Can you answer this question ?
Criteria Ratings Points
Scholarly Tone and literature
35 to >32.0 pts
Advanced
Level one and two headings are coherently aligned with the theory and research and are supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature and written in a scholarly tone.
32 to >22.0 pts
Proficient
Level one and two headings are coherently aligned with the theory and research and are mostly supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature and somewhat written in a scholarly tone.
22 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some headings are missing or are not coherently aligned with the theory and research and are not well supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature. Lacks scholarly tone.
0 pts
Not Present
35 pts
Content 70 to >63.0 pts
Advanced
The theory and theorist are included. One theory is well-developed. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is clearly described. The author’s voice is heard throughout the paper.
63 to >58.0 pts
Proficient
The theory and theorist are included. One theory is mostly well-developed. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is mostly described. The author’s voice is somewhat heard throughout the paper.
58 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The theory and/or theorist are missing. The theory lacks development. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is vaguely described or missing. The author’s voice is vaguely heard throughout the paper.
0 pts
Not Present
70 pts
Current APA, Mechanics, Format & Length
45 to >38.0 pts
Advanced
Paper is free of mechanical and current APA errors. 100% of the length requirement is met. All five sources are peer-reviewed and clearly related to the topic. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist.
38 to >36.0 pts
Proficient
Few mechanical and/or current APA errors exist. Length of the paper is met by 90% to 99%. Four sources are peer-reviewed and clearly related to the topic. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist.
36 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Several mechanical and/or current APA errors exist. Length of the paper is met by less than 90%. Fewer than four sources are peer-reviewed. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist. Some sources are not clearly related to the topic.
0 pts
Not Present
45 pts
Total Points: 150
Theoretical Framework Grading Rubric | EDUC850_B10_202240