Linguistics (Language in the World)
9/16/22, 11:27 PM The Step 2 Assignment - LING150A1 Fall 2022
https://d2l.arizona.edu/d2l/le/content/1163491/viewContent/12955405/View 1/5
Resources:
Note:
Project Overview | Get Help
This step involves collection of the consonant and vowel sounds you used in your Step 1 words to
seed a consonant inventory and a vowel inventory for your new language, and then add or modify the
inventories as you wish. You'll use an 'Illustrations of the IPA' article from the Journal of the
International Phonetic Association as a model for presenting your inventories to a reader.
Continue to use our class styleguide and the of�cial Interactive IPA Chart.
You will need an Illustrations of the IPA article as well.
To be eligible for a grade, your work must be submitted as a pdf �le to the
correct assignment folder. We do not accept assignments by email. If you
experience a technical dif�culty with your upload, contact the 24/7 IT
Support Desk and document that contact. Then notify Amy
The Assignment Revise your Step 1 as needed based on the assessment you received, and update your Change Log to
re�ect your revisions.
Draft two sections of your Language Project: Phonemic Inventories and Phonotactics and Rhthym. Your Phonemic Inventories should have two subsections: consonants and vowels.
Each of these sections should be introduced with a section header.
In phonemic inventories, describe the set of consonant and the set of vowel sounds your
language uses to distinguish words. Use (and cite) your Illustrations of the IPA article for
inspiration.
In the consonants subsection: introduce, present and describe a consonant chart that
includes all consonant sounds you'll use in your words. Select three pairs of consonant
sounds from your chart, and for each pair of sounds create a minimal pair of words in your
new language to show that those sounds are really contrastive.
In the vowels subsection: introduce, present and describe a vowel chart that includes all
vowel sounds you'll use in your words. Identify your language as using either contrastive
length or else contrastive tones (or both). Select two vowels from your chart, and for each
vowel create a minimal pair of words that illustrates your length or tone system.
Identifying Consonants, Vowels and Rhythms
9/16/22, 11:27 PM The Step 2 Assignment - LING150A1 Fall 2022
https://d2l.arizona.edu/d2l/le/content/1163491/viewContent/12955405/View 2/5
Note:
In the phonotactics and rhythm section, using the 'phonotactics' section of Bischoff and
Fountain's Phonology manuscript as a model, describe the rules in your language that govern
the interleaving of consonants and vowels in words. Identify whether your language
requires words to be consonant-initial or vowel-initial, or whether it allows either. Identify
whether your language requires words to be consonant-�nal or vowel-�nal, or whether it
allows either. Describe any rules about the number of consonants that are allowed in a row
between vowels.
As always, add a sentence or two of summary and conclusion at the end of this section so that
you're ready to add more information in the next step.
Aim for a total of 1-3 additional pages of text for these two sections, bringing your whole paper to
(about) 5-8 pages all-inclusive.
Page 1: Title page (updated with the correct date, an accurate title, and an updated honor
footnote)
Page 2: Change Log
Pages 3-?: The required main sections of your paper: Introduction, Core Vocabulary, Phonemic
Inventories, and Phonotactics and Rhythm.
Last Page: References (includes at least the citations necessary at Step 1, as well as a citation
for your Illustrations of the IPA article and Bischoff and Fountain's Phonology manuscript).
Any paper shorter than 4 pages is missing at least one required element; any paper longer than 8
pages may not be assessed in full. If you �nd yourself writing a lot, that's great! But we can only
devote so much time to reading each student's work, so please communicate with your grader about
appropriate expectations for dealing with longer-than-required work.
Amy's Demos It took Amy a total of about one and a half hours to complete this assignment - about one hour of
which is captured in the videos below. It'd be smart to give yourself maybe three 45 minute work
sessions to prep the assignment? Your mileage may vary, of course.
Video: Finding an Illustrations of the IPA article (5:31)
Video: Setting up the sections (7:35)
Video: The consonant inventory (9:21)
Video: Consonant minimal pairs (7:13)
Video: The vowel inventory (8:56)
Video: Vowel minimal pairs (4:46)
Video: Phonotactics and rhythm (11:27)
PDF: Amy's Step 2 example
9/16/22, 11:27 PM The Step 2 Assignment - LING150A1 Fall 2022
https://d2l.arizona.edu/d2l/le/content/1163491/viewContent/12955405/View 3/5
NEVER COPY AND PASTE or QUOTE and never CLOSELY PARAPHRASE
from Amy's demos. They are here as examples to provide you with
inspiration, but your work must be a product of your own invention. If you
use any speci�c ideas from Amy's language project in your own, you should
cite this as Fountain, Amy. 2021. Example language creation project. Ms.
University of Arizona.
Grading Rubric Your work will be assessed according to this rubric, which is summarized in the table below:
advanced advanced- intermediate
intermediate beginner wrong track
revised content
revision is
comprehensive
and effective,
content shows
advanced
mastery of
relevant
concepts
30 points
revision is
comprehensive
and effective,
content shows
intermediate
mastery of
relevant
concepts
27 points
revision is
comprehensive
and effective,
content shows
beginning
mastery of
relevant
concepts
24 points
revision is not
comprehensive,
or is not
effective, or
neither
15 points
there is no
evidence of
revision
0 points
draft content
new sections
are complete
and content
demonstrates
good-faith
effort
25 points
new sections
are not quite
complete, but
content
demonstrates
good faith
effort
22 points
new sections
have
substantial
gaps, but
content
demonstrates
good-faith
effort
19 points
new sections
exist, at least in
part - but they
do not show
evidence of
good-faith
effort
12 points
new
sections
are missing
0 points
9/16/22, 11:27 PM The Step 2 Assignment - LING150A1 Fall 2022
https://d2l.arizona.edu/d2l/le/content/1163491/viewContent/12955405/View 4/5
advanced advanced- intermediate
intermediate beginner wrong track
referencing style
in-text
citations and
references are
complete and
fully consistent
with our
styleguide
10 points
in-text
citations and
references are
complete and
partially
consistent with
our styleguide
8 points
in-text
citations and
references are
complete but
use some other
style (APA,
MLA...)
6 points
referencing and
citation is
incomplete
(academic
integrity
violation?)
4 points
there is no
referencing
or citation
(academic
integrity
violation?)
0 points
presentation the paper is
consistent with
our styleguide
and is
beautifully
presented
10 points
the paper is
consistent with
our styleguide
but has a few
formatting
inconsistencies
8 points
the paper is
consistent with
our styleguide
but has lots of
formatting
inconsistencies
6 points
the paper is not
consistent with
our styleguide
4 points
poor
formatting
renders the
paper
illegible
0 points
Revised content is assessed based your demonstrated mastery of course concepts, as well as your
effective use of both self-directed and (if applicable) instructor-directed revision. For this reason,
assessment of your revised content crucially depends on your Change Log. If you fail to note a
change in your log, you are unlikely to earn credit for it.
Draft content is assessed based on the completeness of your submission (does it include all the
required sections and parts? Does each section respond to the prompts in the assignment
description?) and evidence in your writing of good-faith effort to follow these instructions and to
really engage with our course content. You can provide evidence of your good-faith effort by writing
something that attempts to address every prompt, even if you think you might be doing it wrong.
Getting things wrong and making 'mistakes' is a great way to learn, and we will reward excellent
mistakes with points! You can also include comments in your writing to let us know you're
struggling. Failure to address instructions and/or leaving sections blank is inconsistent with good-
faith effort.
Any non-zero score you earn is a successful one!
What if I missed the previous step? Students who were not able to submit the previous assignment for a grade should:
Complete that assignment on their own; then
Note in the Change Log that there is no instructor-directed revision because of the miss.
9/16/22, 11:27 PM The Step 2 Assignment - LING150A1 Fall 2022
https://d2l.arizona.edu/d2l/le/content/1163491/viewContent/12955405/View 5/5
Your grader will adjust the rubric as needed to ensure that your work is evaluated fairly, and you
should communicate with your grader about your situation so that they are able to address it in a
way that best supports your learning.
Preparing for the next Step
Assignments that earn 'advanced' or 'advanced-intermediate' assessments should be revised
for the next step under based on your own insights and goals.
These levels of attainment are used when you have met the minimum requirements we've
provided.
This means that you should look for opportunities to improve your assignment based on your
own ideas and preferences, still in keeping with assignment rules.
You may receive suggestions from your grader, and if you do, you must address them.
Assessments in these categories, handled as suggested here, represent excellent progress to
a high course grade!
Assignments that earn 'intermediate' or 'beginner' assessments should be revised for the next
step under the guidance of the grader's comments, and with careful review of the instructions
given here. You are always encouraged to do self-directed revision as well!
These levels of attainment are used when your work is not fully compliant with the minimum
requirements we've provided.
You will receive suggestions from your grader, and you must address them.
Excellent strategies for addressing 'intermediate' or 'beginner' assessments include
discussing your work with peers, visiting instructors during of�ce hours or by appointment,
and reviewing assignment descriptions.
Assessments in these categories, handled as suggested here, represent excellent progress to
a high course grade!
The only way an assignment score can 'damage' your course grade is for you to ignore it or fail to
respond productively. Any score can be problematic if you do not productively revise your work.
On to Step 3!