Maritime Security

profileKila
Transportation7.pptx

Mass Transit on Fixed Rails and Guideways

Chapter 7

Week 9

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Mass Transit History

Horse drawn trolleys led city growth

Subways, subway-surface cars and elevated trains were twentieth century methods for moving workers to jobs

Short haul passenger rail connected outer suburbs to inner cities

Cable cars and monorails remain as tourist attractions

Light rail focuses on transit oriented development

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Mass Transit

Self-powered

Operating on tracks or guideways

Electric powered

Environmentally friendly

No air pollution at point of usage, unlike diesel busses

Fixed route and fixed station locations

Some operate in street right-of-way and cause traffic congestion

Some operate in their own right-of-way but at grade an cause traffic blockages at crossings

Many systems removed after WW II

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Mass Transit

1970s gas crisis led to new appreciation of mass transit

Commuter rail shared tracks with freight rail

Cities added new subway lines – New York and San Francisco

Light rail added in Los Angeles and San Diego

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Components

Trolleys = 456 directional route miles

Light rail systems had 1,477 directional route miles

Commuter rail had 7,561 directional route miles.

13,000 vehicles in urban mass transit service on rails

6,494 commuter rail cars and locomotives

Transit rail vehicles traveled 762 million miles in 2008

Commuter rail travelled 337 million miles.

Mass transit rail systems accounted for 18,931 million passenger miles in 2008

Commuter rail accounted for another 11,032 million passenger miles.

By 2002 more than six thousand agencies operated bus, rail, ferry and other transit systems.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Locations

At grade, elevated and subways, may use tunnels

Limited access and egress points – through existing buildings, dedicated stations

Right-of-way is within 25 feet of the track

Can only go backward or forward on the track, sometime single set

For subways and elevated lines and in tunnels, repair, recovery or rescue vehicles have to use the same track

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Trolleys, Streetcars and Trams

Developed in nineteenth century for urban travel

First steam and cable but then electricity

“Trolley” is the part that contacts the electric rail

San Francisco, Philadelphia an New Orleans still have trolleys

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Trolleys, Streetcars, Trams

Trolleys have to travel on fixed tracks

Schedule is usually intervals between arrival rather than times schedule

“Mixed traffic” is when trolley and cars share the same street

Safety problems

Rails are slippery when wet

Drivers needing to turn left have to cross trolley tracks

Riders have to walk across lanes of traffic to access the trolley, which typically stops near the corner

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Light Rail

Uses existing street rights-of-way to create rapid transit

Operate as single cars or sets

Generally have their own operating space, with grade separation from traffic, or fenced area

Freeway can carry about 2,000 cars per hour , an average light rail car can carry 20,000 riders per hour

Cars crossing tracks at intersections are protected with left turn lane and left turn signal

Riders usually have pedestrian crossing to reach the platform, separated from traffic

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Subways, Underground, Metro, Tube

Underground commuter systems powered by electricity

1863, London, world’s first; 1904, New York; 1907, Philadelphia

Extensive infrastructure: tunnels beneath city streets, stations, electric wires & transformers, ventilation systems

Large operating rooms where signals, lighting, ventilation and power are coordinated

Entrances at street level

Stations at the basement level of surrounding buildings

Ticket purchasing options

Information kiosks.

Stations may have a single entry to a single line, with a cross over to the opposite direction track, or multiple corridors leading to several systems in both directions.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Subways, Underground, Metro, Tube

Security challenges

Limited access, generally by stairs, so difficult to evacuate during rush hour

ADA elevators

Some deep systems have escalators, but heat or ice and snow at the top can stop operation

Log corridors require lighting and ventilation, making power outage a crisis

Challenge for EMS response

Carrying equipment an patient long distances

Challenge for Fire personnel wearing SCBA

Challenge for police patrol

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Subway tunnels

Limited access

Often under water or through rock

Deep systems may have multiple escalators, susceptible to power outage and breakdowns

Usually accessible only at station portals, although older systems may have cross overs.

Ventilation using forced air, fans, pneumatic action of trains with air intakes at sidewalk level

Tunnels are lit by electric light bulbs that are triggered by the train’s passage, leaving the tunnels dark between trains

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Elevated Systems

Chicago most famous “El”

Above ground on limited access tracks

“Cat walks” for repair and maintenance along some segments

Access through second story of existing buildings or through stations above streets

Access by stairs and elevators with ADA accommodations

Open air ventilation

Emergency access by ladders possible

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Tourist-Oriented Systems

Cable cars

Cable runs under the street

Motorman engages and disengages the car to the cable for passenger access

Handbrake holds steady on inclines

Monorails

Use urban air space to save ground level for cars

Single rail on elevated track, system usually timed for cars to pass at stations

Disney uses monorails from hotels to parks

Seattle’s was built for the 1962 World’s Fair

Tokyo’s was built for the 1964 Olympics

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Heavy Passenger Rail

Heavy rail commuter trains

share tracks with freight railroad companies

Variety of cars

traditional railway carriages

double-decker cars offering WiFi, tables, restrooms and bicycle storage.

Commuter trains are generally self-propelled

Electricity or diesel engines

Trains may be on a push-pull system using a locomotive, which may be electric or diesel.

Commuter rail usually travels longer distances at higher speeds and at a higher cost than light rail systems.

Light rail stations may be a mile or less apart to support a walking environment

Commuter rail stations are usually ten or more miles apart, supported by bus line connections or car parks.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Heavy Passenger Rail

Open system, may use tunnels or bridges, may be fenced in urban area

Grade crossings in less populated areas, over or under crossings for busy streets

Access through stations which may be at grade, elevated or underground

Stations are frequently multi-modal exchange points

bus stops

taxi stands

parking lots for commuters’ cars

“kiss and ride” lots with short term parking for picking up commuters

Access to other mass transit systems like subways or light rail.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Break

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Cyber System Controls: CI Interconnections

Mass transit rail-based systems almost all operate on electricity from the public grid.

Electric power transmission and distribution is dependent on SCADA systems.

Many of mass transit’s computer-based systems transmit information over telephone or wireless systems to the computers, and communications systems are also dependent on SCADA infrastructure.

Ability of rail-based mass transit systems to operate effectively is based on systems dependent on computer functionality.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Cyber System Controls

Modern rail-based mass transit systems rely on computer controls

train schedules and announcements

Signals and switches

ventilation, heating and air conditioning

ticketing and access to stations.

Some systems even operate the cars by computer without human drivers.

Modern security systems have computer tie-ins

closed circuit television

fire alarms, smoke detection systems and intrusion detection alarms

SCADA systems – Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition-they are dependent on computer functionality (SCADA, n.d.), and are crucial to the safety and security of passengers and employees.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Threats to Rail-Based Transit Systems

Mid-1980s- the threats to rail-based transit systems

homeless people living in the stations

unruly youths annoying and threatening other passengers

graffiti defacing cars and station walls

violent criminal acts = robbery, drug dealing and shooting.

Targeted enforcement campaigns like New York City Transit’s have largely eliminated the worst criminal violence from rail-based urban mass transit systems

In this same period in other nations terrorists had targeted rail-based mass transit,

Goal to hurt the economy or the government’s credibility, not to injure passengers.

IRA waged a war of terror against British interests for over eighty years

targeting the London subway system and commuter rail throughout the county

IRA would contact law enforcement with enough warning time to remove people but not to protect the system.

British tube riders accepted the inconvenience and cooperated with evacuations.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

21st Century – Transit as Site, Weapon and Victim

International terrorism has focused on rail-based transit

Liberation groups like the Chechan rebels and Tamil Tigers, 1990s into 21st century

Rise of Islamist terrorists = spread of violence against all types of transportation.

Jenkins’ = 1920-1997

639 attacks or threats against commuter systems, stations, tunnels and bridges

1970- 2009 chronology - attacks against transportation since 1970, and train derailments since 1920

522 attacks against rail-based mass transit alone

434, or 83%, used explosives or incendiary devices.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Rail-Based Mass Transit

Most attacks against rail-based mass transit have been in other countries

Madrid, London, Mumbai, Moscow

Plots against NYC Transit, PATH thwarted so far…

US mass transit = open system, concentration of people

Attack = loss of life, psychological damage

Circulatory system of urban environment, economic engine

NYC Transit = $400 million/day

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Cyber Systems

HSPD-7: CI/KR

National Cyber Alert System

. “[P]hysical access to network switches and jacks related to SCADA provides the capacity to bypass the security on control software and control SCADA networks.”

Firewalls, VPN to protect interconnected CI/KR

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Attacks Against Rail-Based Systems

Passengers cannot flee easily, constrained by tracks, fences, elevation or tunnels.

Light and air depend on power from the outside, although generator back-up systems may be provided

Electric vehicles require electricity from the community grid to move

Large groups, contained for periods between stations

Small arms and explosives like surface transit

Stations and service corridors offer more hiding places

Remote control or times devices

Limited air exchange makes biological weapons attractive

Challenge to prevent, recognize and apprehend

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Actual Events

Criminals and mentally ill still greatest threat

Terrorists more efficient

Small arms, chemical, fire, explosives

Disrupted events planned for biological

Cyber is future potential attack mode

Jenkins’ chronologies of mass transit to 1920.

Attacks on surface transportation increased over the past 25 years

Israel most attacks; India and Pakistan most fatalities.

600 attacks 1920 and 1997 on rail-based mass transit, commuter rail and light rail

27% of the attacks against vehicles

13% of the attacks against stations.

The IRA in the United Kingdom and the Algerian extremists in France

Aum Shinrikyo chemical attack on Tokyo subway lines

Starting in 1993 Islamic extremists plots against on the New York City subway systems.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Actual Attacks

Long Island Railroad Murders, 1993

Mentally ill man

Small arms

Random targets

Dead and wounded

Slow response to uninjured passengers

Psychological injuries

Aum Shinrikyo, 1995

Religious cult

Chemical Sarin

Targeted trains that converged on the Tokyo subway station that served the police department

Deaths, injuries

Slow response to event and clean-up

Injured contaminated hospitals, taxis; trains went on to other stations

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Actual Attacks

Arson on Korean Subway, 2003

Mentally ill, suicidal man

Burning liquid

Materials in car toxic when burned

Burned electric circuits locked doors, trapped passengers inside car

Dead, injured missing

70 incinerated in car, 50 died on stairs trying to escape

Slow communications

Fire in station cut lighting and ventilation

European IEDs

Madrid, 2004 used left behind IEDs in backpacks with cell phone timers; Al Qaeda sympathizers

London, 2005 was suicide bombers; Al Qaeda sympathizers

Moscow, 2010 was Chechan rebels, suicide bombers

All mass carnage for a political cause

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Security Strategies for Rail-Based Systems

Fixed routes and schedules

Cannot deviate from rails

Specified stations, tunnels, bridges

More predictability but better focus for technology – cameras, lights, alarms

Prevention is hard

Response and recovery plans easier

Redundancy and dual purpose plans.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Security Cycle

Minor intrusions are important indicators

“See Something, say Something” needs to be enlarged to include reports of vandalism

Create partnerships for rapid information exchange with internal personnel and those from other agencies

Street repair, utility repair and grounds maintenance personnel from other companies can be a resource

Employees are also “eyes and ears” Train operators,

ticket sellers

station cleaning crews

Vendors – newspapers and food

Conscious of changes in passenger behavior, breakdowns of equipment, operational problems with facilities.

Employees and vendors should receive the same security vigilance training as mass transit staff

Create central pit of contact for information from all station and system employees

Report damage, vandalism and unusual behavior

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Security Cycle

Law Enforcement Personnel

Situational awareness in stations

Collaborate with other law enforcement agencies on petty crime, gang activity, terrorism threats

Technology operators

Fire and smoke alarms. Intrusion detection, cameras

Communication with law enforcement or security for quick response

Operators collect data and provide to central POC

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Security Cycle

Information collected must be analyzed in a central point for patterns

Leads to creation of proprietary intelligence

Analysts need to collaborate with local fusion center, read FTA’s weekly bulletins, DHS newsletters

Local crime, damage to the system and presence of unexpected persons can lead to useful intelligence to create security enhancements like changes of personnel deployment, redirection of cameras and lighting, e.g copper wire thefts

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Training on Policy Changes

Staff must be made aware of new threats and policy changes

Brief bulletins for simple changes- reporting path, us of cameras

Briefing training on bigger policy changes- access control, security system enhancements

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Security Technologies

Consider cost-benefit

Dual use like enhanced or redundant lighting, back-up power for ventilation, roving patrols, fire protection

Single purpose item consideration

Response to identified threat

Many technologies and all not equally effective

Employment of security strategies requires engineering advice

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Functions Relative Effectiveness Costs Physical or Operational Strategy Benefits/ Dual use
Minimum Strategies          
Lighting High Medium Physical Deter Anti-theft, safety
Ventilation enhancements High Very High Physical & Operational Mitigate Safety
Fire Detection System Medium Low Physical Detection Safety
Fire Protection System High High Physical & Operational Mitigate Safety
Cameras High Medium Physical Operational Deter and Interdict Traffic surveillance, facility design efficiency
Security Awareness training: employees and passengers High Low Operational Deter, Mitigate Safety, Security
Roving patrols Medium Low Operational Deter, Detect, Interdict Safety, Security

Excerpt from Security Strategies for Rail-based Mass Transit

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Human Element

Some systems operate without human action once installed – ventilation

Some need human interface on schedule, e.g. camera tape management

Vehicle cameras for accident liability, also for criminal apprehension

Gets help to drive and passengers in an emergency if monitored

Cameras recorded and monitored in parking areas, platforms, passageways

Presence of a camera may deter crime

Monitored cameras are only as good as the observer

Dual use cuts down on routine crime and vandalism

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Human Element

Roving patrols

Randomness to defeat criminal surveillance

Change number of personnel and direction of patrol

LIRR free rides to armed law enforcement commuters

Random inspection of commuters’ baggage

VIPR teams for any transit system

High visibility apprehensions

Petty crime, vandalism

Perimeter control

Station and platform patrol

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Explosives Detection

Jenkins considers threat to mass transit

Behavioral assessment

DHS Hostile Intent Detection

SPOT program

Nin-intrusive evaluation of stress, fear or deception

Suicide Bomber Recognition and Response Guides

Random sweeps through crowds using dogs

Portable detection units for left behind items

Probable cause to swab something in someone’s possession- might be the behavioral clues

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Training and Exercises

What to report and how to report it

System Security Awareness for Transit Employees

Emergency and Security Plan

Medical

Fire

Crime

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Training and Exercises

Passenger training on what to report and how to report it

Cell phone cameras can help transit security but may lead to social media involvement

See Something, Say Something messages

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Cyber Security

Intrusion

Intentional hacking

Viruses

Physical access to system components

Remote or automated control of systems

Firewalls, anti-virus software and redundant manual controls of mechanical, electrical and communications systems offer protection

Human element

No USB drives at work

No internet access from SCADA computers

Safeguard passwords

Physical locks kept locked

Doors not propped open

Change codes and passwords regularly

Hot sites and cold sites for COOP

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

Summary

In the open environment of rail-based mass transit perfect security is not possible.

Steps can be taken to encourage public participation in the security of the system.

Employees can become partners in observation and reporting suspicious objects and people. Mitigation measures can be taken to lessen the likelihood of damage and the amount of damage from crime or attack.

Deterrence, detection and interdiction systems can be applied.

Rapid response will limit damage and losses, and a recovery plan will limit economic impacts.

©2013, CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis

image2.jpeg

image3.jpeg

image4.jpeg

image5.jpeg

image6.jpeg

image7.jpeg

image8.jpeg

image9.jpeg

image10.jpeg

image11.jpeg

image12.jpeg

image13.jpeg

image14.jpeg

image15.jpeg

image16.jpeg

image17.jpeg

image18.jpeg

image19.jpeg

image20.jpeg

image21.jpeg

image22.jpeg