presentation

Assignment 2 – IND150

Title Text Analysis

Value 35%

Week Due Friday Week 7

Length 1000 words and 15 minute oral presentation

Learning Outcomes Unit Outcomes

2,3,4

Task Description

In assessment 1 you completed a mind map of the process of colonisation. In assessment two you are to select an article written about the colonisation process that portrays the point of view of the coloniser. Your job is to reinterpret the text into a 1000 word document so that it is now written from the point of view of the colonised. Obviously, this is not to be done word for word but in a way that conveys the central messages.

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your knowledge of the opposing perspectives, and of the mechanism at play in the colonisation process. It should highlight a cause and effect element.

Then, you must present your work.

Preparation

To prepare for this assignment you need to; 1. Know the mechanisms of colonisation. 2. Understand the chosen article and the impact of actions described. 3. Decide how this may be expressed from ‘the other’ perspective. 4. Think about how to effectively present your work.

Presentation

The presentation for this is assessment may be a PowerPoint . As you will not be presenting

this in a class environment your notes section needs to contain what you would say if you were

giving this presentation orally. Use the appropriate referencing. APA is preferred.

The assessment criteria document gives information on how your assessment will be marked.

Read this carefully.

HD (8 5 -1 0 0 ) D (7 5 -8 4 ) C (6 5 -7 4 ) P ass (5 0 -6 4 ) Fail (0 -4 9 ) Total

Content (4 0 %)

Content is accurate and thoroughly and consistently supported with academic evidence. All requirements are met 40 39 38 37 36 35 34

Content is mostly accurate and effectively and consistently supported with academic evidence. All requirements are met 33.6 33 32 31 30

Content is generally accurate and moderately supported with academic evidence. Most of the requirements are met 29.6 29 28 27 25 24

Content is satisfactory and at times supported with academic evidence. Some of the requirements are met. 23.6 23 22 21 20

Content is limited and frequently unsupported with academic evidence. Limited or none of the requirements are met. 19.6 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Or ganis atio n (2 0 %)

Information is organised in highly effective structure which is clear and logical. Presentation has a clear, concise and a very effective beginning, development and conclusion 20 19 18 17 16.8

Information is organised in an effective structure which is clear and logical. Presentation has an effective and concise beginning, development and conclusion. 16.8 15 14.9

Information is organised in good structure which is logically sequenced. Presentation has a reasonable and clear beginning, development and conclusion 14.8 14 13 12 11.9

Information is somewhat organised with little structure and at times is not logical. Presentation is acceptable but at times is has an unclear beginning, development and conclusion 11.8 11 10 9.9

Information is limited and at times has no organisation or structure. Presentation is unclear, incoherent or under developed; transitions are unclear or missing 9.8 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

D esign / Cr eativit y (1 5 %)

All graphics and visual aids are outstanding and support the content of the presentation.

All graphics and visual aids are effective and support the content of the presentation. Presentation shows

Graphics and visual aids are acceptable and support the content of the presentation. Presentation shows

Graphics and visual aids are reasonable but inconsistent and at times do not support the content of the

Graphics and visual aids are limited or not used and often do not support the content of the presentation.

Presentation shows extensive originality, creativity and innovation. 15 14 13 12.7

considerable originality, creativity and innovation. 12.6 12 11.2

moderate originality, creativity and innovation. 11.1 10 9 8.86

presentation. Presentation shows flaws in originality, creativity and innovation 8.85 8 7.36

Presentation does not show originality, creativity or innovation 7.35 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Refer encin g (1 5 %)

Sources are clearly integrated into and advance the argument. The presentation consistently and accurately uses appropriate Harvard referencing style. 15 14 13 12.7

Sources are clearly related to and advance the argument. The presentation consistently and strongly uses the Harvard referencing style. 12.6 12 11.2

Sources are used to substantiate the argument. The presentation uses appropriate Harvard referencing style, however some errors present 11.1 10 9 8.86

Sources are used but inconsistently. The presentation attempts to use Harvard referencing style with errors present. 8.85 8 7.36

Source material is misquoted, used out of context or not used at all. The presentation frequently has inaccurate use of Harvard referencing style. 7.35 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Effective ness an d D eliver y / Gr ammar and S pellin g (1 0 %)

Presentation includes all information needed to gain an extensive understanding of the topic. It is an highly effective presentation with no grammatical or text errors 10 9 8.5

Presentation includes all information needed to gain a considerable understanding of the topic. It is an effective presentation with minimal grammatical, or text errors 8.4 8 7.5

Presentation includes most information needed to gain a moderate understanding of the topic. It is an very good presentation with some grammatical or text errors 7.4 7 6

Presentation includes some information needed to gain a satisfactory understanding of the topic. It is a good presentation but with many grammatical or text or errors. 5.9 5

Presentation does not provide enough information needed to gain an understanding of the topic. Grammar and text errors are consistently present 4.9 4 3 2 1 0

Co m m e n t s

To t a l