Virtual Poster Presentation Assignment

profilerich8416
TheRelationshipbetweenCPAPUsageandCornealThickness.PDF

The Relationship between CPAP Usage and Corneal Thickness Ethem Gelir1*, Murat Timur Budak1, Sadik Ardıc2

1 Physiology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey, 2 Sleep Laboratory, Pulmonary Medicine Department, SGK Ankara Education Hospital,

Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between CPAP usage and corneal thickness in patients with sleep disordered breathing. Full-night polysomnography (PSG) recordings were collected. Ten patients had undergone PSG recordings with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and seven patients had undergone PSG recordings without CPAP. We measured corneal thickness by ultrasonic pachymeter before sleep and ten minutes after waking. We also measured visual acuity with a routine ophthalmologic eye chart before and after sleep. We asked patients to fill out a post-sleep questionnaire to get their subjective opinions. In the without-CPAP group, corneal thickness increased significantly during sleep in both eyes (left, p = 0.0025; right, p,0.0001). In the with-CPAP group, corneal thickness did not increase significantly (p.0.05 for both left and right cornea). There was no significant difference in visual acuity tests (p.0.05 for both left and right eye) between the two groups. According to our results, there is a significant increase in corneal thickness in the without-CPAP group. Our data show that a low percentage of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep may cause an increase in corneal thickness, which can indicate poor corneal oxygenation. In fact, many sleep- disordered breathing (SDB) patients have low REM. Since a contact lens may cause low corneal oxygenation, SDB patients with contact lenses should be monitored carefully for their corneal thickness.

Citation: Gelir E, Budak MT, Ardıc S (2014) The Relationship between CPAP Usage and Corneal Thickness. PLoS ONE 9(1): e87274. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0087274

Editor: Karen L. Gamble, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States of America

Received April 30, 2013; Accepted December 26, 2013; Published January 24, 2014

Copyright: � 2014 Gelir et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: [email protected]

Introduction

SDB is the most common sleep disorder associated with

excessive sleepiness. SDB is characterized by episodes of sleep

apnea (cessation of breathing over 10 s or more) or hypopnea

(significant reduction of breathing), oxygen desaturations, and

frequent arousals [1]. The most common form of SDB is

obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and is associated with airway

collapse as the cause of breathing cessation or reduction. The

standard, first-line treatment for OSA is continuous positive

airway pressure (CPAP) [2]. CPAP is fan-generated air pressure

delivered via a nasal mask and titrated to offset negative

intrathoracic pressures produced during inhalation. As such,

CPAP acts as a pneumatic splint to maintain airway patency. It

has been shown to be very effective in most patients leading to

improved daytime alertness, cognitive function, and quality of life

[3–5].

Since the discovery of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in

1953, it has been established that REM sleep is homeostatically

regulated. Selective REM sleep deprivation produces compensa-

tory increases in REM on subsequent sleep opportunities [6]. This

phenomenon is commonly called ‘‘REM rebound’’. REM

rebound occurs regardless of whether the original REM suppres-

sion was instrumental [7] (i.e., waking subjects up when they

entered REM sleep), pharmacologic [8] (e.g., amitryptaline or

fluoxetine), or disease related [9] (e.g., sleep-related breathing

disorders). Subsequently, researchers have found that in adults,

REM occupies 20–25% of total sleep time and many physiologic

changes are associated with REM sleep, including atonia [10],

poikilothermia [11], nocturnal penile tumescence [12,13], middle

ear muscle activity [14], and increased cerebral blood flow [15].

Recently, corneal thickening was added to the list of physiologic

properties affected by REM sleep. The hypothesis was advanced

by Maurice (1998) who proposed that eye movements in REM

sleep help corneal oxygenation. According to Maurice, thermal

circulation of the aqueous humor is needed for adequate corneal

respiration. This circulation is suppressed when the lids are closed,

and REM is required to stir the anterior chamber and thus prevent

corneal anoxia during sleep [16].

Corneal thickness measurements give valuable information

about the physiological status of the cornea [17–19]. Healthy

human corneal thickness is around 500 microns [20]. However the

thickness can change under some circumstances, such as hypoxia

and hypercapnia. It has also been shown that corneal thickness

significantly affects intraocular pressure measurement, and may

itself be a risk factor for developing glaucoma [21,22]. Early

studies showed that the normal human cornea would swell by 7%

every hour in an oxygen-free environment [23]. Diurnal variation

of central corneal thickness (CCT) has also been described, with

swelling overnight; this swelling resolved by early afternoon,

suggesting it was caused by the lid closure creating hypoxia [24].

Corneal swelling caused by hypoxia is a well-known phenomenon,

especially in relation to contact lens wear [25]. Long-term use of

contact lenses was shown to alter the following conditions in the

PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87274

cornea: epithelial oxygen uptake, epithelial thickness, stromal

thickness, and corneal endothelial morphology [26,27].

OSA causes decreased REM sleep percentage and CPAP usage

can usually reverse this decrease. If Maurice’s hypothesis is right,

then decreased REM percentage should jeopardize corneal

oxygenation. So far, no study has elucidated the relationship

between the CPAP usage and the corneal thickness. Thus, the

purpose of this study was to determine whether a correlation exists

between CPAP use and corneal thickness in patients with OSA.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement We obtained Institutional Review Board approval from Baylor

College of Medicine (Houston,TX) for the procedures of the study.

Our study has been carried out in accordance with The Code of

Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki)

for experiments involving humans.

Subjects In this study, patients underwent standardized sleep center

clinical procedures. Men and women, admitted to the Sleep

Laboratory at Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, for overnight polysomnography,

were eligible for this study. Subjects who met the following

inclusion criteria were selected for this study: patients must be

diagnosed with OSA, be 21–65 years of age (inclusive), and

provide written informed consent. We excluded patients with eye

(e.g., glaucoma) or neurological (e.g., periodic leg movement)

diseases. Twenty patients participated in the study, subjects were

randomly assigned to one of two groups (10 subjects in each

group). Patients who had used CPAP were called the ‘‘with-

CPAP’’ group, and patients who had not used CPAP were called

the ‘‘without-CPAP’’ group. However three subjects in the ‘‘with-

CPAP’’ group were excluded because they did not tolerate the

CPAP treatment. All subjects (1 woman and 16 men) were CPAP

naı̈ve. The ‘‘with-CPAP’’ group subjects underwent full-night

manual CPAP titration. The mean age in the with-CPAP group

was 5763.5 years and in the without-CPAP group 5962.2 years

(mean 6 S.E.M.). These age distributions were normal, as

demonstrated by normograms. The only additional procedures

for this study were pre- and post-sleep ultrasonic corneal thickness

measurement and visual acuity testing.

Corneal thickness measurement A DGH500 Pachette ultrasonic pachymeter with a hand-held

transducer (DGH Technology, Inc. Exton,PA) was used to

measure corneal thickness. The ultrasonic pachymeter calculates

readings based on an ultrasonic velocity of 1640 m/s for normal

human corneal thickness. To locate the center of the cornea, each

subject was instructed to stare directly at an ophthalmic pen light

positioned at eye level, approximately 2 meters from the subject.

Although there are other methods to measure corneal thickness,

such as optic and electronic digital methods, the ultrasonic method

is the most preferred one, because it is accurate, easy to use, and

reliable [28,29]. Thickness measurement of each cornea was done

15 times for each measurement and the arithmetic mean of 15

measurements was used as a parameter of statistical analysis of

each eye.

Visual acuity testing This procedure involves a standard eye chart. A second chart

was used to prevent memorization of letters by the subject, as each

individual was exposed to the chart twice. Right and left eyes of

patients were examined separately to assess visual acuity. In this

method, normal vision was accepted as 20/20 (Snellen unit). We

transformed these values to their decimal equivalents as 20/20 =

1. Normal vision is represented by ‘‘1’’. So, an increase in this

numerical value should be considered as better vision and vice

versa. These decimal values were then converted into a logarithm

of the minimum angle of resolution (logMar) equivalents.

Standardized sleep center clinical procedure Analysis included overnight polysomnography for diagnosis

followed by a night of CPAP titration. These procedures were

performed as part of a routine clinical evaluation. Full-night PSGs

were recorded according to standard practice. We made sleep

recordings using Grass Heritage computerized polysomnographic

systems. Standard surface electrodes were used to record

electroencephalographic, electrooculographic, electromyographic

(submental and anterior tibialis), and electrocardiographic activ-

ities. Nasal oral thermocouples monitor airflow, while thoracic and

abdominal movements indicate respiratory effort. Respiratory

tracings were scored for the presence of apneas (a 10 second, or

longer, cessation in nasal-oral airflow) or hypopneas (a 10 second,

or longer, reduction of nasal-oral airflow of 50%, or more). Blood

oxygen saturation was monitored with pulse oximetry (with the

sensor placed on the earlobe). Sleep latency, sleep efficiency,

percentage of time in each sleep stage, and other polysomno-

graphic parameters were calculated. Recording and scoring

techniques followed currently published standards for human

subjects; this includes procedures for sleep stages [30], respiration

[31], and leg movement [32]. In the morning, monitoring devices

were removed and the subject completed a post-sleep question-

naire detailing subjective sleep quality and quantity. A registered

polysomnographic technologist analyzed the sleep record and

oximetry data. Then, a staff physician reviewed the records. In

addition to the mentioned measurements, we also elicited REM

density value, which measures the frequency of rapid eye

movements during REM sleep. The formula used to calculate

REM density is described elsewhere [33].

Table 1. Pre and post sleep comparison of left and right corneal thickness of each group.

Group n Pre-Sleep Left Cornea Post-Sleep Left Cornea Pre-Sleep Right Cornea Post-Sleep Right Cornea

Without-CPAP 10 537.5611.6 * 553.5613.2 538.0610.8 ** 559.0611.5

With-CPAP 7 544.869.5 545.2610.2 545.768.9 551.469.7

Values are given as microns for corneal thickness (means 6 S.E.M.). *p = 0.0025 very significant (t = 4.134 with 9 degrees of freedom). The comparison is between Pre-Sleep and Post-Sleep of left corneal thickness in without-CPAP group. **p, 0.0001 extremely significant (t = 9.257 with 9 degrees of freedom). The comparison is between Pre-Sleep and Post-Sleep of right corneal thickness in without-CPAP group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087274.t001

CPAP and Corneal Thickness

PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 2 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87274

Sleep questionnaires As a part of routine sleep center clinical procedure, we

administered a post-sleep questionnaire to subjects. In this

questionnaire, among many others, there were four questions

regarding vision after sleep. These questions were about ‘‘Clearer

Vision’’, ‘‘Dimmer Vision’’, ‘‘Blurred Vision’’, and ‘‘Eye Discom-

fort’’. They were asked to check one of the three options, which

were ‘‘less’’, ‘‘same’’, and ‘‘more’’.

Results

Subjects There was no statistically significant difference in the age

distribution between the two groups (p = 0.35). Thus, the groups

were considered comparable. In this study, patients underwent

standardized sleep center clinical procedures.

Corneal thickness versus REM percentages and REM density

Statistical analysis for corneal thickness was performed by

Student’s t-test using GraphPad InStat 3.1 and Prism 5.03,

GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA. In the without-CPAP

group, corneal thickness increased significantly after one night’s

sleep. The two-tailed p value was 0.0025 for left cornea, and p was

, 0.0001 for right cornea. In the with-CPAP group, corneal

thickness did not increase significantly after one night’s sleep, as

measured using a two-tailed t-test.

The average percentages of REM sleep were 13.062.1 and

15.9864.0 in without-CPAP and with-CPAP groups, respectively.

An Unpaired test was performed to compare REM sleep

percentages of both groups and no significant difference was

found. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to test

the null hypothesis that there was no correlation between REM

sleep percentages and corneal thickness values. No significant

correlation was found (r 2

= 0.124 for right cornea, 0.187 for left

cornea in with-CPAP group and; 0.123 for right cornea, 0.275 for

left cornea in without-CPAP group). Corneal thickness values of

both groups are listed in Table 1, and associated REM sleep

percentages and REM density values are listed in Table 2. Values

are given as microns for corneal thickness, and as a percentage for

REM sleep (mean 6 S.E.M.).

The average REM density values were 9.160.6 and 11.560.7

in without-CPAP and with-CPAP groups, respectively. An

Unpaired test was performed to compare REM density values of

both groups and, we observed that the REM density value of the

with-CPAP group is noticeably higher than that of the without-

CPAP group (p, 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient was

calculated to test the null hypothesis that there was no correlation

between REM density and corneal thickness values. No significant

correlation was found (r 2

= 0.308 for right cornea, 0.458 for left

cornea in with-CPAP group and; 0.003 for right cornea, 0.015 for

left cornea in without-CPAP group).

Visual acuity Eye chart examination revealed vision improvement in 7 eyes

and deterioration in 3 eyes, while it revealed no change in 10 eyes

of the without-CPAP group (10 patients, 10 pairs of eyes). In the

with-CPAP group (7 patients, 7 pairs of eyes), vision improvement

was observed in only one eye, and deterioration was observed in 5

eyes, while no change was observed in 8 eyes. There was no

Table 2. Demographic and polysomnographic variables in all subjects.

Group n Age (years old) BMI (kg/m 2

) SpO2 (%) Pre-CPAP AHI AHI Baseline REM (%) REM (%) REM Density

Without-CPAP 10 5962.2 30.461.8 90.961.2 --- 24.063.2 --- 13,062,17 9.160.6

With-CPAP 7 5763.5 32.562.1 92.661.9 25.963.1 6.560.7 12,362,0 15,964,0 11.560.7

p value --- 0,6730 0.4883 0.4615 --- 0.0005 --- 0.4858 0.0354

All values are presented as means 6 S.E.M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087274.t002

Table 3. Visual acuity values of each patient.

Without-CPAP Group With-CPAP Group

Right Eye Pre- sleep

Right Eye Post-sleep

Left Eye Pre-sleep

Left Eye Post-sleep

Right Eye Pre-sleep

Right Eye Post-sleep

Left Eye Pre-sleep Left Eye Post-sleep

20/16 20/16 20/16 20/16 20/16 20/16 20/16 20/16

20/20 20/20 20/16 20/16 20/25 20/20 20/25 20/25

20/60 20/40 20/20 30/20 20/25 20/25 20/30 20/40

20/20 20/16 20/20 20/16 20/20 20/25 20/20 20/25

20/16 20/20 20/16 20/20 20/25 20/25 20/25 20/25

20/20 20/20 20/25 20/25 20/25 20/25 20/25 20/25

20/20 20/20 20/20 20/20 20/16 20/20 20/16 20/20

20/25 20/20 20/20 20/16 --- --- --- ---

20/30 20/30 20/40 20/25 --- --- --- ---

20/50 20/50 20/25 20/30 --- --- --- ---

Values are given as Snellen units. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087274.t003

CPAP and Corneal Thickness

PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 3 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87274

statistically significant difference in visual acuity before and after

sleep (p.0.05) for both groups. Visual acuity values of each patient

before and after sleep are given as Snellen units in Table 3. Figure

1 shows eye chart visual acuity results as logMar equivalents.

Overnight polysomnography values Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), blood oxygen saturation levels

(SpO2) and REM Density values of both groups are given in Table

2. Values are presented as mean 6 S.E.M. by using Student’s t

test.

Sleep questionnaires According to the sleep questionnaire results, all of the with-

CPAP group patients claimed that they had better vision after

sleep. Our results showed that there were statistically significant

changes in blurred vision and dimmer vision while there were no

significant changes in clear vision and eye discomfort between

groups. However, following Bonferroni adjustment for four

comparisons and the adoption of p = 0.0125 as the border level

of statistical significance, the indicated differences became

statistically insignificant. Figure 2 shows these post-sleep question-

naire results.

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the relationship between CPAP usage

and corneal thickness. According to our results, there is a

significant increase in corneal thickness in the without-CPAP

group. Our results show that REM density value for the with-

CPAP group was higher than that of the without-CPAP group (p,

0.05); however, the raw REM percentages of both groups were not

significantly different, and no significant correlation was found

between REM sleep percentages and corneal thickness values. The

reason for this inconsistency is that REM sleep percentages and

REM densities are different measurements, even though REM

density is a derivative of REM percentage. REM density is defined

as the percentage of time (in minutes) in which rapid eye

movements occurred during the respective period of REM sleep,

considering that amplitude of eye movements is higher than

25 mV [33]. Calculation of this index was made by the following

equation: total minutes of rapid eye movements/total minutes of

REM sleep x 100.

The tonic components of REM sleep (REM duration, the REM

percent of sleep period time) may be increased while the REM

density is significantly decreased due to prolongation of total REM

duration and a parallel reduction of the total number of eye

movements [34]. Several studies confirm the independence of

REM density from other REM sleep parameters observed after

selective paradoxical sleep deprivation and after the administra-

tion of cholinergic drugs [35]. Another reason for inconsistency

may be the small sample size of our study. Increasing the sample

size may cause a significant difference in the raw REM

percentages.

During night sleep, REM sleep has been proposed as a factor

aiding corneal oxygenation [16]. The literature shows that

extended usage of contact lenses diminishes corneal tissue

Figure 1. Results of eye chart visual acuity test for the without-CPAP group (A) and with-CPAP group (B) are presented in bar graph. There is no significant difference between groups. Error bars = S.E.M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087274.g001

CPAP and Corneal Thickness

PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 4 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87274

oxygenation [26]. Our study demonstrated that REM density

decreased in OSA patients. However, there is no study to analyze

corneal oxygenation data for contact lens usage in OSA patients.

Based on this study and a literature review, we believe that OSA

patients who wear hard contact lenses might be at risk for corneal

thickening. However, this hypothesis requires further studies to be

confirmed. Finally, this study is also limited by the lack of a formal

control group of individuals who did not have OSA.

To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that OSA

patients experience corneal thickness increase during sleep.

Because our data are concerned with the acute effect of OSA on

the cornea, we only analyzed one night of pre and post sleep data.

Therefore, further studies of long term effects of OSA on corneal

thickness are required. Our study emphasizes the following points.

First, OSA patients who wear hard contact lenses should be

monitored carefully, because their corneal thickness can also be

affected by decreased REM percentages. Second, it may be

prudent for clinicians to consider the possibility of glaucoma in

OSA patients and vice versa. Glaucoma is one of the leading

causes of visual impairment and blindness [36]. OSA patients have

a higher prevalence of glaucoma and ocular hypertension [37], so

any patients with increased corneal thickness should be evaluated

carefully.

In summary, we do not claim that rapid eye movements are

indispensable for a healthy cornea or that the only function of

REM sleep is to provide oxygen to the cornea. But our data show

that corneal thickness increased in OSA patients, and this finding

must be kept in mind when evaluating these patients. Further

research would be useful with larger numbers of patients, and

longer follow-ups are required to confirm the effect of OSA on the

cornea.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EG. Performed the experiments:

EG. Analyzed the data: EG MTB SA. Contributed reagents/materials/

analysis tools: EG MTB SA. Wrote the paper: EG MTB.

Figure 2. Results of post-sleep questionnaire of ‘‘with-CPAP’’ (CPAP) and ‘‘without-CPAP’’ (wo/CPAP) groups. The questionnaire is made-up of four categories, which are Blurred Vision (BV) – panel A, Dimmer Vision (DV) – panel B, Clear Vision (CV) – panel C and Eye Discomfort (ED) –panel D. Statistically significant (i.e., accepted as p,0.05) p values are shown in the figure. Non-significant p values are not shown. The possible three answers to each of the categories are summarized as ‘‘Less answer’’ = ‘‘Less’’, ‘‘Same answer’’ = ‘‘SameMore’’ and ‘‘More answer’’ = ‘‘SameMore’’ to make an easy interpretation of data. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087274.g002

CPAP and Corneal Thickness

PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 5 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87274

References

1. Wellman A, White D (2011) Central Sleep Apnea and Periodic Breathing. In:

Kryger M, Roth T, WC D, editors. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine 5th Edition. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company. pp. 1140–1152.

2. Buchanan B, Grunstein R (2011) Positive Airway Pressure Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome. In: Kryger M, Roth T, Dement

W, editors. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine 5th Edition. 5th Edition

ed. Philadelphia, PA. pp. 1233–1249. 3. Aloia MS, Di Dio L, Ilniczky N, Perlis ML, Greenblatt DW, et al. (2001)

Improving compliance with nasal CPAP and vigilance in older adults with OAHS. Sleep Breath 5: 13–21.

4. Ferini-Strambi L, Baietto C, Di Gioia MR, Castaldi P, Castronovo C, et al.

(2003) Cognitive dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): partial reversibility after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Brain Res

Bull 61: 87–92. 5. Ferini-Strambi L, Marelli S, Galbiati A, Castronovo C (2013) Effects of

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on cognitive function and neuroimaging data in obstructive sleep apnea. Int J Psychophysiol.

6. Achermann P, Borbely A (2011) Sleep Homeostasis and Models of Sleep

Regulation. In: Kryger M, Roth T, WC D, editors. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine 5th Edition. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company. pp.

431–444. 7. Feng P, Ma Y, Vogel GW (2001) Ontogeny of REM rebound in postnatal rats.

Sleep 24: 645–653.

8. Feige B, Voderholzer U, Riemann D, Dittmann R, Hohagen F, et al. (2002) Fluoxetine and sleep EEG: effects of a single dose, subchronic treatment, and

discontinuation in healthy subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 26: 246–258. 9. Horner RL, Brooks D, Kozar LF, Leung E, Hamrahi H, et al. (1998) Sleep

architecture in a canine model of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 21: 847–858. 10. Kleitman N (1963) Sleep and Wakefulness. Chicago: The University of Chicago

Press.

11. Heller H, Glotzbach S, Grahn D (1988) Sleep-Dependent Changes in the Thermoregulatory System. In: Lydic R, Biebuyck J, editors. Clinical Physiology

of Sleep. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 145. 12. Fisher C, Gorss J, Zuch J (1965) CYCLE OF PENILE ERECTION

SYNCHRONOUS WITH DREAMING (REM) SLEEP. PRELIMINARY

REPORT. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12: 29–45. 13. Karacan I (1965) The effect of exciting presleep events on dream reporting and

penile erections during sleep. [Doctoral dissertation]. Brooklyn, NY: New York University.

14. Pessah MA, Roffwarg HP (1972) Spontaneous middle ear muscle activity in man: a rapid eye movement sleep phenomenon. Science 178: 773–776.

15. Hajak G, Klingelhofer J, Schulz-Varszegi M, Matzander G, Sander D, et al.

(1994) Relationship between cerebral blood flow velocities and cerebral electrical activity in sleep. Sleep 17: 11–19.

16. Maurice DM (1998) The Von Sallmann Lecture 1996: an ophthalmological explanation of REM sleep. Exp Eye Res 66: 139–145.

17. Hedbys BO, Mishima S (1966) The thickness-hydration relationship of the

cornea. Exp Eye Res 5: 221–228. 18. Johnson MH, Boltz RL, Godio LB (1985) Deswelling of the cornea after

hypoxia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 62: 768–773. 19. Klyce SD (1981) Stromal lactate accumulation can account for corneal oedema

osmotically following epithelial hypoxia in the rabbit. J Physiol 321: 49–64.

20. Tai LY, Khaw KW, Ng CM, Subrayan V (2013) Central corneal thickness

measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.

Cornea 32: 766–771.

21. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, et al. (2006) Effect of

central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation

tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 124: 471–476.

22. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA (2006)

Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma

damage. Am J Ophthalmol 141: 868–875.

23. Polse KA, Mandell RB (1970) Critical oxygen tension at the corneal surface.

Arch Ophthalmol 84: 505–508.

24. du Toit R, Vega JA, Fonn D, Simpson T (2003) Diurnal variation of corneal

sensitivity and thickness. Cornea 22: 205–209.

25. Moezzi AM, Fonn D, Varikooty J, Richter D (2011) Distribution of overnight

corneal swelling across subjects with 4 different silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye

Contact Lens 37: 61–65.

26. Holden BA, Sweeney DF, Vannas A, Nilsson KT, Efron N (1985) Effects of

long-term extended contact lens wear on the human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol

Vis Sci 26: 1489–1501.

27. Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Stapleton F (2009) The effect of long-term wear of soft

lenses of low and high oxygen transmissibility on the corneal epithelium. Eye

(Lond) 23: 1282–1287.

28. Salz JJ, Azen SP, Berstein J, Caroline P, Villasenor RA, et al. (1983) Evaluation

and comparison of sources of variability in the measurement of corneal thickness

with ultrasonic and optical pachymeters. Ophthalmic Surg 14: 750–754.

29. Faulkner W, Varley G (1997) Corneal Diagnostic Techniques. In: Krachmer J,

Mannis M, Holland E, editors. Cornea Fundamentals of Cornea and External

Disease. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby. pp. 279.

30. Rechtschaffen A, Kales A (1968) A manual of standardized techniques and

scoring system for sleep stages in human subjects. Washington D.C.: U.S.

Government Printing Office.

31. Bornstein S (1982) Respiratory monitoring during sleep: polysomnography. In:

Guilleminault C, editor. Sleeping and Waking Disorders: Indications and

Techniques. Menlo Park, CA.: Addison-Wesley. pp. 183–212.

32. Bonnet M, Carley D, Guilleminault C (1993) Recording and scoring leg

movements. The Atlas Task Force. Sleep 16: 748–759.

33. King D, Akiskal HS, Lemmi H, Wilson W, Belluomini J, et al. (1981) REM

density in the differential diagnosis of psychiatric from medical-neurologic

disorders: a replication. Psychiatry Res 5: 267–276.

34. Hohagen F, Riemann D, Spiegel R, Holzhauer M, Berger M (1993) Influence of

the cholinergic agonist SDZ 210-086 on sleep in healthy subjects. Neuropsy-

chopharmacology 9: 225–232.

35. Antonioli M, Solano L, Torre A, Violani C, Costa M, et al. (1981) Independence

of REM density from other REM sleep parameters before and after REM

deprivation. Sleep 4: 221–225.

36. Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Munoz B, et al. (2004) Causes

and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch

Ophthalmol 122: 477–485.

37. Moghimi S, Ahmadraji A, Sotoodeh H, Sadeghniat K, Maghsoudipour M, et al.

(2013) Retinal nerve fiber thickness is reduced in sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep

Med 14: 53–57.

CPAP and Corneal Thickness

PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 6 January 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 1 | e87274