The Runaway Doctor
The Runaway Doctor Vanity Fair – January 2011
When luxury-loving Dr. Mark Weinberger vanished, in 2004, he left in his wake a wife saddled with more than $6
million in debts, a father headed for bankruptcy, and hundreds of patients who say he misdiagnosed them and
performed completely unnecessary sinus surgeries. Now “TheNoseDoctor” of Merrillville, Indiana, is facing prison,
along with more than 350 malpractice suits, after finally being captured while hiding out in a tent in the Italian Alps.
The author investigates charges that a talented young physician became a greedy, mutilating monster.
By Buzz Bissinger
THE FUGITIVE UNKIND Mark Weinberger, then wanted by the F.B.I., skiing in the Italian Alps, November 8, 2009. The photo was taken by his girlfriend, Monica
Specogna.
His hair is longer than it was in his former life, the life he left behind like a snake shedding its
skin. A yellow bandanna wraps around his forehead, and reflective dark glasses cover his eyes,
giving him the look of a ski bum trying too hard to hide middle age. Married and divorced three
times, he has found serenity in his latest relationship, with an Italian woman named Monica, who
runs a small grocery store. It is she who has taken the picture of him after a day in the mountains
of northwestern Italy, just outside the storybook ski resort of Courmayeur.
There is a thin smile across Mark Weinberger’s face on this sunny day in 2009. The smile
suggests contentment—a contentment distant from the driven, fanatical years he spent marketing
himself as “TheNoseDoctor” in a small midwestern town, his local celebrity buoyed by a first-
rate pedigree that includes the University of Pennsylvania, U.C.L.A. medical school, and a
prestigious fellowship. There is something wry about that little smile in the mountains,
something smug and self-congratulatory. Or maybe it is just that he looks so relaxed, at ease, not
a care in the world.
He has done it.
He has left behind a trail unlike that of any previous doctor in the U.S., one in which he saddled
a wife with more than $6 million in debts and pushed his own father into deep financial trouble;
left behind mountains of public documents claiming that in the name of sheer greed he
performed hundreds of sinus-related surgeries that not only were completely unnecessary but
also made some patients’ conditions worse; left behind accusations that he scared patients into
having surgery by showing them hideous but phony images of their supposed conditions; left
behind alleged misdiagnoses in which he failed to detect throat cancer in a woman who
subsequently died, and missed the tumor on the pituitary gland of an eight-year-old girl while
giving her sinus surgery she never should have had, because her sinuses were not yet fully
formed; left behind a criminal indictment in federal court on 22 counts of health-care fraud; left
behind more than 350 malpractice suits that have been filed against him; left behind a court
deposition in which an eminent medical expert called him a disgrace to his profession and the
worst doctor he’d ever encountered.
People can say all they want about him: that hundreds of patients in northwestern Indiana are
walking around with worthless holes in their sinuses which he put there using an outdated
surgical procedure, and that he has billed insurance companies for a myriad of operations that
one medical expert says he could only have performed with “twelve hands” in the 25 minutes his
notes indicate the surgeries took. “He mutilated people for money” is the way trial lawyer Barry
Rooth will ultimately describe his practice in a court proceeding. But this is like talking about a
dead man. Because as Christmas nears in 2009, nobody in the United States has a clue as to
where he is.
Stories about doctors causing harm by performing surgeries incorrectly, or trying to game the
system by over-billing insurance companies, are hardly new. But none come close to the
depredations of Mark Weinberger as pieced together through dozens of interviews and an
examination of thousands of pages of court records. His is a saga so disturbing, cruel, and bizarre
as to be almost surreal. Weinberger himself told his wife at a time when he was still practicing
but under increasing scrutiny that he was the victim of a grand conspiracy brought on by other
professionals envious of his phenomenal success; they in turn had friends who were trial
lawyers, and so the long knives came out. When the first wave of legal actions were taken
against him, in the summer of 2004, he painstakingly plotted to combat them.
The plan was: he disappeared.
For five years he was on the run. During that time he never contacted his wife, Michelle Kramer.
He never got in touch with or sent word to members of his family. He seemed settled in
Courmayeur, although he apparently did not work, paid for everything in cash, and was seen
getting around often by bicycle. The relationship with his new girlfriend was blooming into an
improbable love affair, and they talked of adopting children together, since she could not have
any of her own. But he also spent stretches of time in a tent by himself on the Italian side of
Mont Blanc, the tallest mountain in the Alps, apparently proving to himself that he was able to
survive. This way of living represented a wholesale re-invention, given the excessive lifestyle
that had been his addiction when he still practiced medicine and lived in Chicago—the only way
of proving to himself his worth and success, some believe.
He had lived high and mighty in his former life, reportedly making as much as $3 million a year.
He owned a $2.4 million town-house condominium in Chicago; it was five stories high, with an
elevator, and was across the street from a park where elegant widows walked elegant little dogs
in the looming shadow of the John Hancock building. He had an 80-foot yacht called the Corti-
Seas, worth roughly $4 million. He had an undeveloped property of 1.41 acres with a pink-sand
beach on Harbour Island, in the Bahamas, worth $750,000.
He could be charming and erudite, and, having been a philosophy major at Penn, was fond of
quoting Schopenhauer. He could also be dismissive and rude and narcissistic; once, according to
Michelle, he said he was unhappy in their marriage over the issue of her lack of eagerness for
oral sex. He would yell at nurses in his office, telling them they were fat because they were
eating pizza. He would take change from shopkeepers and throw it on the ground because he
could not be bothered with it.
Since he was cunning and smart, his disappearance was the result not of some impulsive moment
of panic but rather of painstaking plotting to ensure that nobody he knew would ever discover
him. He almost certainly felt the odds of being found after five years were nonexistent. He had
rendered himself invisible, just as a book on the very subject which he had bought before he left,
How to Be Invisible, had instructed. There were cracks, though, little mistakes he was starting to
make in Courmayeur in the summer of 2009. He was getting casual in concealing himself. But
these missteps amounted to nothing, because no one was actively looking for him anymore.
His actions, if all the accounts are true, resembled those of a sociopath, a monster for whom the
only needs that mattered were his own. The wave of malpractice allegations could hardly have
been foreseen during the academic year 1995–96, when Mark Weinberger was a young and
ambitious doctor with a fellowship at the University of Illinois at Chicago, studying under one of
the most eminent rhinoplasty surgeons in the world. The fellowship was extremely
competitive—only 2 of the roughly 100 who applied that year were accepted, and Weinberger’s
references from the Division of Otolaryngology at the University of California San Diego
Medical Center, where he had been a resident for five years, were impeccable. “We have
searched over and over again for clues and there really weren’t any,” says Dr. Eugene Tardy,
now retired, under whom Weinberger served the fellowship.
“He was a bright, talented, compassionate, caring doctor,” adds Dr. Daniel Becker, who was the
other fellow that year and is now clinical associate professor in the Department of
Otorhinolaryngology at the University of Pennsylvania with a private practice in New Jersey. “I
don’t know what happened after that time. That’s the big mystery.”
“A Dollop of Schmaltzmanship”
Mark Weinberger was one of three boys born to Fred and Fanny Weinberger. He was the middle
child, with a birth date of May 22, 1963, and the family had a unique claim to fame:
What do you think I am, chopped liver?
They were. They were the kings and queens of chopped liver, thanks to a recipe created by Mark
Weinberger’s grandmother Sylvia with what The New York Times called in her 1995 obituary “a
sprinkling of matzoh meal, a pinch of salt and a dollop of schmaltzmanship.” That story began
when she made chopped liver for a luncheonette she and her husband had opened in 1944 in the
Bronx. When people liked the chopped liver, she put it in Bronx supermarkets, a sideline that
ultimately transformed into a $2-million-a-year packaged-food business known as Mrs.
Weinberg’s Food Products. (Her name was shortened because it would not fit on the original
labels, according to the Times.) The company was dissolved in 1989, but the chopped liver still
lingers, having earned mentions in exhibitions at the American Jewish Historical Society and at
the National Museum of American Jewish History.
Fred Weinberger worked as a physicist in Washington for the federal government, and, for a
time, as an executive with the family business. He eventually settled his family in Mamaroneck,
in Westchester County, New York, so the three sons—Jeff, Mark, and Neil—could attend the
well-regarded Scarsdale High School, one town over. The move paid off, as all three then went
on to Ivy League schools: Jeff, the oldest, to Columbia, Mark and Neil to Penn.
According to Michelle Kramer, based on extensive conversations she had with Mark after they
were married, all this achievement had not been without cost. Jeff carried the stigma of being
hard to get along with and was argumentative with his parents, ultimately becoming estranged
from the family; when his mother died of cancer, in May of 2002, he did not attend the funeral.
Mark, for his part, had the sense that his mother always favored Neil, because she and he had
similarly artistic personalities; she liked the fact that Neil went into the film business after
graduation from Penn. Mark, according to Michelle, had tried to impress his mother with his
academic accomplishments. He was a cum laude graduate of Penn, then thrived in medical
school at U.C.L.A. with a grade-point average of 3.82 and a merit scholarship. But those stellar
marks apparently didn’t count for much with Fanny Weinberger, to the extent that years later
Mark wanted as few drawers as possible in the Chicago condominium he and Michelle
redesigned because, he told his wife, “my mom would take any award I had and put it into a
drawer because she didn’t want Neil to feel bad.”
Later on, after Mark had become a successful doctor, Michelle would watch as he tried to
impress his mother when they were out for dinner together. He regaled Fanny with stories of
trips taken all over the world courtesy of NetJets (the private-jet service that is somewhat akin to
a time-share), and she responded by saying, “You should donate your money to charity. You
should do some good in your community.” Invariably, after an hour at dinner together, mother
and son would be fighting.
Mark had what could be categorized as classic middle-child syndrome, always wanting to please
and to prove his success. And, at least in his father’s case, there was ample family pride and, at
times, parental assistance. When Mark expanded his practice by building a state-of-the-art clinic,
in 2002, Fred Weinberger lent him a million dollars for the purchase of a cat-scan machine. Fred
was particularly proud that Mark was scientific-minded, as he himself was. But that loan would
come back to haunt him after his son’s disappearance, in the fall of 2004. The next year Fred
Weinberger filed for bankruptcy. When the federal court appointed a receiver to sort out Mark’s
assets in his absence, Fred, then 76, requested repayment of the million-dollar loan—plus interest
and expenses. The claim was rejected.
In 1996, after completing his fellowship, Mark had begun practicing as an ear-nose-and-throat
surgeon in Merrillville, Indiana, roughly 30 miles from Chicago. A tepid and dreary town of
30,000 at the time, Merrillville seemed an unlikely place for a doctor with such lofty credentials.
But the air quality in the region was poor because of all the steel mills surrounding it. The
concentration of airborne pollutants could often lead to sinus problems, which became
Weinberger’s specialty. The blue-collar population in the area, largely unionized, also had
something that is believed to have been essential to Weinberger’s plans for his practice: health
insurance, of which he accepted any and all kinds.
Michelle Kramer was Mark Weinberger’s third wife. Little information is available about his
first marriage, which occurred around the time he was a resident, in San Diego. Weinberger
himself seems to have swept it under the carpet to the degree that Michelle did not even know
about the marriage until she was told about it during a television interview after Mark’s
disappearance. On December 31, 1997, Weinberger, then 34, got married for the second time, to
a woman named Gretchen Vandy, then 24; the couple separated after 14 months. According to a
request for support Vandy filed in Cook County during their divorce, Weinberger was already
making in excess of a million dollars a year and living a lavish lifestyle—multi-thousand-dollar
shopping sprees, frequent vacations, and dinners in restaurants costing upwards of a thousand
dollars.
One night in early 2000, Weinberger was at a club called Glow in Chicago when he met
Michelle Kramer, then 25. She was a student at the University of Chicago, taking a variety of
graduate courses. She was also blonde and thin and striking, and both seemed instantly smitten
with each other. She had always looked up to doctors—ever since she was 13, growing up on the
southwest side of Chicago, when she had been hit by a car, leaving her in a body cast for roughly
a year—and she found Mark Weinberger charming and smart and romantic. He in turn, as they
fell in love, promised to treat Michelle as a “princess for the rest of your life.”
They became engaged in the spring of 2001. Weinberger liked being over the top, doing things
differently from the common herd, so the engagement wasn’t an engagement as much as it was a
piece of performance art. The extravaganza took place at the Piazza Navona, in Rome, while the
couple was there on vacation. Mark had a special affinity for Italy and would travel there often.
On this occasion, he got to the Piazza before Michelle and hired singers to serenade her as she
arrived. In a final flourish, with people gathered around to watch, he dropped to one knee and
proposed with an enormous ring.
But even at this infatuated stage of their relationship Michelle noticed signs that Weinberger had
a difficult personality: the way he could be charming one moment and irrational and haughty
with others the next, the way he could not deal with the slightest adversity. Shortly after the
couple became engaged, Michelle’s father was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. He was
dying, and while Weinberger tried to be supportive, he almost seemed more upset that the illness
might, as Michelle says, put an end to the “fun and games” the two of them had enjoyed up until
then. “Now everything is going to change,” she remembers his telling her. “Do you realize how
our life is going to change?” He even suggested they should not get married. He changed his
mind, but later expressed puzzlement, almost irritation, when Michelle spent as much time as she
could with her father while he was in the hospital. “Why does somebody want to be in a hospital
room?” he asked petulantly. “It doesn’t help anything.” She was struck by the lack of empathy,
particularly from a physician. Several years later, right before his disappearance, he told
Michelle that he didn’t even enjoy being a doctor and disliked patients.
The wedding was planned for May of 2002. Weinberger had envisioned a grand ceremony in
Ravello, Italy, with both a rabbi and a Catholic priest flown in to fit their religious backgrounds.
But the date was moved up to November 1, 2001, at the Chicago Botanic Garden, so that
Michelle’s father could walk her down the aisle. At first Weinberger was adamantly against the
shift. “You can’t let dying people change what the living are going to do,” he said to her, but
once again he changed his mind and told Michelle he loved her.
In the end, there would be three different wedding celebrations, the one in Ravello transformed
into a blessing ceremony. Weinberger flew in roughly 15 guests from the United States and
housed them in the Villa Cimbrone, a restored 12th-century residence that has included among
its guests Winston Churchill, D. H. Lawrence, and Greta Garbo. It was again typical of the way
Weinberger did things. The third reception, for 110 guests, was at the Field Museum, in Chicago.
The couple purchased their condominium in November of 2002. Mark eventually had three
drivers, and his car was always on call in front of the property. He kept a large staff at home,
including a personal assistant, three women in maid’s uniforms to clean and do the laundry, a
personal trainer, and a massage therapist who gave Mark and Michelle nightly massages. He was
extremely particular about his needs. Every day, according to Michelle, one of the chauffeurs
would drive him the hour or more it took to get to work in Merrillville, fighting traffic all the
way, then return to the city to pick up sushi from a restaurant he liked called Japonais, and then
drive back to Merrillville in time for Weinberger’s lunch.
Mark also had particular sexual desires when it came to marriage. He had been obsessed with the
fantasy of bedding cheerleaders ever since high school in Scarsdale, back when the real thing
was clearly off limits because of his non-jock status, and Michelle would surprise him from time
to time by wearing a cheerleading costume when he came home from work.
On another occasion, during one of their trips to Italy, he turned to her over dinner and said he
was not happy. When Michelle asked him why, he said he was disappointed with the level of
enthusiasm that she put forth while performing oral sex on him. He said he had a DVD for her to
look at to gain pointers. Shocked and humiliated, she left the restaurant. But what upset Michelle
even more was Mark’s obliviousness to what was going on in her life at the time—studying for
her Ph.D. at the Chicago School of Professional Psychology, still mourning her father. All he
seemed to care about was receiving nightly oral sex from Michelle, and receiving it with gusto.
1–800-sinuses
TheNoseDoctor!
He shouted it on a billboard.
TheNoseDoctor!
He used it as the name for his Web site.
TheNoseDoctor!
He couldn’t use it as a number for patients to call—too many letters—so instead he came up with
1–800-sinuses.
He was a marketing machine, opening his new facility (paid for in part by his father’s loan) at
the end of 2002 in a grand ribbon-cutting ceremony featuring a huge sign outside that heralded
the weinberger sinus clinic, mounted beneath an expensive sculpture of a face with a very large
nose. The clinic’s interior had ample deposits of marble and stainless steel and cherrywood. Even
the refrigerator in the nurses’ kitchen was a Sub-Zero. Artful travel books sat atop the tables in
the waiting room, instead of creased magazines. There were bookends in the shapes of noses.
The software in the computer system was such that even before a patient left the office a bill was
already on its way to the insurance company.
Walking into the clinic, says former patient William Boyer (who would eventually win a
$300,000 malpractice verdict against Weinberger), was like walking into the Ritz-Carlton. Boyer
believes the clinic’s décor was all part of Weinberger’s business model, to convince patients,
particularly an unsophisticated heavy-equipment operator such as himself, that to have built such
a lavish palace Weinberger must have been at the top of his field.
Through 2001, TheNoseDoctor’s reputation appears to have been unblemished, with not a single
malpractice suit filed against him. That would change, especially following the opening of the
new clinic, which, at least in hindsight, seems almost to have been designed to facilitate risky
medicine. It was a one-stop shop: because Weinberger had his own cat-scan machine he could
read the results himself and avoid the oversight that would have come had he needed to send
patients to a hospital for scans. And the fact that there were no other surgeons in the practice
meant there were no peers on hand to raise suspicions, which may be why, according to court
filings, at least 90 percent of the patients who came to see Weinberger were advised on their very
first appointment that they needed some type of sinus-related surgery.
Around this time, even some of Weinberger’s friends began to question his behavior. Jim Platis,
a plastic surgeon, had been friends with Mark since the 1990s. Platis liked Weinberger’s sense of
humor and his varied interests, which ranged from philosophy to classical music to old George
Carlin routines. Platis also believed his friend to be a very good surgeon, respected by his peers.
Along with his wife, Platis had attended the blessing ceremony in Ravello, in 2002. But
afterward he began to notice a change in the way Weinberger was spending money, whether it
was the 80-foot yacht that trolled the Mediterranean, or the multiple drivers, or the sushi lunches
from Chicago. “The way he was going through money,” Platis says, “my wife and I both thought
that he had another source of income [outside the practice]. The money was being spent almost
carelessly.” Platis and his wife began to feel uncomfortable, and they eventually stopped
socializing with the couple.
Though Michelle herself was pursuing a doctorate in psychology, she felt in many ways like a
kept woman, believing Mark’s priority was for her to wear skimpy outfits and have her nails and
hair and makeup done. Newly wed, Mark had indeed treated her like a princess, just as he had
promised; their marriage was all Michelle thought it would be, and more, and she adored him.
But as her academic career advanced, Mark came to resent it, particularly as problems began to
mount in his own work. Instead of supporting her, he made increasing demands, and her self-
esteem ebbed. “I like it when you spend your day getting beautiful for me,” he told her. Although
she weighed roughly 105 pounds, he gave her grief when, as a self-indulgence every
Thanksgiving or Christmas, she went to Godiva and bought a box of truffles. He spread his
fingers as if to measure her buttocks, and while there was a tone of frivolity to it, she could tell
that he was serious in making sure she wasn’t gaining weight, since he had an obsession with the
subject and said he hated fat women. (He himself worked out three times a day.) He had a saying
that the size of an engagement ring should be in inverse proportion to the size of its recipient’s
buttocks, and since Michelle’s engagement ring was large her buttocks should be small. “It’s
almost like he wanted this transitory life and he wanted me to be a slutty girlfriend and not his
wife,” she says.
Mark did not allow her to have her own checkbook or see the bills. He gave her a thousand
dollars a week in spending money, leaving it on the kitchen counter as if she were a prostitute.
He did complain they were overspending, and Michelle, still in her 20s then, readily admits that
she enjoyed the lavish trappings of wealth and extravagance, particularly the yacht, as probably
any spouse would have. But when Mark worried about money, she claims, she told him to get rid
of at least the NetJets account and the personal staff that took over the house each day. Instead,
during one of their next jaunts in the Mediterranean, they docked at Marbella, where they went to
Versace and Weinberger spent tens of thousands of dollars on the latest styles for both of them.
Phyllis Barnes was 47 years old and employed helping recently laid-off steelworkers find new
jobs when she went to see Weinberger in September of 2001. She had had a cough for several
months, sometimes spitting up blood, and was now having problems breathing. She was losing
weight, because it was hard for her to swallow. She had already been to a physician assistant and
a doctor, who thought the problem might be asthma or allergies, but her symptoms persisted.
A colleague suggested that she go see Dr. Weinberger, that maybe her problem was sinus-
related. When she saw the ear-nose-and-throat surgeon, he diagnosed her problem as exactly
that. She had surgery the following month, supposedly to remove excess polyps so that she could
breathe more easily. The surgery did not work, and she continued to have enormous difficulty
breathing. She went back to see Weinberger, and he told her to relax and give the surgery time to
work. But her condition did not improve. She thought she might have pneumonia, and she saw
Weinberger once more, but he said he did not treat pneumonia and told her to go to an
emergency room. She saw several other doctors: one said she had a virus; another said it was
bronchitis and prescribed antibiotics. But her breathing was not getting any better—to the point,
she later said in a court deposition, that it felt “like somebody was hanging me by a rope.”
On December 7, 2001, she went to yet another doctor, named Dennis Han. Like Weinberger,
Han was an ear-nose-and-throat surgeon. He immediately saw how sick she was and, based on
the sound of her breathing alone, made the correct diagnosis: she did not have sinus problems;
she had throat cancer.
According to legal documents, Weinberger had not even performed a throat exam on Barnes
during her initial visit, but ordered a cat scan of her sinuses only. The reason, her lawyers
suggested, is that Weinberger sometimes saw more than 100 patients a day, meaning, given his
hours, that he spent an average of three minutes with each of them; he also took on as many as
120 new patients a month. His practice was likened in one document to an “assembly line.” As
Peggy Hood, Barnes’s sister, later put it in a deposition, “I feel like he had just treated everybody
the same and didn’t treat them as individuals You went in, you got a sinus operation, you left.”
When Dr. Han had seen Barnes in December, three months after her first visit to Dr. Weinberger,
the tumor inside her larynx was easily visible upon examination, filings assert. So too, in all
likelihood, was the enlargement of the lymph nodes in her neck. She also had two firm masses
on the left side of her neck which were consistent with cancer. But when Weinberger had last
seen Barnes, only 18 days earlier, he made no notations of any of this. “With such obvious
abnormality, Dr. Weinberger would almost have had to intentionally ignore this situation in
order to have missed it as badly as he did,” her lawyer, Kenneth J. Allen, stated in a filing on
behalf of Barnes. After Barnes died of cancer, in 2004, an Indiana medical-review panel
consisting of three physicians would find Weinberger negligent in his treatment of her. “Cancer
ultimately took her life, but that son of a bitch stole her dignity,” says Allen.
Barnes filed suit against Weinberger on October 29, 2002, when she was still struggling to
survive. But instead of deterring Weinberger’s procedures in any way, the suit seemed to have
the opposite effect, particularly after the new clinic opened. In 2003 and 2004, according to court
records, Indiana state records, and interviews with trial attorneys, he performed hundreds of
sinus surgeries that were allegedly medically unnecessary. Weinberger’s ostensible goal was to
relieve congestion by removing what he identified as obstructing polyps and mucus. However,
based upon court records and interviews with trial attorneys, instead of the accepted method of
enlarging the natural sinus openings to improve drainage, he employed an outdated and
substandard procedure in which he drilled holes into the back of the maxillary sinuses, so that
mucus drained further back into the sinuses, causing chronic sinusitis that most of his patients
never had before they sought his help.
In the case of the patient William Boyer, according to court testimony, Weinberger showed him
an image of polyps inside his sinus cavity that were bloody, infected, and pus-filled. After seeing
the picture, Boyer, shocked by his condition, agreed with Weinberger’s recommendation that he
needed surgery. But, according to court testimony, the picture that Weinberger had shown him
had not been of his own sinus cavity. In addition, an EKG taken before surgery had indicated
that Boyer had an irregular heartbeat, which should have been an immediate red flag, causing re-
evaluation of the surgery. But Weinberger allegedly changed the interpretation of the EKG
simply by crossing out the word “abnormal” on the test result, writing in “normal,” and signing
his name. During Boyer’s surgery, Weinberger compounded the risk by giving Boyer cocaine
(which has legitimate medical uses) and epinephrine, the combination of which can exacerbate
an irregular heartbeat. He also did what he had done in hundreds of other cases, lawyers have
asserted: drilled holes into Boyer’s sinuses that ultimately did nothing to alleviate his problems
and may have worsened them.
At the civil trial hearing Boyer’s suit, there would be dispute between each side’s medical
experts as to whether the surgery had caused long-term injury. But the defense did not dispute
that Weinberger had provided Boyer with substandard care. In fact, James Stankiewicz, an
eminent ear-nose-and-throat surgeon, even though he was testifying on Weinberger’s behalf,
described him as the worst doctor Stankiewicz had ever seen in his more than 30-year medical
career.
Boyer’s civil suit, filed in 2004, was only the first to go to court of the more than 350 that have
been filed against Weinberger. By the time Boyer’s suit went to trial, Indiana state medical-
review panels had already found Weinberger negligent in at least 20 cases. And there remain
hundreds in which review panels—the first step in determining medical malpractice under
Indiana law—have yet to make a finding.
“Employees Were Afraid of Him”
In August of 2004, Barry Rooth, who would eventually represent 289 former patients of
Weinberger’s, made a request to the doctor’s office for the medical records of roughly 18
patients—which Weinberger could have interpreted only as guaranteeing that more malpractice
claims were coming. According to court documents, at least two other malpractice suits aside
from Phyllis Barnes’s had already been filed, and it was clear at least to Michelle that the
pressure of protracted litigation was getting to her husband—drastic mood swings, odd hints that
he knew he was going to “lose everything,” and questions about how she would feel if they
abandoned their life in Chicago and moved to an island off Europe. That same month, Michelle
went to the American Psychological Association Convention in Hawaii. When she returned,
every room of the town house had video cameras and a safe. Michelle was aware of the
accusations against Weinberger’s practice—he talked about it incessantly—but she says she
supported him and believed other professionals were out to get him because of his success. At
the time, she did not believe that he would ever do anything that was not medically warranted.
She had become pregnant earlier that spring. Weinberger complained about having to attend all
the ultrasounds with her, but Michelle insisted that he accompany her when they would be able
to learn their child’s sex. The procedure took place at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, in
Chicago, on August 20, and there was terrible news: Michelle had had a miscarriage. But when
Mark saw the attending physician, with his wife hysterical and sobbing, he showed no emotion,
according to Michelle, instead talking shop about the size of his surgical practice. At one point
he did shed some tears, but Michelle believed that they were forced. When she had the follow-up
D&C procedure—another very emotional time—Mark missed it, arriving only afterward.
His co-workers at the clinic also noticed changes in Weinberger. He talked little and spent more
and more time in the back of the office. “Employees were afraid of him,” says one. He grew
snappish with patients, or sometimes did not answer at all when asked a question. Usually clean-
cut, he came to work some days with a stubble of beard and occasionally walked around the
office not fully dressed.
A group of men with thick, possibly European accents came to the clinic one day in the late
summer of 2004. Employees were confused and fascinated; they had never seen men like this
before, although it was later theorized that the men were diamond dealers from New York, many
of whom are Hasidic Jews. The men carried briefcases, and in the clinic’s conference room, it is
now believed, a transaction took place in which Weinberger traded cash for diamonds. Around
the same time he suddenly took over the clinic’s bookkeeping, allegedly siphoning $2 million
from the business, according to a former employee. Boxes began to be delivered, 30 or 40 in
total. Staff members did not open them but could tell by the outside labels that they contained
camping gear. Soon there was an incredible array in his office, a survivalist’s wet dream,
virtually all of it kept in a room that employees called “the scary room”: three portable-shower
kits, a waterproof wallet and passport holder, a set of plates, cups, and cutlery in its own netting,
two small compasses, a portable vinyl sink, a portable headlight, a five-language translator, a
pocket weather tracker, a Garmin color map navigator with European software, an anti-microbial
water bottle, a bubble-padded sleeping mat, backpacks, thermal underwear, a knit hat, glove
liners, and much more.
On September 16, 2004, Phyllis Barnes died. Two days later, Weinberger, Michelle, her mother,
her hairstylist, and several of Michelle’s friends left for a long-planned trip to Greece to celebrate
her 30th birthday. Weinberger and Michelle flew to Paris first-class on Air France; from there
the entourage was taken by NetJets to Mykonos.
Their yacht, the Corti-Seas, coming from Athens, was supposed to be docked in Mykonos when
they arrived. But it was delayed, turning Weinberger into a nervous wreck. Michelle could not
understand why he was so upset, until she later learned that he had sent a shipment of survival
gear to Athens, to be picked up by the yacht, as well as another shipment to Cannes.
The Corti-Seas finally arrived the next day. That night all the members of the group went out to
dinner. Michelle told what Weinberger considered an off-color and inappropriate story. He got
angry and she got angry. She was also still going through the emotional effects of the
miscarriage. But they smoothed things over and went to bed on the yacht.
She woke up at six a.m.
His side of the bed was empty.
She assumed he had gone for his early-morning jog, just as he usually did in Chicago, along
Lake Michigan, taking their dog, Angel. But this morning something did not feel right. She
looked for him all over Mykonos. Later that day she was told by the yacht’s captain that
Weinberger had flown to Paris to have the diamonds that he would give her as a birthday present
set. But by nightfall he had not come back. She knew what she had instinctively suspected since
she woke up: he had vanished.
The next day she got the number of a Greek cell phone he had been using and dialed.
“Hello!” said the voice, jaunty and cheerful.
“Mark … ” she said.
There was silence for 10 seconds. The line went dead.
She never heard from him again.
In the yacht’s safe she found what he had left to provide for her immediate future: a thousand
euros and her passport. The Corti-Seas, which had run up significant dockage fees on Mykonos,
was seized by Greek customs officials. To get home to Chicago, Michelle borrowed money from
an aunt for a ticket.
There was an envelope waiting for her when she arrived. It was from Mark. Distraught, she
hoped and prayed there was an explanation inside. She tore the envelope open. It contained only
the certification for her engagement ring, presumably so she could sell it to raise some cash. He
left her with more than $6 million in liabilities that she would list when she filed for bankruptcy
a year later, in October 2005.
Courmayeur is in the northwestern corner of Italy, where the borders of France, Switzerland, and
Italy all meet. It lies at the foot of Mont Blanc; the mountain and nearby peaks, Maudit and the
Grandes Jorasses—all dappled in snow even in summer—gleam in the sun like a set of pearly
teeth. The town, with a permanent population of roughly 3,000, buzzes in the winter, when
Milan’s wealthy seize upon it, then settles back down during the summer, although there is a
steady flow of hikers in the fertile valley of the Val Ferret. The Via Roma, a stone-paved
walkway, curls through the center of town with an offering of exclusive couture—scarves by
Hermès, slippers by Gucci, watches by Tag Heuer. There are also stores that sell fruit in rainbow
hues and hearty wedges of the freshest cheese.
This was where Mark Weinberger ended up, some say as early as 2007. Because of his love for
Italy, the choice of the ski-resort town made sense, particularly considering its remoteness. There
were wild rumors that he had previously been to Israel or China, or even Miami, where he
supposedly watched the filming of an episode of CSI Miami. But there is no doubt that before he
arrived in Courmayeur, he spent time in the South of France.
Michelle Kramer, shortly after returning to Chicago, went to the city office that Weinberger
maintained separate from the condominium and clinic. She found material that he had shredded,
and over the course of three sleepless days and nights she pieced the hundreds of strands
together. She found evidence of two trips to New York in which he had bought $79,000 worth of
diamonds. She found receipts for purchases from an online store called GPS City totaling $1,487
and another purchase of $370 for a wind-and-weather gauge, leading her to speculate that he was
planning to lie low for some time on a sailboat. Using credit-card statements as well, she tracked
him to Monaco and then to Cannes and Nice, where he continued to indulge his penchant for fine
clothing. But then the trail grew cold.
In 2005 his medical license was revoked by the state of Indiana, and he was indicted in absentia
by a federal grand jury for health-care fraud. In 2006, Michelle was granted a divorce from
Weinberger. But in her continued effort to locate her ex-husband, she appeared on talk shows
such as Oprah Winfrey’s and Larry King’s. Eventually, in September of 2008, she was
instrumental in getting Mark’s story on America’s Most Wanted.
“A Client Like Any Other”
When Mark Weinberger arrived in Courmayeur he told people he had come from Monte Carlo,
and he did appear to be traveling back and forth to someplace else. At the end of 2008 he rented
a modest two-bedroom apartment in Courmayeur. It was on Via Regionale, No. 39, down a
series of steps and below street level. Above was a small shopping strip—a shoe store, a butcher,
and a tiny grocery on the end where Monica Specogna worked. She was attractive and slender,
with strikingly handsome features and thick black hair that fell to her shoulders. Then in her late
30s, she had been born in Udine, in northeast Italy, and had studied at the Academy of Fine Arts
in Florence. For a period she had worked in music, playing bass and heavy-metal guitar and
doing the sound mixing for several small albums. There had been struggles in her life, and dark
periods, but she found a home in Courmayeur, where she reveled in the peace and tranquillity of
the area, or what she simply described as “the mountain.” She loved to ice-climb, she loved to
ski, she loved to bike, and she loved to trek into uncharted regions. It was her life.
She met Weinberger in the winter of 2007–8 when he came into her store to buy food. “He was a
client like any other,” she told me. “Pleasant. Talkative. We spoke about music but not about
anything else.” In December 2008, however, a relationship began to spark. They decided to go
skiing together. Both intrepid, they went off the usual course into the woods, and from that day
on skied together as much as they could.
Weinberger told her that he had been living in Monte Carlo but had been traveling around
Europe on bike. The choice of Courmayeur was by chance—without looking he had supposedly
placed his finger on a map of the Alps, and it landed on the ski-resort town. He struck Monica as
sincere and honest. He claimed to be a divorced Wall Street stockbroker who had earned enough
to live a “peaceful life” without having to work. (He perversely gave his birthday as February 5,
which had been the due date for his and Michelle’s baby before the miscarriage.) According to
Monica, he said “he had led a stressful life in the United States because he had to earn money to
maintain the lifestyle he had had—cars, diamonds, planes, boat. He had accumulated so much
stress that he couldn’t take it anymore.” He told Monica his prior life had been based on money.
“He felt a slave to it, and therefore he defined society as a ‘prison.’ ” He said he did not care
much for social life and—ironically, given his past—he condemned the excessive lifestyles of
the rich skiers who flocked to Courmayeur.
“I never thought he was telling me lies,” says Monica. “I never suspected a thing.” There is an
admirable earnestness to her; she is somebody who is comfortable with who she is and what she
has been through to get there. But in the end Mark jeopardized her safety, as he had so many
others who trusted him.
Still equipped with his flair for romantic drama, he took their relationship to a new level on
Valentine’s Day 2009, when he arrived at Monica’s apartment bearing a single rose. When they
weren’t skiing together, he read weighty books about mountains and cosmology and philosophy
and astrophysics. (He also read Crime and Punishment.) A metamorphosis was taking place
inside him, from grandiose spender to grandiose survivalist. In the late spring he and Monica
biked the 170 miles from Courmayeur to Grindelwald, Switzerland, at the foot of the famed
Mount Eiger. At the end of the trip he decided that he was going to camp in the mountains for
the rest of the summer, drawn to the wilderness because of what he told Monica were “its
benefits, its difficulties, the unforeseen.” He settled at a steep wall on the side of a mountain near
Courmayeur. Once in a while he hiked into town to buy food and equipment.
At the end of September he came up with the idea of living at relatively high altitude for a year
and writing a book about the experience, which he hoped would give him enough money to settle
with Monica in Grindelwald and maybe even adopt children. “I want to do this,” he told a
skeptical Monica and set up camp at a site in the Val Ferret, where conditions could be deadly in
winter. Monica at first thought his plan was “folly,” despite Mark’s being in good shape and
possessing, she believed, the requisite mental toughness to survive in brutal conditions. She tried
talking him into relocating to a safer site, but he refused. The parallels to Christopher
McCandless, the doomed protagonist of Jon Krakauer’s best-selling nonfiction narrative Into the
Wild and Sean Penn’s movie adaptation, were inescapable. Hikers and mountain climbers saw
him doing odd exercises outside the tent, almost a kind of yoga. “It was strange,” says Paolo
Panizzi, the proprietor of a cheese-and-wine shop in Courmayeur.
Mark had stopped paying rent on his apartment. After several months the rental agent got angry
and contacted the local office of the Carabinieri, the Italian national police force, in Courmayeur.
The rental agent took with him a copy of Weinberger’s passport photo with his true identity;
strangely, Weinberger had given it to the agent when he rented the apartment, even though he
was a fugitive.
The Carabinieri checked their database and found an international arrest warrant for Weinberger
from Interpol. They also discovered that he had been on America’s Most Wanted. But they did
not know where he was.
On Monica’s 39th birthday, December 10, Weinberger came down from his tent, and they went
skiing together. She also received a phone call that day from a friend who said he had to talk to
her. The next day the friend told her “that something was not right with Mark, that he was not
who he said he was.” Moreover, the friend said, Mark was wanted by the F.B.I. Monica was
astonished and confused. That day she accompanied Mark back to the Val Ferret, where he
headed off to his tent. When she returned to town, she went online. On the America’s Most
Wanted Web site she learned who Mark really was and what he had allegedly done.
“My whole world collapsed,” she says. With a printed copy of the Web-site page, she went to the
Carabinieri and told them that she “knew where Mark was and that they had to go get him.” It
was a wrenchingly difficult decision for her to turn him in—she had spent the best year of her
life with him, she says—but “it had to be done, because I was raised to be sincere, because I had
a civic duty, because I was also afraid He could not escape forever, and he should not escape
forever.”
The Val Ferret cuts a long swath in between the mountains. Because of bad weather, the
Carabinieri could not act on Monica’s tip and conduct a search by helicopter until December 14.
They did not find Weinberger but did spot traces that showed where he had been. In addition, a
climber reported having seen a man living in a tent.
The next day, using a snowmobile, they located him. The temperature was roughly 4 degrees
below zero, and the snow was so high that the tops of pine trees were barely visible. Weinberger
was in the vicinity of the Elena Refuge, about 6,000 feet above sea level and a quarter-mile from
the main trail. He had chosen a spot at the base of the Triolet Glacier.
Giuseppe Ballistreri, head of the local Carabinieri, asked Weinberger what he was doing there. “I
just want to live a quiet life,” he replied. Ballistreri asked for identification, and Weinberger
produced a ski pass with the name “Mach Weinberg.” Lacking proper papers, he was taken back
to the Carabinieri barracks in Courmayeur. He was quiet, but did not appear to be nervous.
Subsequently, when officers searched the area where he had been taken into custody, they
discovered not just one campsite but three. They found cans of food. They found a stove used to
melt snow into water. They found changes of clothing. They found various medications,
including Viagra. All of it was enough to last somebody for a significant period.
At the barracks, Weinberger sat at a long table with the officers and wolfed down a bowl of pasta
before anyone else was finished. He posed amiably for a picture. Lieutenant Colonel Guido Di
Vita, of the Carabinieri, in charge of the region that includes Courmayeur, asked him again who
he was, although Di Vita already knew.
“I am a surgeon and I am divorced,” Weinberger said.
He then took out a knife he had concealed and cut himself near his jugular vein, in what some
construed as a suicide attempt.
Though a physician, he failed.
Because the wound was superficial.
On February 25 of this year, Mark Weinberger was extradited to the United States. Prosecutors
requested he be held without bond, which Weinberger didn’t challenge. He was placed in the
Federal Metropolitan Correctional Center in Chicago. His hair, in a picture taken of him while in
custody, was no longer free and easy, as it had been in Courmayeur, but short and nubby, making
him look like a two-bit thug. He refused my repeated requests for an interview. His lawyer,
Adam Tavitas, said that “much of the information that has been written about Mark is wrong.”
But on October 22, he appeared in federal court in Hammond, Indiana, to plead guilty to all the
criminal charges against him. The plea deal he struck with federal prosecutor Diane Berkowitz
was for a four-year sentence, or roughly two months for each count. The judge, Philip Simon,
has until January 21 to accept the plea, but there has been outrage among some of Weinberger’s
victims and others over the perceived leniency of the recommended sentence.
In a letter to the judge asking him to reject the plea, Michelle Kramer wrote that, as the legal
actions piled up against her ex-husband while he was still practicing in Merrillville, he “stated
that if he went to prison it would be ‘club fed’ and he would ‘do little to no time.’ … He laughed
when he discussed the treatment of ‘white collar criminals.’ ”
Michelle Kramer, now doing postdoctoral research in neuropsychology at Johns Hopkins, has
had six years to reflect on her ex-husband. She doubts he feels the slightest remorse over what he
has done, nor does she believe he truly thinks he is guilty of anything. As part of his plea
agreement, any profits from a film or book must go toward restitution. But Michelle knows Mark
and she can picture him sitting in jail figuring out a way around the restriction so that he can tell
the world his life story. Such an effort wouldn’t surprise her—another self-deluded vision by a
man who will never run out of them, regardless of how many people he damaged and devastated.
Buzz Bissinger is a Vanity Fair contributing editor.