Order 1031893: Churchill′s Seven Jewish Children is anti-semitic. Agree or disagree.

T he storm over Car yl Churchill's "Seven Jewish Children'T he storm over Car yl Churchill's "Seven Jewish Children'

The power of theater: Eight minutes about Seven Jewish ChildrenSeven Jewish Children Carol Rocamora

May 16, 2009 in Theater

C h u rc h i l l : ' A p o l i t i c a l e ve n t . 'C h u rc h i l l : ' A p o l i t i c a l e ve n t . '

The English playwright Caryl

Churchill has been surprising and

shocking audiences for four

decades with her unpredictable

choice of subject matter and

innovative dramatic form. Her 28

plays— including

and

—

deal with a dazzling range of

topics, from 17th-Century

revolutionary idealism to

environmental poisoning to the

stock market to human cloning.

But they share a common ground

of social conscience, historical

perspective and a deeply felt

humanism.

Churchill's latest play has

unleashed a response that's

unprecedented even for her— not

only because of its provocative

content and unorthodox form, but

also because of the unique way in

which it has been disseminated.

Cloud Nine, Top

Girls, Far Away, A Number

Drunk Enough to Say I Love You

Seven Jewish Children: A Play for

, lasts only eight minutes, and was rushed into the world in response to the 22-day war between

Israel and Palestine that ended on January 18, 2009, killing roughly 1,300 Palestinians and 13 Israelis.

The play's narrative, written in seven poetic, page-long scenes, suggests a group of Israeli adults (parents,

grandparents, etc.) struggling over what to tell their children about recent stages of Jewish history. I say

"suggests"​ because Churchill provides no specifications of time and setting, no stage directions, no cast of characters, no indication of who speaks each line (indeed, we only surmise that members of an elder

generation are reciting the dialogue). The play seems to move from the pogroms of 19th-Century Eastern

Europe to the Holocaust to the founding of the state of Israel to the series of wars with Israel's neighbors

to the most recent tragic conflict in Gaza.

"Tell her/Don't tell her…." ​ is the incantation that is repeated again and again, as the elders anguish over conflicting interpretations of Israel's history. " ​Tell her her uncles died/Don't tell her they were killed,"​ they say about the Holocaust, for example; or "Don't tell her she doesn't belong here,"​ in reference to the migration to Israel in 1948; or "Don't tell her anything about the army/Tell her, tell her about the army," ​ about the current events in Gaza. Throughout, above all, is the of "Don't frighten her…." ​

was first read on February 6— only a week after Churchill had written it— at the

Royal Court Theatre in London (where Churchill has been a playwright in residence and where many of

her plays originated) with a company of nine actors. Churchill asked for no royalties, specifying instead

that the reading be given as a benefit for a charity called Medical Aid for Palestinians. Churchill

customarily declines to discuss her plays and rarely grants interviews, but she made a brief statement to

the Guardian, expressing feelings of urgency about the play.

"Anyone can perform it without acquiring the rights, as long as they do a collection for people in Gaza at

the end of it," ​ she said in her statement. "It's only a small play, but it came out of feeling strongly about what's happening in Gaza— it's a way of helping the people there. Everyone knows about Gaza, everyone

is upset about it, and this play is something they could come to. It's a political event, not just a theater

event."

The Royal Court promptly posted a full text of the play on its website. Subsequently, on February 26, a

few weeks after the reading, a video of the play performed by actress Jennie Stoller appeared on the

. But the British Broadcasting Corporation refused to broadcast it, citing a policy of

impartiality.

Gaza

leitmotif

A unique birthing process

Seven Jewish Children

websiteG u a rd i a nG u a rd i a n

"'Incitement to hatred'

The response to the reading and the website video was predictably explosive. critic Michael

Billington praised the play as an example of "theater's power to heighten consciousness and articulate

moral outrage," ​ while Christopher Hart of The Times of London called it a "dishonest and grossly anti- Israeli rant."​ Sixty-five prominent Jewish leaders co-signed a letter to the , denouncing

as historically inaccurate. The Spectator attacked the play as an "open incitement to

hatred"​ and a "ten-minute blood libel." ​

Since the turbulent opening, the play has been performed across the United Kingdom, adhering to

Churchill's specifications that, in lieu of royalties, contributions be made to Palestinian relief.

has captured the attention of American audiences and critics, too. The New York Theatre

Workshop held three readings of the play during the last week in March. On the night I attended, a group

of eight actors read through the play, followed by an audience discussion, and concluding with a re-

reading of the play as a monologue, this time by Andre Gregory, the director.

That same week in Washington D. C., two staged readings of the play were held on March 26 and 28 at

Theatre J, located in the Jewish Community Center in Washington"“ despite vigorous opposition from the

journalist Jeffrey Goldberg in (his headline ran "Caryl Churchill Advances Demonization of

Jews"​). Forums were held after each performance, including the reading of three "response plays" ​: , by Deb Margolin; , by Robbie Gringas; and , by

Iris Bahr.

"Listening to the sharp give-and-take became as integral to the experience as listening to the eight fine

actors reading from Churchill's script," ​ commented Peter Marks of the . As in London, the readings in America (subsequent ones were held in Seattle and Chicago) prompted further heated remarks

about the play in critics' columns and blogs.

I recently received a copy of the play from a colleague and distributed it to my students at New York

University's Tisch School of the Arts, where we read aloud the other day. Unlike

some of the more vocal public reactions, which reflected immediate concerns, my students looked at the

bigger picture.

"It could be about any struggle," ​ said one. "It could be about colonization in India."​

Guardian

Daily Telegraph

Seven Jewish Children

Seven

Jewish Children

"'Response plays' answer back

The Atlantic

Seven

Palestinian Children The Eighth Child Seven English Children

Washington Post

My students' broader perspective

Seven Jewish Children

"I think it's a tirade of an authority figure trying to calm down his people, but really trying to calm

himself,"​ said another.

"It's a very powerful piece about how we talk to our kids in a time of war, and it's a beautiful message,

really,"​ said yet another. "I think Churchill purposely leaves a lot out and only presents one side. This way she allows the audience to fill in the rest. As they leave the theater, they'll be saying, "'I don't believe that,

I believe this.' The play is very effective in that it'll get people talking."​

I am grateful for the clarity of my students' insights. They've provided an unbiased perspective on eight

minutes of theater that have accomplished so much. For the phenomenon of Seven Jewish Children isn't

only about Israeli history and the Palestine question. It's also about what Caryl Churchill has shown us

that theater can do.

She has written a play that has gone from the page to the stage in a matter of weeks, provoking an

immediate response and an ensuing worldwide dialogue.

She has written a play that received its "world premiere"​ on-line, uniquely casting a newspaper in the role of theater producer.

She has written a play that invites theaters to incorporate audience "talk-back"​ sessions into the presentation, rendering the post-performance discussion as integral to the play as the dramaturgy itself.

She has written a play that dramatically demonstrates, as the critic Michael Billington put it,

"theater's ability to react more rapidly than any other art form to global politics."​

She has written a play calling urgent attention to the responsibility of all adults, to explain our world to

our children.

As one of my students said, "Something good will come of this." ​

Guardian's

♦

More in Theater