Book Review
THEO 650 Book Review Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced 92-100% (A) |
Proficient 84-91% (B) |
Developing 1-83% (< C) |
Not present |
|
Introduction |
18 to 20 points
There is a clear overview statement. The book is identified. The introduction provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents. |
17 points
The book is identified, an overview statement is provided, and the reader knows generally where the book is heading. |
1 to 16 points
The introduction is minimal, brief, and cursory. |
0 points
|
|
Content and Critical Evaluation |
60 to 65 points
The major issues and ideas of the book are addressed clearly and substantively. The paper contains a detailed evaluation of the major issues and ideas of the book. Assertions are properly supported by evidence. |
55 to 59 points
The major issues and ideas of the book are addressed in a general manner. Evaluation of major issues and ideas of the book is given, offering some depth and analysis. Assertions are generally supported by evidence. |
1 to 54 points
Summary and evaluation are provided, but the paper lacks depth in assessment and analysis. Evaluation is minimal, needing development. |
0 points
|
|
Conclusion |
18 to 20 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper. |
17 points
The conclusion is given and offers a general summary of issues treated in the paper. |
1 to 16 points
The conclusion is minimal, brief, and cursory. |
0 points
|
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced 92-100% (A) |
Proficient 84-91% (B) |
Developing 1-83% (< C) |
Not present |
|
Structure and Format |
11 to 12 points
There are clear transitions between paragraphs and between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. Headings are properly used throughout. |
10 points
Transitional elements are used between paragraphs and sections. The paper generally flows in a logical manner. Headings are generally correct. |
1 to 9 points
Few transitional elements are provided between paragraphs and sections. The paper lacks a logical flow. Few or no headings are used throughout. |
0 points
|
|
Style and Turabian Requirements |
11 to 12 points
The paper properly uses current Turabian. It has a title page, Proper headings, footnotes, and bibliography are used. The paper reflects a graduate level of vocabulary. Assignment contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format. |
10 points
Turabian formatting is used throughout. Assignment contains 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Few errors (3-4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format. |
1 to 9 points
Assignment contains 5 or more errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Numerous errors (5+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format. |
0 points
|
|
Assignment Requirements |
19 to 21 points
Student reading summary meets the 1800 minimal word requirement. The word count should not include the title page and bibliographical material. |
18 points
The summary falls within 10% of the minimum word requirement |
1 to 17 points
The reading assignment falls short of the minimum word requirement by 11% or more. |
0 points
|