Case Study

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction 5 to >4.0 pts

Advanced

A quality synopsis of client is given. Presenting problem discussed. Client history summarized. Issues of concern highlighted.

4 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

Good synopsis of client is given. Presenting problem discussed. Client history summarized. Issues of concern highlighted.

3 to >2.0 pts

Developing

An adequate synopsis of client is given. Presenting problem somewhat discussed. Client history not done. Issues of concern barely highlighted.

2 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations

An adequate synopsis of client is given. Presenting problem not discussed. Client history not done. Issues of concern not highlighted.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

Brief Trauma Question., Life Stressors Checklist, CA PTSD-CA Scale

50 to >45.0 pts

Advanced

All components scored correctly based on the narrative. Excellent summary of assessments provided. Total scores shown where required. Copy of each assessment uploaded when required.

45 to >41.0 pts

Proficient

All components scored correctly based on the narrative. Good summary of assessments provided. Total scores shown where required. Copy of each assessment uploaded when required.

41 to >37.0 pts

Developing

All components scored mostly correct based on the narrative. Adequate summary of assessments provided. Total scores shown where required. Most copies of assessments uploaded when required.

37 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations

Components not scored correctly based on the narrative. Adequate summary of assessments provided. Total scores not shown where required. Copies of assessments not uploaded when required.

0 pts

Not Present

50 pts

Diagnostic Impressions

14 to >12.0 pts

Advanced

Primary diagnosis, issues, risks shown. Secondary diagnosis, issues, risks shown.

12 to >10.0 pts

Proficient

Primary diagnosis, issues, risks shown. Secondary diagnosis, issues, risks mostly shown.

10 to >8.0 pts

Developing

Primary diagnosis, issues, risks shown. Secondary diagnosis, issues, risks not shown.

8 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations

Incorrect primary diagnosis, issues, risks shown. Incorrect secondary diagnosis, issues, risks shown.

0 pts

Not Present

14 pts

Trauma Case Study: Child Grading Rubric | TRMA830_D02_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Recommendations 15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

Minimum of three recommendation shown, Competent reasons shown, Resources cited in current APA for each.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Minimum of three recommendation shown, General reasons shown, Resources cited in current APA for each.

11 to >10.0 pts

Developing

Two recommendation shown, General reasons shown, Resources cited in current APA for most.

10 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations

One to two recommendation shown, General reasons barely or not shown, Resources cited in current APA for some or none.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Organization 11 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement.

9 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

All required elements are included and organized. There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement or comes very close.

8 to >7.0 pts

Developing

Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

7 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations

Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

0 pts

Not Present

11 pts

Trauma Case Study: Child Grading Rubric | TRMA830_D02_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Style 15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

The paper properly uses current APA style. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.

11 to >10.0 pts

Developing

The paper inconsistently uses current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

10 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations

The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

0 pts

No Marks

15 pts

Sources 10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources. All sources are referenced throughout the paper.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The Reference page meets the required number of sources. Most sources are referenced throughout the paper.

7 to >6.0 pts

Developing

The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. Not all sources are referenced throughout the paper.

6 to >0.0 pts

Below Expectations

The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. Not enough sources are referenced throughout the paper, or none are referenced.

0 pts

No Marks

10 pts

Total Points: 120

Trauma Case Study: Child Grading Rubric | TRMA830_D02_202230