Tk20 Assessment Assignment
TK20 Assessment - Diversity and Professional Organizations and Journals EDSE 4070
1. Read the first chapter from the required course text related to the foundations of multicultural education to understand how professional organizations and journals reflect key themes of American society. 2. Become familiar with at least one professional organization from your content area (math, physical education, English, etc.). These professional organizations will most likely have links/resources/guides to appropriate content related, peer-reviewed journals. 3. Read three articles from professional journals in your teaching field (content area) that focus on teaching your subject matter. The articles you select must relate to the following topics: gender, exceptionality, race or ethnicity, socio-economic class, linguistic diversity, or other theme strongly related to diversity in American society and schools. 4. Write an analysis of each article in terms of usefulness, newness of information, adaptation based on your student teaching needs, and other pedagogical aspects. This means you need to provide thoughtful, highly detailed analysis of usefulness of the articles' approaches to diversity in planning future practice and present clear, well-developed plans for ways to address diversity in future practice based on the information in the articles. 5. The length is 2 ½ - 3 pages of full text for each article analysis - excluding the reference page. 6. The paper will have parenthetical/in-text references. 7. Include a reference page and cover sheet (review APA). 8. You will turn in copies of the sources that you used in the paper with the parts that you used highlighted, underlined or marked in some way. These can be in the form of a word document, downloaded article, scanned article, etc. 9. Use APA formatting style 10. The paper will have 1 inch margins, be double spaced, and use New Times Roman size 12 font. 11. Review the rubric for this assignment (located under TK20 assessment tools as well as presented below).
Due: Submission Via TK20 by 11:59PM of the due date
* 24 Point Rubric
Criterion Performance Rating
Absent Unsatisfactory Developing Target Outstanding Score
1.Subject-‐specific professional journal(s) addressing diversity themes and articles are attached and highlighted.
0 No journals are identified which address diversity themes.
1 The articles selected are not from a subject-‐specific professional journal or do not address diversity themes.
2 One article is from a subject-‐specific professional journal and addresses diversity themes.
3 Two articles are from subject-‐specific professional journals and address diversity themes.
4 All articles selected are from subject-‐ specific professional journals which address diversity themes.
2. Understanding of diversity issues
0 No understanding of the issues relating to diversity is expressed.
1 Demonstrates little understanding of the issues relating to diversity expressed in the articles.
2 Demonstrates appropriate understanding of the issues relating to diversity expressed in one article.
3 Demonstrates an appropriate understanding of the issues relating to diversity expressed in two articles.
4 Demonstrates a strong understanding of the issues relating to diversity expressed in three articles.
3. Analysis of approaches to diversity
0 No analysis of approaches to diversity is provided. No connection to theory, textbooks and lectures is given.
1 Provides little analysis of connecting theory, textbook and lectures to diversity.
2 Provides some analysis connecting theory textbook and lecture to diversity.
3 Provides thoughtful analysis connecting theory textbook and lecture to diversity.
4 Provides thoughtful, highly detailed analysis connecting theory textbook and lecture to diversity.
4. Plans to address diversity in practice
0 No application plans to address diversity in future field experiences are presented.
1 Presents few application plans for ways to address diversity in future field experiences.
2 Presents some application plans for ways to address diversity in future field experiences.
3 Presents clear application plans for ways to address diversity in future field experiences.
4 Presents clear, well-‐developed application plans for ways to address diversity in future field experiences.
5. Command of Standard English
0 Does not show a command of Standard English grammar and punctuation. Contains many errors that seriously detract from meaning.
1 Writing shows an adequate command of Standard English grammar, but punctuation may contain many errors that seriously detract from meaning.
2 Writing shows an adequate command of Standard English grammar and punctuation. May include errors that slightly detract from the meaning or distract the reader.
3 Shows a good command of Standard English grammar and punctuation. May include minor errors that do not detract from the meaning.
4 Shows a strong command of Standard English grammar and punctuation.
6. Organization, readability and format
0 No meaning is conveyed due to a lack of organization. Formatting or length requirements not met. APA format not used.
1 The paper has problems with organization, or APA format. Formatting and length requirements are met.
2 The paper is readable, but may have problems with organization and/or not meet all guidelines for essay formatting, APA format, length or references.
3 The paper is generally well-‐organized, and follows guidelines for essay formatting, APA format, length and references. Is attractive and easy to read.
4 The paper is uniformly well organized, closely follows guidelines for essay formatting, APA format, length or references. Is attractive and easy to read.
Total Score
Comments