Master of International Tourism and Hospitality Management -

% of marks : % score Excellent (95%) Good work (85%) Better than average (70%) OK (50%) Needs more work (40%) CVF (15%)

Completion of the correct CVF

survey (36 questions)

Completed the appropriate CVF survey.

Attached CVF survey to uploaded

assessment

Completed the appropriate CVF survey.

Attached CVF survey to uploaded

assessment

Completed the 'wrong' CVF survey.

Attached CVF survey to uploaded

assessment

Completed the appropriate CVF survey.

Did not attach to assessment Did not complete the survey or attach

CVF links (30%)

Application of evidence & links to

elements of the CVF.

Clear links between CVF survey results and

the different elements of the CVF.

Better scores will identify 'roles' /

'competencies'

Clear links between CVF survey results and

the different elements of the CVF.

Some links between CVF survey results and

the different elements of the CVF

Some attempt at links between CVF survey

results. Very general

Few or no clear links between CVF survey

results and the different elements of the

CVF. Very general comments

Industry links (30%)

Application of evidence & links to

the role of a manager and to

management [in a tourism and

hospitality context]

Clear personal links to industry experiences

and the role of managers / management

Clear connection to CVF survey results

Clear personal links to industry experiences

and the role of managers / management

Some focus on CVF survey results

Clear links to industry experiences and the

role of managers - within T & H organistions

No personal experiences

Attempted links to industry experiences

More general and little connection to CVF

survey results

Very general: no lnks to personal industry

experiences

No connection to CVF survey results

Literature (15%)

Use of the Quinn et al text book

chapters: plus other sources

Included Quinn et al text source & used at

least 3 references. Broader range of

sources used.

Literature was relevant and well integrated

into the paper

Included Quinn et al text source & used at

least 3 references.

Literature was relevant and well integrated

into the paper

Included Quinn et al text only

Well integrated into the paper

Included Quinn et al text only

Attempted integration of literature into

paper

No text used and no other literature.

Presentation (10%)

Within word limit!

Correct referencing. Coherence of

presentation / correct grammar /

spelling

Adhered to word limit.

All in-text referencing was OK

Grammar, spelling and general flow of the

paper was excellent

Close to word limit.

All in-text referencing was OK

Grammar, spelling and general flow of the

paper was excellent

Close to word limit.

All in-text referencing was OK

Some grammar, spelling errors

Close word limit

Most in-text referencing was OK

Flow a bit messy with grammar / spelling

errors

Did not adhere to word limit

Incorrect referencing

Many grammar / spelling errors: paper did

not flow well