IFSM 380 DISC 7&8
Download Principles of Management for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected].
Things to Consider When Managing Teams
3. What are some key considerations in managing teams?
For those of us who have had the pleasure of managing or leading a team, we know that it can
feel like a dubious distinction. Leading a team is fulfilling—especially if the task or
organizational mandate at hand is so critical to the organization that people are happy to be a part
of the team that drives things forward. It can also be an exercise in frustration, as the charge is to
lead a group composed of various individuals, which at various times will act both like a group
and like a bunch of individuals. Managing teams is no small feat, and the most experience
managers truly understand that success ultimately depends on their ability to build a strong and
well-functioning team. In J.J. Gabarro’s The Dynamics of Taking Charge (HBS Press, 1987, pp.
85–87), he quotes a manager who had successfully worked to turn around a number of
organizations:4
“People have to want to work together; they have to see how to do it. There has to be an
environment for it and that takes time. It’s my highest priority right now but I don’t write it down
anywhere because it’s not like other priorities. If I told corporate that building a team was my
prime goal they’d tell me, so what? They’d expect that as part of making things better.”
I love this quotation because it’s so indicative of the state of most organizations today. The focus
is on corporate goals and priorities—very task-driven and outcome-driven—but it is the people
dynamics and how people work together in the company and in TEAMS that can make a real
difference to the goals and outcome.
Managerial Leadership
Who Am I Managing?
Making the jump from individual contributor to manager is never easy, and it doesn’t take long
for a new manager to realize that what got him there is much different than what is needed to be
successful in the future. Individual contributors that have been recently promoted would
probably say that they have strong technical skills in their area, and that they were very good at
doing what they were doing. In a more savvy organization that recognizes leadership
competencies, individual contributors would probably say that they have strong technical skills
AND that they showed some behaviors and potential to lead others. When new managers enter
their new roles, they expect that they will be managing people—that is, the people on their
teams. Few new managers fully realize that the challenge ahead is not just in managing their
people, but in managing all the other stakeholders and constituencies that want to and need to
weigh in.
One of the key challenges that faces new managers is figuring out to balance all of the multiple
demands from both the team and the stakeholders and constituencies external to the team. Linda
A. Hill, the Wallace Brett Donham Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business
School, states that “among all the challenges facing new managers, the need to reconcile
Download Principles of Management for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected].
different constituencies’ expectations and interests is probably the most difficult.” She asserts
that the demands that the new manager’s direct reports, his peers, his boss, and the company’s
customers place on the new manager will cause conflict at times. Having teams of their own,
new managers may think that managing their direct reports is the most important role to play,
even at the exclusion of managing other stakeholders. This is incorrect. A new manager needs to
“manage his other consistencies just as carefully.” (“Helping New Managers Succeed,” Lauren
Keller Johnson, HBR 2008).
Whenever I started a new role, I always created a quick stakeholder checklist for myself. This
document is essentially a list of all the stakeholders (beyond the team I am managing) with
whom I need to build a relationship in order to be successful. I listed the names of my boss, my
boss’s boss, my peers, and any other key influencers or internal customers from the business.
This is a quick checklist of the people that I need to immediately have a “meet and greet” with
and then possibly even set up a regular meeting with at a certain cadence. I have learned over the
years that each of these stakeholders will have some input and impact on my success, and the
quicker and more effectively I engage them in the work my team is performing, the better the
chance of my team’s success. Some of the questions I will ask myself when figuring out my
stakeholder list include:
Whose support will I need? Who needs my support? What do they need from me or my team? Who can keep me and my team from being successful? What is my ongoing influencing strategy?
Some new managers will feel that these strategies for building stakeholder support are too
“political” and they don’t feel right. Trust me when I tell you that this is a necessary part of the
new manager role, because now the role and the work call for greater interdependence and
relation building in order to be successful. It is no longer just about individual technical skills,
but more about building and managing relationships with people who will support you and your
team to get your work done. So, if you are a new manager asking “Who am I managing?” … the
answer is EVERYONE.
Discussion Questions
1. Do you agree with the statement that “what got you there isn’t what will make you successful in the future”? Why or why not?
2. Who would be on your stakeholder checklist? Which stakeholders are you already engaging and building relationships with?
In Linda A. Hill’s Harvard Business Review article “Managing Your Team”5 (HBR 1995), she
discusses that managing a team means managing paradox. Paradox exists in the fact that teams
have both individual and collective identities and goals. Each individual has goals and ideas as to
what he wants to accomplish—on the project, in one’s career, and in life. The team itself, of
course, has goals and success metrics that it needs to meet in order to be successful. Sometimes
these can be in conflict with each other. Competition may arise among team members, and a
win-loss attitude may take place over a collaborative and problem-solving team dynamic. The
team manager may need to step in to help integrate all of the individual differences to enable
Download Principles of Management for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected].
them to productively pursue the team goal. Therein lies the primary paradox—balancing
individual differences and goals AND the collective identity and goals. Other paradoxes include:
Fostering support AND confrontation among team members Focusing on performance AND learning and development Balancing managerial authority AND team member discretion and autonomy Balancing the Triangle of Relationships—manager, team, and individual
Managing a team also means managing its boundaries. Managing the team’s boundaries—or
space between the team and its external forces, stakeholders, and pressures—is a delicate balance
of strategy, stakeholder management, and organizational behavior. The team manager must
serve, in part, as a buffer to these external factors so that they don’t derail or distract the team
from its goals. However, the manager must also understand enough about the external
environment and have enough emotional intelligence to understand which forces, players, or
situations must be synthesized within the team for its own benefit. Think about any medium or
large-scale change initiative that you have been a part of in your career. Ideally, there is
generally a vision for change and a level of sponsorship at the senior levels of the organization
that is supposed to pave the way for that change to take root. The project team is officially
“blessed” to kick off the team, create a charter, and identify the needed actions to drive the
initiative to successful completion.
The dynamic that ensues after the kickoff is really what will determine the success of the team.
There are numerous stakeholders in any organization, and many will be pro–change initiative,
but others may be against the initiative—either due to lack of understanding or concerns about
losing power, territory, etc. The external environment and business strategy may not be
particularly well suited for a change initiative to take place, and so there may be the feeling of
forces opposing the project team efforts. A strong team manager needs manage these
“boundaries” with the organization to help the team navigate through and with the organizational
Exhibit 15.6 The Triangle of Relationships (Attribution:
Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC-BY 4.0 license)
Download Principles of Management for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected].
complexities, goals, nuances, and egos that are a part of any organization. In Linda A. Hill’s
Harvard Business Review article “Exercising Influence,” she states that “managers also need to
manage relationships with those who are outside their team but inside their organizations.6 To do
so, they must understand the power dynamics of the larger organization and invest time and
energy in building and maintaining relationship with those on who the team is dependent.” It is
also, in her view, “the manager’s job, at a minimum, to educate other about organizational
structures, systems, or politics that interfere with the team’s performance.” With all of the
potential external influences on a team, managing a team’s boundaries can truly mean the
difference between success and failure.
The final element of managing a team is to manage the team itself—both the people elements
and the process elements, or task at hand. The process-focused elements include managing the
work plan to reach the overall goal, as well as the incremental meetings and milestones that are a
part of the team’s journey to reach the longer-term goal. Keeping the team focused on its
objectives—beginning with setting agendas all the way to managing project tasks and celebrating
milestones—assures that the team will stay on track. Projects and initiatives vary in size, scope,
and complexity, and so the project management tools shouldn’t be prescribed in a general sense.
The important takeaway here is to choose an approach and a tool that works for the culture of the
team and the organization, and that helps the team understand where they are, where they need to
go, and what resources are a part of that process.
In managing the team members and interpersonal dynamics, there is the important element of
selecting the right team members, shaping the team’s norms and culture (how are decisions
made, what are our rules, how do we manage conflict, etc.), and coaching the team. Defining the
right skill sets, functions, perspectives, and expertise of the members will ensure a solid
foundation. Helping the team to identify and formalize the ground rules for team engagement
will help manage in the face of adversity or team conflict in the future. Finally, playing a role as
a supportive coach will help both the individual team members and the group entity think
through issues and make progress towards goals. A coach doesn’t solve the individual/team
problem, but helps the team think through a solution and move forward. Teams may need
guidance on how to work things out within the team, and the manager must provide feedback
and hold team members accountable for their behavior and contribution. Continuous
improvement is the name of the game. A team may not start out as high performing, but they can
certainly achieve that goal if everyone is focused on incremental improvements to
communication, collaboration, and performance.
Concept Check
1. Discuss the paradox(es) of a team. 2. How can a leader manage team boundaries?
This work "Things to Consider When Managing Teams" is a derivative of Things to Consider When Managing Teams by
OpenStax used under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. "Things to Consider When Managing Teams" by
UMGC is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License .