Learning Resources and Activities Website Landing Page (ELL's)

Maria2316

TSL558Rubricweek4.pdf

Home >Education homework help >Learning Resources and Activities Website Landing Page (ELL's)

Learning Resources and Activities Website Landing Page - Rubric

Part 1: Website Landing Page - Introduction 6 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Website Landing Page - Introduction

5. Target 6 points

An introduction that includes step-by-step directions for how students and families can access the resources on the

website landing page is specific and well-crafted.

4. Acceptable 5.22 points

An introduction that includes step-by-step directions for how students and families can access the resources on the

website landing page is clear and descriptive.

3. Approaching 4.44 points

An introduction that includes step-by-step directions for how students and families can access the resources on the

website landing page is unclear.

2. Insufficient 4.14 points

An introduction that includes step-by-step directions for how students and families can access the resources on the

website landing page is flawed.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Part 1: Website Landing Page – Practice Activities 12 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Website Landing Page – Practice Activities

5. Target 12 points

Two practice activities for each of the content areas that can be downloaded by students and families are ideal.

4. Acceptable 10.44 points

Two practice activities for each of the content areas that can be downloaded by students and families are appropriate.

3. Approaching 8.88 points

Two practice activities for each of the content areas that can be downloaded by students and families are somewhat

inappropriate.

2. Insufficient 8.28 points

Two practice activities for each of the content areas that can be downloaded by students and families are inappropriate.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Part 1: Website Landing Page – Digital Resource Links 12 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Website Landing Page – Digital Resource Links

5. Target 12 points

Two digital resource links for each of the content areas are meaningful and well-selected. Brief descriptions are specific and

substantial.

4. Acceptable 10.44 points

Two digital resource links for each of the content areas are relevant. Brief descriptions are clear and detailed.

3. Approaching 8.88 points

Two digital resource links for each of the content areas are somewhat relevant. Brief descriptions are unclear or lacking

detail.

2. Insufficient 8.28 points

Two digital resource links for each of the content areas are unfitting or missing. Brief descriptions are imprecise or not

included.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Part 2: Re�ection 18 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Reflection

5. Target 18 points

Reflection on how collaborating with families using technology resources can support their ELLs’ learning in language and

content areas is compelling. Creatively includes ways to provide support for families of ELLs who have technology-related

challenges.

4. Acceptable 15.66 points

Reflection on how collaborating with families using technology resources can support their ELLs’ learning in language and

content areas is convincing. Reasonably includes ways to provide support for families of ELLs who have technology-related

challenges.

3. Approaching 13.32 points

Reflection on how collaborating with families using technology resources can support their ELLs’ learning in language and

content areas is shallow. Minimally includes ways to provide support for families of ELLs who have technology-related

challenges.

2. Insufficient 12.42 points

Reflection on how collaborating with families using technology resources can support their ELLs’ learning in language and

content areas is unconvincing. Fails to include ways to provide support for families of ELLs who have technology-related

challenges.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Language Use and Audience Awareness 3 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness

5. Target 3 points

Word choice is distinctive, creative, and well-suited to the purpose, discipline, scope, and audience of the presentation.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

Word choice is reflective of the intended audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary, and communicates clearly.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

Some distracting inconsistencies or repetitions in word choice are present. Language is lacking awareness of the targeted

audience.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

Inappropriate word choice is evident. Language is not reflective of the targeted audience.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Aesthetic Quality 3 points

Criteria Description

Aesthetic Quality

5. Target 3 points

Design is pleasing. Skillful handling of color, text, and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall,

effective and functional text or visuals are evident.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

Design is clean. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. A variety of objects, charts, and graphs are

integrated to amplify the message.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

Design detracts from purpose. Color, text type/size, and visuals are too simplistic or cluttered.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

Design is inconsistent, fragmented, and detrimental to the presentation’s purpose. Visuals detract from the content.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources 3 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

5. Target 3 points

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and

style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and

style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target 3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

recurrent.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are

found throughout.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 60 points

https://www.gce.com/