Trip to the mall
shacast
TriptotheMallPaperOTA104_105Sessionrevised.docx2
Community/Functional Mobility Analysis: Trip to the Mall
Name:_____________________
Date: ______________
Course: OTA 104/105: Activity Analysis
Course objective(s):
UNIT SEVEN: Analyzing Human Motion in Daily Activity
Upon successful completion of this unit on written and practical examination, the student will:
Analyze various case examples by:
a. Identifying physical performance impairments during an occupation.
b. Selecting appropriate tests to assess the indentified physical performance deficits.
c. Determining and defending which model of practice/frame of reference would best guide the treatment of the identified impairments.
d. Implementing the selected frame of reference/model of practice in correcting, or compensating, for the identified impairments.
Curriculum thread(s) addressed:
· Occupation centered practice
· Role Acquisition
Assignment Objective(s):
The student will demonstrate proficiency in applying Activity Analysis to a wheelchair activity that requires propulsion and mobility throughout a mall or shopping center through understanding the difference between quantitative and qualitative research studies.
Instructions
· Student will engage in IADLS:
· Shopping
· Car transfers
· Functional Mobility to include:
· Accessing a water fountain
· Accessing the elevator
· Accessing the restrooms.
· Other functional mobility related activities
· The students will be assigned the above described functional activity which they will perform resembling a patient with a pre-determined diagnosis and disability.
· Students will analyze the functional activity outcome and submit a written assignment (minimum 3-4 pages) utilizing the following structure:
· Description of the activity(including listing the most significant steps)
· Analysis of client factors and occupational performance skills,
· Demands and requirements of the activity,
· Environmental and physical context assessment,
· List of recommendations that are evidence based; scientific based.
Resources/supplies used to demonstrate skill:
· Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF) to be used as a guide to analyze the foundational elements of task/occupation Performance
· Application of concepts previously learned about activity analysis
|
Criteria |
Poor (1) |
Fair (2 ) |
Good (3) |
Excellent (4) |
|
Use of proper terminology and grammar |
Use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on more than 9 occasions. |
Use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on no more than 7 occasions. |
Good; use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on no more than 5 occasions. |
Excellent; use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on no more than 3 occasions.
|
|
Organization and structure |
Did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommended at 3 or more times or sections |
Fair; however, did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommended at 2 times or sections |
Good; did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommended at 1 time or section |
Excellent; followed the structure and organization of paper as recommended at all times
|
|
Accurately completed the section related to the brief description of the activity. |
Completed the section 25% accurately with comprehensive information |
Completed the section 50% accurately with comprehensive information |
Completed the section 75% accurately with comprehensive information |
Completed the section 100% accurately with comprehensive information
|
|
Accurately completed all sections of the self reflection of the Activity |
Did not complete accurately 5-6 questions of the self reflection of the activity |
Fair; did not complete accurately 3-4 questions of the self reflection of the activity |
Good; did not complete accurately 1-2 questions of the self reflection of the activity |
Excellent; completed accurately all sections of the self reflection of the Activity |
|
Identified the most significant and meaningful steps of the activity in a sequential order |
Did not identify 5-6 important steps accurately |
Fair; did not identify 3-4 important steps accurately |
Good; did not identify 1-2 important steps accurately |
Excellent; identified all steps accurately |
|
Identify all client factors accurately |
Did not complete client factors accurately 5-6 times |
Fair; did not complete client factors accurately 3-4 times |
Good; did not complete client factors accurately 1-2 times |
Excellent; identify all client factors accurately |
|
Identify all client performance skills accurately |
Did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 5-6 times |
Fair; did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 3-4 times |
Good; did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 1-2 times |
Excellent; identified all client’s performance skills accurately |
|
Identified the demands and the requirements of the activity accurately |
Did not to identify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 5-6 occasions |
Fair; did not identify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 3-4 occasions |
Good; did not identify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 1-2 occasions |
Excellent; identified all the demands and requirements of performing the activity accurately |
|
Identified environmental and physical context assessment accurately |
Did not identify the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 5-6 occasions accurately |
Fair; did not identify accurately the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 3-4 occasions |
Good; did not identify accurately the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 1-2 occasions |
Excellent; identified all the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity accurately |
|
Completed the list of problems accurately |
Did not complete 5-6 problems accurately |
Did not complete 3-4 problems accurately |
Good; did not complete1-2 problems accurately |
Excellent; accurately completed the list of problems
|
|
Completed the list of evidence based recommendations accurately |
Did not complete or missed 5-6 evidence based recommendations accurately |
Fair; did not complete or missed 3-4 evidence based recommendations accurately |
Good; did not complete or missed 1-2 evidence based recommendations accurately |
Excellent; completed the list of evidence based recommendations accurately
|
|
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 25% of the content |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 50% of the content |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 75% of the content |
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 100% of the content |
Comment:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Score: The total score to accumulate is “48”. Your score was _____________ with a
percentage of ________________ .
ACOTE Standards for an Accredited Educational Program for the Occupational Therapy Assistant:
(B.1.1., B. 3.2. ,B. 4.3., B.4.4., B.4.9., B.4.10., B.4.14, B.6.2)
Revised 07/13/2020 JM
