Katharine Becks -Training

profilerbgriff
TrainingandDevelopmentProject.docx

Training & Development Project

This project requires the development of a training program for an organization, involving the identification of a training need, the specification of the KSAOs (knowledge, skills, abilities and other personal characteristics) to be learned, the level of proficiency to be achieved, training contents/topics, training methods and methods of evaluation to be used.  You are encouraged to develop a training program for a volunteer position for the organization for your employer, a school, hospital, Salvation Army, United Way, etc.  Please consider selecting a training need that is of interest to you and perhaps your employer.  This training project is to allow you to gain experience developing a  short  training program OR you could also describe an existing training program, critique it and describe in detail how you would improve it.  An example of a Training Program Plan is available under “Files” on Canvas for your consultation.

Due:  T&D Project due by 02/23/2020.

Grade Value: The Training & Development project is worth 35% of the total course grade.

Rubric

Grading Rubric for T&D Project

Grading Rubric for T&D Project

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGOALS/OBJECTIVES: Outcomes for training.

1.0 pts

The project met or exceeded all requirements of the assignment excellently. well formed: specific, measurable, realistic, attainable, stretch, behavioral, concrete.

0.6 pts

Clearly stated.

0.3 pts

Poorly stated, vaguely formed outcomes.

0.0 pts

Not stated goals/objectives.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOVERVIEW: Introduction of purpose of presentation, case or problem and background described, overview of T&D plan described; informs participants of their role and what is expected.

1.0 pts

Clear and confident introduction of roles and purpose, overview, and agenda; relevant & clear background.

0.6 pts

Introduction was made; clear overview/agenda and background, but could be more complete or polished.

0.3 pts

Introduction of presentation but awkward, sketchy or unclear overview/agenda and background.

0.0 pts

No introduction or overview, background or agenda.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOVERALL ORGANIZATION & CONSISTENCY

1.0 pts

Organized, consistent and easy to understand. Description, learning objectives, content and methods are consistent and connected to each other

0.6 pts

Displayed organization, some consistency and ease of understanding. Description, learning objectives, content and methods needs to be worked on for more consistency and connection to each other.

0.3 pts

Little organization or consistency shown; lacks connection to course objectives.

0.0 pts

Training is not organized or prepared.

1.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRATIONALE FOR DESIGN: Explanation of underlying reasons and strategy for sequencing activities.

0.5 pts

Complete rationale based on training theory.

0.3 pts

Complete rationale but not based on or supported by training theory.

0.15 pts

Brief but incomplete rationale.

0.0 pts

No explanation of rationale.

0.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENT, AESTHETICS, CREATIVITY & LAYOUT

0.5 pts

The content of project is thoughtful and meaningful. Explored combinations and revisions on several ideas, made connections to previous knowledge, showed an awareness of the elements and principles of design, chose a color scheme carefully, and used space effectively.

0.3 pts

The content of your project is meaningful. The artwork shows that you applied the principles of design while using one or more elements effectively; showed an awareness of using the space adequately.

0.15 pts

The assignment was adequately done, yet it shows a lack of planning and little evidence that an overall composition was thought out and executed.

0.0 pts

The project shows little evidence of thought regarding content and the elements and principles of art and design.

0.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEVALUATION OF TRAINING

1.0 pts

Trainer showed a plan to check for learner’s understanding of training material (Examples include a question and answer period, practice of skills with feedback and/or reflection and planning time) throughout the training.

0.6 pts

Trainer showed a plan to check for learner understanding of training material.

0.3 pts

Trainer showed an attempt to check for learner understanding of training material.

0.0 pts

Trainer did not show any plan to check for learner understanding of training material.

1.0 pts

Total Points: 5.0