Theory Assignment

profilesueme
TheoryRubric.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Identify the Theory and Level

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

Provides a thorough discussion of the theory to be critiqued and its level (grand, middle-range).

13 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

Provides a somewhat detailed discussion of the theory to be critiqued and its level (grand, middle range).

12 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Provides a limited discussion of the theory to be critiqued and its level (grand, middle range).

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Identify the Approach

10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

The approach used (name of the model/approach and the authors/researchers who developed the model) is clearly identified and discussed.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The approach used is identified and discussed, but additional details are needed for clarity.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Provides a limited discussion of the approach used.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Summary (i.e., Theory Description)

30 to >27.0 pts

Advanced

The theory is thoroughly summarized/described with major concepts cited.

27 to >24.0 pts

Proficient

Summary of theory is relatively thorough, but additional details/discussion are needed for clarity.

24 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Summary of theory is limited. Some examples include: lack of thoroughness, depth, and/or non-adherence to the selected model/approach.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Critique (i.e., Critical Reflection)

50 to >45.0 pts

Advanced

The theory is thoroughly critiqued using the chosen approach.

45 to >41.0 pts

Proficient

Theory critique is relatively thorough, but additional details/discussion are needed for clarity.

41 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Critique of theory is limited. Some examples include: lack of thoroughness, depth, and/or non-adherence to the selected model/approach.

0 pts

Not Present

50 pts

Theory-Based Exemplar Paper (TEP): Theory Analysis Grading Rubric | NURS502_D01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Writing Quality

30 to >27.0 pts

Advanced

Quality of work includes: clarity and thoroughness of writing, grammar, varied sentence structure, evidence of critical thinking, and proper use of current APA format.

27 to >24.0 pts

Proficient

Quality of work has several errors in: clarity and thoroughness of writing, grammar, sentence structure, critical thinking, and use of current APA format.

24 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Quality of work has substantial errors in: clarity and thoroughness of writing, grammar, sentence structure, critical thinking, and use of current APA format.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Length and Source Requirements

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

Required length (4-5 pages) is met. The title page and reference page do not count towards this length requirement. At least 2 scholarly sources are required.

13 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

Length of paper is 4 pages. The title page and reference page do not count towards this length requirement. There is a minimal discrepancy in the required number and/or type of references utilized within the paper.

12 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Paper length is less than 4 pages. The title page and reference page do not count towards this length requirement. There is a significant discrepancy in the required number and/or type of references utilized within the paper.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Total Points: 150

Theory-Based Exemplar Paper (TEP): Theory Analysis Grading Rubric | NURS502_D01_202140