Cost accounting
INTRODUCTION
It was a typical February wintry day in New England.
Rehearsals for the upcoming play Kamala were in full swing
inside two rented rooms of a church in Belmont, Mass. The
actors were all present for the rehearsal despite a snow storm
warning for the morning. The heat from the passionate and
intense drama was riveting for the observers in the room,
making the wintry day a little more tolerable. But Jayanti
Bandyopadhyay, the actor portraying the lead female role
Sarita, had more on her mind than the powerful lines she
had to deliver in the play and the heat in the room. She was
concerned about the production’s budget for the four shows
planned for late March. By the afternoon, bright sunshine
made the threat of the snowstorm disappear, and Jayanti’s
memory drifted back to when the company made the
decision to produce Kamala. The Stage Ensemble Theater
Unit, Inc. (SETU) just completed a successful production
staging one of the Indian epics, The Ramayana, in the
latter part of 2016. The success meant the company had a
comfortable cash reserve, which emboldened Subrata Das,
the director, to consider producing Kamala, a play that had
special meaning for the company and for him and Jayanti.
It was SETU’s first production when the theater company
was founded in 2003, and Subrata and Jayanti had played
the leading male and female roles. The play was set in
contemporary times with a strong social justice message—
quite different from the historic epics that SETU had now
become famous for.
As a community theater company, SETU’s historic
epics with a large cast brought in more audience members
through personal connections and word of mouth. The
healthy cash balance from The Ramayana, and the relative
lower production costs of contemporary plays led Subrata
to believe he could take the risk to reproduce Kamala in
2017. With the March opening only a month away, Jayanti
knew she needed to get a clear picture of the budget and
worked on getting members of SETU to focus on marketing,
fundraising, and ticket sales so they would have a chance of
at least breaking even.
ABOUT SETU
Several theater enthusiasts founded SETU in 2003. As
a community theater company, SETU was staffed by all
volunteers, each contributing their expertise and time.
SETU’s founders decided to not charge membership fees for
the participants. They made sure that SETU was incorporated
from day one, because they wanted to avoid the “unlimited
liability” problem associated with partnerships. All of the
founders were professionals, such as college professors,
technology entrepreneurs, physicians, and corporate managers.
They also agreed to organize SETU as a not-for-profit,
because its mission was to bridge the culture gap between
India and the Western world through the medium of theater.
One of the founders, Jayanti, was an accounting professor
at a local university and utilized her accounting knowledge
to apply for section 501(c)(3) status and successfully
I M A E D U C AT I O N A L C A S E J O U R N A L V O L . 1 1 , N O . 1 , A R T. 1 , M A R C H 2 0 1 81
ISSN 1940-204X
The Show Must Go On: Making the Numbers Work for a Not-for-Profit Theater Company
© 2 0 1 8 I M A
Jayanti Bandyopadhyay Bertolon School of Business Salem State University
Miranda Lam Bertolon School of Business Salem State University
Sanjay Kudrimoti Bertolon School of Business Salem State University
received approval for operating as a not-for-profit from the
Internal Revenue Service and the state of Massachusetts.
To keep paperwork manageable for volunteer staff, SETU
management decided to limit its annual gross receipts to be
less than $50,000 so that they could file the 990N tax form.1 By
2017, only two of the original founders, Jayanti and Subrata (a
successful tech entrepreneur), remained with the company.
The founders made a firm commitment to perform plays
from Indian history and current events in English so that
the plays would be accessible to a wide audience. Speaking
English was also more practical because India has a diverse
body of languages with more than 13 main languages and
hundreds of dialects. Therefore, India uses English as the
common language in the majority of business dealings.2
Because finding well-written plays with Indian themes in
English was not been an easy task, the director or others
often had to translate plays written in one of the Indian
languages into English. Their last play, The Ramayana, was
a well-known Indian epic, and the script was co-authored by
nine members. SETU had successfully operated for 15 years
and had built a good reputation in the Greater Boston area as
a theater company introducing Indian culture while giving
education and performance opportunities to passionate
theater lovers, experienced and novice alike.
THE MAKING OF KAMALA
The production to be staged at the end of March, Kamala,
was originally written in the Indian language Marathi by
a famous playwright, Vijay Tendulkar, in 1981 and then
translated into English by Priya Adarkar in 1997. The play
was inspired by a true story. Ashwin Sarin, a journalist for the
newspaper Indian Express bought a girl from a “rural flesh
market” and presented her at a press conference to expose
such a malaise in modern society. Moved by this news story,
Vijay skillfully created a play that exposed the dark side
of a male-dominated society. The main character, Jaisingh
Jadav, was also an investigative journalist, but Vijay wanted
him to be more complex, not a flawless hero. Vijay portrayed
Jaisingh’s behavior toward his wife Sarita as no better than
treating a woman like a slave. The story showed the parallels
of a poor village woman sold away in the slave trade and a so-
called happy housewife married to a self-serving journalist,
both finding themselves on the common platform of sexual
slavery in a male-dominated world.3 Vijay had visited
Boston in 2002. The cast and crew met him for a discussion
and contributed a sizeable amount to the playwright and
obtained his permission to stage the play in 2003, which was
SETU’s first production as a theater company.
PRE-PRODUCTION
The director, Subrata, had been in touch with Tanuja
Mohite, Vijay’s daughter, through email for obtaining
permission to stage the play again in 2017. Tanuja indicated
that the royalty fee would be Rupees or International
Normalized Ratio (INR) 2000 per show. Subrata agreed to
pay INR 12,000 in anticipation of six shows for the current
production. Given the exchange rates between the U.S.
Dollar and Indian Rupee between January and March 2017,
INR 12,000 plus bank fees for the money transfer would
total about US$200, which seemed reasonable as the royalty
fee.4 He decided to embed several music and dance pieces
in the script, because he wanted to create an added culture-
specific appeal, especially in line with the well-known
reputation of song- and dance-studded Bollywood movies.
Including the dancers, the play had a cast of 13 people and
approximately five people in the crew for stage management,
make-up, music, and light operation. Jayanti felt that
everyone was passionate about acting and being on stage, but
no one was thinking about the budget for the production.
She decided to pin down her longtime friend Subrata, the
director, in a phone conversation about the preparation of a
detailed budget. She asked him to allot at least 45 minutes
for this conversation.
Jayanti and Subrata were the two SETU members with
check-signing authority and electronic access to SETU’s
checking account at Citizens Bank. The account required
a minimum balance of $2,000 at all times to avoid check
writing fees. Both founders agreed that $2,000 was also a
good amount as the prudent reserve and should not be used
to cover expenses of future productions. As of February 1,
2017, the checking account had a balance of $9,525.32 from
previous production receipts over expenditures. Therefore,
$7,525.32 was available for future productions. Subrata felt
confident that, with SETU’s established reputation in the
Boston area, assuring a full house for each show should not
be difficult. The balance in the checking account might have
provided him with a false sense of security. Jayanti was more
cautious and took into account the fact that Kamala might
draw a smaller audience when searching for a venue.
After looking at various options, the Mosesian Center
for the Arts Black Box Theater in Watertown seemed best.
It was in close proximity to Subrata’s residence, as he would
have to go back and forth frequently during the days of
the performances. SETU negotiated a contract with the
Black Box Theater, and the key terms of the contract are
summarized in Exhibit 1. The Black Box Theater charged a
fixed fee of $1,000 for the use of the space for the weekend
I M A E D U C AT I O N A L C A S E J O U R N A L V O L . 1 1 , N O . 1 , A R T. 1 , M A R C H 2 0 1 82
of March 31, April 1, and April 2 and for March 30 for setting
up the stage and a dress rehearsal. They also charged a
one-time set-up fee of $30 for the box office. Technical
support and lighting fees were $30 per hour with a minimum
four-hour charge. The sound technician charged $30 per
hour with a minimum four-hour charge. The stage manager
charged $60 per show. SETU was planning four shows over
the weekend, and each show run for 90 minutes. At the time
of planning, SETU would exceed the four-hour minimum
requirement. SETU’s certificate of liability insurance
annual coverage was valid until June 30, 2017, satisfying a
requirement for the contract with the Black Box Theater.
Unfortunately, the sound system did not suffice at the
theater, and additional equipment had to be rented. Subrata
had checked prices for sound system rentals and operating
fees. A local entrepreneur was willing to rent a sound system
for $300 in total. Past experience had taught Jayanti to be
cautious when budgeting for lighting and sound equipment,
so they allocated an additional $200 in the budget for
miscellaneous sound and lighting expenses.
The group was using a church for the weekly Sunday
rehearsals. Subrata informed Jayanti that the church did not
expect any payment but would appreciate a donation. If
the church would be used every Sunday for two months for
rehearsals, a $300 donation seemed appropriate to Subrata.
Jayanti reminded Subrata that while the amount seemed
reasonable, the classification could not be a donation,
because SETU is a not-for-profit organization. The amount
would be considered as rent to be paid.
The set for Kamala was modest compared with an
historic epic. It required a living room set for an upper-
middle class household of a journalist. Several of the cast
members agreed to lend their own furniture, wall hangings,
and other props for the play. If these items were to be rented,
a minimum cost of $200 would be incurred. One of the cast
members who owned a small stage decorating business took
charge of the stage decoration and volunteered her services,
which would cost at least $500 if SETU had to pay. Jayanti
looked into renting a van for hauling the furniture to and
from the venue. The cost of renting the van appeared to
be at least $500. In conversations with her sister, Jayanti
was very thankful that she was willing to volunteer to drive
her truck back and forth to haul the furniture, thus saving
the van rental cost. The costumes for this play were not as
elaborate or unique as in past productions. Jayanti found out
that make-up materials left over from past productions were
sufficient for this production, and any new materials would
be taken care of by each cast member.
PROMOTION AND MARKETING
Next, the discussion revolved around possible sources of
funds. Since SETU did not charge membership fees, the
major source of funds had always been from ticket sales.
Because the play was about a current social concern in
India, both Subrata and Jayanti realized that the majority of
the audience would most likely be from the Indian-origin
population in the Greater Boston area. Nonetheless, they
dreamed of having a full house including all ethnicities.
They knew that promotion would be needed to reach a
wider group. Several local e-news sources, such as India
New England News ($150 negotiated fee), The Foundations
TV ($150 negotiated fee), and Lokvani ($60 negotiated fee)
were options to consider. These e-news sources would host
weekly ads to promote Kamala for three months on their
pages. The Foundations TV would post clips of rehearsals
and interviews with cast members on its Facebook page.
India New England News agreed to publish an article about
the upcoming production during the week before the
performances. A total of $360 was the budget for these
sources. While Jayanti was getting concerned with the
perceived ever-increasing costs, she realized that marketing
and promotion would have to be an integral and crucial part
of this production.
A professional graphic artist among the SETU group
volunteered to create a theatrical poster for Kamala (see
Exhibit 2). Such creative work would have cost $500 at a
minimum if SETU had to pay for those services. Even with
donated artwork, the printing costs of posters and playbills
were estimated to total $150. While on the subject of
promotion and marketing, Subrata casually mentioned that
he was thinking about setting up accounts on more social
media outlets for SETU and expanding engagement on
SETU’s Facebook. The idea had instant appeal. Jayanti, the
ever-vigilant accountant, added, “I think this is a great idea,
but which social media outlet and how?” Subrata said that
SETU had a large number of connections with past patrons
on its Facebook page. These people could become part of
the network, and their friends would also be exposed to
SETU’s posts. This network of friends, patrons, and theater
enthusiasts could increase and sustain public interest in
SETU and its productions through social media. Plus, there
was no cost associated with it.
Subrata commissioned three of the cast members to be
continuously active on various social media outlets. All of
them were professionals with full-time jobs but agreed to
volunteer their service to market SETU’s production. Their
voluntary service for this production was estimated to be
I M A E D U C AT I O N A L C A S E J O U R N A L V O L . 1 1 , N O . 1 , A R T. 1 , M A R C H 2 0 1 83
$300 if an outside consultant were to be hired, even for a not-
for-profit. Jayanti had always provided her accounting and
bookkeeping expertise for SETU on a voluntary basis. She
jokingly reminded Subrata that SETU was saving at least
$300 in bookkeeping costs even for simple bookkeeping.
Even though ticket sales would likely always be the main
source of funds, Jayanti and Subrata agreed on one aspect:
SETU had to look for alternative sources to cover the expenses
necessary for a production like Kamala. They had good reason
to hope for sponsorships and advertising spaces for this play
since the story had universal appeal. During the past production
of the epic Ramayana, one cast member (a psychologist
by profession) helped raise $2,500 from her network. This
fundraising effort was the best one in SETU’s history, because
Ramayana was a well-known and well-loved story. Jayanti and
Subrata had hoped for $200 in cash sponsorship from the same
network for the smaller Kamala production.
In the past, at other theater venues, selling Indian snacks
such as samosas brought in extra funds. But new rules at the
Black Box Theater prohibited selling food items, because
the management had their own concession stand though
they allowed free promotional snack items for the audience.
Subrata and Jayanti decided to offer samosas to the audience
for free to enhance an Indian cultural experience. A cast
member was able to negotiate a fixed price of $275 with a
local Indian restaurant for providing samosas on all three days.
Traditionally, SETU had provided light sandwiches for the
cast and crew during performance days. Subrata’s wife Janique
had a very good relationship with the owner of Russo Farms
through her bakery delivery business. Russo Farms agreed to
donate $300 worth of sandwiches and vegetable platters for
the cast and crew for the performance weekend.
MAKING THE NUMBERS WORK
After the conversation with Subrata, Jayanti decided to
prepare the budget in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. She
wanted to estimate how many tickets were needed to cover
all of the known costs. They were planning to put on four
shows over the weekend—one on Friday evening, two on
Saturday, and one on Sunday afternoon. The Black Box
Theater could accommodate a maximum of 90 people
per show. While optimism reigned supreme, the reality
was that SETU had never had a full house for each show.
In the recent past, the epics have achieved 75% to 80%
occupancy. Due to the mature and difficult issues explored
in Kamala, SETU had expected occupancy to be as low as
50%. The ticket price was set at $25 for adults and $22 for
students and seniors. The price included a $2 facility fee
and a $3 box office fee per ticket to be paid to the Black Box
Theater for setup and commission (see Exhibit 1). These
prices appeared to be reasonable in comparison with similar
entertainment events in the Indian-origin community. See
Exhibit 3 for a summary of data used in estimating receipts.
Jayanti decided she would have to send an email to all
SETU members explaining the budget and why everyone’s
effort in selling the number of tickets necessary to cover
those costs was crucial. She knew that her task was difficult
because the majority of the actors and artists were not
necessarily thinking of the business side of the production,
especially because SETU was a not-for-profit.
From a financial perspective, keeping costs under control
was a key factor. In addition to detailing actual cash costs,
she thought members would also appreciate knowing the
contributed value of volunteers which helped keep costs low.
Knowing the minimum number of tickets needed to break
even would enable her to be proactive if ticket sales did not
meet projection. That information would also motivate each
member to promote the play on individual personal Facebook
pages and invite friends and families to attend. Fifteen years
of production experience also meant that Jayanti and Subrata
knew things might not always go as planned, from cost
overrun to show cancellations due to weather. Jayanti focused
on the spreadsheet and considered various scenarios.
CASE QUESTIONS:
1. Prepare a budgeted statement. Have two main sections
titled “Receipts” and “Expenditures.” Within the sections,
make sure to have subcategories so that actual receipts and
costs in the future could be compared with the budget.
Proper accounting format with currency should be used.
Fill in the budget column using information from the case.
Leave the actual column blank.
2. Using the budget prepared in Question 1:
a. Identify each cost as variable, fixed, or step in relation
to tickets sold. Hint: Determine the weighted average
ticket price and contribution margin from the sales mix
information (percentage of adult tickets vs. percentage
of student and senior tickets).
b. In the first case, assume that all funds are to come from
ticket sales only and that there are four shows in total.
Compute the breakeven point in number of tickets to
be sold and in U.S. dollars.
c. In the second case, assume the same in (b) but only
three shows in total. Compute the breakeven point in
number of tickets to be sold and in U.S. dollars.
I M A E D U C AT I O N A L C A S E J O U R N A L V O L . 1 1 , N O . 1 , A R T. 1 , M A R C H 2 0 1 84
d. In the third case, assume that SETU would receive
sponsorship funds (cash and in-kind donations) in
addition to ticket sales for four shows. Compute the
breakeven point in number of tickets to be sold and in
U.S. dollars.
e. In the fourth case, assume that SETU would receive
sponsorship funds (cash and in-kind donations) in
addition to ticket sales for three shows. Compute the
breakeven point in number of tickets to be sold and in
U.S. dollars.
f. Comment on the feasibility of the required number
of ticket sales computed from above, keeping in mind
the nature of the play, that it is staged by a community
theater organization, and the ethnicity aspect. Suggest
ways for SETU to achieve the necessary amount of
ticket sales.
3. A common practice in SETU was to ignore labor or
personal items contributed by members and loyal
supporters who typically did not ask for receipts from
the organization for tax purposes. We referred to these
contributions as hidden costs because they were not
included in the budget nor were they recorded in the
financial statements. However, in the scenario where
members or supporters did not have the expertise, these
functions would require paid services, and the items
would have to be purchased or rented.
a. Identify and provide the approximate value of human
resources and personal items that were contributed by
actors and patrons in the Kamala production.
b. Incorporate these hidden costs, and measure their
impact on the budgeted statement in Question 1 and
the breakeven numbers and U.S. dollars calculated in
Question 2.
c. Evaluate the importance of the hidden costs
mentioned in the case that were not explicit cash
outlays or when the donors did not require a receipt
for tax purposes.
4. Extra Question: In light of the added hidden costs
discussed previously, determine what ticket prices
Subrata and Jayanti would have to charge to break even
for this production if they had to pay for all donated
services and products, assuming they keep the same sales
mix and could reach (a) 50% capacity, (b) 65% capacity,
and (c) 80% capacity.
ENDNOTES
1 “Annual Electronic Filing Requirement for Small Exempt
Organizations—Form 990-N (e-Postcard),” Internal
Revenue Service (IRS), December 3, 2017, www.irs.gov/
charities-non-profits/annual-electronic-filing-requirement-
for-small-exempt-organizations-form-990-n-e-postcard,
Accessed December 13, 2017.
2 “The World Factbook,” The Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
geos/in.html#People, Accessed May 5, 2017.
3 Sangita Sunil Dhimate, “Feminist Analysis of Vijay
Tendulkar’s Kamala,” International Journal of Multifaceted and
Multilingual Studies, 2016, http://ijmms.in/sites/ijms/index.
php/ijmms/article/view/366/361.
4 “Current and Historical Rate Tables,” XE Currency
Converter, www.xe.com/currencytables/, accessed March 31,
2017.
I M A E D U C AT I O N A L C A S E J O U R N A L V O L . 1 1 , N O . 1 , A R T. 1 , M A R C H 2 0 1 85
ABOUT IMA® (INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS) IMA®, the association of accountants and financial professionals in business, is one of the largest and most respected associations focused exclusively on advancing the management accounting profession. Globally, IMA supports the profession through research, the CMA® (Certified Management Accountant) program, continuing education, networking and advocacy of the highest ethical business practices. IMA has a global network of more than 85,000 members in 140 countries and 300 professional and student chapters. Headquartered in Montvale, N.J., USA, IMA provides localized services through its four global regions: The Americas, Asia/Pacific, Europe, and Middle East/India. For more information about IMA, please visit www.imanet.org.
I M A E D U C AT I O N A L C A S E J O U R N A L V O L . 1 1 , N O . 1 , A R T. 1 , M A R C H 2 0 1 86
Contract costs with Black Box
Hall rental per week, including practices and performance $1,000
One time ticket set up fee $30
Technical support and lighting (4 hours minimum) $30 per hour 1.5 hour per show*
Sound technician (4 hours minimum) $30 per hour 1.5 hour per show**
House management $60 per show
Facility fees $2 per ticket
Ticket convenience charges $3 per ticket
Exhibit 1 Summary of the Contract with Mosesian Center for the Arts Black Box Theater
*SETU would have to pay minimum of 4 hours ($120) even if SETU did not use 4 hours of technical support and lighting. **SETU would have to pay mimimum of 4 hours ($120) even if SETU did not use 4 hours of sound technician.
Exhibit 2 Theatrical Poster for Kamala Production
Ticket Sales Assumptions
Estimated number of shows 4
Price per ticket – adult $25 including $5 in fees
Price per ticket – student and senior $22 including $5 in fees
Estimated percentage of adult ticket 70%
Estimated percentage of student and senior ticket
30%
Maximum capacity 90 seats
Average occupancy per show 50%
Exhibit 3 Assumptions for Estimating Ticket Sales and Receipts