PRESENTATION

Rubric for Collaborative Presentation – In-Class or Online (with Oral Delivery)

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total

Presentation/ Content (grade)

0-34 points 35-39 points 40-44 points 45-50 points /50

Presenta(on content shows a lack of understanding of the topic. There is inadequate evidence of research and insufficient relevant informa(on and facts. Content is confusing and/or contains frequent inaccuracies. Required elements are missing and/or randomly organized. Sources, if included, generally lack proper cita(on format (APA 7th ed.).

Presenta(on content shows general understanding of the topic. There is limited evidence of research in loca(ng relevant informa(on and facts and/or suppor(ng statements made. Content contains some inaccuracies, inconsistencies, misinterpreta(ons, and/or somewhat unclear. A required element may be missing and/or some sources may be improperly cited (APA 7th ed.).

Presenta(on content shows an adequate understanding of the topic. Some research effort is evident in loca(ng relevant informa(on and facts. Content is mostly accurate and reasonably organized. May contain some inconsistencies in content or some connec(ons made may not be supported. Required elements are included and sources are properly cited (APA 7th ed.) for the most part.

Presenta(on content shows a thorough understanding of the topic. Substan(ve research effort is evident in loca(ng relevant informa(on and facts. Content is accurate and sequenced in a clear, logical way. All required elements are included and sources are properly cited (APA 7th ed.).

Presentation/ Design (grade)

0-18 points 19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25

Slides generally lack visual appeal and are text-heavy with liLle or no visuals and/or exhibit an overuse of color or anima(ons. Media, (e.g., images), if used, are rarely cited on each slide. No theme is evident and the presenta(on appears disjointed rather than unified and/or frequent errors (grammar, punctua(on, spelling, formaPng, etc.) on the slides

Slides generally include a mix of white space, visuals, and/or text but not consistently and/or some overuse or inappropriate use of color or anima(ons. Theme (e.g., template) is not consistently evident throughout the presenta(on and/or some errors (grammar, punctua(on, spelling, formaPng, etc.) on the slides.

Slides are effec(vely designed with visual appeal including white space, visuals, and minimal text for the most part. Color and anima(ons are used appropriately. Theme (e.g., template) is evident in the presenta(on for the most part to produce a cohesive presenta(on and/or minor errors (grammar, punctua(on, spelling, formaPng, etc.) on the slides.

Slides are visually well designed, aesthe(cally pleasing with appropriate use of white space, visuals, and minimal text, on each slide. Color and anima(ons are used judiciously. Theme (e.g., template) is evident throughout to produce a highly cohesive presenta(on. Basically free from errors (grammar, punctua(on, spelling, formaPng, etc.) on the slides.

Presentation/ Oral Delivery

grade)

0-10 points 11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points /15

Ineffec(ve in delivering the oral presenta(on demonstra(ng below average/poor communica(on skills. Substan(ally over/under the (me limit to present and/or not all members presented. Lack of prepara(on was evident.

Somewhat effec(ve in delivering the oral presenta(on demonstra(ng average communica(on skills. Slightly over/ under the (me limit. Some members presented more than others. More prepara(on was needed.

Effec(ve in delivering the oral presenta(on demonstra(ng good communica(on skills and generally close to the (me limit for the group to present (20 minutes total). All group members presented and prepara(on was evident for the most part.

Highly effec(ve in delivering a well- polished oral presenta(on within the (me limit for the group to present (20 minutes total). All group members presented equally. Prepara(on was strongly evident.

0-4 points 5 points 7 points 8-10 points

Presentation/ Notes/

Transcript ( grade

Presenta(on lacks “Notes” on slides (or in a separate document) to explain each slide and/or, if included, the notes repeat the text provided on the slide. Wri(ng demonstrates a below average/ poor wri(ng style with frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctua(on, and/ or usage.

Minimal “Notes” are included in the presenta(on slides (or in a separate document) and/or are sporadically provided. Wri(ng demonstrates an average wri(ng style with some errors in spelling, grammar, punctua(on, and/or usage.

“Notes” are included in the presenta(on (or in a separate document) for the most part to explain slides as a wriLen transcript. Wri(ng demonstrates an above average wri(ng style with liLle grammar, punctua(on, spelling, and or usage errors.

“Notes” are included in the presenta(on (or in a separate document) to fully explain each slide as a wriLen transcript. Wri(ng demonstrates a strong wri(ng style basically free from grammar, punctua(on, spelling, or usage errors.

/10