Research

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Christian Perspective

42 to 45 points

There is a clear, logical flow and rationale in the content. Content covers a Christian worldview perspective of human sexuality and God’s design for sex. The theology is well supported. Major points are stated clearly and supported by scholarly sources.

38 to 41 points

There is a good, logical flow and rationale in the content. Content of the topic is mostly covered. The theology is well supported. Major points are stated clearly and mostly supported by scholarly sources.

1 to 37 points

The flow and rationale of the content is unclear. Content is lacking in the area to be covered. The theology is not well supported. Major points are not stated clearly and lack support from scholarly sources.

0 points

Not discussed.

Sexual Brokenness

41 to 43 points

There is a clear, logical flow and rationale in the content. Content covers the area of sexual wounding or brokenness and discusses treatment of one area of sexual brokenness. Major points are stated clearly and supported by scholarly sources.

37 to 40 points

The discussion of sexual brokenness reflects a good analysis and exploration of the treatment of one area of sexual wounding is mostly supported by scholarly sources. Major points are mostly clearly stated.

1 to 36 points

The discussion reflects a weak coverage and exploration of the topics identified. The discussion lacks sufficient support by scholarly resources.

0 points

Not discussed.

Personal Theology

40 to 42 points

Clear description and identification of key points in the personal theology of human sexuality and sex from Scriptures and scholarly sources is included.

37 to 39 points

Good description and identification of key points in the personal theology of sexuality and sex from Scriptures and scholarly sources is included.

1 to 36 points

Poor description and/or identification of key points in the theology of sexuality and sex from Scriptures and scholarly sources is included.

0 points

Not discussed.

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Mechanics

18 to 20 points

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. A clear introduction, body, and conclusion are present.

17 points

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. A good introduction, body, and conclusion are present.

1 to 16 points

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. An introduction, body, and conclusion are present, but are not clear.

0 points

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor.

APA Format

18 to 20 points

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Abstract, Citations, Running head, and References are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in APA-approved font style and size. A clear Abstract is included.

17 points

Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in APA-approved font style and size. A good abstract is included.

1 to 16 points

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect. An unclear abstract is included.

0 points

Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, Running head, and References are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect. A poorly written abstract is included.

Research Elements

18 to 20 points

Required length (6–8 pages) is met. Required references (10) are included. Arguments are correctly supported with research. Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate Reference page is provided.

17 points

Required length (6–8 pages) is met. Academic primary and secondary materials are used and include academic journal articles and books (at least 8). Arguments for treatment suggestions are supported with appropriate research materials. Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate Reference page is provided.

1 to 16 points

Required length (6–8 pages) is partially met. Academic sources are used though popular sources are also incorporated (fewer than 5). Arguments incorporate academic support from the professional literature but often include personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. Research is not aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate Reference page is provided.

0 points

Appropriate sources are not used or sources are lacking entirely. Arguments are not supported with research. Reference page is incomplete or missing.