faults given above was developed by E. M. Anderson and is

often referred to as the Anderson theory of faulting.

As an example of a major thrust fault, let us consider the Wind River

thrust fault in Wyoming. The structure of this fault, determined using seis-

mic reflection profiling, is illustrated in Figure 8–11; it is essentially the same

as the structure shown in Figure 8–1. The elevated block is responsible for

the uplift of the Wind River Mountains. This is a range of mountains 220

km long and 70 km wide; the highest peak has an elevation of 4267 m. The

mountains are cored by Precambrian rock with an age of 2.7 Ga; they are

representative of the deep crust. Clearly there has been considerable uplift

and erosion. The depressed block to the west of the Wind River thrust fault

is responsible for the formation of the Green River basin. This is a sedimen-

tary basin with large petroleum reserves. The basin has a maximum depth

of about 12 km. The Wind River Mountains are one of a series of Laramide

ranges in Wyoming with an age of 50 to 70 Ma. They are clearly the result of

crustal compression with the compressional strain being accommodated on

a series of major thrust faults that are responsible for the formation of the

mountain ranges and the adjacent sedimentary basins. On the Wind River

thrust fault there has been at least 21 km of crustal shortening and 13 km

of vertical uplift.

The seismic profiling illustrated in Figure 8–11 clearly traces the fault to

a depth of 24 km and possibly as deep as 36 km. Over this depth range

the angle of dip is nearly constant with an average value of 35◦. Assuming

that the Anderson theory of faulting is applicable, the coefficient of friction

corresponding to this angle of dip is fs = 0.36 from Equation (8–34). Al-

though this value for the coefficient of friction is considerably less than that

obtained in laboratory experiments, this lower value is probably applica-

ble to the large-scale deformations associated with a major thrust fault. A

8.4 Anderson Theory of Faulting 641

substantial pore pressure could help explain the reduced value of fs. With

fs = 0.36, the angle of dip of a normal fault is 55◦. Typical angles of dip for

the surface exposures of normal faults are 55 to 65◦.

Problem 8.2 Using the Anderson theory of faulting for the strike–slip

fault illustrated in Figure 8–3 show that

cot 2ψ = ±fs. (8.36)

Here the upper sign applies if ∆σxx > 0 and the lower sign applies if ∆σxx <

0. Prove that this result is independent of the ratio ∆σzz/∆σxx.

Problem 8.3 A number of criteria have been proposed to relate the brittle

fracture of rock to the state of stress. One of these is the Coulomb–Navier

criterion, which states that failure occurs on a plane when the shear stress

τ attains the value

|τ | = S + µσn, (8.37)

where S is the inherent shear strength of the rock and µ is the coefficient of

internal friction. Consider a two-dimensional state of stress with principal

stresses σ1 and σ2 and show that |τ |−µσn has a maximum value for a plane

whose normal makes an angle θ to the larger principal stress given by

tan 2θ = −1

µ . (8.38)

Show also that the quantity |τ | − µσn for this plane is

|τ | − µσn = 1 2(σ1 − σ2)(1 + µ2)1/2 − 1

2(σ1 + σ2)µ.

(8.39)

According to the Coulomb–Navier criterion, failure will occur if this quantity

equals S; that is, the failure criterion takes the form

σ1{(1 + µ2)1/2 − µ} − σ2{(1 + µ2)1/2 + µ} = 2S.

(8.40)

What is the compressive strength of the rock in terms of µ and S ? From

Equation (8–38) it is seen that θ must exceed 45◦, so that the direction of

shear fracture makes an acute angle with σ1. The Coulomb–Navier criterion

is found to be reasonably valid for igneous rocks under compression.

642 Faulting

Figure 8.12 Strength envelope for the oceanic lithosphere. The solid lines are the strength of the lithosphere for the Anderson theory of faulting from Equation (8–35). The dashed lines are the stresses associated with solid- state creep in the lithosphere from Equation (7–192).

8.5 Strength Envelope

The Anderson theory of faulting can also be used to find a strength envelope

for the lithosphere. For example, let us consider the oceanic lithosphere. We

assume that the failure stress in the upper part of the lithosphere is given

by the Anderson theory of faulting from Equation (8–35). We evaluate this

equation by taking the fluid pressure to be hydrostatic so that pw = ρwgy,

ρ = 3300 kg m−3, ρw = 1000 kg m−3, and the coefficient of friction fs = 0.6,

and show by the solid lines in Figure 8–12 the resulting tectonic stresses

∆σxx as a function of depth for compressional and tensional failures.

We further assume that the failure stress in the lower part of the oceanic

lithosphere is given by the solid-state creep law for the mantle from Equation

(7–192). To determine a stress, we must specify the temperature, pressure,

and strain rate. We assume a linear thermal gradient dT/dy = 25 K km−1

and neglect the pressure dependence at the shallow depths considered. The

resulting stress envelopes due to solid-state creep are given as the dashed

lines in Figure 8–12 for two strain rates, ε̇ = 10−12 s−1 and ε̇ = 10−14 s−1.

8.6 Thrust Sheets and Gravity Sliding 643

Figure 8.13 Compressional strain of continental crust can be accommo- dated by the emplacement of a thrust sheet A over the adjacent brittle upper crust B. The stippled region of the lower crust C is deformed plasti- cally to about twice its original thickness.

In defining the strength envelopes for the oceanic lithosphere given in Fig-

ure 8–12, we assume that the lower of the frictional stress or the creep stress

determines the strength. We see that the maximum strength is at a depth

of about 28 km for the conditions considered. The maximum compressional

stress ∆σxx is about 1300 MPa and the maximum tensional strength ∆σxx is

about −450 MPa. The total compressional force Fc that can be transmitted

by the oceanic lithosphere is the area under the curve in Figure 8–12 and

is approximately 2.2 × 1013 N m−1. Similarly, the total tensional force FT that can be transmitted by the oceanic lithosphere is about 8×1012 N m−1.

In Section 6–21 we estimated that the “ridge push” force FR = 3.9 × 1012

N m−1 and that the maximum “trench pull” force FB = 4.9 × 1013 N m−1.

However, as noted in that section, the trench pull force is largely balanced

by resistive forces encountered by the descending lithosphere so that the net

force in the oceanic lithosphere is probably comparable to the ridge-push

force. The strength of the oceanic lithosphere, as we have determined it, is

sufficient to transmit this force through old oceanic lithosphere.

8.6 Thrust Sheets and Gravity Sliding

Displacements on thrust faults are an important mechanism for accommo-

dating compressional strain in the continental crust. Another mechanism is

the emplacement of long thin thrust sheets as illustrated in Figure 8–13. The

continental crust is split into two parts, the upper brittle part of the crust

A is overthrust over the adjacent upper brittle crust B. The lower part of

the continental crust C is compressed plastically to about twice its original

thickness. The overthrust brittle crust constitutes a thrust sheet.

The mechanics of thrust sheet emplacement can be studied with the ide-

alized wedge-shaped model shown in Figure 8–14. We assume that isostasy

applies to the thrust sheet. The angles γ and β are therefore related by

β =

(

ρc ρm − ρc

)

γ, (8.41)

where we have also assumed that the angles are small so that tan β ≈ β and

644 Faulting

Figure 8.14 A wedge-shaped model of a thrust sheet.

tan γ ≈ γ. A horizontal static force balance on a section of the thrust sheet

of length l leads to the conclusion that the net horizontal force on the base

of the thrust sheet must equal the sum of the lithostatic pressure and the

tectonic stress ∆σxx integrated over the thickness of the sheet at x = l (see

Figure 8–14). The latter quantity, denoted by F1, is

F1 =

∫ βl

−γl (γl + y)ρcg dy +

∫ βl

−γl ∆σxx dy

= ρcg

2 (γ + β)2l2 + ∆σxx(γ + β)l. (8.42)

Substitution of Equation (8–41) into (8–42) gives

F1 = ρcg

2

(

ρm ρm − ρc

)2

γ2l2 + ∆σxx

(

ρm ρm − ρc

)

γl.

(8.43)

To calculate the horizontal force acting on the base of the thrust sheet,

we need to determine the normal and shear stresses on the basal fault. The

lithostatic stress on the basal plane at a horizontal distance x from the apex

of the wedge is ρcg(γ + β)x. Since the angles γ and β are small, σn on the

basal plane is approximately equal to the lithostatic pressure

σn = ρcg(γ + β)x = ρcρm

(ρm − ρc) γgx. (8.44)

The normal stresses on the basal plane exert a force whose horizontal com-

ponent is ∫ l

0 σnβ dx =

ρ2 cρmgγ

2l2

2(ρm − ρc)2 , (8.45)

where we have used the small angle approximation sinβ ≈ β. Amonton’s

law, Equation (8–23), gives the shear stress acting on the basal fault during

8.6 Thrust Sheets and Gravity Sliding 645

emplacement of the thrust sheet

τ = fsρcρm

(ρm − ρc) γgx. (8.46)

The shear stresses on the basal plane exert a force whose horizontal compo-

nent is ∫ l

0 τ dx =

fsρcρmγgl 2

2(ρm − ρc) , (8.47)

where the small angle approximation cos β ≈ 1 has been used. The force

balance on the thrust sheet is obtained by equating expression (8–43) to the

sum of Equations (8–45) and (8–47) with the result

∆σxx = lgρc(fs − γ)

2 . (8.48)

If the friction coefficient fs is greater than the slope γ of the thrust sheet,

a compressive tectonic stress is required to emplace it. On the other hand,

if the coefficient of friction is less than the slope γ of the thrust sheet,

the gravitational body force on the base of the thrust sheet suffices for

emplacement. This is gravitational sliding.

The Appalachian Mountains in the southeastern United States appear to

be cored by a major thrust sheet some 250 km or more in width. The Ap-

palachians are the remnants of a major mountain belt that resulted from a

continental collision when the proto-Atlantic Ocean (Iapetus) closed. This

ocean was created during the late Precambrian by the rifting of a supercon-

tinent. In the early Cambrian a trench system developed off what is now

the east coast of the United States. Remnants of the resulting island arc

are seen in the Carolina slate belt (see Figure 8–15). The closure of the

proto-Atlantic was completed in the Carboniferous and Permian (at about

250 to 300 Ma). The suture between proto-Africa and proto-North America

is believed to lie east of the Carolina slate belt.

Apparently during the continental collision, crystalline rocks of proto-

Africa and the island arcs were overthrust to the northwest over proto-North

America as a major thrust sheet. The structure, as obtained from deep

crustal seismic reflection profiling, is illustrated in Figure 8–15. Because the

thrust sheet has been displaced a considerable distance, it is also referred to

as an allochthonous sheet. The Valley and Ridge province to the northwest is

composed of sediments that were pushed ahead of the sheet. The crystalline

rocks of the Blue Ridge province are separated from the sedimentary rocks of

the Valley and Ridge province by the Great Smoky thrust fault. This fault,

which dips relatively steeply near the surface but flattens rapidly at depth,

646 Faulting

F igu

re 8.15

C ro

ss sectio

n o f th

e A

p pa

la ch

ia n

M o u n ta

in s

o f th

e so

u th

ea stern

U n ited

S ta

tes sh

o w in

g th

e em

p la

cem en

t

o f a n

a lloch

th o n o u s

th ru

st sh

eet fro

m th

e so

u th

ea st

(C oo

k et

a l.,

1 9 7 9 ).

8.7 Earthquakes 647

Figure 8.16 Dependence of the tectonic stress required for emplacement of the Appalachian thrust sheet on the coefficient of friction.

is the basal fault of the thrust sheet. The Brevard fault that separates the

crystalline rocks of the Inner Piedmont province from the crystalline rocks

of the Blue Ridge province is a thrust fault in the thrust sheet.

If the thrust sheet has a width l = 250 km and a maximum thickness of

15 km, a wedge model of the sheet has γ+β = 3.43◦. From Equation (8–41)

with ρc = 2600 kg m−3 and ρm = 3300 kg m−3, we find that γ = 0.73◦

and β = 2.70◦. The tectonic stress required to emplace the thrust sheet is

obtained from Equation (8–48). The dependence of this tectonic stress on

the coefficient of friction is given in Figure 8–16. We see that gravitational

sliding will occur if fs < 0.0127; reasonable stress levels require very low

values for the coefficient of friction. Seismic studies indicate that much of

the thrust sheet in the southern Appalachians is underlain by a thin layer

of sediments. These sediments apparently provide a zone of weakness and

a low coefficient of friction. A thrust sheet that is emplaced over a zone of

weakness is also known as a décollement.

Problem 8.4 Consider the stability of the rock slope sketched in Figure 8–

17 against sliding along the plane AB. Assume Amonton’s law is applicable

and show that the condition for slope stability is

tan β <fs. (8.49)

8.7 Earthquakes

We have previously discussed the earthquake cycle in terms of stick–slip

behavior and elastic rebound. This behavior was illustrated in Figure 8–

648 Faulting

Figure 8.17 A rock slope with a potential slide surface AB making an angle β to the horizontal.

4. Due to tectonic motion, shear stress builds up on a locked fault until

the failure stress is reached. At this time an earthquake occurs and the

accumulated stress is relieved.

During an earthquake, the displacement on the fault takes place in a few

seconds. The earthquake propagates along the fault at a velocity near the

speed of sound in the rock (a few kilometers per second). The displacement

on the fault generates seismic waves that propagate through the surrounding

rock. A significant fraction of the stored elastic energy goes into the seismic

waves; the remainder is dissipated as heat by friction on the fault.

To illustrate the earthquake cycle, we will consider the simple slider-block

model illustrated in Figure 8–18. A block of rock of mass m rests on a

surface. The contact area A represents the fault that will rupture to produce

an earthquake. The mass is pressed against the surface by a normal force

Fn. We take the normal stress on the fault to be the lithostatic pressure so

that

Fn = ρghA, (8.50)

where h is the mean depth of the fault being considered. The mass of the

block m is given by

m = ρA3/2. (8.51)

This is a cube with a linear dimension A1/2.

We assume that the block is being pulled along the surface by a constant-

velocity driver plate, the constant velocity is u0. The driver plate is attached

to the block by a spring with a spring constant k. This spring force must be

balanced by a resisting shear force on the surface. This surface shear force

Fτ is given by

Fτ = kx, (8.52)

where x is the extension of the spring. In our model the spring represents the

accumulation of elastic strain in the rock adjacent to the fault. The block

in our model interacts with the surface through friction, which prevents the

8.7 Earthquakes 649

u0

k

m

Fn

x

Figure 8.18 Slider-block model for fault behavior. The driver plate extends the spring at a constant velocity u0 until the spring force kx equals the static friction force Fτ . At this time slip occurs and the cycle repeats.

block from sliding (or a model earthquake from occurring) until a critical

pulling force Fτs is reached. The block sticks and the force in the spring

increases until it equals the frictional resistance to sliding on the surface,

and then slip occurs. The extension of the spring is analogous to the elastic

strain in the rock adjacent to a fault. The slip is analogous to an earthquake

on a fault. This is stick–slip behavior. The stored elastic strain in the spring

is relieved; this is elastic rebound, as previously discussed in Section 8–3.

When the block “sticks” the extension of the spring x is related to the

constant velocity u0 of the driver plate by x = u0t, where t is the time since

the last slip event. From Equation (8–18) the shear stress on a fault is given

by

τ = Gx

2b , (8.53)

where b is the distance from the fault where the uniform velocity is applied.

For a fault it is appropriate to assume that this distance is approximately

equal to the linear dimension of the fault A1/2. Taking b = A1/2 and using

Equation (8–53) we can write an expression for the shear force on the fault:

Fτ = τA = GxA1/2

2 . (8.54)

Thus from Equations (8–52) and (8–54) we have an expression for our model

spring constant:

k = GA1/2

2 . (8.55)

Assuming that the slip condition is given by Amonton’s law, Equation

650 Faulting

(8–23), the static condition for the onset of sliding is

kxs = fsFn. (8.56)

This is the extension of the spring xs required to initiate slip. Substitu-

tion of Equations (8–50) and (8–55) into Equation (8–56) shows that the

accumulated displacement on the fault is given by

xs = 2fsρghA

1/2

G . (8.57)

This is the displacement that would occur on the fault if the shear stress on

the fault was reduced to zero.

Once the block in Figure 8–18 starts to slip, there is still a frictional

force resisting the motion. The simplest representation of this resistance is

through a dynamic coefficient of friction fd defined by

Fτ = fdFn. (8.58)

For stick–slip behavior to occur, the static coefficient of friction must be

greater than the dynamic coefficient of friction, fs > fd. When fs < fd,

stable sliding occurs and the block is pulled along the surface at the velocity

u0. Once sliding begins the equation of motion for the block is

m d2x

dt2 + kx = fdFn. (8.59)

Sliding is analogous to an earthquake and it relieves the accumulated strain

in the spring in analogy to elastic rebound. Substitution of Equations (8–51),

(8–55), and (8–50) into Equation (8–59) gives

2ρA

G

d2x

dt2 + x =

2fdρghA 1/2

G . (8.60)

In writing Equation (8–60) we assumed that the loading velocity of the driver

plate u0 is so slow that it can be neglected during the sliding of the block.

This is reasonable because an earthquake lasts only a few tens of seconds,

whereas the interval between earthquakes on a fault is typically hundreds of

years or more.

To study the motion of the block, we introduce the following nondimen-

sional variables

φ = fs fd

T = t

(

G

2ρA

)1/2

X = xG

2fsρghA1/2 U =

u

fsgh

(

G

)1/2

, (8.61)

8.7 Earthquakes 651

where u = dx/dt. In terms of these variables, the condition for the initiation

of slip given by Equation (8–57) becomes

X = 1 (8.62)

and the equation of motion (8–60) becomes

d2X

dT 2 +X =

1

φ . (8.63)

We assume that slip starts at T = 0 with X = 1 as given by Equation (8–

62). It is also appropriate to assume that the initial slip velocity is zero so

that U =dX/dT = 0 at T = 0. The solution of Equation (8–63) that satisfies

these conditions is

X = 1

φ +

(

1 − 1

φ

)

cos T (8.64)

and the slip velocity is given by

U = dX

dT = −

(

1 − 1

φ

)

sinT. (8.65)

Sliding ends at T = Ts = π when dX/dT is again zero. When the velocity

is zero the friction jumps to its static value, preventing further slip. The

position of the block at the end of slip is X = (2/φ) − 1 so that the total

nondimensional displacement of the block during the slip event is

∆X =

(

2

φ − 1

)

− 1 = 2

(

1

φ − 1

)

. (8.66)

If φ = fs/fd is only slightly larger than 1, then ∆X is small and only a

fraction of the stress (strain) is lost in the slip event. If fd→ 0, we have

φ→∞ and ∆X =−2. Because the dynamic friction is small, energy is con-

served and the energy associated with the extension of the spring X = 1 is

converted to energy associated with the compression of the spring X = −1.

This type of overshoot is rarely seen in actual earthquakes.

Problem 8.5 In the slider-block model, what value of φ gives zero residual

extension of the spring X = 0?

From Equation (8–65) the maximum nondimensional slip velocity Umax

occurs at T = π/2 and is given by

Umax =

(

dX

dT

)

max = −

(

1 − 1

φ

)

. (8.67)

The dependences of X and U on T during slip are given in Figure 8–19 for

φ = 1.25. For this case ∆X = −0.4 and Umax = −0.2.

652 Faulting

U dX

dT =

1

0

−1

X

2

π T

π

Figure 8.19 Dependence of the nondimensional slider-block position X and velocity dX/dT on time T during a slip event as given by Equations (8–64) and (8–65) for φ=1.25.

After the slip event is completed, the spring again extends due to the

velocity u0 of the driver plate. The nondimensional velocity of extension U0

from Equation (8–61) is

U0 = u0

fsg

(

k

m

)1/2

. (8.68)

The nondimensional time before the next slip event ∆Te obtained from

Equations (8–66) and (8–68) is

∆Te = ∆Xe

U0 =

2

U0

(

1 − 1

φ

)

. (8.69)

At the end of this time another slip event occurs and the cycle repeats. Slip

events occur periodically.

Problem 8.6 The spring force on the slider block in Figure 8–18 at the

time of slip initiation is fsFn. What is the spring force on the slider block

at the end of slip?

Problem 8.7 (a) Show that the work done by the driver plate during a

stress accumulation phase is

W = 2m2g2fd

k (fs − fd).

(b) Show that this is also the work required during this time if there is stable

sliding, i.e., if the block moves at the velocity u0 with F = fdfn.

We will now use these results to approximate the actual behavior of a fault

during an earthquake cycle. We first relate the displacement on a fault during

8.7 Earthquakes 653

an earthquake ∆w to the displacement of the slider block using Equations

(8–61) and (8–66) with the result

∆w = 2fsρghA

1/2

G ∆X =

4fsρghA 1/2

G

(

1 − fd fs

)

.

(8.70)

The maximum slip velocity on the fault umax from Equations (8–61) and

(8–67) is

umax = fsgh

(

G

)1/2

Umax = fsgh

(

G

)1/2(

1− fd fs

)

.

(8–71)

The stress on the fault just prior to the earthquake from Equations (8–23)

and (8–50) is τfs = fsρgh. The stress on the slider block is proportional to

the nondimensional extension of the spring X. Prior to a slip event X = 1

and the change in X, ∆X, is given by Equation (8–66). We conclude that

the fraction of the initial stress on a fault that is lost during an earthquake

is equal to ∆X and the stress drop on the fault due to the earthquake ∆τ

is given by

∆τ = τfs∆X = 2fsρgh

(

1 − fd fs

)

, (8.72)

where ∆τ is defined to be a positive quantity.

As an example, let us take the mean depth of the fault to be h= 5 km,

ρ= 2500 kg m−3, and g=9.8 m s−2 and find from Equation (8–50) that

the mean normal stress on the fault σn is 124 MPa. To specify the static

frictional stress on the fault we must choose a coefficient of static friction

and take fs = 0.05. From Equation (8–23) we find that the static frictional

stress on the fault τfs is 6.2 MPa. This is the stress on the fault just prior

to rupture.

Our choice of such a low value for the coefficient of static friction requires

an explanation. As discussed in Section 8–3, a typical value of fs from lab-

oratory experiments is 0.85. However, as we will show, such a high value

for fs requires large stress drops in earthquakes that are not consistent with

observations. One explanation for this low value of fs is a high pore pressure

of water on faults. As seen in Equation (8–24), a high pore pressure pw can

greatly reduce the coefficient of static friction on a fault.

We must also choose a value for the ratio of static to dynamic friction φ.

654 Faulting

Again, values for the dynamic coefficient of friction are controversial. Slip

velocities on faults are high and they cannot be simulated in the laboratory.

We assume φ = 1.1 and find from Equation (8–72) that the stress drop in

the earthquake ∆τ is 1.23 MPa, independent of the area of rupture A. We

will show that observations confirm this. The residual stress on the fault

after an earthquake is τfd = τfs − ∆τ = 5 MPa.

We will now consider an earthquake of a specified size. Let the rupture

area A = 100 km2 so that the characteristic linear dimension A1/2 is 10 km.

For the parameter values given before and G = 3 × 1010 Pa we find from

Equation (8–70) that the displacement on the fault during an earthquake

∆w is 0.82 m. From Equation (8–71) we find that the maximum slip velocity

on the fault during rupture umax is 0.1 m s−1. This is a typical slip velocity

on a fault during an earthquake.

The displacements of the rocks adjacent to a fault generate seismic waves

during an earthquake. These waves are of two types: body waves that prop-

agate through the interior of the Earth and surface waves that propagate

along the surface. There are two types of body waves: P or compressional

waves and S or shear waves. Displacements in compressional waves are in

the direction of propagation and displacements in shear waves are perpen-

dicular to the direction of propagation. There are also two types of surface

waves: Love and Rayleigh waves. Surface waves are similar to wind-driven

waves on an ocean.

The ground motions caused by seismic waves are the primary cause of

damage when an earthquake occurs. Because the displacements in surface

waves are restricted to a thin surface layer, they are primarily responsible

for earthquake damage. Prior to the development of the seismograph in

about 1900 the only measure of the strength of an earthquake was the felt

intensity. An earthquake was quantified in terms of the effects it had on

people, buildings, and the environment in the immediate vicinity of the

rupture. A typical felt intensity scale (the modified Mercalli) is given in

Table 8–1. The maximum felt intensities are usually found near the fault

where the earthquake occurs; felt intensities decrease with distance from

the fault. The felt intensity is influenced by the type and depth of soil; it

is generally higher on deep, loose soils. Because the application of the felt

intensity scale is subjective, care must be taken in its use.

The development of the seismograph made it possible to introduce a quan-

titative measure of earthquake size. The magnitude m of an earthquake is

obtained from the measured surface displacements at seismic stations. The

magnitude scale was originally defined in terms of the amplitude of ground

motions at a specified distance from an earthquake. Typically, the surface

8.7 Earthquakes 655

Table 8.1 Typical Felt Intensity Scale

I Not felt. II Felt by a few people. III Hanging objects sway. IV Windows and doors rattle. V Sleepers waken. VI Windows and glassware broken. VII Difficult to stand. VIII Branches broken from trees. IX Cracks in ground – general panic. X Large landslides – most masonry structures destroyed. XI Nearly total destruction.

Table 8.2 Typical Maximum Felt Intensities and Felt Distances for

Earthquakes of Prescribed Magnitude (m)

Magnitude Maximum Felt Distance (m) Felt Intensity (km)

2 I–II 0 3 III–IV 15 4 V 80 5 VI–VII 150 6 VIII 220 7 IX–X 400 8 XI 600

wave magnitude ms is based on the motions generated by surface waves

(Love and Rayleigh waves) with a 20-s period, and the body wave magnitude

mb is based on the motions generated by body waves (P and S waves) hav-

ing periods of 6.8 s. The magnitude scale is a popular measure of earthquake

strength because of its logarithmic basis, which allows essentially all earth-

quakes to be classified on a scale of 0–10. Unfortunately, the two magnitude

scales, ms and mb, are not equal for a given earthquake. Also, magnitudes

are sensitive to the paths that seismic waves traverse and to conditions in

the source region and near the seismic station. In addition, different types of

earthquakes generate different surface displacements. Thus, published mag-

nitudes for a given earthquake can differ by 10% or more.

An alternative approach to the quantification of the size of an earthquake

is the seismic moment M defined by

656 Faulting

M = GA∆w. (8.73)

This seismic moment is the product of the shear modulus G of the rock in

which the fault is embedded, the fault rupture area A, and the mean dis-

placement across the fault ∆w during the earthquake. The seismic moment

is a measure of the strain released during the earthquake and is determined

from seismograms recorded at a large number of seismic stations.

Although the accepted measure of the size of an earthquake is the seis-

mic moment, the magnitude scale has received such wide acceptance that a

moment magnitude m has been empirically defined in terms of the seismic

moment M using the relation

logM = 1.5m+ 9.1. (8.74)

This definition is consistent with the definition of the surface wave magni-

tude but not with the definition of the body wave magnitude. It is standard

practice to use long-period (50–200 s) body and/or surface waves to directly

determine the seismic moment M , and Equation (8–74) is used to obtain a

moment magnitude. In the remainder of our discussion of earthquakes we

will consider only the moment magnitude.

The moment magnitude can be related to the total energy in the seismic

waves generated by the earthquake Es through the empirical relation

logEs = 1.5m + 4.8, (8.75)

where Es is in joules. Table 8–2 relates the moment magnitude of an earth-

quake to the felt intensity and the felt distance. Again, this is an approximate

relation since the felt intensity will depend on the depth of the earthquake

as well as its magnitude. Also, the felt intensity of an earthquake of a given

magnitude varies from one location to another.

In terms of the simple slider-block model, the seismic moment for a model

earthquake is obtained by substituting the displacement ∆w from Equation

(8–70) into the definition of the seismic moment given in Equation (8–73)

with the result

M = 4fsρghA 3/2 (

1 − fd fs

)

. (8.76)

This result predicts that the seismic moment is proportional to the rupture

area A raised to the 3/2 power. The seismic moments of a large number

of earthquakes are given in Figure 8–20 as a function of the square root

8.7 Earthquakes 657

Figure 8.20 Dependence of the seismic moment M on the square root of the rupture area A1/2 for a large number of earthquakes (Hanks, 1977). The solid line is the prediction given by Equation (8–76) taking fs =0.05, ρ=2500kgm−3, g= 9.8m s−2, h= 5km, and fs/fd =φ= 1.1.

of the rupture area. This figure also shows the prediction of Equation (8–

76) for fs = 0.05, ρ = 2500 kg m−3, g = 9.8 m s−2, h = 5 km, and

fs/fd = φ = 1.1. The corresponding stress drop from Equation (8–72) is

1.23 MPa. The prediction of the slider block model is in good agreement

with the observed moments and rupture areas of earthquakes.

For the earthquake considered previously (A1/2 = 10 km), the moment

M from Equation (8–76) is 2.23 × 1018 J. From Equation (8–74), the cor-

responding moment magnitude m is 6.17. And from Equation (8–75) the

radiated elastic wave energy Es = 1.33 × 1014 J.

We can estimate the elastic energy released in an earthquake using the

slider-block model. From Equations (8–55) and (8–57), the energy stored in

658 Faulting

the spring prior to the earthquake is

Es = 1

2 kx2

s = f2 s ρ

2g2h2A3/2

G . (8.77)

From Equation (8–70) the energy in the spring after the earthquake is

Er = 1

2 k(xs − ∆w)2 =

f2 s ρ

2g2h2A3/2

G

(

2fd fs

− 1

)2

.

(8.78)

The energy released in the model earthquake is

∆E = Es − Er = 4fsfdρ

2g2h2A3/2

G

(

1 − fd fs

)

.

(8.79)

For the earthquake with A1/2 = 10 km, we find ∆E = 4.13 × 1014 J. This

is higher than the seismic radiated energy given before, as expected. In our

simple slider-block model the elastic energy lost in a slip event goes into

frictional heating on the slipping surface. In a real earthquake a fraction of

the lost energy is radiated in seismic waves and the remainder is converted

to heat by friction on the fault.

Problem 8.8 Compute the wave energy released in a magnitude 8.5 earth-

quake and compare it with the amount of heat lost through the surface of

the Earth in an entire year.

Problem 8.9 Data on the frequency with which earthquakes of a

given magnitude occur can be summarized by the formula

dN

dm = 5.25 × 107 exp(−2.07m), (8.80)

where dN is the number of earthquakes per year with magnitude between

m and m+ dm. Use Equations (8–75) and (8–80) to show that the rate of

energy release Ė12 by earthquakes with magnitudes lying between m1 and

m2 is

Ė12(J yr−1)= 7.35× 1012{e1.25m2 − e1.25m1}. (8.81)

If the largest earthquakes to occur have magnitude 8.5, compute the yearly

release of wave energy. How does this compare with the energy released by a

single magnitude 8.5 earthquake? What do you conclude about the relative

contributions of large numbers of small earthquakes and small numbers of

large earthquakes to the yearly release of seismic energy?

8.8 San Andreas Fault 659

8.8 San Andreas Fault

Let us now turn our attention to two major strike–slip faults. First consider

the San Andreas fault, which stretches almost the entire length of the state of

California, as shown in Figure 8–21. Along much of its length the motion on

the fault is primarily strike–slip. The San Andreas is recognized as a major

boundary between the Pacific and North American plates. If the fault is

to accommodate the relative motion between these two plates by strike–

slip motion, it must lie on a small circle about the pole of rotation that

defines the relative motion between the two plates. Two small circles drawn

about the pole of rotation given in Table 1–6 are compared with the trend

of the fault in Figure 8–21. The small circles are in excellent agreement

with the trend of the fault along much of its length. This is strong evidence

that a large fraction of the relative motion between the Pacific and North

American plates occurs on the San Andreas fault. Studies of the relative

motion between the two plates give a relative velocity of 46 mm yr−1 (see

Section 1–8).

The San Andreas fault appears to be divided into four distinct sections

that exhibit quite different behavior. Some sections of the fault exhibit little

seismic activity; the fault appears to be locked, and strain is being accumu-

lated. The accumulated strain on these sections is relieved in great earth-

quakes. On other sections of the fault, small earthquakes and aseismic creep

relieve at least a fraction of the accumulating strain.

The northern terminus of the fault is near Cape Mendocino at the triple

junction of the Pacific, North American, and Juan de Fuca plates. A northern

locked section extends about 300 km from Cape Mendocino to near Redwood

City. A fault break with surface displacements of about 4 m was reported

along the entire length of this section in the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.

There has been no reported fault creep or earthquakes on this section since

1906.

A central free section extends some 300 km from Redwood City to near

Cholame. Fault creep and small earthquakes regularly occur on this section

of the fault. Surface displacements during the 1906 earthquake extended

some 100 km into this section, but the magnitude of the surface displacement

was considerably less than in the northern locked section. The rate of fault

creep on this section of the fault is 20 to 30 mm yr−1. This is less than the

46 mm yr−1 relative plate velocity given in Section 1–8.

A southern locked section of the fault extends some 350 km from near

Cholame to near San Bernardino. There were reports of fault breaks along

the entire length of this section during the 1857 southern California earth-

660 Faulting

Figure 8.21 Surface trace of the locked and free sections of the San Andreas fault. Also shown are two small circles drawn about the pole of rotation for the motion of the Pacific plate relative to the North American plate.

quake. Since then there have been no reports of earthquakes or fault creep

on this section. The curvature of the fault north of San Bernardino proba-

bly plays an important role in the behavior of the fault in this section. The

convergence of the plates at this bend in the fault requires a thrusting com-

ponent, and the result is the uplift associated with the Transverse Ranges,

a series of mountain belts in this area.

South of San Bernardino, the San Andreas fault splays off into a series of

8.8 San Andreas Fault 661

faults. Small and moderate earthquakes and fault creep occur on a number

of these faults, and it appears that this section of the fault is not locked.

It is consistent with our present knowledge of the San Andreas fault to

postulate that displacements on the locked sections of the fault occur during

great earthquakes. Earthquakes on the two locked zones occur at different

times, possibly alternately, and the central free section is a transition zone

between the two locked zones.

The documented history of great earthquakes on the San Andreas fault

is relatively short; the San Francisco earthquake on April 18, 1906, was

certainly a great earthquake, with an estimated surface wave magnitude

ms of 8.25. Based on the surface offsets given in Figure 2–27, we take the

mean displacement on the fault in this earthquake to be ∆w = 4 m along

a 200-km length of the fault. For a rupture depth of 15 km, the rupture

area A is 3000 km2. With G = 3 × 1010 Pa, the seismic moment M of this

earthquake from Equation (8–73) is 3.6 × 1020 J. From Equation (8–74),

the corresponding moment magnitude m is 7.6. Because very few seismic

records are available to estimate the surface wave magnitude, the moment

magnitude is the preferred magnitude value for this earthquake.

If the full relative plate velocity of u0 = 46 mm yr−1 was accommodated

on the San Andreas fault, the 4 m of displacement during the 1906 earth-

quake would represent 90 years of accumulated strain. However, tectonic

displacements associated with the Pacific–North American plate boundary

occur throughout the western United States. In particular, other important

faults in California accommodate a fraction of the relative motion between

the plates. Based on geodetic observations, it is estimated that about 35 mm

yr−1 or 60% of the total motion is accommodated directly on the San An-

dreas fault. With this rate of strain accumulation, the 1906 San Francisco

earthquake represents 114 years of accumulated strain. There is recorded

evidence of a large earthquake in northern California in 1838, but it has not

been documented that this earthquake accommodated major displacements

on the northern locked section of the fault.

A great earthquake occurred on the San Andreas fault north of Los An-

geles on January 9, 1857. It is generally accepted that this was a great

earthquake on the southern locked section, although there were no direct

observations of surface displacements. Studies of apparent stream offsets at-

tributed to this earthquake indicate a mean displacement ∆w of 7 m and a

magnitude ms ≈ 8.3. A second great historic earthquake occurred on this

section on December 8, 1812. Sieh et al. (1989) dated the displaced lay-

ers of sediments in riverbeds adjacent to this southern locked section and

concluded that great earthquakes had occurred on this section in the years

662 Faulting

1480± 15, 1346± 17, and 1100± 65. The mean interval between these five

earthquakes is 190 years; the longest interval was 332 years and the shortest

was 45. In 2000, the interval since the last great earthquake is 143 years

and the accumulated strain, assuming a relative velocity of 35 mm yr−1,

would result in a slip of 5 m if relieved by a great earthquake. Although

great earthquakes occur on the southern locked section of the San Andreas

fault fairly regularly, they are certainly not periodic. This behavior can be

attributed to the complex interactions between the San Andreas fault and

the many other major faults in the region that have large earthquakes.

The Parkfield section of the San Andreas fault just north of the southern

locked section has a particularly interesting history of seismicity. During

the past 150 years, earthquakes with m ≈ 6 have occurred with remarkable

regularity. Events occurred in 1857, 1881, 1901, 1922, 1934, and 1966. The

mean interval between these earthquakes is 22 years and the shortest is 12

years and the longest is 32 years. The prediction that an m ≈ 6 earthquake

would occur on this section prior to 1992 with a 95% probability led to a

massive instrumentation of the fault; the predicted earthquake had not yet

occurred in 2001. Again, we have an example of earthquakes on a major

fault occurring fairly regularly, but certainly not periodically.

The magnitudes of earthquakes associated with the San Andreas fault

system are given in Figure 8–22 as a function of latitude for the period from

1880 to 2000. Earthquakes with a magnitude of 5 or larger that occurred

within 100 km of the fault are included. The extent of the 1906 fault break

and the division of the fault into sections are indicated. The reporting bias

evident in the data can be attributed to the large increase in the number

of seismographs since 1950, which has greatly improved the recording of

earthquakes. Despite the variations in the quality of the data some clear

trends are discernible. The most obvious is the reduction in the number

of small and intermediate size earthquakes adjacent to the northern locked

section following the 1906 earthquake. The first intermediate size earthquake

to occur was the October 17, 1989, Loma Prieta earthquake (m = 7.1). In

direct contrast, a number of intermediate size earthquakes occurred in this

region prior to the 1906 earthquake. They include one in the Santa Cruz

mountains in 1865 (m ≈ 6.5), Hayward in 1868 (m ≈ 6.8), Vacaville in

1892 (m ≈ 6.8), and Mare Island in 1898 (m ≈ 6.5). There appears to

have been a systematic activation of seismic activity prior to the great 1906

earthquake. The reduction in seismic activity following the 1906 earthquke

is strong evidence that the stress level in the elastic lithosphere adjacent

to the northern locked section of the San Andreas fault was significantly

reduced by the 1906 earthquake.

8.8 San Andreas Fault 663

F ig

u re

8. 22

E a rt

h qu

a ke

s w it h in

1 0 0 km

o f th

e S a n

A n d re

a s

fa u lt

w it h

m a gn

it u d es

gr ea

te r

th a n

m =

5 th

a t oc

cu rr

ed

fr o m

1 8 8 0

to 2 0 0 0

a re

gi ve

n a s

a fu

n ct

io n

o f la

ti tu

d e.

T h e

so li d

li n e

sh o w s

th e

su rf

a ce

ru p tu

re o f th

e 1 9 0 6

ea rt

h qu

a ke

. T

h e

le tt er

s lo ca

te th

e K

er n

C o u n ty

(A ),

S a n

F er

n a n d o

(B ),

L a n d er

s (C

), N

o rt

h ri

d ge

(D ),

a n d

H ec

to r

M in

e (E

) ea

rt h qu

a ke

s. T

h e

fr ee

a n d

lo ck

ed se

ct io

n s

o f th

e fa

u lt

a re

lo ca

te d

by th

e d a sh

ed li n es

.

664 Faulting

Figure 8.23 The complex tectonic situation in Turkey. The Anatolian plate is bounded on the north by the North Anatolian fault and on the east by the East Anatolian fault.

Let us now turn our attention to the seismic activity adjacent to the

southern locked section of the San Andreas fault as illustrated in Figure 8–

22. No great earthquake has occurred on this section since 1857. A significant

number of intermediate size earthquakes have occurred adjacent to this sec-

tion since 1952. These include the July 21, 1952, Kern County earthquake

(m = 7.5), the February 9, 1971, San Fernando earthquake (m = 6.7),

the June 28, 1992, Landers earthquake (m = 7.3), the January 17, 1994,

Northridge earthquake (m = 6.7), and the October 16, 1999, Hector Mine

earthquake (m = 7.1). Indicated by letters in Figure 8–22, these events may

be indicative of a systematic seismic activation preceding the next great

earthquake on the southern locked section of the San Andreas fault.

8.9 North Anatolian Fault

Another example of a major strike–slip fault is the North Anatolian fault

in Turkey. This fault is the site of a remarkable series of major earthquakes

that began in 1939; the earthquakes swept along almost the entire 1000-km

length of the fault from east to west. The tectonic setting of the North Ana-

tolian fault is considerably more complex than that of the San Andreas fault.

Turkey forms part of the broad collisional zone that extends from southern

Europe through Asia to India. The tectonics of Turkey can be at least par-

tially understood if a major part of it is assumed to consist of a small plate,

the Anatolian plate, as illustrated in Figure 8–23. The collision between the

8.9 North Anatolian Fault 665

Table 8.3 Characteristics of a Series of Earthquakes with Magnitudes

Greater than 7 along the North Anàtolian Fault

Length of Offset Date m Break (km) (m)

December 26, 1939 7.8 360 7.5 December 20, 1942 7.1 50 1.7 November 26, 1943 7.3 260 4.5 February 1, 1944 7.3 180 3.5 May 26, 1957 7.0 40 1.65 July 22, 1967 7.1 80 2.60 August 17, 1999 7.4 100 2.5

Arabian plate and the Eurasian plate is wedging the Anatolian plate toward

the west. The North Anatolian fault forms the northern boundary of the

plate and the East Anatolian fault the southeastern boundary. The west-

erly movement of the plate causes right-lateral strike–slip displacements on

the North Anatolian fault and left-lateral strike–slip displacements on the

East Anatolian fault. Subduction of the African plate occurs at a series of

arcuate trenches along the southern boundary of the Anatolian plate. The

foundering of the African plate may result in tensional stresses in the Ana-

tolian plate landward of the trenches. These stresses may also contribute

to the westward movement of the Anatolian plate. To the west and east of

the Anatolian plate the tectonics of the broad collisional zone become even

more complex. To the east of the Anatolian plate the convergence between

the Arabian and the Eurasian plates is accommodated in a broad zone of

compression. The western part of the Anatolian plate merges into an exten-

sive zone of extensional tectonics in western Turkey and Greece. Because of

the complexity, plate tectonics provides relatively poor constraints on the

relative velocity across the North Anatolian fault. This relative velocity is

estimated to be about 15 mm yr−1.

The magnitude of earthquakes associated with the North Anatolian fault

system are given in Figure 8–24 as a function of longitude for the period 1880

to 2000. Also included are the surface breaks associated with a series of large

earthquakes that have occurred since 1939. The dates, magnitudes, lengths

of the surface breaks, and offsets for these earthquakes are summarized in

Table 8–3.

The first and largest of these earthquakes was the Erzincan earthquake

of December 26, 1939, with a magnitude of 7.8. The surface break extended

from near the junction of the North and East Anatolian faults some 350 km

666 Faulting

Figure 8.24 Earthquakes on and adjacent to the North Anatolian fault with magnitudes greater than m=5 that occurred from 1880 to 2000 are given as a function of longitude. The solid lines are the surface ruptures of the sequence of large earthquakes that occurred on the North Anatolian fault between 1939 and 1999.

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting 667

to the west. This event was followed on December 20, 1942, by an earthquake

on a more northerly branch of the fault near the western end of the 1939

surface break. Another large earthquake occurred on the northerly branch on

November 26, 1943, extending the surface break 260 km to the west. This was

followed on February 1, 1944, by another large earthquake that extended the

surface break another 190 km to the west. Two large earthquakes occurred in

1957 and 1967 near the western termination of the 1944 surface break. The

propagating sequence was extended to the west by the August 17, 1999,

Izmit earthquake with a surface break of 100 km. This earthquake killed

close to 20,000 people. The propagation of seismic activity along the fault

can be attributed to the transfer of stress from a section of the fault on

which an earthquake has occurred to an adjacent section. This behavior is

quite different from that on the San Andreas fault.

Fault creep occurs on the North Anatolian fault at Ismetpasa, which is

located midway along the surface rupture of the February 1, 1944, magnitude

7.3 earthquake. Between 1970 and 1980 the rate of fault creep was close

to 10 mm yr−1. This observation of fault creep is in contrast to the San

Andreas fault system, where fault creep apparently occurs on sections of the

fault where great earthquakes do not occur. The fault creep on the North

Anatolian fault and on the San Andreas fault are the only well-documented

examples of aseismic fault creep at this time.

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting

In this section we will consider two mathematical solutions of the equations

of elasticity that are applicable to displacements during an earthquake on a

strike–slip fault. The models are idealized, but they illustrate some impor-

tant aspects of the problem. In the first example we determine the strain

field caused by a displacement on a fault. We consider the half-space y > 0

in which there is initially a uniform shear stress σxz,0 as shown in Figure

8–25a. A two-dimensional crack that extends from the surface to a depth

y = a is then introduced at x = 0. The introduction of the crack causes

the displacements shown in Figure 8–25b. The resulting strain field models

the strain due to an earthquake on a strike–slip fault. We assume that the

only nonzero component of displacement is wz in the z direction. After the

introduction of the crack there are two nonzero components of shear stress:

σxz (and σzx) and σyz (and σzy). To simplify the analysis, we neglect the

frictional stress on the fault after the earthquake has occurred and assume

σxz = 0 on x = 0, 0 ≤ y ≤ a. The displacement and stress fields in this

two-dimensional problem are independent of z.

668 Faulting

Figure 8.25 The displacement field due to faulting on a model strike–slip fault. The surface is at y=0 and the fault is at x =0, 0≤ y≤ a. Displace- ments are in the z direction. (a) Initially the half-space y> 0 is in a state of uniform shear stress σxz,0. (b) After the introduction of the crack the shear stress on the crack is zero (σxz =0) and there is a displacement across the crack.

The determination of the stresses, strains, and displacements in the half-

space y > 0 requires that we derive the differential equation expressing the

equilibrium of forces on a small element of material. Figure 8–26 shows a

small rectangular parallelepiped in the half-space with those nonzero stress

components that exert forces in the z direction. Because the net force in the

z direction on this small volume element must be zero, we can write

{σxz(x+ δx, y) − σxz(x, y)} δy δz + {σyz(x, y + δy) − σyz(x, y)} δx δz = 0. (8.82)

Upon expanding σxz(x + δx, y) and σyz(x, y + δy) in a Taylor series, per-

forming the indicated subtractions and dividing by δxδyδz, we obtain the

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting 669

Figure 8.26 The nonzero stress components that exert forces in the z di- rection on a small rectangular parallelepiped in the half-space of the model strike–slip faulting problem of Figure 8–25.

equation of equilibrium in the form

∂σxz ∂x

+ ∂σyz ∂y

= 0. (8.83)

Both σxz and σyz are related to the derivatives of the displacement wz. From

Equations (2–102), and (3–49), we obtain

σxz = G ∂wz ∂x

σyz = G ∂wz ∂y

. (8.84)

Substitution of Equation (8–84) into (8–83) yields

∂2wz ∂x2

+ ∂2wz ∂y2

= 0. (8.85)

The displacement wz satisfies Laplace’s equation.

The solution for the displacement prior to the introduction of the crack

is simply

wz = σxz,0 G

x. (8.86)

After the introduction of the crack the solution to Laplace’s equation must

satisfy the boundary conditions

∂wz ∂y

= 0 at y = 0 (8.87)

670 Faulting

∂wz ∂x

= 0 at x = 0, 0 < y < a (8.88)

wz = 0 at x = 0, a < y (8.89)

wz → σxz,0 G

x as x→ ∞. (8.90)

The first condition follows from Equation (8–84) and the fact that the shear

stress σyz must be zero at the surface y = 0. The second condition comes

from Equation (8–84) together with the vanishing of the shear stress σxz on the crack. The third condition is a consequence of the overall geometry

and the fact that the crack does not extend below y = a. Finally, the fourth

condition is a requirement that the displacement far from the crack equal

the initial displacement.

The solution of Laplace’s equation that satisfies conditions (8–87) to (8–

90) can only be obtained by using the mathematical theory of complex

variables. We introduce the complex variable Z according to

Z = y + ix, (8.91)

where i is √ −1. The real and imaginary parts of any function of Z are

solutions of Laplace’s equation. To solve the model strike–slip faulting prob-

lem, we must devise a function of Z whose real or imaginary part satisfies

Equations (8–87) to (8–90). The function that does this is

wz = σxz,0 G

Im{(Z2 − a2)1/2}, (8.92)

where Im denotes the imaginary part of the complex function. We can imme-

diately verify that conditions (8–89) and (8–90) are satisfied. On the plane

x = 0, Z = y and Wz becomes

wz = σxz,0 G

Im{(y2 − a2)1/2}. (8.93)

This is clearly zero for y > a because (y2 − a2)1/2 is a real number.

The surface displacement is obtained by setting Z = ix in Equation (8–92)

with the result

wz = ±σxz,0 G

Im{(−x2 − a2)1/2}

= ±σxz,0 G

Im{i(x2 + a2)1/2}

= ±σxz,0 G

Re{(x2 + a2)1/2}

= ±σxz,0 G

(x2 + a2)1/2. (8.94)

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting 671

The plus sign is for x > 0, the minus sign is for x < 0, and Re denotes the

real part of a complex function. In the limit x→∞ this reduces to

wz → σxz,0 G

x. (8.95)

Thus conditions (8–89) and (8–90) are indeed satisfied by Equation (8–92).

To check the other two conditions, we need to differentiate wz with respect

to x and y. The derivatives of the complex quantity (Z2−a2)1/2 are obtained

by using the chain rule as follows

∂x (Z2 − a2)1/2 =

∂Z

∂x

d

dZ (Z2 − a2)1/2

= iZ

(Z2 − a2)1/2 (8.96)

∂y (Z2 − a2)1/2 =

∂Z

∂y

d

dZ (Z2 − a2)1/2

= Z

(Z2 − a2)1/2 . (8.97)

From Equations (8–92), (8–96), and (8–97) we obtain

∂wz ∂y

= σxz,0 G

Im

{

Z

(Z2 − a2)1/2

}

(8.98)

∂wz ∂x

= σxz,0 G

Re

{

Z

(Z2 − a2)1/2

}

. (8.99)

On y = 0 we have Z = ix and Equation (8–98) becomes

∂wz ∂y

= σxz,0 G

Im

{

ix

(−x2 − a2)1/2

}

= σxz,0 G

Im

{

ix

i(x2 + a2)1/2

}

= σxz,0 G

Im

{

x

(x2 + a2)1/2

}

= 0. (8.100)

Therefore condition (8–87) is satisfied. On x = 0, Z = y and Equation

(8–99) becomes

∂wz ∂x

= σxz,0 G

Re

{

y

(y2 − a2)1/2

}

. (8.101)

This is clearly zero when 0 < y < a because (y2 − a2)1/2 is an imaginary

number. Thus Condition (8–88) is satisfied.

672 Faulting

The shear stresses in the half-space after the introduction of the crack are

obtained by combining Equations (8–84), (8–98), and (8–99)

σxz = σxz,0 Re

{

Z

(Z2 − a2)1/2

}

(8.102)

σyz = σxz,0 Im

{

Z

(Z2 − a2)1/2

}

. (8.103)

On the plane x = 0 the stresses are

σxz = 0 0 ≤ y < a

= σxz,0y

(y2 − a2)1/2 y > a (8.104)

σyz = −σxz,0y

(a2 − y2)1/2 0 ≤ y < a

= 0 y > a. (8.105)

As y→∞, σyz→ 0 and σxz→ σxz,0 on the plane of the crack. Both compo-

nents of shear stress are infinite at the crack tip x = 0, y = a. This stress

singularity is typical of crack problems. On the surface y = 0, Z = ix, and

the stresses according to Equations (8–102) and (8–103) are

σxz = ±σxz,0 x

(x2 + a2)1/2 (8.106)

σyz = 0. (8.107)

As x→ ±∞ we again find σxz → σxz,0.

We can use the solution obtained above to determine the surface displace-

ment caused by a displacement on a strike–slip fault. Prior to the introduc-

tion of the crack the surface displacement is given by Equation (8–86). After

the crack is introduced the surface displacement is given by Equation (8–

94). The surface displacement caused by the introduction of the crack ∆wz is the difference between Equations (8–94) and (8–86)

∆wz = ±σxz,0 G

[(x2 + a2)1/2 − |x|]. (8.108)

Thus, the displacement across the fault (crack) is

∆wz0 = 2aσxz,0 G

(8.109)

and the coseismic displacement as a function of the distance x from the fault

can be written

∆wz = ±∆wz0 2

[(

1 + x2

a2

)1/2

− |x| a

]

. (8.110)

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting 673

Figure 8.27 Surface displacements during the 1906 San Francisco earth- quake as a function of distance from the San Andreas fault compared with the predicted displacements from Equation (8–110) for ∆wz0 = 3.2 m and a= 6km.

The prediction of Equation (8–110) for the dependence of coseismic surface

displacement on distance from the fault is compared with data from the

1906 San Francisco earthquake in Figure 8–27. Measurements of surface

displacement at several distances from the San Andreas fault are shown by

the circles, while the solid curve is a plot of Equation (8–110) with ∆wz0 =

3.2 m and a = 6 km. For G = 30 GPa, these values of ∆wz0 and a correspond

to a shear stress σxz,0 = 8 MPa. Because earthquakes occur on the San

Andreas fault to depths of 12 to 15 km, this value of a is probably too small

by about a factor of 2. This disagreement can be attributed in part to the

assumption that σxz = 0 for the entire depth of the fault after an earthquake.

As discussed before, a nonzero residual stress is expected because of friction

on the fault. The stress drop during the earthquake, though quite low, is

probably reasonably accurate.

Coseismic horizontal displacements associated with the m = 7.3 Landers

(California) earthquake of June 28, 1992, obtained from synthetic aperture

radar interferometry (INSAR) are given in Figure 8–28 as a function of

distance from the rupture. The INSAR pattern used to obtain these dis-

placements was given in Figure 2–38. The surface displacements during this

earthquake were primarily right-lateral strike–slip. The observed displace-

ment data in Figure 8–28 are compared with the predicted displacements

from Equation (8–110) for ∆wz0 = 2 m and a = 5 km. For G = 30 GPa,

674 Faulting

Figure 8.28 Surface displacements during the 1992 m=7.3 Landers earth- quake as a function of the distance x from the fault. Positive distances are to the northeast and negative distances to the southwest. The data points are from the synthetic aperture radar interferometry image in Figure 2–38 (Massonnet et al., 1993). The solid line gives the predicted displacements from Equation (8–110) with ∆ wz0 = 2 m and a= 5 km.

these values of ∆wz0 and a correspond to a shear stress σxz,0 = 6 MPa from

Equation (8–109).

These examples illustrate how surface displacements can be obtained when

faulting occurs on a specified fault. The coseismic surface displacements as-

sociated with an earthquake are often measured by geodetic methods. If

the fault plane is known from the location of earthquakes, then various

distributions of displacement on the fault can be considered until the sur-

face displacements are matched. The distributed displacements on the fault

are known as dislocations. The application of this approach requires ex-

tensive numerical calculations. For an earthquake involving only local dis-

placements, this procedure may be reasonably successful in determining the

distribution of strain and the change in stress associated with the earth-

quake. However, for very large plate boundary earthquakes such as the 1906

San Francisco earthquake, displacements are expected to occur throughout

the lithosphere.

Let us now consider a two-dimensional model for the cyclic accumulation

and release of stress and strain on a strike–slip fault located at x = 0 and ac-

commodating horizontal motion in the z direction between two lithospheric

plates of thickness b, as illustrated in Figure 8–29. The initial situation shown

in Figure 8–29a corresponds to a time after a major earthquake when the

shear stress and shear strain associated with the interaction between the

adjacent plates have been reduced to zero by both the main shock and the

relaxation effects of aftershocks. The plates are subject to a uniform relative

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting 675

Figure 8.29 The displacement field due to the stick–slip behavior of two lithospheric plates of thickness b sliding past each other. (a) Initially there is no stress but the fault at x =0 is locked to a depth a. (b) The plates are displaced but no displacement occurs on the locked part of the fault. (c) The locked part of the fault fails and the plates are uniformly displaced with respect to each other and the stress is zero. The cycle repeats.

motion parallel to the fault. We assume that the fault is locked to a depth

a and that no stress is transmitted across the fault at greater depths. The

base of each plate is also assumed to be stress-free. The shear stress and

shear strain accumulate as a result of the relative motion and maximize in

the vicinity of the fault, as illustrated in Figure 8–29b. When the failure

stress is reached on the locked fault, an earthquake occurs. The earthquake

relieves the stress in the immediate vicinity of the locked fault and transfers

stress to the lower plastic portion of the fault. The stresses on this deeper

zone are relieved by plastic flow, a process that may be responsible for the

decaying sequence of aftershocks that follows a major earthquake. In our

model we assume that the accumulated stresses are totally relieved follow-

ing the aftershock sequence, as illustrated in Figure 8–29c. Except for the

finite displacement on the plate boundary the state of zero shear stress and

676 Faulting

zero shear strain is identical with that illustrated in Figure 8–29a. The cyclic

process is then repeated.

As in the previous example there is only one nonzero component of dis-

placement wz and two nonzero components of shear stress σxz (and σzx)

and σyz (and σzy). The displacement wz satisfies Laplace’s equation (8–

85). Initially the displacement and shear stresses are zero; after strain has

accumulated the required boundary conditions are

∂wz ∂y

= 0 at y = 0, b (8.111)

wz = 0 at x = 0, 0 < y < a (8.112)

∂wz ∂x

= 0 at x = 0, a < y < b. (8.113)

The first condition is the vanishing of the shear stress σyz at the surface and

at the base of the plate. Equation (8–112) requires the displacement to be

zero on the locked portion of the fault. The third condition is the vanishing

of the shear stress σxz on the plastic part of the fault. The solution to this

problem in terms of the complex variable Z = y + ix is

wz =A Re

ln

sin πZ 2b +

(

sin2 πZ 2b − sin2 πa

2b

)1/2

sin πa 2b

,

(8–114)

where A is a constant of integration. The complex components of sin Z,

cosZ, and lnZ are given by

sinZ = sin y coshx+ i cos y sinhx (8.115)

cosZ = cos y cosh x− i sin y sinhx (8.116)

lnZ = 1

2 ln(y2 + x2) + i tan−1 x

y . (8.117)

On the surface, y = 0 and Z = ix, the displacement is

wz = A ln

sinh πx 2b +

(

sinh2 πx 2b + sin2 πa

2b

)1/2

sin πa 2b

.

(8.118)

At large distances from the fault, πx/(2b) ≫ 1, the surface displacement

becomes

8.10 Some Elastic Solutions for Strike–Slip Faulting 677

Figure 8.30 Surface velocity uz as a function of distance x from the San Andreas fault in southern California. The data points are a compilation of velocity measurements using GPS, VLBI, and surface triangulation (after Shen et al., 1996). The solid curve is from Equation (8–128) taking the thickness of the elastic lithosphere b=75 km, the depth of the locked por- tion of the fault a= 10 km, and requiring uz =± 23 mm yr−1 at x =± 135 km.

wz ≈ A ln

{

2 sinh πx 2b

sin πa 2b

}

≈ A

{

ln eπx/2b − ln sin πa

2b

}

≈ A πx

2b . (8.119)

The two shear stress components are found by differentiating Equation

(8–114) with the result

σxz = G ∂wz ∂x

= −πGA 2b

Im

cos πZ2b (

sin2 πZ 2b − sin2 πa

2b

)1/2

(8.120)

σyz = G ∂wz ∂y

= πGA

2b Re

cos πZ2b (

sin2 πZ 2b − sin2 πa

2b

)1/2

.

678 Faulting

(8.121)

On the surface, y = 0, Z = ix, the shear stress is

σxz = πGA

2b

cosh πx 2b

(

sinh2 πx 2b + sin2 πa

2b

)1/2 , (8.122)

and σyz is zero on y = 0 as required by condition (8–111). At large distances

from the fault, πx/(2b) ≫ 1, the shear stress becomes

σxz ≈ πGA

2b ctnh

πx

2b ≈ πGA

2b ≡ σxz,0. (8.123)

Far from the fault the surface shear stress is a constant. The constant of

integration A is related to the shear stress applied across the fault at large

distances from the fault. At the fault, x = 0, the surface shear stress is given

by

σxz = πGA

2b sin(πa/2b) =

σxz,0 sin(πa/2b)

. (8.124)

For small values of a/b the stress is strongly concentrated near the fault.

It is of interest to compare the results of this analysis with the measured

surface velocities in the vicinity of the San Andreas fault. Observed velocity

vectors for geodetic stations in southern California were given in Figure 2–

37. These velocities were obtained using global positioning system (GPS)

and very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations. The observed

surface velocities as a function of distance from the San Andreas fault are

given in Figure 8–30. The velocity on the fault trace is taken to be zero

and the distances x measured perpendicular to the fault are positive to the

northeast and negative to the southwest. Velocities on the Pacific plate are

positive (to the northwest) and velocities on the North American plate are

negative (to the southeast).

The theoretical formula for the surface velocity parallel to a strike–slip

fault as a function of the distance from the fault uz(x) is obtained by taking

the time derivative of surface displacement given in Equation (8–118). The

result is

uz = ∂wz ∂t

= dA

dt

× ln

sinh πx 2b +

(

sinh2 πx 2b + sin2 πa

2b

)1/2

sin πa 2b

.

8.11 Stress Diffusion 679

(8.125)

At large distances from the fault, Equation (8–119) indicates that

uz ≈ dA

dt

πx

2b . (8.126)

The model parameter dA/dt can be related to the relative velocity ur across

the San Andreas fault by requiring the displacement rate ∂wz/∂t to equal

ur/2 at a distance xr from the fault. If we assume that xr is sufficiently large

so that Equation (8–126) is valid, we can write

ur 2

=

(

∂wz ∂t

)

x=xr

= πxr 2b

dA

dt . (8.127)

Substitution of Equation (8–127) into Equation (8–125) gives

uz = bur πxr

ln

sinh πx 2b +

(

sinh2 πx 2b + sin2 πa

2b

)1/2

sin πa 2b

.

(8.128)

To compare this result with the data from the San Andreas fault, let the

thickness of the elastic lithosphere b = 75 km and the depth of the locked

portion of the fault a = 10 km. We assume that the relative velocity across

the San Andreas fault determined from plate tectonic studies, 46 mm yr−1,

is applied at a distance xr = 135 km from the fault. The theoretical rate of

strain accumulation using these parameters and Equation (8–128) is com-

pared with the observations in Figure 8–30. We see that reasonable agree-

ment between theory and experiment is obtained. The cyclic strain accu-

mulation and release is restricted to the immediate vicinity of the fault. We

previously reached this same conclusion in Section 8–6 using a more approx-

imate analysis. In the next section we suggest that this restriction is due to

the interaction of the elastic lithosphere with the viscous asthenosphere.

8.11 Stress Diffusion

The interaction of the viscous asthenosphere with the overlying elastic litho-

sphere causes the cyclic strains on a major strike–slip fault to be damped

with distance from the fault. The effect can be demonstrated by the simple

model illustrated in Figure 8–31. An elastic lithosphere of thickness hL over-

lies a Newtonian viscous asthenosphere of thickness ha. The fault, located at

x = 0 strikes in the z direction. The cyclic behavior of the fault is modeled

by a periodic displacement applied to the elastic lithosphere at x = 0. To

680 Faulting

Figure 8.31 Model for determining the damping of cyclic strains on a fault by the interaction of an elastic lithosphere of thickness hL with a Newtonian viscous asthenosphere of thickness ha. The fault is at x= 0 and strikes in the z direction.

simplify the analysis, we neglect the vertical variation of the displacement

wzL in the lithosphere. We also assume that there are no variations along

the strike of the fault, that is, ∂/∂z = 0. Thus we take wzL = wzL(x).

The partial differential equation governing the behavior of the lithosphere

can be derived by carrying out a force balance on a section of the lithosphere

of width dx and unit length in the z direction, as illustrated in Figure 8–32.

The displacement of the lithosphere parallel to the strike of the fault gives

rise to the elastic shear stresses σxz on the vertical boundaries of the element

and the viscous shear stress τyz on its base. The balance of forces on the

element in the z direction gives

τyz dx+ {σxz(x+ dx) − σxz(x)}hL = 0 (8.129)

or

τyz = −hL ∂σxz ∂x

. (8.130)

Because the elastic shear stress is related to the strike displacement by

σxz = G ∂wzL ∂x

, (8.131)

where G is the shear modulus of the lithosphere (see Equations [2–102] and

[3–49]), we can rewrite the force balance equation as

τyz = −hLG ∂2wzL ∂x2

. (8.132)

To relate the viscous shear stress in the asthenosphere to wzL, we assume

that the velocity at the base of the asthenosphere is zero and that the viscous

8.11 Stress Diffusion 681

Figure 8.32 The force balance on a section of the lithosphere of width dx and unit length parallel to the strike of the fault.

flow in the asthenosphere can be approximated by the linear Couette flow

considered in Section 6–2. From Equations (6–1) and (6–13),

τyz = −µ ha

∂wzL ∂t

, (8.133)

where µ is the viscosity of the asthenosphere. Substitution of this expression

into Equation (8–132) yields

∂wzL ∂t

= hahLG

µ

∂2wzL ∂x2

. (8.134)

Both the displacement of the lithosphere and unsteady one-dimensional heat

conduction are governed by the one-dimensional diffusion equation (see Sec-

tion 4–13). The effective diffusivity for the displacement of the lithosphere

is equal to hahLG/µ.

The spatial damping of cyclic displacements on the fault by the lithosphere–

asthenosphere interaction can be demonstrated by solving Equation (8–134)

for an applied periodic displacement at x = 0 of the form

wzL = wzL,0 cosωt, (8.135)

where ω is the circular frequency of the applied displacement. The solution

to the analogous heat conduction problem has previously been obtained in

Section 4–14. By appropriate modifications of Equation (4–89), we find that

682 Faulting

the displacement of the lithosphere is given by

wzL = wzL,0 exp

{

− x

(

ωµ

2hahLG

)1/2 }

× cos

{

ωt− x

(

ωµ

2hahLG

)1/2 }

. (8.136)

The amplitude of the displacement of the lithosphere decreases exponentially

with distance from the fault; the displacement is damped to 1/e of its value

at the fault in a distance ds given by

ds =

(

2hahLG

ωµ

)1/2

. (8.137)

To estimate ds, we take ha = 100 km, hL = 30 km, G = 30 GPa, and

µ = 4 × 1019 Pa s. The frequency of the applied displacement at the fault

is related to the period τ by ω = 2π/τ . As a typical time interval between

great earthquakes we take τ = 150 years; this gives ω = 1.33 × 10−9 s−1.

From Equation (8–137) we find ds = 58 km, which agrees with values we

estimated earlier in the chapter. Although this solution is approximate and

only periodic variations at the fault have been considered, more exact numer-

ical calculations verify that fault displacements are damped a few hundred

kilometers from the fault by the interaction between the elastic lithosphere

and the viscous asthenosphere. A major earthquake on one part of a plate

boundary is therefore unlikely to change the stress significantly on faults on

other parts of the plate boundary. Thus great earthquakes are unlikely to

trigger other great earthquakes at large distances.

8.12 Thermally Activated Creep on Faults

On near-surface fault zones the concept of a coefficient of friction is likely

to be applicable. However, many faults extend deep into the lithosphere,

where they are likely to behave plastically. In this section we consider the

steady-state creep on deep fault zones. We previously suggested in Section

4–27 that frictional heating may be important on such fault zones. Therefore

our analysis includes heating due to viscous dissipation.

Figure 8–33 illustrates the one-dimensional model we will use to determine

the structure of the shear zone formed between two half-spaces moving in

opposite directions parallel to the interface plane x = 0 with total relative

velocity u0. The center of the shear zone is the plane x = 0, and |x| measures

the distance normal to the fault. Sufficiently far from the fault the velocity

8.12 Thermally Activated Creep on Faults 683

Figure 8.33 One-dimensional model for the structure of a fault zone on which there is steady-state creep.

u approaches ±u0/2. Frictional heating produces a temperature anomaly in

the shear zone; the temperature T far from the fault plane must decrease

linearly with distance from the fault in order to conduct away the heat gen-

erated by friction in the shear zone. The temperature will have a maximum

value T1 at the center of the shear zone. The symmetry of the model re-

quires that T be symmetric and u be antisymmetric about x = 0; T and u

depend only on x in this steady one-dimensional problem. We assume that

dislocation creep with an effective viscosity µeff given by Equation (7–119)

governs the deformation in the shear zone. The viscosity in the shear zone

is substantially lower than it is far from the fault because of the strong tem-

perature dependence of µeff and the temperature anomaly due to frictional

heating in the shear zone. The reduced viscosity in the shear zone facilitates

the decoupling of the oppositely moving half-spaces and concentrates the

shear into a relatively narrow region around the fault.

The equations governing the temperature and velocity in frictionally heated

shear flows with temperature-dependent viscosity have already been dis-

cussed in Section 7–5. From Equation (7–120) we know that the shear stress

τ in the shear zone is a constant if there is no pressure gradient along the

fault plane. We group all the preexponential quantities in the viscosity Equa-

tion (7–119) except for the shear stress and the temperature into a constant

684 Faulting

Table 8.4 Values of the Exponential Integral E1(x )= ∫ ∫ ∫∞

x (e–t/t ) dt

x E1(x ) xe xE1(x )

0 ∞ 0.01 4.03793 0.02 3.35471 0.03 2.95912 0.04 2.68126 0.05 2.46790 0.10 1.82292 0.20 1.22265 0.30 0.90568 0.40 0.70238 0.50 0.55977 0.60 0.45438 0.70 0.37377 0.80 0.31060 0.90 0.26018 1.0 0.21938 1.2 0.15841 1.4 0.11622 1.6 0.08631 1.8 0.06471 2.0 0.04890 0.72266 2.5 0.02491 0.75881 3.0 0.01305 0.78625 3.5 0.00697 0.80787 4.0 0.00378 0.82538 4.5 0.00207 0.83989 5.0 0.00115 0.85211 6 3.6008× 10−4 0.87161 7 1.1548× 10−4 0.88649 8 3.7666× 10−5 0.89824 9 1.2447× 10−5 0.90776

10 4.1570× 10−6 0.91563 20 9.8355× 10−11 0.95437

C and write the equation for µeff as

µeff = CT

τ2 eEa/RT . (8.138)

Since τ is a constant, the effective viscosity varies only with T and primarily

with the exponential of the inverse absolute temperature.

The differential equation for the temperature is Equation (7–141); with

8.12 Thermally Activated Creep on Faults 685

τ = µeff du/dx this equation takes the form

k d2T

dx2 + τ

du

dx = 0. (8.139)

Because the shear stress is constant, Equation (8–139) can be integrated to

give

k dT

dx + τu = 0. (8.140)

The constant of integration is zero because u = 0 at x = 0 and symmetry

requires dT/dx = 0 at x = 0. Substitution of τ = µeffdu/dx in Equation

(8–140) yields

u du = −k dT µeff

, (8.141)

which can be further modified using Equation (8–138) for µeff to

d

(

u2

2

)

= −kτ2

CT e−Ea/RT dT. (8.142)

Equation (8–142) can be integrated analytically using the exponential inte-

gral function E1 first introduced in Problem 4–35 to obtain

u2 = 2kτ2

C

{

E1

(

Ea RT1

)

− E1

(

Ea RT

)}

, (8.143)

where the constant of integration has been evaluated by letting u = 0 and

T = T1 at the center of the shear zone. The exponential integral function is

tabulated in Table 8–4 and plotted in Figure 8–34.

In the limit x→ ∞, u→ u0/2, T decreases, and E1(Ea/RT ) → E1(∞) =

0 (Table 8–4). Thus Equation (8–143) gives

u2 0 =

8kτ2

C E1

(

Ea RT1

)

, (8.144)

a relation that can be used to calculate the maximum temperature at the

center of the shear zone as a function of the total relative velocity across

the shear zone, the shear stress, and the rheological properties. In Chapter

7 we noted that Ea/RT1 ≫ 1. An approximate formula for the exponential

integral of a large quantity is

E1

(

Ea RT1

)

≈ RT1

Ea e−Ea/RT1 (8.145)

(see Table 8–4). Therefore, Equation (8–144) can be approximated by

u2 0 ≈ 8kτ2RT1

CEa e−Ea/RT1 . (8.146)

686 Faulting

Figure 8–35 shows how the maximum temperature at the center of a mantle

shear zone depends on the relative velocity across the zone for several values

of shear stress. The curves were drawn using Equation (8–146) with k = 4.2

W m−1 K−1, R = 8.314 J K−1 mol−1, C = 109 Pa3 s K−1, and Ea = 523

kJ mol−1. Temperatures of about 1300 K are required if dislocation creep

is to accommodate relative velocities of tens of millimeters per year across

mantle shear zones under applied shear stresses of about 1 MPa.

An equation for the temperature distribution in the shear zone can be

obtained by substituting Equation (8–143) into Equation (8–140):

dT

dx = −τ2

(

2

kC

)1/2{

E1

(

Ea RT1

)

− E1

(

Ea RT

)}1/2

.

(8.147)

This equation is subject to the condition T =T1 at x= 0. It can be integrated

numerically or analytically if two approximations are made. First, we assume

that the arguments of the exponential integral functions are large compared

with 1. We can then use the approximation contained in Equation (8–145)

and write

dT

dx = −τ2

(

2

kC

)1/2

× {

RT1

Ea e−Ea/RT1 − RT

Ea e−Ea/RT

}1/2

. (8.148)

If we then write θ = T1 − T and assume θ ≪ T1, we

can approximate Equation (8–148) by

dx = τ

k

{

2kRT1τ 2e−Ea/RT1

CEa

}1/2

{1 − e−Eaθ/RT 2 1 }1/2.

(8.149)

From Equation (8–146) we recognize that the first quantity in brackets on

the right side of this expression is u2 0/4; thus we can simplify Equation (8–

149) to

dx = τu0

2k {1 − e−Eaθ/RT 2

1 }1/2. (8.150)

This equation can be integrated analytically by making the substitution

s = e−Eaθ/RT 2 1 (8.151)

and we find

8.12 Thermally Activated Creep on Faults 687

Figure 8.34 The exponential integral.

ds

s(1 − s)1/2 =

−τu0Ea 2kRT 2

1

dx. (8.152)

The integral of Equation (8–152) yields

T = T1 + RT 2

1

Ea ln

{

sech2 (

τu0Eax

4kRT 2 1

)}

, (8.153)

where the constant of integration has been chosen to satisfy T = T1, θ = 0,

s = 1 on x = 0. By substituting Equation (8–153) into Equation (8–140),

we obtain the velocity distribution in the shear zone as

u = u0

2 tanh

(

τu0Eax

4kRT 2 1

)

. (8.154)

In the limit x→ ∞,

sech

(

τu0Eax

4kRT 2 1

)

→ 2e−τu0Eax/4kRT 2 1

and

688 Collateral Reading

Figure 8.35 Dependence of the temperature at the center of a shear zone on the relative velocity across the shear zone for several values of the applied shear stress.

dT

dx → −τu0

2k .

Also, as x→ ∞,

tanh

(

τu0Eax

4kRT 2 1

)

→ 1

and

u→ u0

2 .

Problem 8.10 Define the half-width of the shear zone xs as the value of

x at which u = 0.9(u0/2).

a. Obtain an expression for the half-width from Equation (8–154).

b. What is the half-width of the shear zone if u0 = 100 mm yr−1 and τ = 10

MPa? Use the values of C, Ea, and k given previously.

Collateral Reading

Brewer, J. A., S. B. Smithson, J. E. Oliver, S. Kaufman, and L. D. Brown

(1980), The Laramide orogeny: Evidence from COCORP deep crustal

Collateral Reading 689

seismic profiles in the Wind River mountains, Wyoming, Tectonophysics

62, 165–189.

Byerlee, J. (1977), Friction of rocks, in Experimental Studies of Rock Friction

with Application to Earthquake Prediction, J. F. Evernden, ed., pp. 55–

77 (U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California).

Cook, F. A., D. S. Albaugh, L. D. Brown, S. Kaufman, J. E. Oliver, and R.

D. Hatcher (1979), Thin-skinned tectonics in the crystalline southern

Appalachians; COCORP seismic reflection profiling of the Blue Ridge

and Inner Piedmont, Geology 7, 563–567.

Hanks, T. C. (1977), Earthquake stress drops, ambient tectonic stresses and

stresses that drive plate motions, Pure Appl. Geophys. 115, 441–458.

Massonnet, D., M. Rossi, C. Carmona, F. Adragna, G. Peltzer, K. Feigi, and

T. Rabauts (1993), The displacement field of the Landers earthquake

mapped by radar interferometry, Nature 364, 138–142.

Shen, Z. K., D. D. Jackson, and B. X. Ge (1996), Crustal deformation across

and beyond the Los Angeles basin from geodetic measurements, J. Geo-

phys. Res. 101, 27, 957–27, 980.

Sieh, K., M. Stuiver, and D. Brillinger (1989), A more precise chronology of

earthquakes produced by the San Andreas fault in southern California,

J. Geophys. Res. 94, 603–623.

Collateral Reading

Bullen, K. E., An Introduction to the Theory of Seismology, 3rd edition

(Cambridge University Press, London, 1963), 381 pages.

A classic introductory textbook on seismology. The first eight chapters pro-

vide the essential background theory on the mechanics of deformable

media and the transmission of seismic waves subject to various bound-

ary conditions. This is followed by three chapters dealing with the gath-

ering and treatment of instrumental data on earthquakes. The remain-

ing parts of the book apply the theory and observational results to

a variety of problems including the structure of the Earth’s interior,

long-period oscillations of the Earth, earthquake occurrence, nuclear

explosions, and extraterrestrial seismology.

Hobbs, B. E., W. D. Means, and P. F. Williams, An Outline of Structural

Geology (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976), 571 pages.

An introductory textbook on structural geology for undergraduate students

covering the mechanical aspects of rock deformation, stress, strain, the

response of rocks to stress, the microfabric of deformed rocks, crys-

tal defects, microscopic mechanisms of deformation, undeformed rock

690 Collateral Reading

structures, folding, features of folded rocks, foliations, lineations, brittle

deformation, joints, faults, field methods, and structural associations of

the Earth. A few of the chapters have problems with answers given in

an appendix.

Jaeger, C., Rock Mechanics and Engineering (Cambridge University Press,

London, 1979), 523 pages.

A textbook about the physical and mechanical properties of rocks and the

engineering applications of rock mechanics. Part 1 discusses the devel-

opment of rock mechanics and the geologists’ input to this science. Part

2 deals with rock properties, in situ residual stresses, strains and fail-

ure of rock masses, theoretical approaches to determinations of stress–

strain fields, and effects of interstitial water. Part 3 covers applications

to rock slopes and rock slides, galleries, tunnels, mines, underground ex-

cavations, and dams. Part 4 describes case histories of accidents, dam

disasters, and rock slides.

Lay, T., and T. C. Wallace, Modern Global Seismology (Academic Press, San

Diego, 1995), 517 pages.

This is a comprehensive treatment of seismology and earthquakes at a mod-

erately advanced level. Topics include body waves, surface waves, free

oscillations, seismic sources, Earth structure, and earthquake mechan-

ics.

Ramsay, J. G., Folding and Fracturing of Rocks (McGraw-Hill, New York,

1967), 568 pages.

A book outlining the basic theories of stress, strain, the properties of rocks,

and rock deformation in geology. Chapter 1 introduces the methods

used to analyze the orientation of structures. Chapters 2 to 6 develop

the analysis of stress and strain from first principles. The various types

of folds in rocks are described in Chapter 7 with an analysis of their

formation and a discussion of their general tectonic environment. The

final three chapters treat the deformation of linear structures, folding of

obliquely inclined surfaces, and structural complexities associated with

the superposition of two systems of folds.

Reid, H. F., The mechanics of the earthquake, in The California Earthquake

of April 18, 1906, Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Com-

mission, Volume 2 (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington,

D.C., 1910), 192 pages.

A detailed account of the great earthquake and its seismic record. Part 1

describes the shock, its time and origin, permanent ground displace-

ments, the nature of the acting forces, shearing movements in the fault

zone, vibratory movements and their effects, and the influence of the

Collateral Reading 691

foundation on the apparent intensity. Part 2 summarizes instrumental

records of the earthquake from observatories around the world. There

is an appendix on the theory of the seismograph.

Richter, C. F., Elementary Seismology (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1958),

768 pages.

A fundamental, relatively nonmathematical textbook on seismology written

for the geologist and engineer. Part 1 describes the nature of earth-

quakes and observations of them. The major topics include the charac-

ter of earthquake motion, descriptions of important earthquakes, fore-

shocks, aftershocks, earthquake swarms, earthquake effects on buildings,

effects on ground and surface water, intensity, volcanic earthquakes,

tectonic earthquakes, faulting, seismograph theory, elasticity, seismic

waves, deep-focus earthquakes, magnitude, statistics, energy, micro-

seisms, and earthquake risk. Part 2 discusses earthquakes in California,

New Zealand, Japan, Taiwan, and other regions. An extensive set of

tables gives mathematical details and useful seismic data.

Scholz, C. H., The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting (Cambridge Uni-

versity Press, Cambridge, 1990), 439 pages.

This is an excellent intermediate level treatment of rock mechanics and

earthquakes. Subjects include approaches to brittle failure, friction,

structure of faults, quantification of earthquakes, the seismic cycle, and

earthquake prediction.

9

Flows in Porous Media

9.1 Introduction

Fluids such as water, steam, petroleum, and natural gas often migrate

through the Earth’s crust. If these flows occur through open fractures, they

can be studied using the channel flow theory developed in Chapter 6. In

many cases, however, flows in the Earth’s crust occur through a matrix of

interconnecting passages provided by large numbers of small fractures or

through the voids of naturally porous rocks. If the scale of the flow system

is large compared with the scale of the interconnected passages, it is often

appropriate to consider flow through a uniform porous medium.

Sand is an example of a naturally porous material. Because of the irregular

shapes of sand particles there is a considerable void or pore space between

them. The fraction of the volume made up of pore space is known as the

porosity φ. Loose sand is particularly porous, φ ≈ 40%, while oil sands have

porosities in the range of 10 to 20%. Values of φ for some porous rocks, for

example, sandstone and limestone, are listed in Table 2–2. As noted before,

rocks that are not naturally porous can still be approximated as porous

media if they are extensively fractured. The distribution of fractures must

be reasonably uniform and the separation of fractures small compared with

the scale of the overall flow.

Fluids can flow through a porous medium under the influence of an applied

pressure gradient. In Chapter 6 we showed that, for laminar flow, the flow

rate in channels and pipes is linearly proportional to the pressure gradient

and inversely proportional to the viscosity. This is also the result obtained

for many porous medium flows. The resistance of a porous medium to flow

depends on the size, number, and “tortuosity” of the fluid pathways through

the solid matrix. A measure of this resistance is the permeability k of the

medium. The viscous flow theory in Chapter 6 can be used to determine

9.2 Darcy’s Law 693

the permeability for idealized models of porous media. However, the per-

meability of actual rocks must be determined in the laboratory or by field

experiments.

In this chapter we develop the theory of flow through porous media and

consider a number of geological applications. Calculations for the flow of

groundwater have many important implications. In the immediate vicinity of

a cooling intrusion the groundwater may boil, leading to hot springs, geysers,

and geothermal reservoirs. These processes are responsible for many mineral

deposits because minerals dissolve freely in hot groundwater and precipitate

when the temperature drops or boiling occurs. Models of flow in porous

media can also be applied to problems involving the migration of magma.

9.2 Darcy’s Law

In many applications the flow through a porous medium is linearly pro-

portional to the applied pressure gradient and inversely proportional to the

viscosity of the fluid. This behavior is known as Darcy’s law, an empirical

relationship credited to Henry Darcy, who carried out experiments on the

flow of water through vertical homogeneous sand filters in 1856. For a one-

dimensional geometry in which the volumetric flow rate per unit area u is

driven by the applied pressure gradient dp/dx, Darcy’s law takes the form

u = −k µ

dp

dx , (9.1)

where k is the permeability of the medium and µ is the dynamic viscosity

of the fluid.

The volumetric flow rate per unit area u has the dimensions of velocity,

and it is referred to as the Darcy velocity. However, because it represents

volume flow rate per unit area of the medium, and the pores or cracks occupy

only a small fraction of this area, u is not the actual velocity of the fluid in

the small channels. It is the average velocity per unit area.

The permeability characterizes the resistance of the porous medium to

flow through it. The more permeable the medium is, that is, the larger

k is, the smaller is the pressure gradient required to drive a given flow.

The SI unit for permeability is square meter, m2. Typical values for the

natural permeabilities of some geologic materials are given in Table 9–1.

Coarse gravel is highly permeable, while unfractured homogeneous granite

is virtually impermeable. Darcy’s law is sometimes written in terms of the

694 Flows in Porous Media

Table 9.1 Typical Values for the Natural Permeabilities of Geologic

Materials

Permeability k (m2) Classification Material

10−7

10−8 Gravel 10−9 Pervious 10−10

10−11 Sand 10−12

10−13 Semipervious 10−14 Sandstone 10−15

10−16

10−17 Limestone 10−18 Impervious 10−19

10−20 Granite

hydraulic head H defined in Equation (6–9)

u = −kρg µ

dH

dx = −KdH

dx , (9.2)

where K ≡ kρg/µ is known as the hydraulic conductivity. The form of

Darcy’s law given in Equation (9–2) is used frequently in applications to

groundwater flow.

Darcy’s law is applicable to flow through a solid matrix only if several

conditions are satisfied. First, the scale of the porosity must be small com-

pared with the other characteristic dimensions of the flow situation. For

example, if a sedimentary layer of thickness h is made up of particles with

a mean diameter b, the condition b ≪ h is required for Darcy’s law to be

valid. Alternatively, if the porosity of the layer is due to interconnected frac-

tures, the dimensions and spacing of the fractures must be small compared

with the thickness h. The second condition is that the flow in the individual

channels must be laminar. This condition, discussed in Section 6–4, places

an upper limit on the dimensions of the porosity and the flow rate of the

fluid. Although Darcy’s law is an empirical statement, it can be derived the-

oretically for several simple models of the channel configuration within the

solid matrix.

Problem 9.1 To derive an upward flow in a porous medium, it is clear

that pressure must increase more rapidly with depth y than it does when the

9.3 Permeability Models 695

fluid is motionless. Use this idea to justify writing Darcy’s law for vertical

flow in a porous medium in the form

v = −k µ

(

dp

dy − ρg

)

, (9.3)

where v is the vertical Darcy velocity (positive in the direction of increasing

depth), ρ is the fluid density, and g is the acceleration of gravity. Consider

a porous medium lying on an impermeable surface inclined at an angle θ

to the horizontal. Show that Darcy’s law for the downslope volumetric flow

rate per unit area q is

q = −k µ

(

dp

ds − ρg sin θ

)

, (9.4)

where s is the downslope distance and q is positive in the direction of s.

Problem 9.2 Consider an unconsolidated (uncemented) layer of soil com-

pletely saturated with groundwater; the water table is coincident with the

surface. Show that the upward Darcy velocity |v | required to fluidize the

bed is

|v | = (1 − φ) kg(ρs − ρw)

µ , (9.5)

where φ is the porosity, ρs is the density of the soil particles, and ρw is the

water density. The condition of a fluidized bed occurs when the pressure

at depth in the soil is sufficient to completely support the weight of the

overburden. If the pressure exceeds this critical value, the flow can lift the

soil layer.

9.3 Permeability Models

Idealized models for the geometrical configuration of the channels in a porous

medium allow us to derive Darcy’s law using viscous flow theory. Explicit

relationships for the permeability are obtained. A variety of models can

be used to approximate the structures of different materials. A sandstone

may be approximated by a matrix of closely packed spheres, while frac-

tured volcanic rock may be modeled with a regular (or random) matrix of

thin channels. We do not consider alternative microscopic models in detail

because they differ by geometrical factors that are of order one.

A typical model for the microscopic structure of a porous material is a

cubic matrix of circular tubes. The matrix has a dimension b, and the tubes

have a diameter δ, as illustrated in Figure 9–1. Each cube has a tube on

each of its 12 edges; 1/4 of a tube of diameter δ and length b lies within the

696 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.1 An idealized model of a porous medium. Circular tubes of di- ameter δ form a cubical matrix with dimensions b.

cube on each of these edges. Thus the equivalent of three tubes of diameter

δ and length b lie within the cube. The porosity is therefore given by

φ = 3π

(

δ

2

)2 b

b3 =

4

δ2

b2 . (9.6)

We assume that the sides of the cubes lie in the x, y, and z directions.

Under an applied pressure gradient, dp/dx, fluid flows through the tubes

that are parallel to the x axis. If the flow through the tubes is laminar, the

mean velocity in the tubes ūc is given by Equation (6–37)

ūc = − δ2

32µ

dp

dx . (9.7)

To obtain the mean velocity per unit area, the Darcy velocity u, consider a

square with dimensions b lying perpendicular to the x direction with corners

lying on the axes of four tubes. One-fourth of the cross-sectional area of each

tube lies within the square. Thus the equivalent of the volumetric flow rate

through a single tube π(δ2/4)ūc flows across the area b2. The Darcy velocity

is therefore given by

u = πδ2

4b2 ūc =

φūc 3 , (9.8)

where Equation (9–6) has been used to eliminate δ2/b2. By combining Equa-

tions (9–7) and (9–8), we obtain

u = − b2φ2

72πµ

dp

dx . (9.9)

Our simple model predicts a linear relationship between the Darcy velocity

9.4 Flow in Confined Aquifers 697

Figure 9.2 Horizontal one-dimensional flow in a confined porous aquifer. The flow is driven by the indicated drop in head.

and the pressure gradient in accordance with Darcy’s law. A comparison of

Equations (9–1) and (9–9) shows that the permeability k is given by

k = b2φ2

72π =

π

128

δ4

b2 . (9.10)

The permeability is a function of the geometry of the connected porosity.

Taking δ = 1 mm and b = 0.1 m, we find that k = 2.45 × 10−12 m2. The

porosity is only 2.36×10−2%; the mean velocity in a single tube is 1.27×104

times larger than the Darcy velocity.

Problem 9.3 Assume that a porous medium can be modeled as a cubic

matrix with a dimension b; the walls of each cube are channels of thickness

δ. (a) Determine expressions for the porosity and permeability in terms of

b and δ. (b) What is the permeability if b = 0.1 m and δ = 1 mm?

9.4 Flow in Confined Aquifers

Groundwater flow often takes place in a layer of porous sedimentary rock

bounded above and below by impermeable strata. The channel formed by

this layering is known as a confined porous aquifer. Consider one-dimensional

flow through a confined aquifer with a constant cross-sectional area A, as

sketched in Figure 9–2. For this flow the pressure p is a constant over the

area p = p(x). The Darcy velocity u is given by Equation (9–1); a uniform

velocity profile, u = u(x), is obtained. There is no requirement that the

Darcy velocity in a porous medium satisfy a no-slip condition at the bound-

aries. The no-slip condition is valid on the microscopic scale of individual

channels, but not on the macroscale of the aquifer.

The volumetric flow rate Q through the aquifer is the product of the

Darcy velocity with the cross-sectional area

Q = uA = −kA µ

dp

dx . (9.11)

698 Flows in Porous Media

Because the flow rate Q is a constant independent of x, the pressure gra-

dient is a negative constant; thus the pressure decreases linearly with x.

For a porous aquifer with the circular cross-section and semicircular geom-

etry previously considered in Section 6–5, the pressure gradient is given by

Equation (6–43), and the volumetric flow rate through the aquifer can be

written

Q = kR2ρgb

µR′ , (9.12)

where πR′ is the length of the aquifer and b is the elevation of the entrance

of the aquifer relative to the exit.

Problem 9.4 Assume that the model just described is applicable to an

artesian spring (a spring driven by a topographic head). If a topographic

head of 60 m drives water through the aquifer at the rate 8.3×10−5 m3 s−1,

determine the permeability of the aquifer if its area is 2 m2 and the distance

from source to exit is 2 km.

Problem 9.5 Consider one-dimensional flow through a confined porous

aquifer of total thickness b and cross-sectional area A. Suppose the aquifer

consists of N layers, each of thickness bi(i = 1, . . ., N) and permeability

ki(i = 1, . . ., N). Determine the total flow rate through the aquifer if all

the layers are subjected to the same driving pressure gradient. What is the

uniform permeability of an aquifer of thickness b that delivers the same flow

rate as the layered aquifer when the two are subjected to the same pressure

gradient?

We next consider the drawdown of water into a well that completely pene-

trates a confined aquifer, as illustrated in Figure 9–3. The well is considered

to be a sink for the flow in the aquifer that is uniform, horizontal, and

radially inward toward the well. The radial Darcy velocity in this cylindri-

cally symmetric flow is ur. The radial distance from the well is r, and ur is positive in the direction of increasing r. Darcy’s law for one-dimensional

flow, Equation (9–1), can be generalized to apply to the radial flow of this

problem if we replace the pressure gradient in Equation (9–1) by the radial

pressure gradient dp/dr. We can therefore write

ur = −k µ

dp

dr (9.13)

or, in terms of the hydraulic head H,

9.4 Flow in Confined Aquifers 699

Figure 9.3 A model for the withdrawal of water from a well penetrating a confined aquifer.

ur = −kρg µ

dH

dr . (9.14)

If the thickness of the aquifer is h, the volume flow rate of water across a

cylindrical surface of radius r is

Qr = 2πrhur. (9.15)

Note that Qr is negative for radially inward flow. The substitution of Equa-

tion (9–14) into Equation (9–15) gives

Qr = −2πhkρgr

µ

dH

dr . (9.16)

Conservation of mass requires that Qr be independent of r; the same amount

of fluid must cross each cylindrical surface per unit time. Thus |Qr| is the

volumetric flow rate into the well, and Equation (9–16) is a first-order, total

differential equation relating the hydraulic head H to the radial position r.

We integrate this equation to give

H −H0 = −µQr

2πhkρg ln

r

r0 , (9.17)

whereH0 is a prescribed hydraulic head at a radial position r0(H = H0 at r =

r0). It is not possible to prescribe the ambient hydraulic head as r → ∞ be-

cause Equation (9–17) exhibits a logarithmic singularity. The radial position

r0 is taken to be the distance to where the aquifer is being charged. The

hydraulic head at the well Hw is obtained by setting r = rw (the well radius)

in Equation (9–17) with the result

Hw = H0 − µQr

2πhkρg ln rw r0 . (9.18)

700 Flows in Porous Media

We can rearrange this equation to yield an expression for Qr in terms of the

hydraulic heads H0 and Hw

Qr = 2πhkρg(H0 −Hw)

µ ln

(

rw r0

) . (9.19)

As a typical numerical example we take H0−Hw = 10 m, h = 1 m, rw = 0.1

m, r0 = 1 km, k = 10−11 m2, the viscosity of water µ = 10−3 Pa s, the

density of water ρ = 103 kg m−3, and g = 10 m s−2. The flow rate to the

well, from Equation (9–19), is |Qr| = 6.8× 10−4 m3 s−1.

Problem 9.6 Consider the drawdown of a well penetrating a confined

porous layer saturated with gas. The geometry is identical with that of

Figure 9–3. Darcy’s law in the form of Equation (9–13) is valid for the

uniform flow of gas toward the well. Because the gas is compressible, both

its density ρ and pressure p vary with radial distance r from the well. The

mass flow rate of gas Mr crossing a cylindrical surface of radius r and height

h must be constant to conserve mass. Assume that the perfect gas equation

of state p = ρRT applies, where T is the gas temperature and R is the

gas constant, and that the gas flow is isothermal. Show that the pressure

distribution in the gas reservoir is

p2 − p2 0 =

−MrµRT

πhk ln

r

r0 (9.20)

and that the mass flow rate into the well is

Mr = (p2

0 − p2 w)πhk

µRT ln rw r0

. (9.21)

Assume that the pressures p0 at r = r0 and pw at r = rw are maintained

constant during exploitation of the reservoir. Note that Mr is negative for

flow toward the well.

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers

In many cases the flow in an aquifer with an impermeable lower boundary

has a free upper surface. This upper surface is the water table and is often

referred to as a phreatic surface. An aquifer in which the fluid has a free

surface is known as an unconfined aquifer.

Let us consider a one-dimensional flow in an unconfined aquifer with a

horizontal lower boundary, as shown in Figure 9–4. Below the phreatic sur-

face the porous medium is saturated with water; above the free surface there

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 701

Figure 9.4 One-dimensional flow through an unconfined aquifer.

is no groundwater. We denote the height of the phreatic surface above the

lower boundary by h(x) and assume that it is a slowly varying function of

x; that is, we assume dh/dx ≪ 1. In this case we can relate the horizontal

pressure gradient in the saturated portion of the aquifer to the variation of

h by

dp

dx = ρg

dh

dx . (9.22)

This is known as the Dupuit approximation. The hydraulic head is the

thickness of the water layer. This approximation breaks down when two-

dimensional flow develops in the saturated part of the layer. Two-dimensional

flow will occur if the slope of the free surface, dh/dx, becomes of order unity.

The Darcy velocity in the water-saturated region is found by substituting

Equation (9–22) into Equation (9–1)

u = −kρg µ

dh

dx . (9.23)

The Darcy velocity depends on x because h is a function of x, but it is

uniform over the thickness of the saturated zone. The total rate of fluid flow

Q per unit width at position x in the aquifer is

Q = u(x)h(x) = −kρg µ h dh

dx . (9.24)

Conservation of mass requires that the flow through the aquifer Q be con-

stant. Thus Equation (9–24) can be considered as a differential equation for

h as a function of x. Assuming that h = h0 at x = 0, we integrate this

equation to give

h =

(

h2 0 −

2Qµx

kρg

)1/2

. (9.25)

The phreatic surface in the Dupuit approximation is a parabola. The free

surface height is zero at the downstream distance

x0 = kρgh2

0

2µQ . (9.26)

702 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.5 Unconfined flow through a porous dam. The Dupuit parabola AC is the solution if (h0 − h1)/h0 ≪ 1. The actual phreatic surface AB lies above the Dupuit parabola resulting in a seepage face BC.

However, the Dupuit approximation breaks down as x→ x0 because dh/dx → ∞.

As a specific example, consider the flow through the porous rectangular

dam illustrated in Figure 9–5. The dam is constructed from material with a

permeability k. The width of the dam is w, the height of the water behind

the dam is h0, and the height of the water in front of the dam is h1. The dam

and the reservoirs behind and in front of the dam are assumed to lie on an

impermeable stratum. From Equation (9–25) the flow of water Q through

the dam is

Q = kρg

2µw (h2

0 − h2 1). (9.27)

This is known as the Dupuit–Fuchheimer discharge formula. Since the Dupuit

approximation has been used in the derivation of Equation (9–27), it might

be expected to be valid only if (h0 − h1) ≪ h0; however, we will show that

this result is valid for an arbitrary value of h1.

If h1 is a small fraction of h0, the actual phreatic surface AB lies above

the Dupuit parabola, as illustrated in Figure 9–5. This results in a seepage

front BC on the downstream face of the dam. If h1 is a small fraction of h0,

the Darcy velocity components ux and uy are of the same magnitude in the

porous dam. However, Darcy’s law is still valid for the individual velocity

components, and the horizontal component ux is given by

ux = −k µ

∂p

∂x , (9.28)

where p = p(x, y). We integrate this equation over the rectangular cross

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 703

section of the dam, 0 < x < w and 0 < y < h0, with the result

∫ w

0

∫ h0

0 ux dy dx = −k

µ

∫ h0

0

∫ w

0

∂p

∂x dx dy. (9.29)

The orders of integration on the two sides of the equation can be inter-

changed without affecting the result. However, the flow of water at a value

of x is

Q =

∫ h0

0 ux dy, (9.30)

and Q is a constant independent of x. We also note that

∫ w

0

∂p

∂x dx = p1(y) − p0(y), (9.31)

where p1(y) is the pressure distribution at x = w and p0(y) is the pressure

distribution at x = 0. Substitution of Equations (9–30) and (9–31) into

Equation (9–29) yields

Q = k

µw

(

∫ h0

0 p0 dy −

∫ h0

0 p1 dy

)

. (9.32)

The pressure distributions are given by

p0 = ρg(h0 − y) (9.33)

p1 = ρg(h1 − y) 0 < y < h1

= 0 h1<y<h0 (9.34)

so that the integrals appearing in Equation (9–32) are

∫ h0

0 p0 dy =

1

2 ρ gh2

0 (9.35)

∫ h0

0 p1 dy =

1

2 ρ gh2

1. (9.36)

The substitution of Equations (9–35) and (9–36) into (9–32) once again

yields Equation (9–27). Thus the Dupuit–Fuchheimer discharge formula is

valid for all values of the ratio h1/h0.

Problem 9.7 The base of an unconfined aquifer is inclined at an angle

θ to the horizontal. Use Equation (9–4) and the Dupuit approximation to

derive an expression for the flow rate Q if the free surface is at a constant

height h above the base.

704 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.6 Unconfined flow through a stratified porous dam.

Problem 9.8 Consider the unconfined flow through the stratified porous

dam sketched in Figure 9–6. Assume that the height of the water in front

of the dam h1 exceeds the thickness a of the layer with permeability k2 and

that the phreatic surface lies totally in material with permeability k1. Show

that the flow rate through the dam is given by

Q = k1ρg

2µw (h2

0 − h2 1)

{

1 + 2a

(h0 + h1)

(

k2

k1 − 1

)}

.

(9.37)

Do not use the Dupuit approximation.

The Dupuit approximation can be used to consider the drawdown of a well

penetrating an unconfined aquifer, as sketched in Figure 9–7. The radial

Darcy velocity ur in the Dupuit approximation can be obtained from a

generalization of Equation (9–23)

ur = −kρg µ

dh

dr . (9.38)

The flow rate through a cylindrical surface of height h(r) and radius r is

Qr = 2πrhur = −2πkρg

µ

(

rh dh

dr

)

, (9.39)

where Qr is positive if the flow is radially outward. Conservation of mass

requires Qr to be constant. We integrate Equation (9–39) with the condition

that h = h0 at r = r0 and obtain

h2 − h2 0 =

−µQr πkρg

ln r

r0 . (9.40)

If the well has a radius rw and the height of the phreatic surface at the well

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 705

Figure 9.7 Draw down of a well penetrating an unconfined aquifer.

is hw, we find from Equation (9–40) that the flow to the well is

Qr = πkρg(h2

0 − h2 w)

µ ln(rw/r0) . (9.41)

Again r0 is the distance to where the aquifer is being recharged.

Problem 9.9 Determine the flow rate into the well for the case h0 = 10

m, hw = 1 m, k = 10−12 m2, µ = 10−3 Pa s, r0 = 5 km, and rw = 0.1 m.

Calculate the shape of the phreatic surface.

So far we have limited our discussion to steady flows. To deal with flows in

which the height of the phreatic surface and the flow rate through the aquifer

vary with time t, we need to develop a continuity or conservation of mass

equation. We continue to assume the validity of the Dupuit approximation

and consider one-dimensional flow through an element of the unconfined

aquifer between x and x + δx, as shown in Figure 9–8. The flow rate into

the element per unit distance perpendicular to the plane in Figure 9–8 is

u(x, t)h(x, t). Similarly, the flow rate out of the element is u(x+δx, t)h(x+

δx, t). The net rate of flow out of the element is

u(x+ δx, t)h(x+ δx, t) − u(x, t)h(x, t)

≈ ∂

∂x (uh) δx.

If the flow out of the element is not equal to the flow into the element,

the height of the free surface must change, since the fluid is assumed to be

incompressible. If the height of the phreatic surface changes from h(t, x) to

h(t+ δt, x) in time δt, the change in the volume of fluid in the element is

φ[h(t+ δt, x) − h(t, x)] δx ≈ φ ∂h

∂t δx δt.

706 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.8 One-dimensional flow through an element of an unconfined aquifer.

The factor φ is required because the fluid only fills the pore space in the

matrix. Conservation of fluid requires that the net flow out of the element

in time δt equals the decrease in fluid volume in the element so that

φ ∂h

∂t +

∂x (uh) = 0. (9.42)

Substitution of the Darcy velocity from Equation (9–23) yields

∂h

∂t = kρg

µφ

∂x

(

h ∂h

∂x

)

. (9.43)

This nonlinear diffusion equation is often referred to as the Boussinesq equa-

tion.

If the variation in h is small, we can write

h = h0 + h′, (9.44)

where h0 is constant and |h′| ≪ h0. Substitution of Equation (9–44) into

(9–43) and neglecting the term that is quadratic in h′ yields

∂h′

∂t = kρgh0

µφ

∂2h′

∂x2 . (9.45)

This process of linearization is identical with that previously carried out in

Section 6–19. Equation (9–45) is identical in form with the governing equa-

tion for the one-dimensional, unsteady conduction of heat given in Equation

(4–68). A variety of solutions of this diffusion equation can be obtained using

the methods introduced in Chapter 4.

As an example, consider how a specified periodic variation of h′ at x = 0,

h′ = h′s cosωt, (9.46)

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 707

causes the water table to fluctuate at distances x > 0 in a semi-infinite

unconfined aquifer. The variation in h′ could be due to the influence of

annual runoff from a mountain range on the water table in an adjacent arid

region. Noting that kρgh0/φµ in the porous flow problem is equivalent to κ

in the heat conduction problem, the solution given in Equation (4–89) can

be appropriately modified to yield

h′ = h′s exp

{

−x (

ωµφ

2kρgh0

)}

× cos

{

ωt− x

(

ωµφ

2kρgh0

)}

. (9.47)

The amplitude of the periodic fluctuation in the phreatic surface decreases

to 1/e of the applied value in a distance

xe =

(

2kρgh0

ωµφ

)1/2

. (9.48)

Taking φ = 0.1, k = 10−11 m2, ω = 2 × 10−7 s−1 (a period of 1 year),

µ = 10−3 Pa s, and h0 = 100 m, we find that xe = 1 km. We see that the

influence of a change of hydraulic head propagates over a relatively short

distance.

Problem 9.10 The hydraulic head at x = 0 is increased from h0 to h0+∆h

at t = 0(∆h ≪ h0). Determine the flow into the unconfined aquifer that

occupies the region x > 0.

Problem 9.11 At t = 0 the phreatic surface in an unconfined aquifer in

the region x > 0 has a height h0. For t > 0 there is a constant discharge Q0

(per unit length) from the aquifer at x = 0. Assuming that |∆h|≪h0 show

that the height of the phreatic surface as a function of t and x is given by

h = h0 − 2Q0

(

kρgh0φ

µt

)1/2(

ξ erf ξ − 1√ π e−ξ

2 )

,

(9.49)

where

ξ = x

2

(

µφ

kρgh0t

)1/2

.

Problem 9.12 At t = 0 the height of the phreatic surface in an unconfined

aquifer is h = h1 for −L ≤ x ≤ L and h = h0 for |x | > L(h1 − h0 ≪ h0).

Show that the height of the phreatic surface as a function of x and t for

708 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.9 Drainage of water out of a bank due to the sudden change in the water level in the channel.

t > 0 is

h− h0 = (h1 − h0)

2

{

erf

[

(L− x)

2

(

µφ

kρgh0t

)1/2]

+ erf

[

(L+ x)

2

(

µφ

kρgh0t

)1/2]}

. (9.50)

Problem 9.13 For t ≤ 0 there is a steady flow Q0 in an unconfined aquifer

in the region x > 0. From Equation (9–25) the height of the phreatic surface

is

h2 = h2 0 −

2µQ0x

kρg , (9.51)

where h0 is the height of the surface at x = 0. At time t = 0 the height at

x = 0 is changed from h0 to h1, |h0 − h1| ≪ h0. Show that the height of the

phreatic surface at subsequent times is

h = h2 1 + (h2

0 − h2 1) erf ξ − 2µQ0x

kρg , (9.52)

where ξ = (1/2)x(µφ/kρgh̄t)1/2 and h̄ is a suitably defined average height.

Proceed by recognizing that h2 also satisfies a linearized diffusion equation

when there are small changes in the square of the water table height. It

is advantageous to solve for h2 rather than h because the initial condition,

Equation (9–51), is given in terms of h2. Show that the flow into the channel

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 709

Figure 9.10 Numerical similarity solution of the nonlinear Boussinesq equa- tion for water seepage into a channel from an adjacent bank after a sudden decrease in water level in the channel. The dimensionless water surface height is shown as a function of the similarity variable for f(0)= 0 and 0.5 (solid lines). The numerical solution is compared with the approximate linearized solution [Equation (9–59)] (dashed curve) for f(0)= 0.5.

at x = 0, is

Q = Q0 − 1

2 (h2

0 − h2 1)

(

kρgφ

πµh̄t

)1/2

. (9.53)

A number of solutions of the nonlinear Boussinesq equation (9–43) can

also be found. First consider the problem illustrated in Figure 9–9. At time

t = 0−, Figure 9–9a, the water table in a channel and the adjacent porous

bank is at a height h0 above a horizontal, impermeable bed. At time t = 0+,

Figure 9–9b, there is a sudden drop in the water level in the channel to a

height h1, and it remains at this value for t > 0. Water drains from the

aquifer into the channel, and the height of the phreatic surface drops, Figure

9–9c. The required initial and boundary conditions for this problem are

h(0, t) = h1 h(∞, t) = h0 h(x, 0) = h0. (9.54)

We noted before that the linearized form of the Boussinesq equation is

identical with the equation governing the one-dimensional, unsteady con-

duction of heat. The boundary conditions for this problem are identical

with those used for the instantaneous heating or cooling of a semi-infinite

half-space considered in Section 4–15. Therefore it is not surprising that the

710 Flows in Porous Media

similarity variable used for that problem – see Equation (4–96) – can also be

used for this problem (noting the correspondence between κ and kρgh0/µφ)

ξ =

(

µφ

kρgh0t

)1/2x

2 . (9.55)

In addition it is convenient to introduce the dimensionless water surface

height

f = h

h0 . (9.56)

In terms of f and ξ the Boussinesq equation (9–43) becomes

−2ξ df

dξ =

d

(

f df

)

. (9.57)

From Equations (9–54) and (9–55) the necessary boundary conditions are

f(0) = h1

h0 f(∞) = 1. (9.58)

While it is not possible to obtain an analytic solution of Equation (9–57),

a solution can be obtained by numerical integration. The results of such an

integration are given in Figure 9–10 for f(0) = 0 and 0.5.

If Equation (9–57) is linearized as discussed before, the solution is

f = f(0) erfc ξ. (9.59)

This result is valid in the limit f(0) → 1 (see Problem 9–10). The approxi-

mate result from Equation (9–59) is compared with the numerical integration

of Equation (9–57) in Figure 9–10 for f(0) = 0.5. Reasonably good agree-

ment is obtained, even though the linearization condition is not satisfied.

The fact that we have obtained a similarity solution shows that the shape

of the phreatic surface varies with position and time in a self-similar manner;

that is, h depends only on x/t1/2. It must be noted, however, that this is

only true for sufficiently large times. For small times dh/dx is of order unity,

and the Dupuit approximation used in deriving Equation (9–43) is violated.

Problem 9.14 For the problem in Figure 9–9 show that the rate at which

water seeps into the channel Q per unit distance along the channel is

Q = −φh1

2t1/2

(

kρgh0

µφ

)1/2

f ′(0), (9.60)

where f ′(0) is df/dξ at ξ = 0.

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 711

A similarity solution of the Boussinesq equation can also be obtained

for the lateral spreading of a linear mound of groundwater. The mound of

groundwater will diffuse outward in much the same way that a pulse of heat

diffuses. The latter problem was studied in Section 4–21. Just as the total

amount of heat was conserved in Equation (4–159), the total amount of fluid

must be conserved in this problem. If the initial volume of water per unit

distance parallel to the linear mound is V1, conservation of fluid requires

that ∫ x0

0 hdx =

V1

2φ , (9.61)

where h = h(x, t) is the height of the mound above an impermeable plane

and x0(t) is the half-width of the mound at its base. We show that the

spreading fluid mound has a well-defined front, which we denote by x0; that

is, h ≡ 0 for |x| > x0. The fluid mound spreads symmetrically so that half

the fluid is in the region 0 < x < x0.

Just as we introduced similarity variables to solve the thermal diffusion

problem, we can also introduce similarity variables for this problem. The

similarity variables relevant to the spreading of the groundwater mound are

f =

(

12kρgφt

µV 2 1

)1/3

h (9.62)

ξ =

(

2µφ2

3kρgV1t

)1/3

x. (9.63)

The Boussinesq equation (9–43) must be rewritten in terms of these vari-

ables. The required partial derivatives are

∂h

∂t = − 1

3t

(

µV 2 1

12kρgφt

)1/3(

ξ df

dξ + f

)

(9.64)

∂x

(

h ∂h

∂x

)

=

(

µV 2 1

12kρgφt

)2/3(2

3

µφ2

kρgV1t

)2/3

× d

(

f df

)

. (9.65)

Substitution of these expressions into Equation (9–43) gives

f d2f

dξ2 +

(

df

)2

+ ξ df

dξ + f = 0. (9.66)

Substitution of the nondimensional variables into the conservation of fluid

condition, Equation (9–61), yields

712 Flows in Porous Media

∫ ξ0

0 f dξ = 1, (9.67)

where ξ0 is given by Equation (9–63) with x = x0. An analytic solution that

is symmetric about ξ = 0 and that satisfies Equations (9–66) and (9–67) is

f = 32/3

2

(

1 − ξ2

32/3

)

|ξ| ≤ ξ0 = 31/3. (9.68)

The shape of the phreatic surface at any given time is parabolic. Equation

(9–68) shows that f = 0 for |ξ| = ξ0 = 31/3. Thus ξ = ξ0 defines the fluid

front or maximum half-width of the spreading mound. There is no fluid in

the region |ξ|>ξ0. The actual position of the fluid front as a function of

time follows from Equation (9–63)

x0 =

(

9kρgV1t

2µφ2

)1/3

. (9.69)

Upon combining Equations (9–62), (9–63), and (9–68), we obtain the height

of the phreatic surface as a function of position and time:

h =

(

3µV 2 1

32kρgφt

)1/3 {

1 − (

2µφ2

9kρgV1t

)2/3

x2

}

.

(9.70)

At t = 0 the fluid mound has zero thickness and infinite height. However,

the total volume of water is finite and equal to V1 per unit distance along

the mound.

Problem 9.15 Show that the maximum height of the phreatic surface as

a function of x is

hmax = 1

2 √

3

V1

φx (9.71)

and that this occurs at time

tmax = 2µφ2x3

√ 3kρgV1

. (9.72)

Problem 9.16 Let h0 be the height of the laterally spreading groundwater

mound at x = 0 and t = t0. Let the half-width of the mound at its base be

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 713

l0 at t = t0. Show that the height of the mound at x = 0 and t = t0 + t′ is

given by

h0

(

1 + 6kρgh0t

µφl20

)−1/3

.

In addition, demonstrate that the half-width of the mound at its base at

time t = t0 + t′ is

l0

(

1 + 6kρgh0t

µφl20

)1/3

.

We next determine the height of the phreatic surface h as a function of x

and t when water is introduced at x = 0 at a constant volumetric rate Q1

per unit width. For t < 0, h is zero; for t > 0, there is a constant input of

water at x = 0. Half of the fluid flows to the right into the region x > 0,

and half flows to the left. From Equation (9–24) we can write the flow rate

to the right at x = 0+ as

−kρg µ

(

h ∂h

∂x

)

x=0+ =

1

2 Q1. (9.73)

The water table height h(x, t) is the solution of the Boussinesq equation

(9–43) that satisfies condition (9–73).

Once again we introduce similarity variables. The appropriate similarity

variables for this problem are

f =

(

kρgφ

Q2 1µt

)1/3

h (9.74)

ξ =

(

φ2µ

kρgQ1t2

)1/3

x. (9.75)

Aside from numerical factors these variables are the same as the ones in

Equations (9–62) and (9–63) if we replace V1/t in those equations by Q1.

The introduction of these similarity variables into the Boussinesq equation

yields

f d2f

dξ2 +

(

df

)2

+ 2

3 ξ df

dξ − 1

3 f = 0. (9.76)

The boundary condition at x = 0+ given in Equation (9–73) becomes (

f df

)

ξ=0+ = −1

2 . (9.77)

The solution of this problem, unlike that of the previous one, requires a

714 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.11 The nondimensional height of the phreatic surface f as a func- tion of the similarity variable ξ for fluid injection at a constant rate from the plane x =0.

numerical integration. As was the case for the spreading mound of ground-

water, there is a fluid front, and f = 0 for ξ > ξ0. At the flow front Equation

(9–76) yields (

df

)

ξ=ξ0

= −2

3 ξ0. (9.78)

The numerical solution of Equation (9–76) subject to conditions (9–77) and

(9–78) is given in Figure 9–11. The value of ξ0 is 1.18, and the actual position

of the fluid front from Equation (9–75) is

x0 = 1.18

(

kρgQ1t 2

φ2µ

)1/3

. (9.79)

The height of the phreatic surface at x = 0 is

hx=0 = 0.82

(

Q2 1µt

kρgφ

)1/3

. (9.80)

Problem 9.17 If fluid is injected along a plane at x = 0 at a rate of 0.1

m2 s−1, how high is the phreatic surface at the point of injection and how

far has the fluid migrated if µ = 10−3 Pa s, φ = 0.1, k = 10−11 m2, ρ = 1000

kg m−3, and t = 105 s?

To solve problems involving unsteady horizontal radial flow toward or

away from a vertical line, we need to generalize the Boussinesq equation to

cylindrical or polar coordinates. We do this by first deriving a fluid conser-

vation equation for radial flow. The change in volume of fluid between r and

r+ δr due to a change in the height of the phreatic surface occurring in the

time interval t to t+ δt is

2πrφ{h(t+ δt) − h(t)} δr = 2πrφ ∂h

∂t δt δr.

9.5 Flow in Unconfined Aquifers 715

The net flow out of the cylindrical element in time δt is

{Qr(r + δr) −Qr(r)} δt = ∂Qr ∂r

δr δt,

where Qr is the rate at which fluid flows across a cylindrical surface of height

h and radius r. Conservation of fluid requires that any net outflow from the

cylindrical element be balanced by a drop in height of the phreatic surface

in the element. This enables us to write

∂Qr ∂r

+ 2πrφ ∂h

∂t = 0. (9.81)

By substituting for Qr in terms of h from Equation (9–39), we obtain

∂h

∂t = kρg

µφr

∂r

(

rh ∂h

∂r

)

. (9.82)

We first derive a similarity solution of this equation for the radial spread-

ing of a mound of water. A volume of water V0 is introduced at time t = 0

along the vertical line at r = 0. The fluid spreads radially outward; at any

time t > 0, the region r > 0 must contain the original amount of fluid. Thus

we can write the fluid conservation condition

2πφ

∫ r0

0 rh dr = V0. (9.83)

The integration extends only to r = r0 because, as before, the water mound

has a fluid front at r = r0; that is, h = 0 for r > r0.

The appropriate similarity variables for this problem are

f =

(

4kρgt

µV0

)1/2

h (9.84)

η =

(

µφ2

4kρgV0t

)1/4

r. (9.85)

The introduction of these variables into Equation (9–82) yields

f d2f

dη2 +

(

df

)2

+ f

η

df

dη + η

df

dη + 2f = 0. (9.86)

The nondimensional fluid conservation equation becomes ∫ η0

0 ηf dη =

1

2π , (9.87)

where η0 is the value of η corresponding to r = r0. We can find an analytic

solution for the axisymmetric spreading of a groundwater mound, just as

716 Flows in Porous Media

we did for the spreading of the linear groundwater mound. The solution of

Equation (9–86) that satisfies Equation (9–87) is

f = 1√ π

(

1 − η2√π 2

)

|η| ≤ η0 =

(

2√ π

)1/2

.

(9.88)

The actual position of the fluid front as a function of time follows from the

value of η0 and Equation (9–85)

r0 =

(

16kρgV0t

πµφ2

)1/4

. (9.89)

By combining Equations (9–84), (9–85), and (9–88), we obtain the height of

the phreatic surface as a function of position and time:

h =

(

µV0

4πkρgt

)1/2 {

1 − (

πµφ2

16kρgV0t

)1/2

r2 }

.

(9.90)

Problem 9.18 Show that the maximum height of the phreatic surface as

a function of r is

hmax = V0

2πφr2 (9.91)

and that this occurs at time

tmax = πµφ2r4

4kρgV0 . (9.92)

Problem 9.19 Let h0 be the height of the spreading axisymmetric ground-

water mound at r = 0 and t = t0. Let the maximum radius of the mound

at its base be b0 at t = t0. Show that the height of the mound at r = 0 and

t = t0 + t′ is given by

h0

(

1 + 8kρgh0t

µφb20

)−1/2

.

In addition, demonstrate that the maximum radius of the mound at its base

at time t = t0 + t′ is

b0

(

1 + 8kρgh0t

µφb20

)1/4

.

An exact solution of the nonlinear diffusion equation for the height of the

phreatic surface as a function of position and time is also possible when

water is introduced at r = 0 at a constant volumetric rate Q0. For t < 0, h

9.6 Geometrical Form of Volcanoes 717

is zero for all r; for t> 0, there is a constant input of water at r = 0. The

boundary condition on the flow rate from Equation (9–39) is

−2πkρgrh

µ

∂h

∂r → Q0 as r → 0. (9.93)

The appropriate similarity variables for this problem are

f =

(

kρg

µQ0

)1/2

h (9.94)

η =

(

µφ2

kρgQ0t2

)1/4

r. (9.95)

Aside from numerical factors, these variables can be obtained from the ones

in Equations (9–84) and (9–85) by replacing V0/t in those equations with

Q0. The introduction of these variables into Equation (9–82) yields

f d2f

dη2 +

(

df

)2

+ f

η

df

dη + η

2

df

dη = 0, (9.96)

while the boundary condition at r = 0 from Equation (9–93) becomes

ηf df

dη → − 1

2π as η → 0. (9.97)

A numerical solution is required for this problem. There is a fluid front

at η = η0 and f = 0 for η > η0. From Equation (9–96) we can rewrite the

condition f = 0 at the fluid front as (

df

)

η=η0

= −1

2 η0. (9.98)

The numerical solution of Equation (9–96) subject to the conditions given

in Equations (9–97) and (9–98) is given in Figure 9–12. The value of η0 is

1.16, and the position of the fluid front from Equation (9–95) is therefore

r0 = 1.16

(

kρgQ0t 2

µφ2

)1/4

. (9.99)

The height of the phreatic surface is logarithmically singular as r → 0. This

is the same singularity as we found for the steady flow problem in Equation

(9–40).

9.6 Geometrical Form of Volcanoes

The shapes of many volcanoes are remarkably axisymmetric and similar. A

large fraction of the composite volcanoes that make up the volcanic lines

718 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.12 The nondimensional height of the phreatic surface f as a func- tion of the similarity variable η for a line source releasing fluid at a constant rate at r= 0.

Figure 9.13 Mount Fuji in Japan.

adjacent to ocean trenches have near-constant flank slopes and are concave

upward near their summits. An example, Mount Fuji, in Japan, is shown in

Figure 9–13. There are, however, a number of phenomena that can produce

nonsymmetrical edifices. Examples include parasitic centers of volcanism on

the flanks of a volcano, glacial and other types of erosion, and explosive

eruptions.

One model for the geometrical form of volcanoes assumes that the volcanic

edifice is a uniform porous medium and that the surface of the volcano is a

surface of constant hydraulic head. The volcano is the constructional sum of

9.6 Geometrical Form of Volcanoes 719

Figure 9.14 The mechanism by which a surface flow extends a volcanic edifice. (a) Magma penetrates the permeable edifice searching for the path of least resistance to the surface. (b) The magma reaches the surface at the point of least resistance. (c) The surface flow extends the edifice.

many small lava flows. Each flow passes through the interior porosity of the

edifice, flows onto the surface, and extends the porous matrix of the edifice

as it solidifies.

The way in which these flows extend the edifice is illustrated qualitatively

in Figure 9–14. At the beginning of an eruption, magma reaches the center

of the base of the edifice through a volcanic pipe. Studies of groundwater

migration indicate that volcanoes are permeated by fractures; presumably

these are thermal contraction cracks formed during the solidification of in-

dividual flows. In some volcanoes the permeability is dominated by radial

rift zones from which most eruptions emanate.

We assume that the magma is driven through the preexisting matrix of

channels in search of the least resistant path to the surface of the volcano.

This is illustrated in Figure 9–14a. In Figure 9–14b the magma reaches the

surface following the path of minimum hydraulic resistance. The magma con-

tinues to flow to the surface following this path creating a surface flow that

extends the volcanic edifice (Figure 9–14c). Upon solidification, there will be

an increase in the resistance to flow along this path, and the next eruption

will follow a different path and occur at another point on the surface. If a

volcano grows too tall, flank eruptions will widen it; if a volcano grows too

wide, summit eruptions will increase its elevation. The equal resistance to

flow requires that the volcano grow axisymmetrically.

The flow of magma through the volcanic edifice is essentially the same

720 Flows in Porous Media

as the flow of groundwater through an unconfined aquifer. We assume that

the surface of the volcano is a surface of constant hydraulic head, just as

the phreatic surface in an unconfined aquifer is. We further assume that the

slope of the volcano is small so that the Dupuit approximation can be made.

When the magma reaches the surface, it extends the matrix instead of filling

the pore space. Thus it is necessary to set φ = 1 in the mass conservation

equation (9–81) and in the nonlinear diffusion equation (9–82).

The similarity solution for the shape of the phreatic surface when fluid

is introduced at r = 0 at a constant rate Q0 is directly applicable to this

problem. The similarity profile for the phreatic surface given in Figure 9–12

is therefore also the predicted geometrical form for volcanoes. The similarity

profile yields an actual volcano shape h = h(r) through the scaling factors in

Equations (9–94) and (9–95). These scaling factors can be adjusted to give

the best fits possible to actual volcanoes. The predicted form is compared

with a cross section of Mount Fuji in Figure 9–15. In general the agreement

is satisfactory. Near the base of the volcano the observed profile is more

rounded; this can be attributed to deposits of alluvium. The theoretical

profile is not expected to be appropriate near the summit where it is singular

and where the Dupuit approximation is not valid.

The radius of the volcano is equivalent to the radial position of the fluid

front given by Equation (9–99) with φ = 1. From Equations (9–94), (9–95),

(9–98), and (9–99) with φ = 1, the flank slope of the volcano at its base is

(

∂h

∂r

)

r=r0

= −0.58

(

µ

kρg

)3/4Q 1/4 0

t1/2 . (9.100)

The negative product of Equations (9–99) and (9–100) defines a reference

height for the volcano equal to

hr = 0.673

(

µQ0

kρg

)1/2

. (9.101)

Because the reference height is independent of time, the theory predicts that

volcanoes grow primarily by increasing their radii. A series of predicted vol-

canic profiles are compared with the cross sections of six volcanoes from the

volcanic line in the western United States in Figure 9–16. Good agreement

is obtained. It appears that volcanoes do, in fact, grow mainly by increasing

their radii.

Just as we have applied the similarity solution for a line source of fluid in

an unconfined aquifer to the determination of volcano shapes, we can also

apply the similarity solution for a planar source of fluid to the determination

of the geometrical form of volcanic ridges. The similarity form of the cross

9.6 Geometrical Form of Volcanoes 721

F ig

u re

9. 15

C o m

pa ri

so n

o f th

e si

m il a ri

ty so

lu ti o n

fo r

th e

co n st

a n t h yd

ra u li c

h ea

d vo

lc a n ic

su rf

a ce

(c ir cl

es )

w it h

a

cr o ss

se ct

io n

o f M

o u n t F u ji , J a pa

n (s

o li d

li n e)

.

722 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.16 Topographic profiles across seven volcanoes from the volcanic line in the western United States; R–Rainier, S–Shasta, A–Adams, B– Baker, H–Hood, L–Lassen, St–St. Helens. Four theoretical profiles are also included.

section of a volcanic ridge is therefore given in Figure 9–17. The transfor-

mation equations (9–74) and (9–75) can be used to convert this similarity

profile into actual profiles of h = h(x). The scale factors in these equations

can be adjusted to give the best possible fits to observed ridge cross sec-

tions. A number of linear volcanic ridges rise above the seafloor. Typical

bathymetric profiles across the Hawaiian, Walvis, and Ninety East Ridges

are compared with predicted profiles from the similarity solution in Figure

9–17. Reasonably good agreement is obtained.

9.7 Equations of Conservation of Mass, Momentum, and Energy

for Flow in Porous Media

So far we have considered one-dimensional or axisymmetric flows that only

require Darcy’s law and a simple mass balance equation for their solu-

tion. In this and subsequent sections we are concerned with both one-

and two-dimensional flows in which there is also a transport of heat. Thus,

in addition to Darcy’s law, we require differential equations for conservation

of mass and energy in two dimensions. We previously derived the relevant

equations for a viscous incompressible fluid in Chapter 6; these equations

can be applied to flows in porous media with minor modifications.

Conservation of mass for the flow of a viscous incompressible fluid in two

9.7 Equations of Conservation of Mass, Momentum, and Energy for Flow in Porous Media723

F ig

u re

9. 17

B a th

ym et

ri c

p ro

fi le

s a cr

o ss

th e

(a )

H a w a ii a n , (b

) W

a lv

is , a n d

(c )

N in

et y

E a st

ri d ge

s. T

h eo

re ti ca

l

p ro

fi le

s p re

d ic

te d

by th

e si

m il a ri

ty so

lu ti o n

a re

a ls o

sh o w n .

724 Flows in Porous Media

dimensions requires that Equation (6–53) be satisfied. This equation can

also apply to flows in porous media if the solid matrix cannot deform and if

the fluid is incompressible

∂u

∂x + ∂v

∂y = 0. (9.102)

The velocity components in this equation are the Darcy velocities. Although

the Darcy velocity components are not the actual fluid velocities in the mi-

croscopic channels of the porous medium, they are equivalent to the velocity

components of an ordinary viscous fluid insofar as their transport of such

quantities as mass and heat are concerned. This is apparent from the def-

inition of the Darcy velocity as the volumetric flow rate per unit area of

the entire medium. The Darcy velocity is an average velocity over an area

element in a porous medium. The average is defined in such a way that it

accounts for the transport of heat across the area element as well as the

transport of mass.

The energy equation for a two-dimensional flow of an incompressible fluid

in a porous medium can be written

ρmcpm

∂T

∂t + ρfcpf

(

u ∂T

∂x + v

∂T

∂y

)

= λm

(

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2

)

, (9.103)

which is a generalization of Equation (6–293). The fluid and the solid matrix

are assumed to have the same temperature T . The diffusion of heat by

conduction occurs through the entire medium, and the appropriate value of

the thermal conductivity appearing on the right side of Equation (9–103)

must be a volumetric average over the fluid-filled pores and the solid matrix.

We have used the symbol λm for this average thermal conductivity of the

medium to avoid confusion with the symbol for permeability. Because a

substantial fraction of the medium is made up of the solid matrix, which

is usually a better conductor of heat than the fluid, it is generally a good

approximation to assume that λm is the thermal conductivity of the solid

matrix. Thermal energy is stored in both the fluid-filled pores and the solid

matrix. Therefore the thermal inertia term on the left side of Equation (9–

103) is also a volumetric average. The advection terms on the left side of

the equation use the fluid density ρf and the fluid specific heat cpf because

only the fluid transports heat.

To complete the formulation of the problem, we require Darcy’s equations

for the horizontal and vertical components of the Darcy velocity. These were

given in Equations (9–1) and (9–3).

9.8 One-Dimensional Advection of Heat in a Porous Medium 725

9.8 One-Dimensional Advection of Heat in a Porous Medium

Considerable observational evidence indicates that magma bodies induce

large-scale motions of groundwater in the surrounding rocks. A substantial

fraction of the hot springs with exit temperatures greater than about 50◦C

is believed to be the direct result of this type of hydrothermal circulation.

The intrusion heats the groundwater, which becomes less dense and rises.

Near the Earth’s surface the water cools and becomes more dense. It can

then sink and recharge the aquifers and porous rock in the vicinity of the

intrusion. The water is reheated, and the cycle repeats. An analysis of the

complete hydrothermal convection system requires the solution of a coupled

set of nonlinear differential equations in at least two dimensions. This prob-

lem is considered in subsequent sections. Here, however, we study only the

upwelling flow above the intrusion. A one-dimensional solution is obtained

for the dependence of temperature on depth, and this is compared with mea-

surements of the subsurface temperature in the Steamboat Springs, Nevada,

hydrothermal system.

We simplify Equations (9–102) and (9–103) for steady one-dimensional

upflow and obtain

dv

dy = 0 (9.104)

ρf cpf v dT

dy = λm

d2T

dy2 . (9.105)

From the first of these equations v is a constant, and Equation (9–105) can

be immediately integrated to give

ρf cpf vT = λm

dT

dy + c1. (9.106)

The constant of integration c1 can be determined from the conditions at

great depth where upwelling fluid has the uniform reservoir temperature Tr.

Therefore as y → ∞, we must have dT/dy → 0 and T → Tr. This gives

c1 = ρfcpf vTr (9.107)

and

ρf cpf v(T − Tr) = λm

d

dy (T − Tr). (9.108)

The rearrangement of Equation (9–108) in the form

d(T − Tr)

(T − Tr) = ρfcpf

v

λm dy (9.109)

726 Flows in Porous Media

and the integration of Equation (9–109) gives the result

ln T − Tr c2

= ρfcpf

v

λm y (9.110)

or

T − Tr = c2 exp

(

ρfcpf v

λm y

)

. (9.111)

As y → ∞, the right side of this equation approaches zero because v is

negative for upflow and T − Tr. To evaluate the integration constant c2, we

set T = T0 at the surface y = 0 and find

c2 = T0 − Tr. (9.112)

The temperature as a function of depth is therefore given by

T = Tr − (Tr − T0) exp

(

ρfcpf v

λm y

)

. (9.113)

We now apply this result to measurements of temperature versus depth in

the Steamboat Springs, Nevada, hydrothermal system.

Steamboat Springs in southern Washoe County, Nevada, is an area of hot

springs and some geysering. Extensive recent volcanics in the immediate

vicinity suggest that this thermal system is associated with a solidifying

magma body, although there is no direct evidence of the presence of the

magma body. Probably the best information on the horizontal extent of the

hydrothermal system comes from measurements of the groundwater temper-

ature at the water table. A contour map of this temperature for the Steam-

boat Springs area is given in Figure 9–18. A well-defined thermal anomaly

exists with a horizontal extent of 5 to 10 km. The dark areas are regions

where boiling hot springs occur.

The bottom temperatures logged during the drilling of a well adjacent

to the hot springs are shown in Figure 9–19. This well was located about

60 m from the nearest boiling spring. Also shown in Figure 9–19 is the

temperature profile given by Equation (9–113). In making this comparison,

we have taken T0 = 10◦C, Tr = 165 ◦C, λm = 3.35 W m−1 K−1, ρf = 1000

kg m−3, cpf = 4.185 × 103 J kg−1 K−1, and v = −6.7 × 10−8 m s−1. This

value of the Darcy velocity gives a predicted near-surface thermal structure

that is in good agreement with observations. It is of interest to see how

this velocity compares with the observed discharge of the thermal system.

The approximately 70 hot springs associated with the Steamboat Springs

thermal system discharge water at a rate of about 3.33 × 10−3 m3 s−1.

However, geochemical studies indicate that a large fraction of the discharge

of the system reaches Steamboat Creek directly without being fed through

9.8 One-Dimensional Advection of Heat in a Porous Medium 727

Figure 9.18 Groundwater temperature (◦C) in the Steamboat Springs, Nevada, hydrothermal system. The solid areas are the regions of boiling hot springs and geysers.

Figure 9.19 Temperature as a function of depth in the Steamboat Springs hydrothermal system. The data are from the GS-3 well (White, 1968) and the solid line is from Equation (9–113).

the hot springs. Based on these geochemical studies the total discharge of the

system is estimated to be 7.12 × 10−2 m3 s−1. Assuming that our derived

Darcy velocity of magnitude 6.7 × 10−8 m s−1 is correct, the total area

728 Flows in Porous Media

required to discharge 7.12 × 10−2 m3 s−1 is 1.1 km2. This indicates that

ascending flow is confined to relatively restricted thermal plumes near the

regions of boiling hot springs.

If the flow is driven by the buoyancy of the hot water, we can use this

Darcy velocity to estimate the permeability of the system. Recall that the

buoyancy force results from the small decrease in density that occurs upon

heating

ρf = ρf0 − αfρf0(Tr − T0), (9.114)

where ρf0 is the density of the water at temperature T0 and αf is the volume

coefficient of thermal expansion of water. Upon substituting Equation (9–

114) into Darcy’s law, Equation (9–3), we obtain

v = −k µ

(

dp

dy − ρf0g

)

− k

µ αfρf0g(Tr − T0).

(9.115)

If we assume that the pressure gradient in excess of the hydrostatic value is

negligible in the upwelling flow, we obtain

v = −k µ αfρf0g(Tr − T0). (9.116)

Taking v = −6.7×10−8 m s−1 as obtained above, Tr−T0 = 155 K, αf = 10−3

K−1, and µ = 1.33 × 10−4 Pa s, we find that the required permeability is

k = 5.75× 10−15 m2, a low value. This calculation shows that the buoyancy

of the hot water can easily drive the flow.

It should be emphasized that these calculations are only approximately

valid. Several important fault zones are associated with the Steamboat

Springs system, so the validity of the porous flow model is questionable.

Also, only the ascending flow has been considered. This is only part of the

hydrothermal system. In the next section we will consider the complete hy-

drothermal circulation pattern for convection in a fluid-saturated porous

layer heated from below.

Problem 9.20 Calculate the surface heat flux for the steady one-dimensional

upwelling of fluid through a porous medium. Assume that temperature is

uniform at great depth. How does the surface heat flow compare with the

heat carried upward by the fluid at great depth? Use the parameter values

given previously to estimate the total rate at which heat is being brought

to the surface by the Steamboat Springs geothermal system.

Problem 9.21 Consider the upwelling of a mixture of water and steam

in a porous medium. Because of the cold temperatures near the surface,

9.9 Thermal Convection in a Porous Layer 729

the mixture will reach a level where all the steam must abruptly condense.

There will be a phase charge interface with upwelling water just above the

boundary and upwelling steam and water just below it. Show that the tem-

perature gradient immediately above the interface (dT/dy)2 is larger than

the temperature gradient just below the interface (dT/dy)1 by the amount

−Lρsvs, where L is the latent heat of the steam–water phase change, ρs is

the density of the steam, and −vs is the upwelling Darcy velocity of the

steam.

9.9 Thermal Convection in a Porous Layer

In Section 6–19 we considered the onset of thermal convection in a fluid

layer heated from below. Here we treat the analogous problem for a layer

of fluid-saturated porous material contained between impermeable isother-

mal boundaries. The upper boundary, y = 0, is maintained at temperature

T0, and the lower boundary, y = b, is kept at temperature T1(T1 > T0).

The temperature gradient across the layer must exceed a critical value be-

fore convection will occur. Prior to the onset of convection the temperature

distribution is given by the conduction solution (Equation (6–295))

Tc = T0 +

(

T1 − T0

b

)

y. (9.117)

At the onset of convection the temperature difference T ′ ≡ T − Tc is ar-

bitrarily small. The components of the Darcy velocity u′, v′ are similarly

infinitesimal when motion first takes place.

As in Section 6–19 we adopt the Boussinesq approximation and consider

the fluid to be incompressible except for the buoyancy term in Darcy’s law

for the vertical Darcy velocity component. Thus the energy equation (9–103)

can be written in terms of T ′ according to

ρmcpm

∂T ′

∂t + ρfcpf

(

u′ ∂T ′

∂x + v′

∂T ′

∂y

)

+ ρfcpf v′

(T1 − T0)

b = λm

(

∂2T ′

∂x2 + ∂2T ′

∂y2

)

.

(9.118)

Since T ′, u′, and v′ are small quantities, the nonlinear terms u′∂T ′/∂x and

v′∂T ′/∂y on the left side of Equation (9–118) can be neglected. The appro-

priate forms of Equations (9–1), (9–3), (9–102), and (9–118) for the small

perturbations of temperature T ′, velocity u′, v′, and pressure p′ can be writ-

730 Flows in Porous Media

ten

∂u′

∂x + ∂v′

∂y = 0 (9.119)

ρmcpm

∂T ′

∂t + ρf cpf

v′ (T1 −T0)

b =λm

(

∂2T ′

∂x2 + ∂2T ′

∂y2

)

(9.120)

u′ = −k µ

∂p′

∂x (9.121)

v′ = −k µ

(

∂p′

∂y + αfρfgT

′ )

. (9.122)

These equations must be solved subject to the boundary conditions v′ =

T ′ = 0 at y = 0, b because the boundaries are isothermal and impermeable.

As was shown in Section 6–19, the critical condition for the onset of con-

vection can be obtained by setting ∂/∂t = 0. Thus Equation (9–120) can be

written

ρf cpf v′

(T1 − T0)

b = λm

(

∂2T ′

∂x2 + ∂2T ′

∂y2

)

. (9.123)

The pressure perturbation can be eliminated from these equations by dif-

ferentiating Equation (9–121) with respect to y and Equation (9–122) with

respect to x and subtracting. The result is

∂u′

∂y − ∂v′

∂x = kαfρfg

µ

∂T ′

∂x . (9.124)

We can eliminate u′ between Equations (9–119) and (9–124) by the same

procedure of cross differentiation and subtraction to get

∂2v′

∂x2 + ∂2v′

∂y2 =

−kαfρfg µ

∂2T ′

∂x2 . (9.125)

A single equation for T ′ can be found by solving Equation (9–123) for v′

and substituting into Equation (9–125) with the result

∂4T ′

∂x4 + 2

∂4T ′

∂x2∂y2 + ∂4T ′

∂y4

= −kαfρ2

fgcpf (T1 − T0)

µλmb

∂2T ′

∂x2 . (9.126)

The boundary conditions must also be written in terms of T ′. Because T ′ = 0

on y = 0, b, ∂2T ′/∂x2 is also zero on these boundaries. With v′ = 0 and

∂2T ′/∂x2 = 0 on y = 0, b, Equation (9–118) gives ∂2T ′/∂y2 = 0 on the

9.9 Thermal Convection in a Porous Layer 731

Figure 9.20 The Rayleigh number for the onset of convection in a layer of porous material heated from below as a function of the wavelength param- eter 2πb/λ.

boundaries. Thus, the complete set of boundary conditions for the fourth-

order differential equation for T ′ is T ′ = ∂2T ′/∂y2 = 0 on y = 0, b.

The elementary solution for T ′ that will satisfy both the differential equa-

tion and the boundary conditions is

T ′ = T ′ 0 sin

πy

b sin

2πx

λ , (9.127)

where T ′ 0 is the amplitude of the temperature perturbation and λ is its

wavelength. This form of the solution automatically satisfies all the bound-

ary conditions. Its amplitude is indeterminate from a linear analysis, but its

wavelength can be found by substituting Equation (9–127) into Equation

(9–126) with the result

{ (

2πb λ

)2 +π2}2

(

2πb λ

)2 = αfgρ

2 f cpf

kb(T1 −T0)

µλm . (9.128)

732 Flows in Porous Media

The dimensionless combination of parameters on the right side of Equation

(9–128) is the appropriate Rayleigh number for thermal convection in a layer

of porous material heated from below

Ra ≡ αfgρ

2 f cpf

kb(T1 − T0)

µλm . (9.129)

In terms of this Rayleigh number Equation (9–128) becomes

{ (

2πb λ

)2 + π2}2

(

2πb λ

)2 = Ra = Racr. (9.130)

The Rayleigh numbers given in Equation (9–130) are the critical Rayleigh

numbers Racr for the onset of convection with wavelength λ; see Equation

(6–319). The dependence of Racr on 2πb/λ is given in Figure 9–20. There is

a minimum value of Racr which is the lowest value of the Rayleigh number

at which convection can occur. The value of wavelength corresponding to

min (Racr) is obtained by differentiating the left side of Equation (9–130)

with respect to 2πb/λ and setting the result equal to zero. When this is

done, we obtain

λ = 2b. (9.131)

The minimum value of Racr is found by substituting this result into Equation

(9–130)

min(Racr) = 4π2 = 39.4784. (9.132)

We can now determine under what conditions thermal convection of ground-

water will occur in a uniform permeable layer. Taking Ra = 4π2, ρf =

1000 kg m−3, αf = 10−3 K−1, µ = 1.33 × 10−4 Pa s, cpf = 4.2 × 103 J kg−1

K−1, λm = 3.3 W m−1 K−1, and g = 10 m s−2, we can rewrite Equation

(9–129) as

dTc dy

= 4.2 × 10−10

kb2 , (9.133)

where all quantities are in SI units. Equation (9–133) gives the minimum

value of the temperature gradient required for convection to occur in a

porous layer of permeability k and thickness b. Figure 9–21 shows this re-

lation in the form of a plot of dTc/dy versus k for several values of b. This

figure shows that for a typical geothermal gradient of 20 K km−1 and a layer

thickness of 1 km a permeability greater than 2.1 × 10−14 m2 is required

for thermal convection. High geothermal gradients and large permeabilities

9.9 Thermal Convection in a Porous Layer 733

Figure 9.21 The thermal gradient required for hydrothermal convection in a porous layer as a function of the permeability of the layer for several layer thicknesses.

favor the occurrence of hydrothermal convection. Conditions in geothermal

areas on the continents and in the oceanic crust near ocean ridges gener-

ally meet the minimum requirements for hydrothermal convection. Exten-

sive fractures or fault zones usually provide the required permeability, and

near-surface magma bodies usually provide the high thermal gradients.

Problem 9.22 Determine the minimum critical Rayleigh number for

the onset of convection in a layer of porous material heated from below

with an isothermal and impermeable lower boundary and an isothermal

constant pressure upper boundary. This boundary condition corresponds to

a permeable boundary between a saturated porous layer and an overlying

fluid. What is the horizontal wavelength that corresponds to the minimum

value of Racr? Take the layer thickness to be b, and let the upper boundary,

y = 0, have temperature T = T0 and the lower boundary, y = b, have

temperature T = T1. Assume that at the onset of convection T ′ has the

form

T ′ = T ′ 0 sin

2πX

λ Y (y) (9.134)

and show that Y (y) is a solution of

d 4Y

dȳ 4 − 2a2 d

2Y

dȳ 2 + Y (a4 − a2Ra) = 0, (9.135)

734 Flows in Porous Media

where

a ≡ 2πb

λ ȳ ≡ y

b . (9.136)

Show that the general solution of Equation (9–135) can be written as

Y = c1e γȳ + c2e

−γȳ + c3 sin δȳ+ c4 cos δȳ, (9.137)

where c1, c2, c3, and c4 are constants of integration and

γ2 = a2 + a √

Ra (9.138)

δ2 = a √

Ra − a2. (9.139)

Show that the boundary conditions are

Y = 0 on ȳ = 0 and 1 (9.140)

d2Y

dȳ2 = 0 on ȳ = 1 (9.141)

d

dȳ

(

d2y

dȳ2 − a2Y

)

= 0 on ȳ = 0. (9.142)

Substitute Equation (9–137) into each of these boundary conditions to ob-

tain four homogeneous equations for the four unknown constants c1, c2, c3,

and c4. Show that a nontrivial solution of these equations requires

γ tan δ + δ tanh γ = 0. (9.143)

This transcendental equation is an eigenvalue equation that implicitly gives

Racr as a function of a, since both γ and δ are defined in terms of Ra and

a in Equations (9–138) and (9–139). The critical Rayleigh number can be

found by numerically solving Equations (9–138), (9–139), and (9–143). The

value of min (Racr) turns out to be 27.1. One way of proceeding is to choose

a value of a (there exists an Racr for each a). Then try a value of δ. Compute

γ from γ2 = 2a2 + δ2. Then compute tan δ/δ and − tanh γ/γ. Iterate on δ

until these ratios are equal. With δ determined Racr follows from Equation

(9–139). Repeat the process for different values of a until min (Racr) is found.

Problem 9.23 Heat flow measurements as a function of distance from

the Galapagos spreading center show an approximate periodic spatial varia-

tion with a wavelength of about 7 km. If these data are interpreted in terms

of hydrothermal convection in the oceanic crust, what is the approximate

depth of circulation? If the Rayleigh number for the convecting system is

about 100 and the temperature rise across the layer is several hundred ◦C,

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media 735

Figure 9.22 A two-dimensional plume of hot groundwater rising above an intrusion of small cross-sectional area emitting heat at the rate Q per unit distance perpendicular to the plane of the figure.

estimate the permeability of the crustal rocks. Oceanic basalts are estimated

to have permeabilities of about 10−16 m2.

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media

If an intrusion is of limited spatial extent, the heated buoyant groundwater

in its vicinity rises in the form of a plume. Such a narrow plume resem-

bles smoke rising from a chimney on a calm day. Figure 9–22 illustrates

the two-dimensional plume above an intrusion of small cross-sectional area

extending infinitely far in the z direction. For our analysis we approximate

the intrusion as a line source of heat emitting Q units of energy per unit

time and per unit distance in the z direction. The intrusion is embedded in

a porous medium of permeability k completely saturated with groundwater.

The vertical coordinate −y is measured upward from the intrusion or line

source of heat located at the origin of the coordinate system.

The equations governing the structure of the plume are Equations (9–1),

(9–3), (9–102), and (9–103). Because the flow is steady, we set ∂/∂t = 0 in

Equation (9–103) and obtain

ρfcpf

(

u ∂T

∂x + v

∂T

∂y

)

=λm

(

∂2T

∂x2 + ∂2T

∂y2

)

. (9.144)

736 Flows in Porous Media

As before we adopt the Boussinesq approximation. The Darcy equations can

be written

u = −k µ

∂p

∂x (9.145)

v = −k µ

{

∂p

∂y + ρfαfg(T − T0)

}

, (9.146)

where the hydrostatic pressure has been eliminated using Equation (6–284)

and ρf and T0 are the constant density and temperature of the ambient

groundwater.

These equations can be simplified using a boundary-layer approximation

if the plume remains thin as it moves upward. If δ is the width of the plume

a distance h above the intrusion, the requirement that the plume be thin is

equivalent to δ ≪ h. The narrowness of the plume depends on the rate at

which the line source emits heat. For Q sufficiently large, the groundwater

in the plume will be very buoyant and will rise at a relatively rapid rate. As

a consequence, plume material will move upward quite far before it has an

opportunity to spread laterally. The result will be a narrow plume. We will

be able to state quantitatively just how large the heat source must be for the

plume to remain thin because the analysis to follow will yield an equation

for plume width as a function of distance above the intrusion.

If the plume is thin, quantities such as velocity and temperature will vary

rapidly with distance across the plume compared with how they will vary

with distance along the plume. This characteristic allows the problem to be

simplified using boundary-layer approximations similar to the ones we have

already used in our studies of the structure of the thermal lithosphere or

boundary layer in Section 4–16. To determine the approximations appropri-

ate to the present problem, we estimate the relative sizes of the terms in the

governing equations. We will then neglect the terms that are demonstrably

small. Let U and V represent the magnitudes of the horizontal and vertical

Darcy velocities in the plume at a distance h above the origin where the

plume thickness is δ. The gradient of u across the plume ∂u/∂x is approxi-

mately

∂u

∂x ≈ U

δ , (9.147)

while the gradient of v along the plume ∂v/∂y is approximately

∂v

∂y ≈ V

h . (9.148)

The continuity equation (9–102) requires that these two terms balance,

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media 737

which is only possible if

U

δ ≈ V

h or U ≈ V

(

δ

h

)

. (9.149)

The magnitude of the horizontal velocity in the plume is very small compared

with the magnitude of the vertical velocity if δ ≪ h.

Darcy’s law for the horizontal flow can now be used to relate the magni-

tude of the flow pressure P to the magnitude of the upward flow. According

to Equation (9–145)

U ≈ k

µ

P

δ , (9.150)

or, with the help of Equation (9–149),

P ≈ µ

k Uδ ≈ µ

k

δ2

h V. (9.151)

The pressure gradient term in Darcy’s equation for the vertical flow

−(k/µ)(∂p/∂y) thus has magnitude V (∂2/h2). The term is much smaller

than the vertical flow itself if δ ≪ h; that is, the upward motion of the

plume is driven by the buoyancy force. The pressure gradient term can thus

be neglected in Equation (9–146), which becomes

v = −kρfαfg µ

(T − T0). (9.152)

The vertical velocity in the plume is directly proportional to the temperature

excess.

The terms on the left side of the energy equation are comparable because

u ∂T

∂x ≈ UT

δ ≈ V T

h ≈ v

∂T

∂y . (9.153)

The terms on the right side of the temperature equation are unequal, how-

ever, because

∂2T/∂y2

∂2T/∂x2 ≈ T/h2

T/δ2 = δ2

h2 ≪ 1. (9.154)

Thus heat conduction along the plume can be neglected compared with heat

conduction across the plume, and we can write

u ∂T

∂x + v

∂T

∂y =

λm ρf cpf

∂2T

∂x2 . (9.155)

The boundary-layer equations for the plume structure are Equations (9–

102), (9–152), and (9–155). Darcy’s law for the horizontal velocity is not

required because the effects of the flow pressure are negligible.

738 Flows in Porous Media

As in the case of the thermal plume considered in Section 6–21, the vertical

flux of heat at any value of y must be equal to the heat input Q. Because

the plume is symmetric about its centerline, this condition can be written

Q = −2

∫ ∞

0 ρf cpf

v(T − T0) dx, (9.156)

where the minus sign is required because the velocity v is negative. The

symmetry of the plume also requires

u = ∂v

∂x = 0 at x = 0. (9.157)

At large distances from the plume the ambient temperature is T0, and the

fluid is motionless so that

T → T0, v → 0 as x→ ∞. (9.158)

It is once again appropriate to introduce the stream function defined in

Equations (6–69) and (6–70) to satisfy the conservation of mass equation

(9–102). In terms of the stream function, Equation (9–152) can be written

T − T0 = − µ

kρfαfg

∂ψ

∂x . (9.159)

Upon substituting Equation (6–69), (6–70), and (9–159) into Equation (9–

155), we obtain an equation for ψ:

∂ψ

∂y

∂2ψ

∂x2 − ∂ψ

∂x

∂2ψ

∂x∂y = − λm

ρfcpf

∂3ψ

∂x3 . (9.160)

The integral condition, Equation (9–156), becomes

kαfgQ

2µcpf

=

∫ ∞

0

(

∂ψ

∂x

)2

dx (9.161)

and the boundary conditions, (9–157) and (9–158), become

∂ψ

∂y = ∂2ψ

∂x2 = 0 at x = 0 (9.162)

∂ψ

∂x → 0 as x→ ∞. (9.163)

We must obtain a solution to Equation (9–160) subject to the conditions

given in Equations (9–161) to (9–163). Once again we can use similarity

variables. The appropriate variables are

f =

( µc2pf ρf

kαfgλmQy

)1/3

ψ (9.164)

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media 739

η =

(

kαfgρ 2 f cpf

Q

µλ2 my

2

)1/3

x. (9.165)

Substitution of these variables into Equations (9–160) to (9–163) yields

f d2f

dη2 +

(

df

)2

+ 3 d3f

dη3 = 0 (9.166)

1

2 =

∫ ∞

0

(

df

)2

dη (9.167)

f = d2f

dη2 = 0 at η = 0 (9.168)

df

dη → 0 as η → ∞. (9.169)

Equation (9–166) can be immediately integrated to give

f df

dη + 3

d2f

dη2 = 0. (9.170)

The constant of integration is zero because the boundary conditions (9–

168) require both f and its second derivative to vanish at η = 0. Another

integration of Equation (9–170) gives

f2 + 6 df

dη = c21 (9.171)

or df

c21 − f2 =

1

6 dη, (9.172)

where c21 is the constant of integration. The integral of this equation is

f = c1 tanh

(

c1η

6

)

, (9.173)

where the additional constant of integration is zero, since f = 0 at η = 0.

Note that the boundary condition (9–169) is automatically satisfied by this

form of f .

The constant of integration c1 is determined by substituting Equation

(9–173) into Equation (9–167) with the result

1 = c41 18

∫ ∞

0 sech4

(

c1η

6

)

dη = c31 3

∫ ∞

0 sech4s ds

= c31 3

[

tanh s− 1

3 tanh3 s

]∞

0 =

2

9 c31 (9.174)

740 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.23 Velocity and temperature distributions in a two-dimensional plume.

or

c1 =

(

9

2

)1/3

. (9.175)

Upon substituting this value of c1 into Equation (9–173), we obtain

f =

(

9

2

)1/3

tanh

(

η

481/3

)

. (9.176)

By combining Equations (6–70), (9–159), (9–164), (9–165), and (9–176), we

find that the vertical Darcy velocity and temperature in a two-dimensional

plume of groundwater is

v = −kρfαfg

µ (T − T0)

=

(

kαfgQ

µcpf

)2/3(3ρf cpf

32yλm

)1/3

sech2 (

η

481/3

)

.

(9.177)

In applying this equation, recall that the upward coordinate is −y and that

y = 0 at the location of the line source of heat. Thus v is negative, as it

should be for an upward flow, and T − T0 is positive, consistent with a hot

plume. The velocity and temperature structures are shown in Figure 9–23.

Problem 9.24 Show that the width of the plume δ, defined as the region

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media 741

Figure 9.24 An axisymmetric plume rising above a small igneous body emitting heat at the rate Q as it cools.

where (T − T0)/(T − T0)max > 0.1, is given by

δ = 13.2

(

µλ2 my

2

kαfgρ 2 f cpf

Q

)1/3

. (9.178)

What condition must Q satisfy for the boundary-layer approximations to be

valid?

We next consider the axisymmetric plume that rises above a small cooling

igneous body approximated by a point source of heat emitting Q units of

energy per unit time. The heat source is located at the origin of the coordi-

nate system with −y vertically upward and r the radial distance from the

plume centerline, as sketched in Figure 9–24. The boundary-layer approx-

imations also apply to the axisymmetric plume, and we need only modify

Equations (9–102), (9–152), and (9–155) for the effects of cylindrical geome-

try. Equation (9–152), Darcy’s law for the vertical flow, does not require any

change. The right side of Equation (9–155) gives the result of heat conduc-

tion normal to the plume centerline in the two-dimensional case. It needs

to be replaced by the appropriate form for heat conduction in the radial

direction that appears on the right side of Equation (6–253). In addition,

the horizontal advection term u∂T/∂x on the left side of Equation (9–155)

must be replaced by the radial advection term ur∂T/∂r, where ur is the

radial Darcy velocity. Thus the energy equation for the axisymmetric plume

is

742 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.25 Flows into and out of an infinitesimal tubular cylindrical vol- ume in a porous medium.

ur ∂T

∂r + v

∂T

∂y =

λm ρf cpf

(

∂2T

∂r2 +

1

r

∂T

∂r

)

. (9.179)

The appropriate form of the steady incompressible continuity equation in

cylindrical geometry can be derived by carrying out a balance of fluid on

the tubular cylindrical element in Figure 9–25. The rate of fluid flow into

the element is v(y) times the area 2πr δr plus ur(r) times the area 2πr δy or

v(y)2πr δr + ur(r)2πr δy.

The rate of fluid flow out of the element is

v(y + δy)2πr δr + ur(r + δr)2π(r + δr) δy.

These rates must balance for steady incompressible flow resulting in

0 = v(y + δy) − v(y)

δy

+ 1

r

{

(r + δr)ur(r + δr) − rur(r)

δr

}

. (9.180)

In the limit δy, δr → 0 Equation (9–180) gives the incompressible continuity

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media 743

equation in cylindrical geometry

1

r

∂r (rur) +

∂v

∂y = 0. (9.181)

The equations governing the axisymmetric plume are Equations (9–152),

(9–179), and (9–181).

The vertical flux of heat at any value of y must be equal to the heat input

Q

Q = −2π

∫ ∞

0 ρfcpf

rv(T − T0) dr. (9.182)

The minus sign is required because Q and T − T0 are positive whereas v is

negative. The symmetry of the plume at the plume centerline requires

ur = ∂v

∂r = 0 at r = 0. (9.183)

At large distances from the plume the ambient temperature is T0, and the

fluid is motionless so that

T → T0, v → 0 as r → ∞. (9.184)

We proceed as we did in analyzing the two-dimensional plume by intro-

ducing a stream function ψ appropriate to axisymmetric incompressible flow

v= 1

r

∂ψ

∂r (9.185)

ur =−1

r

∂ψ

∂y . (9.186)

It can be verified by direct substitution that the continuity equation (9–181)

is identically satisfied. The temperature in the plume is related to ψ through

Equations (9–152) and (9–185)

T − T0 = −µ

kρfαfgr

∂ψ

∂r . (9.187)

A single equation for ψ is obtained by substituting Equations (9–185) to

(9–187) into Equation (9–179)

1

r2 ∂ψ

∂y

∂ψ

∂r − 1

r

∂ψ

∂y

∂2ψ

∂r2 +

1

r

∂ψ

∂r

∂2ψ

∂r∂y

= λm ρfcpf

{

1

r2 ∂ψ

∂r − 1

r

∂2ψ

∂r2 + ∂3ψ

∂r3

}

. (9.188)

744 Flows in Porous Media

The integral condition, Equation (9–182), becomes

Q = 2πcpf

µ

k αfg

∫ ∞

0

1

r

(

∂ψ

∂r

)2

dr (9.189)

and the boundary conditions, Equations (9–183) and (9–184), become

−1

r

∂ψ

∂y → 0,

∂r

(

1

r

∂ψ

∂r

)

→ 0 as r → 0

(9.190)

1

r

∂ψ

∂y → 0 as r → ∞. (9.191)

We again find a solution by introducing similarity variables; the appro-

priate variables for the axially symmetric plume are

f = ρf cpf

ψ

λmy (9.192)

η = − (

kcpf αfgQ

µ

)1/2 ρfr

λmy . (9.193)

The minus sign is inserted into Equation (9–193) to make η a positive vari-

able. Substitution of these variables into Equations (9–188) to (9–191) gives

ηf d2f

dη2 − f

df

dη + η

(

df

)2

=− df dη

+ η d2f

dη2 − η2 d

3f

dη3

(9.194)

1 = 2π

∫ ∞

0

(

df

)2 dη

η (9.195)

f

η − df

dη → 0,

1

η

d2f

dη2 − 1

η2

df

dη → 0 as η → 0

(9.196)

1

η

df

dη → 0 as η → ∞. (9.197)

Equation (9–194) can be integrated to give

f

η

df

dη =

1

η

df

dη − d2f

dη2 + c1. (9.198)

The boundary conditions (9–196) require that the constant of integration c1

9.10 Thermal Plumes in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media 745

be given by

c1 = lim η→0

(

df

)2

. (9.199)

However, Equations (9–185), (9–192), and (9–193) show that df/dy is pro-

portional to rv. Because v is finite at r = 0, rv → 0 as r → 0 and df/dη → 0

as η → 0. Thus c1 = 0 and Equation (9–198) becomes

f

η

df

dη =

1

η

df

dη − d2f

dη2 . (9.200)

A solution of this equation that satisfies the boundary conditions (9–196)

and (9–197) is

f = 4c2η

2

1 + c2η2 . (9.201)

The constant of integration c2 is obtained by substituting Equation (9–201)

into (9–195) with the result

c2 = 3

64π . (9.202)

Equation (9–201) becomes

f = 3

16π

η2

(

1 + 3η2

64π

) . (9.203)

The vertical velocity and temperature distributions in the plume are ob-

tained by combining Equations (9–185), (9–187), (9–192), (9–193), and (9–

203)

v = −kρfαfg

µ (T − T0)

= 3

8πy

kαfgρfQ

µλm

{

1 + 3

64π

r2

y2

kαfgρ 2 f cpf

Q

µλ2 m

}−2

.

(9.204)

The dimensionless velocity and temperature profiles for the axisymmetric

plume are shown in Figure 9–26.

Problem 9.25 Show that the diameter of the axisymmetric plume δ, de-

fined as the region where (T − T0)/(T − T0)max > 0.1, is given by

δ = 24|y |λm ρf

(

µ

k αfgcpf Q

)1/2

(9.205)

746 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.26 Profiles of the dimensionless velocity and temperature in an axisymmetric plume.

Figure 9.27 The formation of magma at grain intersections during the first stages of partial melting.

What condition must Q satisfy for the boundary layer approximations to

be valid?

9.11 Porous Flow Model for Magma Migration

A large fraction of the Earth’s volcanism occurs beneath ocean ridges. As

mantle rock rises beneath a ridge partial melting occurs because of the de-

crease in pressure (see Figure 1–4). The resulting magma migrates upward

through the mantle to form the basaltic oceanic crust. Although pressure-

release melting explains why partial melting occurs at depth beneath an

ocean ridge, it does not explain how the magma ascends through the mantle

to form the overlying oceanic crust.

When partial melting occurs, the first magma produced collects along

9.11 Porous Flow Model for Magma Migration 747

grain boundary intersections, as illustrated in Figure 9–27. When sufficient

melting has occurred, the magma coalesces to form a network of intercon-

nected channels. The channels provide permeability for the migration of

magma through the matrix of unmelted crystalline grains. Since the magma

is lighter than the remaining crystalline rock, the gravitational body force

drives the magma upward along the vertically connected channels.

A porous flow model can be used to quantitatively treat this upward

migration of magma. The magma fills the porosity, and the solid crystals

make up the matrix. As a reasonable approximation we assume that the

microscopic porous flow model given in Section 9–3 and illustrated in Figure

9–1 is applicable to this problem. The differential buoyancy of the magma

relative to the solid crystals is the pressure gradient that drives the magma

upward, that is,

dp

dy = (ρs − ρl)g, (9.206)

where ρl is the magma density and ρs is the density of the solid. In writing

Equation (9–206), we assume that the pressures in the liquid and the matrix

are equal. For this to be the case, the matrix must be able to deform and

collapse as the magma migrates upward. At the high temperatures associ-

ated with partial melting and on the relevant time scales, solid-state creep

processes are sufficiently rapid to provide this deformation.

The relative velocity between the magma in the vertically connected chan-

nels and the deformable matrix is given by substituting Equations (9–6) and

(9–206) into (9–7)

vl − vs = −b 2φ(ρs − ρl)g

24πµ . (9.207)

In this equation b is the grain size, vl is the actual velocity of the magma

in the vertically connected channels, vs is the actual velocity of the solid

matrix (upward velocities are negative), φ is the volume fraction of magma,

and µ is the magma viscosity. Magma in the horizontally connected channels

moves upward with the velocity vs of the solid matrix. The quantities vl,

vs, and φ are functions of depth y in the melt zone. Figure 9–28 shows the

magma migration velocity relative to the solid matrix vl−vs as a function of

the volume fraction of magma for b = 2 mm, ρs − ρl = 600 kg m−3, g = 10

m s−2, and µ = 10 Pa s. The viscosities of magmas are strong functions

of temperature and vary considerably with magma composition. A typical

viscosity for a basaltic magma is 1 Pa s; andesitic magmas have viscosities

of about 100 Pa s.

We now apply the magma migration model to the production and ascent

748 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.28 Magma migration velocity relative to the solid matrix vl−vs

as a function of the volume fraction of magma φ.

of magma beneath an ocean ridge. We assume that mantle rock is rising

vertically at a velocity −v0 that is sufficiently large that prior to the onset

of melting, heat conduction is negligible and the temperature of the rock is

constant. The rock begins to melt when it reaches the depth y0 at which

its temperature profile intersects its melting temperature Tm profile. The

dependence of the melting temperature on pressure is given by the slope of

the Clapeyron curve

γm =

(

dp

dT

)

m , (9.208)

which is assumed to be constant. Since dp/dy = ρsg, the melting temper-

ature gradient dTm/dy is ρsg/γm and Tm as a function of depth is given

by

Tm = Tm0 + ρsg

γm y, (9.209)

where Tm0 is the value of the melting temperature at the surface. The melt-

ing temperature profile and the isotherm of the ascending unmelted mantle

rock are shown in Figure 9–29a for y0 = 50 km, γm = 7.5 MPa K−1, g = 10

m s−2, ρs = 3300 kg m−3, and Tm0 = 1400 K. The temperature of the rising

mantle rock prior to the onset of melting is 1620 K in this example.

Once melting commences, the temperature profiles of the ascending man-

tle rock and magma coincide with the melting temperature profile. As the

rock and magma move upward, their temperatures decrease along the melt-

9.11 Porous Flow Model for Magma Migration 749

Figure 9.29 Dependence of (a) temperature T, (b) melt fraction f, (c) up- ward velocity of the solid matrix −vs, (d) upward velocity of magma in vertically connected channels −vl, and (e) volume fraction of magma φ on depth y in the melt zone beneath an ocean ridge.

ing curve, and internal energy is made available to melt an increasing fraction

of the rock. We define the melt fraction f to be the ratio of the total upward

mass flow rate of magma to the upward mass flux of rock −ρsv0 prior to the

onset of melting. From Equation (9–8), the upward mass flow rate of magma

in the vertically connected channels is −φρlvl/3, and the upward mass flow

rate of magma in the horizontally connected channels is −2φρlvs/3. Thus

the melt fraction is given by

f ≡ φρlvl + 2φρlvs 3ρsv0

. (9.210)

If the upward mass flow rate of magma changes by

d

dy

{

φρl(vl + 2vs)

3

}

750 Flows in Porous Media

between y and y−dy, and the latent heat of fusion is L, an amount of energy

L d

dy

{

φρl(vl + 2vs)

3

}

must be extracted from the internal energy of both the rock and magma

per unit time and per unit area over this same depth interval. Thus, the

appropriate energy balance is

(−ρsv0)cp dT

dy = L

d

dy

{

φρl(vl + 2vs)

3

}

, (9.211)

where we have assumed that the specific heats of the rock and magma, cp,

are equal. The coefficient of cp(dT/dy) on the left side of Equation (9–211)

is the total upward mass flow rate of rock and magma in the melt zone;

conservation of mass requires that this equal the mass flow rate of rock

(−ρsv0) prior to the onset of melting. Substitution of Equation (9–210) into

(9–211) yields

cp dT

dy = −Ldf

dy . (9.212)

In the melt zone dT/dy = ρsg/γm. We use this value of the temperature

gradient and integrate Equation (9–212) with the boundary condition f = 0

at y = y0 to obtain

f = cpρsg

γmL (y0 − y). (9.213)

Melt fraction increases linearly with decreasing depth in the melt zone as

illustrated in Figure 9–29b for cp = 1 kJ kg−1 K−1, L = 320 kJ kg−1, and

the other quantities as given before. A 25% melt fraction is produced over

a depth range of 18 km.

The velocity vs can be determined as a function of depth by combining

Equation (9–210) with the conservation of mass equation

ρsv0 = ρlφ(vl + 2vs)

3 + ρsvs(1 − φ). (9.214)

If we divide Equation (9–214) by ρsv0 and subtract (9–210), we obtain

1 − f = vs v0

(1 − φ). (9.215)

Since φ is generally much smaller than 1 (we will see in an example below

that φ is smaller than about 10−3), we can neglect φ in Equation (9–215)

and solve for vs

vs = v0(1 − f)

9.11 Porous Flow Model for Magma Migration 751

= v0

{

1 − cpρsg

γmL (y0 − y)

}

. (9.216)

At y = y0, vs equals v0; as y decreases, the upward velocity of the solid

matrix −vs also decreases. Figure 9–29c shows −vs as a function of depth

for the parameter values already given.

To determine vl, we eliminate φ between Equations (9–207) and (9–210)

and find

v2 l + vlvs − 2v2

s + 3fρsg(ρs − ρl)b

2v0 24πµρl

= 0. (9.217)

The solution of this quadratic equation for vl is

|vl| = −|vs|

2 +

{

9v2 s

4 + fρsg(ρs − ρl)b

2|v0| 8πµρl

}1/2

,

(9.218)

which becomes, upon substituting for f and vs from Equations (9–213) and

(9–216),

|vl| = −|v0|

2

{

1 − cpρsg

γmL (y0 − y)

}

+

[

9v2 0

4

{

1 − cpρsg

γmL (y0 − y)

}2

+ ρ2 sg

2(ρs− ρl)b 2|v0|cp(y0 − y)

8πµρlγmL

]1/2

. (9.219)

At y = y0, vl equals v0; as y decreases, |vl| increases. Figure 9–29d shows

the depth dependence of the upward velocity of the magma in the vertically

connected channels. In addition to parameter values already given, we used

v0 = −50 mm yr−1, ρl = 2700 kg m−3, b= 2 mm, and µ = 1 Pa s to calculate

vl. The velocity of the magma in the vertically connected channels is tens of

meters per year. Thus the magma flows freely upward along grain boundaries

as soon as the melt is produced. Melts from different depths mix to form

the magma reaching the surface.

The volume fraction of magma can be found by solving Equation (9–207)

for φ and substituting for vl and vs from Equations (9–216) and (9–218)

with the result

φ = 24πµ

b2(ρs − ρl)g

[

−3|v0| 2

{

1 − cpρsg

γmL (y0 − y)

}

+

{

9v2 0

4

(

1 − cpρsg

γmL (y0 − y)

)2

752 Flows in Porous Media

+ cpρ

2 sg

2(y0 − y)(ρs− ρl)b 2|v0|

8πγmLµρl

}1/2 ]

. (9.220)

At y = y0, φ is zero; as y decreases, φ increases. However, as can be seen in

Figure 9–29e, for the parameter values given above, φ remains less than a

few tenths of a percent. Although the volume fraction of magma is small in

the melt zone, the magma in the vertically connected channels is rising so

fast that the mass flow rate of this magma is a substantial fraction f of the

ascending mantle rock.

Problem 9.26 Melting in a layer with a thickness h is caused by a uniform

rate of heat generation H per unit mass.

(a) Show that the rate at which magma migrates out of the top of the layer

is given by hH/L.

(b) Derive an expression for the volume fraction of magma as a function of

depth in the layer in terms of the grain size b, the magma viscosity µ,

and the densities ρs and ρl.

9.12 Two-Phase Convection

If groundwater is heated sufficiently, boiling will occur. Geysers are evidence

of boiling at depth. If water and steam coexist, the temperature of the

mixture is at the boiling temperature, and the steam is said to be wet.

If all the water is converted to steam, the temperature may exceed the

boiling temperature and the steam is said to be dry. Wells of the geothermal

power stations at the Geysers north of San Francisco and at Lardarello in

Italy discharge dry steam. However, in the main reservoirs of these vapor-

dominated systems, the steam is wet.

To better understand the behavior of such geothermal reservoirs, let us

again consider a horizontal layer of a permeable medium saturated with

water. The impermeable upper boundary at y = 0 is maintained at a tem-

perature T0, and the impermeable lower boundary at y = b is maintained at

a temperature T1, T1 > T0. The stability of this layer with regard to thermal

convection was considered in Section 9–9. Here we assume that the Rayleigh

number for the layer is less than the minimum critical value of 4π2 given in

Equation (9–132).

As long as the temperature T1 of the lower boundary is less than the

boiling temperature Tb, heat is transferred across the layer by conduction,

and the temperature is given by Equation (9–117). When the temperature of

the lower boundary reaches the boiling temperature, a two-phase, essentially

9.12 Two-Phase Convection 753

Figure 9.30 The heat pipe mechanism (b) for the vertical transport of heat in a two-phase fluid layer with the temperature profile (a) and the satura- tion profile (c).

isothermal zone develops adjacent to the lower boundary, as illustrated in

Figure 9–30. In the two-phase zone the light steam rises through the denser

water because of buoyancy. Boiling takes place at the lower boundary of

the layer, and steam condenses at the boundary between the upper water

layer and the lower two-phase zone. The depth of this boundary is yb. An

isothermal region in which heat is transferred by the counterflow of the two

phases is known as a heat pipe. Measurements of temperature and pressure in

drill holes in vapor-dominated geothermal systems show that their structures

indeed resemble the model in Figure 9–30; they consist of near-surface water

layers several hundred meters thick overlying the main vapor-dominated

two-phase reservoirs.

Some laboratory measurements of heat transport in a counterflowing steam–

water layer are given in Figure 9–31. The total thickness of the layer in which

these data were acquired is b = 0.159 m, its porosity φ equals 0.37, its per-

meability k = 8.5×10−12 m2, and the thermal conductivity of the saturated

medium λm = 0.92 W m−1 K−1. Figure 9–31a shows the temperature pro-

files in the layer for various values of the heat flux q. The isothermal lower

zone and the linear temperature profile in the upper conduction-dominated

region are clearly illustrated. The depth to the upper boundary of the two-

phase zone yb is easily obtained in terms of the heat flux by considering

Fourier’s law of heat conduction in the upper layer

yb = −λm(Tb − T0)

q , (9.221)

where it will be recalled that an upward heat flux is negative. Figure 9–

754 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.31 (a) Temperature distribution in a porous layer saturated with water and heated from below for several values of the heat flux (Bau, 1980). (b) Measured dependence of the ratio of the depth of the two-phase zone to the layer thickness on the heat flux compared with Equation (9–221).

31b shows that the predicted values of yb/b are in good agreement with the

observations.

We next consider the heat pipe mechanism for the transport of heat in the

two-phase zone. Steam is produced at the lower boundary and flows upward

at a mass flow rate per unit horizontal area dmv/dt (upward velocities and

mass flow rates are negative); water is condensed at the upper boundary of

the two-phase zone and flows downward with a mass flow rate dmw/dt that

just balances the upward steam flow. In this steady state one-dimensional

counterflow, mass conservation requires

dmv

dt + dmw

dt = 0. (9.222)

No condensation or boiling can occur within the two-phase zone because

it is isothermal and there is no heat conduction. The enthalpy of the rising

steam exceeds that of the descending water by an amount equal to the latent

heat of vaporization of water. Thus there is a net upward advection of heat

at the rate

q = L dmv

dt = Lρvvv = −Lρwvw = −Ldmw

dt ,

9.12 Two-Phase Convection 755

(9.223)

where L is the latent heat of vaporization, ρv and ρw are the densities of

steam and water, and vv and vw are the Darcy velocities of steam and water.

In deriving Equation (9–223), we have used the relations

dmv

dt = ρvvv

dmw

dt = ρwvw (9.224)

between the mass flow rates and the Darcy velocities.

For two-phase flow in a porous medium Darcy’s law for vertical flow,

Equation (9–3), can be modified to give

vv = −k(1 − S)

µv

(

dp

dy − ρvg

)

(9.225)

vw = −kS µw

(

dp

dy − ρwg

)

, (9.226)

where µv and µw are the dynamic viscosities of steam and water and S is

the saturation, the fraction of the porosity filled with water. The fraction

of the porosity filled with steam is 1 − S. Equations (9–225) and (9–226)

can be derived by assuming a parallel model in which the water flows in a

fraction S of the horizontal area occupied by the interconnected porosity,

and steam flows in the remaining fraction 1 − S.

The combination of Equations (9–222) to (9–226) yields a formula for the

heat flux that is written in dimensionless form as

Γ = qµv

kLgρv(ρv − ρw) =

S(1 − S)

{(1 − S)µwρv

µvρw + S} .

(9.227)

The dimensionless heat flux Γ is a function of the saturation S. Since S

is constant in the two-phase region, see Figure 9–30c, Γ is also constant.

The dependence of Γ on S from Equation (9–227) is given in Figure 9–

32 for the atmospheric pressure value of the ratio µvρw/µwρv = 70. The

figure also includes data from the laboratory experiment described above;

the agreement between theory and experiment is quite good.

The magnitude of the heat flux across the layer is a maximum |q|max at

the value of the saturation Smax shown in Figure 9–32. The value of Smax can

be obtained by differentiating Equation (9–227) and setting dΓ/dS equal to

756 Flows in Porous Media

Figure 9.32 Dependence of the water saturation S on the dimensionless heat flux Γ from laboratory measurements (circles) and Equation (9–227) (curve).

zero

Smax = {(µwρv

ρwµv )1/2 − µwρv

ρwµv }

{1 − µwρv

ρwµv } . (9.228)

For water and steam with µvρw/µwρv = 70, Equation (9–228) gives Smax =

0.1072. The maximum heat flux Γmax is obtained by substituting Equation

(9–228) into Equation (9–227)

Γmax =

[

1 +

(

µwρv µvρw

)1/2 ]−2

. (9.229)

For µvρw/µwρv = 70, Γmax is 0.798. If the heat flux exceeds this value,

burnout occurs. A large fraction of the layer is saturated with dry steam and

heat is transported by the convection of the dry steam and conduction in the

matrix. The temperature increases by a large amount in order to transport

a small amount of additional heat. The maximum heat transport by the

heat pipe mechanism is independent of the layer thickness – see Equations

(9–227) and (9–229). With the properties appropriate to the boiling of water

at atmospheric pressure L = 2500 kJ kg−1, ρw = 1000 kg m−3, ρv = 0.598

kg m−3, µw = 0.284 × 10−3 Pa s, µv = 1.25 × 10−5 Pa s, we find that

the heat pipe mechanism accommodates a heat flux q = 0.95 Wm−2 if the

permeability k = 10−15 m2.

Problem 9.27 Consider a porous layer saturated with water that is at the

Collateral Reading 757

boiling temperature at all depths. Show that the temperature–depth profile

is given by

1

Tb0 − 1

T = Rv L

ln

(

1 + ρlgy

p0

)

, (9.230)

where Tb0 is the boiling temperature of water at atmospheric pressure p0,

ρl is the density of liquid water which is assumed constant, and Rv is the

gas constant for water vapor. Start with the hydrostatic equation for the

pressure and derive an equation for dT/dy by using the formula for the

slope of the Clapeyron curve between water and steam

dp

dT =

Lρlρv T (ρl − ρv)

≈ Lρv T , (9.231)

where ρv is the density of water vapor. Assume that steam is a perfect gas

so that

ρv = p

RvT . (9.232)

Finally, note that p = p0 + ρlgy if ρl is assumed constant. What is the

temperature at a depth of 1 km? Take Rv = 0.462 kJ kg−1 K−1, L = 2500

kJ kg−1, Tb0 = 373 K, p0 = 105 Pa, ρl = 1000 kg m−3, g = 10 m s−2.

Problem 9.28 Calculate pressure as a function of depth in a vapor-

dominated geothermal system consisting of a near-surface liquid layer 400

m thick overlying a wet steam reservoir in which the pressure-controlling

phase is vapor. Assume that the hydrostatic law is applicable and that the

liquid layer is at the boiling temperature throughout. Assume also that the

steam reservoir is isothermal.

Collateral Reading

Bau, H. H. (1980), Experimental and theoretical studies of natural convec-

tion in laboratory-scale models of geothermal systems, Ph.D. Thesis,

Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

White, D. E. (1968), Hydrology, activity and heat flow of the Steamboat

Springs thermal system, Washoe County, Nevada, U.S. Geological Sur-

vey, Professional Paper 458-C.

Collateral Reading

Bear, J., Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media (American Elsevier, New

York, 1972), 764 pages.

758 Collateral Reading

A definitive textbook on the theory of the dynamics of fluids in porous me-

dia for advanced undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of

groundwater hydrology, soil mechanics, soil physics, drainage and irri-

gation engineering, sanitary engineering, and petroleum and chemical

engineering. A good background in advanced engineering mathematics

is required including such subjects as vector analysis, cartesian ten-

sors, and partial differential equations. Chapter 1 is an introductory

chapter describing aquifers, groundwater, and oil reservoirs, the porous

medium, and the continuum approach to porous media. Chapter 2 dis-

cusses fluid and porous matrix properties. In Chapter 3 the concepts of

pressure and piezometric head are introduced. Succeeding chapters deal

with the fundamental fluid transport equations in porous media, con-

stitutive equations, Darcy’s law, hydraulic conductivity, layered media,

anisotropic permeability, derivations of Darcy’s law, methods of solu-

tion of boundary and initial value problems, unconfined flow and the

Dupuit approximation, flow of immiscible fluids, hydrodynamic disper-

sion, and models and analogs including the Hele–Shaw cell. There are

problems at the end of each chapter and an appendix with answers.

Domenico, P. A., and F. W. Schwartz, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology

(John Wiley, New York, 1990), 824 pages.

This is a comprehensive textbook that covers a broad range of topics con-

cerning both the physical and chemical aspects of hydrogeology. Con-

cepts of porosity and permeability, Darcy’s law, aquifers, and the gov-

erning equations are introduced. Methods of hydraulic testing, trans-

port of heat and particulate matter, aqueous geochemistry, solution and

precipitation, contaminant transport, and remediation are covered.

Freeze, R. A., and J. A. Cherry, Groundwater (Prentice Hall, Englewood

Cliffs, N.J., 1979), 604 pages.

This undergraduate textbook covers virtually all aspects of the flow of

groundwater. Both physical and chemical processes are considered along

with engineering applications.

Fyfe, W. S., N. J. Price, and A. B. Thompson, Fluids in the Earth’s Crust

(Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978), 383 pages.

A textbook for advanced undergraduate and graduate students on the gen-

eration and migration of fluids in the crust, their influence on struc-

tures, and their collection and concentration into commercially viable

reservoirs. Major chapter headings include an introduction to fluid in-

volvement in geochemical and tectonic processes, chemistry of natural

fluids, volatiles in minerals, mineral solubility and solution chemistry,

rates of metamorphic reactions, release of fluids from rocks during meta-

Collateral Reading 759

morphism, controls of fluid composition, melting, experimental rock de-

formation, crustal conditions of temperature, pressure, and strain rate,

permeability, hydraulic fracture, elasticity, dewatering of the crust, di-

apirs and diapirism, and fluids, tectonics, and chemical transport.

Goguel, J., Geothermics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976), 200 pages.

This is an English translation of the author’s book “La Géothermie.” The

book begins with a discussion of the thermal regime near the Earth’s

surface and how it is affected by groundwater circulation. The problem

of extracting usable heat from geothermal resources is then addressed.

The operation of wet and dry steam geothermal power plants is de-

scribed and methods are given to estimate the power output and useful

lifetime of a geothermal resource. The final few chapters consider more

general problems of interest to students of Earth science: thermal ef-

fects of igneous intrusions and extrusions, heat produced by deformation

and faulting, thermal stresses in rocks, the source of the heat-producing

metamorphism, cooling of the Earth, thermal effects of radioactive de-

cay, and convection in the mantle. Aside from the solutions of a few

differential equations the book is nonmathematical in nature.

Muskat, M., The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids Through Porous Media (J.

W. Edwards, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1946), 763 pages.

A classic textbook on the theory of flow through porous media. Part 1 is

an essentially nonmathematical treatment of the foundations of porous

medium flow theory. It includes an extended introduction about the

physical situations to which the theory is relevant – groundwater flow

and the migration of oil and gas, and chapters on Darcy’s law, the

measurement of permeability, and the hydrodynamical equations. Part

2 discusses the steady-state flow of liquids stressing two-dimensional

problems and potential theory methods; three-dimensional problems,

gravity-flow systems, nonuniform permeability, two-fluid systems, and

multiple-well systems are also considered. Part 3 deals with the flow

of compressible liquids in porous media and Part 5 treats the flow of

gases.

Phillips, O. M., Flow and Reaction in Permeable Rocks (Cambridge Univer-

sity Press, Cambridge, 1991), 277 pages.

This is a graduate level textbook on flow through porous media. The gov-

erning principles, patterns of flow, reactions, instabilities, and thermal

convection are considered.

Polubarinova-Kochina, P. Ya., Theory of Ground Water Movement (Prince-

ton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1962), 613 pages.

A classic textbook, translated from the Russian edition, on the mathematical

760 Collateral Reading

theory of the flow of groundwater. The book is intended primarily for

hydraulic engineers and the level of mathematical sophistication is high.

There are two major parts on steady and unsteady flows. Major chap-

ters include physical and mathematical fundamentals, two-dimensional

flows in a vertical plane, confined seepage under hydraulic structures,

the method of inversion and its applications, seepage in heterogeneous

and anisotropic soils, natural and manmade wells, three-dimensional

problems in seepage, inertia effects in unsteady flows, nonlinear un-

steady flow with a free surface, linear equations of unsteady groundwa-

ter flow, two-dimensional unsteady flow, and numerical and graphical

methods in steady and unsteady flows.

Scheidegger, A. E., The Physics of Flow through Porous Media (University

of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 1960), 313 pages.

A fundamental textbook on the physical principles of hydrodynamics in

porous media. Topics covered are description and characterization of

porous materials, physical properties of fluids, equations of fluid flow,

hydrostatics in porous media, Darcy’s law and solutions of Darcy’s equa-

tion, physical aspects of permeability, and multiple-phase flow in porous

media.

Waring, G. A., Thermal springs of the United States and other countries

of the world—A summary, U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper,

No. 492, 1965, 383 pages.

An extensive review of the information on the location of the springs, the

temperature of the water, flow rate, chemistry, gas content, and practi-

cal uses. The facts are tabulated by country or geographical area. The

data are accompanied by a brief description of the geology and a map

showing the location of the springs. There is a long annotated list of

references to the literature on thermal springs.

10

Chemical Geodynamics

10.1 Introduction

Radioactive heating of the mantle and crust plays a key role in geodynamics

as discussed in Section 4–5. The heat generated by the decay of the uranium

isotopes 238U and 235U, the thorium isotope 232Th, and the potassium iso-

tope 40K is the primary source of the energy that drives mantle convection

and generates earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Radiogenic isotopes play

other key roles in the Earth sciences. Isotope ratios can be used to date the

“ages” of rocks.

The science of dating rocks by radioisotopic techniques is known as geochronol-

ogy. In many cases a rock that solidifies from a melt becomes a closed isotopic

system. Measurements of isotope ratios and parent–daughter ratios can be

used to determine how long ago the rock solidified from a magma and this

defines the age of the rock. These techniques provide the only basis for abso-

lute dating of geological processes. Age dating of meteorites has provided an

age of the solar system of 4.55 Ga. The oldest rocks on the Earth were found

in West Greenland and have an age of 3.65 Ga. Lunar samples returned by

the Apollo missions have ages of over 4 Ga.

Quantitative measurements of the concentrations of radioactive isotopes

and their daughter products in rocks form the basis for chemical geody-

namics. Essentially all rocks found on the surface of the Earth have been

through one or more melting episodes and many have experienced high tem-

perature metamorphism. These episodes have clouded the chemistry of the

source rocks from which the surface rocks have been derived. For example,

the partial melting of mantle rocks concentrates incompatible elements into

the resulting magma, but isotope ratios generally remain unaffected. Thus

isotope systematics can place quantitative constraints on the evolution of

the mantle as well as provide an absolute geological time scale.

762 Chemical Geodynamics

Isotope studies of mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) show that they are

remarkably uniform in their isotopic signatures. This uniformity is evidence

that the upper mantle reservoir from which they are extracted is a well-

mixed geochemical reservoir. These systematics also show that the reservoir

is not pristine, but is systematically depleted in incompatible elements rel-

ative to the reference bulk silicate Earth. The relative concentrations of

incompatible elements for the bulk silicate Earth are inferred from values

found in chondritic meteorites. If the upper-mantle MORB source reservoir

is depleted in the incompatible elements, then there must be a complemen-

tary enriched reservoir; this is the continental crust. When partial melting of

the mantle occurs beneath a mid-ocean ridge the incompatible elements are

systematically fractionated into the melt. Thus the basaltic oceanic crust

is enriched in the incompatible elements. The complex magmatic processes

responsible for the formation of the continental crust further concentrate

these incompatible elements. This phenomenon was illustrated by the typ-

ical concentrations of the incompatible heat-producing elements given in

Table 4–2. We will show that the isotope systematics of MORB can be used

to determine the mean age of the continents and to estimate the size of the

mantle reservoir from which the continental crust has been extracted.

Isotope studies of ocean island basalts (OIB) show systematic differences

from MORB. The OIB, e.g., Hawaii, tend to be enriched in incompatible ele-

ments relative to MORB. Because OIB are generally associated with mantle

plumes, we can conclude that plumes do not originate from the well-mixed

upper mantle reservoir from which MORB is extracted. One hypothesis for

the enriched OIB is that plumes sample a near pristine lower mantle reser-

voir. Mixing between a pristine lower mantle and a depleted upper mantle

can explain some, but not all, of the isotope systematics of OIB. A second

hypothesis is that the isotope heterogeneities associated with OIB developed

in the continental crust and mantle and that plumes contain subducted ma-

rine sediments and delaminated continental lithosphere that have not been

completely mixed into the mantle reservoir.

Geodynamic constraints can also be obtained from the concentrations of

the rare gases helium and argon in the atmosphere and their fluxes out of

the crust and mantle. As an example, all 40Ar found in the atmosphere is

the result of the decay of 40K within the Earth’s interior. Thus a balance

can be made between the heat generated from potassium in the mantle and

the mass of argon in the atmosphere.

10.2 Radioactivity and Geochronology 763

10.2 Radioactivity and Geochronology

Lord Rutherford first pointed out the potential of radioactive isotopes for

heating the interior of the Earth. In 1905 he proposed that uranium minerals

could be dated by determining the amount of radiogenic helium in them.

Boltwood (1907) published the first age determinations of uranite based on

uranium–lead (U/Pb) ratios. His dates of 410–535 Ma are generally consis-

tent with modern measurements on these rocks. Early studies of age dating

were summarized and the first geological time scale was proposed by Holmes

(1913).

Geochronology is based on the decay of a radioactive parent isotope with

a mole density j (moles per unit mass) to a radiogenic daughter isotope with

a mole density i∗ and on a nonradiogenic reference isotope of the daughter

element with a mole density i. The isotope ratio α is defined by

α = i∗

i , (10.1)

and the parent–daughter composition ratio µ is defined by

µ = j

i . (10.2)

As a specific example, consider the rubidium–strontium isotope system. The

radiogenic parent rubidium isotope is 87Rb, the radiogenic daughter stron-

tium isotope is 87Sr, and the nonradiogenic reference strontium isotope is 86Sr. The concentrations of the radioactive parent isotope j and the ra-

diogenic daughter isotope i∗ vary with time t according to the principle of

radioactive decay

dj

dt = −λj (10.3)

di∗

dt = λj, (10.4)

where λ is the decay constant and time t is measured forward. The concentra-

tion of a radioactive parent isotope decreases in time at a rate proportional

to the concentration of the parent isotope, while the concentration of the

radiogenic daughter isotope increases in time at the same rate. The integrals

of Equations (10–3) and (10–4) are

j = j0e −λt (10.5)

i∗ = i∗0 + j0(1 − e−λt), (10.6)

where subscript zero refers to the concentrations at t = 0. The half-life t1/2 of

764 Chemical Geodynamics

a radioactive parent isotope is defined to be the time required for one-half of

the atoms present at t = 0 to decay. By putting j = j0/2 in Equation (10–5)

we obtain

0.5 = e−λt1/2 (10.7)

or

t1/2 = ln 2

λ =

0.69315

λ . (10.8)

Some of the more widely studied isotopic systems together with their decay

constants and half-lives are given in Table 10–1.

The isotope and composition ratios α and µ can be determined using

Equations (10–1), (10–2), (10–5) and (10–6). If the initial isotope and com-

position ratios at time t = 0, α0 and µ0 respectively, are specified, the

subsequent time evolution of a closed system is given by

α = µ0(1 − e−λt) + α0 (10.9)

µ = µ0e −λt. (10.10)

Eliminating the initial composition ratio µ0 from this pair of equations gives

α = α0 + µ(eλt − 1). (10.11)

This relation may be used to determine the “age” of a rock. The age refers to

the time when the relevant elements became “frozen” into the rock. Under

ideal conditions no further gain or loss of these elements would occur until

the rocks are studied in the laboratory. Thus a measured date may represent

the time since the crystallization of the rock or the time since a metamor-

phic event when the rock was heated to sufficiently high temperatures for

chemical changes to occur.

For a number of isotopic systems it is appropriate to assume that λt≪ 1.

When this approximation is applied to Equations (10–9) and (10–10) we

obtain

α = α0 + λtµ0 (10.12)

µ = µ0. (10.13)

From Table 10–1 we see that this will be a good approximation for both

the rubidium–strontium and samarium–neodymium systems. As a specific

example of age dating, consider a rock that crystallized from a melt at time

t=0. We assume that the isotope ratio in the melt α0 is a constant. The

crystallized rock will have a variety of minerals in it. As these minerals form,

fractionation of the parent and daughter isotopes occurs. In some minerals

10.2 Radioactivity and Geochronology 765

T ab

le 10

.1 Is

o to

pe S ys

te m

s C

o m

m o n ly

U se

d in

C h em

ic a l G

eo d yn

a m

ic s

a n d

T h ei

r P ro

pe rt

ie s

D ec

ay C

o n st

a n t

o f

H a lf -L

if e

o f

R a d io

a ct

iv e

R a d io

g en

ic S ta

b le

R a d io

a ct

iv e

R a d io

a ct

iv e

Is o to

p e

P a re

n t

D a u g h te

r R

ef er

en ce

P a re

n t λ

P a re

n t τ 1

/ 2

S y st

em Is

o to

p e

Is o to

p e

Is o to

p e

(G y r–

1 )

(G y r)

R u b id

iu m

– S tr

o n ti u m

8 7 R

b 8 7 S r

8 6 S r

1 .4

2 ×

1 0 −

2 4 8 .8

S a m

a ri

u m

– N

eo d y m

iu m

1 4 7 S m

1 4 3 N

d 1 4 4 N

d 6 .5

4 ×

1 0 −

3 1 0 6

U ra

n iu

m – L ea

d 2 3 8 U

2 0 6 P

b 2 0 4 P

b 1 .5

5 1 ×

1 0 −

1 4 .4

6 9

U ra

n iu

m – L ea

d 2 3 5 U

2 0 7 P

b 2 0 4 P

b 9 .8

4 8 ×

1 0 −

1 0 .7

0 4

766 Chemical Geodynamics

0 1 2

τ = 3.65 Ga

3 4 0.7

α 0.8

0.9

µ

Figure 10.1 Rubidium–strontium isochron for the Amitsoq gneiss from the Godthaab district of southwestern Greenland. The isotope ratio α is given as a function of the composition ratio µ for various minerals. (Data from Moorbath et al., 1972). This is one of the oldest terrestrial rocks. The correlation with Equation (10–12) gives an age τ =3.65 Ga.

the parent isotope is enriched relative to the daughter isotope. In these

minerals µ is large and the isotope ratio α becomes progressively larger over

time. If α0 was a constant and if the rock was not subsequently altered

chemically, then measurements of α versus µ for different minerals in the

rock should lie on a straight line known as the whole-rock isochron. The age

is proportional to the slope of this line according to Equation (10–12).

Radiometric dating techniques presently in wide use include the decay

of 87Rb to 87Sr, 147Sm to 143Nd, 40K to 40Ar, 235U to 207Pb, and 238U to 206Pb. We first consider the Rb–Sr dating method. From Table 10–1 the

half-life for the system is 48.8 Gyr, thus the linear approximation given in

Equation (10–12) is applicable. Rubidium is an alkali metal that substitutes

for potassium in micas and K-feldspar. Strontium is an alkaline earth metal

that substitutes for calcium in minerals such as plagioclase and apatite. Nat-

urally occurring rubidium typically contains 72.2% 85Rb and 28.8% 87Rb.

Naturally occurring strontium typically contains 82.5% 88Sr, 7.0% 87Sr, 9.9% 86Sr, and 0.6% 84Sr. Radiogenic 87Rb decays to the stable daughter 87Sr by

the emission of a beta particle and an antineutrino.

An example of a Rb–Sr whole-rock isochron is given in Figure 10–1. The

10.2 Radioactivity and Geochronology 767

rock is an Amitsoq gneiss from West Greenland and it is one of the old-

est terrestrial rocks. Present values of isotope ratios α are plotted against

present values of parent–daughter ratios µ for several minerals in this rock.

The straight line is the best fit of Equation (10–12) to the data. To obtain

this fit, we require that the age of the rock be τ = 3.65 Ga and that the

isotope ratio of the rock be α0 = 0.70. (We use the symbols t and unit yr

when time is measured forward from the past and the symbols τ and unit a

when time is measured backward from the present.)

Radiometric dating of rocks is not always as simple as this example. First,

because decay products are isotopes of elements such as strontium, lead, and

argon, there is uncertainty in the amount of the daughter element present at

t=0. In addition, rocks are not perfectly closed systems; there can be some

exchange of both parent and daughter atoms with surrounding material.

This is of particular concern when the decay product is a gas such as argon.

Problem 10.1 Show that the mean life of the atoms of a radioactive

isotope with decay constant λ is λ−1.

Problem 10.2 Four minerals in a rock were found to have the following 87Sr/86Sr and 87Rb/86Sr ratios: (1) 0.797 and 12.5, (2) 0.790 and 11.2, (3)

0.764 and 7.0, (4) 0.742 and 4.2. What is the age of the rock?

Problem 10.3 Five minerals in a shale were found to have the following 87Sr/86Sr and 87Rb/86Sr ratios: (1) 0.784 and 18.0, (2) 0.769 and 14.0, (3)

0.750 and 9.4, (4) 0.733 and 5.7, (5) 0.716 and 2.0. What is the age of the

rock?

Problem 10.4 Two minerals, A and B, from a rock have strontium isotope

ratios of 0.79 and 0.77 and rubidium–strontium composition ratios of 5.1 and

2.1, respectively. To understand these ratios, assume that the rock underwent

a metamorphic alteration at some time after its formation. Assume that

during the metamorphism 87Sr was completely mixed but was not lost from

the rock. Deduce the original age of the rock and the age of the metamorphic

event. Assume that the mineral A is 8% of the rock and that mineral B is

18%. Take the ratio of the number of common 87Sr atoms to the number of 86Sr atoms to be 0.7.

A second important isotope system in chemical geodynamics is the samarium–

neodymium system. Samarium and neodymium are rare earth elements that

occur in many silicate and carbonate minerals. The radiogenic parent samar-

ium isotope is 147Sm, the radiogenic daughter neodymium is 143Nd, and the

non-radiogenic reference neodymium isotope is 144Nd. Radiogenic 147Sm de-

cays to the stable daughter 143Nd by alpha particle emission. The Sm–Nd

768 Chemical Geodynamics

system can be used for geochronology in exactly the same way as the Rb–

Sr system. The primary advantage of both systems is that the parent and

daughter elements are solids and therefore relatively secure against gain or

loss during the life of the rock. The main disadvantages are the low con-

centrations of the elements and the relatively long half-lives, which make it

difficult to date young rocks.

Another important isotope system for geochronology and chemical geody-

namics is the uranium–lead system. The two principal isotopes of uranium

are 238U and 235U with concentrations of 99.27% and 0.72%, respectively.

Both isotopes are radiogenic and decay to lead isotopes through the emis-

sion of α and β particles: 238U decays to 206Pb and 235Ur decays to 207Pb.

Other lead isotopes are 204Pb which is not a radiogenic product and 208Pb

which results from the decay of the radiogenic isotope of thorium 232Th.

The uranium–lead system has the advantage that two different uranium

isotopes decay to two different lead isotopes with different decay constants

(Table 10–1). The system has the disadvantage that the elements are active

chemically and the parent and daughter elements behave quite differently.

In particular, uranium is very soluble in water under oxidizing conditions.

For the uranium–lead isotopic system, the radioactive parent isotopes 238U

and 235U have mole densities j and j′. The radioactive daughter isotopes 206Pb and 207Pb have mole densities i∗ and i∗′. The nonradiogenic reference

isotope is 204Pb with a mole density i. The decay constants are denoted by

λ and λ′.

The uranium–lead system is commonly discussed in terms of the compo-

sition ratios

µ = j

i ν =

j′

j , (10.14)

where µ is the uranium–lead ratio and ν is the ratio of the uranium parent

isotopes, which is a universal constant for the Earth. In addition, the lead

isotope ratios

α = i∗

i β =

i∗′

i (10.15)

are introduced. The time evolution of a closed system is given by

α = µ0(1 − e−λt) + α0 (10.16)

β = ν0µ0(1 − e−λ ′t) + β0 (10.17)

µ = µ0e −λt (10.18)

ν = ν0e (λ−λ′)t, (10.19)

10.2 Radioactivity and Geochronology 769

where α0 and β0 are initial values of the isotope ratios and µ0 and ν0 are

initial values of the composition ratios. It is not appropriate to use the linear

approximation of the exponentials for the decay of uranium isotopes because

of the relatively large values of the decay constants (Table 10–1).

Initial values for the lead isotope ratios at the time the Earth formed

have been obtained from studies of iron meteorites. Virtually no uranium or

thorium is present in these meteorites so that the measured values are taken

to be primordial; these are α0 = 9.307 and β0 = 10.294. Initial values of the

composition ratios µ0 and ν0 at the time the Earth formed are related to the

composition ratios of the present bulk silicate Earth µsp and νsp (assumed

to have evolved as a closed system) by

µsp = µ0e −λτe (10.20)

νsp = ν0e (λ−λ′)τe =

1

137.8 , (10.21)

where τe is the age of the Earth. (Note that subscript p is used to indicate

present values.) The present uranium isotope ratio is νsp = j′sp/jsp = 1/137.8

(ν0 = 1/3.16). The present lead isotope ratios for the bulk silicate Earth are

αsp = µsp(e λτe − 1) + 9.307 (10.22)

βsp = µsp

137.8 (eλ

′τe − 1) + 10.294. (10.23)

This is known as the Holmes–Houtermans model based on independent

derivations by Holmes (1946) and Houtermans (1946).

Elimination of µsp from Equations (10–22) and (10–23) gives

βsp − 10.294

αsp − 9.307 =

1

137.8

(

eλ ′τe − 1

eλτe − 1

)

. (10.24)

The dependence of βsp on αspdefines an isochron for the bulk silicate Earth.

Meteorites are a source of minerals that follow an isochron. The meteorites

have been isolated closed systems since early in the evolution of the solar

system. Some meteorites have considerably higher uranium–lead composi-

tion ratios µ than other meteorites. The high µ meteorites generate more

radiogenic lead (206Pb, 207Pb) and thus have higher isotope ratios αsp and

βsp. Data for αsp and βsp from several meteorites are given in Figure 10–2.

The data correlate with the isochron given by Equation (10–24) taking the

age τe = 4.55 Ga, which is believed to be the age of the solar system.

The time evolutions of the isotope ratios in the bulk silicate Earth are

given by

αs = µs(e λt − 1) + 9.307 (10.25)

770 Chemical Geodynamics

A B

A = 4.6 Ga

B = 4.5 Ga

40

30

20

10

10 20 30 40 50 60

bsp

asp

Figure 10.2 Lead isotope ratios for several iron and stony meteorites (Pat- terson, 1956). The 207Pb ratios βsp are given as a function of the 206Pb ratios αsp. Three isochrons are given from Equation (10–24); the best agree- ment is with an age τe =4.55 Ga, this is the age of the solar system.

βs = µs

137.8 (eλ

′t − 1) + 10.294 (10.26)

µs = µspe λ(τe−t), (10.27)

where αs and βs are the lead isotope ratios at a time t after the formation of

the Earth and µs is the uranium–lead ratio at a time t after the formation

of the Earth. The evolution of primeval lead in a closed system is illustrated

in Figure 10–3. The isotope ratios βs and αs follow the growth curves given

by Equations (10–25), (10–26), and (10–27); results are given for present

uranium–lead ratios µsp = 8, 9, 10. The values of βs and αs at the present

time, βsp and αsp, for various values of µsp define the geochron. The inter-

sections of the geochron with the growth curves give the values of βsp and

αsp for a closed system with the three values µsp = 8, 9, 10. The values of βs and αs at a time τ in the past for various values of µsp define an isochron;

isochrons are given in Figure 10–3 for primeval lead with τ = 1, 2, 3 Ga.

For lead to lie on a growth curve it must have been a closed system for

the age of the Earth. Some galena (PbS) deposits that satisfy this condition

are associated with sediments and volcanics in greenstone belts and island

arcs that were conformable with the host rocks (in contrast to cross-cutting

veins). Thus they are known as conformable lead deposits.

Lead isotope data for several conformable lead deposits are given in Fig-

ure 10–4. The βs–αs data in Figure 10–4 correlate well with the growth curve

corresponding to µsp = 9. It should be emphasized that conformable lead

10.3 Geochemical Reservoirs 771

Figure 10.3 Growth curves for the lead isotope ratios in a closed system of primeval lead, αs and βs, as given by Equations (10–25), (10–26), and (10– 27). Results are given for present uranium-lead ratios µsp =8, 9, and 10. The present values of αs and βs, αsp and βsp, for all values of the present uranium-lead ratio µsp define the geochron. The values of αs and βs at a time τ in the past for various values of µsp define an isochron. Isochrons are given for τ =1, 2, 3 Ga.

deposits are those that lie on a growth curve. Most lead deposits appear to

have been derived from source regions that have generated excess radiogenic

lead. This is also the case for the lead isotopes in both MORB and OIB as

will be shown.

10.3 Geochemical Reservoirs

The Earth is subdivided into well-defined physical units. At the center is

the solid inner core surrounded by the liquid outer core. The core is pri-

marily iron and the core’s formation occurred very early in the evolution of

the Earth. The largest unit in the Earth is the mantle. In some cases it is

appropriate to divide the mantle into two units, the upper mantle and the

lower mantle. The near-surface layer on the Earth is divided into two units,

the oceanic crust and the continental crust. We finally have the oceans and

the atmosphere. In terms of geochemistry we define each of these units to

be a geochemical reservoir. Some of these reservoirs are quite homogeneous

chemically whereas others are quite heterogeneous. The chemical composi-

tion of the atmosphere is homogenous whereas the chemical composition of

the continental crust is quite heterogeneous.

In terms of chemical geodynamics, we utilize a box model (Figure 10–5)

772 Chemical Geodynamics

Figure 10.4 Lead isotope ratios αs and βs are given by the solid circles for several conformable lead deposits (Kanasewich, 1968). The data points correlate well with the growth curve from Equations (10–25), (10–26), and (10–27) taking µsp =9. The numbers on the growth curve represent ages τ in Ga. The oldest lead deposit has an age of about 2.2 Ga. The geochron is also shown.

in which each of these units is treated as a geochemical reservoir. The focus

of our attention will be the geochemical cycle associated with plate tecton-

ics and mantle convection. The primary processes are the generation of the

oceanic crust at ocean ridges and its elimination at subduction zones, the

generation of continental crust at subduction zones, the creation of oceanic

and continental crust at hotspots, and the loss of continental crust by de-

lamination and sediment subduction. There are also important interactions

with the core, oceans, and atmosphere.

The creation of the oceanic crust at mid-ocean ridges leads to the strong

concentration of incompatible elements into the basaltic oceanic crust from

the upper mantle through the partial melting process. Gases and fluids gen-

erated by this volcanism transfer incompatible and volatile elements to the

oceans and atmosphere. Hydrothermal circulations also exchange material

between the oceanic crust and the oceans. The oceanic crust is coated with

sediments that are primarily derived from the continents.

At ocean trenches the altered oceanic crust is cycled back into the Earth’s

interior. Along with the descending lithospheric plate, some continental ma-

terial is recycled into the mantle at subduction zones; this material includes

chemically altered oceanic crust and entrained sediments. At a depth of

about 100 km, the upper part of the oceanic crust melts. Partial melting

also occurs in the overlying mantle wedge. These processes further concen-

trate the incompatible elements. The result is island-arc volcanism. This

10.3 Geochemical Reservoirs 773

Inner Core

Outer Core

Lower Mantle

Upper Mantle

Continental

Crust Oceanic

Crust

Oceans

Atmosphere

Solidification

Exsolution

Subducation

Delamination Plumes

DelaminationIsland Arcs

Hot Spots SubductionRidges

Hot Spots

Island Arcs

Hydrothermal

Sediments

Volcanism

Erosion

Volcanism

Figure 10.5 Schematic diagram of the geochemical reservoirs and interac- tions involved in the chemical geodynamic behavior of the Earth.

volcanism along with continental flood basalts and hotspot volcanism forms

new continental crust. However, all of these sources have compositions that

are considerably more mafic (basaltic) than the present silicic composition

of the continental crust. Further differentiation of the continental crust is

attributed to remelting events and delamination of the mafic lower conti-

nental crust. The magmas from the mantle associated with subduction zone

volcanics, flood basalts, and hotspot volcanism intrude the continental crust

and in the presence of water produce silicic (granitic) magmas. These mag-

mas rise into the upper crust making the upper crust more silicic and the

lower crust more mafic. Subsequently the mafic dense rocks of the lower

crust are returned to the mantle by delamination. The net result is that

continental crust becomes more silicic and it becomes a reservoir for the

774 Chemical Geodynamics

incompatible elements, including the radiogenic elements U, Th, and K and

the light rare Earth elements.

Although the continental crust is small in volume, its enrichment in in-

compatible elements is so large that it constitutes a significant global reser-

voir for these elements. The atmosphere constitutes an important reservoir

for the radiogenic gases helium and argon. While the oceanic crust plays a

critical role in chemical geodynamics, its volume is so small that it can be

neglected in isotopic mass balances.

Isotopic studies of basalts provide important insights into the mantle reser-

voir or reservoirs from which they are derived. Basalts formed at mid-ocean

ridges (MORB) and at oceanic islands (OIB) generally have the same major

element composition. Both types are generated by pressure-release partial

melting of mantle rock. But when considered in terms of trace element and

isotopic compositions, the MORB and OIB can be quite different. Isotope

ratios and the distributions of rare earth elements show that normal mid-

ocean ridge basalts (n-MORB) are nearly uniformly depleted in incompatible

elements. A normal MORB is defined in this context as the oceanic crust

of that portion of the ridge system with bathymetric depths greater than

2 km. This excludes, for example, sections near Iceland and the Azores. The

uniformity of n-MORB is evidence that the upper mantle from which it is

derived is nearly homogeneous as discussed in Section 6–24. The depletion

of the n-MORB source region is complementary to the enrichment of the

continental crust. Thus, it is necessary that the rocks from which the con-

tinental crust has been extracted be uniformly mixed back into the upper

mantle reservoir.

Although n-MORB is remarkably uniform, other mantle-generated basalts

are more heterogeneous. Shallow parts of the mid-ocean ridge system gen-

erally have enriched mid-ocean ridge basalts (e-MORB) and OIB have a

wide variety of isotopic signatures. These signatures range from depleted

n-MORB values, to bulk silicate Earth values, to enriched continental crust

values. Therefore, the mantle cannot be a single homogeneous chemical reser-

voir.

Some e-MORB and OIB appear to lie on a mixing line between n-MORB

and a primordial bulk-Earth reservoir. For such a chemical reservoir to have

survived over some 4.5 Gyr it must have remained essentially isolated over

this period. One hypothesis that explains the mixing line is a two-layer

mantle. Within the lower mantle there is an isolated region with primordial

mantle rock. The primordial lower mantle region is separated from the de-

pleted upper mantle by a compositional boundary. The density differences

associated with this compositional boundary prevent subducted and delam-

10.3 Geochemical Reservoirs 775

inated lithosphere from entering the lower mantle. When plumes rise from

the thermal boundary layer above this compositional boundary, they en-

train primordial lower mantle material. Thus the primordial lower mantle

region is decreasing in size with time. The mixing of primordial lower man-

tle rock with depleted upper mantle rock can explain the principal isotopic

characteristics of the basalts generated by the major Hawaiian and Icelandic

plumes. An alternative explanation for these geochemical characteristics is

that their source regions are “blobs” of primitive mantle scattered through-

out the lower mantle. Mantle plumes sample these blobs but mid-ocean ridge

volcanism does not.

Although the mixing of primitive and depleted mantle reservoirs can ex-

plain some of the geochemical characteristics of e-MORB and OIB, other

characteristics require an alternative explanation. The anomalous isotopic

signatures of OIBs from ocean islands such as Tristan, Gough, Kerguelen, St.

Helena, Azores, and the Society Islands can be attributed to the presence

in the depleted mantle reservoir of incompletely homogenized subducted

oceanic crust and entrained sediments and delaminated continental crust

and lithosphere. The observed isotopic anomalies must have developed in

old continental crust and lithosphere because chemical heterogeneities would

not have persisted for the required length of time in the convecting mantle.

Because of the kinematics of plate tectonics, the mid-ocean system ran-

domly migrates over the upper mantle. The position of ridges is specified

by the symmetry of the seafloor spreading process. The ascending flow be-

neath an ocean ridge is generally a passive process and the volcanism that

generates n-MORB randomly samples the upper mantle reservoir. The near

uniformity of n-MORB in terms of rare earth distributions and isotope ratios

is evidence that the upper mantle is a nearly uniform depleted reservoir. Ex-

ceptions are ridge segments that interact with mantle plumes, for example

Iceland and the Azores. In these regions the ridges are anomalously shallow

and e-MORB is produced.

Now let us briefly consider the core reservoir. In Figure 10–5 the core

reservoir is divided into two parts in accordance with our knowledge of the

core structure. Cooling of the Earth through geologic time has resulted in

the growth of a solid inner core. In this process, light alloying elements

such as silicon are concentrated into the liquid outer core which becomes

progressively richer in the light elements with time. Of particular importance

are the possible modes of interaction of the lower mantle and outer core

including chemical reactions at the core–mantle boundary, exsolution of light

elements from the outer core into the lower mantle, and dissolution of heavy

elements from the lower mantle into the outer core. While there is much

776 Chemical Geodynamics

speculation about core–mantle mass exchange, there is no strong evidence for

significant transport between these reservoirs so in the following discussions

we will assume such transport is negligible and neglect the core reservoir.

10.4 A Two-Reservoir Model with Instantaneous Crustal

Differentiation

The simplest model for the geochemical evolution of the mantle and the

continental crust is a two-reservoir model consisting of the continental crust

with a mass Mc that was instantaneously separated from a mantle reservoir

at a time τc before the present (τc is the age of crustal separation), the mass

of the complementary mantle reservoir is Mm. This complementary mantle

reservoir may be the entire mantle, in which case Mm is the mass of the

mantle, or there may be an isolated pristine mantle reservoir in the deep

mantle, in this case Mm is less than the mass of the mantle. The mass of

the mantle reservoir and the time of crustal separation can be constrained

by the measured values of the isotope ratios and composition ratios.

When considering reservoir models it is standard practice to express iso-

tope ratios in terms of a normalized isotope ratio defined by

ε =

(

α

αs − 1

)

× 104 =

[(

i∗/i

i∗s/is

)

− 1

]

× 104,

(10.28)

where the subscript s refers to the bulk silicate Earth, and to express con-

centration ratios in terms of a fractionation factor defined by

f = µ

µs − 1 =

(

j/i

js/is

)

− 1. (10.29)

If the parent isotope j is more incompatible than the daughter isotope i,

then f > 0 in the enriched reservoir and f < 0 in the depleted reservoir. If

the parent isotope j is less incompatible than the daughter isotope i then

f < 0 in the enriched reservoir and f > 0 in the depleted reservoir. If f > 0

then the isotope ratio becomes more radiogenic and ε> 0; if f < 0 then the

isotope ratio is less radiogenic and ε< 0. For the rubidium–strontium system

the parent isotope 87Rb is more incompatible than the daughter isotope 87Sr

and f > 0 and ε> 0 in the enriched crustal reservoir and f < 0 and ε< 0 in

the depleted mantle reservoir. For the samarium–neodymium system the

parent isotope 147Sm is less incompatible than the daughter isotope 143Nd

and f < 0 and ε< 0 in the enriched crustal reservoir and f > 0 and ε> 0 in

the depleted mantle reservoir.

10.4 A Two-Reservoir Model with Instantaneous Crustal Differentiation 777

To compare model results with observed values of isotopic ratios and

fractionation factors, we need to develop expressions for the model quan-

tities fc, fm, εc, and εm, where subscripts c and m refer to the crustal and

mantle reservoirs, respectively. From the definitions of ε and f in Equa-

tions (10–28) and (10–29) it is clear that we need to derive formulas for

i∗c(t), i ∗ m(t), i∗s(t), jc(t), jm(t), and js(t). This can be done using Equations

(10–5) and (10–6) provided we are careful to identify the amounts of the

parent and daughter isotopes in the initial state of each reservoir and to

measure time forward from the instant of creation of each reservoir. Prior to

crustal separation, all material evolves as bulk silicate Earth with an initial

time t=0 and the initial amounts of the parent and daughter isotopes are

js0 and i∗s0.

For both the rubidium–strontium system and the samarium–neodymium

system, it is a good approximation to assume that λt≪ 1. With this approx-

imation the isotope and composition ratios for the bulk silicate Earth from

Equations (10–12) and (10–13) are given by

µs = µ0 (10.30)

αs = α0 + λtµ0. (10.31)

The composition ratio µs can be taken to be constant and the isotope ratio

αs increases linearly in time.

We assume that the continental crust is instantaneously removed from the

mantle source reservoir at t= τe− τc. Subsequent to this separation the two

reservoirs – the enriched continental crust and the depleted mantle – evolve

as closed geochemical systems. Although the continental crustal reservoir is

enriched in both the parent and daughter isotopes, the enrichment factors

for the two differ. For the crustal and mantle source reservoirs, the initial

time is τe− τc (τe is the age of the Earth) and the initial amounts of the

parent and daughter isotopes are written 〈jc〉, 〈jm〉, 〈i∗c〉, and 〈i∗m〉, where the

brackets indicate that a quantity is evaluated at t= τe− τc. The initial values

of 〈jc〉 and 〈i∗c〉 in the crustal reservoir are represented by enrichment factors

Dsj and Dsi relative to the bulk silicate Earth at the time of separation

Dsi ≡ 〈i∗c〉 〈i∗s〉

= 〈ic〉 〈is0〉

(10.32)

Dsj ≡ 〈jc〉 〈js〉

. (10.33)

In writing Equation (10–32) we assumed that the radiogenic and nonra-

diogenic daughter isotopes i and i∗ have the same enrichment factors. If

778 Chemical Geodynamics

Table 10.2 Present Parameters for the Sm–Nd and Rb–Sr Isotope Systems

Isotopic System Sm–Nd Rb–Sr

Composition ratio, bulk silicate Earth µsp 0.1967± 0.0030 (0.0892± 0.0073) Isotope ratio, bulk silicate Earth αsp 0.51262± 0.00011 0.70476± 0.00044 Composition ratio, mantle µmp 0.22 ± 0.04 0.020± 0.020 Isotope ratio, mantle αmp 0.51315± 0.00015 0.70271± 0.00058 Fractionation factor, mantle fmp 0.118 ± 0.22 −0.78± 0.24 Normalized isotope ratio, mantle εmp 10 ± 5 −29 ± 15 Composition ratio, crust µcp 0.108 ± 0.012 0.9 ± 0.9 Isotope ratio, crust αcp 0.5114± 0.001 0.718± 0.02 Fractionation factor, crust fcp −0.451± 0.07 9.1 ± 10 Normalized isotope ratio, crust εcp −23.8 ± 22 190 ± 300 Enrichment factor Dsi 29 ± 9 —– Q, Gyr−1 25.3 ± 0.02 17.7 ± 1.5

Source: Allègre et al., 1983.

the parent isotope is more incompatible than the daughter isotope then

Dsj >Dsi, if the daughter isotope is more incompatible than the parent iso-

tope, then Dsi>Dsj. The initial values of i∗ and j in the mantle reservoir at

t= τe− τc, 〈i∗m〉 and 〈jm〉, can be related to Dsi and Dsj by the application

of mass conservation for the parent radionuclide and daughter species at the

time of crustal separation:

〈i∗s〉(Mc +Mm) = 〈i∗c〉Mc + 〈i∗m〉Mm (10.34)

〈js〉(Mc +Mm) = 〈jc〉Mc + 〈jm〉Mm. (10.35)

A similar equation applies to the nonradiogenic isotope. Equations (10–34)

and (10–35) can be rearranged to give

〈i∗m〉 〈i∗s〉

= 〈im〉 〈is0〉

= 1 − Mc

Mm (Dsi − 1) (10.36)

〈jm〉 〈js〉

= 1 − Mc

Mm (Dsj − 1), (10.37)

where, consistent with Equation (10–32), we have assumed the equality of

the enrichment factors of the radiogenic and nonradiogenic daughter isotopes

in the mantle source reservoir at the time of crustal formation.

After crustal separation the isotope and composition ratios for the two

reservoirs are obtained using Equations (10–1), (10–2), (10–30) to (10–33),

(10–36), and (10–37) with the result

µc = µ0

(

Dsj

Dsi

)

(10.38)

10.4 A Two-Reservoir Model with Instantaneous Crustal Differentiation 779

µm = µ0

[

1 − Mc Mm

(Dsj − 1)

1 − Mc Mm

(Dsi − 1)

]

(10.39)

αc = α0 + λ(τe − τc)µ0 + λ(τc − τ)µc (10.40)

αm = α0 + λ(τe − τc)µ0 + λ(τc − τ)µm. (10.41)

Using Equations (10–28), (10–29), and (10–38) to (10–41) the fractionation

factors and normalized isotope ratios for the continental crustal and depleted

mantle reservoirs are given by

fc = Dsj

Dsi − 1 (10.42)

fm =

[

1 − Mc Mm

{Dsj − 1} 1 − Mc

Mm {Dsi − 1}

]

− 1 (10.43)

εc = Qfc(τc − τ) (10.44)

εm = Qfm(τc − τ) (10.45) where

Q = 104 js0 i∗s0 λ = 104 µs0

αs0 λ (10.46)

and τ is the age

τ ≡ τe − t. (10.47)

In writing Equations (10–44) and (10–45), we assumed that λτeµ0/α0 ≪ 1

and that λτe≪ 1.

Upon evaluating Equations (10–42) to (10–46) at the present time τ = 0,

expressions for τc and Mc/Mm can be obtained in terms of the measurable

quantities εmp, fcp, and fmp

τc = εmp Qfmp

(10.48)

Mc

Mm =

{

Dsi

(

1 − fcp fmp

)

− 1

}−1

. (10.49)

These results are also valid for the gradual formation of the continental crust

if τc is interpreted as the mean age at which the crust was extracted from

the mantle reservoir. We next evaluate these formulas for τc and Mc/Mm

using data from the widely investigated Sm–Nd and Rb–Sr systems.

To employ Equations (10–48) and (10–49) to estimate τc and Mc/Mm we

must specify the numerical values of the composition ratios, isotope ratios,

and other parameters that enter these equations. The values we need are

780 Chemical Geodynamics

Table 10.3 Parameter Values for the Sm–Nd and Rb–Sr Isotope Systems

Used in the Two-Reservoir Model∗

Isotope System Sm–Nd Rb–Sr

Q(Gyr)−1 25.3 17.7 εmp 10 −29 fmp (0.188) −0.78 fcp −0.451 —– Dsi 29 —– εcp −23.8 —–

∗ Values are either from Table 10–2 or are calculated (shown in parentheses). Calculated values are based on a separation age τc = 2.1 Ga and a mass ratio

Mc/Mm = 0.010.

given in Table 10–2 with error estimates. Reference values of the samarium–

neodymium system for the bulk silicate Earth are based on data from chon-

dritic meteorites (this is commonly known as a chondritic uniform reservoir,

or CHUR). Meteorite data do not yield a bulk silicate Earth value for the

rubidium–strontium composition ratio because the Earth is significantly de-

pleted in these elements relative to chondritic meteorites.

The value of µs for the Rb–Sr system given in Table 10–2 has been inferred

from Rb–Sr versus Sm–Nd systematics. Values for all relevant quantities are

given except for the enrichment factor Dsi for the Rb–Sr system. This is

because of the extreme variability of the concentrations of rubidium and

strontium in the crust. In some cases parameter values are better constrained

for the Sm–Nd system and in other cases they are better constrained for the

Rb–Sr system.

From Equation (10–48) and Table 10–2 we can obtain the mean age of

the crustal reservoir. Substitution of values gives τc = 3.3 Ga for the Sm–Nd

system and τc = 2.1 Ga for the Rb–Sr system. This difference in ages can be

attributed either to uncertainties in the isotope parameters or to differential

crustal recycling. The uncertainties in the isotope parameters, particularly

fmp, are sufficiently large to explain the difference in ages. The values for

mantle fractionation are better constrained for the Rb–Sr system because

the degree of fractionation is larger. Thus the lower age of 2.1 Ga is favored

by most geochemists. Isotope parameters consistent with this age are given

in Table 10–3. The time evolution of the Sm–Nd system consistent with

the values in Table 10–3 is given in Figures 10–6 and 10–7. Composition

ratios µ and isotope ratios α are given as functions of time t and age τ

in Figure 10–6 for the bulk silicate Earth, depleted mantle, and enriched

10.4 A Two-Reservoir Model with Instantaneous Crustal Differentiation 781

Figure 10.6 Time evolution of the Sm–Nd system consistent with the values given in Table 10–3. (a) Composition ratios µ are given as a function of time t and age τ for the bulk silicate Earth, the depleted mantle, and the enriched continental crustal reservoirs. (b) Isotope ratios α are given as a function of time t and age τ for the bulk silicate Earth, depleted mantle, and enriched continental crustal reservoirs.

continental crustal reservoirs. The continental crust is separated from the

depleted mantle reservoir at an age τc = 2.1 Ga. The mantle is enriched in

the parent isotope 147Sm and the crust is enriched in the daughter isotope 143Nd relative to the bulk silicate Earth, thus µm>µs>µc in Figure 10–

6a. Because of its enrichment in the parent isotope, the mantle becomes

more radiogenic than the bulk silicate Earth. Because of its depletion in the

radiogenic isotope, the crust becomes less radiogenic than the bulk silicate

Earth, thus αm>αs>αc in Figure 10–6b.

Fractionation factors f and normalized isotope ratios ε for the Sm–Nd

system are given as functions of time t and age τ in Figure 10–7. Values are

given for the bulk silicate Earth, depleted mantle, and enriched continental

crustal reservoirs. The behavior of the fractionation factors in Figure 10–7a is

essentially similar to the behavior of the composition ratios in Figure 10–6a.

The positive values of ε for the depleted mantle reservoir in Figure 10–7b

782 Chemical Geodynamics

Figure 10.7 Time evolution of the Sm–Nd system consistent with the values given in Table 10–3. (a) Fractionation factors f are given as a function of time t and age τ for the bulk silicate Earth, the depleted mantle, and the enriched continental crustal reservoirs. (b) Normalized isotope ratios ε are given as a function of time t and age τ for the bulk silicate Earth, depleted mantle, and enriched continental crustal reservoirs.

indicate relative enrichment in the parent isotope. Similarly, the negative

values of ε for the enriched continental crustal reservoir indicate relative

depletion in the parent isotope.

We will now determine the constraints on reservoir masses. If τc =2.1 Ga

and (εmp)Nd = 10 we find from Equation (10–48) that (fmp)Nd = 0.188, a

value that is within the uncertainties given in Table 10–2. To obtain the

ratio of the mass of the continental crust to the mass of the depleted mantle

using Equation (10–49) the Sm–Nd system must be used since (fcp)Sr is

poorly constrained. With the assumption (fmp)Nd = 0.188 and the use of

other values from Table 10–2, Equation (10–49) gives Mc/Mm = 0.010. For

comparison, the ratio of the mass of the crust to the mass of the entire mantle

is 0.0050 and the ratio of the mass of the crust to the mass of the mantle

above the 660-km seismic discontinuity is 0.0180. This mass balance suggests

that the depleted upper mantle reservoir constitutes about one-half of the

mantle and that the remainder of the mantle is a near-primordial reservoir

10.4 A Two-Reservoir Model with Instantaneous Crustal Differentiation 783

in the lower mantle. There are certainly major uncertainties in making this

determination of the masses of the mantle reservoirs. The uncertainty in the

value of (fmp)Nd is the most important. However, as we will discuss, other

geochemical observations support the presence of a near-primordial reservoir

of approximately this size in the lower mantle.

The U–Pb system can also be studied in the context of the instantaneous

crustal differentiation model. For the uranium–lead system, the linear ap-

proximation for radioactive decay cannot be used and the full exponential

relation is required; also, the composition ratios are not constant. At the

time of crustal separation t = τe− τc, the applicable bulk silicate Earth val-

ues of the isotope and composition ratios αsc, βsc, µsc, and νsc are obtained

from Equations (10–16) to (10–19) with the result

αsc = µ0(1 − e−λ(τe−τc)) + α0 (10.50)

βsc = µ0ν0(1 − e−λ ′(τe−τc)) + β0 (10.51)

µsc = µ0e −λ(τe−τc) (10.52)

νsc = ν0e (λ−λ′)(τe−τc). (10.53)

Only the composition ratio µ changes when the crust is formed because

αsc, βsc, and νsc are isotope ratios. From Equations (10–14), (10–32), and

(10–33), the changes in µ are related to the mean enrichment factors by

µc0 µsc

= jc0isc ic0jsc

= Dsj

Dsi (10.54)

µm0

µsc =

1 − (Mc/Mm)(Dsj − 1)

1 − (Mc/Mm)(Dsi − 1) ≡ ξ, (10.55)

where µc0 and µm0 are the composition ratios for the enriched crust and

depleted mantle, respectively, at the time of formation of the crust. The

parameter ξ is a measure of the fractionation at this time. Formulas for

the present lead isotope ratios of the crust and mantle can be found by the

manipulation of the preceding equations

αcp = µsp

[

eλτe − eλτc + Dsj

Dsi (eλτc − 1)

]

+ α0

(10.56)

βcp = µsp

137.8

[

eλ ′τe − eλ

′τc + Dsj

Dsi (eλ

′τc − 1)

]

+ β0

(10.57)

αmp = µsp[e λτe − eλτc + ξ(eλτc − 1)] + α0 (10.58)

784 Chemical Geodynamics

17 18 19 20 21 15.3

15.4

15.5

15.6

15.7

15.8

βmp

MORB

Geochron

µsp = 8.05

τ c =

3 G

a

ξ = 1

.5

τ c =

2 G

a

ξ =

2. 0

ξ =

2. 5

τc = 1 Ga

αmp

Figure 10.8 Predicted values of the lead isotope ratios for the depleted mantle based on a model of instantaneous crustal formation. The geochron for the present bulk silicate Earth from Equations (10–22) and (10–23) is shown. The uranium–lead composition ratio for the bulk silicate Earth is assumed to be µsp =8.05. The isotope ratios βmp and αmp for the depleted mantle from Equations (10–58) and (10–59) are given for various ages τc of crustal formation by the solid lines. Values corresponding to ξ= 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5, as defined in Equation (10–55), are shown by the dotted lines. The distance from the geochron increases with increased removal of lead from the mantle, i.e., larger ξ. The intersections of the dotted lines with the solid lines give the required values of ξ. The field for lead data obtained from MORB (White, 1985) is also shown.

βmp = µsp

137.8 [eλ

′τe − eλ ′τc + ξ(eλ

′τc − 1)] + β0,

(10.59)

where Equations (10–20) and (10–21) have been used to introduce present

bulk silicate Earth values.

Let us compare these lead isotope results for instantaneous crustal dif-

ferentiation with MORB data. The MORB isotope data are taken to be

representative of the depleted mantle reservoir. The envelope for the cor-

relation between βmp and αmp for the lead isotope data from MORB is

shown in Figure 10–8. The geochron from Equations (10–22) and (10–23) is

shown for τe = 4.55 Ga. For the bulk silicate Earth, µsp =8.05 is a preferred

value. The point on the geochron corresponding to this uranium–lead ratio

is indicated in Figure 10–8. This model assumes that lead was preferentially

segregated into the continental crust at a time τc ago. Thus ξ, defined by

Equation (10–55), is greater than 1 since Dsi is larger than Dsj . The mag-

10.4 A Two-Reservoir Model with Instantaneous Crustal Differentiation 785

Table 10.4 Isotope Decay Reactions That Produce Rare Gases and the

Associated Decay Constants

Decay Constant Half-Life Isotopic Reaction λ (Gyr–1) τ1/2 (Gyr)

238U→ 206Pb +8 4He 1.551× 10−1 4.469 235U→ 207Pb +7 4He 9.849× 10−1 0.7038 232Th→ 208Pb +6 4He 4.948× 10−2 14.009 40K→ 40Ar 5.81 × 10−2 11.93 (40K→ 40Ar, 40Ca) (5.543× 10−1) (1.2505)

Source: Allègre et al., 1987.

nitude of ξ is a measure of the degree of preferential segregation of uranium

into the mantle reservoir.

We assume the lead isotope data for MORB reflect the isotopic state of

the depleted mantle reservior. The dependence of βmp on αmp for τc = 1, 2,

and 3 Ga is given by the solid lines in Figure 10–8. The distance from the

geochron increases as ξ increases. Values corresponding to ξ= 1.5, 2.0, and

2.5 are illustrated by the dotted lines. The MORB field can be explained

by a crustal segregation age τc between about 1.5 and 2.0 Ga and values

of ξ between 1 and 2. The mean age of the continental crust inferred from

the model and the MORB lead isotope data is about 1.7 Ga. With ξ= 1.5,

Dsj = 32, and Mc/Mm = 0.010, Equation (10–46) gives Dsi= 55; thus, lead

must be strongly fractionated into the continental crust.

The model for MORB lead based on instantaneous crustal formation re-

quires the removal of lead. The upper continental crust is not enriched in

lead relative to uranium, however, and thus there is no direct evidence that

the continental crust serves as the complementary lead-enriched reservoir.

This lack of an obvious lead-enriched reservoir has become known as the

missing lead paradox. The missing lead might reside in the lower continen-

tal crust or in the core. Because the mean age of extraction from the mantle

of the missing lead is between 1.5 and 2.0 Ga and the age of core formation

is about 4.5 Ga, the core is unlikely to be the reservoir of the missing lead.

Problem 10.5 Isotope studies show that the uranium–thorium

ratio is 4.0 for the bulk silicate Earth, 5.5 for the continental crust, and 2.5

for the MORB source reservoir. What fraction of the mantle is the MORB

source reservoir?

786 Chemical Geodynamics

10.5 Noble Gas Systems

In this section we consider the two isotopic systems (listed in Table 10–4)

that produce the noble gases helium and argon. The radiogenic parent iso-

topes of these gases are the principal heat-producing isotopes in the mantle.

The noble gas systems have both advantages and disadvantages when used

in reservoir modeling. The gases (particularly helium) have high diffusion

rates in the mantle and therefore migrate readily. Thus, measured concen-

trations must be treated with considerable care; however, the high mobility

leads to high rates of mantle degassing, and measurements on concentra-

tions and fluxes in the oceans and the atmosphere can be interpreted to

provide insights into rates of production and transport in the mantle. The

noble gas observations on MORB and OIB can also be interpreted in terms

of a “primitive” signature. The Earth’s mantle (and presumably the core)

was extensively outgassed during accretion. High concentrations of nonra-

diogenic noble gas isotopes 3He and 36Ar are evidence for a primitive mantle

(or core) reservoir that was less extensively outgassed.

There is essentially no primordial 40Ar in the Earth; for practical purposes

all 40Ar found in the atmosphere is the result of the radioactive decay of 40K

within the Earth’s interior. The present isotope ratio for the atmosphere is 40Ar/36Ar = 295.5. The mass of 40Ar in the atmosphere is M40Ar = 6.60 × 1016 kg. Because of the heavy atomic mass of argon, significant quantities

of the argon isotopes do not escape from the atmosphere into space.

The 40Ar in the Earth’s atmosphere must have been transported from the

Earth’s interior to the atmosphere. Transport processes include volcanism,

hydrothermal circulations through the continental and oceanic crusts, and

erosion. As we discussed earlier, the fundamental hypothesis of chemical geo-

dynamics is that the enriched continental crust has been separated from a

depleted mantle reservoir. This depleted mantle reservoir may be all or part

of the mantle. In the latter case there will be a second buried, near-pristine

mantle reservoir. The near-pristine reservoir would have elemental concen-

trations close to those of the bulk silicate Earth. Similarly, the sum of the

enriched continental crustal reservoir and the depleted mantle reservoir will

also have elemental concentrations close to those of the bulk silicate Earth.

We assume that a large fraction of the argon produced by the radioactive

decay of potassium to argon has escaped from the crust and upper man-

tle reservoir to the atmosphere. The mass of 40Ar produced over the age

of the Earth τe = 4.55 Ga in a reservoir of mass M is related to the mean

10.5 Noble Gas Systems 787

concentration of potassium in the reservoir CK by

M40Ar = 1.19 × 10−4λ40Ar

λ40 K

[exp(λ40 K τe) − 1]MCK,

(10.60)

where λ40Ar = 5.81 × 10−2 Gyr−1 is the decay constant of 40K to 40Ar and

λ40K = 5.543 × 10−1 Gyr is the decay constant of 40K to both 40Ar and

40Ca (see Table 10–4). The constant 1.19×10−4 is the fraction of potassium

that is the isotope 40K. From Table 4–1 we take CK =31× 10−5 and with

M40Ar = 6.60× 1016 kg from above and τe = 4.55 Ga we find from Equa-

tion (10–60) that M = 1.38× 1024 kg. This is 34% of the mass of the entire

mantle. The mass of 40Ar in the atmosphere is 34% of the mass of 40Ar that

has been produced by the decay of 40K in the crust and mantle over the

past 4.55 Ga. One explanation is that there is a primordial reservoir in the

mantle from which the argon has not escaped to the atmosphere with a mass

that is 66% of the entire mantle. This is consistent with the 50% mass for a

primordial reservoir deduced on the basis of Nd–Sm and Rb–Sr systematics

in Section 10–4.

While global balances of 40Ar can be carried out, it is not possible to do

the same for 4He because of the relatively rapid loss of this light constituent

from the atmosphere. The isotope composition ratio (molal) of primordial

helium from carbonaceous chondrites enriched in gases is 4He/3He = 1500–

3500. The present isotope ratio for the atmosphere is 4He/3He= 7.2× 105. A

large fraction of the 4He in the atmosphere is attributed to the decay of 235U, 238U, and 232Th in the mantle and crust (Table 10–4). This radiogenic helium

plus primordial helium migrate from the mantle and crust to the oceans

and atmosphere. A small amount of 3He is also produced in the Earth’s

interior by nuclear reactions involving 6Li. The helium isotopes escape from

the atmosphere because of their relatively low masses. The residence time

of helium in the atmosphere is estimated to be 500,000 years. 3He is also

generated in the upper atmosphere by cosmic ray bombardment.

Measurements of the 4He/3He ratios for gases trapped in MORB have rela-

tively little scatter with a mean value of about 4He/3He× 86,000. The values

of 4He/3He for MORB are a factor of eight smaller than the atmospheric

value. The 4He/3He ratio from the mantle is smaller than the 4He/3He ratio

in the atmosphere because the helium flux into the atmosphere from the

continents is highly radiogenic, i.e., high 4He/3He.

In direct contrast to MORB, measurements of the 4He/3He ratios for

gases trapped in basalts from the Hawaiian Islands show significantly lower 4He/3He ratios. Samples from Loihi seamount give 4He/3He = 30,000 ±

788 Chemical Geodynamics

10,000 with samples from other Hawaiian volcanoes giving somewhat higher

values. The interpretation of the high 3He values from the Hawaiian volca-

noes is that these volcanoes are sampling a primitive reservoir. High 3He

values are also found in Iceland.

10.6 Isotope Systematics of OIB

So far we have concentrated on the crustal and depleted mantle reservoirs.

We now turn to the isotope systematics of OIB. Unlike MORB, the OIB have

considerable isotopic variability. Interpretations of this variability require an

identification of OIB sources. It is clear that OIB cannot come entirely from

the near-homogeneous upper mantle reservoir that is the source of MORB.

The ocean islands where basalts are found are hotspots attributed to partial

melting in mantle plumes. In turn, the likely source of the mantle plumes is

the instability of the hot thermal boundary layer at the base of the mantle

reservoir that is the source of MORB. This boundary layer could lie at the

core–mantle boundary or it could be at the upper boundary of a primordial

reservoir in the lower mantle.

Pressure-release melting occurs in the ascending plume material resulting

in OIB. The isotopic signatures of OIB can be attributed to the source region

in the thermal boundary layer and to material entrained in the plume as it

ascends through the mantle. If mantle convection is layered, then at least

part of the signature can be attributed to a pristine or near-pristine layer in

the lower mantle. A second possible source of anomalous isotopic signatures

is subducted oceanic lithosphere and delaminated continental lithosphere.

These units sink through the mantle and are gradually heated by adiabatic

compression and by heat conduction from the hot surrounding mantle. After

heating, this material can become entrained in the general mantle circulation

and eventually into upwelling plumes, or the sinking material can descend

to the bottom of the convecting region, be heated within the lower thermal

boundary layer, and then swept into the plumes rising from the boundary

layer. As part of the ascending mantle plumes, the formerly subducted and

delaminated material can contribute to the isotopic heterogeneity associ-

ated with OIB. Thus, some of the isotopic heterogenity of OIB could have

developed within the aging continental crust and mantle lithosphere.

The isotope systematics of OIB are illustrated in Figures 10–9 to 10–11.

Normalized isotope ratios for the samarium–neodymium system εp(Nd) are

plotted against the normalized isotope ratios for the rubidium–strontium

system εp(Sr) in Figure 10–9. By definition, the bulk silicate Earth (BSE)

lies at εp(Nd)= εp(Sr)=0. As discussed in Section 10–4, our preferred values

10.6 Isotope Systematics of OIB 789

Figure 10.9 Neodymium–strontium isotope correlations for MORB and OIB. Normalized isotope ratios for the samarium–neodymium system εp(Nd) are plotted against the normalized isotope ratios for the rubidium– strontium system εp(Sr). Observations lie within the specified envelopes. The data for the basalts are divided into five groups: I. MORB; includes data from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Ar), East Pacific Rise (PR), the south- west section of the Indian Ridge (IR), and Easter Island (E). II. Hawaii (H). III. Kerguelen (K); also includes data from Gough (Go), Tristan da Cunha (T), and the Walvis Ridge (W). IV. St. Helena (SH); also includes data from Ascension (As), the Australs (Au), and Guadalupe (Gu). V. Society (So); also includes data from Samoa (SA), the Azores (Az), Rapa Ridge (R), MacDonald (MD), and Bouvet (B). Solid circles indicate bulk silicate Earth (BSE) values, εp(Nd)= εp(Sr)=0, and depleted mantle reservoir (DMR) values, εp(Nd)= 10 and εp(Sr)=−29.

for the depleted mantle reservoir (DMR) are εp(Nd)= 10 and εp(Sr)=−29

(Table 10–3). The actual measurements for MORB lie within the envelopes

given by Ar (mid-Atlantic ridge), PR (east Pacific rise), and IR (the south-

west section of the Indian Ridge). The classification of the OIB will be

discussed later. The normalized isotope ratios for the rubidium–strontium

system εp(Sr) are plotted against the lead 206Pb/204Pb isotope ratios αp(Pb)

in Figure 10–10. The BSE lies at εp(Sr)= 0 and αp(Pb)= 17.55. The lead 207Pb/204Pb isotope ratios βp(Pb) are plotted against the lead 206Pb/204Pb

isotope ratios αp(Pb) in Figure 10–11. This is an extension of the lead–

lead correlation given in Figure 10–8 to include the OIB. The BSE lies at

βp(Pb)= 15.4 and αp(Pb)= 17.6 and the geochron for the BSE from Equa-

tions (10–22) and (10–23) is given for µsp = 8.05. To systematize these results

we consider four MORB and OIB classifications as follows:

MORB (I). In addition to normal mid-ocean ridge basalts (n-MORB),

790 Chemical Geodynamics

Figure 10.10 Strontium–lead isotope correlations for MORB and OIB. Nor- malized isotope ratios for the rubidium–strontium system εp(Sr) are plot- ted against the 206Pb/204Pb isotope ratios αp(Pb). The data are divided into five groups as described in Figure 10–9. The solid circle indicates BSE values, εp(Sr)= 0 and αp(Pb)=17.6.

this group includes a substantial fraction of the OIB from Iceland, the

Galapagos, and Easter Island. The source is the well-mixed, depleted up-

per mantle reservoir, as discussed before. Mantle plumes contribute to the

basaltic volcanism on Iceland, Galapagos, and Easter Island, but much of

this basaltic volcanism comes from the same depleted mantle reservoir as

n-MORB. The Nd–Sr correlation for MORB from the East Pacific Rise in

Figure 10–9 tightly clusters near the depleted mantle value, (εmp)Nd =10

and (εmp)Sr =−29. This can be attributed to the large quantities of basalt

produced by this rapidly spreading ridge.

Hawaii (II). The Hawaiian hotspot is the most voluminous source of OIB.

Hawaiian basalts appear to be a mixture between basalts from the depleted

mantle reservoir and basalts from a relatively pristine reservoir. The po-

sitions of Hawaii in the isotope correlation plots of Figures 10–9 to 10–11

confirm this association. In particular, the Hawaiian basalts in the Nd–Sr

correlation plot given in Figure 10–9 lie on a mixing line trend between the

DMR and the BSE. Both Hawaii and Iceland can be associated with strong

mantle plumes that contain considerable mantle rock from the depleted n-

MORB source reservoir but also contain entrained pristine mantle rock. The

association of pristine mantle rock is consistent with primordial noble gas

signatures discussed in the previous section.

10.6 Isotope Systematics of OIB 791

Figure 10.11 Lead-lead isotope correlations for MORB and OIB. The 207Pb/204Pb isotope ratios βp(Pb) are plotted against the 206Pb/204Pb iso- tope ratios αp(Pb). The data for basalts are divided into five groups as de- scribed in Figure 10–9. The solid circle indicates BSE values, βp(Pb)=15.4 and αp(Pb)=17.6.

Kerguelen (III). The OIB from Kerguelen have a dis-tinctive enriched

isotopic signature relative to MORB. This signature is also found in OIB

from Gough, Tristan da Cunha, and the Walvis Ridge. This group is referred

to as enriched mantle member number one (EMI). These islands have a

nearly pristine signature for Sr, Nd, and Pb but not for 3He. The pristine

signature is particularly striking in the Sr–Pb correlation plot in Figure 10–

10. The (βp)Pb–(αp)Pb correlation in Figure 10–11 shows relatively little lead

loss but an old model age. One interpretation is that the source is recently

delaminated old continental lithosphere. Such a delamination would not be

expected to include the radiogenic upper continental crust. Its Sr, Nd, and

Pb isotope signatures would be nearly pristine but 3He would be low because

this mantle is outgassed.

St. Helena (IV). The OIB from St. Helena is distinctive in having suffered

a very large lead loss relative to MORB and other OIB. This signature is

also found in OIB from Ascension, the Australs, and Guadalupe. The large

lead loss associated with this group implies high values for the uranium–

lead ratio µ; for this reason they are referred to as HIMU. The source of

the large values of µ is the radiogenic continental crust. This OIB group

can be attributed to mixing between depleted mantle and delaminated old

continental crust.

792 Collateral Reading

Society (V). The OIB from the Society Islands also have a distinctive

enriched isotopic signature. It is distinct from the Kerguelen group in the

strontium isotopic signature. The end member of this group is denoted as

the enriched mantle member number two (EMII). This group includes the

Marquesas, Samoa, and the Azores including Sao Miguel, Rapa Ridge, Mac-

Donald, and Bouvet. The OIB from the Society Islands and Samoa are

particularly anomalous in Nd–Sr systematics as shown in Figure 10–9. The

end member of this group lies on a mixing line between the depleted mantle

reservoir and marine sediments. The Azores have a large spread that can be

associated with a mixing line between the depleted mantle and subducted

young continental crust. The large lead loss shown in the (βp)Pb–(αp)Pb

correlation (Figure 10–11) can be associated with subducted radiogenic sed-

iments from the upper continental crust.

The Kerguelen, St. Helena, and Society types of OIB are associated with

weak plumes that do not entrain pristine rock. However, all the OIB in-

clude substantial fractions of basalts from the depleted mantle reservoir.

The neodymium–strontium correlation given in Figure 10–9 shows a strong

mixing-line trend between depleted MORB and BSE. This trend is strong

evidence for the existence of a near-pristine reservoir. Only the Society group

shows a significant deviation from the trend. As shown in Figure 10–11 all

OIB lie to the right of the geochron. This characteristic lead signature may

have developed in the continental crust.

The OIB heterogeneities probably arise from two sources: (1) nearly pris-

tine rock that is entrained from the lower mantle and (2) continental crust

and mantle that have recently been subducted or delaminated. Hawaii and

Iceland are examples of the entrainment of lower mantle material. The

basalts from these islands lie on mixing lines between depleted and primi-

tive isotopic ratios and have excess primordial rare gas isotopes. Other OIB

are divided into three types: The Kerguelen group is characterized by an

isotopic signature associated with a contribution from recently delaminated

continental lithosphere. The St . Helena group is characterized by a very

large lead loss attributed to old, radiogenic continental crust. The Society

group has anomalous Nd–Sr systematics and a large lead loss that is at-

tributed to young continental crust.

Collateral Reading

Allègre, C. J., S. R. Hart, and J.-F. Minster (1983), Chemical structure and

evolution of the mantle and continents determined by inversion of Nd

Collateral Reading 793

and Sr isotopic data, II. Numerical experiments and discussion, Earth

Planet. Sci. Lett. 66, 191–213.

Allègre, C. J., T. Staudacher, and P. Sarda (1987), Rare gas systematics:

Formation of the atmosphere, evolution and structure of the Earth’s

mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 81, 127–150.

Boltwood, B. B. (1907), On the ultimate disintegration products of the ra-

dioactive elements, Am. J. Sci. 4, 77–88.

Holmes, A. (1913), The Age of the Earth (Harper and Brothers, London)

194 p.

Holmes, A. (1946), An estimate of the age of the Earth, Nature 157, 680–

684.

Houtermans, F. G. (1946), Die isotopenhäufigkeiten in natürlichen Blei und

das Alter des Urans, Naturweiss. 33, 185–186, 219.

Kanasewich, E. R. (1968), The interpretation of lead isotopes and their

geological significance. In Radiometric Dating for Geologists, pp. 147–

223, eds. E. I. Hamilton and R. M. Farquhar (Interscience Publishers,

London).

Moorbath, S., R. K. O’Nions, R. J. Pankhurst, N. H. Gale, and V. R. Mc-

Gregor (1972), Further rubidium–strontium age determinations on the

very early Precambrian rocks of the Godthaab district, West Greenland,

Nature Phys. Sci. 240, 78–82.

Patterson, C. C. (1956), Age of meteorites and the Earth, Geochim. Cos-

mochim. Acta 10, 230–237.

White, W. (1985), Sources of oceanic basalts: Radiogenic isotope data, Ge-

ology 13, 115–118.

Collateral Reading

Dickin, A. P., Radiogenic Isotope Geology (Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, 1995).

An advanced and very complete treatment of isotope geochemistry. The

isotope systematics of the Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd, U–Th–Pb, Re–Os, and Lu–

Hf systems are given. Rare gas geochemistry and U-series geochemistry

are treated. Experimental techniques, fission track dating, cosmogenic

nuclides, and extinct radionuclides are covered along with a variety of

applications.

Faure, G., Principles of Isotope Geology, 2nd edition (Wiley, New York,

1986).

A comprehensive treatment of the uses of isotopes in geology. Various age

794 Collateral Reading

dating techniques are comprehensively reviewed. The radiogenic sys-

tematics of the Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd, Lu–Hf, Re–Os, and U–Th–Pb systems

are given. The stable isotopic systems of oxygen, hydrogen, carbon,

nitrogen, and sulfur are also treated.

Appendix A

Symbols and Units

A.1 SI Units

796 Symbols and Units

Quantity Unit Symbol Equivalent

Basic Units Length meter m Time second s Mass kilogram kg Temperature Kelvin K Electrical ampere A

current Derived Units

Force newton N kg m s−2

Energy joule J kg m2 s−2

Power watt W kg m2 s−3

Pressure pascal Pa kg m−1 s−2

Frequency hertz Hz s−1

Charge coulomb C A s Capacitance farad F C2 s2 kg−1m−2

Magnetic tesla T kg A−1 s−2

induction Multiples of Ten

10−3 milli m 10−6 micro µ 10−9 nano n 10−12 pico p 10−15 femto f 10−18 atto a 103 kilo k 106 mega M 109 giga G 1012 tera T 1015 peta P 1018 exa E

A.2 Conversion Factors 797

A.2 Conversion Factors

798 Symbols and Units

To Convert To Multiply by

acre ft2 43560 m2 4046.9

angstrom, Å cm 10−8

nm 10 astronomical unit, AU cm 1.496 × 1013

Tm 0.1496 bar, b atm 0.98692

dyne cm−2 106

lb in−2 14.5038 mm Hg 750.06 MPa 10−1

barrel, bbl (petroleum) gal (US) 42 liter 158.98

British thermal unit, cal 251.996 (B.T.U.) joule 1054.35

calorie (gm), cal joule 4.184 centimeter, cm inch 0.39370

m 10−2

darcy m2 9.8697× 10−13

dyne g cm s−2 1 newton 10−5

erg cal 2.39006× 10−8

dyne cm 1 joule 10−7

fathom, fath ft 6 feet, ft in 12

m 0.3048 furlong yd 220 gal cm s−2 1

m s−2 10−2

gallon, gal (U.S. liq.) in3 231 liter 3.78541

gallon, gal (Imp.) in3 277.419 liters 4.54608

gamma gauss 10−5

tesla 10−9

gauss tesla 10−4

gram, g pound 0.0022046 kg 10−3

heat flow unit (H.F.U.) cal cm−2 s−1 10−6

mW m−2 41.84 hectare acre 2.47105

cm2 108

horsepower W 745.700

A.2 Conversion Factors 799

To Convert To Multiply by

inch, in cm 2.54 joule, J erg 107

cal 0.239006 kilogram, kg g 103

pound 2.20462 kilometer, km m 103

ft 3280.84 mile 0.621371

kilometer hr−1 mile hr−1 0.621371 kilowatt watt 103

HP 1.34102 knot mi hr−1 1.150779 liter cm3 103

gal (U.S.) 0.26417 in3 61.0237

meter ft 3.28084 micron, µ cm 10−4

mile ft 5280 km 1.60934

mm Hg dyne cm−2 1333.22 newton dyne 105

ounce lb 0.0625 pint gallon 0.125 poise g cm−1 s−1 1

kg m−1 s−1 0.1 pound kg 0.453592 poundal newton 0.138255 quart gallon 0.25 stoke cm2 s−1 1 slug kg 14.594 tesla gauss 104

ton (short) lb 2000 kg 907.185

watt J s−1 1 HP 0.00134102

yard in 36 m 0.9144

year (cal) days 365 s 3.1536×107

800 Symbols and Units

A.3 List of Symbols

A.3 List of Symbols 801

Equation Symbol Quantity Introduced SI Unit

a equatorial radius (1–6) m of the Earth

radius (6–213) m A equatorial moment (5–29) kg m2

of inertia area (3–36) m2

Madelung (7–10) constant

b distance (2–2) m b∗ Burgers vector (7–116) m B magnetic field (1–2) T

equatorial moment (5–31) kg m2

of inertia buoyancy flux (6–244) kg s−1

Br Brinkman number (7–154) c specific heat (4–67) J kg−1 K−1

polar radius of (5–55) m the Earth

cD drag coefficient (6–226) C degree of (3–116)

compensation concentration (4–6) polar moment (5–26) kg m2

of inertia d distance (2–141) m D magnetic declination (1–4)

flexural rigidity (3–72) N m drag (6–218) N pipe diameter (6–266) m diffusion (7–62) m2 s−1

coefficient enrichment factor (10–32)

e isotropic strain (2–132) eccentricity (5–65) charge on an (7–10) C

electron specific internal (7–27) J kg−1

energy E Young’s modulus (3–4) Pa

Eckert number (6–412) energy (8–72) J

Ea activation energy (7–77) J mole−1

E0 barrier energy (7–76) J mole−1

f coefficient of (2–23) friction

frequency (4–73) s−1

force (5–1) N flattening of (5–56)

the Earth friction factor (6–39) fractionation (10–29)

factor

802 Symbols and Units

Equation Symbol Quantity Introduced SI Unit

F force per unit (2–14) N m−1

width force (8–49) N

g acceleration of (1–1) m s−2

gravity ∆g gravity anomaly (5–100) m s−2

G gravitational (2–66) m3 kg−1 s−2

constant shear modulus (3–1) Pa

h depth (2–2) m height of (3–101) m

topography heat transfer (6–264) W m−2 K−1

coefficient height of phreatic (9–22) m

surface H heat generation rate (4–5) W kg−1

thickness of (5–148) m reference crust

hydraulic head (6–9) m i mole density (10–1) I magnetic inclination (1–2) j mole density (10–1) J flux of atoms (7–58) m−2 s−1

J2 ellipticity coefficient (5–43) k thermal conductivity (4–1) W m−1 K−1

Boltzmann constant (7–27) J ◦K−1

permeability (9–1) m2

k̄ spring constant (7–18) N m−1

K bulk modulus (3–50) Pa transport coefficient (4–258) kg m−1 s−1

hydraulic (9–2) m s−1

conductivity l length (3–66) m L length (2–22) m

latent heat (4–138) J kg−1

m magnetic dipole (1–6) A m2

moment mass (5–1) kg earthquake (8–72)

magnitude M mass (2–66) kg

bending moment per (3–58) N unit length

moment of an (8–73) J earthquake

Ma atomic mass (7–27) kg mole−1

n number of atoms per (7–46) m−3

unit volume ∆N geoid anomaly (5–69) m N0 Avogadro’s number (7–27) Nu Nusselt number (6–267)

A.3 List of Symbols 803

Equation Symbol Quantity Introduced SI Unit

p pressure (1–1) Pa P horizontal force per (3–58) N m−1

unit length flow pressure (6–66) Pa

Pe Peclet number (6–274) Pr Prandtl number (6–3) q load (3–56) Pa

heat flow per (4–1) W m−2

unit area Q heat flow (4–5) W

volumetric flow rate (6–35) m3 s−1

integrated heat flux (4–117) J m−2

heat source strength (4–119) W m−1

heat content per (4–158) J m−2

unit area r radial coordinate (2–65) m R radius of the earth (2–74) m

pipe radius (6–33) m radius of curvature (3–66) m universal gas constant (7–27) J mole−1 K−1

Ra Rayleigh number (6–316) Re Reynolds number (6–40) s surface distance (1–19) m

distance to rotation (5–46) m axis

specific entropy (4–252) J kg−1 K−1

S shear strength (8–36) Pat time (4–7) s T temperature (4–1) K u horizontal velocity (1–17) m s−1

U velocity (4–151) m s−1

geopotential (5–53) m2 s−2

lattice energy (7–4) J v vertical velocity (6–52) m s−1

specific volume (4–173) m3 kg−1

V volume (3–51) m3

vertical force per (3–56) N m−1

unit length gravitational (5–51) m2 s−2

potential Va activation volume (7–77) m3

w width (2–6) m displacement (2–75) m vertical deflection (3–58) m

W depth of compensation (5–151) m x horizontal coordinate (2–75) m y vertical coordinate (1–1) m Z complex distance (8–88) m z horizontal coordinate (2–85) m

number of charges (7–10) per ion

804 Symbols and Units

Equation Symbol Quantity Introduced SI Unit

α angle (1–22) stretching factor (2–6) flexural parameter (3–127) m coefficient of thermal (4–176) K−1

expansion isotope ratio (10–1)

β angle (2–150) compressibility (3–50) Pa−1

geothermal gradient (4–61) K m−1

isotope ratio (10–1) γ slope of Clapeyron (4–256) Pa K−1

curve Euler’s constant (4–120)

Γ jump frequency (7–56) s−1

δ tube diameter (9–6) m ∆ subtended angle (1–17)

dilatation (2–86) ε strain (2–74)

small quantity (5–22) normalized isotope (10–28)

ratio ε̇ rate of strain (2–127) s−1

ε0 permittivity of (7–10) F m−1

free space ζ distance (4–19) m η distance (4–19) m

similarity variable (4–96) θ colatitude (1–6)

angle (2–26) nondimensional (4–93)

temperature κ thermal diffusivity (4–68) m2 s−1

λ decay constant (10–3) s−1

Lamé parameter (3–1) Pa wavelength (3–107) m thermal conductivity (9–103) W m−1 K−1

µ viscosity (6–1) Pa s coefficient of (8–36)

internal friction composition ratio (10–2)

µ0 permeability of (1–6) T m A−1

free space ν Poisson’s ratio (3–4)

kinematic viscosity (6–2) m2 s−1

isotope ratio (10–14) ξ distance (4–151) m ρ density (1–1) kg m−3

σ stress (2–1) Pa Stefan–Boltzmann (4–242) W m−2 K−4

constant surface mass (5–106) kg m−2

density

A.3 List of Symbols 805

Equation Symbol Quantity Introduced SI Unit

τ shear stress (4–243) Pa period of (4–74) s

oscillation relaxation time (6–104) s growth time (6–157) s

τ1/2 half-life (4–7) s φ latitude (1–10)

angle (2–87) kinetic energy (7–46) J porosity (9–5)

ψ longitude (1–14) stream function (6–69) m2 s−1

ω angular velocity (1–17) s−1

solid body rotation (2–93) circular frequency (4–72) s−1

Appendix B

Physical Constants and Properties

B.1 Physical Constants

Quantity Symbol Value

Speed of light c 2.99792458×108 m s−1

Electronic charge e −1.60217733×10−19 C Permeability of µ0 4π× 10−7 T mA−1

vacuum Permittivity of ε0 8.8541878×10−12 F m−1

vacuum Planck constant h 6.6260755×10−34 J s Boltzmann k 1.380658×10−23 J K−1

constant Stefan–Boltzmann σ 5.67051×10−8 W m−2 K−4

constant Gravitational G 6.6726×10−11 N m2 kg−2

constant Electron rest mass me 0.91093897×10−30 kg Atomic mass unit 1.6605402×10−27 kg Avogadro’s NA 6.0221367×1023 mol−1

number Universal gas R 8.314510 J mol−1 K−1

constant

B.2 Properties of the Earth 807

B.2 Properties of the Earth

808 Physical Constants and Properties

Quantity Symbol Value

Equatorial radius a 6.378137×106 m Polar radius c 6.356752×106 m Volume V 1.0832×1021 m3

Volume of core Vc 1.77×1020 m3

Volume of mantle Vm 9.06×1020 m3

Radius of sphere of 6.3708×106 m equal volume

Radius of core rc 3.480×106 m Radius of inner core ric 1.215×106 m Mass M 5.9736×1024 kg Mean density ρ 5.515×103 kg m−3

Mass of core Mc 1.883×1024 kg Mass of mantle Mm 4.043×1024 kg Mass of crust Mcr 2.36×1022 kg Equatorial surface ge 9.7803267715 m s−2

gravity Polar surface gravity gp 9.8321863685 m s−2

Area A 5.10×1014 m2

Land area 1.48×1014 m2

Continental area Ac 2.0× 1014 m2

including margins Water area 3.62×1014 m2

Oceans excluding Ao 3.1× 1014 m2

continental margins Mean land elevation h̄ 875 m Mean ocean depth w̄ 3794 m Mean thickness of h̄cc 40 km

continental crust Mean thickness of h̄oc 6 km

oceanic crust Mean surface heat flow q̄s 87 mW m−2

Total geothermal flux Qs 44.3 TW Mean continental heat q̄c 65 mW m−2

flow Mean oceanic heat flow q̄o 101 mW m−2

Solar constant 1373 W m−2

Angular velocity w 7.292115×10−5 rad s−1

Ellipticity coefficient J2 1.08263×10−3

Flattening f 3.35281068118×10−3

Polar moment of inertia C 8.0358×1037 kg m2

Equatorial moment of A 8.0095×1037 kg m2

inertia Age of Earth τe 4.55 Ga

B.3 Properties of the Planets 809

B.3 Properties of the Planets

810 Physical Constants and Properties

M ercu

ry V en

u s

E a rth

M a rs

J u p iter

S a tu

rn U

ra n u s

N ep

tu n e

P lu

to

S em

im a jo

r a x is

o f

5 7 .9

1 0 8 .2

1 4 9 .6

2 2 7 .9

7 7 8 .2

1 4 3 1

2 8 8 7

4 5 2 9

5 9 3 6

o rb

it, 1 0 6

k m

S id

erea l p erio

d o f

8 7 .9

6 9

2 2 4 .7

0 1

3 6 5 .2

5 6 3 6

6 8 6 .9

8 6

4 3 3 2 .6

6 0

1 0 ,7

5 9 .4

3 3 0 ,6

8 8 .9

6 0 ,1

8 9

9 0 ,4

6 5

rev o lu

tio n , d ay

s E

ccen tricity

0 .2

0 5 6 1 4

0 .0

0 6 8 2 1

0 .0

1 6 7 2 1

0 .0

9 3 3 1 3

0 .0

4 8 1

0 .0

5 1

0 .0

4 7

0 .0

0 7

0 .2

5 3

In clin

a tio

n to

7 .0

0 5

3 .3

9 4

— 1 .8

5 0

1 .3

0 5

2 .4

9 0 .7

7 3

1 .7

7 0

1 7 .1

3 eclip

tic, d eg

E q u a to

ria l ra

d iu

s, 2 4 3 9

6 0 5 2

6 3 7 8

3 3 9 4

7 1 ,3

9 8

6 0 ,3

3 0

2 6 ,2

0 0

2 5 ,2

2 5

1 1 5 7

k m

E llip

ticity 0

0 0 .0

0 3 4

0 .0

0 5 9

0 .0

6 3 7

0 .1

0 2

0 .0

2 4

0 .0

2 6 6

— M

a ss

1 0 2 4

k g

0 .3

3 0 3

4 .8

6 9

5 .9

7 3 6

0 .6

4 1 8 5

1 8 9 9

5 6 8 .5

8 6 .8

3 1 0 2 .4

0 .0

1 5

D en

sity, k g

m −

3 5 4 2 7

5 2 0 4

5 5 1 5

3 9 3 3

1 3 2 6

6 8 7

1 3 1 8

1 6 3 8

1 1 0 0

E q u a to

ria l g rav

ity, 3 .7

0 1

8 .8

7 0

9 .7

8 0 3

3 .6

9 0

2 3 .1

8 .9

6 8 .6

9 1 1 .0

0 .7

2 m

s −

2

S id

erea l p erio

d o f

5 8 .6

5 −

2 4 3 .0

0 .9

9 7 2 7 0

1 .0

2 5 9 5 6

0 .4

1 3 5 3 8

0 .4

3 7 5

− 0 .6

5 0 .7

6 8

− 6 .3

8 7

ro ta

tio n , d ay

s C / M

R 2

— 0 .3

4 0 .3

3 3 5

0 .3

6 5

0 .2

6 0 .2

5 0 .2

3 0 .2

3 —

S u rfa

ce tem

p era

tu re,

4 4 0

7 3 0

2 8 8

2 1 8

1 2 9

9 7

5 8

5 6

5 0

K

B.4 Properties of the Satellites 811

B.4 Properties of the Satellites

812 Physical Constants and Properties

Distance Sidereal from Planet Period Radius Mass

Planet Satellite 103 km Days Km 1021 kg

Earth Moon 384.4 27.322 1737.103 73.483 Mars Phobos 9.38 0.3189 11 1.08×10−3

Deimos 23.48 1.26244 6 1.80×10−4

Jupiter Amalthea 181.3 0.49818 120 — Io 422 1.76914 1821 89.33 Europa 670.9 3.5512 1569 48.0 Ganymede 1070 7.155 2634 148 Callisto 1883 16.689 2403 107.6 Leda 11,094 238.7 8 — Himalia 11,480 250.6 93 — Lysithea 11,720 259.2 18 — Elara 11,737 259.6 38 — Ananke 21,200 631 R 15 — Carme 22,600 692 R 20 — Pasiphae 23,500 735 R 25 — Sinope 23,700 758 R 18 —

Saturn Mimas 185 0.942 199 0.0375 Enceladus 238 1.370 250 0.074 Tethys 295 1.888 530 0.622 Dione 377 2.737 560 1.05 Rhea 527 4.518 765 2.28 Titan 1222 15.945 2575 134.5 Hyperion 1481 21.277 145 0.1 Iapetus 3561 79.331 718 1.59 Phoebe 12,952 550.4 R 110 —

Uranus Miranda 130 1.413 1235 0.066 Ariel 191 2.520 579 1.35 Umbriel 266 4.144 585 1.17 Titania 436 8.706 789 3.53 Oberon 583 13.463 761 3.01

Neptune Triton 355 5.877 R 1353 21.5 Nereid 5513 360.14 170 —

Pluto Charon 19.4 6.387 — —

B.5 Properties of Rock 813

B.5 Properties of Rock

Density E G k α

kg m--3 1011 Pa 1011 Pa ν Wm--1 K--110--5 K--1

Sedimentary Shale 2100–2700 0.1–0.7 0.1–0.3 0.1–0.2 1.2–3 Sandstone 1900–2500 0.1–0.6 0.04–0.2 0.1–0.3 1.5–4.2 3 Limestone 1600–2700 0.5–0.8 0.2–0.3 0.15–0.3 2–3.4 2.4 Dolomite 2700–2850 0.5–0.9 0.2–6.4 0.1–0.4 3.2–5

Metamorphic Gneiss 2600–2850 0.4–0.6 0.2–0.3 0.15–0.25 2.1–4.2 Amphibole 2800–3150 0.5–1.0 0.4 2.1–3.8 Marble 2670–2750 0.3–0.8 0.2–0.35 0.2–0.3 2.5–3

Igneous Basalt 2950 0.6–0.8 0.25–0.35 0.2–0.25 1.3–2.9 Granite 2650 0.4–0.7 0.2–0.3 0.2–0.25 2.4–3.8 2.4 Diabase 2900 0.8–1.1 0.3–0.45 0.25 2–4 Gabbro 2950 0.6–1.0 0.2–0.35 0.15–0.2 1.9–4.0 1.6 Diorite 2800 0.6–0.8 0.3–0.35 0.25–0.3 2.8–3.6 Pyroxenite 3250 1.0 0.4 4.1–5 Anorthosite 2640–2920 0.83 0.35 0.25 1.7–2.1 Granodiorite 2700 0.7 0.3 0.25 2.0–3.5

Mantle Peridotite 3250 3–4.5 2.4 Dunite 3000–3700 1.4–1.6 0.6–0.7 3.7–4.6

Miscellaneous Ice 917 0.092 0.31–0.36 2.2 5

814 Physical Constants and Properties

Bulk Shear Radius Depth Density Pressure Gravity Modulus Modulus Poisson’s

r (km) y (km) ρ (kg m--3) P (GPa) g (m s--2) K (GPa) G (GPa) Ratio ν

3480.0 2891.0 5566.5 135.8 10.69 655.6 293.8 0.31 3500.0 2871.0 5556.4 134.6 10.66 653.7 293.3 0.30 3600.0 2771.0 5506.4 128.8 10.52 644.0 290.7 0.30 3700.0 2671.0 5456.6 123.0 10.41 627.9 285.5 0.30 3800.0 2571.0 5406.8 117.4 10.31 609.5 279.4 0.30 3900.0 2471.0 5357.1 111.9 10.23 591.7 273.4 0.30 4000.0 2371.0 5307.3 106.4 10.16 574.4 267.5 0.30 4100.0 2271.0 5257.3 101.1 10.10 557.5 261.7 0.30 4200.0 2171.0 5207.2 95.8 10.06 540.9 255.9 0.30 4300.0 2071.0 5156.7 90.6 10.02 524.6 250.2 0.29 4400.0 1971.0 5105.9 85.5 9.99 508.5 244.5 0.29 4500.0 1871.0 5054.7 80.4 9.97 492.5 238.8 0.29 4600.0 1771.0 5003.0 75.4 9.95 476.6 233.0 0.29 4700.0 1671.0 4950.8 70.4 9.94 460.7 227.3 0.29 4800.0 1571.0 4897.9 65.5 9.93 444.8 221.5 0.29 4900.0 1471.0 4844.3 60.7 9.93 428.8 215.7 0.28 5000.0 1371.0 4789.9 55.9 9.94 412.8 209.8 0.28 5100.0 1271.0 4734.6 51.2 9.94 396.6 203.9 0.28 5200.0 1171.0 4678.5 46.5 9.95 380.3 197.9 0.28 5300.0 1071.0 4621.3 41.9 9.96 363.8 191.8 0.28 5400.0 971.0 4563.1 37.3 9.97 347.1 185.6 0.27 5500.0 871.0 4503.8 32.8 9.99 330.3 179.4 0.27 5600.0 771.0 4443.2 28.3 10.00 313.4 173.0 0.27 5701.0 670.0 4380.7 23.8 10.02 299.9 154.8 0.28 5701.0 670.0 3992.1 23.8 10.02 255.6 123.9 0.29 5800.0 571.0 3939.3 19.9 10.00 239.7 116.2 0.29 5900.0 471.0 3813.2 16.0 9.99 209.7 100.7 0.29 5971.0 400.0 3723.7 13.4 9.97 189.9 90.6 0.29 5971.0 400.0 3543.3 13.4 9.97 173.5 80.6 0.30 6000.0 371.0 3525.9 12.3 9.96 170.1 79.5 0.30 6100.0 271.0 3466.2 8.9 9.93 158.6 75.9 0.29 6151.0 220.0 3435.8 7.1 9.91 152.9 74.1 0.29 6151.0 220.0 3359.5 7.1 9.91 127.0 65.6 0.28 6200.0 171.0 3364.8 5.5 9.89 128.1 66.2 0.28 6300.0 71.0 3375.7 2.2 9.86 130.4 67.6 0.28 6346.6 24.4 3380.7 0.6 9.84 131.5 68.2 0.28 6346.6 24.4 2900.0 0.6 9.84 75.3 44.1 0.25 6356.0 15.0 2900.0 0.3 9.84 75.3 44.1 0.25 6356.0 15.0 2600.0 0.3 9.84 52.0 26.6 0.28 6368.0 3.0 2600.0 0.0 9.83 52.0 26.6 0.28 6368.0 3.0 1020.0 0.0 9.83 2.1 0.0 0.50 6371.0 0.0 1020.0 0.0 9.82 2.1 0.0 0.50

B.6 Mantle Properties

Appendix C

Answers to Selected Problems

1–1 57 Myr

1–2 25 km

1–3 439 m

1–4 3.74 × 10−4 T

1–5 1660 km

1–6 51◦N, 78◦E

1–7 75◦N, 123◦E

1–8 70◦N, 186◦E

1–11 0.3◦, 70◦

1–12 5.5◦, 69◦

1–13 1886 km, 2441 km

1–14 1028 km, 2080 km

1–17 9.1 mm yr−1

1–18 75 mm yr−1

1–19 47 mm yr−1

1–20 210◦, 120 mm yr−1; 0◦, 104 mm yr−1

1–22 260◦, 43 mm yr−1

1–23 200◦, 83 mm yr−1; 180◦, 78 mm yr−1

1–24 250◦, 92.4 mm yr−1; 50 mm yr−1

1–25 91◦, 51 mm yr−1

2–1 220 MPa

2–2 68 km

2–3 290 m

2–4 1.18

2–5 1.40

2–6 5.3 km, 30 km

2–7 −150 MPa

2–9 4.1 × 1011 N, 41 MPa

816 Answers to Selected Problems

2–10 8.6 × 104 N

2–14 166.5 MPa, −23.5 MPa

2–17 4.6 GPa

2–18 13,200 kg m−3, 433 GPa, 129 GPa, 12.9 m s−2

2–19 47 and 63 MPa, 75◦ and 165◦

2–20 0.5, 3, 5, 5.5 MPa

2–26 xc − xa = [(xb − xa) 2

+ (zb − za) 2]1/2

sin θ2 sin(θ1 + θ2)

× {

−cos

[

θ1 + tan−1 (

zb − za xb − xa

)]}

zc − za =[(xb−xa)2 +(zb−za)]1/2 sin θ2

sin(θ1 +θ2)

× sin

[

θ1 + tan−1 (

zb − za xb − xa

)]

2–27 45 mm yr−1

2–29 ε̇xx = 10−7 yr−1, ε̇yy = 2.1 × 10−7 yr−1, ε̇xy = 10−7 yr−1

2–30 20.2mm/yr (∆PG = 75.3◦,∆PW = 59.7◦,∆GW = 61.4◦, β = 89.1◦)

2–31 −85mm/yr (∆PS = 79.5◦,∆PM = 62.6◦,

∆SM = 60.6◦, β = 64.4◦)

2–32 −73.8mm/yr (∆PE = 84.1◦,∆PA = 74.9◦,

∆EA = 36.6◦, β = 72.5◦)

2–33 34.5mm/yr−1, 35.7◦ E of S

2–34 35.8mm/yr−1, 41.9◦ E of S

3–1 180 MPa

3–2 42 MPa, 125 MPa

3–3 νσ1,−ν(1 + ν)σ1/E

3–4 (2ν2 + ν − 1)ρgy/E, (1 − 2ν)ρgy

3–7 x(L− x)M0/2D

3–8 x(3L2 − 4x2)Va/48D

3–9 q(L− x),−q(L− x)2/2

3–10 32.4 MPa, 0.27 MPa

3–11 −x3L× q/12D + 3x2L2q/16, 0 < x < L/2

(16x4 − 64x3 L+ 96x2L2 − 8xL3 + L4) × q/384D L/2 < x < L

3–12 (9Lx2 − 4x3)Va/12D 0<x<L/2

(24Lx2 − 8x3 + 6L2x− L3)Va/48D L/2 < x < L

3–13 (x4 − 2x3L+ xL3)q/D, L/2, 3L2q/4h2

3–14 0.405 m

Answers to Selected Problems 817

3–15 (L4q0/π 4D) sin(πx/L)

3–17 (p− ρgh)(L2 − 12x2)/24, ±L/2

3–18 (p− ρgh)(12x2 − L2)/4h2, ±L/2

3–20b 1.0 GPa

3–21 18.1 km

3–22 16.5 km

4–3 18 ppb, 72 ppb, 0.108%

4–4 7.4 × 10−12 W kg−1, 3.1 × 10−13W kg−1, 1.5 × 10−11 W kg−1,

1.1 × 10−9 W kg−1, 7.7 × 10−10 W kg−1, 3.4 × 10−10 W kg−1,

3.5 × 10−12 W kg−1

4–5 9 × 10−11 W kg−1

4–7 16 mW m−2, 10 km

4–8 q∗ = qm + ρhrH ∗

4–9 137 km, 0.52 µW m−3

4–10 qs = qm + 1

2 ρHsb

T = T0 + 1

k

(

qmy + 1

2 ρHsby

− 1

2 ρHsy

2 + 1

6

ρHsy 3

b

)

4–11 55.5 mW m−2, 608.5◦C

4–14 58,000 K

4–15 T0 + ρH

6k (a2 − b2) + Γb

4–16 T0 + qsa

k

(

3

2

a

b − 1

)

4–17 T0 + ρH

6k (a2 − r2) +

1

3

ρHb3

k

(

1

a − 1

r

)

,

a > r > b

4–19 733 m

4–20 43.8 mW m−2

4–23 1.3 × 1012 yr, 1011, 3.6 × 1011, 1.2 × 1012, 1.9 × 1011

4–24 7.4 × 10−15 K s−1

4–25 9.3 × 10−15 K s−1

4–26 3.16 m, 9.94 m

4–27 950 m

4–28 1.14 m

4–29 5.2 × 10−3 K

4–30 π

4 + nπ, n = 1, 2, 3 . . .

4–31 3.64(κt)1/2

4–32 3 × 105 sec

818 Answers to Selected Problems

4–34 T0 + βy − ∆T0erfc y

2 √

κ(t+ τ) ,−τ < t < 0

T0 + βy − ∆T0erfc y

2 √

κ(t+ τ)

+ ∆T0erfc y

2 √ κt , t > 0

4–37 0.32 m

4–38 26 Myr

4–39 65.9 Myr, 92 km

4–40 κ(Tm − T0)

(πκt)1/2 erf λ1 , eλ

2 1

4–41 T0 + (Tm − T0)

erf λ3 erf

(

y

2 √ κt

)

, 0 < y < ys

Tv − (Tv − Tm)

erfcλ3 erfc

(

y − y5

2 √ κt

)

, y > ys

(Tm − Tv)

erfcλ3 − (Tv − Tm)

erfcλ3 =

√ π Lλ3e

λ2 3

c 4–42 32 km

4–43 140 km

4–44 1.29 days

4–46 T0 + (T∞ − T0) exp

(

−Uξ κ

)

4–47 T0 − T∞erf(α/2

√ κ)

1 − erf(α/2 √ κ)

+

[

T∞ − T0

1 − erf(α/2 √ κ)

]

erf y

2 √ κt

4–48 qm

ρ[L+ c(Tm − T0)] 4–49 16.5 MPa

4–50 6.4 km

4–52 500 m, 200 m

4–53 0.04 mm yr−1

4–54 χ(ρm − ρl)yL

(ρm − ρw) , 0.6

4–55 320 m

4–56 4.2 km

4–57 2–3 km

4–58 7.6 km, 12.8 km

4–59 10.6 km, 18.5 km

4–60 2.46 km

4–61 68 K

4–62 17,000 K

Answers to Selected Problems 819

4–63 2.7 K

4–67 7.1 m2 s−1

4–68 2.3 m2 s−1

5–1 1.67 × 10−3

5–2 3.4 621 × 10−3

5–3 (a) 6.25 × 107 J, (b) 1.12 × 104 m s−1,

(c) 62,200 K

5–4 No

5–5 9.78031846 m s−2, 9.832177 m s−2,

9.7804629 m s−2, 9.832011 m s−2

5–7 ge + 2Gb/a3

5–8 4140 kg m−3, 12,410 kg m−3

5–9 4460 kg m−3

5–10 3.74 days

5–11 21 hours

5–12 13 million tons

5–16 3.98 mm s−2

5–18 8.1 km

5–19 4.3 × 106 kg m−2

5–20 0.044978 mm s−2, −0.56184 mm s−2

5–22 πG

g ρcu

{

2h

[

H +

(

ρm− ρcl ρm− ρcu

)

bL

]

+ h2ρm

(ρm − ρcu)

}

5–23 14.4 km

6–2 1

2

dp

dx (2 y − h) − µ

u0

h ,−µu0

h , 1

2

dp

dx (2 y − h)

6–3 h

2 +

µ0u0

h(dp/dx)

6–4 ρgh2 sin α

3µ ,

(

3µQ

ρg sin α

)1/3

6–5 0.317 MPa

6–6 19.2 MPa

6–7 1.27 × 10−20

6–8 0.025 m, 0.84 m s−1, 4 × 104

6–9 (ρs − ρl)gd 3/12µ

6–10 − 1

dp

dx

(

y3

3 − hy2

2

)

+ u0y

2

2h − u0y,

−u0

[

y − y2

2h + 6

(

hL h

+ 1

2

)

(

y3

3h2 − y2

2h

)]

6–12 0.61 km, 0.22 km, 4× 1021 Pa s

820 Answers to Selected Problems

6–13 u = − √

2U

(2 − π2

4 )

[

π

2 +

(

π

2 −2

)

tan−1 y

x − (

πx

2 +

[

2 − π

2

]

y

)(

x

x2 + y2

)]

v = − √

2U

(2 − π2

4 )

[

π

2 tan−1 y

x − (

πx

2 +

[

2 − π

2

]

y

)(

y

x2 + y2

)]

u

= U

(9π2

4 − 2)

{(

9π2

4 − 2

)

+ π(2 √

2 − 3π)

− [√

2

(

2 + 3π

2

)

− 2

(

1 + 3π

2

)]

tan−1 x

y − [(

2 − √

2 3π

2

)

x

+

(√ 2

[

2 + 3π

2

]

− 2

[

1 + 3π

2

])

y

]

× x

x2 + y2

}

v = U

(9π2

4 − 2)

× {(

2− √

2 3π

2

)

π+

(

2− √

2 3π

2

)

tan−1 y

x

− [(

2 − √

2 3π

2

)

x+

(√ 2

(

2 + 3π

2

)

−2

[

1 + 3π

2

])

y

]

x

x2 + y2

}

6–15 4.6 × 1018 Pa s

6–16 195,000 yr

6–20 3.3 × 1018 Pa s

6–21 8.46 × 1020 Pa s

6–24 52 km, 55 m3 s−1, 4.6 × 1010 W, 0.21 Myr−1, 1.38×108 km3

6–25 74 km, 232 m3 s−1, 1.9 × 1011 W, 0.42 myr−1, 2.22 × 109 km3

6–26 T = C1x+ C2 + C1

4κµ

(

1

6 y4 − 1

4 d2y2 +

5

96 d4 )

q = C1kd

3

24κµ , h =

70

17

k

d , Nu =

70

17 6–29 2.4 × 105, 2.9 × 109, 4.2 × 107, 1.2 × 106

6–30 1.16 b, 7.85 b

6–33 14.4 km

6–35 0.32

6–38 T0 + µu2

0

kh2

(

hy − 1

2 y2 )

, µu2

0

h , µ u2

0

2, k 7–1 547 kJ mole−1

7–3 1.6 × 108 Pa

7–4 1.24 × 103 J kg−1 K−1

7–11 −72 bars

7–13 137 MPa, 860 K

C.1 Answers to Selected Problems 821

7–21 σ∗, σ∗/ √

6

7–22 σ0/[(1 − ν)2 + 1]1/2,

(1 − ν2)σ0/E[(1 − ν)2 + ν]1/2

7–23 2τ , √

7–24 a2σ0

2

(

1 − c2

3a2

)

, σ0a

2

3 , σ0a

2

2

C.1 Answers to Selected Problems

1–1 56 Myr

1–2 25 km

1–3 439 m

1–4 3.74 × 10−4 T

1–5 1660 km

1–6 51◦N, 78◦E

1–7 75◦N, 123◦E

1–8 70◦N, 186◦E

1–11 0.3◦, 70◦

1–12 5.5◦, 69◦

1–13 1886 km, 2441 km

1–14 1028 km, 2080 km

1–17 10.4 mm yr−1

1–18 89 mm yr−1

1–19 49 mm yr−1

1–20 210◦, 120 mm yr−1; 0◦, 104 mm yr−1

1–22 260◦, 43 mm yr−1

1–23 200◦, 83 mm yr−1; 180◦, 78 mm yr−1

1–24 250◦, 92.4 mm yr−1; 50 mm yr−1

1–25 91◦, 51 mm yr−1

2–1 220 MPa

2–2 68 km

2–3 290 m

2–7 −150 MPa

2–9 4.1 × 1011 N, 41 MPa

2–10 8.6 × 104 N

2–14 166.5 MPa, −23.5 MPa

2–17 4.6 GPa

2–18 13, 200 kg m−3, 433 GPa, 129 GPa, 12.9 m s−2

2–19 47 and 63 MPa, 75◦ and 165◦

822 Answers to Selected Problems

2–20 0.5, 3, 5, 5.5 MPa

2–26

xc − xa = [(xb − xa) 2 + (zb − za)

2]1/2 sin θ2

sin(θ1 + θ2) {

− cos

[

θ1 + tan−1 (

zb − za xb − xa

)]}

zc − za = [(xb − xa) 2 + (zb − za)]

1/2 sin θ2 sin(θ1 + θ2)

×

sin

[

θ1 + tan−1 (

zb − za xb − xa

)]

2–27 45 mm yr−1

2–29 ǫ̇xx = 10−7 yr−1, ǫ̇yy = 2.1 × 10−7 yr−1, ǫ̇ = 10−7 yr−1

3–1 180 MPa

3–2 42 MPa, 125 MPa

3–3 νσ1,−ν(1 + ν)σ1/E

3–4 (2ν2 + ν − 1)ρgy/E, (1 − 2ν)ρgy

3–7 x(L− x)M0/2D

3–8 x(3L2 − 4x2)Va/12D

3–9 q(L− x),−q(L− x)2/2

3–10 32.4 MPa, 0.27 MPa

3–11 −x3L× q/12D + 3x2L2q/16, 0 < x < L/2

(16x4 − 64x3L+ 96x2L2 − 8xL3 + L4)

× q/384D L/2 < x < L

3–12 (9Lx2 − 4x3)Va/12D 0 < x < L/2

(24Lx2 − 8x3 + 6L2x− L3)Va/48D L/2 < x < L

3–13 (x4 − 2x3L+ xL3)q/D, L/2, 3L2/4h2

3–14 0.405 m

3–15 (L4q0/π 4D) sin(πx/L)

3–17 (p− ρgh)(L2 − 12x2)/24,±L/2 3–18 (p− ρgh)(12x2 − L2)/4h2,±L/2

3–20b. 1.0 GPa

3–21 18.1 km

3–22 24 km

4–3 15 ppb, 60 ppb, 0.099%

4–4 6.3 × 10−12 W kg−1, 2.3 × 10−12 W kg−1, 2.6 × 10−11 W kg−1

9.6 × 10−10 W kg−1, 5.1 × 10−12 W kg−1

4–5 9.4 × 10−11 W kg−1

4–7 16 mW m−2, 10 km

4–8 q∗ = qm + ρhrH ∗

C.1 Answers to Selected Problems 823

4–9 137 km, 0.52 µW m−3

4–10

qs = qm + 1

2 ρHsb

T = T0 + 1

k

(

qmy + 1

2 ρHsby −

1

2 ρHsy

2 + 1

6

ρHsy 3

b

)

4–11 55.5 mW m−2, 608.5 ◦C

4–14 K

4–15 T0 + ρH

6k (a2 − b2) + Γb

4–16 T0 + qsa

k

(

3

2

a

b − 1

)

4–17 T0 + ρH

6k (a2 − r2) +

1

3

ρHb3

k

(

1

a − 1

r

)

, a > r > b

4–19 733 m

4–20 43.8 mW m−2

4–23 1.3 × 1012 yr, 1011, 3.6 × 1011, 1.2 × 1012, 1.9 × 1011

4–24 6.2 × 10−15 K s−1

4–25 9.3 × 10−15 K s−1

4–26 3.16 m, 9.94 m

4–27 950 m

4–28 1.14 m

4–29 5.2 × 10−3 K

4–30 π

4 + nπ, n = 1, 2, 3 . . .

4–31 3.64(κt)1/2

4–32 3 × 105 sec

4–34

T0 + βy − ∆T0erfc y

2 √

κ(t+ τ) ,−τ < t < 0

T0 + βy − ∆T0erfc y

2 √

κ(t+ τ)

+ ∆T0erfc y

2 √ κt , t > 0

4–37 0.32 m

4–38 26 Myr

4–39 65.9 Myr, 92 km

4–40 κ(Tm − T0)

(πκt)1/2erfcλ1 , eλ

2 1

824 Answers to Selected Problems

4–41

T0 + (Tm − T0)

erf λ3 erf

(

y

2 √ κt

)

, 0 < y < ys

Tυ − (Tυ − Tm)

erfc λ3 erfc

(

y − y5

2 √ κt

)

, y > ys

(Tm − T0)

erfc λ3 − (Tυ − Tm)

erfc λ3 =

√ πLλ3e

λ2 3

c

4–42 32 km

4–43 140 km

4–44 1.29 days

4–46 T0 + (T∞ − T0) exp

(

− Uξ

κ

)

4–47

T0 − T∞erf(α/2 √ κ)

1 − erf(α/2 √ κ)

+

[

T∞ − T0

1 − erf(α/2 √ κ)

]

erf y

2 √ κt

4–48 qm

ρ[L+ c(Tm − T0)] 4–49 16.5 MPa

4–50 6.4 km

4–52 500 m, 200 m

4–53 0.04 mm yr−1

4–54 χ(ρm − ρl)yL

(ρm − ρw) , 0.6

4–55 320 m

4–56 4.2 km

4–57 2–3 km

4–60 68 K

4–61 17,000 K

4–62 2.7 K

5–1 1.67 × 10−3

5–2 3.4621 × 10−3

5–3 (a) 6.25 × 107 J, (b) 1.12 × 104 m s−1, (c) 62,200 K

5–4 No

5–5 9.78031846 m s−2, 9.832177 m s−2, 9.7804629 m s−2,

9.832011 m s−2

5–7 ge + 2Gb/a3

5–8 4140 kg m−3, 12,410 kg m−3

5–9 4460 kg m−3

5–10 3.74 days

C.1 Answers to Selected Problems 825

5–11 21 hours

5–12 13 million tons

5–16 3.98 mm s−2

5–18 8.1 km

5–19 4.3 × 106 kg m−2

5–20 0.044978 mm s−2, −0.56184 mm s−2

5–22

πG

g ρcu

{

2h

[

H +

(

ρm − ρcl ρm − ρcu

)

bL

]

+ h2ρm

(ρm − ρcu)

}

5–23 14.4 km 6–2

1

2

dp

dx (2y − h) − µ

u0

h ,−µu0

h , 1

2

dp

dx (2y − h)

6–3 h

2 +

µ0u0

h(dp/dx) 6–4

ρgh2 sinα

3µ ,

(

3µQ

ρg sinα

)1/3

6–5 0.317 MPa

6–6 19.2 MPa

6–7 1.27 × 10−20

6–8 0.025 m, 0.84 m s−1, 4 × 104

6–9 (ρs − ρl)gd 3/12µ

6–10 − 1

dp

dx

(

y3

3 − hy2

2

)

+ u0y

2

2h − u0y,

−u0

[

y − y2

2h + 6

(

hL h

+ 1

2

)(

y3

3h2 − y2

2h

)]

6–12 0.61 km, 0.22 km, 4 × 1021 Pa s

6–13

u = − √

2U (

2 − π2

4

)

[

π

2 +

(

π

2 − 2

)

tan−1 y

x

− (

πx

2 +

[

2 − π

2

]

y

)(

x

x2 + y2

)]

υ = − √

2U (

2 − π2

4

)

[

π

2 tan−1 y

x − (

πx

2 +

[

2 − π

2

]

y

)(

y

x2 + y2

)]

826 Answers to Selected Problems

u = U

(

9π2

4 − 2

)

× {(

9π2

4 − 2

)

+ π(2 √

2 − 3π)

− [√

2

(

2 + 3π

2

)

− 2

(

1 + 3π

2

)]

tan−1 x

y

− [(

2 − √

2 3π

2

)

x

+

(√ 2

[

2 + 3π

2

]

− 2

[

1 + 3π

2

])

y

]

× x

x2 + y2

}

υ = U

(

9π2

4 − 2

)

× {(

2 − √

2 3π

2

)

π +

(

2 − √

2 3π

2

)

tan−1 y

x

− [(

2 − √

2 3π

2

)

x

+

(√ 2

(

2 + 3π

2

)

− 2

[

1 + 3π

2

])

y

]

x

x2 + y2

}

6–15 4.6 × 1018 Pa s

6–16 195,000 yr

6–20 3.3 × 1018 Pa s

6–21 8.46 × 1020 Pa s

6–26

T = C1x+ C2 + C1

4κµ

(

1

6 y4 − 1

4 d2y2 +

5

96 d4 )

q = C1kd

3

24κµ , h =

70

17

k

d ,Nu =

70

17

6–29 2.4 × 105, 2.9 × 109, 4.2 × 107, 1.2 × 1064

6–30 1.16 b, 7.85 b

6–33 14.4 km

6–35 0.32 6–38

T0 + µu2

0

kh2

(

hy − 1

2 y2 )

, µu2

0

h , µu2

0

2k

C.1 Answers to Selected Problems 827

7–1 547 kJ mole−1

7–3 1.6 × 108 Pa

7–4 1.24 × 103 J kg−1 K−1

7–11 −72 bars

7–13 137 MPa, 860 K

7–21 σ∗, σ∗/ √

6

7–22 σ0/[(1 − ν)2 + 1]1/2, (1 − ν2)σ0/E[(1 − ν)2 + ν]1/2

7–23 2τ, √

3τ 7–24

a2σ0

2

(

1 − c2

3a2

)

, σ0a

2

3 , σ0a

2

2

Index

absolute temperature, 298 time scale, 411

acceleration, centrifugal, 28, 200 fluid element, 235 gravity, 7, 84, 195, 200, 235

reference, 204 accretional plate boundaries, 1, 6, 339

seismicity, 339 accretionary prism, 10 accumulation, strain, 95, 99, 364, 366 activation energy, 304

mantle, 320 volume, 304

active continental margin, 39 adiabat, mantle, 185 adiabatic compressibility, 185, 187

compressional heating, 187 flow, 187 temperature gradient, 185

admittance, 216 advection of heat, 169, 262, 391

porous medium, 391 age determination, 410–411

continents, 410, 420 earth, 153, 156, 165, 414 meteorites, 410, 414 moon, 56, 410 seafloor, 32, 159

Airy compensation, 219 Akna Montes, 66 Alae, 68, 164 albedo, 68 albite, 7 allochthonous thrust sheet, 349 alluvial fan, 191 Alps, 20 Altiplano, 20 Amalthea, 67 Amontion’s law, 342

wet fault, 343 Anatolian fault, North, 359

Anderson, E. M., 346 theory of faulting, 343

angle, fault dip, 339, 343 subduction, 10, 242

angular fold, 252 momentum, 58 velocities, 32

anharmonicity, 298 anisotropic thermal conductivity, 147 anomalies, geoid, 203, 216

gravity, 195, 207 Bouguer, 211–212 free-air, 212 sphere, 208

isostatic, 216 magnetic, 5, 23, 28 potential, 204

anorthite, 7 answers to problems, 437 anticline, 45, 124 anticlinoria, 45, 249 Aphrodite Terra, 66 Apollo project, 56, 410 Appalachian basin, 130

mountains, 45–46, 348 thrust sheet, 348

aquifer, 134, 226, 233 artesian, 233 confined, 376 heating, 264 unconfined, 378

arc, island, 2, 10 volcanism, 12, 184

Archean, 22 Archimedes’ principle, 74, 257 area, continents, 19, 135

oceans, 135 argon, 411–412, 423 Argyre basin, 60 arm, failed, 38

moment, 114

Index 829

Arsia Mons, 60 Artemis, 67 artesian flow, 233, 377 Ascension, 426 Ascraeus Mons, 60 aseismic creep, 52, 87, 257

slip, 52 aspect ratio of convection cells, 278

mantle, 324 asthenosphere, 1, 54, 226

counterflow, 226–227, 230 Atla, 66 Atlantic Ocean, 38 atomic forces, 293 atoms, diffusion, 285

impurity, 301 interstitial, 301 kinetic energy, 297 mass, 297 potential energy, 297 spacing, 293 volume, 294

aulacogen, 38 Australs, 426 avalanche, mantle, 189 Avogadro’s number, 296, 298 axis, principal strain, 93

principal stress, 82 rotational, 24, 197 transformation of strain, 91 transformation of stress, 80

axisymmetric plume in porous medium, 399

azimuth, magnetic, 23–24 Azores, 417, 427 back arc spreading, 13 Bacon, Francis, 3 balance, force, 77, 228, 235

moment, 116 barrier, potential, 300 basal drag, 231

heating, 136 basalt, 7

flood, 17, 261 liquidus, 140 lunar, 56–57 ocean island, 410, 424 oceanic, 3, 410 solidus, 140

basement, 21, 76 basin, Appalachian, 130

foreland, 130 impact, 56 Los Angeles, 180 marginal, 13 Michigan, 58, 216 ringed, 58 sedimentary, 5, 42, 75, 129, 179

Basin and Range province, 48, 54 bathymetry, 6, 174 beach terraces, elevated, 4, 55, 240 bedding planes, 139 belt, thrust, 42 benchmark, 95 bending, 113–114

cylindrical, 113–114 earth’s lithosphere, 121 elastic, 114 elastic-plastic, 335 island chains, 124 moment, 113, 127, 335–336

critical, 252, 335 maximum, 335

ocean trenches, 5, 9, 105, 127, 336 plastic, 9, 252, 335 plates, 112, 116 sedimentary basins, 5, 129 under periodic load, 122 viscous, 252

Beni Bousera, 268 Benioff zone, 1, 11 Bermuda Swell, 221 Beta Regio, 66 biharmonic equation, 237 binary planet, 58 binding energy, 293 Biot, M., 252

theory of folding, 252 blobs, mantle, 417 block faulting, 9 blocking temperature, 23 body force, 73, 235

descending lithosphere, 191, 280 gravitational, 73, 195, 235, 280 wave magnitude, 353

boiling hot springs, 48, 226, 391 Boltzmann’s constant, 298 bombardment, terminal, 56 Bouguer gravity anomaly, 212

formula, 210 boundary condition, free surface, 229, 269

no slip, 229, 269 boundary layer, 54, 155, 189, 272, 397

equations for plumes, 397 stability, 272 structure of thermal convection, 274 theory, 272, 274 thermal, 54, 155, 189, 272, 274

thickness, 155, 272 Boussinesq approximation, 266

equation, 381 Bouvet, 427 box model, 415 breakdown pressure, 86 breakout, wellbore, 87 Brevard fault, 349

830 Index

Brinkman number, 316 brittle crust, 42, 339, 347

deformation, 42, 105, 292, 339 fracture, 346

Brunhes epoch, 26 buckling, 118, 250

force, 119, 124, 250 lithospheric, 123 wavelength, 119, 124

bulge, equatorial, 195, 197 flexural, 341 peripheral, 124 rotational, 195, 197

bulk modulus, 112, 294 silicate earth, 410

buoyancy flux, 260 force, 1, 54, 226, 257, 260, 266, 274, 392

Burgers circuit, 308 vector, 308

buried load, 216 burnout, 407 cake, marble, 286 Callisto, 55–56, 67, 70 Caloris basin, 58 Cambrian period, 22 Cameroon Line, 47 capture, lunar, 58 carbonaceous chondrite, 9, 65 Carboniferous period, 22 Carolina slate belt, 227, 349 cell, aspect ratio, 271, 278, 395 cellular convection, 267, 274, 393 Cenozoic era, 22 center of mass, 199 centrifugal acceleration, 28, 200 chamber, magma, 7, 166 channel flow, 226, 312, 314

frictional heating, 314 non-Newtonian, 312 temperature dependent viscosity, 314

chaotic terrain, 62 charge, electronic, 295 chemical geodynamics, 410

remanent magnetism, 23 chevron fold, 252 chondritic meteorite, 9, 138, 419

uniform reservoir, 419 circuit, Burgers, 308 circular frequency, 150 circulation, hydrothermal, 48, 134, 159, 391,

416 Clapeyron curve, 191, 281, 403, 408 climb, dislocation, 309 Coble creep, 300, 307 coefficient, diffusion, 302–303

drag, 257 friction, 79, 342, 346, 351

dynamic, 342, 351

internal, 346 static, 342

heat transfer, 263 thermal conductivity, 133 thermal expansion, linear, 172, 299

volumetric, 172, 266, 299 cohesive energy, 293 colatitude, 196

magnetic, 24 collision, continental, 40–41, 46, 79, 339 column, stratigraphic, 20 compaction of sediments, 328 comparative planetology, 55 compensation, 123, 195, 213

Airy, 219 degree, 123, 174 depth, 174, 220 flexure, 214 Pratt, 220 thermal, 221

competent rocks, 250 complementary error function, 155 component, velocity, 234 composition ratio, 410–411 compositional boundary, 324 compressibility, 73, 112, 293

adiabatic, 185, 187 isothermal, 172

compression, tectonic, 249, 339 triaxial, 110 uniaxial, 107

compressional heating, 187 compressive strain, 339

stress, 52, 78 condition, free-surface, 229, 269

no-slip, 228, 269 conductive heat transfer, 132, 262, 266

cylindrical, 150 moving medium, 168 spherical, 144, 150 three-dimensional, 146, 260 time-dependent, 149–150, 169 two-dimensional, 146

conductivity, hydraulic, 375 thermal, 133, 266

anisotropic, 147 measurement, 134, 157

conduit, volcanic, 226 confined aquifer, 376 conformable lead deposits, 415 conjugate faults, 341 conservation, energy, 138, 226, 297

laws, 226 mass, 226, 230, 235 momentum, 226, 390 porous medium, 381, 385, 390, 393

conservative field, 201 constants, physical, 433

Index 831

constitutive law, 226 contact metamorphism, 171 continental collision, 40–41, 46, 79, 339

crust, 2, 19–20, 74–75, 410, 415 age, 420 formation, 22, 410, 416 thickness, 3, 19, 74

drift, 3–5, 22, 226 fit, 3, 40 geotherm, 141, 160, 187 heat flow, 135, 142, 160

production, 141 lithosphere, 141, 160, 187, 424

thickness, 188, 222 margin, 3, 39

active, 39 passive, 39

reconstruction, 40 rifts, 38, 340 shields, 21 splitting, 38

continents, 2, 17, 40 age, 410, 420 area, 19, 135 thermal subsidence of, 181

continuity equation, 235 porous medium, 381, 386, 400

control volume, 231 convection, cellular, 267, 274, 393

heat transfer, 132, 266 homogenization, 286 mantle, 4, 136, 189, 226, 285

aspect ratio, 323 layered, 189 lower, 189, 324 secondary, 177 upper, 189, 324 whole, 189

parameterized, 279 porous layer, thermal, 393 secondary, 177 thermal, 4, 54, 226, 266–267, 272, 274

finite amplitude, 272, 274 stability analysis, 267, 272

two-phase, 405 convergent plate boundaries, 1, 9, 39, 285, 415 conversion factors, 429 cooling, earth, 4, 54, 136, 325

half space, 153, 175, 183 instantaneous, 153 oceanic lithosphere, 157 plate, 161, 176, 222 secular, 4, 54, 136, 325

coordination number, 294 core, earth,s, 26, 189, 415

inner, 27, 415 lunar, 57 Mercury, 58

outer, 26, 189, 415 corner flow, 242 coronae, 67 coseismic strain, 94

surface displacement, 363 cosines, law of, 36, 197 Couette flow, 229, 287, 313

frictional heating, 283 temperature dependent viscosity, 311, 312

Coulomb energy, 293, 295 forces, 293

Coulomb-Navier criterion, 346 counterflow, 405

asthenosphere, 226–227, 230 of steam and water, 405

country rock, 166 covalent bonds, 296 Crater Lake, 53 crater palimpsests, 70 craters, planetary, 55 creep, aseismic, 52, 87, 355

Coble, 300, 307 diffusion, 55, 292, 300, 306 dislocation, 55, 292, 307 fault, 341, 361, 368 grain boundary, 300, 307 Herring-Nabarro, 306 olivine, 320 power law, 311 pressure-solution, 292, 329 solid-state, 4, 55, 369

Cretaceous period, 22 critical bending moment, 252, 335

buckling force, 119, 124, 250 Rayleigh number, 270, 273, 394 wavelength for buckling, 119, 124

crust, brittle, 42, 339, 347 continental, 2, 19–20, 74–75, 410, 415

age, 420 formation, 22, 410, 416 thickness, 3, 19, 74

lunar, 57 oceanic, 3, 415

thickness, 3 stress in, 85

crustal extension, 54 rheology, 327 roots, 4 shortening, 42, 45 stretching, 75, 182 thickening, 42, 45 thinning, 75, 182

crystalline lattice, 293 structure, 293

Culling model, 191 Curie temperature, 22 curvature, radius of, 114 cyclic strain damping, 367

832 Index

cylindrical bending, 113–114 heat transfer, 150 pipe, 231, 260

dam, porous, 379 damping, cyclic strain, 367 Danu Montes, 66 Darcy, H., 374

law, 374 velocity, 374

dating, meteorites, 410, 414 radiometric, 410

daughter isotope, 411 decay constant, 411

radioactive, 410–411 Deccan flood basalts, 17, 261 declination, magnetic, 23 décollement, 41, 350 deep sea drilling project, 32 defect, point, 301 deflection, lithosphere, 106, 121

Moho, 215 deformation, brittle, 42, 105, 292, 339

ductile, 42, 105, 292 elastic, 105, 293 map, 321 plastic, 105, 334

degree of compensation, 123, 174 degrees of freedom, 297 Deimos, 64 delamination, 3, 19, 22, 410, 415, 424 delta, river, 192 density, 7, 73

anomaly, 207 dipole moment of, 217 mantle, 185, 436

depleted mantle, 9, 410 deposition of sediments, 191 depositional remanent magnetism, 23 deposits, mineral, 48, 374 depth, compensation, 174, 220

dependence of heat production, 141 ocean, 174 skin, 152

descending lithosphere, 9, 12, 190–191 body forces, 191, 280 thermal structure, 190

deviatoric strain, 94 stress, 77, 84

normal, 84 principal, 84

Devonian period, 22 dextral strike-slip fault, 49, 52 diamagnetic, 22 diamonds, 269 diapirism, 226, 244, 259 differentiation, 22 diffusion, 302, 367

atom, 285

coefficient, 302–303 creep, 55, 292, 300, 306

viscosity, 306 grain boundary, 300, 306 heat, 154 ions, 55 stress, 302, 367 vacancy, 55, 302

diffusivity, thermal, 149, 227 dike, 8, 166 dilatation, 88, 107, 112 dimensionless variables, 232 diopside, 7 dip angle of faults, 339, 343

slip faults, 341 subducted lithosphere, 10, 242

dipole, magnetic, 23–24 moment, 23

density, 217 dip-slip faults, 341 discharge formula, Dupuit-Fuchheimer, 379 dislocation, 307, 364

climb, 309 creep, 55, 292, 307

viscosity, 309 edge, 308 screw, 308 slip, 309

displacement, 88 earthquake, 51, 339, 352, 364 fault, 51, 339, 342, 350, 352, 363

dissipation, tidal, 58, 69 viscous, 262, 283, 315

distance, felt, 354 surface, 34

distribution, Maxwell-Boltzmann, 300 plate, 1 seismicity, 51 volcanism, 46

diurnal temperature changes, 150, 152 domes, salt, 195, 208, 226, 244, 249 downthrust blocks, 42 drag, 256

basal, 231 coefficient, 257 lithosphere, 231 pressure, 256 viscous, 257

drawdown, well, 377, 380 drift, continental, 3–5, 22, 226 drilling project, deep sea, 32 driving forces, 280

mechanisms, 4, 54 drop, stress, 352 dry steam, 405 ductile behavior, 42, 105, 292 Dulong and Petit, law of, 298 Dupuit approximation, 378

Index 833

Dupuit-Fuchheimer discharge formula, 379 du Toit, A., 3 dynamic friction, 342, 351

viscosity, 227 dynamo, 26 Earth, age, 153, 156, 165, 414

bulk silicate, 410 cooling, 4, 54, 136, 324 fission, 58 properties, 433 rotation, 3, 197

earthquake, displacements, 51, 339, 352, 363 energy, 354 Erzincan, 359 felt distance, 354

intensity, 353 Hector mine, 359 Kern County, 358 Landers, 103, 359, 364 Loma Prieta, 358 magnitude, 353

body wave, 353 moment, 354 surface wave, 353

moment, 354 Northridge, 359 Parkfield, 357 San Fernando, 359, 363 San Francisco, 54, 356, 363 Tangshan, 42

earthquakes, 1, 51, 339, 350 distribution, 51 frequency of occurrence, 355 great, 339, 357, 368 intraplate, 54 New Madrid, 54 subduction zone, 10, 339

Earth’s core, 26, 189, 415 rotation, 3, 197

East African Rift, 38, 47 Pacific Rise, 30

Easter Island, 426 eccentricity, 202 Eckert number, 284 eclogite, 269 eddies, 232 edge dislocation, 308 effective stress, 343

viscosity, 323 eigenvalue, 119, 124 Einstein frequency, 297

period, 297 Eistla, 66 Eithinoha, 67 elastic bending, 114

flexure at island chains, 113–114 ocean trenches, 5, 9, 105 sedimentary basins, 5, 129

limit, 335 lithosphere, 6, 106, 127, 331

thickness, 126, 128, 130, 332 material, 105, 293 perfectly plastic, 9, 292, 332 rebound, 339, 342, 350 wave energy, 355

elasticity, linear, 106, 293 thermal, 173

electronic charge, 295 elevated beach terraces, 55, 240 elevation correction, 212

phase change, 191, 281 ellipsoid of revolution, 202, 405 ellipticity, 202 embedded plate, 116 endothermic phase change, 188 energy, activation, 304

atomic kinetic, 297 atomic potential, 297 balance, 266 binding, 293 cohesive, 293 conservation, 138, 226, 297

porous medium, 390, 393 Coulomb, 293, 295 earthquake, 354 equation, 268 equipartition of, 297 gravitational potential, 201 internal, 296, 298 lattice, 292 radioactive decay, 136

enrichment factor, 418 enstatite, 8 enthalpy, 407 entropy, 186, 303 envelope, strength, 347 Eocene period, 22 episodic subduction, 274 equation, biharmonic, 237

Boussinesq, 381 continuity, 235 energy, 268 force balance, 228 heat, 267 Laplace’s, 147, 214, 362 mass conservation, 226, 230, 235 motion, 228

equator, magnetic, 5, 23–24 equatorial bulge, 195, 197

moment of inertia, 206 radius, 200

equilibrium, hydrostatic, 4, 74, 123, 195, 213, 215

equipartition of energy, 297 equipotential, gravity, 202 erf, 155

834 Index

erfc, 155 erosion, 20, 191

stress due to, 52, 109, 174 temperature due to, 156, 168

error function, 155 complementary, 155

Erzincan earthquake, 359 Euler’s theorem, 32 Europa, 56, 67, 69 exothermic phase change, 188 expansion, 172, 299

linear coefficient of thermal, 172, 298 volumetric coefficient of thermal, 172, 266

exponential heat source distribution, 141 integral, 157, 327, 369

extension, 54 extensional strain, 340 factor, conversion, 429

frequency, 303 friction, 232 integrating, 264

failed arm, 38 failure, lithospheric, 13 fan, alluvial, 191 Farallon plate, 39 fault, 1, 51, 292, 339

Brevard, 349 conjugate, 341 creep, 341, 361, 368 cyclic strain damping, 367 dip slip, 341 displacement, 51, 339, 342, 350, 352, 363 friction, 341 frictional heating, 184, 190 gouge, 51, 339, 343 left-lateral, 52, 341 locked, 341, 350 normal, 38, 52, 339–340 North Anatolian, 359 reverse, 339 right-lateral, 52, 341 rupture, 339 San Andreas, 14, 35, 47, 51, 53, 86, 94–95,

97, 112, 339, 355 strain accumulation, 364, 366

stress drop, 352 strike-slip, 52, 339, 341, 361 thrust, 42, 52, 339, 346 transform, 13, 177, 339 wet, 343

faulting, Anderson theory of, 343 block, 9

faults, conjugate, 341 dip angle, 339, 343

friction on, 341 water pressure, 343

fayalite, 8 felt distance, 354

intensity, 353 Fennoscandia, 241 ferrimagnetic, 22 ferromagnetic, 22 fiber stress, 113 Fick’s law, 302 field, conservative, 201

gravity, 195 magnetic, 5, 23

finite amplitude thermal convection, 272, 274 fission of earth, 58 fit of continents, 3, 40 flattening, polar, 195, 202

earth, 206 Mars, 206 moon, 206 rotational, 200

flexural bulge, 339 parameter, 125 rigidity, 115 wavelength, 122

flexure, 105, 112 compensation due to, 214 island chains, 5, 124 ocean trenches, 5, 9, 105, 127, 336

plastic, 336 under periodic load, 122 sedimentary basins, 5, 129

flood basalts, 17, 261 flow, adiabatic, 187

aquifer, 233, 378 artesian, 233, 377 asthenosphere, 226–227, 230 channel, 226, 310, 312

non-Newtonian, 310 corner, 242 Couette, 229, 287, 312 heat, 46, 48, 133, 135 laminar, 232 pipe, 231, 260 plug, 314 Poiseuille, 232 porous media, 374, 377, 391 rate, volumetric, 232, 238 sphere, 255 stagnation point, 268 Stokes, 254, 259 turbulent, 232, 257 unsteady, 257

fluid, 226 incompressible, 235 injection, 343 linear, 226 mechanics, 226 Newtonian, 55, 226–227, 292 non-Newtonian, 55, 292, 311 pressure, 237

fluidized bed, 375

Index 835

flux, buoyancy, 260 heat, 46, 133 material, 230 vacancy, 302

fold, angular, 252 chevron, 252 recumbent, 46 wavelength, 252

folding, 45, 226, 249, 292 Biot theory, 252

foot wall, 341 force balance, 77, 228, 235

body, 73, 191, 235, 280 buckling, 119, 124, 250 buoyancy, 1, 54, 226, 257, 260, 266, 274, 392 Coulomb, 293 gravitational, 73, 195, 235, 280 inertial, 235 interatomic, 293 pressure, 228 surface, 73 tectonic, 78 viscous, 235

forces, atomic, 293 body, 73, 235 driving, 280 frictional, 231 gravity, 73, 195, 235, 280 inertial, 235 pressure, 228 ridge push, 224, 281 suction, 243 surface, 73 tidal, 3 topography, 223

geoid, 223 viscous, 235

forebulge, 125 foreland basins, 130 formation, permeable, 233 forsterite, 8

specific heat, 298 fossil magnetism, 22 foundering, lithospheric, 9 Fourrier’s law, 132, 147

cylindrical geometry, 150 spherical geometry, 150 three dimensions, 146 two dimensions, 146

frictional heating, 262 fractionation, 8

factor, 418 fracture, 105, 292, 339

brittle, 346 hydro, 86, 259 magma, 259 propagation of, 226, 259 zone, 14, 105, 177

bathymetric offset, 177 free-air correction, 212

gravity anomaly, 212 freedom, degrees of, 297 free-slip condition, 229, 269 free-surface condition, 229, 269 frequency, 150

circular, 150 Einstein, 297 factor, 303

Freyja Mons, 66 friction, 79, 342, 351

coefficient, 79, 342, 351 dynamic, 342, 351 static, 342

factor, 232 fault, 341 force, 231 internal, 346

frictional heating, 13, 184, 190, 262, 267, 283, 315, 369

front, seepage, 379 Fuji, Mount 389 function, complementary error, 155

error, 155 stream, 237

fusion, latent heat of, 162 gabbro, 8 Galapagos Islands, 47, 426

spreading center, 49, 396 galena, 415 Galilean satellites, 55, 67, 70 Ganymede, 55, 67, 70 gas constant, universal, 298 gases, noble, 411, 423

rare, 411, 423 gauge, strain, 86 geochemical reservoir, 285, 410, 415 geochron, 415 geochronology, 20, 410–411 geodesy, 95 geodetic network, 96

reference system, 205 geodolite, 98 geodynamics, chemical, 410 geoid, 201–202, 223

anomaly, 203, 216 isostatic, 216

height, 217 map of, 217

reference, 202–203 sea floor, 222 topography ratio, 221

geological time scale, 20, 410–411 geometrical form of volcanoes, 387 geotherm, 140, 187–188, 324

continental, 141, 160, 187 mantle, 185, 187–188, 324

836 Index

oceanic, 159, 187 geothermal gradient, 133

reservoirs, 226, 405 geysers, 48, 226, 405 Geysers geothermal field, 405 giant impact, 58 glacial rebound, 4, 55, 203, 238, 319 glaciation, 3

temperature effect of, 152, 156 global positioning system, 100, 366 Glomar Challenger, 32 Gondwanaland, 3, 40 Gordon, R. B., 4 gouge, fault, 51, 339, 343 Gough, 417, 426 graben, 38 gradient, adiabatic, 185

geothermal, 133 pressure, 227

grain boundary creep, 300, 307 diffusion, 300, 306

granite, 8 gravimeter, 212 gravitation, Newton’s law of, 195 gravitational acceleration, 7, 84, 195, 200, 235

constant, universal, 85, 196 equipotential surface, 201–202 force, 73, 195, 235, 280 instability, 1, 226, 245 potential, 201

anomaly, 204 energy, 201 sliding, 6, 52, 281, 347

gravity, acceleration of, 7, 84, 195, 200, 235 anomalies, 195, 207

Bouguer, 211–212 continuation, 214 free-air, 212 horizontal cylinder, 208 line, 209 lunar, 211 salt dome, 208 sphere, 208 vertical cylinder, 211

correction, elevation, 212 free-air, 212 latitude, 212 terrain, 212

data, reduction of, 212 equipotential, 202 field, lunar, 58, 211

Venus, 65–66 formula, Bouguer, 210 periodic mass distribution, 213 potential, 201 reference, acceleration of, 204 topographic effect, 211

great earthquakes, 339, 357, 368

Greenland, 410, 412 ground ice, Mars, 61 groundwater, 226, 405

flow, 376 mound, 384

groved terrain, 70 growth rate, 248, 269 Gruntfest number, 316 Guadalupe, 426 guide, stress, 5, 9 Gulf of Aden, 38 half-life, 411 half space cooling model, 153, 175, 183 hanging wall, 339 harmonic motion, 297 harzburgite, 8 Haskell, N. A., 4 Hawaiian-Emperor chain, 15, 423 Hawaiian Islands, 15, 46, 410, 417, 423, 426

deep, 124 ridge, 124, 390 swell, 16, 221, 260

head, hydraulic, 228, 230, 375 plume, 17, 259 pressure, 281

heat advection, 169, 262, 391 conduction, 132, 262, 266

cylindrical, 150 moving medium, 168 one-dimensional steady, 138 one-dimensional unsteady, 149–150, 169 spherical, 144, 150 three-dimensional, 146, 260 two-dimensional, 146

equation, 267 flow, 46, 48, 133, 135

continental, 135, 142, 160 convective, 132, 266 cylindrical, 150 effect of erosion, 156, 168 effect of glaciation, 152, 156 effect of sedimentation, 168 lunar, 57, 144, 146 mantle, 143, 160 measurement, 133 oceanic, 135, 159, 161 reduced, 143 sedimentary basins, 179 spherical, 144 surface, 48, 133, 135–136, 159

flux, plume, 260 generation, 54, 136, 141, 410

depth dependence, 141 mantle, 136–137 meteorites, 138

latent, 162, 407 pipe, 405 specific, 172, 187, 298

Index 837

transfer, 132 coefficient, 263 conductive, 132, 262, 266 convective, 132, 266 radiative, 132

heating, adiabatic compressional, 187 aquifer, 264 basal, 136 compressional, 187 fault, 184, 190 frictional, 13, 184, 190, 262, 267, 283, 317,

369 half space, 153, 175, 183 instantaneous, 153 radioactive, 4, 54, 136, 410

Hector Mine earthquake, 359 helium, 411, 423 Hellas basin, 60 hematite, 22 Herring-Nabarro creep, 306 Hess, H., 3 high temperature peridotite, 288 highlands, lunar, 56 Himalayas, 20, 41 hinge, plastic, 9, 336 Holmes, A., 4, 411 Holmes-Houtermans model, 414 Holocene, 22 homogenization, convective, 286 homologous temperature, 304 Hooke’s law, 107 hot branch, 318

springs, 47–48, 226, 264–265, 391 hotspot, 14, 46–47, 261, 415, 424

distribution, 16, 47, 260 swell, 16, 47, 221, 260 track, 15, 261

Hudson Bay, 241 hydraulic conductivity, 375

head, 228, 230, 375 hydrofracturing, 86, 259 hydrostatic equation, 7

equilibrium, 4, 74, 123, 195, 213, 215 head, 228, 230, 375 pressure, 7, 234, 237 stress, 84

hydrothermal circulations, 48, 134, 159, 391, 416

Iapetus, 348 ice, formation of, 164

Galilean satellites, 70 load, 55, 238 sheet, 55, 349

Iceland, 15, 417, 426 Imbrium basin, 57 impact basins, 56

cratering, 55 giant, 58

impurity atoms, 301 inclination, magnetic, 23 incompatible elements, 137, 285, 410 incompetent rock, 250 incompressible fluid, 235

material, 107 inertia, moment of, 199, 205–206, 221

equatorial, 206 Mars, 62, 206 moon, 57, 199, 205–206 polar, 206 sphere, 205 spheroid, 206 thermal, 267

inertial force, 235 injection, fluid, 343 inner core, 27, 415 instability, gravitational, 1, 226, 245

Rayleigh, 270, 273, 394 Rayleigh-Taylor, 245, 324

instantaneous cooling, 153 heating, 153 shut-in pressure, 86

interferometry, radar, 103, 364 very long baseline, 99, 366

integrating factor, 264 intensity, felt, 353 interatomic force, 293 intermediate principal stress, 84 internal energy, 296, 298

friction, 346 interstitial atoms, 301 intraplate earthquakes, 54

volcanism, 46 intrusion, cooling, 48

deformation due to, 119 Io, 55–56, 67

heat flow, 69 volcanism, 68

ionic bonding, 294 irreversible process, 187, 303 isentropic process, 186 Ishtar Terra, 66 island arc, 2, 10

angle of subduction, 10, 242 chains, 15

bending, 124 volcanism, 12, 184

isochron, 412, 414 whole rock, 412

isostasy, 74, 174, 213 Airy, 219 Pratt, 220 thermal, 221

isostatic geoid anomaly, 216 isotherm, 5 isothermal compressibility, 172 isotope ratio, 410–411

838 Index

normalized, 418 isotopes, daughter, 411

parent, 411 radioactive, 4, 410–411 reference, 411

isotropic, 105 strain, 94 stress, 84, 112

J2, 200 earth, 206 Mars, 206 moon, 206

Jeffreys, H., 4 joints, 292 jump frequency, 301 Jurassic period, 22 Kelvin, Lord, 153, 156, 165

material, 330 Kerguelen, 417, 426 Kern County earthquake, 358 Kilauea Iki, 164 kimberlite, 8 kinematic viscosity, 227

mixing, 286 kinetic energy, atomic, 297 laccolith, 119 lakes, lava, 164 Lakshmi Planum, 66 Lamé parameters, 106 laminar flow, 232 Landers earthquake, 103, 359, 364 Laplace’s equation, 147, 214, 363

solution, 170, 276 Laplacian operator, 237 Lardarello geothermal field, 405 latent heat of fusion, 162

of vaporization, 407 latitude, 199

correction, 212 magnetic, 23–24

Latona, 67 lattice energy, 292

sites, 296 spacing, 293 structure, 293

Laurasia, 3, 40 lava lakes, 164 law of cosines, 36, 197

of Dulong and Petit, 298 of sines, 36

layer stretching, 287 layered mantle convection, 189 lead, 412–413

deposits, 415 isochron, 412

left lateral strike slip fault, 52, 341 Lherz, 289 lherzolite, 288

limit, elastic, 335 line, volcanic, 1, 13, 46 linear coefficient of thermal expansion, 172,

299 elasticity, 106, 293 fluid, 226

linearized stability analysis, 267–268 liquidus, basalt, 140 list of symbols, 430 lithosphere, 1, 5

asthenosphere interaction, 367 bending, 5, 105, 121 continental, 141, 160, 187, 424

thickness, 188, 222 deflection, 106, 121 descending, 9, 12, 190–191 drag on, 231 elastic, 6, 106, 127, 331

thickness, 126, 128, 130, 332 oceanic, 9, 157, 424

half-space cooling model, 157 plate cooling model, 161 thickness, 5, 158

thermal, 5, 6 lithospheric buckling, 123

failure, 13 flexure, 105, 112

compensation due to, 214 due to periodic loading, 122 island chains, 5, 124 ocean trenches, 5, 9, 105, 127, 336 sedimentary basins, 5, 129

foundering, 9 stress, 49, 52, 281

lithostatic pressure, 74, 77, 84, 234, 350 load, buried, 216

ice, 55, 238 island, 124 sediment, 129

lobate ejecta flow, 62 scarps, 59

locked fault, 341, 350 Loma Prieta earthquake, 358 Los Angeles basin, 180 low velocity zone, 227

viscosity zone, 227 lower mantle, 12, 324, 415

reservoir, 410 lunar basalt, 56–57

capture, 58 core, 57 crust, 57 gravity field, 58, 211 heat flow, 57, 144, 146 highlands, 56 magma ocean, 56, 165 magnetic field, 57 maria, 56

Index 839

mascons, 58, 211 moment of inertia, 57, 206 orbit, 58 origin, 58 samples, 56 temperature, 145

MacCullagh’s formula, 200, 205 MacDonald, 427 Madelung constant, 295 magma, 7, 226

body, 48 chamber, 7, 166 fracture, 259 migration, 402

porous flow model, 402 ocean, 56, 165 solidification, 162 velocity, 164, 258, 402 viscosity, 258 volume fraction, 402

magnesiowüstite, 186, 188, 191 magnetic anomalies, 5, 28

azimuth, 23 colatitude, 23 declination, 23 dipole, 23 equator, 24 field, 5, 23

Mars, 63 Mercury, 59 moon, 57 remanent, 5, 22 Venus, 65

inclination, 23 latitude, 23–24 moment, 23–25 poles, 5, 24–25 reversal, 5, 26

magnetite, 22 magnetization, chemical remanent, 23

depositional remanent, 23 natural remanent, 22 permanent, 22 thermoremanent, 23

magnitude, earthquake, 353 body wave, 353 moment, 354 surface wave, 353

Makaopuhi, 164 mantle, 3, 415

activation energy, 304 volume, 304

adiabat, 185 avalanche, 189 composition, 8, 281 convection, 4, 136, 189, 226, 285

aspect ratio, 324 layered, 189

lower, 189, 324 upper, 189, 324 whole, 189

density, 185, 436 depleted, 9, 410 geotherm, 185, 187–188, 324 heat flow, 143, 160 lower, 12, 324, 415 mixing, 285–286 overturn, 189 phase change, 186 plume, 14, 55, 177, 259, 399, 410, 417, 424 pressure, 84, 186, 436 properties, 436 recycling, 20, 285 reservoir, 410 rheology, 318, 323 solidus, 188, 324 strain rate, 319 tomography, 12 upper, 12, 324, 415 viscosity, 4, 55, 240

map, deformation, 321 marble cake, 286 margin, continental, 3, 39

active, 39 passive, 39

marginal basins, 13 maria, lunar, 56 Mariana trench, 128

bathymetric profile, 128 Marineris, Valles, 61 Marquesas, 427 Mars, 55, 59, 144

canyons, 61 channels, 61 chaotic terrains, 62 core, 63 density, 62 dune field, 62 dust storms, 62 ground ice, 61 hemispheric asymmetry, 60 magnetic field, 63 moment of inertia, 62, 206 satellites, 64 volcanism, 60

mascons, lunar, 58, 211 mass, atomic, 297

center of, 199 conservation, 226, 230, 235

porous media, 390 material, elastic, 105, 293

flux, 230 incompressible, 107 Kelvin, 330 Maxwell, 330 plastic, 9, 105, 292, 333–335

840 Index

viscoelastic, 292, 329 Matthews, D., 5 Matuyama epoch, 26 maximum bending moment, 335

principal stress, 84 shear stress, 83

criterion, 334 Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, 300 Maxwell material, 330

Montes, 66 measurements, gravity, 212

heat flow, 133 strain, 94 stress, 85 thermal conductivity, 134, 157

mechanics, fluid, 226 melt fraction, 137, 404

temperature, 304 melting, 7

pressure release, 6, 402 membrane stress, 52 Mercury, 55, 58

core, 58 density, 58 intercrater plains, 59 lobate scarps, 59 magnetic field, 59

Mesozoic era, 22 metamorphism, 171

contact, 171 meteorites, age, 410, 414

carbonaceous chondrite, 65 chondritic, 9, 138, 419 flux, 56

Michigan basin, 58, 216 Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 30 mid-ocean ridge basalt, 410 migration, magma, 402 mineral deposits, 48, 374 minimum principal stress, 84 Miocene period, 22 mixing, mantle, 285–286

diffusive, 285 kinematic, 286

modulus, bulk, 112 rigidity, 106 Young’s, 106

Moho, 3, 195 deflection, 215

Mohorovicic discontinuity, 3 mole, 296 molecular volume, 294, 296 moment arm, 114

balance, 116 bending, 113, 127, 335–336

critical, 252, 335 maximum, 335

density dipole, 217

earthquake, 354 of inertia, 199, 205–206, 221

equatorial, 206 Mars, 62, 206 moon, 57, 206 polar, 206 sphere, 205 spheroid, 206

magnetic, 23–25 magnitude, 354 seismic, 354

momentum, angular, 58 conservation, 226, 390

monuments, 96 moon, 55–56

age, 56, 410 capture, 58 core, 57 gravity field, 58, 211 heat flow, 57, 144, 146 highlands, 56 lava lake, 164 magma ocean, 56, 165 magnetic field, 57 maria, 56 mascons, 58, 211 moment of inertia, 57, 206 orbit, 58 origin, 58 temperature, 145

Morgan, W. J., 5, 15 motion, equation of, 228

simple harmonic, 297 Mount Baker, 53, 389

Fuji, 389 Mazuma, 53 St. Helens, 53, 389 Shasta, 53, 389

mountain building, 1, 41 multiple solutions, 317 nappe, 46 natural remanent magnetism, 22 neodymium, 412–413 Neogene, 22 network, geodetic, 96 neutral surface, 114 New Madrid earthquakes, 54 Newtonian fluid, 55, 226–227, 292 Newton’s law of gravitation, 195

second law of motion, 235 Ninety-East ridge, 390 noble gases, 411, 423 non-linear fluids, 292

terms, 268 non-Newtonian fluid, 55, 292, 311

channel flow, 312 nonrenewable stresses, 174, 235 normal fault, 38, 52, 339–340

Index 841

polarity, 26 strain, 73, 87 stress, 73, 80, 235

deviatoric, 84 shear, 235

normalized isotope ratio, 418 North Anatolian fault, 359 Northridge earthquake, 359 no-slip condition, 228, 269 number, Avogadro’s, 296, 298

Brinkman, 316 coordination, 294 Eckert, 284 Gruntfest, 316 Nusselt, 263, 273, 277 Péclet, 264 Prandtl, 227, 264 Rayleigh, 269, 271, 394

critical, 270, 273, 394 Reynolds, 232, 257, 263–264

Nusselt number, 263, 273, 277 oblate spheroid, 195 oblateness, 199 oblique subduction, 36 ocean crust, 3, 415

basalt, 7, 410 thickness, 3

geoid, 222 geotherm, 159, 187 heat flow, 135, 159, 161 island basalts, 410, 424 lithosphere, 9, 157, 424

cooling, 77, 157 half-space cooling model, 157 plate cooling model, 161 thermal structure, 158 thickness, 5, 158

magma, 56, 165 ridges, 1, 6, 38, 339–340, 415, 425 trenches, 1, 9, 39, 339

flexure, 5, 9, 105, 127, 336 seismicity, 10, 339

oceans, 2 area, 135 bathymetry, 4, 55, 174, 240

oil fields, 244 Old Faithful Geyser, 50 oldest rock, 412 Oligocene period, 22 olivine, 8, 186

rheology, 320 olivine-spinel phase change, 186, 188, 191

elevation of, 191, 281 Olympus Mons, 60 one-dimensional channel flows, 226

heat conduction, 138 onset of thermal convection, 267, 272 operator, Laplacian, 237

ophiolites, 7–8 orbit, prograde, 58 Ordovician period, 22 ore deposits, 48, 374 origin of the moon, 58 orogenic zone, 41 orogeny, 41 orthopyroxene, 8 outer core, 26, 189, 415 overburden, 74, 78, 173 overcoring, 86 overthrust, 79 overturn, mantle, 189 Paleocene, 22 Paleogene, 22 paleomagnetic pole, 25 paleomagnetism, 5, 22, 24 paleoreconstructions, 40 Paleozoic era, 22 palimpsests, crater, 70 Pangaea, 3, 40 paramagnetic, 22 parameterized convection, 279 parent, isotopic, 411 parent-daughter ratio, 411 Parkfield earthquake, 357 partial melting, 7, 137, 402 Pascal, 74 passive margin, 39 Pavonis Mons, 60 Péclet number, 264 perfect gas, 408

plasticity, 9, 292, 333 peridotite, high temperature, 288 period, 150

Einstein, 297 periodic load, flexure, 122

gravity, 213 heating, 150 temperature variation, 147

periodite, 8 peripheral bulge, 124 permanent magnetism, 22 permeability, 374

magnetic, 24 models, 375

permeable formation, 233 Permian era, 22 perovskite, 186, 188, 191 petroleum formation, 181 Phanerozoic, 22 phase change, 11, 162, 188, 191

endothermic, 188 exothermic, 188 mantle, 186 olivine-spinel, 186, 188, 191

elevation, 191, 281 univariant, 191

842 Index

Phobos, 64 phreatic surface, 378 physical constants, 433

properties, 433 pillow lava, 7 ping-pong ball analogy, 10 pinned plate, 113 pipe flow, 231, 260

heat, 405 heat addition, 262 volcanic, 234

plagioclase feldspar, 7 plane strain, 111

stress, 109 planet, binary, 58 planetology, comparative, 55 planets, pressure within, 84

properties, 434 plastic bending, 9, 252, 335

deformation, 105, 334 hinge, 9, 336 perfectly, 9, 292, 333 plate, 334 yield, 333, 334

plate bending, 112, 116 boundaries, accretional, 1, 6, 339

convergent, 1, 9, 39, 285, 415 buckling, 118, 250 cooling model, 161, 176, 222 curvature, 114 deflection, 113 embedded, 116 flexure, 105, 112 motion, 22, 100 pinned, 116 plastic, 334 rotation, 32 tectonics, 1, 5, 226, 280, 285

driving forces, 280 velocities, 33, 100 viscous, 252

plates, distribution, 1 Pleistocene period, 22 Pliocene period, 22 plug flow, 312 plume, 14, 55, 177, 259, 399, 410, 417, 424

buoyancy flux, 260 head, 17, 259 heat flux, 260 mantle, 14, 55, 177, 259, 399, 410, 417, 424 tail, 17, 259 thermal, 54

porous media, 396, 399 point deflect, 301 Poiseuille flow, 232 Poisson’s ratio, 106 polar flattening, 195, 202

moment of inertia, 206

radius, 202 wander, 3, 28

path, 28 polarity, normal, 26

reversed, 26 pole, magnetic, 5, 24–25

paleomagnetic, 25 positions, 34 rotational, 32

pore pressure, 343 porosity, 88, 374 porous aquifer, confined, 376

unconfined, 378 dam, 379 layer, thermal convection, 393 media, 374, 390–391 thermal plume, 396, 399

postglacial rebound, 4, 55, 203, 238, 319 potassium, radioactive, 4, 410, 412 potassium-argon age dating, 412 potential anomaly, 204

barrier, 300 energy, atomic, 297 gravitational, 201 well, 201, 300

power-law creep, 311 Prandtl number, 227, 264 Pratt compensation, 220 Precambrian period, 22 pressure, 7, 84, 112

breakdown, 86 drag, 256 fluid, 237 force, 228 gradient, 227 head, 281 hydrostatic, 6, 234, 237 lithostatic, 74, 77, 84, 234, 350 mantle, 84, 186, 436 planetary interiors, 84 pore, 343 release melting, 6, 402 shut-in, 86 solution, 249, 328

creep, 249, 292, 329 principal axes, strain, 93

stress, 82 strain, 94 stress, 82, 112

deviatoric, 84 intermediate, 84 maximum, 84 minimum, 84

prism, accretionary, 10 problem answers, 437 process, irreversible, 187, 303 prograde orbit, 58 properties, earth, 433

Index 843

mantle, 436 planets, 434 rock, 435 satellites, 434 transport, 228

Proterozoic, 22 proto-Atlantic Ocean, 45 pull, trench, 1, 9, 281 pure shear, 90, 111–112 push, ridge, 6, 224, 281 pyrolite, 8, 281 pyroxene, 7 Quaternary, 22 radar interferometry, 103, 364 radial heat flow, 144, 150

cylindrical, 150 spherical, 144

radiation, heat transfer, 132 radioactive decay, 410–411

rate, 411 heating, 4, 54, 136, 410 isotopes, 4, 410–411

radioactivity, 411 radiometric dating, 410 radius, equatorial, 200

curvature, 114 island arc, 10 plate, 114

polar, 202 random eddies, 232 Rapa Ridge, 427 rare gases, 411, 423 rate, growth, 248, 269

strain, 226, 306, 319 ratio, aspect, 278

mantle, 323 Poisson’s, 106

Rayleigh number, 269, 271, 394 critical value, 270, 273, 394

Rayleigh-Taylor instability, 245, 324 rebound, elastic, 339, 342, 350

postglacial, 4, 55, 203, 238, 319 reconstruction of continents, 40 recumbent fold, 46 recycling, mantle, 20, 285 Red Sea, 38 reduced heat flow, 143

age dependent, 160 reduction of gravity data, 212 reference acceleration of gravity, 204

geoid, 202–203 relaxation, stress, 292, 330

time, 240, 330 viscoelastic, 330

remanent magnetization, 5, 22 chemical, 23 depositional, 23 natural, 22

thermo, 23 renewable stresses, 174 reservoir, geochemical, 285, 410, 415

geothermal, 226, 405 lower mantle, 410 upper mantle, 410

resistance, thermal, 134 Réunion, 17, 261 reversal, magnetic, 5, 26 reverse fault, 339 reversed polarity, 26 revolution, ellipsoid of, 202, 405 Reynolds number, 232, 257, 263–264 Rhea Mons, 66 rheological law, 226

parameters, 320 effects on mantle convection, 323

rheology, 226, 292 brittle, 339 crustal, 327 mantle, 318, 323 olivine, 320 perfectly plastic, 292, 333 stress dependent, 312 viscoelastic, 292

ridge, aseismic, 389 bathymetry, 6, 174 push, 6, 224, 281 seismicity, 1, 6, 339 subduction, 39 volcanism, 6

ridge-ridge transform, 14 ridges, aseismic, 389

ocean, 1, 6, 38, 339–340, 415, 425 rift valley, 38, 340 right lateral strike-slip fault, 52, 341 rigidity, flexural, 115

modulus of, 106 ringed basins, 58 Rio Grande Rift, 38, 48 river delta, 192 rock ages, 411

properties, 435 roots, continental, 4 rotation pole, 32

earth’s, 3, 197 solid-body, 90

rotational axis, 24, 197 bulge, 195, 197 flattening, 195, 202

rubidium, 411–412 rubidium-strontium dating, 412 runaway, thermal, 318 Runcorn, K., 5 Rutherford, Lord, 411 St. Helena, 417, 426 salt domes, 195, 208, 226, 244, 249 samarium, 412–413

844 Index

Samoa, 427 San Andreas fault, 14, 35, 47, 51, 53, 86,

94–95, 97, 112, 339, 355 strain accumulation, 364, 366

San Fernando earthquake, 359, 363 San Francisco earthquake, 54, 356, 363 satellite laser ranging, 99 satellites, Galilean, 55, 67, 70

Mars, 64 properties, 434

saturation, 407 Scandinavia, 238 scarps, lobate, 59 screw dislocation, 308 sea level, 20, 178, 204

changes, 20, 178 seafloor, age, 32, 159

geoid, 222 slope, 231 spreading, 1, 3, 32, 38

velocity, 32 seasonal temperature changes, 150 second law of motion, Newton’s, 235 secondary convection, 177 secular cooling, 4, 54, 136, 325 sedimentary basins, 5, 42, 129, 179

flexural structure, 5, 129 thermal evolution, 179

subsidence, 179 sedimentation, temperature, 168

stress, 52, 109 sediments, 7, 191

accretional, 10 compaction, 328 deposition, 191 subduction of, 10, 410, 416

seepage front, 379 seismic low velocity zone, 227

moment, 354 reflection profiling, 346 waves, 4, 353–354

seismicity, 49 accretional plate boundaries, 1, 6, 339 distribution, 51

western United States, 52 intraplate, 54 subduction zone, 10, 339

separation of variables, 147, 150, 239 shear, 227

flow, 227, 311 stress dependent, 311 subcritical, 318 supercritical, 318 temperature dependent, 311, 314 viscous dissipation, 315

force, 227 heating, 283, 315 modulus, 112

pure, 90, 111 simple, 90, 111 strain, 73, 95 strength, 346 stress, 73, 78, 80, 227, 235

criteria maximum, 334 maximum, 83, 132

viscous, 235 sheet, allochthonous, 349

ice, 55, 349 thrust, 45, 78, 347

shell, spherical, 10, 144 shield volcanoes, 60, 66 shields, continental, 21 shortening, crustal, 42, 45 shut-in pressure, 86 Sieh, K., 357 silicic volcanic rocks, 13 sill, 166 Silurian period, 22 similarity, 154, 383

variable, 154, 383 simple harmonic motion, 297

shear, 90, 111 sines, law of, 36 sinestral strike-slip fault, 52 sites, lattice, 296 SI units, 429 skin depth, 152 slab pull, 1, 9, 281 slider-block model, 350 sliding, gravitational, 6, 52, 281, 347

stable, 351 slip, aseismic, 52

dislocation, 309 slope stability, 350 Snake River plain, 47 Society, 417, 426 solid body rotation, 90

crystalline, 296 state creep, 4, 55, 369

solidification, 162 dike, 166 lava lake, 164 magma, 162

chamber, 166 sill, 166

solidus, 7, 140, 324 basalt, 140 periodite, 188

solubility, 249, 328 of silica, 249, 328

solution, pressure, 249, 328 creep, 249, 292, 329

solvent, 328 spacing, atomic, 293 specific heat, 187, 298

at constant pressure, 187

Index 845

at constant volume, 172 spectral reflectance, 68 sphere, flow over, 255

gravity anomaly due to, 208 heat conduction in, 144, 150 moment of inertia, 205

spherical shell, 10, 144 spheroid, 202

moment of inertia, 206 oblate, 195

spinel structure, 186, 188 spreading, behind-arc, 13

seafloor, 1, 3, 32, 38 spring constant, 297, 350 springs, artesian, 233, 377

hot, 47–48, 226, 264–265, 391 stability analysis, 267–268, 393

boundary layer, 272 buckling, 118, 250 linearized, 267 porous media, 393 thermal convection, 267, 272, 393

stable sliding, 351 stagnation point flow, 268 static friction, 342 steam, 405

dry, 405 wet, 405

Steamboat Springs, Nevada, 391 steam-water mixtures, 405

counterflow, 405 Stefan problem, 162 Stefan-Boltzmann constant, 184 Stickney, 65 stick-slip behavior, 339, 341, 350 Stokes flow, 254, 259

formula, 257 strain, 73, 87

accumulation, 95, 99, 364, 366 compressive, 339 coseismic, 94 deviatoric, 94 extensional, 340 gauge, 86 isotropic, 94 measurement, 94 normal, 73, 87 plane, 111 principal, 94

axes, 93 rate, 226, 306, 319

mantle, 319 shear, 73, 95

maximum, 83, 132 unrecoverable, 333

thermal, 172 transformation of coordinates, 93 uniaxial, 108

stratigraphic column, 20 stream function, 237 strength envelope, 347

shear, 346 yield, 251

stress, 49, 73, 106 bending, 114 compressive, 52, 78 crustal, 85 deviatoric, 77, 84 diffusion, 302, 367 drop, 352 due to erosion, 52, 109, 174

sedimentation, 52, 109 effective, 343 elastic, 6 fiber, 113 frictional, 341

dynamic, 342 static, 342

guide, 5, 9 hydrostatic, 84 isotropic, 84, 112 lithostatic, 74, 77, 84, 234, 350 measurement, 85 membrane, 52 nonrenewable, 174 normal, 73, 80, 235

deviatoric, 84 plane, 109 principal, 82, 112

axes, 82 deviatoric, 84 intermediate, 84 maximum, 84 minimum, 84

relaxation, 292, 330 renewable, 174 shear, 73, 78, 80, 227, 235

maximum, 83, 132 yield criteria, 334

strain relations, 106 elastic, 106

tangential, 257 tensile, 78 thermal, 52, 171, 174 three-dimensional, 83 transformation of coordinates, 80 two-dimensional, 80 uniaxial, 106 viscous, 235

normal, 235 shear, 235

yield, 292, 333 stretching, crustal, 75, 182

factor, 75 layer, 287

strike-slip fault, 52, 339, 341, 361

846 Index

conjugate, 341 dextral, 49, 52 left lateral, 52, 341 right lateral, 52, 341 sinistral, 52

strontium, 411–412 structure, crystalline, 293 subcritical shear flow, 318 subducted lithosphere, 1, 9, 39, 285, 415, 424

thermal structure, 190 subduction, 1, 9, 39, 285, 415, 424

angle of, 10, 242 episodic, 274 oblique, 36 ridge, 39 sediment, 10, 410, 416 seismicity, 10, 339 volcanism, 1, 12, 46

submarine hot springs, 226 subsidence, 174, 179

continents, 181 glaciation, 238 sedimentary basins, 179 thermal, 174, 179

suction force, 243 sudden cooling, 153

heating, 153 supercritical shear flow, 318 superposition, principle of, 148 surface deformation, 1

displacements, 363 distance, 34 equipotential, 201–202, 223 force, 73 heat flow, 48, 133, 135–136, 159

production, 141–142 neutral, 114 phreatic, 378 strain, 94 wave magnitude, 353

suture, 42, 349 swells, 16, 47, 221, 260

Bermuda, 221 Hawaiian, 16, 221, 260

symbols, list of, 430 syncline, 45, 124 synclinoria, 45, 249 synthetic aperture radar interferometry, 103,

364 table, water, 378 tail, plume, 17, 259 tangential stress, 257 Tangshan earthquake, 42 Taylor, F. B., 3 tectonic force, 78 tectonics, compressional, 249, 341

plate, 1, 5, 226, 280, 285 tensional, 47

temperature, 296 absolute, 298 blocking, 23 Curie, 22 dependent rheology, 311, 314

Couette flow, 314 dependent viscosity, 311, 314 diurnal variation, 150, 152 effect of erosion, 156, 168 effect of sedimentation, 168 glaciation, 152, 156 gradient, 132

adiabatic, 185 homologous, 304 liquidus, 140 log, 133 melt, 304 moon, 145 oceanic lithosphere, 158, 161 periodic surface, 147

time dependent, 150 seasonal variation, 150 sedimentary basins, 179 solidus, 7, 140, 324 subducted lithosphere, 190 thrust sheets, 157 topographic effect, 147

tensile stress, 78 tensional tectonics, 47 terminal bombardment, 56

velocity, 259 terraces, elevated beach, 4, 240 terrain correction, 212 Tertiary, 22 Tethys Ocean, 3, 40 Tharsis, 60 Theia Mons, 66 theodolite, 96 theory of faulting, Anderson, 343

of folding, Biot, 252 thermal boundary layer, 54, 155, 189, 272, 274

compensation, 221 conductivity, 133, 266

anisotropic, 147 measurement of, 134, 157

contraction, 1 convection, 4, 54, 226, 266–267, 272, 274

finite amplitude, 272, 274 porous layer, 393 stability analysis, 267, 272

diffusion, 154 length, 154

diffusivity, 149, 227 elasticity, 173 evolution of sedimentary basins, 179 expansion, 172, 299

linear coefficient of, 172, 299 volumetric coefficient of, 172, 266, 299

INDEX 847

history of the earth, 325 inertia, 267 isostasy, 221 lithosphere, 5, 6 plume, 54

porous media, 396, 399 resistance, 134 runaway, 318 strain, 172 stress, 52, 171, 174 subsidence, 174, 179

continents, 181 sedimentary basins, 179

thickness, 155, 272 thermally activated creep, 4, 292

faults, 368 thermoremanent magnetism, 23 thickening, crustal, 42, 45 thickness, boundary layer, 155, 272

continental crust, 3, 19, 74 continental lithosphere, 188, 222 elastic lithosphere, 126, 128, 130, 332 oceanic crust, 3 oceanic lithosphere, 5, 158

thinning, crustal, 75, 182 thorium, radioactive, 4, 410 three-armed pattern, 38

dimensional heat conduction, 146 thrust belt, 42

fault, 42, 52, 339, 346 Wind River, 346

sheet, 45, 78, 347 tidal dissipation, 58, 69

forces, 3 time dependent heat conduction, 149

geological, 20, 410–411 relaxation, 240, 330

viscoelastic, 330 tomography, mantle, 12 topographic correction for heat flow, 147 topography forces, 223

geoid, 223 gravity due to, 211 ocean floor, 174 temperature effect, 147 valley and ridge, 45, 249, 349 Venus, 65

torque, 235, 243 transfer, convective heat, 132, 266 transform fault, 13, 177, 339 transformation of strain coordinates, 93

of stress coordinates, 80 transition to turbulence, 233, 257 transport coefficient, 192

properties, 228 Transverse Ranges, 54, 357 trench, ocean, 1, 9, 39, 339

earthquakes, 10, 339

elastic bending, 5, 9, 127 plastic bending, 9, 336 pull, 1, 9, 281 volcanism, 1, 12, 46

Tresca criteria, 334 triangulation, 96 Triassic period, 22 triple junction, 14, 35 Tristan, 426 turbulent flow, 232, 257 two-dimensional heat conduction, 146 two-phase convection, 405

flow, 405, 407 unconfined aquifer, 378 unconformities, 20 unconsolidated, 375 uniaxial compression, 107

strain, 108 stress, 106

United States, western, 47, 52 units, SI, 429 univariant phase change, 191 universal flexure profile, 128

gas constant, 298 gravitational constant, 85, 196

unrecoverable strain, 333 unsteady flow, 257 upper mantle, 12, 324, 415

reservoir, 410, 415 upthrust block, 42 uranium, radioactive, 4, 410, 412–413 uranium-lead dating, 412 vacancy, 55, 301

diffusion coefficient, 302 flux, 302

Valles Marineris, 61 valley and ridge topography, 45, 249, 349

rift, 38, 340 van der Waals force, 296 vapor-dominated geothermal system, 405 variable, similarity, 154, 383 variables, separation of, 147, 150, 239 vector, Burgers, 308 velocities, angular, 32

plate, 33, 100 velocity components, 234

Darcy, 374 magma, 164, 258, 402 terminal, 259

Venus, 65–67 atmosphere, 65 coronae, 67 gravity, 65–66 magnetic field, 65 topography, 65

very long baseline interferometry, 99, 366 Vine, F., 5 viscoelasticity, 292, 329

848 INDEX

Kelvin, 330 Maxwell, 330 relaxation time, 330

viscosity, 226–227 diffusion creep, 306 dislocation creep, 309 dynamic, 227 effective, 323 grain boundary creep, 307 kinematic, 227 magma, 258 mantle, 4, 55, 240 pressure solution creep, 329 temperature dependent, 311, 313

Couette flow, 313 viscous bending, 252

dissipation, 262, 283, 315 drag, 257 flow past sphere, 254 force, 235 heating, 262, 283 plate, 252 stress, 235

normal, 235 shear, 235

volcanic conduit, 226 line, 1, 13, 46 pipe, 234 ridge, 391

volcanism, 1, 46, 226 Africa, 49 distribution, 46 intraplate, 46 Io, 68 island arc, 12, 184 Mars, 60 ridge, 6 subduction zone, 1, 12, 46 western United States, 50

volcano, geometrical form, 387 profiles, 389 shield, 60, 66

volume, activation, 304 atomic, 294 control, 231 molecular, 294, 296 specific, 172

volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion, 172, 266, 299

flow rate, 232, 238 von Mises criterion, 334 vortices, 257 Wadati-Benioff zone, 1, 11 wall, foot, 339

hanging, 339 Walvis ridge, 390, 426 wander, polar, 3, 28 water table, 378

wavelength, buckling, 119, 124 folding, 252

wave number, 269 waves, seismic, 4, 353–354 Wegener, A., 3 well drawdown, 377, 380

potential, 201, 300 wellbore breakout, 87 western United States, 47, 52 wet steam, 405 whole mantle convection, 189

rock isochron, 412 Wilmington oil field, 181 Wilson, J. T., 38

cycle, 38 Wind River Mountains, 346

thrust fault, 346 xenoliths, 8, 255, 269 Yellowstone, 47 yield, plastic, 333–334

shear stress criteria, 334 strength, 251 stress, 292, 333 Tresca criteria, 334 von Mises criteria, 334

Young’s modulus, 106