Can you answer this question ?

profilemwhitener2011
TheoreticalFrameworkGradingRubric2.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Scholarly Tone and literature

35 to >32.0 pts

Advanced

Level one and two headings are coherently aligned with the theory and research and are supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature and written in a scholarly tone.

32 to >22.0 pts

Proficient

Level one and two headings are coherently aligned with the theory and research and are mostly supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature and somewhat written in a scholarly tone.

22 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Some headings are missing or are not coherently aligned with the theory and research and are not well supported throughout the body of the paper using scholarly literature. Lacks scholarly tone.

0 pts

Not Present

35 pts

Content 70 to >63.0 pts

Advanced

The theory and theorist are included. One theory is well-developed. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is clearly described. The author’s voice is heard throughout the paper.

63 to >58.0 pts

Proficient

The theory and theorist are included. One theory is mostly well-developed. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is mostly described. The author’s voice is somewhat heard throughout the paper.

58 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The theory and/or theorist are missing. The theory lacks development. An explanation for how the theory is appropriate for the research is vaguely described or missing. The author’s voice is vaguely heard throughout the paper.

0 pts

Not Present

70 pts

Current APA, Mechanics, Format & Length

45 to >38.0 pts

Advanced

Paper is free of mechanical and current APA errors. 100% of the length requirement is met. All five sources are peer-reviewed and clearly related to the topic. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist.

38 to >36.0 pts

Proficient

Few mechanical and/or current APA errors exist. Length of the paper is met by 90% to 99%. Four sources are peer-reviewed and clearly related to the topic. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist.

36 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Several mechanical and/or current APA errors exist. Length of the paper is met by less than 90%. Fewer than four sources are peer-reviewed. One source may be non-peer reviewed to account for the original theorist. Some sources are not clearly related to the topic.

0 pts

Not Present

45 pts

Total Points: 150

Theoretical Framework Grading Rubric | EDUC850_B10_202240