For Prof Double R ONLY

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not Present

Part 1 – Models

32 to 35 points

Select 1 model from 4 of the 8 provided categories of models. Describe 1 of the stories you heard in a meeting that could be used as an example of that particular model. This would include at least 2 paragraphs: 1) provide the details of the story, and 2) give the specific reasons that you felt this model provides a good explanation of the client’s addiction.

29 to 31 points

This section is not thorough in identifying the following: Select 1 model from 4 of the 8 provided categories of models. Describe 1 of the stories you heard in a meeting that could be used as an example of that particular model. This would include at least 2 paragraphs: 1) provide the details of the story, and 2) give the specific reasons that you felt this model provides a good explanation of the client’s addiction.

1 to 28 points

Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: Select 1 model from 4 of the 8 provided categories of models. Describe 1 of the stories you heard in a meeting that could be used as an example of that particular model. This would include at least 2 paragraphs: 1) provide the details of the story and 2) give the specific reasons that you felt this model provides a good explanation of the client’s addiction.

0 points

These things are not discussed.

Part 2 – Member’s Story

32 to 35 points

The paper thoroughly describes 1 member’s story. At least 2 different models that could be used to evaluate the 1 member’s story are thoroughly described. The paper clearly describes what it was about their story that caused you to consider using the models you selected to help explain the person’s addiction.

29 to 31 points

This section is not thorough in identifying the following: The paper thoroughly describes 1 member’s story. At least 2 different models that could be used to evaluate the 1 member’s story are thoroughly described. The paper clearly describes what it was about their story that caused you to consider using the models you selected to help explain the person’s addiction.

1 to 28 points

Two or more essential elements of this section are missing: The paper thoroughly describes 1 member’s story. At least 2 different models that could be used to evaluate the 1 member’s story are thoroughly described. The paper clearly describes what it was about their story that caused you to consider using the models you selected to help explain the person’s addiction.

0 points

These areas are not included in the paper.

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not Present

Mechanics

9 to 10 points

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.

8 points

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate.

1 to 7 points

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

0 points

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.

APA Format Elements

9 to 10 points

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. An Abstract is not needed.

8 points

Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.

1 to 7 points

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are included, though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 points

Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, citations, running head, and references are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.

Research Elements

9 to 10 points

Major points are supported by at least 3–4 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. Paper is appropriate length of 6–7 pages.

8 points

Major points are supported by 1–2 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. Paper is not the appropriate length and is either excessively long or too brief.

1 to 7 points

Major points are supported by at least 1 scholarly source and the textbook is not listed/or the resources are not scholarly. Paper is not the appropriate length and is either excessively long or too brief.

0 points

Major points are not supported scholarly sources. Paper is not the appropriate length of 6–7 pages.

Total: /100