TRANSFORMING NURSING

profilepreet22
TRANSFOMINGNURSINGWK8INSTRUCTIONS.docx

LITERATURE REVIEW: THE USE OF CLINICAL SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AND EFFICIENCIES

New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

· Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

· Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

· For information about annotated bibliographies, visit  https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

· Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

· In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

· Use APA format and include a title page.

· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8

Submit your completed Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described....Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

The response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described....Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Response includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

Response includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

ATTENTION

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

· Conduct a search for recent (within the  last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. Do not use old sources, webpages, or sources other than the Library databases (Proquest, CINAHL, Ebscoe, for example). The research should  provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as (for example) “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”  Choose one clinical system, find articles/research about it.

· Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed articlesfrom your research. The articles should include research or extensive commentary related to your chosen clinical system and to the application of the system. Webpages, college websites, consumer website are not appropriate. Put in your search criteria: peer reviewed. The goal is to find evidence to support your topic.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed.  Be sure to address the following:

· Identify the 4 peer-reviewed articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.  You will use a full reference in the body of the paper for each article and not a reference page as usual. In text  Citations are not needed because the reference is noted at the beginning of each article summary.

· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

· Students usually submit formatting several different ways. Your paper should follow this organizational model:

1. Start with a title page: Page numbers are always upper right-hand corner; centered on the page is Title of your paper ( bolded); your name; Course number and course name; Walden University; Instructor name; date of submission. Do not add a header (this has not been required for nearly 2 years at Walden). Do not add an abstract. Do not add a Table of contents.

2. On the second page add a Level 1 heading: Title of your paper (this first heading is  bolded).

3. The first paragraph is the introduction to your topic. Include the main points to be found in your paper. Include a purpose statement: The purpose of this paper is.....

4. Body of the paper:  Begin with each full reference; Left justified (Same as a Level 2 heading. Indent all lines after the first line. Then  begin a new paragraph, which is the summary of your first article. In text citations are not necessary in an annotated bibliography because it is assumed all information came from the one source. However, if you use direct quotes (which I highly urge you not to), please add the proper formatted direct quote.  Repeat this for every source you are summarizing.

5. The final paragraph is the conclusion. Heading:  Conclusion (left justified or centered). The conclusion is a summary and reminds the reader of the main points. There is no new content added to a conclusion paragraph.

6. Lastly, Reference page.  There is no reference page. All full references should be noted in the body of the paper.

Additional basic APA tips: Double space only; font is Times New Roman, size 12; page numbers on every page, upper right-hand corner; NEVER add an author's full first name or the academic credentials in a reference- last name and initials only. Look at the APA text, the library sources, or to PurdueOwl website.

I hope these tips help with this big assignment. Remember this is a portfolio assignment. If you have any questions, always email me. I am happy to assist. I want you to be successful.