Reflection Paper on film (2-3 pages MAX)
HISTORY OF CHILD MALTREATMENT
Nydia Y. Monagas, Psy.D.
What places children at risk?
What are the sources of greatest risk to the development of children?
Poverty
Violence
Economy
Dissolution of families
Educational problems
Mental health issues
Drug and alcohol use
Cultural Relativism v Universality
Universality
The view that universal moral principles exist to
determine good and bad
Cultural Relativism
Posits that good and bad should be determined by
one’s culture
“Gray” areas in abuse/neglect
DEVELOPMENT OF WESTERN VIEWS
OF CHILDREN
Era 1: Children as Property
Prior to 15th century, children 7+ were adults with
adult responsibilities and rights
Infanticide common
Pederasty an accepted practice in ancient Greece
Marriages arranged, and often consummated, very
early
Incest taboo is nearly universal
Era 2: Discovery of Childhood –
Distinct Developmental Phase
16th-18th centuries
Particularly in upper classes, children seen as having
special needs; children received only what their
parents could afford (e.g., education)
View of the needs depended upon philosophical
positions regarding the basic nature of people:
Calvin v Rousseau
What is your philosophical position?
Era 2: Economic Issues
Families heavily dependent upon children economically
Many indentured out or working in jobs more easily done by them (chimney sweeps, mines)
Elizabethan Poor Laws (1601) –children who were
orphaned or abandoned were to be afforded
protection by local parishes
Beginning of voluntary child welfare societies
Era 3: Child Saving-Philosophical and
Economic Basis
19th-mid 20th century
View of children as torch bearers of future, with special physical and mental needs that should be considered apart from adults
Probably made possible by increasing survival rates
Also industrialization and growth of middle class decreased family economic dependency on children
Era 3: Victorian views
Rigid sexual standards
Extreme consequences for masturbation
Yet…
Sexual abuse flourished behind closed doors
Pornography and child prostitution
Freud and the discovery and denial of child sexual
abuse
Era 3: Social Issues
Major social movements: abolition of slavery, women’s
suffrage, labor movement
Development of movement focused on protecting
children from abusive caretakers/employers
Movement also encouraged governmental
interference
Mary Ellen Wilson, 1873
Era 3: Major Developments in
Child Welfare
Orphan Trains
Child labor laws
1938 – Fair Labor Standards Act – minimum age of
employment and limits on number of hours minors can
work
Social Security Act of 1935 – mandated services
for neglected and dependent children and children
in danger of becoming delinquent
Era 3: Major Developments in Child
Advocacy
Compulsory public education
Juvenile rights in justice system
In re Gault (1967) – juveniles accused of a crime have
right to due process as adults, including right to counsel,
right to oppose witnesses, rights against self
incrimination
Era 4: Governmental Responses to
Child Maltreatment
Late 20th century; civil rights, women’s movement
Increased professional recognition: battered child
syndrome, professional societies
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (1974)
Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act
(1980): family preservation
Adoption and Safe Families Act (AFSA) (1997):
safety and permanency first
Era 4: Critique of Governmental
Responses
Concerns about effect of “system” on children:
foster care drift, increased understanding of role of
attachment
Concerns about disproportionality, and distrust of
“system” by members of disempowered groups
Increased attention to rights/voices of youth
Questions to Consider
How do we define child maltreatment
What is the balance between child protection and family preservation
How much should child maltreatment be addressed as a:
Criminal problem
Psychological problem
Social problem
Questions to Consider (cont)
You have probably heard newscasters make
statements such as, “Our children are at a greater
risk today than ever. There is an epidemic of child
abuse.”
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Why or why not?