Real estate review assignment due tomorrow
1 | P a g e
Final Project – Trenton, FL – Small Town Retail – McDonalds and Family Dollar
BTS
Real Estate Development – REE 6715
Dr. William Hardin
Note: it would be hard to get all the graphics in this one and site plan. A
member of this group had access to site plans and some renderings.
2 | P a g e
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary................................................................................................................. 3
2. Property Summary ..................................................................................................................5
3. Market Analysis.......................................................................................................................11
4. Comparable Sales....................................................................................................................13
5. Cost Structure..........................................................................................................................14
6. Returns - Projections............................................................................................................... 13
7. Investment Decision.................................................................................................................17
8. Exhibits..................................................................................................................................... 18
1. Executive Summary
3 | P a g e
The proposed project is a built to suit for McDonald’s and Family Dollar that would entail
two standalone buildings for each tenant on a common parcel. The small town retail
partnership gives the corporations the ability to enter a small town and utilizing one
another as a traffic generator. Trenton is a submarket of Gainesville and there is little
competition for McDonalds as there is only one other local burger restaurant and there
is a Dollar General on the outskirts of town competing with Family Dollar.
The property is located on the north east
corner of 1 st St and State Road 26, one
block east of US 129. It is the best
positioned site in the trade area with all
the sites at the intersection of US 129 and
SR 26 developed. The parcel is
approximately 58,506 sf (1.35 acres), site
frontage 296 feet.
The site is very well located along the SR 26 corridor, serving the Trenton market and
moving traffic to Gainesville to the east. Access is provided by full access drives on
both SR 26 and NE 2 nd
St. Parking is adequate with the addition of the on street parking
locations to the west and north of the parcel.
McDonald’s Information on the Small Town Retail Program for Developers
4 | P a g e
2. Property Summary
5 | P a g e
Property Specific Attributes
The proposed development is situated in a market that both McDonald’s and
Family Dollar have identified in their market plans as desirable however lower volume
sales due to the small town population. There is a need for the retailers after reviewing
the trade area market in the 2 mile and 10 minute trade area. Due to the lower
population there is minimum convenience retailers and to do any shopping or fast food
the decision is to commute east to Gainesville or south to Chiefland. This location will
be able to pull customers from further than the 10 minute ring without impacting any of
the existing McDonald’s or Family Dollars as most are concentrated in Gainesville.
There is an established population base in Trenton and SR 26 and US 129 are the main
thoroughfares in the town for commuters. These two retailers will be complimentary and
a great addition to the area for the local customers.
Zoning
The zoning for the property is CG-1 and allows for the retail uses as proposed.
Zoning for Trenton McDonalds/Family Dollar
Zoning: CG – Commercial General
Setbacks: Front – 20’, Side – 10’, Rear – 15’
Height: 35’
6 | P a g e
Landscape Buffer: 10’ along the side yard and rear
Parking: 1 space for every 150’ of non-storage floor area
Maximum Building Lot Coverage: In addition to meeting the setbacks and
parking requirements, no structure shall exceed a 1.0 floor area ratio
Real Estate Deal
The property is under contract for $132,500 and the construction cost for both
tenants is $1,838,266 for building and site and each tenant completes the interior with
their own finishes, equipment and furnishings. Both corporate leases are being
presented to their management teams and McDonald’s lease is $60,000/year for the
base of 10 years and 10% increases every 5 years. There are six option periods, five
years each with a total potential of 40 year term. Family Dollars lease begins at
$80,000/year with the same increases and options.
The leases for each tenant states that interior improvements are the tenants’
responsibilities for maintenance and the Landlord is responsible for structural and
HVAC repairs over and above $500 however the tenant’s must show they have a
7 | P a g e
contract with a licensed HVAC contractor for quarterly maintenance. Real estate taxes
are prorated by the parcel split and tangible taxes are the responsibility of each tenant.
The tenants do pay common area maintenance to the landlord to maintain the common
parking lot and landscaping.
Property Location: Northeast corner of SR 26 and US 129
Land Price: $132,000
Construction Costs:
McDonald’s Building: 2,800 sf @ $140 psf
Family Dollar Building: 8,000 sf @ $75 psf
General Requirement and Site costs: $10 psf
Soft Costs: $35,000
Existing McDonald’s and Family Dollars in Gilchrist and Alachua Counties
Conceptual Site Plan
8 | P a g e
Aerial Overlay of Site plan
Exterior Rendering of McDonald’s w/Drive Through and Family Dollar
9 | P a g e
McDonald’s Floorplan
10 | P a g e
3. Market Analysis
11 | P a g e
Demand Drivers
Demographics
Gilchrist County, FL
Data source: U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Census Bureau, Population Division, Washington,
D.C.
Page 2
Components
Components of Population Growth, 2000-2012
Change 2000-
2012
Population Growth (2000 - 2012) 2,275
Avg. Annual Population Change (Natural Change & Net Migration) 219
Avg. Annual Natural Change (Births & Deaths) 27
Avg. Annual Births 188
Avg. Annual Deaths 161
Avg. Annual Net Migration (International & Domestic) 200
Avg. Annual International Migration 6
Avg. Annual Domestic Migration 194
Avg. Annual Residual -5
Percent of Population Growth, 2000-2012
Avg. Annual Natural Change (Births & Deaths) 12.0%
Avg. Annual Net Migration (International & Domestic) 90.2%
•
•
•
This page describes various components of population change and total population growth (or decline). Total population growth (or decline) is the sum of
natural change (births & deaths) and migration (international & domestic).
How have the components of population changed?
From 2000 to 2012, migration contributed
to 90% of population growth.
From 2000 to 2012, population grew by
2,275 people, a 16% increase.
From 2000 to 2012, natural change
contributed to 12% of population growth.
Data Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Census Bureau, Population Division, Washington, D.C.
* The Census Bureau makes a minor statistical correction, called a "residual" which is
shown in the table above, but omitted from the figure. Because of this correction, natural
change plus net migration may not add to total population change in the figure.
188
(161)
27
194
6
200 219
(200)
(150)
(100)
(50)
-
50
100
150
200
250 B
ir th
s
D e
a th
s
N a
tu ra
l C
h a n
g e
D o
m e
s ti c M
ig ra
ti o
n
In te
rn a
ti o
n a l M
ig ra
ti o
n
M ig
ra ti o
n
P o
p u
la ti o n
G ro
w th
(N
a tu
ra l &
M ig
ra ti o
n )
Average Annual Components of Population Growth*, Gilchrist County FL, 2000-2012
12 | P a g e
City of Trenton
Page 7
Industry Sectors
•
•
•
•
•
Data Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce. Multiple Years (See Data Sources & Methods page). Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic
Information System, Washington, D.C. Table CA25.
From 1970 to 2000, jobs in government
jobs grew from 311 to 1,159, a 273%
increase.
How has employment by industry changed historically?
This page describes historical employment trends by major industry category (non-services related, services related, and government) and by industry.
Employment includes wage and salary jobs and proprietors. The employment data are organized according to the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
system and reported by place of work.
From 1970 to 2000, jobs in services
related industries grew from 279 to
2,047, a 634% increase.
From 1970 to 2000, jobs in non-services
related industries grew from 498 to
1,167, a 134% increase.
In 2000 the three industry sectors with
the largest number of jobs were
government (1,159 jobs), services (1,059
jobs), and farm (611 jobs).
From 1970 to 2000, the three industry
sectors that added the most new jobs
were government (848 new jobs), retail
trade (352 new jobs), and construction
(216 new jobs).
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1 9 7
0
1 9 7
1
1 9 7
2
1 9 7
3
1 9 7
4
1 9 7
5
1 9 7
6
1 9 7
7
1 9 7
8
1 9 7
9
1 9 8
0
1 9 8
1
1 9 8
2
1 9 8
3
1 9 8
4
1 9 8
5
1 9 8
6
1 9 8
7
1 9 8
8
1 9 8
9
1 9 9
0
1 9 9
1
1 9 9
2
1 9 9
3
1 9 9
4
1 9 9
5
1 9 9
6
1 9 9
7
1 9 9
8
1 9 9
9
2 0 0
0
Employment by Industry, Gilchrist County FL
Services Retail trade
Government Manufacturing
Construction Finance, ins. & real estate
Agricultural services Trans. & public utilities
Wholesale trade Farm
Mining
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1 9 7 0
1 9 7 1
1 9 7 2
1 9 7 3
1 9 7 4
1 9 7 5
1 9 7 6
1 9 7 7
1 9 7 8
1 9 7 9
1 9 8 0
1 9 8 1
1 9 8 2
1 9 8 3
1 9 8 4
1 9 8 5
1 9 8 6
1 9 8 7
1 9 8 8
1 9 8 9
1 9 9 0
1 9 9 1
1 9 9 2
1 9 9 3
1 9 9 4
1 9 9 5
1 9 9 6
1 9 9 7
1 9 9 8
1 9 9 9
2 0 0 0
Employment by Major Industry Category, Gilchrist County FL
Services related Non-services related Government
Page 7
Industry Sectors
•
•
•
•
•
Data Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce. Multiple Years (See Data Sources & Methods page). Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic
Information System, Washington, D.C. Table CA25.
From 1970 to 2000, jobs in government
jobs grew from 311 to 1,159, a 273%
increase.
How has employment by industry changed historically?
This page describes historical employment trends by major industry category (non-services related, services related, and government) and by industry.
Employment includes wage and salary jobs and proprietors. The employment data are organized according to the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
system and reported by place of work.
From 1970 to 2000, jobs in services
related industries grew from 279 to
2,047, a 634% increase.
From 1970 to 2000, jobs in non-services
related industries grew from 498 to
1,167, a 134% increase.
In 2000 the three industry sectors with
the largest number of jobs were
government (1,159 jobs), services (1,059
jobs), and farm (611 jobs).
From 1970 to 2000, the three industry
sectors that added the most new jobs
were government (848 new jobs), retail
trade (352 new jobs), and construction
(216 new jobs).
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1 9 7
0
1 9 7
1
1 9 7
2
1 9 7
3
1 9 7
4
1 9
7 5
1 9 7
6
1 9 7
7
1 9 7
8
1 9 7
9
1 9 8
0
1 9 8
1
1 9 8
2
1 9 8
3
1 9 8
4
1 9
8 5
1 9 8
6
1 9 8
7
1 9 8
8
1 9 8
9
1 9 9
0
1 9 9
1
1 9 9
2
1 9 9
3
1 9 9
4
1 9
9 5
1 9 9
6
1 9 9
7
1 9 9
8
1 9 9
9
2 0 0
0
Employment by Industry, Gilchrist County FL
Services Retail trade
Government Manufacturing
Construction Finance, ins. & real estate
Agricultural services Trans. & public utilities
Wholesale trade Farm
Mining
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1 9 7 0
1 9 7 1
1 9 7 2
1 9 7 3
1 9 7 4
1 9
7 5
1 9 7 6
1 9 7 7
1 9 7 8
1 9 7 9
1 9 8 0
1 9 8 1
1 9 8 2
1 9 8 3
1 9 8 4
1 9
8 5
1 9 8 6
1 9 8 7
1 9 8 8
1 9 8 9
1 9 9 0
1 9 9 1
1 9 9 2
1 9 9 3
1 9 9 4
1 9
9 5
1 9 9 6
1 9 9 7
1 9 9 8
1 9 9 9
2 0 0 0
Employment by Major Industry Category, Gilchrist County FL
Services related Non-services related Government
13 | P a g e
4. Comparable Sales
Credit Rating – Moody’s A2
Source- Calkain Research
14 | P a g e
Credit Rating – Moody’s Baa3
Source- Calkain Research
Since both of these tenants are investment grade, the cap rate is established by the
strength of corporate lease guarantor and to a lesser extent location. A blended selling
cap rate of 6% is the selling market cap rate for this tertiary market development.
5. Cost Structure
Construction Costs
Based on previous small town retail projects and McDonald’s average costs and
utilizing their suppliers to obtain price breaks due to their negotiated bulk prices
for materials the hard costs for the McDonald’s building is $140 per SF or
$392,000. The Family Dollar building is a metal building with exterior stucco and
the cost is much lower at $75 per SF and $600,000 for the hard costs of the
building.
15 | P a g e
Contingency
Due to unforeseen circumstances, a 5% ($80,603) contingency is built into the
budget should there be any additional costs that come up during the construction
of the project.
Land
Acquisition cost of the land is contracted for $132,000 for 1.35 acres. There is a
historic building on the property and the cost of the transporting the home was
factored into the price negotiations.
General Requirements and Site Work
The property is fairly clear however there is a historical structure that will need to
be moved and a large oak removed and fees paid into a tree mitigation fund.
Bringing utilities to the property and separately metering for each tenant have
been accounted for and this breaks down to $10 per SF or $585,060.
Soft Costs
Engineering costs for this project are a flat fee of $35,000 with our preferred firm.
This is a fixed negotiated costs as these types of project are straight forward and
we have done multiple projects throughout the state.
Permitting Costs
The permitting fees in the City of Trenton are $25,000.
Impact Fees
The impact fees are assessed by the amount of traffic this use will bring
additionally to the road way systems. The city has assessed the project $40,000.
Project Management
A 5% ($80,603) project management fee is included to the costs for the general
contractor supervision of the project.
16 | P a g e
6. Returns and Projections
17 | P a g e
Returns
7. Investment Decision
As a preferred developer within the McDonald’s Small Town Retailer program
there is little risk involved in the decision to move forward with the project. The
territory is assigned and the company decides dictates the growth market and the
partners they will move forward with in these deals. Once the management
committee signs on the location and site plan, a lease is prepared for each
retailer and we move forward with planning and permitting the development.
The most difficult part is to keep the change orders down and keep the
construction costs as close to the prototypical as possible. The local franchisee is
involved in the build out and that can become costly if the project manager does
not keep firm. These costs should be billed directly to the franchisee as
McDonald’s does not vary from their signed contract unless there is an
unforeseen issue on the job site that will need immediate repair. Family Dollar’s
buildout is much more straightforward as there is no franchisee involved and they
want turnover once the vanilla shell is complete and they complete the buldout.
As we have done many of these small town deals, our typical financing structure
is 80% LTC and market interest rates are 4.25% with a 30 year amortization.
This would amount to an 11.69% return based on our cash flow after debt service
of $46,060 annually.
However, due to the strong cap rates of both tenants we may flip this property in
year 3 as this these cobranded properties need a couple of years to mature and
work out any issues before putting them on the market. McDonald’s cap rate is
trading at 4.5% in most sales and Family Dollar is just under 8% and we would
market this property at a blended cap rate at 6%. The sale price at this cap is
$2,333,333 and after the fees the IRR is 26% for this project.
The largest hurdle to getting this deal completed is being selected as the retailers
preferred developer and we maintain this status by delivering a product they are
happy with and we continue to look forward to a long and profitable relationship.
18 | P a g e
8. Exhibits – Demographic and Income Profiles in the 5-10-15 minute drive times
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e